|
RampageClover-190.8cm says on 29/Jul/10
About 1cm or 0.5in below Matthew Fox....but could Fox be a little taller than 6ft2in?
Lenad says on 29/Jul/10
Looks 1-2cm shorter than Fox Karl Karlsen says on 26/Jul/10
For me the quote "I'm 6ft1" is kindy disturbing. He can't be 6'2 or even 6'1.5 if he said he's 6ft1, but he's nothing under 6ft1. I think he's 6'1.25-6'1.5 and Fox is 6'2 which is possible, because Fox seems to be a little bit taller by half an inch.
I'm 6'1ft, too (6'0.75) and claim to be 6'1.5 so... it's okay! Everything over 6'1 is tall, Holloway and Fox are tall. Both 6'1+ RampageClover 190.8cm says on 9/Jul/10
D.J I actually thought he looked a bit taller than Fox.
186cm is the lowet. RampageClover 190.8cm says on 26/Jun/10
Height: 6ft1.5in(187cm)
This guy rounds sown for sure. D.J says on 20/Jun/10
and if you watch the last episode of lost towards the end in the church scene he is pretty much eye to eye with Matthew D.J says on 20/Jun/10
He was listed at 6'2 most of the time Chameleon says on 19/Jun/10
Told you so, this guy looks 187CM... Mike says on 18/Jun/10
Click Here
Holloway with Neil Hopkins listed at 6'1. Holloway appears to be 6'1 1.5... Moke says on 12/Jun/10
Guys even if it`s true what you say, we need a pic where you can footwear. For example next to a proven 6`1 guy. Chameleon says on 7/Jun/10
This guy looks 187 cm. saw him on Ellen etc 6'1 at absolute LOWEST. Hugh 190-192cm says on 3/Jun/10
I'm serious this guy can appear taller than 6ft2in a lot banarama says on 23/May/10
Hugh stop asking adding height to every page Hugh 190-192cm says on 19/May/10
at least put him at 186cm Rob? Hugh 190-192cm says on 4/May/10
Genuinely looks about level with Fox. I think it's Fox is 6ft2in on the dot and Holloway is 6ft1.5in-6ft2in. That's how close they are. However it wouldn't suprise me if Fox was even 189cm.
It could be Fox at 188-189cm and Holloway 187-188cm.
Any verdicts? Anonymous says on 1/May/10
Click Here
well will, i think most male actors wear boots on tv unless they're crazy tall to begin with. Will says on 20/Apr/10
Every picture I've seen on this thread he is standing closer to the camera, even with Maggie Grace (unintentionally I'm sure). Stop asking for a upgrade when your evidence is flawed. He certainly looks 6'1, and in lost he wears boots (it suits his character's style). ANDREA [ITA] says on 14/Apr/10
Nobody claims a bigger height! If he said 6ft 1, he's max 6ft 1! Anonymous says on 12/Apr/10
185cm for Josh, I disagree with this listing I say he is 187cm. cody says on 12/Apr/10
6'2" easily for this guy Hugh 190cm-192cm says on 8/Apr/10
6ft1.25in-6ft1.5in precisely. Probably out of bed is something like 6ft1.75in-6ft2in. He's gotta be taller than 185cm Rob Anonymous says on 26/Mar/10
His height is actually 6'1 1/2- 1.87m, He probably measures 187 some time in the Morning which is fine, tall guy. Hugh 190-192cm says on 15/Mar/10
6ft 1.5 or 6 ft 1.75 I think rob is more appropriate lust says on 4/Mar/10
he is 6'1 check his picture with maggie grace filip says on 3/Mar/10
whatever in 185-188 range. Anonymous says on 18/Feb/10
Most people don't include the half inch when saying their height. "6ft 1" covers the range from 6ft 0.5 to 6ft 1.5 so his statement in itself isn't really a reason to deny an upgrade. JoshJ says on 17/Feb/10
look its common for people not to know their exact height. most adults never have their heights measured properly unless they seek it or is required for some particular reason. we've been watching this guy for 5 years and its safe to say he is very close to matthew fox and terry o'quinn. i would say 6'1.5" suits him perfectly. 191cm/252lbs says on 2/Feb/10
He looks similiar to 6"2 Matthew Fox every time I see him on Lost. This guy has to be 187cm or therebouts. Maybe even after a good nights sleep hes just about 6"2 ANDREA[ITA] says on 1/Feb/10
cmon guys. if he claims 6ft 1, he can't be more. maybe he's 187 cms out of bed but in my opinion he's a real 6ft 1. that's it. he simply claims his REAL height and this is the reason why he looks taller than the others that lie about their height. Moke says on 22/Jan/10
Ah c`mon everywhere else his height is 6'1.5". You know why? Cause they measured him when back in the day he became a model. Unfortunately he isn`t one anymore so he was deleted from the Calvin Klein site. He just told you roughly which was his height just as he did the guys from MensHealth (6'2). Please change. That`s ridiculous. Hugh 190-192cm says on 3/Jan/10
Fox 188cm and Holloway 187cm Milosh says on 29/Dec/09
Tall guy, I'd say 6'1.5". Just a hair shorter than Fox. All Hail 191cm says on 13/Dec/09
Exactly 187cm tall no more or less. It is common for 6ft 1 to 6ft 2 guys to round down, rob. Or maybe Holloway doesn't know centimeteres to inches and just assumes 187cm is 6ft 1 and not 6ft 1.5 when it's actually vice versa! Hugh 191cm says on 4/Dec/09
I'll settle on a solid 6ft 1.5. Hugh 191cm says on 26/Nov/09
Rob there is a term I use from time to time.
'pulling your leg'
That's exactly what Mr. Holloway is doing. He's clearly taller than 185cm
Whip out a season of lost of your choice and watch this guy next to Mtthew Fox. He's like the same height and can look taller at times. Other times a tad shorter. but barely. Hugh 191cm says on 23/Nov/09
I think Holloway is 186cm at lowest, Fox is still 188cm. mk 187 says on 22/Nov/09
I agree, if Fox is 188cm, Holloway has to be 186cm, maybe he just wrong measured himself. On every picture here they are about the same height, there can´t be difrence of 3cm. And if Holloway is only 6´1, O´Quinn has to be downgrade to 6´1 or 6´1.25 and Fox at least to 6´1.5. rob89 says on 21/Nov/09
I have him at just over 6'1 (186 cm). Maybe, just maybe he's 6'1.5 (187 cm), but no taller than that though. If he's really only 6'1 flat, then Fox is most likely a bit under 6'2. He's never a full inch taller than Holloway, everything else being equal. Hugh 190cm says on 20/Nov/09
Yeah, but he's rounding down. For instance Jack Coleman who claims 6ft2 is listed as 6ft2.5 189cm on this site. Hugh 191cm says on 17/Nov/09
Rob isn't even replying to any of our posts
[Editor Rob: holloway says he's 6ft 1, I agree with his statement.] mk 187cm says on 10/Nov/09
Yes, it´s time for UPGRADE ! I would say : Josh Holloway's height is 6 ft 1.5 in (187cm). Hugh 191cm says on 9/Nov/09
UPGRADE TIME!!!! Josh Holloway's height is 6 ft 1.75 in (187cm). mk 187cm says on 9/Nov/09
186/187cm for him. That´s for sure. Moke says on 8/Nov/09
Another pic with Fox and Holloway: Click Here
Definitely no 3cm difference! (but bad angle here, I know...) Hugh 191cm says on 7/Nov/09
Holloway 186cm minimum and Fox 188cm on the dot. Still undecided about O'Quinn. Hugh 191cm says on 5/Nov/09
He's definately taller than 185cm. Cmon rob 187cm mk 187cm says on 26/Oct/09
I think he´s not so close to 188cm. He claimed 6´1 and I doubt he was wrong in 3cm. But he has to be upgraded, he´s 186/187cm. I would go with 6´1.5. That ´s pretty accurate for him. Hugh 191cm says on 23/Oct/09
there should be more 6ft1.75 guys on this site and Holloway should be one Paul says on 21/Oct/09
Moke, that's not correct, 6'2 is =187,96, and 6'3 is more like=190.50 or smt, 6'4= 193 cm and 6'5=195,5 Moke says on 19/Oct/09
mk 187, thats an interesting discovery. When you go on like this there is soon no more congruence between feet and centimeters which leads to false correlations: 6'2=188.976 (=189cm), 6'3=192.024 (on celebsheight indicated as 191cm!), 6'4=195.072 (here 194cm...) So, what now? An actor which claims 6'4 in reality stands 195cm, not 194cm! In my opinion the american (?) foot-system is too inaccurate... Hugh 191cm says on 19/Oct/09
Rob should definately upgrade Holloway. I don't know what's stopping him. Paul says on 18/Oct/09
I really think that it's time for a upgrade, I mean, there's barely any difference at all between Josh and Matthew Fox, I really think Matthew Fox is flat 6'2 (188cm) and that Josh is actually 187 cm which would be about 6'1.5 and instead of rounding up he rounds down, but it's pretty god damn obvious that he's almost a legit 6'2 mk 187cm says on 16/Oct/09
Yes, at least +1cm. Maybe he really thought 186cm, because in some cases you can find 185cm as still 6´0 and 186cm as full 6´1 not 6´1.25. And it´s true in some way, because when you convert cm on ft you´ll get this : 185cm = 6,0696ft, 186cm = 6,1024ft and 187cm = 6,1352ft (what is converted quite good). Hugh 191cm says on 15/Oct/09
Rob whats stopping you from giving him that extra 1cm? Hugh 191cm says on 13/Oct/09
6'1/6'2 rob. Hugh 191cm says on 5/Oct/09
Bang on Mk. 186-187cm. mk 187cm says on 5/Oct/09
Yeah, weak 6´2" so 6´1.5" or 6´1.75" (still 187cm). 188cm out of the bed and 186cm in the evening. But most of the day he is about 187cm. Hugh 191cm says on 4/Oct/09
Not sure about the full 6ft2. But it's not impossible. Taller than 6ft1 though. A weak 6ft2. mk 187cm says on 4/Oct/09
Daveyy, no he´s not (Holloway). Fox maybe. Daveyy says on 1/Oct/09
He is a full 6'2... Matthew Fox is 6'2.5 Hugh 191cm says on 23/Sep/09
yeah lenad, and 188cm max. Lenad says on 20/Sep/09
bare min 186cm Moke says on 17/Sep/09
Seriously? If his wife stood 5'5 Josh would be like 6'3... Click Here
Next to 6 ft 1.75 (?) Terry O'Quinn. Something need to be changed here ;) Click Here Hugh 191cm says on 16/Sep/09
His wife looks about 5ft5. Moke says on 13/Sep/09
@ Hugh 191:
You`re someway right, but: If Holloway moved a step forward they would stand next to another which should made them stand about the same height...in my opinion.
Someone know how tall his wife is? Click Here mk 187cm says on 13/Sep/09
Hugh 191cm, I agree 186/187 cm. Hugh 191cm says on 11/Sep/09
Theres about 2cm between them in Foxs favour. But that still puts Holloway at 186cm at least. 185cm is too low. Moke says on 8/Sep/09
Click Here
Here you can see that there is NEVER one inch between this two men. Assuming Fox is maybe 1cm taller,Holloway would still be 187cm, which sounds very likely after aaallllll this discussions about his height:) mk 187cm says on 6/Sep/09
Hugh 191cm, yes Fox is 188 cm, maybe even 189 cm, for Holloway 187 cm is pretty accurate, but nothing over that. Hugh 191cm says on 5/Sep/09
I think fox might even be 6ft2-6ft2.5. mk187cm says on 5/Sep/09
Seriously, you should upgrade him. He is at least 186 cm, maybe more. I would say he´s exactly my height - 6´1.5". Hugh 191cm says on 5/Sep/09
Closer to 6ft2 Moke says on 4/Sep/09
A question to the moderator: Have you acctually ever granted an actor/actress some centimeters more subsequently? Because in this case it seems approbiate for most of the users. Thanks for your answer! Hugh 191cm says on 21/Aug/09
Holloway looks 187cm and Fox a hair taller at 188cm. Josh.J says on 8/Aug/09
rob, i implore you to upgrade mr holloway's height. its very possible for people to accidently downgrade their height due to miscalculating metric-feet/inch conversions. every single picture of mr holloway and matthew fox points to the FACT that they are virtually identical in height. josh is at least 187/ 6'1.5". Vincent 185cm says on 6/Aug/09
He seems to be at least 187 cm, but have you noticed his sloping shoulders? Hugh 191cm says on 1/Aug/09
Seriously rob can't you see the difference between Fox and Holloway. I can't. I'd go with 6ft1.5 at least
And maybe a weak 6ft2. italian boy says on 27/Jul/09
185min 187max Hugh 190cm says on 29/Jun/09
aaa you don't lose height when your in your 30's-40's. You start shrinking in your 50's. Hugh 190cm says on 29/Jun/09
Rob you have to take a closer look at this guy. He's very similiar to Matthew Fox in height. 186cm at least and maybe 6ft2. aaa says on 28/Jun/09
I think now when he is almost 40 he is 186cm tall. Younger he could be 187cm maybe bit over - weak 188cm. adam says on 25/Jun/09
He has claimed 6-1½ also and definitely looks it.
[Editor Rob: which program/interview did he claim that?] rob89 says on 24/Jun/09
Definitely at the very least 6'1, and probably a bit over like most here seem to think. He does looks taller than just 6'1 most of the time. Moke says on 20/Jun/09
This man necessarily needs a boost cause he`s doing understatement (or he care less than we do:)). Most of people here are in favor of setting this guy to 6ft1.75 or 6'2. So why not doing it? LOLZ says on 12/Jun/09
Yeah Man 187 Hugh 190cm says on 9/Jun/09
Terry O'Quinn looks a hair taller than holloway so he's the listed 6ft1.75.. holloway looks 186cm. John says on 7/Jun/09
after watching lost recently, Josh Holloway appears taller than Matthew fox i would say there would only be the tinyest bit of difference though i reckon they are both 6"2 and Terry 0'quin is 6"1, cos Matthew fox is taller in flashbacks than Terry O'quin by about an inch and i think Josh Holloway is Fractionaly taller than Matthew fox, watch lost this week and see what i mean. Hugh 190cm says on 2/Jun/09
Well he's taller than 185cm. Hugh 190cm says on 17/May/09
Maybe 187cm/188cm. Hugh 190cm says on 10/May/09
186-187cm. Lenad says on 4/May/09
I'd say a weak 6'2 most likely Moke says on 28/Apr/09
There is no way Holloway is shorter than 6ft1. Actually "6ft1" is closer to "186cm" by the way.If you convert foot into meters/centimeters you get to that result. So why you don`t change that? Random Guy says on 25/Apr/09
Josh is taller than o'quin 4 sure and slightly taller the fox Josh.J says on 24/Apr/09
i just saw an episode of NCIS from the first season. mr holloway stars as a local sheriff. next to mark harmon, who is 6'0 on this site, he looked the same or even slightly shorter! this wasnt from just one shot but many. im really perplexed by this. either harmon had some crazy elevators which i seriously doubt or he is taller then 6'0 or josh is shorter then 6'1. im quite not sure which is which. Lenad says on 20/Apr/09
Come on Rob 186cm chelsea says on 20/Apr/09
He is definitly 6ft 1in (185),and maybe the same hieght as Matthew Fox.
...Ooooo....
...(---)....
....)--)....
...(---).... Lenad says on 18/Apr/09
He is definitly not under 6ft1. 186cm is probably closer to the truth. I'm sorry guys but Holloway looks too close in height to Matthew Fox to be anything shorter than his stated 6ft1. |
