How tall is Leonardo DiCaprio

Leonardo DiCaprio's Height

5ft 11.25in (181 cm)

American actor best known for starring in films such as Titanic, Inception, The Revenant, The Departed, Shutter Island, Gangs of New York, Aviator, Blood Diamond and The Wolf of Wall Street. On Teletext UK, a journalist once said "He stands no more than 5ft 10ins (if that), is rake thin" and The Sun reported the reason Gisele Bundchen broke up with Leo was that her "ideal man has to be taller than me". Leo himself claims to be 6 foot. In AccessHollywood he said " 'That's the number one thing people say to me constantly 'Wow! You're a lot taller than I thought you'd be,...They have a perception, I guess, that most actors are gnomes or something.' For the record, Leonardo hangs in the air at about 6 feet tall."

How tall is Leonardo DiCaprio
Leo and Cate Blanchett
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of George Clooney
George Clooney
5ft 10.75in (180 cm)
Height of Matthew McConaughey
Matthew McConaughey
5ft 10.75in (180 cm)
Height of Margot Robbie
Margot Robbie
5ft 5.5in (166 cm)
Height of Johnny Depp
Johnny Depp
5ft 9in (175 cm)

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (107 Votes)
5ft 11.19in
Gaza2121 said on 6/Dec/16
Randy, actually that was meant for Tom Hardy haha. I agree with Leo's listing actually.
Randy said on 5/Dec/16
Gaza you are completely right
Gaza2121 said on 5/Dec/16
175.5 cm.
Spencer said on 2/Dec/16
Looks about 4.5 inches taller than Winslet in Titanic. I don't think he is anything over 5'11. Hanks looks an incher taller in Catch Me if You Can. He is slightly above average height for a man.
Gaza2121 said on 2/Dec/16
Trey, pics or it didn't happen.
Trey said on 29/Nov/16
No way he is any taller than 5'9. I have literally met him and he short
vaiski said on 28/Nov/16
According to photographic evidence, I was exactly the same height as my older brother, 175cm or 5'9, when I was 17 years and 8 months old. I grew to be 181cm or 5'11.25 by the time I was 19. Growing 3 inches between 17-20 seems plausible to me.
Editor Rob: physically DiCaprio was behind the curve and underdeveloped. It's not a huge surprise, a bit like a Bieber, looking 15 when he's about 18-19.
Johno said on 27/Nov/16
I have seen guys gain height at 18; my mate went from around 5'6.5-5'7 at 18 and half years to 5'9 at 22 and his younger brother i believe gained even more; honestly he is around 6'0 now but i reckon he went from 5'8 to 6'0 between the ages of 18 to 23? Somewhere like that. These late height growth spurts seem to run through families.

Both of them however, did not seem have gone through advance puberty by the age of 18; they looked really young. Honestly, like 14-year olds at 18-19 and basically teenagers in their early 20s so i guess the onset of puberty has something to do with it. Speaking anecdotally, if you look very young at 18, you got some chance to grow and what i mean by growth is, at least 2-inches and up to 4-inches that i have actually witnessed. If one of your older siblings has goon through similar growth pattern spurts, then chances are, so can you.

Another mate was around 5'8-ish at 16-17 and now he is 5'11-ish.

I am not so sure Brad Pitt went through the same process though. First of all, he looked like a normal guy, going through regular puberty and looked mature and developed enough; nothing like Dicaprio and Ralph Macchio and secondly; any material growth beyond the usual years looks to be rare. I am not prepared to give Pitt that verdict of confidence.
Hafeez said on 26/Nov/16
So rob :
By your reply to giorgi !
You're saying he gained more than 3 inshes from 18 - 20 ?
Editor Rob: depends on the exact filming dates of This Boy's Life, but certainly from age 17-21 he gained 3 inches
Johnson said on 26/Nov/16
@James I agree most guys stop growing up at the frame 14-17 years old. Others can extend 18-19. 20-21 is less common. Mistakes in measurement are very usual that is why we need several tests
spainmen191cm said on 25/Nov/16
@James
Well thats your opinion, in my case Im 20 right know and im almost 6ft4 (6ft3.5-75 at night) In 3 months I will be 21. And I was a late bloomer at 14 I was pretty short, but then I started to sprout up. Also at 18-19 I was 6ft2.75, so I grew almost an inch after that age. The majority of men stop around 18 but there is a small percentage that grow till 21-22 look at Ralph Macchio!
Giorgi said on 24/Nov/16
Rob, how tall do you think he was in This Boy's Life? I think he didn't look more than 5'7" next to Ellen Barkin.
Editor Rob: Giorgi, he probably was roughly 5ft 8 at nearly 18 and gained around 18-20 range.
James said on 23/Nov/16
@Spainmen191cm Men stop growing in height when they are between 18 and 19 years old. I don't know if someone exceptionally could grow until 20 but definetely no more. The idea that people still grow in height until 21 is a myth not based on rigorous scientific evidence. But you are suggesting DiCaprio could have been growing after 21!! After 21 is impossible to remain growing in height. So yes, DiCaprio was already fully grown in Romeo and Juliet. I think some people get confused and think they have grown after 20 because they have been incorrectly measured on other occasions.

For example, when I was 20 years old I was once measured as 1.83. When I was 25 I was measured as 1.84. Does it mean I grew after 20? Nope, I was incorrectly measured as 1.83 that's the reason.
spainmen191cm said on 21/Nov/16
Rob, do you think that in Romeo and Juliet film, when he was 21-22, was fully grown?
hm said on 20/Nov/16
he looks a few inches shorter then 6'4 John Kerry for that film "Before The Flood" I'm guessing he wore lifts for that too?
HonestSlovene said on 20/Nov/16
He does look more 5'11.5 than 5'11 flat (though he can often look that as well) but never seems 5'11.75" or even 6'0" flat. Not to mention the sub 5'11" claims for him are also extremely ridiculous. 5'11.25" is probably his absolute low (5'11.5" regular low) and he hangs at 181-182 cm range during the day IMHO. A weak 5'11.5".
Johnny said on 18/Nov/16
@Rob what was Big G's estimation of Leo's height?
Editor Rob: Johnny, at least six foot range
Dmeyer said on 17/Nov/16
Looks about 4cm on 177cm damon
Truth said on 17/Nov/16
People are blinded by their love for him. He's 180cm max
S.J.H said on 15/Nov/16
@Daniel said on 11/Nov/16


Like the journalist who met Leo in person said that he was not over 5'10. Might be a myth if not Tom Hardy would be 5'8 no more and that would put nathan jones at 6'8 not 6'9 - 6'10
trumpslave said on 12/Nov/16
Leo definitely is 182 cm just look at his pictures with matt damon he is way taller than him and in the pictures with tom hanks he is wearing very flat shoes and tom clearly is wearing high heel shoes
Daniel said on 11/Nov/16
He can't be over 5'10
Ryan said on 8/Nov/16
Y'all are trippin...he is 5'9 and a half max!
Dionisio Rojas said on 5/Nov/16
Definitely 1.80-1.81 no more!. Nice to see that heights are getting more accurate!!!
Animus said on 4/Nov/16
He often seems taller than a flat 5'11", but it's hard to argue 5'11.5" seeing him next to Tom Hanks. Hanks could look a full inch taller than DiCaprio back in the day, which is close to impossible, if they have similar footwear and are separated by only half an inch. (I don't think Hanks consistently wore thicker shoes than DiCaprio and I don't think DiCaprio's posture is that awful.)

5'11.25" is probably the best listing for DiCaprio, but I think it's close to his absolute low - he often looks 5'11.5".
Giorgi said on 4/Nov/16
Rob, can you tell exactly how many cm heels is she wearing?
Editor Rob: Giorgi, who do you mean? Cate? If so, 7cm at least, possibly a little bit more as it is a highish angle.
Anon said on 2/Nov/16
5 feet 11 3/8 inches...he didn't look to much shorter than Obama, looked 5 11.5 inches
Cristofer said on 31/Oct/16
1.82 day 1.80 night
CS said on 31/Oct/16
@Chris there's photos of Leo with Obama where Leo looks 5'11 and other photos where Leo looks 5'11.5. This listing is a great middle point and honestly out of all the heights Leo looks, the average does come out somewhere pretty close to 181 cm. This listing is fine and probably as accurate as we are going to get.
Chris said on 31/Oct/16
Solid 6'1 Obama cleared him 2 inches, 180cm flat is a better shout Rob!
Chris said on 31/Oct/16
Solid 6'1 Obama cleared him 2 inches, 180cm flat is a better shout Rob!
Tiago said on 30/Oct/16
He is just a typical 5'11 guy, no more
Brandon W. said on 29/Oct/16
Check out pic with UFC fighter Nick Diaz 6ft
Animus said on 28/Oct/16
Rob, did he wear lifts in "The Aviator" to play the 6ft3 Howard Hughes? He looks over six feet with John C. Reilly.
Editor Rob: I believe he slipped a little lift in his shoes for that role.
CS said on 27/Oct/16
Rob how much do you reckon he weighed in Titanic? How about now?
josh jeffords said on 25/Oct/16
Just watched departed again leo is much taller than a clearly under 5 10 mat damon.
Both are shorter than the aging alec baldwin and way taller than little marky mark.
Quick math says leo is weak 5 11 down to strong 5 10 damon is a strong 5 8 .5 max.
This is the tallest I ever remember leo looking he usually look 5 10 if that.
Weird build and not great posture/fitness seem to make him look smaller.
He looked a weak 5 10 in blood diamond with the 6 2 cast members.
Even smaller in Quick and the dead only time hackman looked 6 2.
Justbringit said on 24/Oct/16
Tbh in the most recent pics I see in this site he looks taller than 5'11 more like 5'11.5"
Giorgi said on 19/Oct/16
Next to 191 cm John Kerry.

Click Here

How would you measure him based solely on this photo, Rob?
Editor Rob: he could be in the 3 inch range under Kerry there.
S.J.H said on 19/Oct/16
Obama is def 2" taller than leo. Leo is just a decent 5'11 guy. For anyone wanted to say obama is higher than 6'1 to bring up leo height then they should refer to see how 186ish tony parker edge out obama easily a 1/2' close up
Johnny said on 17/Oct/16
@Rob what do you think of this photo? Leo looks the same height as Tarantino. Click Here
Editor Rob: Quentin could just be losing a good 1-2 inches in posture there, Leo is standing pretty decent in comparison.
shiva 181 cms said on 16/Oct/16
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
shiva 181 cms said on 16/Oct/16
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
shiva 181 cms said on 16/Oct/16
His listing his nailed on he looks 5'11 as well as 5'11.5
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Oct/16
Hey Rob. How much taller does Obama look than Leo in this video at the beginning. A bit over an inch?

Click Here
Editor Rob: from the clip you could still make an argument he looked 5ft 11.5
177-178 cm guy said on 16/Oct/16
@Bobby Leo looks at least 5'11" in these pictures of him next to Obama if he's actually 6'1":

Click Here

Click Here
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 13/Oct/16
With Morgan Freeman:

tinyurl.com/z7mz7kv

Leo is closer to the camera, but I still only see two inches between them.
Bobby said on 12/Oct/16
Are we really going to question the fact that di Caprio is no longer quite 6'0? The picture I saw of him next to Obama shows a least a three inch difference in my opinion, it's possible he is closer to 5'10.5 but in Hollywood, he is 6'0 feet tall.
Sam said on 11/Oct/16
Looks to be in the upper 5'11 range, which I always figured was the start of weak-tall.
Dmeyer said on 11/Oct/16
Hé can realy look 5 ft 10,75 up to 5 ft 11,75 , mostly 5 ft 11-11,5 ,
Johan said on 10/Oct/16
If Leo is 180 max then Orlando bloom is no more than 177 cm. Gets listed at 179 cm.
yaniv maor said on 9/Oct/16
exactly 180cm ...slouching makes him look sometimes like a 178cm
Peter 179cm said on 6/Oct/16
@ D There's more chance he's 179-180cm than 181-182 range,though...Various pictures suggest that, i mean look at him with 175 Mario Lopez he barely even pass for 5'10 next to him ( 177-178 range).The max i'd give him is 180cm range so basically 5'11 or a fraction under it.
justbringit said on 6/Oct/16
i have to say that i don't agree with 5'11 for him i think he is taller than that in fact i would say at least a solid 5'11.25 or maybe even 5'11.5"
D said on 2/Oct/16
Peter, if Leo is 1.79 I can assure you that Damon is 1.75 and Pitt is 1.76.
Peter 179cm said on 1/Oct/16
He barely looks 177-178cm next to officially listed 185 Obama who might actually be 184 at his low. I would guess at most 180cm for Leo after various pictures. He might be 181 in the morning,but by dinner-time no more than a strong 179/weak 180.
S.J.H said on 1/Oct/16
I watch Titanic twice i have see a proper 5'11 for leo not more. The 0.25 is a myth or just a morning height
Original said on 30/Sep/16
5'11.25.
Johno said on 30/Sep/16
I suspect the difference might be greater than 2-inches there Hello.
Hafeez said on 30/Sep/16
Hey rob : i have two questions about leonardo ...
1 : do you think that leonardo dicaprio grow some inshes or cm's afte the age 18 to his mid 20's ?

2 : if first question is yes !
Then how much do you think he gained ?

Thank you rob
Much love from libya <3
Editor Rob: from 18 to 21 he did gain something, how much I am still not exactly sure, at least an inch anyway.
Hello said on 30/Sep/16
Saw a picture of him next to Obama, looked a good two inches shorter than him, no idea what the footwear situation was.

Click Here
Allen said on 29/Sep/16
I think this listing is accurate. Though he has a bad posture that at times he looks more like 179-178cm. But if he stands straight and keeps his good posture he definitely is 181cm. Very accurate listing in my opinion.
BT said on 29/Sep/16
Imo he looks 5'11 flat mostly, at times it's a toss-up between that and 5'11.25 for me.
Johno said on 27/Sep/16
Here is Mario Lopez with Beckham

Click Here

Here he is with Leo,

Click Here

Beckham would be taller than Leo.
what!!!?!!! said on 21/Sep/16
lol, Rob is being polite at everyone, even boosting their self-confidence. Really nice guy
Dmeyer said on 20/Sep/16
So Rob �t 181,4cm m'y low with exelent posture and high eye level i wil look � ha�r taller
Editor Rob: in photos of you and Leo, I'm sure people would probably guess you as being taller of the 2.
CS said on 19/Sep/16
Hey Rob, if I'm around 5'11 flat at my low (used to think I was 180.8 cm but now I've measured a few times and 180.4 is closer) and have generally good posture, how do you think I would look next to Leo?
Editor Rob: may be hard to tell a difference really, if you had good posture I doubt he'd look taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Sep/16
@D: Exactly....it's not always determined by genetics.


I think if Leo hits 5ft11 flat it's after a very long day on his feet. Anything under that is unlikely.
CS said on 18/Sep/16
@dmeyer by that logic would you say people who are thin can appear anywhere from a quarter inch under their true height up to a half inch above their true height? Seeing as Leo is 5'11.25 but can appear that range you listed.
Dmeyer said on 18/Sep/16
5 ft 11-11,75 is the range he Can apears
Dmeyer said on 18/Sep/16
Rob on Bad days i aint under 181,3cm so i could be 1cm taller than leo as you say h� could be 180,3cm on a Bad day , on normal day. Am near 181,5 and he is 181 so maybe just 0,5cm
Editor Rob: I think you probably have an overall better posture than Leo, I'm sure you meet him you'd look a bit taller.
D said on 17/Sep/16
I know a guy who grew from 1.76 at 18 to 1.81 at 22 and still growing. Its all how well you eat, sleep how much you walk daily and mostly genetics
Dmeyer said on 15/Sep/16
Rob do you think h� dosnt dip under 181cm or could h� drop to 180,6-7cm after � long day or after � 1hour walk or weight lifting , i think 5 ft 11,25 is his very low and will be 11,5 on a relaxing day
Editor Rob: after a long day on set and dehydration he could be just 5ft 11, but then anybody has a potential to dip a little under their usual low on bad days
greg said on 14/Sep/16
bull crap he is a late bloomer! he didnt grow over 3 inches past 19, thats insane...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Sep/16
He has said he was late bloomer
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Sep/16
Wait, he was 19 during it. He gained 10-11 CM at 19+.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 11/Sep/16
He seemed 171-172 CM by Johnny Depp in What's Eating Gilbert Grape, and he was 18 during that time. He also looked nothing like he does now.
sabot said on 3/Sep/16
Listing is spot now. Thumbs up.
Greg89 said on 31/Aug/16
Hey Rob, whatching the photos when Leo was 16-17 years old, he seemed to be around 5ft 7in. Do you think he grew about 4 inches at age of 17?
Editor Rob: at 17-20 he gained a few inches.
S.J.H said on 22/Aug/16
Good job to big rob. Leo is never 5'11.5 or 6'0 range. Truth he is 5'11 and 5'11.25 still acceptable. Like i say before christopher nolan was not even shorter than leo. People who watch Titanic will believe me he statued at 180ish
Animus said on 19/Aug/16
Even if Leo isn't standing totally straight in this picture with Clint Eastwood, I think it's pretty clear that he isn't a six-footer and probably is closer to 5'11":

Click Here
CS said on 18/Aug/16
@Leo is 182. 1 cm difference can be hard to notice in photos. I mean sometimes it's evident but other times it's very hard to tell the difference. Just look at Rob's photo with Jeremy Renner and you'll see what I am talking about. 1 cm height difference can look identical at times.
truth said on 18/Aug/16
@Leo is 182 cm The camera is slightly tilted to Leo's favor, if it was straight then 181.5-182 cm for Chadwick and 181-181.5 cm for Leo, he just edges him out.
Leo is 182 said on 17/Aug/16
Hey Rob, what do you make of this photo? Chadwick and Leo look about equal, I heavily disagree with 181 cm being Leo's height, it's just too short compared to how he actually looks.

Click Here
Editor Rob: they can look very similar I think
CS said on 14/Aug/16
I agree with the comments regarding Hanks and DiCaprio in Catch Me if you Can. They looked different enough for this listing to fit DiCaprio better but also close enough for DiCaprio to not really be under this mark. Unless of course Hanks was really 5'11.75 peak. Nonetheless both guys are in the 5'11-6' range with Hanks being closer to the 6 ft mark and DiCaprio being closer to the 5 ft 11 mark.
James said on 13/Aug/16
Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hanks:
Click Here
Click Here

181 cm seems to be a good listing
Spencer said on 12/Aug/16
He looks 5'11 in Catch Me if You Can. Walken and Hanks both look about an inch taller.
Tom said on 12/Aug/16
Probably no more than 5-10.
Johan said on 12/Aug/16
Yes, I think this is as close to the truth as well get without actually measuring the guy. However some celebs will be affected by this. Orlando Bloom for instance is noway only 2 cm shorter than Leo. Its at least 3cm.
Ian said on 11/Aug/16
Hes 5'9 in titanic
truth said on 11/Aug/16
Either listing 5'11.5 or 5'11.25 is fine for him anyway.
Brad said on 10/Aug/16
He's 5 foot eleven and a half.
Dmeyer said on 7/Aug/16
i agree rob peak hanks was 0.5-0.75in taller than leo , and 5 ft 11.75-6ft hanks evening height not 6 ft 0.25 or 11.5 , today leo at 181cm can look a hair taller than 5 ft 11.5 today hanks with weak posture
rakesh said on 5/Aug/16
He is about 5feet 9inches legit no joke
Dmeyer said on 4/Aug/16
I agree with rob that there is less than 1in between Lo And Hanks if you consider posture/footwear
Editor Rob: 3/4 inch maybe, at times I think it could look a bit less.
It could be argued Hanks was just under 6ft but I think the 6ft mark is ok for him peak.
Dmeyer said on 4/Aug/16
If you look well at dicaprio Hanks pics , i the rcent ones Hanks is barely as tall , but back in the days , when they stand with equal posture in some pics they looks nearly identical , of course in some leo can look 2cm smaller in others near 3cm but i those Hanks has an hogan type shoes with near 4cm heels , many cuban heels will give 1,4-1,7in while hogan 1,4-1,6in while Lo has typical 1-1,1in , in others Hanks have a 1-1,1in while Lo 0,7-0,8in plus Hanks like to stand well , i us to have a friend who is 5 ft 11 i am 5 ft 11,5 h stands relax And i stand tall with 0,5in more shoes And then i suddenly apear 1,25in kind of like Pitt And Clooney 179 And 180 Guy plus better posture footwear, And the diffrence is more noticable , i think there is very big chance Hanks was no more than 182,5cm peak especialy if Lo is 181 And Jude Law 178 , if you look at pics of leo/watanabe , leo/Hanks And Lo/Cooper you can see that Cooper is the tallest near Lo then watanabe then Hanks
justbringit said on 3/Aug/16
I think that leo is pretty much at the start of tall range.I could see hi being up to 5'11.5" but 5ft 11.25in seems ok also
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/16
Looked 184/185cm in Blood Diamond wearing boots.
dmeyer said on 3/Aug/16
Afternoon i can go from 181,6 to 181,3 so afternoon height is fine
Tardis said on 3/Aug/16
There's no way Leo is this low, but it's what ever people shorter than him want to believe, I guess.
Puma said on 2/Aug/16
If Caprio is 181 cm, Jon Bernthal is 179.
I watched the wall street.
Clearly 2 cm differance.
Rob?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/16
Wasn't expecting this....but it's fine I guess. Probably hits it at his low.
Dmeyer said on 1/Aug/16
rob when you list someone you mean they are 180.5-181cm night , they dont dip under 5'11 and are likely a fraction more but if someone is in that 181-181.5cm zone you will list them 5'11.5 , anyway leo can look anywere 5 ft 11-11.75
Editor Rob: I'm thinking in most cases around afternoon is fine, most won't drop that much more, a small fraction.
It's not impossible a guy like Leo shrinks near a full inch, he could go from 183 to 181
Dmeyer said on 1/Aug/16
181 would make sens whi he looks noticably shorter than 183cm Hanks , whi he can look just 3-4cm over damon , also 181cm is enaugh to look 6 ft in dcent shoes And being thin ,
Dmeyer said on 29/Jul/16
181cm fits him well but that is his evening height h wakes at 6 ft or 6 ft 1/8
Dmeyer said on 28/Jul/16
So at low of 181,4cm i am hair taller , 181cm looks right , if h was 181,5cm h would have looked closer to Hanks height 10 years back
truth said on 28/Jul/16
Spot on Rob.
CS said on 25/Jul/16
Wow. I never thought I'd see the day he'd be downgraded. This listing fits him as well.
Editor Rob: Never say Never...but in this case you had to register to vote on that votesy page, so it at least was a good indication of the general opinion.
Johnny said on 25/Jul/16
@Rob why did you downgrade him?
Editor Rob: Since I was 50/50 over whether he is near 5ft 11 or really 11.5, I put up that poll and thought the general average guess might fall in the 11.25 range...
177-178 cm guy said on 24/Jul/16
Finally he's downgraded. This listing fits Leo well IMO.
Dejavu said on 23/Jul/16
I think he really gained some height and weight in his late teen. He looked 5'10.5 max and now he looks a strong 5'11 to 6'0.
Mike said on 19/Jul/16
He still is 5'10, look at him in revolutionary road....he is not much taller than kate
S.J.H said on 18/Jul/16
Leo is 180cm and this listing could only fit him not long out of bed
Johno said on 15/Jul/16
I am not much of any height difference between him and latest girlfriend, Nina Agdal who is listed at 176 cm.
CS said on 13/Jul/16
He definitely gained some height between 18 and 21 considering he was 5'10 range around the time of What's Eating Gilbert Grape.
James Edward Crowley Maximus Meridius said on 11/Jul/16
Rob is It possible Leo grew half an inch when h was 25 26 i hav heard h didn't start puberty until h was 18 19 h was a very late bloomer h was during 24 25 during the filming of beach h could hav been 5ft 11in at the start of the filming and 5ft 11.5in when filming ended he may hav grown half an inch are you going too upgrade him too 6ft 0in at some point he looks 6ft 0in that's the height he is listed as online he must grew half an inch at 24 25 and grew half an inch again when he was 25 26 that means he grew a full inch in one year he may hav still growing in beach he wasn't finished growing yt very late bloomers usually grow for longer.
Editor Rob: I don't know if he did after 21, I think between 18 and 21 he did get something.
truth said on 11/Jul/16
@Celebheights 6'1.5

Looks like an exact 4 in difference. I guess Cooper forgot his lifts this day because I always pegged him at a strong 6'0/ 183-184 cm and Neeson at a strong 6'4 / 193-194 cm.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 10/Jul/16
Here's a good photo of him by Liam Neeson:

Click Here

6'1" is definitely possible for him.
jtm said on 9/Jul/16
anyone that thinks cooper is 6'1 needs to look at the picture on liam nesson's page.
CS said on 6/Jul/16
Bradley Cooper looks 6'1 to me which actually helps Leo's case if Bradley is indeed a bit higher than what he is listed.
Lenad 5ft9.75in said on 6/Jul/16
I think this listing is spot on
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jul/16
Leonardo DiCaprio - 5ft11(182cm)
Bradley Cooper - 6ft0(185cm)
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Jul/16
Bradley Cooper was near 6'1" in person, and he appeared to be at least 6'1" (if not slightly higher) by Ashton Kutcher.
CS said on 4/Jul/16
@Mat probably not until Leo starts shrinking lol.
Pucko said on 4/Jul/16
Closer to 181cm then to 183cm, but both 5'11.25 and 5'11.5 works good for Leo. I think we can close this case now Rob
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 4/Jul/16
With Ben Affleck who is anywhere from 6'2"-6'2 1/4" in person (6'2 1/2" shouldn't be completely ruled out either)

Click Here

Click Here

Even if you factor in that there is uneven footwear, there is no more than 2 1/2" between them.
Will said on 3/Jul/16
He really is 5'10 max MAX
Mat said on 2/Jul/16
Editor Rob: I don't know how good Leo's posture is, Cooper looks a guy with a better overall stance.

You are never going to downgrade him, are you?
Roy said on 2/Jul/16
There is no way he is less than 5'11. That's that.
Mat said on 1/Jul/16
Editor Rob: there could be a good 3cm at least between them.

So Rob, if you see at least 3 cm between them, shouldn't you give Leo 181 cm or Bradley Cooper 185 cm?
Editor Rob: I don't know how good Leo's posture is, Cooper looks a guy with a better overall stance.
Johan said on 1/Jul/16
cmon weak 5'10? He is 183 cm in shoes as we see from that pic. They look like 2cm style but lets just say that they are an inch that still puts him at 180.5cm about so a proper 5ft 11 guy.
Ryan said on 30/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75
Jeff said on 30/Jun/16
Closer to 5'11.5 than 5'10
truth said on 30/Jun/16
5'10 is just as bad as 6'0, 5'11 and some spare change is perfect.
Mat said on 29/Jun/16
Rob, do you really see only 1 inch between these 2? Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here

I personally see 1.5 inch difference, maybe 2 inch when Leo is slouching.
Editor Rob: there could be a good 3cm at least between them.
Dan said on 28/Jun/16
He is 5'10 flat
CS said on 27/Jun/16
Rob, would you say Leo is at the start of tall range?
Editor Rob: it's probably around the start yeah...
truth said on 27/Jun/16
@c-mo He looks no more than 5 cm taller than her in the picture above. Also his shoes are no more than 2.5 cm and her heels are about 6 cm. So she is standing there at 179 cm in heels and he is 183-184 cm in shoes, barefoot he is 181 cm or a weak 5'11.5. Might be less but no more than 1 cm.

@Johan Pitt is roughly 2 cm shorter, 179-180 cm. Might be 5'11/180 cm but imo this height is one of the more optimistic guesses. 5'10.5 to 5'10.75 is most realistic for him.
Truth said on 26/Jun/16
He's shorter than listed. He's not over 180
177-178 cm guy said on 24/Jun/16
5'9.75" is a joke. Leo usually looks 179-181cm range in pictures.
Eric said on 23/Jun/16
@Jeff Wrong bro!!
Jeff said on 22/Jun/16
He's above average height but never a six footer. Therefore, 5'11 - 5'11.5 is best for him and get over it people!
Eric said on 21/Jun/16
5'9.75 son
Johan said on 20/Jun/16
Click Here

Next to Jonah Hill . You can compare with the pic on Brads page. Its true he can look anything between 1-2 cm shorter than Leo. Not much in it if you look at Jonah's eyelevel with lines. Leo looks also 1 inch or so shorter than 6'0.5" Bradley Cooper in recent pics so it might actually be possible that Pitt is 5'11" like you said CS.
CS said on 19/Jun/16
@Johan pretty sure it's only 1 cm.

Pitt ~ 180 range
DiCaprio ~ 181 range
Pat said on 19/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75
Jim said on 18/Jun/16
Leo is 5-10 at max, end of story, probably 5'9.75
giant said on 18/Jun/16
he was shorter than ex girlfriend Toni Garrn. Toni is around 6'0". He is clear 5'9.75", max 5'10". never 5'11"+. same height with ex girlfriend Gisele imho.
Johan said on 17/Jun/16
2cm taller than Pitt so its either 179 > 181cm or 180>182 cm . I think the former.
Mike said on 17/Jun/16
Yes he is 5'9-5'10 that's it! He is not 5'11
Alxr37 said on 16/Jun/16
yeah Leo's 5'10 but bieber needs a upgrade to 5'9 lol Leo is probably 5'11 at worst
J.B. said on 16/Jun/16
Seems 5'11," maybe 5'11.25."

Here he is with 5'10" Matt Damon and 5'8" Mark Whalberg. However, due to lighting and the cut of their suits, its difficult to judge their footwear and if any of them are wearing lifts.

Click Here

Click Here
Jeff said on 16/Jun/16
Whoever thinks Leo is 5'9.75 is a hater
the Slav said on 16/Jun/16
Mike, no way is he that short. He's a solid 5'11
Mike said on 16/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75!! HE is not 5'11
Mike said on 16/Jun/16
He is 5'9.75!! HE is not 5'11
tiny said on 13/Jun/16
5'9.75"-5'11"/177-180cm
George said on 12/Jun/16
He's 5'10 jeezus
an anonymous peach said on 10/Jun/16
Rob, would you say he was at his full height in What's Eating Gilbert Grape?
Editor Rob: I think he still gained a bit near age 20
CS said on 10/Jun/16
5'11.25 - 5'11.5 at his low
Dmeyer said on 10/Jun/16
Rob at 181,3-181,5cm night me , its very likely Lo is no taller than me And possible couple of mm shorter
Editor Rob: it may well turn out he is not taller than you.
Dmeyer said on 10/Jun/16
She is about 5'11 shoes on h looks 6ft 0,25 shoes those look like to give 0,75 so bang 5ft 11,5
c-mo said on 9/Jun/16
@Mat

you might be right . it would be good if leo would stand next to people who have a pic with rob here . or even better if rob would meet leo :)
Mat said on 8/Jun/16
@ c-mo

I have actually asked Rob in the past about here heels, and he estimated them at 2.8 inches, that's 7 cm. You may look in the comments below and find it, it was a few months ago. he has also estimated a 1.5 inch difference between them, so you are wrong. I think you are counting dicaprio 's hair. she comes up to his hairline.

Dicaprio has never seen 6 foot in his life. he is at best a weak 182 and even that's pushing it. 181 is the most possible for him, and 180 as a low guess.
truth said on 7/Jun/16
He has probably lost nothing yet, he is only 41 y.o. for christ sake. 180 - 181 cm guy.
c-mo said on 7/Jun/16
@Mat

4cm seems a little too low of a difference between them on the pic . really looks more like 5-6 cm to me because the top of her head seems to be in the middle of his forehead

his face is just lower (low eyelevel) I think thats why you think that there is only 4cm difference

and her heels seem to be rather in the 8-9cm range rather than 7 ...look at the heel height page here
CS said on 7/Jun/16
Rob, if I'm about 180.8 cm at night (just measured a few hours ago) and I stood by Leo would people be able to spot a difference in height between him and I?
Editor Rob: you may well look close enough that people view you both as same height.
Mat said on 5/Jun/16
@ c-mo

if you think there is a 6 cm difference between blanchett and dicaprio you are brain damaged. he's at most 4 cm taller than her. she's wearing 7 cm heels. so 173+7=180 cm.
he is 4 cm taller so 180+4=184 cm. substract 3 cm and he is 181 cm. see? you can't really prove anything. mind you blanchett has claimed ''about 5'8'' which to me sounds like an almost 5'8. i know she's listed 173 cm but i'm just saying.
c-mo said on 3/Jun/16
call me crazy but I think he is rather 184cm

why ? let me explain :

look at the pic . Cate Blanchett is 173cm . she is wearing about 8cm heels on the pic . lets be optimistic and say that leos shoes give 3cm

blanchett 173cm + 8cm = 181cm

she comes up to leos forehead at the point where it is about 6cm distance to the top of the head . so 181cm + 6cm = 187cm . now subtract the shoes of leo and we get 184cm .

anything below 183cm is very unlikely IMO . anything less than 182cm seems impossible . some here said he is 178cm xD lmao
CS said on 3/Jun/16
@Saqib was there ever a time Leo regularly worked out? I can't recall seeing photos of him buff or at least toned.
Saqib said on 3/Jun/16
He doesn't look like he has worked out in the last 20 yrs to keep himself fit. Its possible that leo may have lost 1-2 cm
Allen said on 2/Jun/16
@truth

Yeah. As far as I know Leo never wears lifts and he really does look 5'11.5. Though he has a bad posture lately still doesn't look less.
CS said on 30/May/16
@Saqib from what I've gathered I think Rob believes Brad is a strong 180 guy, so quite possibly a few millimeters over it but not enough to tip the mark to 181. And Leo he believes is a strong 181 guy. He's listed at 182 cm because 5'11.5 is 181.6 cm and that rounds to 182 cm as I'm sure you know. However Rob has said he wouldn't put 181.0 cm past Leo so there still definitely is a chance. The closest case scenario is Brad is a smidge over 5'11 and Leo is 5'11.25 and the farthest case scenario is Brad is a tiny bit under 5'11 (about an eighth of an inch) and Leo is a smidge under 5'11.5. Their difference in height if you just say for simplicity "about a centimeter" is pretty close to the height difference a friend and I have.

Btw, I see Brad and Leo being roughly the same height in that pic. You can't see the footwear in that pic but they look roughly the same half inch (centimeter) range there to me.
truth said on 27/May/16
@Allen Bromance for Leo I see? ;) Anyway, 5ft11/180cm or 5ft11.25/181cm is most likely, he could be 5ft11/182cm also, but that would be earlier in the day...
Saqib said on 27/May/16
I believe leo is same height as brad pitt but if hes taller then its no more than 1cm
Brad i believe is 179-180cm
So if brad is 179 leo is 180
If hes 180 that makes leo 181.

Leo isnt 182. 182 looks closer to 6ft. Leo has never looked taller in movies. When i first watched titanic i pictured him being average height because there were scenes where he was taller than some people and there were other scenes where he was shorter. So i i thought of him being in 5'10-5'11 range before googling his height.



Click Here


Leo looks an inch shorter than brad here but this is probably because brad is wearing lifts like he normally does.

So leo without shoes 5'11/181cm, with normal shoes 6 ft
Brad pitt without shoes 5'11/180cm ,with shoes and lifts 6'1.

This is the only possible explanation to why brad is taller than leo in this pic.
Mat said on 26/May/16
Rob, how much are you convinced that Leo could be a flat 5'11? I don't think you really are
Editor Rob: I think while a chance, there is a greater chance of 11.25.
Allen said on 25/May/16
He is a true 182 cm guy. He has never looked less.
Saqib said on 25/May/16
Rob do you think leo is same height as brad pitt or is he taller?
Editor Rob: I think if you measured them you'd find Leo might have a better chance of stretching up a bit taller than he can look, whereas Pitt looks like he generally maintains a very close standing->measurable height.
c-mo said on 25/May/16
Rob how tall do you think he was in Romeo and Juliet ?
Editor Rob: I think by then he looked near his final height at around 21
James B said on 24/May/16
Rob I get the impression hanks was in lifts with dicaprio.........
Editor Rob: for some reason Hanks never struck me as a bloke who would wear lifts, but it's the dependable and reliable guys you sometimes have to keep a closer eye on.
Johno said on 23/May/16
For me Saqib; the difference is not quite 2-inches but then again, Leo has some hefty formals on there so the difference could be a full 2-inches.

Mr Bachan for me seems to be hovering around the 6'0 mark; he is in his 70s, Leo looks 5'10, 5'10.25 in comparison.
Saqib said on 22/May/16
Leonardo looks like 5'11,180cm flat next to 6'1 amitabh bachan


Click Here

Click Here
the Slav said on 22/May/16
5'11.75 is the tallest he can be
Saqib said on 18/May/16
I am new here so I have questions.

1) when i post a comment, after how much time will it appear on the comment's section?

2) why do celebrities and other people irl lie about their height? I never understood this.

3) how can i cure my obsession with heights?
Editor Rob: hopefully within a day.

Celebs, want others to think of them in good light. Being tall is a positive trait, so many might add an inch or two.
For me, the positive is telling the truth, regardless of the actual height.

To cure an obsession, sometimes it takes effort and spreading interests so that your day is filled with a variety of tasks.

But in some cases, being hyper-focused on a topic isn't necessarily a bad thing...it's how humans have progressed, by having people who devote inordinate amounts of time to solving problems and inventing solutions.
Saqib said on 18/May/16
How tall is leonardo dicaprio and johnny depp in these pics?

Click Here

Click Here
Editor Rob: at that age he looked maybe an inch taller
Johno said on 16/May/16
Click Here

The other picture; it did not publish in my previous comment. Even when Mario's dodgy posture, their eyelines clearly match, there is hardy any height difference there.
James said on 16/May/16
Rob, what do you think is the difference between Leo and Tyrese Gibson in this picture?

Click Here
Editor Rob: he does appear at least an inch taller, I don't know if he is losing anything more than a fraction in posture?
Z187 said on 15/May/16
In his bio it says he's 5'11.5" (half an inch taller than one of his model gfs that I can't remember) .. Can't blame him for rounding up by a cm... Who would really bother saying I'm 5'11 and a half ?
Johno said on 14/May/16
@Mat, in their movie they looked nearly 2-inches apart and similarly, the same in those pictures you supplied.

Hanks is a 5'11, 5'11-range sort of guy. Quite clearly he has some height on Leo thus me it is improbable that he is anywhere near 6'0 by a country-mile; although i think people can still argue in the 5'10-range for me; i have him at a flat 5'10 but he can look a 5'10-range to; although at times he can often look pretty stout and average. A tall-average sort-of guy for me.

Hanks 5'11, 5'11-range
Dicaprio nearly 2-inches shorter
Johno said on 14/May/16
TJE said on 11/Apr/16
@Johno

In the wider shot, yes, but in Leo's closeup it's more 2 inches. When Leo picks his head up, Mario is looking straight into his nose indicating so.

Hence, Leo's a 5'11 range guy who frequently slouches; look at him with Matt Damon, Christopher Nolan, even Cate Blanchett on the top, who's a strong 5'8 in heels. He always looks 5'11 min

Better yet with 5'3 Martin Scorcese:

Click Here

Once you look into it more, you will realize that the 5'10 assessment is bogus.

Also, it's not those who "estimate higher" that go off topic. It's actually the opposite. In fact, most commenters that estimates higher are barraged with ad homs by other commenters. The site's riddled with such scenarios. You will also notice people who think every single celebrity wears 3 inch lifts populating the most popular pages. These people can get quite volatile if scrutinized.

In fact, you are amongst the people who both underestimate celebrities and veer off topic, albeit more levelheaded.
-------------------------------------------------------

2-inches? For your benefit, i don't think your not that daft and believe you probably know what 2-inches difference looks like, Rob has got some illustrations for you to view. Let me post a few pictures of a 5'8.75, Mario Lopez and a Mr Dicaprio. The comparions are pretty clear and the difference is clear to see.

Click Here
Click Here

Now ------------ where are those phantom 2-inches? I cannot even see 1-inch; i can barely see 0.5-inches and if we were to correct Mario's posture ....... You get the picture; no wait ------- you don't.

Why does Mr Dicaprio's height so 'miniscule' next to a 5'8.75-5'9.25? Infact, i believe Mario's height ranges from 5'9.25 in the morning, to 5'8.5 at night.

Together with the video i already posted, there is another comparisons of them two for you to realise that height difference between is hardly 0.5-inches let alone 2-inches as your saying; that is pretty crazy and i refuse to believe your this incompetent when it comes height, so why do you state 2-inches for this A-lister? If you want to argue near 6'0 or 2-inches; you really ought to use different media or pictures for example, not create space out of nowhere; for pictures and videos where such information was not recorded.

I think Leonardo could wake up at 5'10.5-ish in the morning but individuals can lose upto to an inch in height during the day, so i believe he averages 5'10-ish or near there throughout the day. I believe his lowest is lower then these parameters though. This is why maybe that reporter barely even saw 5'10 for Mr Dicaprio when they met him.

In terms of height users. No, i believe height cynics get it harder then height inflators; the term, "troll" is brandished oh-to-easily and that is pretty ad-homien if you ask me and once you see this term used by one username, you all of a sudden see a flurry of them in quick succession, thus you can see why i am pretty cynical at times.

Mario Lopez 5'8.75, 5'9
Leonardo Dicaprio in comparison [0.5-inches taller than Lopez], let us give him 5'10.25 [Gave him phantom height due to possible, quite clearly way off the 5'11-range]
michael smith said on 13/May/16
I see that Jennifer Connelly is at eye Leonardo DiCaprio level with a similar footwear, so do you think that there is 13 cm of diffrence?
Mat said on 13/May/16
@Editor Rob: generally at that time Hanks could look at least half inch taller, possibly 2cm taller.

I see 2 or 3 cm. Maybe you should either give Hanks a little bit more then, or finally give Leo 181 cm. A friend of mine is a half inch taller than me and we usually look indentical.
jtm said on 12/May/16
DiCaprio's footwear in the picture with blanchett looks really suspicious to me.
jtm said on 12/May/16
since when is a 5'11 described as being short? 5'11 is above average height.
Dmeyer said on 12/May/16
The Guy is not less than 181cm night so 5ft11,5 is fair listing propbably wakes 183-183,5
Flyin said on 11/May/16
Still beats 5"8 in heels with modest shoes. Looks like my brother with his wife. 6"0 and 5"8. I think he is a very strong 5"11. Solid posture here as well. Wish I was that tall for longer than half an hour.
Mat said on 11/May/16
Check this Rob. Don't you think that's more than 1 inch difference between him and Hanks?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob: generally at that time Hanks could look at least half inch taller, possibly 2cm taller.
ARGH said on 10/May/16
Leo ain't 6 feet. No 6 foot man is described as being short.

He's 5'11.
Tommy said on 10/May/16
He's never outside of 5'11- 5'11.5 range
CS said on 10/May/16
c-mo said on 8/May/16
yes and no ...it depends on the person and also the activity level of the day you know what I mean ? some will lose height quicker than others etc.

imo out of bed height and like 1 hour after is inflation but after that is claimable . I am 178.3 or when I get a lot of sleep like 10h+ 178.5cm fresh out of bed in the first 1-2 minutes ...after 1 hour I am 177.4cm or something around that . after 2-3 hours I am around the 177cm mark give or take 2 mm or so and I see no reason why I shouldnt claim this height ? even though I fall to 176.3 cm 5-6 hours after out of bed and fall to 176cm at night. several hours of a day I am 176.8 to 177.5cm range ...I mean come on

like I am 2.3 to 2.5 cm taller than 176cm out of bed and 2-3 hours after waking up I am 177cm so why should I claim my lowest ? what benefit does that bring to anybody lol ....especially since people guess me 180cm constantly and I have a higher than average eye level ....I mean the 177cm IS MY HEIGHT TOO in the end and a part of me and not even my out of bed height so there is 0% reason for me to claim 176cm especially since many 172cm guys claim 176cm ...I know a guy who is 170cm or so and on a dating profile he listed himself as 176cm even though he looks a lot shorter next to me .

if you guys want to go by night height thats your desicion but for me it is nonsense

------------------------------------------

I understand that tbh and I think in your case it's perfectly fine to say 177 cm. I think the discrepancy can come depending on how much an individual shrinks. And like you even said it does depend on the person as well as the activity level of the day, I completely agree. There are no hard and fast rules, just a general idea of how people shrink but based on your case I believe 177 cm is fine to say. I'm basically agreeing with you.
Celebheights 6'1.5"/187 CM said on 9/May/16
Out of bed: 6'0 1/4"
Before bed: 5'11 1/2"

5'11" is ridiculous.
James said on 8/May/16
Rob, is 180 cm just below 5'11?
Editor Rob: yeah a little bit
CS said on 8/May/16
177-178 cm guy said on 7/May/16
Here's Leo next to Chadwick Boseman who is listed at 5'11.5" on this site:
Click Here

---------------------------------

Leonardo definitely fits his listing in that pic.
c-mo said on 8/May/16
CS said on 6/May/16
c-mo said on 5/May/16
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly

I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day

I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm

----------------------------------

I understand what you are saying. The only thing though is that typically your lunchtime/noon height is only a few mm or so more than your night height. Rob's posted a graph before demonstrating this, I think it honestly gives a great deal of validity to our night height. I do get what you are coming from though... I think we both can agree though that our early morning/out of bed height definitely is an inflation, like you said.

-------------------------------------------

yes and no ...it depends on the person and also the activity level of the day you know what I mean ? some will lose height quicker than others etc.

imo out of bed height and like 1 hour after is inflation but after that is claimable . I am 178.3 or when I get a lot of sleep like 10h+ 178.5cm fresh out of bed in the first 1-2 minutes ...after 1 hour I am 177.4cm or something around that . after 2-3 hours I am around the 177cm mark give or take 2 mm or so and I see no reason why I shouldnt claim this height ? even though I fall to 176.3 cm 5-6 hours after out of bed and fall to 176cm at night. several hours of a day I am 176.8 to 177.5cm range ...I mean come on

like I am 2.3 to 2.5 cm taller than 176cm out of bed and 2-3 hours after waking up I am 177cm so why should I claim my lowest ? what benefit does that bring to anybody lol ....especially since people guess me 180cm constantly and I have a higher than average eye level ....I mean the 177cm IS MY HEIGHT TOO in the end and a part of me and not even my out of bed height so there is 0% reason for me to claim 176cm especially since many 172cm guys claim 176cm ...I know a guy who is 170cm or so and on a dating profile he listed himself as 176cm even though he looks a lot shorter next to me .

if you guys want to go by night height thats your desicion but for me it is nonsense
truth said on 7/May/16
yeah 5ft11-5ft11.5 is more or less his range.
truth said on 7/May/16
@cmo/Dmeyer ah so now I understand how height is listed here, thanks guys.
177-178 cm guy said on 7/May/16
Here's Leo next to Chadwick Boseman who is listed at 5'11.5" on this site:
Click Here
aaron zamora said on 7/May/16
Am I really the only one waiting for Leo to get downgraded?
CS said on 6/May/16
c-mo said on 5/May/16
yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly

I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day

I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm

----------------------------------

I understand what you are saying. The only thing though is that typically your lunchtime/noon height is only a few mm or so more than your night height. Rob's posted a graph before demonstrating this, I think it honestly gives a great deal of validity to our night height. I do get what you are coming from though... I think we both can agree though that our early morning/out of bed height definitely is an inflation, like you said.
c-mo said on 5/May/16
CS said on 3/May/16
@c-mo when you state your estimates for people, are you thinking of their average height? Like the average of their night height and morning height.

--------------------------------

yes I go by noon/lunchtime height mostly

I think early morning and also night heights are not the best options to be neither listed nor claimed . I neither see our out of bed height as the height we should claim nor the height we are at night after being awake for 13-14+ hours and having have done several activities like working/sports etc on top of it during the day

I give you an example . if you are 180.3cm out of bed , 179,2 cm being awake for 2-3 hours , 178.6cm after being awake 5-6 hours , 178cm flat at night .....then the height you should claim is 179cm ...NOT 178cm or 180cm
Rick said on 5/May/16
He looks no more than 5'10 in wolf of wall street
CS said on 3/May/16
@c-mo when you state your estimates for people, are you thinking of their average height? Like the average of their night height and morning height.
CS said on 3/May/16
Rob has said Leo's range is roughly 5'11" - 5'11.5" so there's no doubt in my mind he's somewhere in that zone. Of course he can sometimes appear shorter like dipping down below 5'11" and other times appearing taller like approaching 6'0" but everyone appears taller or shorter than they actually are at times. That's just how it is.
James B said on 3/May/16
When will you give him 181cm rob?
Editor Rob: by the time I do he might be shrinking ;)
c-mo said on 2/May/16
easy 182cm . maybe 183cm

I dont get people here who think he is 5'10
Original said on 26/Apr/16
5'11.25/5'11.5
Tommy said on 22/Apr/16
Funny how people are commenting about a man who will probably never get married or have any kids in his entire life
Dmeyer said on 17/Apr/16
At rampage with respect , if rob list him 5ft 11,5 181,6cm means rob think the absolute max possible is 182cm And absolute minimum 180,5cm so you could do an b c , like 184/182cm 183,5/181,5cm And 183/181cm
Tommy said on 15/Apr/16
Rob, do you think his long hair makes him look taller?
Editor Rob: he brushes it back, but it doesn't have a lot of volume, so won't add that much.
TJE said on 15/Apr/16
@jtm

Because people slouch. It's just how it is. Most people aren't walking around at full height and Leo's no exception.
Mat said on 14/Apr/16
Everyone here knows that by the end of 2016, Dicaprio will be downgraded to a 181 cm listing. He is going to be the most famous 181 guy in all of celebheights xD. It is just a matter of time really. I wonder if he will ever be downgraded to 180 though, cause he looks it sometimes... Anyway, 180 or 181, it's one of the two really, unless we measure him we won't know for sure. But we do know he is not 182 ;-)
Mat said on 14/Apr/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, where would Leo fit in?

A) 185cm/183cm
B) 184.5cm/182.5cm
C) 184cm/182cm
D) 183.5cm/181.5cm
E) 183cm/181cm
--------------------------------
Why are you doing this ABCD **** in every single page? Admin lists him at 5'11.5, which is a weak 182 cm, so why are you asking if he is 183 cm or 182.5? That's just a waste of time and stupid. If Admin thought Leo was 183 he would have listed him 6 feet even. The question is whether Dicaprio is in the 181-182 zone or the 180-181 zone or even -though less possible, in the 179-180 zone. Oh, and the average loss for above average heights is more 2.5 cm range than 2 cm.
jtm said on 14/Apr/16
why is this slouching excuse used so often here?
TJE said on 11/Apr/16
@Johno

In the wider shot, yes, but in Leo's closeup it's more 2 inches. When Leo picks his head up, Mario is looking straight into his nose indicating so.

Hence, Leo's a 5'11 range guy who frequently slouches; look at him with Matt Damon, Christopher Nolan, even Cate Blanchett on the top, who's a strong 5'8 in heels. He always looks 5'11 min

Better yet with 5'3 Martin Scorcese:

Click Here

Once you look into it more, you will realize that the 5'10 assessment is bogus.

Also, it's not those who "estimate higher" that go off topic. It's actually the opposite. In fact, most commenters that estimates higher are barraged with ad homs by other commenters. The site's riddled with such scenarios. You will also notice people who think every single celebrity wears 3 inch lifts populating the most popular pages. These people can get quite volatile if scrutinized.

In fact, you are amongst the people who both underestimate celebrities and veer off topic, albeit more levelheaded.
007 said on 11/Apr/16
Leonardo looks between 5'10.75" to 5'11.25"(180-181cm) with Jonah Hill( 5'6.25").
Click Here Click Here
Tommy said on 11/Apr/16
Rob, how much taller do you think he is next to Kate Winslet?
Editor Rob: typically she has worn heels when being seen with Leo, but when wearing heels I think leo looked roughly 3 or a bit more inches taller
Johno said on 10/Apr/16
TJE, i am just a commentator on here, policing is not my job. All my comments are here plain to see and you will notice that i don't initiate anything. Although, i do see some users ridiculing others in the aim to veer off topic and i hope others start to notice this pattern; it is mostly users that go for higher height estimates. As i said before, fixed user names would be ideal but i am fine as it is.

My post was not a rebuttal; it was just me posting content for other users to see and judge Leonardo's height ---- the content is pretty much on topic and it is not doctored by me thus, instead of ignoring it ---- simply click the link.

You will notice that Leonardo looks virtually the same height as Mario Lopez ...
Johno said on 10/Apr/16
TJE, i am just a commentator on here, policing is not my job. All my comments are here plain to see and you will notice that i don't initiate anything. Although, i do see some users ridiculing others in the aim to veer off topic and i hope others start to notice this pattern; it is mostly users that go for higher height estimates. As i said before, fixed user names would be ideal but i am fine as it is.

My post was not a rebuttal; it was just me posting content for other users to see and judge Leonardo's height ---- the content is pretty much on topic and it is not doctored by me thus, instead of ignoring it ---- simply click the link.

You will notice that Leonardo looks virtually the same height as Mario Lopez ...
truth said on 10/Apr/16
Mario Lopez is 5ft9 and he looks 2 inches shorter than Leo (eye level is at the tip of his nose). 5ft11 would be the fairest estimate imho.
TJE said on 9/Apr/16
@Johno

Lol tf are you on about? You forget to take your meds this week? Please keep your conspiracy theories to yourself, mate.

Your hypocrisy is astounding since you go around this site constantly veering off subject and police other commenters in the same breath. Also, your follow up post only proves that you made your "rebuttal" out of pure insecurity.

You've essentially just trolled yourself. Congratulations. Goodbye now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Rob, where would Leo fit in?

A) 185cm/183cm
B) 184.5cm/182.5cm
C) 184cm/182cm
D) 183.5cm/181.5cm
E) 183cm/181cm
Editor Rob: I think ultimately D-E zone is where he might end up, the general consensus could fall around 5ft 11.25 overall.
Johno said on 7/Apr/16
Click Here

Here is an interview between Mario Lopez who is between 5'8.75-5'9 and Leonardo Dicaprio and it is glaringly obvious -------- they look the same height !

It is quite surprising that he looks the same height as a 5'8-range, 5'9 man and Mario tends to bend or duck his head often. He stands eye-to-eye to Dicaprio and thus me giving Leonardo a phantom 1-inch should reduce any possibility of error or under estimation.

Leonardo Dicaprio with my phantom 1-inch added to his height still does not look above 5'10 and you understand why his ex-girlfriend was insinuating that he was short but i don't consider 5'10 short in any capicity.

Mario Lopez 5'8-range, 5'9
Leonardo Dicaprio; looked the same height as Lopez plus Phantom inch is 5'10.
Johno said on 7/Apr/16
TJE ----- is that some sort of condition. At times i believe Rob should actually fix usernames on here and that way you won't see all of a sudden multitude of comments on here from a single or dual source. By labelling me, "Height183" will not serve as a good deflection or pre-emptive defense against a possible counter accusation.

Although, with user names fixed, you will probably see a good slow down of these random correspondences to Rampage or his often conversations to himself; anyway .....
Hasselbaink said on 7/Apr/16
If Tom Cruise is 5'7 then i can't see Dicaprio being 5'11.5 next to him in this photo Click Here What do you think?
TJE said on 6/Apr/16
@Rampage

Lmao Johno must be Height183 reincarnated.

Please go away Height183, we all know you have nothing of value to say on the subject matter.
Tommy said on 6/Apr/16
This 5'11.5 listing is the highest he can ever look
Johno said on 5/Apr/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/16
Johno, what you like is to bully and denigrate other visitors to this site because their opinions differ to yours. In some ways, your as obnoxious and dislikable as Andrea

------------------------------------------------------------------

You are something else; it seems Andrea sounds like a smart individual and pretty reasonable and pleasant to me and so do many users who have perfectly valid opinions but honestly why cannot you let people have their own height opinions without bringing commentary on the person's supposed character into question? Keep it strictly height related? This is what i have increasingly noticed about height inflators, it is almost like they have a personal affiliation with the celebrity's height category. I do hope other users notice this set pattern; it is silly.

Keep the topics strictly about height and stop crying.
Ricky said on 4/Apr/16
He looked 5ft11 range at visit Medan and Aceh Indonesia in march 2016
BT said on 4/Apr/16
@datguy: The votesy page currently has 30 (out of 66) people saying 5'11 and 17 saying 5'11.25, so yeah, most people would agree with you on that. It's been well documented over the years that he mostly does look nearer 5'11 than 5'11.5. I'm sure Rob will change the listing eventually ;)
datguy said on 3/Apr/16
leo appears 5'11-511.25 WAY more. than 5'11.5 he should get a downgrade rob he hardly ever appears this height and I'm sure most people here would agree with me
CS said on 3/Apr/16
I never really thought about Leonardo's height until I found out about this website. Looking through a lot of photos of Leo and I have to say Rob's range of 5'11" - 5'11.5" is spot on. The shortest he can look IMO is 5'10.5" and the tallest is 6'0" so 5'11" - 5'11.5" is pretty accurate with 5'11.25" being the sweet spot perhaps.
zaq said on 2/Apr/16
looks like he grew a bit since 19 when filming with depp looked to be 5'7-5'8 in that movie
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Apr/16
Johno, what you like is to bully and denigrate other visitors to this site because their opinions differ to yours. In some ways, your as obnoxious and dislikable as Andrea
Allen said on 1/Apr/16
Leo never wears lifts! And he is on the tall side as it seems. Looks from 178 to 182.
Aaron Zamora said on 1/Apr/16
So far 5'11 (180) cm is what everyone think Leo measures. When will you downgrade him, Rob? That voting page has been there for a while already.
Editor Rob: I think it's worthwhile to keep that vote open for a long time to get more votes.
Aza said on 28/Mar/16
Rob has Kate Blanchett at 173 cm. Her shoes look to give 5 cm making her look 178cm. Think the listing is pretty close. Could argue for 181cm or 182 cm as am not 100% sure on his footwear.
Mat said on 27/Mar/16
Click Here

Rob, how tall does Leo look here? 5'10.5?
Editor Rob: with cooper he can look right on 5ft 11
Aaron zamora said on 26/Mar/16
Is there a chance of Leo being 5'10.75? Who do you think is taller him or Jake gyllenhal?
Johno said on 26/Mar/16
End of discussion? What like end of thread for all time? The whole point of these threads is to discuss; tbere is no end to anything.

Are you insinuating that the 6'1 estimate at 16 as stated in this article is correct? What is he now ---- 6'2?

Alternatively, if you believe 5'11 is his lowest and i believe, a 5'10-range could be his lowest, then i would like my odds of being correct ----- i really, really like them.
Tom said on 25/Mar/16
More proof he's 5-10. Click Here

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.