How tall is Hulk Hogan

Hulk Hogan's Height

6ft 3in (191 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 6in (198 cm)
American Wrestler and actor. In Feb 2005 Allure he said: "I used to be 6ft 7, but after knee, neck and back surgeries I'm now about 6ft 4". In 2011 he repeated in an interview he was 6ft 7 barefoot but lost height and was 6ft 4, but now after multiple back surgeries believes he is 6ft 5 again.

Add a Comment 250 comments




bigmike74 said on 29/Jun/16
@RP i seen Graham also in 1978 at a Angels Restaurant in Pensacola FL he was in flat tie die boat shoes and cut off jeans. He was 6'3" easy. Maybe 6'2" at 3 in the a.m. but mid to evening still hitting that mark. Look up the photo with him and Arnold he had 2" on him and ole Arnold was a 6'1 to 6'1.5" guy then.
dicksock said on 29/Jun/16
RP said on 29/Jun/16
Bigmike74...Wayne Coleman aka Superstar Billy Graham was only 6'2" peak (barefoot) in his prime. He's shrunk a lot too, last time I saw him, he was BARELY scrapping 6'0"...I'm 5'11" & he was marginally taller than me. At bet best 6'0" now...but, his peak barefoot height was 6'2"...he's even admitted this himself before in shoot interviews.

___________

I have watched several shoots with Graham, and he always claims he was 6'4" and that steroids caused him to shrink to 6'. Where have you heard him say he was only 6'2"? I've always felt he was more like 6'3" in his day.
RP said on 29/Jun/16
Bigmike74...Wayne Coleman aka Superstar Billy Graham was only 6'2" peak (barefoot) in his prime. He's shrunk a lot too, last time I saw him, he was BARELY scrapping 6'0"...I'm 5'11" & he was marginally taller than me. At bet best 6'0" now...but, his peak barefoot height was 6'2"...he's even admitted this himself before in shoot interviews.
dicksock said on 28/Jun/16
eightcrazyred6ft said on 26/Jun/16
Can't see Hogan taller than studd in the vid.
High camera and studd moving around, Studd in cowboyboots was visible taller than Hulk in cowboyboots.

Nice vid but without both standing straight face to face, no chance to tell the actual gap.

Imo Studd was somewhere between 2and 4cm taller than Hogan. Not quite as tall as Sid Eudy but closer to Sid than Hogan.

______________

You may be correct. Studd may have been about 1" taller than Hogan. However, there are some good points from 3:59-4:08 to compare their heights. What I find interesting is that even when Studd was standing pretty straight, only a few feet from Hogan, he looked several inches shorter. I just can't imagine Studd looking taller in that situation if they went face to face. It would be one thing if they looked the same height there, but Hogan looked several inches taller the whole time. Studd certainly did not look more than 5" taller than the 6'0-6'1" Roddy Piper, who was wearing flat heeled shoes. Studd never looked taller than the ~6'6" One Man Gang either. I think it is possible that Studd was no more than 6'6" legit and could look 6'7" depending on his lift situation.
bigmike74 said on 27/Jun/16
@Canson i think Rob is dead on with his peak on Hogan. I have seen him in person and his body such as arms and legs are of a taller person with severe damage to his body. 6'5" is to low for peak maybe in the mid to late 90's evening height he would be 6'5" possibly just under if he was active but right out of bed in the 90's i think he would hit the 6'5.75 mark. Early 90's still 6'6" out of bed. He wasn't but a 1.5" under a prime 6'7.5" Undertaker then in the 2000's he looked to be 3" shorter. I always see people saying he was a lift guy but if you really look at his yellow boots they only gave him 1" that's it. When i was a kid i seen a young Hogan and he was massive i mean guys like superstar Graham and Bobby Duncum sr who were in the 6'3" to 6'5" range looked small against him in. I honestly think and i would bet Rob would probably say the same that in his early 20's he probably hit 6'6.5" possibly 6'7" right out of bed. The guy was huge. Also @Rob congrats on your Country breaking away from the Union i think it will make your economy stronger.
bigmike74 said on 26/Jun/16
@Rob how do i upload pictures on here?
Editor Rob: if you have a link to a photo like http://www.website.com/photo.jpg please use a url shortening site like http://bit.ly or https://goo.gl/ and then paste the shortened link.

The reason I did that is because it cuts out 90% of spam comments.
heightcrazyred6ft said on 26/Jun/16
Can't see Hogan taller than studd in the vid.
High camera and studd moving around, Studd in cowboyboots was visible taller than Hulk in cowboyboots.

Nice vid but without both standing straight face to face, no chance to tell the actual gap.

Imo Studd was somewhere between 2and 4cm taller than Hogan. Not quite as tall as Sid Eudy but closer to Sid than Hogan.
Canson said on 25/Jun/16
@bigmike74: in his prime he would've been Prob 6'5. I'd say at absolute worst 195 cm. he was between 195-197 tho back at his peak
RP said on 25/Jun/16
Whoa! Hogan & Studd exact same height in that video! Guess that confirms that Studd would occasionally wear 1.5" lifts??? I would say it's Hogan in lifts...but, Stuff with Mean Gene looked a tad shorter than he normally did with Gend in other mid-1980's interviews?? Also, Roddy Pipper only looked about a 1/2" shorter than David Schultz who many claimed to be 6'3.5 to 6'4". Today's lesson...never trust any pro wrestlers footwear at anytime.
6'2 said on 25/Jun/16
probably camera angle studd was 6'7, plus studd stands with his legs apart studd was defenitey taller than hogan so hopefully this doesnt start a debate because theres just no need hogan 6'5..5 or 6" studd was taller good video all the same.
dicksock said on 24/Jun/16
Here is a video of John Studd and Hogan from 1984. Hogan actually looks taller than Studd.
Click Here
bigmike74 said on 23/Jun/16
@6'2 agreed no way 6'5". Maybe in thick shoes he can hit 6'5" but not barefoot that ship has sailed for him. 6'4" morning and 6'3.5" mid to evening height no lower though it's just not possible knowing my height barefoot.
bigmike74 said on 23/Jun/16
@6'2 agreed no way 6'5". Maybe in thick shoes he can hit 6'5" but not barefoot that ship has sailed for him. 6'4" morning and 6'3.5" mid to evening height no lower though it's just not possible knowing my height barefoot.
6'2 said on 22/Jun/16
doubt hes 6'5 today id say peak close to 6'6, so 6'3 nowadays would be quite accurate, again his posture is not as good 30 years ago so could possibly stretch to 6'4
bigmike74 said on 15/Jun/16
@er4smiths please stop with your stupid BS. You already fanboy Hogan on Facebook which he responded to you then you troll people on twitter about hogan like a creepy weirdo. I have screen shot everything that i have found on your long insane height trolling obsession of Hulk Hogan. I have no problem emailing the 30 screen shots to Rob showing him what you actually do. Hell even people have told you on some of the trolling you do that they are 6'2" or 6'3" and Hogan was bigger than them. Please stop Erik. If everyone wants to see for them selves what this guy does so we can finally get him to stop just look on twitter under Erik Rosenquist go through his tweets there's tons of them trolling on Hogans height to Hogan and people who took pics with him also him trolling on Andre and many others. Everyone please look it up for yourselves then we all can start ignoring him because all he is doing is trolling.
er4smiths said on 15/Jun/16
Marlon Wayans is listed as 6ft 0.5in on here and most people agree he's around 6 feet.
Now Google him and Hulk Hogan and looks at the pics of them standing side by side.
Sorry guys, but a 6'3-6'4.5" man stands much taller than that against a 6 footer.
I am looking forward to the attempted excuses.
Jackie Knife said on 14/Jun/16
2 RP
Wow... If Brock really was 6'2-3/8" that makes The Rock at least 6'3 and 1/2 inches tall back in 2002. Maybe even 6'4". But could it be possible?
bigmike74 said on 14/Jun/16
@RP makes sense. I met him mid morning around 9:30 - 10:00. With my shoes (trainers) on I'm right on that fine line between 6'3.9" and 6'4" roughly 1.2" increase. He was in similar shoes not the jordans he wears on TV but trainers right off memory i don't know brand and he was atleast 1" to 1.2" taller than me when my brother asked him to stand straight for pics. I wouldn't go lower that 6'3.75" barefoot with a slight bend but morning erect and hasn't been on his feet 6'4" totally but no more barefoot. I honestly wouldn't be suprised if he would hit 6'4.25" to 6'4.5" right out of bed. I would agree as i have said before 6'3.5" evening and midday after lifting or moving around alot but standing totally erect i still say he would hit right around the 6'4" mark but as the day wound down he would have to force that mark.
RP said on 14/Jun/16
Brock was measured barefoot in 2004 by NFL DR's & medical staff @ 6'2-3/8" & 286 lbs naked...."Minnesota Vikings Staff" !! This is well known & established.
RP said on 12/Jun/16
Big Mike, he is taller than you...6'3.5" to 6'2.75" ...correct? Not totally ruling out a perfectly erect 6'4" for him in the morning. But, he's basically 6'3.5" now.
Johan said on 11/Jun/16
@denali

Brock is listed at 6'2" here .
RYAN11 said on 10/Jun/16
Where did Hogan look an inch shorter than Hasselhoff?? The picture of them in their racing suits side by side with the exact same footwear, angle etc showed them equal in height. Hasselhoff is more than 6'4" also.
denali said on 8/Jun/16
hes taller than brock who is 6-3 according to mma so ill go 6-4 even for hulk.
bigmike74 said on 8/Jun/16
@RP opinions are based on visual perception whether pictures or face to face. I have met Hogan and i am just under 6'3" and he was taller than me. So if he was 6'3" we would be almost eye to eye which was not the case.
Johan said on 8/Jun/16
6'3" looks reliable. Not nonsense at all. He is a solid inch under hasselhoff and he didnt look more than 3 inches taller than the 6 foot guy who posted here a while back.

He also held his own with Randy Orton but he had more footwear.
RP said on 7/Jun/16
Big mike74...Rob is right, Hulk is "max" 6'3.5" today @ 62 years old...he never pulls off a legit 6'4" when he's with other legit 6'4" & 6'5" guys.
er4smiths said on 6/Jun/16
@Rob you're probably more than likely being very generous with the 6'3" listing - Joe M. dwarfed Hogan and Snoop is 6'3" at best and is taller as is Hasselhoff and P. Manning. The Rock is 6'2" AT BEST - look at the pic of he and Barkley or Kenny Anderson.
bigmike74 said on 6/Jun/16
@Rob i respect your opinion and pics are not good for height reference but seeing him with my own eyes i know he is 6'4" if he stands up straight. 6'3.5" with bad posture. But what's a inch right. But 6'3" and lower is just nonsense
miko said on 6/Jun/16
I still believe if you put him under a tape measure and he forced everything to the max he'd hit at least 6'3.
RP said on 6/Jun/16
To Andre: no way I can ever buy peak Andre The Giant only being 6'9.5" peak height! Andre was 3" taller than legit 6'8.5" barefoot Ernie Ladd in the late 1970's ! Anything under 6'11" peak Andre is complete rubbish ! Peak Andre was anywhere from 6'11" to 7'0.25" peak height! Pin pointing exactly where between 6'11" & 7'0.25" is the issue tho, due to his posture.
bigmike74 said on 6/Jun/16
@Rob when are you gonna upgrade his current height? You have DDP @6'4" and Hasselhoff @6'4" and Hogan is the same height as both those guys.
Also you have the Rock @6'3" and Hogan is taller than him to this day with bad posture. Austin is minimum 6'2" in shoes and pics of them together show Hogan 3" taller. Can he get upgraded? The man is not as low as 6'3" even with bad posture. Same height as snoop and Billy Gunn again both 6'4" guys.
Editor Rob: I'm not sure he is that tall, when he was doing the event with Joe Manganiello he looked more 6ft 3 than 4.
er4smiths said on 4/Jun/16
@andre - agreed very well said. I wouldn't be surprised if Hogan was 6'2" now.
JT said on 4/Jun/16
Click Here Hogan’s got some big-heeled boots on. Click Here Johnny Carson was probably 5’10”ish and Ed McMahon 6’2”ish.

~6’7.5” Magic Johnson by comparison Click Here
Click Here If Hogan was a legit 6’6” he’d probably have to be within 0.5” of Magic in those boots.
andre said on 3/Jun/16
Andre the giant was at his prime 6ft9.5 and if he lose any height he would be from 6ft8.5 to 6ft8 some people even say he looks like 6ft7.5 in his last movie back in 1992 and hogan was 6ft4.5 at his tallest and today is 6ft3 end of the story

accept it rob
berta said on 31/May/16
197,5 right out of bed. then after 1 hour ore so i go down to 197 and some Days if i dont do anything Heavy just sit infront the computer i can still be 197 in the evening. And if i work the whole day( i have kind of a fysical job) and then go to the gym, then i be 196,5. I giuss if i would do deadlift with 400 Pounds 20 set, then i maybe be 196,3 but overall i loose just about 1 cm from first minute i Wake to the time i go to bed. But as i said Before i Think thats because i have strong back muscles. Dont know what i deadlift but i have benched 202,5 kg wheni was at my strongest. So i guess a guy like John cena doenst loose more than 1 cm at most because he is mutch stronger than me.
Canson said on 28/May/16
@Berta: is 197.5 out of bed or is that like first hour? Youre right. You don't lose much considering 6'5 3/8 after lifting from maybe 6'5 3/4 morning. I lose 3/4 regularly even if I don't lift (196 out of bed/194.2-3 at night) and can get down a hair under the 194 mark if I lift even if hydrated. I've seen 6'4 flat (maybe a mm over) as an experiment once but because I stood for hours and wasn't well hydrated
Canson said on 28/May/16
@James B: well said! Howard sternesque in his prime
James B said on 25/May/16
At his peak a textbook example of a true 6'5 man.
the Slav said on 24/May/16
Hogan was 6'5 tops at his peak
Berta said on 22/May/16
to aNSWER RAMPAGE. yOU DONT HAVE TO LOOSE THAT MUTCH HEIGHT DURING THE DAY just because youare very tall. I am about 197,5 in the morning and the shortest i get is 196.5 if i lift heavy during the day. I think the moore musles you have the lesser chnce to shrink that mutch during the day.
Vegas said on 22/May/16
RYAN11 said on 19/May/16
Guys do not get inflated by 4 or 5 inches, it's impossible to get away with and pointless
-------------------------------

Yes they do. Rey mysterio was billed 5'6 his whole run in WWE and he is 5'2 at most (go have a look at 5'8 rob standing with him)

Dave Finlay was listed 6'2 and when I met him in 2009 he looked no more than 5'10. Kurt angle was billed 6'2 in WWE and he is 5'10. Colin Cassidy who just debuted in main roster is billed 7 feet despite getting listed at 6'8 in college basketball

Khali during his run in Japan was listed 7'7 so that's at least a 6 inch markup

Hogan in 1993 was getting listed at 6'7 by WWE because I have official wwe trading cards from that year with that listing. He was also listed 6'6 before his big megapush in 1984 outside WWE so that rules out any chance he ever stood 6'7 unless you think promoters underbilled him..
Leo said on 21/May/16
In his debut in the WWF (1979), he was described 6'5-6'6.
6'5.5 is very reasonable and maybe never was 6'6.
62B said on 20/May/16
So Andre who was at one time a legit 7'2-3" guy gets billed at 7'4-5", Hogan a legit 6'7" guy gets billed between 6'8-9" consistently by the WWF until he went to WCW.

The Height difference between the Andre I ran into in 1988 and the 7'2" guy I stood next to was to great for me to believe Andre was ever that tall. Its really hard to convey just how large of a man Andre was. Terri Todd probably said it best when he described him as looking inhuman, but I don't think he was ever over 7' , and Hogan who stood right next to my 6'4 1/2" or so Grandfather in 1980 was not 2 1/2" taller. At best he had my Grandfather by an inch. Hogan may have been 6'7" in cowboy boots, but not barefoot.
josey wales said on 19/May/16
Not only does greater height influence height fluctuation, but build and body mass as well.
RYAN11 said on 19/May/16
As RP pointed out, when athletes come from pro organizations where their height is already known the WWF could not inflate them. Otherwise they would have listed Ladd at 7 feet tall or 6'11" anyway. They always pushed up most wrestlers to 1-2 inches taller if they were already tall guys, greater the height the more exaggerated you can be. So Andre who was at one time a legit 7'2-3" guy gets billed at 7'4-5", Hogan a legit 6'7" guy gets billed between 6'8-9" consistently by the WWF until he went to WCW. By the time the 90's had come around too many stars and athletes were involved and they could no longer get away with the inflated heights like before. Undertaker a legit 6'8 plus guy gets billed at 6'10" and Kane who was around the same height gets padded boots and 7 foot listing. Just like Big Show got billed at 7'4" in WCW, Internet took care of getting away with that so he got listed at his true height of 7' tall in WWE. Guys do not get inflated by 4 or 5 inches, it's impossible to get away with and pointless. Hogan was 6'7" and nothing proves otherwise, he now stands at 6'4" at his best with poor posture almost all the time because of his hips and knees. There are things I always got a kick out of like how they announced Taker at 328lbs yet you could clearly see Hogan was bigger everywhere and only 1-2 inches shorter at most, yet he always was announced at 302lbs lol.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/16
Rob, is the height fluctuation (morning to evening) more dramatic for 6ft5-6ft7 range guys?
Editor Rob: the longer the spine, the greater the chance of a larger 'diurnal variation'.

mine is typically in the 0.6-0.7 range.
RoelC said on 16/May/16
RP said on 13/May/16
Just look at the still photos from the brawl that broke out in the RIders Chiefs game that one year...google Ernie Ladd-Ben Davidson-Raiders/Chiefs brawl...Ben got in Ernie's face...Ernie had him by a strong solid inch!

That would be a funny picture, considering that brawl you're referring to happened during the 1970 NFL-season. Several years after Ernie Ladd was officially retired and therefore wasn't even part of that match. I did the google search and found no pic of Ladd & Davidson. Please post that picture here then, if you claim you've seen one.

If Davidson hated the Chiefs and wanted to dish Ernie Ladd by downplaying his size, why didn't he do the same with Morris Stroud, who also played for the Chiefs?
bigmike74 said on 15/May/16
Ladd was taller than Davidson, and Davidson was a legit 6'8" Man. So 6'9" was dead on for Ladd just look at older pictures of Ladd's Football career. Super big guy.
RP said on 13/May/16
Raiders & Chiefs players literally hated each other back in those days! Like real hatred! Watch sons of the old documentaries on the Raiders vs Chiefs fued! They were always taking crap & dissing each other! Ben Davidson who was listed @ 6'8" & was actually a barefoot 6'7.5" always hated Ernie & the fact he got all the pub for his height & got called the Tallest Pro Football Playet! Ernie was taller than Ben..fact!! Just look at the still photos from the brawl that broke out in the RIders Chiefs game that one year...google Ernie Ladd-Ben Davidson-Raiders/Chiefs brawl...Ben got in Ernie's face...Ernie had him by a strong solid inch!
RP said on 12/May/16
Straightahead, due to Ernie Ladd being a very popular football player for well over a decade...and being always listed as the tallest pro football player for years all over the media...all the sports world & fans knew Ladd was 6'9"!! Therefor...pro wrestling had to stick with his 6'9" billing. Same reason WCW announced Karl Malone @ 6'9"...they couldn't just go bill him at 6'11" !! All the world already knew he was 6'9"...same thing with Ernie Ladd!
straightahead said on 12/May/16
@RYAN11 said on 2/May/16
Thanks RP for the only reasonable and intelligent reply to my post about Studd and Ladd. I'm going to give the link to Ladd's NFL player profile, he was 6'9", can't find 6'6 or 6'7" anywhere for him so not sure how that becomes FACT LOL. Studd in equal gear, posture, angle, distance etc was no more than one inch shorter than Ladd and that much is FACT lol.

Logic isnt your strongest side i can see, now if Ladd had been a legit 6'9 dont you think he would had been billed 7ft then? Ladd was 6'6 according to Ben Davidson.
Smithf895 said on 8/May/16
Hey would you mind letting me know which web host you're working with? I've loaded your blog in 3 completely different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you suggest a good internet hosting provider at a fair price? Kudos, I appreciate it! eggkedfeebddbeda
RP said on 5/May/16
Also, Ken Norton Jr who was always billed & 6'3" or 6'2.5" was only 3.5" taller than Mr T in their A-Team prison yard stare down episode.
RP said on 5/May/16
Hulk Hogan had 6" on Mr. T...peak Mr.T was more like 5'11" instead of 5'10"...Carl Wearhers was only 2" @ best taller than Mr. T in Rocky 3.
RP said on 5/May/16
Ernie barefoot 6'8.5"
Studd 6'7" and later in his career after he ballooned well above 350 ...6'6.5" to 6.6.75"
Mickey Rourk referred to John Switton aka Big John Studd as 6'8" & 370 lbs several years ago in an interview when describing their fight scene in Harley Davidson & The Marlboro Man. It was filmed around 1989-1990, I do believe??
Vegas said on 5/May/16
Boss said on 3/May/16
Here is a better shot of Ernie Ladd and Studd. The interview Studd is clearly closer to the camera and Studd has a footware and posture advantage on Ladd. When Ladd straightens his posture here he is clearly a couple inches taller than Studd even with Studd's footware advantage.
_______________

ladd has a big camera angle advantage there

the person closest the camera always appears shorter when the camera is high above subjects..hence why kane looks 6+ inches taller than big show Click Here
straightahead said on 4/May/16
@Jim Hopper said on 2/May/16 Mr T 5-10" Max. Hogan 6.5" peak

You really see a difference of 7 inches there?! omg i didnt know Hogan had a 14 inches long head...
Boss said on 3/May/16
Ernie Ladd gives his height as 6'9" in this shoot interview.
Click Here

Here Ernie Ladd with #70 Jim Tyrer (6'6") and Earl Faison (6'5"). He looks every bit of 6'9".
Click Here

Ernie later in his career with 6'7" Buck Buchanan.
Click Here
Click Here

Here is a better shot of Ernie Ladd and Studd. The interview Studd is clearly closer to the camera and Studd has a footware and posture advantage on Ladd. When Ladd straightens his posture here he is clearly a couple inches taller than Studd even with Studd's footware advantage.
Click Here
Jim Hopper said on 2/May/16
5-9" Sam with Hulk. Click Here
Jim Hopper said on 2/May/16
Click Here Peak body height here. Mr T 5-10" Max. Hogan 6.5" peak
RYAN11 said on 2/May/16
Thanks RP for the only reasonable and intelligent reply to my post about Studd and Ladd. I'm going to give the link to Ladd's NFL player profile, he was 6'9", can't find 6'6 or 6'7" anywhere for him so not sure how that becomes FACT LOL. Studd in equal gear, posture, angle, distance etc was no more than one inch shorter than Ladd and that much is FACT lol.
Click Here
Boss said on 1/May/16
So Rude estimates Hulk at 6'5 range doesn't mean he is right on. There was also the story in the book Sex, Lies and Headlocks that Hulk was 6'5 and when he first met McMahon he gave him a 1000 sequence robe and a pair of boots with lifts inside so they could bill him as 6'8. Either way he would still appear 6'6 range in comparisons.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 1/May/16
Ladd was 6´7", a tad or two taller than Studd FACT.
Hogan at his peak was a solid 6´5"-6´5.5" guy, described at this height by a lot of guys that actually worked with him.
Peak Andre was 5.5"-6" taller than Hogan.

Rob,whats your height for peak Big John Studd?
RP said on 30/Apr/16
Did StraighHead seriously just call Ernie Ladd 6'6" ??? OMG!!!! LOL!!!! Ladd was a legit 6'8.5" "barefoot" at his peak in his 20's & 30's!
James B said on 30/Apr/16
Hogan claims he was 6'7 peak and I have no problems believing he was at that height out of bed or in large wrestling gear.
James B said on 30/Apr/16
Interesting Sid eudy didn't make the 13 tallest wrestlers of all time list. Him and hogan were both well over average sized for a WWE wrestler but I think you have to be 6'7 minimum to be considered a legit tall guy in the WWE world.
Halb said on 30/Apr/16
Jim Hopper said on 25/Apr/16
Had a magazine from Japan from the early 90s with a Rick Rude interview in it,he stated WWF billed him at 6-4" and he said he was just over 6-2". Also said it was common practice to bull **** heights.Warrior was billed at 6-4 but he said warrior was shorter than him!! Hogan was never 6-7 he said. 6-5" maybe flat.

That's nice to know!
straightahead said on 29/Apr/16
@RYAN11 said on 27/Apr/16
Peak Studd was well over 6'8", Fralic stood on his toes to get up to his eyes, and Studd was slouching, so enough of the 6'7" bull for him. He was almost even with Erie Ladd when they were both at their best heights and Ernie was a legit 6'9" plus barefoot guy. And if Bill Anderson was around 6'1", what are you trying to prove? Hogan was still way over half a foot taller in their pictures together.

Your the one who should be ignored here, since your a proven liar. If anyone was on his tip toes, it was Studd - thats the only way that makes sense, but since we cant know for sure either way, why dont you drop it? and Ladd was 6'6 not 6'9
bigmike74 said on 28/Apr/16
FYI all the guy asking the question is er4smiths. That's a fact look back at older posts it's him.
Old conservative hippy said on 27/Apr/16
I mentioned it before, I used to be 6' 4.5", and wish I still was. Met Hogan only 1 time in my life, that was back in my own height prime in 1977. At that time, I have no doubt he was 6'7". One thing else about Hogan, he has enormous hands.
RYAN11 said on 27/Apr/16
Peak Studd was well over 6'8", Fralic stood on his toes to get up to his eyes, and Studd was slouching, so enough of the 6'7" bull for him. He was almost even with Erie Ladd when they were both at their best heights and Ernie was a legit 6'9" plus barefoot guy. And if Bill Anderson was around 6'1", what are you trying to prove? Hogan was still way over half a foot taller in their pictures together.
Roman Reigns said on 27/Apr/16
Click Here Hogan claims he was 6'7" at the age of 25.
bigmike74 said on 26/Apr/16
Never met JYD or Studd but in there matches there is not 2" between he and Hogan maybe 1" at best. There are pictures out there and matches on youtube that show good comparison shots and for sure in any of those shots they look to close to judge but giving the Benifit of the doubt because i have not personally seen Studd i will give him a inch but anything more is absurd. 6'6" Prime Hogan for the million time.
RP said on 26/Apr/16
I stand corrected!...the propanderance of the evidence points to a barefoot peak Bill Anderson @ 6'0.5" (72.5") !!!
Boss said on 26/Apr/16
Bill Anderson looks at least 6'1" range.
JT said on 25/Apr/16
Click Here Met JYD back in 1986 - he was no more than 6'1".
james said on 25/Apr/16
He was never 6'7 .John Studd was 6'7 and was always about 2 inches taller than Hulk in their matches ..and back in 1997 when 6'7 Dennis Rodman would do NWO promos with Hogan in cowboy boots .Hogan looked about 6'5 next to dennis
Jim Hopper said on 25/Apr/16
Had a magazine from Japan from the early 90s with a Rick Rude interview in it,he stated WWF billed him at 6-4" and he said he was just over 6-2". Also said it was common practice to bull **** heights.Warrior was billed at 6-4 but he said warrior was shorter than him!! Hogan was never 6-7 he said. 6-5" maybe flat.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 24/Apr/16
Click Here

Always visible shorter than 6´1" range guys like Vince, Warrior, Roddy Piper.
Clear 4 inches shorter than 6´4" Warlord.


OJ Simpson is slouching as hell, how comes you make up storys about Vince wearing lifts and not mentioning this???

Guess Warlord, Warrior, Roddy were in the same lifts too, 6´1.5"-6´2"Sting of course was in lifts b/c he was clearly taller loooool


Bill at his peak was a solid 6-footer , 6´1"-6´1.5" in footwear.
Vegas said on 24/Apr/16
If Anderson is 6'2 and we take that photo of him and Hogan at face value then Hogan was basically 6'8 and big show was best part of 7'2 comparing him to anderson..so wwe didn't over overbill either!

Funny Anderson looks around my height standing next to big show.
heightcrazyred6ft said on 24/Apr/16
Calm down with all these excuses

Bill was not 6'1" or taller.

He claimed 6'1" so thats his height us style in footwear
RP said on 23/Apr/16
Yep, Boss is correct...Vince is perfectly erect & intentially trying to look his tallest. Bill is relaxed, slouched a bit & he has a noticeably bent knee as well. Vince's 1.25" advantage here quickly disappears to nothing or 0.25" if Bill stands as straight & erect as Vince. Plus, never trust Vince McMahon's footwear !!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Apr/16
Bill Anderson looks near 6ft2 for sure and he's leaning w/h Vince (who was that range himself peak).
RP said on 23/Apr/16
Vince does have Bill by an inch +...however, Vince was long rumored to be a lift wearer as well ??? So, who knows. IMO...the best proof is Bill having 1.25" on a "known' & officially meaured 6'1" man in OJ Simpson. Giving, OJ was not in his prime anymore...and not is full 6'1" to 6'1.25" peak anymore...but, most likely had only list a 0.5" at that time ??
Boss said on 23/Apr/16
Bill is leaning a bit and has his knees bent with Vince. They are close to the same height.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 21/Apr/16
Click Here

This is the best to get Bill´s real height imo. Looks a solid inch or a bit more shorter than 6´1.5" max VKMcM.

So Bill comes out a solid 6footer.
RP said on 21/Apr/16
Thank you, Boss! Exactly! Plus, it is well known that Sting wore very thick soled wrestling boots. Giving him about a 0.5" footwear advantage over most guys. Steve aka Sting, has claimed many times that his real height is 6'2"...like I said before...Bill was at a minimum of 6'1.5" at his peak...most likely 6'1.75" to a weak 6'2"! BTW...JT, a 6'0" Bill Anderson gives you a 6'2" to 6'2.5" Bruiser Brody...LOL!!!!! And Yes!! OJ Simpsin was a legit 6'1" to 6'1.5" plus in his prime...probably a weak 6'1" to 6'0.75" at the time the pic with Bill was taken. Age and the NFL beatings did cost OJ a good inch in height be his 50's.
Boss said on 21/Apr/16
Bill Anderson claims a height of 6'2".
Click Here

Here is Bill with 6'1" OJ Simpson.
Click Here

Here is Bill with 6'2" John Candy.
Click Here

Here is Bill and Sting at their peak. Bill is not on his toes. His right leg is straight and planted firmly on the ground. His left leg is on his toe a bit but is also bent so i doubt he is gaining any height from it.
Click Here

Here in JT's version he changes the angle so it looks like is right foot is off the ground and then shows 2 photos of a past peak Bill with Sting.
Click Here

Bill looks easily between 6'1"-6'2" peak. So RP is closer than JT.
Boss said on 20/Apr/16
Here Hulk Hogan and Big Bill Anderson.
Click Here
JT said on 20/Apr/16
RP said on 19/Apr/16
Yep, Brody aka Goodish had a true barefoot height of 6'4"...possibly 6'4.5" at his absolute peak & prime. A peak Hogan was taller. Best comparison is the pics with Bill Anderson who was a legit 6'2"...absolutely no less than 6'1.5" to 6'1.75",,,There are two great pics of Hogan wit Bill Anderson & Brody with Bill Anderson. Back in the early 80's...'80-'83 time frame. Hogan is a solid 4" taller than Bill Anderson ...maybe even 4.5" inches. While Brody was only 2" to 2.5" taller. Just google this pics. Sorry, I couldn't get them to post on this page...Hogan was most likely in his 1.5" wrestling boots when he was with Anderson...so, I'll give him a 0.5" footwear advsantage over Bill Anderson. Those two pics show the following: Bill Anderson: 6'1.75", Hogan: 6'5.75" to 6'5.5" & Brody; 6'4" to 6'4.25" ???

Bill Anderson was 6’0” TOPS.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here (on his toes in the left pic)

Why do you always feel compelled to make things up and act like you have the inside scoop on wrestlers and can pinpoint their heights down to a fraction of an inch? You’re proven wrong so often, including in the past on Brody’s height, so at least knock off the fraction estimates.
Boss said on 20/Apr/16
I think those estimates are very close Red. I enjoy some of your comparison pics as well. Anywhere from 6'5"- 6'6.5" peak for Hogan is a legit guessing range. We can go as high as 6'6.5" because that's what he stated under oath and "maybe" he measured right out of bed. In Brody's book it said he was 6'4 and 240 in high school and then he is reffered to as 6'5 in most cases so 6'5" seemed realistic but 6'4 range is fine for Brody.
straightahead said on 20/Apr/16
At 263 lbs, he lookes heavier than Hogan as well
bigmike74 said on 19/Apr/16
@HeightcrazyRed6ft i seen Brody and Bugsy Mcgraw in the early 80s at a Wrestling show in Jacksonville at the shriners hall back then you could meet them and get autographs unlike now how the wrestling shows have become a huge event anyways i knew of Bugsy from CWF in Tampa which came on at 2 Saturday afternoon but not Brody. I was around 15 or 16 years old and not done growing so i was around 6' to 6'05" and Bugsy in Cowboy boots was taller than then probably 6'1" maybe 6'2" and Brody was a big guy but a few years before that i seen Hogan in Tampa wrestling at a show at the armory and Hogan was younger, bigger in mass and taller than both Brody and Busgy. Peak Hogan was every bit a 6'7" to 6'7.5" guy then in gear and Brody had to be 6'5" in gear.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 19/Apr/16
Boss said on 18/Apr/16
So what Red your saying Brody is 6'4 and would be taller than a peak Hogan. That's ridiculous if that's what your trying to say.

*********************************************************

No I was saying that because of 6´4" Brody would be taller if standing straight, the pic must be a composite. Footwear is pretty equal.

Peak Hogan was imo 6´5.25-6´5.5" evening height.
JT said on 19/Apr/16
Click Here
Click Here
Looks like a composite photo as Hogan had a larger body mass than brody.
RP said on 19/Apr/16
Yep, Brody aka Goodish had a true barefoot height of 6'4"...possibly 6'4.5" at his absolute peak & prime. A peak Hogan was taller. Best comparison is the pics with Bill Anderson who was a legit 6'2"...absolutely no less than 6'1.5" to 6'1.75",,,There are two great pics of Hogan wit Bill Anderson & Brody with Bill Anderson. Back in the early 80's...'80-'83 time frame. Hogan is a solid 4" taller than Bill Anderson ...maybe even 4.5" inches. While Brody was only 2" to 2.5" taller. Just google this pics. Sorry, I couldn't get them to post on this page...Hogan was most likely in his 1.5" wrestling boots when he was with Anderson...so, I'll give him a 0.5" footwear advsantage over Bill Anderson. Those two pics show the following: Bill Anderson: 6'1.75", Hogan: 6'5.75" to 6'5.5" & Brody; 6'4" to 6'4.25" ???
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 18/Apr/16
Boss said on 18/Apr/16
I don't make anything up there Red. Brody is listed 6'5" from almost everywhere I can find and was billed at 6'8". Brody has what looks like cowboy boots on so why are you talking about Hogan's boots. The pic could be composite but gives us an idea.


:) That was my point... listed everywhere...but brought up at celebheights as a legit 6´4" - Hope Rob lets more old comments stay here in the future :)
Thought as a longtime visitor you should´ve known about Brodys legit height of 6´4". Even his good friend Stan Hansen described him as 6´4".
And Brody isn´t in cowboyboots he is in wrestlingboots with about the same sole as Hogans.
RP said on 18/Apr/16
It is without question a composite photo. Frank Goodish was 6'4" to 6'4.5" barefoot...abut 6'5.5" in his wrestling boots. his 6'8" billing was ridiculous ! Right up there with Andre's 7'4" or Kane's 7'0" billings.
James B said on 18/Apr/16
Yeah so the reason why maybe sid had so much height on hogan in 1991 is because he might have been no taller than 6'5 (196cm) by that point.
Boss said on 18/Apr/16
So what Red your saying Brody is 6'4 and would be taller than a peak Hogan. That's ridiculous if that's what your trying to say.
Boss said on 18/Apr/16
I don't make anything up there Red. Brody is listed 6'5" from almost everywhere I can find and was billed at 6'8". Brody has what looks like cowboy boots on so why are you talking about Hogan's boots. The pic could be composite but gives us an idea.
Kunoichi said on 17/Apr/16
Boss said on 16/Apr/16
Hulk with 6'5" Bruiser Brody. Hogan has slightly better posture but Brody has a footware advantage. He looks 6'6" with Brody.
Click Here

Unfortunately, it is a composite photograph.
James B said on 17/Apr/16
Rob do you think it's impossible that hogan could have shrunk to 6'5 in 1991 due to surgeries?
Editor Rob: not impossible to have lost some height. The amount of impacts some wrestlers take over a few years might cause disc problems earlier than we expect.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 17/Apr/16
Looking again at the Brody Hogan pic this time on the big screen, I doubt they really stood together, Hulk has pretty big soles and Brody standing straight would easily be taller than Hulk
heightcrazyred6ft said on 17/Apr/16
Boss, its well known on this site for years that Brody was 6'4" so stop making things up.
Brody is slouching big time he would need more massive footwear to egalize that.
Hogan barely looks taller and noway 6'6"
Johan said on 17/Apr/16
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 16/Apr/16
James B said on 14/Apr/16

You forget as well Sid had significant hair advantage over hogan to which can distort things.


Nonsense, counting Sids hair would make a 3" difference, Sid didn´t have noticeable footwear advantage.
Click Here

Great pics HeightcrazyRed6ft, a solid 2 in between Hogan and Sid. He is also looking a 6'7.5" peak Taker in the eye, I wonder what excuses will be used for that. He could have been slightly less but under 6'7" for Sid just seems beyond ridiculous now.

6'6.5" peak Sid means the serious downgraders here are right. Hogan must have been 6'4.5" peak.
Boss said on 16/Apr/16
Hulk with 6'5" Bruiser Brody. Hogan has slightly better posture but Brody has a footware advantage. He looks 6'6" with Brody.
Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 16/Apr/16
James B said on 14/Apr/16

You forget as well Sid had significant hair advantage over hogan to which can distort things.


Nonsense, counting Sids hair would make a 3" difference, Sid didn´t have noticeable footwear advantage.
Click Here
James B said on 16/Apr/16
johan- you forget sids hair advantage
Damian said on 16/Apr/16
Odd, his legs seem to look shorter than the rest of his body.
bigmike74 said on 15/Apr/16
@er4smiths glad you met someone. But Hogan is not under 6'3.5 with bad posture there's just no way i am a tad over 6'3" in shoes 6'4" in boots and Hogan is taller than me with equal footwear so there is absolutely no way! He is taller than me. With equal footwear i with cross trainers on am exactly 6'3 5/8" tall without shoes I'm 6'2.75" 6'3" out of bed. He had me by atleast a inch and a quarter maybe 1 and a half is more accurate. So at 6'3.5/8" at bare minimum 1" he's 6'4.5/8" with shoes your math don't line up. Try again buddy.
Johan said on 15/Apr/16
@James B

I tried photobucket and what i saw was someone's guess on the footwear. He was also incorrect on the height difference, it was 2 inches not 1.5 inches so even with a 0.5 inch advantage which i highly doubt that still puts Sid at 6'7" if Hogan was 6'5.5" as i think.

If he was the 6'6" that many think then Sid was 6'7.5" at peak which i think is too much.
62B said on 15/Apr/16
er4smiths said on 14/Apr/16
hey guys - sorry I was away. I know you all missed me...well at least bigmike74 did!
Anyway - @62B little late to give you my answer as you won't believe me but my guess in 2 seconds was 6'6" and that's before JT fixed the angle. That's the God's honest truth. That's not to say I couldn't guess wrong other times as nobody is perfect - well except ryan11 and Boss! This weekend I actually got to see a great pic a guy showed me of he and Hogan at an autograph signing. I measured up to the guy in the exact same pose he and hogan are in. We asked 4 random people nearby to look at the photo and then compare the pic to he and I standing in the same way and they all said myself and Hulk looked the same height next to the guy. So all that being said - and before the chosen 3 lambaste me with the name calling this actually was huge because it's proving my very logical obvious theory more and more. Hulk Hogan can not be over 6'2.5" today period. Again, to all my hateslaves out there - I will eat BIG CROW publicly if someone can prove me wrong. I won't mind as I really just want us all to agree. Like that will ever happen! This is America land of the divided. Also, Rob - I think I need a step by step tutorial on how to post a pic on here. I'm having a tough time with posting pics. Man it feels good to be back! Unless you all want me to leave forever... :(
________________________________________

Sorry bud, you are right. I don't believe you. Mainly because you did exactly what I thought you would do and wait for me to post Sams height. The other interesting result about my photo test ,that I figured would happen, is the only people to take a guess were the people that don't seem to have the agenda of downgrading people they have never seen in person. Hogan was easily 6'5" and in my opinion probably some change peak. 6'6" peak for me is pushing it, but not out of the realm of possibility. Today he could be 6'2 1/2" like you say, as I do believe he is about my height, but people who have seen him recently suggest he is probably still at least 6'3". Maybe taller.
er4smiths said on 14/Apr/16
hey guys - sorry I was away. I know you all missed me...well at least bigmike74 did!
Anyway - @62B little late to give you my answer as you won't believe me but my guess in 2 seconds was 6'6" and that's before JT fixed the angle. That's the God's honest truth. That's not to say I couldn't guess wrong other times as nobody is perfect - well except ryan11 and Boss! This weekend I actually got to see a great pic a guy showed me of he and Hogan at an autograph signing. I measured up to the guy in the exact same pose he and hogan are in. We asked 4 random people nearby to look at the photo and then compare the pic to he and I standing in the same way and they all said myself and Hulk looked the same height next to the guy. So all that being said - and before the chosen 3 lambaste me with the name calling this actually was huge because it's proving my very logical obvious theory more and more. Hulk Hogan can not be over 6'2.5" today period. Again, to all my hateslaves out there - I will eat BIG CROW publicly if someone can prove me wrong. I won't mind as I really just want us all to agree. Like that will ever happen! This is America land of the divided. Also, Rob - I think I need a step by step tutorial on how to post a pic on here. I'm having a tough time with posting pics. Man it feels good to be back! Unless you all want me to leave forever... :(
James B said on 14/Apr/16
Johan - type in Sid and hulk hogan on photobucket.com. It mentions on the descriptions in some of the pictures of the 2 men how much height advantage sids boots gave him.

You forget as well Sid had significant hair advantage over hogan to which can distort things. A lot of the photos of Sid justice and hogan are from the early 90s and I think by that stage hogan was half an inch shorter than his peak of 6'6.
Johan said on 14/Apr/16
How do you know that Sid wore thicker boots James B??

I mean Hogan was usually in solid 2 inch cowboyboots so what do you think Sid was wearing?


62B said on 11/Apr/16

Not sure if anyone else was wanting to take a guess on the kids height I posted with Shaq so 184.3cm, you win. Sam is 6'6"

Shaq comes out at his listing then as well. Between 7' and 7'1" considering his footwear. Also explains why Big Show was 2in smaller.

(Formerly 184.3cmNight)
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 13/Apr/16
James B said on 12/Apr/16

Uh your forgetting Sid wore thicker wrestling boots then hogan

I´m pretty sure they weren´t noticable higher, watch WM8 again and you even see Hogan on his tiptoes still near 2inches shorter during their staredown.
RP said on 13/Apr/16
62B...yeah, when you adjust the camera tilt he did look more 6'6.5" to me. Great example on how hard it is to truly judge someone's height from random photos.
RP said on 13/Apr/16
Sean nailed it!
James B said on 13/Apr/16
Boss said on 12/Apr/16
Sid was Undertakers height in his wrestling gear. Sid's boots may be why he comes out taller than his barefoot height. He looks a .5" taller than Taker in some pics and .5" shorter in some pics. Undertaker is 6'7.5" barefoot and around 6'8.5" in his boots with Sid. So Sid could look 6'8" range or better in boots.

It says here taker had 1 inch on Sid at mania 97

Click Here
Sean said on 12/Apr/16
Hulk Hogan - 6'5.5" peak barefoot. 6'7" with wrestling boots
James B said on 12/Apr/16
James B said on 11/Apr/16
I think it's fair to say that by 1992 hogan was no taller than 6'5 1/2

If Hogan was 6´5.5" in 1992, Sid was 6´7.25-6´7.5" Fact

I think Rob has Sid a tad to low, 6´6.75"-6´7" imo
Wich makes Hogan a maximum 6´5" flat in 1992, he already wrestled 15 yrs so losing a tad or two isn´t impossible

Uh your forgetting Sid wore thicker wrestling boots then hogan
62B said on 12/Apr/16
RP said on 11/Apr/16
@62B...I'm settling on 6'7.5" with the young man with Shaq. I have looked at the pic 3 times...I'm sticking with 6'7.5" ???
___________________________________________________

Thought I had posted that he is 6'6". Maybe it just hasn't shown up yet in the comments
Boss said on 12/Apr/16
Sid was Undertakers height in his wrestling gear. Sid's boots may be why he comes out taller than his barefoot height. He looks a .5" taller than Taker in some pics and .5" shorter in some pics. Undertaker is 6'7.5" barefoot and around 6'8.5" in his boots with Sid. So Sid could look 6'8" range or better in boots.
RP said on 12/Apr/16
With JT's corrected camera angle...the young lad with Shag now looks 6'6.5" tops.
Johno said on 11/Apr/16
Has upto 5-inches on 5'10 listed St. Pierre so 6'3, 6'2.5-6'3.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 11/Apr/16
James B said on 11/Apr/16
I think it's fair to say that by 1992 hogan was no taller than 6'5 1/2

If Hogan was 6´5.5" in 1992, Sid was 6´7.25-6´7.5" Fact

I think Rob has Sid a tad to low, 6´6.75"-6´7" imo
Wich makes Hogan a maximum 6´5" flat in 1992, he already wrestled 15 yrs so losing a tad or two isn´t impossible
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 11/Apr/16
JT said on 11/Apr/16
62B said on 6/Apr/16
Not sure why my link did not work, but here it is again for those who want to test their ability to guess someones height from a picture


I agree with the 6´6" estimations, but Shaq isn´t standing straight, so we can only guess how much height he would gain.
RP said on 11/Apr/16
@62B...I'm settling on 6'7.5" with the young man with Shaq. I have looked at the pic 3 times...I'm sticking with 6'7.5" ???
JT said on 11/Apr/16
62B said on 6/Apr/16
Not sure why my link did not work, but here it is again for those who want to test their ability to guess someones height from a picture

Click Here

Not a good pic to estimate heights since there is about a 4 degree camera tilt in favor of the other guy (corrected here) Click Here Plus, the camera angle is on his side as well just like it favors Yao Ming over Dikembe Motumbo here Click Here
James B said on 11/Apr/16
I think it's fair to say that by 1992 hogan was no taller than 6'5 1/2
62B said on 11/Apr/16
Not sure if anyone else was wanting to take a guess on the kids height I posted with Shaq so 184.3cm, you win. Sam is 6'6"
James B said on 10/Apr/16
straightahead said on 9/Apr/16
The "freak of nature" Studd was only a tad taller than the 6'4 1/2 Fralic, but who knows? maybe Studd had some amazing peak we never saw?

I think studd was 6'6?
RP said on 10/Apr/16
Adam Scherr aka Braun Strowman: 6'7.75" & 370-380 lbs "legit"!!! &
John Minton aka Big John Studd: 6'6.75" & 330-350 lbs in his prime.
bigmike74 said on 10/Apr/16
@62B i don't think he's gonna comment so please tell us the young fellas height? The angles are funky but the guy has to be 6'4.5" - 6'6.5" I'm sure the idiot will have something stupid to say but never the less ignore him so please spill it already.
62B said on 10/Apr/16
straightahead said on 9/Apr/16
The "freak of nature" Studd was only a tad taller than the 6'4 1/2 Fralic, but who knows? maybe Studd had some amazing peak we never saw?
__________________________________________________________________________________

Eh, Studd overall from the interview video with Fralic to the wm2 battle royal looks at least 6'6". Personally I don't think Studd had Hogan by more than an inch in the mid/late 80's.
Boss said on 10/Apr/16
6'7.5 " for the guy with Shaq.
Vegas said on 9/Apr/16
bigmike74 said on 7/Apr/16
@62B pic has a funky angle but i would guess 6'3.5" to 6'4.5".

------------------------------

well there is shaq standing beside hogan (in cowboys) back in 1994 Click Here

that chap is easily a couple of inches taller than hogan "funky angle" or not
bigmike74 said on 9/Apr/16
@62B if shaq is 7'1" then that young fella is in the 6'5 1/2" to 6'6 1/2" Range barefoot. It looks like shaq is leaning and relaxed as if he didn't want to take the pic but if he's 7' then i say 6'4.5" to 6'5.5" with the funky angle. Really hard to say.
straightahead said on 9/Apr/16
The "freak of nature" Studd was only a tad taller than the 6'4 1/2 Fralic, but who knows? maybe Studd had some amazing peak we never saw?
62B said on 9/Apr/16
@ 184.3cm and RP. I am kind of waiting for er4smiths to take a guess before I say
James B said on 8/Apr/16
Big John studd was a freak of nature though. Made hogan look small in terms of sheer body mass.

In fact I think a prime stud was more of a monster than Braun strowman.
184.3cm (Night) said on 8/Apr/16
@62B

I would have said around 6'6" for the kid next to Shaq but im not sure about the footwear. I think Shaq has less shoes there and the kid has volume in his hair. Removing the hair i thought around 6'6".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Apr/16
I actually think he was a solid 6ft6 guy in his prime (and 6ft7 out of bed). Watch him in the late 70's. Just a mountain of a man and at his heaviest was well over 300lbs...and very agile for his size.
RP said on 7/Apr/16
62B...if Shaq is 7'1"..???...then I'd guess the young man in the pic is 6'8" ?? ...if Shaq is 7'0" barefoot? Then I'd say that fella is 6'7" barefoot. Maybe 6'7" & change ???
bigmike74 said on 7/Apr/16
@62B pic has a funky angle but i would guess 6'3.5" to 6'4.5".
bigmike74 said on 7/Apr/16
One Man Gang was a big guy. 6'6" - 6'7" easy. Ben Davidson was a extremely tall guy for NFL back then 6'8 1/4" was his barefoot measurement when he tried out for the NFL and also documented on his physical clearence form that they did every year start of season. His last 1 says 6'8" which i assume is just minor height loss from getting hit in the NFL for so long. That picture shows alot of things. 1. A prime 6'3" Hogan as some of the idiots say just can't be possible. 2. A prime 6'4" Hogan just can't be possible.
3. A prime 6'6" Hogan fact. Just to appease the idiots even if he had lifts in his boots it still puts him at 6'6" if no lifts are there which i would bet there weren't he could have been a shade over 6'6". So now all that is out there let the dumb a$$ ignorant Moran try to figure a way out to side step it. Ben Davidson was around 6'9 1/2 - 3/4" and change with boots so a 6'3" Hogan would have to have blocks under his feet to get to the mark he is in that pic.
62B said on 6/Apr/16
Not sure why my link did not work, but here it is again for those who want to test their ability to guess someones height from a picture

Click Here
straightahead said on 4/Apr/16
It IS Fred Ottman, in one of his early characters i believe in Texas All Star wrestling .

@bigmike74 the truth must be devastating for your wet pants fankid fantasies, so extremely devastating even to this date that your only desperate chance here is to focus on me as a poster, using name callings, ignoring the truth, and being a proven liar. You have zero arguments and zero evidence to come up with.
RYAN11 said on 4/Apr/16
Boss, that photo has been on here many times. Hogan is no more than 1 inch shorter than Davidson. Hogan is bald while they have full heads of hair. Carey has unknown footwear while Hogan and Bens are the same. Carey is a foot closer to the camera which is why he looks 6'6" there. Hogan is 6'7" there easily barefoot, but if you want to say 6'6.5" I'm not arguing over a half inch lol. Hogan is further back as you pointed out, so that alone makes him within an inch or less of big Ben.
6'2 said on 4/Apr/16
first of all straighthead if you want to put george gray omg akeem at 6'1 or 2"' thats fine but in a recent pic of him with slick he appears a few inches shorter seems to be the same event as the one ottman was at now slick is about 6'3 or 4 when you compare him to 6'4 kamala but when we look at slick when he managed akeem he was 3"' shorter putting him in 6'7 bracket. basically what im saying theres something very wrong with the pictures of omg and ottman trust me on this george gray is not under 6'3 and i stand by all my estimations i belive im about the best on this page if not im certainly in the top 1
John said on 4/Apr/16
He was listed 6ft 4 and 1/2 during his college baseball career
62B said on 4/Apr/16
Lets have a test to see how good you guys are guestimating heights from pics. How tall is this kid with Shaq? Click Here He is the son of one of my high school classmates
RYAN11 said on 3/Apr/16
Straightahead, do you even know who the One Man Gang is or was?? He was even in height with Studd, so now Studd was only 6'3"?? You must be confused, as for 6'2" list, it's reasonable and if anything estimating on the low side for some of them.
bigmike74 said on 3/Apr/16
@6'2 Ingnore the idiot. Good listing. That's not even Ottman. Like i have said if we all just ignore that idiot maybe he will just finally get the hint that his BS has come to a end.
James B said on 3/Apr/16
I must say in the 1980s hogan looked like a very big man indeed. Held his own against 6'11 Andre.

Today hogan still looks like a really big guy but obviously he will keep losing height in the upcoming years.

Have a gut feeling though hogan ain't going to be alive for a great deal longer.
straightahead said on 2/Apr/16
@6'2 said on 31/Mar/16
peak height hogan 6'6,. 1991 6'5 today 6'3 or so.sid peak 6'7.5 now 6'6. big show peak7'1 2006 7ft now 6'11. undertaker peak 6'8 2003 6'7.5 today 6'6.5-7"'. john studd peak 6'7 1989 6'6.5 1993 6'6. andre the giant peak 7'1.5" 1983 7ft 1987 6'11. kevin nash peak 6'10 now 6'9. kane peak 6'8.5 now 6'7. one man gang 6'7 maybe 6'6 now. john tenta 6'6

You only need to prove one of these height estimations dead wrong and your entire list fails, totaly. Lets check out One Man Gang, he was not taller than the 6'3 Ottman Click Here (back in the days) and this is how they compare recently Click Here

With that said and proved, you then need to delete 3 inches from many of the others in this list as well, start with Hogan. But you actually got some of them almost right, like Tenta he was perhaps 6'5. Kane and Taker minimum 6'7 peak, Nash maybe 6'9.
Boss said on 1/Apr/16
Here Hogan with NFL's Ben Davidson 6'8" and Julius J Carrey 6'5". Carey and Davidson are both standing closer to the camera with Carey being the closest. Hogan comes out looking around 6'6-6'6.5" range.
Click Here
Johno said on 1/Apr/16
Probably could still measure 6'3.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 1/Apr/16
Dub said on 30/Mar/16
Kevin Nash clearly stated Hogan was 6ft 4in when he first saw him in action in the 1980s so why are people still saying Hogan was 6ft 7in?

Because Nash´s 6´4" was a rough guess from a distance, not a measurement.
Anyway it´s quite as wrong as the 6´7". Right around the middle of them is the truth.

This is how I see the chances of his peak evening height:

198cm - 3%
197cm - 25%
196cm - 55%
195cm - 15%
194cm - 2%


Rob, nailing it to evening height would you agree with this?
Editor Rob: I'd weight it a bit higher towards 197-8
bigmike74 said on 1/Apr/16
I have met many tall athletes and just tall people in general in the business I'm in. I don't claim to be a height expert but i know a 6'2" person compared to a 6'4" person. Hogan was bigger than me and my brother we are both considered tall guys. He was taller than both of us in low top shoes maybe giving 1" tops of lift more like .75". He was 2" taller than my 6'2" brother. My brother had regular shoes on giving about 1" so footwear was equal. There's not that much of a noticeable difference with 1" but 2" + you can see. When he was standing around limp posture he still had Troy by almost 2" so 6'3.5" at low and straightened up 6'4" maybe even 6'4 1/4" that's barefeet. My statement towards straightahead was just so everyone can see what most of us already know that he is just stirring the pot with BS. The Rocks page shows that read down it a bit in bold letters he says he could see Hogan over 6'5" peak but on here he spouts 6'4" I'm sure if you went to other wrestlers sites on here he would be all over the place to push his agenda for his fanboy fantasy. I won't respond to his trolling but the prople who met Hogan know what I'm talking about.
6'2 said on 31/Mar/16
peak height hogan 6'6,. 1991 6'5 today 6'3 or so.sid peak 6'7.5 now 6'6. big show peak7'1 2006 7ft now 6'11. undertaker peak 6'8 2003 6'7.5 today 6'6.5-7"'. john studd peak 6'7 1989 6'6.5 1993 6'6. andre the giant peak 7'1.5" 1983 7ft 1987 6'11. kevin nash peak 6'10 now 6'9. kane peak 6'8.5 now 6'7. one man gang 6'7 maybe 6'6 now. john tenta 6'6
Dub said on 30/Mar/16
Kevin Nash clearly stated Hogan was 6ft 4in when he first saw him in action in the 1980s so why are people still saying Hogan was 6ft 7in?
straightahead said on 30/Mar/16
@Alex said on 24/Mar/16
Jesus, how can be possible lose almost 10 cm of height? There's any other case in the wrestling world? Losing a solid 7 cm is tremendous, it is never possible for anyone in nature.

For the Hogan fankids it is...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Mar/16
6ft7-6ft8 in wrestling boots peak.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 29/Mar/16
Longtime german WWE commentator Carsten Schäfer described Hogans inring height as 1,98m-2m depending on how thick the soles of his shoes are. Pretty interesting he mentioned the footwear, he met him personally backstage so I don´t think he is making things up.

The comment was on a german dvd when Hogan fought Big John Studd.

1,98m-2m / 6´6"-6´6.75" in ringgear sounds pretty legit and points to a 6´5"-6´5.5" barefootheight, hard to get closer than this.
straightahead said on 29/Mar/16
@bigmike74 please, stop focus on me and try focus on the subjects instead... everyone has right to their own opinion (right Rob?) and i never said Hogan was 6'5, more like 6'3! get your facts right!
Editor Rob: yeah, I think people can guess Hogan whatever they wish. There is bounds of believability though. Saying Hogan is 6ft - 6ft 1 would be taking it too far.
miko said on 29/Mar/16
I'm still of the opinion that if he stands up as tall as physically possible he'd still clear 6'3.
James B said on 28/Mar/16
Sid would often wear thicker wrestling boots than hogan in the early 90s boosting him to 6'7 legit and add to that hogan probably was between 6'5-6'6 at that point.
Old conservative hippy said on 27/Mar/16
Back in my prime I was 6'4.5" tall and 245 pounds. Those days are long gone. I got to meet Hogan in 1977, trust me, he was he was every bit of 6'7" and 290 to 310 pounds then. Never met him again.
bigmike74 said on 27/Mar/16
If you want to see a troll in action visit the rocks page here stroll down the comments and you will see @straightahead saying a totally different tune. Rob please block that person he is a troll just trying to work up people on the internet. You own the site look yourself and see what i mean about his BS on the rocks page. Hes on there saying Hogan was 6'5" plus and the rock is 6'4" but on here he's saying different just to piss people off. People like that cause others to stop participating which in tern hurts the site.
To all don't take my word for it look yourself. Once you see then ignore that idiot.
bigmike74 said on 27/Mar/16
@rampage (-_-_-)clover that interview was years ago where he said 6'5". He's not that tall barefoot. At the most out of bed maybe 6'4 1/2" but he walks around at 6'3.5". If he stands straight he is 6'4" barefeet.
straightahead said on 27/Mar/16
@bigmike74 as usually, a troll like you again focus on me instead of my comment and you didnt face anything i wrote. You are still living a kids dream
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Mar/16
He's said 6ft4½, 6ft5 and "a little over" 6ft5 recently.
62B said on 24/Mar/16
RYAN11 said on 22/Mar/16
Big Mike, you are on the money about that troll. I have met and seen him up close twice. Once in 87 pre height loss and just over a year ago. He was truly 6'9" in his wrestling boots back then so 6'7" or within a half inch barefoot easily. He was over 6'4" barefoot the last time I met him, one guy there who was 6'4" thought for a second he was taller taking a picture with him until Hogan straightened his knees and stood tall, suddenly Hogan was taller and their footwear was the same

__________________________________________

I saw him in 1980, He was 6'51/2" at most in my opinion.
bigmike74 said on 24/Mar/16
@straightahead Blah Blah Blah! I won't resond to complete ignorance. I'm done with arguing with you about you incompetence, ignorance and complete utter stupidity. You can keep saying your ignorant crap but at this point no one here acknowledges you as a competent judge of anything. In this world you have the smart and the stupid and you are on the dump end of stupid a special kind at that. I won't acknowledge anything further you say because then i would be allowing your stupidity to carry on to me.
Alex said on 24/Mar/16
Jesus, how can be possible lose almost 10 cm of height? There's any other case in the wrestling world? Losing a solid 7 cm is tremendous, it is never possible for anyone in nature.
6'2 said on 24/Mar/16
no way he was 6'4 peak that would make sid 6'5.5 peak which in turn would make harvey whippleman 4'11
bigmike74 said on 23/Mar/16
@rampage (-_-_-)clover i could see him at 6'5" in those jordans he wears but he's not over 6'4" barefoot.
Kiat said on 23/Mar/16
Click Here

Hulk Hogan and Abyss
RYAN11 said on 22/Mar/16
Big Mike, you are on the money about that troll. I have met and seen him up close twice. Once in 87 pre height loss and just over a year ago. He was truly 6'9" in his wrestling boots back then so 6'7" or within a half inch barefoot easily. He was over 6'4" barefoot the last time I met him, one guy there who was 6'4" thought for a second he was taller taking a picture with him until Hogan straightened his knees and stood tall, suddenly Hogan was taller and their footwear was the same.
straightahead said on 22/Mar/16
@bigmike74 and there we go again, another personal focus. Iknow your desperade because you have ZERO evidence. Fact is, Hogan couldnt even pull of his fantasy height of 6'6 next to other billed wrestlers. Some examples: like "6'7 John Studd" (who was with a huge footwear advantage same height as 6'4 1/2 Fralic) "6'6 One Man Gang" (who wasnt taller than the 6'3 Ottman), "6'4 Bossman" (who was shorter than 6'3 Ottman), "6'3 dibiase" (who was shorter than Bossman), "6'2 peak Vnce" (who was shorter than 6'0 tops Bret Hart) and the list goes on and on and on... all these pure fantasy heights, THIS is what you comparing Hogan too.

But in reality, he had when wearing cowboyboots(!), tops 6 inches on 5'10 Bulldog (some here even give him 5'9) so that puts Hogan to what? u do the math. 6'2 peak or maybe 6'3 if lucky, and he wasnt taller than 6'4 Jimbo Covert, and he had barely 2 inches on 6'2 Otis Wilson even the fact Hogan for 100% sure weared cowoyboots in that picture (and btw, both Jim's and Otis heights included footwear, so they are more likely 6'3 and 6'1) again we are back to a 6'2-6'3 Hogan.

er4smiths is more and more right, Hogan no way 6'4 peak but more likely 6'3 - BARELY.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Mar/16
Rob, he claims to be a little over 6ft5 in his most recent interview!

Click Here

Pause at 4:18
Editor Rob: he's being a bit cheeky, but then out of bed with sneakers I'm sure he is that mark.
berta said on 22/Mar/16
same height as me when he was Young 196,5-197 and now 191-2
JD said on 22/Mar/16
Dears, all these discussions about a few centimeters back and forth, please see Hulk with singer James Blunt, James s round 5 feet 8 inches let us say 1,73 m and Hulk is more than a head bigger than him. As Celeb delivers nearly and realistic size measures let us accept that Terry Bollea now is abount 6 foot 3.5 inches which is 1,92 cm and used to have about 6.6 inches at he top. So we can also believe Terry that with his 6 foot 4 inches he is telling us the truth. As a big fan of Hulk Hogan and his way how he presents wrestling i am strongly convinced that he tells us the truth also here. But you all are right that the good Andre the Giant was in maximum round 6.11.5 seeing him also on the picture with Wilt Chamberlain and never was 7 feet 5 inches ever. Have a good time all of you fans of wrestling community.
Barrythetiler said on 21/Mar/16
Bigmike74 which part of the trial is that comparison ? I have tried to find it but to no avail.
6'2 said on 21/Mar/16
buster douglas wa 2-3" shorter than hogan in 1989 in his match against randy savage and buster was at least 6'3
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Mar/16
He said in another interview that he's a little over 6ft5!
RP said on 20/Mar/16
Boss is correct...Danimal was very accurate & knowledgable with his height listings.
bigmike74 said on 19/Mar/16
@straightahead i take what i said back about er4smiths. You should be eating the 45 LCP. Aleast with er4smiths once he actually sees proof of something he will admit it i honestly think you are the troll. I don't care if you don't believe me about Hogans height it really doesn't matter. I met him stood 2 feet away from him for 15 minutes i sized him up and i had another person of known height to me to base my already known conclusion of where he hovers around and it's no less than 6'3.5 minimum and more like 6'4". You preach camera angles this and camera angles that. B.S. I don't get fanboy star struck so just like looking at a person in the grocery store who is taller than me i did the same with Hogan. You cant say that and until you can stfu! You are trolling with you complete nonsense. A taller man can adjust his height by stance and relaxed posture when taking photos with a shorter person Rob can tell you that he does it quite often with other celebs when he gets photos with them when they are slouching. If he stood straight at his height and takes a picture with say a 6'2" person who is leaning or slouching with relaxed posture the 6'2" person from the mid chest level up in the photo could look 5'11" so your garbage is not excepted as fact especially to the people on here who have met Hogan face to face.
I haven't read a post yet where a person who has met his says he's anything less than 6'3.5" but most say 6'4" plus the 6'5" assumptions are a little out there but i cant say it's a lie not knowing what his footwear is. But your picture measuring claims are garbage and should be looked at as garbage. All the people saying there face to face estimation can't be wrong.
RP said on 19/Mar/16
Wikipedia now has him listed @ 6'8" & 322 lbs ...LOL!! That's his old AWA billing from 1982-'83 ...LOL!
RP said on 18/Mar/16
Well, he may be 6'8" now that he'll have $115 million of Gawker money to stand on 😂😂😂
Boss said on 18/Mar/16
I've posted here for years. You know nothing about posture or camera angles and just try to annoy people with your ignorant gargbage. I guess Rob is a troll since he has Hogan at 6'6 peak height. Straightahead reminds me of a troll who is blocked from this site. Danimal is not a troll and is actually way more credible than you will ever be.
bigmike74 said on 18/Mar/16
@er4smiths yes its name Hogan vs Gawker day 1 trial exerts 2 of 4.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Mar/16
He's now being listed at 6ft8 on the four-letter website.
straightahead said on 17/Mar/16
Boss ever heard about angles? Other way around and Jordan would be the one having an inch on Chet. BTW Chet looked barely 6'4 next to 6'2 Otis Wilson. You reminds me of a troll that used to be here, "Danimal". Wouldnt surprise me if your the same person.... can you do some ip research, Rob?
er4smiths said on 16/Mar/16
@bigmike74 - I've gone thru all 3 days of the Gawker trial and I seem to be missing the part you described down below "If you want stone evidence watch the 1st day of Hogans court case vs Gawker. They ask him under oath and the judge states her Deputy in the court room is 6'3' for reference what his starting weight and height were pre health issues and he states just over 6'6.5" and 310 pounds then they ask him after injuries what his weight and height is and he states 6'4" and his weight moves between 275 to 290 pounds. She has her deputy stand beside him for reference and he is taller than the deputy"
Can you provide the youtube link and at about what time point the part is at in the video? thanks
bigmike74 said on 16/Mar/16
@RP i don't think they were talking in shoes height. The judge made her bailiff stand next to Hogan and she said his height was 6'3" Hogan was in dress shoes and appeared 1.5" to 2" taller. He had the heel advantage and for once he stood straight up and was no less than 6"4" possibly .5" to .75" over.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 16/Mar/16
Rob could he really edge Ralf Möller at peak?
Editor Rob: they probably would be so close that you might be pushed to tell...
Boss said on 15/Mar/16
Looks like Chet Coppock has more than an inch on 6'5 range Michael Jordan.
Click Here

Hulk Hogan and Chet Coppock. Chet is a little closer to the camera.
Click Here
RP said on 13/Mar/16
On what Big Mike74 posted on Hogan's trial testimony of being 6'6.5" peak & now 6'4" @ 62 yeas old....I can totally buy that with it being his height in shoes? Peak Hogan was about 6'6.5" in shoes...and current Hogan is indeed about 6'4" in shoes. And since 2/3rds of the general public give their heights as it is with shoes on...then this is accurate testimony.
straightahead said on 13/Mar/16
@RYAN11 you already gave me the laugh of the year and yet its still only mars... so now we are to believe that the GIANT in the company was heavier than his BILLED weight too?! seriously you cannot judge height NOR weight. And no they wouldnt had announce Hogan as 330 if he was a legit 300, try 360 instead. Studd on the other hand was barely a legit 300 lbs but billed around 360-370. 280 lbs Fralic looked more massive in shoulders, chest, arms next to Studd than what Hogan ever did, and add to this; leg muscles. Hogan never had big leg muscles but Fralic had since he played football.

Hogan 6'4 - 270 lbs (being generous)
Studd 6'5 - 300 lbs
bigmike74 said on 11/Mar/16
@er4smiths i don't know what photos you are looking at but Hogan looks equal in height with Hoff and possibly a bit taller if he straightened up and the Aikman pics are not even usable for the ones you are talking about because they were on a blue screen incline and Aikman was infront of Hogan same goes with the manning pic that is the worst for ignorant comparison because of the angles and how both men are standing. Try again you are still talking nonsense. You should eat a 45 LCP.
Shawn said on 9/Mar/16
Watch this shoot with Kevin Nash (listed on this site at 6'9"), and jump to exactly 2:54 in the interview:

Click Here

Nash mentions how the first time he ever saw Hulk from the 3rd row in the crowd(in the 80s), he was 6'4". And him and Hogan are friends. Make from that what you will.
RYAN11 said on 9/Mar/16
Hogan's weight fluxuated between 310-330 lbs while he was on the juice and that has been stated by many others not just Hogan. Listing Hogan at just over 300lbs was to make the Giants he wrestled seem overwhelming to beat. If you wee to announce him at 330lbs then the 360lb Studd doesn't seem so gigantic, and Bundy who.was 440lbs seems to big also. As for Andre, Noni would not say he was 700lbs, but his announced weight never changed for 10 years despite the FACT he kept growing at an accelerated rate and was noticeably much heavier, so 600lbs is easily possible. Big Show was just under 500lbs at one point, and was never as large as Andre was nor as tall. Like Big Mike pointed out, I also haveet and seen both Hogan and Andre up.close in person. I also know what a 250 or 300 lbs man looks like. Hogan was much bigger and taller than any 6'4" 280 lb guy in the 80's. And Andre was over 7 feet tall by a good amount and we'll over the 525lb mark they gave him when I saw him in 1987. But you go.on with your expert height guessing from pictures lol
bigmike74 said on 9/Mar/16
@straightahead do us all a favor and disappear the ignorance you spew is starting to make yourself look like a complete idiot. If you want people on here to start taking your ignorant crap seriously start stating realistic heights. Your perception is so far off that it makes you look like a fool.
Anonymous1 said on 9/Mar/16
...I don't claim to be certain of anything, regarding Hogan's height. But, in just watching his first appearance on The A Team (1985) today, on whatever oldies station, he was taller than Mr T, for sure. But, he did not seem to completely dwarf him, either. I've always read T was 5'11 or 5'11 and 1/2. If that's true, Hogan certainly didn't "look" 6 or 7 inches taller than him, in this 1985 episode. If Hogan was 6'7, or close to it, back then, it sure didn't seem so in this show. Looked more like 6'4 or "maybe" 6'5, barely. All I'm saying is that maybe this explains his huge height loss; Maybe he was never anywhere near 6'7 to begin with. I'm basing this solely on what I saw today.
6'2 said on 9/Mar/16
he had at least 2-3"' on buster douglas whowas 6'3-4"'
bigmike74 said on 9/Mar/16
@straightahead i don't care either way. If you want stone evidence watch the 1st day of Hogans court case vs Gawker. They ask him under oath and the judge states her Deputy in the court room is 6'3' for reference what his starting weight and height were pre health issues and he states just over 6'6.5" and 310 pounds then they ask him after injuries what his weight and height is and he states 6'4" and his weight moves between 275 to 290 pounds. She has her deputy stand beside him for reference and he is taller than the deputy. Point is the Attorney asking the questions was showing the jury and judge the physical aspect of what wrestling does to your body and how the Gawker people hurt his only way of making money since he can't be ring active. It's on youtube look it up.
bigmike74 said on 9/Mar/16
@straightahead i don't care either way. If you want stone evidence watch the 1st day of Hogans court case vs Gawker. They ask him under oath and the judge states her Deputy in the court room is 6'3' for reference what his starting weight and height were pre health issues and he states just over 6'6.5" and 310 pounds then they ask him after injuries what his weight and height is and he states 6'4" and his weight moves between 275 to 290 pounds. She has her deputy stand beside him for reference and he is taller than the deputy. Point is the Attorney asking the questions was showing the jury and judge the physical aspect of what wrestling does to your body and how the Gawker people hurt his only way of making money since he can't be ring active. It's on youtube look it up.
RP said on 8/Mar/16
What we do know about Chet, is that Chet in dress shoes was exactly 1" taller than Michael Jordan in sneakers. Jordan has documented barefoot measurements raging anywhere from 6'4.75" to 6'5.25",,,meaning barefoot Chet was nothing less than a minimum 6'5.75" barefoot...and maybe as much as 6'6.25" ???
er4smiths said on 8/Mar/16
RYAN11 - how can he be 6'4" now, when he is dwarfed by 6'5" Joe Manganiello and Peyton Manning, noticeably shorter than 6'4" Troy Aikman and David Hasselhoff and 6'3" Snoop Dogg. This is where my issue is. These aren't speculations, they are backed up by photographic evidence. He is also barely taller than John Cena, same height has 6'2" Rock etc etc. I'd really like to have a grown up conversation on this and see where you're coming from.
me said on 8/Mar/16
No way Studd was only 6'5". He was the same height as Rick Barry. As far as Chet goes he and Hogan are close in height with Hogan edging him out. Hogan from the get go said Andre had at least 6" on him. Hogan always claimed 6'7" but even at 6'6" that puts Andre right where Rob has him and Hogan as well. For Chet to say 3" taller is ridiculous. That would mean the same difference between Hogan and Andre and we know that isn't even close. That is if Chet actually said that. Maybe he had an issue with Vince. Regardless he is way off.
straightahead said on 7/Mar/16
@bigmike74 i rather trust solid evidence instead of your hyped expectations as a kid (no offense) but we have a peak Hogan with 6'4 Jimbo Covert and 6'2 Otis Wilson, and he couldnt even look above Otis head...

@RYAN11, really? im not the one claiming that a larger than life wrestler was heavier (320 as u claim) than his BILLED weight(!) which was approx 300, so if anyone is posting garbage here, its you. I bet you believe his fairy tales about Andre too, that he was 700 lbs at WM3.
Aaronious said on 6/Mar/16
Rob, check out this picture with the ring announcer from WM2, Chet Coppcock, who was a legit 6'6", and Hogan, as well as some other WM2 guys:

Click Here
Editor Rob: Hogan could look nearer 6ft 6 in the 80's, with that guy he does look more than 6ft 5
bigmike74 said on 6/Mar/16
@straightahead no i was born in 1970 my tag name has 74 on it for personal reasons that are none of your business. I seen Hogan in Tampa in 1981 at a CWF show. My older brother who is 6'4" was there with us and was shorter than Hogan by a good amount i remember it clearly because i thought damn Hogan can look over the top of Alans head (my brother). A 6'5" guy can't look over a 6'4" mans head as he did Alans.
Boss said on 6/Mar/16
Well Chet says he and Hogan were same height as we already knew. Andre was more than 3" taller than Hogan at Wrestlemania more like 5" and more like 6" when they first met in the late 1970's. Also, Andre almost exclusively wrestled guys 6'6 range or more so some accounts just don't add up. We have Ernie Ladd, Killer Kowalski, Bobo Brazil, Don Leo, Big John Studd, Giant Baba, Rene DeLartesse, Buddy Baker, Blackjack Mulligan, Tyler Mane and his partner, One Man Gang, Giant Haystacks, Wilt Chamberlain and more around Chet's height or up to several inches taller.
bigmike74 said on 6/Mar/16
@straightahead no i was born in 1970 my tag name has 74 on it for personal reasons that are none of your business. I seen Hogan in Tampa in 1981 at a CWF show. My older brother who is 6'4" was there with us and was shorter than Hogan by a good amount i remember it clearly because i thought damn Hogan can look over the top of Alans head (my brother). A 6'5" guy can't look over a 6'4" mans head as he did Alans.
62B said on 6/Mar/16
JT said on 3/Mar/16
Here’s Chet Coppock’s response to my email several years ago
Click Here We don’t know if Chet was a legit 6’6” either although if he claims he was a little taller than Michael Jordan, he’s not a flat 6’5”.
___________________________________________

You also don't know that Chet Choppock wasn't a little over 6'6" and just rounded down.
straightahead said on 6/Mar/16
JT, thats a another proof. Its kinda amazing (or not..) how he never can pull off any taller than 6'4 next to ppl of KNOWN height...

dustin, Akeem/OMG was more like 6'3 at the very best, the rest is footwear if he appeared taller since he was not taller than the 6'3 Ottman. Studd with a asumed footwear advantage, appeared same height as 6'4 1/2 Fralic. Studd could actually only had been 6'4...
RYAN11 said on 5/Mar/16
Er4smiths, you are either in desperate need of glasses or you just like stirring up stuff. If you ever really want to debate his height peak or now you need to start making somewhat realistic comments. He is around 6'4" now, saying that for a peak height is just foolish and cannot be taken seriously. Hogan was over 6'6" barefoot in his 20's, the only debatable subject is whether he was really 6'7" or was he just really close and rounded up. I personally ally saw him up close in 1986 and again met him in 2014. He was at least 320lbs and over 6'6" back then, he has lost size mostly in his legs and somewhat in his arms, chest and shoulders which is natural given his age and the fact he doesn't loft really heavy weight like he used to. He is easily still around 290 lbs now, I've been around many guys in the 6'2-3" range in the gym who are bulked up and he still is considerably larger. Straightahead, everyone should simply stop responding to anything you post as it is complete garbage.
Boss said on 4/Mar/16
The reason Chet's left shoulder looks higher is because he he closer to the camera.
dustin said on 4/Mar/16
er4smiths, you can clearly see the top of hogans bald head, Chet's head is harder to judge because he has puffy hair. if his head were shaved you could see that the top of his head is pretty even with Hogans. Chets shoulders may look higher, but Hogan has a large head. Footwear advantage cannot be assumed in any pic that you cannot clearly see footwear. I dont see 2 inches. In fact i do not see inches at all. I see a half inch difference at the most in that pic. Judging a prime 80's early 90's Hulk against Tenta, Zeus, Jake Roberts, Chet, Hillbilly Jim, One Man Gang, Muhammad Ali, Christopher Lloyd, Richard Belzar, King Kong Bundy and countless others, A 6'5"-6'6" Hulk Hogan is what we have in the his prime. Obviously he is alot shorter these days.
bigmike74 said on 4/Mar/16
Both pics with Chett show a 6'6" Hogan and Chett they both are leaning and camera angle is in favor of Chett. I showed the pics to my sister in law who does photography for a living and she confirmed that if that pic with just Chett and Hogan the angle is a 28 degree tilt in favor of Chett if you square it out Hogan would be taller not by much but taller none the least. More than likely footwear advantage goes to Hogan by just assuming but take the footwear away same height around the board. 6'6" peak Rob nailed it.
straightahead said on 4/Mar/16
er4smiths yes, 6'4 at the very very best...
62B said on 4/Mar/16
er4smiths said on 2/Mar/16
I find that "most" people are not good judges of height. I pride myself in it, and have always been obsessed with height since I was a little boy. I would ask tall people there heights and so on.
_____________________________________________________________________________________

I think its a little funny bud that you think you are any more qualified than anybody else to judge how tall a person is that you have never met or seen in person, just because you've been "obsessed with height since you were a kid." You can be proud of yourself all you want for your own perceived ability to guess height from pictures, but its not likely to ever convince someone like myself who has seen Hogan during his peak height days that he was 6'3.5". I saw with my own eyes that Hogan was taller than my 6'4"+ Grandfather.
straightahead said on 3/Mar/16
bigmike74 i asume you was born in 1974, so you was only 6 back in 1980 when you claim Hogan was 6'6 and in his peak. Im amazed how a 6 year old boy could do an estimation like that, or did you measure him? (against what/who?)
JT said on 3/Mar/16
Here’s Chet Coppock’s response to my email several years ago
Click Here We don’t know if Chet was a legit 6’6” either although if he claims he was a little taller than Michael Jordan, he’s not a flat 6’5”.

The latest pic of Hogan and Chet is nice but pointless for estimating height, as we can’t see the footwear, stances, or level of the floor. Hogan very easily could have been wearing cowboy boots with Chet, just as he is here Click Here wearing that same American Made shirt. Rob has George Peppard at 6’0” although he’s around 57 here with Hogan and may have lost a little height. Regardless, Hogan's nowhere near 6'8" in cowboy boots with Peppard.
dustin said on 3/Mar/16
Studd had more than 2 inches on Superman. More like at least 3 or more, and his head is tilted forward sightly. Also Christopher Reeve is listed as 6'3.5" on this sight. He is that at the very least. I just dont see a 6'5" Studd. He was similar in height with Akeem. Maybe a bit taller. No way is Akeem only 6'5".
bigmike74 said on 2/Mar/16
Hogan has never been 6'8" as he was billed maybe in thick boots but more like 6'7.5 -.75" but barefeet prime he was every bit of 6'6" and more than likely hit 6'7" right out of bed but that we don't know. A 1980 Hogan was 6'6" a 2016 Hogan is in my opinion from seeing him and knowing my own height around 6'3.5 - 6'4". The people who haven't seen him should stfu! Your opinions are bs and you are simply put idiots and your measuring skills need working on.
dustin said on 2/Mar/16
Boss, that is the pic i was referring to. Also in regards to the picture er4smiths is referring to, you cannot see the footwear so how can you tell that he has thicker soles?
er4smiths said on 2/Mar/16
@Boss - that's a great pic, thanks for posting. When I look at that pic - my first thought is Chet looks at least 2" taller. Let me explain before you assume I'm crazy.
Chet looks leaned down into Hogan a bit (common pose lots of people do) and also if you look at Chet's shoulders (obviously his left) they are higher. I think we
can safely assume Hogan has the footwear advantage, and also since this photo is surrounded by a black frame, if you enlarge the pic and get the top of Chet's head to
touch the black frame line - you see a nearly 2" gap from the top of Hogan's head to the line. To me, Hogan looks around 6'4" tops in this pic. I am actually ok with a 6'4" peak Hogan. What do you all think?
er4smiths said on 2/Mar/16
bigmike74 - I'm not calling you a liar. I don't know you, and assume you're probably a good guy (even though you name the state I live in and call me an idiot). I can also assume, we are all here to find out the truth when it comes to Hogan's peak barefoot height and current barefoot height. As I have told ryan11 - you bring up a very valid point about seeing Hulk in person as opposed to having never. I don't disagree, I just think there is more to it than that. There are so many factors that can come into play, the least of which, is one person's observation skills compared to the next. Witnesses of a crime can have completely different accounts or descriptions of what happened or what the person looked like, how tall etc. Also, in a lot of pictures WWF/WWE were very calculating on how they stacked wrestlers up with each other. Having them stand on boxes, stand closer to the camera, film at certain angles to make it look like they were taller or larger, wear lifts, etc etc. I'm 6'2" but get told by people
all the time they thought I was 6'3" or 6'4" - I find that "most" people are not good judges of height. I pride myself in it, and have always been obsessed with height since I was a little boy. I would ask tall people there heights and so on.
I am basing my opinion on Hulk's peak and current barefoot height, on tons of pictures with many different people to compare with. I also have a good friend who has met him and shook his hand and spoke to him for over 5 minutes at an Army
event in GA. I have the picture to prove it. My friend is 5'10" and Hulk was no more than 4 inches taller. He described Hulk as seeming like a 6'1" guy. I've said it till I'm blue in the face - WWF/WWE are highly skilled at creating larger than life
figures with their superstars. For example billing 6'1" guys as 6'4" and by far embellishing weights too. They billed Kane up to 7ft tall at one point. In reality he is 6'4.5"-6'5" - look at the pic with Vince Vaughn - same height. So you can get angry
and name call etc - but that doesn't bode well for you proving your argument. We all really need to start being civil and acting like fellow height and wrestling fans. Not out to prove each other wrong but to come together and join forces and resources
and prove once and for all Hulk Hogan's barefoot peak and current height.
Sincerely
er4smiths - from TN
straightahead said on 1/Mar/16
bigmike74 i guess your so frustrated because some of us dont buy your crap and lies, so you must make it personal with name callings. Again, how will Hogan become taller when/if someone met him? He never had 3 inches on 6'3 Ottman, he had barely 1 on him, he wasnt taller than 6'5 Tenta he was actually shorter. He wasnt taller than 6'4 Jimbo Covert, and neither did he have more than 2 inches on 6'2 Otis Wilson. He peaked 6'4 tops at the very most and thats it.

For the record dustin, Studd had 2 inches on the 6'3 Reeve and he was BARELY taller than 6'4 1/2 Fralic, so er4smiths is right on - 6'5.
Boss said on 1/Mar/16
er4smiths said on 29/Feb/16
sorry Dustbin, not a chance. Chet was leaning and behind Hogan in the pics. PLUS Hogan was wearing much thicker soles. Why are you guys so dense when it comes to camera angles or footwear advantage??

Well here is Hulk Hogan and 6'6 Chet Coppock standing straight and side by side. Chet Coppock is actually a little closer to the camera.
Click Here
bigmike74 said on 29/Feb/16
So basically everyone on here who has met Hogan shook his hand and stood face to face with him weather in shoes or like some say flip flops all say 6'3.5 - 6'4.5 are liars if you go by what the 2 guys who haven't met him say. I met the guy he's taller than me. Er4smiths &straightahead have never met the guy and compare pictures which most of them show him as tall as Rod has him listed. I personally think those 2 are the same idiot guy from Tennessee who should have been pillowed. To all who have met him your opinions are valid for those who haven't yours are nothing more that BS.
dustin said on 29/Feb/16
Studd did tower over Christopher Reeve, and was as tall as Rick Barry after several years in wrestling and over 350lbs of bodyweight. The photo of Hogan and Chet i saw, they were side by side and their looked to be maybe a 1/4 of an inch difference.I guess Tenta, Zeus and Hillbilly jim were all 6'2" to 6"3 as well? Get outa here with all that. 6'9" Andre? keep dreaming dude.
er4smiths said on 29/Feb/16
sorry Dustbin, not a chance. Chet was leaning and behind Hogan in the pics. PLUS Hogan was wearing much thicker soles. Why are you guys so dense when it comes to camera angles or footwear advantage??
If John Studd was 6'7'-7.5" - he would tower over Bill Fralic and Christopher Reeve AND Rick Barry. Studd was 6'5" tops barefoot. Hogan was around 6'3.5" barefoot and Andre was 6'9" barefoot - obvious as snow.
Hogan is NOT anywhere close to 6'4" right now. I love the "he crouches down or stands with his knees bent" excuse. If he stood up he'd be 6'5"? lmao He was dwarfed by 6'5" Joe M. 6'6" Dennis Rodman 6'4" Troy Aikman
Now how about all the pics side by side with 5'8"-5'11" guys where he barely looks 6'2" at best?? RIGHT - that's because HE IS. I agree he has lost some height - everyone does with age and of course with certain surgeries etc.
So 6'3.5" to 6'2" is more than appropriate.
straightahead said on 28/Feb/16
We have a peak Hogan struggling with 6'4 next to 6'4 Jim Covert and 6'2 Otis Wilson, we have Hillbilly Jim next to Covert as well, and he doesnt look taller than 6'4 either - with no angle excuses to use in neither of the pictures. Tenta was listed 6'5 (which is 196 cm) as well as 198 cm, in this case its common sense to go by the lower height, especially since he had no way near 3 inches on the 6'3 Ottman (Typhoon/Tugboat)
Dustin said on 27/Feb/16
The prime Hogan height discussion should be over after seeing the Chet Coppock pics. He was 6'5".5-6'6". Game over. Now all the Studd and Andre heights can have a definite starting point. Prime Studd was 6'7"-6'7.5" and Andre was never under 6'11" while still wrestling.
Justin said on 27/Feb/16
I never knew that Zeus wore platform shoes but makes sense now. Hogan must of been his billed height then
joe### said on 26/Feb/16
Click Here
denali said on 25/Feb/16
i met curt angel he is 5-9.75----5-10 spot on , use him to compare hogan. im 5.9 exact he was just barley taller than me.
Straightahead said on 25/Feb/16
@bigmike74 so Hogan will become taller when i met him?! Some ppl in here have met British Bulldog, they estimate him to be everything from 5'9 to 5'11. The funny thing is that one of them who met both claims that Hogan was 6'6 while still says Bulldog was 5'9... but pictures proves that there was no way near 9 inches beween them (the difference was 6 inches - when Hogan weared cowboy boots). So i rather trust my eyes, common sense, and ton's of video and photo evidence over some biased fanboys wet dream.
Boss said on 24/Feb/16
Hey Rob, what's your opinion on Hogan and Chet Coppock?
Editor Rob: they may well have been pretty close, near 6ft 6
Boss said on 24/Feb/16
We have Hogan in his prime with 6'6 Chet Coppock in his prime and Hogan is in 6'6 range peak. Hogan was slightly taller than 6'5+ Hillbilly Jim , 6'5 Tiny Lister, and was as tall or slightly taller than 6'5 3/4 Earthquake John Tenta, 6'6 One man gang. I mean 6'5 Tiny Lister in 2" heels and has slightly better posture and is on his tip toes. Yet they are right around same height in their staredown.
Boss said on 23/Feb/16
Also, when in Zues character Lister would walk on around on his tip toes to appear as tall as possible. Lister was billed as 6'9" monster.
Boss said on 23/Feb/16
Lister wore 3" platforms in No Holds Barred. Lister wore 2" heels in WWF. So Lister was 6'7 in his boots in his WWF run.
bigmike74 said on 22/Feb/16
@straightahead are you just that ignorant or are your statements just your way of trying to be funny? Until you meet Hogan your incompetent moronic statements should be viewed as ignorance. I have met him and apparently so have others on here and every single person who says they have all say the same thing 6'3.5 to 6'4.5. So until you stand face to face with this man you and er4smiths should not comment because it's all bulls&#t.
RYAN11 said on 22/Feb/16
Zeus had a huge footwear advantage, those boots had huge heels giving Tiny a 3-4 inch boost. Hogan was taller barefoot by a good margin. The other thing nobody seems to notice or remember is how they listed Zues as 6'9" and 330 lbs, but Hogan was noticeably bigger and thicker. Hogan was 6'7", Lister was over 6'5" and with a 3 inch extra boost looked slightly taller than Hogan in ring. As for this Lister said they were the same height, the were close but Hogan had him by over an inch.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.