|
Red says on 9/Jan/12
logan noll 1996 says on 29/Dec/11
Mark Calaway(The Undertaker) is 6 foot 10. Sid's actual height is 6 foot 7 while his billed height is 6 foot 9.
LoL - NO!
Congratulations now you´re a troll
logan noll 1996 says on 29/Dec/11
Mark Calaway(The Undertaker) is 6 foot 10. Sid's actual height is 6 foot 7 while his billed height is 6 foot 9. NeNa says on 14/Dec/11
the true says on 14/Dec/11
Sid actually looks taller than Mark Calaway (the Undertaker) in that picture with sid wearing a hockey mask. Sid is slightly taller than taker. just go to the undertaker page and see for your self.
6'7 seems to be right on spot.
I agree with 6'7" for Sid. BUT I'm pretty sure that the Undertaker ist the TALLER one of those two. The picture you are talking of is the only picture I know, in which Sid looks as tall as (I don't think taller than) Calaway. In every other staredown I know, Undertaker looks slightly (about 0.5") taller. the true says on 14/Dec/11
Sid actually looks taller than Mark Calaway (the Undertaker) in that picture with sid wearing a hockey mask. Sid is slightly taller than taker. just go to the undertaker page and see for your self.
6'7 seems to be right on spot. Richard says on 5/Nov/11
Always thought Sid was taller than 6'7". His height often billed 6' 11" or sometimes 6' 9". Richard says on 5/Nov/11
Always thought he was 6 ft 11" though has been billed 6 ft 9". 6 ft 7" seems short though still very tall Danimal says on 19/Oct/11
chriszaun says on 18/Oct/11
sid was 6 foot 8 peak,6 foot 7 today
6'7" in the 1990's. Today he's a bit shorter. chriszaun says on 18/Oct/11
sid was 6 foot 8 peak,6 foot 7 today drummer777 says on 16/Oct/11
Ultimate warrior more like 6'0 to 6'1 almost 6'2 Sting and warrior wrestled together early on, warrior and sting close in height. Flair is below 6'0.
Sting is 6'1 to 6'1 1/2.
When you look at boxing they have weigh ins and height checks, we don't see any of that in entertainment wrestling I wonder why.. Thomas says on 15/Oct/11
some of the most ridiculous measurements Wrestling history:
Ric Flar 6'1 246 (yeah right, a peak arnold was 6'1.5 and 248 )
Batista 6'6 and 320 (lol, the guy is barely 6'3, most 6'3)
Undertaker 6'10 ½ and 328 ( more like 6'7 and 285-290 in 1991 )
Kurt Angle 6'2 and 230 ( 5'10.5 at most)
wcw The Giant 7'4 and 540 ( peak 7 and at that time maybe 420 )
Kane 7' and 330 ( never close to 7 even in his highed heel boots, more like 6'7.5 )
Big John Studd 6'10 370 ( probably struggling to hit the 6'6 mark )
Andre the Giant 7'4 and 7'5 ( as we know more like 6'11 - 7'0 )
Hulk Hogan 6'8 ( more like a flat 6'5 )
other real heights:
Goldberg 6'2.25 (6'4 and mentioned as 6'5 when facing Nash, wcw Giant )
Brock Lesnar 6'2 (6'3 and a few times 6'4 )
Triple H 6'2.5 (billed as 6'4)
Sting 6'1.5 (billed as 6'3 and even 6'4 in WCW )
Lex Luger 6'2.75 ( billed as 6'5 )
Scott Hall 6'5.5 ( billed as 6'7 )
Randy Savage 5'11 ( 6'2 in WWF and 6'1 in WCW )
Ultimate Warrior 6'2 ( 6'4 and 6'5 in WWF ) Red says on 7/Oct/11
Danimal says on 2/Oct/11
Red says on 13/Aug/11
Here´re some comparison pics Supermum
Click Here
Click Here
Now put a 1979-1980 Hulk Hogan next to a 1992 Sid Eudy and watch that height difference narrow even more.
Yes, I think that´s true but Hogan lost maybe a half inch from his peak till 1992.
Taker peak 6´7.5"
Sid peak 6´7.25"
Hogan peak-6´5.5", 1992-6´5", 2003-6´3.5",
lowest around 6´3", today close to or dead on 6´4" Vegas says on 4/Oct/11
yes danimal thats why sid was at least 2 inches taller next to mene gene and lance russell than a late 1970s/early 80s hogan and why in cowboys boots sid was much taller next to vince than hogan was in his cowboys
your obsession with making hogan taller in the 80s and shorter in 00s is fun to read though drummer777 says on 3/Oct/11
Paul wight was Billed 7'4 7'3 7'2, and he is shorter than that, Sting is billed 6'3 and 6'2, sting is 6'1, Goldberg was billed 6'4 and he is 6'2. All of these guys are shorter than there billed height.
Hogan was billed 6'6 in 1982 and they billed him at 6'8, they also hyped Paul wight as being andre's son, and that was just a story angle because Paul wight was of similar height to andre.
Way back Mean Mark Callous was announced as 6'7, when you look at Sid and Undertaker they are the same Height, Spivey is listed as 6'6 in football when you see him side by side with Mark Callaway they look the same height.
Find a pic with Undertaker next to Bill Fralic, its like Studd being billed at 6'10, he was 6'5 to 6'6 next to fralic. They gave studd a 5 inch advantage. Danimal says on 2/Oct/11
Red says on 13/Aug/11
Here´re some comparison pics Supermum
Click Here
Click Here
Now put a 1979-1980 Hulk Hogan next to a 1992 Sid Eudy and watch that height difference narrow even more. dicksock says on 30/Sep/11
drummer777 says on 29/Sep/11
Undertaker and Sid are 6'6 at the most and they were billed 6'7, 6'8, 6'9 and 6'10, I remember watching wrestling way back and Mean Mark Callous was billed 6'7.
Show me a 6'7" billing for Mark. Just Sid was listed at 6'7" does not mean he was shorter than that. Tony Atlas was billed at 6'2" and he looked every bit of it. Randy Orton is billed at 6'4" and he looks closer to 6'5". Sting was billed at 6'2" and looks every bit of it. Paul Wight is billed at 7' and looks every bit of it. Seiji Sakaguchi, the famous Japanese wrestler, was billed to 6'5" and looked every bit of it.
I have to say I'm astounded that you think Aikman and Hogan are the same height. I agree, but a lot of other clowns on this site are claiming Aikman is 2" taller. Danimal says on 30/Sep/11
drummer777 says on 29/Sep/11
Undertaker and Sid are 6'6 at the most and they were billed 6'7, 6'8, 6'9 and 6'10, I remember watching wrestling way back and Mean Mark Callous was billed 6'7.
WRONG. He was NEVER billed under 6'8"...NEVER. drummer777 says on 29/Sep/11
Undertaker and Sid are 6'6 at the most and they were billed 6'7, 6'8, 6'9 and 6'10, I remember watching wrestling way back and Mean Mark Callous was billed 6'7. Kane says on 24/Sep/11
@James no Undertaker's peak is 6'10 he's now 6'8-6'9 and Sid is actually 6'9 its on imd* and everything and Kane is 6'9 or 6'8.5. drummer777 says on 26/Aug/11
If hogan was at least 6'7 he should be the same height as Sid. Hogan and Troy Aikman look the same height, Hogan likes to bend his Knees alot when he talks. drummer777 says on 26/Aug/11
Tyler Mane droped himself from 6'10 to 6'8, Nash should be 6'8 as well if that is the case. Nash and Tyler look the same height in all there tag team events. miko says on 24/Aug/11
Click Here
Check out 2:00 onwards, Gonzalez has a full head on Sid. James says on 20/Aug/11
okay probably nothing less than 201cm for Sid.
Undertaker 201-202cm peak like a weak 6'7 1/2. Kane was a legit 6'7.5. Terryman says on 15/Aug/11
whenever Sid went on a staredown with someone he always made sure he stood in his straightest posture ever(shoulders with taker...hint hint),I wonder why though? NCL says on 14/Aug/11
Red says on 13/Aug/11
Here´re some comparison pics Supermum
Click Here
Click Here
Dude, great work as usual!
miko says on 12/Aug/11
Sid had the higher eye-line, both men probably think Sid is the taller man because of that.
Although I do think Taker was marginally taller (maybe 1cm), I wouldn't rule out both being the same height.
Sid is not over 6'7, and I don't believe Taker was anything over 6'7.5. He never looked a legit 6'8 unless in bigger boots.
I definitely agree that 'Taker either had Sid in height mariginally or they were the same height. Mamun says on 14/Aug/11
Thank you sooooooooooo mush your Excelency King RED ! Your comparisons ARE the best in Celebheights.com . You have no idea how much I enjoy them !
Kind regards
SUPERMUN Mamun says on 13/Aug/11
WOW Vegas ! We never agreed on the same thing ! This is History !
Regards
SUPERMUN Mamun says on 12/Aug/11
It's nice to hear from you again my freind Red ! I agree to everything you have to say ! Is it possible my friend to post a still image at 2.35 seconds
in that video ? Sid's shoulder traps are way higher than UT !
Regards
SUPERMUN miko says on 12/Aug/11
Sid had the higher eye-line, both men probably think Sid is the taller man because of that.
Although I do think Taker was marginally taller (maybe 1cm), I wouldn't rule out both being the same height.
Sid is not over 6'7, and I don't believe Taker was anything over 6'7.5. He never looked a legit 6'8 unless in bigger boots. Vegas says on 12/Aug/11
drummer777 says on 11/Aug/11
Sid 6'6 barefoot and 6'7 and a half in shoes depending on the heel size of course. Kevin Nash 6'8 and Tyler Mane 6'8 barefoot, Undertaker 6'6 barefoot
Barry windham 6'5 barefoot, Spivey 6'6
____________
if you are going to drop nash, sid and taker then windham must fall, sid had no less than 2 inches on him in the early 1990s, nash had more than 2 inches on spivey
i agree with mamun, maybe its the hair but sid does look taller than taker in that video, his shoulders are higher too (not that thats very relevant) Red says on 12/Aug/11
Mamun says on 11/Aug/11
Red , in that vedio SID actually looked taller !
Regards
SUPERMUN
Hi Supermum,
I think Taker edges him regarding the top of their heads. Sid gains height from his hair and the mask. They look very similar in height and I think Taker is maximum 1 cm taller.
Bodywise, Sid was always the taller man, Taker has just a longer head and neck. drummer777 says on 11/Aug/11
Sid 6'6 barefoot and 6'7 and a half in shoes depending on the heel size of course. Kevin Nash 6'8 and Tyler Mane 6'8 barefoot, Undertaker 6'6 barefoot
Barry windham 6'5 barefoot, Spivey 6'6. James says on 11/Aug/11
Yeah Sid might be barely 6'7 like 200cm. Mamun says on 11/Aug/11
Red , in that vedio SID actually looked taller !
Regards
SUPERMUN Vegas says on 11/Aug/11
takers not half an inch taller in that video drummer777 says on 10/Aug/11
Tyler Mane is 6'8, Nash looks the same height as mane. Red says on 10/Aug/11
Kian says on 9/Aug/11
When he wrestled Undertaker he was 6ft9 in boots and looked 1.5 inchs smaller than Undertaker because Undertaker is 6ft9 but 6ft10.5 in boots.
No.
They´re not their billed heights. Sid was barely 6´7" at his peak and Undertaker 0.25-0.5 inches taller because his head is longer.
Click Here Kian says on 9/Aug/11
When he wrestled Undertaker he was 6ft9 in boots and looked 1.5 inchs smaller than Undertaker because Undertaker is 6ft9 but 6ft10.5 in boots. James says on 8/Aug/11
200-201cm James says on 17/Jul/11
a 6'7 mesomorph is intimidating Terryman says on 23/Jun/11
2,01m 297lbs mersomoph. Vegas says on 21/Jun/11
@ james, sid was billed 6'7 in his early wrestling days Click Here
sid also looked very close in height with dan spivey circa 1990 (as did taker next to spivey btw) and spivey was max 6'6, sid also didn't have more than 4 inches on 6'3 max lex luger in 1991, in that video you posted sid easily looks an inch shorter next to nash than tyler mane did half a decade earlier Mamun says on 18/Jun/11
In the movie " River of Darkness " Sid and Nash looked like they were the same height !
Regards
SUPERMUN James says on 9/Jun/11
Rob do you think 6'7.5 or even 6'8 range is possible for sid?
If you have time watch this video and sid only looks 1.5 inches shorter than kevin nash who some say could have been 6'10.
Click Here
[Editor Rob: some do believe he's that range, I'm not as sure he really is though.] James says on 8/Jun/11
he could look 202cm next to Kevin Nash back in 1998. Cranberries says on 27/May/11
6'6.5" max IMO, considering the heel on them shoes. Clay says on 18/May/11
All this talk of massive exagerations for wrestlers, yet tons are listed correctly as well. Snausages says on 8/May/11
Sid was an oddball, he must have been the only wrestler back when, who was actually listed at about his exact size. I can remember watching matches of him back in about 1993 and he was billed at 6'7 307. He was at least that Paul says on 2/Apr/11
202.5cm peak, 6'7 201cm today. He has been in the ring for over two decades. Jake T. says on 30/Mar/11
Sid was most likely this tall years ago but for all the pictures I saw with Taker, Bryan Adams, Hulk Hogan and Kevin Nash I think he is at the 200 cm mark today.6'6.75 in my opinion. Tuga says on 24/Mar/11
Thats really fast, but it could be, the video I was refering was longer of course but that should be part of it. NCL says on 22/Mar/11
Tuga says on 8/Feb/11
Since you´re here longer than me do you remember the video I posted from the wwe website with a different angle from their wm13 staredown? It was clear again by that taker is the taller man, not by much but still...
I think I may have found the clip you're referring to, it was very briefly on Raw last night, maybe someone can make a screen cap of it:
Click Here Pause at exactly 4:07, it's hard to catch, it's very fast. Vegas says on 21/Mar/11
she was in wwe but they sacked her straight away, different rumours going around about that, she had a trial with tna recently but she is a really bad wrestler and the tna girls didn't like the way she worked rough with them
this isn't a comparison but in heels she does look close to khalis height (in shoes), the other guy looks about ~5'11 in footwear to me looking at his other photos with wrestlers Click Here Clay says on 12/Mar/11
When is this chick going to be in WWE? She would be nearly Khali's height in heels, LOL. Vegas says on 5/Mar/11
isis the amazon college freshman listing age 18 or 19 Click Here NCL says on 4/Mar/11
Tuga says on 3/Mar/11
NCL, you make good points, we have good middle of the ring fullbody staredowns between them and taker is taller.
Thanks my friend! Tuga says on 3/Mar/11
NCL, you make good points, we have good middle of the ring fullbody staredowns between them and taker is taller. James says on 27/Feb/11
WOW the undertaker looks different there NCL says on 27/Feb/11
Oh just noticed something interesting too: look at the top of Sid's head where the mask is. I'm not sure how to word this but notice the white part of his mask goes INTO his hair a bit? That's probably where is headline is. I'm probably wording this horribley wrong but look at the very top of Sid's head - you can see a part of his mask is going into the hair
Click Here NCL says on 27/Feb/11
Here's a fun little challenge: How's about some take this photo and draw a line from the top of Undertaker's head to Sid's and we'll see how much of the hair is just poof and how much is actually is his scalp
Click Here James says on 26/Feb/11
Eh he doesn't look quite 6'7 in comparison to Mamuns cousin. Vegas says on 24/Feb/11
aaronious show us a video where sid has dan spivey by 2 inches and spivey was at most 6'6, sid was wearing cowboy boots on family feud, nash in flat sneakers so a good 1 inch footwear advantage, any time sid and nash have had the same footwear on nash has had him by a good 2 inches, from the 3min mark onward sid and nash are side by side for a while Click Here aaronious says on 24/Feb/11
PROOF that sid is and has always been a half inch taller than undertaker, putting sid at 6'8":
Click Here aaronious says on 24/Feb/11
sid looks a full 12" taller than mamun in BOTh pics. sid has an enormous head, 10+"
why you still hating on Sid rob? in EVERY interview where he stands toe to toe with taker, both in the old "mark callus" days and now, sid ALWAYS has .5" on taker, every friggin time.
sid is a legit 6'9"
if anyone ever watched family fued when they had the wcw on there, sid stood next to nash and was 1 inch shorter, there was no mistaking it.. sid isn't 6'7", he's 6'8"
he had almost 2" on bryan adams, even though bryan had a footwear advantage Vegas says on 22/Feb/11
tuga at best sid there would be the same height as isis if they switched footwear, she is much taller than him in heels, barefoot probably looking at 2-3 inches taller than sid and 5 taller than jake, apters what 6 inches under her chin there, her heels aren't that big either, maybe 3 inches at most, no platform on the front to give more than ~3 inches Click Here
another sid comparison, this guy claims 5'10 (he is the mod of a convention type website) Click Here with isis Click Here
great pity she left wwe again, would have loved to see her next to khali and wight Tuga says on 22/Feb/11
Vegas says on 13/Feb/11
i think if roberts or sid stood next to isis in those heels it wouldn't look good for either
Well, if sid and roberts were using isis heels it wouldn´t look good for isis either ;) Anonymous says on 21/Feb/11
How tall is Bill Apter? NCL says on 21/Feb/11
NeNa says on 19/Feb/11
NCL says on 16/Feb/11
woops! mean COULD have been wearing heels :>)
I don´t know, if I got you right. At 0:05 you can see her heels and they are high! Nevertheless, I don´t doubt her 6'9" either.
Yeah what I meant to say was that she wears heels often in addition to being a legit 6'9" NeNa says on 19/Feb/11
NCL says on 16/Feb/11
woops! mean COULD have been wearing heels :>)
I don´t know, if I got you right. At 0:05 you can see her heels and they are high! Nevertheless, I don´t doubt her 6'9" either. NCL says on 16/Feb/11
NCL says on 14/Feb/11
Vegas says on 13/Feb/11
bill apter and sid Click Here
apter jake roberts Click Here
apter with 6'9 billed isis Click Here
i think if roberts or sid stood next to isis in those heels it wouldn't look good for either
I think it's possible she couldn't have been wearing heels. Most of the pictures of her out of the ring I've seen she's wearing heels. Just put her name in google images Click Here
I'm sure she's certainly a legit 6'9" tho
woops! mean COULD have been wearing heels :>) NCL says on 14/Feb/11
Vegas says on 13/Feb/11
bill apter and sid Click Here
apter jake roberts Click Here
apter with 6'9 billed isis Click Here
i think if roberts or sid stood next to isis in those heels it wouldn't look good for either
I think it's possible she couldn't have been wearing heels. Most of the pictures of her out of the ring I've seen she's wearing heels. Just put her name in google images Click Here
I'm sure she's certainly a legit 6'9" tho Vegas says on 13/Feb/11
bill apter and sid Click Here
apter jake roberts Click Here
apter with 6'9 billed isis Click Here
i think if roberts or sid stood next to isis in those heels it wouldn't look good for either Stone says on 12/Feb/11
Sid is absolute MINIMUM of 6'6" NCL says on 11/Feb/11
Tuga says on 10/Feb/11
NCL says on 9/Feb/11
This may be the photo you're referring to but if it is to be fair 'Taker does have the angle advantage Click Here
It wasn´t a photo, it was a video from the wwe website. That photo is obviously favoring taker.
Ooh Ok I know what you're talking about now. If I find it I'll post it, may be on the WWE site someplace. Tuga says on 10/Feb/11
NCL says on 9/Feb/11
This may be the photo you're referring to but if it is to be fair 'Taker does have the angle advantage Click Here
It wasn´t a photo, it was a video from the wwe website. That photo is obviously favoring taker. NCL says on 9/Feb/11
Tuga says on 8/Feb/11
JT says on 8/Feb/11
Tuga, not sure why Michael drew the line so far above Taker’s head. Look at the distance between Taker's eyes and the top line - Taker has a pointy head but it's not deformed. It’s probably more like this Click Here Taker is obviously closer to the camera and has footwear every bit as large as Sid’s, if not larger.
Yes JT, that was my point that they both have similar footware, like I said taker´s foot is closer to the camera making his boots look bigger.
Since you´re here longer than me do you remember the video I posted from the wwe website with a different angle from their wm13 staredown? It was clear again by that taker is the taller man, not by much but still...
This may be the photo you're referring to but if it is to be fair 'Taker does have the angle advantage Click Here Tuga says on 8/Feb/11
JT says on 8/Feb/11
Tuga, not sure why Michael drew the line so far above Taker’s head. Look at the distance between Taker's eyes and the top line - Taker has a pointy head but it's not deformed. It’s probably more like this Click Here Taker is obviously closer to the camera and has footwear every bit as large as Sid’s, if not larger.
Yes JT, that was my point that they both have similar footware, like I said taker´s foot is closer to the camera making his boots look bigger.
Since you´re here longer than me do you remember the video I posted from the wwe website with a different angle from their wm13 staredown? It was clear again by that taker is the taller man, not by much but still... JT says on 8/Feb/11
Tuga, not sure why Michael drew the line so far above Taker’s head. Look at the distance between Taker's eyes and the top line - Taker has a pointy head but it's not deformed. It’s probably more like this Click Here Taker is obviously closer to the camera and has footwear every bit as large as Sid’s, if not larger. Tuga says on 8/Feb/11
Vegas says on 7/Feb/11
why because its on video, second both sid and taker are in the same flat boots in that memphis video, third because taker has short hair, that photo which has been discussed many times is
Vegas, what about all the other videos of their staredowns in the middle of the ring? For example the one from wrestlemania where we can even see footware, its much better than the masked sid one...
Besides taker stacks up better to nash than sid ever did, in 2002 he was clearly taller next to hogan than sid ever was and I mention this because I know you don´t think hogan lost almost any height by that time, these are just examples, but still if you wan´t a 6'7 taker you´ll still have to explain why he´s 3 inches taller than 6'5 jbl or again looks 6'8 next to khali.
On the matter of footware, its funny how peolpe tought he wore big boots in his ministry days but actually it was probably his smallest footware in wwe/f. NCL says on 7/Feb/11
Red, appreciate the pic, but I just do not agree. That's an EXTREME close up, anything would look large in that. And even if it was true, Sid's boots in the WWF were still larger IMO. Tell ya what, if you can/have time, find a pic of Sid's boot from 1991ish and do that extreme close up, you'll see what I mean. A pic of Kane's boots would work too. If that's an inch and a half than what are Kane's munster boots? 4"?
And I said from his debut TO 94, I didn't say he debuted in 94. I meant that he wore the same boots from his debut until about 1994 (when he debuted the purple gloves and all that) Vegas says on 7/Feb/11
why because its on video, second both sid and taker are in the same flat boots in that memphis video, third because taker has short hair, that photo which has been discussed many times is taken from an angle favouring taker, the cameraman is to the right of taker, there is no way sids eyeline is half an inch higher but he still comes out 1 inch shorter than taker, sorry but no, at most takers forehead is half an inch longer than sids d wade says on 7/Feb/11
i think the Undertaker is a half inch taller than sid so 6,7 1/2 for Undertaker and 6,7 for sid is right and Kane is taller than the Undertaker by 1/4 or 1/2 so Kane is close to 6,8. Tuga says on 7/Feb/11
Click Here
IMO Taker is no doubt taller than sid, Vegas how can you just pick up a masked sid trying to look as tall as possible next to taker and just close the discussion?
There are loads of staredowns between the 2 and taker comes up taller just about every time, look again at the pic I posted, takers foot is closer to the camera, even if taker´s sole was bigger it would be so minimal it doesn´t compensate the difference between them, which is already small. Red says on 6/Feb/11
NCL says on 3/Feb/11
What?? If you really want to go the footwear argument, then look at UT's shoes from the his debut to about 94, they're practically flat, maybe .5" give tops Click Here If that's not a enough, just watch any match from that time period, including his staredowns with Sid. No way a lift could be in that.
???94 Takers Debut was in november 1990 and here are his boots Click Here
They look more like 1.5" than 0.5" and that´s the reason why he looked 1 inch taller than Sid in WWF. Vegas says on 6/Feb/11
well sid sure didn't look 1 inch shorter than taker in that memphis video from 88-89 danimal, good to see you ignore vital evidence again though, any chance taker had of being taller than sid went out the window with that video, taker, sid and jacobs would all be the same height, taker and jacobs are still the same height today
hogan should not be mentioned alongside sid/kane etc kane etc in terms of height, it should be someone like spivey who measured up far better next to sid and taker than hogan ever did, hogans in the bracket alongside guys like jeep swenson, scott hall and this guy Seiji Sakaguchi Click Here Danimal says on 5/Feb/11
Of Taker, Sid and Kane, Taker was the tallest of the 3 men. He was the closes to a legit 6'8" (at his PEAK). Kane was a tad shorter (6'7") and Sid perhaps a tad shorter than Kane (also around 6'7").. I think Studd would have stood a fraction under Sid's height and then it would have been Hogan (PEAK Hogan)... Throw in One Man Gang and Earthquake and you'd have an interesting line up... NCL says on 3/Feb/11
Supermanfan380 says on 21/Jan/11
NCL, it does not matter how many times taker has looked taller than side, or the other way.
If there is strong evidence that UT is not taller when wearing the same footwear, then so be it.
I remember at WM13 UT had on those type of boots that seemed to be hiding a lift. To make them not look like complete wedge shaped feet it looked like the toe area was even extended. Either that or his feet were MUCH bigger than Sid's, which I also consider unlikely, as Sid had pretty big feet himself. Notice in the pic with Mamun.
Foot wear CAN make a big difference, and if UT had a lift in all or most of his WWE appearances, but not in his former WCW days, then there you have it. Sid may be taller than UT.
What?? If you really want to go the footwear argument, then look at UT's shoes from the his debut to about 94, they're practically flat, maybe .5" give tops Click Here If that's not a enough, just watch any match from that time period, including his staredowns with Sid. No way a lift could be in that.
Click Here
With the USWA video, you can definitely make an arugment that UT still edges him out a bit b/c of his long forehead and Sid's poofed hair: Click Here
And with the boots, sure the soles look the same, but I think Sid could have had a lift in his shoe. That's only staredown where his shoulders are higher Click Here
Look, I don't mean to freak out on you and it's certainly a debatable topic - I'm not saying its impossible that Sid is taller, but I think it's highly unlikely.
Now your argument may be, "That's convineint to say that Sid has a lift in his shoe in the USWA (or is it CWA?)
I could say that its convienent that one could put an argument that 'Taker has a lift in his shoe at WM 13
Supermanfan380 says on 21/Jan/11
I remember at WM13 UT had on those type of boots that seemed to be hiding a lift. To make them not look like complete wedge shaped feet it looked like the toe area was even extended.
I don't think 'Taker or Sid had lifts IN there shoes at WM 13. But even if you took away the soles of 'Taker's shoes, that would put him as the same height as Sid with boots on Click Here Mike says on 2/Feb/11
The WWF led me to belive he was 6 ft 9 Anonymous says on 2/Feb/11
Sid looks pretty tall here, 5.44
Click Here FormlessOne says on 31/Jan/11
I don´t know if this was posted before. Here he is described as 6´7" and 290 lbs. Click Here Smaller and lighter than later in his career. Anonymous says on 29/Jan/11
His peak height is 199-200 cms Red says on 23/Jan/11
Supermanfan380 says on 21/Jan/11
I remember at WM13 UT had on those type of boots that seemed to be hiding a lift. To make them not look like complete wedge shaped feet it looked like the toe area was even extended.
That´s exactly what I thought, Taker is much taller than in the early 97 staredowns. He had close to an inch on Sid at WM 13, noway he was that much taller in 1989 with equal footwear. Supermanfan380 says on 21/Jan/11
NCL, it does not matter how many times taker has looked taller than side, or the other way.
If there is strong evidence that UT is not taller when wearing the same footwear, then so be it.
I remember at WM13 UT had on those type of boots that seemed to be hiding a lift. To make them not look like complete wedge shaped feet it looked like the toe area was even extended. Either that or his feet were MUCH bigger than Sid's, which I also consider unlikely, as Sid had pretty big feet himself. Notice in the pic with Mamun.
Foot wear CAN make a big difference, and if UT had a lift in all or most of his WWE appearances, but not in his former WCW days, then there you have it. Sid may be taller than UT. Anom says on 12/Jan/11
Sid, Taker, and Kane were all really close in height. Taker and Kane were around 6'8", Sid a bit shorter at about 6'7.25"-6'7.5" peak. Nash had them by about what looked like 1.5 to 2 inches, 6'9"-6'10". NCL says on 24/Dec/10
Everyone's been having a field day on the Undertaker page with the new Sid/UT video, might as well share it here:
Click Here
Click Here (credit to mikev10)
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
To be even more fair (and to stir the pot a bit, why not?), the only other time I can recall Sid looking taller than 'Taker is in this Interview (see from 4:17 and on - I think 3:31 is the best spot) Click Here it's hard to tell here too tho
My guess TOPS 'Taker is taller by .5", it could even be .25". It's definitely possible they could be the same height but I don't think so because too many staredowns are in 'Taker's favor Clay says on 16/Dec/10
James says on 15/Dec/10
Hogans is 6'3 flat today not 6'2.
+1 James says on 15/Dec/10
Hogans is 6'3 flat today not 6'2. Clay says on 11/Dec/10
Danimal says on 4/Aug/10
Now it's time for Rob to look at recent evidence and downgrade Hogan's current height.
What ''evidence''. Hogan at 6'2'' even today in his late 50's is bull. The only way you justify your Hogan is 6'2 theories is the same way you try to spin the crazy ''Undertaker is 6'6-6'6.5 today'' by pointing to footwear. Clay says on 6/Dec/10
You have been in the presence of some impressive human beings Mamun from Sid, KAne, and Kevin NAsh to Naseer Soomro and Alam Channa.
Next up is shots with Big SHow and Giant Khali! Mamun says on 4/Dec/10
like I had always said SID was just a Gigantic of a man !
Regards
SUPERMUN Clay says on 3/Dec/10
My friend Mamun and uncle Bashir looks at least 6'2'' next to Bruce WIllis. Sid is a mountain of a man! James says on 2/Dec/10
LOL and uncle Bashir is 6'2.
Mamun how big do you think sid would look next to bruce willis given that your cousin towered ove bruce. linke says on 1/Dec/10
mamun,is that Uncle bashir in red shirt?Sid does look much taller than him. Vegas says on 6/Nov/10
full video of that sid and adams staredown Click Here
adams and undertaker 1993 Click Here
adams was also taller than hogan in wcw d wade says on 3/Nov/10
sid is without a doubt 6,7 or 6,7 1/2 he was half inch small than the undertaker. Stone says on 1/Nov/10
Sid was and probably is still a solid 6'7" he is at least 2 inches then Hulk Hogan is . NCL says on 23/Oct/10
Here's a good Sid staredown from Robby's photo album (he posted on the Undertaker page) with a Brian Adams/Crush Click Here |
