|
AKK says on 15/Mar/10
Just saw her in Terminator:RotM. She stood up surprisingly well next to Kristanna, Nick and Arnold(all at or near the 6' mark). 5 and a half sounds just about right, accounting for shoes.
Rachel says on 30/Jul/09
To "lol": These days, fat women like you only consider women with really big breasts to be "curvy". Because you KNOW that most thin women don't have really large breasts, and you feel secure in knowing that fat girls will always have something that thin girls don't. However, you are obviously just jealous and bitter. Thin girls like Megan Fox still have curves, just not the flabby kind. She wasn't at the top of Maxim's hot list because she had a bad body. A slim hourglass figure is ideal, not a fat hourglass. Mike says on 14/May/09
Anonymous, meg and alexia, if you look closely at that photo you'll see that Claire is walking on the road, and Hugh is on the sidewalk. bun says on 16/Nov/08
i agree with angie, its so unterräting to know how These people would appear in Real life, especially Since we're probly never going to meet them Anonymous says on 1/Aug/08
In stardust she is an evident 2-2.5 inches shorter than pfeiffer who on this site is listed as 5,6 and danes 5,5 and a half so wots goin on is pfeiffer taller than 5,6 or is danes listed as too tall? Wots goin on? jax says on 23/Jul/08
Here's a more straight on shot of Claire Danes & Hugh Dancy, both in their bare feet.
Click Here
Click Here
With Claire standing on the little platform thing she appears to be very close in height to Hugh, who is not on the platform.
My guess is the platform is about 2.5" - 3.0".
If Claire's height on this site is accurate, then Hugh might need a slight downgrade. Or if Hugh's is accurate then Claire needs a slight upgrade. alexia says on 23/Jul/08
lookin @ anonymous'z pic...either Dancy is 6'0" or Danes is near 5'2" meg says on 13/May/08
Anonymous, i'm not sure about the 3.5 inch difference in their heights in that picture.. looks like a foot difference, some weird optical illusion going on in that one. That guy looks way taller than 5'9 mah says on 9/May/08
cant you ever stand up straight? its hard to judge when you slouch all the time! Anonymous says on 6/May/08
she is very pretty..
bt chk dis out Click Here
if hugh dancy is 5'9' according to dis very site...so id dis a 3.5 inch difference in dere heights, claire is also wearing high heels *Laura* says on 5/Mar/08
She does look quite tall next to Charlie Cox in Stardust doesn't she. I think she is really pretty, what do you think??? lol says on 19/Feb/08
hi sara all of those people you mentioned do not have nice bodies. they have anorexic bodies with no breasts (if you dont could beckham's huge fake implants) or butt, or any feminine shape what-so-ever. disgusting!! Anonymous says on 19/Dec/07
dunno about that...charlie cox in the movie stardust is supposed to be 1.80cm but yet claire looks quite tall next to him. The world must be going crazy Austrian says on 21/Sep/07
she looks like Axl Rose lololol Danius says on 21/Sep/07
looks 5'6.. Anonymous says on 3/Apr/07
Yes, the 65.5 inch estimate seems right. She is very thin with larger sized bones and it sometimes makes a woman seem tall. She projects a "tall" appearance even if she's a little above the U.S. average. Wonderful actress, very talented. Monica says on 14/Jan/07
Maybe it took him a while to stop growing. |
