How tall is Brad Pitt

Brad Pitt's Height

5ft 11in (180.3 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Films, Troy, Inglorious Bastards, Interview With The Vampire and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. At times he can appear taller, but with impeccable posture and at times, in the last few years, cuban type heels, that is a given. Even his good friend George Clooney was wise to his footwear, saying once in USA Today that "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating."

How tall is Brad Pitt
Brad with Angelina Jolie, Jonah Hill and Claudia Schiffer
Photo by PR Photos

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (584 Votes)
5ft 10.53in (179.1cm)
Dmeyer said on 10/Dec/17
Considering Pitt was ans is likely near 5'11 AT night like 180-180,3cm considering his long torso he could drop 2,1-2,5cm from morning to evening and be in his 20-30s near 183cm morning 6ft , AT the very least 5'11,75 like a lidl over 182cm
Parker said on 9/Dec/17
Clooney looks taller in this series of pics
Click Here
Brad said on 5/Dec/17
5-10, posture, custom boots=rockin' over 6 foot. Clooney knows.
RNP4 said on 4/Dec/17
I just saw Jesse James and Kalifornia, played by Pitt. In the first one his height is mentioned around 172 cm, in the second around 170 cm. I don't think that the height in the scripts corresponds to the truth, but I think his height doesn't exceed 178 cm barefoot. What do you think about?
Original said on 4/Dec/17
Pitt was 1.78 peak, about 1.77 in 2017. Nothing like 1.83, but of course taller than 1.75 imo.
fisherman said on 1/Dec/17
to the at least two commenters... are YOU blind? since you can't see that pitt is wearing THICK shoes and Schiffer is wearing ballet flats.

For Pitt, under 5'9", no. under 5'10"? Not by much anyway. But nowhere near 6 ft, that's plain nuts.
Greg said on 30/Nov/17
@Simon I am 5'11 I wear a 10.5 US, generally I would say 10-11 is common, but some have smaller others bigger.
MJKoP said on 30/Nov/17
Simon said on 29/Nov/17
Rob, what size shoe do you think is normal for a 5'11 male? I know Brad wears a 9 in American size.

Does he? I guess shoe size isn't always correlated to height, after all. I'm a weak 5'7" and a US 9.5, sometimes even 10.
joe### said on 30/Nov/17
178-179 is peak
Pierre said on 30/Nov/17
Click Here = Or maybe they are the same type of shoes as here,and then even a full 5"10' is debatable
Allie said on 30/Nov/17
@Pierre - Idk. Her legs look bent in both photos and she's doing kind of an odd stance woth her feet. Plus Luke is kind of leaning idk. She has a few inches o Naomi and Cindy.
Original said on 30/Nov/17
@Tonyx I don't think he was using lifts in this pic, but even if he had, it has to be a small lifts (like 1' at max), he looks slight taller than this 5'10.25/5" guy, probably around 179.5cm. When he uses lifts or at least his big elevators you can tell "oh Brad is using those big shoes", it wasn't the case there.
Pierre said on 29/Nov/17
@Allie= Click Here Click Here = it's a little funny but... i ask me if she would not be on tiptoe in her boot in the picture you posted ,because in the picture i posted there is apparently no space between her calf and her boot.
Simon said on 29/Nov/17
Rob, what size shoe do you think is normal for a 5'11 male? I know Brad wears a 9 in American size.
Allie said on 29/Nov/17
@Pierre - Her heel almost looks like a dress shoe heel. Maybe a little height but nothing too drastic. I think Claudia's 179/5'10.5. She once said 181 cm so that could have been her morning height.

As for Brad I think he's 5'10-11 range.
Realtalk said on 29/Nov/17
Brad's barefoot pic with Gwyneth Paltrow makes him 5'9.x at most.
supposedly in the barefoot photo brad shrunk through the day by half inch already making him just as tall as Gwyneth.

But because Brad commonly wears 3 inch shoes then he gets the 6 feet vibe.
2.6 inch to 4.6 inch footwear.
From 5'9.x to 6 to 6'2 with the footwear.

From the day of his barefoot pic with Gwyneth then I guess Brad used inversion hanging table and has gotten to 5'10 already.
Greg said on 28/Nov/17
@Simon Idk about a strong 5'11 but I would give him a weak/flat 5'11 during peak. possiably a small fraction lost at age 52/53. But the 5'9 guesses from him are absurd I agree.
Tonyx said on 28/Nov/17
Click Here in elevators with a 5ft10.5in guy to the right wearing dress shoes.
I don't think Brad Pitt is as low as 5ft9in. My guess - 5ft10.25in today.
Pierre said on 28/Nov/17
@Allie= Click Here = she can look shorter in another angle and i think she has a little more shoes heels than Luke.
NickNate said on 28/Nov/17
Imo this lift thing is blown out of proportion. Yeah, there's a couple pics of him where it's pretty obvious he's wearing inserts. And a couple others where he's wearing cuban heels. But i doubt these boost him much over an inch above his natural height. And, in most of his recent pics at least, he tends to look right around this listing. 5'9 claims are absurd for Brad, and if you're claiming he's 5'9 (no sane person should be claiming he's under 5'9), then I'm sorry but your own biases are distorting your perception of his height.

Personal estimate (evening height): 5'10.75/179.7cm, right about 180cm
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 28/Nov/17
@Rampage

It's because he has thicker footwear than her and she has one of her knees bent, don't you see that?
Allie said on 27/Nov/17
As for Brad, Claudia has her legs bent while Brad is standing straight and Claudia's wearing flats.
Allie said on 27/Nov/17
@Pierre - Here she is with 5'9ish Luke Perry. Her small boot heels looks about the same as his dress shoes. Her legs are doing a weird pose and her posture isn't the best in this photo but she still looks taller. If she straightened up I think she could look 5'10.5-5'11.

Click Here
Pierre said on 27/Nov/17
@Rampage=Claudia is "listed" 5"11',she would have said in a interview she is 5"10'.As lots of celebrities her height list is probably rounded up= 5"10' is around 178 cm and then 180 cm(~5"11') is a rounded up value.Add to that her very relax posture which make her lose some centimeters,Brad very straight posture,her very fine shoes heels,the generous heels of Brad's shoes + maybe a little internal heel.
The Shredder said on 27/Nov/17
Rampage , she is in slippers adding nothing and he is in a boot.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Nov/17
Can't understand how hes looking strong 6ft w/h Claudia Schiffer...
Simon said on 25/Nov/17
It would be interesting to find out how many people there are on this site who actually consider him under 5'10. He is CLEARLY not below 5'10, possibly a strong 5'11. Still, he is regurarly guessed in the 5'9-range.
Slim 185 said on 25/Nov/17
I THOUGHT the French guy was trolling all the time, but pitt really did wear lifts to the beach 🏝 : Click Here
EM said on 24/Nov/17
He's not over the average guess here.
Original said on 23/Nov/17
You guys can rule out 180 and 181, Pitt's range is probably 177-179 with 1-inch standard lifts he reach that look that you can see most of time 179,5-181,5 or ~5'11 when he goes really hard you can see he looking 6'.
Tonyx said on 22/Nov/17
With Aaron Taylor Johnson
Click Here
Aaron is listed at 5ft 10.5in(179.1cm) by Rob and the Average Guess(18Votes) is
5ft 10.33in(178.6cm).
And regarding the photos with Schiffer...
Comparing Brad Pitt to a pregnant Claudia Schiffer is a little silly.
Brad is standing as straight as possible, wearing boots with lifts, a blazer with padded shoulders, a longish beard and a hat.
Claudia: pregnant, severely slouching, tilting her head downwards, wearing flat ballet shoes with a little dress, while her longer left leg is bent and her right shorter leg is actually slightly bending in the wrong direction. She knows Brad cares about his height. She didn't challenge him in that aspect, didn't stand as straight as possible.
Brad Pitt would still be taller then Claudia Schiffer if she stood straight, but barefoot that's a whole different story
P.S.
Oh, and lets not pretend like the famous fashion designer Tom Ford doesn't wear lifts under his flared pants/jeans. He totally does wear elevators.
Pierre said on 22/Nov/17
To summarize =Brad is one good inch over 5"10'/5"11' Claudia Schiffer and Brad is one good inch over 5"8'/5"9' Gwyneth :)
Slim 185 said on 22/Nov/17
He’s between 177 to 181 imho.
Tony79 said on 21/Nov/17
Are you guys all blind???
If Claudia Schiffer is 5'11 and Brad is a good inch to 2 inches over her. He's right between 6' - 6'1
MJKoP said on 21/Nov/17
Brad said on 20/Nov/17
Too bad there were not more Brad versus Weinstein. Damon danced on it for awhile. He's 5-10.


But you've said for years that Damon is 5'8"???
Greg said on 20/Nov/17
@Hijopatmus lmao he really does though, this guy is dillusional and annoying all of his comments make no sense.
Brad said on 20/Nov/17
Too bad there were not more Brad versus Weinstein. Damon danced on it for awhile. He's 5-10.
Anonymous said on 19/Nov/17
Absolutely 1.78
Dreampuffe(5'9.5") said on 19/Nov/17
This man did good threatening Weinstein!

As for height, fine as listed.
fisherman said on 17/Nov/17
Pitt's never appeared particularly tall to me. Not in movies and not in those pics either (some sort of lifts in each one). He looks a little over 5'11 WITH the elevator shoes/boots... I'd say 5'9.75".

It's interesting BTW. I was just flipping through some old photos, found some from a trip. Me standing next to a friend who happens to be 5'9.75", with very similar low-heeled "boots" and guaranteed no lifts. I'm 5'11.75" but in the pics it looks like there's no difference at all. I guess it's the result of an accidental "camera trick", a (shorter than either of us) passersby took the pic with the camera tilted, facing slightly downwards (this causes quite a big distortion). Part of the same thing also occurs without cameras involved, like when you're looking up at several people who are noticeably taller than you, you wont see small differences between THEM.
Hijopotamus said on 17/Nov/17
anal176, you need a psychiatrist.
Take it easy.
Han said on 17/Nov/17
@James1234 or he could have shorter arms than you. There is no good evidence putting him under a weak 5'10", so i dont know where you guys get this. He's between 5'9,75" and 5'11,5", and i don't see how you can argue anything else. For the record, my guess is 5'10,75 to 5'11"
anon176 said on 17/Nov/17
Pippi Longstocking said on 15/Nov/17
anon176, how big is your hat?
---
Today we scroll through "Hijoptamus" height lexicon :)

Click Here
Hijopotamus said on 29/Apr/17
Met him, 183 cm big humble great guy.

Click Here
Hijopotamus said on 1/Nov/17
@Appe, my estimation is 184 cm 77kg
He is 186-187 with shoes.

Click Here
Hijopotamus said on 6/Nov/17
Damon- 175 cm
Brad Pitt- 177
George Clooney- 177

Click Here
Hijopotamus said on 15/Nov/17
anon176, how big is your hat?
Real Cavill said on 14/Nov/17
@Anon176. I think he's 5'10" not 5'9". Let's say I'm 5'9". Him being the same would mean if Brad can do it I can do it. So it wouldn't be about me being taller. You don't have to be so dark about everything. Not everyone is what you think.
Brad said on 13/Nov/17
Those dress boots with Lauer are well heeled and wedged, typical Brad in for the pitstop for height fuel.
anon176 said on 13/Nov/17
Real Cavill said on 12/Nov/17
@Anon176. Maybe you think people are jealous because that's how you think? And the appropriate term for this would be envy not jealousy. In many posts people argue height upwards like for Ryan Reynolds to get to the reality that's the opposite of what you're saying. We're all here because let's face it height matters and we want to see how we measure up against the stars. It's normal to compare yourself to others and in order to do that we have to figure out what number is true because Hollywood lies ALOT. It's also good to figure out the reality so people don't get the wrong idea or have an unrealistic view.
---
Think of Pitt as a 5-9 guy, if it boosts yourself nice
Bwk said on 13/Nov/17
5'11.25" in his prime, 5'10.75" today.
Tonyx said on 12/Nov/17
Average Guess (557 Votes)
5ft 10.53in (179.2cm)
Listed by Rob:
Brad Pitt's Height
5ft 11in (180.3 cm)
I think Brad Pitt is 5ft10.25in these days.
Real Cavill said on 12/Nov/17
@Anon176. Maybe you think people are jealous because that's how you think? And the appropriate term for this would be envy not jealousy. In many posts people argue height upwards like for Ryan Reynolds to get to the reality that's the opposite of what you're saying. We're all here because let's face it height matters and we want to see how we measure up against the stars. It's normal to compare yourself to others and in order to do that we have to figure out what number is true because Hollywood lies ALOT. It's also good to figure out the reality so people don't get the wrong idea or have an unrealistic view.
James1234 said on 12/Nov/17
I tried on the jacket he wore in Fury - it was being auctioned. I'm 5'10, and very slim - it just about fit, if I had bigger shoulders it might have been short in the arm. Seeing as he is more built than me, he definitely couldn't be more than 5'10.
Original said on 12/Nov/17
5'10 peak.
Anonymous said on 11/Nov/17
It's incredibly difficult for me to imagine that Brad Pitt, after 8-9 hours of sleep, will measure the height of 182 cm ...
I tend to think that he is strong 5'11 "in the morning (181 cm) and, accordingly, lower in the evening (179 cm).
Tonyx said on 11/Nov/17
Loeparn said on 11/Nov/17
I cannot see Pitt shorter than M. Fassbender

I can. Because at the red carpet events Brad and Michael look roughly the same height, only Pitt is wearing elevator shoes with military posture and Fassbender is wearing average dress shoes with average posture. I think Fassbender would edge Pitt out by a little bit.
anon176 said on 11/Nov/17
Jealous idiots all over this place :(
If Pitt is under 177 I'll eat my hat
Loeparn said on 11/Nov/17
I cannot see Pitt shorter than M. Fassbender
Real Cavill said on 11/Nov/17
@Dan, Hipopotamus, Realtalk - Very well supported arguments. I'm beginning to think Pitt is 5'9" and not even the 5'10" I had him listed at.

@HonestSlovene - While I agree with your logic and that it comes from an honest place, pants length size is not conclusive. People have different proportions. While there aren't usually and huge differences some people have longer legs and are shorter in other places. Pitt looks like he has a small head and neck. So he has long legs like a 5'11", but his shorter neck and head make him 5'10" or even 5'9". Remember, 1 inch really isn't very much in terms of height. Where it makes a taller person look much huger is because of volume and total mass. Two inches can mean two inches in the feet, arms, bigger head, longer clavicles, longer fingers. Look at someone with a short calf muscle versus a long calf or medium attachment calf. The medium and long are only 1-3 inches difference but look more huge due to overall volume.
Realtalk said on 10/Nov/17
After seeing the barefoot pic with Paltrow and the ankle photo with aniston.
I doubt the 5'10 or 5'11 as the real height. 5'9 flat is the maximum for Brad.
Hijopotamus said on 9/Nov/17
a 5ft11 guy on 2 inches cowboy boots and shorter than a 6ft girl on flats?
Hmmm I guess not...
Thelma & Louise

Berta, have a look at the pics with 5ft8ish Paltrow
Canson said on 9/Nov/17
I would say around 5’10.5-.6. Looks maybe 2cm shorter than a guy like dean Cain is
Pierre said on 9/Nov/17
@Dan say on 8/Nov/17" this case should've been closed years ago"
If this discussion isn't close,there is reasons for it imo=Brad full 5"11' or full 5"10' is clearly debatable imo
HonestSlovene said on 9/Nov/17
@Dan He has the same size of jeans to me and also we're roughly the same hiehgt (he's maybe 1 cm taller).
Dan said on 8/Nov/17
This case should’ve been closed years ago. Pitt is obviously a strong/actual 5-10 guy who uses lifts when he’s wearing flats or when he’s wearing boots and wants to appear above average. He isn’t short in any way. He’s average for a white male and when he wears boots and lifts, he appears tallish compared to average celebs. He can’t hang with people like Affleck or Jackman, Eric Bana, Ryan Reynolds or Will Smith, but he doesn’t look short next most celebs like Keanu Reeves, Michael Fassbender, Jim Carrey or cumberbatch. He has very distinct body proportions which make him look average, tall, and sometimes a bit under average. He’s got short arms and short, thick calves. I’d say that a real 5-11 guy is DiCaprio or Ed Norton. Pitt has the body of an mma fighter. He doesn’t force his posture, it’s just the way his body is due to a muscular core and very, very thin waist. He also has really thin quads and hamstrings. He wears size 32-33 jeans, depending on the brand, because different brands have different sizing. He always has extra space in his waist and thighs when he wears those sizes, that’s why he always has a belt. Always has a belt.
177cm said on 8/Nov/17
I agree with the 5'11 listing which he can still look today in his mid 50's.
Real Cavill said on 8/Nov/17
Click Here

Technically, there is no age limit to stop growing because of growth plates something or other. I don't really understand it, but it sounds like they're saying it's not common. From my own experience, I've known zero people who grew past age 17-20. I had a friend who grew one inch in his teens because he stopped bodybuilding for like six months and there's evidence that pressure on joints like that can stop growth. Still, the inch growth happened in the teens and not twenties. It may have not even had anything to do with bodybuilding, but it was a bit of a coincidence he grew when he stopped lifting and he went back to lifting and the growth never happened again.

Then again, I hate to say Pitt is not one of the exceptions to the rule. I've seen exceptions here and there, but we need more proof. Until then, I say Pitt did not grow past 5'10" Thelma and Louise.
berta said on 8/Nov/17
the average seems to loow. 179 is the loowest i would ever argue and tallest is 181,5 i believe he is closer to 181 than 179
Justanotherguy said on 8/Nov/17
You can't just assume that pic with Damon and Clooney is proof that Pitt is insecure and has something to hide. It's just as likely to of been pure coincidence.
Original said on 8/Nov/17
1990 Pitt = strong/solid 5'10" (probably 5'10.25" at night)
2017 Pitt = weak 5'10" (probably around 5'9.5" at night)
Slim 184 said on 7/Nov/17
@Editor rob, do you think he stopped growing by the filming of “Thelma and Louise”?

Cause apparently we can grow mms even till we’re 25 years old like poulter did.
Editor Rob: yes I doubt he grew in his 20's.
Pierre said on 7/Nov/17
My guess=at his peak= around 5"10.75' just after a good night(rounded up to 5"11'),so 5"9.75' range( during the day).Now 5"10.25' after a good night(rounded up to 5"11') so 5"9.25' range(during the day).
Sacred said on 6/Nov/17
He is 5'11"
Hijopotamus said on 6/Nov/17
@hans, those are super lifts

@rob, are you serious? What kind of ankle bends that much?
Editor Rob: well if you bend your foot up the back of the boot might stick out a bit and then the trouser/jean could look like the photo.

Without seeing his trousers higher on his boot I couldn't say. It's different with say a guy like Kyson Lee. I could see him on stage and it was easier to notice how high his ankle looked when he was twiddling his feet around, the ankle was very high up in the boot, so he had a proper elevator boot on and walked like a guy in high heels walks too.
Pierre said on 6/Nov/17
Click Here = Others celebrities in supposed relax posture seem to have a very supple ankle sometimes too, no ?
Pierre said on 6/Nov/17
@hans Hagen=picture 05/nov/17= his right feet (in the air) is in a curious angle imo,or his ankle is very supple or they're are not very flat shoes!
James said on 5/Nov/17
Hey rob, i visited my doc last week and without even talk about height she suggested me some d3 pills. After using them a saw more hair at my chest and my knees started to cracking and hurt just like when i was teenager. Look i know you are not up answering these questions but i would really wanna know your thought if you these pills may affect my height even though I am 19yrs old
Editor Rob: I'd certainly say some pills may be beneficial to health...but I'm not in a position to recommend any.
Hans Hagen said on 5/Nov/17
Didn't think id see him in shoes this big outside of a suit, but these are VERY suspicious. Unless he has some sort of superhuman mobility, these are huge lifts:
Click Here
for the record, I would still argue 5ft 11in
How much do you think they give, Rob?
Editor Rob: it's a decent boot, but impossible to really say if it has anything inside it.
joe### said on 4/Nov/17
179 or 5´10.5 is my gueness.
Simon said on 2/Nov/17
@Editor Rob, it's funny to look at him when they were shooting Inglorious Basterds. Sometimes he would stack up against 6'1 Tarantino, and other times he would look the samme range as 5'7 Christoph Waltz
Brad said on 1/Nov/17
Damon wears custom made footwear, wedged. Danny Ocean will always be taller even with Damon in the customs.
Original said on 1/Nov/17
Most people here think he is somewhere between 177 and 180. 181-182 and 175-176 guesses are off.

Maybe he is 178cm or 5'10 and you know this is a good height after all, of course he also use lifts and thats why he looks more in the 181-183 range sometimes.
Simon said on 1/Nov/17
Rob, do you think he is 6'1+ with his heels?
Editor Rob: with some of the cuban dress shoes he was going to measure 6ft 0.75 in them...

The biggest footwear he seems to have worn on film was in Spy Game...he would have measured a comfortable 6ft 1 in them I feel.
Guest66 said on 31/Oct/17
Rob is damn right here, no case is closed.. Even the actual measurement can be sketchy due to rest/activities height changes.
Dmeyer said on 30/Oct/17
Pitt - 5ft 10.7 (179.6cm)
Clooney - 5ft 10.4 (178.8cm)
Damon - 5ft 9.6 (176.9cm)

That's generally how I see The Ocean's trio this is right within 5mm probably
Hijopotamus said on 30/Oct/17
Rob, I was just joking. What do you mean by “Real Madrid suspect equipment?”
Editor Rob: I would say the stadiometer Real madrid used might have been mis-calibrated.
Pierre said on 30/Oct/17
@ Tonyx = Georges is more distant to the camera in the pic on the boat,he don't look very straight =Matt's shoulder is standing on Georges shoulder which can explain why Georges can not look as tall as he could be.And we don't know the real advantage of Brad's shoes under his pants.
Click Here =here is an other picture,Georges isn't barefoot this time,both seem to have the same advantage of shoes this time,Georges is easily more distant to the camera,is standing a little more straight than in the picture on the boat,Brad has a better posture but curiously Brad don't look taller and maybe even a little shorter i would say.
In your others pictures which seem to be recent i think Georges can have lost a little height(in my memory he had a problem with his back since the first pictures),Matt can have lost height by the years too
Pierre said on 30/Oct/17
Click Here = another comparison James Corden next to Lebron James(listed 6"7.25') (a little more in relax posture than James imo).
Tonyx said on 29/Oct/17
Click Here
Love this photo.
Brad Pitt wearing shoes with roomy pant-legs at the hem while doing his thing with the arms on his waist. George Clooney and Matt Damon clearly tiptoeing a little. The only two things this photo is good for is judging their character and realizing that Brad is the tallest of the three.
Brad Pitt 5ft10.25in
George Clooney 5ft9.75in
Matt Damon 5ft9in
Matt can look taller then George these days. Matt is also way more muscular.
But when BOTH are wearing dress shoes and standing straight Clooney consistently looks taller then Damon.
Tonyx said on 29/Oct/17
I think this is relevant
Click Here
George is wearing average dress shoes and standing relaxed while Matt is wearing sneakers and standing as straight as possible.
Click Here
an anonymous peach said on 29/Oct/17
Pitt - 5ft 10.7 (179.6cm)
Clooney - 5ft 10.4 (178.8cm)
Damon - 5ft 9.6 (176.9cm)

That's generally how I see The Ocean's trio
berta said on 28/Oct/17
still dont think 181 is mimpossible he can look tallish som times and that start from 182 and up in my eyes. he isnt 182 cm tall but i think he really can be vlose to 181. i believe tallest possbile or him is 181,5 and shortest possible 179,5 somewhre in there
Original said on 28/Oct/17
James 173, Gwyneth 174.5, Brad 177.5, Georges 178, Matt 176.5
Kurtz said on 27/Oct/17
179 cm.
Pierre said on 27/Oct/17
My guess=
Rob 173.5 want to say James Corden ~ 171.5 next to Samuel Anderson
want to say Gwyneth ~172.5 next to James
want to say Brad ~176 next to Gwyneth
want to say Luke Wilson ~ 180.5 next to Gwyneth
want to say Georges Clooney 178 peak now 176
Matt Damon 174.5 next to James Corden
all this guess barefoot without lifts :)
Hijopotamus said on 26/Oct/17
My final rating-

177 cm barefoot
180 cm with his shoes
184 cm with his tricks

That makes perfect sense.
Case closed, Rob.
Editor Rob: no case is closed...even a measurement isn't 100% final, there's always room for error or mistakes or erroneous equipment...or even like with Real Madrid, suspect equipment.
Tonyx said on 26/Oct/17
Devon Larratt, Brad Pitt does not have long limbs. He is just not fat. That is it. Why do people keep saying that? On top of that he has small feet and small hands. His arms are average to slightly under average in length.
Devon Larratt said on 26/Oct/17
5'10.5". He is usually wearing bigger heels. He also has long limbs and torso making him appear taller. Certain shaped legs and proportions can make someone appear several inches taller from a distance (on the movie screen too) and vice versa. I dont put stock in pics of guys next to women unless the woman is barefoot and her height is certified. Women lie a lot about their height, weight, age and their footwear varies.
Brad said on 25/Oct/17
He must have on custom jumbo slope wedges with Clooney in the 6-1 shot. He's destroying Clooney and Clooney is irritated.
Peter175 said on 24/Oct/17
Rob, any idea why the guesses for Brad Pitt are so low? It's insane, he looks every bit of 5'11 to me
Editor Rob: I never realised Brad has reached the 500 vote club now, at 5ft 10.5 range...I don't think it's completely unreasonable, that would be the absolute low I'd ever try arguing, but I feel I can still see him around 5ft 11 more than 10.5...
Rose said on 24/Oct/17
I am 5'10" and Brad Pitt looks to be a solid 5'10" to me. I cannot see him as being any shorter. He looks how I look in low heels next to a 5'4" woman in heels when he is with Jennifer Aniston. He is also clearly taller than guys we know are 5'7" or 5'8".
Pierre said on 24/Oct/17
Click Here
Anonymous said on 24/Oct/17
would he still be considered 5ft11 if he wore freaking 3inch+ heels?? Everyone would know by now that he isn't...
Slim 6' said on 24/Oct/17
There is nothing impressive about his height.
Hijopotamus said on 23/Oct/17
@original, in that pic Brad looks 6’2”
looool
Dmeyer said on 23/Oct/17
If you look well as All pics Pitt Tarantino and consider everything footwear angle posture Pitt looks à solid 5'11
Dmeyer said on 23/Oct/17
À few proof that Pitt is 5'11 , hé has looked similar height with Hanks while Pitt has low cut similar shoes , hé has looked easily as tall as 5'11 Élie Roth with low cut Brown shoes and taller with thiker shoes , Can look sightly taller Clooney with similar shoes or taller when in thicker shoes and better posture , tower over Giancarlo 171 and 173 yeun while Pitt has à normal 3cm thiker heel , hold his own with 183,5 Gosling while in shoes that cant give so much and so many others , the only Time hé Can seem under 5'11 is with Paltrow and Tarantino , and even with them Can look 5'11 at Times or 6ft with footwear advantage
Original said on 22/Oct/17
Pitt is 5'9, fact.

Click Here
Realtalk said on 22/Oct/17
@tonyx the white sneakers he wore were massive. Also he wears lifts even with Jennifer aniston photo where you can see jen's ankle and brad's ankle being 2 inches apart.
3.5 inch elevator shoes + 5'8.5 to 5'9.0 equates to 6 feet or over which is a 5'11 guy's height with regular shoes.
5'9 flat at maximum can't be denied because Gwyneth paltrow is confirmed 5'8 with corden. You've already seen the link shown here, Brad barefoot with Gwyneth so no need to look further.
It's okay Brad's 5'9.0 is not a midget size at all, just below average. And he can look tall with elevator shoes.
Pierre said on 22/Oct/17
Click Here Click Here
Hijopotamus said on 22/Oct/17
Tonyx, and I have my doubts Rob thinks Pitt is 180.3
But this site got too big which is great but this kind of thing can happen with super ++AAA Celebrities.
Edimar1.84 said on 21/Oct/17
towered by 6ft1.5 Chris Pratt.
I just say 5ft10.5 for Pitt.
At 20s age he maybe close 5ft10.75/5ft10.85. Good shoes make him look at 5ft11.75/6ft range.
HonestSlovene said on 21/Oct/17
@Hijopotamus I agree with 178 cm for him. Could be taller, but it wouldn't suprise me if he was only this height.
Brad said on 20/Oct/17
In posture, Tonyx is correct.
Tonyx said on 20/Oct/17
Annnon, the only person who believes that Brad Pitt is 5ft11in is Rob. That's it.
Everyone else thinks he is shorter. I think Brad is 5ft10.25in tall.
Original said on 19/Oct/17
@Bego I agree with you. 177,5 at night (peak) with 179,5 out of bed, now 178,5 and 176,5 at night.
Annnon said on 19/Oct/17
In still not convinced that he's 5'11". He's 5'10" to me. He was shorter than Bruce willis in 12 MONKEYS with footwear advantage. He didn't look much taller than 5'7.5" peak Harvey keitel in THELMA AND LOUISE. much shorter than 6'1.5 peak Michael Madsen in that film.about 1-1.5 inches taller than 5'8.5"-5'9" Gwyneth paltrow. And he's a height conscious guy. Never see him in sandles or barefoot unless on a rare occasion with Gwyneth paltrow.
Tonyx said on 19/Oct/17
Christoph Waltz in lifts? Have you gone mad?
Show us the proof.
Hijopotamus said on 19/Oct/17
HonestSlovene, you agree Brad Pitt is 177?
Tonyx said on 19/Oct/17
Realtalk, no. I'm asking if you believe that Brad Pitt wears non-boot footwear in 2017 that gives him the full 3.5in of height. I know some elevators do, but that is irrelevant.

I think he doesn't even get the full 2in when he is wearing sneakers with lifts.
Realtalk said on 19/Oct/17
@tonyx search for elevator shoes
HonestSlovene said on 18/Oct/17
@Original Good point.
Bego said on 18/Oct/17
179 in morning, 177 at night is more likely. Or he's 1cm shorter.
Tonyx said on 17/Oct/17
Realtalk, do you really believe that Brad Pitt wears 3.5in lifts/elevators, as in 8.89cm? Really?
He wears lifts for sure and he isn't 5ft11in, but 3.5in lifts/elevators?

P.S.
My last comment hasn't appeared. I made the links properly and didn't troll or swear... :(
Original said on 17/Oct/17
Christoph Waltz looks little taller than Rob (173,7 at 9pm) compared with Mikkelsen no doubt I would guess around 174,5 for Waltz compared with Mads. Lifts? I think so. IMO Waltz is 170, but looks ~174,5 with lifts (just search images of Waltz and DiCaprio or Waltz and Diane Kruger and Melanie Laurent), Pitt is similar way is around 177/177,5 barefoot (he did look 3cm taller than 174,5 Waltz and perhaps little taller than 176,5 Daniel Bruhl, but could be 181,5/182 in his lifts.

Or do you think Waltz looks flat 170 compared with 175,5/176 JamieFoxx and with 181 Leonardo DiCaprio?

Click Here

Click Here
Editor Rob: Mads at times won't stand as tall as he can, I don't know if Waltz uses lifts, but he did say 170, but also claimed 5ft 8 in the 80's too.
Tonyx said on 16/Oct/17
Next to Bana and Bloom, while Pit having a slight advantage in footwear
Click Here
Can't find the photos someone had posted a while ago from the set of Troy, where you can see he has small lifts in his boots. Someone please post them. There was one for sure.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
On the set of Troy, preparing, wearing Nike Shox(1.41in as listed by Rob on this website) while sword fighting. Irrelevant for judging height, but relevant for understanding how he thinks.
Click Here

This has got to hurt...
Click Here
Ouch.
Click Here
On a yacht, with his family, everyone is barefoot, except Brad.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Has the body and the demeanor of a typical Italian-American man from New Jersey

I think, no, i feel, that Brad Pitt, Matthew McConaughey and Orlando Bloom are the same height barefoot.
Realtalk said on 16/Oct/17
@tonyx you don't say any truth, you're trolling. Brad is 5'9 flat. Barefoot pic with gwyneth don't lie. Ankle height don't lie either. Brad with big elevator shoes don't lie either. It's very easy to find out how big the elevator shoes are, just look at the top of the shoelace but ofc it is covered with long pants many times.
Rising - 174 cm said on 16/Oct/17
@Hijopotamus: Pitt is wearing Palladium boots in that photo. It's one of the few times I've been able to recognize Pitt's boots because a lot of the time, he likely wears some sort of custom boot. Of course, he could fit an insert lift in them. Obviously, celebs don't only wear lifts in the form of custom made elevator shoes as evidenced by Stallone's Hogan sneakers, but it's difficult to know unless they sit down, or I recently noticed a conspicuous bulge in a pair of ordinary New Balance Mel Gibson was wearing. The exception is Robert Downey Jr., who usually wears designer high tops and stuffs the biggest insert lifts in them so I'd say the resulting bulge meets a reasonable burden of proof.

@Pierre: A lot of times I've said I don't know if he has something in his boot or not because it can be difficult to tell with an ankle boot. Plus, Pitt might have shoes slightly big and slip a half inch lift at times and that would be basically undetectable. I suspect Daniel Craig does that. So at times, it depends if you mean a big lift or any lift/extra insole. If you took his 1.5" Cuban heels and did that, you'd get a nice boost over anyone in normal dress shoes.

As for Bloom, I believe this is one of the better pics to show the difference between the two: Click Here Perhaps a bit of a tilt in Bloom's favor, though he also doesn't look to be standing as straight as Pitt. I believe Bloom is a flat 5'10" because he doesn't look that tall next to 5'7" guys like Jerry Bruckheimer or apparently, Christoph Waltz. Bloom was slouching terribly at the photocall, but he stands a bit better in this one: Click Here Pitt is still standing in front of him and you can see has the heeled boots to give him an advantage there. I'm not so sure about shoes on the red carpet, but I think that shows Pitt and Bloom might be much closer in height than you'd think from the photocall with Bana.
Pierre said on 16/Oct/17
Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here In some pictures Orlando Bloom look lots of time just a little taller or same height than listed 5"7' Christoph Waltz and clearly shorter than Mads Mikkelsen(181 range next to Rob imo)(Madds and Christoph have a little advantage of shoes imo but).I ask me if Christoph is maybe more 5"8' range than 5"7'range(or maybe lifts here)
Pierre said on 16/Oct/17
@Rising=yes there is clearly a difference between one guy who see Brad with lifts even in the bed and one guy like you who see Brad almost all the time in classic shoes. The reality is maybe between this two cases.
Hijopotamus said on 16/Oct/17
@rising, you did say there was no proof he wore lifts which is true, I mean has anyone seen them? BUT if you have a look at this.........

Click Here

Watch the pic with Orlando
Rising - 174 cm said on 15/Oct/17
I'd love to hear how I emphasize ankle position too much. It's simply an unavoidable fact that if you have more under your foot in the shoe, your ankle will be higher. It's physically impossible to avoid this, which is why it's the best way to tell if someone has a lift. I've always acknowledged there are other ways to tell such as a bulge around the lace area if the lift is big enough and if you're talking about elevator shoes specifically, then the cut of the shoe will often be recognizable as an elevator. They're all prone to confirmation bias, which I think is on display with anyone seeing Pitt's ankle high with Aniston. But I've never said Pitt never wears lifts. I've just said if he's as big a lift wearer as some make him out to be on this page then it shouldn't be a problem finding Pitt sitting down with his ankle looking conspicuously high. I've found shots like this for Cruise, Stallone, Mel Gibson, Robert Downey Jr., Michael Douglas etc on talk shows, courtside at basketball games etc. So why not Pitt? Maybe he's not the guy who goes to bed in his lifts like some think. Doesn't mean he doesn't wear them at times, but even when he was promoting a film like Troy and appeared on a talk show with a very tall host Conan O'Brien, we finally get a shot like this and Pitt appeared to be in normal shoes with a normal ankle position. You'd think a constant lift wearer wouldn't appear in normal shoes with a near 6'3"-6'4" range host while promoting a blockbuster epic action film.
Peter181cm said on 14/Oct/17
He is 5'10.5 at the TOP!!
Maybe 5'10.25 -_-
Next to reak 5'11 guys he look shorter!
Tonyx said on 14/Oct/17
Realtalk, i wrote that his footwear these days, while still giving him an advantage, is not as thick soled as it used to be. I think to say that he's wearing 3.5in sneakers is like saying that the Russians hacked the USA election or that the USA is actually fighting terrorism. It's just not true.
I think Brad is 5ft10.25in
Realtalk said on 14/Oct/17
@tonyx those white sneakers are big ass shoes lol. Just real talk elevator sneakers look just like that.
Flats are definitely not that and he never wears flats anyway.
3.5 inch sneakers.
Original said on 13/Oct/17
My bet is 177'5 peak, but looking at his pics in 1987/1991 when he wasn't famous he looked more in the 178/179 range more than anything.

For example isn't Helen Slater (listed as 171'5 here, pic w/ Rob) with Brad Pitt in Happy Together 1988?

Click Here

Click Here

Looks 178-79 here again.

I mean of course he uses lifts no doubt, but I'm 80% sure that he wasn't shorter than 177cm at his peak, possibly a little taller, could be 178, even 179 is possible to be honest, in fact he looked many times around 5'10. Today, at 54, he should be 1cm shorter, 176,5 would be my bet now. 177,5 peak.

If he was 173 he could look shorter than Gwyneth (174.5/75cm) when in fact he was taller (about 3cm imo), he would look shorter than Rick Schroeder (175) when he was about 3cm taller, he would look just a bit taller than Shalane McCall (listed as 169) when he was 10cm taller than her, he could look the same height as Cheryl Pollak (listed as 173) when he was considerably taller, I would say more than 5cm, maybe 6 or 7cm.

He is not as shorter as trolls here think like 173 for example, people here are in denial. Self-projection.
CDS said on 13/Oct/17
"Rising" said something that got me thinking

"He's tricky, though. It's almost as though there are two Brad Pitts! Maybe one is a shorter [or taller] double."

Is it possible...could it be...???... Is Brad Pitt actually.... TWINS????... MIND...BLOWN!!....
Justanotherguy said on 13/Oct/17
Tonyx, none of those pictures are obvious evidence of lifts. He could be wearing inserts in his boots but you cant tell. There is really nothing suspicious about any of that footwear. It doesn't look over bulky at all. Some of the styles are high cut, so what? That's not automatic evidence of lifts. I just don't see it.
Tonyx said on 12/Oct/17
Justanotherguy, say what now?
Click Here clearly lifts in those boots.
Click Here bulging vans, lifts inside. Staring at Jon Bernthals shoes/boots.
Click Here even with his family.
22 May 2017 Click Here i bet you'll be lazy to scroll down so
Click Here zoom in.

On the other hand, here Click Here his sneakers look normal. But then you zoom in on the laces Click Here and Click Here especially looking at his right sneaker. Still, after breaking up with Jolie he is getting way less height advantage from his shoes/sneakers/boots that much is clear.
Click Here look at his right foot, the laces area.
Long video of the interview in hd on youtube Click Here

I used to be open to Brad being 5ft9in, but now i just can't see that. I think Pitt, at 53 years old(he's turning 54 this December), even after the knee injury Click Here , is still a genuine 5ft10in-5ft10.5in tall guy. I'm going to go with 5ft10.25in. He can not be a full 5ft11in, because he is listed at 5ft11in on google and imdb. He most certainly has the option to influence those listings, but he doesn't. If he really is 5ft11in and wears lifts then he wouldn't want people to think he is only 5ft11in. That just doesn't make any sense. He would want to claim 6ft tall. Whats the point in wearing lifts/elevators/thick soled boots/small inserts/thick orthopedic insoles if people can just google "how tall is Brad Pitt" and look at that 1.8m listing. I have also noticed on several occasions that his right shoe was bulging more then the left one, so maybe after the knee injury and so many years wearing lifts the difference between his height on his left foot and on his right foot became more significant. I wonder...
Realtalk said on 12/Oct/17
5'8 or 5'9 flat is not a guess, it is the truth based on barefoot, regular footwear and ankle analysis. That has been provided here.

5'10 or 5'11 is a guess, a fallacy. Because the man is already proven to always wear elevator shoes. Just look at how high the shoelace part is how you know it is an elevator shoes. Although it can be hidden with long pants at times.

Just real talk bro
Harris said on 12/Oct/17
The comments have been appearing very slow recently. Keeping up a website like Celebheights seems really difficult with the flood of comments, we should probably take the time out to thank Rob for the time he's taken to try and answer as many user's questions as he can.

As for Pitt, I'm convinced he's near 180 cm, I'd be surprised if he's under 5'10.5" personally. He doesn't really look below this listing. He most likely didn't even finish growing when he (supposedly) put down 5'10" on his resume.
Matt179 said on 11/Oct/17
The reason pitt look tall also because of his build.

He so slim, Its like age never even affect him, He didnt gain any weight at all.

After all these years, he still look young, has all his hair. His diet must be very affective.

Clooney also lost weight alot over the years. Being slim will make you look taller, Add regular dress shoes with 1.25 inch heel + 1.25 lift inside the shoe for lift 2.5 if hes 5foot10.5, He reach 6foot1, for a 6foot image barefeet. Its easy to make him look taller.
Pierre said on 10/Oct/17
@Hijopotamus=yes there is something here imo :) his ankles are very high!
Justanotherguy said on 10/Oct/17
No way hes wearing lifts in that picture with Aniston. This guy isn't short and hes never looked short. Hes in the 5'10-5'11 range. He doesn't really have any need to walk around everywhere he goes wearing lifts. He wears alot of boots that can can give him up to a extra CM of height. He also has good posture for pictures. He has a small body frame that makes him look lean and a little taller. He weighs in the 160 range. At special events he might wears lifts. If he does he isn't rocking huge shoes like Robert Downy Jr. He knows better than that. I really don't believe hes that insecure about his height. But his image is his livelihood so he has to always look the best he can.
Hijopotamus said on 10/Oct/17
Anal176, I've posted all over this site and the heel thing was a requirement rising74 has put too much emphasis on. Next time do your homework before you vomit.
handsome guy said on 10/Oct/17
brad pitt’s height is really mysterious. i think his height is 176~180 range.
Jack The Smackhead said on 10/Oct/17
Anyone guessing he is 5'8/5'9 needs to get their eyes checked I think. You can just tell he doesn't look that short by pictures, he is 5'10 minimum. And besides, if 5'10 George Clooney described him at 6'1, which we know he's not, how could he be around 5'8/5'9? Think logically..
anon176 said on 9/Oct/17
Hijopotamus. Idiot. Look at his ankles uhuhuhu

Serious. what is your problem with this celeb? Its the only page youre posting. Crush on Pitt?
Rising - 174 cm said on 9/Oct/17
@Hijopotamus: I meant the surest way to judge lifts -- especially more modest lifts -- is when you can see the ankle so you can judge if it's higher than it should be or not. Outside of boots and high tops, you can see most people's ankles when they're not covered by pants. I don't own any shoes like that so I don't know what kind of insole they usually have, but it doesn't look like there's room for much and Pitt's feet look pretty flat in them to me. I'm sure they add more than Jen's sandals, but I wasn't even commenting on whether that pic showed Pitt was over or under 5'10". I was only pointing out Lol's erroneous claim that in the photo there was only 3.5" between them and that's clearly not the case. Whether Pitt is getting much of an advantage is beyond the scope of what I'm saying because Lol claimed even with the footwear advantage, Pitt only had 3.5" on her as you can see from his post:

Lol said on 7/Oct/17
Brad has a difference of 3.5 inches with jennifer aniston who is 5'4.5. Jennifer even had tiny slippers and brad had regular shoes.
Jim Hopper said on 9/Oct/17
5-10 to 5-11. No lower or taller.
HonestSlovene said on 9/Oct/17
@Simon I'd say above average, but not tall for a young caucasian of his generation. Height hasn't changed much, 176 cm was average during the 80s-90s now it's 178 cm. Talking exclusively about caucasians, for other races he is tall.
Simon said on 9/Oct/17
If if turns he was 5'11 in his college days, would that be considered tall for his time and location? That would be Missouri, mid-80s.
Hijopotamus said on 9/Oct/17
@rising, in that pic you can see Brads ankle. Why you ignore it? You have been insisting too much on that particular thing and now you ignore it lol
Pitt is wearing vibrams insoles lifts whatever but has shoe advantage while Jen is in flats.
Good job Pierre!
Pierre said on 8/Oct/17
@ Rising = Click Here look at the height of Brad's ankles ,(you compare to the height of Jennifer's ankles) and imagine at what height are his feet in this shoes.He has a good advantage of shoes here imo.Jennifer has poor heels like half an inch.
Mister lennon said on 8/Oct/17
The 5'8-5'9 stuff for pitt is just absurd. He is a strong 5'10 minimun.
Charles said on 8/Oct/17
Brad could possibly be 5'10 but that's a low guess, I think he would measure between 5'10.5 and 5'11 barefoot. The 5'9.5 and down claims are just ridiculous, there's no way he's that short.
Rising - 174 cm said on 7/Oct/17
And Pitt has not lost height. If anything, he looks taller than he did in 1995. Obviously, that's impossible, but it suggests he certainly hasn't lost 1 cm. Again, see him next to actual 5'9" men like Mel Gibson and Anthony Hopkins(Hopkins may have shrunk to 5'8.5" by then) and anyone can see Brad is not around the same height.
Rising - 174 cm said on 7/Oct/17
Much more than 3.5": Click Here At least a 5" difference. Gwyneth is taller than Corden, imo, but not a lot taller.
Pierre said on 7/Oct/17
@Lol=Sorry i made a mistake in my comment on 05/Sep/17 =not "average height" but "current height"
Lol said on 7/Oct/17
Gwyneth paltrow is 173cm because she had an excercise session with Corden with multiple pictutes. That don't lie.
Brad would be 5'8.5 max and with the average 3.6 inch lift, that makes him 6 feet which is a 5'11 with regular shoes.

Brad has a difference of 3.5 inches with jennifer aniston who is 5'4.5. Jennifer even had tiny slippers and brad had regular shoes.


No, Brad did not get limb lengthening surgery.
However he could claim 5'9 and he likely could reach that height if he hangs on the monkey bar but that height gain from the monkey bar decompresses during the day.

He is 5'8 but he could claim 5'9.

Definitely not 5'10, but it's not a surprise that many celebs are exaggerating their height.
Pierre said on 6/Oct/17
Brad/Gwyneth=the different pictures barefoot or in around same shoes prove one thing imo =there is not a very big difference of height between their shoulders(when we can see all the body -and so not eventually a little on tiptoe-,with flat floor,in around the same postures),and not a very big difference of general height.Gwyneth for me is clearly the same height as James Corden to the centimeter,and James look max the same height as Rob next to Samuel Anderson but James is on tiptoe.With Rob strong 5"8',my guess is=James or Gwyneth around 171/172 (and then could explain why sometimes a probably real 5"11' or around this height like Luke Wilson can tower her like here = Click Here ) , Brad in 1995 around 176.5 (and so one hair taller than my guess= 174.5/175 Rick Schroder),Brad in 2017 around 175.5/176.
Pierre said on 6/Oct/17
I agree with Johno,James Corden and Gwyneth are looking the same height in the video and James is shorter than Rob
Rising - 174 cm said on 6/Oct/17
I know of no credible source that suggests Sly Stallone considered limb-lengthened surgery. A few posters here SPECULATED he had it done because he looked conspicuously taller from around 2003-2008, but this was likely due to wearing some sort of lift or thick footwear in virtually every public appearance during that time while maintaining military posture. I doubt Sly would have considered it much, if at all considering it would imperil his ability to stay in shape and require him to be a recluse for many months to recover. Sly obviously wanted to be taller, but I doubt he has that sort of psychological problem with his normal height. Lifts are in the category of things a normal person might do to improve their appearance, but limb-lengthening surgery is for someone with a rather severe psychological issue regarding their height.

As for Pitt, there's two dominant schools of thought. One is that he's no more than 5'10" and has constantly worn lifts for the past 20 years. The other is that he's actually 5'11" and likes Cuban-type heels and boots, but doesn't actually wear lifts and doesn't need them. Personally, I believe the truth is somewhere between. Seeing Pitt shorter than a 5'11" max Bernthal at multiple events makes me conclude he is shorter at 5'10.5"-5'10.75" and this lines up well with Brad in the early to mid 90's, but then he looks too tall recently with Yeun as well as in Meet Joe Black with Anthony Hopkins and The Devil's Own with Harrison Ford. So he's among the trickiest. I think he's probably dabbled in lifts, but is more of a boot guy who prefers a bit extra heel. But I've had a hard time believing Pitt at exactly 5'11" would have claimed that height in the same questionnaire he shaved 2 years off his actual age despite being the ripe old age of 23-24. And Pitt continued to be listed that height even after his career breakthrough. As far as I know, that's still what his PR people claim he is. I have a feeling almost anyone who gets to the full 5'11" is going to claim 6', especially in Hollywood. Of course, most honest 5'10.75" and many 5'10.5" are going to claim 5'11". We tend to think in terms of round numbers, especially since far less people claim fractions, but there's no reason anyone will be more likely to be an exact inch than a 1/4" under or over. He's tricky, though. It's almost as though there are two Brad Pitts! Maybe one is a shorter [or taller] double.

@Lol: Your name is appropriate as it's the reaction most will have reading Brad is 5'8", much less max. ALL pics can "lie". Removing shoes does not magically make the camera angle ideal for comparing height. And who defines "regular shoes"? If we could all agree on what regular shoes are, this wouldn't be nearly as contentious.
Johno said on 5/Oct/17
Paltrow has no height on Corden and Rob has Corden at 5'8.25 although, those of us who have been fans of Corden way before he became American Primetime, know that he falls in to the 5'7-range as well.
Original said on 5/Oct/17
All about Aniston angles... this image means nothing, there is other much better and Pitt looked more or less 5.5" taller.

Regarding Paltrow She's 175 not "5-8" and better photo here both barefoot and Pitt losing more height and he is easily the taller guy, remember that Brad has longer torso too.

Click Here

and he is really taller... look at eye level.

Click Here

Click Here

Probably around 2" difference since Paltrow is closer to the camera and they are at the same level, I have other pics to prove it, so Brad is really taller than Gwyneth and please Gwyneth is at least 175, imo legit 5'9" since she is clearly taller than Corden listed as 173.
Pierre said on 5/Oct/17
@Lol=Maybe not exactly 5"8 but around 5"9' could be a good guess ,like his average height.I think he was a little taller at his peak like in the movie next to Rick Schroder and could measure around 176.5.And now with big shoes he can look around 5"11.75'/6"0' imo and 5"11' or 181 in classic lifts.I think Georges has lost height too,about 5"10' peak and now more 5"9.25'.
Lol said on 5/Oct/17
Too bad barefoot pics and regular shoes pics dont lie

Click Here

 Click Here

5'8 max
5'10-11 only with elevator shoes which he has sticked with.
Jeremy Pivin said on 4/Oct/17
Slim said on 3/Oct/17
Pitt edging 5'10.75" listed Matthew McConaughey.:

mmmmhhhh, I appreciate your intentions amigo but you'd make a better case if the pics you post actually show footwear '_' and not start at the nipple area, ya know? ok now, you made me thirsty, where's my double moka latte?
CDS said on 4/Oct/17
"Rob has got Pitt and Clooney each about half an inch too high."

With all due respect, Rob -- I bow to you as one of the best height estimateurs in the world. However, I do think in THIS particular case, particularly of Brad Pitt, you have a "height in shoes" height. Everything I'm seeing -- from THIS thread I've been viewing the past 8 years or so, is telling me so. It has really been eye-opening. I really think it's time for a downgrade.

One question I don't think any have posed so far for Mr. Pitt.. Is that risky leg-lengthening surgery out of the question? Stallone was rumored to have looked into it...??
Editor Rob: I don't know, I would probably be a bit more surprised if he measured 5ft 10.5 than 11. I have felt that way for a while now.
Matthew Robinson said on 4/Oct/17
Rob has got Pitt and Clooney each about half an inch too high.
Slim said on 3/Oct/17
Pitt edging 5'10.75" listed Matthew McConaughey.:

Click Here
Original. said on 2/Oct/17
Pitt 177-178 (looking around 180 to 183 w/ his lifts)
Corden 173 and Paltrow solid 175.
My final guess for these guys.
Jeremy Pivin said on 2/Oct/17
ok something's afoot: 176 cm Luke Perry towers over Claudia Shiffer (and she's standing straight) whereas 180.3 cm Pitt doesn't (and she uses that trick with her legs tall girls often use to make themselves shorter). Unless Claudia gained like 15cm in her 20s ... xD
Lol said on 2/Oct/17
Gwyneth and Brad have the same height on the barefoot photo.
Jennifer aniston with slippers and Brad pitt on regular sneakers have a 3.5 inch gap.

5'8.0 That is honest and generous.
Although 6'0.5 with elevator shoes which he sticked with at all times except that barefoot photo with gwyneth and regular shoes with jenifer.

173cm
Pierre said on 1/Oct/17
@Original then if i resume,when we can not see the feet of Brad in some pictures his shoulders are easily higher than Gwyneth's shoulders ,and when we can see the feet both have around the same height of shoulders...:)
Pierre said on 1/Oct/17
@Original= Click Here Imo she flex her knees later in the video at around 0:17 and so you can see she start to lose height,at 0:13 i think they'are in around the same posture and same height,her knees are only very close one of the other,James isn't very straight,but this time don't incline his head like the picture you posted, he lose height in your picture his head is around the horizontal !
Hijopotamus said on 1/Oct/17
Corden 175
Paltrow 175,5
Pitt 177
Slim said on 1/Oct/17
Rob, could he hit 182.9 after a 12 hour sleep?
Lol said on 1/Oct/17
174cm brad pitt max.
Proven by gwyneth, corden and aniston. Barefoot, slippers or regular shoes only.
Pierre said on 30/Sep/17
@Rising=the "external heel" of Brad's beige shoes is short.where are their ankles? =over his shoes ,it's logical if not=very uncomfortable shoes.And imo his beige shoes are higher than classic shoes.
Original said on 30/Sep/17
@Pierre LFMAO Of course Gwyneth is taller than Corden, Corden is losing NOTHING there, he stands very well... Corden is the best proof that Gywneth is a legit 5'9 bro...

They are on the same postures just in this moment of the video, both tilting:

Click Here

Compare with Paltrow flexing her knees.

Click Here


Just take a close look at the eye level of both, I measured myself today flexing my knees like Paltrow did and I measured ~2.5cm less, there is very probably the difference between Gwyneth and James, so news they're not of the same height, they are atleast 2cm apart.

Click Here

Click Here

Just accept the fact and then we can move up.

Corden 173 and Paltrow 175/175,5.

@ About Pitt and Paltrow, nothing better than a face-to-face pic, there is no camera effect here:

She is slouching something but there is no less than 3cm between both.

Click Here

And bro she is legit 5'9" imo she is a tall girl compare 175 Gwneth with 181 listed Luke Wilson.

Click Here

She can appear very tall depending on angle. Pitt appears more and more legit 178 range imo.
Rising - 174 cm said on 30/Sep/17
@Pierre: Brad isn't slouching anywhere near like Clooney is, but Brad standing more casually is a better comparison next to a slouching Clooney than Brad with military posture and Clooney with a slouch, plus a full pic is better than one from the waist up and a straight angle better than a high angle.

To answer your question, I think Pitt has about 2 cm shoes at Venice and THAT is a good pic, imo. But Clooney had 3 to 3.5 cm boots. At most, Pitt's shoes might have been 1" there, but the heel is small and his knees are noticeably lower than Clooney's. Brad wearing heeled boots looks different proportionately: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here

That's just one event where he wore his Cuban heel-type dress boots, but you see his knees are noticeably higher, his legs longer and he looks taller overall. Based on the first pic, he looks almost 3" taller than Jolie in heels. I believe she's 5'6", but probably slightly over 5'9" in those heels. Although that's secondary as nobody questions Pitt can reach 6 feet in footwear.

As for the New York premiere with Yeun, I think Rob is correct that Brad has 3 cm footwear. The handprint ceremony may be different. I've said before that I think it's possible Pitt had elevator shoes there: Click Here Click Here But I'd probably defer to Rob's opinion on that anyway.
Pierre said on 30/Sep/17
@Original=your picture Gwyneth /James (Corden) isn't good =James lose lots of height with his head tilting a lot,in the video when they are in same posture they are looking the same height
Slim said on 30/Sep/17
Pierre said on 29/Sep/17
Picture Slim on 29/sept/2017. It seems to me Brad's crotch is lower than the others even if he's closer to the camera ;but maybe he flex his knees i don't know...
**********
Rofl, perry.
Loeparn said on 30/Sep/17
Looking at the pictures of Brad and Clooney, posted by Rising, it is unlikely Pitt is wearing lifts. Brad, who seems to have the longer torso of the two, stands slightly taller. I mean, how short can Pitt's legs really be? 179 cm for Pitt.
Original said on 30/Sep/17
@Rising - 174 cm Btw, he looked 179/180 compared to listed 169 Shalane McCall and the same 179/180 compared to Cheryl Pollak listed as 173. Thats the point. He didn't looked 5'11 or 6'0 with one and 5'9 - 5'10 with other. He looked the same height according with the correct reference (not oficial though).
Original said on 30/Sep/17
@Rising - 174 cm Read all my comments here. They are all parts of the same argumentation.

@Lol Corden is 5'8", Gwyneth is clearly taller than 5'8", probably around 5'9". Brad is taller than Gwyneth, the question is how much. I think 5'10 is fine for him (he just can't be much shorter than that, 5'9.5" is just the min of min, still acceptable though). Of course he is not 5'8". The attempt to use bad pictures of Paltrow and Corden and then bad pictures of Paltrow and Pitt, to say that they are all the same height is old. When Corden and Pitt stay on the same side we'll see that.
Pierre said on 30/Sep/17
And= Click Here = James Corden on tiptoe next to Samuel Anderson(Samuel's head looking downward) compared to strong 5"8' Rob next to Samuel (Samuel's head looking upward and a hat) = Click Here
Pierre said on 30/Sep/17
@Original=yes,or the question is= how many is Brad a on tiptoe or how is the floor,because in others pics inwhich we can see the feet(and the floor) their shoulders are curiously the same height= Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Strange no?
Pierre said on 30/Sep/17
@Rising= because you don't take the good pics,Brad slouch too here.I say again this is not only parameters of postures and camera angle here= Click Here compared to Click Here .You can see in the second pic Georges is slouching too and probably more than in the first pic but...(compare the height of their shoulders too)And i say again Georges is always looking the same height in all the pictures i see of him in web just comfortable external heels sometimes but this times his shoes are not discreet they are big shoes like in the second pic,not curious shoes very slim like classic shoes but with vertical angle toward the laces and very high only over the external heels.At what height do you think are Brad's ankles in his beige shoes(second pic) or here = probably very high imo =if not good bye the comfort... Click Here
Lol said on 30/Sep/17
Stop comparing brad with other men who also use elevator.

Brad being 5'8 proven by gwyneth and corden and aniston when barefoot or regular shoes.

Clooney must be like 5'6.5 if you keep comparing the guy to Brad Pitt 5'8
Lol said on 30/Sep/17
Corden is 5'8
Gwyneth is 5'8
Brad is 5'8.5

The barefoot photos are already shown so stop denying.

brad always wears min 3.6 inch to 4.5 inch elevator shoes.

Is 5'8 small? For an american it is 2 inches below the average.
For the tallest average height in europe or africa, 5'8 is tiny.

But to lie and say 5'11 because you always on elevator shoes is a joke.
Original said on 29/Sep/17
@Pierre

You think for example that he is 3,5cm taller than Gwyneth, point is that you was thinking that Paltrow was about the same height as Corden (173), but news she is not, she is clearly taller than James, she is around 175 very probably.

Pierre said on 20/Aug/17
Brad 176.5 Gwyneth 173 Georges 178
Pierre said on 29/Sep/17
Picture Slim on 29/sept/2017. It seems to me Brad's crotch is lower than the others even if he's closer to the camera ;but maybe he flex his knees i don't know...
Original said on 29/Sep/17
@Pierre

Reality:
Click Here

He looks taller than 175 Paltrow, the question is how much between 2cm and 4cm.
Rising - 174 cm said on 29/Sep/17
@Pierre: Those pics from that day of Pitt and Clooney with the hand/footprints are terrible. Those photos really don't tell us anything.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Even some of these photos I'm posting aren't great since most pics that day are dodgy, but at least they're all full and you can see that Clooney is slouching in all of them, but looks less than 1.5" shortwer in all of them and can look almost as tall. Since you re-post your photos, I'll post this once again since I think it is one of the few decent photos from that day: Click Here Clooney is only 1.5 to 2 cm shorter max, which is also what the video shows. You can't prove someone is wearing lifts by posting dodgy photos to that make them look tall and assume that's how tall they looked that day. I wouldn't read much into any photos of Pitt that aren't full.

As for Schroder, good catch about his Converse -- which add 5/8" -- though I don't know about Pitt's sneakers. As I've said, I see Pitt about an inch taller. I think that's how it looks in the scene I took these stills from: Click Here Being face to face indoors makes it one of the best times to compare their height, imo.

@CDS: Forget about 3.6" elevators. During Sly's most height-obsessed period from around 2003-2008, his favorite shoes weren't even elevators, but thick sneakers by a brand called Hogan. He looked to put insert lifts in them, but they were too low cut to get much more than 2.5", maybe 2.75" max. Sly may have worn 3"-3.5" range on occasion, but it wasn't typical even for him. Burt may wear even bigger elevator boots and may be most likely on this site to actually wear boots that give 3.5", but even that's speculation. They could be 3" for all I know and whatever they were, the angle was intense. Far beyond anything Pitt has worn. Look at the angle of the 3.8" Don's elevator boots Rob wore. Both Sly and Burt wore bigger footwear than Pitt as well.

@Original: He looks near 4" taller, but we have no idea how tall she actually is. IMDB listings are not reliable whether as an accurate guess or even as an actor's official height. I believe they should implement a policy like Wikipedia where a reference is needed for any height. Otherwise, some heights add are just guesses by random anonymous users. A claim by her in an interview and/or her CV would be of some interest, but it'd still have to be confirmed by comparisons to others of ]relatively] known heights.
Original said on 29/Sep/17
@Lol Ok "lover", Brad is 5'8" while Rick and Gwyneth are 5'9", makes all sense and you're a tall guy as well.
Slim said on 29/Sep/17
Rob, do you think he's closer to 6' or 5'10"?
promise not to judge.
Editor Rob: I think at times he has pulled off looking comfortably over 5ft 11, but overall from all the years of this site, I feel the 5ft 11 mark is still believable.
hardguy said on 29/Sep/17
178 visibly shorter than adam levine imo
HonestSlovene said on 29/Sep/17
@Maren I could care less about his height, I'm against dishonesty from certain users here and claiming something without providing evidence...it goes far beyond height.

@Pierre TBH it doesn't matter how tall do you think he would get measured I think he must be at least 5'10". Although based on picture evidence he isn't outside of the 178-180 cm range. As always, I'm not 100% and I could very well be wrong on how tall he really is, but the evidence is quite overwhelming that he's not more or less.
Slim said on 29/Sep/17
Fincher, Norton and Pitt, uncertain of shoes or event, I think off set fight club. Norton may be barefoot.
Click Here
Pierre said on 29/Sep/17
@Original= Click Here =Now Brad more distant of the camera and the angle seem to be favorable for Gwyneth...
Original said on 29/Sep/17
@Maren lol I'm here at 10+ years, very old CelebHeights user.

@Pierre As you can clearly see Paltrow is taller than Corden. She is around 5'9 probably and Brad Pitt is taller than her. Probably around 5'10.
Lol said on 28/Sep/17
@Maren Brad pitt is a small guy and you're envious of him that is why you can't accept the fact and truth that gwyneth is just as tall as him barefoot or with normal shoes, pictures already shown in the comments. Just saying facts.
He sticks with elevator shoes, I do respect his choice to wear elevator shoes but to tell people he's 5'11 is a joke lol.
Lol said on 28/Sep/17
Just look at Pierre's photo links with gwyneth and Lol's photo links with gwyneth and aniston.
Brad pitt is 5'8.5 max.
But he does wear elevator shoes from 3.6 inches to 5 inches. He sticks with them on all events.

The pics of pierre and lol are consistent, barefoot or non elevator shoes.

Brad pitt is 5'8.5 max. Maybe 5'9.0 in his 30's.
Pierre said on 28/Sep/17
@Original=Gwyneth is maybe not very straight but James Corden too,in the video (i have posted another day and you can easily show in web) i don't see a difference between them.In your picture James head tilt a lot with his head so...The pictures Brad/Gwyneth you posted are showing Brad taller but not always a good angle and good postures,and curiously when the floor seem to be regular and they have about the same postures and better angle of the camera their shoulders are at the same height(like in the picture when both barefoot in around the same posture...) and in your pictures Brad's shoulders are very high.Hum,he's maybe a little on tiptoe here no?...In others pictures he has maybe the same type of shoes as next to Georges and Matt when Brad tower Georges and Matt both together,who knows...
Pierre said on 28/Sep/17
@ Hijopotamus =thanks
Pierre said on 28/Sep/17
When i read some very derisive comments in this site ,i think i will one of the first one to laugh the day when some celebrities will be measured barefoot with an height gauge :)
Pierre said on 28/Sep/17
@Original=lol
Maren said on 28/Sep/17
Guys, I'm amusing myself very much about your comments. Are you all so short boys, that you count on every centimeter/inch? Or why is it so important to you whether Brad Pitt is now 5.10 or 5.9 or even 5.11? It does not matter to you how big he really is - you will never even approach at him and I do not mean his height. ;-)
Lol said on 28/Sep/17
@pierre
Gwyneth and Brad are the same height which is 5'8.5 max.
I also posted a picture with them barefoot if you scroll down below.
On your picture gwyneth has slippers while brad has big shoes but not elevator ones.

As I said once a particular celebrity like Brad Pitt uses elevator shoes, they stick with it so he will rarely be seen barefoot or with normal shoes.

Brad is 5'8 and it's okay.
HonestSlovene said on 28/Sep/17
@Pierre He looks at least 5'10" next to her, Luke Wilson is 5'11" and Corden 5'8".
Original said on 27/Sep/17
Good angle from 5'8 Corden compared to Paltrow

Click Here

B-but she is 5'8ish....
Original said on 27/Sep/17
In fact I can see 2cm between Corden and Paltrow in fact.

Click Here
Original said on 27/Sep/17
Why not this pic, Pierre?

Click Here

Reality:

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Best pic Pierre both face to face he looks 2" taller than Gwyneth

Click Here

Both slouching probably the same (very honest pic) Pitt wearing 0.6" converse and Paltrow closer to the camera, I would bet if both had good posture in this pic Pitt would hardly looks less than 2" taller than her.

Click Here


Also Paltrow is 174/174,5 compared to 173 Corden, best posture of Paltrow is at start of the video and not in this pic, and Corden with his hair of course.

Compare:

Click Here

to

Click Here

small difference you know...
Hijopotamus said on 27/Sep/17
@HonestSlovene, I agree, it's getting tiring to check pics of Brad barefoot. Nothing like a good pic of Brad with who knows the exact measure of his heel plus the exact measure of the lift! This is way more interesting and easy so to guess his height, right?? (Sarcasm)

@Pierre, brilliant Job!! Even the biggest fanboys can understand and get it. Rising should learn from you. (no sarcasm)

Pitt 177cm
Pierre said on 27/Sep/17
@Willes188="this could be the worst camera angle in history for judging height""NORTON IS A SOLID 6"0 COULD BE 6.025 ".
Only claim he's 6"0' or 6"0.25' could be the worst argument in history to support his claims...
Pierre said on 27/Sep/17
Luke Wilson listed 5"11.25' next to Gwyneth listed 5"9' = Click Here Click Here
James Corden listed 5"8' next to Gwyneth = Click Here Click Here
Brad next to Gwyneth = Click Here Click Here
Slim said on 26/Sep/17
HonestSlovene, don't pay attention to the French guy , he's been trolling for quite a while now, according to g5'11".
Willes188 said on 26/Sep/17
That could be the worst camera angle in history for judging height Norton is a solid 6ft man could be 6ft 0.25
HonestSlovene said on 26/Sep/17
Looks at least a decent 178 cm if Schroder was 175 cm at that time. If he is more 176-177 cm, then Pitt is about 179-180 cm no question. "B-but the Paltrow pics!"...it's getting tiring now.
Original said on 25/Sep/17
Peak Brad was 177/177,5 at night imo, but back 1988 with Shalane McCall listed as 5'6.5" BP looked around 4" or 4.5" taller than her.

Click Here

Click Here

Shalane McCall Listed as 5'6.5"

Click Here

Click Here


in 1988 in The Dark side of the Sun he looks ~2.5"/3" taller imo than Cheryl Pollak listed as 5'8".

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here


Already considering that most people usually lie about their height in ~2 centimeters, I'd say Brad Pitt looked like a 177/8 guy compared to these actresses.
CDS said on 25/Sep/17
"Also, I don't think he wears 3.6" inches elevators, he couldn't even walk with this type of shoes."

@ Original: Sly & Burt have done so for years...
Animus said on 25/Sep/17
Brad Pitt is at least 5'10¾. This seems to me to be a fact. Does Brad Pitt, like many other celebrities, occasionally wear thick footwear to maximize his physical appearance? Of course he does. That is a far cry from being lift wearer, let alone a regular one. Pitt has good posture and a long torso, perhaps that of a 6'0-6'1 guy, which means in boots or otherwise thick footwear, he proportionally appears taller than 5'11 range.

In reality, seeing him beside Edward Norton, David Fincher, Ryan Gosling, Bruce Willis and many others, it's clear he's 5'10¾-5'11. A 5'11 listing for Brad Pitt is unadulteratedly a good listing.
Pierre said on 24/Sep/17
@Anonymous=read the old comments in Jennifer Aniston's page=some people who wrote they were standing next to her give her 5"3'.
Pierre said on 24/Sep/17
Pictures Original 23/Sep/17 Brad is certainly a little taller than Rick but not a lot imo.In the pictures 1 and 2,look at the floor before them and you will understand where is the camera = Brad seem to be always closer to the camera which give him very probably a little advantage.Rick has a good posture but not perfectly straight.In my memory Brad is the older brother in this movie and then must maybe look taller than Rick,which can explain the position of the camera sometimes,Rick lots of time slouching a little,and Rick's shoes type 0.6 inch converse sometimes.curiously Brad never wear Converse in this movie in my memory,but it's maybe the random...I don't know if Rick was taller in his 20 than in his 17.If the mugshot is good he was under 5"9' in his 17 imo,only his long hairs are as high as the 5"9' graduation
Tonyx said on 24/Sep/17
Click Here
LIFTS in Brad's boots.
Small feet.
Pierre said on 24/Sep/17
Comparisons Brad/Edward Norton=Edward Norton next to Tom Hiddleston listed 187 = Click Here =he never look 183 imo
Original said on 23/Sep/17
Brad Pitt with Rick Schroder measured as 5'9" at 17 years, same angle, same footwear, Brad Pitt is losing more height with his leg open:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

and many others...

In fact is hard to say that Pitt looked the same height of Rick in this film, both with good posture and face to face and Pitt always was the bigger guy in the history.
Rising - 174 cm said on 23/Sep/17
@Pierre: It says that video is not available. As for the mugshot, my point is that we have no way of knowing if it's a real or not. That is a made for TV film so it might be real, but then Schroder was 17 when he filmed it, but 20 when he filmed Across the Tracks. Some can still grow a bit after 17, especially if we're talking about fractions.

@Original: I don't know about Fincher, but Pitt pulled off similar to Norton there, but had boots: Click Here I believe Norton is about 182 cm, but slouches so Pitt can pull off near 182 cm there wearing what look like just 1.25" boots. As I've mentioned, Pitt also pulled off about 2" taller than Mel Gibson that night and I think Gibson is 5'9", but Gibson looked to have a 1 cm or so footwear advantage since he was wearing cowboy boots. So if we consider Gibson looking closer to 5'10" wearing cowboy boots then Pitt seems to pull off at least 5'11.5" that night.
Pierre said on 23/Sep/17
@Rising=i can doubt the mugshot in this movie is disadvantageous,in my memory the movie "Too young for hero" tell the story of a very young man who look older than his real age,so who is tall for his âge,and then can join the army.
HonestSlovene said on 23/Sep/17
Pitt is 5'10.5".
Original said on 23/Sep/17
One more question, how could Brad Pittb e only have 182cm (or even 184cm) with his highest sneakers (just assuming he is "5'8" with 3.6" boots) if he often, at his highest appearances, looks like a real 6-footer guy (if he was only 5'11.5" in his bigger shoes he could look much more like a 5'10.5" guy and not a 6'0), he has to be at least 6'1" in his red carpet shoes. An example is these photos with David Fincher (listed as 6'0.5" and some people here even think he's 6'1" actually) and Edward Norton (legit 6' barefoot) if Brad Pitt seems to be about the same height as Norton and is about the same height than Fincher? This is just one example of many others where Brad Pitt could pass as a legitimate 6'0 guy and is looking too tall to be less than 5'9". Also, I don't think he wears 3.6" inches elevators, he couldn't even walk with this type of shoes.

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here
Rising - 174 cm said on 22/Sep/17
Rick might be no more than 5'9", but I wouldn't even consider a movie mugshot unless it's a TV movie. Frank2 spoke about this. For theatrical releases or weekly television shows, they usually just use props, while for television movies - due to costs - they often actually film in real police stations. But either way, it's often impossible to know if a height chart used is real/accurate so it's not even close to proof. Pitt looked about an inch taller than Schroder throughout that film.
Anonymous said on 22/Sep/17
@Pierre Rick (5'9") needed to stay on tip-toes to reach the same height as Brad here, I can see that. 1' difference atleast.
24:30

Click Here

32:30-33:30 Pitt seems to be atleast 1' taller than Rick in the run again.

and then you again have this pic

Click Here

Pitt seems to be atleast 1" taller again here also bigger frame and he is also losing more height with his open legs, if Rick is 5'9 (with 17 years), BP can't be lower than that.

In fact in all the scenes BP is looking ~1.25" taller than Rick imho. I can give you more examples if you want. They never looked about the same height in fact.


@lol I think Jennifer Aniston is a legit 5'4.5" while Jolie is ~5'5.25".

You just talk about this pic and that BP is only 4' taller than Aniston:

Click Here

Why not this pic? That is much better...

Click Here

They imho look 5.5 inches apart in fact, not 4 inches.

I just can't see Pitt - with all the evidences - being less than 5'9.5" and I can see he being 5'9.5" to 5'10", I agree that he use lifts though and imo he could be measured as 6'1 in them, not only 5'11.6" in them. I have so much evidence that he can pass as legit 6' guy in them, a 5'8 'midget' guy would need 5' inch shoes to pass as 6' guy not only 3.6", so if you think BP is only 5'8 is better to you claim he uses 5' inches boots from now to ever.
Pierre said on 22/Sep/17
@Rising picture on 22/Sep/17(Click Here has a posture like he go to fall forward here and his head is tilting! this is not a good picture to show the differences of height imo! Here= Click Here Click Here = even if Georges slouch a little(hum! not a lot imo!he look straight!) his eyes are the same height as Brad's mouth!about 3 inches! i can understand the angle of the picture and posture is a little advantageous but i think there are others parameters to take in consideration here!
Pierre said on 22/Sep/17
@Tonyx pictures 19/Sept/17= Tonyx,look at all the shoes= Brad is on a bump of sand here
Pierre said on 22/Sep/17
@Rising = In your video the angle isn't very good and Brad seem to slouch lots of time, look at this video since around 0:50 = Click Here .(Lol My pictures are not more dodgy than some pictures you post...)
Rising - 174 cm said on 22/Sep/17
@Pierre: By low cut, I mean not a boot and as Rob said, doesn't conceal enough to fit a big lift. Those don't look like the same shoes either. I don't know what's the point of that dodgy low angle pic where we can't see feet. Seeing how much taller Matt Damon looks to the right of the pic should have made it abundantly clear that's not an accurate representation of how they looked. I posted video from that event before and Clooney was slouching more than usual that day, but Pitt seemed maybe an inch taller overall. Here's a different video that shows basically the same thing: Click Here The difference certainly isn't big in this pic either: Click Here I'm not even convinced Pitt had big shoes that day. Sure, it's possible those are custom 2" elevators, but they may just be 3 cm shoes as well.

On a completely different note, one thing that struck me as interesting was a newspaper in 1995 or 1996 -- I think the Atlanta Journal Constitution -- writing "Brad Pitt is 5-foot-10 in his bare feet." Unfortunately, it doesn't show up on Google anymore, but it made me wonder what their source was and I thought it was interesting Pitt's height was a topic of discussion so far back when others like Oprah were saying Pitt was 6' tall back then.
Lol said on 21/Sep/17
Click Here
Jennifer aniston 5'4 with tiny slippers.

 Click Here
Gwyneth 5'8 barefoot flat

Brad pitt is a small guy, he always wears elevator shoes 3.6 inches. He sticks with it to create an illusion he's 5'11 lol.
Dem custom made high heels.

I'm 5'11 and I know Brad Pitt is surely 5'8 because I have 5'8 and 5'4 friends.
5'8.5 is very generous.
I also know 5'8 guys who use elevator shoes.

Brad pitt is a small guy, robert downey is even smaller who also wears high heels.
Pierre said on 21/Sep/17
@Original =Click Here = Rick Schroder had sometimes flat shoes like 0.6 inch Converse in the movie and Brad seem to wear a little more advantagous shoes.In a mugshot in the movie "too young the hero" Rick is 5"9' at the peak of his hairs= Click Here
Johan said on 21/Sep/17
I don't understand the logic behind saying that Pitt is average height in the US. A guy who is average can't wear 1.5 inch footwear and look tall, he has to be 5'10.5" at least to accomplish that. Thats above average, maybe just a bit but still above.
Willes188 said on 21/Sep/17
Solid 5ft 11
Rising - 174 cm said on 21/Sep/17
@Hijopotamus: I don't have to explain that because I've never said Pitt is 2" taller. I can't bother with every dodgy photo Pierre posts, but that last one shows Paltrow closer to the camera and her eye level around the bottom of Pitt's nose. Btw, pavement is seldom level. And if Pitt has lifts there then he must have had his shins blown off like Cotton from King of the Hill. But I am surprised you know those books despite the high probability you Googled "long books." You forgot Atlas Shrugged. No explanation of the pics with Yeun & Giancarlo either.

@Original: I doubt Pitt hits 6'1"-6'1.5" -- that's Vin Diesel territory. Maybe he reaches about 6'0.5" in his big footwear. Tarantino's slouch makes him a terrible reference. 5'9" Kurt Russell looks nearly as tall as him here: Click Here
Lol said on 21/Sep/17
With jennifer aniston 5'4 wearing tiny slippers.
Click Here

With Gwyneth 5'8 barefoot flat.
 Click Here

Brad pitt is 5'8.5 max but he could possibly be 5'9.0 if he hangs on a monkey bar which he probably does because he has to.

He wears 3.6 inch heels all the time, or wears inserts.

Stop being ignorant and saying he's not 5'10 and he's not even a solid 5'9 but just under it.

5'8.5 is what it is, a lot of these classic celebs wear elevator shoes and they stick with it so you guys are fooled.
Lol said on 21/Sep/17
Check brad pitt barefoot picture on google images, scroll down and you'll see him barefoot with gwyneth who is 5'8

You can also look at brad pitt with jennifer aniston. He's wearing sneakers so no added height, he is 5'8.5 max.
He is only 5'11 with elevator shoes he always uses.
Pierre said on 20/Sep/17
@Original= Click Here =Another picture Quentin Tarentino/Cristoph Waltz/Jamie Foxx =Quentin in around the same posture like in the picture you posted look 5"11' max next to them
Pierre said on 20/Sep/17
@Original=Quentin Tarentino is in a poor posture imo in the picture you post.
In around the same posture Quentin is looking max a weak 5"11' next to Christoph Waltz listed 5"7'
Click Here.
Pierre said on 20/Sep/17
@Original 19/sep/2017=Imo the floor is not flat because in all the others pictures i posted their shoulders are the same height and the floor seem to be flat
KH said on 20/Sep/17
I think this is fair for Brad Pitt. That's why its sad he feels the need to wear big heels all the time. He should be comfortable being 5'11.
HonestSlovene said on 20/Sep/17
@Lol Very strongly doubt he would measure anything less than around 5'10.25" at most evidence suggest that he is a strong 5'10.5" or 179-180 cm range. With lifts he looks tall, like 184-185 cm range.
MisterManletMick said on 20/Sep/17
he is almost certainly somewhere between 175-181 cm tall, my mother thinks she saw him at one point when he was in Australia when he was promoting World War Z and I asked her how tall he was because the rumours always interested me and she says that he wasn't far off my height (obviously I wasn't standing side by side to compare) and according to a metal "hardware store" style tape I am 177.5 in the morning when my anterior pelvic tilt isn't bothering me.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.