How tall is Leonardo DiCaprio ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Leonardo DiCaprio height: 5ft 11.5in (182 cm)

American actor best known for starring in films such as Titanic, Inception, The Departed, Shutter Island, Gangs of New York, Aviator, Blood Diamond and The Wolf of Wall Street. On Teletext UK, a journalist once said "He stands no more than 5ft 10ins (if that), is rake thin" and The Sun reported the reason Gisele Bundchen broke up with Leo was (in her own words) that her "ideal man has to be taller than me". Leo himself claims to be 6 foot. In AccessHollywood he said " 'That's the number one thing people say to me constantly 'Wow! You're a lot taller than I thought you'd be,...They have a perception, I guess, that most actors are gnomes or something.' For the record, Leonardo hangs in the air at about 6 feet tall."


Leo and 5ft 8.5 Cate Blanchett
Photos by PR Photos
You may be interested in...
Add your opinion on the Height of Leonardo DiCaprio

Your Comment:

The Exorcist says on 24/Jan/15
Photos with 5'11" Jon Bernthal from "The Wolf of Wall Street".

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Jon looks a little taller, but he has the bigger footwear advantage. Leo's shoes are hardly giving him anything at all.
Click Here

They'd probably be about the same height barefoot. Five-foot-eleven.
Jake: 1.84 m- 1.85 m says on 24/Jan/15
I think 5ft 11.5in is right!
@rockitbaby says on 24/Jan/15
Just see him next to 6'0 people that you'll se he's 1,81 tops. Again, next to Jean Dujardin, who claims to be 1,81m, he's the exact same height.
Tunman says on 23/Jan/15
Rob,you said he can look between 5'11 and 5'11.5,what are the chances that he cleans 182?very weak in my opinion so what about 5'11.25?He won't look over that with Honsou and even with Kate Winslet
Steve says on 22/Jan/15
He looks like he's barely 5'11".
Arthur says on 22/Jan/15
"At 5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs., he claims he can bench-press 205 lbs."
--Time - Feb 21, 2000.

What about this 5'11" claim Rob?
[Editor Rob: I don't know if that was from him, the journalist could have got the bit about bench press and just added in a height/weight.]
@rockitbaby says on 22/Jan/15
Leo is not 6'0, nothing takes this off my mind LoL he's 1,81m TOPS.
Johnny says on 22/Jan/15
Rob what do you think from my last comment?
[Editor Rob: bernthal isn't 5ft 10, he's a 5ft 11 guy up close.]
Johnny says on 22/Jan/15
I seriously doubt that Leo Dicaprio is 6ft tall. There was a scene in Wolf of Wall Street where he stood next to Jon Bernthal (from Walking Dead), who is listed at 5'10"; and they appeared to be the same height. Of course movies are tricky, as you need to take camera effects and lifts etc into account, but proved (at least from that angle) that Leo isn't 6ft.
david says on 19/Jan/15
180cm-181cm no more, no less.
as says on 19/Jan/15
Late bloomer looked tiny on growing pains at age 16, had a face of a 12 yr old. Must have had a good height shoot after that. I think he's in the 6ft out of bed 5ft11 in the evening range.
Jeff says on 19/Jan/15
Rob, can a 181-182 guy look like a legit tall guy to people? I'm just wondering about the "Wow! You're a lot taller than I thought you'd be..." part in the description...
[Editor Rob: maybe some people associate his youthful looks with a shorter appearance? Could be that his slimmer frame in the past and being somewhere in 181 range just surprised some of them.]
cole says on 18/Jan/15
@jeremy: There are too many unknown variables surrounding that mugshot. The thing with photographing/filming a person up against a height chart is you'd have to get the angle for the camera near 100% right for it to be accurate, slightly too low and he'd appear taller, slightly too high and he'd appear shorter. He'd also have to be standing right up against the actual chart - which in the movie appears to be some distance further away from the camera than Leo (as seen when he does the side pose and walks away). We don't know if it's a chart that's done properly either, it could have been placed lower on the wall for all we know. On top of that he's more than likely wearing some kind of footwear.
rockitbaby says on 18/Jan/15
Exactly, I totally forgot about that scene in Wolf. If he measures 6'0 (I don't even think he was in this mark) with shoes, he can't be 1,82 guys. He's 1,81 TOPS. For me, he's still the classic 1,80m guy.
KT says on 18/Jan/15
Jeremy, If he stands at exactly 6" with shoes on (as he does in "Wolf of Wall Street" when he gets arrested), then he's obviously not 6" barefoot. He's at least 1-inch under that, depending on the footwear.
Bishop says on 18/Jan/15
@Jeremy
You have to take what shoes he's wearing into account, as they can add height :)
jeremy says on 17/Jan/15
Jesus, there is no disputing he is 5'11 1/2 - 6' exactly just look at the scene in wolf of wall street when he gets arrested. He stands next to a measure that proves exactly this
KT says on 17/Jan/15
In "Wolf of Wall Street," they show him standing in front of a height chart right after he gets arrested. He stood around the 6-foot mark; maybe slightly below if you took off the hair. He undoubtedly had his shoes on during this scene, so assuming regular footwear (1-inch), then he's around the 5'10-5'11 mark. At least we know he's not 6-feet barefoot. He's closer to 5'11 than 6'0, I think.
Arthur says on 17/Jan/15
Rob, you have to consider these pics of Dicaprio and Garrn:
Click Here
Click Here
Their difference is too much noticeable to be just half an inch
cole says on 14/Jan/15
@Dmeyer: I agree he's likely a bit shorter, but I've seen no picture good enough to specify just how much shorter.
rockitbaby says on 14/Jan/15
Btw, in these pics she seems slightly taller than Leo and both are with very similar shoes. If he's 1,82 she's probably over 1,84m or more.

Click Here
rockitbaby says on 14/Jan/15
Agree! In any picture we can see the exact difference but the thing is that she always looks taller than him, even barefoot. And it's not a 1cm difference only, is more. If Garrn is like 1,84, 1,85 then I believe Leo is 1,82m.
Dmeyer says on 13/Jan/15
Cole the thing about Toni and Leo is that in every single pic he looks a consistent 2 to the cms shorter and even if they aren't that prefect some have to be somewhat accurate which means that Leo is 180 unless Toni is over 183
Johnny says on 12/Jan/15
Rob what is Toni gardens height you think look at pics of her with karlie Kross and then tell me what you think please. Is she talller than 184?
[Editor Rob: generally garn (I added her) looks in the 6ft range]
cole says on 12/Jan/15
What have you guys seen to say Garrn's an exact amount of centimeters taller than him?
I haven't seen a single usable pic to debate Leo's height relative to Garrn. The ones where they are standing in the water or walking about on the beach are absolutely useless.
Judd says on 12/Jan/15
2 strong cms between Leo and Toni...if she's 6'0" the Leo can't be taller than 5'11.25", what he always looked...
rockitbaby says on 11/Jan/15
If she's 1,83m Leo can be 1,81 tops. If she's 1,81m then Leo is 1,80m tops because there is a difference of more than 1cm between them.
Johnny says on 11/Jan/15
I do think that Leo is 5'11. But, the thing that I question is the fact that at time with Jean he appears to be a bit taller. Not only this, but he also appears to slouch in quite a few of the pics. So, I question whether he would really be shorter than him if he werent slouching at all. Rob, how tall is Toni Garrn? Because if she is around 6' then Leo is 179. But, if shes 185, then I think he could be 182. But, what do you think is her height?
Andrea says on 11/Jan/15
Well, Dmeyer, she got listed at 6' by Rob... I've seen nothing of her except some photos with Leo but if she's "only" 6', i don't think Leo is much over 5'11! 5'11 flat really might be a better shout for Leo!!!
Georgy says on 11/Jan/15
@rockitbaby Personal agent, periodicals, magazines etc. list her her as 181 cm. More importantlt, next to a true 6'1 Karlie Kloss ( Taylor Swift's bff ), she looks no more than 181 cm.
So yeah, it's been arguees for ages, us randoma and Leo's costars and ex model gfs - he is 180 cm. Nothing more than that.
Dmeyer says on 11/Jan/15
If she is 181cm he is Max 179.5-180cm
Dmeyer says on 11/Jan/15
rockitbaby says on 3/Jan/15
I don't know...in this picture Jean looks taller than George.

Click Here

And in that Nespresso ad, the same thing:

Click Here

If Clooney is indeed 1,80 as he claims to be, then Jean is 1,81m, like he says himself. Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops.
Clooney is same height in that pic his head is just down a bit
Celebheights 6'1.5 says on 10/Jan/15
I don't know if this photo has already been linked, but he's clearly taller than a Cameron Diaz who has heels on (who is listed as 5'8", but appears more 5'8.25" to me):

Click Here

This photo proves that he's above 5'11".
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" says on 10/Jan/15
By 6'0" measured 50 Cent:

Click Here
rockitbaby says on 10/Jan/15
@georgy I thought his ex-girlfriend was taller, like 1,84 or something. If she's 1,81 than NO WAY Leo is 1,82 LoL
Georgy says on 8/Jan/15
Next to his legit 181-cm-tall model gf. He ALWAYS looks shorter than her, especially when the're both barefoor. You don't need more evidende. Rob, he's been awaiting downgrading for ages now, deservedly so.
Click Here
Georgy says on 8/Jan/15
It's been sorted out that Leo is not taller than 181 cm since he appears shorter than his present model girlfriend ( quoted as 181 cy model agencies and all thw websites ) when they're both barefeet. He is a classic 180 cm/5'11 guy.
182 cm is regarded as weak 6'0, since it translates to 182.8 cm. Leo is not that for sure. I'm slightly above 183 and my cousin is 182 cm and does happen to have a 181 cm tall girlfriend. Compring the two couples, Leo is definitelt below 181 cm.
rockitbaby says on 4/Jan/15
I really can't see Leo as a 1,82m guy. He just looks tall but seeing him next do Bradley Cooper he's way shorter. Unless Cooper is like 1,90m, which he's not.
cole says on 4/Jan/15
@Clay: Yes you would, as Leo at best could be classified as a questionable 5'11.5. Off the top of my head Sharlto Copley, Matt Smith, Jay Baruchel, Tyler Hoechlin and Sean Pertwee are all more classic 5'11.5 than him.
Clay says on 3/Jan/15
You won't find a more classic 5'11.5 than Leo.
rockitbaby says on 3/Jan/15
I don't know...in this picture Jean looks taller than George.

Click Here

And in that Nespresso ad, the same thing:

Click Here

If Clooney is indeed 1,80 as he claims to be, then Jean is 1,81m, like he says himself. Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops.
Dmeyer says on 2/Jan/15
Click Here , he is Clooney with dujardin he looks a 0.25-0.5in taller that leo does near dujardin , that Will sugest a Max 5'11 leo
rockitbaby says on 29/Dec/14
Dujardin claims to be 1,81m so Leo must be something close this height too. Sometimes he looks a little bit shorter than Jean but others the same height so...

In this video from the Oscars, Leo seems to be the same height as McConaughey. How tall is he? Around 1,80m too?

Click Here
Emil 183 cm says on 28/Dec/14
He looks identical in height with Dujardin judging from their pics, but its hard to tell really. Leo never looks shorter than 1.80 m imo and CAN look 6'0 at few occasions. I think 1.815 m is his exactly height though
rockitbaby says on 26/Dec/14
For me 1,81m is fair too, at the moment he wakes up. But during the day he's 1,80m. These pics are hard to mesure because Leo might be in a better angle and Hill isn't in his perfect posture neither. But there's one pic of him in Wolf Of Wall Street in which he's mesured 6' wearing shoes. We can't see his shoes but I'd say they had around 2cm or 3cm.
johnny says on 26/Dec/14
Yeah maybe they are but there is no way leo is 182 I think he's a solid 180 but the only thing I question is the pic of him with bar on the beach where they are both in flip flops and he looks to be a good margin taller. Maybe the photo is taken at Leo's advantage but still makes me wonder maybe it's slanted and the fact that leo is in front gives him s a couple cms. Thoughts guys?
182cm says on 26/Dec/14
181 cm is the most fair height. 182.5cm morning and 180.5 maybe 180 at night. I feel like most of the heights on this website are 1cm off
rockitbaby says on 25/Dec/14
I don't know how tall is Timberlake but he looks at least 1,82m. Next to quite tall guys as Affleck and Hedlund, he's more than 5cm shorter. Leo just looks to be 6' but he's not. Maybe in a good day he's 1,81m.
johnny says on 25/Dec/14
Yeah his claim is a lot more realistic but still he is not that height Justin just tried to overstate it leo on the other hand didn't overstate it by that much even if he is 179 which he is probably a bit over but Justin Timberlake s claim is way too much. Leo is definitely a solid 180 never dipping below that our above it
177cmGuy says on 25/Dec/14
179-181cm is the best estimate I can give for Leonardo with shoes he's easily 6'0. Merry Christmas to celebheights.
KT says on 24/Dec/14
When I first came on this site many years ago, Leo was listed at 5'11.25. He went up 5'11.75 after a guy named Glen (whatever happened to him?) posted a picture where Leo looked around 6'1". A week later, Glen reported a second sighting of Leo where Leo looked 5'10-5'11. Glen asked him about that, and Leo said something about "period shoes" (probably lifts). That's when Leo went down to 5'11.5 on here, where he has stayed ever since. I think he should go back to the original 5'11.25 listing, even though that fraction of an inch seems like splitting hairs.
sixfooter says on 24/Dec/14
Leo's 6 ft claims seem more realistic than Justin Timberlake's 6'1 claims
rockitbaby says on 24/Dec/14
@cole ok then. If Hill is 1,68m then Leo is around 1,80m. At the red carpet Leo looks way taller but when we see pics of them on their daily routine I can see a shorter difference. I think we all can say that Leo is a 1,80m guy. Pitt looks slightly taller though, like 1,82m or something.
Gx79 says on 23/Dec/14
Rob can he look 5'11 3/4,
[Editor Rob: he can look anywhere from a 5ft 11 to a 6ft at times, but generally I wouldn't guess barefoot he was over 5ft 11.5, and there is as much chance he falls a bit shy of that mark too.]
BOXOFFICEFLOP says on 23/Dec/14
Leo is 5'11 tops. It's very clear when he does films. He looks quite shorter than much taller actors who are like 6'2
Judd says on 23/Dec/14
Leonardo Dicaprio: 5'11.25"
Matt Damon: 5'9.5"
Brad Pitt: 5'10.5-11"
George Clooney: 5'10-10.25"
Samuel L Jackson: 6'1.25" (6'2" peak)
cole says on 23/Dec/14
@rockitbaby: Jonah is listed at a solid 168 cm, and looks about that, could argue 169 though but wouldn't go as high as 170. I think for Leo to be near 182, Jonah would have to be pretty much 170 cm. Mr.R thought Leo looked 179 cm when he saw him and Jonah, and figured Jonah for a 167 cm guy, but both Leo and Jonah could well be people who virtually drops a cm or so with a more care free stance. 168 and 180 is I think a fair shout for their respective measured heights. It doesn't quite look like a 5 inch difference between them, so 5ft 6.25 and 5ft 11. A strong 183 cm guy like Channing Tatum looks noticably taller than Leo compared to Jonah, and other 180 cm guys - Seth Rogen and Brad Pitt for example, looks the same as Leo with Jonah.
rockitbaby says on 22/Dec/14
Hill is what, 1,70m? He seems to be a little bit shrunken in these pics too. I found this one, in which you can see their shoes but they're not standing properly. Anyway, I'd give them a 10cm difference.

Click Here
cole says on 22/Dec/14
Click Here
I think someone used the top photo (original) to argue 6ft for Leo once.
The problem with a lot of photos that are shot up close like this is that they are easily distorted, so it's good when there's some kind of reference point, like there is in this one with the poster in the background. Leo's clearly shorter than Eastwood, 3 cm or so I'd say, and looked even shorter than this compared to him in some pictures from the set of J Edgar.
cole says on 22/Dec/14
Some caps of Leo and Jonah Hill from a youtube-clip (vote4stuff): Click Here Leo looks about 10 cm taller. They are standing/walking about in a studio, so that the ground is flat is safe to assume, but shame there's no visible footwear.
Adolf says on 20/Dec/14
Add some more movies pls.Gangs of new York, Aviator, Blood diamond.
[Editor Rob: there will come a time in 20 years if he keeps making good movies some of the names will have to make way for future films.]
rockitbaby says on 17/Dec/14
I agree with you all. These celebs sometimes look taller than they actually are when they're on premieres and other events but when you see them shooting or hanging out with friends they aren't that tall. The same with Leo. Seeing pics of him on the red carpet he really looks 1,83m to be honest but when you see him in other pics he's the classic 1,80m guy.
Peyman says on 16/Dec/14
I'd say
Leo : 180
matt damon : 176.5
brad pitt : 179
george clooney : 178

they could be 0.5cm shorter when going to sleep :)
Arch Stanton says on 16/Dec/14
He looks a weak 6 ft in Django next to Samuel L. Jackson, unless Samuel is sub 6'2 nowadays through age.
Johnny says on 14/Dec/14
Yep also look at pics of when hes not in these public events. Moreover, when you see him out and about with any of his freidns hes always a bit shorter than on these premieres. Also, for anyone thinking he is above this mark, look at other pics of him with Cate Blanchett and Leo with Tobey Maguire. Check out pics where he is with Tobey on some premieres, and then when he was with him on the Great Gatsby set. There, one can see what his actual height is. But, his lifts arent massive which is why he can look believeable on the premieres.

Minimum for him is 5'10.75 but nothing under that for sure. If that even, Maximum though is 5'11.25 I can see him being a consistent 180cm throughout the day too. Very interesting and good actor too. With a great career, Look at some of the best movies of the last decade, and he has been in quite a few of them. Itz crazy for someone to have such a good track record. Finally, check him out with Toni Garrn. Who is certainly no shorter then 184, and no taller than 185. He looks 4-5 cms shorter than her. Sometimes, albeit rarely even more. Rob, look at pics of him off the red carpet and such, and then youll see he looks shorter than a true 182.
Dmeyer says on 14/Dec/14
When you see Someone quikly when can easily get fulled , for example i saw a Guy. I pegged him 183/4cm then he claimed 182cm we stood near each other we were equal , for some reason a Guy who saw us but not together pegged him as taller than me and at about 6'1-2in , he gave me a taller impression than leo , while leo had more shoes so 5'11 is very possible
rockitbaby says on 11/Dec/14
Yeah, Leo is 1,80 but he can be 1,81 with the perfect posture in the morning. But 1,82m? Never.
AG says on 10/Dec/14
Cate Blanchett called her height : about 5'8, which means 5'8 is her maximum height. On that picture i would give her heels about 3 inches, which makes her 5'11. Leo looks just 1 inch taller than her and as i see he has regular shoes which give him 1-1.25 inches. Leo is between 5'10.75 - 5'11.
Johnny says on 9/Dec/14
Yep he prolly never dips below that, and if he does he only does so up to prolly like 179.9 But, other than that, he goes up to 180,9 too. WOuld you agree Rob?
Look at the pics of him and Tobey Maguire on the great gatsby set too
rockitbaby says on 8/Dec/14
Yeah, it's hard to say something because the angle changes from pic to pic. But I think it's fair to say he's a classic 1,80m guy.
johnny says on 8/Dec/14
Again though we are using the pic where the footwear is questionable look at other ones where leo looks the same if not slightly shorter
rockitbaby says on 7/Dec/14
Thinking like that, she would then be 1,81m with her heels and Leo would be 1,82 or 1,83m. She's still slightly shorter than Leo then.
Dmeyer says on 7/Dec/14
Her shoes give in the 6.5-7cm no more in that shot and leo has 2cm
rockitbaby says on 5/Dec/14
yeah, it depends on the angle and how they are posing. The same event, same shoes, one photo he looks taller and in the other one he looks shorter LoL but Blanchett is like 1,74, if she wears 10cm heels or higher she will be taller than him, unless his shoes are higher too.
Dmeyer says on 4/Dec/14
Click Here , same night as pic above she looks as tall if not 0.5in taller , her shoes shouldnt give more than 3in so 5'11.5 so 5'11.75-6ft shoes on for leo those dont give as mush as 1in so 5'11-11.25 is possible
rockitbaby says on 3/Dec/14
This is him with that guy from The Beach. Leo is slightly taller (both are bending, I know but still).

Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 3/Dec/14
@cole: in that picture he does look around 5ft11. But he's slouching while Blanchett is standing better.

Rob, is 5ft11 flat possible for Leo or do you still think he can clear can mark?
[Editor Rob: anywhere in 5ft 11-11.5 range is arguable, I've went with the top of that range as the guess.]
rockitbaby says on 3/Dec/14
Leo is as tall or shorter than Jean Dujardin, who claims to be 1,81m. Leo is 1,80, 1,81m TOPS. Look at him in the beach, next to his French co-star. He's a little bit taller and the guy is 1,76m.
cole says on 2/Dec/14
@Dmeyer: Yeah it isn't always easy to tell from a meeting like that, if you had stood with him for a while on flat ground it would have been much better. That you even managed to see Leo in public is quite the accomplishment though, he usually does everything in his power to pass by unnoticed!

@Rampage: I think somehow Cate is at a disadvantage in the above photo, can't quite put my finger on what it is though. Here's another where Leo should be at an advantage because of the angle the photo is shot from, but he looks only an inch or so taller. Cate is wearing similar heels to the ones she's wearing in the above photo: Click Here
Dmeyer says on 2/Dec/14
At Cole , i now think 5'11-11.25 is closer , i person he seemed 6'0.25 but had 0.5in more shoes and so 5'11.75 and had a baseball cap that could fulled me 0.5in so 5'11-11.5 is possible
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 1/Dec/14
He actually looks 6ft in the above picture. Blanchett is definitely hitting 5ft10+ territory in those heels and Dicaprio's shoes appear to be normally heeled.

I wouldn't go below 5ft11¼(181cm) for him and the current listing is probably closer.
cole says on 30/Nov/14
@Dmeyer: Agreed, but do you still think 5'11.5 is a fair shout? I honestly haven't seen a shred of viable evidence to suggest he could measure this close to 182 cm. 181 cm is the highest I'd go.
I take it you've seen the pictures of Nicholson, Wahlberg, DiCaprio and Damon at the 'The Departed' premiere, so here's one of Damon with Pitt: Click Here Looks quite like Leo vs Damon to me. Pitt might have the slightest footwear advantage, but he's also dropping a little in posture, so it should more or less make up for it really. I see a 180 cm guy and a 177 cm guy in that shot, and to me Leo looks no taller than what Pitt does compared to Damon. There could be some small differences that comes into play though, like in any case, but still I don't think this listing has a solid enough foundation of evidence to back it up, or maybe I've missed something?
Dmeyer says on 30/Nov/14
To me matt damon isnt under solid 177cm but leo can look 'anywere 180-181 with him
rockitbaby says on 29/Nov/14
Agree! 1,81m in the morning and 1,79m in the evening. With shoes he's 1,83m
cole 2 says on 28/Nov/14
Yeah sorry No I think you were first my bad
My name is cole though
But yeah by me Leo is like 180-179
How tall do you think his father is Rob? He looks to be quite a lot shorter. As does his mother thats why to me Leos huge growth is so odd and not only that but him being this height and not having lifts would be insane. Unless he got dem rlly good genes
Sponk says on 27/Nov/14
181 in the morning
180 during the day 100% KNOW THAT!
179,5 in the evening
cole says on 27/Nov/14
@cole: Could you add something to that nickname, so people can tell us apart? Or were you the first cole? :O
rockitbaby says on 26/Nov/14
Oh I thought that you meant he was the same height as him or 1,83m. He's not much shorter, true. 3, 4cm is a little difference =)
184.3cm says on 26/Nov/14
If he was measured 183cm in dress shoes then he is probably closer to 181cm if they were regular 2-2.5cm dress shoes and not extra thick ones. So i thought first a weak 5'11 (180cm flat) but now i think hes the full 5'11 as he looks very close to Nolan as well.
cole says on 26/Nov/14
@Dmeyer I think Leo is even a bit shorter though. Maybe 179. But, this is only true if people like matt damon are also like 175. Then he is most certainly 179. There is a lot of evidence suggesting matt damon is only 175 too. This guy is kind of hard to judge
Dmeyer says on 25/Nov/14
I meant zane is 184cm leo 181cm
rockitbaby says on 25/Nov/14
@Marcus in that pic I think he wasn't even at the 6'0 mark, was he? Anyway, with heels he's close to 1,83 so he's around 1,80, 1,81m tops!
marcus says on 24/Nov/14
in the wolf of wallstreet he was measured 183cm with dress shoes on(1 inch) so minus that he's 180cm he has bad posture too so he can look 5'10 most of the time
rockitbaby says on 23/Nov/14
Sorry, now the right link

Click Here
rockitbaby says on 23/Nov/14
@Dmeyer If Leo is anything close to 1,84 then Bradley Cooper is like 1,90, Jean Dujardin (who claims to be 1,81) is actually 1,85 and Tobey Maguire is 1,78m. This picture is not good to see their heights at all. This is another picture, just like this last one you sent and Zane is quite taller than Leo.

Click Here
Dmeyer says on 22/Nov/14
Click Here , for those who say he is mush shorter than zane whom i met and is near 184cm
rockitbaby says on 21/Nov/14
Leo seems slightly shorter than Zane in Titanic and during promotion of the film. Zane is what, 1,83m?

Click Here

Click Here
Judd says on 21/Nov/14
Lebensdorf says on 20/Nov/14
I think 5'11. Really no more than that. Billy Zane seemed taller in Titanic. Did they have scenes together in that movie? It's possible that he wasn't done growing at that point. Next to Armie Hammer, he looks between 5'11 and 6 feet even.

I agree. I think diCaprio is 5'11.25", so precisely as tall as Christopher Nolan.
In titanic, there were more than 1" between diCaprio and Zane, and the last one showed to be a realist 6'0.5" next to tall guys like James Cameron (6'2" in 1997) and David Warner (6'1.75-2" in 1997).
rockitbaby says on 20/Nov/14
@Cole yeah, I agree with you. So Leo is like 1,80m, perhaps 1,81m when he wakes up? Rob should get him short here LoL He's not 1,82m.
rmv says on 20/Nov/14
this is a generous listing. he is 179cm max. clearly shorter than nolan and next to tom hanks he's giving up at least 1.5 inches
Lebensdorf says on 20/Nov/14
I think 5'11. Really no more than that. Billy Zane seemed taller in Titanic. Did they have scenes together in that movie? It's possible that he wasn't done growing at that point. Next to Armie Hammer, he looks between 5'11 and 6 feet even.
cole says on 19/Nov/14
@rockitbaby: Yeah he likely would measure between those two marks, but I highly doubt he would measure any taller than the latter. Hanks always had him beat by about 2-3 cm when he still was near to his peak height, today he's clearly dropped a cm or so, and Leo with a hint more footwear and better posture suddenly looks the same or a tad taller. Dujardin, who claims 181 cm, is listed on this site as 180 cm - which is what he mostly looks - Leo looks the same as him or maybe even a tad shorter in premiere pics, when both are wearing similar footwear. In the film though he looked taller than Dujardin, and close in height with 6'0.5 Jon Favreau. In premiere pics with Favreau though, he looks noticably shorter. He definitely had lifts in some of the scenes in 'The Wolf of Wall Street', like he had in 'The Aviator' and in 'The Departed'.
rockitbaby says on 19/Nov/14
Leo is bending yeah but Benedict is also not in his right posture neither. He's taller than Leo. This is him next to Tom Hanks, who is listed as a 1,83m guy:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Now next to Jean Dujardin, who is 1,82m:

Click Here

Click Here

Leo is 1,80 or 1,81m.
abit over 180 and iam taller then 90% guys i meet says on 17/Nov/14
He looked pretty tall when was young(thanks to slim build) In the times when i dont care about anybodys height i believed that he was 185.
But nowdays- no way he is anything about 182 cause it means that he reachs 183 in the morning. He is still young but i think he obviously lost about 0,5cm.
In Gilbert Grail with Johny depp he was around 20+ and ended up growing. As i remember he was about 5cm taller then Johny, 6-max what i can brought so:
180.5-182.5 when he was young(evening-morning)
180-182 today(he can easly lose 2cm durng day since he is a bit overweighted atm)
Last verdict: 181
Dmeyer says on 13/Nov/14
His leg is bended near cumcerbatch could easily look as tall
rockitbaby says on 7/Nov/14
@Joe I agree Joe. He's the kind of guy who looks tall but he's the classic 1,80m guy. He's not shorter than that but he's also not 6' at all. This is him next to CUmberbatch, who's 1,83m. Clearly shorter.

Click Here
Joe says on 6/Nov/14
Di Caprio is not a full 6 foot tall as some publicists claim. He stood next to legit 6 footer Tom Hanks his co-star in Catch me if you Can several times, he stood about an inch shorter than Hanks, maybe a bit more. A British tabloid described DiCaprio as 5-10 with a very slender frame. I believe his taller than 5-10. Probably between 5'10.5" to 5'11". Definitely not a full 6 feet tall man, his rather skinny build makes him appear to be taller than he really actually is, still a very talented actor and lives a very charmed life.
guest says on 2/Nov/14
Jared, isn't the obviously taller guy in the middle listed at 6'1 and LD is wearing thick soled shoes
Dmeyer says on 30/Oct/14
This Guy can look 180 181 and 182
rockitbaby says on 30/Oct/14
For me, Leo is 1,80m, 1,81m tops! Unless Jean Dujardin is like 1,83m and Bradley Cooper is 1,88m or something close to that.
cole says on 29/Oct/14
@Jared: The ground is wonky and uneven to begin with and he's standing on a higher point than the others.
cole says on 28/Oct/14
@Editor Rob: Your thoughts on this? Click Here
Dmeyer says on 28/Oct/14
Jared in that pics he looks solid 184cm considering footwear
rockitbaby says on 28/Oct/14
@Jared I don't think so. Leo is never 1,85, at least in my view. Next to Jean Dujardin, who claims he's 1,81m, he's slightly shorter.

Click Here

Bradley Cooper is listed as 1,84m and Leo is quite shorter than him.

Click Here

And with his girlfriend, who's what? 1,81m? Or she's taller?

Click Here
Jared says on 27/Oct/14
What about this picture?Click Here
That's Christoph Waltz at the far right and he's 5'7 and Di Caprio looks a lot taller than him. I mean from 5'7 to 5'10 is just 3 inches and 3 inches doesn't look that big of a difference in real life. Now Jamie Foxx the black guy is 5'9 and still a lot shorter than 5'10-5'11 Di Caprio when in real life 1 inch is hardly noticeable. It looks like Di Caprio is 6'1 from this picture. What do you think?
rockitbaby says on 26/Oct/14
Leo is 1,80m. I'm convinced.
beau says on 26/Oct/14
His model girlfriend, who is ALWAYS taller than Di Caprio ( importantly, not wearing heels whatsover ), is 5'11.5. And all the pictures out there prove one thing: she is taller than Di Caprio.
sparta says on 24/Oct/14
i ilke he tall but i tall is 190 cm
6 feft
cole says on 23/Oct/14
Click Here
About mid way in the article it says: "At 5 ft. 11 in. and 175 lbs., he claims he can bench-press 205 lbs."
5ft10guy says on 19/Oct/14
How tall is his model girlfriend she looks taller then him
ARY says on 16/Oct/14
If you're a big A-lister you add 4-5cm to your height. Leo can't be taller than 181cm but most of his career he was talked about as if he was 185
Silent_D says on 15/Oct/14
181cm.
James B says on 11/Oct/14
These days leo is not that lean yet he still looks taller than 5'11 flat. When I first saw the beach thought he looked 6'1 in that film.
rockitbaby says on 7/Oct/14
This is Leo next to Guillaume Canet, who is listed 1,76m. Leo is the classic 1,80m guy.

Click Here
Dmeyer says on 7/Oct/14
Rob i use to think leo was 5'11.5-11.75 now i think 5'11-11.25 dinner time
[Editor Rob: 11.25 is always a real possibility]
Judd says on 7/Oct/14
I think Leo is 5'11.25" and Chris Nolan 5'11"
jtm says on 7/Oct/14
he would look shorter than nolan if nolan stood up straight.
Jack says on 6/Oct/14
I agree watterbottle. Not only that but Leo looks to be a bit shorter in some pics. Also Christopher is definetly not a lift wearer
waterbottle says on 6/Oct/14
Funny how Leo is listed at 6'0" nearly everywhere, but he he looks the same exact height as Christopher Nolan (great director btw), who is listed at 5'11" everywhere. I even think 5'11.5" is a bit generous. I would give him 5'10.75"-5'11", especially if we are factoring in NO footwear and if his hair was flattened down or shaven. There is obviously not a difference at all betweem Nolan and Leo:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here
John86 says on 5/Oct/14
beau, agencies have been known to downgrade heights as well as upgrade them to fit the ideal. They might say she is 180cm but she may be even taller, which is not desirable for clothing companies chasing the perfect 5'10 female model.
rockitbaby says on 5/Oct/14
@beau I've read a lot of websites that list her as 1,81m. But if she is this height then Leo is under 1,80m...
184.3cm says on 5/Oct/14
Classic 180cm guy. Look at that film, The Beach. He never looks Tallish only slightly above average. Didnt Tower his co-star either in Shutter Island and that guys what? 170cm? Ruffalo.
beau says on 4/Oct/14
I suggest you guys look at every single picture with his current model-girlfriend. She is ( as her modelling agency lists her ) 180 cm tall, and every time she looks taller than DiCaprio. Every. Single. Time.
PS Barefoot, to be precise.
rockitbaby says on 2/Oct/14
I think he's 1,80m or 1,81m. And he probably did grew up until his twenties =)
cole says on 2/Oct/14
According to Madame Tussauds Beijing, Leo is 4-5 inches taller than Depp: Click Here lol...
But it's not unlikely that he filled in a little after 18/19, however I very much doubt he grew more than an inch. Age 18/19: 5'10, fully grown: 5'11.
John86 says on 1/Oct/14
And might I say, Leo at 18 years old in What's Eating Gilbert Grape is an amazing example of a very late bloomer. He looks an inch shorter than 5'9 Depp and has the face of a 15 year old. He must have grown until he was about 23. He looked full adult height in Titanic, at 24.
John86 says on 1/Oct/14
Ah the classic 'my man has to be taller than me', but she forgot to mention the '...in heels' part at the end. :-) Typical example of a girl thinking her heel height is her actual height. Leo was taller than her/same height, no doubt about it.

5'11 for Leo is fair, no less than that.
rockitbaby says on 30/Sep/14
This picture was taken in 1993 and Leo was like 18,19. He's slightly taller than Depp and Depp is listed as 1,75m. Is it possible that Leo grew up 7cm after turning 18? I don't think so. He's 1,81 tops!

Click Here
Dmeyer says on 29/Sep/14
Évén thaugh he fooled me for about 6ft in person i think 5'11.25 is closer
jasperwazup says on 29/Sep/14
Leo is 181cm tops maybe 182 out of bed. I'm 178cm and people used to tell me I looked 182,183. Leo has a bigger forehead than me and slightly longer legs. I have a 30'' pant and was generally 28''-29'' at 13. about 5'7''-5'7.5''.
rockitbaby says on 28/Sep/14
@Jack hahahaha I agree, Leo is not 1,82m. Like, EVER. Correct this Rob! =) Some people say that Bradley is actually taller than 1,84m. How tall is Ben Affleck? Around 1,91m? Bradley seems to be 5cm shorter than Ben. That Makes Leo 1,80 tops!

Click Here

Click Here
Jack says on 26/Sep/14
Downgrade him Rob for the love of god. Get him to 179. Or at least 180. I mean look at all these evidence pics
Jack says on 25/Sep/14
rockitbaby
In that pic Leo looks around 6 cms shorter/ I would give him around 178 based on that pic alone. But Bradley likes lifts so I dont know for sure
cole says on 25/Sep/14
@rockitbaby: More like 179 or 180 in that pic, but no visible footwear.
Tyler says on 25/Sep/14
5'10.5 barefoot
5'11.5 footwear
6'0 with hair
Done
rockitbaby says on 24/Sep/14
If Bradley Cooper is really 1,84m, then Leo is 1,81m or 1,80m.

Click Here
rockitbaby says on 19/Sep/14
@lelman same picture by another angle. Leo is a little bit taller than Johnny. He's definitely 1,81 tops. Depp is like 1,78m.

Click Here
lelman says on 19/Sep/14
@rockitbaby Leo was what 18-19 there? It's possible he got an extra inch or so after that (not likely, but don't rule it out.) Depp might also be wearing lifts or something.

I think Leo is in the 180cm range for sure, and Depp is probably around 176.
rockitbaby says on 18/Sep/14
@Jason oh but I mean his actual height in the morning. Because during the day our heights usually get shorter. I think Leo is 1,80 or 1,81. But it's weird because Johnny Depp is listed as 5'10 in lots of places and he's as height as Leo here:

Click Here
guest says on 18/Sep/14
Baz's shoes looked diff in another pic.
Jason says on 17/Sep/14
rockitbaby
From that video Jean looks taller than Leo. So im going to say that hes 179. Definetly doesnt drop below that. But, he may early in the morning go above 180.
rockitbaby says on 17/Sep/14
Jean Dujardin claims he's 1,81m and they look pretty much the same height in the video below. I think Leo is 1,81m or 1,80m. I was exagerating by saying he was 1,83m.

Click Here
Jason says on 16/Sep/14
The only question is when are we going to get the downgrade. I would say a 3cm. downgrade. But 2 would also be appropriate from what I see.
Thoughts Rob?
[Editor Rob: 181 is a perfectly reasonable argument for Leo, he can look 5ft 11-11.5 generally.]
rockitbaby says on 15/Sep/14
@Marty Yeah, he's close to 6'0 in this pic but he's wearing shoes so he's probably around 5'11, tops.

@Jason you're right, Leo is probably 1,80 =)
Arch Stanton says on 15/Sep/14
Rob you might want to mention that in Catch Me If You Can (which is worth adding BTW as is The Aviator, Gangs of New York and Revolutionary Road) that his character was described as 6 ft and 160 pounds.
Jason says on 15/Sep/14
@Marty
While I do believe the guy is somewhere between 178-179 we cant say for certain whether or not he is in lifts. But, even if he isnt he is still slightly below 180. Because in that pic he is a bit lower and then those shoes lessen the heel a bit more than 1 inch.
Marty says on 14/Sep/14
@Rob, His chin is at the 5-0 mark & the top of his head is 6-0. This pic shows it.But he is wearing a 1 inch lift & a 1 inch thick sole so he is 5-10 in socks
https://twitter.com/martyX25/status/505219657800773634/photo/1
toad says on 14/Sep/14
Nope I stood next to his effigy at Sydney Darling Harbour madame tussauds.. he was also on a platform and was 2 inches shorter than me I am 6 ft. dicaprio is 5.9 at most if the wax works was accurate
Jason says on 14/Sep/14
@rockitbaby You cant take a pic like that for reference
Gisele is prolly 178-9 But the way they are walking sweks perception.
Look at her head her hips her shoes
all of them are slightly less than Leo i nthat pic she is down to 175. Leo doesnt look much taller than a 5'9 guy in that pic because of how much she drops.
177cmGuy says on 14/Sep/14
If he is 182cm he's closer to 6'0 then 5'11
rockitbaby says on 13/Sep/14
I think it's weird because Gisele is like 1,79m and she is more than 1cm shorter than Leo. Unless she's shorter than that.

Click Here
Paul says on 13/Sep/14
@Spencer : that's what i'm serching to say :)
Spencer says on 12/Sep/14
5'11 guy who looks 6 feet. I am a legit 5'11 and I can pass for 6 feet easily.
nguyen van kuyen says on 12/Sep/14
so..dicaprio is taller than beckham?
dante says on 10/Sep/14
All the pictures below me show clearly DiCaprio is nowhere above 180 cm early morning. Too much evidence of that + the confessions of all the modesl he was with, who clearly stated they were taller than he was ( for example Gisele Bundchen who claims 180 cm ).
cole says on 9/Sep/14
7/Sep/14 post: Click Here
ed says on 9/Sep/14
Rob, you listed Jon Bernthal as 180cm.

look at this photo of dicaprio and bernthal in The Wolf of Wall Street.
Click Here

a better look at their footwear
Click Here

i would say dicaprio is in the 179-180cm range.
Marty says on 8/Sep/14
@Rockitbaby Leo's head measures nearly 12 inches which is above average compared to the standard 9 inches. This makes him look taller.
[Editor Rob: Leo must be brothers with Maurice Tillet or Nicolai Valuev if his head is anywhere near that :)]
cole says on 7/Sep/14
@Red183: Yeah, I mean from chin to top of head when you look straight forward.
I would say 5'11 flat is the absolute most he looks with Waltz and Foxx in that particular shot.
I don't think this one with JGL and Cillian Murphy has been linked before: Click Here
Again he looks nothing over 5'11.
rockitbaby says on 6/Sep/14
@cole great picture to compare! If Robbie is 1,66m as it's listed here, I would say that Leo is definitely slightly above 1,80m. She's in the same height as his nose practically...there would be around 14 or 15cm of difference?
cole says on 6/Sep/14
I looked more closely on this scene from 'The Wolf of Wall Street': Click Here
Leo's loafer adds practically nothing, maybe not even 1 cm. Margot Robbie is barefoot, Bernthal's footwear looks like they could add about 3 cm. Mostly Bernthal looks give or take 4 cm taller than Leo in the scene. But there's not many moments when they have matching postures. I've added three of the better moments in the collage. Although some might think it, I don't think Leo's dropping more posture, it's just Bernthal who's tilting his eyelevel up and Leo who's tilting it down a little (tilting it down can add a cm or so depending on head shape - by tilting it up you could drop a cm, again depending on head shape). I'd say there's a good chance they'd measure close to the same height, and without seeing much of them together other than this, I wouldn't say Leo was near 2 cm taller. Too bad there weren't any full body shots in that scene of just Leo and Jon, that would have been very interesting.
rockitbaby says on 5/Sep/14
@Marty yeah, he's like 1,81m, very close to 1,83m as this pic shows.
Marty says on 4/Sep/14
DiCaprio is 5-10 flat foot. In this pick he is wearing a 1 inch lift in his dress shoes that have a 1 inch sole.
https://twitter.com/martyX25/status/505219657800773634/photo/1
cole says on 4/Sep/14
@Red183: Do you know your head lenght and eyeline? I'm near enough 180 cm (within 1-2mm) at my usual low and have a 24 cm / 9.5in long head, and an eyeline of 12 cm or so / 4.75in. 170 cm is pretty much bang on my eyebrows. I think Leo has an average sized head - somewhere in 9in range and seemingly 4.5in or so eyeline. I can't see how he'd measure much more than myself at his low unless he's dropping a little posture in most pics he's appeared 180 cm, which based on what I've seen seems to be in the majority.
Paul says on 3/Sep/14
@rockitbaby : no doubt , Leo height is around 180 cm at midday (barefoot) .
Marty says on 2/Sep/14
@Cole: That shot is from the actual movie. He has 1 inch soles on his dress shoes so he definitely is not 6 foot flat footed. With shoes he barely makes the 6 foot mark by a hair. Now if he is wearing a standard 1 inch lift, he is only 5-10 flat foot.
rockitbaby says on 2/Sep/14
@Paul I agree Paul! When I watched Gilbert Grape they were the same height and Leo was already older back then.

Click Here

I don't know how tall is Joseph Gordon-Levitt but he seems to be 1,76m and Leo is at least 5cm taller.

Click Here
Paul says on 2/Sep/14
@cole : yeah , 182 is impossible ! but the thing that impress me about Leo height ; when he was 19 years look 178 cm max with Deep !
Paul says on 2/Sep/14
@dante : right he's max 181 cm in the morning , midday around 180 cm ( barefoot)
dante says on 2/Sep/14
Guys, he is visibly shorter than Tom Hanks in "Catch me if you can", approx. 2-3 cm difference. With that in mind, I don't think you could find a better guess. He is definitely 180 cm.
Out of the context of standing near other people, seriously, he doesn't look when standing alone anything more than that. He simply doesn't even give an impression of someone taller than 180cm. Take, for example, Robert Pattinson who is 184 cm tall. Take him alone, again. He looks much taller than DiCaprio, which would again justify 180cm for DiCaprio.
There's too much evidence to suggest that DiCaprio is nowhere above 180cm ( ok, 181 at the max max most in the very morning, straight out of bed ).
cole says on 1/Sep/14
@Paul: Yeah I know. It's still nearer 182 cm than 181 cm though - hence why I think a 5'11.5 listing is too much.
rockitbaby says on 31/Aug/14
Jean Dujardin claims he's 1,81m and Leo is exactly his height...
Paul says on 31/Aug/14
@cole : 5ft 11.5in = 181.61 cm not 182 ;)
Paul says on 30/Aug/14
@cole : right , i think he could be [ 179.5 cm - 181 cm ] barefoot at midday .
cole says on 30/Aug/14
@Paul: I've seen 178, 179, 180 and 181 cm mentions on various sites. Some have him at 183 or 185 cm, the highest I've seen is 187 cm, but I haven't seen 182 cm on any other site than this. Personally I do think he can look in the upper 179 cm range at times, like 5'10.75, which is something he could measure late in the evening - but 5'10 flat is too low a guess. Mostly it looks like he hovers around 5'11 flat.
TJE says on 29/Aug/14
Never looked like he would pass for 6'0. 180-181/ strong 5'11.
cole says on 29/Aug/14
@Marty: Never seen it from that angle before, interesting. Is it from 'behind the scenes'? Maybe they shot that scene in a way that he would look a little over the 6ft mark, which he looked in the movie - but not in this shot. Another addition to the flat 5'11 case. Nice.
Paul says on 29/Aug/14
Click Here
Click Here
What do you think guys? :)
Marty says on 29/Aug/14
DiCaprio in this mug shot from his Wall Street flick is 6-0. Assume he is in standard 1 inch thick dress shoes with a 1 inch lift, so he might be 5-10 flat footed. https://twitter.com/martyX25/status/505219657800773634/photo/1
rockitbaby says on 26/Aug/14
It's complicated because we always base on other people's height. If their heights are not correct, then Leo is taller or shorter. It also depends on the angle, the shoes they're wearing, etc. Leo is taller than Cate in this picture but maybe she isn't 5'8 but shorter than that. Or he's as tall as Jean Dujardin and Jean is not 6'0 but 5'11. Anyway...I've read Jean saying that he's always been 1,81m.
Dmeyer says on 26/Aug/14
I agree leo with hill , cooper , macguire can look a 180.5cm/5'11 Guy no more
Jason says on 26/Aug/14
I agree with Cole. But he can look even only 11cms taller than Jonah. He does generall tower him, but Leo also has better posture, weighs less, uses more lifts, and all around has a head that gravitates everything. Also, with all pics of Jami Foxx and him, Foxx for some reason bends down like he deadlifted 150 kilos. So, Leo is only like 179.
cole says on 26/Aug/14
Damn it link, work!!! Kind of makes my whole rant fall apart when the link isn't working... I'll try again: Click Here
cole says on 25/Aug/14
I'm not usually a big fan of these rants that go on forever, and I tend to divert from doing them, but I want to ask a few questions, and speak my mind a bit.
It might be a little unnecessary, because I might already know the various answers, but here it goes...

@rockitbaby: You're right in that Leo mostly looks 12 cm taller than Jonah - who's listed, and looks 168 cm. Personally I think one of the ways that people are trying to rationalise Leo being a 182 cm guy, is by upgrading guys like Jonah to 170 cm. In my opinion - he's not. As far as I can tell he looks about 168 cm with every single person I've seen him with in decent shots. With Seth Rogen and Michael Fassbender for example, they look about the same height as Leo compared to Jonah. Seth's not 182 cm, Michael's not 182 cm - that's clear when stacking them up against many other celebs. On Blanchett I've said this before: her claim is "about 5'8" - isn't it more likely that she's 173 cm or under, rather than over? I haven't seen too much of her to be sure, but I feel like that's the consensus when someone is using the word "about" when referring to their height.

To everyone (please give your two cents on this picture as well @editor rob): I've posted it before, but it's definitely worth posting again, as most people sadly just kind of neglected it the first time: Click Here Frankly I'm a little stunned that it hasn't been mentioned at all - as I think it's one of the few good shots to argue Leo's height relative to others' - and one where I think it's hard to argue much over 180 cm, due to the reasons I am about to mention.

This is what I'm thinking. Feel free to explain why you agree/disagree, by posting better evidence, for example.
Going by the picture with Foxx, Waltz and Jackson alone, if Leo's in fact a legit 181-182 cm guy - it would mean both Jamie Foxx and Christoph Waltz are claiming 1-2 cm under their real height. Is it just me or is it more likely that Leonardo DiCaprio - a beloved Hollywood-star of many, many years is the one upgrading himself/being upgraded, rather than two (compared to Leo) relatively new Hollywood-faces downgrading themselves? Then there's a 187 cm (ish) - loosly standing Samuel L. Jackson, in less footwear - still looking about 5 cm taller than Leo. I understand that this is just one picture, and that there might be higher res pics from this event, from better angles - but this is the best I have to go on at the moment.

I feel like I'm being quite reasonable here - but then some might say I'm just deluded and insecure.
Let the record show: I'm not. I honestly believe 5'11 is an all around better shout than 5'11.5. I don't care more about what height Leo is listed at than anyone else, to me it just feels as though it's one of the more stand-out listings that examplifies a 0.5in generosity, when compared to others.

I guess my main questions are: how do you decide which people to give the benefit of the doubt, if you're guessing them between two marks, like say 5'11 and 5'11.5. Why go with the highest arguable height? Especially when personally you claim your lowest measured height. If we're talking about a morning measurement, then sure, I can see Leo measuring 5'11.5 or thereabouts, but it's not something he looks consistantly when actual pictures are being taken at events, premieres etc. Tell me if I'm wrong here, but aren't those events/premieres usually taking place in the evening?
Also I get that it's not possible to be 100% accurate, and say "he/she looks this and that much shorter/taller than him/her", when the people in question are wearing different footwear, having a different stance, different hair styles as well as the camera-angle could be questionable - but what makes you decide to go with 182 cm for DiCaprio and 170 cm for Christoph Waltz (for example) - when in nearly every picture, you couldn't really argue there being more than 10 cm between them?
dadang says on 25/Aug/14
He's only 5'9.5" (175cm) without shoes and 5'11.5" (181cm) with elevated shoes. End of the story.
rockitbaby says on 24/Aug/14
@cole It's true. But check this picture of him and Cate Blanchett in this page. She's very tall, around 1,74cm, and even with high heels she's shorter than Leo. Of course his shoes have at least 3cm of heels but he seems to be 1,82. And assuming Jonah Hill is like 1,70cm, I can see a 12cm difference in the link below and in the one you posted.

Click Here
cole says on 23/Aug/14
@rockitbaby: Garrn looks at least 3 cm taller there, but the photo is no good. In fact there are no good pictures of Leo and Toni Garrn to argue Leo's height to the cm, but have a look at the ones I posted on the 24th of June - in stature, Garrn appears noticably taller.
rockitbaby says on 21/Aug/14
In this picture she doesn't seem to be very taller than Leo. He's probably something between 1,81 and 1,83.

Click Here
James B says on 21/Aug/14
181cm is spot on. He's not small at the very upper end of average.
ikura says on 15/Aug/14
Toni Garrn is practically the same height as Karlie Kloss and Frida Gustavsson, who both seem to be 6'2. These three always tower over the majority of models. I bet shes at least 185.

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes in newspapers, books and resumes.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.