|
midnight rambler says on 30/Oct/11
He was exactly the same height as Mick Jagger, 5' 10'' now, 5'8'' or 5'9''
Koalized says on 13/Sep/11
I think than in his youth keith was taller than 5'9'', but he has skrinked a lot during the years, maybe for his rock'n roll lifestyle.
Today he should be somewhere between 5'7'' and 5'8''. Sam says on 12/Sep/11
I think there's enough pictures where Richards and Jagger look close enough in height, often looking to be less than an inch of difference. I think Rob's listing is accurate. Richards did try to claim 5'10" for himself in his book "Life", but there's a picture where Richards is barefoot next to a few guys and he looks pretty shrimpy. Koalized says on 10/Sep/11
So Rob, what do you think about those pics?
[Editor Rob: he can look 5ft 7-8 range in some photos, today maybe he is at most 5ft 8.] Koalized says on 9/Sep/11
Misclick.
I've add the previous post before posting the pic of De Niro with Penn
Click Here Koalized says on 9/Sep/11
Keith Richards is clearly shorter than Robert De Niro
Click Here
Click Here
And De niro seems a little bit shorter, than Sean Penn, but I've no idea about Penn footwear.
De Niro's shoes look like standard italian shoes.
Click Here
On a video on youtube you can see that keith richards was wearing similar footwear. Koalized says on 9/Sep/11
Rob, are you sure that there is just an inch of difference in height between Keith Ricard and Mick Jagger?
[Editor Rob: maybe his claim is from the youth and he's lost height by now, it looks like it.] guyfrommars says on 6/Aug/11
Somewhere (I guess in a book about the band) I've read Richards is 5'8". Voiceless dental fricative says on 28/Jun/11
170 might be his current height. Rob probably is just listing this as his peak. Sam says on 24/Jun/11
Actually, he describes himself as 5'10" at one point in Life (not 170 cm). What is the listed height based on, Rob? He might have scraped a full 5'9" at his peak, if not anymore. Amber says on 24/Jun/11
Jagger was never more than 5'8, he looks optically shorter than Keith because Keith has better proportions, longer legs, Mick has a long body and short legs. Rob says on 14/Dec/10
In his autobiography he claims to be 170 cm. And I think he's being honest. Anonymous says on 26/Nov/10
All these Rock stars heights were exaggerated by the teen mags.
Jagger 5'9 1/2", Richards 5'9", Jones, 5'5", Wyman 5'61/2", Watts 5"7"All these Rock stars heights were exaggerated by the teen mags.
Jagger 5'9 1/2", Richards 5'9", Jones, 5'5", Wyman 5'61/2", Watts 5"7" Maurine says on 27/Oct/10
If anyone saw the CBS Sunday Morning piece on last week (10/24/10), in an Interview with Anthony Mason, who I never considered a tall individual, Keith barely came to his shoulder, hat and all, and looked like a very small, very old child...which, come to think of it, is sort of what he is. |
