LIL LEE says on 29/May/08
Jason easily has 2 inches on Glenn here. 5'10 is right

TNTinCA says on 19/May/08
His face is in the foreground somewhat which I think is also attributing to the illusion of size versus glenn's face. He is also leaning into the camera while glenn is leaning back.

Davey says on 25/Apr/08
Is he the guy from sleepers?

Charliemoto says on 27/Mar/08
wow his head is twice the size of Glenn but then his body is also kinda larger mostly.

i'd give him 5'10 flat actually.

derek d says on 27/Mar/08
His head is big but not as big as it appears in the pic probably because he is closer to the camera than glenn is.

vertically challenged says on 28/Feb/08
Markus....now that is funny!! I have to agree I think his head is huge...

Markus says on 25/Feb/08
His head didn't look so big in the lost boys did it? Strange!

Pik says on 12/Dec/07
He does look 177 cm next to Liotta.
Click Here

Anonymous says on 12/Dec/07
he looks more 5'11. if he stand straight up.

charlie says on 27/Oct/07
Look at him walking side by side with Brad Pitt in "sleepers". He is noticably shorter although that's decieving because its been said that Pitt wears lifts. Even if Pitt was wearing lifts and Patrick wasn't, it still looks like a max. of 5'10" for Patrick to me.

bri says on 9/Oct/07
In the movie Alamo, he looked so short that i remember thinking he'd be a great Wolverine cause he has the stature down and the bad attitude. I'd say he's shorter than the posted 5'9.5 above.

Del Mar says on 10/May/07
If straightening up he could look 5-11, 6 in that pic. Or maybe I think so cause he is closer to the camera

CoolJ says on 23/Jan/07
He looks to have a massive head for a guy only 5'9.5

derek says on 20/Jan/07
Well in the pic with glenn he looks like if he was to standup straight which he is clearly not, he would be over 6 ft... hmmm lifts?

brazilian guy says on 14/Sep/06
i still think that there“s 4 inches between them
notice that pitt is lookin down and his head isn“t straight, and patric is straight,
i guess patric is 173-174, but i might be wrong cause his body is short and he“s got enormous head, so he might be 175-176, ok

Tom says on 12/Aug/06
Whoa, no way was he 10 cm (4 inches!) shorter than pitt. He looked to be 1 or 2 inches shorter, 2.5 at the most.

brazilian guy says on 22/Mar/06
heĀ“s at least 10 cms shorter than pit in sleepers
pit looks 183 for me, i guess patric is 173 - 5'8" tops no higher than that
he is short and has got an enormous head heheh

trueheight says on 9/Feb/06
you are spot on on this one. patric is very much underrated and underappreciated actor. check out Narc, he seems little compared to Liotta but in some interview Liotta said he wore lifts because the character required a huge guy

brazilian guy says on 4/Feb/06
heĀ“s closer than glenn to the camera
it makes him looks bigger, but if you look their heads, the forehead of both are in the same height
i donĀ“t think heĀ“s any bigger than 5'9", he is 1 inch or less bigger than gleen's 173
175 tops is very good for him, but i still think he looks 172-173 tops

dmeyer says on 25/Jan/06
in that pics jason 2 inches taller than glenn maybe 3

Glenn says on 24/Jan/06
I thought he would be 5-8.he was 5-10 max.I think you hit it on the head with your guess.unless lifts?

elio says on 24/Jan/06
From the photo with Glenn he seems closer than Glenn to the camera ... which may mean he is closer to 5'8"-5'9" than 5'10".

If he is not closer to the camera then he's got one humungous head, which would account for him looking like a shorter guy in some of his movies.

In both cases I think we need Glenn's opinion on that photo and if Mr.Patric was wearing unusual shoes.

CelebHeights Editor says on 24/Jan/06
Pic with Patric...maybe Glenn you can comment on this guy. In the pic he's a little closer so, hard to tell...a few encounters place this guy 5ft 8-9 range...

Anonymous says on 5/Jan/06
he is shorter than kiefer sutherland in lost boys
he has at least 3 inches under ray liotta who is listed 5'11''
he is the same hight as sandra bullock
he looks shorty
no way he is 177 cm
for me he looks more 173 or 174
get it right editor
5'8" is sharp for him
he would be grateful heheh
it“s funny how these stars want to fudge their heights
why?, i think the important is their accting, shouldn“t it be
it surprises me
here in brasil is the same, every actor grows when get famous, they always raise their heights, just like "liewood"

LRB2 says on 19/Sep/05
I was an extra on his latest movie and he was my height: 5'8".

mcfan says on 14/Sep/05
My memory was wrong. 5'9.5 seems good, however, Kiefer Sutherland looks his height.

McFan says on 23/Jul/05
He only looks 5'7. Wasn't Kiefer Sutherland like 1-2 inches taller than him in the "Lost Boys?"

funkymonk says on 21/Jun/05
He was in Dublin a few years ago and he walked right past me. I'm 5ft11. He was at least 2 inches shorter than me if not more. He does have a large head and is fairly broad.

miked2789 says on 5/Feb/05
that pic of dafoe and patric makes no sense if patric is really 5 9.5, bullock is 5 7.5 as said on this site. in the pic patric looks to be the same size if not a half inch taller. i think patric is only 5 8, its obvious in the pic.

CelebHeights Editor says on 1/Feb/05
In regards to L's comment, the boat in that pic looks to be sloping in the favor of Dafoe (also slightly closer to the camera). Dafoe is really 5ft 8 tops in the late 90's.