|
Shaun says on 27/Jul/10
He's 5'10.5" tall now. yeah lanky guy and Jerry Hall is 5'7.5". lanky guy you have a serious problem with downgrading people two inches below what they really are/were. I saw him stand side by side with 5'11"listed Jerry Hall with heel advantage and he was 2-3 inches taller. Moore has never been under 6'. Today he is 183-84cm trange. Peak was 187cm.
lanky guy says on 19/Jul/10
Roger Moore stood just over six-feet-tall in his shoes. He's 5'10.5" tall now through aging- he is 80 years old. What great guy he was, and still is. I think he was a very underrated actor. RampageClover 190.8cm says on 4/Jul/10
184cm now...... Jimbo says on 28/Jun/10
Hard to gauge Rogers peak height, he was a tall guy in his younger day but I would say 1.85cm 6'1 tops for Roger and possibly a bit shorter than that. Anonymous says on 22/Apr/10
I just met him and I can assure you he is 6'0.5 now - I'm 6'1 and just topped him. Plus earlier in the evening he stated he was 6'1 at the time he was doing Bond - doing pretty well now for an 82 year old! Gavin says on 19/Apr/10
Look "A view to a kill" with Patrick Bauchau 191 cms...Rog' is near him in the stables...Seems 6' to me ! Frank says on 9/Apr/10
On Youtube, you can see an episode of the tv show Maverick starring James Garner and Roger Moore. James is clearly about 3ins taller than Roger and James's height is usually given as 6ft1ins. Where does that leave us? Iris says on 10/Mar/10
Very nice Gstaad.Funny i saw Mr.Bond two times last january.I`m 177cm and my man karsten is 184cm.Yes, Roger Moore is 180cm, it`s the situation today. Hans says on 10/Mar/10
I agree with Martin. Saw him also in Gstaad several times. Today is he a strong 180cm man.
Thought he is taller,but film and reality is a big difference. Hugh 190-192cm says on 9/Mar/10
In 1981 it was Moore 187cm and Glover 188cm. Today it's moore 184cm and Glover 186cm. Shaun says on 2/Mar/10
The photograph and meeting secene at the ice rink was misleading and Glover looked 6'3" in that scene. But if you see Glover and Moore later in the restaurant Glover was not more than an inch taller. So in my view Moore at 6'1.5" and Glover 6'2"-6'2.5". 6'2.5" I think makes the most sense peak height. Shaun says on 2/Mar/10
6ft 1.5 to 6ft 2 peak and 6ft 0.5 (184cm) now. I agree Hugh. Shaun says on 27/Feb/10
Actually Julian Glover was barely 0.5 inches taller than Moore. If you actually watch them walk to the dinner table together Glover was certainly not over an inch taller so 6'3" is wrong. A flat 6'2" for Glover maybe 6'2.5" max at peak. Martin says on 15/Feb/10
Roger is a good client here in gstaad and very nice person.Met him several times when he is here in gstaad switzerland.He is today 180cm like me.Probably Pierce Brosnan is the same height maybe 1-2cm more.Hope i could help. 191cm/252lbs says on 7/Feb/10
6ft 1.5 to 6ft 2 peak and 6ft 0.5(184cm) now. That seems like fair estimate. Don't you agree Rob? Ollie says on 4/Feb/10
I met him in a swiss ski resort in April 2007, really nice man. i also have a photo of him standing with my mum and cousin. Shaun says on 4/Feb/10
MCV. Moore looked every bit as tall as Paul o Grady if not a little taller. Both look 6'1" to me. RisingForce says on 30/Jan/10
I still want to know how a 5'11" Burt Reynolds looked taller than Moore in Cannonball Run(1981), I know Reynolds wore lifts, but they must have been some huge lifts! And Moore must have been just 6'1" flat by that time. Hugh 190-192cm says on 17/Jan/10
6"0.25 now and 6"1.75 peak Anonymous says on 26/Dec/09
I think roger was 6 ft 1/2 peak. Anonymous says on 29/Nov/09
In that one awards clip both sean connery and michael caine had an inch on moore. H may have looked near 6ft2 in shoes when he was younger. McV says on 11/Nov/09
Click Here
So Moore was 2 inches taller than O’Grady ? Apart from when he’s standing straight and Paul is slouching you can see that he’s clearly shorter ! Hugh 191cm says on 6/Nov/09
Glover is 6ft2 tops. Moore at peak was close to 6ft2. 187cm so this heiht is bang on. Today he still looks over 6ft, say 6ft0.5. He was two inches taller than 6ft1 listed Paul O'Grady on his show a couple of years ago. The Voice of Reason says on 5/Nov/09
Muza, I won't be able to watch For Your Eyes Only again for a while, but I just saw Moonraker and Moore was every bit if not 1cm taller than 6'1" Michael Lonsdale. I stand by my original peak height for Moore at 186cm. He was 184cm at the time the pic was taken of him with Dalton and Brosnan. fabiano says on 4/Nov/09
Okay.Thought both (Roger and Pierce are 6ft2inch)but they are more than 1.5inch under that. GUK says on 1/Nov/09
forgot to post the pic!
Click Here GUK says on 1/Nov/09
Not as tall as Dalton by some way, but a similar height to Brosnan. He was a tall man though and above 6ft but I doubt he was ever 6ft 2 (maybe in shoes) Muza says on 1/Nov/09
Well, ahem, the voice.
Watch that film again, and pay attention to scene in wich both are dinning. It is filmed in a way that Rogs looks in the same height range as Glover, but when we see their complete bodies we can notice tough Rogs is tall is noticeable smaller than Julian Glover. 6' by then i would say. The Voice of Reason says on 31/Oct/09
I still think he was at least 186cm at peak. Just look at him next to Julian Glover (who was 188cm/189cm at the time) in For Your Eyes Only. He looked a strong 6'1" until the late 80's. ralf says on 29/Oct/09
Yes, Muza you are right Roger and Pierce are peak 184cm and not over this. Muza says on 28/Oct/09
I watched again the LALD extra DVD, it tells that producers picked Moore for the part cause their first option, Burt Reinols, was dropped due to his american accent an his stature. He was no taller than 6' and Bond should exceed this treshold. By how much they do not say! In either case, that gives us a mininum of 6'+ for Rog. In the ending scenes of those goodies we can see photos of the cast that were not taken on the plateau or for publicity, just pics of the team enjoying their spare time. In two of them Rog's top of the head is just a hair over Yaphet Kotto's eyebrows, i see a three " gap there. Then if Kotto is 6'4" Moore was never over 6'1". Those are the upper and lower bounds, 6' to 6'1" . End of history. Basilio says on 26/Oct/09
You can trust it because when you see a photo of a Brosnan or Moore with a short person ,they dont seem much taller,but when they appear with a big person tachan!! they are the same height than that big person.
Sorry for my English men,I am Spanish (Galician) Basilio says on 25/Oct/09
Hugh ,why dont you let to colapse it??stars always lie abaout their height,its a fact.You should consider always 2 o 3 cm less that you imagine for a star,in this case Sir Roger Moore.If you think that now Roger is 183cm probably his real height is 180 more or less.
PD:the same for brosnan,with the difference of his well known elevator shoes xd Hugh 191cm says on 18/Oct/09
187-188cm peak and 183-184cm now Hugh 191cm says on 15/Oct/09
Okay 187cm peak and 184cm now Hugh 191cm says on 27/Sep/09
I'd say 186-187cm peak and 184cm now. Hugh 191cm says on 27/Sep/09
I'd say 187cm peak and 184cm now. Lenad says on 26/Sep/09
Probably 186cm at peak and 182-183cm now 007 says on 23/Sep/09
Roger's peak was 6 ft 0 in. Roger is 5 ft 11 now. Not 6 ft 1.5 in. I'll give Sean 6 ft 2 in peak and 6 ft 1 now. FACT. aloy says on 23/Sep/09
Roger Moore wasn't 6'1.5" peak,never ever.His official height is 6'1".I was shocked to see that he was barely 2.5"-3" taller in shoes than barefooted Maud Adams who was 5'9" in "Man with Golden gun".In the same movie there was a shot where both sir Roger and Maud were barefooted before lovemaking and kissing each other standing straight.Roger was 1.5" taller.I am shocked but I cant see anything more than 5'11"-5'11.5" for Sir Roger moor.Sean connery was 188 cm peak and weak 6'1" now. GUK says on 14/Sep/09
Maybe slightly under 6ft now but was around 6ft 1 at peak. Moonraker annual had him at just over 6ft, bear in mind he was in his 50s then ikbtops says on 13/Sep/09
Those photos aren't particularly telling, even seeing as I just tried posting the same exact photos myself.
Sean was/is about 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch taller than a 6'1" Moore. Sir Sean and Sir Michael approximately identical in height 6'1.5 talker says on 10/Sep/09
i agree wih Frank2. .I must say i thought for some time Moore was about 6'1.5",he looks that in some of his movies.I started doubting that height when i saw him in his early Saint episodes,when apparently noone bothered to make him look taller because he was tall enough and wasnt a big star yet.Moore always had a great posture and along with his good looks managed to look taller. robbie says on 9/Sep/09
I think these are the correct heights for the bond actors:
Connery: 189cm (just look at him in Thunderball and Goldfinger you see why)
Lazenby: 188cm (just look at thim walking down the stairs in OHMSS)
Moore: 183cm (not more, Moore was tall but was certainly not the same height as Lazenby/Connery
Dalton: 187cm (I thought Dalton didn't even look that tall in his two Bond movies, but I saw him in Jane Eyre, and he certainly looks 187cm)
Brosnan:186cm (not more, he was listed this height and I think it's right) Frank2 says on 3/Sep/09
I met Lee back in the 1970s. He looked to be a solid 6'4". I ran into Roger Moore at a posh men's clothing store in Beverly Hills on Rodeo Drive. I believe that was back sometime in the late 1990s. He appeared to be my height or 5'11". But in fairness to him, he was slightly intoxicated and probably not standing up that straight. Turned out he was living at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel.
I'd say Moore was 6' in his prime. Maybe slightly over six feet. Ray says on 3/Sep/09
Frank2 says on 2/Sep/09
Moore was considerably shorter than 6'4" Christopher Lee in THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
I totally agree Frank2. Also, Moore wore very large heeled boots throughout that movie. Lee wore plimsoles. Either Lee was a lot more than 6'4" or Moore was scraping 6'. Frank2 says on 2/Sep/09
Moore was considerably shorter than 6'4" Christopher Lee in THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
Click Here
Click Here g says on 1/Sep/09
Also mention that Moore had very tall legs but a relatively short upper body.
He was 183-185cm, not 187cm-188cm Anonymous says on 14/Aug/09
roger moores height was 6 ft 1 1/2 peak end of. Hugh 191cm says on 13/Aug/09
187-188cm peak and 183-184cm now. adam says on 2/Aug/09
Rob has him just right! Tom says on 17/Jul/09
6 FT sounds right. I don't see 6 ft 1.5 in his hay day. No way. Sean was two inches taller. MHouillon says on 15/Jul/09
NO. Roger wore lifts. Look at the un-balance relation of his upper- and lower leg in many of his scenes.
PEAK HEIGHT : 185cm,
Actual Height: 182-183cm, he stood beside me, (his book-promo-event) and he was 2 inches taller than me (I'm 5'10). Lebensdorf says on 10/Jul/09
To all those who keep insisting 6'2'', have you ever seen The Man With the Golden Gun? Christopher Lee, who was 6'5'', had a very good four inches on Moore. A strong 6'1'' at peak Moore indeed was, but not taller. Of course, we must always keep in mind that, as Bond, more was 47 in his first film and 57 in his last film (not exactly a spring chicken during his tenure), but he looked 6'1'' also when he played Simon Templar in the 60s. Hugh 191cm says on 8/Jul/09
Moore looked like he couldve been 6ft2. I think at peak 6ft1.75. Doug says on 4/Jul/09
Definately a legit 6'1" at least. Saw Octopussy earlier and he was between 2 and 3 inches shorter than the Vijay tennis player in it who is a legit 6'4". Moore at 6'1.5" and Vijay at 6'4" is correct. The 5'11" claims are silly. tubbs says on 2/Jul/09
He's nearly as tall as Julius Harris in their scenes together, Harris is nearly 6'4", and he was taller than Hedison by a good inch, who would have been nearly 6'1" then. There are a lot of tall actors in Live and Let Die. Daniel says on 2/Jul/09
Yes, he was "un-lifted" in Live and Let die, that's why he looks 1.83m (6ft) and nothing more throughout the entire movie. tubbs says on 1/Jul/09
Roger never wore lifts........he was as tall as the 6'1" Richard Harris who wore inch lifts in many scenes for the Wild Geese. He wears low cut slip on shoes in Live and Let Die, with no room for lifts. Daniel says on 1/Jul/09
I agree with MHouillon 100%. To me, Roger Moore didn't ever look taller than 6 feet in Live and Let Die. adam says on 29/Jun/09
Moore was 6-1˝ peak max.
Hugh, Kotto was at least 6-4 and didnt look much taller than Moore but Moore wore lifts and camera angles helped him. MHouillon says on 24/Jun/09
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
A 185cm (6'1) in his prime, and a 182-183 nowadays. After Craig, the "shortest" or least tallest Bond. r says on 23/Jun/09
Roger always looked around 185cm, not 187 Hugh 190cm says on 21/Jun/09
I'd say Moore was still close to 6ft2 in 1988. tubbs says on 14/Jun/09
Check out the oscars video from 1988, Caine Connery and Rog present an award, Roger looks the same as Sean, maybe a tad taller. He still looked considerably taller than Paul O'Grady on his recent appearances on the show. O'Grady is listed as 6'1" on celebheights. On the same show he looked 3" taller than the 5'11" Jerry Hall. Atleast 184 now, maybe 'moore'. Ali says on 13/Jun/09
6'1 and 6'2 makes no sense as he is
considerably shorter(2.5 inches or more) than Sean Connery
who was 189 cm peak.
Where is the logic in this? Scroll
down and check the picture I gave
a link to.
One can see clearly that Connery is a big
man and Connery more medium/average.
His peak might be 6 feet, but I doubt it
strongly. 5'10-5'11. Hugh 190cm says on 5/Jun/09
A strong 6ft now and a weak 6ft2 peak. MHouillon says on 3/Jun/09
He is never 5'10 now. He was taller than me by at least 2 inches (I'm 5'10).
No lifts. He wore thin-heeled loafers, and when he sat down, one could see his foot "deep down" in the shoe. No lifts.
Again: 185-186cm in his prime, 183cm (6 ft) now.
187cm is too high. Lenad says on 31/May/09
I saw a solid 6ft0 man in Live and let die like 183-184cm but he was obviously not that low Lebensdorf says on 30/May/09
Now, I think he is about 5-10. Isn't he in his eighties anyway? At peak, 6-1, but no taller than that. MHouillon says on 30/May/09
I just met him, 30 minutes ago. He signed his books in a Hamburg Bookstore, close to where I live. Me at 5'10 stood next to him. 6 feet is dead on. 183cm for sure.
He wore thin-soled and heeled loafers. No lifts.
I think 186 in his heydays, 183cm (6 ft) now is for sure. Lenad says on 28/May/09
Hugh don't pose as anonymos Hugh 190cm says on 23/May/09
Could've sworn I only saw an inch between him and 6ft4 Yaphett Kotto (Some even say 6ft5!) in Live and Let Die. Anonymous says on 6/May/09
5ft11.5 is ridiculous. I'd say 6ft0.5 now and almost 6ft2 in his prime. Christoffer Slotte says on 4/May/09
I was very close to him today and I'd put him at about 6 ft or 5'11˝''. I am 6'1 myself and I was a little bit taller. Anonymous says on 30/Apr/09
6ft2 peak is quite possible. Lenad says on 26/Apr/09
Most likely a strong 6'1 at peak but a possibility of a weak 6'2 Iceman says on 25/Apr/09
In the Daily Mail last week (Tuesday)-Roger was interviewed and he said that he was 6 foot 2.He was considered chubby as a teenager and has had difficuly in keeping his weight down throughout his career.Can't believe he was as tall as Connery. Lenad says on 24/Apr/09
A strong 6'1 possibly a weak 6'2 Daniel says on 21/Apr/09
Anyway, I never see the guy look more than 1.85m (6'1'' flat), not even in the 60s when he played that Simon Templar character Daniel says on 20/Apr/09
Thanks, Reason, very interesting information. The Voice of Reason says on 10/Apr/09
In response Daniel's post on 4/Apr/09:
Actually, most of the "black dudes" in Live and Let Die were 6'3" plus: Yaphet Kotto (Kananga/Mr. Bigg) was about 6'4", Julius Harris (Tee Hee) was 6'3.5", Geoffrey Holder (Baron Samedi) was 6'6", and the guy who played Quarrel Jr. looked about 6'2". Therefore, Roger Moore's peak was about 6'1.5" Lenad says on 8/Apr/09
I think Moore, Carrey and Caine were/are strong 6'1 guys. Hugh 190cm says on 7/Apr/09
Sorry Yaphett Kotto is 6ft4 minimum and has been listed as 6ft6! So that is 6ft2 garunteed for Moore! Hugh 190cm says on 7/Apr/09
Sorry Daniel but Live and Let Die is where Moore looked his tallest. He looked every inch of 6ft2 next to Yaphett Kotto (191cm-193cm). Some say Kotto was 6ft4.5 at his peak. Anonymous says on 6/Apr/09
According to the James Bond film tailors in London, at 6' 1.75" he is the tallest of all the Bond actors. The tailors who have fitted and measured each of the 5 Bonds over the years claim the following heights for each of the other Bond actors: Sean Connery 6' 1 1/2" without shoes, George Lazenby 6' 1 1/2" without shoes, Roger Moore 6' 1.25" without shoes and Pierce Brosnan 6' 1.25" without shoes. Daniel says on 4/Apr/09
In the movie "Live and Let Die" Roger Moore didn't look taller than 6 ft even (1.83m). He couldn't have been 6'1'' unless all the black dudes of the cast had been 6'3'' on average, which in my opinion is unreasonable. Hugh 190cm says on 4/Apr/09
Roger Moore really looked like a badass with that beard. Hugh 190cm says on 3/Apr/09
Moore actually looks quite similiar to Caine. Aswell Connery clearly has the edge on Caine. Doug says on 2/Apr/09
There was roughly a 3.5 inch difference in height between Moore and Lee when they stood back to back. Moore I think stood 6'1.5" at peak, Lee was a likely 195cm, verging on 6'5". It is clear Moore was never quite 6'2" although he came close at peak. Tall man but looked very average compared to Christopher Lee who loomed above even near 6'2" guys. Yazov says on 29/Mar/09
Moore looks a little bit shorter than Sean Connery and Michael Caine. I would say 6'1. Also, Caine looks a little taller than Connery here:
Click Here adam says on 25/Mar/09
A strong 6-1, yep. In his Bond days he was slim and very long-legged which of course added the illusion of him being taller. RisingForce says on 22/Mar/09
Roger did start looking a bit shorter in the 80's, but 6'2" peak height is right. He still looked 6'1" next to 5'9" Jean-Claude Van Damme in The Quest which was made in 1996. I haven't seen him in a movie that was made after that so I couldn't say how tall he is these days. Hugh2 says on 20/Mar/09
My Friend who lives in London met Roger in 1995. He said Roger was very close to 6ft2. Hugh2 says on 20/Mar/09
Lenad's estimates with Carrey, Moore and Caine are accurate. In the 80's and 90's I'd say Moore was still close to 6ft2. MartinVienna says on 17/Mar/09
Roger Moore is about 6 ft (183cm). He is not taller now. |
