|
maio says on 4/Jan/12
6 ft 1.5 in/187 cm (PEAK)
6 ft 0.5 in/184 cm (TODAY)
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m says on 20/Nov/11
Strong 6ft 2 in early films- 1.88 m/1.89 m range. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 9/Sep/11
He would've been in his 50s when Titanic was made, so if he was 189cm then, there's a good he could have been almost 6"3 in his youth? James says on 28/Jul/11
today still at least 6'1 barefoot. In Titanic next too Billy Zane could potentially be 6'1 I think David looked 1.5 inches taller which might indicate that he was still around 189cm in 1997. then again he might have not been over 188cm in titanic? jake says on 19/Jul/11
Could've been as high as 189 cm at peak, now 6ft1.5 or so. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 17/Jul/11
He may only be 185cm now
[Editor Rob: I saw him a few months ago and can still look 6ft 1 range.] James says on 2/Jul/11
188-189cm range in Titanic. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Jun/11
I think 6ft2-6ft2.5 peak Sam says on 29/Apr/11
Yeah, in his films from the 70s, you can see David was probably over 6'2". He looks quite tall in almost all of his films. Compared to 6'3"-peak (don't think he shrunk much) Gregory Peck in The Omen, he looks close in height (just a bit shorter). Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 27/Apr/11
Rob do you think David is still 187cm?
[Editor Rob: I've not seen him for a couple years but last time he was still in that range I felt.] Mr.V says on 23/Feb/11
In this 1967 article about Diana Rigg , David gets described as 6'3 :
Click Here
The article also gives Patrick Macnee's height as 6'1 , which is probably generous . But in David's case I believe it's probably closer to the truth . In "Morgan" you can see that he's quite a bit taller than Vanessa Redgrave when they're both barefoot . I would say he was 6'2.5 minimum in his youth . Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Jan/11
6"2.25(189cm) peak
6"1.5(187cm) today James says on 29/Nov/10
well maybe in 6'2.5 in his 30's. linke says on 21/Nov/10
For a second, i thought it was david warner the cricketer. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 19/Nov/10
If he's 187cm now..He could very well have been a bit more than 6"2 when he was younger. Infact I think he could still be 187-188cm James says on 7/Nov/10
I doubt he was taller than 6'2 when you look at him with 182-183cm Steve Martin. |
