How tall is Scott Eastwood

Scott Eastwood's Height

5ft 10.75in (179.7 cm)

American actor best known for roles in films Texas Chainsaw 3D, Trouble with the Curve, The Longest Ride, Dawn Patrol and The Forger.

How tall is Scott Eastwood
Photo by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Clint Eastwood
Clint Eastwood
6ft 0in (183 cm)
Height of Britt Robertson
Britt Robertson
5ft 2.5in (159 cm)
Height of Cara Delevingne
Cara Delevingne
5ft 7in (170 cm)
Height of Ben Affleck
Ben Affleck
6ft 2.25in (189 cm)

Add a Comment 153 comments

Average Guess (38 Votes)
5ft 10.3in (178.6cm)
Tommy said on 17/Aug/17
What is the chance he goes under 5'10.75 ?
Editor Rob: I can see a 5ft 10.5 possibility for him.
Rising - 174 cm said on 27/Jul/17
Key word is "walking" - you can't judge height accurately from still photos of two people walking mid-stride. But even leaving that aside for now, Scott looks several inches taller in your photos anyway. He's not 5'7"-5'8". I will bet 10 grand on that. Maybe we can get a Paul Newman type bet going and Scott may even consent to getting measured if he knew there was such a bet with such high stakes! Hey, I can dream anyway. It'd be the easiest 10 grand I could hope to make!
Parker said on 27/Jul/17
Katie said on 24/Jul/17
Hi PArker. Check out the photos of him walking to gym with Charlotte Mckinny. They look about the same height. She's 5"7

You think they look the same height Katie? I don't know what to say, I can't get into a debate if that's what you think, but of course you are entitled to your opinion like everyone else on this site. For what its worth, he looks about 3 inches taller to me.
sundaze said on 25/Jul/17
He is 5"10
Rising - 174 cm said on 25/Jul/17
Kurt Russell 5'7"? Actually, from what I read from an actress who worked with him, he's really only 5'3"! Seriously, don't believe everything you hear. Kurt is around 5'9", but can look taller at times. Those stuntmen must have fallen on their heads too many times! Scott looks near an inch taller than Kurt, but he may not be standing as tall as he could and who knows what shoes they're wearing? We don't as they're not visible in the photo. I believe Statham is at least about 5'8.5" or so, though I'm sure he can look shorter since he often slouches. But he's too far behind to compare his height in the photo. Scott is probably between 5'10" and 5'10.5", imo. Scott at 5'8" would make The Rock not much over 6 feet, maybe 184 cm at most when he's actually over 6'2".
Dmeyer said on 24/Jul/17
Havnt Seen much of the Guy but 5'10,5 us closer
Katie said on 24/Jul/17
Hi PArker. Check out the photos of him walking to gym with Charlotte Mckinny. They look about the same height. She's 5"7. He's known for wearing lifts so I'm the photo your referring to its obvious he has them on in that photo. Click Here
Parker said on 23/Jul/17
Katie said on 22/Jul/17
No one here on this forum believes he is 5"10 Rob

I believe he's minimum 5'10 Katie. A 5'8 Scott Eastwood would put Kevin Hart at 5foot - he's short, but not that short.
Click Here
Katie said on 22/Jul/17
No one here on this forum believes he is 5"10 Rob. Look at all th photos with him standing next to 5"8 Jason Stathom. There the exact same height. Also, a 5"10 person would have much longer legs.
Richardspain said on 19/Jul/17
Sorry I don't believe he is 180cm

179 maybe

His father neither was a strong 192 cm 189/190cm barefoot is more credible
Katie said on 19/Jul/17
5"8 flat footed. Shoes 5"10. There are several photos of him with Jason Stathom and Kurt Russell. Jason seen with Rosie his model girl friend is 5"8 standing next to her. Then Kurt Russell has never been taller than 5"7 and everyone in the stunt man world knows this. To state Scott is 5"10 is inaccurate. Maybe with the correct angles or lifts he can appear taller but it doesn't change the fact he is a much smaller man than his father.
tall or nah said on 8/Jul/17
I have a 6'3" dad and a 5'5" mom.
I ended up at 6'0".
In Scott's case I think he is 5'10.5" to 5'11".
James B said on 3/Jul/17
Alex- I was 5'6.5-5'7 at your age and only grew half an inch from 16-20. My mum is 5'1.5 and dad 5'9.5-5'10 when they were younger.

I would say though you could have a growth spurt at 16 it's not impossible because I used to have a friend who was 5'11 aged 16 and he's now around 6'2 I think.
Alex said on 3/Jul/17
Rob, would you reckon that I, at age 16 and 5'6.5", would turn out to be of very similar height to Scott Eastwood, given the heights of my parents: 6'3.5" father & 5'0" mother?
James B said on 28/Jun/17
His other son Kyle defo took after clint in height
shiva182cms said on 21/Jun/17
Scott inhereted 50-50 height from his dad and his mom

Peak clint 6'3.5
Clint's wife 5'2 equalent to 5'6.5or 5'7 for a male
avg of 6'3.5 and 5'6.5 Eauals 5'11
Scott's about 5'11
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jun/17
His mother is about 5 ft 2. Click Here so Scott at 5 ft 11 is explainable given how tall Clint was.
Hi said on 10/Jun/17
How tall is his mom?
Matt677 said on 28/May/17
Looks,about 5ft10 flat usually mabye could see this listing right out of,bed
ronald said on 21/May/17
he looked 5 inches shorter than the rock in latest furious movie
ok said on 21/May/17
He is Dutch average in flats imo (tallest country in the world atm)
ok said on 21/May/17
5"10 imo
peter gabriel said on 11/May/17
more like 5'9
6'1-6'1.5 Guy said on 7/May/17
Ice said on 11/Feb/16
I live in Vienna , and I can guarantee you that the average height for a white / black / ex-jugoslavian man in this city is nowhere under 6'0 . Im 6'2.5" , a height that does not even stand out at all in Vienna , Im maybe slightly above average . Literally every second/third man on the street is my height or taller.

I do not know, of course, it's very difficult for me to believe in this ...
In that case, Vienna is a city of giants.
If 6'2.5 is not a high growth, then this is already a dead end of some kind. Soon, the average altitude will skyrocket to 6'2-6'3 ".
Thank you.
berta said on 5/May/17
179 could be the best listing but 178 coudl also be good. 180 is to mutchchchchchchcch
Richardspain said on 27/Apr/17
I don't believe it! Clint Eastwood's son is shorter than his father..
RisingForce said on 26/Apr/17
In fairness, Kurt wears cowboy boots a lot and can still look about 5'10" or so in them so we should know what Kurt's footwear is since he was measured up pretty well to Vin Diesel recently(who also had his infamous boots). Was Scott really shorter than Tyrese? I believe Tyrese to be closer to 5'10" than 5'11" himself so that's strange. But I do agree anyway that Scott is closer to 5'10" than 5'11".
berta said on 26/Apr/17
rob you should really look in to this guy some more. he is clearly no taller than 179 and could be 178. kurt russel is listed as 176 and may have lost 1 cm he is almost 70 years old and he was barely 1 inch shorter. if kurt is 175 now then this guy is barely 178 if kurt still is 176 then this guy could be 178-79 range but not 180. he is also youngetr and should have better posture and win 1 cm more there. and still just 2 cm beetween them
James B said on 25/Apr/17
shiva182cms said on 15/Apr/17
he looks more hand some than Clint Eastwood



Yeah right
Shredder said on 15/Apr/17
Tyrees Gibson was taller than him . Gibson must be 5'11 or scott is just a strong 5'10.
shiva182cms said on 15/Apr/17
he looks more hand some than Clint Eastwood
shiva182cms said on 15/Apr/17
He certainly has a better height than his father in reality, but for movies his dad's height is better and at his height he'd look like a small guy on screen
John said on 15/Apr/17
How likely 5'10.25 would be his absolute low Rob ? I can see 2cm differences between him and Kurt Russel in FF8.
Editor Rob: sometimes he can look 178-9, other times I think near 180
Christian said on 13/Apr/17
Spot on listing IMO. The rock is clearly over 6'2 tall and Scott doesn't look dwarfed by him by any stretch of the imagination. There is no way this guy is under 5'10 IMO unless the Rock is below 6'1.
Thomas Veil said on 9/Apr/17
5'9 even, he didn't get his dad's height
berta said on 8/Apr/17
he looks really short beside dwayne johnson. i think there is atleat 10 cm beetween them. 179 listing could be better
Josh said on 3/Apr/17
Don't think he is this tall. Always thought he was tallish 5 11. But now think he is a good couple inches shorter.
RisingForce said on 2/Apr/17
He can look about 5'10.5" with Kevin Hart depending on how much Kevin is leaning, but you must be counting all of Scott's hair to get only around 3" and Scott has at least an extra inch hair. Top of his head seems about 4.5" shorter than Rock or at least 4" minimum.
177 cm (m|GER/NRW/CGN) said on 29/Mar/17
@RisingGore
Can't see more than 3"... it's even above Rocks eyes...
Arch Stanton said on 28/Mar/17
Click Here I mean look at Clint's jawline and nose structure there in comparison. Beckham and Jackman are closer I think in that respect, though in fairness Scott is a lot younger.
Arch Stanton said on 28/Mar/17
Editor Rob: James, I've certainly read over the years some quotes from girls on forums and twitter being disappointed when they discovered the height of a favourite actor.

But, you'd be surprised how many women actually don't find guys like Pitt, Clooney attractive.

Sometimes when actors start speaking on certain subjects from their white Ivory towers, it turns people off!

Yeah I've heard quite a lot of women comment that Chris Hemsworth or Hugh Jackman are more attractive than Brad Pitt. Pitt is kind of goofy in a way. I don't think he's looked as good since he went with Jolie, late 90s though in films like Fight Club I think he was about as close to perfection as you can get. I think you'd find it's mostly older women who would find Clooney handsome, he has a debonair look which doesn't appeal much to young girls, but a guy like Jackman approaching 50, I think you'd still get a fair proportion of women in their 20s liking him too. Scott's a good looking lad but contrary to what some people say he's not really a dead ringer or clone of his dad, a good resemblance facially, yes but not as chiselled and rugged/masculine as Clint was in his prime IMO, and of course totally lacking the height. Clint was the sort of guy who could walk into a large, chatty room and people go silent, he had that sort of commanding presence. I doubt most women would think of Pitt and clooney as tall, more average range, I don't think they'd care much if they were both a few inches shorter. Though a guy like Cruise gets a lot of stick from women for being short, part of it is the media exaggeration, most will think he's about 5 ft 1 or 2 so not surprising!
The Exorcist said on 27/Mar/17
@RisingForce: He looks about 5'10.5 with Kevin Hart and The Rock, IMO.
RisingForce said on 27/Mar/17
It's a shame Statham is standing so far back. I'd be very interested in who was taller between him and Kurt Russell side by side. Scott only looks 5'10" there as well as with The Rock: Click Here I don't see Scott's head higher than Rock's eyes if you exclude his hair.
Morris said on 21/Mar/17
175-178 cm.
Yuval said on 17/Mar/17
Rob, do you know the claim that sons get more of their height from the mom's side, and vice verca doughters get height from their dad's?. I did not found scientific evidence that support that, but it seems to be not far of reality, at least from my observations on my friends and family.
James B said on 9/Mar/17
Rob do you think guys like Scott, brad Pitt and George clooney would still be as popular with the ladies if they were all 5ft7?
Editor Rob: James, I've certainly read over the years some quotes from girls on forums and twitter being disappointed when they discovered the height of a favourite actor.

But, you'd be surprised how many women actually don't find guys like Pitt, Clooney attractive.

Sometimes when actors start speaking on certain subjects from their white Ivory towers, it turns people off!
James B said on 9/Mar/17
Yep dead ringer for his dad (except for the height department)
Jervis said on 23/Nov/16
Looked similar to Jimmy Kimmel on the Ellen show.
Ray said on 22/Nov/16
I'd say he's 5'11".
Arch Stanton said on 15/Nov/16
He is increasingly looking like Clint, but he looks like he's trying hard to look like or even be his father though. Like he's really studied the squints and grimaces to look bad ass haha but it doesn't really work with him!
Kai said on 8/Nov/16
Downgrade time Rob.. 5'10.25 !
Adam said on 31/Oct/16
He looked 178/179cm on Snowden. Didnt look like a tallish 180.
kai said on 21/Oct/16
Dear Rob, what would you have guessed for his lowest height? 178.5cm or 179cm ?
Editor Rob: not sure I'd be comfortable trying to argue less than 179 for him.
Arch Stanton said on 19/Oct/16
He looks better in last few years since he's been Hollywooderized.
Sandy Cowell said on 18/Oct/16
I had no idea that Clint Eastwood's son was acting in films! How interesting is this website? I'll have to check out a film or two of his! Until then, I don't feel I have the right to comment any more than I have done.
172.4cm guy said on 17/Oct/16
Scott seemed dwarfed by a lot of the men in Suicide Squad. Even with boots, he looked like he barely pulled off 180cm. I can see him at 178cm barefoot in the mornings, so I'll give him that stature, but not much higher until there's more confirmation. With that said, absolutely great-looking guy. He inherited his father's chiseled features, but not the ruggedness, which is not necessarily a bad thing.
Arch Stanton said on 11/Oct/16
He does have some sort of screen presence and is clearly a chick magnet, but he completely lacks the badass quality his father has. That's not a height thing but he's very different in terms of personality. Efforts to cast him in the sorts of roles Clint was in just look forced and a bit embarrassing as he just looks too nice/cleancut to pull it off. It worked with Clint because he genuinely looks badass and a guy you'd not want to mess with. Scott seems more like the kind of guy who would apologize and send around a bouqet of flowers if his dog peed on your lawn LOL.
Arch Stanton said on 10/Oct/16
Saw him in the Longest Ride, and thought nowhere near as tall as Clint actually has a much better screen presence than I thought. This guy is having an absolute blast, you can see in the film the effect he has on women. Most guys over 6 ft would trade in a few inches to have that!
John said on 5/Oct/16
He's not 5'11. This guy is 5'10 at best. I would go a little shorter than that. He's probably about 5'9.75" or something. Russell Wilson and Johnny Manziel are 5'11. Both are noticeably taller than him.
John Baptist said on 30/Sep/16
Click Here
5'10 and a quarter with jason statham Rob ? Considering SE has angle advantages.
Editor Rob: Kurt is on the other side, and I think he has a bit more than an inch on Kurt there.
James said on 19/Sep/16
180cm is almost tall range, not sure why he looks so short, women think he's tiny for some reason as well. Perhaps its the big head and short legs.
James B said on 14/Aug/16
Scott Eastwood in some photos looks a bit like a young Hugh Jackman actually.
Arch Stanton said on 8/Aug/16
Henrik said on 13/Apr/16
I suppose Clint must have had a taste for the most petite flight attendants whom he could find. Science argues that a son usually takes more after his mother's side of the family.

That's his mother. Click Here Yes, that's where the shorter height is coming from, she looks no more than 5 ft 2. Looks nothing like her as a lot of lads don't look anything like their mothers. The only thing he probably got from her was the shorter height and a personality. Scott seems to be a laughy- jokey, outgoing sort of guy, typical Californian surf boy sort of thing, and his father was more serious and quiet and reserved. Clint was a lot more rugged and masculine looking even at Scott's age too.
Ingrid said on 28/Jun/16
strong 5'10.25
Aaron Zamora said on 26/May/16
Is there any chance of you meeting him and getting a picture with him?
Editor Rob: unlikely unfortunately.
Ryan Allen said on 5/May/16
Rob what was the reason for downgrading Scott Eastwood ?
Editor Rob: he's been stuck on this height for ages.
Aaron Zamora said on 24/Apr/16
Other than his listed height which do you think he would measure 5'10.5 or 5'11?
Editor Rob: at times really I could say either of those figures he can look...
Henrik said on 13/Apr/16
I suppose Clint must have had a taste for the most petite flight attendants whom he could find. Science argues that a son usually takes more after his mother's side of the family.
Arch Stanton said on 7/Mar/16
Yep it's definitely not the actor Alan Bates, they've got it wrong on that site in thinking it's the same man, Bates died in 2003, that was 2008 haha! Still, look at him with Cullum. Doesn't look over 6'2 with him does he?
Editor Rob: yeah I now wouldn't have thought of him as being 6ft 3.
Arch Stanton said on 7/Mar/16
@Rob, I think you're right actually, I mean look at him here next to an old Alan Bates!! Click Here A legit 6 ft 4 guy could do all the slouching in the world and still look taller next to him and Jamie than that. Kyle has definitely claimed 6 ft 4, I've seen it somewhere. He can look 6'3" range on stage but if you really look at most comparisons you'd think more 6'2"!
Flyin said on 5/Mar/16
How can a son of someone 6"4 be the same height as me. Btw father 6"0, brother 5"11.5' mother 5"6. So slightly shorter than siblings in my case but that's nearly a head in difference.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Mar/16
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jan/16
Rob, any guesses for Clint's other son, Kyle?


He's also been listed 6ft4
Editor Rob: he doesn't look 6ft 4, at first I thought 6ft 2!

He can look anything from 6'2-6'4!! I've seen the Kyle Eastwood band quite a bit, they're really good. On stage Kyle can really look 6'3-6'4 range and look quite towering at times, but in photos with Clint and people for some reason looks 6'2 range as Rob says. I think we can rule out a legit 6'4 but there's a chance of 6'3", his posture often isn't great. I think he's one of those guys who slouch a lot and would measure a bit taller than you think. Click Here That was taken about ten years ago I think when Clint would have been about 6 ft 1. On stage with Pitt, Jolie and his dad here, though Pitt is a bit further back Click Here Do you not think that he might be 6'3 ish Rob? I agree he can look just 6'2 in a lot of photos, but I think he does slouch a bit, there's a good chance of 6'2.5-6'3 range I think. I think we can rule out a legit 6 ft 4.
Editor Rob: well looking a bit more and I think he could be near 6ft 2 the more I looked!
Ice said on 11/Feb/16
I live in Vienna , and I can guarantee you that the average height for a white / black / ex-jugoslavian man in this city is nowhere under 6'0 . Im 6'2.5" , a height that does not even stand out at all in Vienna , Im maybe slightly above average . Literally every second/third man on the street is my height or taller .
Ryan Allen said on 6/Feb/16
I meant a region for Dinaric Alps I know it's not a country grizz
grizz said on 1/Feb/16
Dinaric Alps is not a country.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jan/16
Rob, any guesses for Clint's other son, Kyle?


He's also been listed 6ft4
Editor Rob: he doesn't look 6ft 4, at first I thought 6ft 2!
Ryan Allen said on 22/Jan/16
Some people here are saying 5'11 is average, 5'11 is not average here in the United States , it's 71.9. Percentile in height , 5'11 is above average ,still not tall , but a very decent height in which Scott Eastwood is .
Ryan Allen said on 22/Jan/16
There is only six countries in the world that 5'11 is below 70% in height Dinaric Alps, Germany, Austria , Denmark,norway. Serbia .
BT said on 21/Jan/16
@MD: If he's any less than 5'10.75, it's not looking good for Chris Evans' 6ft listing: Click Here
Stormtrooper JB-007 said on 11/Jan/16
@Allie, I think you deserve your own page on here. Great idea Rob: You should start a website called non-celeb heights. I'd be glad to be a guinea pig too
MD said on 10/Dec/15
That shot the same thing, if not even more so.
MD said on 7/Dec/15
@Rob, I think you must have meant it the other way around. The angles are all wrong, but it seems to me that it'd be about debating how much shorter he is in that particular picture than Buble (of course considering possible footwear advantage for Buble). Seems clear to me that they'd be very close in height.
Editor Rob: there was another shot. At times I've seen Scott in photos leaning a bit and he can look near 5ft 10, but I'm not sure he really is that low though.
sfs324 said on 4/Dec/15
Click Here

Thoughts on this Rob? Michael most definitely has a shoe advantage assuming he's wearing dress shoes.
Editor Rob: he doesn't look much taller than buble
Sebs said on 13/Nov/15
Allie you're 5'10 and obviously as a women you'd notice men taller than you. You probably don't even realize the multitude of 5'8-9ers let alone the below 6 foot 5'11er
Allie said on 12/Nov/15
Nothing wrong with being 5'11, like how being 5'6 as a girl Isn't bad either. I'm just saying from my personal experience, I've come across both a handful of guys taller than 6 ft, but also guys shorter than 6'0. Also, I wanted to say that my old high school as I graduated last year heh.

Also, just wondering, do any of these stats or height databases take samples and numbers from a good majority of the country? Cause I do know stats and surveys (which is typically how these numbers are formed) typically tend to just take numbers from a fraction and then put it down as the official thing. Which seems fine, unless they measured from a bunch short or tall people and other reasons. If anyone could answer as Wikipeida's got results back from 2005 :p.
184.3cm (Night) said on 12/Nov/15
Legit 5'11 is taller than 70 percent of men across the globe. Only the tallest countries in the world have it as an average. Being taller than 70 percent is more than the majority.

To put in in perspective 6 foot is around the 80th percentile.

Between 5'9 -5'10.75 you have millions of men. Thats the bulk of the population in the western world. Anything under is <40 percentile.
Jack said on 11/Nov/15
I'm 5'11'.. I went to high school, college and several major cities. And I was a bit taller then the majority of men. seems like a perfectly fine height to me.
Allie said on 11/Nov/15
I wouldn't say most men. 5'11 is only above average in some countries from stats. Stats aren't always the most accurate thing as they only document a fraction of the population then average it out. Because I'm doubting that everyone in the country was measured when they did the stats to calculate average height for the country.

In my school alone, I'm live in Canada, yet A good chunk guys in my school who I swear are 6'1-6'2 and taller (I'm 5'10 and have stood beside them in near similar footwear). and they're still growing possibly as they're only 17-18 But there are also guys who are average height, or still short but still growing.
Sebs said on 6/Nov/15
5'11 is comfortably taller than most men
Dan said on 1/Nov/15
Charming guy but definitely not tall. I would say he's average, around the 5' 11" mark.
Allie said on 18/Oct/15
Sure. If he is 5'9 range then that would make Taylor Swift 5'7 range which would make Karlie only 5'11 or so. And so on and so fourth. But they're not short.
keekers said on 26/Sep/15
Stood next to him last night and he is at most 5'9.5"
Allie said on 23/Sep/15
Around 5'11 seems right.
Jim Hopper said on 21/Sep/15
Actually looks quite short in the picture. Not his dads range at all.
MaryAnne said on 10/Sep/15
He is so tall and handsome as hell!
Arch Stanton said on 2/Sep/15
Rob see Click Here I find it hard to belive he's wearing big lifts there but he really does pull off looking about 184 with Swift!! Perhaps it's not unreasonable that he has a hidden lift in those boots to look taller with Swift, but wearing lifts on a safari in Africa seems weird!
[Editor Rob: I don't think he generally looks much different than 5ft 11, although in one still there he can appear taller.]
Duhon said on 31/Aug/15
He's the lead in the new taylor swift video and it appears they try to play-up his height over her.
grizz said on 31/Aug/15
5in is a huge difference. normal for daughters, but far from regular for sons. hell, I am 1in shorter than my dad and it's fairly visible in pictures/real life,let alone 5 inches.
btw,he seems to have 2inches over taylor swift in wildest dreams video. both were wearing cowboy boots.
5'11 Stud said on 30/Aug/15
Found better lift action in the same video:
Click Here
5'11 Stud said on 30/Aug/15
Strong lift action with T-Swift:
Click Here
James B said on 6/Aug/15
Clint for his generation must have been well within the very tall range. Amongst today's young generation a peak clint would still probably be probably be right at the high end of tall
Sam said on 31/Jul/15
No not a big difference, I've know guys who were much taller than their dads than that but it still puts Clint as very tall when he was young and Scott within the high-average range.
Arch Stanton said on 30/Jul/15
5 inches shorter than your father is a big difference.
James B said on 29/Jul/15
Well he would have been 4-5 inches shorter than his peak dad who was probably 6'3 1/2

Not a massive difference
MD said on 28/Jul/15
If anyone comments on him being "short," it's relative to his father. Expectations are higher because of that for people who've never met him. He's not short, though.
James B said on 26/Jul/15
Rob a lot of people comment on the Internet this guys short
James B said on 24/Jul/15
Wonder who would get more women rob prime clint or Scott?
[Editor Rob: Clint probably.]
Allie said on 16/Jun/15
Height all depends. I know a guy whose 6'4-6'5 and his dad was about 5'7 on a good day. I believe his was mom was shorter, but according to him, his moms brothers were in the tall side. Which probably explains how he got to be so tall. Can't say the same the same about his sister though.

I think maybe 5'10.5, weak 5'11 is a spot on listing. Especially after seeing the pictures with 5'10.5 Erin Heatherton.
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jun/15
Liam Hemsworth especially third photo down looks like he could be Clint's son too! Click Here And he has a Clint like height too!
JB said on 14/May/15
5'11" is actually a fantastic height for bodybuilding. makes it very easy to fill out your frame and look aesthetic. And a legit 5'11" is actually taller than most people give it credit for. Just a tad away from 6" after all. Scott is a good solid height and is built great, and by the looks of it he has no complaints. might not be quite as tall as his Dad was. But in the real world thats pretty irrelevant.
Ron said on 8/May/15
Rob, what would you guess his weight is around? He has a amazing physique for his height.
[Editor Rob: maybe near to 170]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/May/15
@James B: Weak 5ft11 is upper-average.
James B said on 2/May/15
I wouldn't say he looks short in the above pic but more at the lower end of average
Amaze said on 20/Apr/15
I can understand 5'8 being short some places but 5'10 is not short anywhere in the world. He'd be towered by young Clint his dad but he's still at a good height
maximus said on 10/Apr/15
5'10" is not short....you are right at about 6ft with shoes. I'm 5'10-1/4" and have never been called short.....right at around 6ft with shoes.....short is someone like cruise, Hoffman, pacino...its obvious they are not average height even with shoes on.
Arch Stanton said on 31/Mar/15
I saw a comment or two on him the other day in which people called him really short. Compared to Clint short, yes, but he looks upper average to me, not short at all. This guy seems to be everywhere at the moment, the Hollywood agents are certainly doing a good job of promoting him. Some of the staged photos look a bit silly though, you can tell they're telling him to squint and look as much like his father as possible. They even dress him like a cowboy in certain photo shoots. Yes, there's quite a strong resemblance there but I don't think he looks even close to as good as his father looked at that age. I think they should stop saying he's Clint's son and trying to make him look as much like him as possible and let him be himself.
Arch Stanton said on 2/Nov/14
Yeah he looks short in the above photo. Generally he gives a 5'10 range impression. Obviously a strong resemblance facially to a young Clint including the crow's lines and premature aging LOL but he's miles shorter and although seems a nice guy he really doesn't seem to have the charisma and raw masculinity and presence that his dad had. Perhaps in ten years and with greater acting experience he will become so, but it must be very tough having such a father to live up to!
lelman said on 17/Oct/14
Odd proportions, looks like a 5ft 8 guy there, maybe it's because his suit is too big for him.
Arch Stanton said on 9/Sep/14
Yeah I think Kyle is genuinely near his 6'4" claim, he looks similar height to a peak Clint, 6'3.5" is arguable but he tends to slouch a lot to can look 6'2" range. Whenever I see him on stage he always towers above the others.
Greg said on 8/Sep/14
Arch Stanton: I'm seeing a bit more height gap, but maybe not. At this point, Eastwood is in his mid eighties and (my guess) is loosing height more rapidly, so photo dates matter more. In fairly recent pics Kyle is noticeably *way* taller than his father - I'm guessing he's 6'3" at least.
Arch Stanton said on 4/Sep/14
@Greg, not 3 inches, in The Trouble with the Curve I think it was his dad only looked about 1-1.5 inches taller.
Greg said on 3/Sep/14
Looks roughly 3" shorter than his father in pics I've seen. Assuming Eastwood sr. is about 6'1" now (I highly doubt he's any taller than that), would make young Scott about 5'10ish. That's perfectly OK height-wise for a leading man in movies, which I gather he aspires to.
Arch Stanton said on 6/Aug/14
Sam says on 14/Apr/14
He most resembles his dad (in his younger years) of the Eastwood children I've seen but I'm guessing the stewardess that Clint impregnated (while himself married or engaged I believe) wasn't particularly tall.

Agreed that facially he's the most similar, although at times Kyle can look uncannily like a 70s Clint and looks a similar long-legged height. Click Here
TJE said on 28/Jul/14
5'10.5
M.P. said on 3/Jul/14
Damn, he looks tiny! I found this after looking for celebrities my own height. I'm a short little sh*t. This guy proves it.
SAK said on 30/Jun/14
He must feel quite short next to his father (even after shrinkage).
boris said on 19/Jun/14
surprisingly isn't as tall as his father was at peak, still a spitting image of him
5'10 sounds right
James B said on 9/Jun/14
Scott looks 5'9 in the photo
Mathew said on 26/May/14
Arch Stanton says on 30/Apr/14
What I mean by "I wouldn't place too much emphasis on how he looks in photographs" is that he can look anything from 6'2-6'4 in photos but usually slouches and looks taller on stage in videos than he does in photos. I could certainly believe he is 6'3" range anyway.

---

He seldom looks 6'4" without some kind of camera advantage. I don't buy him at 6'4". 6'2" looked reasonable to me, but maybe he's really 6'3".
Arch Stanton said on 30/Apr/14
What I mean by "I wouldn't place too much emphasis on how he looks in photographs" is that he can look anything from 6'2-6'4 in photos but usually slouches and looks taller on stage in videos than he does in photos. I could certainly believe he is 6'3" range anyway.
Arch Stanton said on 30/Apr/14
@ Mathew

I wouldn't place too much emphasis on how he looks in photographs.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

He can look 6'3"-6'4 lot to me. He certainly looks easily 6'3" on stage IMO. I think he's similar to Clint's peak height.
Arch Stanton said on 30/Apr/14
@ Mathew

I agree he tends to look 6'2" range in photographs with Clint but if you see him on stage he really looks near his claim. He's head and shoulders above some of the other musicians at times.
Mathew said on 28/Apr/14
Arch Stanton says on 24/Apr/14
Yeah I think Kyle Eastwood is genuinely near his 6'4" claim, he looks in on stage and looks gangly, even if he tends to look more 6'2" range in most photos with Clint. That's one talented family, check out some of his tracks on youtube like Marrakesh, Andalucia and Cafe Calypso. Some of the best recent jazz stuff I've ever heard. Alison looks tall range not sure on her because of heels but I believe I've seen her look near 6 ft in heels, she could be 5'8-5'9". Very sexy too, out of Clint's children she is the one who seems to have inherited that raw thing that Clint always had. Kyle seems quite shy, humble, and down to earth.

---

I have to disagree about Kyle being 6'4", I just don't see it. 6'2" range looks right to me.
Sam said on 25/Apr/14
IDK on Alison, in the past I think I've seen 5'10" listings, but 5'9" is certainly possible. She was only a couple inches in heels I think under John Cusack. Yeah, anywhere in the 6'2" to 6'4" range is possible for Kyle, it's hard to tell. In certain recent photos, he's got a few inches over his dad. Never heard his music but for sure Kyle and Clint share a love of jazz, I understand Clint was quite pleased with Kyle's career path.
Arch Stanton said on 24/Apr/14
Yeah I think Kyle Eastwood is genuinely near his 6'4" claim, he looks in on stage and looks gangly, even if he tends to look more 6'2" range in most photos with Clint. That's one talented family, check out some of his tracks on youtube like Marrakesh, Andalucia and Cafe Calypso. Some of the best recent jazz stuff I've ever heard. Alison looks tall range not sure on her because of heels but I believe I've seen her look near 6 ft in heels, she could be 5'8-5'9". Very sexy too, out of Clint's children she is the one who seems to have inherited that raw thing that Clint always had. Kyle seems quite shy, humble, and down to earth.
Sam said on 24/Apr/14
Somebody in my ex's family was 6'5"-6'6" with two parents who peaked around 5'7", although the mom came from a tallish family, so of course one can't predict height solely from the parents. I'm not sure how tall Rossif's mom is but I'd bet Kiefer's was quite short, if one of the parents is shorter, the odds increase of the child being shorter but it's never sure-fire. Getting back to Clint's kids, both Kyle and Alison are quite tall and I think their mom was only around average height.
Arch Stanton said on 23/Apr/14
Even if his mother is shortish considering his dad was 6'4" he's quite short considering even if there's nothing wrong with 180. Rossif Sutherland's parents are a similar height and he ended up 6'5". You wouldn't expect him to be under 6 ft but it happens, at least he's taller than Kiefer!!
Emil said on 21/Apr/14
Didn't quite have his dads height de he ;)?
Nonetheless, 180 cm is perfectly fine
Damon said on 16/Apr/14
There are some photos of him walking about with model Erin Heatherton who's listed here at 5'10.5. Not too sure on the footwear, she might be in heels, but she's definitely taller than him in the pictures
James B said on 15/Apr/14
Spitting image of his dad in the 1950s.
Arch Stanton said on 15/Apr/14
Thanks for adding this Rob! Exactly what I guessed. somewhere in 5'10.5"-5'11" range. @Sam, yeah his mother in the photo I saw next to Clint was probably 5'2"-5'3" range, looked quite short. He's not really notable as an actor yet, but I suspect he will be given his name and unlike Kyle who shys away from the Hollywood thing, he seems very proud of being Clint's son and seems very confident. Yes, he looks the most like a young Clint facially out of all of his kids, clearly an obvious resemblance there, but absolutely nowhere near him in stature, presence and charisma. Clint was much more manlier and intimidating looking, even at that age.
MD said on 15/Apr/14
This is has to be an upper-end listing. Bradley Cooper looks a bit more than just an inch-and-a-half than Scott.
richkid123 said on 15/Apr/14
@Emmett I am 5'7"
Emmett said on 14/Apr/14
@Richkid123 Haha how tall are you? I'd love to think that all the good looking guys are about this height, because that's how tall I am!
Small dude :( said on 14/Apr/14
LOL how exactly is he not good looking? Very handsome man.
Sam said on 14/Apr/14
He most resembles his dad (in his younger years) of the Eastwood children I've seen but I'm guessing the stewardess that Clint impregnated (while himself married or engaged I believe) wasn't particularly tall.
SAK said on 14/Apr/14
In the pic above he looks shortish. But overall I would agree with this listing.
Richkid123 said on 13/Apr/14
Yah I did
Chris said on 13/Apr/14
Goodlooking? Nah, he's not really to me.
James B said on 13/Apr/14
You forgot to mention beckham.
Raj said on 13/Apr/14
A full 5 inches shorter than his father! Kind like Sutherland and his father. He has the same long-leg proportions as his father, which make him look taller. Weak 5'11"
Richkid123 said on 12/Apr/14
is it me or are all the goodlooking guys around 5'11" pitt clooney carmack mcconaughey eastwood
James B said on 12/Apr/14
Eh I thought he was 5'8!

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.