|
James says on 26/Mar/08
Thats possible Hugh Hugh says on 26/Mar/08
5ft11ish these days. 181-182cm at his peak.
James says on 24/Mar/08
If he has lost height it is likely only 1 cm so 181cm at peak he might have been. Hugh says on 22/Mar/08
James, Virgil is 45. Derek says on 20/Mar/08
James- Virgil will be 46, so while most guys that age haven't lost any height, he took many bumps and I'm sure he has back problems. Him losing 1/2"-1" isn't impossible. Alex says on 19/Mar/08
I am thinking he went from about 6'0 to 5'11. MP says on 19/Mar/08
If Mamun is 5'8" then Virgil is no less than 5'11" at the very minumum
He's got 3" or more on him Jason says on 19/Mar/08
Born in 1962 from memory ... that'd make him 46 this year. He sure didn't look 50's at all in person, in 2005. It's just the photo. James says on 18/Mar/08
Alex says on 18/Mar/08
He probably was 6'0 or so at a point.
I don't think he is really that old? He looks to be in his 50's so really I doubt he has lost 3 or 4 cm? Hugh says on 18/Mar/08
For Once I agree with James. Virgil has never been near 6ft2 or even 6ft. Ted Dibiase towered over him. Alex says on 18/Mar/08
He probably was 6'0 or so at a point. He looks 5'11 tops with Mamun though. James says on 17/Mar/08
6ft2 is ridicolous, 5ft11 max Alex says on 15/Mar/08
I believe he was billed at 6'2 as well back then. ImRight says on 15/Mar/08
...... he is obviously AT LEAST three inches taller than Mamun in this shot. OPEN YOUR EYES! Mamun says on 14/Mar/08
Well Anonymous I agree with you 1000 % he was a very very nice guy and he was
wearing shoes with the same thickness as mine . But the shoes were not
sctchers . James That is how tall I think he would be barefoot I agree with
you too .
Regards
Mamun deepestvoice says on 14/Mar/08
Sorry about that post from anonymous, that was me by accident. Anonymous says on 14/Mar/08
Danimal, I met Virgil about 7 years ago and his arms were enormous. He was a really nice guy too. James says on 13/Mar/08
how tall did he look to you Mamun? I think he actually looks 5ft10.75 inches in that picture not that you can really tell the difference between that and 5ft11. One things for sure he sure as hell aint 6ft. Mamun says on 12/Mar/08
April 2005 in Long beach comic-con , california USA .
Regards
Supermun Derek says on 12/Mar/08
Mamun- When was this picture taken? D. Ray Morton says on 12/Mar/08
Hey, he's almost smiling here! Frank says on 11/Mar/08
Well Danimal he's older now and off the Juice :o) Alex says on 11/Mar/08
He's still a big guy but not like he was. He still has some size in the picture above. Danimal says on 10/Mar/08
Billed at 6'2" and was a legite 5'11". He lost a TON of muscle. Had HUGE arms in the late 80's.. Jason says on 10/Mar/08
He looked 6'0''ish in person, though I think he was wearing boots. Alex2 says on 10/Mar/08
looks 5'10-5''11. has probably shrunk a little. Derek says on 10/Mar/08
He was billed at 6'1", and was a good 2-3 inches shorter than Ted DiBiase. 5'11" sounds right. Anonymous says on 10/Mar/08
no he does look 5'11 in this picture. Ras says on 10/Mar/08
5'11 sounds right for me. Frank says on 10/Mar/08
I would say 5ft 10 1/2 to 5ft 11 Topps Hes Not 6ft for sure James says on 10/Mar/08
i can buy 5ft11 or a bit more like 181cm Alex says on 10/Mar/08
He looks 5'10 1/2 there. |
