Steve Railsback's Height
5ft 7in (170 cm)
American Actor best known for roles in films such as The Stunt Man, Helter Skelter and Lifeforce.
Add a Comment 19 comments
Average Guess (1 Votes)
Len said on 4/Sep/13
Whoa, really? He's listed at 5'10" elsewhere.
Most actors cheat by the "standard 2 inches".
jake said on 18/Jul/11
5ft6.25 (168 cm) here. Perhaps 5ft7 back in the day.
makeyes said on 6/Apr/11
doesnt look 65, maybe 50-55, which is good i guess.
looks exactly 5'7, i see 3cm difference.
said on 17/Mar/11
How are people only seeing 2" difference?????? Look at the top of their heads. He's a weak 5'5" at best. Rob, how are you keeping him at 5'7". That's more than 1" difference????
[Editor Rob: today he might not be over 5ft 6 but 5ft 5, maybe...but if he's not dropping more height than mamun I'd be shocked.]
Mathew said on 14/Mar/11
Looks like he's closer to 5'5" than 5'7" here.
avi said on 13/Mar/11
2-2.5 inch difference. yes 5'6ish. being Manum is actually over 5'8 a tad.
big mike said on 12/Mar/11
Yea a great performance in Ed Gein yea at 65 best guess he lost a few inches Mamun here got a 2 inch height advantage he's probably 5 ft 6
Bouncer said on 10/Mar/11
Did a great performance in "Ed Gein".
When i first saw the movie i had no idea how tall he is but guessed 5'7. Then i looked at most bio's and couldn't believe i read 5'10 most of the time.
Then i saw this photo with mamun and now i know that at least today he is no taller than 5'6 for sure.
LG69 said on 9/Mar/11
There is a 2" difference in height...so Steve is 5'6 ish
Aaron said on 9/Mar/11
Lol, Mamun looks funny in this picture. He's skinny with a neck like a tree stump. Railsback is really quite short. I've always thought he moved like a midget.
Mr. R said on 7/Mar/11
I remember the Manson movie from the 70's. He wasy scary and being short made him scarier.
RICHARD said on 6/Mar/11
I think the reason he was casted as Charles Manson is probably due to the height,and looks.He actually does look like Manson more now.
Manson is 5'2 so if Railsback was 5'10 then it wouldn't match.lol
Derek d said on 4/Mar/11
Looks 5'5.5 at most.
James said on 4/Mar/11
Jake T. said on 4/Mar/11
Looks 5'5.75 there, maybe 5'6 standing completely straight.
Bouncer said on 4/Mar/11
Are you for real? Today he's under this mark for sure. 5'6 at most.
jtm said on 4/Mar/11
Matt said on 4/Mar/11
lol, 5ft 7 peak is mpore realistic, more liek 5ft 6 flat now days
jake said on 4/Mar/11
hahaha wow, he is listed as 5' 10" everywhere!