anon says on 20/Mar/10
Click Here
Nice try again, Jane but these are not "kitty" heels. (Same evening, as my photo used below). I know, now you feel silly, yes? I FAILED?.... more like YOU FAILED. Bada bing, here is a pic with Vanessa's heel in full view, they are HUGE. And the height is on par with what I was trying to illustrate. Even in high heels Vanessa does not meet the same height next to Johnny as in MY pic with them on the boat which again, is a straight on photo, as opposed to the ones you are using on the boat, which is front round and back round and creates distorted effect.
Click Here this pic is closer to the truth, they are close in height, she is not short like Vanessa. Not in the same height range.
Matter of fact, if you look closely at these heels too, you will see a very thin stiletto, not a "kitty" heel.
Click Here
I think you look desperate trying to use your "kitty" heels as an excuse as to why Vanessa appears short next to Johnny and AJ appears taller..why? Because AJ is taller than Vanessa by at least 3-4 inches..lol.
Jane says on 20/Mar/10
hmm anon IS tallady!!! same desperation, lol.
"Explain the feet size with that height you are trying so desperately"
why would feet size matter it is already established that she has size 9 feet, which look disproportionate to her body (in my opinion), you FAILED to mention the HEEL size that Vanessa Paradis is wearing, the heels are much smaller than the heel size that Angie is wearing.
in this picture you posted you didnt say that Vanessa was wearing KITTY HEELS
Click Here
If you google more pictures of Vanessa you will see that she typically wears kitten heels,
these are kitten heels for those of you that don't know:
Click Here
Angelina wears HUGE heels, Louboutins, sometimes huge platforms, there are various pictures of her wearing these shoes.
Louboutins for those of you who dont know (les passion de les celebrites)
Click Here
cannes, need i say more?
Click Here
Here is Johnny Depp with his longtime girlfriend Vanessa Paradis, Vanessa is wearing low heels:
Click Here
Here is Johnny Depp with his costar Angelina Jolie:
Click Here
Angelina is wearing HIGH heels on the set:
Click Here
I see no camera tricks in these shots:
Click Here
Click Here
Conclusion 1: Angelina is NOT 5’8, I am not saying that she is 5’3 but I believe that she can very well be in the 5’4.5 to the 5’5.5 range and cannot be more than 5’5.5 anon says on 19/Mar/10
Click Here
Here is AJ with Gerard Butler. He is 6'1". That is not what a short woman looks like next to a guy that is over 6' tall.
Here is an interesting article, I wonder if his ideal woman "TALL and dark haired" IS in reference to AJ. lol. too funny.
Click Here anon says on 19/Mar/10
Alex, look it up...both Hillary and Condeleeza are said to be about 5'8" to 5'8.5". Though it is true that we all lose a couple of inches when we age, maybe Hillary is now 5'6" *shrugs* anon says on 19/Mar/10
Click Here
In this side by side pic, Vanessa Paradis, even in high heels, top of her head barely comes up to his nose eyes area. Clearly in the pic I posted where they are on the boat and it is straight on, AJ comes up to almost the top of Johnny's head by an inch or half an inch, in heels. Clearly much taller in her heels next to Johnny, in contrast to the Vanessa next to him. This would be about a 3-4 inch difference between the two ladies, and bring AJ to around 5'7". Nice try though Jane. Explain the feet size with that height you are trying so desperately to promote. Alex says on 18/Mar/10
@anon
if you google her height you get everything from 5'6" to 5'8." There is no definite source that concludes it. As for Hillary there's no way she is taller than 5'5." Just look at her next to Kucinich in every debate they had.
To me Angie looks between 5'5" 1/2 and 5'6" 1/2... I think this site's correct. anon says on 18/Mar/10
Here is another pic, same shoot from scene in The Tourist and straight on, one would get that she is close in height to Kiera Knightly:
Click Here
Camera angles are tricky, your best bet is straight on shots if you are going to use any. anon says on 18/Mar/10
Click Here
Needed to re post as the correct link did not appear for this pic earlier. Can anyone explain why AJ appears in same height to both Condeleeza and Hillary, both known to be around 5'8"? anon says on 18/Mar/10
Click Here
MORE than a couple inches difference and she is wearing high heels. anon says on 18/Mar/10
The pics you posted from The Tourist are not convincing enough because they are on an uneven surface, a boat. And not only that but actors wear lifts when they need to appear taller than their female counter parts in movies. Here is a pic with Johhny Depp and Keira Knightly whom is 5'7" notice he is a couple inches taller.
Click Here Jane says on 17/Mar/10
According to Celebheights.com: Johnny Depp height: 5 ft 9 in (175 cm)
Here are Johnny and Angelina on the set of their new film The Tourist:
Click Here
Click Here
These are the shoes Johnny Depp is wearing on the set:
Click Here
These are the shoes Angelina Jolie is wearing on the set:
Click Here
For good measure here is Johnny Depp with his longtime girlfriend Vanessa Paradis, Vanessa is listed on celebheights.com as: Vanessa Paradis's height is 5 ft 3.25 in (161 cm)
Click Here
Again look at Johnny and Angelina:
Click Here
Click Here
and look at Johnny and Vanessa:
Click Here
Conclusion: Angelina is NOT 5’8, I am not saying that she is 5’3 but I believe that she can very well be in the 5’4.5 to the 5’5.5 range and cannot be more than 5’5.5 anon says on 17/Mar/10
Politicians have no reason to lie about their heights, do they? And politicians are very careful to not be caught lying. They want the people to trust them. They would definitely not lie about height, which is something that could easily be found out when meeting with the public. anon says on 17/Mar/10
Click Here
Here is AJ with Condeleeza Rice, said to be about 5'8" and Hillary Clinton said to be debated between 5'6" or 5'8".
Click Here
Here is Condeleeza Rice next to gymnast Nastia Liukin said to be 5'3"
Click Here
Here is a pic of Hillary with Barack Obama whom is said to be 6'1"
Compare the difference and let me know what you think. hahahahaaa says on 17/Mar/10
If AJ had size9/10 feet on a 5'4" or 5'5" height she'd be in a circus side show, not one of Hollywood's top beauties. lol. anon says on 17/Mar/10
check this one out:
Click Here
Next to: Rosario Dawson 5'7"
Val Kilmer 6'1/2"
Jared Leto 5' 9 1/2"
Oliver Stone 6'
Colin Farrel 5'10"
More pics:
Click Here
Click Here
LOL. I am not going to have an aneurysm doing this. I have my cup of coffee, come here, look for refutable or good evidence on the contrary to what I post..and sadly never find any. I then leisurely scan the internet for proof to back up my claims. I then get on with my day. It's all in good fun and all in the name of debate. By all means Mimi, please bring some pics to show otherwise. There are just too many of AJ next to tall actors that are very indicative to a taller AJ.
Did you go to celeb shoes and compare the actresses heights to their shoe sizes? Pretty congruent but don't point that out to Mimi. anon says on 17/Mar/10
Yes I am intense because there is just TOO MUCH PROOF out there to let this debate rest. Because you and others need to be shown, if you will look and read and accept the facts. Again, we are haggling over about 3 inches at most. It's funny how that means so much to some of you that you cannot see the facts. That other poster MPD brought up some good examples as well. Too bad the links do not work, but anyone can google Angelina Jolie and the other actresses name and research for themselves. anon says on 17/Mar/10
Mimi, you are laughable. I have brought MUCH proof to this debate, to your denial, that feet size is relevant to height. Have you not honestly read anything I have posted? I didn't write those articles nor did the University study. You tell them Mimi. lol. Anyone that has been following this thread can clearly see the one that has the serious problem with the facts is YOU. The pictures I have posted, all of it points to the fact that AJ is NOT 5'5" short. That she is at very least 5'7" with those feet and that build. Sorry. Deal with it.
And far as my link being to the King of Prussia instead of Craig Daniel, I don't know why that link comes up but here again, is a link to Craig Daniel 5'10" next to AJ:
Click Here
Yesss Mimi, all these pics I post of these actors next to AJ, well, they are all short too. Everyone of them lies about their height. It's a conspiracy. lol. mimi says on 16/Mar/10
Anon/talllady is...."intense" hahaha...
everything you just said on your 16/Mar/10 post, by the way, can be said about your posts WORD for WORD. Your pics are always biased and slanted. You seem very bent on the issue. There has not been ONE post of yours, one argument or one picture that is credible and slightly reasonable. The whole Lucy Liu argument about how she was most probably wearing super high heels while Angelina was most probably wearing no heel and now the "articles would be written about AJ's big feet if she had unproportionate feet" argument are plainly put, ridiculous, lack basis and are desperate. Let me guess, you're definitely not in a profession where skilled argument is required.
By the way, have articles been written on Angelina's huge forehead vein? Her large hands? These features aren't usually talked about when speaking of/writing on Angelina, but that doesn't make them any less real and factual. You cannot argue that something is not because it is not mentioned. Prime example of Anon's weak reasoning. Seriously girl, give it a break. That much intensity on the subject can't be good for you. At the rate you're going, you're going to have an aneurysm trying to think of your next argument - which I look forward to reading. hehe... anon says on 16/Mar/10
Click Here
Next to Dan Futterman again. anon says on 16/Mar/10
Click Here
Here they are at the premiere for A Mighty Heart. Dan looks about right next to Brad's height, and to does AJ Can I get another what? what? anon says on 16/Mar/10
Click Here
Next to co-star Dan Futterman, said to be 5'9" or 5'8.5"
Click Here
Next to actor Craig Daniel, said to be 5'10"
Click Here
Next to Indian actor Irfan Kahn said to be 6'1". And next to AJ, again, Dan Futterman 5'9"
Can I get a what? what? lol. anon says on 16/Mar/10
Click Here
Next to co-star Dan Futterman, said to be 5'9" or 5'8.5"
Click Here
Next to actor Craig Daniel, said to be 5'10"
Click Here
Next to Indian actor Irfan Kahn said to be 6'1". And next to AJ, again, Dan Futterman 5'9"
Can I get a what? what? lol. anon says on 16/Mar/10
btw, that's not me, I am a different anon.
I will add though that the shots of her with her size 9/10 bare feet showing look proportionate to a taller woman, not at all a short woman with boat feet. Sorry. They look proportionate to a woman of 5'7" or taller. True regardless, they are big sized feet but would look even more odd if on a woman as short as 5'5". Thanks for showing us the pics to prove the point that her shoe size fits her true taller height.
One more thing, in those pics of her bare footed in that dress, she looks terribly skinny and diminutive. If you put that weight on a woman of even 5'8" she would look tiny. I much preferred the AJ of Tomb Raider where she was healthy, strong and fit. She looked long and tall and could kick ass. In those pics from the Salt set she looks like a small, fragile twig. I won't lie about that. But weight has all to do with it, not height. Jane says on 16/Mar/10
In fact anon your criticism on my opinion and post, wasnt even my post! i did not post that picture of her running through the freeway or said she looked tiny.
You should go through all of my posts instead of making a criticism and saying that you did. you will be delighted that not everyone shares the same reliability on PR websites that you have. Jane says on 16/Mar/10
Anon I did not call her tiny I called her disproportionate. It was another poster who called her tiny.
If you read through my posts you will see plenty of full shot pictures, inducing her shoes and the shoes of those she is pictured with.
If i post a picture that has a bad angle, i say show myself, again read through my posts.
Angie cannot be more than 5'5.5 and from some pictures i believe she can be in the 5'4.5 to 5'5.5 range. I believe my eyes over, PR websites saying she is 5'8. Don't believe anything you read especially concerning Hollywood. Anon says on 16/Mar/10
You know what Jane, with all due respect, you are desperately trying to prove that she is not more than 5'5, but yet you have failed in every attempt to prove such.
You chose a picture where she is barefoot among cars on a freeway, and you call her tiny, but that is such an unfair picture, first of all, because you don't know how close and/or far this picture was taken from the zoom. I am 5'8 and I can show you some of my pics where I look really tiny.
I went through all of your pics that you posted, and every single one is missing a very important component and that is the following: In most of your pics the legs were cut off, or you don't see the shoes etc. In other words they are not believable. Every other website on this planet claims that she is even 5"8, it is only here on this one that people are so skeptical, because they won't accept it. You keep mentioning her feet, to me it screams an desperate attempt to prove that you are the one who is right and nobody else. Let somebody else talk for God sakes. Alex says on 16/Mar/10
Here she is running barefoot. She looks tiny lol
Click Here Jane says on 16/Mar/10
I like her body type, its flattering. She has an inverted triangle shape, broad shoulders, and long limbs. it makes women appear taller, here is great example: Click Here
On the set of Salt, her feet look pretty huge though and disproportionate!
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
in this pic she looks particularly disproportionate(maybe a bit unfair angle but still): Click Here
and here barefoot, you can see her shoulders and arms, long.
Click Here
she looks to me 5'4.5 to 5'5.5 barefoot. no way taller than 5'5.5 anon says on 16/Mar/10
Click Here
Here Mimi, in case you have trouble finding the resource I have mentioned over and over in my "intense and fallacious reasoning and arguments", regarding the 9/10 shoe size of AJ... READ IT. anon says on 16/Mar/10
LittleSue, yes, here is an article on Kate Winslet and her huge feet:
Leo Pokes Fun At Kate's Big Feet
LEONARDO DiCAPRIO made KATE WINSLET's life a misery on the set of TITANIC by poking fun at her huge, oversized feet.
The British star inherited her mother's big feet and has always been very conscious about them - but her problems were doubled when DiCaprio noticed the anomaly.
She says, "They are a size US 11 and I'm five-foot-six-and-a-half.
"Leonardo DiCaprio took great delight in taking the mick out of the size of my feet, and he would make me do foot to foot. We would sit on the floor and he'd go, 'Come on sweetie, let's do foot to foot.'
"I'd put my foot up and he would just fall about laughing because my feet are exactly the same size as his and he's six-foot-one. He'd refer to them as my canoes!"
21/03/2004 20:24
So, yes, here is an example of an ANOMALY as the article states. Soooo, if an article was written about Kate and her big feet, trust me by now AJ and her big feet on a short frame of 5'5" would be mentioned many, many times by now in the tabloids, but to the dismay of some ppl on here, it is not mentioned at all, ever. So that must mean she is in relative height to her size 9/10 feet..common sense. anon says on 16/Mar/10
LittleSue, yes, here is an article on Kate Winslet and her huge feet:
Leo Pokes Fun At Kate's Big Feet
LEONARDO DiCAPRIO made KATE WINSLET's life a misery on the set of TITANIC by poking fun at her huge, oversized feet.
The British star inherited her mother's big feet and has always been very conscious about them - but her problems were doubled when DiCaprio noticed the anomaly.
She says, "They are a size US 11 and I'm five-foot-six-and-a-half.
"Leonardo DiCaprio took great delight in taking the mick out of the size of my feet, and he would make me do foot to foot. We would sit on the floor and he'd go, 'Come on sweetie, let's do foot to foot.'
"I'd put my foot up and he would just fall about laughing because my feet are exactly the same size as his and he's six-foot-one. He'd refer to them as my canoes!"
21/03/2004 20:24
So, yes, here is an example of an ANOMALY as the article states. Soooo, if an article was written about Kate and her big feet, trust me by now AJ and her big feet on a short frame of 5'5" would be mentioned many, many times by now in the tabloids, but to the dismay of some ppl on here, it is not mentioned at all, ever. So that must mean she is in relative height to her size 9/10 feet..common sense. anon says on 16/Mar/10
Mimi, please pay attention to the conversation on here if you are going to ask where the size 9/10 shoe size came from,again, use your google and check the SISTER WEBSITE TO THIS WEBSITE "CELEB SHOES". There are many resources, including Celeb Shoes giving AJ's shoe size ranging from 8.5, 9 and size 10. Yes, those size feet are huge if she was 5'4" or 5'5", that's what I've been saying all along..uuhmmm, hello??? Drea says on 14/Mar/10
I agree with you Alex. She has an elongated face and thin, long-looking limbs. I always thought her arms were a bit disproportionate to her torso too... Littlesue says on 12/Mar/10
Isnt Kate Winset about 5ft 6 with size 9 (UK) feet. I worked in a shoe shop and often saw women about 5ft wit size 6 (UK) feet, Ang would have a size 8 (UK size which is not at alll unusally for someone who is around 5ft 6 Alex says on 12/Mar/10
Alex, you may wanna put something at the end of your name since I been posting here for a couple years so we can tell whos who lol.
I think shes 5'6-5'6 1/2 but can pull off looking a bit taller due to her features. Mimi says on 12/Mar/10
uhhmmm...even at 5'6.5"-5'7" the size 9/10 feet would be HUGE!! hahaha Where did people get the size 9/10 feet info? Alex says on 11/Mar/10
Click Here
Enough with heel pics... anon says on 11/Mar/10
Alex, Emily actually met AJ and I would believe her over you. You, Mimi and Jane have seen all of this proof of pics and studies in this thread and not to mention the all internet sources saying she is 5'8" and yet with all of this, you still can't admit it...in this thread there are even actual cases of meetings or sightings with AJ and you still won't accept the facts. anon says on 11/Mar/10
lol..I can imagine it, suuuuuure, 5'5" with size 9/10 feet. And I can also imagine that if that's so, they never mention it in the tabloids..oh noooo, it just never gets mentioned, it's one of those things everyone sweeps under the rug, her short stature and her humongous feet.... that wouldn't be a freak of nature or odd being 5'5" and having feet size 9/10..I mean with all of the AJ haters out there, and read the threads on the internet, there are alot of them...the topic of her HUGE feet with the small stature would be brought up ALL THE TIME...Sure, Alex, keep on deluding yourself. Alex says on 10/Mar/10
You're right Emily. Angelina is 5'5" and a half. That's what I've been saying all along. Emily says on 9/Mar/10
You are right Alex, Angelina is not 5ft 6.5 or whatever this website claims. SHE IS OVER 5'7. Alex says on 7/Mar/10
I think anon is tall lady too lol
Angelina isn't over 5ft. 6.5 in. Sorryyy lol She's not tiny either but she's between 5'5" and a half and 5'6" and a half. anon says on 6/Mar/10
Click Here
Here is a study (for forensic science purposes) at a University in Nigeria the correlation between hands, feet and height. Read below what the conclusion was for the study:
The relationship between hand and foot length and height is strongly significant (P<0.001). When hand and foot were correlated the relationship between hand and foot length was higher in the females than the males, but when hand and foot lengths were compared to height the relationship was stronger in the males than in the females. Multivariate analysis was conducted to see if the height of subjects could be predicted from the lengths of right and left hands and feet. This proved to be effective and provided valuable predictive equations that enable the prediction of height for both males and females, with higher prediction ability in the females than the males. This finding is in agreement with reports from Turkish sample (4, 6) and Indian sample (9, 14).
Findings from this study have implications of forensic science as well as for evolutionary biology. The results indicate that the reliability of identification of isolated foot and lower leg specimens to sex and race categories is high.
In Conclusion, the results from these study therefore, indicate that if the hand length is known, foot length can be predicted and if the foot length is known, hand length can be predicted and vice versa. The present study shows that hand and foot measurement yielded important predictive information about individual height. anon says on 6/Mar/10
Is that the best you can bring Mimi? Whip out some pics and prove me wrong. I am tired of doing all the work here. lol. anon says on 6/Mar/10
But you bringing up examples of short people you know with large feet is irrelevant because I have stated over and over that GENERALLY (notice the capitol letters)in the general population that small women = small shoe size and taller women = larger shoe size but, again, there are exceptions to the rule as with all things in life. That said, looking at all of the pics, AJ's body frame, she is not in that category of short woman with boat feet. Sorry. anon says on 6/Mar/10
LittleSue, your 5'1' friend has a size 9 (us) shoe and you say "big frame" I would assume she is fat or thick and when we start talking about over weight folks and shoe sizes that brings up something else entirely. If she is 5'1" and fat, of course she will have fat feet and therefore need larger shoes. Mimi says on 5/Mar/10
judging by the intensity and fallacious reasoning and arguments, methinks anon and talllady are related or one and the same... hee hee. anon says on 5/Mar/10
Click Here
Here we have another pic of Brad, AJ and Wclef. This a straight on pic, no play on angles and all their heads are in perspective and shoulders even. Btw, Wyclef is 5'10". ahem says on 5/Mar/10
Regarding the UN pic, Brad and Wycliff's heads also look VERY big compared to AJ's. lol. It's called PERSPECTIVE and happens alot in pics. There is also another pic that was posted with AJ on sidewalk with Brad, that someone used, where he is on the higher end of the sidewalk that has a huge crack in the sidewalk and makes AJ appear much shorter in contrast. In fact the majority of the pics used by those claiming she is short are very weak and distorted to support their claims. ahem says on 5/Mar/10
Just because you have two friends with different feet and height than what most of the population has, does not make your point valid. You could be making up the "friends" you mentioned. The proof is in the online research and also Celeb Shoes site which is a solid reference point regarding feet and height sizing. To be clear, I am 5'8" and my shoe size is 8. I have a couple friends that are 5'7" and wear a size 10! It's odd that my feet would be smaller, but it would even be MORE ODD and freaky if a woman had size 10 feet on a 5'4" or even 5'5" frame, it would definitely make the news. So no, AJ cannot be that short with feet that large. anon says on 5/Mar/10
Go to Celeb Shoe Size website, get actresses shoe sizes, look up their height and see what I am saying is a general rule. Dhort women have smaller feet, taller women have bigger feet. Kate Hudson wears a size 6.5 and is 5' 6". Megan Fox is 5' 6" and wears a size 7. Cameron Diaz is 5' 8 1/2" and wears a size 9. Paris Hilton 5'8" and wears a size 11. And on and on. Clearly they all must be lying about their shoe sizes. anon says on 5/Mar/10
One more thing Mimi, my pics are carefully selected because they show shoes and full length in most of them, and also with as much angle that is even not distorted, such as that UN photo, where AJ is in the distance of the camera and Brad and Wycliff are in the forefront. It does not matter that the pics I show show a mid stride, if you were to visually imagine straightening them up you could then easily see the height. You just are in serious denial when the facts are right in your face and the pics I and others have posted clearly show the total truth. anon says on 5/Mar/10
You would be hoping the shoe size theory is nonsense. There are rare exceptions to the foot to height ratio, but as a GENERAL rule, the size of feet will be fairly indicative to the height of the person. If you do not believe me, go to celebrity shoes website, the sister of this website, and COMPARE all of the shorter actresses shoe sizes to the taller ones and see that generally it's pretty standard - short women = small feet and tall women = bigger feet. ALSO, forensics and law enforcement use foot prints or foot bones if all of the body is not remaining to determine the general height of the person. You do get the occasional anomaly of short women with BIG feet (like your friends). And like anything in nature there is the exception or small precentage that indicates otherwise but there is also the general standard of what MOST people fall into. Period. Go online and research it. One person did a study of 200 people and conclusion was that feet size was relative to height. If AJ was 5'4" with size 10 feet you would have heard a media buzz about it by now, lol...as they tend to pick her apart about everything else. Again, use your common sense. Littlesue says on 5/Mar/10
Big feet does'nt always mean tall, My one mate is 5ft 10, small boned and a sze 4 (UK). My other mate is 5ft 1,big frame and a size 7 (UK) anon says on 4/Mar/10
Click Here
Michell Hicks 5' 9 1/2" next to hubby Jonny Miller WEARING HIGH HEELS, like AJ was in other pic. Gee they too are close to same height. Care to explain Alex? anon says on 4/Mar/10
oh and Alex, if you can explain away why Jonny and AJ are close in height because of her heels, then how can you explain his current 5'10" wife (she's wearing heels)in photos being close to same range of height to AJ? anon says on 4/Mar/10
Click Here
it's commonly used as a method by law enforcement and forensic scientists to determine height by knowing the foot size. anon says on 4/Mar/10
Alex, she is built as a TALL woman of at least 5'7"...big head, long limbs, big hands and feet. She is not your tiny princess, she's Brad's Pitt's 5'7" goddess...all evidence points to that, why can't the usual regulars which I am assuming are short people on here, let it be known, that AJ is AT LEAST 5'7" which is not too tall but not a shorty by any stretch of the imagination.
Your pic of AJ and Jonny are face shots, they could be sitting down for all you know or she could be posed by leaning back. You pic is not proof, but the pics posted with her next to him in the beige dress and the pics of Jonny and his current 5'10" wife are VERY telling. And so are the pics of Brad next to Geena and Gwenyth.
The pic where Brad and AJ are walking on the beach posted just below, she is not wearing heels dear, and there is also a pic scroll down a bit, and there they are also wearing flats and close in height. You are in major denial. Mimi says on 4/Mar/10
Anonymous and anon's pics are terrible for height comparison purposes. Ditto on Anon's arguments re shoe size..haha. I know women at 5'4" with size 8 feet and women at 5'9" with size 6.5. Nonsensical, according to Anon. I'll be sure to let me two friends know they don't make sense. ;-P Alex says on 3/Mar/10
@ "anonymous"
I did google pics of Angelina and Johnny Miller if you'd actually scroll down you'd see I posted one.
@ anon
they appear close in height because she has heels on. Which in that event they looked to be at least 3 inches in length. And foot size is irrelevant. She has long arms compared to her torso and long hands so I wouldn't be surprised her feet would be long too. Doesn't make a different to her overall height. She has a huge head too which makes her look taller. anon says on 3/Mar/10
AJ has a shoe size of 8.5 to 9 and even size 10. Look it up and while you are at it look up the correlation between foot size and height. GENERALLY certain height ranges wear certain sizes..AJ is in the larger shoe range that puts her in the taller female height. talllady says on 3/Mar/10
Click Here
Mimi, here is a pic of Liv Tyler and Kate Moss. Liv is said to be 5'10".
Click Here
Here Kate is with Gwyneth and Liv, both tall women, she's almost as tall.
So going a number of posts back when you (or someone else) showed the pic of Winona and AJ, to prove that AJ is short and then I refuted that with a pic of
Winona next to model Kate Moss, and thus began you debating that Kate Moss is not 5' 7", here are two pics to support my thoughts that AJ and Kate are about 5'7". Thanks! anon says on 3/Mar/10
Click Here
in what pics we can find of AJ and Jonny online, they appear pretty close in height.
Here is a pic of Jonny and his current wife Michelle Hicks whom is 5'9 1/2":
Click Here
Click Here
These pics dispel any notion that Jonny Miller is short or below 5'10" (btw there is also a pic of him and Jude Law (5' 10" 1/2) side by side online and you can tell the height difference is close:
Click Here
Clearly, AJ is close in that height range of his current wife at 5'7" maybe even 5'8" and I'll also mention- good point about shoe size. There is no way a shorter woman would have feet that size. If you go to the celeb shoe size website and compare others heights with shoe size, it's pretty congruent that those at the shorter height wear the smaller shoes and those that are taller wear the larger shoes. Pretty common sense. Anonymous says on 3/Mar/10
If you compare Brad Pitt's height to Geena and Gwyneth and then compare AJ to Brad, in the pics, there is your answer. She is not 5'4" nor 5'5". CLEARLY she is at the very least 5'7". Furthermore her shoe size is telling, she wears a size 9 or 10 according to internet resources. I hardly can imagine a short woman of 5'4" or 5'5" wearing shoes that large, can you? Also look at AJ's hands, and they are on the large side as well. Truly people, she leaning towards the taller than the shorter. Anonymous says on 3/Mar/10
Stef, there is also debate about Jack Black's height and further more those pics have already been posted here. Anonymous says on 3/Mar/10
Alex, google pics of AJ and Jonny Miller and get back to us. lol. interesting argument says on 3/Mar/10
Having looked at a few of her pictures in flats, I'm guessing that her height is not shorter than 5ft 4in but not taller than 5ft 7in Max.
Its very deceiving to try and guess someones' height when they have heels on, espcially when these heels may look very tall but in fact aren't or vice versa.
one of Janes' pic on the Haiti interview shows such a big discrepancy that if AJ was 5ft 8, she would have to seriously bend low to lower her height to what we see in this pic.
Of course that picture is not a full body length one, but AJ's shoulders are literally at chest level of Brad's, that has gotta be around 4-5 inch difference in height, and if Brad's height info is correct at 5ft 11in max, then AJ would be around 5ft 6in as an optimistic guess.
A lot of the other pics posted of Brad and Angelina are either walking, or with AJ holding a baby, which would be 1/2-1 inch shorter than their real height.
Another pic that steph posted belly to belly with Black Jack by Huffington Post - AJ's shoulders are slightly higher than jack in picture when she has heels on. If Jack is indeed 5ft 6inch, her height in this pic with heels on makes her look around 5ft8. I'm assuming AJ's heels around 2-3 inches, then she would fall around 5ft6 range. Alex says on 2/Mar/10
@ stef. She's 2 inches taller then him in that pic. And he has shoes that give him an inch. So he'd be 5'7" and she'd be 5'9" with shoes. 5'9"- 3.5" is 5'5" and a half. So she's between 5'5" and a half and 5'6" and a half I'd say. But based on that pic I'd say 5'5" and a half.
And those who say she's almost Pitt's height on the red carpet make me laugh. I have a friend that's 5'5" and with 4 inch heels she looks 5'10" or 5'11" cuz of how skinny she is. stef says on 2/Mar/10
Hey got a good pic of Ang and Jack black - head to toe - standing belly to belly! Click Here She is wearing the Christian Louboutin Nude 'You You' Peep-toe Pump which has 3.5" heel. with a piece of paper and a pen you can mark the difference between heights of their head....then see how much that is against a "known" 3.5" heel. The difference is less than 3.5" guys. There is no way she is 5'8", 5'7", and frankly I can't see that she is even 5'6" if Jack Black is 5'6" and Dustin Hoffman is about 5'5". Honestly, I think that if they both took their shoes off they would be the same height or she would be a tad bit shorter. Alex says on 25/Feb/10
I made a mistake with 5 inches shorter... Looking back it does look more like she's 4 inches shorter then JLMiller. I'm starting to think this site's right on the money... So yea I'm over the debate. She's whatever this site says she is. Samuel anderton says on 24/Feb/10
Now I am sure that Angelina is 170 cm at least, after Alex showed the pic of Jolie with J.L.Miller. Samuel anderton says on 24/Feb/10
Yes, maximum 2.5 inch smaller mate! It means 6 or 7 cm and it makes this pic accurate!
Glenn knows better and i can say 170 cm is ok for Jolie. Alex says on 23/Feb/10
@ Samuel
2.5 inch smaller? Are you kidding me? lol go look at 2.5 inches on a ruler it's the size of a pinky finger. Alex says on 23/Feb/10
@haha
you can't see their feet but I ran through the film and paused it at times to see both's footwear. Mcavoy is always wearing normal shoes that maybe give him an inch while Angelina wears anything from sneakers that would give an inch to 3 inch heels while she's running in parts of the film.
Knowing your denial though you'll probably say you don't believe me shortgirl says on 22/Feb/10
I saw some recent photos of Jolie in Haiti. She was wearing boots that looked about 2-3 inches. I just want to point this out because a bunch of people posted photos of her doing humanitarian elsewhere and then said she wouldn't be wearing much of a heel doing something like that. I'm not being critical of how she should dress when helping others but since we are only arguing about 1-2 inches, a heel like that would make a difference.
I'm not sure what tallady means that Jolie and Paltrow are similar in height. Relative to Pitt, Jolie is "close" in height to Paltrow when Jolie is big heels and Paltrow is barefoot (look at the Paltrow/Pitt beach photos in Pitt's section).
5'6 is not a bad guess. I think she may be tad under but not much more. mimi says on 22/Feb/10
talllady, your posts make me laugh. you can "assure me lucy liu is wearing massive heels and Angelina shorter heels?" hahaha...
alright, it's pointless to argue with such statements and to continue to expect other than heavily biased pics from you (such as still showing MIDSTRIDE pics of Naomi and Kate to try and make it fit). let's agree to disagree. :) Samuel anderton says on 22/Feb/10
Sorry mate, she looks only 2.5 inch smaller than Johnny M. lucy says on 22/Feb/10
She looks a good 5'7 (170cm). She's not short, yet she's not very tall either. Alex says on 20/Feb/10
And here she is with 5'10" johnny miller. They both have sneakers and she appears 5 inches shorter then him.
Click Here talllady says on 19/Feb/10
Oh and Mimi, here is a recent pic of Naomi and Kate, just for you to look at and think about. Look real hard and be honest:
_ Click Here
*sigh* no matter how you dice it, Kate is almost up there with Naomi. talllady says on 19/Feb/10
Mimi, so what if AJ was wearing heels that night at Kung Fu Panda, you cannot tell if they are shorter heels or not which I had said they are probably shorter heels as in 2-3 inch heels. They are certainly NOT platforms, not like the ones she wore with the pink dress. There is no way by looking at ALL the evidence I have posted along with the pics others have posted supporting that she IS taller, that she is short and near the height of Lucy Lui. NO WAY! That evening at Kung Fu Panda raises questions, but I can assure you that Lucy Lui is "friggen 5'3" and to top it off was wearing the mega heels that evening under that long gown of hers and AJ is wearing shorter heels for the occasion. End of story.. it is the ONLY way you can explain it, ESPECIALLY since I and others have posted pics of AJ along side others as a scale to measure her height. Use your common sense! I notice you conveniently avoid explaining Gwenyth and AJ's height closeness. Or what about Brad? OMG, if she is closer to height to Lucy Lui, then Brad Pitt is a midget of a man in the league of Tom Cruise or Dustin Hoffman. For introspection here is a pic of Brad Pitt and tall 6ft actress Gina Davis next to each other:
Click Here
This should, along with his pics next to Gwyneth, put to rest any false lies that he is a short man. Again, imagine Angelina next to Brad. No. In fact LOOK at ALL the pics of AJ and Brad side by side, here is a good one where they are wearing flats(_ Click Here )and then think about this pic of Brad and 6 ft Geena Davis. LOL! Riiiihgt...Brad is close in height to AJ and therefore also to Lucy Lui and now all of a sudden Geena Davis is near 5ft friggen 3 OR Lucy Lui is close to 6 ft tall. That goes for Gwyneth too. She is also close to Lucy Lui's height. And her husband from Coldplay he is also a midget. They are ALL SHORTIES> But of course! LOL! Get a clue, you are wrong and delusional! Use common sense and COMPARE ALL THESE PEOPLE. PLEASE! haha says on 19/Feb/10
Click Here
let's play by your rules Alex, I'll post a pic not showing their feet..WOW, she's taller than him in this one. ha! Clearly she's maybe 5'8"...gasp! haha says on 19/Feb/10
The last round of pics are BAD examples folks, get real! No feet showing, bad angles. Alex, the pics from the movie with Macavoy are not showing feet. Don't you know in movies they step on platforms or boxes or he might be wearing lifts. xyz says on 18/Feb/10
A lot of photos posted by MPD failed to download. Lots of Hollywood actresses lie about their height so you have to be careful about comparisons. The one I was able to see of Jolie and Halle do not show shoes. I do not believe Berry is 5'6. I have seen her too many times on Oprah to believe that. She looks more like 5'4 next to 5'6.5 Oprah. I would trust the James McAvoy photos just because he is obviously a smaller man and can't get away with lying about it. Alex says on 15/Feb/10
Sorry people but she's only 5'6". She could be a half inch more or less. But she appears to be about 5'6". Here are two pics of her with James Mcavoy who is 5'7". In one they're both standing straight and she's an inch shorter then him if you imagine them bald. And in the other she appears an inch shorter then him mind you he's a bit hunched over.
Click Here
Click Here Zoey says on 14/Feb/10
I think she is around 5'5 she doesnt look really tall but have sexy body . MPD says on 13/Feb/10
My two cents:
Comparison #1: Jenny Shimizu (reported height 5’6) versus Click Here Jolie, who is standing upright, is only slightly taller than Shimizu: I’d say 1” and a smidge.
Comparison #2: Halle Berry (reported height 5’6) standing next to Jolie Click Here and Click Here Jolie looks to be about 1” taller than Berry.
Comparison #3: Hilary Swank (reported height 5’6) versus Jolie Click Here Here, Jolie is a little over 1” taller than Swank. Jolie’s posture is not quite upright: she is slightly hunched.
Comparison #4a: Ann Curry (reported height 5’6) versus Jolie Click Here In this picture, Jolie seems 2 ½” to 3” taller than Curry. However, Jolie is sporting what look to be about 3” heeled boots whereas Curry is in thong sandals Click Here In the picture, the boots are probably giving Jolie an added 1½” to 2”. So taking that into account, I’d say Jolie is a little over an inch taller than Curry.
Comparison #4b: Idem Click Here I couldn’t find a full-length picture to see the shoes they were wearing, but Curry was probably wearing a slightly higher heel. Jolie looks to be about ½” to 1” taller than Curry.
Comparison #4c: Idem Click Here Taking both of their posture into account, Jolie seems to be about 1” taller than Curry in this picture. Pictures of the shoes they were wearing: Jolie Click Here; Curry Click Here
Comparison #5: Rosario Dawson (reported height 5’7) versus Jolie Click Here and Click Here In these pictures, Jolie seems to be just as tall as Dawson. At certain angles (e.g.: Click Here and Click Here), Jolie seems to be at most ½” taller than Dawson. Pictures of the shoes they were wearing in the first link: Jolie Click Here; Dawson Click Here
Comparison #6: Evan Rachel Wood (reported height 5’7) versus Jolie Click Here Wood and Jolie seem to be about the same height here, with Jolie appearing a smidge taller.
Comparison #7: Lola Ponce (reported height 5’7¼) versus Jolie Click Here Their heights are nearly the same.
Comparison #8: Olivia Wilde(reported height 5’7½) next to Jolie Click Here Even though Wilde is leaning a little more forward than Jolie in this picture, the former still looks slightly taller than the latter: ¼” to ½”. I’m assuming they are wearing a similar size heel here.
Comparison #9: Anne Hathaway (reported height 5’8) next to Jolie Click Here Click Here and Click Here The angles are kind of funky but it seems apparent to me that Hathaway, assuming they are wearing a similar size heel, is slightly taller than Jolie—at most ½”. Methinks Hathaway is not really 5’8, but maybe it’s the heels.
Comparison #10: Cate Blanchett (reported height 5’8½ ) versus Jolie Click Here In this picture, one can clearly see that Blanchett is more than 1” taller than Jolie.
Comparison #11: Elizabeth Mitchell (reported height 5’8½ to 5’9) next to Jolie Click Here In this picture, one can clearly see that Mitchell is more than 1” taller than Jolie.
In sum, looking at the ‘evidence’ gathered here, Angelina Jolie appears to be no shorter than 5’7 and no taller than somewhere around 5’7¼. She often seems taller than she really is because of her very slender build , long limbs, long neck, and elongated face. Furthermore, she always parades in heels; and, some of these funky camera angles can trick the eye. Shaun says on 5/Feb/10
Yes she does wear massive heels which create an illusion of her being a tall woman. Not really. She is kind of the equivalent of a man Pitt's height. Not short, a little above average but not tall. Shaun says on 5/Feb/10
WOW what a catfight we have here. Does it really matter if Jolie is 5'5" or 5'7"? She can look as low as 5'5" and as tall as a legit 5'7". She is somewhere in between roughly 5'6". Maybe a smidge under. 5'4" I personally think is too low for her. 5'5" wouldn't be impossible she does look that sort of height in some barefoot pics I've seen of her but I see her around 167cm. Anonymous says on 3/Feb/10
Jane, I am sorry I didn't mean to be rude at all. You have your point and I have mine, and that is fine, to have different opinions will not hurt. You could be right, and I could be right. Jane says on 3/Feb/10
the first one at the beach is a bit unfair, here is a better one, different time all together, cuz at the beach its rocky and sand mounds and its not a good pic: Click Here
and again, this pic is great because they are not moving, they are answering questions.
Click Here Jane says on 3/Feb/10
Anonymous, delusional is if you think a hat is going to make a difference in judging height. Like i said in a previous post with Angie and Mary J. Blige, look at the difference between their shoulder height, cover the hat and you still have a noticeable difference.
she can't be 5'7
Click Here
Brad,Angie and 5'10 Wyclef Jean in Haiti
Click Here
hmm i guess humanitarian work doesn't include wearing heels.
and look how Brad looks next to 5'9 Gweneth Paltrow
Click Here Anonymous says on 2/Feb/10
Jane, you are delusional. The picture u sent of Brad and Angelina, Brad is wearing a hat which clearly adds to his height and she is not standing up straight.Check out the picture that YOU posted. The evidence that you offered is going against you. Even if Brad is only 5'9 which I doubt, you can clearly see in the picture that Angie is only a few inches shorter. Furthermore, Brad is not 5'9 but at least 5'10 or more, which indicates that Angie is at least 5'7. Anonymous says on 1/Feb/10
I think all this is just confusion... you know, I measured myself as 5'2" using a scale at home but I was measured as 5'5" by a nurse in America(supposed to have the best doctors in the world). So 5'2" at home = 5'5" :) Jane says on 1/Feb/10
tallady you're the only one desperate here.
just look how petite she looks in flats next to brad also in flats in New Orleans, its the same height difference i see in the snow picture. She cannot be 5'7!
Click Here
and
Click Here
here they are walking, however if Angie were 5'7, which she is NOT, there wouldn't be as much of a difference, but she clearly looks shorter than expected.
Click Here
when they are in flats together, she does not look 5'7.
and on the set of Salt she is not wearing flat shoes, here is a pic of what shoes she was wearing in the pic next to Leiv
Click Here
Angelina Jolie may not be 5'4 but she may very well be in the 5'4.5 to 5'5.5 range based on the pics I have shown, but she is not 5'7,tallady dear your claim is bogus. Mimi says on 1/Feb/10
Oh dear, talllady continues with her "what if she stood up straight; probably/most likely not wearing super high heels; does not wear super high heels; everybody around her is taller than their sightings so she must be 5'7"" arguments and accompanying obviously biased pics to go along with the argument.
Tallady, you first said that Angelina was not wearing high heels bc she was very pregnant, and when I showed you a pic of Angelina earlier that same day with 4-5 inchers you then changed you argument to "not wearing high heels later that night bc there were so many stairs, long train etc." bogus bogus bogus. Here you go: Click Here Click Here
Not only is she wearing 4in+ heels, but they are PLATFORM heels! If you're going to make an argument, please have valid backup. If not, you're just wasting space here. Putting up 15 questionable pictures does not a point make.
So there you have it. Liu and Jolie are in similar heels...and the height difference is nowhere near putting Jolie at 5'7". Visit Liu's page - most sightings have her at 5'1"-5'2". I've seen Barrymore (with whom Liu was often photographed and always appeared shorter than) and Barrymore is 5'2"ish in flat sneakers. There is NOOOOOOO way that Liu is "5'friggin 3" no matter how many times or what words she uses to say that she is. The only way she is 5'3" is in heels. Angelina next to Liu is very telling. 5'5"-5'6" at most. Linda says on 1/Feb/10
I can totally see where talllady is coming from. There is no other explanation but that Angelina Jolie is on the taller side. Thanks talllady for your insight and taking the time to debunk those false rumors that Angelina is short. Let's give respect where it is due, and give Angelina and her reps that height that she claims even herself. talllady says on 1/Feb/10
Jane, your pic of that supposed height difference where they are in the snow is bogus, first of all, you can tell AJ is leaning in it, and you can't see half of their bodies or feet. I think I will stick to what I was saying about YOU being desperate. If you look at every picture of Brad and AJ, the height difference is but a few inches. He is also about 5'10" to 5' 11" certainly no need for him to wear heeled shoes UNLESS AJ is fairly tall and he needs to compensate that so that he appears alittle taller then her. If she was short, as in 5'4" or 5' 5", he would not need to wear the thick heeled shoes when on the red carpet next to her. At 5'7" when she wears 4-5 inch heels that makes her 5'11", so THAT would be why Brad needs to put on those high heeled shoes that we see in so many red carper pics, so that AJ does not surpass his height Furthermore, I was aware of what type of shoe she was wearing at Cannes, can you read or pay attention? ALL OF THOSE PICS I POSTED EARLIER WAS TO SHOW AJ IN 4-5 INCH HEELS in contrast to the pics from Kung Fu Panda, where she is wearing shorter heels, and thus supports my claim that Lucy Lui was wearing mega heels that evening and explains the close height difference in the pic that you posted to show how "short" AJ is, again bogus. You only make yourself appear desperate when you do this. lol.
Furthermore, explain Gwyneth and Brad's height difference and also Gwyneth's height difference with AJ in pics, she is close to 5'10". Explain why AJ and Gwyneth both appear very close in height next to Brad in many pics. You figure it out. lol. talllady says on 1/Feb/10
Click Here
The correct link to my post below regarding Leiv and AJ on the set of Salt. Imagine her standing totally straight and in heels, she'd be close to his nose, therefore next to a man as tall as he should give you an idea of her height, and it's not 5'4" lol. Jane says on 1/Feb/10
Mimi, I always enjoy your comments and appreciate your logical responses and opinions, despite our different opinions its always good to view great posts. Jane says on 31/Jan/10
I am not short nor am I in denial I don't know how many times I have to post this, its just my opinion and I love to counter argue your invalid observations. that is all...this is fun remember.
Angelina DOES wear gigantic heels, just look at this: Click Here
I know shoes and those are platform Louboutins.
as for Brad and Angie, I see a definite height difference, in this pic we cant see their shoes but how do you account for the overtly obvious difference?
Click Here
and they are not walking so there is no mid-stride disadvantage.
it seems to me tallady that you are in denial and your posts are epic fails. lol. Danielle says on 30/Jan/10
If a person wears a shoes to make them appear taller, you can measure the height by comparing the shoulders. Shoes were not determining factor, and one should not compare the shoes but shoulders. That being said, there is no way that Angie is 5'5, no way. My opinion is 5'7 and maybe even 5'8. talllady says on 29/Jan/10
Another thing I should point out regarding Brad's height, in many, many pics with AJ, he is wearing heeled shoes to pump up his 5'10 height. That would make him in those pics over 6 ft. and then you see where AJ comes up to him in these pics where he is wearing the thick heels. I would say AJ is on the taller side folks. I mean, why would 5'10" Brad need to wear thick heeled shoes if he was way taller than a short AJ, that would make no sense. It would make sense however that next to her, he would need to compensate on the red carpet, because she is even taller in heels. Understand? talllady says on 29/Jan/10
Click Here
Click Here
In the links above we see 5'9 1/2" Gwyneth, 5' 10" Jude Law and 5' 3" Bai Ling next to AJ. You figure it out.
Click Here
this is from the movie, again, seeing close height difference
Click Here
AJ's shoes worn in the movie
And if anyone says "well what kind of shoes were they wearing during the premiere for that movie, here ya go:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Clearly, AJ is in the 5'7" range talllady says on 29/Jan/10
LOL! Jane those platform shoes you posted are the kinds that very short women such as the 5' friggen 3" Lucy Lui would wear. That's what I was saying.
I did not say AJ was not wearing high heels at ANY of the event pics that I listed to show her height difference to Brad (in fact re-read my posts I said on these occasions she was wearing the 4-5 inch heels, I was showing you that in contrast at the Kung Fu Panda Premiere she was alot shorter because she was NOT wearing her 4-5 inch heels, (due to pregnancy, stair, and long flowing gowns are we paying attention?) hence next to Lucy Lui whom was wearing the platforms, appears close in height. Which they are not. Jeez, stay focused. talllady says on 29/Jan/10
Thanks for the pics of Brad and Gweneth. :)
Gwenie is a tall chick and Brad with no shoes next to her is about right, no shock there. No disagreement there. What you might want to ask yourself is why are the pics with Brad and AJ, where they are wearing flats, also appear very close in height, as well. Pics of Gweneth next to Chris Martin, whom is about 6', she stacks up closely to him, what would be expected of a woman her height. So no discrepancy there.
Click Here
Click Here (same day, same clothes, look at flat shoes) talllady says on 29/Jan/10
Oh, there is plenty validity in my pics and posts. it is you and you other short ppl that are in denial. The proof has been in all my pics and debate here. AJ is 5'7" and even taller in heels. talllady says on 29/Jan/10
Click Here
Here is a shot from the set "Salt"...I don't know about you but AJ looks pretty effing tall next to a 6'3" man, if she was totally standing up straight, top of her head would be up to his nose/mouth area, AND if you put 4-5 inch heels on her (which for this action scene where she is seen running in other shots she is wearing flat shoes) imagine where she would come up to Leiv Schreiber then? You got it, almost 6 ft tall in heels, just shy if 4 or 5 inches from the top of this tall man's head. talllady says on 29/Jan/10
Jane, Leiv Shrieber is 6'3" inches of course someone 5'7" and as skinny as AJ is would appear "small". You act like 5'7" is gigantic. pffft. Tall Foreign Observer says on 29/Jan/10
After going through all the arguements and pictures, I see that AJ is 5.5 inches shorter than Brad. I know that Brad is 5'10". That makes AJ 5'4.5". That's still a good height since most of the skinny and good looking American women I see are 5'2"-5'4". Mimi says on 29/Jan/10
AMEN, Jane! I still don't agree that Jolie is 5'4"-5'5". I believe 5'5"-5'6" :) talllady says on 28/Jan/10
Click Here
WOW! Look how tall AJ is in this pic with her heels on, almost as tall as Brad!
Click Here
Yep, no doubt with the heels on she's almost as tall as Brad, their heads are almost even!
Click Here OH! wow! look how much shorter in these pics...what happened..OH!! she decided to go with flatter shoes. What a perfect opportunity for Lucy Lui to appear taller and wear her mega platforms under her long gown. ;) talllady says on 28/Jan/10
Mimi, I totally believe she is NOT wearing high heels at the Kung Fu Panda Premiere BECAUSE I see a height difference between her and Brad when you compare other pics (posted below) of them together at different events, when she actually is wearing the 4-5 inch heels...I mean, come on, look at the long gown with the train dragging on the floor and the amount of stairs that they all had to walk around, just because you show me a pic of her in a shorter dress, at a function on a different day, (a day that did not require walking a maze of up and down stairs, while she was pregnant) does not prove that my opinion is bogus about this particular night with the long gown and the stairs, ask your self: would YOU or would YOU allow someone that is THAT pregnant to wear 4 or 5 inch high heels wearing that dress with all that flowing material at the bottom AND with the logistics of the red carpet walk for the occasion being a bunch of stairs to walk up and down??? I mean SERIOUSLY THINK ABOUT IT. DANGEROUS. Brad wants his babies to be safe as I am sure AJ would for go fashion under such circumstances. Here is a pic from that night with Brad, observe how he is gripping her arm and look at the stairs..and look at her shoes, you can't see the heel length on them, but they sure do appear to me to be a simple and practical pair of one or two inch style shoes and not any mega glam heels. Think what you like but my pics of the height difference sans heels and with heels net to Brad should support my opinion.
Click Here Jane says on 28/Jan/10
As for Brad Pitt, go to his page on celeb heights and you will see a very interesting discussion going on over there. The man is 5’10 to 5’11 but cannot be more than that. Here is a picture in which 5’9 Gwenyth Paltrow and Brad Pitt, both are barefoot, enjoy.
Click Here
The 2009 Cannes pictures are a perfect example of what type of shoes are common for Angie to wear. These shoes can make a 5’5 woman seem at least 5’8
Click Here
if you have common sense you will make a reasonable conclusion. but because you have a firm bias opinion you wont consider it and that is okay. Jane says on 28/Jan/10
Danielle, my posts are not childish, they are fun yes, but they are not ridiculous. And even if 5’1.75 Lucy Liu is wearing gigantic heels with platforms there is no way she can look 5’7 which she could possibly achieve if she was 5’3 but clearly she is not, I also recommend you to view her page on celeb heights and read the discussion there.
tallady honey, I failed to counter your mention about the Russian dialect coach because it is ridiculous and has no fact base, the link looks totally illegitimate and there is no specific information. It is a complete unknown variable, which is like saying its complete B.S.
On the other hand when Liev Schreiber said she is shorter than expected, he doesn't specify how much shorter she is but it is credible, his interview is credible, because we know who he is and what footwear she was wearing on the set.
If you think that because an actor says they are a certain height and that they are telling the truth, you do not know anything about Hollywood or about the business. It seems to me that common sense is lacking because it is a known fact that people, average people, lie about their height, weight and age...how much more incentive do actors have to lie about their weight, heights and age? It is their business to market themselves at optimum desirability.
That is why there is a cool site like celeb heights to discuss height discrepancies that are seen with pictures that I have posted.
I encourage tallady to view the discussions on Lucy Liu’s page and Drew Barrymore’s page on celeb heights to get a better understanding on what everyone thinks about their height. Lucy Liu cannot be 5’3 she is no more than 5’1 and Drew Barrymore is no more than 5’3.
Moreover tallady its not desperation, its exasperation because I don’t see any validity in any of your posts…but its friendly exasperation because as I have said before this site is fun, and I have failed to make my point clear enough for you to see so I will continue to stick to my opinion that Angelina Jolie is 5’4.5 to 5’5.5 a great above average height, and you can continue to stick to your opinion that she is 5’7. Mimi says on 28/Jan/10
I've seen Barrymore in Austin with the MAC guy...she was in low sneakers and she's nowhere 5'4". Seemed around 5'2". So no, Lucy Liu is NOT 5'3"...or maybe in heels she is. talllady says on 27/Jan/10
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Which reminds me, Gweneth Paltrow is known for being very tall and is listed as 5'9" and other sources 5'10"...throws you off when you see how she stacks up next to brad and how AJ stacks up next to Brad..the only thing it could possibly be is that AJ is around 5'7" and that Lucy Lui in the pic posted below is indeed near 5'3" and also wearing platform heels for the Kung Fu Panda premiere. talllady says on 27/Jan/10
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Which reminds me, Gweneth Paltrow is known for being very tall and is listed as 5'9" and other sources 5'10"...throws you off when you see how she stacks up next to brad and how AJ stacks up next to Brad..the only thing it could possibly be is that AJ is around 5'7" and that Lucy Lui in the pic posted below is indeed near 5'3" and also wearing platform heels for the Kung Fu Panda premiere. talllady says on 27/Jan/10
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here (study these, she is wearing 4-5 inch heels)
Pics from Inglorious Basterds premieres and BAFTA awards, note that AJ appears taller these occassions because she is, as we can clearly see wearing very high heels these evenings, as opposed to the evening at the Kung Fu Panda show, where she clearly is not wearing her high heels and looks shorter next to Brad.
Click Here
Argue it all you want, but in the pics where she is wearing very high heels, you can clearly see a couple inches added to her height,in fact in some of these pics if were she to stand totally straight next to Brad (she tends to slouch and position and bend her legs if you notice)she would be almost his height with the heels on! Also, in the pics where she is wearing the green gown, you can totally tell that evening she opted for shorter heels and it clearly shows, where as I am pretty sure that Lucy Lui has on her mega platforms for the occasion and thus they appear to be close in height. There is no way they can be close in height or that would make Brad also diminutive and, lol, he isn't, he's at least 5'10" if not 6 ft. Danielle says on 27/Jan/10
I am sorry Jane, but the picture you are referring to, with Lucy Liu and AJ, it is not clear whether she wears heels or not. So, you cannot use this picture at all. It's ridiculous and childish. YOU CANNOT SEE THEIR FEET. Mimi says on 27/Jan/10
A.M.: What photos posted by me are you referring to? Mimi says on 27/Jan/10
Wait, I just read talllady's whole "she probably isn't wearing high heels and Lucy Liu is most likely wearing super high heels" argument....LOL! Resorting to "probably wearing short heels and most likely wearing super huge heels" to explain Lucy looking 2-2.5 inches shorter than Angelina is WEAK. talllady says on 27/Jan/10
AM, to upload pics, go to tinyurl.com and go to a pic you want to post, copy and paste the web address where the pic is, transfer into the space on tiny url, then copy and past shortened web address into the diolog box here. talllady says on 27/Jan/10
Jane, you mention not a thing about the Russian dialect coach and his statement..he is 5'6" and asks why would AJ be interested in a short man.lol. Off the news wire and in your face. Explain, dear...
It's not my claim that Lucy Lui is 5'3", it is from her own mouth. And Drew Barrymore is 5'4", again also from Drew's own mouth as well, and many times in interviews btw, that puts Drew an inch or so over Lucy Lui, which looks about right in the pics and so Lucy Lui being 5'3' and AJ being 5'7", that's about 4 inches and can be tweaked with high heels, which Lucy Lui wears the platform type in many pics.
Please Jane, you are looking desperate over a few mere inches. Give it up. I have clearly made my case for a taller AJ at 5'7". In many, many detailed ways, anyone with common sense and an unbiased opinion would agree.
Showing heels on a pregnant Jennifer Lopez does not prove a damn thing...the night of the Kung Fu Panda premiere AJ was not wearing high heels, it's obvious, especially wearing that dress with a long train. Look at all the stairs they had to walk up and down. Common sense, dear. There is a such thing as small heeled shoes, like one or two inch heels, for pregnant women, and I believe that is what AJ was wearing that night. Mimi says on 27/Jan/10
Talllady, I stand by my opinion that the Naomi/Kate pic is worthless. Seriously, mid-stride pics are the worst pictures you can use to make a point. Even if it seems like they're lined up, you have not considered height and depth perception, angles, etc. You are looking at the picture very simplistically.
Here is a pic of Kate and Naomi. It is not a great one either given the depth perception involved, but it shows them standing still. It is obvious that there is not a 1-2 inch difference between them, but a much larger height difference between the two.
Click Here
If you look up more pictures of that event, you can see their heels are of very similar height. Even if Naomi were to be 5'9", Kate is nowhere near 2 inches below Naomi.
Anyway, on to Angelina Jolie, the pics of that Cannes event show that she was wearing a platform shoe. Talllady's claim that she was probably wearing shorter heels due to her pregnancy is also bogus. Jolie was wearing 4-inchers (she usually does 4-5 inchers for events) earlier that same day:
Click Here
Guess talllady's "shorter heels due to pregnancy" argument is o-u-t.
By the way, I won't comment on the other model pictures because I have no idea what those other models heights are. Editorial pics are usually not good to use either because of image manipulation. Anyway, I'll respectfully decline to explain photography tricks/issues anymore. I just think the pictures talllady's used are useless and heavily biased to fit what she wants to prove. Give me some good pics and I'll reconsider if necessary. Since you have not and until then, I still believe Jolie is anywhere from 5'5"-5'6" and that Moss is not 5'7". Jane says on 27/Jan/10
tallady, you write an awful lot of words yet none of them seem like viable explanations.
you didn't even touch on the picture of 5'1.75 Lucy Liu and 5'3 Drew Barrymore next to a real 5'8 barefoot Cameron Diaz. Here is a new one, which shows their shoes….
Click Here
Your claim about Lucy Liu being 5’3, where on earth would that put Drew Barrymore? Clearly Lucy Liu is 5’1.75
before there is another pointless discussion about someone other than Angie, please take a look at Lucy Liu, Drew Barrymore and Cameron Diaz's page on celeb heights.com and read the discussions on their pages.
Angelina may have been very pregnant but the picture i shared clearly shows heels and its a clear enough picture that i can see they are peep toe heels. Giving Angie an advantage, platform or not, she is still on her tippy toes. Here is another pic of Angie and Lucy:
Click Here
I suggest you open this pic next to the one with Lucy, Drew, and Cameron.
also, being very pregnant (9 months, with twins) doesn’t stop celebrities from wearing heels. for example a very pregnant (9 months, also with twins), Jennifer Lopez in high heels.
Click Here
again I have made my points and my claim still stands, Angelina is in the 5’4.5 to 5’5.5 range, an above average height and a good one, though she is not as tall as people think she is. talllady says on 27/Jan/10
Mimi, your response to that pic of Naomi and Kate is pure denial. If you study it, their bodies are aligned to the "T", hip to hip, knee to knee, etc. regardless that they are walking, it is a pic head on, top to bottom you are the one with the weak argument, no other pic could illustrate their closeness in height and body size as well. They are also wearing exact height platform heels. There is not one thing you can say about that pic to convince me or anyone else that's being real with themselves, that this pic does not show it the way it is. And funny that earlier in the posts, your rationale was that Naomi is really 5'8" and so I show you pics of other tall models with her and you revert to "that pic with Naomi and Kate is worthless". To you it might be, but that's because you are in denial. talllady says on 27/Jan/10
Click Here
Jane, I can easily explain to you why AJ and Lucy "almost" look the same height at the Kung Fu Panda premiere. First off, compare Lucy's height that evening to Dustin Hoffman. Dustin is known to be at the very least 5'5" or 5' 6", she is nearly that height if you compare her height to Dustin's in her high heels. Next to Jack Black, whom is said to be about 5'6"-5'7" (I believe the latter) she is a few inches shorter. NOW, it would make common sense that Angelina is NOT wearing very high heels this evening, because she is VERY pregnant and wearing a long dress with a long train on it AND the red carpet/premiere area is fraught with many stairs that they had to walk up and down on, (if you look at pics from this evening). Common sense would tell you that she, Brad and anyone else that cared, would not have her in a dangerous situation being in her 8-9 month of pregnancy in HIGHER HEELS. BTW, your pic to show she is wearing high heels in not clear enough to see the actual heel on the shoes. I think she is wearing smaller heels, would make sense. That being said, HOWEVER, Lucy Lui, (whom from her own mouth claims she is "friggen 5'3") because she has a thing about wishing to appear taller or be seen as taller is more than likely wearing the platform high heels that have the rise in the front and the mega heels. But none the less, even with all of these dynamics, AJ is still taller than Lucy in the pics and clearly stands at 5'7" despite her lower heels and Lucy wearing mega high heels. Look at how AJ's shoulders are inches above Lucy's. It is interesting that the pics make them appear close in height, but that is not the case at all and many dynamics are involved. Heels, lifts, angles, slouching, slightly bent legs under long gowns, all of these can make an illusion of shortness or tallness. The bottom line is we are debating about 4 inches give or take. And even IF Lucy is only 5'1" (which I doubt) and AJ is 5'7" which I totally believe, that is only 6 inches of difference (hold up a ruler and look at the small difference, throw in some 4 inch heels and that difference is narrowed. A.M. says on 26/Jan/10
Mimi keeps showing worthless photos, and you are so closed minded that in your mind there is no freaking way that AJ could be tall. The both you and Tall girl have good points, but tallgirl have more believable facts. I know that AJ is at least 5'7. I would like to show some pictures too, how do you upload photos? sarah says on 26/Jan/10
Ok Sun you're right.
I can't find the one where Aniston were sitting and showed more shoe... But from this one you can see that this is a no platform and a big heeled shoe.
Angie shoes are if possible a little bit bigger..
I would like to point out, as I've always said, that Angie could be 5.0, and she would be the MOST BEAUTIFUL WOMAN IN THE WORLD , anyway, the most amazing person living on this planet.... (sorry for my english)
Click Here
Click Here Jane says on 26/Jan/10
mimi thanks for the comment.
mike, leonari,righto and sarah great observations about Jack Black, who is listed on celeb heights as 5'6.
Sun it’s not that I’m so adamant on convincing people it’s that I’m making a valid claim to refute invalid claims of Angie being taller than she is listed and because it’s great fun to discuss and disprove. I believe she is shorter than she is listed because of all the pictorial evidence I have seen. Also the pic with Mary J. Blige, idk (I don’t know) how that pic could look different to other people.
Why on earth would Angeline Jolie look like this:
Click Here
and
Click Here
next to Lucy Liu whose height is: 5 ft 1.75 in (157 cm) as listed on celeb heights, if Angelina was as tall as she is listed or claims.
she is wearing heels:
Click Here
and for good measure here is Lucy Liu next Drew Barrymore 5'3 and with a real 5'8 barefoot Cameron Diaz:
Click Here
Clearly, she is not as tall as listed or claims, in my opinion she is in the 5'4.5-5'5.5 range, which is above average and a great height. Sun says on 25/Jan/10
She looks about 5'7 to me. Tall or not, she is simply gorgeous. I don't understand why Jane is so adamant about trying to convince people that AJ is short. BTW it looks like MJ has a short next to even if they stood "shoulder to shoulder" as you claim, AJ is a lot tall then Mary. Sun says on 25/Jan/10
Sarah, can you show me what heels there were wearing? Heels can range from a quarter inch to 6 inches. Show me their shoes and maybe your point is valid, but right now it's null. sarah says on 25/Jan/10
This is the prove that Aniston and Jolie are about the same height,in those occasions they were wearing the same heels.
Click Here
Click Here mimi says on 24/Jan/10
Not surprisingly, you once again use pictures that are worthless. Don't bother responding if you're going to base yourself off of mid-stride pictures going down steps of Naomi C. and Kate M. Useless to do so and you just seem desperate enough to use heavily-biased pictures to try and make it fit to your wish for a taller Kate Moss. talllady says on 23/Jan/10
let me make this easy for you to grasp Mimi:
Click Here (Kate and Naomi very much side by side, a telling pic)
Click Here (Models Linda Evangelista and Carla Bruni 5'9 1/2" and 5'9 1/2" next to Naomi whom is clearly the same height)
Click Here
(ALL the supermodels we love next to Naomi, if you know who they are google their names and heights, every single one of them are over 5'8" and so is Naomi.
Here I will help you, since you don't know the modeling industry very well, obviously:
Christy Turlington 5' 10"
Stephanie Seymour 5' 10"
Claudia Shiffer 5' 11"
Cindy Crawford 5' 9 1/2"
Linda Evangelista 5' 9 1/2"
Naomi Campbell 5' 9 1/2"
Put Kate Moss in there and she would be the shortest at 5'7", nor would she have done any runway being shorter than that, and THAT is a FACT. talllady says on 23/Jan/10
As well as the pics of AJ and the debate..she is also AT LEAST 5'7". What? No comment on the article about the short dialect instructor for the movie Salt? There is your answer there..he says he at 5'6" short for a woman like AJ to take notice of him. talllady says on 23/Jan/10
Kate is known for being a short model at 5'7". Nothing less than that... and the pis I have shown prove that. Mimi says on 23/Jan/10
I am sure you are a fashion industry insider, lol, but Kate Moss was known for not being the average model and for her small stature. Anyway you slice it, Kate Moss is in no way 5'7". talllady says on 23/Jan/10
therefore in the pic with AJ where he is face to face, take off her heels and take off his shoes and you would have AJ at 5'7" there abouts. talllady says on 23/Jan/10
Click Here
Ben Stiller is 5'7" and apparently Jack Black is in the same range. talllady says on 22/Jan/10
Let's look at some pics of Naomi Campbell, because she was pictured with Kate Moss, who IS at least 5'7" in that side by side pic of the two...and in reply someone else on here tried to say Naomi is "only" 5' 8" ish..take a look at these pics of her with other models in the 5'9" or taller range and then think of Kate Moss in scale to these models.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here talllady says on 22/Jan/10
How much more proof do you need that AJ is at least 5'7"? That is someone whom worked with her closely, her dialect coach for the movie Salt. Go and google a pic of her and her brother James Haven, he is 6'2" and side by side she clearly is long limbed and at the very least 5'7". talllady says on 22/Jan/10
That last post is hot off the press news I found today online. This dialect coach CLEARLY says he is too short at 5'6"..what does this tell you people? Yeah, thought so. talllady says on 22/Jan/10
Dialect coach slams Angelina Jolie affair rumors
A voice coach who helped Angelina Jolie speak Russian in her latest thriller "Salt" has spoken out to deny rumors he had an affair with the Hollywood beauty.
Dialect expert Howard Samuelsohn spent time with the superstar to perfect her Soviet accent for the new movie, in which she plays a Russian sleeper agent.
But following speculation Jolie had a fling with her dialect coach during production, Samuelsohn has come forward to blast reports he bedded the beauty at New York hotel The Waldorf Astoria - insisting he is too "short and middle-aged" for Jolie to be interested in him.
He tells RadarOnline.com, "I'm 5'6, I'm 51 years old, and I've never been to The Waldorf. I would like for someone to get the word out. (This) is total bull[bleep]."
Read more: Click Here talllady says on 21/Jan/10
Mimi, you do not know the modeling industry, do you? No way that Kate Moss is below 5'7"...and there are plenty of ppl on the Naomi Campbell thread that have met her and swear to that she is 5'9.5" to 5'10", which sound right. Therefore in that side by side pic of Kate and Naomi, you are witnessing the heights of 5'7" and 5'9 ish respectively. mike says on 21/Jan/10
jack black looked tiny on the jonathan ross show a few years again. i don't think he's even 5'6. Mimi says on 21/Jan/10
Tallady...except most sightings put Naomi Campbell at 5'8"ish. So no, Kate Moss is not 5'7" leonari says on 20/Jan/10
Jack BlaCK Almost as tall as Tom Cruise? Sure...What are you guys smoking? Give me some of it. Anything above 5'6 for Black is ridiculous talllady says on 20/Jan/10
Mimi, there is totally a way that Kate Moss is 5'7" and it's obvious in the pic where she is prefectly along side Naomi Campbell. talllady says on 20/Jan/10
Jack Black is listed as 5'7 1/2" in a few other resources. That looks about right in the pic, take off her heels and he would be a smidgen taller than her at 5' 7 1/2". righto says on 19/Jan/10
Click Here
Shes 5'8 in heels maybe, but not barefoot, if Jack Black is 5'6, she is 5'5, if he is 5'7, she is 5'6. Mimi says on 18/Jan/10
Bravo, Jane. Your pics and reasoning at least make sense and do not make broad generalizations and are not based on biased evidence such as mid-stride pics, proximity to lens, etc.
By the way, there is no way Kate Moss is 5'7". If you were here when Glen's pics were up, you would've noticed that she looked 5'5" TOPS next to 5'7" Glen, and he commented on how shocked he was that she was so small. Emily says on 17/Jan/10
Bravo tallgirl. I couldn't have said myself better. Jane says on 17/Jan/10
tallady,tallady,tallady, it's not make believe fantasy, it’s an opinion backed up by good pictures and sound enough logic. Angie does not stand up as tallest amongst all the women in this pic
Click Here
I did not point out that Mary is wearing a hat because I would much rather people notice the shoulder height and heels of these two women. Angie has larger facial bone structure as shown in the pic of her and Winona
Click Here
so I didn't say look at Mary's hat and then look at Angie’s head. I said look at their shoulders. Mary and Angie are clearly in the 5'4.5 to 5'5.5 range.
As I pointed out before Renee is listed on this site, celeb heights, as 5'4 but the editor has in quotes "She sometimes can look anywhere from 5ft 3 to 5" Again I recommend you visit her page on celeb heights.
So when Renee and Angie are face to face, look at the picture and take into account Renee's little heel and then look at Angie’s big red heel, she is not 3 inches over Renee, she is probably more like tippy-toeing 1.5 more than Renee is.
Click Here and Click Here
and, Missy Elliot and Christina Aguilera are in the 5’0 to 5’1.5 range , again take a look at their pages on celeb heights.
It’s not that I’m self-serving or in denial as you have suggested, its that I am backing up my opinion with clear pictures and sound enough common sense and logic to counter argue your points. If I have failed you to see my opinion as valid, its been fun anyway. Its an exercise in futility to try to convince anyone who has their opinion firmly planted. but again, its always entertaining. Jane says on 17/Jan/10
alright, I don’t know much about the modeling business but if it’s anything like the acting business, honesty is rare. now I know we digress, but the Angelina and Winona picture has them looking similar in height. And the Kate Moss and Winona Ryder picture has them look similar in height.
Here are pictures that back up my opinion that Kate Moss is not 5’7. She is pictured here with Kelly Osbourne, 5’2 (157 cm) as listed on celeb heights, Click Here both are wearing similar length heels look: Click Here
and Click Here
Here she is with, as listed on celeb heights, 5’2(157cm) Lily Allen: Click Here
and Click Here
If I have not convinced you, look at Kate Moss’s page on celeb heights and join the conversation there. talllady says on 17/Jan/10
Click Here
Click Here
Lilly appears to be taller than 5'$' Crew Barrymore. hummm... talllady says on 17/Jan/10
Click Here
please explain this talllady says on 17/Jan/10
Click Here
one more pic of Jack White and Alison Mosshart to add to the last post I added to the debate. Clearly Kate Moss is 5'7" a few inches over Winona if you compare all these other heights. talllady says on 17/Jan/10
Jane, Jane, Jane, you can go ahead and have your make believe fantasy. I am not stopping you. But the arguement that her red high heels compared to Mary's heels that makes all this difference in the world is a weak argument. AJ stands the tallest amongst all of those women in that pic. Mary is wearing a hat that is giving her height. The telling pic is AJ and 5' 4" Renee standing face to face, which I noticed you conveniantly avoided bringing up, which CLEARLY shows 3 inches over Renee, which once more PROOVES MY POINT. Now, if you will excuse me, I have already spent way too much time on here and I have a life. I think what I brought to this debate on this website is clear as day and ANGELINA JOLIE IS AT LEAST 5'7". Look at all the pics, use logic and you too will arrive at the truth about her height and others as well. talllady says on 17/Jan/10
OK. First of all Jane, the modeling industry would have never given Kate Moss a chance when she was starting out to do runway and print modeling. The modeling industry is set that a model must be 5'8" or above. She was an exception to the rule at 5'7". Those that try to put her at less than that are wishing the modeling industry would change it's requirements but it does not for specific reasons and especially runway modeling. They have to be tall and long limbed and larger than life on the catwoalk to represent the fashion lines for the designers. REQUIREMENT. She would have been used for commercial or other types of modeling had she been shorter and she certainly would not have gotten the work in the earlier days had she been 5'4", the world would have never known who Kate Moss is. Your ammo seems to rely on "but I have heard" she is such and such a height. Well I KNOW what the modeling industry requires and Kate would have never been a model if she was 5'4", when I lived in LA and modeled, I witnessed many of smaller gorgeous models not get work because they were below 5'8". Resources on the internet say 5'6" or 5'7" depending on who you ask. Knowing the modeling industry rules and standards, she is 5'7", her claim to fame as an unusually short model is that one inch from 5'8" and nothing less than that. Even 5'8" are not as preferred than the ones that are even taller. Kate was an anomolly. Do you have any familiarty with the modeling industry standards? Go to any modeling agency website and read about what they require. They measure all the models, end of story. That being said I will post a few pics to prove that Kate Moss is AT LEAST 5'7"
Click Here
Click Here
in the links above she is with beau Jamie Hince of The Kills, no height info on him anywhere but I will show other pics of other rockstars to show YOU the height differences we are looking at.
Click Here
here she is with Pete Doherty whom is 6'2"
clearly in this pic there is about a 7 inch difference that would bring her to 5'7".
Click Here
In this pic we see Kate Moss with Jamie Hince and Alison Masshart of The Kills. Alison, I have read in resources is 5'9" and I went to a Kills show and she IS a tall gal, long limbed. Look at the pic of Alison Mosshart with Jack White in their supergroup The Dead Weather:
Click Here
Jack White is known for being a tall rocker, in the range of 6'2". Clearly you can see that Alison Mosshart is tall up there with Jack White.
And for good measure here is a pic with Jack White and supermodel wife Karen Elson whom is 5'10":
Click Here
Look at where Karen comes up to Jack White at 5'10" to his 6'2". Now look at all the other pics I just posted. Your answer is here in these pics, using Jack White and Pete Doherty at 6'2" as a measuring stick. Again, be real and look closley and embrace the fact that there is no way on earth that Kate Moss is 5'4" and there for the pic I posted with her and Winona that started this round of debate and pics, it is pretty accurate in that it dipicted a few inches difference between Kate Moss and Winoan Ryder. DMEYER says on 16/Jan/10
IF SHE IS 169 THEN PITT IS MAX 178 Jane says on 16/Jan/10
tallady honey dear, your pic with Kate Moss and Winona Ryder helps prove my point.
Kate Moss is listed on celeb heights as: Kate Moss height: 5 ft 5.75 in (167 cm)
but I have heard she is closer to 5'4.
and the pics with Angie and the other celebs are proof that she is totally in the 5'4.4 to 5'5.5 range.
please look at the heels Angie was wearing that day
Click Here
and now look at the heels Mary J. Blige is wearing
Click Here
Mary J. Blige height: 5 ft 4.5 in (164 cm) as listed on celeb heights.
Now consider Mary's shoulder height and Angelina's shoulder height.
and that is all the proof I need, it is as plain as day. Angie is in the 5'4.5 to 5'5.5 range. talllady says on 16/Jan/10
I was looking at the pics with AJ and Renee. Renee is 5'4". CLEARLY, look at this pic, SERIOUSLY, and you see a 3 inch difference, which brings AJ to 5'7". I am sorry to those that want her to be in teh 5'4" 5'5" range, it's not true. That pic especially I see a good few inches over Renee. talllady says on 16/Jan/10
xyz, with the photo of AJ and her father, the one where she is hugging her father, at 5'7" and with heels on, which you cannot prove they are 4 inch heels btw, it would make sense that she comes up to his mouth or chin area if he is 6' 3" or 6'4" ...there are even websites claiming he is 6'5", IF she was standing totally straight which you can see she is bending her neck, which makes her look shorter, her back is rounded/hunched over, she is not standing straight there. Regardless, think of it this way, next to Brad she is a few inches shorter in TONS of pics, if you were to place Brad in this photo with AJ and her dad, where do you think Brad's height would be in comparison? He would be somewhere between AJ and Jon Voight, which would make him about 6ft. I am telling you, you guys keep bringing pics that actually support my case and work against yours. BTW, I claim her height to be around 5'7" the Hollywood fabrication/exaggeration "might" be 5'8" but she definately is not 5'4" or 5'5"..as can be clearly seen with the pic of her and the other women Rene, Missy E, Christina, etc. who ARE in the 5'5" and 5'4" range. She stands above them all. It's plain as day. I rest my case. I totally believe the gals that have met AJ and say she is tall, not short. And I have pointed out MANY pics and evidence to support that. What you chose to believe is based on denial an self serving. What I chose to believe is based on common sense and pictures. Mimi says on 16/Jan/10
Talllady's pics are nice in theory but not in practice. No, there is not such thing as "STANDARD SIZE" shopping cart across the board, they do vary by store. Also, most of her pics are of people walking...those are the absolute worst pictures to compare height. People are caught at different strides in those. Further, the Brad Pitt/Angelina pic where they are hugging and walking is terrible, they are WALKING and at different strides. The pic where Angelina and Brad are looking at the painting/art piece is also terrible to use to compare Angelina and the other woman since the other woman is much farther away from the lens. Seriously, most of the pics posted by Talllady are useless. Please stop filling the board with pictures that are heavily biased.
I agree that Angelina is not 5'4". She is probably 5'5-5'6" at most going on how she looks like next to most Hollywood leading ladies - who are known for being on the shorter side. Also, her Salt co-star Liev Shcreiber said in an interview she was a lot shorter than he expected (the link is posted here below somewhere). She doesn't look anywhere 5'10" so I don't see why he would be surprised at her height if she was indeed 5'8" in person. He's married to petite Naomi Watts, I seriously doubt he would think of a 5'8" as small. Anonymous says on 16/Jan/10
5'6.5"....TOPS, probably 5'5" talllady says on 16/Jan/10
Oh and one more thing about shopping carts, the HANDLES on shopping carts are generally in the same place to cater to the genral public. Size of cart, length or width of basket compartment is not part of this debate. I am talking about where the handle is. And my dears, the handles to cater to the general public are in the same perimeters for the most part. I myself have never pushed a cart where I felt the handles were too low or too high. lol talllady says on 16/Jan/10
The LAST of the three pics of AJ with the shopping cart that I posted below, where she is wearing all black, if you look at that pic, you cannot deny she is at least 5'7". Furthermore, you can clearly tell that these shopping carts are the same size. The standard shopping cart. talllady says on 16/Jan/10
The pic with Winona and AJ in black and white is not convincing for one, you cannot see the shoes they are wearing, and two, AJ still has a slight difference over Winona even though she is leaning and we all know AJ has a long neck that adds to her height, which would add height to her in this pic, but she is positioning herself, head tilted down and downplaying her few inches she has over Winona and look at how Winona is standing very upright pushing her every inch of height. The shoulders of AJ are also just a tad wider than Winona, if you look close. Look at the difference in bone structure, Winona has a tiny head/face, AJ looks physically a little larger next to waif-like Winona. Again, there is only a few inches difference between them, but visually that can be tweeked by any number of things, shoes, position, etc. Here is a pic of 5'7" Kate Moss with Winona Ryder to prove my point:
Click Here talllady says on 16/Jan/10
Jane, I have met Robert Downy Jr when I lived in LA and stood right next to him and talked with him at a club. He is average height, I'd say aboyt 5'10". And I have also seen Brad Pitt from a distance at the Johnny Suede premier, we are talking the beginning of his career, and he was with Juliette Lewis. I noted that he did not look short but not extremely tall either, would ay about 6ft. Now concerning the 5'7" Tom Cruise, you can clearly see in his pics with Nicole and with Katie, that he is short and stocky. You can see it totally. There is no doubt when Tom is in a pic with other ppl, that he is a short man. Not so with Brad. talllady says on 16/Jan/10
Jane dear, your pic with AJ and the other female celebs actually supports my 5' 7" claim (which BTW ppl, is only 2-3 inches difference from your 5'4"- 5'5")CLEARLY she is a good 2 to 3 inches over the other gals, they are ALL wearing heels too. Whose head is above the others by a few inches? Look closely and try to be reasonable. Whose head is higher in the pic with AJ and Rene. Please try to think of a two or three inch difference, and wrap your mind around that. Size wise as far as body frame and weight, AJ is tiny but height wise she does have that 2-3 inch difference. talllady says on 16/Jan/10
Alex, look at all the other pics where she is standing next to men, she is not a short woman, and those men are not built like shorter men, they do not appear stocky, they appear big and tall. In your pic, she is not standing upright and she is also farthest away from the camera. If she were standing upright she would be just a few inches shorter than the man, and that would place the man's height at the high end of 5'11 or 6 ft.
xyz, I don't need to point out to you that not only in that pic where you say she is wearing the heels that look like stilts (he was wearing high heeled shoes as well), but explain the other pics with Brad and Aj that I posted where she is DEFINATELY wearing flats and so is Brad, she is close to the top of his head. And before any of you start, Brad is close to 6 ft if not tall than 6 ft.
You can argue the shopping cart theory all you want, by and large, most shopping carts are a typical height and that is the carts you are seeking in all of the pics I posted. Deal with it. talllady says on 16/Jan/10
I KNEW someone would say this about shopping carts and to that I will say this. If you go to the Dollar Tree store and a few other stores, they have the very small shopping carts, so small in fact that if you were to size the carts in these pics to these smaller carts, you will get a laugh because those carts if you scale them the the STANDARD GROCERY STORE SHOPPING CART, the ppl in the pics with the shopping carts would be definately midgets, which is not the case at all. Go to any Lucky's, Ralphs, Safeway, Longs, Whole Foods, ie, THE MAJORITY of grocery stores and the shopping cart IS a standard size. xyz says on 16/Jan/10
Also here are photos of her and her dad who is suppose to be 6'3. She looks about 6 inches shorter than him in most photos. You can't see all the shoes but she is wearing formal wear which means she is wearing at least 4 inch heels.
If she was 5'8, she should be 6 feet or more in heels which means she should come out to her dad's eyes/eyebrowsd but she is always under, even when he leans in. Would a 6'3 guy wear lifts? Also he's older so he may not be 6'3 anymore.
Click Here xyz says on 16/Jan/10
And in the photos with Gilian Anderson, yes, Anderson has a heel advantage but it's not like AJ is barefoot. She is in decent size heels herself. If she was 5'8, she would look that much taller (about 1.5 inches) BAREFOOT next to Gilian Anderson. I think Anderson's shoes probably give her another 1 inch advantage. Let's round it up to a 3 inch difference so I'm again seeing Jolie between 5'5-5'6.
She is taller than average. She is not short. It's actually a nice height to be for a woman. Taller but not too tall. xyz says on 15/Jan/10
shopping carts are not always standard height across different stores. I have a baby and have to lift my baby with the car seat into the cart. And I feel a different between different stores.
I really don't see how some of the photos talllady posted are evidence she is 5'8. There are short men out there. Just because she looks around the same height as some unknown men of unknown height doesn't mean she is tall. I use to work in male dominated workplace. There are actually more guys who are under 5'7 then you may think.
Also that photo of AJ in the white suit and Brad, her pant leg looks so long she looks like she is walking in stilts. She must have had some mega shoes under those white pants. She is about 2 inches shorter than Pitt...when she is in 6 inch heels. He is wearing stuff in there too so many people say but I doubt Brad Pitt wear 6 inch lifts.
I don't think 5'4 is accurate though. I think she is 5'5-5'6. Alex says on 15/Jan/10
@ talllady
she is not almost that man's height. She is practically a head shorter than him. Jane says on 15/Jan/10
Okay now I will post more pictorial evidence that proves my opinion of Angie being in the 5'4.5 to 5'5.5 range.
Here is Angelia Jolie at the premier of Shark Tale in 2004 with Mary J. Blige, Renee Zellweger, Missy Elliott and Christina Aguilera:
Click Here
these are their heights as listed on celebheights.com
Mary J. Blige height: 5 ft 4.5 in (164 cm)
Renee Zellweger height: 5 ft 4 in (163 cm) “She sometimes can look anywhere from 5ft 3 to 5
Missy Elliott height: 5 ft 1 in (155 cm)
Christina Aguilera height: 5 ft 1.5 in (156 cm)
Angie and Renee: Click Here and Click Here
and a nice close up of Angie’s heels: Click Here Jane says on 15/Jan/10
I don't know why the pics I posted are the same, here is the other one I meant to include of Angie and Winona Ryder. Here you can see their bodies better. Winona Ryder is 5'3.5 as listed on celeb heights.
Click Here
tallady- you have a great point about the shopping carts but only in theory, shopping carts vary in size. i know the shopping carts at whole foods differ from the shopping carts at albertsons and the shopping carts in stores like target are different in length and width. also with the footwear I see Angie has some sort of platform at the front of the shoe. her shoes are primitive and chunky..lol.. these days there are better options. As for the leading men, take a look at the discussions going on about Tom Cruise, Brad Pitt, Robert Downey JR. etc... they have very interesting pics posted. these guys are practically wearing heels. talllady says on 15/Jan/10
Click Here
one more for good measure, Drew Barrymore listed as 5' 4" there abouts, she clearly stands shorter next to a shopping cart than AJ. This is for anyone that wanted a pic of an actress in the 5'4" range next to a shopping cart. I've met Drew barrymore, waited table on her a few years ago, she is petite and very nice. Clearly though AJ has at least a few inches over her. talllady says on 15/Jan/10
If you look closely at the pics of the actresses with the shopping carts, all of them different heights, you can see how they appear next to the standard shopping cart. CLEARLY with each actress, you see how much torso, neck and head is above the cart handles, the short gals the handles are just below their breast area. The taller gals more near the mid torso or belly button.It is that few inches difference! BADDA BING! So there is your answer, case closed. AJ is closer to the taller gals near the shopping cart. Our dear AJ, appears closer in stature to the likes of Jessica Beil and Julia Roberts next to a shopping cart, rather than Jessica Alba and the other shorter actresses. This is solid PROOF that she is AT LEAST 5'7", there is no way denying it, along with the pics of her next to all these men, where she appears pretty damn close to them in height. She is long limbed ppl, small framed and long limbed. She probably has an eating disorder and wants to be "smaller" because if she was at her regular weight she might appear "bigger" thus you hear about her being anorexic at 109 pounds, which I find kind of sad because she appears much more radiant and healthy if she just embraces her normal weight and not let others project onto her that she is smaller than she is. That is a problem with the industry, this obesssion to be tiny and wear a size zero. I think AJ has succumb to that to some degree. There is nothing wrong with being tall and voluptuos. That being said, go to your local grocery store and check out how ppl of various heights stack up next to a shopping cart. BTW, when we haggle over a few inches it's a very subtle thing to detect. 5'4" is only 3 inches from 5'7" and very hard to tell in pics next to other ppl, due to slouching, whether the other is wearing lifts,heels, etc. The clip with AJ and Kelly Ripa, some have used as their supposed "proof" but if you play it slowly, you will totally see AJ slouching as she approaches Kelly and you can definately see how much taller she is than Regis, go and look at that clip and tell me what you see. There is a good 3-4 inches she has over Kelly and Regis but the fact that she is so small framed and thin, it's hard to detect, but it's there. HOWEVER, THE SHOPPING CART EVIDENCE IS OBVIOUS...I should have been a lawyer or detective..lol. K says on 15/Jan/10
I'am 5,5:) Yes, I am short. And yes, It would have been reassuring if she had been shorter. (She is one of my favourite actresses)I've just seen the movie, i tought i am right. But after Talllady's picture i have to say that she is much taller than i tought. (sorry for my english) Jane says on 14/Jan/10
It's not that people want her to be short, its just that she is not as tall as people think she is. Brad Pitts height is also much debated, these people are actors and aesthetics is everything and in our society it is better to be perceived tall than not so tall. And its fun to discuss and show pics along with discussion.
It is so difficult to find pictures of Angie with other actresses, and when she is pictured with actresses her height is so debatable.
Here she is with Winona Ryder, Winona Ryder is on celeb heights as 5'3.5 (161cm)
Click Here
and
Click Here
Angie has great bone structure that lengthens her appearance.
again I stand by my 5'4.5 to 5.5'5 estimate of Angie's true height. talllady says on 14/Jan/10
Click Here
Now this pic speaks volumes..it's either telling you folks that Brad is a tiny man and close in height to Kelly Ripa and Gilliam Anderson, which, come on folks, he would have NEVER have made it as an A lister leading man at under 5'5" ...get real...or it means that Angelina is closer to 5'7"
This whole height thing and pics is strange, it almost seems like these ppl shape shift or something..lol talllady says on 14/Jan/10
Click Here
Again, with this pic, the woman in the background, even though she is in the distance, now THAT is a short woman the height that many of you are saying AJ is. Also, look closely at this pic, if AJ is only 5'4" can it truly be possible that Brad is only 5'8"? When he states he is 6 ft and even fellow actor George Clooney have described him as 6'1". If next to AJ he is almost her height, then we have a serious short leading man, lying about his height, and I know he looks waaaay taller than Tom Cruise. talllady says on 14/Jan/10
To Jane, Gillian Anderson is wearing shoes that add height not only to the heel in back, but look at the front of the shoe. Those are very thick in the front and would add a few inches alone. AJ is also not standing totally straight in the pics, either. Look closely. talllady says on 14/Jan/10
FYI, her father Jon Voight is listed as 6' 3". Genetics play a part in the height of the offspring. talllady says on 14/Jan/10
Alex2, she is standing next to a man in the pic, and is almost his height, aside from the fact that she is somewhat bending in the pic. In MANY pics, next to many men, she is almost the same height, does not look at all short. I highly doubt all these men in the pics on the movie sets are like 5'6" or short, they look to be fairly tall men, around 6ft (like Brad. The one pic where she is getting out of a SUV she is standing next to what I believe is a body guard (he appears in many other pics opening the door for her). NOW tell me that a body guard they would hire would be short, sorry, I am sure he is close to 6ft, his build indicates that in the pic. AJ is a very thin and small framed 5'7". Face it ppl, she is close to the height that many websites say she is and that would be 5'7". Someone else mentioned an article pointing out it stating that she was malnourished at 109 pounds. This is VERY INDICATIVE that she is tall, not short. Sarah says on 14/Jan/10
you're wrong... personally i don't hope she's short...since i'm a big fan and i suppose, unfortunately, that i'll never meet her, i'm just trying to imagine how she can be in person... that's all... Sarah says on 14/Jan/10
OK, What I need to know, is why are people more accepting of Angie being short than tall. People secretly wish that she is a shorty. Talllgirl thanks for the pics. And I
K, Whoopi is not 164 she is much taller. check out the magazine "world", she was listed as the tallest woman in Hollywood in 1987. You are retards. You must be 5'2 that's why you are acting like this. K says on 14/Jan/10
I have just seen Girl interrupted. Whoopi Goldberg and Angleina have the same height in the movie. Whoopi G. is 164 cm. (Angelina wears heels) Alex2 says on 14/Jan/10
This photo will put everything to rest.
Click Here
Now tell me how on earth she's 5'8" talllady says on 13/Jan/10
Click Here
this is a tall woman standing next to her tall husband. anything else is fabricated.
Click Here
Look at the shoes, Brad has thick heels on, if anyone wanted to say she is close to his height because she's waering heels, look at his heels. talllady says on 13/Jan/10
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
pretty tall next to all the men standing in these shots, as well as many other pics. She has to be at least 5'7".
Click Here
again, next to Brad, seems tall to me, being that Brad is 6ft tall. talllady says on 13/Jan/10
Click Here
shopping carts are a standard height, look at Brad and where the cart handle meets the belly button/lower torso area, look at where Angelina meets teh top of the cart, folk if she was only 5' 4"/5' 5" she would be shorter next to the cart. |
