|
Alex says on 6/Nov/09
Her heels are like a half inch to an inch taller than Stefani's. Plus stefani is slouching a bit. Angelina's always standing so straight which makes her look taller all the time. W/e I'm sticking to her being between 5'6" and 5'7"
squirt76 says on 6/Nov/09
The Joile/Stefani photo is hilarious. Check out their friggin' heels! Both of these women are notorious for wearing sky-high heels, especially Gwen. Looks like Jolie's heels are a little higher making her seem a little taller; regardless, I do not think that either of them are over 5'6" and perhaps as low as 5'5". AND they probably both wore those heels anticipating that the other would be wearing big heels, in order to ensure that they wouldn't appear shorter--I just think it's funny how women in Hollywood seem to plan these things. :-) Sam says on 5/Nov/09
Same height! Sorry in this picture she is at least 1,5 inch taller than stefani. Anonymous says on 4/Nov/09
She is the same height (or half inch taller) than Gwen Stefani.
Click Here Alex says on 3/Nov/09
Look she's probably 5'8" with shoes. So 5'6" to 5'7" is most likely her height. Linds says on 25/Oct/09
Angelina probably really is 5 ft 6 because in this picture Click Here with Jack Black, Jolie is only a little taller than 5 ft 6 Black and she's wearing pretty high heels! mimi says on 20/Oct/09
Vegas, you picked a terrible picture...Gwyneth is significantly behind Pitt, of course she's going to look smaller. Although there are a lot of misleading pics out there, the ones where they are side by side, on level ground, etc...are the best. I believe that a series of photos like those can definitely give you an idea how tall someone is. Vegas says on 20/Oct/09
so we are saying paltrow can't look short in photos with pitt, i would be willing to bet paltrow has heels on there given its the oscars Click Here not a huge difference between that and this for example Click Here show those two photos to anyone and they would say that 5'4.5 aniston is about an inch or so shorter than 5'9 paltrow
photos suck in determining or estimating height Samuel Anderton says on 18/Oct/09
who cares, How much is Palthrow's height here!...
We are in a discussion of Angie's height. She said 5 ft 8, New York magazin 5 ft 8, Mr. and Mrs. Smith Wallpaper from 2005 says 5 ft 8.
And i can say ya, if it is an exaggerating, tell me or show me a strong information or proof! shortgirl says on 18/Oct/09
I don't know why my last comment have NOT been posted because all I did was put the link of the article with Liev. Lots of people put links here to photos and videos??? Not sure why that is a taboo.
Anyway, let's clarify here. Liev Schreiber did NOT say Jolie was short at 5'8. He said she was shorter than he expected. THAN the writer of the article when on to describe Jolie as 5'8 and Schreiber as 6'3. My problem with the 5'8 number is that it is a Hollywood fabrication (i.e. the wallpaper) so it is no surprise that the writer took the fictional 5'8 number. She is shorter than Paltrow and Heigl who are established 5'8 women (or something like 5'8).
Photos and videos are not perfect but they are better proof than Hollywood marketing. The Hollywood stuff should not be taken as official information. It is as real as hair dye and silicone implants. I can take a picture of myself and write 5'7 on the corner as well. Or look, "Here I am, 5'7, in front of the White House." shortgirl says on 17/Oct/09
Liev Schrieber did NOT say Jolie was 5'8. He said she was a lot shorter than expected. The writer of the article, who probably never met Jolie, said Jolie was 5'8 which is how she is marketed. Click Here
It is funny the second paragraph is filled with compliments as if he knew he said something he shouldn't have and was trying to make up for it.
I also find it interesting he would mention height of all things. Just like any human, she is bound to have numerous flaws and lots of good qualities too. Why highlight the height issue? He's a tall guy. Isn't he use to seeing lots of shorter people?
Why in the world would a wallpaper of a movie list the actor's height? That just seems very strange. Is that common case now? Sounds like some major marketing engine churning along. I will say I have no doubt Jolie is at least 5'8 and probably taller in heels.
Again, I agree that it is very difficult to judge a person's height within an inch based on photos. There is all sorts of factors that can cause someone to lose small amounts of height. But the photo (and videos too) should give you a sense of how tall someone is when comparing with other actresses of the "same" height standing next to the same people (Pitt and Ripa). And no way is Jolie in the same league as Paltrow and Heigl (height wise). Samuel anderton says on 15/Oct/09
LIEV SCHREIBER has said that he was glad to find his perfect Salt co-star Angelina Jolie flawed. The 6-foot-3 star revealed, he had imagined the stunning beauty to be tall, but was happy to find her short at 5-foot-8.
“She’s a lot shorter than I thought she would be, but I was pleased by that. I’m happy there was a flaw,” the New York Daily News quoted the actor as saying. Samuel anderton says on 13/Oct/09
Appearance in a photo with another celebrities is not a proof for someone's height, but in Mr. and Mrs. Smith wallpaper, on the left corner below of the wallpaper, beautifully printed Angie's height of 5 ft 8. I saw it in 2005. If it would be an exaggerate, it would be better, if you could find an official information to prove about her height. shortgirl says on 12/Oct/09
Here are some questions for those who insist Jolie is 5'7 or 5'8:
Gwyneth Paltrow is often listed as 5'9 although there is some evidence she may be a little bit less than that. A 5'7 or 5'8 Jolie would be very similar to Paltrow in height. An inch or so is not going to look so different. Think about the two of them. Do they really appear to be the same height next to Pitt (by the way, someone posted a really good photo of Paltrow and Pitt barefoot on Pitt's section of this site)? As someone mentioned below, Jolie appears to the same height as Aniston next to Pitt, perhaps a little bit more but not much more.
Another question, please look at the Ripa/Jolie video clip someone put below. I have mentioned this as well the photos with Jack Black and Ellen before but no one claiming Jolie is 5'7/5'8 has commented on it. Explain to me how Jolie looks only 1-2 inches taller than Ripa in similar sized-heels. Megan Fox who is listed 5'4 was on Regis and Kelly. She and Ripa were wearing similar height heels and Megan Fox was taller than Ripa by about the same amount Jolie was to Ripa. I get the feeling Jolie is one of those people with so-so posture sometimes. On the red carpet, she is standing nice and straight but perhaps in more casual circumstances, she may not be standing as straight. So I wouldn't say she is 5'4 like Megan Fox but I don't think she is much taller. And unless she is bent over like the Hunchback of Notre Dame, I can't believe she lost 4 inches.
Katherine Heigl was recently on Regis and Kelly. There is ample evidence she is 5'8. Lately, the claim is 5'9 but again, one inch is not going to make a gigantic difference. Heigl was so much taller than both Regis and Kelly. Now that is a 5'8 woman! She was wearing big heels but so was Ripa. Compare that video to the Jolie/Ripa one.
Wouldn't it be nice if someone can get a photo of Jolie with Patrow or Heigl! Isabel says on 10/Oct/09
No she's 5'7" to 5'8" Star says on 9/Oct/09
Cat I am on your side. People take it way too personally when you tell them celebrities are shorter than they claim. Heaven forbid a celebrity is actually the same height as you. I guess people like to live under this illusion.
You cant be honest with people or they label you as jealous. But I guess they need to believe this. Maybe they dont want to face the fact that the person they worship is just like them. Maye it upsets them that if these people are just like them then any of us could be up there and since we arent as rich or famous they NEED to believe that its because we're not as tall or gorgeous. It just makes dealing with reality easier for some people. Samuel anderton says on 8/Oct/09
I've heard she said she was 5 ft 8 on telly. I think around 1.70 maybe at least 1.70 ya 5 ft 7. shortgirl says on 6/Oct/09
Don't be so upset, Cat. If it makes you feel any better, you have opened up my eyes. Saying a celebrity is shorter than he/she really claim to be isn't always about putting someone down or about being jealous. Some people find this site trivial or silly but I feel it is about tearing down the illusion of perfection that Hollywood and the Beauty Industry have been selling us. And we, women esp., absorb it consciously and sub-consciously. Some of these lies are the star's own ego, some advice from managers, agencies, etc. chambao says on 6/Oct/09
A friend of mine saw Angelina closely during her UNHCR trip in Kosovo, she sad that Angelina is tall around 1.70 cm.She even took a pic with her. chambao says on 6/Oct/09
My friend saw Angelina during a visit of hers for UNHCR,she told me that Angelina is tall,she sad that Angelina's height is probably 1.70 cm. Shaun says on 5/Oct/09
Read what I said again, "If Pitt is say 6'0 in those shoes", Barefoot I'd say Pitt is about 5'10.5" Vegas says on 5/Oct/09
if she is 5'4 why did her modelling agency list her at 5'7?? i never saw 7 inches between jolie and pitt, 7 inches shorter and the top of her head would only reach his mouth, 6 inches shorter and she would only be at his notrils Cat says on 5/Oct/09
Shaun ... you were actually making sense there until you suggested Pitt is 6'. Pitt is only ever 6' in his lifts, which are about 2" on average. So really he is probably about 5'10" flat (which is what many argue). You said though that he has normal shoes, which would give him, what? 1", so let's assume he's 5'11", take away the 6-7", and you have a 5'4-5" AJ. Thank you.
Please don't try to convince me that Pitt is 6' in "normal" shoes .... PLEEEEASSE! I personally think he is between 5'9-10" flat. Shaun says on 4/Oct/09
Recent pics of Pitt and Jolie in Syria Pitt towers above her. He seems to be wearing normal shoes and she is in flip flops and he looks 6-7 inches taller. If Pitt is say 6'0 in those shoes which he looks, Jolie must be 5'5" or 5'6". Cat says on 3/Oct/09
Original, I agree Pitt is about 5'10" flat (possibly 5'9") but even at 5'10" he is not only 4" taller than AJ flat foot, more like 5-6" taller, making AJ 5'4-5".
Why do I insist on this? Because it is common knowledge that actors are ALWAYS shorter than they claim, and they are often surprisingly shorter than we expect them to be. Ample photos provide enough evidence to suggest that AJ is potentially only 5'4" and very few provide evidence to suggest she's more than 5'5". Please don't give me promotional posters or photo shoots (that have been doctored and enhanced) to tell me that she's definitely 5'6" or more. Look at the candid photos casually in the street, etc. They are the proof that at least casts a shadow of a doubt.
But you are not even willing to accept that it's possible. Cat says on 3/Oct/09
Here is something to think about ... if AJ is more than 5'5" and more like 5'6-8" that many of you claim, why is it, assuming they wear roughly the same height shoes (and if anything AJ wears higher shoes) that AJ and Aniston both look to be the same height against Brad Pitt? If Aniston is 5'4" (as listed here and she claims, or almost 5'5") why wouldn't AJ be the same? Taking into account that Aniston is probably more like 5'2"-3", and AJ usually does wear bigger heels than Aniston, it is even more likely that AJ is in the 5'4"-5" range and less likely 5'6"-8" range.
Just think about it, guys, think abou the probability.
And for chrissake, it has nothing to do with jealousy. I would not buy 10 of my favourite AJ movies if I were jealous of her and not a huge fan. Why would I make AJ shorter because I am jealous? Is there something wrong with being 5'4"? Or even 5'2" (like me) for that matter? Because that is what you are saying when you say I must be jealous.
No, NOT JEALOUS of AJ, LOVE AJ. But just don't think she's taller than 5'5". End of story.
Why does disputing an actor's height have to mean you must be jealous? How ridiculous and unfair.
I dispute Gwyneth's height, Aniston's height, Lopez's height, Witherspoon's height, Ellen's height ... I dispute Eastwood's height, Pitt's height, Clooney's height, Damon's height, Hoffman's height, De Niro's height, wow I must be one sad, jealous little person. Shoot, I thought that is what this site is about - DISPUTING HEIGHTS, DEBATING CELEBRITY HEIGHTS.
WHY? BECAUSE I THINK THEY ALL LIE! I DON'T CARE WHAT THEIR RESPECTIVE HEIGHTS ARE IT JUST ANNOYS ME THAT THEY BS ABOUT IT. WE KNOW WHY THEY BS ABOUT IT, BUT IT DOESN'T MAKE IT LESS ANNOYING.
I have enjoyed not being on this site for the past 3 months or whatever it has been and don't intend on making a habit of frequenting this site again. Because it's like talking to a brick wall. None of you want to see reason or logic, you just want to insist the actors are the height they claim and claim everyone must be jealous if they dispute it, you have no solid proof or anything to back up your claim, except for model agency websites and promotional posters.
For chrissake! Anonymous says on 3/Oct/09
All you people who claim AJ is 5'7"-8" barefoot have to prove that she is 5'10"-11" in heels and even up to 6' (if she's 5'8" barefoot) when she wears her 5"ers . GOOD LUCK! Even at 5'6" you would need to prove she is 5'9"-10" in heels and 5'11" in her 5"ers maximum. Again, good luck.
Now proving she is 5'7"-8" in heels is more feasible and a maximum of 5'9" in her 5"ers (5'5" barefoot and giving 4" in actual height), which would make her anywhere between 5'4" and 5'5".
What the hell is the matter with you people? Stop insisting she's more than 5'5" and start actually proving it. Anonymous says on 3/Oct/09
All you people who claim AJ is 5'7"-8" barefoot have to prove that she is 5'10"-11" in heels and even up to 6' (if she's 5'8" barefoot) when she wears her 5"ers . GOOD LUCK! Even at 5'6" you would need to prove she is 5'9"-10" in heels and 5'11" in her 5"ers maximum. Again, good luck.
Now proving she is 5'7"-8" in heels is more feasible and a maximum of 5'9" in her 5"ers (5'5" barefoot and giving 4" in actual height), which would make her anywhere between 5'4" and 5'5".
What the hell is the matter with you people? Stop insisting she's more than 5'5" and start actually proving it. maclochlainn says on 26/Sep/09
Dont know if this helps.
Check out Click Here and look for bus stop poster for mr and mrs smith. Linke says on 22/Sep/09
wasn't khan listed 5'8.5 on tusseds...Bs Vegas says on 22/Sep/09
khan is in his socks getting measured, there is shoes on the waxwork Click Here
i never said pitt was 6ft, i said the pitts waxwork was ~6ft IN SHOES, big difference
forget about trying to estimate womens heel height, there ain't many women wearing 5-6 inch heels on the red carpet despite what you think, this is a large heeled shoe and it gives just over 3 inches to the wearer Click Here rob piece on high heels is informative Click Here i also cannot make out jolies heels at cannes, this year she had a long dress covering her shoes
jolies modelling agency clearly states 5'7, so she is that or very close to it, robs 5'6.5 is probably spot on Original says on 21/Sep/09
5'6 for me. Brad is 5'10. samuel anderton says on 21/Sep/09
Everyone get measured by Madame Tusseaud! They don't make any figure without measure! Unless Angelina Jolie wants it, Madame tusseaud's workers HAVE TO measure her! Star says on 19/Sep/09
Shortgirl is right. The wax museum thing is not any kind of proof. Even if Celine Dion stood next to her statue and they were the same height, Celine was probably wearing heels that day. So if they made the statue to be the height she told them and wore bigger heels then she'd be the same length as the statue.
I know people who have met Jolie and they said she is a very tiny woman. I have never met her myself but when i do I will give you the lowdown for sure.
As for bone loss, I have definitely seen people in my family get shorter over the years without having fractures or the other symptoms mentioned so I dont understand how that happens if it doesn't cause ur height to decrease. shortgirl says on 17/Sep/09
I am sure some celebs will get measured and they are fine with their height, size, whatever. However, there are probably just as many who won't. Can you honestly tell me someone like Jennifer Lopez or Sylvester Stallone will stand barefoot on the floor and let someone measure them???
In the Salman Khan video, he is wearing shoes. Can he possibly be the only one?
In the Carrie Underwood photo, the real Carrie is wearing bigger heels than the statue Carrie but they are roughly the same height. Susan Lucci looks smaller than her statue (but could be the camera angle). What height are we talking about? Height with shoes?
Vegas - many would argue Pitt is 6 feet. but okay, you say Pitt's figure is ~6 feet. In the photo from Febylondon, Pitt's statue is still 2 inches taller than Jolie's statue. What type of shoes was the Jolie statue wearing? 3, 4, 5, or 6 inches? The going heel height now for all female celebs seem to be 5 or 6 inches on the red carpet. 3-4 inches if they are being "casual." If you take a look at the 2009 Cannes photos, the real Jolie/Pitt height difference look the same as the statues in that photo...Jolie is wearing 5-6 inch heels. Hard to tell with Pitt as we can't really see the inside of his shoe but he is probably getting some sort of lift though I doubt he can get away with 3 inch lifts.
Take a look at the photos, videos others have provided below. If Jolie is 5'8, then please:
1) Prove that Brad Pitt is 6'2-3 with shoes
2) Explain how Jolie in 3-4 heels is only slightly taller (2 inches or less)than:
- Jack Black
- ellen
- kelly ripa(Ripa in big heels of course).
Take Kelly Ripa for example. Even the biggest heels, Ripa is probably around 5'6. Jolie should be taller than her barefoot at 5'8, Jolie should be half a head taller in 3 inch heels. Look at the video. Jolie is not much taller.
Those are my reasons for doubting 5'8. samuel anderton says on 16/Sep/09
I say again, Always exact Height must be measured by the making of a statue, because A statue figure is an ACCURATE COPY of the Actors, artists and so...
One strong proof is that Celine Dion was in Madame Tusseaud next to her Statue and they were in same Height!
A statue figure is not made without exact measure of persons! Vegas says on 16/Sep/09
here is salman khan getting measured by madame tussauds Click Here there was another video on youtube of Orlando Bloom getting measured exactly the same way but its since been removed, in tussauds itself there is a video showing beyonce getting measured, regarding the tussauds figures, brad pitts figures stands ~6ft in shoes, it was identical to my height
here is a piece on measurement Click Here
the figures are the same height as the real person
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here shortgirl says on 16/Sep/09
It's a statue, people! Not the actual person...
How do you know they measure the celebrity? I tried to find info. on the internet on how these figures are made but did not find any. Is that what the museum claims?
I find it hard to believe any A-list star (not just Jolie) would let themselves be measured that way.
And the Jolie statue does look 5'8 in the photo but in real life, Jolie never comes up as high on Pitt unless she is wearing 5 inch heels. Was the statue wearing heels? Did you take off the statue's shoes to measure its length?
Strong proof would be if you took a measuring tape and measured Jolie (the actual person).
Ask yourself, if Jolie is 5'8, in 5 inch heels (gives 4 inches) and Pitt is still at least 2-3 taller, how tall is Pitt (in his shoes, lifts, whatever)? You are telling me Pitt is 6'2-6'3? Those are some shoes/lifts! samuel anderton says on 15/Sep/09
Thanx Febylondon, that is a strong proof and it is a strong information what you give us. They always measure before they make the wax statue, ALWAYS EXACT HEIGHT must be measured,
Thank you again.
I know that Angelina is 5 ft8. febylondon says on 14/Sep/09
well i can see angelina is definitely 5'8 in height...i have photos of angelina and brad pitt..ive been in madame tussauds in london and they measure angelina's exact body measurement including height before making wax statue for her...
Click Here mno says on 9/Sep/09
That's from her modelling agency. Aimee says on 30/Aug/09
You guys do realize that Brad wears lifts to the events when he goes with Angie in heels... are any of you taking that into account? Dr. Height says on 30/Aug/09
@Star
There are two kinds of bone loss, Osteomalacia and Osteoporosis. Vitamin D is related to the former, while the later is more related to hormones and calcium intake during early adulthood, but manifests after menopause.
BOTH conditions do not affect height directly. Osteoporosis leads to shortning when Vertebral fractures occur, and Osteomalacia may lead to height defect when it causes leg bowing and kyphosis. Neither are seen in Jolie.... Max G. says on 28/Aug/09
God, I thought Angelina Jolie is at least 5'7" but she definately looks taller than 5'6.5" squirt76 says on 24/Aug/09
All I know is that Jenn Aniston comes up to the same height in heels as Jolie does. Now, Jolie ALWAYS wears big heels at events and stills comes up to the same height on Brad as Jenn used to (top of her head just hits the top of his nose.) Jenn admits that she is only 5'4" so I bet Jolie isn't much taller than that. Star says on 20/Aug/09
Honestly people I think she was possibly 5'6- 5'7 a few years ago but has suffered from bone loss and is now 5'4. She IS really unhealthy and bone loss begins at 35 (shes 34). So take into account that she doesn't get vitamin d from the sun or proper nutrition and her bone loss may have sped up over other peoples. Three years ago she wasn't that much shorter than Brad (who i agree with the general consensus is 5'9- 5'10 and 6 feet in lifts) and in the recent pics of Inglorious ****s premiere she was wearing four inch heels and he still looks much taller than her. He would have had to have four inch lifts to be equal to her in shoes advantage!!! I don't think men can get away with 4'' lifts and have it not be noticed.
So my only explanation is that the woman must have shrunk. Lydia says on 19/Aug/09
My cousin used to work for St. John, and said that she saw Angelina once, barefoot... at about 5'6 tall. Lee says on 14/Aug/09
pretty good pic Alex although in that kind of setting the ground is uneven so it would be hard to see the exact difference. And if you look closely it looks like brad is standing a bit lower than angelina Alex says on 14/Aug/09
Here's a pic of Angelina and Brad pretty much barefoot and with good posture.
Click Here
You can see there's quite a bit of height difference between the two... D123 says on 13/Aug/09
Cat:
You claim to have studied photography. I don't know how true that is. You can't go around, posting pix of Jolie, saying, she doesnt have the body of a person who is taller than 5'5''. WHY? A person might be 6 feet with short, stumpy limbs, a big head and look way shorter than 6 feet. It's about proportions. There are models who are 5'8'' but look 6"2'' or so on their own. There are girls who are 5'2'' but look way taller in pictures. D123 says on 13/Aug/09
Cat is insanely obsessed with AJ's height and wanna feel less intimidated by AJ by thinking, "oh, she's not much taller than me." Her complimenting AJ's looks is just a way of her trying to throw us off so we won't just brush her off saying, "oh, she's just jealous". It's her attempt to look credible. D123 says on 13/Aug/09
Cat:
DOug said AJ would still be hot if she were 5'1''. He did not say she would not but you misread and told the guy off. D123 says on 13/Aug/09
Cat:
DOug said AJ would still be hot if she were 5'1''. He did not say she would not but you misread and told the guy off. Anonymous says on 11/Aug/09
LookAlike: What are you doing on this site then? anon says on 11/Aug/09
why are you on this site if you don't care??? LookAlike says on 9/Aug/09
who cares it's not like your gonna meet AJ, she wears a size 9-9/12 shoe and is 5'6 1/2 I met her years ago before GIA was released sat right nect to her at a club on Sunset, why does her height matter are you ring shopping > then let it alone! kirsty says on 7/Aug/09
she might be looking pretty tall , I think she has 168 or 169 , she seems to have this height . Doug says on 4/Aug/09
On holiday Cat? Where is everybody? Doug says on 30/Jul/09
Squirt76 I agree, she looked about 2.5 inches shorter. 5'5.5" is my estimate. squirt76 says on 30/Jul/09
Just watched Gia again last night. Jolie doesn't appear to be any taller than 5'6". Next to 5'8" Elizabeth Mitchell, Jolie looks about 2-3 inches shorter. Samuel Anderton says on 28/Jul/09
In Iraq pictures, Angelina always looks taller lots of Women and Men there, both have the same boots. Those pictures are the strong proofs and I think, Angelina is at least 5 ft.7! She is a tall woman for an american woman and she always said before she was 5 ft.8! If it is an exaggerating what she said, I can say 5 ft.7! Anonymous says on 28/Jul/09
Look at the photos of her in Iraq. She's taller than any woman there, end taller than many men. She wears boots. I don't think she's just 5 ft. 6.5. Anyway, if she is, to me is the perfect height, for a perfect and gorgeous woman. Jessi says on 27/Jul/09
I'm 5'6.5", exactly, 110 lbs, and in 2003 or 2004 I stood next to her on an elevator at the Mandalay Bay. I was wearing heels and she was in flats, carrying Maddox, and I was at least 4 inches taller than her. I was towering over her - she was tiny compared to me. She, definitely, is not taller than 5'6.5" I would say she's shorter. In fact I know she is. Doug says on 25/Jul/09
BMN, Jolie wears 4 inch heels. She was at least 4 inches shorter than 6'-6'1" Clint Eastwood. Show me once example of her ever looking 5'11" in heels LOL!! Doug says on 25/Jul/09
At least 5'7? If that is so Brad Pitt is at least 6'1"? Mmm, yes thats very likely. Bill Clinton is almost 6'6" then. BMN says on 25/Jul/09
Those of you who are claiming that Jolie is only 5'4" or 5'5" are wrong, and I have no idea how you came to that conclusion. I've seen the woman in person a few times. I am 5'3" and she towers above me in her ballet flats. She is AT LEAST 5'7". Doug says on 24/Jul/09
Good point. Interestingly Clooney was only about 3 inches taller than Ellen. Ellen at 5'6.5" and Clooney at 5'9.5" I can buy. Even if Ellen was 5'7", without heels Jolie cannot be anything above 5'6". Anonymous says on 24/Jul/09
Click Here
Check out this video of Reese Witherspoon on Ellen. No one argues that Reese is 5'2" (max by the way) as she is self-confessed 5'2" (and is listed here as 5'2") so she's a pretty good gauge. She is wearing about 4" heels, giving her about 3" in height, which would put her at 5'5". Yet Ellen is only about an inch taller than her and sometimes looks the same height. Check it out at 30-31 secs. So that would make Ellen 5'6" max. Since she always wears sneakers (say about 1"), that would make her potentially only 5'5". If we can establish a 5'5-6" flat for Ellen, we can gauge many other actors, because so many of them are on her show. In fact check out the one of Jack Black (listed as 5'6" or 5'6.5"), she is the SAME HEIGHT, take away her sneakers and she's 5'5". If Black is actually 5'7" in his sneakers that would still make Ellen 5'6" max. So 5'7" is incorrect, again height with shoes and in Ellen's case an extra inch because she's funny. Definitely 5'5-6" flat for Ellen. And Angelina Jolie with Ellen was only 1-2" taller in 4" heels as well, making Angelina 5'7-8" next to Ellen (check it out on YouTube at 18-19 secs), if you take away Angelina's shoes (3" actual height) that would make Angelina about 5'4-5". What I have been arguing all along. Good on ya Reese Witherspoon at least there's one honest actress to help gauge all others. And who is to say Reese is telling the truth? She may only be 5'-5'1" ... now wouldn't that change things again! Let's assume she's telling the truth. Doug says on 24/Jul/09
I can see Paltrow at 5'8" the very lowest.. I've seen pics of her and Chris Martin in flat footwear and he is only about 5 inches taller and he is a strong 6'1". 5'7" is too low I've seen how she looks next to legit 5'6" and she looks 2 - 3 inches taller for sure. She is too gangly to be only 5'7". She is close to 5'9" in my view. Anonymous says on 24/Jul/09
I don't have time right now to do this but just wanted to see any comments you may have posted. I dispute that Gwyneth is 5'9", I actually think she is more like 5'7" and I have seen photos where she looks this height and she looks the same height as Brad IN HEELS, when they're both flat, he seems an inch or so taller. But I'll look into this one again, because it's been a while since I've analysed photos of the two of them :) Back soon. Doug says on 23/Jul/09
In a lot of old pics Pitt actually looks 3 inches taller than Paltrow. That's odd. Was he wearing lifts back then too? Pitt actually doesn't look under 5'11" legit in some of the pics. Doug says on 23/Jul/09
Remember that Pitt was about an inch taller than 5'9" Gwyneth Paltrow in one of the rare pics of him barefoot. If Paltrow is 5'9", 5'8.5" at lowest possibly then Pitt is 5'10", lowest 5'9.5". To me Paltrow has always looked a tall woman and I can't see her anything below 5'8.5" anyway. Pitt is more than 5'9" flat the lowest possible I can see for him is 5'9.5". To me though Clooney is 5'9.5" and Pitt 5'10". Doug says on 23/Jul/09
Well on looking at pics of them I'd say there is a roughly a 5 inch height difference. I'd roughly but Jolie at 5'5" and Pitt at 5'10" possibly. They are definately not a short couple and can appear on the taller side with huge footwear and because they are so thin with good posture. Interestingly proportionally they are all very similar in that the corresponence in height between men and women is 5 inches so a 6 foot man is equivalent to a 5'7" woman etc. 5'10" man 5'5" woman. Doug says on 23/Jul/09
Interestingly did you see Hoffman and Jolie's father Jon Voight in Midnnight Cowboy? You could have sworn Hoffman was only 5'4" and Voight 6'4"! Voight as I know though was a legit 6'3" in his prime but I know what you mean about Hoffman often seeming 5'4". By the looks of the photos I'd say she mostly gets 3 inches from those shoes unless she is standing with posture but definately 4 inches in the one you said. Also note the steepness of Pitt shoes, he has a 5'10" frame but they boost him up to 6'. Jolie is looking 5'5" or 5'6" in comparison more on the 5'5". Doug says on 23/Jul/09
Well he was the same height as my mother 12 years ago who was between 5'5" and 5'5.5" and was likely around 5'6"-5'6.25" in sneakers like Hoffman. She is now 60 odd and has lost a little in height so if Hoffman has also lost a little height then he is no more than 5'5" flat today. If anything though he seems to have "grown2 of late and looks more like a 5'6" guy, liftt are a possibility, but he never used to seem to wear them. Anonymous says on 22/Jul/09
Doug ... wow! Yes I can agree with 5'5". I'll find some photos where she gets 4" in height. Well I think she does (I can also accept a max of 5'10" for Brad, but I still think closer to 5'9" but let's just leave it at that). That's great that you know for sure that Dustin can't be more than 5'5"-5'5.5", it's a great gauge when you have at least one celeb's height down right, to gauge all others. Not to be cheeky, but are you sure that this did not include about 1" in sneakers? I know my sneakers give me an inch. Just a thought.
Now for some pics ...
Click Here (possibly only 3", but they are pretty high shoes, it's hard to tell)
Click Here (this might be a better angle ... you have to remember that this is the outfit she was wearing in that photo with Dustin where she looked somewhere between the same height and only a couple of inches taller, depending on the angle of the camera, so minus the shoes she would be at least the same height or an inch or two lower making a 5'6.5" Jolie totally out of the question and more like 5'4-5")
Click Here (definitely 4" here)
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here (you may dispute that some of these aren't 4" but this one is a definite 4", possibly 5")
I can find more if you like, but this should suffice, to make a point :) Anonymous says on 22/Jul/09
Doug ... wow! Yes I can agree with 5'5". I'll find some photos where she gets 4" in height. Well I think she does (I can also accept a max of 5'10" for Brad, but I still think closer to 5'9" but let's just leave it at that). That's great that you know for sure that Dustin can't be more than 5'5"-5'5.5", it's a great gauge when you have at least one celeb's height down right, to gauge all others. Not to be cheeky, but are you sure that this did not include about 1" in sneakers? I know my sneakers give me an inch. Just a thought.
Now for some pics ...
Click Here (possibly only 3", but they are pretty high shoes, it's hard to tell)
Click Here (this might be a better angle ... you have to remember that this is the outfit she was wearing in that photo with Dustin where she looked somewhere between the same height and only a couple of inches taller, depending on the angle of the camera, so minus the shoes she would be at least the same height or an inch or two lower making a 5'6.5" Jolie totally out of the question and more like 5'4-5")
Click Here (definitely 4" here)
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here (you may dispute that some of these aren't 4" but this one is a definite 4", possibly 5")
I can find more if you like, but this should suffice, to make a point :) J.J. says on 22/Jul/09
Thought she was 5'6". Still quite a good height. Doug says on 22/Jul/09
In some pics it seems ridiculous to think Pitt is anything under 5'10". In the Eastwood pics with posture he doesn't even look under 6' and can look as high as 6'1". Remember Pitt has appeared as taller than 6' Eastwood in lifts maybe tip toes? I think Pitt must be 5'10" to pull that off but then again Stallone has appeared in the 6' -6'1" range with monster lifts and posture and he is a questionable 5'9". Doug says on 22/Jul/09
Rob check out how Jolie looks next to Lucy Liu, Hoffman and Jack Black. If Lucy Liu is a 5'1" er do you see Jolie as being 6 inches taller? Doug says on 22/Jul/09
Looked at pics of her looking utterely gorgeous and pregnant in that green dress and I would bet any money she is the same height as Hoffman without heels. Lucy Liu is barely 5'1" and Angelina was only about 4 inches taller (if they are both wearing big heels) not 6 inches!!! Wow I believe you have a good argument about Jolie being 5'5" anyway. She looks as if she'd be the same height as Hoffman without heels and I swear Hoffman has never been 5'62 in his life. He was 5'5", 5'5.5" max when I saw him in flat footwear '97. So you can believe me when I say Hoffman is a 5'5"er. Only doubt though is Hoffman has been reported as looking taller of late and wearing lifts. A lot of people said he looked 5'6" in shoes. Either way I now have Jolie at 5'5"-5'5.5" IF she is getting 4 inches from her heels. Doug says on 22/Jul/09
Now Gillian Anderson is no shorter than 5'2" for sure. I think 5'2.5" for her is spot on. Doug says on 22/Jul/09
Mmm there are some pics where Clint looks 6'2" in shoes anway, Forest Whitaker is close to 6'2" and Eastwood is the same height. I'd say he is little above 6' without shoes maybe 184cm. If you work out the height difference and take away the heels I think it points to Angelina being 5'5". I think a flat 5'4" is definately a little low but I don't think she is much more than 5'5" anymore, not over 5'6" anyway, how she looks next to Hoffman has ruled that one out as I've met been within inches of Hoffman and know exactly how tall he is. Doug says on 22/Jul/09
Clint Eastwood is 6'1" in shoes MAX compared to 6'4.5" Tim Robbins today. Robbins who is close to a legit 6'5" has 5 inches on Clint today. I'd say he is a flat 6' today. Now Jolie was what, 4 inches shorter than him in heels? So that puts her around 5'8" or 5'9" in heels which I believe she looks in her best heels. Now take away the 4 inches that she supposedly gains from footwear and you have the answer. Well it points to 5'4"-5'5" range without them, even that adds up to what you claim. Could you find me some pics of her footwear and when she gains as much as 4 inches? Doug says on 22/Jul/09
So I can safely say that Hoffman is roughly a 5'5"-5'5.5" guy. This also adds up in relation to him and Tom Cruise. Wow I've just checked out the pics, and Hoffman is 5'5.5" MAX and she is in heels? How could she possibly be 5'6.5" then?? Doug says on 22/Jul/09
No worries, I also don't like to argue with you either. I agree Pitt and Jolie are not as tall without the inflated Hollywood footwear. I don't think Brad is a really small guy, he is notably taller than even average height blokes like Mel Gibson etc in lifts or whatever he wears but he is certainly light of frame. Seeing him in flat footwear or barefoot I'd say he has the frame of a 5'9"-5'10" guy if he drops his shoes and posture but his build with good footwear can give a 6' impression. If you see photos of Pitt where he isn't trying to look tall and does not realise he is being photographed he looks shorter than normal, don't know if you noticed. In his boots I think it is out of the question he is anything under 5'10", otherwise Me Gibson would be 5'7". In flat footwear about 5'10-5'10.5" maybe but definately not in the "boots". I think he may have been around 5'10" in the Clinton pics as 6'1" Clinton was wearing massive cowboy boots. He does appear at least 6' in boots as witnessed by our Frank2 who works in the industry. I think you are about an inch too low with your estimates, I'm pretty sure Pitt is nearer 5'10" than 5'9". Dustin Hoffman, Woody Allen and Christopher Lloyd (The Doc) are the only American celebs I've seen and I can say that Hoffman back in 1997 was about the same height as my mother who is a little over 5'5" and wearing sneakers like him. He jogged past us in Carmel and he looked to be in the 5'5"-5'5" range. Definately not 5'6" but definately taller than 5'4" too. Anonymous says on 22/Jul/09
Click Here
Angelina with a 5'5" possibly 5'4" Hoffman, and we know in these photos, she is wearing 3-4" Christian Louboutins and Hoffman is in sneakers. When are we getting this downgrade to 5'5" for AJ???
Why is everyone still disputing that Angelina is taller than 5'5"? Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
Doug says on 7/May/09
Jane has a point. Gillian Anderson is a weak 5'3" (without her bigger wedges) but if we take away the heels for both Jolie only looks about 2.5 inches taller in that picture. She looks more of a 5'5"er in that picture if you take away the heels. I'll admit that Jolie has often give a 5'5"er impression but I think she's a flat 5'6". A lot of people think she is a lot taller though for sure.
If AJ is 5'6.5, plus the 2" shoes she's wearing, would make her 5'8.5", given that she is only about 2" taller than Gillian here, that would make Gillian 5'6.5", take away her 3" wedges, would make her about 5'3", which is absolute BS since Gillian is more like 5' - 5'1" flat NOT 5'3". Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
What did everyone make of the pic of AJ with Gillian Anderson ... that one is a sure beauty in proving AJ can't be more than 5'5" and possibly 5'4" because there is no freakin' way, Gillian is 5'3" flat. I am sorry, but she is not taller than me. Her arm length is like a child's which is why coats always look so huge on her and she always has trouble finding sleeve length to fit her. I DON'T HAVE THAT PROBLEM AT 5'2", why would she have that problem at 5'3"??? I don't have long arms either, in fact on the shorter side, unlike Miss Jolie. Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
Sorry, Doug, just one more thing. I meant to add, that photo yes, of AJ and Pitt facing the camera where there is a distinct 6" between them. Pitt, yes potentially in boots, but why isn't it possible for him to be 5'10" in his boots (giving him about an inch from 5'9") and AJ flat, 5'4"??? In any event, we cannot see there shoes so it's a hard one, but you can't deny a 6" difference, and it is highly unlikely that Brad is wearing "lifts" and AJ wearing heels, given the circumstances and where they are. Surely they can leave their egos at the door in their humanitarian pursuits? At most, they would both have 1" height advantage with footwear in that circumstance and there's a 6" difference, so I think 5'4" for AJ and 5'9" for Pitt is looking pretty likely. But ... I'll accept a downgrade to 5'5". Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
Doug, honestly dude, last post to you personally ... first of all, I did quote you as saying Clinton is 6', which is incorrect, you did say 6'1", so I apologise for that. Secondly, you've come a long way in accepting Jolie may be 5'5.5" and Pitt is 5'9.5" as opposed to your initial claims of 5'6" and 5'11" respectively. Thirdly, I have posted ample pics of Jolie with others. You do not need to see her with others to assess her physique and that she does not have the physique of a 5'6" or whatever woman, but 5'4-5" indeed.
I believe Jolie to be 5'4" and Pitt to be 5'9" and until I am standing next to them all of us barefoot and I am proven wrong, I will stand down.
I'm sorry I p***ed you off so much Doug, I didn't mean to. I'm just pretty adamant that AJ is not taller than 5'5". My personal trainer says he is 6' or just under ... and he looks it, in fact I thought he might have been taller. Brad Pitt looks nowhere near as tall as my personal trainer, even in his lifts. I know that's not the best way to assess things, but you look at pics of Brad and he's just small, small, small, just like Jolie. Doug says on 21/Jul/09
In that photo you posted before where there is a 6 inch height difference it is obvious Pitt is in his "boots" while Jolie is wearing flat footwear. So Pitt appears as around 6', Jolie roughly 5'5.5" or 5'6". Cat it isn't much good posting pics of Angelina without having anything to compare it to. Doug says on 21/Jul/09
The thing is Cat if you see how Pitt looks next to Mel Gibson who is listed at 5'9.5" (personally I think he is 5'8.5") then you'd have a hard time arguing Pitt is anything below 5'11" as he looks very close to 6' in comparison. All I know is that Pitt has appeared anything from 5'9" -6'1", normally in the 5'10"-6' range. The only explanation is lifts but having sene Pitt and Jolie together in flat footwear I can see roughly a 4 inch height difference when Pitt is not in his "boots". Jolie at 5'5.5" Pitt at 5'9.5" would seem my best estimate barefoot anyway. He can pull off 6' with the "footwear and effect". Roughly I would have said Jolie 5'6" and Pitt 5'10" if I was giving a rough estimate but I can believe they are a little lower. 5'4" seriously though I don't think likely given that she has appeared close to 5'10" according to reports by some people who have seen her. Doug says on 21/Jul/09
Cat I said "****If**** Clinton is 6'". A lot of people think he is only 6' next to Obama and others today. Personally I think he is 6'1" but I was pondering rather that stating as he did appear an inch shorter than Obama. There is a small possibility that Pitt is 5'9" or 5'9.5" barefoot, he has looked it on several occasions and has looked nothing above average without the posture and shoes. All I know is that on the red carpet he appears as 6' in whatever footwear. Realistically I think Jolie is in the 5'5"-5'6" range. The photos I've seen of her with 5'6" or 5'7" men have indeed knocked an inch off my original estimates. I believe Jolie regularly wears 5 inch heels which give 4 inches in height, so if she is hitting 5'9" range in them as she often looks without it does indeed figure she is a 5'5"er. Granted she looked 5'5" ish max in those barefoot pics you posted, good find. But next to Cordeleeza Rice etc if you tried saying she was only 5'4" or 5'5" it would seem absurd as they were close in height. Maybe Jolie had a slight footwear advantage but she looked tall. Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
Click Here
and just one more for the fun of it ... still don't see 5'9"-10", nor long legs ... and those shoes are fairly high. Need any more convincing? Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
Click Here - again no long legs and no 5'9"-10" woman. What more do you need for a downgrade to at least 5'5"? Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
Click Here - still searching for that 5'9"-10" woman (including heels) ... can't see it. All I can see is a 5'4-5" woman with extraordinarily long arms. Anonymous says on 21/Jul/09
Again here ... Click Here ... where is this 5'9"-10" woman???? Which she would have to be if she were truly this height in 3" heels. Again ... where are the "long" legs? Anonymous says on 20/Jul/09
Click Here - I'm sorry but these are not the physiques of a 5'6.5" (barefoot) woman and a 5'10" (barefoot) man. More like 5'4" and 5'9" respectively. And where, just where, are these "long legs" of AJ's? Long arms yes, skinny legs yes, no hips yes, (all which give the illusion of being taller) but long legs ... NO WAY does she have "long" legs. Anonymous says on 20/Jul/09
Click Here - has everyone forgotten this photo? Jack Black and Dustin Hoffman are both arguably in the 5'5" range, Hoffman potentially 5'4" and Black potentially 5'6". Yet AJ is only 2" taller than Black, in 3-4" heels. Try to imagine where AJ would stand if she did not have those Christian Louboutin (3-4") on. She would definitely come below Black's height and at the same height or a little less than Hoffman, making her at the most 5'5" and more likely 5'4".
Can we please have a downgrade already!!! Anonymous says on 20/Jul/09
Ok, Doug ... whatever! I would accept 5'5" because she certainly is not 5'6.5". And as for me being a sad case, I'm no sadder than you or anyone else obsessing over this site. I prefer to sign in as Anon and have been since I looked at this site again after nearly 5 months! I posted only one post as Cat and that was to reply to someone who addressed me specifically as I wanted to thank them and for them to know who it was from. It is quite possible for De Niro to be under 5'8". Can you do me a favour and not address me personally anymore and I will do the same for you. It's good to know we can agree on a possible 5'5" for AJ. And as for the post regarding Pitt and Clinton, you specifically said "If Clinton is 6' ... there's about 4" between them ... " If you do the math, based on those figures, Pitt would have to be 5'8". I would not put him any higher than 5'9" flat.
The one thing I don't understand about the people on this site is why you are all finding it so hard to accept or believe that a lot of the Hollywood actors are shorter than they claim (2-3" shorter) and that it is a well known fact that they BS about their height. It's a perceived image that they must uphold. They are after a "look" so if a woman or a man has the perfect look but not quite the height, they are not going to compromise on that perfect look when they have all sorts of tricks to make them look taller, rather than find someone who is the right height, but lose that (most important) perfect look. Think about it, for chrisssakes! Doug says on 20/Jul/09
Even if De Niro was 5'7" accounting for footwear Jolie is still minimum 5'5". Doug says on 20/Jul/09
5'6.5" for De Niro? What are you smokin? De Niro is not under 5'8" and was around 5'9" at peak. Jolie looks a little taller than De Niro (who is even wearing thick boots) accounting for the odd camera angle. Take away Jolie's heels and you have the 5'6"-5'6.5". Doug says on 20/Jul/09
As for Jolie I think 5'5" is a possibility. She always wears massive heels and her build and long legs can give an illusion of a much taller woman. I do not think she is any lower than 165cm sorry but I could certainly buy 5'5.5". Personally I think she is 167cm tall. Doug says on 20/Jul/09
Cat you really are quite a sad case if you sign as Cat and then sign as Anon to make it look like somebody else is speaking, I saw your post on Pitt's page as if it waasn't obviously you and I never said Pitt was 5'8". I said he looks 5'9" max next to Bill Clinton. I think he is 5'10", Matt Damon is 5'8.5"-5'9" NOT Pitt. I have no idea how Clinton had 4 inches on him if Pitt stands around 6' in shoes that is all. Stop trying to mince my words to justify Jolie being 5'4". Pitt mostly looks around 6' in shoes, did not look anywhere near it next to CLinton thats all I'm saying. Either CLinton is taller than the 6' or 6'1" than some people think-remember he was listed at 6'2.5"-6'3" while in office or those cowboy boots gave him extra inches or Pitt is 5'9". I personally think Pitt is 5'10" and CLinton 6'1 but Clinton gained an extra inch with his footwear. Anonymous says on 20/Jul/09
Click Here ... proof again that AJ is the same height as Robert de niro (who is potentially only 5'6.5"). AJ is wearing 3" shoes, giving maybe 2" in extra height. 5'4" plus 2" inches makes a 5'6" Angelina Jolie, thus the same height (roughly) as de Niro. It is more likely that AJ is 5'4" than it is likely de Niro is 5'8" given his height comparison to the likes of Stiller and Hoffman. Anonymous says on 20/Jul/09
I'm sorry they just keep coming ... and another one ... Click Here
I understand about camera angles and someone standing closer to the camera can appear taller, HOWEVER, Hoffman and Stiller appear to be very much the same height (isn't Hoffman listed as 5'5"? And some people argue 5'4"?) that's making for a potentially very short Stiller, bringing de Niro even closer to possibly being 5'6" and not 5'8". Because even in this photo, if de Niro were standing closer back in line with Hoffman and Stiller, I doubt he'd be 4" taller, more like maybe 1-2" taller. And he certainly didn't look 4" taller than Stiller in the photos below.
Again, AJ is the same height (more or less) as de Niro in heels, ie. 5'6" or so, so how can she be that flat (ie. barefoot?). COME ON PEOPLE WHAT DOES IT TAKE??? Anonymous says on 18/Jul/09
AlexJ, the pic you had there of AJ next to a shopping trolley ... how do you know that the woman standing next to her isn't 5' or something like that???? The point on AJ where the trolley handle bar reaches her is roughly the same as where it meets me, I'm 5'2". Cat says on 18/Jul/09
Thanks Meg. I haven't been on this site for quite some time. I agree that Jane and I have produced some pretty compelling evidence but I have given up on trying to convince this lot. I would love to see a downgrade to 5'5" (even though I think she's between 5'4" and 5'5" and closer to 5'4"), but anything lower than 5'6" would be good, because she is definitely not this.
I love AJ, I'm a huge fan so downgrading her size (for me) has nothing to do with some grudge or something or even jealousy. I just don't think she's 5'6" plain and simple. That's what this site's about. Anonymous says on 18/Jul/09
Shortgirl, hi :) ... you're right: 5'8" plus 5" (4") heels would make a woman 6' (12" in a foot). I presume you were referring to AJ here? No one is claiming she is 5'8" though (some websites maybe but not this site nor any of the people here ... surely not!?). The claim is she's 5'6.5". AJ typically wears at least 4-5" heels, giving her a height advantage of 3-4". When has she ever looked, either by herself or with others, 5'9.5"-10.5"??????? Which she would have to be if she were 5'6.5".
I don't know why people are having so much trouble accepting that she is 5'4" or close enough. As if the pic with Gillian isn't proof enough. Do all you who agree with 5'5" or greater, really think she is 5'9"-10" here next to Gillian? Gillian's shoes are not that big now. Anonymous says on 18/Jul/09
Click Here
Look at this fantastic pic again. If AJ is indeed 5'6" flat, and you took away her heels in this shot (which look about 2"), she would be roughly the same height as Gillian (Gillian still wearing her bricks here). That would make Gillian in this shot about 5'6". NO WAY! She would have to be wearing 6-7" shoes, since she is about 4'11"-5'. Please don't start arguing with me that Gillian is 5'2.5" as listed here or much over 5'. I am 5'2" and I do not look that tiny nor do I have difficult finding clothing to fit me, ie. like the sleeves! Think about it guys. AJ cannot be more than 5'4" (making her, in average heels (2-3"), the 5'6-7" that she claims and others on her behalf claim). Jane says on 10/Jul/09
thanx Meg i appreciate your comments. here is another pic and both jolie and pitt have flat footwear,with pitt it looks as though he may have a minor insole. she is at the most 5'5.
Click Here shortgirl says on 8/Jul/09
oops I did my math wrong. My comment below should be 6 feet if AJ was 5'8 in 5 inch heels...that would still make Brad Pitt ridiculously taller, like 6'2 shortgirl says on 7/Jul/09
In 5 inch heels, at 5'8, she would be 6'2 (most people agree 5 inch heels will only give you 4 inches). So Brad Pitt must be...6'4...I don't think so. I don't think interviews should be taken too seriously. If each of us had a multi-million dollar career based on an "image," most of us would fib a bit too. She certainly wouldn't be the first, last or only. Heck, most regular people fib a bit too.
Alexandra - I would be curious on your interpretation of "NOT EVEN CLOSE to 5'9" Samuel Anderton says on 6/Jul/09
According to US Magazine, Angelina Jolie has dropped to 109 pounds due to mourning her recently deceased mother.""She has confirmed her height"" On a 5 foot 8 inch frame, this leaves her looking quite thin and frail... Anonymous says on 4/Jul/09
I think 5 ft 6in is a good estimate.
Think about it: she looks about 2 inches shorter than Brad at the red carpet events. Brad is also wearing tux shoes with higher-than-usual heels btw. Those are at least 2 inch high shoes that he is wearing. That said, Angelina is wearing at least 6 inch elevated shoes, from the front and the heel. She always wears the highest shoes there is to be found.
That would make her nearly 6 ft and her object of affection 6 ft 2 in in shoes. Which sounds like the perfect math to me. So in real life, Brad is 180 and Angelina is 168.
She is a 5ft 6in woman, and every single inch of hers is sublime beyond comparison. Brad is the luckiest man in the world. Alexandra says on 3/Jul/09
I am barefoot 5'9. I've seen her in person with flats. She is NO EVEN CLOSE to 5'9. Anderson Cooper even made a comment after he interviewed her that you're expecting this larger-than-life person and she is petite. Meg says on 3/Jul/09
Cat and Jane have produced some compelling evidence to suggest that AJ is shorter than 5'6.5. They have argued their points very well and have convinced me that AJ is proably around the 5'5 mark. Seriously, the analyses of Cat and Jane are always backed by sound evidence and reasoning. I for one totally agree with them and believe that this site must downgrade AJ's height to 5'5. Doug says on 30/Jun/09
Anonymous says on 17/Jun/09
I believe Brad Pitt is 6'1" not 5'10"
Yeah LOL and Bill Clinton is 6'5". Haha google image pictures of them together. LOL. Clinton is a genuine 6'1" and he towers above Pitt. sadegh says on 28/Jun/09
Angelina is exactly 170cm meaning 5.5774.... I am not a predictor.our relative in the us had asked Angelina.my relative [my mother's cousin works in artistic part of CNN]he has had a short interview with Angelina. squirt76 says on 26/Jun/09
I think that this site is dead on the money Anonymous says on 26/Jun/09
Click Here - what do you guys think? shortgirl says on 18/Jun/09
Saw Halle Berry on Oprah several times, last time when she doing promo for Things We Lost in the Fire. She is usually 3 inches shorter than 5'7 Oprah. Both in heels and I would say Oprah's heels are high but not as high as Halle's. She is gorgeous but not 5'7 so she is not a good point of comparison.
Jennifer Lopez has also said she is 120lbs. I don't think anybody believes that so interviews don't mean much. Anonymous says on 18/Jun/09
On enews and interviews shes 5'8.5 I do not know where you people get your information from... Anonymous says on 17/Jun/09
I believe Brad Pitt is 6'1" not 5'10" Anonymous says on 16/Jun/09
Halle Berry is actually a solid 5ft7 believe it or not way taller than 5ft3 Jennifer Lopez. Angelina posed with Halle and is bigger. Beyonce is about as bigger than Halle as is Angelina. AJ may have BK by an inch or so but not much. shortgirl says on 12/Jun/09
I am sorry but I'm still not convinced AJ is solidly 5'7 or over(unless BP is much taller than we think...I probably incensed some people now!).
I have an acquaintance who is 5'7.5 and who likes to wear big heels (like AJ at events). Her husband is 5'10.5/5'11, so roughly 6 feet in shoes. In her 5 inch heels she is roughly the same height as her husband in photos. Sometimes she even looks a smudge taller in the big heels (hair is always down, never fluffy or in an updo).
If AJ and BP are close in height like my friends in their respective footwear (and I agree here that photos can be deceptive), AJ may look taller than BP in some photos and vice versa in other photos due to differences in angle, posture and tilt of the head. I have never seen a photo where AJ is taller than BP or the same height. She is always 2-4 inches shorter at these red carpet events.
I'll stick to my original estimation of 5'6/5'5.5 but am surprised that she was not much taller than Kelly Ripa in the YouTube video below. And even if she is 5'5, I wouldn't call her short. I would take 5'5 any day:) shell says on 12/Jun/09
Slender women often get called "petite" even when tall. I am 5'8 and get called that, and until standing next to me, many guess me to be shorter. In photos, I'd guess her to be about 5'7. She does not look short at all. hey hey! says on 7/Jun/09
Wow, in that pic in Cannes she stands out. Hey physically she looks better with Quentin. Her face is way bigger than Brads. Wooowww. Doug says on 6/Jun/09
Agree with Alex (once again). Jolie is roughly 5'6" 5'6.5" MAX. 5'5.5" is not out of the question. but she is definately above 5'4" folks. Anonymous says on 5/Jun/09
i would wager that it is imperative to Brad Pitt's career that she be seen as tall as possible. That allows people to believe Brad Pitt to be taller in people's minds too. squirt76 says on 26/May/09
In the picture that AlexJ posted she looks about 5'6", but no more than that. I can tell because of where her mid section comes to on the cart compared to where mine comes to (at 5'5"). She looks as though she is a bit taller than me (judging by where her waist area hits the cart handle), so I would say 5'6". Jane says on 24/May/09
What does everyone make of those pictures of Angelina and 5'2 Gillian Anderson? Angelina's height is so debatable because if you look at those pictures posted Angelina doesn't tower over a 5'2 frame. Angelina looks between 5'4.5 and 5'5, especially when she is wearing flats. AlexJ says on 24/May/09
Look at this link Click Here
She's clearly 5'6" or maybe 5'6" 1/2. That's my guess. And she's wearing flats in this pic. eagleyes says on 24/May/09
The Wax Museum in LA has her much shorter than myself at 5'5" and Brads' wax figure is only a few inches taller than me. They are shrimpy for sure! squirt76 says on 23/May/09
Anyone I've ever talked to said that they were suprised at how ahort she was because they had always believed she was atleast 5'7." I have heard reports as low as 5'4." I have a friend who is 5'6" and very slender, sometimes because she is so petite, she doesn't appear tall and it fact looks closer to my own height of 5'5". What I am saying is, that it is just as easy to mistakes a 5'6" woman for a 5'4"-5'5" woman as it is to mistake a 5'4" woman for a 5'6" woman. It all depends on shoes (duh) and the person judging the height! ha says on 21/May/09
it's funny because a lot of people say she's petite when they see her in person. I think it might be because people think pitt is like 6' but someone who met him says he wears lifts. squirt76 says on 21/May/09
5 inch heels? Huh, those must be some heels... amy says on 21/May/09
I met her in London a few months ago, she was on the red carpet and she was wearing 5 inch heels and i said to her "wow you are taller than i expected" and she said most people say that to her. I am 5ft 6.5in and i to was wearing five inch heels and she STILL towered above me. She was like an amazonian. mimi says on 21/May/09
Diane Kruger is closer to 5'5" than her listed height. Look up pictures of her and Michelle Monaghan (5'7") and Bar Rafaeli (5'9") and you will see a big difference in height.
Also, where did you see a pic of Diane's shoes at the Cannes RC? I couldn't find one where her shoes are showing? Jolie was wearing platform shoes, but Diane? Jane says on 20/May/09
My mistake Diane Kruger is listed as the same height as Angelina, both are listed as 5'6.5 however if you look at the Cannes picture Diane looks obviously taller than Jolie. Jane says on 20/May/09
Here is a pic at Cannes 2009, Diane Kruger (5'6),Quentin Tarantino and Brand and Angelina.
Diane Kruger is listed as 5'6 on this site, they are both wearing high platform heels. This pic is another clear example of why Angelina's height is so debatable.
Click Here|1&axs=0|87874683%2c87873303%2c87878991|0 Rob of Arabia says on 19/May/09
I walked by Angelia once at LAX (she was getting her bag out of the limo's trunk) and looked no taller than 5'2" - she had flat shoes on at the time. I would guess Brad is about 5'7" but hard to say with shoes, photo angles and such. Jane says on 9/May/09
yes i agree Elle, looking at the pic you posted and the one where she is pictured with Gillian Anderson who is 5.2 she definitely looks between 5'4.5 and 5.5'5 she barefoot is under 5'6.
Here is another pic of her and 5.2 Gillian Anderson where they are facing each other:
Click Here|1&axs=0|80880652%2c51634548%2c51634549|0 elle says on 9/May/09
Click Here
At this pic Angelina looks about 6in shorter than James who's listed as 6ft1 what makes her 5ft7 in shoes. The dress hides it but you can easily guess she's wearing at least 2in heels. So I guess she's 5ft5.5 barefoot at max but no shorter than 5ft4.5 Doug says on 7/May/09
Jane has a point. Gillian Anderson is a weak 5'3" (without her bigger wedges) but if we take away the heels for both Jolie only looks about 2.5 inches taller in that picture. She looks more of a 5'5"er in that picture if you take away the heels. I'll admit that Jolie has often give a 5'5"er impression but I think she's a flat 5'6". A lot of people think she is a lot taller though for sure. Jane says on 7/May/09
A pic of Angelina and Gillian Anderson together showing their footwear. Although Gillian is in platforms, Angie's heels seem to be the standard type still looking under 5'6. Heels are way more sophisticated these days giving any woman desired inches.
check out the pic:
Click Here|1&axs=0|80880652%2c51634548%2c51634549|0 Jane says on 7/May/09
Here is another excellent photo of Angelina and Gillian Anderson (5'2)
Click Here|1&axs=0|80880652%2c51634548%2c51634549|0 Marlee says on 6/May/09
Wow I thought she was like 5'10 Alex says on 3/May/09
Jolie getting skinny comments I can see, well at least before when she was more skinny. Petite and tiny dont fit her. glenn says on 29/Apr/09
oh,and mimi,she was slightly above my height,in heels.not barefoot.but sometimes heels dont give 3,4 inches.even if it looks it.thats why i know im 5-8.and i saw her on the set of salt.still looked 5-6ish. glenn says on 29/Apr/09
read the glenn page mimi.i mistook your post towards me.i respect you more now than ever.and your opinions.but i dont agree with you on jolie. Mimi says on 29/Apr/09
glenn says on 28/Apr/09
"mimi is right about mid stream pics.but she is wrong about height on jolie and myself."
Not sure what you mean by saying that I'm wrong about your height, Glenn? Rob said you got measured from 5'6.75" to 5'7.25"....wouldn't it be safe to say that you're around 5'7" then??
If so, Jolie would've seemed pretty much your same height in flats to you. It's very hard to gauge a half inch with somebody walking next to you...she most probably just would've seemed your height to you.
Also, there have been comments from off the set of Salt and again, most of them mention that she is short or much shorter than expected. I just don't believe a woman that is close to 5'7" in height would get those comments. Doug says on 29/Apr/09
Julia yes Pitt consistently gets around 2 inches or 6cm from lifts by the looks of it, occaisonally as much as 32 (in the Eastwood photo). Soemtimes he has been caught out when not wearing lifts anc barely looks 5'11" even with normal shoes on. Doug says on 29/Apr/09
Yeah Julia you see how Pitt kids people into thinking he is his desired height of 6'1"? Damon looks 5'10" Pitt looks 6'1". Julia says on 29/Apr/09
Click Here
Pitt towers over everyone. Looks like Matt Damon ist Angelinas height as well :) Julia says on 29/Apr/09
Click Here She has not the best posture. But if Pitt wears lifts always, could they not give him 6cm extra? One thing you guys sometimes get wrong. 10cm heels dont give you 10cm extra. When I wear 10cm heels i´m 177cm. so they give me 7cm extra. Maybe a little less.
I watched a movie where she acts with 19. complete diferent body. She looked taller and well trained. Maybe her peek height was 170-173cm. After giving birth to 4cildren and 20years of career she could lost some cm.
But she just looks great! glenn says on 28/Apr/09
squirt76-thats about right.but i would put pitt at 5-10 the lowest. glenn says on 28/Apr/09
mimi is right about mid stream pics.but she is wrong about height on jolie and myself. Mimi says on 28/Apr/09
Oh my goodness, are you all really basing yourselves on those pictures?? They are terrible for this purpose, they are mid-walk!! Those are incredibly deceptive. I have pictures where I look close to my boyfriend's height in mid-stride in flats and I'm 6 inches shorter than him!
I really don't think Jolie would get the "she's so short, petite, tiny" comments if she were 5'6.5"...she might get the skinny comments at that height, but not the others. She looks like a 5'5.5" woman to me, who can look tall at times and small at others. anon says on 28/Apr/09
she is 5'7 1/2 it's a well known fact! squirt76 says on 28/Apr/09
I am reformed. Glenn, in light of Julia's photos, I think you are right--5 ft 6.5 for jolie--and I think it's Pitt who is a lot shorter than people think. I would say 5'9.5 for Pitt then. Doug says on 28/Apr/09
She is only 5'2" too isn't she. I'd much a woman 5'2" and smoking like that rather than 5'11" Nicole Kidman. Kidman is attractive of course but a little too beanpole and pale for my liking. I'm sure you'll agree with me Alex that height with women is the last thing thats important and that hot women can range from 4'11" to 6'2"! Doug says on 28/Apr/09
OMG Alex YES! Kim Kardashian is EXACTLY my type. Steaming hot or what? Sexy as hell! Doug says on 28/Apr/09
In the second pic Brad is in lifts as normal, looking a good 6' to 6'1" there. Jolie's heels don't look massive but she looks like she'd be close to 5'7" without them. I would say 5'6.5" too. I'm glad to see some women on here like Julia and Anon seeing some sense as the 5'3" 5'4" claims were unbelievable. She is not under 5'6". Doug says on 28/Apr/09
Wooahh yeah you're right Julia. Thats a rare pic when both seem to be wearing flats. Jolie looks in the 5'8"-5'9" range there in flats!! She looks taller there, have no idea how she pulled that off. Brad looks no more than 5'11" there in flatter shoes. Doug says on 28/Apr/09
Julia, Brad is likely 5'10.5" without lifts. However he lives in lifts and mostly stands 6'0-6'1" as you see him. If you check out the pics with Eastwood it is obviously she is in the 5'6"-5'7" range as in heels she is 5'9"-5'10". Julia says on 27/Apr/09
ähm how tall is Brad? I am 170cm and I think that I dont look as tall as she does here. Click Here I think she could hit the 170cm Click Here
and shorter than 169cm NEVER! Alex says on 27/Apr/09
Doug, my type varies. Of course I like lean women but not too skinny where it sickly. If they're naturall skinny its ok. But I also like girls who are average framed or a bit thicker like Kim Kardashian too. Anonymous says on 26/Apr/09
5'6" is a good number.
She is always in 4 inch heels, usually with big hair, and still shorter than Brad. With 4 inch heels, she would come close to 5'10" and Brad is a solid 5"11' - I think. He is also wearing higher-than-usual heel-ed Tom Ford dress shoes on the red carpet nowadays, and looks about 3 inches taller than that goddess of a woman.
5'6" sounds about right. Alex says on 26/Apr/09
Mimi, I am not saying you but random people who come onto this site and just claim Jolie at 5'3-5'5 and dont post again I think are trolls. glenn says on 24/Apr/09
mimi-she had heels on.im bad at judging womens height in general.but i examined her for a week,and she seemed 5-6.5 to my probably 5-7.25,5-7.5.depending on when i woke.which was probably late.i know a girl thats 5-6.5,5-7.and thats what angie looked to me in heels. Doug says on 24/Apr/09
Yep Jolie will never be plump for sure. She is a very athletic fit women, a female action hero. I'm not fond of fat women LOL but I prefer a women to be curvy and fuller looking. Beyonce in my view is a very sexy woman, she has an amazing body but is far from skinny. Mimi says on 23/Apr/09
Glenn, so Jolie was a half inch close to your height in flats?? Alex says on 23/Apr/09
Doug, yea depends on the body type. Jolie just doesn't look good skinny like that. Shes never been plump at all but her more athetlic build is nicer. Girls like Alyssa Milano, Jessica Alba, Megan Fox can look good thinner.
Jane, thanx again. I am also on the Kurt Angle page and you may have seen me on Rob's page. Akshay says on 23/Apr/09
Think 5-6.5 is pushing it a lot..she did not look this tall in changeling..may be she is in the 5-6 land glenn says on 22/Apr/09
brad is right. Doug says on 22/Apr/09
Yeah I much prefer a fuller looking Jolie. Not a fan of the skeleton look on any woman. In fact I'd rather Jolie to be more on the plump side than rake thin! Jane says on 22/Apr/09
btw Alex i saw a pic of you on Alyssa Milano's page and you are hot!!! Jane says on 22/Apr/09
There are many people posting on Brad Pitts height and there are a ton of pics with proof of him being totally in the 5'10 range and i am sure the posters making those assumptions are not trying to make them self's feel better. They are observing and trying to get down the right height. I have seen enough pics to feel confidant enough to say that Angelina Jolie may very well be in the 5'4.5 to 5'5 range. I know that celebrities lie about a lot of things but i am one of those kids growing up in the TMZ era and that just want to know the truth. And it makes fun for posting but, i just really find the negative comments about people here really distasteful so lets just be Switzerland about it! lol... Mimi says on 22/Apr/09
No, Doug and Alex, it is not about downgrading Jolie to "feel better." Why would her being 5'5"ish make me feel better? Does it take away from her beauty, her success? No....she's just as beautiful and successful at 5'5" than 5'6". Your statement that people think she's shorter than 5'6" because they don't like her is so dull. How would me not liking her have anything to do with her being 5'5" instead of 5'6"?
Simply put, I have not seen any evidence that would lead me to believe that she is 5'6" or anove. After all the photos, videos, body size/appearance and comments following personal sightings re her looking much shorter than expected, small and petite lead me to believe she is not more than 5'5.5". At 5'6.5" I really don't think she would be getting those comments, no matter how thin. Believe it or not, there's actually a basis to my opinion on her height other than "I want to feel better about myself" or "I don't like Angelina Jolie." Alex says on 22/Apr/09
Doug, not just to make themselves feel better. Some people just dont like certain celebs and will downgrade them on purpose and find any pics making them look shorter. I've seen people post pics with bad angles etc to show someone look shorter.
Lately Jolie has put a bit of weight back on which was good. Shes not like she was in Tomb Raider but at least shes not skinny like she was, still lean though but healthier looking. Doug says on 22/Apr/09
I agree, even as low as 5'5" for Jolie is pushing it, 5'3" or 5'4" is beyond ridiculous. Yep Alex I think you're right about the extreme downgrading and making themselves feel better for sure. Brad says on 22/Apr/09
Anything below 5' 6.5" is a joke. Mimi says on 21/Apr/09
There is no way that a woman of 5'6.5" looks so short next to a 5'10ish man. She is probably not more than 5'5.5" Alex says on 21/Apr/09
Doug, I know you were. I was just stating my opinion on her height again. I think some people come on here just downgrading certain celebs for whatever reason. Who knows who is on the other computer posting. Some will try to find pics making the person look shorter than they normally due. Doug says on 21/Apr/09
Alex I know she is around 5'6" and that's minimum! I'm being sarcastic to those who think she is 5'3"!! glenn says on 21/Apr/09
rob has this exact.im impressed on this one. Alex says on 20/Apr/09
Jolie has passed for 5'8 which shes not. You'd have to be at least 5'6 in your barefeet to get away with 5'7-5'8. A 5'4-5'5 woman isn't getting away with as much as 5'8.
Doug, 5'6 is the bare minimum I can see Jolie at which may be her barefoot height. Doug says on 20/Apr/09
Basically you're trying to compare a photo of Madonna where you can't see her feet (yet she has always lived in huge heels) but somehow assume she is absolutely barefoot next to Penn. You then use this as justification of how Penn looks compared to a 78 year old slouching Eastwood where he is stood at a very odd angle in relation to Penn and the camera and try to claim that Eastwood is probably not more than 5'9" and Jolie therefore is 5'3". OK then Madonna is 5'3", Penn is 5'5", Eastwood is 5'9" and Jolie is same height as Madonna at 5'3". Yep I'm sure you have this spot on. Keep up the good posts! All just to fight the cause of Jolie being a short woman. Does it really hurt so much that Jolie is just 5'6", thats really little above average for a woman, kind of like 5'10 or 5'11" for a guy, not tall but a decent height. If we were claiming 5'8" or 5'9" barefoot then I could understand. It seems you must be 5'1" or 5'2" and somehow feel threatened that Jolie is anything above 5'4". Doug says on 20/Apr/09
Groan are you stupid or something? 5'3" Madge is clearly in heels (as always), otherwise she would not be as tall as that. That puts her around 5'6" in heels compared to Penn's likely 5'7.5". Doug says on 20/Apr/09
Sean Penn is a weak 5'8" certainly not 5'6". Clint has about 5 inches on him as he's 6'1". Glad you see sense Liss. Liss says on 18/Apr/09
KK doug we get it. shes 5"6 Anonymous says on 17/Apr/09
Mimi, yeah but did you actually SAY that? I can't read what isn't there you moron. You simply said "Cat needs a relaxer". Not "Cat needs a relaxer because she insulted Doug". Bloody idiot you are! Mimi says on 17/Apr/09
It's not anything to me aside from the basis of my saying you need a relaxer...you just seem bent on proving my point. Anonymous says on 16/Apr/09
Mimi ... you're a genius. I hope you milk that for what it's worth. What's it to you if someone insults someone else? That gives you the right to be a smart ass? Doug is a fool if he falls for trick photography. Mimi says on 16/Apr/09
Anonymous says on 14/Apr/09
Quote from Cat - "And Mimi, as I said, give or take an inch wherever you like, you cannot dispute the obvious height difference of (quite often) 4" between Brad and Ange even with her 4" heels. I am well aware that 4" does not give you 4" but more like 3", it doesn't change the fact that AJ cannot be more than 5'5". Before you start insulting people Mimi, saying they need a relaxer, actually read what's being written. Cat AGREED with you that 4" doesn't give 3" in height."
My comment regarding Cat needing a relaxer was due to her insulting Doug on Apr/7/09 comment. Maybe you should take your own advice about reading before commenting. Yeaaaaa....right back at ya. Doug says on 15/Apr/09
For the record in the third world picture we were discussing take away Pitt's cap and I see roughly a 6 inch difference. If Pitt is around 6' there in good footwear and Jolie is in her flats (which she wears in places like this) that still puts her around 5'6" possibly 5'7". I think 5'6" flat makes sense maybe slightly under or slightly above. She is never a hair under 5'5". Doug says on 15/Apr/09
If Jolie however is wearing flats and Pitt is in workmens boots (as normal) it is fairly easy for Pitt to look 6-7 inches taller than her as he did in the photo in some third world country you showed before as he is likely around 6'.0.5" there and Jolie little more than 5'6" in flat shoes. If Jolie was even 5'4" Pitt would have had 8-9 inches on her in that picture which is a full head taller. He wasn't. |
