RampageClover 190.8cm says on 25/Jun/10
Height: 6ft1.25in

under 6ft2in definately

PatB says on 13/Jan/10
I'm amused by the posters who give some person's height to two decimal places. If you want that kind of precision you will need to specify if the subject was inhaling or exhaling when the picture was taken. Take a deep breath and you are about a quarter inch taller. Posture of course is more important still.

Most of the adjustments for age also seem goofy to me. Men lose about an inch from 30 to 70 - some more and some less. No one who posts here has any way of estimating an individual's actual height loss without real measurements. The age adjustments seem to be used as a "fudge factor" that allow you to hold whatever your opinion is irrespective of any evidence.

I turn 67 tommorow. I wondered if I had shrunk. I used to be 6'4". Now I'm only 6'3.75". The reason I don't panic is because when I wear my hiking boots I'm 6'6".

Lee Van Cleef in "The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance" may very well have been standing in a hole when he confronted John Wayne. The Duke, I understand, was concerned with such issues as the heights of his screen enemies. This is in marked contrast to Arnold Swartzenegger who in "The Running Man" was the smallest man (except for Dawson) in the film. Arnold it would seem was more secure.

Aleks says on 2/Jan/10
After seeing For A Few Dollars more and The Good the Bad and the Ugly, Van Cleef looked pretty tall to me.

Didn't look so big when facing John Wayne in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.

6'2" sounds right anyway.

Doug says on 30/Jul/09
He was a tough guy and looked as hard as nails. I wouldn't have messed with him, put it that way. I thought he looked quite wiry though, surprised he weighed 200 considering Sean Connery was the same height and weighed 180 as Bond in the 60s. If anything I'd hvae though Cleef was about 180 and Connery 200, but there ya go.

Doug says on 30/Jul/09
No, just look at him standing in the doorway at the beginning of the Good the Bad and the Ugly. Was definately in the 6'2" range legit I thought as he looked taller than 6'2" in boots. I can buy 6'1" at very lowest.

Yaspaa says on 11/May/09
6'0 for Marvin and 6'1 for Van Cleef. Comparing these guys against other guys is no good because we dont really know their heights either,Eastwood was never 6'4 either,he's lost 3" riiiight.