Lenad says on 27/Nov/08
Deano who the hell are you?! What are you typing from!? A computer in a god-damn mental asylum! Get yourself strapped, electrocuted and placed in padded cell!!!!

Hugh says on 27/Nov/08
Well a stunt man on For your Eyes Only claimed Roger Moore was 6ft5!. Now that's laughable. I'm still more than confident he stood 6ft2 in his younger years.

Hugh says on 27/Nov/08
Tubbs is spot on with his estimates for Moore. I think 6ft0.5 is probably the lowest Roger could be. This also backs up 6ft2 say 30 years ago.

Arbaces says on 26/Nov/08
I saw him in 2006 and he's no more than 5 ft 11

Tubbs says on 26/Nov/08
his recent appearances on tv seem to suggest he is still 6'1. There was little between himself and Jonathan Ross, although the angles weren't great to judge between the two, and he had what looked like 2 inches on Paul O Grady, and 3 on Jerry Hall. He keeps good posture. Upgrade required possibly, atleast to 184cm.

Hugh says on 25/Nov/08
I think a weak 6ft2 peak and now a strong 6ft.

harry says on 24/Nov/08
There's a picture of Roger Moore stood with Clint Eastwood and his wife Maggies from the early 70's in The unauthorised biog. of Clint Eastwood by Patrick Mcgilligan(check it out), and if Moore had been a legit 6' -6'1" then then Eastwood must have been unbelievably huge, well over his given height of 6'4". Roger looks 5'10 solid and no more.

Hugh says on 23/Nov/08
Rob, get rid of this joker. Anway I think Moore was 188cm peak and is now 184cm. He's certainly not under 6ft. Still a considerably tall guy.

deano says on 18/Nov/08
hey guys someone called 4"10 Guy said that the listed iain lee grandson of actor christopher lee at 6 ft 3 is a matter of fact 5 ft 11 so thATS yes Im right 4 inches added ladies and gentlement go and read it your self if you dont believe me.Of course you can continue your course of thinking people are too much over their own height, thats fine if its a business, all respects,I just like to get out the truths sometimes.

Nicole says on 18/Nov/08
I`m beginning to think Roger was never over 6ft1inch maybe a strong 184cm peak height and then loosing with age 2cm and is at the moment 182cm.

Steve says on 16/Nov/08
I saw him several years ago at the Mount Kenya Safari Club. He appeared to be around 6'1". This was around 1992.

deano says on 16/Nov/08
but I think for bigger people, like richard kiel, they put more inches on.

deano says on 16/Nov/08
I know that they lie about heights now because a famous bollywood actor called mithun chakraborty is put down as 6 ft0 but in real life he is as matter of fact 5 ft 8 now thats not a lie because my uncle met him many times as hes big fan of him and he has said mithuns 5 ft 8 and even one day, after looking on the net where they put mithun at 6 ft0 I then went to my mum and told her that he was 6 ft 0 but she didnt beleive me and said hes 5 ft 8.So there you have it guys, some celebs do have inches put on them,by exactly 4 inches.

Hugh says on 16/Nov/08
Lets just take it that you're idiot, deano.

deano says on 14/Nov/08
Lets just take it as CELEB height.

deano says on 14/Nov/08
another thing guys is that if you see mithun in a photo next to salman khan, another great bollywood actor, he does look taller than the 5 ft 8 salman but he is definatly wearing higher lifts than salman I dont know if salmans wearing any lifts maybe just normal shoes , you can clearly see that, and without it he would only I'd say look about 1 and half to two inches taller but then again they would be adding inches to salman also by I'd say more likely to be two inches added rather than 4 cause salman looks quite tall.
look up the picture guys.

talker says on 13/Nov/08
there's a 1963 episode of "the saint" called "starring the saint" in which Simon Templar(Moore) is asked to star in a movie about his life!!In a scene in this episode he meets a film director who asks him his height and Moore as Simon Templar says 6'2".However,personally i believe Moore's peak height was 6'1".

Hugh says on 12/Nov/08
6ft0.5 to 6ft1 for Moore these days and 6ft2 peak.

deano says on 10/Nov/08
okay im sorry if i've upset a few people but im just and I mean just giving my honest opinion on this, and remember its my opinion,I never said your wrong.Im not trying to change views Its just the way I see things,after seeing someone like roger at a big height I'd literally think that hes not its literally how I see things ,its naterul reaction not changing other peoples view.

harry says on 6/Nov/08
In his new book "my word is my Bond", he indirectly reveals his height as "six -foot -one". This was a reference to his younger days though. It is possible I suppose that he was around the 186-187cm range as a young man. Being 80 yrs old, he's obviously lost maybe 4cm in height. There's that famous pic of him stood back to back from the "Man with the Golden Gun" with the great Christopher Lee.(6'4") Roger looks 6ft plus in that picture. What do people think? Mr Lee has got his head stretched upwards though?

Ray says on 4/Nov/08
I remember he was on stage with Michael Parkinson and he Parky asked him about his height. Roger said 6'1.5" but he was referring to his youth. I can accept 6'1" for him in his youth. He did look quite tall. Never 6'2" though.

RisingForce says on 4/Nov/08
I believe his 6'2" claim. Probably only about 6'0" now though. Very similar height to Arnold Schwarzenegger as far as peak and current height.

Hugh says on 2/Nov/08
No Harry, Deano is just being ridiculous. He's saying that Connery was 6ft at his peak and is now a shade under 5ft11! Daniel Craig is 5ft6.5, Pierce Brosnan is 5ft9.5. Deano, you really are thick as a plank.

The Voice of Reason says on 31/Oct/08
This is ridiculous!

Roger Moore peak= 186 cm, Now= 183 cm

To proove that heels doesn't play a factor...
In a scene in Live and Let Die, he is seen wearing dress shoes made of aligator skin without a substantial heel standing about 2" shorter than 6'3.5" Julius Harris.

By the way, Jonathan Ross= 6'1.5"

harry says on 31/Oct/08
Hugh and Deano: Interesting guys, I agree, Johnathon Ross is maybe a solid 6ft, to a possible 6'1". I couldn't believe how short roger was. I think 5'9" -5'10" is possibly closer to the truth. I relise he is 80 and could have shrunk 2-2.5", but he always wore high heels in the Bond movies. I don't wish to lower Roger Moore in any way, he is and has always been a class act. But I felt the same. Another strange thing, if you look in his new autobiographt "My Word is My Bond" - there is a picture of all the Bonds except Connery stood in a line on either side of Parky. Moore looks tiny in comparison to the other bond actors. Maybe at he was a good six feet when he was a younger man.

deano says on 30/Oct/08
my guess at roger moores real height 5 ft 10 1/2

deano says on 24/Oct/08
and the people who get heights from "apparantly" their cvs could be just false information.I look at peoples height from the prospective of their body build and height.

deano says on 24/Oct/08
now evryone if you want to, take everything that I said and you should be able to get good appropriate and resonable height for the celebs.

deano says on 24/Oct/08
now I've seen ordinary people who are 6 ft 2 and they look much bigger than roger moore,now lol if roger moore were 6 ft 2 he'd look abit lets say different now that I dont want to put anything rude,no what Im saying is that keeping they roger moores 5ft 10 body the way it is, and just upscaling it to 6 ft 2 ,again I dont to sound rude, but alot different to other people.

deano says on 24/Oct/08
now ordinary people in real life are more taller than all celebritys put together you just dont see them everyday.

deano says on 24/Oct/08
instead of making them have huge upper bodys and huge legs and huge heads to be 6ft2 you can make them something appropriate and resonable and true to the actuall height to something like 5ft or to be fair to you guys 5 ft 11.I hope you understand what I mean.

deano says on 24/Oct/08
and remmeber he does where lifts so that may help him look taller, but thats it. Now I think you could say they lie but theres always a reason for it so that clears that,and I can tell you hughhhhhh, that I werent born yesterday I have seen lots of roger moore things like movies james bond,like documentarys like the ones that are shown on tv to showcase james bond,programs like 'the saint and trust me I was very sure of rogers height after seeing him in the saint now thats where he hardly ever worn lifts, and he looked small, well what Im saying is smaller than 6 ft 2 let alone 6ft 1 1/2, by say an even 3 inches or how I estimated as 3 and 1/2inches .

deano says on 24/Oct/08
okay now considering the truth this is how i've put the bonds heights after taking away 3 and 1/2 inches off the listed heights which come to as more of a realistic height, here they are:
sean connery - is a shade under 5ft 11
george lazenby - is somewhere around 5 ft 10 1/2 and 5 ft 11 but seeing as he's been listed as 6ft 2 1/2 i'd put him same as sean connery, but because I got a real estmate of connerys height as 6 ft 2.4 something i took 3 inch away, and got his as a definate a shade under 5 ft 11.but not sure about lazenby so i'd just give him a shade under 5 ft 11 aswell
roger moore - 5 ft 10 who later turned 5 ft 9 1/2 and is definatly much shorter as seen on jonathan ross show, hes 5 ft 8 or could most likly to be a little bit under.as he looked alot shorter than jonathan ross by 3 inches or a little more, who is listed 6ft 1 but on my ratio 5ft10, as what roger used to be but has shrunk alot.or you never know might have always been that height(that height from jonathan ross show).
timothy dalton - 5 ft 10 1/2
pierce brosnan - 5 ft 9 1/2
daniel craig - 5 ft 6 1/2.

Hugh says on 24/Oct/08
deano, you were born yesterday. Roger 5ft11 peak and 5ft8 now. Sean Connery Connery 6ft peak, Timothy Dalton 5ft11.5! LOL!. Rob, get this joker off the site. We don't need lunacy

deano says on 23/Oct/08
and one other thing with famous heights theres usually inches added on rather then taken off.As we can clearly see with people like certainly like roger moore and richard kiel.Now I kinda repeated my self there with roger moores height just to remind you not put silly unreal height gestures on like 6ft 2 to for roger moore lol.This guy never looks tall nxt to anyone in films unless of course it was someone really small.cause c'mon if were to be 6 ft 2 that would make everyone in the film 'the spy who loved me' during the first scene where m, bond and other people in the secret agency are disscussing things, are 6 ft 4 and 6 ft 5 etc ,they are not that tall.you see what i mean though, and even they dont look 6 ft 3, maybe make the 6 ft mark but thats it.From my prospective Im looking at the true side of things with famous peoples heights, obviously the people who list them as taller baically are trying to make them bigger because their like icon or something.

deano says on 23/Oct/08
okay not everyones height is fake, say someone like steve mcfadden who plays phil on eastenders, is the height he is listed at of 5 ft 8 I mean because I belive in the fakeness of famouse peoples heights i'd even say steve even had a couple of inches added on him.

deano says on 23/Oct/08
okay not everyones height is fake, say someone like steve mcfadden who plays phil on eastenders, is the height he is listed at of 5 ft 8 I mean because I belive in the fakeness of famouse peoples heights i'd even say steve even had a couple of inches added on him.

deano says on 23/Oct/08
please, roger is no way 6ft 2 one of my relatives is 6 ft 2 or was because hes probably taller now, who looked huge and tall but im afraid roger wears high heels and not even that would make him 6 ft 2! oh my god!.

deano says on 23/Oct/08
okay now people lets get to it these people are not the height they say they are,at heights of 6 ft or even 6 ft 1, now look at the that, but then they say hes 6 ft 1 1/2, roger is probably 5 ft 10 1/2 at his tallest, now thats realistic, I mean with his heels on he'd be 6ft 1/2 at best the only bond who looked tall was actually sean connery who who could of been 6ft then suddenly shrinked, which showed in the later 80's I think at an award show, where they were next to each other, (sir roger and sir sean). which then made roger look tall doesent matter how high heels he was wearing and I know that he wears high ones, and those kind of high heels are about 1 and 1/2 inches or 2 inches I would say.And c'mon timothy dalton, okay he looks taller than roger whos as i said is 5ft 10 1/2 at best so that would make timothy 5 ft 11 1/2 now that is reasonable, I cant say that these people are the height they claim to be just by looking at them and no they do not have massive heads or something, you can easily tell how tall people are when you see them, or have a rough guess of their height, cause people who are tall people do look tall, and people who are medium built are medium built and people who look small etc.My personal opinion of bonds heights and in general any famous persons height to be fake, in the way that they are smaller than the height they say they are.And now I think everyone can say that roger has lost about 2, 2 1/2 inches as he looks smaller than jonathan ross by i'd say 3 whole inches when on the jonathan ross show who is listed as 6ft 1 1/2 so he is rogers former height of which he was also listed at 6 ft 1 1/2, so that would make roger now 5 ft 8 or 5ft 8 and 1/2 I would say.Realistically now c'mon, maybe rogers height could of been at 5ft 11 but that my friends would be at best, and I mean no taller not even a shade.

Paul says on 22/Oct/08
I think Roger Moore is 184 today and 186 peak height. I don't think he has lost that much.

Leo says on 21/Oct/08
He looked like as he suggested, 6ft 2 in the morning - then averaged out at 6ft1.25 I'd say. Rob, what height was David Niven?

Paul says on 21/Oct/08
Roger Moore had at least 2 inches on Paul O'Grady so Rob doesn't always get it right.

Hugh says on 21/Oct/08
Lenad how tall are you? 188.5cm is 6ft2.25 isn't it. I measure at bang on 191cm in the morning. I'm down to about 189-190cm at night.

Elf says on 21/Oct/08
Carrying on from my "anon" comment below. I'd hazard a guess that these days that the height here is accurate and he is six foot barefoot and 6'1 with shoes. He was definately 1.5 inches taller than Jerry Hall in small heels. If Jerry Hall is 5 ft 11 not the 6 ft she often claims to be then it would make sense in comparison. One things for certain he is absolutely not 5ft 10, he has looked too tall for too long to be nearer average. Jonathan Ross's height strangely seems to fluctuate. He claims 6'2 yet was clearly smaller than Jay Z who he stated to Jay Z "Your're a big fella. you must be 6'2" yet compared to other tall guests looks around 6'2. I thought Moore looked two inches shorter not three or four inches as below which is also odd in that Moore looked the same height as O'Grady who is apparently the same height as Ross. Jonathan Ross's exact height is very difficult to guess, I wouldn't be surprised given his obsession with it that he has soles in those shoes of his which give him an extra inch or two.

Lenad says on 20/Oct/08
I can believe he was a full 6'2 in the morning. My dad measures at 190.1cm in the morning and at evening he measures at 188.5cm. So asuming Moore was 188.5cm out of bed, in the evening he measured at 186.8cm.

GUK says on 18/Oct/08
I think he was, he is over 80 now though.

Hugh says on 17/Oct/08
Ross is an idiot. He is obsessed with height. He's 6ft0.5-6ft1 tops. Lenad, I'm not sure if Roger is quite 6ft1 nowadays, 5ft11 is too low though. I think Moore is a little over 6ft nowadays. I'd say 6ft2 at his peak. Note he's a lot heavier these days which may give the illusion he's shorter. He looked a mess on the Paul O'Grady show.

Anonymous says on 17/Oct/08
Roger Moore was on Paul o Grady earlier and was noticeably taller than Jerry Hall who is listed at 6 ft and she had smallish heels on. Look the same height as Paul o Grady who is 6 ft 2 by details I;ve seen. I still think he looks 6 ft 1.5 inches.

Lenad says on 16/Oct/08
5'11 is a joke. The guy is at least 6'1.

GUK says on 13/Oct/08
He looked 5ft 10 max to Jonathan Ross. But Ross wears big shoes, and Moore had normal dress shoes. Ross is smaller than 6ft 1 Tim Henman in tennis shoes. So possibly 5ft 11 now for Roger.

beatlefan says on 13/Oct/08
He did not look 3 inches shorter than Jonathan Ross on that show. He looked the same height. As I said earlier on the thread I have seen him in London and he is still six feet tall.

bananaman says on 13/Oct/08
He looked 3 inches shorter than Jonathan Ross ,where he appeared as a guest last week.Moore was 185cm (@ best when playing Bond.)Ross is 187 cm.Moore was and still is very trim which makes him look taller.

Hugh says on 12/Oct/08
I think they did something with the camera angles in the Last Crusade and For your eyes only. If Yaphet Kotto was 6ft5, which I doubt Roger Moore is 6ft4 lol. I met Connery and Glover in Person and Connery appeared closer to my height which is 6ft2.75.

adam says on 9/Oct/08
Anonymous was me. I apologize, my computer is dumb.

Anonymous says on 9/Oct/08
Close 6-2. 6-1½ is pretty accurate, I`d say. Julian Glover is at least 6-2, could be even more. Remember in "The Last Crusade" he was clearly taller than Ford and taller than Connery! That really makes me wonder... Connery wasn`t under 6-1½ even at that age and Glover looked taller!

Also I noticed that Moore doesnt look much shorter than Yaphet Kotto. Kotto is listed here as 6-4 but watching his other films (Alien, Running Man) he looks taller. Around 6-5, I`d say. Moore looked like one inch or maximum two inches shorter. So if he was barely shorter than Kotto and the same height as Glover, that really puts him over 6-2....

But then again in The Man With The Golden Gun the 6-5 Christopher Lee was like 4 inches taller than Moore, putting Roger under 6-2.

Height can truly be a mystery! I think that they have used some camera angles and stuff to make Moore look taller (or co-stars look shorter) in some occasions.

deano says on 5/Oct/08
i'd say roger's height is 6 ft and 3/4 of an inch or a shade under 6 ft 1 because in a photo standing next to pierce brosnan who is 6 ft 1 looked just shade smaller maybe it was brosnans hair which was bigger than rogers, but they both looked the same height.So roger could well be 6 ft but no taller.

Hmmm says on 4/Oct/08
he probably looks shorter than he is, because people have terrible posture at his age. my dad is 181cm (184cm peak, I measured him for a visa application) but looks 177cm these days. hes about 65.

nicole says on 3/Oct/08
Lenad,every person has his opinion and his impression when you meet someone or see the films and the pictures about the actors.For me after that i have seen all the bond films again with Roger and the pictures and the opinion of Christian who saw Roger in Gstaad 1995 about 6ft1inch then peak height is realistic near 6ft2inch.

Hugh says on 2/Oct/08
Lenad I'm not fooling anyone because I'm telling the truth.

Lenad says on 28/Sep/08
I think 186cm for peak suits him better and Hugh once again stop making lies of meeting celebrites. Cut it out your not fooling anyone.

Ray says on 19/Sep/08
I don't believe Moore was anything close to 6'2". I'd say in his youth he was a 184/5 cm guy or about 6'0.5". These days considering he's in his '80s, he's about 5'11 or so. He did an advert with Beckham and Williams for UNicef and they were barefoot and he had chunky boots on. Becks and Williams are 5'11" or maybe slightly under and Moore was about the same height...so do the math.

nicole says on 18/Sep/08
It`s also my opinion Roger was in his youth in the 187cm - 188cm.And the second point is that Roger doesn`t seem a person who claims a wrong height for himself.

Hugh says on 16/Sep/08
For your eyes only was on the other hight and he did look roughly the same height as julian Glover who is a solid 6ft2. He was definately around 6ft2 at his peak. Most likely. He claims that height anyway. Also he does have the dimensions of a 6ft2 guy. Long legs, broad shoulders.

Hugh says on 16/Sep/08
He would definately not rule out 6ft2 for this guy peakwise. I met him in London a few years back with my bro. He has certainly lost some height. I's say 6ft or just over nowadays. Still reasonably tall guy.

Lenad says on 16/Sep/08
I always estimated at least a solid 6'1 for this guy. Roger Moore was definitly above average because he was taller than most other men his James Bond movies.

Mr. R says on 6/Aug/08
I saw him years ago in New York, and he was much taller than I expected. He was close to 6-2 in his prime.

beatlefan says on 28/Jul/08
I've seen Roger in Charing Cross, London and he certainly wasn't 6'4". He wasn't that close to me but still around the six foot mark I'd say.

rob roy says on 28/Jul/08
i think roger moore is more than 6'1! he's probably 6'4". he really tall and good looking jimbo. but sadly to note however that he does not have any movie for a long time. what to him no one knows. unlike sean connery who is still active.

tubbs says on 18/Jul/08
Checkout Roger on stage with Lennox Lewis and Audley Harrison....yeah it sounds bizarre, but Roger hosted the World Sports Awards in 2000. He makes reference to their sizes saying that he looks a midget in comparison, but Lewis, who is near enough 6'5" only had 4" on him at the most, and Harrison, who was an inch taller than Lewis only looked to be 5" taller than Sir Roger. Rogers autobigraphy is out soon, so i'm sure there will be plenty of chances to guage his height with the obligatory plugging that goes on with such things....maybe on the Jonathan Ross show, Paul O'Grady again, and possibly on a couple of the American chat shows, he's mentioned it on his own website.

Scott B. says on 15/Jul/08
Roger Moore had at least 4 inches on 5'9 VanDamm. 6'1 for Moore.

Phil says on 27/Jun/08
Roger Moore was indeed 6feet2 in the morning

talker says on 25/Jun/08
after watching more of his early stuff i dont think Moore was ever 6'1.5"(1.87).And i am suspicious of too much shrinking except in special cases.I believe Moore was 1.85 in his youth and lost propably 2cm which is possible,4cm sounds too much to me,Moore looks like he kept himself in good shape,he wouldnt lose that much height.

Birnam says on 25/May/08
6'1 was the peak for Moore, today he's lucky if he's a plain 6'.
Brosnan is somewhere between 6'0.5" and 6'1.25" roughly speaking.

Scott B says on 24/May/08
Moore and Brosnan are the same height. 6'1 Barefoot.

Viper says on 22/May/08
This is the tallest Ive ever seen Moore look. Click Here

Birnam says on 19/May/08
Nicole, that could be barely possible.
There are well known pics showing Dalton, Moore and Brosnan together.
Dalton is about two inches taller than the other ones, wich are more or less in the same height range, BTW the picture is dated in the 90's when your "Christian" is belived to meet Moore. A 6'2" Moore would have made a near 6'4" Dalton, but we now the later is not over that very figure: 6'2" , or scrapping it. Think about it.

nicole says on 16/May/08
Hugh could be right. In 1995 january was a friend of mine Christian with his familiy like every year in winter in Gstaad.Then in a restaurant Christian saw Roger Moore going out of the restaurant and Christian came in. Christian is 5ft10.5 inch (barfooted) and 6ft with shoes and said to me Roger was two inches taller than him.

Agustín (Argentina) says on 16/May/08
Moore was an England "superstar" in The Persuaders (1971). And he was only Roger Moore in "The Saint" (1968 more or less). He could be able to select his co-stars in "The Persuaders". ¿Do you mean?. Mooore = top: 1.83 m.

Hugh says on 14/May/08
I think Moore was 6ft2 at his peak and is now scraping 6ft1.

Mard says on 6/May/08
Yeah Burger man, that's the point.
He's an actor and his impeccable posture gave him the role, that and his carisma, his acting skills ...er, let's get back to the topic.
Yeah, he was Bond regarding he had the looks, hedonistic behaviour...but also pretending it. Is job as living mannequin helped to overcome the taller and muscular precedent on Connery.

burger man says on 6/May/08
He was 3-4 inches shorter than VJ Amritaj in Octopussy.Moore was about 180 lbs when playing Bond which made him look taller.184 cm during his Bond years seems right.

Gonzalo says on 6/May/08
Well, he looks taller than 1`83 to me. Not sure about 1`88, that sounds too much for me. However, it is true as Tubbs points that he looked very similar in height to Elliot Golud, who is clearly a 1`90 guy. Moore was also 5 cms taller than Glenn Ford, listed here 1´80. To me Roger Moore was 1`85-86 at his peak

Mard says on 5/May/08
Well Gonzalo, it's not what it sounds to you but what is feasible.
His slender figure made him appear taller than he really is. Comparing him to other actors he's never under the 6' mark, possibly more, but never in hell 6'2" or close. So for me he was 6'1" at his heyday.

Gonzalo says on 5/May/08
Roger moore could have been 1`86 in his youth. He looked tall. To put him around 1`83 sounds like a joke to me

Scott B says on 24/Apr/08
Christopher Lee was 6'5 Moore is 6'1.

Ed T. says on 19/Apr/08
There seems to be alot of evidence on this site ( picture with Christopher Lee; couple of pictures with Gregory Peck , group picture with Peck, David Niven, etc. ) that would indicate that Moore was closer to 6 foot even, than he was to 6 '1". This would support my opinion that Lee Marvin was closer to 6'1" than he was to 6'2" , or maybe between 6'1" and 6'2". In a clip I saw from Shout at the Devil, I don't see Marvin looking more than one inch taller than Moore and more likely just a half inch taller.

Anonymous says on 19/Apr/08
When he stood back to back with Christopher Lee 6'4'', Moore looked @ least 4 inches shorter.6 foot even @ his peak seems right.

guk says on 11/Apr/08
I had a James Bond Annual in the 1970s (Moonraker I think) in the bio, Roger Moore is listed as between 6ft and 6ft 1, of course that could have been made up

Hugh says on 11/Apr/08
I still think 6ft2 is possible.

Ray says on 8/Apr/08
I don't believe Moore was 6'1.5" back in the day. With shoes on I'd say he hit that height. Just over 6' during the Saint and early bonds and then probably dropped a cm. He got totally owned by Lee in TMWTGG. I know he was 6'4" - 6'5" but at 6'1.5" barefoot for Moore the diff wouldn't have been that great.

talker says on 7/Apr/08
i just got the early Saint episodes DVD,in one of the first ones Roger looks much shorter than i thought.He is clearly shorter than actor Anthony Dawson who plays professor Dent in dr.No.Dawson looks shorter than Connery in that movie.
There are some other actors in same episode who are ALL taller than Moore.He looks to barely reach 6'in this,its really strange.

Hugh says on 29/Mar/08
Every Bond except Daniel Craig has been listed at 6ft2.

Hugh says on 28/Mar/08
6ft2 neighbourhood during his bond days now 6ft1 or a hair shorter.

Maden says on 20/Mar/08
The guy was a solid 6'1" when young and 6' now, he looked a lot of taller thanks to his lanky figure. Forget everything over that.

Hugh says on 20/Mar/08
Roger Moores peak height was 6ft2. These days I think hes still standing reasonably tall at just over 6ft.

Marcelo C. says on 18/Mar/08
Roger George Moore used to be one of the most elegant and well proportioned men I´ve seen on screen. His way of walking, moving, used to make him look as "a standard of elegance". Even taller actors weren´t so elegant as him, that´s why I consider that elegance isn´t also "tall height". Many tall actors aren´t elegant, and on the other side, many actors just having a decent height, are very elegant.

tubbs says on 29/Feb/08
I saw Escape to Athena today, and he still looked 6'2" opposite David Niven, Telly Savalas, he looked the same as Richard Roundtree, who was near 6'3" in the late 70's, and there was minimal difference between himself and 6'3" Elliott Gould. He still has great posture, and always looks like he's managed to lose very little height, even at 80 he still looks to be touching the 6'1" mark.

talker says on 27/Feb/08
a cousin of mine used to see Moore all the time in the late 70's at Swiss luxury ski resort Gstaad,and he told me he was then 1.87m like the peak height in the listing says.Thats what he looks in the Saint series.When in the 80's he played Bond he may have lost half inch.

Ivan 6'2.25 says on 6/Feb/08
6'1.5 seems right in his early days,in james bond the tailor measure him exactly 6'1.25 186 cms in the mid 70s quite tall too.

l1m3hous3 says on 5/Jan/08
I can't agree.
By his last Bond, Roger was a plain 6'.
Click Here

Anonymous says on 4/Jan/08
Checkout roger in the Persuaders, he looks a comfortable 6'2", seriously, recently on Paul O Grady he looked the same as him, O'Grady is a genuine 6'2". He still looks around the 6'1" mark, upgrade required. Just because he is 80, it doesn't mean he's lost a lot of height.

l1m3hous3 says on 2/Jan/08
He was 6'1" on his bond films, nowadays on the 6' neighbourhood.
He really never shrunk a big chunk, always maintained an excellent posture.

Minstrel Man says on 31/Dec/07
He looked at least 6'1" in the Bond movies, perhaps 6'1.5" in the morning.

Peak height was probably 6'1.5". Nowadays he looks about an inch shorter than Brosnan, so probably 6'0.5"

Anonymous says on 15/Dec/07
Moore looks 6'1" in the Bond movies. I particularly noticed in Moonraker, he looks equal in height to 6'1" Michael Lonsdale. Not sure about his earlier work. Could have been 6'1.5" in his peak. He was already 45 by the time his first Bond film started shooting, maybe he lost .5".

Meredith says on 25/Nov/07
to Scott B

You've seen all his Bond movies? Pretty much like the average viewer (through the cinema, tv, DVD's). A very good one to compare his height is TMWTG. In the final scene at the lab Chris Lee has a fair 4" on him, and that. So he does look no more than 6'1" assuming Lee was a little over 6'4", wich seems to be the case.

Scott B. says on 24/Nov/07
I am a Big fan of Roger Moore and have all seven of his Bond movies on DVD. Roger was at least 6'1 in the Bond days. When standing back to back with Christopher Lee there was about a 3 inch difference between them. Might even have been 6'2.

Meredith says on 21/Nov/07
quote:
he stuntman who did the rock climb commented on how difficult it was to make him look like Roger Moore due to the difference in height.
"He was a big guy, like 6'5", and i'm more like 5'6"

bloke, that's only a way of putting things.
At 5'6" that small dude looked like a stump next to 6'1" Moore.

tubbs says on 26/Sep/07
On the special features of For Your Eyes Only, Rick Sylvester, the stuntman who did the rock climb commented on how difficult it was to make him look like Roger Moore due to the difference in height.
"He was a big guy, like 6'5", and i'm more like 5'6" , now i'm not saying that Roger is anywhere near 6'5", but there is no way a guy who is 6ft even could be mistaken as 6'5", I am still convinced he was 6'2", and now is brushing the 6'1" mark.

Editor Rob says on 23/Sep/07
Lol, I saw old kate o'mara quote calling him 6ft 4!
"The studio were all laughing at the site of this tiny actress (I'm only 5ft 4) nearly laying out the urbane Roger Moore, who is 6ft 4"

Jim says on 17/Sep/07
I came to this site by accident, but by chance, I stood next to roger moore at a swimming pool in london at the time he was playing the saint I was 15 we both were barefoot, wet and pretty much exactly the same height ,I was 6,foot even then.I will say later with his hair up he looked taller

tubbs says on 19/Aug/07
I think Mike was having a larf...Reid never seemed to be 6'2 in Eastenders, especially opposite 6'4" Craig Fairbrass. I would say Mike was 6'0, any ideas Rob?

Mr Gumby says on 15/Aug/07
The late great Mike Reid used to be a stunt man for Roger in The Saint back in the late 60's and said he was much taller than Roger. Now Mike stood about 6'2 and Roger 6'1 so was Roger wearing lifts, or was Mike having a larf?

tubbs says on 12/Aug/07
Click Here

Quite a good interview here with Roger and Clive Anderson, after about 4 minutes, Roger gives his height as 6'2".

Anthony says on 25/Jun/07
I watched "Octopussy" the other night, and Moore, at 56 years old, looked at least 6'1 throughout the entire movie. He was definitely in the same range as 6'1-6'2 Louis Jordan, he was at a max 3 inches shorter than 6'4 Vijay Armitraj, and next to 6'2-6'3 Kabir Bedi has near his height as well. Alos, hsi two main female co-stars, Maude Adams (5'9) and Kristine Wayborn (5'8) were quite tall (I'm pretty sure I recall heels as well), and Moore still was taller than them. I'd say he was easily at least 6'1, as I mentioned.

dmeyer says on 30/May/07
in 1995 he looks an easy 4 in on vandamme so eiter in 95 he was steel 6'1 but if he was 6 ft then vandamme is 5'8

Brabek says on 4/May/07
I met Roger Moore in Canada in 2006 and he was about 5 ft 11.5, no more. Peak height was probably 6 ft.

Viper says on 27/Apr/07
Robert is right. Moore has never looked 6-2. Small chance he was 6-1 peak, buu I doubt even that.

Anonymous says on 27/Apr/07
Having seen a lot of Roger Moore's work,dating back to a film he made in 1954, it is easy to see that he was 6'2" at peak height. In the Persuaders he towers over 5'9" Curtis, who in most of the episodes wears what can only be described as some kind of platform heel. When he doesn't there is atleast 5" between them, maybe more. Also in one episode his height is listed as 6'3", he obviously isn't that height, but he is genuinely a tall guy. These days whenever he's on tv he still looks 6'1ish, check him out next to 6'2" Paul O'Grady, the difference is minimal.

Robert says on 23/Apr/07
No way Moore was 6-2 even in his 007 days.
A former Gym teacher at our school was 6-2, and he looks much more taller than Moore. I have not seen them together, but by looking at them apart, you can realize. For example, I also know that Charlton Heston is taller than Jack Nicholson, although I have never seen them together.
So, forget the 6-2 for Moore.
That's nonsense.

Also

Sam says on 20/Apr/07
That 6' listing couldn't be more inaccurate. He was definately 6'2 at his peak back in his 007 days. Now a solid 6'1-6'1.5. He shrunken at all.

tubbs says on 1/Apr/07
Have you seen them with Roger Moore? If not it's impossible to judge who is taller.

Robert says on 31/Mar/07
It is not bizarre.
I also know someone, who is 6'. He has been measured that height, and he clearly looks taller than Roger Moore.
If you compare Zidane and Sampras, I agree that they are about the same height, but both are taller than Roger Moore.

tubbs says on 30/Mar/07
Another bizarre comparison.....maybe if Sampras was involved it would be easier to judge.

Robert says on 23/Mar/07
Moore's peak height never could have been 187 cm.
Compare him to 6-1 football player Zinedine Zidane.
Can Moore have been taller than Zidane? No way.
Do they look the same height? Not either.
Zidane looks clearly taller.

Mario says on 5/Mar/07
Yeah well, Moore was 69 years old by the time that movie did came out and in 95 he did look about Brosnan's height. 6-1 I guess.

Viper says on 4/Mar/07
Its also very possible that Van Damme is as short as 5-8 as well. Roger did have 4-5 inches on Van Damme. That still only puts Moore at 6-1.

Tubbs says on 3/Mar/07
Gotxo,
you can probably tell that I am a fan of Rogers, and always thought of him as a solid 6'0", nothing more, nothing less, that was until I saw a quote of his stating that he was 6'2". At first I thought there was no chance of him being that tall, until I saw this site, there is a lot of evidence to suggest he is his claimed height. Recently I have seen The Quest, and dmeyer is pretty much on the money, Roger has atleast 4", sometimes looks like possibly more on Van Damme, who is around the 5'9" mark. I've also seen him in Bullseye with 6'2" Michael Caine, and he is pretty much the same as Caine throughout the whole movie. He is taller than too many 6footers to be anything less. Gotxo, you are a good contributor to the site, with sound reasonings to back up your viewpoints, but you can't honestly believe that the Sea Wolves picture is a reliable source to estimate anyones height, let alone Sir Rogers.

Mario says on 3/Mar/07
Gotxo, a picture in which the celebs are leaning doesn't say much to me + Moore foots are more sinked in the ground. I have similiar photos with friends in which I (180cm) look taller than one of my 184cm friends. Not that it doesn't say much about this, but what I want to say is those pictures aren't good to judge about height.

By the way 191cm Peck has a 3-4cm advantage on Moore in the movie. Did you see the oscar video?

Anthony says on 2/Mar/07
6'2 seems believable enough for me, or within a centimeter.

dmeyer says on 2/Mar/07
in the movie he did with vandamme in 95 the quest he looked easy 10 cm taller so was steel 6'1 10 years ago

Gotxo says on 2/Mar/07
Mario/tubbs
You deny every pic that goes against your beliefs.
Both are loosing height due to bad porture, but Peck's even worse.
And yet ther is more than one inch of advantage for Peck.

Viper says on 1/Mar/07
6-2 for Moore is silly. I could maybe buy 6-1 peak, but not 6-2. Hell, thats pretty much Connery's peak height!!!

Mario says on 1/Mar/07
Gotxo, most people now, including editor rob en glenn think now that Moore was pretty close to the 6 ft 2 mark in his youth, so there is nothing strange about it.

Really, a picture in which Moore is leaning or the horrible pictures that you did once post of Connery and Moore aren't going to change my mind on this guy.

186-187 cm peak height, 185cm for the 90s and currently 183-184cm. That's what my conclusion is after looking hundreds of pictures and watching the saint, the persuaders and of course Bond...

tomking says on 1/Mar/07
My friends who have a little house in Gstaad Switzerland said two month ago, they have seen Roger many times and he is still with 80 years 1.83m or 6 ft.
So the peak height is absolut correct and not logical to say this man was never 6`1.5`` in his younger day.

Gotxo says on 1/Mar/07
Tubbs/Mario
You must be blind dude, or you simply don't want to accept proofs that point in other directions than your fanactic thoughts. Roger is not at a lower part of the ground and if his legs are a little crossed Peck's head is too way tilted, so the one loosing more height there is Peck. Roger looks 6' there.

tubbs says on 28/Feb/07
Gotxo, it seems as though you are insinuating that myself and Mario are the same person,simply because we have the same opinion on Roger Moore, which doesn't fit yours. If you look closely at the picture from the Sea Wolves, Roger is in a relaxed posture, slouching, with his legs crossed, and is also standing at the lowest point of the dip. Maybe Rob can cast his eye on the picture for reliability, I saw this picture months ago, but didn't think it was good enough to judge height properly. I , like you Gotxo thought Roger Moore was 6ft even until I saw this site,the evidence to suggest he was 6'1+ is too much to ignore, think about it.

Gotxo says on 26/Feb/07
Mario=Tubbs

Same condition affect both, and Peck is VISIBLE TALLER.More than one inch for sure. This guy is very dodgy to measure cause he's genuinely tall, but found of big heeled shoes. After all he's a former model.

BTW you can deny an evidence as big as a temple when you have it in front of your eyes. Peck is 6'3 and Moore is nowhere near 6'2" on that pic.

Mario says on 25/Feb/07
Same conditions? Just look at the ground... then again why don't you respect the opinions of other persons Gotxo?

The oscar video (that sadly isn't anymore avaible) proofed that height difference between Connery and Moore was minimal, at least in 88".

tubbs says on 24/Feb/07
Gotxo.....???!?don't understand what you are trying to say?

Gotxo says on 23/Feb/07
Mario/Tubbs

You're mad dude, you're not able to recognise that you were wrong when you get sound evidence in front of your eyes. Peck was 190cm, moore was at the topmost 6'1" , IMHO was between 6'-6'1" wich is allready tall.
The ground is Ok, as same conditions affect Peck too, it's simply he's more than one inch bigger.
He was dwarfed by the real 6'2" Julian Glover in For Your Eyes Only, the camera work was very clever at hidding it, nevertheles is noticeable for a guy with a minimum attention.

Mario says on 21/Feb/07
Yeah well, Peck that great actor was 191cm and if Moore was 187cm (or perhaps it's possible Moore had lost a cm by that time), it makes sense.

Gonzalo says on 21/Feb/07
Whatever you want, Mario. Peck is two inches taller. If you prefer, watch The sea wolves and you will see that Peck is more than an inch taller. And Peck was over sixty in that movie.

Mario says on 20/Feb/07
In the first one Peck is much closer to the camera and in the second you should look at Moore's foot's and the uneven ground.

Gonzalo says on 20/Feb/07
Roger Moore looks clearly shorter than Gregory Peck i these two pictures. Peck was well into his sixties.
Click Here
Click Here
I don`t think Moore reached 6`2 in his prime

tubbs says on 19/Feb/07
When stood opposite the 6'2" Van Johnson in The Last Time I Saw Paris, Roger was atleast the same height, and in some scenes looked 0.5" taller. The film was made in 1954, so Roger would have been 26 or 27 at the time, this would probably be a good indication of his peak height. When he has mentioned 6'2" as his height in the past, I honestly think he has been telling the truth.

Bob says on 15/Feb/07
Imagine that you will see a picture of Moore and Pete Sampras, and you see that Moore is at least the same height as him.
Would you not laugh?

Anthony says on 15/Feb/07
When did all this talk of Moore being average come about? Moore was clearly at least 6'1 at his peak.

Bob says on 14/Feb/07
I would say that Moore is a guy of average range. He might be closer to the tall class, but I would not consider him as definitely tall.

Glenn says on 11/Feb/07
Thank heavens I know where my Roger Moore pic is.there is tons of old stuff I never posted.will do in time.I also lost at least 50 pics,maybe double that.I have friends that lost that and a couple of hundred as well.ouch.

tubbs says on 10/Feb/07
Good finds Mario....goes to show that Connery and Roger are very close in height, certainly not a 2" difference, and also the picture of Roger with Dalton and Lazenby shows that in 2002 he was very close in height to those two. Recently watched North Sea Hijack, and Moore has a good shot with George Baker near the start of the movie, Baker who is a genuine 6'4" only had a couple of inches at most on him. Moore also looked the nearly same as 6'2.5" Anthony Perkins, and had atleast 3" on James Mason. I think Moore should be put back upto atleast 6'0.5" for his current height, he was up there until Frank2 said he saw him buying a cardigan in the States!?!.....Glenn has met him, and he marked him as 6'1", there is plenty of evidence to suggest he is still near the 6'1". By the way Glenn, do you know what happened to your photo with Sir Roger?

Mario says on 10/Feb/07
Here a some more pics:
Click Here

Robert says on 9/Feb/07
Sean Conney is taller than Roger Moore.Their height difference is not that much but Connery is still taller.

tubbs says on 8/Feb/07
Click Here

Looks the same as Connery, and about half inch shorter than Caine....around 6'1.5" still in 1988.

Robert says on 1/Feb/07
There is nothing that someone can say about his height, unless you see him barefeet.

tubbs says on 1/Feb/07
Still hovering around the 6'1" mark these days.....looked 6'2" back in the day opposite the 6'4" Julius Harris in Live & Let Die,opposite the 6'5" Chris Lee, as Anthony already mentioned, opposite the 6'2" Julian Glover in For Your Eyes Only, opposite 6'2" Lee Marvin in Shout at the Devil,opposite the 6'3.5" Kabir Bedi in Octopussy - barefooted, opposite the 6'2.5" Anthony Perkins in North Sea Hijack the list goes on. He can give the illusion i suppose of not being that tall because he is a big guy all round - he was never a bean pole, it is only when he stands next to other stars that it shows how tall he really is.

Anthony says on 31/Jan/07
He was 187 when he played Bond. He looked it next to many, many co-stars, including the 6'5 Christopher Lee. And he's still tall today.

Robert says on 29/Jan/07
Use your brain guys.
Does it sound realistic that Moore was 187 cm, when playing James Bond?
Everyone I know that is 187, looks taller than Moore.
Foget 187 cm for Moore.
5-11 is enough

Anthony says on 27/Jan/07
Thank you, tubbs.

tubbs says on 25/Jan/07
To back up what Anthony is saying, when the producers of Bond were looking for someone to play the roll they advertised for guys who were atleast 6'1"...Connery obviously got the gig, who was near enough 6'3" back then, do you really think he'd have got the role if he was 5'10, the same applies to Roger Moore.

Anthony says on 24/Jan/07
Actually, height is very important to 007. The character of James Bond is supposed to be the ideal male fantasy: handsome, built, charming, intelligent, suave, adventurous and, yes, TALL. Height is essential to the character. One of the reasons people complain about Craig is that he was under the 6' mark (he looks 5'10 even at best to me).

Mike says on 24/Jan/07
Anthony, of course he would be chosen as bond if he would be average height.
Height does not play such a big role.
The best is if you see him barefeet.

George H says on 24/Jan/07
Moore is not even just 5'10" now! In his prime he always looked a legit 6'2" or very close to that. He doesn't strike me as a lifts guy, simply because he's got a realistic and fair view of himself. He was the first one to say he looked to old to continue playing Bond and he also was one of the few stars who always made and makes jokes about him only showing up for close-ups and that the rest of the stuff was all done by super athletic stunt guys and stand-ins. That doesn't sound like a guy who'd wear lifts to look taller. If you saw him in older movies he was always one of the taller guys. In that series he did with Tony Curtis he was mor than half a head taller and much broader build as well. 5'10" is ludicrous.

Anthony says on 23/Jan/07
Mike, Moore was not a lifts guy. He was legit 187 cm in his prime. If he was of average height, would he have been chosen as Bond? It would be known if a Bond actor wore lifts, as Brosnan, Dalton and Craig have all been rumored. Connery, Lazeny and, yes, Moore, are legit 6'1-6'2 guys (though I think Connery looked closer to 6'3 in his prime).

Mike says on 22/Jan/07
This guy certainly wears lifts that make him a couple of inches taller.
I would say that he is a guy of average height.

tubbs says on 18/Jan/07
Mike, the Sampras comparison is pretty random, what about comparisons with co stars, and other celebs. I must admit that I thought he was 6'0 peak, and around 5'11 now. That was until I saw this website, and there seems to be a lot of evidence to suggest 6'1.5/2. Even now he looks near 6'1, catch him whenever he's on the Paul O Grady show, and he's nearly the same as 6'2 O'Grady.

Mike says on 17/Jan/07
If 5'10 is unrealistic, then lets add it to 5'11"
6-2 is unrealistic as well. Compare him for example with tennisplayer Pete Sampras, who is 6-1, and Moore is at least the same height as Sampras is.Does that not sound unrealistic?I mean, Sampras really occurs to be taller.

Glenn says on 16/Jan/07
Near 6-2 in youth.

Anthony says on 16/Jan/07
Mike, I disagree. I definitely think he was 6'1-6'1.5 (probably 6'2-6'2.5 in shoes). In "The Man With The Golden Gun", he looked about 3.5-4 inches smaller than Christopher Lee, who was a solid 6'5 in his prime. So maybe he wasn't quite 6'2 except for in the morning, but in his peak he was at least 6'1. 5'10 and especially 5'9 are unrealistic.

Mike says on 16/Jan/07
No, Moore is not taller than Connery.I would say that connery is taller, but just a little bit on that picture, but this is not true either, because Connery looks to be more than one inch taller.
Moore must certainly have worn lifts, because he really does not look like being a tall man.

Mike says on 15/Jan/07
Anthony,he might not be 5-9, but he could never have been 6-2.That's not realistic.

Anthony says on 15/Jan/07
5'9 is rediculous, 6'2 or close to it at his peak is believable.

Mike says on 14/Jan/07
Moore really does not look like being tall.
I would say he is around 5-9. In case he is taller, then 5-10 at best.
I know friends who are 185, and it is obvious that they are taller.

pianochris123 says on 6/Jan/07
I walked past him with a friend of mine in Charing Cross, London. He is still just about six foot. Not bad considering he's 80 this year. Still the 2nd best Bond ever as well!

tomking says on 6/Jan/07
Friends of us saw him in 2003 in Gstaad (Switzerland) and they said he is 6ft.
He is 79 Years old now!His peak height is correct.

Glenn says on 25/Dec/06
I met him in 1991.he was near 6-2 in his youth.shrunk to 6-1 in 1991,and maybe less now.

Robin says on 24/Dec/06
I think Roger was never more than 6ft, He was in a film with David Niven who claimed to be 6ft and Roger stuggled to be as tall. Rogers claimed height was always 6ft2. His friend, Mr Connery, never claimed to be over 6ft1.

tubbs says on 7/Dec/06
I have watched those two films recently, and Roger is atleast 1 inch taller than Maud when she's in heels, and when they are both barefoot, there is quite a considerable difference in height. My estimate is Maud is around 5'11.5 barefoot, and around the 6'1 region in heels. Roger looks 3 inches shorter than the 6'5" Chris Lee in the dual picture, and is at the most 2.5" shorter than the 6'4" Vijay Armritaj in Octopussy (1983, aged 54, there are plenty of good close ups of the two together in Octopussy. As for his current height, he still looks 6'1", he looked the same as Paul O'Grady on his show a few weeks back, and O'Grady has been listed in various places as 6'2", and certainly looks it.

Anonymous says on 6/Dec/06
In two scenes (one from "The man with the golden gun", and another one in "Octopussy"), when Moore as Bond is supposedly making the love with Maud Adams (Octopussy and the other name of the girl Maud was interpreting at The man with the golden gun, can't remember) both take their shoes off, they are both straight and barefeet. Now, Maud Adams has been described as a tall, 6+ woman, and these secenes seem to corroborate that. Moore seemed to be slightly taller than Maud, perhaps even half an inch, now if Moore is 6'2 tall (1.88) I think that would make Maud a 6'1.5 (1.87) woman (1.85 to say the least though hardly), either Moore is shorter than 6'2 or Maud is definitely that tall. I want to think Moore is 6'2 and Maud is indeed 6'1.5 so that it makes sense.

Anonymous says on 18/Nov/06
with 6ft 5 christopher lee
Click Here

Mario says on 20/Sep/06
Gotxo, if your arguments aren't false? Why don't you post hyperlink here on Celebheights to the pictures of 'Young' Connery and 'Young' Moore together? I'm getting curious on those pics which proof according to [b]you[/b], your statement.

Most actors round there height up? Short actors Gotxo, but is Moore a short actor (?)and what would be the point of adding a half inch to his height? This can't be even considered argument Gotxo. Also your arguments get weak, weaker and weaker. Gotxo: Moore is 6 ft 1, because there are two black guy's taller than him in LALD and he wears 70s cowboy boots in a 70s movie... c'mon....

Gotxo says on 19/Sep/06
Mario:
You've a problem, i've to excuse of nothing, cause my arguments are not false.
I asume i could be wrong or the likes, but i'm not lying.
If i repeat similar things is that because till the date i havent't changed my mind on the subject.
Recheck your statements, if you ask me photos of both being young and next to each other, and you say it's impossible beacause they are scarce, then your argumentes can't have neither no graphical backup.

The only one who insults here is you, me saying that Moore exaggerates is not saying nothing wrong. Most actors do it because their agents say what they are supposed to say..."yeah i'm as tall as people expect me to be", "as successfull as in films", "i do eat that, i do not eat this".
That's part of the game chap, it's simply to understand.

Anonymous says on 18/Sep/06
theres a reasonably good pic of brosnan and moore on the set of goldeneye in the book james bond - the legacy. they look about the same height

Mario says on 17/Sep/06
I'm not insulting Got'x'o. But it annoy's that you say this every time:

" but never looked that compared to connery, even if he was supposedly 187cm and the later 189cm. The difference between them was noticeable."

Come with photos in which both men are young and if you can find them because they don't exist, excuse yourself for your false arguments. Now you are even insulting Roger Moore because he doesn't say the height that you want that he's.

Gotxo says on 16/Sep/06
Insulting again Mario?
Well you're not able to write properly my nick.
That might explain why do you confuse a guess with a certainty, you don't have a basis, you've a guess: Moore's shrunkment during his middle age.
Well there´s no prove at all of the former bigger height, nor of the shrunkment
Again you've same as me ideas, not facts.
The only diff are a lot of insults to expense.

Mario says on 16/Sep/06
Gotzo, don't be that Ignorant. You are always talking about Connery being so much taller than Moore, but you can't even come with photos in which both men are young. I have a basis, you don't.

Gotxo says on 15/Sep/06
Mario, we're on a Dead End, sorry but your reasons aren't better than mines, we're only just gessing, mind that. No not every one's height decreases in same manner but you're taking that Moore's shrunkment for granted with no basis at all.

Mario says on 9/Sep/06
Gotxo, once again you come with the Connery defence which doesn't say nothing. There are only "good" pictures of the two Bond's which come from the end the 80s, 90s and 00s. Tell me because you still haven't tell me Gotxo what that says about there peak height? Do you think that everyone lost the same height Gotxo?

Gotxo says on 8/Sep/06
Rob- To me that 6'2" sounds like an stretch, he can look very tall du to his
slender figure, but never looked that compared to connery, even if he was supposedly 187cm and the later 189cm. The difference between them was noticeable.
He also was a male model in his youth, lying about measures in that profession is common too.

Viper652 says on 8/Sep/06
I dont even buy that 6-2 morning height at all still. I still think hes 6-0 1/2 peak.

Editor Rob says on 8/Sep/06
Indiana Evening Gazette, 1967 Moore says:
6ft 2 "early in the morning...by late after noon I'm 5 feet 3" and 175lbs back then.
half joking, but an actor using their morning height now...can't blame em.

Tubbs says on 6/Sep/06
Click Here link from Rogers own website, taken from a story in the early 60's.

[Editor Rob: was channel flicking the other week and saw a scene in one bond, where he looked taller than desmond q guy, both were standing beside george baker.

Baker does claim on his resume to have been 6ft 4, don't know though]

piwo81 says on 31/Aug/06
Did anyone see spot that he was a little shorter than Walken (6') in "A View To A Kill" ?? How can he be 187 then???

the man with the golden gun says on 31/Aug/06
People on here are underestimating Roger Moores height. In the height of his fame he was a comfortable 6'2", watch him next to 6'4 Julius Harris (Tee Hee)in Live an Let Die.Even now he looks around the 6'1" mark.

Gotxo says on 24/Aug/06
absurd

tubbs says on 15/Aug/06
In Live And Let Die, we don't see the feet I don't think in the scene which Gotxo mentions, so maybe the bouncers are in platform shoes. It fits in with the era, there is also a shot in the car park scene of a platform shoe or two. What i'm trying to say is that they may have put 6'3 or 4 actors in platforms to look even bigger compared to Roger.

Mario says on 12/Aug/06
Why would it be unlikely? because it doesn't favour your theories?
The henchman of the bad-guy's in Bond-movie's are always on the tall side. Jaws, Hans, Tall german of TND, Gobinda, Kaufman, Necros etc... are all from 190 to 220cm.

Gotxo says on 2/Aug/06
Tubss/Mario
What matters?
He wears them in several scenes trhought the film, so that flic is not a valid way to compare him to supposedly tall co-stars.
Plus when he meets Solitarie for his #1 time in the secreet room of "The fillet of soul" he's taken out from there by two black bouncers.
If he was 6'2" then both bouncers would be like 6'5" or maybe over, possible but unlikely.

tubbs says on 1/Aug/06
I have the DVD of Live and Let Die, and it mentions the crocodile shoes in the special features. It has a close up of thm on Rogers feet, and they are low cut slip on shoes, not boots, as Gotxo mentions.

Mario says on 26/Jul/06
I haven't sayd that he does only wears them in the Crocodile farm? And what does it matter that he wears crocodile boots in some parts? It are the 70s, part of the mode....For more information about the Crocodile boots watch the LALD documantary. Be realistic.

Gotxo says on 25/Jul/06
Mario.
Watch again LALD Moore wears boots throughout the film, not only in the croc farm /drug fabric scene.