|
Iris says on 10/Mar/10
Very nice Gstaad.Funny i saw Mr.Bond two times last january.I`m 177cm and my man karsten is 184cm.Yes, Roger Moore is 180cm, it`s the situation today.
Hans says on 10/Mar/10
I agree with Martin. Saw him also in Gstaad several times. Today is he a strong 180cm man.
Thought he is taller,but film and reality is a big difference. Hugh 190-192cm says on 9/Mar/10
In 1981 it was Moore 187cm and Glover 188cm. Today it's moore 184cm and Glover 186cm. Shaun says on 2/Mar/10
The photograph and meeting secene at the ice rink was misleading and Glover looked 6'3" in that scene. But if you see Glover and Moore later in the restaurant Glover was not more than an inch taller. So in my view Moore at 6'1.5" and Glover 6'2"-6'2.5". 6'2.5" I think makes the most sense peak height. Shaun says on 2/Mar/10
6ft 1.5 to 6ft 2 peak and 6ft 0.5 (184cm) now. I agree Hugh. Shaun says on 27/Feb/10
Actually Julian Glover was barely 0.5 inches taller than Moore. If you actually watch them walk to the dinner table together Glover was certainly not over an inch taller so 6'3" is wrong. A flat 6'2" for Glover maybe 6'2.5" max at peak. Martin says on 15/Feb/10
Roger is a good client here in gstaad and very nice person.Met him several times when he is here in gstaad switzerland.He is today 180cm like me.Probably Pierce Brosnan is the same height maybe 1-2cm more.Hope i could help. 191cm/252lbs says on 7/Feb/10
6ft 1.5 to 6ft 2 peak and 6ft 0.5(184cm) now. That seems like fair estimate. Don't you agree Rob? Ollie says on 4/Feb/10
I met him in a swiss ski resort in April 2007, really nice man. i also have a photo of him standing with my mum and cousin. Shaun says on 4/Feb/10
MCV. Moore looked every bit as tall as Paul o Grady if not a little taller. Both look 6'1" to me. RisingForce says on 30/Jan/10
I still want to know how a 5'11" Burt Reynolds looked taller than Moore in Cannonball Run(1981), I know Reynolds wore lifts, but they must have been some huge lifts! And Moore must have been just 6'1" flat by that time. Hugh 190-192cm says on 17/Jan/10
6"0.25 now and 6"1.75 peak Anonymous says on 26/Dec/09
I think roger was 6 ft 1/2 peak. Anonymous says on 29/Nov/09
In that one awards clip both sean connery and michael caine had an inch on moore. H may have looked near 6ft2 in shoes when he was younger. McV says on 11/Nov/09
Click Here
So Moore was 2 inches taller than O’Grady ? Apart from when he’s standing straight and Paul is slouching you can see that he’s clearly shorter ! Hugh 191cm says on 6/Nov/09
Glover is 6ft2 tops. Moore at peak was close to 6ft2. 187cm so this heiht is bang on. Today he still looks over 6ft, say 6ft0.5. He was two inches taller than 6ft1 listed Paul O'Grady on his show a couple of years ago. The Voice of Reason says on 5/Nov/09
Muza, I won't be able to watch For Your Eyes Only again for a while, but I just saw Moonraker and Moore was every bit if not 1cm taller than 6'1" Michael Lonsdale. I stand by my original peak height for Moore at 186cm. He was 184cm at the time the pic was taken of him with Dalton and Brosnan. fabiano says on 4/Nov/09
Okay.Thought both (Roger and Pierce are 6ft2inch)but they are more than 1.5inch under that. GUK says on 1/Nov/09
forgot to post the pic!
Click Here GUK says on 1/Nov/09
Not as tall as Dalton by some way, but a similar height to Brosnan. He was a tall man though and above 6ft but I doubt he was ever 6ft 2 (maybe in shoes) Muza says on 1/Nov/09
Well, ahem, the voice.
Watch that film again, and pay attention to scene in wich both are dinning. It is filmed in a way that Rogs looks in the same height range as Glover, but when we see their complete bodies we can notice tough Rogs is tall is noticeable smaller than Julian Glover. 6' by then i would say. The Voice of Reason says on 31/Oct/09
I still think he was at least 186cm at peak. Just look at him next to Julian Glover (who was 188cm/189cm at the time) in For Your Eyes Only. He looked a strong 6'1" until the late 80's. ralf says on 29/Oct/09
Yes, Muza you are right Roger and Pierce are peak 184cm and not over this. Muza says on 28/Oct/09
I watched again the LALD extra DVD, it tells that producers picked Moore for the part cause their first option, Burt Reinols, was dropped due to his american accent an his stature. He was no taller than 6' and Bond should exceed this treshold. By how much they do not say! In either case, that gives us a mininum of 6'+ for Rog. In the ending scenes of those goodies we can see photos of the cast that were not taken on the plateau or for publicity, just pics of the team enjoying their spare time. In two of them Rog's top of the head is just a hair over Yaphet Kotto's eyebrows, i see a three " gap there. Then if Kotto is 6'4" Moore was never over 6'1". Those are the upper and lower bounds, 6' to 6'1" . End of history. Basilio says on 26/Oct/09
You can trust it because when you see a photo of a Brosnan or Moore with a short person ,they dont seem much taller,but when they appear with a big person tachan!! they are the same height than that big person.
Sorry for my English men,I am Spanish (Galician) Basilio says on 25/Oct/09
Hugh ,why dont you let to colapse it??stars always lie abaout their height,its a fact.You should consider always 2 o 3 cm less that you imagine for a star,in this case Sir Roger Moore.If you think that now Roger is 183cm probably his real height is 180 more or less.
PD:the same for brosnan,with the difference of his well known elevator shoes xd Hugh 191cm says on 18/Oct/09
187-188cm peak and 183-184cm now Hugh 191cm says on 15/Oct/09
Okay 187cm peak and 184cm now Hugh 191cm says on 27/Sep/09
I'd say 186-187cm peak and 184cm now. Hugh 191cm says on 27/Sep/09
I'd say 187cm peak and 184cm now. Lenad says on 26/Sep/09
Probably 186cm at peak and 182-183cm now 007 says on 23/Sep/09
Roger's peak was 6 ft 0 in. Roger is 5 ft 11 now. Not 6 ft 1.5 in. I'll give Sean 6 ft 2 in peak and 6 ft 1 now. FACT. aloy says on 23/Sep/09
Roger Moore wasn't 6'1.5" peak,never ever.His official height is 6'1".I was shocked to see that he was barely 2.5"-3" taller in shoes than barefooted Maud Adams who was 5'9" in "Man with Golden gun".In the same movie there was a shot where both sir Roger and Maud were barefooted before lovemaking and kissing each other standing straight.Roger was 1.5" taller.I am shocked but I cant see anything more than 5'11"-5'11.5" for Sir Roger moor.Sean connery was 188 cm peak and weak 6'1" now. GUK says on 14/Sep/09
Maybe slightly under 6ft now but was around 6ft 1 at peak. Moonraker annual had him at just over 6ft, bear in mind he was in his 50s then ikbtops says on 13/Sep/09
Those photos aren't particularly telling, even seeing as I just tried posting the same exact photos myself.
Sean was/is about 1/2 to 3/4 of an inch taller than a 6'1" Moore. Sir Sean and Sir Michael approximately identical in height 6'1.5 talker says on 10/Sep/09
i agree wih Frank2. .I must say i thought for some time Moore was about 6'1.5",he looks that in some of his movies.I started doubting that height when i saw him in his early Saint episodes,when apparently noone bothered to make him look taller because he was tall enough and wasnt a big star yet.Moore always had a great posture and along with his good looks managed to look taller. robbie says on 9/Sep/09
I think these are the correct heights for the bond actors:
Connery: 189cm (just look at him in Thunderball and Goldfinger you see why)
Lazenby: 188cm (just look at thim walking down the stairs in OHMSS)
Moore: 183cm (not more, Moore was tall but was certainly not the same height as Lazenby/Connery
Dalton: 187cm (I thought Dalton didn't even look that tall in his two Bond movies, but I saw him in Jane Eyre, and he certainly looks 187cm)
Brosnan:186cm (not more, he was listed this height and I think it's right) Frank2 says on 3/Sep/09
I met Lee back in the 1970s. He looked to be a solid 6'4". I ran into Roger Moore at a posh men's clothing store in Beverly Hills on Rodeo Drive. I believe that was back sometime in the late 1990s. He appeared to be my height or 5'11". But in fairness to him, he was slightly intoxicated and probably not standing up that straight. Turned out he was living at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel.
I'd say Moore was 6' in his prime. Maybe slightly over six feet. Ray says on 3/Sep/09
Frank2 says on 2/Sep/09
Moore was considerably shorter than 6'4" Christopher Lee in THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
I totally agree Frank2. Also, Moore wore very large heeled boots throughout that movie. Lee wore plimsoles. Either Lee was a lot more than 6'4" or Moore was scraping 6'. Frank2 says on 2/Sep/09
Moore was considerably shorter than 6'4" Christopher Lee in THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
Click Here
Click Here g says on 1/Sep/09
Also mention that Moore had very tall legs but a relatively short upper body.
He was 183-185cm, not 187cm-188cm Anonymous says on 14/Aug/09
roger moores height was 6 ft 1 1/2 peak end of. Hugh 191cm says on 13/Aug/09
187-188cm peak and 183-184cm now. adam says on 2/Aug/09
Rob has him just right! Tom says on 17/Jul/09
6 FT sounds right. I don't see 6 ft 1.5 in his hay day. No way. Sean was two inches taller. MHouillon says on 15/Jul/09
NO. Roger wore lifts. Look at the un-balance relation of his upper- and lower leg in many of his scenes.
PEAK HEIGHT : 185cm,
Actual Height: 182-183cm, he stood beside me, (his book-promo-event) and he was 2 inches taller than me (I'm 5'10). Lebensdorf says on 10/Jul/09
To all those who keep insisting 6'2'', have you ever seen The Man With the Golden Gun? Christopher Lee, who was 6'5'', had a very good four inches on Moore. A strong 6'1'' at peak Moore indeed was, but not taller. Of course, we must always keep in mind that, as Bond, more was 47 in his first film and 57 in his last film (not exactly a spring chicken during his tenure), but he looked 6'1'' also when he played Simon Templar in the 60s. Hugh 191cm says on 8/Jul/09
Moore looked like he couldve been 6ft2. I think at peak 6ft1.75. Doug says on 4/Jul/09
Definately a legit 6'1" at least. Saw Octopussy earlier and he was between 2 and 3 inches shorter than the Vijay tennis player in it who is a legit 6'4". Moore at 6'1.5" and Vijay at 6'4" is correct. The 5'11" claims are silly. tubbs says on 2/Jul/09
He's nearly as tall as Julius Harris in their scenes together, Harris is nearly 6'4", and he was taller than Hedison by a good inch, who would have been nearly 6'1" then. There are a lot of tall actors in Live and Let Die. Daniel says on 2/Jul/09
Yes, he was "un-lifted" in Live and Let die, that's why he looks 1.83m (6ft) and nothing more throughout the entire movie. tubbs says on 1/Jul/09
Roger never wore lifts........he was as tall as the 6'1" Richard Harris who wore inch lifts in many scenes for the Wild Geese. He wears low cut slip on shoes in Live and Let Die, with no room for lifts. Daniel says on 1/Jul/09
I agree with MHouillon 100%. To me, Roger Moore didn't ever look taller than 6 feet in Live and Let Die. adam says on 29/Jun/09
Moore was 6-1˝ peak max.
Hugh, Kotto was at least 6-4 and didnt look much taller than Moore but Moore wore lifts and camera angles helped him. MHouillon says on 24/Jun/09
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
A 185cm (6'1) in his prime, and a 182-183 nowadays. After Craig, the "shortest" or least tallest Bond. r says on 23/Jun/09
Roger always looked around 185cm, not 187 Hugh 190cm says on 21/Jun/09
I'd say Moore was still close to 6ft2 in 1988. tubbs says on 14/Jun/09
Check out the oscars video from 1988, Caine Connery and Rog present an award, Roger looks the same as Sean, maybe a tad taller. He still looked considerably taller than Paul O'Grady on his recent appearances on the show. O'Grady is listed as 6'1" on celebheights. On the same show he looked 3" taller than the 5'11" Jerry Hall. Atleast 184 now, maybe 'moore'. Ali says on 13/Jun/09
6'1 and 6'2 makes no sense as he is
considerably shorter(2.5 inches or more) than Sean Connery
who was 189 cm peak.
Where is the logic in this? Scroll
down and check the picture I gave
a link to.
One can see clearly that Connery is a big
man and Connery more medium/average.
His peak might be 6 feet, but I doubt it
strongly. 5'10-5'11. Hugh 190cm says on 5/Jun/09
A strong 6ft now and a weak 6ft2 peak. MHouillon says on 3/Jun/09
He is never 5'10 now. He was taller than me by at least 2 inches (I'm 5'10).
No lifts. He wore thin-heeled loafers, and when he sat down, one could see his foot "deep down" in the shoe. No lifts.
Again: 185-186cm in his prime, 183cm (6 ft) now.
187cm is too high. Lenad says on 31/May/09
I saw a solid 6ft0 man in Live and let die like 183-184cm but he was obviously not that low Lebensdorf says on 30/May/09
Now, I think he is about 5-10. Isn't he in his eighties anyway? At peak, 6-1, but no taller than that. MHouillon says on 30/May/09
I just met him, 30 minutes ago. He signed his books in a Hamburg Bookstore, close to where I live. Me at 5'10 stood next to him. 6 feet is dead on. 183cm for sure.
He wore thin-soled and heeled loafers. No lifts.
I think 186 in his heydays, 183cm (6 ft) now is for sure. Lenad says on 28/May/09
Hugh don't pose as anonymos Hugh 190cm says on 23/May/09
Could've sworn I only saw an inch between him and 6ft4 Yaphett Kotto (Some even say 6ft5!) in Live and Let Die. Anonymous says on 6/May/09
5ft11.5 is ridiculous. I'd say 6ft0.5 now and almost 6ft2 in his prime. Christoffer Slotte says on 4/May/09
I was very close to him today and I'd put him at about 6 ft or 5'11˝''. I am 6'1 myself and I was a little bit taller. Anonymous says on 30/Apr/09
6ft2 peak is quite possible. Lenad says on 26/Apr/09
Most likely a strong 6'1 at peak but a possibility of a weak 6'2 Iceman says on 25/Apr/09
In the Daily Mail last week (Tuesday)-Roger was interviewed and he said that he was 6 foot 2.He was considered chubby as a teenager and has had difficuly in keeping his weight down throughout his career.Can't believe he was as tall as Connery. Lenad says on 24/Apr/09
A strong 6'1 possibly a weak 6'2 Daniel says on 21/Apr/09
Anyway, I never see the guy look more than 1.85m (6'1'' flat), not even in the 60s when he played that Simon Templar character Daniel says on 20/Apr/09
Thanks, Reason, very interesting information. The Voice of Reason says on 10/Apr/09
In response Daniel's post on 4/Apr/09:
Actually, most of the "black dudes" in Live and Let Die were 6'3" plus: Yaphet Kotto (Kananga/Mr. Bigg) was about 6'4", Julius Harris (Tee Hee) was 6'3.5", Geoffrey Holder (Baron Samedi) was 6'6", and the guy who played Quarrel Jr. looked about 6'2". Therefore, Roger Moore's peak was about 6'1.5" Lenad says on 8/Apr/09
I think Moore, Carrey and Caine were/are strong 6'1 guys. Hugh 190cm says on 7/Apr/09
Sorry Yaphett Kotto is 6ft4 minimum and has been listed as 6ft6! So that is 6ft2 garunteed for Moore! Hugh 190cm says on 7/Apr/09
Sorry Daniel but Live and Let Die is where Moore looked his tallest. He looked every inch of 6ft2 next to Yaphett Kotto (191cm-193cm). Some say Kotto was 6ft4.5 at his peak. Anonymous says on 6/Apr/09
According to the James Bond film tailors in London, at 6' 1.75" he is the tallest of all the Bond actors. The tailors who have fitted and measured each of the 5 Bonds over the years claim the following heights for each of the other Bond actors: Sean Connery 6' 1 1/2" without shoes, George Lazenby 6' 1 1/2" without shoes, Roger Moore 6' 1.25" without shoes and Pierce Brosnan 6' 1.25" without shoes. Daniel says on 4/Apr/09
In the movie "Live and Let Die" Roger Moore didn't look taller than 6 ft even (1.83m). He couldn't have been 6'1'' unless all the black dudes of the cast had been 6'3'' on average, which in my opinion is unreasonable. Hugh 190cm says on 4/Apr/09
Roger Moore really looked like a badass with that beard. Hugh 190cm says on 3/Apr/09
Moore actually looks quite similiar to Caine. Aswell Connery clearly has the edge on Caine. Doug says on 2/Apr/09
There was roughly a 3.5 inch difference in height between Moore and Lee when they stood back to back. Moore I think stood 6'1.5" at peak, Lee was a likely 195cm, verging on 6'5". It is clear Moore was never quite 6'2" although he came close at peak. Tall man but looked very average compared to Christopher Lee who loomed above even near 6'2" guys. Yazov says on 29/Mar/09
Moore looks a little bit shorter than Sean Connery and Michael Caine. I would say 6'1. Also, Caine looks a little taller than Connery here:
Click Here adam says on 25/Mar/09
A strong 6-1, yep. In his Bond days he was slim and very long-legged which of course added the illusion of him being taller. RisingForce says on 22/Mar/09
Roger did start looking a bit shorter in the 80's, but 6'2" peak height is right. He still looked 6'1" next to 5'9" Jean-Claude Van Damme in The Quest which was made in 1996. I haven't seen him in a movie that was made after that so I couldn't say how tall he is these days. Hugh2 says on 20/Mar/09
My Friend who lives in London met Roger in 1995. He said Roger was very close to 6ft2. Hugh2 says on 20/Mar/09
Lenad's estimates with Carrey, Moore and Caine are accurate. In the 80's and 90's I'd say Moore was still close to 6ft2. MartinVienna says on 17/Mar/09
Roger Moore is about 6 ft (183cm). He is not taller now. RisingForce says on 12/Mar/09
Moore and Caine were more like 6'2". Carrey is more like 6'1". Lenad says on 9/Mar/09
I think if you put Jim Carrey, Michal Caine, a younger Roger Moore they'd all be pretty much the same height. \_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ says on 5/Mar/09
Very close to 6ft2 if not 6ft2 in his younger years. He still looks fairly tall. A little over 6ft maybe. linebacker40 says on 5/Mar/09
Oddly enough, I only thought he was 5'10". But after seeing several of his bond films, it became more and more apparent that he was a strong 6' to 6'1" even. Likely was 6'1" or a bit more throughout his youth. Tubbs says on 24/Feb/09
He looked taller than Michael Caine in a show they did about the BBC wardrobe department together, and there were plenty of good shots on that show to judge....Connery has never been 3" taller than Roger. If you check the 1988 oscars Roger looks a fraction taller than Sean, I would put money on them looking virtually the same height today, as Sean doesn't have great posture for a 6'2" guy, and Roger has impeccable posture. Also check out the Sea Wolves, barefooted next to 6'3.5" Greg Peck in shoes, the difference is only 2", when both in uniform there is probably 4cm difference. 6'2" when younger, atleast 6'1" today. RisingForce says on 15/Feb/09
I agree. He was 6'2", he had lost height by the time of the last Bond movie he did because he was barely taller than Christopher Walken. GUK says on 13/Feb/09
The moonraker album had him "between 6ft and 6ft 1" Brad says on 13/Feb/09
6' 2" easy when Warner Bros. had him many years ago. I've met some of Warner Bros.' TV guys from back then and seeing him standing by them, he sure looks it except by Garner. Looked same as "The Saint" and still that as 007 with Chistopher Lee in '74. 6' today. Anonymous says on 11/Feb/09
guys in the mroing straight after I wake up Im 5 ft 9 then later in the morning not that late about 15 - 20 minutes later im 5ft 8 1/2 and then very much later in the day plus the normal time in the day Im 5 ft 8.So my normal height is 5 ft 8 and abit like just a point under half of a quarter its really hardly anything under 5 ft 8 and half of a qaurter.It practically is 5 ft 8 and half of a quarter. Anonymous says on 11/Feb/09
There all small they look nothing like six foot man if your just talking business thats fine but their real life height is much shorter for connery its like 5 ft 9 1/2 to 5 ft 10 1/2 at peak trust me otherwise your blind, if you have actually met them..And if you talk back to me your even more crazy. Doug says on 7/Feb/09
Echoing what Tubbs said below I also thought he still looked 6'0.5"-6'1" on his recent TV appearances judging by his height in relation to others. ANybody who thinks he is 5'10" or below are seriously incorrect, he had 2 inches (at least) on Jerry Hall who is 5'11!! I remember seeing them together and thinking, wow he must be at least 6 even. Doug says on 7/Feb/09
Ali does have a point though about the difference between him and Connery. Connery isn't even standing up straight and appears to have 2 inches on him. I can't see Moore under six feet at peak he was about 3-4 inches shorter than Christopher Lee who was a clearly 6'5" at peak at least. I think 6 ft 1.5 in (187 cm) is very accurate. Been watching his films all these years and sorry he just looks too tall compared to the average guys to not have been over six foot. Compared to many he has always looked tall in his films not massive but certianly 6'1". Those who think he was only 5'9" are ridiculous. I am a little confused though by his 5'11" look next to Connery. jennifer says on 7/Feb/09
Roger is a difficult case. I think his good posture even with 80 years makes him look taller.But peak height could be a strong 184cm. Arbaces says on 6/Feb/09
Hi Anonymous. Roger Moore was at most 5 ft 11 when I met him in February 2006. jennifer says on 5/Feb/09
Met Roger in Gstaad Switzerland in November 2002. He was 1inch taller than me.I`m 5ft10.5inch.Very nice man. RisingForce says on 4/Feb/09
I agree with Hugh.
I think Moore was 6-2 in the morning like he claimed. Hugh says on 3/Feb/09
Ali, you're pathetic and a worthless man. Get off this site. Anonymous says on 3/Feb/09
hey arbaces are you saying that roger moore was 5 ft 9 at peak or when you recently met him. Anonymous says on 3/Feb/09
if people still think that roiger moore is 6 ft 1 1/2 then make sure you look at his footwear when you meet him Im sure you'll see 4 1/2 inch lifts or that he is in fact about 5 ft 8 1/2 to 5 ft 9. Lenad says on 31/Jan/09
Moore does look like he could pass for 6'2 in his younger days. Seriously, he did look 6'1 minimum! Arbaces says on 29/Jan/09
You're absolutely right Ali, I met Roger Moore and he is no more than 180cm. Ali says on 25/Jan/09
My friends. Roger Moore was not tall
like Connery.
Roger Moore's peak height is about 180cm.
He is considerable shorter than Connery.
Check this picture with Moore and Connery:
Click Here
It's obvious that Connery is considerably taller,
at least 2 inches. Sean Connery's peak height
is 6-2, which makes Moore about 180-183 cm.
Moore was never 6-1 or taller. He wears lifts
on special occasions. Hugh says on 24/Jan/09
I'd say a weak 6ft2 in his prime and now maybe 6ft0.5. That seems about right. Mr. R. says on 24/Jan/09
I met Roger many years ago when I moved to New York. He was definitely close to 6-2. Now he looks closer to 6 feet. Josh says on 23/Jan/09
In his new autobiography he said he stood over 6ft. In one interview he stated 6ft 1. Also while making an episode on the saint he said near 6ft 2. Hugh says on 11/Jan/09
I think 6ft2 when he was younger seems fair. I still think he's a bit over 6ft. 184cm maybe? Lenad says on 29/Dec/08
A solid 186cm or a weak 187cm at peak. Lenad says on 29/Dec/08
A weak 6'2 is a weak 188cm. I think a weak 6'1.5 (187cm) at peak. Hugh says on 26/Dec/08
I'd say both Swartzneggar and Moore are still a little over 6ft these days. I watched a View to a Kill and Moore looked about 2cm taller than Christopher Walken. RisingForce says on 24/Dec/08
6-2 peak and probably 6-0 now. He's identicle to Arnold Schwarzenegger for both peak and current height. Jay says on 5/Dec/08
Hugh wrote: I think a weak 6ft2 peak and now a strong 6ft.
Sounds about right. 6'0 1/2" sounds about right for his current height. bees says on 2/Dec/08
I will meet him in Oslo on friday, and I will measure him. I am quite sure that he is 6`0 now (and 6`1 in the sixties.I will tell you... Anonymous says on 2/Dec/08
Hey Lenad, Hugh I dont lie about my comments I try to sound as realistic and decent about the TRUTH as I can. Hugh and Lenad just take THIS as the truth or in your opinion just an honest opinion, now I cant sound any fairer than that can I. Anonymous says on 2/Dec/08
Hugh even when I was little kid I believed he was 6 ft 2 well actually I thought he was 6 ft 1 1/2 but I look at them and I think, "he aint 6 ft 2" hes atleast 4 inches smaller, at max 4 inch smaller. Anonymous says on 2/Dec/08
sorry to owner of this site, I couldnt be ruder with my bad language Im really sorry sir/madame. Lenad and Hugh if you look on this website, and go to bruce forsyth By all means continue what you guys are doing thats fine, but on my case if you go to bruce forsyth on this website somewhere there someone wrote that they saw bruce in surrey shopping and he looked 5 ft 6 maximum and website lists him today as 5 ft 11.So there you are thats got to be some truth(I mean him being 5 ft 6 at max). Anonymous says on 2/Dec/08
I mean even when celebs mainly Im talking about Roger Moore look tall its cause there wearing very high lifts or just high lifts, and I'm talking about them on screen. Trust me guys after I've finnish writing this I wont write anymore cause I've said my part. When roger looks tall its cause he stands around short people, well, quite short.I think you guys are the mental ones(lenad and Hugh) calling people names if you dont believe it ,dont, just dont be rude, its other peoples opinion. cause if you consider roger to be 6 ft 2 and consider that the truth truth, being the actual truth then your mental or wierd. But if you consider that its not true or you consider it true but not saying it then your not mental. I see it as just looking at there bodys ON SCREEN only, and from looking at them their not 6 ft 2, thats roger moore. e erm this is not from a mental asylem, lenad and hugh though you could be from a mental asylum, I saw a relative of mine who was 6 ft 2 bear feet and hes much taller than roger moore I can assure you that. And since mr lenad and Hugh were kinda rude to me I thought I'll be rude back, thats all. Lenad says on 27/Nov/08
Deano who the hell are you?! What are you typing from!? A computer in a god-damn mental asylum! Get yourself strapped, electrocuted and placed in padded cell!!!! Hugh says on 27/Nov/08
Well a stunt man on For your Eyes Only claimed Roger Moore was 6ft5!. Now that's laughable. I'm still more than confident he stood 6ft2 in his younger years. Hugh says on 27/Nov/08
Tubbs is spot on with his estimates for Moore. I think 6ft0.5 is probably the lowest Roger could be. This also backs up 6ft2 say 30 years ago. Arbaces says on 26/Nov/08
I saw him in 2006 and he's no more than 5 ft 11 Tubbs says on 26/Nov/08
his recent appearances on tv seem to suggest he is still 6'1. There was little between himself and Jonathan Ross, although the angles weren't great to judge between the two, and he had what looked like 2 inches on Paul O Grady, and 3 on Jerry Hall. He keeps good posture. Upgrade required possibly, atleast to 184cm. Hugh says on 25/Nov/08
I think a weak 6ft2 peak and now a strong 6ft. harry says on 24/Nov/08
There's a picture of Roger Moore stood with Clint Eastwood and his wife Maggies from the early 70's in The unauthorised biog. of Clint Eastwood by Patrick Mcgilligan(check it out), and if Moore had been a legit 6' -6'1" then then Eastwood must have been unbelievably huge, well over his given height of 6'4". Roger looks 5'10 solid and no more. Hugh says on 23/Nov/08
Rob, get rid of this joker. Anway I think Moore was 188cm peak and is now 184cm. He's certainly not under 6ft. Still a considerably tall guy. deano says on 18/Nov/08
hey guys someone called 4"10 Guy said that the listed iain lee grandson of actor christopher lee at 6 ft 3 is a matter of fact 5 ft 11 so thATS yes Im right 4 inches added ladies and gentlement go and read it your self if you dont believe me.Of course you can continue your course of thinking people are too much over their own height, thats fine if its a business, all respects,I just like to get out the truths sometimes. Nicole says on 18/Nov/08
I`m beginning to think Roger was never over 6ft1inch maybe a strong 184cm peak height and then loosing with age 2cm and is at the moment 182cm. Steve says on 16/Nov/08
I saw him several years ago at the Mount Kenya Safari Club. He appeared to be around 6'1". This was around 1992. deano says on 16/Nov/08
but I think for bigger people, like richard kiel, they put more inches on. deano says on 16/Nov/08
I know that they lie about heights now because a famous bollywood actor called mithun chakraborty is put down as 6 ft0 but in real life he is as matter of fact 5 ft 8 now thats not a lie because my uncle met him many times as hes big fan of him and he has said mithuns 5 ft 8 and even one day, after looking on the net where they put mithun at 6 ft0 I then went to my mum and told her that he was 6 ft 0 but she didnt beleive me and said hes 5 ft 8.So there you have it guys, some celebs do have inches put on them,by exactly 4 inches. Hugh says on 16/Nov/08
Lets just take it that you're idiot, deano. deano says on 14/Nov/08
Lets just take it as CELEB height. deano says on 14/Nov/08
another thing guys is that if you see mithun in a photo next to salman khan, another great bollywood actor, he does look taller than the 5 ft 8 salman but he is definatly wearing higher lifts than salman I dont know if salmans wearing any lifts maybe just normal shoes , you can clearly see that, and without it he would only I'd say look about 1 and half to two inches taller but then again they would be adding inches to salman also by I'd say more likely to be two inches added rather than 4 cause salman looks quite tall.
look up the picture guys. talker says on 13/Nov/08
there's a 1963 episode of "the saint" called "starring the saint" in which Simon Templar(Moore) is asked to star in a movie about his life!!In a scene in this episode he meets a film director who asks him his height and Moore as Simon Templar says 6'2".However,personally i believe Moore's peak height was 6'1". Hugh says on 12/Nov/08
6ft0.5 to 6ft1 for Moore these days and 6ft2 peak. deano says on 10/Nov/08
okay im sorry if i've upset a few people but im just and I mean just giving my honest opinion on this, and remember its my opinion,I never said your wrong.Im not trying to change views Its just the way I see things,after seeing someone like roger at a big height I'd literally think that hes not its literally how I see things ,its naterul reaction not changing other peoples view. harry says on 6/Nov/08
In his new book "my word is my Bond", he indirectly reveals his height as "six -foot -one". This was a reference to his younger days though. It is possible I suppose that he was around the 186-187cm range as a young man. Being 80 yrs old, he's obviously lost maybe 4cm in height. There's that famous pic of him stood back to back from the "Man with the Golden Gun" with the great Christopher Lee.(6'4") Roger looks 6ft plus in that picture. What do people think? Mr Lee has got his head stretched upwards though? Ray says on 4/Nov/08
I remember he was on stage with Michael Parkinson and he Parky asked him about his height. Roger said 6'1.5" but he was referring to his youth. I can accept 6'1" for him in his youth. He did look quite tall. Never 6'2" though. RisingForce says on 4/Nov/08
I believe his 6'2" claim. Probably only about 6'0" now though. Very similar height to Arnold Schwarzenegger as far as peak and current height. Hugh says on 2/Nov/08
No Harry, Deano is just being ridiculous. He's saying that Connery was 6ft at his peak and is now a shade under 5ft11! Daniel Craig is 5ft6.5, Pierce Brosnan is 5ft9.5. Deano, you really are thick as a plank. The Voice of Reason says on 31/Oct/08
This is ridiculous!
Roger Moore peak= 186 cm, Now= 183 cm
To proove that heels doesn't play a factor...
In a scene in Live and Let Die, he is seen wearing dress shoes made of aligator skin without a substantial heel standing about 2" shorter than 6'3.5" Julius Harris.
By the way, Jonathan Ross= 6'1.5" harry says on 31/Oct/08
Hugh and Deano: Interesting guys, I agree, Johnathon Ross is maybe a solid 6ft, to a possible 6'1". I couldn't believe how short roger was. I think 5'9" -5'10" is possibly closer to the truth. I relise he is 80 and could have shrunk 2-2.5", but he always wore high heels in the Bond movies. I don't wish to lower Roger Moore in any way, he is and has always been a class act. But I felt the same. Another strange thing, if you look in his new autobiographt "My Word is My Bond" - there is a picture of all the Bonds except Connery stood in a line on either side of Parky. Moore looks tiny in comparison to the other bond actors. Maybe at he was a good six feet when he was a younger man. deano says on 30/Oct/08
my guess at roger moores real height 5 ft 10 1/2 deano says on 24/Oct/08
and the people who get heights from "apparantly" their cvs could be just false information.I look at peoples height from the prospective of their body build and height. deano says on 24/Oct/08
now evryone if you want to, take everything that I said and you should be able to get good appropriate and resonable height for the celebs. deano says on 24/Oct/08
now I've seen ordinary people who are 6 ft 2 and they look much bigger than roger moore,now lol if roger moore were 6 ft 2 he'd look abit lets say different now that I dont want to put anything rude,no what Im saying is that keeping they roger moores 5ft 10 body the way it is, and just upscaling it to 6 ft 2 ,again I dont to sound rude, but alot different to other people. deano says on 24/Oct/08
now ordinary people in real life are more taller than all celebritys put together you just dont see them everyday. deano says on 24/Oct/08
instead of making them have huge upper bodys and huge legs and huge heads to be 6ft2 you can make them something appropriate and resonable and true to the actuall height to something like 5ft or to be fair to you guys 5 ft 11.I hope you understand what I mean. deano says on 24/Oct/08
and remmeber he does where lifts so that may help him look taller, but thats it. Now I think you could say they lie but theres always a reason for it so that clears that,and I can tell you hughhhhhh, that I werent born yesterday I have seen lots of roger moore things like movies james bond,like documentarys like the ones that are shown on tv to showcase james bond,programs like 'the saint and trust me I was very sure of rogers height after seeing him in the saint now thats where he hardly ever worn lifts, and he looked small, well what Im saying is smaller than 6 ft 2 let alone 6ft 1 1/2, by say an even 3 inches or how I estimated as 3 and 1/2inches . deano says on 24/Oct/08
okay now considering the truth this is how i've put the bonds heights after taking away 3 and 1/2 inches off the listed heights which come to as more of a realistic height, here they are:
sean connery - is a shade under 5ft 11
george lazenby - is somewhere around 5 ft 10 1/2 and 5 ft 11 but seeing as he's been listed as 6ft 2 1/2 i'd put him same as sean connery, but because I got a real estmate of connerys height as 6 ft 2.4 something i took 3 inch away, and got his as a definate a shade under 5 ft 11.but not sure about lazenby so i'd just give him a shade under 5 ft 11 aswell
roger moore - 5 ft 10 who later turned 5 ft 9 1/2 and is definatly much shorter as seen on jonathan ross show, hes 5 ft 8 or could most likly to be a little bit under.as he looked alot shorter than jonathan ross by 3 inches or a little more, who is listed 6ft 1 but on my ratio 5ft10, as what roger used to be but has shrunk alot.or you never know might have always been that height(that height from jonathan ross show).
timothy dalton - 5 ft 10 1/2
pierce brosnan - 5 ft 9 1/2
daniel craig - 5 ft 6 1/2. Hugh says on 24/Oct/08
deano, you were born yesterday. Roger 5ft11 peak and 5ft8 now. Sean Connery Connery 6ft peak, Timothy Dalton 5ft11.5! LOL!. Rob, get this joker off the site. We don't need lunacy deano says on 23/Oct/08
and one other thing with famous heights theres usually inches added on rather then taken off.As we can clearly see with people like certainly like roger moore and richard kiel.Now I kinda repeated my self there with roger moores height just to remind you not put silly unreal height gestures on like 6ft 2 to for roger moore lol.This guy never looks tall nxt to anyone in films unless of course it was someone really small.cause c'mon if were to be 6 ft 2 that would make everyone in the film 'the spy who loved me' during the first scene where m, bond and other people in the secret agency are disscussing things, are 6 ft 4 and 6 ft 5 etc ,they are not that tall.you see what i mean though, and even they dont look 6 ft 3, maybe make the 6 ft mark but thats it.From my prospective Im looking at the true side of things with famous peoples heights, obviously the people who list them as taller baically are trying to make them bigger because their like icon or something. deano says on 23/Oct/08
okay not everyones height is fake, say someone like steve mcfadden who plays phil on eastenders, is the height he is listed at of 5 ft 8 I mean because I belive in the fakeness of famouse peoples heights i'd even say steve even had a couple of inches added on him. deano says on 23/Oct/08
okay not everyones height is fake, say someone like steve mcfadden who plays phil on eastenders, is the height he is listed at of 5 ft 8 I mean because I belive in the fakeness of famouse peoples heights i'd even say steve even had a couple of inches added on him. deano says on 23/Oct/08
please, roger is no way 6ft 2 one of my relatives is 6 ft 2 or was because hes probably taller now, who looked huge and tall but im afraid roger wears high heels and not even that would make him 6 ft 2! oh my god!. deano says on 23/Oct/08
okay now people lets get to it these people are not the height they say they are,at heights of 6 ft or even 6 ft 1, now look at the that, but then they say hes 6 ft 1 1/2, roger is probably 5 ft 10 1/2 at his tallest, now thats realistic, I mean with his heels on he'd be 6ft 1/2 at best the only bond who looked tall was actually sean connery who who could of been 6ft then suddenly shrinked, which showed in the later 80's I think at an award show, where they were next to each other, (sir roger and sir sean). which then made roger look tall doesent matter how high heels he was wearing and I know that he wears high ones, and those kind of high heels are about 1 and 1/2 inches or 2 inches I would say.And c'mon timothy dalton, okay he looks taller than roger whos as i said is 5ft 10 1/2 at best so that would make timothy 5 ft 11 1/2 now that is reasonable, I cant say that these people are the height they claim to be just by looking at them and no they do not have massive heads or something, you can easily tell how tall people are when you see them, or have a rough guess of their height, cause people who are tall people do look tall, and people who are medium built are medium built and people who look small etc.My personal opinion of bonds heights and in general any famous persons height to be fake, in the way that they are smaller than the height they say they are.And now I think everyone can say that roger has lost about 2, 2 1/2 inches as he looks smaller than jonathan ross by i'd say 3 whole inches when on the jonathan ross show who is listed as 6ft 1 1/2 so he is rogers former height of which he was also listed at 6 ft 1 1/2, so that would make roger now 5 ft 8 or 5ft 8 and 1/2 I would say.Realistically now c'mon, maybe rogers height could of been at 5ft 11 but that my friends would be at best, and I mean no taller not even a shade. Paul says on 22/Oct/08
I think Roger Moore is 184 today and 186 peak height. I don't think he has lost that much. Leo says on 21/Oct/08
He looked like as he suggested, 6ft 2 in the morning - then averaged out at 6ft1.25 I'd say. Rob, what height was David Niven? Paul says on 21/Oct/08
Roger Moore had at least 2 inches on Paul O'Grady so Rob doesn't always get it right. Hugh says on 21/Oct/08
Lenad how tall are you? 188.5cm is 6ft2.25 isn't it. I measure at bang on 191cm in the morning. I'm down to about 189-190cm at night. Elf says on 21/Oct/08
Carrying on from my "anon" comment below. I'd hazard a guess that these days that the height here is accurate and he is six foot barefoot and 6'1 with shoes. He was definately 1.5 inches taller than Jerry Hall in small heels. If Jerry Hall is 5 ft 11 not the 6 ft she often claims to be then it would make sense in comparison. One things for certain he is absolutely not 5ft 10, he has looked too tall for too long to be nearer average. Jonathan Ross's height strangely seems to fluctuate. He claims 6'2 yet was clearly smaller than Jay Z who he stated to Jay Z "Your're a big fella. you must be 6'2" yet compared to other tall guests looks around 6'2. I thought Moore looked two inches shorter not three or four inches as below which is also odd in that Moore looked the same height as O'Grady who is apparently the same height as Ross. Jonathan Ross's exact height is very difficult to guess, I wouldn't be surprised given his obsession with it that he has soles in those shoes of his which give him an extra inch or two. Lenad says on 20/Oct/08
I can believe he was a full 6'2 in the morning. My dad measures at 190.1cm in the morning and at evening he measures at 188.5cm. So asuming Moore was 188.5cm out of bed, in the evening he measured at 186.8cm. GUK says on 18/Oct/08
I think he was, he is over 80 now though. Hugh says on 17/Oct/08
Ross is an idiot. He is obsessed with height. He's 6ft0.5-6ft1 tops. Lenad, I'm not sure if Roger is quite 6ft1 nowadays, 5ft11 is too low though. I think Moore is a little over 6ft nowadays. I'd say 6ft2 at his peak. Note he's a lot heavier these days which may give the illusion he's shorter. He looked a mess on the Paul O'Grady show. Anonymous says on 17/Oct/08
Roger Moore was on Paul o Grady earlier and was noticeably taller than Jerry Hall who is listed at 6 ft and she had smallish heels on. Look the same height as Paul o Grady who is 6 ft 2 by details I;ve seen. I still think he looks 6 ft 1.5 inches. Lenad says on 16/Oct/08
5'11 is a joke. The guy is at least 6'1. GUK says on 13/Oct/08
He looked 5ft 10 max to Jonathan Ross. But Ross wears big shoes, and Moore had normal dress shoes. Ross is smaller than 6ft 1 Tim Henman in tennis shoes. So possibly 5ft 11 now for Roger. beatlefan says on 13/Oct/08
He did not look 3 inches shorter than Jonathan Ross on that show. He looked the same height. As I said earlier on the thread I have seen him in London and he is still six feet tall. bananaman says on 13/Oct/08
He looked 3 inches shorter than Jonathan Ross ,where he appeared as a guest last week.Moore was 185cm (@ best when playing Bond.)Ross is 187 cm.Moore was and still is very trim which makes him look taller. Hugh says on 12/Oct/08
I think they did something with the camera angles in the Last Crusade and For your eyes only. If Yaphet Kotto was 6ft5, which I doubt Roger Moore is 6ft4 lol. I met Connery and Glover in Person and Connery appeared closer to my height which is 6ft2.75. adam says on 9/Oct/08
Anonymous was me. I apologize, my computer is dumb. Anonymous says on 9/Oct/08
Close 6-2. 6-1˝ is pretty accurate, I`d say. Julian Glover is at least 6-2, could be even more. Remember in "The Last Crusade" he was clearly taller than Ford and taller than Connery! That really makes me wonder... Connery wasn`t under 6-1˝ even at that age and Glover looked taller!
Also I noticed that Moore doesnt look much shorter than Yaphet Kotto. Kotto is listed here as 6-4 but watching his other films (Alien, Running Man) he looks taller. Around 6-5, I`d say. Moore looked like one inch or maximum two inches shorter. So if he was barely shorter than Kotto and the same height as Glover, that really puts him over 6-2....
But then again in The Man With The Golden Gun the 6-5 Christopher Lee was like 4 inches taller than Moore, putting Roger under 6-2.
Height can truly be a mystery! I think that they have used some camera angles and stuff to make Moore look taller (or co-stars look shorter) in some occasions. deano says on 5/Oct/08
i'd say roger's height is 6 ft and 3/4 of an inch or a shade under 6 ft 1 because in a photo standing next to pierce brosnan who is 6 ft 1 looked just shade smaller maybe it was brosnans hair which was bigger than rogers, but they both looked the same height.So roger could well be 6 ft but no taller. Hmmm says on 4/Oct/08
he probably looks shorter than he is, because people have terrible posture at his age. my dad is 181cm (184cm peak, I measured him for a visa application) but looks 177cm these days. hes about 65. nicole says on 3/Oct/08
Lenad,every person has his opinion and his impression when you meet someone or see the films and the pictures about the actors.For me after that i have seen all the bond films again with Roger and the pictures and the opinion of Christian who saw Roger in Gstaad 1995 about 6ft1inch then peak height is realistic near 6ft2inch. Hugh says on 2/Oct/08
Lenad I'm not fooling anyone because I'm telling the truth. Lenad says on 28/Sep/08
I think 186cm for peak suits him better and Hugh once again stop making lies of meeting celebrites. Cut it out your not fooling anyone. Ray says on 19/Sep/08
I don't believe Moore was anything close to 6'2". I'd say in his youth he was a 184/5 cm guy or about 6'0.5". These days considering he's in his '80s, he's about 5'11 or so. He did an advert with Beckham and Williams for UNicef and they were barefoot and he had chunky boots on. Becks and Williams are 5'11" or maybe slightly under and Moore was about the same height...so do the math. nicole says on 18/Sep/08
It`s also my opinion Roger was in his youth in the 187cm - 188cm.And the second point is that Roger doesn`t seem a person who claims a wrong height for himself. Hugh says on 16/Sep/08
For your eyes only was on the other hight and he did look roughly the same height as julian Glover who is a solid 6ft2. He was definately around 6ft2 at his peak. Most likely. He claims that height anyway. Also he does have the dimensions of a 6ft2 guy. Long legs, broad shoulders. Hugh says on 16/Sep/08
He would definately not rule out 6ft2 for this guy peakwise. I met him in London a few years back with my bro. He has certainly lost some height. I's say 6ft or just over nowadays. Still reasonably tall guy. Lenad says on 16/Sep/08
I always estimated at least a solid 6'1 for this guy. Roger Moore was definitly above average because he was taller than most other men his James Bond movies. Mr. R says on 6/Aug/08
I saw him years ago in New York, and he was much taller than I expected. He was close to 6-2 in his prime. beatlefan says on 28/Jul/08
I've seen Roger in Charing Cross, London and he certainly wasn't 6'4". He wasn't that close to me but still around the six foot mark I'd say. rob roy says on 28/Jul/08
i think roger moore is more than 6'1! he's probably 6'4". he really tall and good looking jimbo. but sadly to note however that he does not have any movie for a long time. what to him no one knows. unlike sean connery who is still active. tubbs says on 18/Jul/08
Checkout Roger on stage with Lennox Lewis and Audley Harrison....yeah it sounds bizarre, but Roger hosted the World Sports Awards in 2000. He makes reference to their sizes saying that he looks a midget in comparison, but Lewis, who is near enough 6'5" only had 4" on him at the most, and Harrison, who was an inch taller than Lewis only looked to be 5" taller than Sir Roger. Rogers autobigraphy is out soon, so i'm sure there will be plenty of chances to guage his height with the obligatory plugging that goes on with such things....maybe on the Jonathan Ross show, Paul O'Grady again, and possibly on a couple of the American chat shows, he's mentioned it on his own website. Scott B. says on 15/Jul/08
Roger Moore had at least 4 inches on 5'9 VanDamm. 6'1 for Moore. Phil says on 27/Jun/08
Roger Moore was indeed 6feet2 in the morning Birnam says on 25/May/08
6'1 was the peak for Moore, today he's lucky if he's a plain 6'.
Brosnan is somewhere between 6'0.5" and 6'1.25" roughly speaking. |
