|
routy says on 8/Mar/10
5'11 MAX considering the footwear advantage
Josh says on 3/Mar/10
5'11" next to Jenny Hugh 190-192cm says on 28/Feb/10
179-180cm next to Rob filip says on 18/Feb/10
on the left photo looks 181. Hugh (191cm/252lbs) says on 12/Feb/10
181cm at the lowest. Basically 5ft 11.5 J.J. says on 8/Feb/10
Looks 5'11.625" with Jenny so very good 182cm guy Jon 183cm says on 24/Jan/10
looks closer to 6' with jenny than he dus with rob. stil don't buy it though. maybe 5ft 11.25 Hugh 190-192cm says on 14/Jan/10
C'mon rob between 180-182cm Hugh 190-192cm says on 14/Jan/10
Can't beleive this guy claims 6"2 as his height. haha says on 12/Jan/10
looks 2 inches tops over you Bohm says on 10/Jan/10
There are plenty of guys close to his height claiming 6 foot 2. Hugh 190-192cm says on 31/Dec/09
Thats the one. Konan says on 29/Dec/09
Click Here yeah, they have the same height 191cm is Royalty says on 9/Dec/09
I've found a picture where he looks the same height as Robert Pattinson! I'll try and post it. 191cm is Royalty says on 9/Dec/09
I'll settle on a really solid 5ft 11 at best like 181-182cm. 191cm is Royalty says on 9/Dec/09
Rob you said it's even ridiculous listing him as 5ft 11.5! TNmuscle says on 8/Dec/09
Yeah I agree w/ Hugh downgrade him, every comment on this page is about how he's not 6ft :P Hugh 191cm says on 4/Dec/09
still selling as 6ft, rob? c'mon he's clearly 180-181cm max linke says on 1/Dec/09
in that vampire movie,is he taller than pattison?5'11 guy claiming 6'2 is funny but i've came across several such 5'11ers. dmeyer says on 29/Nov/09
looks more 5 ft10.5 Hugh 191cm says on 29/Nov/09
180-182cm rob? Hugh 191cm says on 27/Nov/09
5ft 11.25in Lozzer says on 22/Nov/09
Solid 5'10.75" :) Hugh 191cm says on 15/Nov/09
5ft11 minimum pikapika says on 15/Nov/09
he looks 5'10.5 max here T,J, says on 14/Nov/09
That's the weakest 6' i've ever seen. Especially since he has a shoe advantage in these pics miko says on 11/Nov/09
Perhaps Gil got Rob a cameo in the New Moon film?
Because that's the only possible reason he's still listed at 6"0!
Or maybe Rob tried out his new 2.5" boots he bought and Jenny was in heels?
Seriously, a downgrade is required, even if only to 5"11.5, it's closer to reality. Ras says on 8/Nov/09
Rob, the top of your head is quite above his eyebrows:
Click Here
How is he 6 ft? He looks 5'11. Hugh 191cm says on 6/Nov/09
6ft2!!!! Anonymous says on 6/Nov/09
Click Here
compare rob with gil and taylor with gil.
I think taylor needs a downgrade? Anonymous says on 6/Nov/09
wow he really doesn't look 6ft tall here rob (even with his military posture). Compare these pics with you standing next to 5'11ers Josh.J says on 4/Nov/09
5'10.5" and he does have good posture TN 185cm says on 3/Nov/09
Looks about 5'11 to me if you two are 5'8 Jon 183cm says on 2/Nov/09
doesnt quite look like he's straightened his posture in both these pictures. I hav a bit more of an advantage than this if i lean how he is towards my 5ft 8 gf, both of us in shoes, and im 6ft. 5ft 11 looks more realistic than 6ft, especially with that half inch advantage he has, but 1.82 m isn't ruled out. Original says on 1/Nov/09
Max 181. 5'11 is correct. James says on 1/Nov/09
He's got a VERY bizzare perception of his height if he might be only 5'10.5 or 5'11 and is claiming 6'2. Brian says on 1/Nov/09
Rob, did you giving him the 6' listing also have something to do with not wanting to stray too far away from his 6'2" claim, i.e. if he just claimed 6'0" or 6'1", would you have just given him 5'11"? Ace says on 31/Oct/09
So he's only 5`11 in the photo, next you subtract .5 inches for the shoe advantage, and we are down to 5`10.5. This guy is stretching his height by nearly 4 inches!
[Editor Rob: about 179cm...that's what he could 'appear', but the photographer is 5ft 2. Sometimes that could knock 1/2 inch from perceived height, but sometimes it might not...] miko says on 31/Oct/09
Rob, doesn't it take away the seriousness for the site if you leave him at that height.
He clearly isn't that tall and you have proof of it. James says on 31/Oct/09
Rob if you think he might be 180cm or even less why don't you downgrade him?????
[Editor Rob: Gil's a werewolf, it's bad enough listing him only 6ft let alone 5ft 11.5!] Anonymous says on 30/Oct/09
He is 6 foot, just use this picture as reference.
Click Here
BTW this photo has an illusion regarding the way Rob is angled to the camera. His right shoulder is closer then the other and it has a weird effect where it makes Gil's shoulders look the same level as Robs. I think that is where people are seeing the 5'11" claim.
[Editor Rob: I think he's 180cm in that photo as shown, but knock another 1/2 inch off that for his shoe advantage ;)] Yaspaa says on 30/Oct/09
The guy looks 5'11. J.J. says on 30/Oct/09
5'11" for sure James says on 30/Oct/09
Maybe he claimed 6'2 because he measured himself out of bed at being slightly over 6'0? Or maybe he measured himself in chunky boots? Unlikely though.
He might just have a odd perception of his own height and think he's 6'2 and dosen't need to bother measuring. James says on 30/Oct/09
Rob do you think he might be between 5'11-6'0?
[Editor Rob: I think he's a decent guy, I don't know why he said 6ft 2 though.
I wouldn't be shocked if he was slightly under 6ft.] Rika says on 30/Oct/09
Looks 5'11 and he's erected his posture in both shots. Josh.J says on 29/Oct/09
6'2? in his wildest and most fantastical dreams. he looks 5'11 with good posture Hugh 191cm says on 29/Oct/09
Looks 5ft11-5ft11.5 Lynn says on 29/Oct/09
5'11 miko says on 29/Oct/09
That is the weakest 6"0 I've ever seen.
Very lucky if he is much over 5"11.
What does he have over Rob and Jenny, perhaps a little over 2 inches at the maximum, then take his footwear advantage away, you get 5"11 at the max. James says on 29/Oct/09
5'11 Realme2008 says on 29/Oct/09
Okay, 4 inches + a 1/2 inch footwear advantage. I'm no seeing that at all in these photos. His posture isn't that great, but even with better posture... Oleg says on 29/Oct/09
looks 3 inches taller. 5ft11 I guess |
