|
Kerry says on 6/Mar/10
Whoever thinks she has the figure of a 12-year-old boy, obviously hasn't seen the film "Priceless". Also, regarding her height - there is a point in that same film, where she is calling all the numbers in her little black book, where she makes a comment something to the effect of being very small, but nicely packaged.
Nina says on 9/Jan/10
she is slim but not skinny,im 1.58m with 40 Kg and i dont have anorexia, i look slim not skinny,when u r not tall it's not necessary to be over 50 Kg Katharina says on 26/Dec/09
1.60m and 40 kg? I love her as an actress, but I think she's way to skinny. A friend of mine had anorexia, and she was about the same weight with 1.58m. Daily says on 5/Dec/09
Audrey is one of the most beautiful creatures ever to walk this planet.
But 5'3 damn thats short. My height! Yeuj, and she is my favorite actress. guyfrommars says on 30/Sep/09
She had ordinary boots on, with ca. 1.25-inch heels in the movie. And 5ft8.5 Kassovits looked at least 4 inches taller than her, which makes Audrey 5ft3. krys says on 10/Sep/09
I just watched amelie yesterday, and she looked a good 5"5, especially with those boots on. I thought she was taller than 5"3 as well. I just don't see how she could be..? guyfrommars says on 10/May/09
5ft8 Kassovits looked tall next to her in Amelie. She was wearing average boots without heels in that film. Bunny says on 13/Feb/09
Oh I thought she was like 5"5 or 5"6 Anonymous says on 3/Dec/08
I would say she is shorter than stated. If she was 160 cm., with high heels she will look like an average-tall girl, about 1.70, and she never ever looks like that. Corinne says on 5/Nov/08
Wow i agree, on seeing Amelie i was under the impression that she was tall. She must just be thin and maybe have a smallish head. Same height as me! Yay all my favourite actresses are around my height, this site makes me happy to be small :D betykk says on 25/Jul/08
I very like film Amelie and I was surprised when I read Audrey is only 160 cm. In this film she looks more, more taller. meg says on 11/May/08
tiny girl. this is most evident in group photos i reckon. Edwin says on 17/Feb/08
5'2.5 is probably right. Some people have said she has the figure of a 12-year-old boy but I actually think that's she's hott and her height makes her look all the more feminine. Achilles says on 17/Jan/08
Tom Hanks is around 6' give or take, and he towers over her in Davinci code..
i dunno fi she has heels on, but either , audrey toujour tres belle!! bam says on 17/Nov/07
She is lovely, but in the interest of accuracy, rob i would consider downgrading her slightly. A 5'3 commonly being called tiny is like calling a 5'8-5'9 man tiny. What do you think rob? Roo says on 24/Aug/07
1.6m is around 5'2.5. For once somebody who is honest about their height hooray!! :oD Xan says on 20/Jun/07
So glad to see this! My little bro and I were watching an Audrey Tatou movie last night and I asked him if I was about her height (I'm 5'3, though I think now I'm closer to 5'4) and my brother told me she was MUCH taller than me. Ha! Maria Ana says on 30/Jan/07
40 kilos for 1.60m is not necessarily skinny! i am 1.70m and 47.5 kilos, and i am slim, not skinny! i just have very light bones! dmeyer says on 30/Oct/06
she could be less sice even in 3 inches heels she make hanks look 195 cm Megan says on 1/Oct/06
if a lot of people call her tiny, then she is most likely under 5'3". since 5'4" is average height, someone who is 1" under that wouldn't always be talked about their height and how tiny they r. i would say she is around 5'1". Maria says on 16/Jun/06
I think she might be well under 5 foot 3, possibly between 5 foot and 5 foot 2. And yeah, she is really skinny. I'd think that if they called her tiny in the magazine where she is the cover model, I would say she is well under 5 foot 3 because that is average height, so Im saying smaller than that. Tia says on 10/Jun/06
in her photos of TDVC, Audrey does not look 5'3, but instead a little shorter. In the movie, she wore high-heals (though not overly high)...but her height through out the movie was not consistent. In the scene toward the end, upon makin the discovery of Sang-Real and her grandmother...as she bids Robert farewell, the film shot was inconsistant. When the camera focuses on Hanks, Audrey appeared to be reach above his shoulder...but when it was the other way round, she was well below Hank's shoulder. I think you may want to reconsider this height... crewmember says on 7/Jun/06
quarant kilos=40 kilos=88lbs? that is SKINNY!
audrey looks a lot taller because she is so thin and has very long/lean legs. if you notice her legs are like twigs. i am 5'3 but i don't give the illusion of being as tall because i have shorter legs and am heavier. it's true that thinner you are, the taller you seem.
Allison says on 14/Apr/06
She seems about 8 inches shorter (in heels) than Tom Hanks in promotional photos for The da Vinci Code. CelebHeights Editor says on 8/Feb/06
Studio Magazine, 2006:
"Avec mon Metre Soixante, et mes quarant kilos"
In other words, She says her height and weight: "with my height of 1m 60" Anonymous says on 30/Dec/05
she's probably between 5'1"-5'2" Cliff says on 29/Dec/05
Interesing write-up on my favorite living French Actress in the new issue of Newsweek (Jan 3, 2006). The photo on the cover features her standing next to Hanks (6ft) and Tautou is wearing huge 4 inch heels which brings her very slightly above his shoulder. The article inside quotes one of the producers of "Da vincci code" as saying that: "she is impossibly small, you can almost fit her in the palm of your hand." It was again stressed later in the article that she definitely wasn't tall. With all of the emphasis placed on her size, she may indeed be closer to the 152-155cm mark instead of the 157cm I stated previously. She has as many references in articles on her regarding her size as Kylie Minogue does, which likely means you're well below average. |
