|
191cm/252lbs says on 2/Feb/10
He looks similiar to 6"2 Matthew Fox every time I see him on Lost. This guy has to be 187cm or therebouts. Maybe even after a good nights sleep hes just about 6"2
ANDREA[ITA] says on 1/Feb/10
cmon guys. if he claims 6ft 1, he can't be more. maybe he's 187 cms out of bed but in my opinion he's a real 6ft 1. that's it. he simply claims his REAL height and this is the reason why he looks taller than the others that lie about their height. Moke says on 22/Jan/10
Ah c`mon everywhere else his height is 6'1.5". You know why? Cause they measured him when back in the day he became a model. Unfortunately he isn`t one anymore so he was deleted from the Calvin Klein site. He just told you roughly which was his height just as he did the guys from MensHealth (6'2). Please change. That`s ridiculous. Hugh 190-192cm says on 3/Jan/10
Fox 188cm and Holloway 187cm Milosh says on 29/Dec/09
Tall guy, I'd say 6'1.5". Just a hair shorter than Fox. All Hail 191cm says on 13/Dec/09
Exactly 187cm tall no more or less. It is common for 6ft 1 to 6ft 2 guys to round down, rob. Or maybe Holloway doesn't know centimeteres to inches and just assumes 187cm is 6ft 1 and not 6ft 1.5 when it's actually vice versa! Hugh 191cm says on 4/Dec/09
I'll settle on a solid 6ft 1.5. Hugh 191cm says on 26/Nov/09
Rob there is a term I use from time to time.
'pulling your leg'
That's exactly what Mr. Holloway is doing. He's clearly taller than 185cm
Whip out a season of lost of your choice and watch this guy next to Mtthew Fox. He's like the same height and can look taller at times. Other times a tad shorter. but barely. Hugh 191cm says on 23/Nov/09
I think Holloway is 186cm at lowest, Fox is still 188cm. mk 187 says on 22/Nov/09
I agree, if Fox is 188cm, Holloway has to be 186cm, maybe he just wrong measured himself. On every picture here they are about the same height, there can´t be difrence of 3cm. And if Holloway is only 6´1, O´Quinn has to be downgrade to 6´1 or 6´1.25 and Fox at least to 6´1.5. rob89 says on 21/Nov/09
I have him at just over 6'1 (186 cm). Maybe, just maybe he's 6'1.5 (187 cm), but no taller than that though. If he's really only 6'1 flat, then Fox is most likely a bit under 6'2. He's never a full inch taller than Holloway, everything else being equal. Hugh 190cm says on 20/Nov/09
Yeah, but he's rounding down. For instance Jack Coleman who claims 6ft2 is listed as 6ft2.5 189cm on this site. Hugh 191cm says on 17/Nov/09
Rob isn't even replying to any of our posts
[Editor Rob: holloway says he's 6ft 1, I agree with his statement.] mk 187cm says on 10/Nov/09
Yes, it´s time for UPGRADE ! I would say : Josh Holloway's height is 6 ft 1.5 in (187cm). Hugh 191cm says on 9/Nov/09
UPGRADE TIME!!!! Josh Holloway's height is 6 ft 1.75 in (187cm). mk 187cm says on 9/Nov/09
186/187cm for him. That´s for sure. Moke says on 8/Nov/09
Another pic with Fox and Holloway: Click Here
Definitely no 3cm difference! (but bad angle here, I know...) Hugh 191cm says on 7/Nov/09
Holloway 186cm minimum and Fox 188cm on the dot. Still undecided about O'Quinn. Hugh 191cm says on 5/Nov/09
He's definately taller than 185cm. Cmon rob 187cm mk 187cm says on 26/Oct/09
I think he´s not so close to 188cm. He claimed 6´1 and I doubt he was wrong in 3cm. But he has to be upgraded, he´s 186/187cm. I would go with 6´1.5. That ´s pretty accurate for him. Hugh 191cm says on 23/Oct/09
there should be more 6ft1.75 guys on this site and Holloway should be one Paul says on 21/Oct/09
Moke, that's not correct, 6'2 is =187,96, and 6'3 is more like=190.50 or smt, 6'4= 193 cm and 6'5=195,5 Moke says on 19/Oct/09
mk 187, thats an interesting discovery. When you go on like this there is soon no more congruence between feet and centimeters which leads to false correlations: 6'2=188.976 (=189cm), 6'3=192.024 (on celebsheight indicated as 191cm!), 6'4=195.072 (here 194cm...) So, what now? An actor which claims 6'4 in reality stands 195cm, not 194cm! In my opinion the american (?) foot-system is too inaccurate... Hugh 191cm says on 19/Oct/09
Rob should definately upgrade Holloway. I don't know what's stopping him. Paul says on 18/Oct/09
I really think that it's time for a upgrade, I mean, there's barely any difference at all between Josh and Matthew Fox, I really think Matthew Fox is flat 6'2 (188cm) and that Josh is actually 187 cm which would be about 6'1.5 and instead of rounding up he rounds down, but it's pretty god damn obvious that he's almost a legit 6'2 mk 187cm says on 16/Oct/09
Yes, at least +1cm. Maybe he really thought 186cm, because in some cases you can find 185cm as still 6´0 and 186cm as full 6´1 not 6´1.25. And it´s true in some way, because when you convert cm on ft you´ll get this : 185cm = 6,0696ft, 186cm = 6,1024ft and 187cm = 6,1352ft (what is converted quite good). Hugh 191cm says on 15/Oct/09
Rob whats stopping you from giving him that extra 1cm? Hugh 191cm says on 13/Oct/09
6'1/6'2 rob. Hugh 191cm says on 5/Oct/09
Bang on Mk. 186-187cm. mk 187cm says on 5/Oct/09
Yeah, weak 6´2" so 6´1.5" or 6´1.75" (still 187cm). 188cm out of the bed and 186cm in the evening. But most of the day he is about 187cm. Hugh 191cm says on 4/Oct/09
Not sure about the full 6ft2. But it's not impossible. Taller than 6ft1 though. A weak 6ft2. mk 187cm says on 4/Oct/09
Daveyy, no he´s not (Holloway). Fox maybe. Daveyy says on 1/Oct/09
He is a full 6'2... Matthew Fox is 6'2.5 Hugh 191cm says on 23/Sep/09
yeah lenad, and 188cm max. Lenad says on 20/Sep/09
bare min 186cm Moke says on 17/Sep/09
Seriously? If his wife stood 5'5 Josh would be like 6'3... Click Here
Next to 6 ft 1.75 (?) Terry O'Quinn. Something need to be changed here ;) Click Here Hugh 191cm says on 16/Sep/09
His wife looks about 5ft5. Moke says on 13/Sep/09
@ Hugh 191:
You`re someway right, but: If Holloway moved a step forward they would stand next to another which should made them stand about the same height...in my opinion.
Someone know how tall his wife is? Click Here mk 187cm says on 13/Sep/09
Hugh 191cm, I agree 186/187 cm. Hugh 191cm says on 11/Sep/09
Theres about 2cm between them in Foxs favour. But that still puts Holloway at 186cm at least. 185cm is too low. Moke says on 8/Sep/09
Click Here
Here you can see that there is NEVER one inch between this two men. Assuming Fox is maybe 1cm taller,Holloway would still be 187cm, which sounds very likely after aaallllll this discussions about his height:) mk 187cm says on 6/Sep/09
Hugh 191cm, yes Fox is 188 cm, maybe even 189 cm, for Holloway 187 cm is pretty accurate, but nothing over that. Hugh 191cm says on 5/Sep/09
I think fox might even be 6ft2-6ft2.5. mk187cm says on 5/Sep/09
Seriously, you should upgrade him. He is at least 186 cm, maybe more. I would say he´s exactly my height - 6´1.5". Hugh 191cm says on 5/Sep/09
Closer to 6ft2 Moke says on 4/Sep/09
A question to the moderator: Have you acctually ever granted an actor/actress some centimeters more subsequently? Because in this case it seems approbiate for most of the users. Thanks for your answer! Hugh 191cm says on 21/Aug/09
Holloway looks 187cm and Fox a hair taller at 188cm. Josh.J says on 8/Aug/09
rob, i implore you to upgrade mr holloway's height. its very possible for people to accidently downgrade their height due to miscalculating metric-feet/inch conversions. every single picture of mr holloway and matthew fox points to the FACT that they are virtually identical in height. josh is at least 187/ 6'1.5". Vincent 185cm says on 6/Aug/09
He seems to be at least 187 cm, but have you noticed his sloping shoulders? Hugh 191cm says on 1/Aug/09
Seriously rob can't you see the difference between Fox and Holloway. I can't. I'd go with 6ft1.5 at least
And maybe a weak 6ft2. italian boy says on 27/Jul/09
185min 187max Hugh 190cm says on 29/Jun/09
aaa you don't lose height when your in your 30's-40's. You start shrinking in your 50's. Hugh 190cm says on 29/Jun/09
Rob you have to take a closer look at this guy. He's very similiar to Matthew Fox in height. 186cm at least and maybe 6ft2. aaa says on 28/Jun/09
I think now when he is almost 40 he is 186cm tall. Younger he could be 187cm maybe bit over - weak 188cm. adam says on 25/Jun/09
He has claimed 6-1½ also and definitely looks it.
[Editor Rob: which program/interview did he claim that?] rob89 says on 24/Jun/09
Definitely at the very least 6'1, and probably a bit over like most here seem to think. He does looks taller than just 6'1 most of the time. Moke says on 20/Jun/09
This man necessarily needs a boost cause he`s doing understatement (or he care less than we do:)). Most of people here are in favor of setting this guy to 6ft1.75 or 6'2. So why not doing it? LOLZ says on 12/Jun/09
Yeah Man 187 Hugh 190cm says on 9/Jun/09
Terry O'Quinn looks a hair taller than holloway so he's the listed 6ft1.75.. holloway looks 186cm. John says on 7/Jun/09
after watching lost recently, Josh Holloway appears taller than Matthew fox i would say there would only be the tinyest bit of difference though i reckon they are both 6"2 and Terry 0'quin is 6"1, cos Matthew fox is taller in flashbacks than Terry O'quin by about an inch and i think Josh Holloway is Fractionaly taller than Matthew fox, watch lost this week and see what i mean. Hugh 190cm says on 2/Jun/09
Well he's taller than 185cm. Hugh 190cm says on 17/May/09
Maybe 187cm/188cm. Hugh 190cm says on 10/May/09
186-187cm. Lenad says on 4/May/09
I'd say a weak 6'2 most likely Moke says on 28/Apr/09
There is no way Holloway is shorter than 6ft1. Actually "6ft1" is closer to "186cm" by the way.If you convert foot into meters/centimeters you get to that result. So why you don`t change that? Random Guy says on 25/Apr/09
Josh is taller than o'quin 4 sure and slightly taller the fox Josh.J says on 24/Apr/09
i just saw an episode of NCIS from the first season. mr holloway stars as a local sheriff. next to mark harmon, who is 6'0 on this site, he looked the same or even slightly shorter! this wasnt from just one shot but many. im really perplexed by this. either harmon had some crazy elevators which i seriously doubt or he is taller then 6'0 or josh is shorter then 6'1. im quite not sure which is which. Lenad says on 20/Apr/09
Come on Rob 186cm chelsea says on 20/Apr/09
He is definitly 6ft 1in (185),and maybe the same hieght as Matthew Fox.
...Ooooo....
...(---)....
....)--)....
...(---).... Lenad says on 18/Apr/09
He is definitly not under 6ft1. 186cm is probably closer to the truth. I'm sorry guys but Holloway looks too close in height to Matthew Fox to be anything shorter than his stated 6ft1. \-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-/ says on 15/Mar/09
Matthew Fox is a legit 6ft2. O'Quinn I'd say was 6ft2 in his prime and now at 55 years old is a solid 187cm guy. Holloway is the exact same height as O'Quinn. Lenad says on 6/Mar/09
On Lost him and Fox look the same height give or take 1cm. I must admit, Fox is a tiny bit taller but the truth is they are very close in height. sarah says on 11/Feb/09
I think he's 6' 1" and pure heaven Hugh says on 28/Jan/09
I think Fox is 6ft2 minimum. Brian says on 25/Jan/09
@ Anonymous "Josh often wears converse which have a thin sole" It`s easy: Converse is supposed to be the shoe-type "converse all star" which is a well-known shoe with a thin sole. Sole=this is the part of the shoe which is directly under your feet:). I personally think he`s 187cm. AG says on 24/Jan/09
My opinion is that Josh Holloway is 186cm, Terry O´Quinn and Matthew Fox is 187cm. Sometimes i can't see any difference between these men. They always almost look about the same height. Hugh says on 24/Jan/09
I'd say 6ft1.5. Rebecca says on 19/Jan/09
He's an absolute hunk.He's tall indeed and looks stunning. aaa says on 17/Jan/09
On some sites he is listed as 185cm, on other as 186 but mostly as 187. So my best guess is he´s 186.5cm (6´1.38 :) Anonymous says on 16/Jan/09
So Brian, what do you think, what is his height ? And what does it mean : ...Josh often wears converse which have a thin sole ! (i´m from abroad and my english is not so good) Brian says on 10/Jan/09
I think roughly said he`s between 185cm-188cm, certainly not taller or shorter than that. It is so hard to say who of them- Holloway, Fox and O´Quinn - is the tallest. I noticed though that Josh often wears converse which have a thin sole! Josh says on 6/Dec/08
6'1.25 (186cm) and Fox is about the same height not 6'2. Hugh says on 2/Dec/08
I think he's 187cm. Moke says on 23/Nov/08
I couldn`t say who is taller - Fox or Holloway - so I don`t care if you wright 185cm here. I certainly think they are the same height. Hugh says on 18/Nov/08
No 6ft1 is 185cm. 186cm is 6ft1.25. Haw says on 15/Nov/08
On one site I saw that he is 182. That make me really laugh. Anyway I think he is not so tall as you said. If he said I´m 6´1 then it´s probably true and I think 6´1 is closer to 186cm than 185cm. So my opinion is that Holloway is 186cm, O´Quinn is 187cm and Fox is 188cm. Anonymous says on 15/Nov/08
On one site I saw that he is 182. That make me really laugh. Anyway I think he is not so tall as you said. If he said I´m 6´1 then it´s probably true and I think 6´1 is closer to 186cm than 185cm. So my opinion is that Holloway is 186cm, O´Quinn is 187cm and Fox is 188cm. Hugh says on 17/Oct/08
I think Fox is 189cm, Holloway is 187cm and O'Quinn is 188cm. The three of them are extremely close in height. Lenad says on 15/Oct/08
True that Caeser but you did say that Fox stands out amongst this tall cast which he doesnt. I still think Fox is 188 and Holloway 187. Hugh says on 15/Oct/08
6ft2ish sounds about right. Caesar says on 11/Oct/08
Lenad says on 21/Sep/08
Caeser so you think he looks much clearly shorter than 6'2 Matthew Fox? Well I got news pal, Fox doesnt stand out against Holloway because they are very close in height.
An inch is not a huge difference. Nobody "stands out" merely being an inch taller than someone else. Holloway could be 6'1 and some change, but that is all. Lenad says on 2/Oct/08
Josh is at least 6'1.5 and yes Fox could possibly be at least 6'2.5. They both look very tall compared to other people.l Anonymous says on 30/Sep/08
i think mathew fox is closer to 6'3 than 6'2 and josh closer to 6'2.in fact i believe mathew is 6'2.5 at least and josh 6'1.5.i cant imagine mathew being shorter than ben affleck.also the dad of mathew in lost looks at the same range Lenad says on 27/Sep/08
Okay people listen to my message The 6'2 Matthew Fox is barely taller than him. Josh is a solid 6'1 at the very least. Do you agree Rob? Lenad says on 21/Sep/08
Caeser so you think he looks much clearly shorter than 6'2 Matthew Fox? Well I got news pal, Fox doesnt stand out against Holloway because they are very close in height. Lenad says on 13/Sep/08
Yeah he is a bit closer to the camera so it does even out that Holloway isnt taller than Matthew Fox but I have to say that it doesnt even out by that much. If they stood next to one another I would say that Fox is only very marginally taller. Definitly not a full inch taller. Caesar says on 10/Sep/08
Holloway is significantly closer to the camera in that picture. Refer to the "photos and perspective" article on the side of the page. Lenad says on 9/Sep/08
Caesar see the picture posted by the Truth? He is 6'1.5 at least. bud earl says on 7/Sep/08
6.3 I would have guess I met him in person last year and the cast of lost Caesar says on 29/Aug/08
Lenad says on 22/Aug/08
So you think its obvious that he is shorter than Fox Caseser? I think they are very close.
He's always shorter than Matthew Fox. If there were only a half inch between them occasionally Holloway would look taller, especially on a beach with uneven ground. In contrast, O'Quinn often looks the same height as Fox, and often a little shorter. 6'1 is exactly right for Holloway, maybe a smidgen over, say a quarter inch. Hugh says on 28/Aug/08
He's close to 6ft2. 6ft1.5 is more feasible. Rob it is time to upgrade. Lenad says on 22/Aug/08
So you think its obvious that he is shorter than Fox Caseser? I think they are very close. Caesar says on 21/Aug/08
Lenad says on 13/Aug/08
I agree. Maybe a weak 188cm when he stands next to Matthew Fox. Id say they are roughly the same height. The day he gets an upgrade to 6'1.5 Im gonna have a hell of a party
Always looks shorter than Matthew Fox and Terry O'Quinn. I think 6'1 is perfectly accurate. I do wonder if Fox is closer to 6'3 though, as he seems to always stand out, even among this tall cast. Lenad says on 13/Aug/08
I agree. Maybe a weak 188cm when he stands next to Matthew Fox. Id say they are roughly the same height. The day he gets an upgrade to 6'1.5 Im gonna have a hell of a party yoney says on 11/Aug/08
He is clearly more than 6 ft 1. I would say 6 ft 1.5, maybe a weak 6 ft 2. An upgrade is really needed! the truth says on 7/Aug/08
he is one of the very few people who downgrade their heights the truth says on 6/Aug/08
see this rob: Click Here lol says on 6/Aug/08
josh is at least 1.87.he looks the tallest actor in lost if he stands straight he is taller than mathew fox.it is just his style that makes him look shorter.upgrade now!!!!!!:P moke says on 28/Jul/08
Its funny. Everybody here wishes an upgrade for Josh Holloway. Charlie23 says on 9/Jul/08
Josh Holloway has the body type of a 6'1.5 person. Lenad says on 6/Jun/08
Either we need to downgrade Fox or upgrade Holloway to 187cm. jay says on 4/Jun/08
6'1.5" if not 6'2"... 6'1" is too short for him. Jake says on 1/Jun/08
I seriously think he's a 6'1.5. He looks close to Matthew Fox and he is at most half an inch away. Anonymous says on 26/May/08
fox is 6 ft 2 noyhing more maye less Ally says on 26/May/08
Just UPGRADE HIM!!! He's 6'1.5 and that so obvious! dmeyer says on 25/May/08
if josh realy is 185.42 cm then fox is max 1 cm taller if not the same 6 ft 1.5 for fox or for holloway Anonymous says on 23/May/08
Fox is 6'2.5, Holloway is 6'1.5 and Terry O'Quinn is 6'1.25. dmeyer says on 20/May/08
i think this guy could be closer to 6 ft 2 he might be 6 ft 1.5 Gem says on 16/May/08
haha, goshhh he said he is 6ft 1, and he surely will know it so why talking about the fact that he might be taller dmeyer says on 14/May/08
if holloway is legit 6 ft 1 wish i think he is 1 in is hard to tell is the flor is uneven dmeyer says on 1/May/08
this guy could be 6 ft 1.25 to 6 ft 1.5 he looks as tall as fox on the show but the floor is very uneven aabbcc says on 24/Mar/08
Here's a photo where you can see all of them together on a flat surface: Click Here ted T says on 12/Jan/08
The man said he is 6-1.Yes,a good 6-1 and not over.Why you people want ALWAYS them to be taller???He is 185.End of story.He said his REAL height,not 1/2 an inch over like most people claim.Now what's your problem with that? Anonymous13 says on 7/Jan/08
still haven't changed his height to 6'1,5? Moke says on 19/Dec/07
why is Terry O’Quinn listed as 6 ft 1.75 and josh just 6 ft 1?I think everybody would agree that they have the same height or even that Josh is slightly taller. pretty curious. Alexandra says on 4/Sep/07
He towers over 5'9 Maggie Grace when she's in flats, so I think he could be 6'1.5 or maybe even 6'2. andrew says on 23/Jul/07
He usually looks shorter than Matthew Fox, so I think 6'1" is right. Charlie23 says on 17/Jul/07
I agree with you people the guy looks 6'1.5 - 6'2 Alucard says on 25/Jun/07
I think it's time to change Josh's height to 6'1.5" at least... Nicola says on 11/Jun/07
I 'm sure that Josh is taller than 6'1''. He even looks slightly taller than Matthew Fox(6'2''). So, his exact height is 6 ft 1,75 in (187 cm)
Click Here teknus says on 31/May/07
he is 6'3 Martin says on 13/May/07
I would say Matthew Fox is 6'2,5" and Josh Holloway 6'1.5"-6'2". According to what I have seen of them. Frank says on 29/Apr/07
Nothing under 6ft1 that's for sure. AA says on 25/Apr/07
Tall, but not 6'3". I'm gonna stick with 6'1.5" (maybe 6'2", but almost remote) Anonymous says on 25/Apr/07
By this pic i would say the diference between holloway and fox is 1/2 inch. Both are not in a straight position but you can see taht fox is a little bit taller.
Click Here Frank says on 23/Apr/07
Click Here looks tall to me AA says on 22/Apr/07
What the hell?? 6'3"???
Fox is 6'2" for sure, and Holloway is an INCH taller??
He's 6'1.5" (187 cm) clare says on 14/Apr/07
josh is 6'3,he sais that in a other magazine.I don't understand why he sais two different things but I think that he standing 6'3 and not 6'1 AA says on 10/Mar/07
Josh is 6'1.5", Fox is 6'2", O'Quinn is 6'1.25" and Adewale is 6'1". Moke says on 13/Feb/07
wth?!I would also say he's about 6'2 (188cm). He looks at least the same height as matthew fox so why you put him as a 6'1?? fox also wears high boots in lost. even if M. fox would wear flip-flops and josh higher shoes in lost you would see the diference of 3cm, but fox doesen't..so..bump this guy up! Gabba says on 9/Jan/07
Long hair go down, which make him shorter.. he's surely 1 cm less than M.Fox (who is 188)..they're almost the same..in every picture of cast of Lost they look very similar.. he's 187. KingCobra says on 12/Dec/06
Nah i would say 6'1 barefoot. Have you seen those boots he wears in Lost? They must add AT LEAST an inch to his height. And to be honest you cant compare his height to other people in lost because the ground level is all over the place. I think the only place you can truly guess his height is off the set and on flat ground. But i would say 6'1. Not 6'2. me says on 16/Aug/06
Josh looks taller than Terry O' Quinn. Him and "Jack" always look about even because Sawyer is always hunched over. I think Josh Holloway has to be at least 6ft. 2in. AA says on 13/Jul/06
Yeah, he's being modest... he's sure 6ft1.5, he looks close to Matthew Fox... bikagyura says on 28/Mar/06
I think he looks just a little bit over 6' 1 styleforlife says on 23/Feb/06
yes he is the kind of guy that doens't care what his height is because he know he has a good height but I have to say I think he is 6 ft 1 ..Fox is a little bit taller..one inche is hard to see but if you look realy good you will see it Phil says on 25/Jan/06
Seriously, bump this guy up. He's at least 6' 1.5" GLV says on 20/Jan/06
as you may know, Josh was a model for many years... you can get details on his height (6'1"), chest, waist, etc (and even shoe size!) on various model sites, as http://www.selectmodel.com/site/vcheck.html . Go in men, search by first name. One other site said 6'1" 1/2 RLG says on 25/Oct/05
Yeah, Josh Holloway, Matthew Fox and Terry O'Quinn always look about the same height in the photos I've seen on level ground at awards shows, etc. and I'd agree Josh is closer to 6'2" than 6'1" if the heights of Fox and O'Quinn are fairly accurate.
Here Josh looks at least as tall as Terry O'Quinn:
http://www.lost-media.com/modules.php?name=coppermine&file=displayimage&album=712&pos=37
Here he's the same height as Matthew Fox:
http://www.lost-media.com/modules.php?name=coppermine&file=displayimage&album=336&pos=40
From the photos I've seen, Josh almost never stands up straight with his head level. sam says on 23/Sep/05
He always looks taller than 6'1" to me, closer to 6'2" actually. He just seems to be a tall guy. Tuco says on 29/Aug/05
Well Rob, in Naveen's defense, you have Dominic Monaghan listed as a solid 5'7, and Naveen has at least a couple inches over Monaghan on Lost. You're right though, he really does look shorter in pics than on the show.
[Editor Rob: Lost is notoriously hard to compare heights on since the ground is as uneven all over the place...] Anonymous says on 19/Apr/05
He seems taller than 6'1" in many photos, I see. He may be one of those tall guys who doesn't really care what their height is so they just guess. I could be wrong though.
[Editor Rob: I don't really see Lost so only put down the height he said. Of course he may actually be slightly taller...] |