How tall is Daniel Cudmore - Page 2

Add a Comment509 comments

Average Guess (71 Votes)
6ft 6.56in (199.5cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Sep/13
Could very well be a 199cm guy. But for sure nothing 6ft6.
Mathew said on 12/Sep/13
Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!

---

He isn't 197, but he sure does look 197 cm with Rob above. He's gotta be at least 199 - 200 cm in reality though.
avi said on 4/Sep/13
@Lo sgozzatore says on 26/Aug/13

I think he dips into the 6'6.5 area most of day if not by evening at the worst. Still could be weak 6'7.
Lo sgozzatore said on 26/Aug/13
At worst he's 6'6.5, but 6'7 is spot on in my opinion. Noway in hell he's just 197!
Sixseven said on 23/Aug/13
Daniel Cudmore is 197cm tall(6'5.6")
Dean 5ft 9.25 said on 19/Aug/13
Rob what would you rather be 6ft 7 or 5ft 10?
[Editor Rob: 6ft 7 would be interesting if i was doing a height site like this, but living day to day 5ft 10 would be non stand out, nowhere near as many look at or notice you compared to giant heights...]
avi said on 11/Aug/13
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]

Theres no doubt hes a very tall guy but i was merely asking if its psosible hes in the 6'6.5 range at night at least. sssuming you are n par with his chin theres no way his head is 11 inches! his head must be 10 inches and he must be a 6'6.5 range. Jenny seems to come 1/4 below his chin or equal with it so about 10.25 difference here.
[Editor Rob: I think his head is a decent 10 inch, so 6ft 6.5 isn't impossible but I think measuring him you'd get 6ft 7]
avi said on 1/Aug/13
@Rob
Rob you may have been too busy to answer this:
"@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here..."
rob can you maybe show me a picture of him next to a 5'10 guy and to 6'1 guy? it may be easier to see the difference there
[Editor Rob: cudmore is very tall guy, I can believe he would measure 6ft 7 barefoot]
avi said on 17/Jul/13
@Rob
im confused a bit. assuming his head is 10 inches and you are at his chin wouldnt this make him 6'6 range?? i think you may be 7.5 inch above his chin.i know you have .4 inch thicker shoe but even so would you consider him a weak 6'7.i mean his head could be 9.5 then difference wouldn't be a solid 10 inches. i see 10 inches here...
Connor 184cm said on 22/Jun/13
Rob do you think 6ft 7 is a bad height?
[Editor Rob: it's a standout height. More eyes are on you than the average man...for some people that would be a bad thing, but others would like the feeling of that and also taller people are given more leeway in work and are thought of in a better sense than the smaller man.

There can be advantages and disadvantages in general day to day living. Imagine going on the tube/buses/flights/cars regularly - it's more physically challenging being extremely tall than being average in situations like that.]
lelman said on 14/Jun/13
Rob, is he the tallest guy you and Jenny have gotten a photo with?

Real big guy, easily 6'7"
[Editor Rob: there's ian whyte who is tallest so far.]
avi said on 7/Jun/13
the difference between me and my mom is like this so 10 inches probably.
Thor/Johno said on 30/May/13
I rest my point, ian is so tall that i could not tell the difference between 6'11, 7'0, 7'1 or 7'2
Thor/Johno said on 30/May/13
Jimmy, ok compared to challenger 15. 6'5.2 challenger 15 comes about 0.5 inches below ian's eyeline and ian's eyeline seems about 5.5 inches so i would say about 6 - 6'5 inches taller challenger 15 ie 6'11.5 (But that isn't set in stone)

Compare the pictures yourself.
Thor said on 30/May/13
Jimmy, i have no idea. He is to tall and the difference between rob, jenny and him is far to great.

Put it this way, if rob measured him at 7'1, i would say cool he looks it, if measured him at 7'0, i would say cool he looks it and if rob measured him at 7'2 or 7'3, i would say cool he looks it.

You see, if rob was at least 6'5, i could reasonably deduce ian's height but he isn't. The only way round it would be to compared challenger 15 with rob and ian with rob and work out the difference and even then it wouldn't be accurate.

In real life if i saw a 6'7 contender or 6'8, 6.8.5 i would not able to tell. I cannot tell the difference between 6'9 - 7'0 honestly. Similarly, i cannot tell if some is 4'10, 4'11 or 5'0? or eg 3'3 - 3'8 - the height's are just to far out from my height. I doubt those individuals would be able to tell how tall i am but if someone was 5'0 or above, could reasonably predict my height, or someone that was upto 6'5, probably could deduce my height to.

I can tell the difference between someone who is 5'0 - 6'6, those parameters.

Ian is massive guy, i'll leave him at his listed height of 7'1
jimmy said on 29/May/13
Johno how tall do u think this guy is?
Click Here
jimmy said on 17/May/13
So Cudmore looked at least 1.25" taller than #15 who is 6'5.2" at his lowest having 0.4" less footwear than Rob.So he can't be under 6'6.75".And as Rob has said #15 looks taller than he measures.Rob have you seen Joe again? I doubt that he is legit 6'5",but with a tad more footwear he looks closer to 6'5" than 6'3" or 6'4" as Johno insists.He looks clearly taller than a guy like Kevin Sorbo.
johno said on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.

As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .

rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty hard to tell since the difference between him and rob is great )
johno said on 15/May/13
Cool - if cudmore appeared in the region of 1 - 1.5 inches taller then challenger 15 then i can't argue.

As i said before because he is so tall, even a slight slouch can make him look shorter by 0.5 inches. I was purely using the picture above and considering footwear disadvantage and comparing with challenger 15's picture and cudmore came out a fraction shorter but that's probably due to posture and you can't tell his true length by bit. Yes, cudmore could realistically be 6'6.5 .

rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'6.25 - 6.6.75 (but it's pretty to tell since the difference between him and robbis great)
johno said on 14/May/13
Jimmy my point is, joe looked a strong 6'3 range with rob rather then strong 6'4 so effectively he could be around 6'3.75 aswell not neccessarily at 6'3.25 in the evening.

With cudmore i put him at upper 6'5 range, lower 6'6 judging by the above picture. Taller then challenger 15 as rob stated. As stated earlier, cudmore is one head length taller then rob ie 9 - 9.5 inches plus shoe deficit. Another approach is to compare this picture with challnger 15's and you will see that he comes a fraction shorter with a footwear disadvantage but obviously taller without. Even from an overall profile perspective, cudmore gives me 6'5 indication but taking account of footwear, a weak 6'6 profile man.

Sure he could measure 6'7 or 6'6.5 by the measuring tape but since he is so tall a 0.75 inches margin of error becomes irrelevant in the context of things. If i didn't have rob's guideline of 6'7 and using challenger 15's picture, head length and general overview i would have put cudmore at a weak 6'6 evening time. I would pretty nervou with a 6'7 or 6'6.5 bet and that's the criteria i go by and it is not fullproof but i am comfortable with my estimation.

joe strong 6'3 range or weak 6'4 (sound better)
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6
[Editor Rob: I saw the big height challenger the other day in the supermarket and he definitely gives a bigger look than joe does, but Cudmore is taller in person, at least 1-1.5 inches]
jimmy said on 13/May/13
@Johno Manganiello at 6'.3.25" this guy at 6'5.5".I think u are underestimating heights a big time.
Johno said on 5/May/13
Jimmy, i was scaling the picture of rob with challenger 15 and cudmore comes out a bit shorter. The fact that cudmore has footwear disadvantage would make cudmore about the same height as challenger 15. I have given cudmore an extra 0.5 inches for assurance.

Further, cudmore skull is not any longer then rob's ie 9-9.5 inches. Rob is around his chin level, which would make cudmore about 6'5.5 - 6'6 taking footwear into account. Thats why i put cudmore in the upper 6'5 range.

Rob 5'8
challenger 15 6'5.25
cudmore 6'5.75 - 6'6 (pretty fair)
jimmy said on 28/Apr/13
Johno says on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration

Daniel has longer head than 15.And the angle of the photo makes 15 look taller than he really is.
Johno said on 26/Apr/13
Compared to challenger 15 (6.5.25) not much difference, i give cudmore 6'5.75 taking footwear disadvantage into consideration
John said on 25/Apr/13
Well, at last someone taller then me...
wiltonstilts said on 25/Apr/13
He does appear to be 6'6
jimmy said on 8/Apr/13
His head looks quite long.10"-10.5" Rob?
[Editor Rob: not more than 10 inches]
jimmy said on 2/Apr/13
He looks at least 10.5' taller than Rob who is 5'8.2" and with 0.4 advantage.Minimum flat 6'7".
Arch Stanton said on 17/Mar/13
Click Here

He even looks a respectable height next to 7'1" Ian Whyte!
Arch Stanton said on 16/Mar/13
A legit 6'7" barefoot is just a huge body frame to be carrying around. I feel pretty tall at my height and if I hold a mirror up and see where 6'7" is on my door I always find it amazing how a guy could be that big or more barefoot. Guys like Cudmore must feel extremely tall wherever they go. To the point of being awkward i think. A legit 6'7" and over is an extreme height for a human being, without a doubt!
Elijah said on 10/Mar/13
Legit listing. You two look like his children. lol
Fern194cm-192cm said on 18/Feb/13
No guys, He looks a legit 6,7. First off, Rob is really 5,8 and change (not just 5,8 flat) and second my brother is 6,6.5 at night and beside a 5,8.5 guy he looks about the same!
Nick 189 said on 15/Feb/13
Looks 6'6
Ramsay said on 21/Jan/13
Aragorn, why do you think you can estimate his height so precisely? Have you stood with him next to a stadiometer?
Aragorn 5'11 said on 17/Jan/13
Legit 200 cm. (6'6.75) Just a little bit under 6'7.
John said on 9/Jan/13
Tim, well I'd definitely prefer to not be that tall if thats what you mean
Mathew said on 31/Dec/12
Looks 6'5.5" - 6'6" in the picture, although with the 1 cm footware disadvantage. He could be 6'6.5" - 6'6.75" rather than the full 6'7".
truth said on 30/Dec/12
a solid 6ft7. Gigantic.
Lo sgozzatore said on 17/Dec/12
Legit 6'7 guy, i doubt he's anything less than 2 metres
J.J. said on 10/Dec/12
@Larc-186.7-188.6cm I'd say 6'7" or exactly 200cm/2m is when people start to appear extremely tall. because that is over 99.9% on the growth chart
Tim said on 8/Dec/12
Is 6'7" past the point of being reasonably tall? Seems like with that height you'd have a lot of trouble just doing usual things like driving or showering
mId said on 25/Nov/12
Hmm.. I'm 183 cm and have a friend that's 202 cm and somehow this difference between Rob/Jenny and this guy doesn't shock me? I remember me and my friend stood next to eachother in a shopping-mall mirror and I looked like a kid next to him. Rob/Jenny is supposed to be 4" shorter than me.. so adding 4" on them in this photo and they wouldn't look that "towered".. but I thought I did with my friend.. weird :/ I would have guessed maybe 194-195 for this guy based on this pic.
James said on 19/Nov/12
6'6.5. Its not that shocking seeing this guy next too 2 5'8ers.

I think if you stood this guy next too peter crouch there would be a good 1 inch between the 2.
runt said on 19/Nov/12
Not a hair over 6'6.875"
getting_taller said on 17/Nov/12
So this is what a 6'7" looks like standing beside 5'8" footers whew. Clearly taller than Manganiello,Mcpartlin,Momoa.
The Exorcist said on 12/Nov/12
Very tall!
Larc-186.7-188.6cm said on 7/Nov/12
6'6-6'7 starts to appear extremely tall.

He's 6'7 for sure.
Caren said on 5/Nov/12
It's nice to see such a tall person stand up so straight! So many of them slouch!
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Looking again that right photo of the Challenger 15 he looks MASSIVE. At first glance you think he's near 6 ft 8.
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
That's right I think Cudmore had an inch on #15 and adjusting for Rob's shoe advantage I added half an inch and pretty much got 200 cm for him in comparison
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Click Here

Here he is next to Jackman. Jackman's posture isn't the best and Cudmore's is almost Stallone like but Cudmore actually makes Jackman looks a 6'1"er here. In that photo its difficult to see him even a hair under 6 ft 7 even accounting for posture differences.
Shaun said on 19/Sep/12
Mathew says on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]

I did the comparison Mathew when we were doing the Challenges. Cudmore had about 1.5 inches on Challenger 15 accounting for Rob's footwear advantage. If the big guy is just shy of 6'5.5" Cudmore is pretty much around 6'7" as he claims legitimately. Cudmore does look more 6'6" to the eye here but I think the lowest he could possibly be in comparison to #15 is 199.5-200cm. Cudmore could be 2 metres flat which is virtually 6'7" but for sure he's nothing under 6'6.5".
TNTinFL said on 23/Aug/12
Can't argue with that height. I actually thought he was taller; 6'8". When I first saw him on X2 was during that scene where they were raiding the mansion. He was barefoot and still towered over 6'2" (and change) Jackman.
Mathew said on 19/Aug/12
It'd be interesting to see a comparison between Cudmore and Challenger 15. Because Cudmore honestly doesn't look taller to me in this picture for some reason.
[Editor Rob: in person cudmore is definitely a taller guy, although maybe cos the challenger is shot from a different angle it makes him imposing]
Shaun said on 10/Aug/12
@Hob. Steven = LanJiao =" I'm 6'5"" . Average height in China didn't you know?
Hob said on 7/Aug/12
"Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?"

shuan, i don't get you. i did not claim 6'5 by you were think 0.5" shape off to 6'4.5 my height? im tall and not far to reach cudmore claim but i choose not to claim height here. thankful shuan.. by the way cudmore does't not look 6'7 even to pity to him without shoe advantage next to 5'8.25 rob in 1 inch shoe. my guess still 6'6.5 for cudmore or max 6'6.75
matt789 said on 27/Jul/12
he looks a solid 6 foot 6 and a weak 6 foot 7
Mathew said on 7/Feb/12
Shaun says on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?

---

I don't think he looks an inch and a half taller than Challenger 15, I know he's loosing a cm to footware though so it becomes closer to that. 6'6.5" is okay to me, but 6'7" is kind of pushing it.
Shaun said on 28/Jan/12
6'6.5" is 199.5 cm right? Yeah I can buy about that or 200cm but I cant see him as a flat 6'6" guy or lower, he looks a couple of inches taller than somebody of Ryan McPartlin's height, as you say Cudmore looks extremely tall and McPartlin a more modest "very tall". He does look close enough to 6'7" to round up half an inch as is common amongst taller guys in Hollywood and in general. He looks well proportioned at this height though, compared to several other English lamposts I can think over LOL...
Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
Rob what's the lowest you think he could possibly be? I can see 200cm as possible but he is does look minimum inch and a half taller than Challenger #15 right?
[Editor Rob: well he looked in the 6ft 6 range, and the challenger 15 looked 6ft 5 range, but cudmore of course had converse while i had an inch, so I would doubt he'd measure under 6ft 6.5.]
Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
If you compare this guy to Challenger 15 and then take into account Rob's footwear he's close enough to 6'7" if not on the mark. I can see 200c, but I doubt he under that.
Shaun said on 27/Jan/12
Does that mean we can downgrade you to at least 6'4.5" then Steven?
steven said on 18/Jan/12
rob, cudmore should be downgrade at least 6'6.5. #15 guy does't look much on 1" shorter than cudmore look.
steven said on 14/Jan/12
i see daniel cudmore here is 6'6 and 6'7 in shoe 6'6.75 in sneakers. i usually think 6'3 for ryan mcpartlin , but after some reason i convince he is about 6'4 and looks it with rob. from here we see daniel cudmore had less footwear by 1cm than rob he look full almost 10" taller than rob which could have make him 6'6.25 and 6'6 flat min. he had regular size head ,does't had over 10" head so 6'6 would't be wrong.
JM9 said on 13/Jan/12
I would agree Witchdoctor, but there are three other things: Rob has a 1 cm footwear advantage here, and he is standing nearer to the camera than Cudmore. Plus, Cudmore appears to have a longer head (maybe 2-3cm) than the man in that challenge. Put that together and I can see 4-5 cm.
Witchdoctor said on 13/Jan/12
if Challenge 15 is 1.96m than Daniel cudmore is around 1.99m,chances that daniel is 5cm taller are just really slim!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 2/Jan/12
Rob, what about around 199 before bed? You said that very tall guys loose more height during the day! So if 202-203 out of bed and 199 before bed is a possibility? Or he never dips below 200?
ChiasmataX said on 24/Dec/11
He looked a legit 6'6 in this picture. It is easy to tell because a legit 6'6 will have a full head over 5'8-5'8.5 people.
avi said on 24/Dec/11
@[Editor Rob: cudmore is at least 2 inches taller in person than ryan is, ryan is very tall but daniel is extremely tall and had 0.4 inch less sneaker than me.]

yes maybe you feel that way but the evidence points to Cudmore being about 1.5 inches taller than Mcpartlin. but lets say you are right and it is 2 inches then Cudmore should be a weak 6'6.5 dipping into the 6'6 .25 zone. plus Mcpartlin could be 6'4.25. So you should drop Cudmore down to 6'6.5 he looks a weak 6'6 with you BUT like you said you have .4 advantage. So 6'6 is very generous. Not a 6'7er...
Mathew said on 23/Dec/11
He looks about 197 cm in the picture. Factor in the footware disadvantage and he looks 6'6".
Shaun said on 18/Dec/11
I think at some point in the day he might measure 200cm barefoot. He's clearly very close to 6'7".
anonim said on 15/Nov/11
Up to 192 I think this guy does not stop 2 meters!
Physics Enemy said on 13/Nov/11
For me 6' 2" evening is the start of very tall.
Tom101 said on 13/Nov/11
id say around 6-7" here,my friend is 6-7" and im 6-2.5" so i think knowing my other friends around 5-8" mark so to me hes that height.
LAN Jiao said on 26/Oct/11
#roughly estimate:
6'7 = 200.5cm > cudmore claim. possible just a fraction over 199cm through out.
6'7.25 = 201cm > lebron james barefoot. maybe straight down 200.0cm mid noon.

think the half cm could make a little difference. if put lebron stand next to cudmore with both straight up , cudmore is 5mm down lebron but might had hair advantage 2-2.5cm on almost bald lebron and came out people would argue cudmore is 6'8 and lebron is shorter. this thing happen in reality we seen.
Lucoso said on 26/Oct/11
very tall almost 2m
Shaun said on 25/Oct/11
Na a legit 6 ft 6 barefoot guy will usually be considered extremely tall. A 6'5" guy though very tall. I'd agree on 6 ft 10 for a giant though.
Alex said on 22/Oct/11
Solid tall is 6'1-6'3. Very tall 6'4-6'6. 6'7-6'9 extremely tall then 6'10 plus is a giant
Legend said on 20/Oct/11
He's close to 6'7 whatever he is...I think I've guessed 6'6.5 before.
george555 said on 16/Oct/11
he looks at least 6'6-probably 6'6.5, 6'7 is too big of a height, he doesn't have 11 inches on Mamun.
Triplescrew said on 16/Oct/11
@ Vegas

Sorry I didn't see your request. Here it is:

Daniel Cudmore (6'7") vs Michael Kingma (6'9.5") vs Ian Whyte (7'1")

Click Here
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" range, Virtual/borderline giant 6'8"-6'10", true giant 6'10" +??
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah if you never dip under 6'3" barefoot all day and are a strong 6'3" that's what I'd consider the start of the very tall range. Extremely tall 6'5.5"-6'8" ramge
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
For me a legit 6'3" evening height is the start of very tall.
Shaun said on 16/Oct/11
Yeah I'd probably agree with you on that Alex. A true giant has to be over 6'10" really but anything over 6'8" for me is the "mark". Cudmore I'd describe as extremely tall but not a "giant". Kim Kardashians husband Chris Humphries at 6'9" to me at times looks a giant or a borderline one.
LAN Jiao said on 16/Oct/11
rampage, u lost counting mamun hair. with mamun he look legit 199cm not even 201 or 202cm stop upgrading celebs..
i doubt his 6'7 201 claim was morning measurement. he only look 200 at best. between 199-200cm. maybe he hover just 199.5cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Oct/11
Looks 201cm-202cm or a strong 6ft7 with Mamun.
Alex said on 8/Oct/11
Could be 6'6 1/2 compared to Ryan but 6'7 is very possible too.
avi said on 6/Oct/11
Rob, looks more like 6'6. especially if compared to 6'4 and change Mcpartlin...
[Editor Rob: cudmore is at least 2 inches taller in person than ryan is, ryan is very tall but daniel is extremely tall and had 0.4 inch less sneaker than me.]
Moke said on 3/Oct/11
So his head is 11 inches long then? wow!
James said on 2/Oct/11
® says on 29/Sep/11
Jack swagger is 6'5 and he looks normal,james.

Swagger looks very bioo me and can even look bigger than 6'5 with his hairstyle like 6'6-6'7.
Alex said on 30/Sep/11
I would say
5'11-6'0- above average/tall
6'1-6'3- solid tall
6'4-6'6- very tall
6'7-6'9- extreme tall
6'10 plus- giant
Alex said on 30/Sep/11
6'7-6'9 is the extreme tall range I could agree on. When I think of giant I'd think of 6'10 or taller. Usually people think of 7'0 or more as a giant.
Vegas said on 30/Sep/11
triplescrew those are really good, can you do one for cudmore, ian whyte and michael kingma (three tallest men photographed next to rob)
LAN Jiao said on 30/Sep/11
Mr.awesome would be 5-6cm under cudmore. 6'7 flat cudmore also look awesome.
Triplescrew said on 29/Sep/11
Daniel Cudmore (6'7") vs Ryan Mcpartlin (6'4.5")

Click Here
® said on 29/Sep/11
Jack swagger is 6'5 and he looks normal,james.
LAN Jiao said on 28/Sep/11
up here rob mention cudmore wore 0.6 converse but i did believe it is less than 0.6 while cumore is a very big guy probably 230pounds so his heavy after wore in the converse could be 0.35-0.4(1cm flat or under) therefore i can tell a giant 200cm daniel cudmore is easily over 2inch taller than armie hammer. because armie not 6ft5 , if you compare him to "6ft" leo di caprio he was big 4inch taller.
[Editor Rob: I doubt they shrinked much]
James said on 23/Sep/11
Shaun says on 19/Sep/11
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.

Well Armmie could be 1 or 2cm less than 6'5 in my opinion. certainly tim robbins looks not normal height in photos. If you look at Ralf Moller who is 6'5-6'6 he looks far from normal sized in pics as well.

i think 6'4 is normal too a degree but i am not sure i would give 6'5 that label? i would defenintnly call 6'5 'super tall'. even 6'3 or 6'4 be branded as super sized.
xyz.reg(6 ft 1.5 in) said on 20/Sep/11
A legit 6ft 7in person..
@Balthier Hahahahahahaha..man dat was a gud 1..rofl..!!!
Shaun said on 19/Sep/11
A well-built 6'5" though generally looks normal. I mean you see pictures of Armie Hammer and he doesn't look freaky, far from it. Sometimes 6'5" can even look only tall rather than super tall. Even Cudmore here looks normal. Peter Crouch on the other hand does look freaky because he is extremely skinny.
James said on 18/Sep/11
Shaun says on 13/Sep/11
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.

I have heard people describe '6'5' as being circus show material. Although 6'5 is super tall i don't know about circus material? I know 6'4 is 'big' but it is defenintly not circus like since i had friends who were that tall. the thing is i rarely see legit 6'5 guys around and i don't have any friends who are that tall either.
Kostas said on 14/Sep/11
Cranberries,I know for sure that i do NOT,even if he is around a foot taller than me
i prefer being able to fit in cars and airplane seats
Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
If you are a legitimiate 6 ft 8 I think that is the start of where your proportions would literally start to look giant like so you could argue anything over 6'8" is a giant. But a true giant in the sense of not human like and looking like something from a circus show or children's story has to be 6'10" at least. Cudmore I would place in extremely tall range.
Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
A true giant I'd agree is 6'10" or over. But if you measure 6'9" barefoot last thing at night hard to deny that's a giant...
Shaun said on 13/Sep/11
Balthier says on 11/Sep/11
It's hillarious to see how much smaller Rob and Jenny are compared to Daniel. They look like his kids.

And Jenny's a tall woman too, sure she towers a lot of short women.
James said on 11/Sep/11
Greenbolt says on 10/Sep/11
People keep debating as to where "very tall" ends and where "giant" begins. Personally, I think there's a category in between very tall and giant. Maybe like "extremely tall", where you're out of the norm, but not quite tall enough to be considered a giant. Here's my tall chart:

6'0'' to 6'1''- typical tall

6'2 to 6'3''- solid tall

6'4'' to 6'5'' very tall

6'6'' to 6'9''- extremely tall

6'10''+ giant

Cudmore is in the "extremely tall" range in my opinion.

Actually i would label 6'7-6'9 range as gigantic
Balthier said on 11/Sep/11
It's hillarious to see how much smaller Rob and Jenny are compared to Daniel. They look like his kids.
Greenbolt said on 10/Sep/11
People keep debating as to where "very tall" ends and where "giant" begins. Personally, I think there's a category in between very tall and giant. Maybe like "extremely tall", where you're out of the norm, but not quite tall enough to be considered a giant. Here's my tall chart:

6'0'' to 6'1''- typical tall

6'2 to 6'3''- solid tall

6'4'' to 6'5'' very tall

6'6'' to 6'9''- extremely tall

6'10''+ giant

Cudmore is in the "extremely tall" range in my opinion.
James said on 7/Sep/11
Alex says on 6/Sep/11
6'7 is very tall. I dont think its in the giant range yet. I'd not wanna be 6'7. 6'7 is the height where it'll tower over guys 6'2-6'3 and show you how tall it really is.

I think 6'7 is a little more than just 'very tall'. although you could say that 6'7 flat is right at the upper end off very tall. I mean come on alex a 6'7-6'8 man would tower over a 6'2-6'3 guy so i don't see whats wrong about 202cm being the start off a giant. just look at peter crouch.
lan jiao said on 7/Sep/11
i think in mall thats less chance to see someone tall as daniel cudmore 199-200cm. as skinny 160pounds and 195cm with a regular 1.2in boots on a day shop in a mall im greatly tall in the mall by a few would stare at me in a day im use to it. cudmore walks in the mall would get more attention for sure.
Legend said on 7/Sep/11
6'7 is a giant. Why is 6'7 not a giant? It has to be when you are that much taller than tall guys.
Alex said on 6/Sep/11
6'7 is very tall. I dont think its in the giant range yet. I'd not wanna be 6'7. 6'7 is the height where it'll tower over guys 6'2-6'3 and show you how tall it really is.
Alex said on 6/Sep/11
Looks more 6'6 and change. Still a very tall guy.
James said on 2/Sep/11
6'7 1/2 in my opinion is the true start off a giant and i agree 6'7 is too tall.

6'1-6'2 range is optimum perfect height for men and 6ft and 6'3 are good as well although not quite the perfect heights. A lot of people think 6'3 is too tall so obviously A LOT more people will think 6'7 is too big.

A 6'7 man would tower over a 6'3 man too give you an idea of just how big it is.
Hansen said on 1/Sep/11
i think 6ft7 is too tall while hits a giant range. 6ft6 were huge. im 6ft5 and always quoted by people that im in the very tall range. cudmore is probably strong 6ft6.5 if not 6ft7 hes in e huge range. 6ft7 could mean 200cm or 201cm, im sure morning he easily hit each.
Larc 6 ft 1.75 in said on 28/Aug/11
Cranberries (18m, 193cm) says on 17/Aug/11
Perfect male height... Do any other guys envy him?
----
Troll, nobody is complexed like you and wants to be 6'7 here.

He looks 197cm with Rob and 198-199cm with Mamun, on the right pushing 200cm.
I agree with Andrew 199cm seems right for him.
Mathew said on 23/Aug/11
ANDREA[ITA] says on 8/Aug/11
In the pic with rob he looks 6'5, with mamun he looks 199!

I'd say he's 197 cm next to Rob (although it turns to 198 cm if you factor in the footware advantage), around 199 - 200 cm with Mamun on the left and 201 cm on the right. If I had to guess I'd peg him at 199 cm.
Hansen said on 22/Aug/11
thanks mamun! :)

but if mamun you wore 0.5in here and he is 173.5cm added about 1.25cm makes you 5ft8.75 , so mamun about 174.75cm next to a solid 10in under cudmore estimated. cudmore was only 200cm in converse. emm...so he could be under 200cm in reality possible??!.. maybe he hover 198.5~199cm barefoot and was measure out 200(6ft7-flat)-201(6ft7.25) morning.
Legend said on 20/Aug/11
Cranberries stop trolling...
Mamun said on 18/Aug/11
I do ! Hansen , my boots don't give me 1.2 inchs ! They only give me .5 inchs ! Please check out my picture with WILLIAM FORSTY ! Regards SUPERMUN
Terryman said on 17/Aug/11
201cm as perfect male height is crazy as hell! even 196cm is just too tall by most standards,daniel Cudmore is just too well proportioned and does n't look freakish but any other guy would just look damn silly at this height!
Cranberries (18m, 193cm) said on 17/Aug/11
Perfect male height... Do any other guys envy him?
leo said on 17/Aug/11
solid 6ft 6.75 inches max. Basically hits 200cm right on dot.
Hansen said on 17/Aug/11
he does look a full 10inch on mamun. i believe mamun stand 173-173.5 added 1.2inch boots/shoe so mamun abt max 176.5cm with shoe disadvantge than daniel 1.5cm converse style. roughly daniel stand at 201.5cm w shoe. so 200cm barefoot for him is greatly fair. he hover 200cm. ;)
FiveNine said on 15/Aug/11
On the Subject of Towering.....And who said you can't take it with You!!!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Aug/11
6ft5 is a bit low. Up against 5ft8, the height difference wouldn't be as lengthy as it is in these pics.
However he could be 199cm-200cm instead of the full 6ft7(201cm) because with Rob and Jenny he only looks 6ft6(198cm) and is only bending a little.
Hansen said on 15/Aug/11
""ANDREA[ITA] says on 8/Aug/11
In the pic with rob he looks 6'5, with mamun he looks 199!""

don underestimate daniel, because in picture he clearly came out no where under 6ft6. im 6ft5.25 and rob could easily came up my lower chin by 0.7in at a 10in head i have. up here no 3of them standing great post and daniel had a clear head up on rob. rob had a cm shoe advantage. daniel gota be 6ft6.5 at lowest.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Aug/11
201-202cm or a strong 6ft7 with Mamun.
With Rob and Jenny he looks 6ft6(198cm) with the slouch
ANDREA[ITA] said on 8/Aug/11
In the pic with rob he looks 6'5, with mamun he looks 199!
Mathew said on 31/Jul/11
I can't help but look at the pic w/ Rob and see a hair under 6'6".
5'8.56784 said on 28/Jul/11
199.9999999cm, nothing more. Max 200,999999999999cm. Lol
James said on 7/Jul/11
No way over 6'7.
Candyman said on 3/Jul/11
Very long neck on this guy.
5'8.18758596 said on 2/Jul/11
He might even be slightly taller than 6'7.
Terryman said on 30/Jun/11
1,99.5 meters nothing more!
Mathew said on 23/Jun/11
He can look barely 6'6" or the full 6'7". With Rob he looks 6'6" max.
micheal said on 17/Jun/11
very tall guy looks about 10 inches taller than Rob in the photo and considering the shoes he is at least 6'6.5 and could very well be 6'7"
James said on 15/Jun/11
6'7 for sure next to 6'1-6'2 Hugh Jackman
Shaun said on 14/Jun/11
Looks 6'7" next to Seagal. Looks 6'7" next to Jackman. Yeah pretty much. Not under 2 metres anyway.
Collossus from Russia said on 12/Jun/11
HEY ROB, could you be 100% sure this guy is a full 6'7" out of bed, with great posture

[Editor Rob: I would bet he was at least 6ft 7 out of bed, but very likely more.]
James said on 11/Jun/11
Shaun would you agree he can look 6'7 in pics?
Shaun said on 10/Jun/11
Based on rough gauge of Rob and Mamun 6 foot level is around his top lip area I would estimate. There's got to be a good 7 inches to the top of the head from there.
Shaun said on 10/Jun/11
Way I look at it is imagine a 6 ft line roughly level with the top of the h on "Twlight" in the background. If you try to visualise 2 inches and then another two inches based on that level , 6'2", 6'4", 6'6" etc then he has to be 6'7" range. He could be 200cm, but no lower than 2 metres however much he can look more 6'6".
James said on 8/Jun/11
i think 6'6.5 would be accurate
James said on 8/Jun/11
6'8 in big shoes?
avi said on 7/Jun/11
the thing is he ins't looking 6'7 next to Mamun. looks 6'6. definitely strong 6'6. maybe he is stating his height in shoes??
Dave said on 7/Jun/11
I'd say 202 cm
Shaun said on 3/Jun/11
Well to me he does look 10 inches taller than Rob he says he has footwear advantange so if he isn't the full 6'7" he is not under 6'6.5". Yes he doesn't give off a freak impression like Peter Crouch or somebody and looks two inches shorter but because he is so well proportioned it doesn't like freakish. To the casual eye he looks like a 6'5"-6'6" guy but if you really imagine a height chart next to Rob who is at least 5'9" in formal shoes then he is not under 2 metres and pretty much as tall as he claims.

[Editor Rob: yeah I have a 1-inch boot on, he had a converse so definitely had around 0.4 inches less footwear than me.]
James said on 31/May/11
remember with daniel rob has footware advantage. thats probably how tall daniel would look next to a 5'9 man.
James said on 31/May/11
I am not sure if Swagger is over 6'5 cuase he looked smaller than the Undertaker
d wade said on 31/May/11
in the first jagger kane pictur its look like a inch different but in the second it looks close to 3 inches and yes the guy looks only 1 inch taller than 6,4 boob sapp and he looks 6,5 with Goldberg.it possible that kane is 6,7 flat but he looks taller than cudmore next to mamun. kane 6,7 1/2 cudmore 6,6 1/2 are my estimates.
Vegas said on 31/May/11
@people says on 28/May/11
Yh but i don't beleive jack swagger is just 6'5 vegas, he looks 6'5 1/2-6'6 to me, are you sure you can judge these big heights vegas, perhaps your perception of what 6'5 looks like is wrong?,
__________

i know what 6'5 looks like, 3 of my best friends are 6'4 and i was in college every day with a legit 6'5 rugby player for 2 years, also swagger was clearly shorter in person compared to jon heidenreich who himself was listed 6'6 in pro-football

d wade says on 27/May/11
in the second picture he looks 3 inches taller than 6,5 schwagger
__________

didn't you only see one inch Click Here but 3 inches between kane and swagger??
James said on 30/May/11
Swagger looks 195cm to me
Mohammed said on 29/May/11
Doubt he's any taller than 6'6
Mathew said on 27/May/11
Vegas says on 25/May/11
mathew, that shot favours kane with mamun, look at the background, the opposite in the shots with cudmore, glens also closer to the camera in his shot with mamun, thats rough but close enough i feel, move kane one or two steps back and they would be identical Click Here when you see how my ~5'6 friend looked with glen jacobs in 2004, its then easier to see that kane would have little or nothing on cudmore Click Here
i have met glen jacobs a number of times and he isn't taller than 6'7 in fact with ~6'5 people like jack swagger in photos he looks shorter (i have also met swagger) Click Here i would be very surprised if jacobs is taller than cudmore let alone 1.5-2 inches taller

I'm fine accepting a 6'7" max Kane, but he seems like he'd be a little taller than Cudmore.
d wade said on 27/May/11
kane is atleast 1 inch taller than cudmore with mamun, cudmore has better posture than kane and Kane has a huge head im really sure that he is taller than flat 6,7 . i think cudmore 6,6 1/2 and kane 6,7 1/2 is right.in the second picture he looks 3 inches taller than 6,5 schwagger
Derek d said on 26/May/11
Vegas says on 25/May/11
i have met glen jacobs a number of times and he isn't taller than 6'7 in fact with ~6'5 people like jack swagger in photos he looks shorter (i have also met swagger) Click Here i would be very surprised if jacobs is taller than cudmore let alone 1.5-2 inches taller

He does not look shorter than 6'5 Swagger in that photo, especially in the others. You are counting Swagger's hair. Height ends where the top of your head ends, not where your spikey hair ends. Jacobs a good 2 inches taller in both pics considering he's also further away from the camera. Other than that good post, I agree Jacobs is the same height as Cudmore.
James said on 26/May/11
LOL glenn jacobs does not look to happy in your photo Vegas
TruebloodFan said on 25/May/11
more of a 6'6''.
James said on 23/May/11
i doubt he's the full 201cm.
J.J. said on 23/May/11
Looks 6'6" I think he isn't as tall as 6'7"
James said on 21/May/11
I agree 6'7 does seem kinda extreme for Cudmore
Mathew said on 20/May/11
Compare Cudmore with Rob and Mamun. Who does he look nearer in height to?
George Hertzberg (194 - 195 cm):
Click Here
Or Kane (202 cm):
Click Here
He looks like he'd fall about dead on between the two at best, if anything I think he looks closer to George Hertzberg's height; so that would suggest 6'6" max. Counting a .4" footware disadvantage above, he's no more than 199 cm.
Mathew said on 20/May/11
He doesn't look like he'd only be .5" shorter than 6'7.5" Kane to me, comparing the pics. Especially with Rob and Jenny.
runt said on 19/May/11
I don't see 11". Isn't bottom of chin @ top of head only 8-9"? Maybe his head is abnormally long, it's certainly a lot longer than Mamun's.
James said on 18/May/11
maybe a bit ecto/meso? still for a 6'7 man he's built well and has good proportions.
Cranberries (6 ft. 3.25 evening, 17 years) said on 18/May/11
I think he's more of an endomorph. His face tells me he's been fat at some point during his life.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/May/11
That is not a mesomorph!
PatB said on 16/May/11
You have three staff who get photographed next to the celebrities - but they are all almost exactly the same height!!! Surely you could have at least one large person and one short person. You need someone about 6'4" for the tall guys and someone about 5'0" for the small women.
James said on 14/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/May/11
This guy looks on the skinny side aswell...

Disagree he actually looks quite mesomorphic too me. i mean he's has not got the build of say Scott L Schwartz and is by no means a classic mesomorph but i'd say he's medium build not a full blown ectomorph like peter crouch.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/May/11
This guy looks on the skinny side aswell...
James said on 12/May/11
He might 'look' 2 inches taller becuase crouch is super skinny and lanky at 6'7. I mean LOL Crouch only weighs like 175 lbs. and with him being slightly taller than cudmore could easily give o fthe illusion of being 2 inches bigger. i know a guy who is 6'2.25 (189cm) who is built like peter crouch and looks 6'4. i know someone as well who apprently is 6'3.5 who is fat and out of shape and looks 6'2 becuase of his build.

So
Peter Crouch 6'7.5 (202cm)
Daniel Cudmore 6'6.75 (200cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/May/11
201cm is fine...and Shaun WTF are you saying?

If Crouch is 2 inches taller than Cudmore that makes him 6"9
Shaun said on 10/May/11
Peter Crouch looks two inches taller than Cudmore..
James said on 9/May/11
Yeah Shaun i agree. I think Daniel is like Stephen Merchant 'barely' 6'7 unlike Peter Crouch who is close to 6'8 and has very lanky proportions.
Shaun said on 6/May/11
Does look 199cm in Rob's picture I agree.
Shaun said on 6/May/11
To me James he looks around 200cm, weak 6'7".
James said on 3/May/11
looks about 2 inches shorter than 6'8 in the photos. in reality though he might be 3cm under the 6'8 mark.
James said on 2/May/11
Vegas says on 2/May/11
cudmore is 6 inches taller than jackman in that photo james

Yeah he does look 6'8 in comparison.

In Reality maybe

Daniel Cudmore 6'6.75 (200cm)
Hugh Jackman 6'1.5 (187cm)
Vegas said on 2/May/11
cudmore is 6 inches taller than jackman in that photo james
Lenad said on 2/May/11
Looks 6'6-ish to me
James said on 1/May/11
Mathew says on 30/Apr/11
James says on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.

I agree, in fact I think it's a good chance.

with hugh jackman who is not over 6'2 daniel does look a very solid 6'7 but then again hugh is slouching.
Click Here
Mathew said on 30/Apr/11
James says on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.

I agree, in fact I think it's a good chance.
James said on 28/Apr/11
I still think there is a chance he is slightly under 6'7.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/11
Looks 201/202cm with Mamun and 199cm with Rob and Jenny..

Overall 6"7 looks good
James said on 26/Apr/11
with mamun looks 6'6 or 6'7 not 6'7.5 though
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Apr/11
6"6.5(199cm) with Rob and Jenny

6"7.5(202cm) with Mamun
James said on 24/Apr/11
to be fair to daniel he is nodding his head down just slightly with rob and probably not standing at his tallest so appearing 6'6 with relaxed posture.

in photos he does not look 6'7 to me.
Candyman said on 17/Apr/11
I see 6'7"....Who want some??
James said on 15/Apr/11
Who cares if he's 1 inch taller there both giants
James R said on 14/Apr/11
he is an inch taller than his brother Canadian international rugby Jamie Cudmore who is 6 ft 6 in
James said on 13/Apr/11
Well there only pics if rob said he looked 6'7 then he is. but yes i agree 6'6 is what i see with rob.
LG69 said on 12/Apr/11
6'7" is right on the nose. To "123" who said he looks 6'5" at best--please, he is taller than 6'5".
fair assessment said on 12/Apr/11
He is a legit 6' 6 in these photos, definitely not 6'7. He is 6'7 with 1 inch shoes and 6' 6 barefoot.
Legend said on 9/Apr/11
He looks 6'6 to me.
Mathew said on 9/Apr/11
I think Cudimore isn't looking more than 6'6" range with Rob. Compare that picture to Josh Homme who is 6'4" standing beside Brody Dalle who like Rob is 5'8" for comparison.
Click Here
It's clear Cudmore would be the taller of the two but I don't think by as much as 3". Next to Mamun, he's nearing 6'7" but maybe not quite even still.
James said on 4/Apr/11
Well 6'7 it is then even though he does look more 6'6 in the photos.

Rob please don't take offense but since you are 5'8 it cannot be easy to figure an exact estimate for someone so tall like Daniel even if you meet them in person.....?

[Editor Rob: well, there's a lot you can do to improve guessing. The further away the harder it can be but what I've tried to do over the years of this site is to 'program' the old noggin to better recognise 5ft 10, 11, 6ft 3,4 etc. I've used the stadiometer and people I know as the basis for that. I have measured many family/friends whose height I know exactly and this all helps reinforce what certain heights look like from my perspective.

Add in other people whose height I know who also stand beside a celebrity and this helps a bit aswell.]
James said on 2/Apr/11
Rob could 6'6.75 (200cm) be a possiblitly for Daniel?

[Editor Rob: 6ft 7 is pretty fair for him I think]
Legend said on 31/Mar/11
Looks more like 6'6 to be honest.
James said on 27/Mar/11
he looks closer to 6'7 with mamun
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Mar/11
More like 198-199cm or a solid 6ft6 with Rob and Jenny
Rikashiku said on 25/Mar/11
HE looks closer to 6'6" than 6'7". Still pretty damn tall. Just 5inches away from 7'0"
James said on 24/Mar/11
similar to how big ralf moellear would look if he had a photo taken with rob
Mathew said on 19/Mar/11
I think he looks more 6'6" than 6'5" next to Rob. Although he certainly doesn't look as tall as 6'7". He looks like he's a weak 6'6" next to Rob, and maybe a weak 6'7" next to Mamun, not a legitimate 6'7" in any of these pics.
James said on 17/Mar/11
i thought he looked 6'5 in the pic

shaun yes 6'4 is a legit very tall height indeed.
Matt said on 17/Mar/11
rob this guy really looks near 6ft 7 with you, yet the photo compasison thing shows 6ft 5 and a bit?

Click Here

have i done something wrong or is he really in the 6ft 5 range

[Editor Rob: in a photo thing he would come in near 6ft 6, then add on 0.4 inches for footwear.

He looked at least 2 inches taller in person than romero does without considering footwear.]
Shaun said on 16/Mar/11
Well I normally think anybody over 6'4" legit barefoot is in the excessively tall range. A true 6 ft 4 is very tall indeed but 6'7" is insane..
James said on 9/Mar/11
With Mamun looks the full 6'7
Mathew said on 8/Mar/11
Yeah, judging by the pics with Rob and Mamun and his interview (he really hesitated before saying 6'7") I'm thinking he's close to the full 6'7" but a little under it, like 199 - 200 cm.
James said on 7/Mar/11
Peter Crouch looks taller probably as well becuase he is dispraportionate. Trust me some 6'2 guys with Peter Crouches build can look very tall whereas other 6'2 guys with a build like Mick Foleys just look tall, tallish or only a few inches above average.

It could the case with Cudmore and Crouch since Daniel is better proportioned.
Matt said on 5/Mar/11
did he look 6ft 7 in person?

[Editor Rob: I think he looked at least 6ft 6-6.5 range so add 0.4 inch and if he's not 6ft 7 I'd be surprised.]
lillo thomas said on 4/Mar/11
In the pics with rob and mamum he look 6-6 .
Mathew said on 3/Mar/11
Vegas says on 1/Mar/11
mathew you have barkley at 6'4.5, if thats right then novoselic ain't 6'7 Click Here

I agree Barkley looks a minnimum of 6'5.5" there I just wish we could see the floor, he side closer to Krsit at one point and looses like .75".
SolidSnake said on 3/Mar/11
For a 6'7 he looks well built. Probably like 220 or 230 pounds
Anonymous1 said on 3/Mar/11
Click Here
Vegas said on 1/Mar/11
mathew you have barkley at 6'4.5, if thats right then novoselic ain't 6'7 Click Here
James said on 28/Feb/11
Mathew says on 27/Feb/11
He looks under 6'7" to me in all three pictures. I'd buy 6'6" - 6'6.5" though. A couple of legitimate 6'7" guys are Peter Crouch and Krist Novoselic, they would be taller than this dude for sure.

I kinda disagree because with Mamun he looks just about 6'7 since his eye level is 6 inches higher than mamuns head. With rob though i agree he looks 198cm since his eyes are 5 inches over the top of robs head but like i said though that is because of footware advantage so dan in my opinon is 199cm.
Mathew said on 27/Feb/11
He looks under 6'7" to me in all three pictures. I'd buy 6'6" - 6'6.5" though. A couple of legitimate 6'7" guys are Peter Crouch and Krist Novoselic, they would be taller than this dude for sure.
James said on 26/Feb/11
Daniel is 6'6.5 (199cm). he would be the height of peter crouch in shoes.
SolidSnake said on 26/Feb/11
He is at the height where you have to duck under virtually every door frame in the world. Sucks lol
Moke said on 25/Feb/11
As he has exactly one full head on Rob he should be around 6'6.5 max. Like 173cm+25cm (?)
James said on 25/Feb/11
Anonymous says on 24/Feb/11
He puts peter crouch to shame, 6'7 doen't look so bad now after looking at this, it's hard just hard to believe he and crouch are the same height

If Crouch had equal footware to rob i am sure peter would appear 1.5 inches taller than daniel in the pic because crouch could be 6'7 1/2. Anyway Cudmore does not look over 6'6 in the photo. I think 199cm is Daniels real height.
James said on 24/Feb/11
Shaun says on 24/Feb/11
Yeah but he does not look a giant does he. He looks pretty normal, even if he's a lot higher than the majority.

About 9 or 10 inches over the average in the UK. I think that just about makes him a gaint in my opinon. Yeah i agree shaun he does look very tall with rob and jenny but not really 'a giant'. when first stumbling upon this pic he gives of a 6'5 impression.

to be honest as well he does not look 6'7 at all with rob more like 6'6 (198cm). his eyes are only 5 inches over the top of robs head. with mamun he does look 6'7 though. he probably looks 6'6 with rob because of footware disadvantage but i think daniel could be 6'6 1/2 its not impossible.

what do you think shaun?
Shaun said on 24/Feb/11
Yeah but he does not look a giant does he. He looks pretty normal, even if he's a lot higher than the majority.
SolidSnake said on 23/Feb/11
Very tall. NBA Average is 6 ft 7
MD said on 23/Feb/11
Shaun, I noticed the same thing. He looks perfectly proportioned.
James said on 22/Feb/11
A giant begins at 6'7 in my opinon.

With rob looks 199cm or 200cm with footware disadvantage. 6'7 guy but no more.
Guy Who Normally Comments with Anonymous said on 22/Feb/11
Well wait charts only go up to 6'4. I consider anyone over 6'4-6'4 1/2 "out of normal human height range" Giant would be 6'6 because coming across someone more than 6'5-6'5 is a rarity. Even people above 6'3 is pretty rare. 6'6 + is freak height. come on we are not meant to be this tall. the problems these people will get will reflect that. This guy looks about 6'6 1/2.
Bob said on 22/Feb/11
basketball player height a strong 6'7" with shoes. 6'6"- 6'6.5" barefoot.
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
Ian Whyte looks a giant. Cudmore just looks very tall I think, maybe a giant begins at 6'8"...
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
The thing is he looks a perfectly normal size, even if he is very tall. I mean you see pictures of Peter Crouch and Stephen Merchant and you think human lampost. I think it must be because he is well proportioned and well built so he doesn't look like he's been stretched but he really doesn't look as tall as Crouch or Merchant. Usually I think of anybody over 6'6" as a giant but he really doesn't look it.
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
Did you look a legitimate 6 ft 7 to you Rob? As he'd be standing close to 6'8" right in footwear?

[Editor Rob: for a tall guy he stood tall with quite a few girls in front of us and Jenny commented after our photo she noticed he was standing tall...I think he is what he claims, not as tall as 6ft 8, but not 6ft 6. Look at Ian Whyte, he is 7ft 1 and I'm 5 inches under his chin...and whyte has a 2cm longer head.

He appeared - taking account 0.4 inch less footwear than me - 2 inches taller in comparison to how actors like Tony Todd or Tom Noonan looked.]
Shaun said on 22/Feb/11
Looks about 11 inches taller than Rob accounting for his relaxed posture and footwear disadvantage. 6'7" would seem correct.
SAK said on 21/Feb/11
He looks a legit 6ft7,
Twigaledwardsbabiee said on 21/Feb/11
He is real tall he iss mahussive!!!
J.J. said on 12/Feb/11
Looks no shorter than 6'6.5"
James said on 31/Jan/11
He's not 6'8 nor does he look anywhere near it with mamun
Chuck said on 23/Jan/11
Easy 6'7" (never said that about anybody on this sight before :p) He could very well be 6'8" as well. Looks pretty much a whole foot taller than Mamun in the photographs above!
James said on 23/Jan/11
Hugh could be 187cm in height and even if he is 188cm your not taking into hugh jackmans really bad posture in the photo.

With Mamun I think Daniel Cudmore looks 6'6-6'6.5 in height. I think his real height is 6'6.5 or 6'6.25 not 6'7. 6'8 is a joke for this guy.
Jake T. said on 21/Jan/11
If he is not 6'7 I would put him at 6'6.75 because he doesn't look any shorter than that.
Shaun said on 15/Jan/11
Click Here

Easily 5 inches on 6'2" Hugh Jackman.
Shaun said on 15/Jan/11
Average head length is what 10 inches?? Mamun is below his chin level so I'd say Cudmore is 11 inches taller. He is 6 ft 7...
Shaun said on 15/Jan/11
This guy must have super tall parents if both he and his two brothers are all over 6'5". His father is probably over 6'4" and mother at least 5'10". This guy reminds me of somebody I met a while back. There's me generally feeling tall and when I stood face to face and chatted with him I just felt like a shrimp!! The world's a funny place. Even if you are a legit 6'4" there will always be people like this guy who are even taller... You must admit though it is extremely rare for somebody to be this tall and not built like Peter Crouch..
Da Man said on 31/Dec/10
Looks 6'7"-ish.
Mr. R said on 30/Nov/10
Don't buy 6-7. He is downgrading. Closer to 6-8. Really stunned he has a career in Hwood being that tall. He is a big boy!
Chris said on 29/Nov/10
Dan is 6'7 and his ideal weight is 255, but a guy that big fluctuates 10 pounds a day.
Matt said on 16/Nov/10
this is actually spot on, there is probably a 10.75-11 inch difference between mamun and daniel because the top of mamun's head is 1.5 inch below daniels chin, and the average head is 9-10 inch but this guy is huge so possible even more. but i think 6ft7 is spot on
Jordan said on 3/Feb/09
Rob should we mention that he claimed 6'7 in the above description ? Casue its funny how the interviewer asked if he was 6'8, and he made appoint to say 6'7.

[Editor Rob: yes I'll mention it.]
Jordan said on 31/Jan/09
Click Here

Rob,
Scroll Down, Dan says he is 6'7 to the interviewer.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.