|
Victor says on 15/Nov/09
Tom is 184 cm nowadays
Aleks says on 31/Oct/09
Hanks is certainly not 6'3".
It wasn't Tom, or your dad isn't really 6'3". Anonymous says on 30/Oct/09
I walked by Tom Hanks once and he seemed about 6'3" (my dad's height). He seemed really tall Hugh 191cm says on 30/Oct/09
Hes got good posture so I doubt hes shrunk. Im going with a strong 6ft guy. Hugh 191cm says on 30/Oct/09
Looked only marginally shorter than Dan Aykroyd in one movie Hugh 191cm says on 19/Oct/09
If Hanks was 1-2cm taller than Washington it would make him 185-186cm which is too high. Oleg says on 19/Oct/09
I just watched Philadelphia, and Hanks was 1-2cm taller than 184 Denzel Washington. I think Hanks was 6ft1 in his prime Hugh 191cm says on 16/Oct/09
6 ft 0.25 in (184cm) Hugh 191cm says on 30/Sep/09
If Hanks is 182-183cm there, then that makes Timberlake 184cm at least. Josh.J says on 24/Sep/09
Click Here
with justin timberlake. looks 182~183cm Hugh 191cm says on 8/Sep/09
183-184cm. Phoenix says on 2/Sep/09
looks 182-183 cm Emanuel says on 9/Aug/09
I go with 6'0 for Hanks. He definately has a good posture... Frank2 says on 3/Aug/09
If I had to bet the farm, I say Hanks is 6' even. His posture is sometimes no so great. He was an inch shorter than 6'1" Dan Aykroyd in DRAGNET. He was taller than 5'11' Leonardo DiCaprio in CATCH ME IF YOU CAN. In some angles, Hanks looked two inches taller.
Hanks and DiCaprio with 5'7" Steven Spielberg:
Click Here
Click Here
Hanks with DiCaprio:
Click Here
Hanks and Aykroyd:
Click Here Mathew says on 3/Aug/09
Yeah Hanks and Willis are very similar in height. I'd go Willis 5-11 and Hanks 5-11.25 personally. TELLEM says on 2/Aug/09
maybe their both 5'11? or hanks is 5'11 and a half? Hugh 191cm says on 2/Aug/09
Hanks has hair advantage but I still think he's taller than willis. I think hanks is 6ft0.25 and willis is a shade under 6ft. Frank2 says on 2/Aug/09
Hanks and Bruce Willis:
Click Here
As you can see, Hanks looks slightly taller which is what I've seen on occasion. I'm the same height as Willis. In an earlier shot posted by Matthew, Willis looks slightly taller so it could be posture on both men's part. TELLEM says on 22/Jul/09
HANKS is shorter than tommy lee jones whos 6'0, who was 2 inches shorter than an aging gene hackman in "total package" Frank2 says on 22/Jul/09
They are the same height. If anything, Hanks might be half an inch taller. I've seen both men. Stood next to them and they're my height. on at least one occasion, Hanks has looked slightly taller than me, but that might have been due to larger heels on his shoes. He doesn't wear lifts, but some shoes have over an inch on the heel. I always wear loafers with heels no higher than an inch. Some of my shoes have half an inch heels. Mathew says on 22/Jul/09
Yeah I know Willis' posture is a little straighter but Hanks looks under 5'11" there. I do think in reality Hanks and Willis are about the same height. TELLEM says on 21/Jul/09
look at his posture, then compare it to willis'. willis is also closer to the camera. Mathew says on 20/Jul/09
Hanks looks shorter than 5'11" - 5'11.5" Bruce Willis here: Click Here
I think 181 cm suits Hanks better than 183 cm. Hugh 191cm says on 13/Jul/09
Yeah his height really does fluctuate. yoney says on 12/Jul/09
I do agree that he looks taller than 5'11", but not sure if he is more than 6'. 182-183 cm sound reasonable. Lenad says on 10/Jul/09
5ft11ish in Big and the green Mile. A very strong 6ft1 in road to perdition. A weak 6ft1 in Sleepless in Seattle a strong 6ft0 in Philadelphia and a strong 6ft0 in Splash thekiddd says on 5/Jul/09
He did look short in Green Mile but he can look 5'11" at times. Seeing he could be fooled for 6'1" or 5'11", 6' exact is right! If he was 6'1" then he couldn't be mistaken for 5'11". le samourai says on 5/Jul/09
in picture with writer william monahan(182cm), Tom Hanks looks a little shorter..his height is 180cm barefoot..in shoes he is 6'0 :) Hugh 190cm says on 29/Jun/09
Seems fair James. Lenad says on 25/Jun/09
6ft1 max. Looked 186-187cm in Road to perdition but thats a bit too high King says on 25/Jun/09
TELLEM says on 22/Jun/09
how is he a strong 6'0er when tommy lee jones is taller than him? and so is denzel? an aging gene hackman had a solid 2 INCHES on tommy lee jones in "the package". c'mon now, hanks is a weak 6'0er.
That's ridiculous.Have u seen PHILADELPHIA£¿In the elevator£¬Denzel and Tom was about the same height. Hugh 190cm says on 23/Jun/09
He's never been close to 6ft2 in his life. But I'll agree James that he's given the rare illusion of looking that tall in the past. Hugh 190cm says on 23/Jun/09
183-184cm on the nose. Probably measures closer to 6ft1 in the morning. Lenad says on 22/Jun/09
In Angels and demons he did look 182-183cm TELLEM says on 22/Jun/09
how is he a strong 6'0er when tommy lee jones is taller than him? and so is denzel? an aging gene hackman had a solid 2 INCHES on tommy lee jones in "the package". c'mon now, hanks is a weak 6'0er. Mathew says on 22/Jun/09
IMO some legit 6' celebs are Denzel, Tommy Lee Jones, Edward Norton, and Travolta. David Morse is 6'4" so Hanks is 5'11", DiCaprio fudges his height a bit - I think he does anyways. Nismofreak says on 22/Jun/09
A strong 6 footer. He looked did indeed look half an inch taller than DiCaprio in "Catch Me If You Can". Lenad says on 22/Jun/09
Most likely a weak 6ft1 morning and rest of the day strong 6ft0 Mathew says on 21/Jun/09
Lenad says on 20/Jun/09
Well Hugh he clearly isnt 187cm
Hugh seems to have higher estimates than most people on the site more often than not, which is fine, but just a pattern I notice. Personally, I give Hanks 5'11". Lenad says on 21/Jun/09
182cm min mastadon says on 21/Jun/09
spot on 6ft Lenad says on 20/Jun/09
Well Hugh he clearly isnt 187cm TELLEM says on 19/Jun/09
hanks was only one inch shorter than 6'1 dan akroyd in "dragnet" and was described as 6'0. but hes shorter than than 6'0 tommy lee jones here: Click Here and he was shorter than 6'0 denzel in philedelphia Lenad says on 19/Jun/09
Frank2 are you going to rule out poor posture giving you that impression? I think 5ft11 is a bit short, true he did look around that height in the green mile. also are you american Frank2 says on 19/Jun/09
Hanks is at least 5'11" and is probably a hair under 6". Ahleks says on 17/Jun/09
He didn't exactly look 6' in The Green Mile, but it's probably because Michael Clarke Duncan, David Morse and James Cromwell are all 6'4+. Burtley says on 16/Jun/09
I guess we all believe what we want.
As I said, I will give Tom Hanks his 6 feet in lifts, but barefooted, I believe he is only 5'10". But enough of that. Have a good day. dmeyer says on 16/Jun/09
i met hanks and the minimum for him is 5 ft 11.5 to 5 ft 11.75 absolute lowest and absolute max 6 ft 0.25 to 6 ft 0.5 but to me he looked exactly 6 foot Burtley says on 16/Jun/09
James says on 15/Jun/09
5'10 is dillusional
I believe you mean delusional.
And I will give Tom Hanks 5'11" straight out of bed, or 6' or 6'1" with his elevator shoes (so 5'10"). I am 6'3.25" but have measured about 6'4.5" right out of bed. I could easily go around saying I am 6'4", or for that matter 6'5", but that would be delusional. So I say 6'3 for me as I say 5'10" for Tom Hanks. Burtley says on 13/Jun/09
I have to say this again since so many people still think he is 6 ft. tall.
Burtley says on 3/Jun/09
I am doubting 6 ft. Check out when he was on Conan last night (06-02, you can watch on Hulu). In a skit he is sitting in a chair and gets knocked over with his feet up. One shoe flies off and Conan grabs it and holds it in front of him. You can obviously tell that the shoes have huge heels and are probably lifts too. I dare say he is even barely 5' 10". Just my observations.
Seriously people, watch it and tell me he is 6 ft. without those lifts and heels. Again, I stick to my belief that he is just 5 feet, 10 inches. Hugh 190cm says on 12/Jun/09
Hanks in my opinion has always been a strong 6ft 183-184cm. Hugh 190cm says on 12/Jun/09
Frank2 at 5ft11.5-6ft you could claim 6ft1 and get away with it. WhiteKnight says on 11/Jun/09
In Miami Vice he`s just a little bit taller than Don Johnson, which is 178 cm! Lenad says on 9/Jun/09
Looked like he could pass for 6ft2 in Road to perdition but hes obviously not that tall dmeyer says on 8/Jun/09
it is hard to judge an exact height i have seen hanks a few times and he did seem about 6 ft evry time time i saw him T.J. says on 7/Jun/09
Well Lenad, 6' i think is a little generous for Tom
A strong 5'10.5" maybe 5'11", but I just dont see 6' Lenad says on 7/Jun/09
Yeah anything over 6ft1 in reality seems extreme for Hanks. Mathew says on 7/Jun/09
Frank2 says on 6/Jun/09
Hanks is 5'11" or slightly over.
Agreed. He's a strong 5'11", like 181 I'd say. Frank2 says on 6/Jun/09
Hanks is 5'11" or slightly over. Lenad says on 6/Jun/09
He sure as hell didnt look 187cm in The Green Mile. More like 181cm Mathew says on 5/Jun/09
By the way, no disrespect meant by that Hugh, you're entitled to your opinion even if you think he is a strong 6', but I just don't see it. I see a strong 5'11" but that's it. But I won't disrespect your opinion, just disagree with it. Anything in the 6'2" - 6'4" range I think is too high to seriously consider, however. Mathew says on 5/Jun/09
Priceless is people saying 6'2", 6'4" even. I think the debate is between 5'11" and 6' - not between 6'1" and 6'2". Lenad says on 5/Jun/09
In Big he looked a solid 5ft11 and could pass for 6ft0 Lenad says on 5/Jun/09
I saw 181-182cm in Big. TELLEM says on 5/Jun/09
tommy lee jones was no more than 183 cm. did u watch the package with gene hackman having a SOLID 2 INCHES on him? i did. hackman was way past his peak around this time. Lenad says on 5/Jun/09
Sleepless in Seattle 184-185cm, Philadelphia 183-184cm, The Green Mile 180-181cm, Splash 183-184cm, The Da Vinci Code 182-183cm, Catch me if you can 184-185cm, Forrest Gump 183-184cm, Road to perdition 185-186cm Hugh 190cm says on 5/Jun/09
That's very funny TELLEM. I don't actually. There are loads of celebs on this site who I think should be listed shorter. Josh.J says on 4/Jun/09
Click Here
looks 6'0~6'1 with ewan here. maybe has slight heel advantage but still at least a 6ft guy. TELLEM says on 4/Jun/09
hugh is 190cm. he wants EVERY actor to be around his height. Hugh 190cm says on 4/Jun/09
You thinking 5ft11 is priceless. Hugh 190cm says on 4/Jun/09
Sleepless in Seattle 186-187cm, You've got Mail 184-185cm, Big 187cm, Forrest Gump 185cm, Philidelphia 183-184cm, Green Mile, 181-182cm, Road to Perdition 187-188cm, Catch me if you Can 185-186cm, Davinci Code 183cm, Charlie Wilson's War 180cm.
Overall I see Hanks as a strong 6ft guy. Mathew says on 3/Jun/09
Burtley says on 3/Jun/09
I am doubting 6 ft. Check out when he was on Conan last night (06-02, you can watch on Hulu). In a skit he is sitting in a chair and gets knocked over with his feet up. One shoe flies off and Conan grabs it and holds it in front of him. You can obviously tell that the shoes have huge heels and are probably lifts too. I dare say he is even barely 5' 10". Just my observations.
Yeah I'm not sold on hanks as 6' myself, let alone 6'1". My estimate of him was 180 - 182 cm, or roughly 5'11" +/-. I'd say 5'10" range (even though I think he's a bit more than this) would less surprising to me than 6'1". Burtley says on 3/Jun/09
I am doubting 6 ft. Check out when he was on Conan last night (06-02, you can watch on Hulu). In a skit he is sitting in a chair and gets knocked over with his feet up. One shoe flies off and Conan grabs it and holds it in front of him. You can obviously tell that the shoes have huge heels and are probably lifts too. I dare say he is even barely 5' 10". Just my observations. TELLEM says on 1/Jun/09
he was a bit shorter than 6'0 denzel washington in "philedelphia" and was stated as "6'0" in dragnet. and here he looks shorter than 6'0 tommy lee jones: Click Here Hugh 190cm says on 30/May/09
Looks 6ft0.25 to me. He looked at least 6ft1 in Catch me If You Can. More like 6ft2 (188cm). Lenad says on 27/May/09
In the Da Vinci code and Angels and Demons I saw a weak 6'0 (182-183cm) man, in the green mile I see a strong 5'11 (180-181cm) man. He's probably a strong 6ft0 most likely 183-184cm Charlie23 says on 24/May/09
Needs to be downgrade in my opinion to 5'11.5 based on A&D movie. Hugh 190cm says on 22/May/09
6ft4? now that is funny. 6ft-6ft1 is bang on. Mathew says on 21/May/09
Yeah 6'4" is a joke, that puts Kevin Bacon at 6'3". Lenad says on 20/May/09
JJ thinks 6'4? Somebody get this joker off this site!! TELLEM says on 19/May/09
tom hanks was described at 6 foot in "dragnet". hes never been more than that, not even 6'1. Mathew says on 19/May/09
6'1" for Hanks is laughable. That makes Kevin Bacon 6', as Hanks was no more than an inch taller than him. JJ says on 18/May/09
This entry is just plain wrong. I was on an elevator with Tom once. He is really tall. I wouldn't be surprised if he were 6'4" Akirum says on 16/May/09
I can't see Tom Hanks anything above 6 feet. anonymous says on 14/May/09
Tom hanks is really tall. In catch me if you can, he is taller than claimed 6 foot leonardo dicaprio. He is considerably taller than 5 foot 7 catherine zeta jones in the terminal. He is tall in the lady killers. I think he might be 6 foot 1. Any lower than 6 foot is laughable. John says on 13/May/09
Claiming 6'1 and being 6'1 are two different things. Tall shoes, tall hair, being measured in the morning, etc. can all give you that extra inch or two. Hugh 190cm says on 13/May/09
Can get away with claiming 6ft1. GUK says on 8/May/09
6ft in shoes no doubt L says on 5/May/09
I waited on him a few years back and it doesn't seem like he was 6 feet. Maybe 5'11". Maybe. Bigman says on 29/Apr/09
He was always 6ft. Never 6'1" anon. He can look 5'11" and 6'1" sometimes I agree. Anonymous says on 29/Apr/09
6ft0.75 prime. anon says on 27/Apr/09
6'1 prime, 6' today. Lenad says on 26/Apr/09
5ft11ish with bad posture. How do I know? Well my dad is a solid 6'2 and he can look 6ft1ish when he stoops. Its the same with Tom Hanks. The guy can look more 5'11 because of bad posture but he is most likely a solid 6ft0 Mathew says on 24/Apr/09
181 cm is about it for Tom Hanks, Colin Hanks is the one who is 6-1. Lenad says on 20/Apr/09
6'1 is possible for Hanks but anything more is out of the question. Most likely a strong 6ft0 183-184cm. Hugh 190cm says on 13/Apr/09
I think he could be 184cm on a good day. Hugh 190cm says on 10/Apr/09
183cm at the lowest. 184cm or maybe even 185cm prime. I don't buy anything lower than 6ft for this guy. Clyde says on 9/Apr/09
Tom Hanks is 181 cm and has never been over 182 cm. Lenad says on 8/Apr/09
Never been shorter than 5'11.5. Never taller than 6'1 either. Anonymous says on 3/Apr/09
looks more 5'11 in the green mile Hugh 190cm says on 30/Mar/09
183-184cm range without a doubt. TELLEM says on 22/Mar/09
in the movie "dragnet" he was described as 6'0...so hes either 6'0, or a tad bit less. i'll just go wif 6'0. RisingForce says on 20/Mar/09
I agree Tellem, I think too many people assume celebs ahve shrunk. I only assume that if they appear visibly smaller like Arnold, Clint Eastwood, Brian Dennehy. Of course there are examples that aren't quite that obvious like Harrison Ford and Jackie Chan, but still it has to be a visible height loss for me to think they're shorter now. Some people in their 60's don't shrink. For example Stallone if anything looks taller now. Chuck Norris is almost 70 and still seems the same height. Frank2 also stated that he was the same height in his 60's that he was in his 20's. glenn says on 18/Mar/09
can give a 5-11 impression,even in front of me.but he is indeed 6ft. TELLEM says on 18/Mar/09
just because hes in his early 50's doesn't exactly meen hes lost height...maybe if he was in his early 60s, then ok Shane says on 18/Mar/09
Worked on Joe vs the Volcano with him barefoot, definitely six foot miko says on 12/Mar/09
Wouldn't be suprised if he's lost 1/2 inch, he is in his early 50's now. mcfan says on 6/Mar/09
In Dragnet he is 6ft as described by Aykroyd. I thought he was 1.5 inches shorter than Aykroyd in it. I do see him at times appear taller, but I think this is good posture and high shoulders...possibly lifts. \\_-_-_-Hugh-_-_-_/ says on 5/Mar/09
yoyo you are stupid. Hanks was at least 6ft in his prime and most likely taller. He looked close to 6ft2 at times even. yoyo says on 2/Mar/09
tom hanks is no way 6ft. he always apear less than 6ft. his 5ft11.5 at peak. 5ft11.25(181cm) now. \-_-_-(Hugh)-_-_-/ says on 22/Feb/09
Leo is almost 6ft. 5ft11.75. Hanks did look a good inch taller than him in Catch me if you Can. I'd say a weak 6ft1. Prime anyway. mcfan says on 21/Feb/09
Great posture, high shoulders. I think he is only 5'11.5. He gives the impression of someone taller due to his great posture and high shoulders. Dan Aykroyd was 1.5 inches taller than him in Dragnet. But then some people claim Dan is taller than 6'1 which I don't agree with. marioo says on 13/Feb/09
he was taller than 6'di caprio in catch me if you can Hugh says on 2/Feb/09
177cm! Absurd. Willis is at least 6ft. jo says on 31/Jan/09
Sorry rising force,I met bruce willis in paris and he is about 177 Hugh says on 27/Jan/09
Sorry I meant Hanks claimed 6ft1. Lenad says on 27/Jan/09
Hugh, I thought Travolta claimed 6foot. Hugh says on 23/Jan/09
I'm assuming he'd claim 5ft11. Most 6ft guys like Hanks claim to be taller. Denzel Washington claims 6ft1, Nicholas Cage claims 6ft1, Travolta claims 6ft2 and Willis claims 6ft1. Hugh says on 22/Jan/09
I'd say he claims 6ft1. Hugh says on 17/Jan/09
I'd say 184cm is about right. Lenad says on 17/Jan/09
I'd guess a strong 182cm or maybe a bit more. He doesnt seem over 6'1 and no less than 5'11.5 so Hanks is most likely a 6footer. I also dont think he lost any height. Hes filled out a bit which might give the illusion. Hugh says on 16/Jan/09
Sorry James, but I cannot picture Hanks being under 6ft. Even Nowadays. Sure he can look 5ft11ish in some movies due to say posture. But overall he looks like a solid 6ft guy. Mister Lennon says on 16/Jan/09
around 6ft. Hugh says on 16/Jan/09
Hanks is still 6ft I think. I'd say 6ft now and 6ft0.5 at peak. Or he might still be 184cm. Lenad says on 15/Jan/09
I can buy 6'1 for Hanks. No more though. Hugh says on 13/Jan/09
No, I think Hanks is taller than Willis but not by much. Washington and Hanks are around the same height. Perhaps Washington can look a bit taller. But I remeber in Philadelphia in some scenes Hanks looked a shade taller than Denzel. Lenad says on 12/Jan/09
You know on closer inspection Washington looked a tiny bit taller. RisingForce says on 10/Jan/09
Anonymous says on 1/Jan/09
shorter than bruce willis (5'11.5")
That's a perfect example of why the five eleven stuff for Bruce is wrong. Hanks is about six feet and Bruce is over six feet. Lenad says on 9/Jan/09
Maybe he is closer to 6'1. He looked pretty much the same as Denzel Washington in Philadelphia. Joe257 says on 7/Jan/09
He looked tall in Forrest Gump, about 6'1" I would say. So 6 feet is reasonable. Lenad says on 7/Jan/09
6'2 is BS but yes so is 5'11. Lenad says on 6/Jan/09
He never looks 6ft2 ever. Anonymous says on 1/Jan/09
shorter than bruce willis (5'11.5") anonymous says on 30/Dec/08
He looked really tall next to 6 foot leonardo dicaprio. 6 foot and it was camera effects. Hugh says on 28/Dec/08
6ft1 sightings for this guy are frequent enough. 6ft2 is even more frequent. Hugh says on 21/Dec/08
I'm sticking to strong 6ft. Sure he can give a 5ft11-6ft illusion. Hugh says on 15/Dec/08
I don't 181cm is Tom's height. a good 6ft for this guy. No less. anonymous says on 13/Dec/08
I would say that tom hanks is around 5' 11". Some people don't realize that 5'11" is not short....thats just slightly under 6'.....so that why he doesn't appear to be short because he is slightly above average height. Even if he were 5'10"...thats still not short considering adding another inch for footwear....so there you go again with shoes 5'11 or 5'11 1/2....mystery solved. Tony says on 7/Dec/08
lowest is 183cm Click Here
freeze that video at 34 seconds him and Ross are the exact height
same shoulder line ups and head measurements
I admit the camera angle has changed during that video before they are seated and infact could be illusion with the angle and the camera
but interesting none the less DMEYER says on 7/Dec/08
frank said than hanks looked 5 ft 11.5 but possibly 6 ft Hugh says on 5/Dec/08
I can see the lowest being 183cm. He just can't be under 6ft. 6ft0.5 is probably closer to the truth. He's a reasonably tall guy. Lenad says on 4/Dec/08
So Frank2 witnessed Hanks at not quite 6feet. In addition I can see 185cm at the highest and 182cm at the lowest. He seems a legit 6 footer unlike most people who get listed at that. Lenad says on 2/Dec/08
Didnt Frank2 witness Hanks at 5ft11ish? Hugh says on 1/Dec/08
Actually he looks quite close in height to his son. Hugh says on 30/Nov/08
I wouldn't go lower than 6ft. Always looks at least 6ft to me. Next to Michael Clarke he looked short but that guy would make anyone look small. Hugh says on 30/Nov/08
6ft1 maybe at his peak. Who ever said he was 187cm though? Lenad says on 30/Nov/08
Yeah he looks taller than average so a solid 6foot if not a little more. I wouldnt go as high as 187cm though. DMEYER says on 29/Nov/08
i worked with hanks for 3 weeks he didnt seem over 6 ft not under either no more than 184 cm peak Hugh says on 28/Nov/08
I certainly saw 6ft1 back 20 years ago. Actually he did look quite tall in Saving Private Ryan. Hugh says on 25/Nov/08
I could possibly give Hanks a weak 6ft1 as his peak. And a strong 6ft nowadays. anonymous says on 22/Nov/08
In catch me if u can, he was about an inch taller than leonardo dicaprio. He's 6 foot. Hugh says on 7/Nov/08
Craig is actually between 5ft10 and 5ft11. Bond Tailors measurement. Greg says on 5/Nov/08
Did someone see his photo with Daniel Craig?? Craig is 5´9´´ to 5´10´´ and Hanks is much taller than Craig on this photo, so I think Hanks is a solid 6´!! thekiddd says on 30/Oct/08
6'1" he can pass for even though he is 6'. 6'2" he could never pass for at anytime in his life. Lori says on 29/Oct/08
My husband met and spoke to Tom at a neighborhood BBQ back in 2002, and he thought Tom was closer to 6'2". My husband is a solid 6'4", and I have to say, Tom did look quite tall standing next to my husband. And I'm pretty sure he had on sneakers. Milosh says on 25/Oct/08
I'd say this is about right. He was like an inch taller than 5'11" Adam Goldberg in Saving Private Ryan. Hugh says on 22/Oct/08
I think he could be. He's not below 6ft. Hugh says on 20/Oct/08
Who Beatty or Hanks? Hugh says on 17/Oct/08
Beatty still looks a solid 6ft2. I think Hanks is no less than 6ft0.5. thekiddd says on 16/Oct/08
Yeah. His wife once said he was 6'2" but she doesn't know Jack Squat! TELLEM says on 6/Oct/08
i hear beatty is not 6'2 anymore...he could be 6'1...rob has him right at 6'0 Vegas says on 6/Oct/08
his tussauds waxwork is no more than 6ft in shoes (and thats me being generous) George H. says on 6/Oct/08
There was an even better picture on this page already Click Here George H. says on 6/Oct/08
6'2"? Don't think so. Borrowing pictures from the Warren Beatty page, here's Hanks in 2007 next to 6'2" Beatty Click Here thekiddd says on 5/Oct/08
I said not to me. I didn't say you were wrong. And he looks about 6 on Road To Perdition to me. thekiddd says on 3/Oct/08
He Never Looks 6'2" IMO. Hugh says on 30/Sep/08
In Green Mile he looked more 5ft11ish. In the Road to Perdition and in Sleepless in Seattle however he looked closer to 6ft2! The Horse of FUNK says on 27/Sep/08
Despite Dmeyer's goobly gock language, he's usually one of the more accurate members on this site. I agree with Dmeyer--Hanks generally looks 6'0" - 6'.05", even occasionally 6'1". He's definitely 6', that's for sure, and I'm willing to bet he's probably more like 184cm and just generally has relaxed posture. Hugh says on 26/Sep/08
I think anything under 6ft is laughable. Hugh says on 21/Sep/08
I think Hanks is at least 6ft. Alex says on 20/Sep/08
5'11-6'1 is one of those pretty tough ranges to tell on TV. They can be in that range and you can't be sure which height they are. Tom was never 6'1 but I think legit 6'0 at his peak. Today I could agree on 5'11 though. Hugh says on 15/Sep/08
I really don't know. One of Viper's stupid insults I guess. Hugh says on 13/Sep/08
Rob, can you please get rid of Viper. Everytime I post a comment he keeps insulting me for no reason. He keeps saying I'm a Parody poster and that I'm 'really stupid'. ... Gonzalo says on 11/Sep/08
Where is Dmeyer? Has he left the site?
[Editor Rob: he posted a comment quite recently.] Anonymous says on 27/Aug/08
My dad is six feet and I'm 5' 10". That pisses me off something awful. I think six footers look average height half the time and tall the other half. dits says on 13/Jul/08
david morse is 6'4" barefoot and tends to wear thick boots more than hanks does. thekiddd says on 29/Jun/08
He looked tiny in Green Mile ext to David Morse like 5'10". I always thought he was about 5'11" but I think 6 feet is fine for him. brotha says on 21/Jun/08
Just watched a league of their own. Hanks looks to appear the same height of Davis. Some shots in the film are misleading and appear to make Davis taller, but it really isn't the case. dmeyer says on 20/Jun/08
most of the time hanks look 6 ft to 6 ft 0.5 in one time he pulled of 6 ft 1.5 in in road to perdition he defenetly had lifts he made tucci look 5 ft 4 daii says on 17/Jun/08
he looks quite tall in forrest gump and the green mile (obviosly not compared to john coffee) but id say Tom is 5'11.5 to 6'0.5
so about 6 feet tall! Hugh says on 16/Jun/08
Okay, 6ft1/6ft2 illusion. But 6ft0.5 is a possibility. dmeyer says on 11/Jun/08
i met hanks he was 48 years old so very well could have lost 0.5 to 1 cm and he looked 183 solid or 184 so peak height minimum 6 ft to 6 ft 0.5 in so at early 50s might 5 ft 11.75 ro 6 ft flat dmeyer says on 11/Jun/08
that actor is nuts i met hanks in low cut shoes at the very shortest he is 5 ft 11.75 and more likely 6 ft 0.25 Jake Is Back says on 7/Jun/08
Hanks at 6'2" is more laughable than Hanks at 5'11". I really disagree with over 6', thats the most I see him at. Hugh says on 7/Jun/08
Candy was 6ft2-6ft3 so that makes Hanks and Washington 6ft1-6ft2. Lenad says on 6/Jun/08
He is about the same height as Denzel Washington and a little bit shorter than John Candy but I'll just have to say that the 5'11 guy who claimed Hanks is shorter is an Idiot unless Washington and Candy are lift wearers. glenn says on 6/Jun/08
there is no way he is under 6ft is correct.and could be 6-1 is also possible. Hugh says on 5/Jun/08
Anything below 6ft is ridiculous for Hank. His son Colin is barely taller than him. Hanks is 6ft1 at least. Anonymous says on 31/May/08
I've always perceived him as a regular (as in somewhere in the 'average' spectrum )height guy. He sure as hell isn't 5' 10" or 6ft +. Lenad says on 28/May/08
Now in his early movies, he usually looked 5'11 at best but he has looked 6'1 today, but the 5'11 guy said Hanks is shorter than him. Therefore it makes sennse if Tom wears lifts, making him really 5'10-5'11 like he looked in his early films. There is no way he is 6'1 or close to it. thekiddd says on 27/May/08
Nah. He was always 6 feet flat. I don't think he's quite reached the age of shrinkage. He can pass for 5'11" but 6' looks like his height back then and today. Arnie says on 21/May/08
Who is ever 6' on the mark 6' on the exact cm anyway, Tom might very well be 5'11.80 Jake Is Back says on 10/May/08
Well, never met him but he really does look more 5'11" than 6' half the time. James W. says on 9/May/08
I thought Hanks looked the same height as Davis. He's an easy sixfooter. glenn says on 4/Mar/08
i totally agree leung that he could look 6-1 at times. Leung says on 3/Mar/08
Hanks was only slightly shorter than John Candy in Splash. In his earlier movies Hanks often look close to 6’1”. I believe that he was probably a solid 6’0.5” peak height. Anonymous says on 3/Mar/08
If thats true, Laurence Fishburne is taller than 6'.
Click Here
In comparrison to Bacon he has more height over him than Hanks does. glenn says on 3/Mar/08
bacon is 5-11.hanks is 6ft. |
