Nathan Jones Height
6ft 9 ¾ (207.6 cm)
Australian actor and wrestler known for appearing in Mad Max: Fury Road. In a WWE interview referred to himself "Here's a 6-foot-10 guy running through 2,000 people" and on his facebook mentioned his weight, saying "I'm 6 foot 10" and 350 pounds". He was also describe as "6'9" when fighting in Pride.
Photos by PR Photos
Photos by PR Photos
You May Be Interested
Kevin Nash
6ft 8 ¾ (205 cm)
6ft 8 ¾ (205 cm)
Tyler Mane
6ft 7 (201 cm)
6ft 7 (201 cm)
Tom Hardy
5ft 9 (175 cm)
5ft 9 (175 cm)
Hafthor Julius Bjornsson
6ft 7 ¾ (203 cm)
6ft 7 ¾ (203 cm)
Add a Comment679 comments
Average Guess (201 Votes)
6ft 9.49in (207cm)
6ft 9.49in (207cm)
Yas said on 19/Sep/23
He looks exactly the same as Conan Stevens in that pic. What are you looking at Sup?
He looks exactly the same as Conan Stevens in that pic. What are you looking at Sup?
Sup said on 31/May/23
He doesn’t looks taller than old Kevin nash who listed here 6ft8 3/4 and he is very probably in footwear advantage over nash.
Click Here
How can be this guy near 6ft10?
This is what he looks next to taker and big show
Click Here
Click Here
He doesn’t looks taller than old Kevin nash who listed here 6ft8 3/4 and he is very probably in footwear advantage over nash.
Click Here
How can be this guy near 6ft10?
This is what he looks next to taker and big show
Click Here
Click Here
Sup said on 29/May/23
if you want more proof he is easily over an inch shorter than 6ft10 3/4 list conan Stevens
Click Here
Considering the head size nathan here is at least 1.5 inch shorter. I never see nathan around 6ft10 espacially next to big show
if you want more proof he is easily over an inch shorter than 6ft10 3/4 list conan Stevens
Click Here
Considering the head size nathan here is at least 1.5 inch shorter. I never see nathan around 6ft10 espacially next to big show
Sup said on 27/May/23
Big Rob Watch this
Click Here
Nathan isn’t an inch taller than Matt morgan in his peak. I think a downgrade is necessary. This guy never looks near 6ft10 and for sure he wasn’t taller than peak Kevin nash
Click Here
Click Here
Big Rob Watch this
Click Here
Nathan isn’t an inch taller than Matt morgan in his peak. I think a downgrade is necessary. This guy never looks near 6ft10 and for sure he wasn’t taller than peak Kevin nash
Click Here
Click Here
Sup said on 25/May/23
Editor Rob
10.5-11 could be argued.
If nathan have a 10.5-11 inch long head big show have over 12 inch easily
Click Here
10 inch flat is ok for his head, however Rob he could looks 2 inch shorter easily than big show i think nathan is not over 6ft9 1/2
Editor Rob
10.5-11 could be argued.
If nathan have a 10.5-11 inch long head big show have over 12 inch easily
Click Here
10 inch flat is ok for his head, however Rob he could looks 2 inch shorter easily than big show i think nathan is not over 6ft9 1/2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Aug/22
Did he edge Nash though?
Did he edge Nash though?
SeanR said on 4/Aug/22
Here is Nathan Jones with 6’5” NFL listed Jon Heidenreich: Click Here
And near peak 6’7” undertaker in 2003: Click Here
Nathan peak: 6’9 1/4” (Maybe 6’9 1/2”); current 6’9”
Here is Nathan Jones with 6’5” NFL listed Jon Heidenreich: Click Here
And near peak 6’7” undertaker in 2003: Click Here
Nathan peak: 6’9 1/4” (Maybe 6’9 1/2”); current 6’9”
SeanR said on 24/Jul/22
Hi Rob,
The pic I posted back on 7/14 here with Chris Hemsworth is that proof Jones still is around 6’9”? (Looks like a 6 inch difference there) Time for a peak and current….
Maybe this will work:
Peak: 6’9 1/2”
Current: 6’9”
Never was convinced that Jones was 2.5 inches taller than a peak 6’7 1/4 Undertaker.
Hi Rob,
The pic I posted back on 7/14 here with Chris Hemsworth is that proof Jones still is around 6’9”? (Looks like a 6 inch difference there) Time for a peak and current….
Maybe this will work:
Peak: 6’9 1/2”
Current: 6’9”
Never was convinced that Jones was 2.5 inches taller than a peak 6’7 1/4 Undertaker.
Daniel Lee said on 17/Jul/22
@Rob i think your listings of wrestlers between 6'8 to 6'10 aren' too good like the wrestlers between 6'7 to 6'8
Big Cass 6'7 7/8
Giant Haystacks 6'7.75"
Akebono 6'7.75"
Kane 6'7 3/8
Undertaker 6'7 1/8
Daniel Lee said on 15/Jul/22
Peak heights:
Nathan Jones 206.7 cm
Kevin Nash 206 cm
Kurrgan 204.5 cm
Matt Morgan 204 cm
@Rob i think your listings of wrestlers between 6'8 to 6'10 aren' too good like the wrestlers between 6'7 to 6'8
Big Cass 6'7 7/8
Giant Haystacks 6'7.75"
Akebono 6'7.75"
Kane 6'7 3/8
Undertaker 6'7 1/8
Daniel Lee said on 15/Jul/22
Peak heights:
Nathan Jones 206.7 cm
Kevin Nash 206 cm
Kurrgan 204.5 cm
Matt Morgan 204 cm
Daniel Lee said on 15/Jul/22
Peak heights:
Nathan Jones 206.7 cm
Kevin Nash 206 cm
Kurrgan 204.5 cm
Matt Morgan 204 cm
Peak heights:
Nathan Jones 206.7 cm
Kevin Nash 206 cm
Kurrgan 204.5 cm
Matt Morgan 204 cm
SeanR said on 14/Jul/22
Recent pic with Nathan and 6’3” Chris Hemsworth: Click Here
Looks like Jones is still hanging on to 6’9” (maybe 6’9 1/4”) in his 50’s.
Rob would you agree?
Recent pic with Nathan and 6’3” Chris Hemsworth: Click Here
Looks like Jones is still hanging on to 6’9” (maybe 6’9 1/4”) in his 50’s.
Rob would you agree?
Rep said on 16/Jun/22
Rob
Nathan jones doesn’t look much taller than undertaker here
Click Here
I struggle to see 2 inch of difference but i doubt over 2. He looks very similar to Matt Morgan and he was also describe as 6ft9 in pride. I think 6ft9 or 6ft9 1/4 is much more believable than near 6ft10
Editor Rob
Rob
Nathan jones doesn’t look much taller than undertaker here
Click Here
I struggle to see 2 inch of difference but i doubt over 2. He looks very similar to Matt Morgan and he was also describe as 6ft9 in pride. I think 6ft9 or 6ft9 1/4 is much more believable than near 6ft10
Editor RobHe was struggling to look 6ft 10 there.
Ian C. said on 29/Mar/22
Guy can't be too bright, as he was an armed robber in Australia when he was a teenager and was caught. How could a man that tall hope to hide from the police? Also, how hard could it have been to identify him after the first robbery if the police were looking for an eighteen year old who was also a giant? That would narrow the suspect list down quite a bit.
Guy can't be too bright, as he was an armed robber in Australia when he was a teenager and was caught. How could a man that tall hope to hide from the police? Also, how hard could it have been to identify him after the first robbery if the police were looking for an eighteen year old who was also a giant? That would narrow the suspect list down quite a bit.
SeanR said on 14/Mar/22
Nathan and Matt Morgan looking pretty close in height with similar footwear: Click Here
Nathan either will need a downgrade or Morgan will need an upgrade.
Jones: 6’9 1/4”
Morgan: 6’8 3/4”
Nathan and Matt Morgan looking pretty close in height with similar footwear: Click Here
Nathan either will need a downgrade or Morgan will need an upgrade.
Jones: 6’9 1/4”
Morgan: 6’8 3/4”
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Dec/21
Full 6ft10 and flat 6ft9 are out the window....couple of inches on Taker and Kane but shorter than Big Show peak (today probably close)
Full 6ft10 and flat 6ft9 are out the window....couple of inches on Taker and Kane but shorter than Big Show peak (today probably close)
King Spattan said on 4/Nov/21
Rob,
If he and Big Show were face to face I still feel Big Show will be noticeably taller than Jones by at least 3 inches like it was years ago and what's your opinion on that??
Rob,
If he and Big Show were face to face I still feel Big Show will be noticeably taller than Jones by at least 3 inches like it was years ago and what's your opinion on that??
Bob jim said on 27/Oct/21
If you look at team Lesnar days in 2003, he looks a lot shorter than Big Show. I would say max 6’9 at peak.
If you look at team Lesnar days in 2003, he looks a lot shorter than Big Show. I would say max 6’9 at peak.
SeanR said on 27/Oct/21
My apologies Rob, this is the correct pic with Nathan Jones and Kane. Click Here
I see more that 2 inches if Jones tilts his head
Editor Rob
My apologies Rob, this is the correct pic with Nathan Jones and Kane. Click Here
I see more that 2 inches if Jones tilts his head
Editor RobCould be a bit more than 2 inches there
SeanR said on 23/Oct/21
Hi Rob,
I know this is not a good pic but if Nathan tilts his head upright he can look 2+ inches taller than current 6’6 3/4” Kane: Click Here
Do you think he can pass for 6’9” today even though he is 54 years old?
Editor Rob
Hi Rob,
I know this is not a good pic but if Nathan tilts his head upright he can look 2+ inches taller than current 6’6 3/4” Kane: Click Here
Do you think he can pass for 6’9” today even though he is 54 years old?
Editor RobTaker? I thought it was Bloom looking within 2 inches.
King Spattan said on 21/Oct/21
Rob,
I used to believe he really was 6'11" he sure looks like he could pass as that until I saw him Next to Big Show anyways how long do you think his head is??
Editor Rob
Rob,
I used to believe he really was 6'11" he sure looks like he could pass as that until I saw him Next to Big Show anyways how long do you think his head is??
Editor Rob10.5-11 could be argued.
FriedChicken said on 28/Sep/21
6'9 1/2 looks better.
6'9 1/2 looks better.
King Spattan said on 19/Sep/21
Rob,
If he is 6'9" Big Show does look 7'1" he always did look taller by much but it was years back I don't know now?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob,
If he is 6'9" Big Show does look 7'1" he always did look taller by much but it was years back I don't know now?
Click Here
Editor RobMaybe that angle helps Big Show, a bit of a tilt.
MichaelMyers said on 14/Sep/21
6'10" easy for peak. But being in his mid 50s now, and having lifted weights much of his life, he's most likely lost height by now. Plus super tall people often times tend to lose height earlier on in life.
6'10" easy for peak. But being in his mid 50s now, and having lifted weights much of his life, he's most likely lost height by now. Plus super tall people often times tend to lose height earlier on in life.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jul/21
Below 6ft9 is a joke
Below 6ft9 is a joke
Lee Parker said on 28/Jul/21
Yes big show would have been peak in 2003. He was 31 back then and 7 foot. Nathan looks 6ft 10 easy
Yes big show would have been peak in 2003. He was 31 back then and 7 foot. Nathan looks 6ft 10 easy
Alex 6'0 said on 25/Jul/21
Looked 2 inches shorter than Big show in 2003. Big show wouldn't been his peak then. I can see jones 6'9 range then
Looked 2 inches shorter than Big show in 2003. Big show wouldn't been his peak then. I can see jones 6'9 range then
Riccardo89 said on 18/May/21
I consider 6'9.75 way to high honestly. Looking at facts now, opposite to what i used to think 20 years ago whatcing WWE with other eyes , i believe he wasnt taller than 6'8"/6'8.5. No way in my opinion.
I consider 6'9.75 way to high honestly. Looking at facts now, opposite to what i used to think 20 years ago whatcing WWE with other eyes , i believe he wasnt taller than 6'8"/6'8.5. No way in my opinion.
Undertaker Frank said on 12/May/21
He didnt have 3 inches on The Undertaker I dont believe hes 6ft 9
He didnt have 3 inches on The Undertaker I dont believe hes 6ft 9
recapa said on 26/Mar/21
6ft9.25-6ft9.5.
6ft9.25-6ft9.5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Dec/20
A guy like him would be capable of fluctuating more than an inch
A guy like him would be capable of fluctuating more than an inch
Canson said on 3/Dec/20
I’d go right around the average guess of 6’9.43 and say his peak was 6’9.25-6’9.5 afternoon height. So effectively he’d be near 6’10.5 out of bed making his 6’10” claim a decent early morning measurement
I’d go right around the average guess of 6’9.43 and say his peak was 6’9.25-6’9.5 afternoon height. So effectively he’d be near 6’10.5 out of bed making his 6’10” claim a decent early morning measurement
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 26/Nov/20
NJ look more 6'9 1/4 with some 5'9 actors comparison. If he did not lost any height i did go with solid 6'9 1/2 if he get measure not less but not over.
NJ look more 6'9 1/4 with some 5'9 actors comparison. If he did not lost any height i did go with solid 6'9 1/2 if he get measure not less but not over.
OriginalAnon said on 11/Nov/20
He didn't look 3 and 3 quarter inches taller than Magnus Samuelson.
He didn't look 3 and 3 quarter inches taller than Magnus Samuelson.
recapa said on 2/Nov/20
206cm guy .similar to peak kevin nash
206cm guy .similar to peak kevin nash
SeanR said on 22/Oct/20
Hi Rob,
I am torn on Nathan Jones height because either he is going to need to be downgraded or Matt Morgan will need to be upgraded.
I recently watched a video on youtube titled: “Brock Lesnar Big Show vs APA 10 30 03”, and from the 6:03 to 6:14 mark it just looks like they are way too close in height. And their footwear is very similar also.
I hope other guests here can post the video as proof but I just can’t imagine Jones being a full inch taller than Matt Morgan. I’d say 1/2 inch difference at best between the two.
I am seeing 3 potential options:
a) Jones 6’9 1/2”, Morgan 6’9”
b) Jones 6’9 1/4”, Morgan 6’8 3/4” (This is the best option)
c) Jones 6’9”, Morgan 6’8 1/2”
If I am wrong, I’m wrong. I just haven’t see pics with Jones being 6’9 3/4” or 6’10”. And if he is that tall Morgan will need to be upgraded again also.
Hi Rob,
I am torn on Nathan Jones height because either he is going to need to be downgraded or Matt Morgan will need to be upgraded.
I recently watched a video on youtube titled: “Brock Lesnar Big Show vs APA 10 30 03”, and from the 6:03 to 6:14 mark it just looks like they are way too close in height. And their footwear is very similar also.
I hope other guests here can post the video as proof but I just can’t imagine Jones being a full inch taller than Matt Morgan. I’d say 1/2 inch difference at best between the two.
I am seeing 3 potential options:
a) Jones 6’9 1/2”, Morgan 6’9”
b) Jones 6’9 1/4”, Morgan 6’8 3/4” (This is the best option)
c) Jones 6’9”, Morgan 6’8 1/2”
If I am wrong, I’m wrong. I just haven’t see pics with Jones being 6’9 3/4” or 6’10”. And if he is that tall Morgan will need to be upgraded again also.
SeanR said on 8/Oct/20
Hi Rob,
Could 6’9 1/2” peak for Nathan work or do you feel he is still close to 6’10”?
Editor Rob
Hi Rob,
Could 6’9 1/2” peak for Nathan work or do you feel he is still close to 6’10”?
Editor RobIt's one possibility
FrankR1 said on 14/Sep/20
In 2003, Nathan Jones looked about 1.5 inches taller than the legit 6’8” Mark Calloway (Undertaker). I’d put Jones at 6’9.5” to 6’9.75” peak.
In 2003, Nathan Jones looked about 1.5 inches taller than the legit 6’8” Mark Calloway (Undertaker). I’d put Jones at 6’9.5” to 6’9.75” peak.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 1/Sep/20
I use to think he was only 6'8-6'8 3/4 range but found out he would be taller than that if get measure. Perhaps 6'9 now at worst and 6'9 3/4 was really a peak height. 6'6-6'7 is a joke.
I use to think he was only 6'8-6'8 3/4 range but found out he would be taller than that if get measure. Perhaps 6'9 now at worst and 6'9 3/4 was really a peak height. 6'6-6'7 is a joke.
6'3 Julian said on 29/Aug/20
Gotta be lower. He was billed 6’10, which means he’s 6’6-7 most likely
Gotta be lower. He was billed 6’10, which means he’s 6’6-7 most likely
Josh D said on 25/Aug/20
Nathan is definitely 6ft 9+
I was fortunate to walk past him on the street in our home town of the gold coast. I stand about 1.8m and he was just unbelievable to look at.
I think photos can be deceiving until you see someone with your eyes
Nathan is definitely 6ft 9+
I was fortunate to walk past him on the street in our home town of the gold coast. I stand about 1.8m and he was just unbelievable to look at.
I think photos can be deceiving until you see someone with your eyes
SeanR said on 19/Aug/20
Nathan Jones could be as low as 6’8 3/4” today. The pic with Kevin Nash on this page looks to show he is sub 6’9”.
However there is a pic with Shad Gaspard on this site also where he looks at or above 6’9”. Really hard to nail down his exact height currently.
At peak I believe he was 6’9 1/4”.
Nathan Jones could be as low as 6’8 3/4” today. The pic with Kevin Nash on this page looks to show he is sub 6’9”.
However there is a pic with Shad Gaspard on this site also where he looks at or above 6’9”. Really hard to nail down his exact height currently.
At peak I believe he was 6’9 1/4”.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 28/Jul/20
Rob, don't you think NJ already lost a 1/2? He seem taller in the 2000s than the 2010s.
Editor Rob
Rob, don't you think NJ already lost a 1/2? He seem taller in the 2000s than the 2010s.
Editor Robyeah it's not ruled out
Riky said on 27/Jul/20
Look at 6'10"1/4 basketball player C. Bosh next to 6'7"1/4-1/2 k.love.
Than look at max 6'7" probably 6'6.5 undertaker in 2003 next to Nathan Jones.
Nathan Jones was never more than 6'8.5 in my opinion, clearly not 6'10"
Look at 6'10"1/4 basketball player C. Bosh next to 6'7"1/4-1/2 k.love.
Than look at max 6'7" probably 6'6.5 undertaker in 2003 next to Nathan Jones.
Nathan Jones was never more than 6'8.5 in my opinion, clearly not 6'10"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jul/20
Full 6ft10 and flat 6ft9 are unlikely
Full 6ft10 and flat 6ft9 are unlikely
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 9/Jul/20
At most i buy him being 6'9 1/2 peak during his wrestling days and already down to 6'9 in his early 40s since he get describe at 6'9 and claim 6'10 several times. 6'8 3/4 is the impression he give to me when compare to some well known bollywood actors, current 6'6 3/4 Kane and honest 5'9 Tom Hardy but he could be 6'9 when get measure. The full picture with Michael Jai White he tilt down his face level could have make a shorter impression to me although he look struggle 6'8 1/4-6'8 1/2 but if he looking straight i doubt under 22cm taller than 184cm Michael. If MJW is legit 6'0 1/2 also Nathan could be as high 6'9 1/4 and maybe this listing is legit peak for him, for sure he was always a weak 6'10.
At most i buy him being 6'9 1/2 peak during his wrestling days and already down to 6'9 in his early 40s since he get describe at 6'9 and claim 6'10 several times. 6'8 3/4 is the impression he give to me when compare to some well known bollywood actors, current 6'6 3/4 Kane and honest 5'9 Tom Hardy but he could be 6'9 when get measure. The full picture with Michael Jai White he tilt down his face level could have make a shorter impression to me although he look struggle 6'8 1/4-6'8 1/2 but if he looking straight i doubt under 22cm taller than 184cm Michael. If MJW is legit 6'0 1/2 also Nathan could be as high 6'9 1/4 and maybe this listing is legit peak for him, for sure he was always a weak 6'10.
SeanR said on 1/Jul/20
Hi Rob,
Do you think that Jones is 2.5 inches taller than a 6’7.25” peak Undertaker?
I think 6’9 1/4” peak seems likely as he was barely taller than a 6’8 3/4” peak Matt Morgan.
Editor Rob
Hi Rob,
Do you think that Jones is 2.5 inches taller than a 6’7.25” peak Undertaker?
I think 6’9 1/4” peak seems likely as he was barely taller than a 6’8 3/4” peak Matt Morgan.
Editor RobI can see why 2.5 inches seems possible as a difference. The more I seen of Jones, the less a full 6ft 10 became, but how much closer to 6ft 9 flat he might be is another matter.
Riky said on 19/Jun/20
He looked 6'8" next to Kane few years ago
He looked 6'8" next to Kane few years ago
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/Jun/20
Nothing change the fact of Nathan's real barefoot height is 205 cm unless Michael Jai White is more than 6'0 1/2.
Nothing change the fact of Nathan's real barefoot height is 205 cm unless Michael Jai White is more than 6'0 1/2.
SeanR said on 11/May/20
Check out Nathan Jones instagram: rictus_erectus.
There’s a pic with him and Jason Mamoa that was posted recently. Mamoa is 6’3.5” range and Nathan looks about 5.5 inches taller (If you take out Mamoa’s hat)
Nathan can still pull off 6’9” range. Just not sure of 6’9.75” or 6’10” at peak
Check out Nathan Jones instagram: rictus_erectus.
There’s a pic with him and Jason Mamoa that was posted recently. Mamoa is 6’3.5” range and Nathan looks about 5.5 inches taller (If you take out Mamoa’s hat)
Nathan can still pull off 6’9” range. Just not sure of 6’9.75” or 6’10” at peak
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 8/May/20
@Canson I bet he was never 6'10. He might have lost a fraction was 6'9 peak but took some look at him with a few well known bollywood star he can look from 6'8 1/4 to 6'8 3/4 range never a big 6'9 with them also no chance he hit it with an honest chad like legit 5'9 Tom Hardy. I don't understand why Rob lack of looking in Nathan's height, there is no way he is this close to 6'10 Big Show.
@Canson I bet he was never 6'10. He might have lost a fraction was 6'9 peak but took some look at him with a few well known bollywood star he can look from 6'8 1/4 to 6'8 3/4 range never a big 6'9 with them also no chance he hit it with an honest chad like legit 5'9 Tom Hardy. I don't understand why Rob lack of looking in Nathan's height, there is no way he is this close to 6'10 Big Show.
Canson said on 1/May/20
@Junior: I think he’s lost height. He’s not 208cm if he ever was. Probably True 6’9 range 6’9-6’9.5
@Junior: I think he’s lost height. He’s not 208cm if he ever was. Probably True 6’9 range 6’9-6’9.5
Canson said on 1/May/20
@Junior: I think he’s lost height. He’s not 208cm if he ever was.
@Junior: I think he’s lost height. He’s not 208cm if he ever was.
Michael186 said on 1/May/20
This guy's really hard to pin down. In MMA he looked about 205cm, but in wrestling he could look as high as 209-210. Maybe the boots?
I'm going with 207 barefoot.
This guy's really hard to pin down. In MMA he looked about 205cm, but in wrestling he could look as high as 209-210. Maybe the boots?
I'm going with 207 barefoot.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 1/May/20
If NJ get another downgrade at 6'9 that would be fine. His lowest might be just 6'8 3/4 had compare him enough with solid 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White, 5'9 Tom Hardy and 6'8 1/2 Kevin Nash and some well known bollywood actors. 6'9 and 3/4 is so much over listed.
If NJ get another downgrade at 6'9 that would be fine. His lowest might be just 6'8 3/4 had compare him enough with solid 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White, 5'9 Tom Hardy and 6'8 1/2 Kevin Nash and some well known bollywood actors. 6'9 and 3/4 is so much over listed.
Undertaker Frank said on 5/Apr/20
If Taker was no more than 6ft 6 Jones did not look 3 inches taller i would say less than 2 inches between them so 6ft 9 would be out of the Question
If Taker was no more than 6ft 6 Jones did not look 3 inches taller i would say less than 2 inches between them so 6ft 9 would be out of the Question
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 23/Mar/20
@Rampage Those 6'7-6'8 wrestler were usually over listed. Just one example of Matt Morgan more 6'8 than his 6'10-6'11 claim. Perhaps Nathan Jones did not look a full 6'9 with legit 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White and legit 5'9 Tom Hardy. I did guess him 6'8 1/2 worst case and 6'8 3/4 a high chance.
@Rampage Those 6'7-6'8 wrestler were usually over listed. Just one example of Matt Morgan more 6'8 than his 6'10-6'11 claim. Perhaps Nathan Jones did not look a full 6'9 with legit 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White and legit 5'9 Tom Hardy. I did guess him 6'8 1/2 worst case and 6'8 3/4 a high chance.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Mar/20
Under 6ft9 is a joke. He’s noticeably taller than 6ft7-8 guys in wrestling
Under 6ft9 is a joke. He’s noticeably taller than 6ft7-8 guys in wrestling
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 4/Mar/20
Flat 6'8 is a bit too low. Unless M.J.W is a weak 6'0 1/2.
Flat 6'8 is a bit too low. Unless M.J.W is a weak 6'0 1/2.
Riccardo5'7 said on 15/Feb/20
He is 6 foot 8, and I don't get the 0.25 downgrade
He is 6 foot 8, and I don't get the 0.25 downgrade
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 14/Feb/20
Nathan Jones 205cm for sure and 207.6cm with sneakers on. Nash is 204cm maybe 1/8th more at most. 6'9 1/2-6'10 barefoot is bs.
Nathan Jones 205cm for sure and 207.6cm with sneakers on. Nash is 204cm maybe 1/8th more at most. 6'9 1/2-6'10 barefoot is bs.
Robbe said on 19/Jan/20
6'10 Pekka Markkanen with 6'6.5 Jari Raitanen.
Click Here
Nathan may be 6'8 in a good day.
6'10 Pekka Markkanen with 6'6.5 Jari Raitanen.
Click Here
Nathan may be 6'8 in a good day.
Robbe said on 18/Jan/20
This guy is heavily overlisted, like all dudes in WWE. Nathan here with 6'6 John Heidenreich, compared to 6'10 listed Joonas Suotamo with 6'6 Spencer Wilding.
Click Here
These guys supposed to be within 0.25in lol.
This guy is heavily overlisted, like all dudes in WWE. Nathan here with 6'6 John Heidenreich, compared to 6'10 listed Joonas Suotamo with 6'6 Spencer Wilding.
Click Here
These guys supposed to be within 0.25in lol.
SeanR said on 12/Jan/20
I still think 6’9.75” might still be too high for Nathan.
Definitely 6’9” or 6’9.25” but not more than that. I wish Vegas would repost those Nathan Jones Matt Morgan pics out of gear from a few years back. Didn’t see more than .5 inch difference between the two.
And the recent pic with Nash and Jones didn’t look like Jones having an inch advantage.
I still think 6’9.75” might still be too high for Nathan.
Definitely 6’9” or 6’9.25” but not more than that. I wish Vegas would repost those Nathan Jones Matt Morgan pics out of gear from a few years back. Didn’t see more than .5 inch difference between the two.
And the recent pic with Nash and Jones didn’t look like Jones having an inch advantage.
Deathvalley99 said on 12/Jan/20
Rob, if you wouldn't think he seemed taller than nash did, how likely is 6ft9 1/2 ? Kevin nash peak height is 6ft9 1/2
Rob, if you wouldn't think he seemed taller than nash did, how likely is 6ft9 1/2 ? Kevin nash peak height is 6ft9 1/2
Deatvalley99 said on 10/Jan/20
rob, honestly who do you think gives a taller impression, peak Kevin Nash or peak Nathan jones?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
rob, honestly who do you think gives a taller impression, peak Kevin Nash or peak Nathan jones?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor RobI think Nathan weak 6ft 10 is believable, I wouldn't think he seemed taller than nash did.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jan/20
9ft9½-10...I like it Rob
9ft9½-10...I like it Rob
Deathvalley99 said on 8/Jan/20
6ft9 1/2 is a better list. He was describe as 6ft9 in pride and he was 2 inches taller than the undertaker. A full 6ft10 always is too much
6ft9 1/2 is a better list. He was describe as 6ft9 in pride and he was 2 inches taller than the undertaker. A full 6ft10 always is too much
Alex Katch said on 6/Jan/20
I think that guy is 6ft 9in (206cm) barefoot and 6ft 10in (208cm) in shoes
I think that guy is 6ft 9in (206cm) barefoot and 6ft 10in (208cm) in shoes
Xpac99 said on 13/Dec/19
Rob if you imagine nathan jones today face to face vs the young kevin nash i don’t believe that you think he’s taller
Editor Rob
Rob if you imagine nathan jones today face to face vs the young kevin nash i don’t believe that you think he’s taller
Editor RobHe may not be, could be close in height for peak Nash, I can see a case for Jones between 9ft 9.5 and 10
Mikey97 said on 29/Nov/19
6'9" is more accurate
6'9" is more accurate
James B 172cm said on 29/Nov/19
imagine a 1994 kevin nash standing in his ring gear next too nathan jones in that photo
imagine a 1994 kevin nash standing in his ring gear next too nathan jones in that photo
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 29/Nov/19
I did say Nash and Nathan is the same height both 6'10 with wrestling boots on. Barely 204cm not judging by the comparison picture. 6'6 1/2-3/4 Kane did not even look 2" shorter than NJ. 6'9-6'10 is out.
I did say Nash and Nathan is the same height both 6'10 with wrestling boots on. Barely 204cm not judging by the comparison picture. 6'6 1/2-3/4 Kane did not even look 2" shorter than NJ. 6'9-6'10 is out.
Xpac99 said on 27/Nov/19
Click Here
This is the pic and nash is in footwear disadvantage! Rob, nathan jones needs a current height
Editor Rob
Click Here
This is the pic and nash is in footwear disadvantage! Rob, nathan jones needs a current height
Editor RobIt's tricky with a photo like that, the camera is to the right of Nash, so he's at an advantage.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Nov/19
Sub-6ft9 is a joke
Sub-6ft9 is a joke
Xpac99 said on 10/Nov/19
Torday as tall as Kevin nash in recent pic whit him. 6ft8 1/2, 6ft9
Torday as tall as Kevin nash in recent pic whit him. 6ft8 1/2, 6ft9
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Sep/19
Weak 6'9. If he get a downgrade at 6'9 is fine but with 184cm Michael Jai White comparison had prove him deadly on the 205cm and 6'10 in shoes.
Weak 6'9. If he get a downgrade at 6'9 is fine but with 184cm Michael Jai White comparison had prove him deadly on the 205cm and 6'10 in shoes.
Roderick said on 15/Sep/19
@edwards Yeah, he's definitely not 6'10".
Also, you previously stated how you thought Kane looked 6'7" if Nathan Jones was 6'10", so now that you think he's 6'9", wouldn't that mean you think Kane now looks 6'6" with Jones? Kane had perfect posture, too, in that shot.
@edwards Yeah, he's definitely not 6'10".
Also, you previously stated how you thought Kane looked 6'7" if Nathan Jones was 6'10", so now that you think he's 6'9", wouldn't that mean you think Kane now looks 6'6" with Jones? Kane had perfect posture, too, in that shot.
John barrett said on 14/Sep/19
Nathen had a pic taken not to long ago with Wrestler Kevin Nash - Nash is reported to be 6'9 or just under, these days Nathen didn't look any taller then 6'8''
Nathen had a pic taken not to long ago with Wrestler Kevin Nash - Nash is reported to be 6'9 or just under, these days Nathen didn't look any taller then 6'8''
edwards said on 10/Sep/19
actually ,i changed my mind on his height.yes i agree max he canbe at peak is 6'9
actually ,i changed my mind on his height.yes i agree max he canbe at peak is 6'9
Roderick said on 9/Sep/19
I suppose 6'8.5" is reasonable. He has looked as low as 6'8" at times.
I suppose 6'8.5" is reasonable. He has looked as low as 6'8" at times.
Dan Trojan said on 7/Sep/19
If i was to guess his height i would say 6'8" 6'9" max let's not forget he never looked more than 1.5 inches taller than the undertaker i agree 6'10" is too high
If i was to guess his height i would say 6'8" 6'9" max let's not forget he never looked more than 1.5 inches taller than the undertaker i agree 6'10" is too high
Mo Obeidallah said on 29/Aug/19
Michael Jai White was also wearing shoes lol
Michael Jai White was also wearing shoes lol
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 26/Aug/19
Michael Jai White comparison have already proven 6'8 1/2 a low for Nathan since he got a bit shoe advantage than Michael. 6'10 its a boots height he claim or wrestling billed height.
Michael Jai White comparison have already proven 6'8 1/2 a low for Nathan since he got a bit shoe advantage than Michael. 6'10 its a boots height he claim or wrestling billed height.
kr0t0n said on 26/Aug/19
@Sotiris Gravas
So we both agree, that Jones has never been 6'10, right?
@Sotiris Gravas
So we both agree, that Jones has never been 6'10, right?
Canson said on 25/Aug/19
Nathan Jones never looks as low as 6’6”. I doubt less than 6’8-6’9 worst case
Nathan Jones never looks as low as 6’6”. I doubt less than 6’8-6’9 worst case
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Aug/19
He was listed 6'9" in Pride, I doubt he would be underlisted like that.
He was listed 6'9" in Pride, I doubt he would be underlisted like that.
Sotiris Gravas said on 23/Aug/19
@krOtOn Dude, I already posted that Charlize Theron pic... Don't forget that she's wearing heels:
Click Here , Click Here , Click Here (I hope ppl w/ a foot fetish enjoyed those pics.)
@krOtOn Dude, I already posted that Charlize Theron pic... Don't forget that she's wearing heels:
Click Here , Click Here , Click Here (I hope ppl w/ a foot fetish enjoyed those pics.)
kr0t0n said on 22/Aug/19
Nathan Jones and Charlize Theron
Click Here
Jones is half a head taller than her. Theron is 177 cm (5'9.3/4).
Her page: Click Here
Now do the math: if Jones is really 6'10 (as he likes to claim in interview), he would tower over her even more so - full head. Therefore he cannot be 6'10, not in his prime, not today. 6'6-6'7 is possible, but not bigger.
His wife: Click Here
Fawn Tran is short and tiny - 5'1. Huge contrast in height and size.
Click Here
Such a huge guy should be paired with someone like Gwendoline Christie, that would be a perfect match.
Nathan Jones and Charlize Theron
Click Here
Jones is half a head taller than her. Theron is 177 cm (5'9.3/4).
Her page: Click Here
Now do the math: if Jones is really 6'10 (as he likes to claim in interview), he would tower over her even more so - full head. Therefore he cannot be 6'10, not in his prime, not today. 6'6-6'7 is possible, but not bigger.
His wife: Click Here
Fawn Tran is short and tiny - 5'1. Huge contrast in height and size.
Click Here
Such a huge guy should be paired with someone like Gwendoline Christie, that would be a perfect match.
SeanR said on 19/Aug/19
Nathan Jones height is all over the place here on this site: anywhere between 6’6” to 6’10”. No doubt Nathan wakes up to this day at age 50 at 6’10”. Probably down today to 6’8.5” or 6’8.75”. Peak height 6’9” or 6’9.25”
Nathan Jones height is all over the place here on this site: anywhere between 6’6” to 6’10”. No doubt Nathan wakes up to this day at age 50 at 6’10”. Probably down today to 6’8.5” or 6’8.75”. Peak height 6’9” or 6’9.25”
Hopping hopper said on 16/Aug/19
6-9.5 imo. Definitely over 6-9.
6-9.5 imo. Definitely over 6-9.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 15/Aug/19
If Nathan Jones is 6'10 then Michael Jai White is 6'2 max and Tom Hardy max 5'10.5".
If Nathan Jones is 6'10 then Michael Jai White is 6'2 max and Tom Hardy max 5'10.5".
kr0t0n said on 2/Aug/19
Click Here
On this video you see, that Undertaker and Jones were the same height. The video was made in march of 2003. Undertaker was in his prime and stood 6'7. Therefore Nathan Jones stood 6'7 either. Now both of them grew old pretty much and lost fraction of their height. Undertaker barely stands 6'6 in the age of 54, perhaps Jones shrinked to 6'6 either.
Click Here
On this video you see, that Undertaker and Jones were the same height. The video was made in march of 2003. Undertaker was in his prime and stood 6'7. Therefore Nathan Jones stood 6'7 either. Now both of them grew old pretty much and lost fraction of their height. Undertaker barely stands 6'6 in the age of 54, perhaps Jones shrinked to 6'6 either.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 22/Jul/19
@Rampage with 6'0.25-6'0.5" Michael Jai White he had no chance to reach up a full 6'9 for measurement.
@Rampage with 6'0.25-6'0.5" Michael Jai White he had no chance to reach up a full 6'9 for measurement.
Johan 185 cm said on 22/Jul/19
Click Here
Tara Reid would be around 5'8" in those platform heels that day. He looks easily a foot taller, somewhere between 6'9.5"-6'10". Big guy.
Click Here
Tara Reid would be around 5'8" in those platform heels that day. He looks easily a foot taller, somewhere between 6'9.5"-6'10". Big guy.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jul/19
Not under 6ft9, over it quite likely…
Not under 6ft9, over it quite likely…
Sotiris Gravas said on 20/Jul/19
6'8" Nathan Jones w/ around 5'5" Danny Trejo... Click Here
Trejo and 5'2" Rey Mysterio... Click Here
Around 6'7" (not 6'9") Ike Catcher w/ Trejo... Click Here
Ike w/ 6'4.5" Zlatan Ibrahimovic... Click Here
Ike and mabye 6'0" Michael Jai White... Click Here
Jones and White... Click Here
Trejo w/ maybe 6'6" Aaron Judge... Click Here
Trejo w/ listed 6'5" Tony Gonzalez... Click Here
No way is Jones more than 6'8" now.
6'8" Nathan Jones w/ around 5'5" Danny Trejo... Click Here
Trejo and 5'2" Rey Mysterio... Click Here
Around 6'7" (not 6'9") Ike Catcher w/ Trejo... Click Here
Ike w/ 6'4.5" Zlatan Ibrahimovic... Click Here
Ike and mabye 6'0" Michael Jai White... Click Here
Jones and White... Click Here
Trejo w/ maybe 6'6" Aaron Judge... Click Here
Trejo w/ listed 6'5" Tony Gonzalez... Click Here
No way is Jones more than 6'8" now.
SeanR said on 19/Jul/19
Hi Rob,
Any chance or is there evidence enough for Nathan to get downgraded, perhaps to 6’9” or 6’9.25”?
There are pics that Vegas shared a few years back with Nathan and Matt Morgan together out of gear and they looked very similar in height. But considering Nathan was bald and Matt had hair I give Nathan the 1/2 inch advantage.
Also there are some pics with Nathan and Kevin Nash also here on this page to suggest than Nathan is not 6’10”.
Editor Rob
Hi Rob,
Any chance or is there evidence enough for Nathan to get downgraded, perhaps to 6’9” or 6’9.25”?
There are pics that Vegas shared a few years back with Nathan and Matt Morgan together out of gear and they looked very similar in height. But considering Nathan was bald and Matt had hair I give Nathan the 1/2 inch advantage.
Also there are some pics with Nathan and Kevin Nash also here on this page to suggest than Nathan is not 6’10”.
Editor RobStill not ruled out
Roderick said on 18/Jul/19
I don't think he would be listed at 6'9" if he was really 6'10" in MMA. Probably 6'9" flat honestly.
I don't think he would be listed at 6'9" if he was really 6'10" in MMA. Probably 6'9" flat honestly.
Miiiiiiighty_- said on 11/Jul/19
People claiming 6'6.5" .. 6'7 LOL
This site must have some of the worst downgraders ever...
If he is 6'6.5 then this is really bad news for Hollywood because then everybody is 3 inches smaller!
By the way his PRIDE listing means nothing, as the japanese mixed tales of the tapes plenty of times during the PRIDE era, I can provide example if need be, like Sergei Kharitonov who was billed 5'11" in his first fight when the guy is a 6'3ish framed HW...
Sorry but I don't buy anything below 207cm for this guy in his prime.
People claiming 6'6.5" .. 6'7 LOL
This site must have some of the worst downgraders ever...
If he is 6'6.5 then this is really bad news for Hollywood because then everybody is 3 inches smaller!
By the way his PRIDE listing means nothing, as the japanese mixed tales of the tapes plenty of times during the PRIDE era, I can provide example if need be, like Sergei Kharitonov who was billed 5'11" in his first fight when the guy is a 6'3ish framed HW...
Sorry but I don't buy anything below 207cm for this guy in his prime.
Yas said on 6/Jul/19
Jones looks an inch taller in the Nash pic. Maybe not 6'10 but not 6'8 either.
Jones looks an inch taller in the Nash pic. Maybe not 6'10 but not 6'8 either.
Qadaruddin said on 5/Jul/19
Def 6'9 peak..6'8 now..
Def 6'9 peak..6'8 now..
Heisenberg89 said on 28/Jun/19
Strong 6'8 at his peak(6'8.5) strong 6'7 now day (6'7.75).
I think the 6'10 listing here has reason to exist more for keep the logic on others listing on this site.
Obviously no one think is is 6'10 barefoot.
Strong 6'8 at his peak(6'8.5) strong 6'7 now day (6'7.75).
I think the 6'10 listing here has reason to exist more for keep the logic on others listing on this site.
Obviously no one think is is 6'10 barefoot.
Heisenberg89 said on 28/Jun/19
Strong 6'8 at his peak(6'8.5) strong 6'7 now day (6'7.75).
Strong 6'8 at his peak(6'8.5) strong 6'7 now day (6'7.75).
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/Jun/19
@Yas said on 12/Jun/19 Typo error dude. 6'8 1/2 not 6'6 1/2 but i would go with 6'8 3/4 for him next to 6'7 Kane.
@Yas said on 12/Jun/19 Typo error dude. 6'8 1/2 not 6'6 1/2 but i would go with 6'8 3/4 for him next to 6'7 Kane.
Yas said on 12/Jun/19
Looks 6'9 with Nash. 6'6 is dumb.
Looks 6'9 with Nash. 6'6 is dumb.
Yas said on 12/Jun/19
6'6.5? Are you kidding?
6'6.5? Are you kidding?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 29/May/19
@Sotiris Gravas We can't see their footwear. Djimon Hounsou is listed 6'1.5" but maybe 6'1.25" lowest so Michael could be 6'0.25" at worst. Nathan Jones had a longer head than Michael so 8-8.25" between them is positive. I can buy the lowest 6'6 1/2 for Nathan Jones but def he is over listed more than an inch.
@Sotiris Gravas We can't see their footwear. Djimon Hounsou is listed 6'1.5" but maybe 6'1.25" lowest so Michael could be 6'0.25" at worst. Nathan Jones had a longer head than Michael so 8-8.25" between them is positive. I can buy the lowest 6'6 1/2 for Nathan Jones but def he is over listed more than an inch.
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/May/19
@Junior Hernandez Not that one pic proves anything, but here's an interesting pic of White w/ maybe 6'1.25" Djimon Hounsou (2008)... Click Here
@Junior Hernandez Not that one pic proves anything, but here's an interesting pic of White w/ maybe 6'1.25" Djimon Hounsou (2008)... Click Here
Space said on 21/May/19
Nathan Jones was 6’9.5” 350lbs in wwe. He was bigger than 6’8.5” 340lb Matt Morgan and 6’7” 355lb A-Train. If you could pick a guy to paint purple and play Thanos in the Avengers, it would be Nathan Jones from back in the day.
Nathan Jones was 6’9.5” 350lbs in wwe. He was bigger than 6’8.5” 340lb Matt Morgan and 6’7” 355lb A-Train. If you could pick a guy to paint purple and play Thanos in the Avengers, it would be Nathan Jones from back in the day.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 19/May/19
@Sotiris Gravas He can't be 6'7 but 6'8 also is too low. Michael Jai White is 6'0.5" not 6'0 and only look to have 8" max lower than Nathan. So consider Nathan is 6'8.5" at worst not less.
@Sotiris Gravas He can't be 6'7 but 6'8 also is too low. Michael Jai White is 6'0.5" not 6'0 and only look to have 8" max lower than Nathan. So consider Nathan is 6'8.5" at worst not less.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/May/19
Rock and Khali... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here Khali is not as tall as ppl think.
Rock and Khali... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here Khali is not as tall as ppl think.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/May/19
This is max 6'2" The Rock next to 6'8" Alonzo Mourning... Click Here , Click Here
Mourning and 6'10" (maybe 6'10.25") Chris Bosh... Click Here , Click Here
This is max 6'2" The Rock next to 6'8" Alonzo Mourning... Click Here , Click Here
Mourning and 6'10" (maybe 6'10.25") Chris Bosh... Click Here , Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/May/19
Maybe I was wrong when I said 6'7". That said, he's max 6'8".
Here he is w/ max 6'0" Michael Jai White... Click Here , Click Here
How tall is Bolo Jr.? Click Here Seen here w/ Jones.
Maybe I was wrong when I said 6'7". That said, he's max 6'8".
Here he is w/ max 6'0" Michael Jai White... Click Here , Click Here
How tall is Bolo Jr.? Click Here Seen here w/ Jones.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/May/19
@Rampage he isn't a full 6'9 let alone 6'10. Check him out with 6'0.5" Michael Jai White you will believe he dip below 6'9.
@Rampage he isn't a full 6'9 let alone 6'10. Check him out with 6'0.5" Michael Jai White you will believe he dip below 6'9.
ratdancer said on 11/Apr/19
Never 6'10", probably 6'9" peak, now more like 6'8.5".
Never 6'10", probably 6'9" peak, now more like 6'8.5".
SeanR said on 8/Apr/19
Nathan gives the impression of being the same height as Nash peak and current.
Never thought of Nathan as a true 6’10” guy, more of a 6’9.25” peak, and 6’8.5” now at aged 50.
The pic with Nathan and Nash recently posted together seems to confirm that.
Nathan gives the impression of being the same height as Nash peak and current.
Never thought of Nathan as a true 6’10” guy, more of a 6’9.25” peak, and 6’8.5” now at aged 50.
The pic with Nathan and Nash recently posted together seems to confirm that.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Apr/19
I can see an argument for 6ft9-10 range but definitely not below
6ft7 is madness.
I can see an argument for 6ft9-10 range but definitely not below
6ft7 is madness.
Ozzy said on 3/Apr/19
I get to meet Nathan in a few days. Cant wait to see the big guy in person. I hope I can get a photo to share ...
My estimate is 6'7 - 6'8" .. Ill see how it goes lol ...
I get to meet Nathan in a few days. Cant wait to see the big guy in person. I hope I can get a photo to share ...
My estimate is 6'7 - 6'8" .. Ill see how it goes lol ...
rawdshaq said on 30/Mar/19
I think he needs a downgrade bro.
I think he needs a downgrade bro.
Crane said on 21/Mar/19
@Rob Click Here He was listed 6'9 in Pride 1 1997. So, you might consider.. :)
Editor Rob
@Rob Click Here He was listed 6'9 in Pride 1 1997. So, you might consider.. :)
Editor RobI'll mention the fact he was once billed at it, is he lying about 6ft 10? He wouldn't be the first to do so!
Heisenberg89 said on 6/Mar/19
6'7.75 peak and 6'7" now barefoot
6'7.75 peak and 6'7" now barefoot
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 26/Feb/19
@Phenom89 No. Conan is closer to camera angle and in a thai action movie they make together look at most an inch between them. Jones is more weak 6'9 and Conan weak 6'10.
@Phenom89 No. Conan is closer to camera angle and in a thai action movie they make together look at most an inch between them. Jones is more weak 6'9 and Conan weak 6'10.
Ozzy said on 13/Feb/19
Ive never seen Nathan at 6'10". Seems too much. Huge guy though. I see Nathan more in the face of the camera than Kane. If he were to move side by side I think 1" difference. My guesstimate and being fair Nathan at 6'7" and Kane about 6'6".
Ive never seen Nathan at 6'10". Seems too much. Huge guy though. I see Nathan more in the face of the camera than Kane. If he were to move side by side I think 1" difference. My guesstimate and being fair Nathan at 6'7" and Kane about 6'6".
Phenom89 said on 29/Jan/19
Click Here
How tall really is Conan? 207-8cm?
I think Jones is around 1.5" shorter
Click Here
How tall really is Conan? 207-8cm?
I think Jones is around 1.5" shorter
rawdshaq said on 23/Jan/19
@Sotiris He could be less than 6' 1", too, but that's what he claimed on Twitter. Kane is at the most 6'5" and this dude is lucky to be 6'8".
@Sotiris He could be less than 6' 1", too, but that's what he claimed on Twitter. Kane is at the most 6'5" and this dude is lucky to be 6'8".
Sotiris Gravas said on 14/Jan/19
@184guy2 Here's rawdshaq's pic of 6'1" Bryan Rosser and Kane in HUGE heels, looking all of 6'5", NOT 6'7"... Click Here Which puts Jones at WAY shorter than you think he is.
@184guy2 Here's rawdshaq's pic of 6'1" Bryan Rosser and Kane in HUGE heels, looking all of 6'5", NOT 6'7"... Click Here Which puts Jones at WAY shorter than you think he is.
184guy2 said on 7/Jan/19
@Sotiris
Kane looks nowdays about 6'7
Nathan looks max 2'' taller
6'9 ish nowdays it's cool and 6'9.5 peak
Doesn't looked 6'10 beside Paul Wight
@Sotiris
Kane looks nowdays about 6'7
Nathan looks max 2'' taller
6'9 ish nowdays it's cool and 6'9.5 peak
Doesn't looked 6'10 beside Paul Wight
Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Jan/19
Surprised this pic still hasn't been added here... Nathan Jones and Nash... Click Here
Surprised this pic still hasn't been added here... Nathan Jones and Nash... Click Here
Canson said on 3/Jan/19
@Junior: 6’7.5 is out of the question but 6’9” range isn’t for him nor is weak 6’9
@Junior: 6’7.5 is out of the question but 6’9” range isn’t for him nor is weak 6’9
Yuval said on 20/Dec/18
Magnus was listed 6'6 in world strongest man 2003. So he is no more then that.
Magnus was listed 6'6 in world strongest man 2003. So he is no more then that.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Dec/18
This great pic of Jones was posted recently on Kane's page. I'm surprised it still wasn't added here:
Click Here
Just a reminder, here's Kane next to little 5'6" Rand Paul... Click Here Notice how Kane should be TOWERING over Rand Paul, but clearly... isn't.
For comparison, legit 6'7" Mathias Doepfner w/ 5'7" (not 5'7.5") Mark Zuckerberg:
Click Here , Click Here
Doepfner is slouching WAY more in those pics than Kane w/ Paul.
@Rob How is Jones 6'10" when he looks around 6'7"...?
This great pic of Jones was posted recently on Kane's page. I'm surprised it still wasn't added here:
Click Here
Just a reminder, here's Kane next to little 5'6" Rand Paul... Click Here Notice how Kane should be TOWERING over Rand Paul, but clearly... isn't.
For comparison, legit 6'7" Mathias Doepfner w/ 5'7" (not 5'7.5") Mark Zuckerberg:
Click Here , Click Here
Doepfner is slouching WAY more in those pics than Kane w/ Paul.
@Rob How is Jones 6'10" when he looks around 6'7"...?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/Nov/18
At worst 6'8 1/4 with 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White. Thought 6'9 at first but took more look 6'8 1/2 would be max.
At worst 6'8 1/4 with 6'0 1/2 Michael Jai White. Thought 6'9 at first but took more look 6'8 1/2 would be max.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 20/Oct/18
Undertaker today is 6ft6 1/2 nathan was 2.5inches taller 6ft8 1/2 barefoot.
Undertaker today is 6ft6 1/2 nathan was 2.5inches taller 6ft8 1/2 barefoot.
FMExTREME said on 10/Oct/18
Jones doesn't look 6'10 at all at any time, a peak Nash was around 6'10 and you can just tell he rwally is a giant, Jones doesn't give that impression, I'd say even today Nash would Jones, 6'8 max.
Jones doesn't look 6'10 at all at any time, a peak Nash was around 6'10 and you can just tell he rwally is a giant, Jones doesn't give that impression, I'd say even today Nash would Jones, 6'8 max.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/Sep/18
If Nathan Jones is only 6'7 then Conan Stevens would be 6'7 3/4. Actors like Stephen Merchant will be 6'5 flat.
If Nathan Jones is only 6'7 then Conan Stevens would be 6'7 3/4. Actors like Stephen Merchant will be 6'5 flat.
Xpac99 said on 29/Aug/18
I think Rob that 6ft 10 for jones is too much... ok is taller than Morgan 1 inch or more but the first mistake in my opinion is that Morgan is rank taller than he is . Morgan looks very tall but when came face to face with a Train i didn’t see much different...
Click Here
While for nathan wasn’t taller in my opinion than Nash and i show you this two videos
Click Here
Click Here
What do you think ?
I think your guess of height for Morgan and nathan is too much because you didn’t compared them with others but only looking them in the ring... but of course i can be wrong
I think Rob that 6ft 10 for jones is too much... ok is taller than Morgan 1 inch or more but the first mistake in my opinion is that Morgan is rank taller than he is . Morgan looks very tall but when came face to face with a Train i didn’t see much different...
Click Here
While for nathan wasn’t taller in my opinion than Nash and i show you this two videos
Click Here
Click Here
What do you think ?
I think your guess of height for Morgan and nathan is too much because you didn’t compared them with others but only looking them in the ring... but of course i can be wrong
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Aug/18
The dude is around 6'7".
Here he is w/ Arnie... Click Here
Here w/ Luke Gallows... Click Here
@Xpac99 Great pic.
@Rob Based on Xpac99's pic alone, why is Jones still at a crazy listing like 6'10"...? The word laughable comes to mind. Look at the match between him and Kurt Angle. Angle looked like a giant.
P.S. If Jones is 6'7", Matt Morgan is 100% 6'6". In a word: downgrade.
The dude is around 6'7".
Here he is w/ Arnie... Click Here
Here w/ Luke Gallows... Click Here
@Xpac99 Great pic.
@Rob Based on Xpac99's pic alone, why is Jones still at a crazy listing like 6'10"...? The word laughable comes to mind. Look at the match between him and Kurt Angle. Angle looked like a giant.
P.S. If Jones is 6'7", Matt Morgan is 100% 6'6". In a word: downgrade.
Xpac99 said on 17/Aug/18
Click Here
With 6ft 6 heideraich you still think that nathan jones was 6 ft 10 ?
Click Here
With 6ft 6 heideraich you still think that nathan jones was 6 ft 10 ?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 27/Jun/18
Consider a long head and face features than Michael Jai White i did give 6'9 don't think he look over it. 6'9.5" measure in the morning and 6'10 out of bed.
Consider a long head and face features than Michael Jai White i did give 6'9 don't think he look over it. 6'9.5" measure in the morning and 6'10 out of bed.
YL07 said on 27/May/18
Hey Rob. I honestly think Nathan Jones could be closer to 6'9" than his 6'10" claim. In his MMA career, he was listed at 6'9" Click Here. Seeing with all the segments when he was working for the WWE w/ The Undertaker, A-Train (who I feel looks to be around 6'7"), Big Show, Matt Morgan etc. He definitely looks he has almost a 2" advantage over The Undertaker here Click Here, and also looks Nathan Jones might have a slight edge over Matt Morgan (either 0.5 - 1 in advantage over Matt Morgan) Click Here. I definitely think he could be closer to 6'9" than 6'10". Do you agree Rob?
Editor Rob
Hey Rob. I honestly think Nathan Jones could be closer to 6'9" than his 6'10" claim. In his MMA career, he was listed at 6'9" Click Here. Seeing with all the segments when he was working for the WWE w/ The Undertaker, A-Train (who I feel looks to be around 6'7"), Big Show, Matt Morgan etc. He definitely looks he has almost a 2" advantage over The Undertaker here Click Here, and also looks Nathan Jones might have a slight edge over Matt Morgan (either 0.5 - 1 in advantage over Matt Morgan) Click Here. I definitely think he could be closer to 6'9" than 6'10". Do you agree Rob?
Editor Rob6ft 9.5 is possible
tree said on 11/May/18
But Nathan is looking down,if he would look straight ahead he would be 6ft9,i can buy that for him,but 6ft10 looks too much.
But Nathan is looking down,if he would look straight ahead he would be 6ft9,i can buy that for him,but 6ft10 looks too much.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 6/May/18
I found out Nathan Jones atually claim his wrestling billed height at both 6'10-6'11. More i at look Jones i figure he look just fine at 6'8.5" nothing over it next to 6'0.5" Michael Jai White which some people even guessing lower between 6'0-6'0.25" range. At some point i can see a flat 204cm for Jones maybe not less.
Click Here: This is how they look in difference at most 8". 204cm vs 184cm.
I found out Nathan Jones atually claim his wrestling billed height at both 6'10-6'11. More i at look Jones i figure he look just fine at 6'8.5" nothing over it next to 6'0.5" Michael Jai White which some people even guessing lower between 6'0-6'0.25" range. At some point i can see a flat 204cm for Jones maybe not less.
Click Here: This is how they look in difference at most 8". 204cm vs 184cm.
5'12 said on 12/Feb/18
@raju
Kurt Angle said that Benoit was 5’8”.
@raju
Kurt Angle said that Benoit was 5’8”.
Paddy said on 8/Feb/18
I think this guy is 6'8" tops. He didn't look that much taller than Koji Kitao who is around 6'6".
I think this guy is 6'8" tops. He didn't look that much taller than Koji Kitao who is around 6'6".
Yas said on 4/Feb/18
Heights given in fights are regularly wrong.
Heights given in fights are regularly wrong.
Logan said on 2/Feb/18
About 6'9" little taller than Morgan who is about 6'8" at the least
About 6'9" little taller than Morgan who is about 6'8" at the least
niceguy82 said on 22/Jan/18
Click Here Here barefoot match. Stats say 6'9 and nowhere near 6'11 that's for sure.
Click Here Here barefoot match. Stats say 6'9 and nowhere near 6'11 that's for sure.
Cameron said on 17/Nov/17
Been watching him a bit lately and I think he is or was 6'9 maybe 6'8 1/2 barefoot certainly no less than that he has long legs and average torso.
Been watching him a bit lately and I think he is or was 6'9 maybe 6'8 1/2 barefoot certainly no less than that he has long legs and average torso.
Edimar1.84 said on 2/Nov/17
6ft9, needs a downgrade.
6ft9, needs a downgrade.
Canson said on 29/Oct/17
@Junior: I thought 6’9.5 at first but maybe that is more of what he really is today 6’8.5-6’9 Chris Webber height
@Junior: I thought 6’9.5 at first but maybe that is more of what he really is today 6’8.5-6’9 Chris Webber height
JJAK said on 28/Oct/17
Can we get a peak height I believe he has lost an inch from early 90s.
He looked less huge in mad max maybe 6 9 or 8 even.
Peak should be this 6 10 fing huge dude and funny should do comedy :#.
Can we get a peak height I believe he has lost an inch from early 90s.
He looked less huge in mad max maybe 6 9 or 8 even.
Peak should be this 6 10 fing huge dude and funny should do comedy :#.
Supermanfan380 said on 17/Oct/17
This one has always been hard to pin down. Part of the issue as with all wrestling is camera distance in the ring as well as footwear can vary by a whole 2". Nathan is certainly one of the tallest non-acromegalic giants the WWE has had in the last 40 years.
This one has always been hard to pin down. Part of the issue as with all wrestling is camera distance in the ring as well as footwear can vary by a whole 2". Nathan is certainly one of the tallest non-acromegalic giants the WWE has had in the last 40 years.
Junior said on 14/Oct/17
@mrtguy said on 3/Aug/17
Rob, 6'9'' seems more realistic than 6'10'', Big Show had over 2 inches
Totally agree. He did look about 2" shorter than a peak Big Show and comparing a peak Big Show next to 7'0 Shaquille O'neal i did say Big Show at most 6'11 peak and Nathan Jones maybe 6'9 or worst 6'8.75".
@mrtguy said on 3/Aug/17
Rob, 6'9'' seems more realistic than 6'10'', Big Show had over 2 inches
Totally agree. He did look about 2" shorter than a peak Big Show and comparing a peak Big Show next to 7'0 Shaquille O'neal i did say Big Show at most 6'11 peak and Nathan Jones maybe 6'9 or worst 6'8.75".
mrtguy said on 3/Aug/17
Rob, 6'9'' seems more realistic than 6'10'', Big Show had over 2 inches
Rob, 6'9'' seems more realistic than 6'10'', Big Show had over 2 inches
even said on 27/Jul/17
both his claims about his height and his weight are legit
both his claims about his height and his weight are legit
chris said on 25/Jul/17
Next to Big Show he looked 6'9 at most. He also seems to be an inch taller than Undertaker, who was 6'8 at the time.
Next to Big Show he looked 6'9 at most. He also seems to be an inch taller than Undertaker, who was 6'8 at the time.
even said on 7/Jul/17
morning = 6'10"
night = 6'9.5"
morning = 6'10"
night = 6'9.5"
S.J.H said on 6/Jun/17
Not over one foot taller than 5'9 tom hardy
Not over one foot taller than 5'9 tom hardy
Bard said on 2/Jun/17
He's around Durant's height. Durant can give a taller impression because of his obviously thinner build.
He's around Durant's height. Durant can give a taller impression because of his obviously thinner build.
Logan said on 29/May/17
He is 6,9.5-6,10
He is 6,9.5-6,10
mrtguy said on 23/May/17
Rob, you really think there's a 0.5 half inch between him and Big Show seems likely more face to face, tall to tall in person??
Rob, you really think there's a 0.5 half inch between him and Big Show seems likely more face to face, tall to tall in person??
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/May/17
Hard to say really they could have been closer than we think
Hard to say really they could have been closer than we think
James B said on 24/Apr/17
Rob if this guy edged out a peak Nash would that rule out a peak of 6'10 for Kevin?
Rob if this guy edged out a peak Nash would that rule out a peak of 6'10 for Kevin?
Bwin said on 22/Apr/17
This needs to be downgraded to 6'9.
This needs to be downgraded to 6'9.
miko said on 19/Apr/17
He never looked close to 6'10 with Big Show.
He never looked close to 6'10 with Big Show.
Supermanfan380 said on 19/Apr/17
And sure enough... right when I think I have evidence that there wasn't much difference with Jones and Magnus, then I find this video where Magnus claims that Jones was about 10cm taller than himself, and that is about 4" inches. It's the second video on this site: Click Here
And sure enough... right when I think I have evidence that there wasn't much difference with Jones and Magnus, then I find this video where Magnus claims that Jones was about 10cm taller than himself, and that is about 4" inches. It's the second video on this site: Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Apr/17
Rob, do you think this guy would edge out a young Nash?
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think this guy would edge out a young Nash?
Editor Rob it's arguable, sometimes he can give off a bigger impression than Nash did, but you never know - they might have measured within half inch
Supermanfan380 said on 18/Apr/17
I wouldn't be shocked one bit if the 6'10" for Nathan is actually his morning height. On reviewing the Magnus vs. Nathan Jones arm wrestling match it's important to see what they look like, at the top of their heads, when both are standing upright. There actually is not a big difference there. Looks like roughly 1" to 2" between them.
Part of why Nathan looks profoundly bigger in overall size is because he had far more muscle on his frame at that time. Nathan was 340 while Magnus only weighed about 275 back then.
Then add to that how Magnus technique involved dropping himself lower than the table. He is literally trying to get his center of gravity as low as possible.
The second part of the vid, right before the arm break, Magnus is low and leaned away from the camera. Nathan is leaning a lot further toward the camera.
So we get an illusion of Nathan being like half a foot taller, but just is not the case. Sure Nathan is taller, but we are talking only a couple inches.
It would have been interesting to see the two compared once Magnu himself was up around 350 pounds.
I wouldn't be shocked one bit if the 6'10" for Nathan is actually his morning height. On reviewing the Magnus vs. Nathan Jones arm wrestling match it's important to see what they look like, at the top of their heads, when both are standing upright. There actually is not a big difference there. Looks like roughly 1" to 2" between them.
Part of why Nathan looks profoundly bigger in overall size is because he had far more muscle on his frame at that time. Nathan was 340 while Magnus only weighed about 275 back then.
Then add to that how Magnus technique involved dropping himself lower than the table. He is literally trying to get his center of gravity as low as possible.
The second part of the vid, right before the arm break, Magnus is low and leaned away from the camera. Nathan is leaning a lot further toward the camera.
So we get an illusion of Nathan being like half a foot taller, but just is not the case. Sure Nathan is taller, but we are talking only a couple inches.
It would have been interesting to see the two compared once Magnu himself was up around 350 pounds.
Chris said on 5/Mar/17
Nathan Jones is at least 1.5 inches taller than the Undertaker. There is a noticeable difference.
And remember, Nathan is completely bald. Hair adds at least 0.5 inches to your height.
If you shaved Matt Morgan's head, he'd look smaller. I promise you. You're giving Matt Morgan an inch in height that is just his hair!
That's a real important point. Remember guys like Nathan Jones, The Rock and Hulk Hogan are bald. And you're comparing them, often, to guys with big heads of hair.
Believe me, if you shave your head you'd lose at least 0.5 inches in height
Nathan Jones is at least 1.5 inches taller than the Undertaker. There is a noticeable difference.
And remember, Nathan is completely bald. Hair adds at least 0.5 inches to your height.
If you shaved Matt Morgan's head, he'd look smaller. I promise you. You're giving Matt Morgan an inch in height that is just his hair!
That's a real important point. Remember guys like Nathan Jones, The Rock and Hulk Hogan are bald. And you're comparing them, often, to guys with big heads of hair.
Believe me, if you shave your head you'd lose at least 0.5 inches in height
Yas said on 4/Mar/17
MMA listing are always accurate lol.
MMA listing are always accurate lol.
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 25/Feb/17
Nobody said on 3/May/16
Here he is competing in his first and only MMA fight at the first Pride event, he is barefoot as was listed at 6'9 Click Here
************************************************************************************************
Exactly, 6ft9" barefoot, no taller than that next to Taker, Big Show and Matt Morgan for sure.
6ft10in in footwear only
Nobody said on 3/May/16
Here he is competing in his first and only MMA fight at the first Pride event, he is barefoot as was listed at 6'9 Click Here
************************************************************************************************
Exactly, 6ft9" barefoot, no taller than that next to Taker, Big Show and Matt Morgan for sure.
6ft10in in footwear only
Sean said on 21/Feb/17
Not sold that Nathan is 6'10". Only 1/2 inch taller than 6'8.5" Matt Morgan. Looked 1 1/2 inches taller than Undertaker (6'7.5")in 2003. Also there are pics with NFL turned wrestler Jon Heidenreich out there with Nathan, and Jon is listed at 6'5" by the NFL. 6'9" fits at this point.
Not sold that Nathan is 6'10". Only 1/2 inch taller than 6'8.5" Matt Morgan. Looked 1 1/2 inches taller than Undertaker (6'7.5")in 2003. Also there are pics with NFL turned wrestler Jon Heidenreich out there with Nathan, and Jon is listed at 6'5" by the NFL. 6'9" fits at this point.
Yas said on 24/Jan/17
I've only seen two pics from that movie and Nathan looks noticeable taller in one of them.
I've only seen two pics from that movie and Nathan looks noticeable taller in one of them.
S.J.H said on 21/Jan/17
Nope. He is at most 6'9 and check him out with tom hardy and a thai movie he starred. 205-206cm not over
Nope. He is at most 6'9 and check him out with tom hardy and a thai movie he starred. 205-206cm not over
josh jeffords said on 1/Nov/16
Gigantic guy has been billed everywhere from 6 8 to over 7.
To be honest anything over 6 8 is freaking huge also dude carries ton of muscle on him.
He likely is shrinking and those weights are not helping.
He looked 7 ft in first strike but Jackie Chans height was inflated take him down to 5 8 and Nate is 6 10 prime.
Actually he looked even bigger against Jet li but his is likely under 5 8..
Must be fun finding clothes and shoes or a car to fit in..
Gigantic guy has been billed everywhere from 6 8 to over 7.
To be honest anything over 6 8 is freaking huge also dude carries ton of muscle on him.
He likely is shrinking and those weights are not helping.
He looked 7 ft in first strike but Jackie Chans height was inflated take him down to 5 8 and Nate is 6 10 prime.
Actually he looked even bigger against Jet li but his is likely under 5 8..
Must be fun finding clothes and shoes or a car to fit in..
S.J.H said on 18/Oct/16
Absolute highest 6'9.25 generous, his big frame doesn't seem to help him look 6'10
Absolute highest 6'9.25 generous, his big frame doesn't seem to help him look 6'10
miko said on 14/Oct/16
Big Show had too much height on this guy for him to be a flat 6'10.
6'9/6'9.25 range IMO, barely taller than 6'8.5 Matt Morgan.
Big Show had too much height on this guy for him to be a flat 6'10.
6'9/6'9.25 range IMO, barely taller than 6'8.5 Matt Morgan.
joe### said on 1/Oct/16
kevin nash peak in my opinion was higher than Nathan Jones
kevin nash peak in my opinion was higher than Nathan Jones
S.J.H said on 27/Sep/16
No way nathan is 4 inches taller than 6'6 bruce spence. Look every bit of 6'9 next to tom hardy
No way nathan is 4 inches taller than 6'6 bruce spence. Look every bit of 6'9 next to tom hardy
Fern194cm-192cm said on 2/Sep/16
I do believe that 6,9.5 is right on the money for jones in mid day. What do you think Rob?
I do believe that 6,9.5 is right on the money for jones in mid day. What do you think Rob?
Sean said on 25/Aug/16
Rob, do you think a downgrade is possible for Nathan? Maybe 6'9"-6'9.25"? In 2003 only looked 1-2 inches taller than Underaker who was probably peak 6'7.5" at the time. In addition I only felt he was 1/2 inch taller than Matt Morgan also. Unless Matt Morgan is taller than 6'8.5"?
Rob, do you think a downgrade is possible for Nathan? Maybe 6'9"-6'9.25"? In 2003 only looked 1-2 inches taller than Underaker who was probably peak 6'7.5" at the time. In addition I only felt he was 1/2 inch taller than Matt Morgan also. Unless Matt Morgan is taller than 6'8.5"?
Canson said on 17/Aug/16
@heightchecker34: well said that 6'10 is a lot but 6'7 honestly is pushing it IRL. No benefit to being that tall and not being a pro athlete. ive noticed even legit 196 and 197 guys while the latter may round to 6'6 never say 6'7 unless they were former athletes themselves.
@heightchecker34: well said that 6'10 is a lot but 6'7 honestly is pushing it IRL. No benefit to being that tall and not being a pro athlete. ive noticed even legit 196 and 197 guys while the latter may round to 6'6 never say 6'7 unless they were former athletes themselves.
heightchecker34 said on 8/Aug/16
I'll give Nathan Jones the 6'10 listing... with that height and physique, that's just freaky strong. I selfishly would love to be in that body, imagine what you could do. I doubt anyone picks on him, he has an intimidating presence, not to mention he has already been in prison so he knows how to take care of himself. I think a lot of women would be still be attracted to a guy like that, he is strong, brawny, essentially a man's man. My perfect height is 6'7, so its still in the extremely tall range, 6'10 is admittedly pushing it. Too bad his run in WWE didn't really pan out, its a shame would could have been.
I'll give Nathan Jones the 6'10 listing... with that height and physique, that's just freaky strong. I selfishly would love to be in that body, imagine what you could do. I doubt anyone picks on him, he has an intimidating presence, not to mention he has already been in prison so he knows how to take care of himself. I think a lot of women would be still be attracted to a guy like that, he is strong, brawny, essentially a man's man. My perfect height is 6'7, so its still in the extremely tall range, 6'10 is admittedly pushing it. Too bad his run in WWE didn't really pan out, its a shame would could have been.
Canson said on 3/Aug/16
Rampage's estimate is legit. He does look like he could overtake Nash these days. I can see him as maybe 210 out of bed 207 at his lowest and NAsh 208 205 at his lowest
Rampage's estimate is legit. He does look like he could overtake Nash these days. I can see him as maybe 210 out of bed 207 at his lowest and NAsh 208 205 at his lowest
James B said on 23/Jul/16
I think his 6ft10 claim is probably in shoes
I think his 6ft10 claim is probably in shoes
Alex said on 9/Jul/16
Rob, Google listed him as 213 cm, like Shaquille O'Neal. Another generous listing of Google?
Editor Rob
Rob, Google listed him as 213 cm, like Shaquille O'Neal. Another generous listing of Google?
Editor Rob he only claims 6ft 10, so anything more is a bit like a wrestling listing.
It's like listing alberto del rio 196cm and Colin Salmon 193cm.
There's about 2-2.5 inches between those guys in person, in Colin's favour of course.
It's like listing alberto del rio 196cm and Colin Salmon 193cm.
There's about 2-2.5 inches between those guys in person, in Colin's favour of course.
James B said on 22/Jun/16
Actually rampage I'd say Jones and Nash would measure very close today.
Nathan himself could be 6'8.5 now aged 45 and 6'8.75 12 years ago.
Actually rampage I'd say Jones and Nash would measure very close today.
Nathan himself could be 6'8.5 now aged 45 and 6'8.75 12 years ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Jun/16
I believe he'd measure taller than Nash today
I believe he'd measure taller than Nash today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jun/16
"Nathan Jones's Height is 6ft 9½in (207.01cm)"
Alternatively 6ft9¼ or 6ft9¾ are also feasible. Maybe not a full 6ft10 but not 6ft9 flat either. He looks noticeably taller than 6ft7-8 range guys.
"Nathan Jones's Height is 6ft 9½in (207.01cm)"
Alternatively 6ft9¼ or 6ft9¾ are also feasible. Maybe not a full 6ft10 but not 6ft9 flat either. He looks noticeably taller than 6ft7-8 range guys.
Sam said on 27/May/16
Yeah, I think he looks more 6'9" range than 6'10" such as in Fury Road.
Yeah, I think he looks more 6'9" range than 6'10" such as in Fury Road.
Slim said on 22/May/16
Canson said it best
Canson said it best
Nobody said on 3/May/16
Here he is competing in his first and only MMA fight at the first Pride event, he is barefoot as was listed at 6'9 Click Here
Here he is competing in his first and only MMA fight at the first Pride event, he is barefoot as was listed at 6'9 Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Apr/16
I can believe somewhere between 6ft9-10 for Jones (similar range to a peak Kevin Nash I'd imagine). Not under 6ft9 though.
I can believe somewhere between 6ft9-10 for Jones (similar range to a peak Kevin Nash I'd imagine). Not under 6ft9 though.
James B said on 25/Apr/16
Jones looked taller than undertaker in there segements (taker might have not been over 6'7 at that point)
My opinions on team lesnars heights
Nathan Jones 6'8.75
Matt Morgan 6'8.5
Big Show 6'11.75 (peak 7'0)
Brock Lesnar 6'2.25
A-Train 6'5 (not far of 6'8 in thick wrestling boots)
Jones looked taller than undertaker in there segements (taker might have not been over 6'7 at that point)
My opinions on team lesnars heights
Nathan Jones 6'8.75
Matt Morgan 6'8.5
Big Show 6'11.75 (peak 7'0)
Brock Lesnar 6'2.25
A-Train 6'5 (not far of 6'8 in thick wrestling boots)
Sean said on 22/Apr/16
2003 Team Lesnar (WWE), barefoot heights:
Nathan Jones 6'9"
Matt Morgan 6'8.5"
Big Show 6'11.75" (Peak 7'0.5")
Brock Lesnar 6'2"
A-Train 6'6"
2003 Team Lesnar (WWE), barefoot heights:
Nathan Jones 6'9"
Matt Morgan 6'8.5"
Big Show 6'11.75" (Peak 7'0.5")
Brock Lesnar 6'2"
A-Train 6'6"
joe### said on 16/Apr/16
6'8.75 seemed to look it in Pride
6'8.75 seemed to look it in Pride
Johno said on 15/Apr/16
I don't remember him being taller than Taker.
I don't remember him being taller than Taker.
mrtguy said on 14/Apr/16
Nathan Jones is 6'9'' IMO, but can get a taller impression because of his build
Nathan Jones is 6'9'' IMO, but can get a taller impression because of his build
S.J.H said on 8/Apr/16
Tom hardy make nathan jones look like a decent weak 6'9 - 6'8.75
Tom hardy make nathan jones look like a decent weak 6'9 - 6'8.75
Canson said on 5/Apr/16
I have to agree with MD and 184.3cm. I wouldn't want to be 6'10 nor do I "care" about towering over others. 6'10 has to be an awful quality of life. No normal I modded vehicle fits someone that tall "comfortably" you just get by in SUVs from what I've seen. Not practical. Lol have to disagree with you Rampage. You're a very very good height as is compared to Jones and still edge most. 6'4 flat (while clothes shopping may be a bit more challenge for u than a 6' or 6'1 guy, is still manageable). I'm only about 1/2" or so taller than you at 6'4.5 my normal afternoon low if no gym, compression.
Ice: TBH you speak complete utter nonsense. And Thomas and MD is right, you are coming across as insecure. What do you mean 6'1 is average? It's tall and is practical tall. It looks average because so many 5'11 guys claim it when they aren't. That is the real issue here. Too many people claim shoes, lie, etc. 6'1 also looks abnormal when a guy who measures 6' for most of the day claims an "out of bed 6'1". even a proper 5'11 is relatively tall and is a great height. A legit 5'11 guy in good footwear can pull off a weak 6' almost with ease. Don't see why people don't just claim what they are rather than lying. 6'-6'1 are comfortable tall.
I have to agree with MD and 184.3cm. I wouldn't want to be 6'10 nor do I "care" about towering over others. 6'10 has to be an awful quality of life. No normal I modded vehicle fits someone that tall "comfortably" you just get by in SUVs from what I've seen. Not practical. Lol have to disagree with you Rampage. You're a very very good height as is compared to Jones and still edge most. 6'4 flat (while clothes shopping may be a bit more challenge for u than a 6' or 6'1 guy, is still manageable). I'm only about 1/2" or so taller than you at 6'4.5 my normal afternoon low if no gym, compression.
Ice: TBH you speak complete utter nonsense. And Thomas and MD is right, you are coming across as insecure. What do you mean 6'1 is average? It's tall and is practical tall. It looks average because so many 5'11 guys claim it when they aren't. That is the real issue here. Too many people claim shoes, lie, etc. 6'1 also looks abnormal when a guy who measures 6' for most of the day claims an "out of bed 6'1". even a proper 5'11 is relatively tall and is a great height. A legit 5'11 guy in good footwear can pull off a weak 6' almost with ease. Don't see why people don't just claim what they are rather than lying. 6'-6'1 are comfortable tall.
Canson said on 5/Apr/16
I have to agree with MD and 184.3cm. I wouldn't want to be 6'10 nor do I "care" about towering over others. 6'10 has to be an awful quality of life. No normal I modded vehicle fits someone that tall "comfortably" you just get by in SUVs from what I've seen. Not practical. Lol have to disagree with you Rampage. You're a very very good height as is compared to Jones and still edge most. 6'4 flat (while clothes shopping may be a bit more challenge for u than a 6' or 6'1 guy, is still manageable). I'm only about 1/2" or so taller than you at 6'4.5 my normal afternoon low if no gym, compression.
Ice: TBH you speak complete utter nonsense. And MD is right, you are coming across as insecure about your height. What do you mean 6'1 is average? It's tall and is practical tall. It looks average because so many 5'11 guys claim it when they aren't. That is the real issue here. Too many people claim shoes, lie, etc. 6'1 also looks abnormal when a guy who measures 6' for most of the day claims an "out of bed 6'1". even a proper 5'11 is relatively tall and is a great height. A legit 5'11 guy in good footwear can pull off a weak 6' almost with ease. Don't see why people don't just claim what they are rather than lying. 6'-6'1 are comfortable tall.
I have to agree with MD and 184.3cm. I wouldn't want to be 6'10 nor do I "care" about towering over others. 6'10 has to be an awful quality of life. No normal I modded vehicle fits someone that tall "comfortably" you just get by in SUVs from what I've seen. Not practical. Lol have to disagree with you Rampage. You're a very very good height as is compared to Jones and still edge most. 6'4 flat (while clothes shopping may be a bit more challenge for u than a 6' or 6'1 guy, is still manageable). I'm only about 1/2" or so taller than you at 6'4.5 my normal afternoon low if no gym, compression.
Ice: TBH you speak complete utter nonsense. And MD is right, you are coming across as insecure about your height. What do you mean 6'1 is average? It's tall and is practical tall. It looks average because so many 5'11 guys claim it when they aren't. That is the real issue here. Too many people claim shoes, lie, etc. 6'1 also looks abnormal when a guy who measures 6' for most of the day claims an "out of bed 6'1". even a proper 5'11 is relatively tall and is a great height. A legit 5'11 guy in good footwear can pull off a weak 6' almost with ease. Don't see why people don't just claim what they are rather than lying. 6'-6'1 are comfortable tall.
184.3cm (Night) said on 2/Apr/16
Its more a matter of opinion. I can tell you one thing i would never want to be a solid 6'10". My co-worker is pushing 6'11" and even doing the most rundimentary things is a struggle for him. They had to special order his clothes and shoes as well and give him his own modified car. So he has leg room...two other guys in the office use the car as well.
I get it some people want to be really tall but its too much in everyday life.
To me 6'6"-6'7" is the end of comfort with around 6'4" being the perfect height if you want to call it that. 6'3" being also good.
Its more a matter of opinion. I can tell you one thing i would never want to be a solid 6'10". My co-worker is pushing 6'11" and even doing the most rundimentary things is a struggle for him. They had to special order his clothes and shoes as well and give him his own modified car. So he has leg room...two other guys in the office use the car as well.
I get it some people want to be really tall but its too much in everyday life.
To me 6'6"-6'7" is the end of comfort with around 6'4" being the perfect height if you want to call it that. 6'3" being also good.
Thomas6ft1 said on 1/Apr/16
@Ice
You sound psychotic and top of that you have insecurity issues and inferiority complex.
@Ice
You sound psychotic and top of that you have insecurity issues and inferiority complex.
MD said on 1/Apr/16
No, I'm one of those people (and there are many of us) tired of your tired antics on this website, Ice.
No, I'm one of those people (and there are many of us) tired of your tired antics on this website, Ice.
Ice said on 31/Mar/16
Extremeley many very tall men who havent crossed the border of having that impressive imposing , near freak height claim 6'10 , when they are actually in the 6'7-6'8 range .
Extremeley many very tall men who havent crossed the border of having that impressive imposing , near freak height claim 6'10 , when they are actually in the 6'7-6'8 range .
Ice said on 31/Mar/16
@ MD Im not trolling ? Have you ever thought about that some guys would like to tower over others ? Or are you stuck in your "beeing average / slightly over average" is absolute best and everyone shouldnt dare to think something else ? Are you one of those "5'11-6'1 is absolute god status" guys , who are just fooling themselves ?
@ MD Im not trolling ? Have you ever thought about that some guys would like to tower over others ? Or are you stuck in your "beeing average / slightly over average" is absolute best and everyone shouldnt dare to think something else ? Are you one of those "5'11-6'1 is absolute god status" guys , who are just fooling themselves ?
Rory said on 29/Mar/16
Wouldn't want to be 6ft10 myself but each to their own.
Wouldn't want to be 6ft10 myself but each to their own.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Mar/16
An enviable height...
An enviable height...
Ice said on 24/Mar/16
Perfect height for a guy
Perfect height for a guy
Gary said on 13/Mar/16
I think undertaker and Kane are tAller than 6ft7 range if jones if 6ft10, which I can find believe able.
I think undertaker and Kane are tAller than 6ft7 range if jones if 6ft10, which I can find believe able.
mrtguy said on 28/Feb/16
Nathan Jones is 6'9'' he can pass as being taller.
Nathan Jones is 6'9'' he can pass as being taller.
Musclehed320 said on 17/Feb/16
Its difficult getting a height on Nathan from his WWE days, camera distances in certain videos with wide lenses and the distorting of some being closer to the camera than others makes it hard.
In the video where BigShow appeared a lot taller, as Rob noted, it’s difficult to tell, and those angles may have been used to sell BigSHow and Albert as “overwhelming odds”.
In some videos Nathan Towers over the Undertaker. Undertaker actually looks up at Nathan, with Nathan looking down. Yet in others they both look close in height. Very Similar to how Kevin Nash and Undertaker sometimes looks very close in height, and other times Nash looked clearly 2-3” taller.
Anyhow, at the time TROY was filmed Nathan had one of the best super tall physiques on film, regardless of his exact stature. Very few men of his stature have ever been built like that. Find me 5 men of his height and build, there likely are a few, but they are very rare.
Likely not many men of that height care to develop their bodies to that point. I’ve seen quite a few impressive specimens, who were quite tall, thick sturdy bone structures, but who never really got into weights, and tended to go for what came easy to them, such as Basketball. Take 7’2” Chris Christofferson for example. Looks like you could build a ton of strength and muscle on such a frame, but instead he plays Basketball. Sure he lifts, but its only a secondary hobby, which he can only do in moderation, as he has to stay relatively light for BBall.
Nathan on the other hand only had the weights as is option in Prison. In general taller guys start out at a deficit in static strength, yet Nathan defied that, building his strength to profound levels. He excelled in the Bench Press and Deadlift, and had to have had decent Squat as well to become a powerlifting champion, before moving on to strongman.
So, however tall he was exactly, try to find 5 men around his height or taller with a more impressive build.
Its difficult getting a height on Nathan from his WWE days, camera distances in certain videos with wide lenses and the distorting of some being closer to the camera than others makes it hard.
In the video where BigShow appeared a lot taller, as Rob noted, it’s difficult to tell, and those angles may have been used to sell BigSHow and Albert as “overwhelming odds”.
In some videos Nathan Towers over the Undertaker. Undertaker actually looks up at Nathan, with Nathan looking down. Yet in others they both look close in height. Very Similar to how Kevin Nash and Undertaker sometimes looks very close in height, and other times Nash looked clearly 2-3” taller.
Anyhow, at the time TROY was filmed Nathan had one of the best super tall physiques on film, regardless of his exact stature. Very few men of his stature have ever been built like that. Find me 5 men of his height and build, there likely are a few, but they are very rare.
Likely not many men of that height care to develop their bodies to that point. I’ve seen quite a few impressive specimens, who were quite tall, thick sturdy bone structures, but who never really got into weights, and tended to go for what came easy to them, such as Basketball. Take 7’2” Chris Christofferson for example. Looks like you could build a ton of strength and muscle on such a frame, but instead he plays Basketball. Sure he lifts, but its only a secondary hobby, which he can only do in moderation, as he has to stay relatively light for BBall.
Nathan on the other hand only had the weights as is option in Prison. In general taller guys start out at a deficit in static strength, yet Nathan defied that, building his strength to profound levels. He excelled in the Bench Press and Deadlift, and had to have had decent Squat as well to become a powerlifting champion, before moving on to strongman.
So, however tall he was exactly, try to find 5 men around his height or taller with a more impressive build.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Feb/16
I have to say that he had a very underrated physique in Troy...definitely silenced the naysayers who think that the tall man has no place in bodybuilding and powerlifting. He was jacked. Not sure if it was natural though
I have to say that he had a very underrated physique in Troy...definitely silenced the naysayers who think that the tall man has no place in bodybuilding and powerlifting. He was jacked. Not sure if it was natural though
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 10/Jan/16
In 2003 I would say
Big Show 6´11.5"
Nathan Jones 6´9"
Matt Morgan 6´8"
Undertaker 6´7"
Kane 6´7.25"
In 2003 I would say
Big Show 6´11.5"
Nathan Jones 6´9"
Matt Morgan 6´8"
Undertaker 6´7"
Kane 6´7.25"
mrtguy said on 3/Jan/16
Rob , Isn't this a solid 3 inch height difference? Click Here
Editor Rob
Rob , Isn't this a solid 3 inch height difference? Click Here
Editor Rob being that close with wide angle can be hard to tell the actual difference.
AussieMike said on 15/Jul/15
As a big dude myself (6'8" 265, I've noticed that while an average person's height can vary by an inch day/night, the variance gets wider the bigger you are. A fair amount of my height comes from my torso, so spinal disc compression and poor posture (tired) can drop my height up to 2.5" over a long day, but my armspan stays at 205cm. (Ordinary shoes add at least another inch, so exact numbers are never going to happen).
You can also lose apparent height in a photo because you have to tilt your head down to look at the camera/talk to someone shorter than you, if you stand up straight you'd have to look down your nose at people. Not exactly friendly!
Just felt like sharing,
(Nathan's fight with Tony Jaa in 'The Protector' was epic, he just yells and breaks stuff!)
As a big dude myself (6'8" 265, I've noticed that while an average person's height can vary by an inch day/night, the variance gets wider the bigger you are. A fair amount of my height comes from my torso, so spinal disc compression and poor posture (tired) can drop my height up to 2.5" over a long day, but my armspan stays at 205cm. (Ordinary shoes add at least another inch, so exact numbers are never going to happen).
You can also lose apparent height in a photo because you have to tilt your head down to look at the camera/talk to someone shorter than you, if you stand up straight you'd have to look down your nose at people. Not exactly friendly!
Just felt like sharing,
(Nathan's fight with Tony Jaa in 'The Protector' was epic, he just yells and breaks stuff!)
Jake T. said on 28/Jun/15
I think Nathan would be the same height as Nash at 6'9. He looks a foot taller than Tom Hardy.
I think Nathan would be the same height as Nash at 6'9. He looks a foot taller than Tom Hardy.
Fern194cm-192cm said on 31/May/15
Honestly, Nathan Jones sometimes looks 6,8ish and sometimes looks legit 7,0. I think anywhere between 6,9.5 and 6,10.5 is realistic. He is absolutely enormous no matter what. Also, he is incredibly strong. Heck, its kind of weird. Some of the big strong guys on this site (Nash, Mane, Thor, Jones) are actually fairly handsome guys
Honestly, Nathan Jones sometimes looks 6,8ish and sometimes looks legit 7,0. I think anywhere between 6,9.5 and 6,10.5 is realistic. He is absolutely enormous no matter what. Also, he is incredibly strong. Heck, its kind of weird. Some of the big strong guys on this site (Nash, Mane, Thor, Jones) are actually fairly handsome guys
hal said on 23/May/15
Saw Mad Max: Fury Road yesterday and dang, this guy's a beast. I could tell he was really tall but I wasn't expecting him to be almost 7 feet. I would've guessed 6'7" or 6'8". Must be his mesomorphic build that makes him seem slightly shorter. So jealous of guys like Nathan. He would've been a good Mountain on Game of Thrones.
Saw Mad Max: Fury Road yesterday and dang, this guy's a beast. I could tell he was really tall but I wasn't expecting him to be almost 7 feet. I would've guessed 6'7" or 6'8". Must be his mesomorphic build that makes him seem slightly shorter. So jealous of guys like Nathan. He would've been a good Mountain on Game of Thrones.
six nine said on 30/Apr/15
I am 6'9" 400# and met Nathan Jones in the LAX airport...he was an 1" taller.I was bigger body wise. He is a nice guy and asked me if I ever thought of pro wrestling or strongman. I said no I was into personal protection i.e bodyguard. I told him there were two fellow bigger than myself, that work for me.
I am 6'9" 400# and met Nathan Jones in the LAX airport...he was an 1" taller.I was bigger body wise. He is a nice guy and asked me if I ever thought of pro wrestling or strongman. I said no I was into personal protection i.e bodyguard. I told him there were two fellow bigger than myself, that work for me.
James B said on 1/Apr/15
6'10? I would have thought 6'8 range i mean can you honestly say this guy would have edged out a 1994 kevin nash?
Rob is 6'9.5 possible?
6'10? I would have thought 6'8 range i mean can you honestly say this guy would have edged out a 1994 kevin nash?
Rob is 6'9.5 possible?
6'1 dan said on 25/Mar/15
how can you downgrade this monster like that? he was 6foot 10 in 2003 and had 2 inches on taker.that's the only truth
how can you downgrade this monster like that? he was 6foot 10 in 2003 and had 2 inches on taker.that's the only truth
The Tall Kid said on 22/Mar/15
Out of curiosity guys, how tall would you say Conan Stevens is?
Out of curiosity guys, how tall would you say Conan Stevens is?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 17/Feb/15
Njp says on 17/Oct/14
6'9" flat.
Right, was listed 6´9" as a barefoot fighter, vid was posted here again and again...
Didn´t look more than 2.5-3 inches taller than Sid Eudy after legbreak and about 1.5"-2" taller than Taker, but Taker had clear footwear advantage.
Njp says on 17/Oct/14
6'9" flat.
Right, was listed 6´9" as a barefoot fighter, vid was posted here again and again...
Didn´t look more than 2.5-3 inches taller than Sid Eudy after legbreak and about 1.5"-2" taller than Taker, but Taker had clear footwear advantage.
Icehole73 said on 14/Nov/14
I agree that he had two inches on Taker and was about 2.5" shorter than Big Show. So that puts them at 7', 6'9.5" and 6'7.5" respectively. But thats me. Happy to help!
I agree that he had two inches on Taker and was about 2.5" shorter than Big Show. So that puts them at 7', 6'9.5" and 6'7.5" respectively. But thats me. Happy to help!
Paul said on 10/Nov/14
6'10 probably but really around 3 inches on Undertaker?
This linked relates to around 2003 when UT was already past peak height.
Clearly one estimate on this site must be wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPsWarWRb4
6'10 probably but really around 3 inches on Undertaker?
This linked relates to around 2003 when UT was already past peak height.
Clearly one estimate on this site must be wrong.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBPsWarWRb4
Njp said on 17/Oct/14
6'9" flat.
6'9" flat.
njp said on 28/Aug/14
looking back at the Undertaker (6ft 7 max.) collaboration he looks marginally taller than taker. Probably 6'9" peak in the morning
looking back at the Undertaker (6ft 7 max.) collaboration he looks marginally taller than taker. Probably 6'9" peak in the morning
lion said on 27/Aug/14
He was 6'10 + at his peak. Looked like a giant freak in his strongmen days
He was 6'10 + at his peak. Looked like a giant freak in his strongmen days
Halb said on 10/Jun/14
I think the new mountain is the best. Has the mass.
I think the new mountain is the best. Has the mass.
Sam said on 28/May/14
Stevens was the best of the three Mountains on GOT, the new one looking like a baby-faced college linebacker in the midst of a temper tantrum.
Stevens was the best of the three Mountains on GOT, the new one looking like a baby-faced college linebacker in the midst of a temper tantrum.
Yaspaa said on 26/May/14
I think it's time to get Conan Stevens on the site, he's about the same height as Jones, bills himself as 7'0 though.
I think it's time to get Conan Stevens on the site, he's about the same height as Jones, bills himself as 7'0 though.
Vince said on 24/May/14
Matt Morgan 6'9''
Nathan Jones 6'10''
Matt Morgan 6'9''
Nathan Jones 6'10''
cdk82 said on 13/Apr/14
BAREFOOT 6'9"
IN BOOTS 6'10.5"
BAREFOOT 6'9"
IN BOOTS 6'10.5"
Yaspaa said on 5/Jan/14
Clement, what are you talking about? How on earth do you extrapolate that answer from what I wrote. I say 6'9, you think I say 6'5-6'6... honestly...
Clement, what are you talking about? How on earth do you extrapolate that answer from what I wrote. I say 6'9, you think I say 6'5-6'6... honestly...
Yahright said on 1/Nov/13
I truly believe he is at least 6'9 barefoot. 203,4 cm? No way.... he DID comfortably tower over Magnus. The commentator even said on the video he made Magnus look like a little school kid haha, Does anyone have any info on what his doing nowadays?
I truly believe he is at least 6'9 barefoot. 203,4 cm? No way.... he DID comfortably tower over Magnus. The commentator even said on the video he made Magnus look like a little school kid haha, Does anyone have any info on what his doing nowadays?
berta said on 19/Oct/13
he didnt look that mutch taler than samuelsson in the video where samuelsson brake his arm maybe 7 cm. i met samuelsson today im about 196,5 evening and we were about the same height. I think nathan jones are about 203-204 cm
he didnt look that mutch taler than samuelsson in the video where samuelsson brake his arm maybe 7 cm. i met samuelsson today im about 196,5 evening and we were about the same height. I think nathan jones are about 203-204 cm
clement said on 11/Oct/13
I guess Yaspaa has got it Nathan Jones is in 6'5" to 6'6" RANGE ....taht's it.
I guess Yaspaa has got it Nathan Jones is in 6'5" to 6'6" RANGE ....taht's it.
Yaspaa said on 29/Aug/13
Samuelsson isn't a 'legit' 2m, his height was given anywhere from 6'5-6'7 in the Strongman events. Torfi Olafsson competed with Samuelsson and was billed as 2m and he always slightly edged out Samuellson, leading me to believe him to be a flat 6'6. Jones did make him look significantly smaller though, and Jones was billed at 6'9 in PRIDE Fighting. No less than 6'9 and no more than 6'10.
Samuelsson isn't a 'legit' 2m, his height was given anywhere from 6'5-6'7 in the Strongman events. Torfi Olafsson competed with Samuelsson and was billed as 2m and he always slightly edged out Samuellson, leading me to believe him to be a flat 6'6. Jones did make him look significantly smaller though, and Jones was billed at 6'9 in PRIDE Fighting. No less than 6'9 and no more than 6'10.
Icehole73 said on 8/Jul/13
I think next to Taker he looks maybe 6'9". Still huge but not 6'10" because he is too short next to Big show, I agree.
I think next to Taker he looks maybe 6'9". Still huge but not 6'10" because he is too short next to Big show, I agree.
187 said on 8/May/13
@Dicksock
Yes I understand that, but I dont feel that is the case with Nathan Jones. Just take a look at him in his strongman days, he would tower over all the other competetiors. If you've ever seen the size of these strongmen- you would know that is not an easy feat lol. Jones looked huge opposite Magnus Samuelsson back in the 1995 arm wrestle match up, and Samuelsson is a legit 6'6.75.
@Dicksock
Yes I understand that, but I dont feel that is the case with Nathan Jones. Just take a look at him in his strongman days, he would tower over all the other competetiors. If you've ever seen the size of these strongmen- you would know that is not an easy feat lol. Jones looked huge opposite Magnus Samuelsson back in the 1995 arm wrestle match up, and Samuelsson is a legit 6'6.75.
187 said on 6/May/13
@Dicksock
Nice name Lol, take a look at him in his strongman days firstly and tell me his not 6'10.. his even huge opposite Magnus Samuelsson, who is a legit 6'6.75.
@Dicksock
Nice name Lol, take a look at him in his strongman days firstly and tell me his not 6'10.. his even huge opposite Magnus Samuelsson, who is a legit 6'6.75.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.