|
Michael E Burgess says on 30/May/08
Jack O'Halloran are involved in the film business together, on a co-investor, partnership type of agreement. I know the man well. We usually talk something like three times a day. He is all of 6'6". He no longer looks like the Non of 1978, but he is a big, big man, and 6'4" doesn't cut it. Glenda says on 25/Sep/07
I am his daughter and I can attest he was 6'6". I am sure he may have shrunk over the years but my father has been 6'6" since he was in his late teens.
supes78 says on 30/Mar/07
Next to 6'2.75" Routh:
Click Here
O'Halloran doesn't look more than 6'5" today. Paul says on 31/Oct/06
Yeah I didn't realise the statue was on a platform. He might have been 6'6 at one time. He appeared in the 1976 remake of King Kong and was easily the biggest guy in the group. supes78 says on 30/Oct/06
The sculptor's of that Reeve statue went to great pains to make it as accurate as possible by having it be 6'4" barefoot. The statue is on a raised platform in the shape of an 'S' symbol but as far as I can tell, they are standing on the platform with him. If not, that would make O' Hollaran taller than 6'6" since the platform is raised a few inches off the ground. Peak height for celebs are always hard to gauge but considering the guy is 63 years old today, I'd be surprised if the still stood at the peak height of 6'6" he gives for himself. Paul says on 30/Oct/06
Taking into account the photos from supes78 I'd say not much over 6'4 personally, and that was when he was younger. Anonymous says on 28/Oct/06
Yup, those are huge lifts. And Reeve not only didn't have lifts, but the soles of his boots were very thin, so in terms of height he was essentially walking around barefoot. O'Halloran definitely looked taller than Reeve, but only by a couple of inches. Paul says on 28/Oct/06
Crikey...some lifts. They would put Kane to shame. TNTinCA says on 26/Oct/06
He can't be 6'4" since he was obviously taller than Christopher Reeve in Superman 2. I think 6'6" is accurate. |