Donald Sutherland's Height
6ft 1 (185.4 cm)
Peak height was 6ft 3 ½ (191.8 cm)
Canadian Actor best known for roles in films such as Don't Look Now, MASH, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Kelly's Heroes, Ordinary People, Klute, The Italian Job (2003), Space Cowboys and The Hunger Games Trilogy. In his early career he was described as 6ft 4 and weighing 185 pounds although in a 1981 article it mentioned "Donald Sutherland, 6 foot 3½ inches".
Photo by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
Kiefer Sutherland
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
Clint Eastwood
5ft 11 (180 cm)
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Elliott Gould
6ft 1 (185 cm)
6ft 1 (185 cm)
Liam Hemsworth
6ft 3 ¼ (191 cm)
6ft 3 ¼ (191 cm)
Add a Comment347 comments
Average Guess (75 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 3.55in (191.9cm)
Current: 6ft 1.67in (187.1cm)
Peak: 6ft 3.55in (191.9cm)
Current: 6ft 1.67in (187.1cm)
Sandy Cowell said on 26/Sep/23
I’ve been watching on YouTube a video of Procal Harum’s ‘Pandora’s Box’ and thinking that the singer and pianist, Gary Brooker, looks rather like Donald Sutherland, only with brown hair. but Gary isn’t as tall. Check it out, folks - it’s a brilliant song!
Donald gets 6ft3.5 for his peak and 6ft1.25 for today’s height
I’ve been watching on YouTube a video of Procal Harum’s ‘Pandora’s Box’ and thinking that the singer and pianist, Gary Brooker, looks rather like Donald Sutherland, only with brown hair. but Gary isn’t as tall. Check it out, folks - it’s a brilliant song!
Donald gets 6ft3.5 for his peak and 6ft1.25 for today’s height
James B 172cm said on 6/Sep/23
Eastwood 6’3.25-6’3.5 and Sutherland 6’3.5-6’3.75
Eastwood 6’3.25-6’3.5 and Sutherland 6’3.5-6’3.75
Slamm said on 30/Aug/23
In Kelly’s heroes looks no different from him and Clint
In Kelly’s heroes looks no different from him and Clint
Gerald S said on 6/Apr/23
Rob, who do you think could have peaked at a stronger 6’3.5” out of Sutherland and Clint Eastwood?
Editor Rob
Rob, who do you think could have peaked at a stronger 6’3.5” out of Sutherland and Clint Eastwood?
Editor RobI do find it hard to pick one, but maybe the odds are a bit in Donald's favour.
Arch Stanton said on 6/Mar/23
Sinclair said on 3/Jun/22
I could not go under 6’3.5” or over 6’4” peak for Sutherland; he gets 6’3.75” peak from me. I sense that Sutherland was a tiny fraction closer to 6’4” than Clint Eastwood, in their prime years.
Clint seemed to edge out Sutherland in one scene in Kelly's Heroes though...
Sinclair said on 3/Jun/22
I could not go under 6’3.5” or over 6’4” peak for Sutherland; he gets 6’3.75” peak from me. I sense that Sutherland was a tiny fraction closer to 6’4” than Clint Eastwood, in their prime years.
Clint seemed to edge out Sutherland in one scene in Kelly's Heroes though...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Feb/23
6ft3¾ as a peak is arguable.
Today I'm wondering if maybe he can still stretch up over 6ft1 when measured.
Editor Rob
6ft3¾ as a peak is arguable.
Today I'm wondering if maybe he can still stretch up over 6ft1 when measured.
Editor RobHarder to estimate these days, as with many elderly people, is some of the bad posture baked in.
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 20/Feb/23
The 6ft 3.5 as per quote could be spot on though. 192 earlier in the day.
The 6ft 3.5 as per quote could be spot on though. 192 earlier in the day.
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m said on 20/Feb/23
Rob, is there a chance he was 6ft 3¾ peak? He may have been near to Goldblum's height. Looked very tall in 'Klute' - absolute classic film.
Editor Rob
Rob, is there a chance he was 6ft 3¾ peak? He may have been near to Goldblum's height. Looked very tall in 'Klute' - absolute classic film.
Editor RobA chance of that, but I've never been convinced about full 6ft 4 for him.
Daycringeothon said on 2/Feb/23
Sutherland has the classic lower eye level than Pitt’s higher eye level. Pitt is 180cm-ish on a good day. Sutherland’s posture is not good and Pitt stands tall as he usually would.
Sutherland has the classic lower eye level than Pitt’s higher eye level. Pitt is 180cm-ish on a good day. Sutherland’s posture is not good and Pitt stands tall as he usually would.
Sandy Cowell said on 6/Sep/22
I’ve found another movie which stars Hilary Mason, who starred with Donald in ‘Don’t Look Now’, as the blind psychic.
It is called ‘The Monster’ aka ‘I Don’t Want To Be Born’, and Hilary plays Mrs Hyde.
Born in 1917 on the 4th September, she died one day after her 89th Birthday. Hilary was known for her sinister parts and I found 5ft5.5 for her. This will obviously have been her peak height, as next to huge Donald, she looked tiny! She’ll have been 55 or 56 when ‘Don’t Look Now’ was made.
A page for her would be a groove, Rob!
Donald gets 6ft3.5 for his peak and 6ft1.5 for nowadays.
I’ve found another movie which stars Hilary Mason, who starred with Donald in ‘Don’t Look Now’, as the blind psychic.
It is called ‘The Monster’ aka ‘I Don’t Want To Be Born’, and Hilary plays Mrs Hyde.
Born in 1917 on the 4th September, she died one day after her 89th Birthday. Hilary was known for her sinister parts and I found 5ft5.5 for her. This will obviously have been her peak height, as next to huge Donald, she looked tiny! She’ll have been 55 or 56 when ‘Don’t Look Now’ was made.
A page for her would be a groove, Rob!
Donald gets 6ft3.5 for his peak and 6ft1.5 for nowadays.
Sinclair said on 3/Jun/22
I could not go under 6’3.5” or over 6’4” peak for Sutherland; he gets 6’3.75” peak from me. I sense that Sutherland was a tiny fraction closer to 6’4” than Clint Eastwood, in their prime years.
I could not go under 6’3.5” or over 6’4” peak for Sutherland; he gets 6’3.75” peak from me. I sense that Sutherland was a tiny fraction closer to 6’4” than Clint Eastwood, in their prime years.
Sulu2021 said on 17/May/22
Donald was a towering actor at his peak, but now he doesn't seem to tower over me (I'm 6ft ⅞ in) due to the fact that he lost quite a bit of height. This means that Donald and I are now less than an inch apart in height.
Donald was a towering actor at his peak, but now he doesn't seem to tower over me (I'm 6ft ⅞ in) due to the fact that he lost quite a bit of height. This means that Donald and I are now less than an inch apart in height.
Andrey200 said on 6/May/22
Rob, he’s looking even shorter than listed with Claes Bang here
Click Here=
Editor Rob
Rob, he’s looking even shorter than listed with Claes Bang here
Click Here=
Editor RobSometimes he does drop height in photos, but has probably shrunk a bit more last couple of years.
Impala 64 said on 15/Dec/21
peak : 192 cm
current : 187.4
peak : 192 cm
current : 187.4
Pedriscovery said on 15/Dec/21
Hello berta.I think mer sutherland no lost much height and STILL near 6.3 its only a terrible posture in a lot of photos its a 86 yeards old man in this photo with liam is in 82 yeards old an his posture its inusualing good and looks near of 6.3
Hello berta.I think mer sutherland no lost much height and STILL near 6.3 its only a terrible posture in a lot of photos its a 86 yeards old man in this photo with liam is in 82 yeards old an his posture its inusualing good and looks near of 6.3
berta said on 9/Dec/21
Strange, almost the same heigt as liam hemsworth in that Photo. And in other photos he can look about the same beside brad pitt. Looking 188 in one Photo nd 182 in other. Maybe he really is legit 6'1 still. Or 186. I have no idea on this guy at current. Peak was at worst 191 and at best 192,5. I think almost 192 is what he measured.
Strange, almost the same heigt as liam hemsworth in that Photo. And in other photos he can look about the same beside brad pitt. Looking 188 in one Photo nd 182 in other. Maybe he really is legit 6'1 still. Or 186. I have no idea on this guy at current. Peak was at worst 191 and at best 192,5. I think almost 192 is what he measured.
Pedriscovery said on 20/Nov/21
In this photo with a young david swimmer.Sutherland with 65 yeards old Steell keep 6.3" un this time he was two noches more tall than eastwood.
In this photo with a young david swimmer.Sutherland with 65 yeards old Steell keep 6.3" un this time he was two noches more tall than eastwood.
Pedriscovery said on 6/Nov/21
He was a leigth 6.4" with Ian mckellen and will smith in the 90's.
He was a leigth 6.4" with Ian mckellen and will smith in the 90's.
Pedriscovery said on 4/Nov/21
Its right Rob.But you admited id sutherland in this photo have a relax posture and appears like 6"1.5 with a good posture still like 6".2 or more near of liam hemsworth ar 82 yeards old
Its right Rob.But you admited id sutherland in this photo have a relax posture and appears like 6"1.5 with a good posture still like 6".2 or more near of liam hemsworth ar 82 yeards old
Pedriscovery said on 3/Nov/21
Hello Rob.Have a good photo of this i send 28/10/2021 right here Click Here
Editor Rob
Hello Rob.Have a good photo of this i send 28/10/2021 right here Click Here
Editor RobLiam looks shorter than usual there...claflin looking taller than he usually did beside Liam. Donald about 6ft 1-1.5 range there, with looser posture.
Pedriscovery said on 1/Nov/21
Rob.Do you think un this photo have much diferent of height between me sutherland and liam hemsworth?and if stanley tuccy is about 1.72 cm mr sutherland its about 16 or 17 cm.more tall.its right?
Editor Rob
Rob.Do you think un this photo have much diferent of height between me sutherland and liam hemsworth?and if stanley tuccy is about 1.72 cm mr sutherland its about 16 or 17 cm.more tall.its right?
Editor RobThere was no photo linked, but in some photos like this you can see Donald shrunk, but then even with age his posture is poor and in photos I can imagine he has dropped 1-2 inches a lot of the time.
Pedriscovery said on 30/Oct/21
This is a good example wen Mr sutherland take a good posture looks similar in height like liam and this is a good photo.in this moment he is in 82 yeards old.The problem with sutherland is the terrible posture he no lost much height
This is a good example wen Mr sutherland take a good posture looks similar in height like liam and this is a good photo.in this moment he is in 82 yeards old.The problem with sutherland is the terrible posture he no lost much height
82muchlunch said on 8/Jan/21
Met Sutherland a long time ago in Denver, Co. at a bar called Confetti’s.
At that time I stood 6’ 2.75” and he appeared to be a couple of of inches shorter than I. Used to think he was really tall in films, after meeting I changed my opinion. To judge a person’s height watch their films and see where they compare to a doorway. A door frame is usually set at 6’8”.
Met Sutherland a long time ago in Denver, Co. at a bar called Confetti’s.
At that time I stood 6’ 2.75” and he appeared to be a couple of of inches shorter than I. Used to think he was really tall in films, after meeting I changed my opinion. To judge a person’s height watch their films and see where they compare to a doorway. A door frame is usually set at 6’8”.
Jtm said on 17/Nov/20
The average guess is just what the popular opinion is not facts but again comparing him with Pitt is very misleading for obvious reasons
The average guess is just what the popular opinion is not facts but again comparing him with Pitt is very misleading for obvious reasons
Pedriscovery said on 16/Nov/20
Hello Rob.look this video.Elizabeth debicki probably is in heels and mr sutherland its in the same heigth somethimes he droped the posture but steel the same heigth of debicky at 85 yeards old and walk with a stick.This man is now 6.2" almost.The photo with brad pitt its anecdotic.
Hello Rob.look this video.Elizabeth debicki probably is in heels and mr sutherland its in the same heigth somethimes he droped the posture but steel the same heigth of debicky at 85 yeards old and walk with a stick.This man is now 6.2" almost.The photo with brad pitt its anecdotic.
Pedriscovery said on 16/Nov/20
Berta the photo with nicole kidman and sutherland is from 2019.Is imposible in one yeard lost 2 inches of height.If you look other photos of brad pitt and 6.2" adam drver appears like a same rangue its very extrange.Think about this.
Berta the photo with nicole kidman and sutherland is from 2019.Is imposible in one yeard lost 2 inches of height.If you look other photos of brad pitt and 6.2" adam drver appears like a same rangue its very extrange.Think about this.
berta said on 16/Nov/20
i cant really understand how the average guess for his current height is 188 cm when he and brad pitt looks about the same height these days. i dont think he is mutch over 6 feet now. he starting to become a clint eastwood.
Editor Rob
i cant really understand how the average guess for his current height is 188 cm when he and brad pitt looks about the same height these days. i dont think he is mutch over 6 feet now. he starting to become a clint eastwood.
Editor Robthe current height started out over 6ft 2 a few years back, and maybe not as many votes in last 5 years for him...
Pedriscovery said on 12/Nov/20
Rob.in this photo sutherland is almos 4 inches on matthew mconnaguey
Editor Rob
Rob.in this photo sutherland is almos 4 inches on matthew mconnaguey
Editor Robnot sure as much as 4 inches that moment
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 31/Oct/20
I'm watching Donald in a film from 1965 when he'll have been his optimum height. It's called 'Doctor Terror's House of Horrors' and you get the chance at the end to actually compare him to Christopher Lee. Peter Cushing also stars. He plays a tarot card reader, who turns out to be something very nasty indeed! 😣
Wasn't Donald BLOND? He had pale blue eyes too.
6ft3.5 peak and 6ft2 now.
I'm watching Donald in a film from 1965 when he'll have been his optimum height. It's called 'Doctor Terror's House of Horrors' and you get the chance at the end to actually compare him to Christopher Lee. Peter Cushing also stars. He plays a tarot card reader, who turns out to be something very nasty indeed! 😣
Wasn't Donald BLOND? He had pale blue eyes too.
6ft3.5 peak and 6ft2 now.
Pedriscovery said on 18/Oct/20
Whit nikole kidman (recently photo)looks 6.2"
Whit nikole kidman (recently photo)looks 6.2"
Pedriscovery said on 12/Oct/20
With 6.3"james d'arcy
With 6.3"james d'arcy
Tall Sam said on 10/Oct/20
I think as much as even 6'3.75" is dependable for Sutherland at peak, but the listing is quite possible. I think he's lost a solid 3 inches and now, as always, bad posture doesn't help.
I think as much as even 6'3.75" is dependable for Sutherland at peak, but the listing is quite possible. I think he's lost a solid 3 inches and now, as always, bad posture doesn't help.
Pedriscovery said on 9/Oct/20
And geena davis probably is in heels and peter coyote was listed in 6.2/5"
And geena davis probably is in heels and peter coyote was listed in 6.2/5"
Pedriscovery said on 9/Oct/20
Rob.mr sutherlan ever have terrible posture,but sometimes when he takes a good posture his a towering presence.I see the last year in San Sebastian festival and still almost 6.2" with 85 yeards old
Rob.mr sutherlan ever have terrible posture,but sometimes when he takes a good posture his a towering presence.I see the last year in San Sebastian festival and still almost 6.2" with 85 yeards old
Pedriscovery said on 8/Oct/20
Rob look this photo with peter coyote and geena davis.
Editor Rob
Rob look this photo with peter coyote and geena davis.
Editor RobWell he's not slouching there, for once.
Pedriscovery said on 29/Sep/20
In the movie the eagle has landed is almos 2 or 3 incher more tall than michael caine
In the movie the eagle has landed is almos 2 or 3 incher more tall than michael caine
Pedriscovery said on 26/Sep/20
in 1995 with morgan freeman,sutherland appears near of 6.4" at 60 yeards old
in 1995 with morgan freeman,sutherland appears near of 6.4" at 60 yeards old
Pedriscovery said on 24/Sep/20
ROB.look this recent photo with 6.2"elizabeth debiky
Click Here
Editor Rob
ROB.look this recent photo with 6.2"elizabeth debiky
Click Here
Editor RobShe will be dropping some height by looking down there.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 21/Sep/20
I watched Donald in 'An American Haunting' last night, a film from 2005. Donald's wife is played by Sissy Spacek, (5ft1.5?) who will have been 53 to Donald's 69/70. The height difference was enormous! I can still see 6ft3 for back then.
⭐ I recommend the film 'Doctor Terror's House of Horrors', a film which enables us to compare Donald with Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. He's definitely the second tallest. Furthermore, he's in the film 'Ad Astra', from last year, in which he stars with Brad Pitt and Liv Tyler, amongst others. I seriously can't wait! 😅
6ft3.5 peak and 6ft2 today. 👍👍
I watched Donald in 'An American Haunting' last night, a film from 2005. Donald's wife is played by Sissy Spacek, (5ft1.5?) who will have been 53 to Donald's 69/70. The height difference was enormous! I can still see 6ft3 for back then.
⭐ I recommend the film 'Doctor Terror's House of Horrors', a film which enables us to compare Donald with Christopher Lee and Peter Cushing. He's definitely the second tallest. Furthermore, he's in the film 'Ad Astra', from last year, in which he stars with Brad Pitt and Liv Tyler, amongst others. I seriously can't wait! 😅
6ft3.5 peak and 6ft2 today. 👍👍
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Sep/20
He can still look 186-187cm, so this at worst today
He can still look 186-187cm, so this at worst today
Nik Ashton said on 20/Sep/20
Donald is next to (just under) his son Kiefer on today’s comments page and he is getting his 300th comment! It would be interesting to have been able to compare him with Kiefer when they were 50 and 18 respectively!
Donald is next to (just under) his son Kiefer on today’s comments page and he is getting his 300th comment! It would be interesting to have been able to compare him with Kiefer when they were 50 and 18 respectively!
Pedriscovery said on 20/Sep/20
Hello Rob the 19/09/20 i sen a good photo with mr sutherland and liam hemsworth in pthe premiere of hangred games in this photo mr sutherlan have a good posture and appear like a 6.3" near of hemsworth with 83 yeards old in this moment,in other photos the pose with liam its horrible and appears like 6.1".But i see a mr sutherland very near of me in San Sebastian an i sure its a very tall man today with 85 yeards old beleavme Rob this man steell a tall man.Sorry by my english.
Hello Rob the 19/09/20 i sen a good photo with mr sutherland and liam hemsworth in pthe premiere of hangred games in this photo mr sutherlan have a good posture and appear like a 6.3" near of hemsworth with 83 yeards old in this moment,in other photos the pose with liam its horrible and appears like 6.1".But i see a mr sutherland very near of me in San Sebastian an i sure its a very tall man today with 85 yeards old beleavme Rob this man steell a tall man.Sorry by my english.
Pedriscovery said on 20/Sep/20
Sorry Rob. im not send the complete information.Angus heigt its 6,3" in this photo with his father are the shame heigth i try say this but my english is very bad.Sorry again.
Editor Rob
Sorry Rob. im not send the complete information.Angus heigt its 6,3" in this photo with his father are the shame heigth i try say this but my english is very bad.Sorry again.
Editor RobAngus can look over 6ft 2, a few inches shorter than Roussif.
berta said on 18/Sep/20
is he really 185 still? he lokos shorter than brad pitt in a lot of photos. i dont think he is that short but maybe not mutch over 6 feet today.
Editor Rob
is he really 185 still? he lokos shorter than brad pitt in a lot of photos. i dont think he is that short but maybe not mutch over 6 feet today.
Editor RobIt's how much he can stretch up...last 5 years he looks like he's lost another inch
Hong said on 14/Sep/20
@Tall Sam,I think Brad is always well prepared when being photographed with taller stars.
@Tall Sam,I think Brad is always well prepared when being photographed with taller stars.
Tall Sam said on 11/Sep/20
@Hong, I'd be quite skeptical about Brad wearing ordinary shoes, maybe conscious of how short he'd look near Driver and Theron.
@Hong, I'd be quite skeptical about Brad wearing ordinary shoes, maybe conscious of how short he'd look near Driver and Theron.
Pedriscovery said on 11/Sep/20
Hello Rob.I read the last coments about Donald Shutherland height i see this yeard a mr sutherlamd in person at san sabastian cinema festival.and i stand in front of him .mi height its about 5,11 0/5" and im surprised how big is mr sutherland when he adopted a good posture about more than two inches on me.but normally he walk with a stick an its 85 yeards old he stell around 6,2.5". Look the video of the festival he dewarfed all people near arround hem.please look the video of festivalm
Editor Rob
Hello Rob.I read the last coments about Donald Shutherland height i see this yeard a mr sutherlamd in person at san sabastian cinema festival.and i stand in front of him .mi height its about 5,11 0/5" and im surprised how big is mr sutherland when he adopted a good posture about more than two inches on me.but normally he walk with a stick an its 85 yeards old he stell around 6,2.5". Look the video of the festival he dewarfed all people near arround hem.please look the video of festivalm
Editor Robthat's interesting, and I can believe his posture is all over the place, terrible at times.
Hulk.23 said on 11/Sep/20
I would say 6’3/191cm peak and 6‘1/185cm today.
I would say 6’3/191cm peak and 6‘1/185cm today.
Hong said on 11/Sep/20
Click Here Here's the full length shot of Brad and Driver,I don't know how Brad is managing to look so tall,maybe trik photography or something?
Click Here Here's the full length shot of Brad and Driver,I don't know how Brad is managing to look so tall,maybe trik photography or something?
James B 172cm said on 10/Sep/20
Rob do you think his current height is due a downgrade? Maybe give him 6ft1 for current height
Editor Rob
Rob do you think his current height is due a downgrade? Maybe give him 6ft1 for current height
Editor Robyeah, he is looking (if he ever stands up straight, which in some films he does) around 6ft 1.
Hong said on 10/Sep/20
Click Here Here's Brad with 6 ft2.25 listed Adam Driver,Brad's height is not the most reliable source for height comparisons.
Click Here Here's Brad with 6 ft2.25 listed Adam Driver,Brad's height is not the most reliable source for height comparisons.
Hong said on 10/Sep/20
To be fair to Donald he is on a walking stick there and is 85 years old. Click Here
To be fair to Donald he is on a walking stick there and is 85 years old. Click Here
Hong said on 8/Sep/20
Click Here what about this one with 5 ft11.25 listed Tommy Lee Jones,they both look the same height.
Editor Rob
Click Here what about this one with 5 ft11.25 listed Tommy Lee Jones,they both look the same height.
Editor RobDonald is one guy who I've mentioned before has stood really poor in photos, though today could he be around 6ft? He certainly can make Brad look tall!
Hong said on 7/Sep/20
Click Here It looks like poor old Donald has joined Eastwood in the shrinking department.
Editor Rob
Click Here It looks like poor old Donald has joined Eastwood in the shrinking department.
Editor Robthere were a few other shots Here.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 17/Jul/20
🗓️ July 17th 2020 really IS the 85th Birthday of Donald Sutherland. I just noticed that I put it for last year's, but I was wrong. His year of birth is 1935.
🗓️ July 17th 2020 really IS the 85th Birthday of Donald Sutherland. I just noticed that I put it for last year's, but I was wrong. His year of birth is 1935.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 17/Jul/20
🎁🎂🎈 Happy Birthday Donald! 🎈🎂🎁
Many Happy Returns to Donald Sutherland on his 8️⃣5️⃣th Birthday. One wonderful actor, who continues making excellent films.
6ft3.5 peak
6ft2 today 😆👍🎊 XXX
🎁🎂🎈🎊🎁🎂🎈🎊🎁🎂🎈🎊🎁🎂🎈🎊
🎁🎂🎈 Happy Birthday Donald! 🎈🎂🎁
Many Happy Returns to Donald Sutherland on his 8️⃣5️⃣th Birthday. One wonderful actor, who continues making excellent films.
6ft3.5 peak
6ft2 today 😆👍🎊 XXX
🎁🎂🎈🎊🎁🎂🎈🎊🎁🎂🎈🎊🎁🎂🎈🎊
Fezz123 said on 18/May/20
Definitely not as tall as listed, either peak or current.
Definitely not as tall as listed, either peak or current.
Tall Sam said on 11/May/20
If Goldblum was 6'4.25", in Invasion Sutherland looked pretty much on the nose 0.5 inches shorter, generally a pretty subtle difference between them.
If Goldblum was 6'4.25", in Invasion Sutherland looked pretty much on the nose 0.5 inches shorter, generally a pretty subtle difference between them.
movieguy12 said on 11/May/20
I don't think you can upgrade Sutherland. In the Invasion of the Body Snatchers Jeff Goldblum did look a bit taller than Sutherland. You could say Goldblum was just over 6'4'', Sutherland a little under.
I don't think you can upgrade Sutherland. In the Invasion of the Body Snatchers Jeff Goldblum did look a bit taller than Sutherland. You could say Goldblum was just over 6'4'', Sutherland a little under.
movieguy12 said on 10/May/20
Had Lee Marvin by a couple of inches in the Dirty Dozen and in turn looked 2 inches shorter than Clint Walker in that movie. Sutherland always looked in the 6'3'' to 6'4'' range. Unusually taller for an actor, his son Kiefer is probably more the typical actor in height.
Had Lee Marvin by a couple of inches in the Dirty Dozen and in turn looked 2 inches shorter than Clint Walker in that movie. Sutherland always looked in the 6'3'' to 6'4'' range. Unusually taller for an actor, his son Kiefer is probably more the typical actor in height.
Spencer said on 20/Apr/20
Weak 6'4" peak
Weak 6'4" peak
Pedriscovery said on 7/Feb/20
Rob,i think he need a upgrade of heigth at peak.in this photo jhon voight its very young and sutherland its two inches more tall.
Rob,i think he need a upgrade of heigth at peak.in this photo jhon voight its very young and sutherland its two inches more tall.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Nov/19
James B, it’s arguable...but I agree with Rob that he didn’t quite make the full 6ft4
James B, it’s arguable...but I agree with Rob that he didn’t quite make the full 6ft4
James B said on 28/Oct/19
Rob could 6’3.75 be closer for his peak maybe?
Editor Rob
Rob could 6’3.75 be closer for his peak maybe?
Editor RobI still feel his current peak is ok, I wouldn't give him a full 6ft 4
Pedriscovery said on 27/Sep/19
Looking the photos and videos of San Sebastian festival cinema ,at 84 yeards old sutherland dwarfed a lot of people arround hem.sometimes he adopted a veri poor posture and downgrsde his heigth but in this videos and photos he unuasuly adopted a good posture and look like a 6.3 foot man.
Looking the photos and videos of San Sebastian festival cinema ,at 84 yeards old sutherland dwarfed a lot of people arround hem.sometimes he adopted a veri poor posture and downgrsde his heigth but in this videos and photos he unuasuly adopted a good posture and look like a 6.3 foot man.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 17/Jul/19
🎈🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Donald! 🎂🎁🎈
Today is the magnificent Donald Sutherland's Birthday. He is, along with Donald Pleasance, my favourite Donald and he turns 85 this very day. My favourite films of his are 'Don't Look Now', 'Doctor Terror's House of Horrors' and 'Invasion of The Body Snatchers', but in all truth, this great man has starred in so many films, tackling a whole host of roles. What a legend! 😁👍🎊📅
I wish him the happiest Birthday EVER! XXX
Peak height - 6ft3.5
Today - 6ft2
🎉🍰🕯️💝🎉🍰🕯️💝🎉🍰🕯️💝🎉🍰🕯️💝
🎈🎁🎂 Happy Birthday Donald! 🎂🎁🎈
Today is the magnificent Donald Sutherland's Birthday. He is, along with Donald Pleasance, my favourite Donald and he turns 85 this very day. My favourite films of his are 'Don't Look Now', 'Doctor Terror's House of Horrors' and 'Invasion of The Body Snatchers', but in all truth, this great man has starred in so many films, tackling a whole host of roles. What a legend! 😁👍🎊📅
I wish him the happiest Birthday EVER! XXX
Peak height - 6ft3.5
Today - 6ft2
🎉🍰🕯️💝🎉🍰🕯️💝🎉🍰🕯️💝🎉🍰🕯️💝
Pedriscovery said on 26/Jun/19
I see a very good photo in a premiere with geena davis and 6.2" peter coyote and donald sutherland.sutherland is the most tall.search the photos in google.its very clear.
I see a very good photo in a premiere with geena davis and 6.2" peter coyote and donald sutherland.sutherland is the most tall.search the photos in google.its very clear.
Hong said on 5/Jun/19
I've seen pics of him standing beside an actor called Harris Dickinson, who is listed as 6ft,and he is taller than Sutherland. I don't know this guy or weather or not he is 6ft,but he is listed as this height online.
I've seen pics of him standing beside an actor called Harris Dickinson, who is listed as 6ft,and he is taller than Sutherland. I don't know this guy or weather or not he is 6ft,but he is listed as this height online.
Pedriscovery said on 25/Mar/19
6'2 peak is a joke.now with 82 yeards old is posible.he Was a 6'3/5 peak
6'2 peak is a joke.now with 82 yeards old is posible.he Was a 6'3/5 peak
Sandy Cowell said on 9/Dec/18
Oh yes! I have just reached the end of 'Dr Terror's House of Horrors', when all the doomed male passengers climb out of the train - to find that it's been the grim reaper who's been telling their fortunes with his tarot cards! Donald is the only cast member who stands anywhere near to Christopher Lee's height, and I'm glad I gave Christopher 6ft5 just now! The film hails from 1965 - and with 99℅ certainty will have been an 'X' rated film! I saw it when I was 11 and was terrified, but loved it nonetheless!
Donald was, of course, at his peak height, and had blond hair. There was still a noticeable difference between Donald and Christopher, neither actor of which I can see wearing lifts.
I will gladly go with 6ft3.5 for Donald's peak, and 6ft2 for today's height.
Oh yes! I have just reached the end of 'Dr Terror's House of Horrors', when all the doomed male passengers climb out of the train - to find that it's been the grim reaper who's been telling their fortunes with his tarot cards! Donald is the only cast member who stands anywhere near to Christopher Lee's height, and I'm glad I gave Christopher 6ft5 just now! The film hails from 1965 - and with 99℅ certainty will have been an 'X' rated film! I saw it when I was 11 and was terrified, but loved it nonetheless!
Donald was, of course, at his peak height, and had blond hair. There was still a noticeable difference between Donald and Christopher, neither actor of which I can see wearing lifts.
I will gladly go with 6ft3.5 for Donald's peak, and 6ft2 for today's height.
tree said on 1/Aug/18
In the movie Outbreak in 1995 in a scene he stood face to face with 6ft2 Morgan Freemn and looked 1.5 inches taller.
In the movie Outbreak in 1995 in a scene he stood face to face with 6ft2 Morgan Freemn and looked 1.5 inches taller.
Pedriscovery said on 11/Jul/18
Ever angles tricks? Wath coincidence he ever have a terrible posture but wen have a good posture, appears his real heigth still a 6.3" at 82 yeards old,dont forgett
Ever angles tricks? Wath coincidence he ever have a terrible posture but wen have a good posture, appears his real heigth still a 6.3" at 82 yeards old,dont forgett
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 10/Jul/18
Camera angle tricks all over please stop. At most he is 6'3 5/8 peak (192.1) and he is clearly under 6'2 now.
Camera angle tricks all over please stop. At most he is 6'3 5/8 peak (192.1) and he is clearly under 6'2 now.
Pedriscovery said on 4/Mar/18
I dont know how is tall donald sutherland now.but in the premiere of pride and prejuice still appears a bit taller than 6,3" Matthew mcfayden
I dont know how is tall donald sutherland now.but in the premiere of pride and prejuice still appears a bit taller than 6,3" Matthew mcfayden
Junior Hernandez said on 9/Feb/18
In 1995 Citizen X Max Von Sydow and him they look very close in height and they both in their 60s in that film. Max.V.S is 6 years senior than Sutherland. 6'3.5" peak is legit.
In 1995 Citizen X Max Von Sydow and him they look very close in height and they both in their 60s in that film. Max.V.S is 6 years senior than Sutherland. 6'3.5" peak is legit.
Pedriscovery said on 18/Jan/18
The definitive evidence of shutherland height is the filme outbreak with Morgan Freeman,in one Tale appears face to face with Freeman and sutherland is cleary two inches on Freeman not doubt if Freeman was 6"2 sutherland in this moment was 6.4"
The definitive evidence of shutherland height is the filme outbreak with Morgan Freeman,in one Tale appears face to face with Freeman and sutherland is cleary two inches on Freeman not doubt if Freeman was 6"2 sutherland in this moment was 6.4"
Rory said on 7/Jan/18
I think Clint and Sutherland were both 6ft3.5, but in Kelly's heroes there's not any revealing scenes really to attest that although you can tell both are very close in height. They had different proportions too, Sutherland had a narrower head than Clint but broader shoulders.
I think Clint and Sutherland were both 6ft3.5, but in Kelly's heroes there's not any revealing scenes really to attest that although you can tell both are very close in height. They had different proportions too, Sutherland had a narrower head than Clint but broader shoulders.
Pedriscovery said on 1/Jan/18
In Kelly héroes sutherland ever have a ver bad posture with Eastwood. But in space Cowboys is cleary almost two inches more tall than Eastwood
In Kelly héroes sutherland ever have a ver bad posture with Eastwood. But in space Cowboys is cleary almost two inches more tall than Eastwood
movieguy said on 25/Dec/17
Actually thought Sutherland edged Clint in Kelly's Heroes. No shots of them standing really close together. By Space Cowboys Sutherland had a couple of inches on Clint.
Actually thought Sutherland edged Clint in Kelly's Heroes. No shots of them standing really close together. By Space Cowboys Sutherland had a couple of inches on Clint.
Mongo said on 19/Dec/17
Check out "Kelly's Heroes" and compare Sutherland to Clint Eastwood, who was 6'4 at the time. Eastwood TOWERED over Sutherland by a good four or five inches in every scene they both appeared in, regardless of the angle, and when you could see them both from head to foot. It was obvious neither was wearing lifts. It surprised me because I thought Sutherland would be about the same height at Eastwood, but he wasn't. In those same scenes, he appeared closer to Telly Savalas in height, maybe even a little shorter. Honestly, in those scenes, Sutherland looked to be 5'11 to 6' at the most.
Check out "Kelly's Heroes" and compare Sutherland to Clint Eastwood, who was 6'4 at the time. Eastwood TOWERED over Sutherland by a good four or five inches in every scene they both appeared in, regardless of the angle, and when you could see them both from head to foot. It was obvious neither was wearing lifts. It surprised me because I thought Sutherland would be about the same height at Eastwood, but he wasn't. In those same scenes, he appeared closer to Telly Savalas in height, maybe even a little shorter. Honestly, in those scenes, Sutherland looked to be 5'11 to 6' at the most.
Junior said on 19/Dec/17
@jervis
I agree he wasn't over 187cm now.
@jervis
I agree he wasn't over 187cm now.
DirectorKrennic said on 8/Nov/17
192 cm peak, 188 cm now.
192 cm peak, 188 cm now.
jervis said on 23/Aug/17
He's 81 now.Just seen him in an episode of the saint opposite Roger Moore and he looked about 2 inches taller,so depending on if Moore was 6ft1.5 then Sutherland was 6ft3.5 peak.l would say he's about 6ft1.5 now though.
He's 81 now.Just seen him in an episode of the saint opposite Roger Moore and he looked about 2 inches taller,so depending on if Moore was 6ft1.5 then Sutherland was 6ft3.5 peak.l would say he's about 6ft1.5 now though.
Junior said on 16/Aug/17
He look so tall in the 70s,80s show. He could be 6'3.75" and drop a tap below 6'2 nowadays at nearly 80 of age.
He look so tall in the 70s,80s show. He could be 6'3.75" and drop a tap below 6'2 nowadays at nearly 80 of age.
Mark(5'9.5 said on 7/Aug/17
5'10" for this Donald = beyond insanity
5'10" for this Donald = beyond insanity
movieguy said on 27/Jul/17
Charlie, Donald Sutherland is the tallest 5'10'' guy I've ever seen, surely you must be joking.
Charlie, Donald Sutherland is the tallest 5'10'' guy I've ever seen, surely you must be joking.
RLM said on 23/Jul/17
Try looking at Donald and Kiefer side by side in The Forsaken
You'll see the minimum 6"-7" height difference between the two
Try looking at Donald and Kiefer side by side in The Forsaken
You'll see the minimum 6"-7" height difference between the two
Charlie said on 29/Jun/17
Donald Sutherland is very close to Kiefer Sutherlands height.In the photos i see a 2 inch height difference. No way is Donald 6'2. Kiefer in the 1980' was listed as 5'8 for the longest time. Kiefer today would be 5'7.5 Donald Sutherland is between 5'9.5 to 5'10.If Sutherland was 6'2 then Kiefer would have to be 6'0 tall. We all know he is not 6'0.A little advice hen people start comparing tall actors with average height actors you want to be sure that the average height actor is indeed average. I have seen many Talk shows where the host talks about having guests on his show who he thought were average male height until they show up on the show and they find the actors are 3 to 4 inches shorter than average. To be honest because of shoe lifts and Camera angles of cameras it is very hard to distinguish a person's height. In Movies we may see what we know to be a 6'2 actor standing beside what we know to be a 5'9 actor but magically they both appear the same height. I love movies but movies do lie. Shorter than average actors were required to wear shoe lifts for several years to fit the character they are delivering to us.In the old movies they would have short actors stand on a ramp as they did with actor Claude rains. This would give the illusion that he was taller than the female. Shots like these you would never see from the ground up.Now in Animal House one of my favourite movies you can see Donald Sutherland looking pretty tall but 6'2 tall? No. Many of the male actors use in that movie were 5'8 and under so yes Donald's height would stick out a bit. I would put Donald at 5'9.5 today and Kiefer at 5'7 or 5'7.5.
Donald Sutherland is very close to Kiefer Sutherlands height.In the photos i see a 2 inch height difference. No way is Donald 6'2. Kiefer in the 1980' was listed as 5'8 for the longest time. Kiefer today would be 5'7.5 Donald Sutherland is between 5'9.5 to 5'10.If Sutherland was 6'2 then Kiefer would have to be 6'0 tall. We all know he is not 6'0.A little advice hen people start comparing tall actors with average height actors you want to be sure that the average height actor is indeed average. I have seen many Talk shows where the host talks about having guests on his show who he thought were average male height until they show up on the show and they find the actors are 3 to 4 inches shorter than average. To be honest because of shoe lifts and Camera angles of cameras it is very hard to distinguish a person's height. In Movies we may see what we know to be a 6'2 actor standing beside what we know to be a 5'9 actor but magically they both appear the same height. I love movies but movies do lie. Shorter than average actors were required to wear shoe lifts for several years to fit the character they are delivering to us.In the old movies they would have short actors stand on a ramp as they did with actor Claude rains. This would give the illusion that he was taller than the female. Shots like these you would never see from the ground up.Now in Animal House one of my favourite movies you can see Donald Sutherland looking pretty tall but 6'2 tall? No. Many of the male actors use in that movie were 5'8 and under so yes Donald's height would stick out a bit. I would put Donald at 5'9.5 today and Kiefer at 5'7 or 5'7.5.
Arch Stanton said on 13/Apr/17
I thought Goldblum looked easily an inch taller than Sutherland in most scenes.
I thought Goldblum looked easily an inch taller than Sutherland in most scenes.
movieguy said on 12/Apr/17
Watched Invasion of Body Snatchers again last night. A brilliant film. In some scenes Sutherland looks as tall as Jeff Goldblum, in others an inch shorter. I think Goldblum edges out Sutherland but there isn't a huge difference both are very tall men.
Watched Invasion of Body Snatchers again last night. A brilliant film. In some scenes Sutherland looks as tall as Jeff Goldblum, in others an inch shorter. I think Goldblum edges out Sutherland but there isn't a huge difference both are very tall men.
S.J.H said on 24/Feb/17
Peak jeff goldblum morning 6'4.25-6'4.5 night 6'3.75-6'4
Peak donald sutherland morning 6'3.5 night 6'3 , now 6'1.5 look like 2" shorter than liam hemsworth
Peak jeff goldblum morning 6'4.25-6'4.5 night 6'3.75-6'4
Peak donald sutherland morning 6'3.5 night 6'3 , now 6'1.5 look like 2" shorter than liam hemsworth
S.J.H said on 11/Jan/17
Sutherland look an inch shorter than a peak 6'4.5 jeff goldblum. This peak height listing is correct but he look a weak 6'2 nowadays
Click Here
Sutherland look an inch shorter than a peak 6'4.5 jeff goldblum. This peak height listing is correct but he look a weak 6'2 nowadays
Click Here
S.J.H said on 2/Oct/16
Maybe 6'1.25 nowadays?
Maybe 6'1.25 nowadays?
jervis said on 6/Sep/16
Looked the full 6ft4 in movies with Connery,Caine and Morgan Freeman.
Looked the full 6ft4 in movies with Connery,Caine and Morgan Freeman.
Jervis said on 5/Sep/16
Just looking at some pics of Donald with Kiefer,and I have noticed that Donald is dropping a lot of height by bending his knees and spreading his legs etc.Some of the same pics are just from the waist up giving the impression that there is much less height difference between them,but if you see the same pic in full lenght you can see that Donald even at the time in his seventies was much the taller of the two. It goes to show you how just by dropping posture you can make someone smaller look a lot taller.And you can have two people of equal height standing next to each other ,one with perfect posture and the other hunched or slouching can make a great deal of difference in both heights. So sometimes a photo can give a false impression of heights.
Just looking at some pics of Donald with Kiefer,and I have noticed that Donald is dropping a lot of height by bending his knees and spreading his legs etc.Some of the same pics are just from the waist up giving the impression that there is much less height difference between them,but if you see the same pic in full lenght you can see that Donald even at the time in his seventies was much the taller of the two. It goes to show you how just by dropping posture you can make someone smaller look a lot taller.And you can have two people of equal height standing next to each other ,one with perfect posture and the other hunched or slouching can make a great deal of difference in both heights. So sometimes a photo can give a false impression of heights.
Arch Stanton said on 28/Jul/16
Well, dipping under or not, a legit 187-88 is rare on a guy aged 81
Well, dipping under or not, a legit 187-88 is rare on a guy aged 81
Arch Stanton said on 28/Jul/16
Yes, a terrible idea remaking Don't Look Now. One of the greatest films ever, you've never going to top it or produce anything as good so why bother but to steal people's money? Remakes are rarely better, though Star is Born 1954 IMO is better than the 1937 one.
Yes, a terrible idea remaking Don't Look Now. One of the greatest films ever, you've never going to top it or produce anything as good so why bother but to steal people's money? Remakes are rarely better, though Star is Born 1954 IMO is better than the 1937 one.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/May/16
He might be dipping under 6ft2 now at 80 but it's quite obvious he was once close to 6ft4...
He might be dipping under 6ft2 now at 80 but it's quite obvious he was once close to 6ft4...
pedriscovery said on 19/Apr/16
I read a recently article in CQ magacine and the journalist sai "he is in early 80 as a tall man 6,2", and recibes to my in jaket and pantys whitout shoes"
I read a recently article in CQ magacine and the journalist sai "he is in early 80 as a tall man 6,2", and recibes to my in jaket and pantys whitout shoes"
pedriscovery said on 19/Apr/16
I ser recently space cowbys,in every scenes sutherland appears the more tall of the cast,only under James cromwell,but Almost two inches or more tall than eastwood
I ser recently space cowbys,in every scenes sutherland appears the more tall of the cast,only under James cromwell,but Almost two inches or more tall than eastwood
S.J.H said on 2/Apr/16
Donald sutherland is not even 6'3.5 peak but at most 6'3 and 6'1.5 nowadays
Donald sutherland is not even 6'3.5 peak but at most 6'3 and 6'1.5 nowadays
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Mar/16
Rob, are you still convinced he's 6ft2 today?
Editor Rob
Rob, are you still convinced he's 6ft2 today?
Editor Rob he can look struggling with it now...
Arch Stanton said on 7/Mar/16
Got a very good look at him and Elliot Gould in S*P*Y*S. If you have Gould as 6'2 flat 6'3.5 is really the most you could argue. Sutherland looks about 4 cm taller, in some scenes it can look just an inch, but between 1 and 2 inches taller.
Got a very good look at him and Elliot Gould in S*P*Y*S. If you have Gould as 6'2 flat 6'3.5 is really the most you could argue. Sutherland looks about 4 cm taller, in some scenes it can look just an inch, but between 1 and 2 inches taller.
movieguy said on 26/Jan/16
Found the movie with the Goldblum Sutherland photo so realise it was Sutherland, I mistakenly thought the only film they made together was Bodysnatchers. Watched Don't Look Now last night and had to say Sutherland looked very tall. Did look 6'4'' and the film is a masterpiece which very bizarrely is being remade apparently. Sutherland thinks this is an awful idea and I agree. Always seems like a really cool guy on screen but some reports say he isn't very friendly or approachable in real life. A brilliant actor though.
Found the movie with the Goldblum Sutherland photo so realise it was Sutherland, I mistakenly thought the only film they made together was Bodysnatchers. Watched Don't Look Now last night and had to say Sutherland looked very tall. Did look 6'4'' and the film is a masterpiece which very bizarrely is being remade apparently. Sutherland thinks this is an awful idea and I agree. Always seems like a really cool guy on screen but some reports say he isn't very friendly or approachable in real life. A brilliant actor though.
pedriscovery said on 19/Jan/16
Y agree with the coment,in this photo sutherland have a inusual good posture,and looks the same heigth of goldblum,and say more,in the photo with his sons,kieffer lift his foots to appears more tall in this photo,his brother rosiff is 6,5", donald is not much small i
Y agree with the coment,in this photo sutherland have a inusual good posture,and looks the same heigth of goldblum,and say more,in the photo with his sons,kieffer lift his foots to appears more tall in this photo,his brother rosiff is 6,5", donald is not much small i
movieguy said on 17/Jan/16
Doesn't look like Donald Sutherland in that photo with Goldblum although could be my eyes are deceiving me. They did Invasion of Body Snatchers together and Goldblum looked a bit taller I recall. I think that Sutherland was more or less 6'4'' in his younger days.
Doesn't look like Donald Sutherland in that photo with Goldblum although could be my eyes are deceiving me. They did Invasion of Body Snatchers together and Goldblum looked a bit taller I recall. I think that Sutherland was more or less 6'4'' in his younger days.
Arch Stanton said on 16/Jan/16
Christopher Lee had him by about an inch in Bear Island I think, maybe 4cm, but not easy to tell with the terrain. I think you could argue 6'3.25 as Clint is now at 6'3.75, but around this is more accurate than the previous 6'4.
Christopher Lee had him by about an inch in Bear Island I think, maybe 4cm, but not easy to tell with the terrain. I think you could argue 6'3.25 as Clint is now at 6'3.75, but around this is more accurate than the previous 6'4.
Andrea said on 6/Jan/16
He doesn't look over 6'3 with Jeff...
Btw, Sam, he totally looks like Kiefer in the picture you posted! "Today" maybe not so much but now they are similar in height :) Click Here
He doesn't look over 6'3 with Jeff...
Btw, Sam, he totally looks like Kiefer in the picture you posted! "Today" maybe not so much but now they are similar in height :) Click Here
Arch Stanton said on 2/Jan/16
Goldblum had him by an easy inch in Invasion of the Body Snatchers. But I think 6'4.5 peak for Goldblum.
Goldblum had him by an easy inch in Invasion of the Body Snatchers. But I think 6'4.5 peak for Goldblum.
Moke said on 22/Dec/15
Looks barely 6'1 nowadays.
Looks barely 6'1 nowadays.
Gonzalo said on 30/Nov/15
In that pic they both look the same height. Goldblum looks taller because of his hair. But their eyes are in the same line
In that pic they both look the same height. Goldblum looks taller because of his hair. But their eyes are in the same line
Sam said on 28/Nov/15
I think at 6'4.25" and 6'3.5" are good listings for Jeff Goldblum and Sutherland based on here.
Click Here
I think at 6'4.25" and 6'3.5" are good listings for Jeff Goldblum and Sutherland based on here.
Click Here
S.J.H said on 22/Nov/15
Liam hemsworth look 6'4 next to donald sutherland
Liam hemsworth look 6'4 next to donald sutherland
Arch Stanton said on 20/Sep/15
Rob can you add a photo?
Rob can you add a photo?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Sep/15
His posture is pretty bad nowadays. He can look barely over 6ft
His posture is pretty bad nowadays. He can look barely over 6ft
Judd ISR said on 18/Sep/15
6'3.5" at peak and 6'2.25" today...
6'3.5" at peak and 6'2.25" today...
Pedriscovery said on 13/Jul/15
Un the film"puppet masters"hace two partners un the cast ,listed un 6" 2 and he is cleary two inches almost more tal than hem,he was 60 yeards old un this time
Un the film"puppet masters"hace two partners un the cast ,listed un 6" 2 and he is cleary two inches almost more tal than hem,he was 60 yeards old un this time
James B said on 27/Jun/15
6'3.25 was probably his true peak height. Just look at him next to clint eastwood who wasn't even a full 6'4
6'3.25 was probably his true peak height. Just look at him next to clint eastwood who wasn't even a full 6'4
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Jun/15
Rob, could you add Ordinary People and A Time To Kill to the list?
Rob, could you add Ordinary People and A Time To Kill to the list?
Dmeyer said on 21/Jun/15
He steel looks 6'2 or 2.5 at Times he hasnt lost so much for near 80 at that height
He steel looks 6'2 or 2.5 at Times he hasnt lost so much for near 80 at that height
Sam said on 15/May/15
I agree with the man who said Sutherland was pretty dead-even with Max Von Sydow, but there's a chance Von Sydow was more 6'3.5" than the full 6'4". In his 50s, Von Sydow seemed to be edged out by 6'4" Daniel Stern in Hannah and Her Sisters.
I agree with the man who said Sutherland was pretty dead-even with Max Von Sydow, but there's a chance Von Sydow was more 6'3.5" than the full 6'4". In his 50s, Von Sydow seemed to be edged out by 6'4" Daniel Stern in Hannah and Her Sisters.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Mar/15
He was also described 6ft5.
He was also described 6ft5.
Joe said on 29/Nov/14
Sutherland was 6'4" during his prime years, he has lost a lot of height as he is now nearly 80 years old. He looked considerably shorter than Liam Hemsworth who is 6'3". I think his current height is more around 6 feet even and nothing more.
Sutherland was 6'4" during his prime years, he has lost a lot of height as he is now nearly 80 years old. He looked considerably shorter than Liam Hemsworth who is 6'3". I think his current height is more around 6 feet even and nothing more.
pedriscovery said on 19/Nov/14
Its ok.in a film with max vonn sidow "oviri" are the same heigth.con sidow was 6'4"
Its ok.in a film with max vonn sidow "oviri" are the same heigth.con sidow was 6'4"
pedriscovery said on 1/Nov/14
if you look six degrees of separation,donald suderland is minimum five or six centimetres more tall than will smith,the diference of heigth is considerable like james avery in a "fresh prince"donal sutherland in this time was a strong 6,4"
if you look six degrees of separation,donald suderland is minimum five or six centimetres more tall than will smith,the diference of heigth is considerable like james avery in a "fresh prince"donal sutherland in this time was a strong 6,4"
pedriscovery said on 28/Oct/14
Donald sutherland ever was more tal than eastwood un kellys héroes he adopted bad postures if you look móviles with cristopher lee 6'5" the diferente of height is 0.5" with Roberto ryan he look the same height
Donald sutherland ever was more tal than eastwood un kellys héroes he adopted bad postures if you look móviles with cristopher lee 6'5" the diferente of height is 0.5" with Roberto ryan he look the same height
Sam said on 23/Oct/14
This is more accurate than 6'4" I think, although at times he could seem a weak 6'4" guy along the lines of Jason Segel, Conan O'Brien, John Wayne or, uh, Clint Eastwood.
His advantage over Connery in The Great Train Robbery and advantage over Caine in The Eagle Has Landed seems to be more so around 1.5 than a solid 2 inches.
Click Here
Click Here
Also, a similar 1.5 inch advantage over Jim Brown and Lee Marvin in The Dirty Dozen.
Click Here
This is more accurate than 6'4" I think, although at times he could seem a weak 6'4" guy along the lines of Jason Segel, Conan O'Brien, John Wayne or, uh, Clint Eastwood.
His advantage over Connery in The Great Train Robbery and advantage over Caine in The Eagle Has Landed seems to be more so around 1.5 than a solid 2 inches.
Click Here
Click Here
Also, a similar 1.5 inch advantage over Jim Brown and Lee Marvin in The Dirty Dozen.
Click Here
James B said on 11/Oct/14
Well he could look closer to 6'3 flat compared to Goldblum and clint eastwood.
Well he could look closer to 6'3 flat compared to Goldblum and clint eastwood.
pedriscovery said on 29/Sep/14
Sorry the film is out break
Sorry the film is out break
pedriscovery said on 19/Sep/14
In "disclosure" film he is cleary two inches more tall than morgan freeman,look the final scene
In "disclosure" film he is cleary two inches more tall than morgan freeman,look the final scene
thebad7 said on 14/May/14
filmfan says on 22/Mar/14
I don't understand the comments about Eastwood being taller. Sutherland is clearly taller in Space Cowboys and in Kelly Heroes they don't really stand close together often and when they do Sutherland looks slightly taller.
If you're talking late 1969/early 1970, then YES, Eastwood has the advantage. No, they don't stand close together often, but in a few instances where comparisons can be made, Eastwood has a slight but noticeable advantage. If you're talking 1999/2000 when SPACE COWBOYS hit theaters, then YES, Sutherland has the advantage since Clint has been losing height since about the early 90s. Compared to Eastwood, Sutherland has kept most of his height as he's advanced in age. In 2011's THE MECHANIC--good action film, but nowhere near the perfection of the 1972 Charles Bronson film--he looks bare minimum 6'2 1/2" and this around age 75.
tb7
filmfan says on 22/Mar/14
I don't understand the comments about Eastwood being taller. Sutherland is clearly taller in Space Cowboys and in Kelly Heroes they don't really stand close together often and when they do Sutherland looks slightly taller.
If you're talking late 1969/early 1970, then YES, Eastwood has the advantage. No, they don't stand close together often, but in a few instances where comparisons can be made, Eastwood has a slight but noticeable advantage. If you're talking 1999/2000 when SPACE COWBOYS hit theaters, then YES, Sutherland has the advantage since Clint has been losing height since about the early 90s. Compared to Eastwood, Sutherland has kept most of his height as he's advanced in age. In 2011's THE MECHANIC--good action film, but nowhere near the perfection of the 1972 Charles Bronson film--he looks bare minimum 6'2 1/2" and this around age 75.
tb7
Arch Stanton said on 1/Apr/14
Yeah they didn't share many scenes standing together, only a couple and briefly but Eastwood definitely had the edge on Sutherland in the close up scene although we don't know what the ground level was like.
Yeah they didn't share many scenes standing together, only a couple and briefly but Eastwood definitely had the edge on Sutherland in the close up scene although we don't know what the ground level was like.
pedriscovery said on 18/Feb/14
in comander in chief geena davis have tall shoes,and sutherlan is more tall,6,4"is posible today
in comander in chief geena davis have tall shoes,and sutherlan is more tall,6,4"is posible today
176,2Tunman said on 8/Feb/14
I think this listing is accurate.He looked very similar to Eastwood in Kelly's Heroes though Eastwood may be 1cm taller.He still looked about 6'3 comparing to 6' Geena Davis in Commander-in-Chief.
I think this listing is accurate.He looked very similar to Eastwood in Kelly's Heroes though Eastwood may be 1cm taller.He still looked about 6'3 comparing to 6' Geena Davis in Commander-in-Chief.
thebad7 said on 30/Jan/14
Gifted actor. To this day, my favorite role of his is Ronald the Firebug from 1991's BACKDRAFT--the guy's only in one scene, and he steals the entire film. As for his height, Rob's spot on. He wasn't quite 6'4", but close. Of course, 1970's KELLY'S HEROES is the favorite example. As several other posters noted, Don and Clint were very close--with Clint having a hair (1/2") on Sutherland and both men were wearing WWII era combat boots.
Peak: 6'3 1/2".
2014: strong 6'2"/weak 6'3". For a man his age, he's kept most of his height.
tb7
Gifted actor. To this day, my favorite role of his is Ronald the Firebug from 1991's BACKDRAFT--the guy's only in one scene, and he steals the entire film. As for his height, Rob's spot on. He wasn't quite 6'4", but close. Of course, 1970's KELLY'S HEROES is the favorite example. As several other posters noted, Don and Clint were very close--with Clint having a hair (1/2") on Sutherland and both men were wearing WWII era combat boots.
Peak: 6'3 1/2".
2014: strong 6'2"/weak 6'3". For a man his age, he's kept most of his height.
tb7
Gomecito said on 13/Dec/13
Sutherland and Goldblum. At first they look the same height. Afetrwards Goldblum looks taller but Sutherland is slouching
Click Here
Sutherland and Goldblum. At first they look the same height. Afetrwards Goldblum looks taller but Sutherland is slouching
Click Here
Sam said on 19/Nov/13
There are several scenes and shots of Eastwood and Sutherland together during Kelley's Heroes and they look similar, though at times Eastwood actually looks a smidge taller, not the other way around.
There are several scenes and shots of Eastwood and Sutherland together during Kelley's Heroes and they look similar, though at times Eastwood actually looks a smidge taller, not the other way around.
pedriscovery said on 17/Nov/13
ina photograps of premier of hangred games shuterlan is a bit taller than liam hemsworth today with 77 yeards old
ina photograps of premier of hangred games shuterlan is a bit taller than liam hemsworth today with 77 yeards old
pedriscovery said on 17/Nov/13
have a video edition of kellys heroes,in the portait photograph have a image of telly savallas,sutherland and clint eastwood and donal with relax posture an legs open is more tall than eastwood,so eastwood never was a 6,4" or sutherland was 6"5
have a video edition of kellys heroes,in the portait photograph have a image of telly savallas,sutherland and clint eastwood and donal with relax posture an legs open is more tall than eastwood,so eastwood never was a 6,4" or sutherland was 6"5
Arch Stanton said on 12/Nov/13
He's lost height, yes, but his profile still resembles that of a guy near 6'4", long face and long willowy frame
He's lost height, yes, but his profile still resembles that of a guy near 6'4", long face and long willowy frame
Arch Stanton said on 22/Sep/13
No it wasn't 2-3 inches though Pedri, more 1.5-2 inches. Gould at 6'2" and Sutherland at 6'3.5" looks about right.
No it wasn't 2-3 inches though Pedri, more 1.5-2 inches. Gould at 6'2" and Sutherland at 6'3.5" looks about right.
Arch Stanton said on 22/Sep/13
Strangely though Skerritt looks taller than 5'11" next to Sutherland in MASH.
Strangely though Skerritt looks taller than 5'11" next to Sutherland in MASH.
Arch Stanton said on 22/Sep/13
Agreed Pedri. Sutherland really looks a big guy in MASH and looks 6'4' ish. The fact that Clint Eastwood was a bit taller at the same sort of period as Kelly's Heroes, I have no doubts that Eastwood was a legit 6'4" peak. Sutherland at 192 peak is spot on IMO and he could have been 6'4" morning anyway.
Agreed Pedri. Sutherland really looks a big guy in MASH and looks 6'4' ish. The fact that Clint Eastwood was a bit taller at the same sort of period as Kelly's Heroes, I have no doubts that Eastwood was a legit 6'4" peak. Sutherland at 192 peak is spot on IMO and he could have been 6'4" morning anyway.
pedriscovery said on 16/Sep/13
in a film M.A.S.H with elliott gould 6ft2" donald was 2 o 3 inches more tall,in pride an prejuice he was more tall than hes partner,i not remember the name,but he was 191cm an donald he a bit more tall,with 74 yeards in this movie
in a film M.A.S.H with elliott gould 6ft2" donald was 2 o 3 inches more tall,in pride an prejuice he was more tall than hes partner,i not remember the name,but he was 191cm an donald he a bit more tall,with 74 yeards in this movie
jtm said on 26/Aug/13
peak height is accurate but he could be shorter than 6'2 nowadays.
peak height is accurate but he could be shorter than 6'2 nowadays.
pedriscovery said on 23/Aug/13
in six degrees of separation he is two inches more tall than will smith 6"2,donald is 6"4 today,he declared "in a lot of movies and photograps encorved himself to look to ayes front to front
in six degrees of separation he is two inches more tall than will smith 6"2,donald is 6"4 today,he declared "in a lot of movies and photograps encorved himself to look to ayes front to front
pedriscovery said on 23/Aug/13
in the tv series mis president donald sutherland have two partners in 6"4 in some photografs he have the similar heigth
in the tv series mis president donald sutherland have two partners in 6"4 in some photografs he have the similar heigth
Ian C. said on 3/Aug/13
He's in The Dirty Dozen, and the Dozen are ordered to line up according to height. Sutherland is second from the tall end of the line, standing next to six foot six Clint Walker. Probably the only time in his life that Sutherland has felt short. Show me an interview with Sutherland where he does not mention his height.
He's in The Dirty Dozen, and the Dozen are ordered to line up according to height. Sutherland is second from the tall end of the line, standing next to six foot six Clint Walker. Probably the only time in his life that Sutherland has felt short. Show me an interview with Sutherland where he does not mention his height.
bookman said on 11/Jun/13
I just saw Body Snatchers again and I would say slightly less than GoldBlum. My guess 6'3 in his younger days.
I just saw Body Snatchers again and I would say slightly less than GoldBlum. My guess 6'3 in his younger days.
pedriscovery said on 3/Apr/13
in a imagen with morgan freeman face to face donald was a trhee inches more tall,moran freeman is 6,2".
in a imagen with morgan freeman face to face donald was a trhee inches more tall,moran freeman is 6,2".
Arch Stanton said on 17/Feb/13
Disagree, that would put Connery at 6 ft 1 flat peak. 6'3.5" peak is about right.
Disagree, that would put Connery at 6 ft 1 flat peak. 6'3.5" peak is about right.
James said on 19/Nov/12
Eastwood possibly 192cm and Sutherland 191cm in my opinion
Eastwood possibly 192cm and Sutherland 191cm in my opinion
James said on 12/Nov/12
Still a legit tall man at 6'2
Still a legit tall man at 6'2
kevin said on 11/Nov/12
peak height at 192cm seems correct when you have eastwood at 193cm peak.
peak height at 192cm seems correct when you have eastwood at 193cm peak.
James said on 10/Nov/12
Rob is 6'3.25 (191cm) possible for his peak height? There's always a chance Clint Eastwood was 6'3.75 peak and he edged him out in kellys hearoes.
Editor Rob
Rob is 6'3.25 (191cm) possible for his peak height? There's always a chance Clint Eastwood was 6'3.75 peak and he edged him out in kellys hearoes.
Editor Rob he's been called 6ft 3 and 4 in his heydey, I'm not as sure he was a big 6ft 4, but one of those guys somewhere in 6ft 3-4 range
Halb said on 18/Sep/12
Still looked tall in Space Cowboys
Still looked tall in Space Cowboys
Shaun said on 24/Aug/12
6'3.5" peak 6'2" today for Sutherland is spot on in my opinion. Good call Rob, Eastwood definitely edged him out in Kelly's Heroes.
6'3.5" peak 6'2" today for Sutherland is spot on in my opinion. Good call Rob, Eastwood definitely edged him out in Kelly's Heroes.
Hob said on 28/Jul/12
in recent picture he had bizarre to look as short as 5'11.5-6'0 even. maybe he drop posture alot. wonder he was only 6'2 a stretch in dress shoe.
in recent picture he had bizarre to look as short as 5'11.5-6'0 even. maybe he drop posture alot. wonder he was only 6'2 a stretch in dress shoe.
Danimal said on 25/Jul/12
Was about an inch shorter than 6'5" Christopher Lee in Dr. Horror's House of Horrors (1965)/
Was about an inch shorter than 6'5" Christopher Lee in Dr. Horror's House of Horrors (1965)/
mike said on 24/Jul/12
Didn't look that tall in without limits looked in the 185 Cm range next to billy crudup
Didn't look that tall in without limits looked in the 185 Cm range next to billy crudup
jake, 1.82 m/ 1.83 m said on 13/Jan/12
6" 3.75 (192 cm) peak, looks just under 6" 2 today.
6" 3.75 (192 cm) peak, looks just under 6" 2 today.
avi said on 5/Jan/12
a very strong 6'3 because Clint Walker had almost 2 inches on him in Dirt Dozen. We know Clint Walker i sunder 6'6 a strong 6'5 so this would make sense.
a very strong 6'3 because Clint Walker had almost 2 inches on him in Dirt Dozen. We know Clint Walker i sunder 6'6 a strong 6'5 so this would make sense.
William Williams said on 27/Nov/11
I worked with Donald Sutherland in a Canadian made movie called Alien Thunder.
It was made in 1972/73 in Saskatchewan, Canada. I am 6'3 1/2" and Donald Sutherland is exactly the same height. I have a still picture with both of us in costume. i ahd been considered to complete some stunt double work for Mr.Sutherland.
I worked with Donald Sutherland in a Canadian made movie called Alien Thunder.
It was made in 1972/73 in Saskatchewan, Canada. I am 6'3 1/2" and Donald Sutherland is exactly the same height. I have a still picture with both of us in costume. i ahd been considered to complete some stunt double work for Mr.Sutherland.
Billy said on 20/Nov/11
I saw Donald opposite Matthew McConaughey in "A Time To Kill" which was on TV last night and in their scene together they appeared the exact same height. In fact half the time Matthew looked taller.
I saw Donald opposite Matthew McConaughey in "A Time To Kill" which was on TV last night and in their scene together they appeared the exact same height. In fact half the time Matthew looked taller.
LAN Jiao said on 6/Nov/11
changes.. ignore prev post.
peak clint - 6'4
sutherland - 6'3.25
jeff goldblum - 6'4.5
changes.. ignore prev post.
peak clint - 6'4
sutherland - 6'3.25
jeff goldblum - 6'4.5
thebad7 said on 6/Nov/11
Rob, this site is great, and you are pretty much spot on with your measurements. Unfortunately, some trolls permeate the forum with inaccuracy and general BS just to be obnoxious. They might consider actually watching the films and studying photos before polluting the forum.
Eastwood was 6'4" as a young man. Just watched him this morning in COOGAN'S BLUFF. He has a good 2" on 6'2" Don Stroud. He's a hair taller than Sutherland in 1970 for KELLY'S HEROES.
tb7
Rob, this site is great, and you are pretty much spot on with your measurements. Unfortunately, some trolls permeate the forum with inaccuracy and general BS just to be obnoxious. They might consider actually watching the films and studying photos before polluting the forum.
Eastwood was 6'4" as a young man. Just watched him this morning in COOGAN'S BLUFF. He has a good 2" on 6'2" Don Stroud. He's a hair taller than Sutherland in 1970 for KELLY'S HEROES.
tb7
LAN Jiao said on 3/Nov/11
no no. he never shorter than clint eastwood at peak even now. hes beem underestimate and clint gets overestimate all this while..
sutherland @ peak 191 (full inch lower peak jeff goldblum)
clint @ peak 188-189 (exactly same height as 6'2 lee van cleef @ peak)
no no. he never shorter than clint eastwood at peak even now. hes beem underestimate and clint gets overestimate all this while..
sutherland @ peak 191 (full inch lower peak jeff goldblum)
clint @ peak 188-189 (exactly same height as 6'2 lee van cleef @ peak)
thebad7 said on 3/Nov/11
He was tall as a young man, and even today he's still tall. I don't believe he ever reached 6'4", but I do believe he hit 6'3 1/2" for his peak. He looked a hair shorter than a young Clint Eastwood in 1970's KELLY'S HEROES, with Eastwood being about 1/2" to 1" taller.
I saw him most recently alongside Jason Statham in the 2011 retread of THE MECHANIC. Surprisingly decent film--though it pales next to the '72 Bronson classic--and The Don looks to be about 6'2" today after having seen him in this film.
tb7
He was tall as a young man, and even today he's still tall. I don't believe he ever reached 6'4", but I do believe he hit 6'3 1/2" for his peak. He looked a hair shorter than a young Clint Eastwood in 1970's KELLY'S HEROES, with Eastwood being about 1/2" to 1" taller.
I saw him most recently alongside Jason Statham in the 2011 retread of THE MECHANIC. Surprisingly decent film--though it pales next to the '72 Bronson classic--and The Don looks to be about 6'2" today after having seen him in this film.
tb7
jake, 1.82 m said on 30/Oct/11
He dwarfed the cast of Don't Look Now.
He dwarfed the cast of Don't Look Now.
LAN Jiao said on 26/Oct/11
peak 191 , now 187 (only if measure straight up). sutherland had develope a bad hump can look 6'0 in picture. 6'2 easily morning.
peak 191 , now 187 (only if measure straight up). sutherland had develope a bad hump can look 6'0 in picture. 6'2 easily morning.
LAN Jiao said on 7/Oct/11
He never look 6'4 during peak. 6'3.25 at best, in body snatcher look an inch under 6'4 jeff goldblum. Probably lose 4cm at 6'1.5 now. Can look 6'1 with relax posture alot.
He never look 6'4 during peak. 6'3.25 at best, in body snatcher look an inch under 6'4 jeff goldblum. Probably lose 4cm at 6'1.5 now. Can look 6'1 with relax posture alot.
dmeyer said on 5/Oct/11
today 6 ft 2 giving impression of 6 ft 1 in bad posture near 6 ft 4 peak
today 6 ft 2 giving impression of 6 ft 1 in bad posture near 6 ft 4 peak
dmeyer said on 5/Oct/11
in italian job he has about 6 in on mark whalberg
in italian job he has about 6 in on mark whalberg
Patty said on 25/Sep/11
Met him at a party in 2005. easily the tallest person there, well over 6 ft. My guess would be 6'3" or maybe a tad more.
Met him at a party in 2005. easily the tallest person there, well over 6 ft. My guess would be 6'3" or maybe a tad more.
Hansen said on 23/Aug/11
watched a old movie 70s show named body snatcher stars 6ft4 jeff goldblum along donald sutherland, sutherland can look only 6ft2 close up scene next to goldblum while another scene with a stretch up he look legit 6ft3.25 , no more less. during prime in mash he look a flat 6ft3 a big hair near 6ft5 , think he should be on 6ft3.25 in prime nowadays he had lost height and posture both. the lowest down he look 6ft in pictures and i believe straight up at 6ft2 was pretty accurate.
watched a old movie 70s show named body snatcher stars 6ft4 jeff goldblum along donald sutherland, sutherland can look only 6ft2 close up scene next to goldblum while another scene with a stretch up he look legit 6ft3.25 , no more less. during prime in mash he look a flat 6ft3 a big hair near 6ft5 , think he should be on 6ft3.25 in prime nowadays he had lost height and posture both. the lowest down he look 6ft in pictures and i believe straight up at 6ft2 was pretty accurate.
James said on 10/Aug/11
I think he really was 6'4 (193cm) when younger because he was 2 inches taller than Sean Connery who was a strong 6'2 peak like pushing 189cm. sutherland is very similar too tom selleck in build.
I think this proves my point as well that clint eastwood might have been 194cm peak because he had an edge on sutherland in 1970.
I think he really was 6'4 (193cm) when younger because he was 2 inches taller than Sean Connery who was a strong 6'2 peak like pushing 189cm. sutherland is very similar too tom selleck in build.
I think this proves my point as well that clint eastwood might have been 194cm peak because he had an edge on sutherland in 1970.
Sam said on 29/Jul/11
Here's an interesting shot from a 1986 film where Sutherland looks marginally taller than Max von Sydow, although I think he's a little closer to the camera:
Click Here
Here's an interesting shot from a 1986 film where Sutherland looks marginally taller than Max von Sydow, although I think he's a little closer to the camera:
Click Here
5'8.56784 said on 28/Jul/11
Del Mar, this guy looks 6'2 next to Farrell, check Farrel's heel advantage of 1 extra inch.
Del Mar, this guy looks 6'2 next to Farrell, check Farrel's heel advantage of 1 extra inch.
jake said on 17/Jul/11
He had 3 inches on 6ft0.25 Denzel Washington in Fallen. If he was still around the 6ft3 mark in 1998 I'd say he was close to 6ft4 at peak.
He had 3 inches on 6ft0.25 Denzel Washington in Fallen. If he was still around the 6ft3 mark in 1998 I'd say he was close to 6ft4 at peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jul/11
6ft3.5(192cm) prime
6ft3.5(192cm) prime
Terryman said on 28/Jun/11
1,91 meters peak,looked really weird when he was a young man!
1,91 meters peak,looked really weird when he was a young man!
Mathew said on 23/Jun/11
James says on 16/Jun/11
Would you agree he did not look over 6'2.5 (189cm) in Lock Up?
I think 6'2.5" in that movie seems like a pretty good estimate. He was clearly not 6'4" then anyways.
James says on 16/Jun/11
Would you agree he did not look over 6'2.5 (189cm) in Lock Up?
I think 6'2.5" in that movie seems like a pretty good estimate. He was clearly not 6'4" then anyways.
James said on 16/Jun/11
Mathew says on 14/Jun/11
James says on 21/May/11
i don't think he was ever 6'4.
No taller than 189cm even in 1989
---
Yeah I think 6'4" is a bit much for him.
Would you agree he did not look over 6'2.5 (189cm) in Lock Up?
Mathew says on 14/Jun/11
James says on 21/May/11
i don't think he was ever 6'4.
No taller than 189cm even in 1989
---
Yeah I think 6'4" is a bit much for him.
Would you agree he did not look over 6'2.5 (189cm) in Lock Up?
Mathew said on 14/Jun/11
James says on 21/May/11
i don't think he was ever 6'4.
No taller than 189cm even in 1989
---
Yeah I think 6'4" is a bit much for him.
James says on 21/May/11
i don't think he was ever 6'4.
No taller than 189cm even in 1989
---
Yeah I think 6'4" is a bit much for him.
James said on 21/May/11
i don't think he was ever 6'4.
No taller than 189cm even in 1989
i don't think he was ever 6'4.
No taller than 189cm even in 1989
Gus said on 14/May/11
Sutherland was a half inch maybe just a centimetre shorter than strong 6'3 peak Eastwood. I think sutherland was more 189/190cm tbh than 6'4.
Sutherland was a half inch maybe just a centimetre shorter than strong 6'3 peak Eastwood. I think sutherland was more 189/190cm tbh than 6'4.
gogo said on 9/May/11
colin sure is in lifts
colin sure is in lifts
Del Mar said on 8/Feb/11
From the lasest pics on gettyimages he doesn't seem to have more than 1 inch on Colin Farrell! Click Here Maybe only 6-1 now?
From the lasest pics on gettyimages he doesn't seem to have more than 1 inch on Colin Farrell! Click Here Maybe only 6-1 now?
kevin said on 26/Jan/11
was shorter than both eastwood 192-193cm and goldblum 193-194cm. at his peak more like 192cm. 191cm minimum
was shorter than both eastwood 192-193cm and goldblum 193-194cm. at his peak more like 192cm. 191cm minimum
Bon_ said on 26/Jan/11
Strong 6'3 in his prime.
Strong 6'3 in his prime.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/11
Is there a chance he's still a fraction over 6"2 Rob?
Is there a chance he's still a fraction over 6"2 Rob?
Cookie said on 2/Jan/11
Sutherland looks like a giant compared to Kate Bush in the music video 'Cloudbusting'.
Sutherland looks like a giant compared to Kate Bush in the music video 'Cloudbusting'.
yoyo said on 17/May/09
his def near 6ft4 in 1980s.. but not quite 6ft4. i seen him in real in late 90s looks about 6"2.5 with a very bad posture. def 6ft3 in 90s. recent movies he could look as low as 6ft1..
his def near 6ft4 in 1980s.. but not quite 6ft4. i seen him in real in late 90s looks about 6"2.5 with a very bad posture. def 6ft3 in 90s. recent movies he could look as low as 6ft1..
RisingForce said on 11/May/09
He was about Clint Eastwood's height in Kelly's Heroes which was in 1970. 6-4 peak isn't hard for me to believe. he seemed like he was almost a head taller than mark wahlberg in the italian job(2003) and i peg mark at 5-7.5. donald was about 4 inches taller than stallone in lock up, which was 1989.
He was about Clint Eastwood's height in Kelly's Heroes which was in 1970. 6-4 peak isn't hard for me to believe. he seemed like he was almost a head taller than mark wahlberg in the italian job(2003) and i peg mark at 5-7.5. donald was about 4 inches taller than stallone in lock up, which was 1989.
yoyo said on 22/Apr/09
with his bad posture in movies and photo taken he could look as low as 6ft0.75(185cm). standing straight up he could be 6ft2 now. def not as tall as in the 1990s time especially in OutBreak standing next to 6ft2 Morgan Freeman looks 6ft3 tall. this oldman has shrunk quite alot.. 1.5in lost.
with his bad posture in movies and photo taken he could look as low as 6ft0.75(185cm). standing straight up he could be 6ft2 now. def not as tall as in the 1990s time especially in OutBreak standing next to 6ft2 Morgan Freeman looks 6ft3 tall. this oldman has shrunk quite alot.. 1.5in lost.
Hugh 190cm said on 10/Apr/09
Actually maybe 6ft4 prime. He was over an inch taller than supposedly 6ft3 Elliot Gould in Mash.
Actually maybe 6ft4 prime. He was over an inch taller than supposedly 6ft3 Elliot Gould in Mash.
Hugh 190cm said on 10/Apr/09
Rob this guy still looks close enough to 6ft3. 188cm-189cm?
Rob this guy still looks close enough to 6ft3. 188cm-189cm?
Doug said on 4/Apr/09
Funny thing is although Kiefer is so much shorter he definately resembles Donald facially more than Rossif does. They definately have similar eyes and a long pointy face shape, you can definately see its his father even though he towers above Kiefer.
Funny thing is although Kiefer is so much shorter he definately resembles Donald facially more than Rossif does. They definately have similar eyes and a long pointy face shape, you can definately see its his father even though he towers above Kiefer.
Doug said on 4/Apr/09
In some recent photos Eastwood still looks in the 6'2" range and in one photo looks pretty evenly matched with Sutherland today. It seems strnage both men have lost two inches or more. If they were however 6'3"....
In some recent photos Eastwood still looks in the 6'2" range and in one photo looks pretty evenly matched with Sutherland today. It seems strnage both men have lost two inches or more. If they were however 6'3"....
\_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ said on 1/Mar/09
189cm nowadays. 192cm-193cm peak.
189cm nowadays. 192cm-193cm peak.
-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-/ said on 21/Feb/09
I think 6ft3.75 was his peak. A weak 6ft4. Nowadays looks to have lost a little more than one inch. 6ft2-6ft2.5.
I think 6ft3.75 was his peak. A weak 6ft4. Nowadays looks to have lost a little more than one inch. 6ft2-6ft2.5.
yoyo said on 7/Feb/09
in 1970s to 80s hes a solid 6ft3.5 tall. in late 90s he has drop about 2cm and looks a good 190cm tall. nowadays 189 or abit lower like 188 make sense..
in 1970s to 80s hes a solid 6ft3.5 tall. in late 90s he has drop about 2cm and looks a good 190cm tall. nowadays 189 or abit lower like 188 make sense..
Doug said on 7/Feb/09
I don't think he ever was legit 6'4" barefoot, can't see anything above 6'3". Might have been 6'4" in shoes.
I don't think he ever was legit 6'4" barefoot, can't see anything above 6'3". Might have been 6'4" in shoes.
Doug said on 7/Feb/09
How can a 6'4" guy only have a 5'8.5" son? It doesn't make sense.
How can a 6'4" guy only have a 5'8.5" son? It doesn't make sense.
adam said on 6/Feb/09
I`ll have to agree. Sutherland was near 6-4 peak but I
I`ll have to agree. Sutherland was near 6-4 peak but I
Lenad said on 31/Jan/09
6ft2 if anything probably is his peak height. The 6ft4 is utter bull.
6ft2 if anything probably is his peak height. The 6ft4 is utter bull.
adam said on 6/Jan/09
Well! Rob took an inch off from his current height which seems to be the right thing to do. Maybe half an inch off from his peak height, Rob? I mean he really was clearly shorter than Goldblum...
Well! Rob took an inch off from his current height which seems to be the right thing to do. Maybe half an inch off from his peak height, Rob? I mean he really was clearly shorter than Goldblum...
yoyo said on 3/Jan/09
his son is all tall over 6ft2 accept Kiefer..
his son is all tall over 6ft2 accept Kiefer..
adam said on 1/Jan/09
Yes, Sutherland is a Canadian actor, not US. And he was possibly half an inch shorter than the listed height here.
Yes, Sutherland is a Canadian actor, not US. And he was possibly half an inch shorter than the listed height here.
yoyo said on 27/Dec/08
his never a solid 6ft4. But a good 192ish in 1970s, In 1980s sometimes his bad posture makes look as low from 187 to 190 without a straight standing posture. Nowadays hes a strong 6ft1 without good posture, 6ft2 with a good one.
his never a solid 6ft4. But a good 192ish in 1970s, In 1980s sometimes his bad posture makes look as low from 187 to 190 without a straight standing posture. Nowadays hes a strong 6ft1 without good posture, 6ft2 with a good one.
Guy said on 25/Dec/08
Donald Sutherland is actually Canadian.
Donald Sutherland is actually Canadian.
yoyo said on 20/Dec/08
old donald is once 192cm tall. nowadays looks 188. His 6ft5 son rossif sutherland had 3in on him. so 188 now was right.
old donald is once 192cm tall. nowadays looks 188. His 6ft5 son rossif sutherland had 3in on him. so 188 now was right.
adam said on 16/Dec/08
I would put him in the 6`3
I would put him in the 6`3
Hugh said on 11/Dec/08
6ft4 is not impossible. He was a huge man for his generation. He looked huge bak in the day. He's tall a genuinely tall man.
6ft4 is not impossible. He was a huge man for his generation. He looked huge bak in the day. He's tall a genuinely tall man.
Lenad said on 10/Dec/08
Pheraps he lost no height. Maybe just shy of 6'3 peak but anything higher is out of the question.
Pheraps he lost no height. Maybe just shy of 6'3 peak but anything higher is out of the question.
glenn said on 9/Dec/08
he is still 6-3.saw him last year.i agree 6-4 peak sound a little extreme.but not impossible.
he is still 6-3.saw him last year.i agree 6-4 peak sound a little extreme.but not impossible.
adam said on 9/Dec/08
Jesus christ my English sucked in the previous post! I apologize for that.
Lenad, he was obviously more than 6-2 peak. No questions about that. But he could have been slightly less than 6-4.
Jesus christ my English sucked in the previous post! I apologize for that.
Lenad, he was obviously more than 6-2 peak. No questions about that. But he could have been slightly less than 6-4.
Lenad said on 8/Dec/08
He really was 6ft2 peak. The 6ft4 is utter bull.
He really was 6ft2 peak. The 6ft4 is utter bull.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.