How tall is George Clooney

George Clooney's Height

5ft 10 ¾ (179.7 cm)

American actor best known for playing Dr Doug Ross on E.R. In film, he has starred in Ocean's Eleven, Out of Sight, Up in the Air, Gravity, Syriana, The Perfect Storm, From Dusk Till Dawn, The Descendants and Three Kings. He has claimed to be 5ft 11 (and a half).

How tall is George Clooney
George and Sandra Bullock
Photo by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Brad Pitt
Brad Pitt
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Height of Matt Damon
Matt Damon
5ft 9 ¾ (177 cm)
Height of Leonardo DiCaprio
Leonardo DiCaprio
5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm)
Height of Tom Cruise
Tom Cruise
5ft 7 ¾ (172 cm)

Add a Comment1554 comments

Average Guess (248 Votes)
5ft 10.31in (178.6cm)
viper said on 23/Apr/19
5-10 is being nice.

Never taller than 5-9.5
Vibram said on 22/Apr/19
I think he is 5ft10.2 (178.3cm) with 5'11.3 (181.0cm) bruce willis in 2004. I doubt at 57 today he's more than 1/4 inch down from his peak. He's no less than 177.87867cm today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Apr/19
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Feb/19
5ft10½ now, 5ft11 today

Lol I meant 5ft11 peak
Ian555 said on 20/Apr/19
Rob I think Clooney did claim one time that he was 6 feet tall but said all the other guys on ER are 6’ 2”. Also, why do a lot of people think him claiming 5’ 11” is outrageous to them? If he’s only 5’ 10 3/4”, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to round up to 5’ 11”?
Editor Rob
His 5ft 11 claim is at times believable, it's not like he's 5ft 10 flat or anything (well, from what I've seen I'd never go that low!).
Totigno said on 20/Apr/19
he claimed 179cm in a interview magazine i read at the end 1990's early 2000's.
but i think he is under that.
Kimblemur said on 18/Apr/19
5’9 1/2
Johan 185 cm said on 18/Apr/19
5'10.5" peak

5'10" today.
mohammad said on 16/Apr/19
He cannot be under 5 foot 10 its against all the logics .
cmillzz said on 20/Mar/19
Not sure on his height tbh
billionaireslayer said on 20/Mar/19
Strong 5'9 peak maybe weak 5'10
Mickie said on 6/Mar/19
Interesting that he'd been guessed at 5'9.5" in person by at least one verified celebheights poster
Lara said on 5/Mar/19
1.80 m.
Vibram said on 4/Mar/19
178cm prime (90's), 177cm today.
viper said on 18/Feb/19
Waaaayyy better chance Brad Pitt is over 5-10 than George ever was.
viper said on 18/Feb/19
Maybe, maybe 5-10 peak. No way over that.
viper said on 18/Feb/19
He never looked close to 5-11 on ER.
viper said on 18/Feb/19
He looks 5-9.5 there, what I've always pegged him at
VelikiSrbin said on 18/Feb/19
Next to 5'8 listed Ice Cube looks 2.5 inches taller. Click Here

5'10.5 peak 5'10 today IMO
Bwk said on 16/Feb/19
Do you think 5'11" is possible for him Rob?
Editor Rob
There was a chance yes he could have measured it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Feb/19
5ft10½ now, 5ft11 today
Guest66 said on 9/Jan/19
I think it’s possible that he was 5’10.5 at his peak and is closer to 5’10 flat nowadays.
Pierre said on 22/Dec/18
Georges with 6"1' Barack in around the same posture= Click Here .No less than 3 inches between them imo.
Other pics= Click Here Click Here Click Here
Rising - 174 cm said on 24/Nov/18
Clooney didn't look any more than 179 cm in 1998 with 186 cm Evander Holyfield: Click Here Clooney's dress shoes might have been a fraction thicker too, though I would say he's taller with Holyfield than 5'10" flat Mike Tyson was regardless.

@Hijo: The Frye Campus boots he wore for Spy Game could be called huge heels by today's standards and maybe those Guidi boots, though the designer Chelsea boots and Oxfords he's worn to red carpets have a heel a bit bigger than average, but not what I'd call huge. You're right that he wears very expensive footwear, though. It's not unusual to see him in boots worth thousands. I have no idea what's inside them, though.
Hijoputamos said on 18/Nov/18
@rising, yeah you are right, Brad wears HUGE heels, lifts, elevator shoes (the ones everyone thinks are regular shoes BUT are NOT- that’s why they’re so expensive and can trick mostly everyone;)
Without shoes Pitt is a few mm taller than 5’9 Gwyneth Paltrow
Rising - 174 cm said on 13/Oct/18
@Pierre: Pitt does wear thicker boots and bigger heels than George for the most part. He also has better posture. This is why Brad can sometimes look noticeably taller even though they're at least close in height. I agree he probably started losing height not long after the Syriana injury. Perhaps 1/4" loss by age 50 and another 1/4" loss since.
Pierre said on 8/Oct/18
@Rising=Yes his shoes are looking a little bit advantageous with a discreet angle over his feet,i would guess he can gain around 2 inches with this.I think Brad's shoes are looking lots of time more advantageous than George's shoes.I have read Georges Clooney suffered a spinal injury during filming of Syriana in 2005 and i think he lost a little bit height since this year
Rising - 174 cm said on 5/Oct/18
@Aleko: I agree with you on both Clooney and Damon, though Pitt only claimed 5'11" himself so he definitely isn't 5'11.5". Pitt and Damon are both still at their peaks, imo. @Pierre: That's a reasonable guess for prime, imo and that would be my guess if he's not 5'10.5", though I don't know if he's shrunk THAT much yet. It was actually reported that George did wear elevator shoes when he was with Stacy Keibler and in 2015, an Australian elevator shoemaker also claimed George ordered them from him. Look at how much better his posture was: Click Here Click Here and he wore the same shoes at the Golden Globes with her: Click Here and look at his posture once again: Click Here His shoes look normal at both events: Click Here so it could just be that George only wanted to look taller with her by standing better or maybe his mother was reminding him not to slouch that year, but he did remark on her height and think about when else you've seen George stand like that. It's a big contrast to his usual slouch with her in 2012. I don't know if the lift reports are accurate or not, but maybe it's not a coincidence they were the exact time his posture was much better. George's style would only be the most discreet type, but if he does wear them occasionally then maybe he has shrunk more than I thought.
Aleko said on 2/Oct/18
Brad Pitt 5ft 11.5 peak
Clooney 5ft 10.5 peak
Damon 5ft 9.5 peak
Pierre said on 2/Oct/18
My guess around 5"10.25'in his prime around 5"9.25'now.Doesn't wear elevator shoes
Rising - 174 cm said on 22/Sep/18
The 2.25" footwear advantage Sharon Stone had is probably similar to 5'7" Sandra Bullock's footwear advantage above and George she winds up an inch max taller: Click Here That was 2013 and he definitely wouldn't have been taller than 5'10.5" Stacy Keibler by 2012: Click Here And some height loss was clear by 2017 with 5'8" Mark Wahlberg: Click Here Marky Mark has a camera advantage and 1.4" Timberlands while George probably had 1"-1.2" range shoes. So imo, George was 5'10.5" peak, probably 1/4" less by 2012-2013 and now 5'10" flat at 57. He's a better candidate for a peak/current height than Cruise and Gibson, imo.
Rising - 174 cm said on 19/Sep/18
@JamesG: There's no way he's that tall compared to the other listings on this site. 5'11.5" was his peak height in shoes. I can believe RP saw him similar height to himself as a half inch is not much and can be obscured by the most subtle differences in ground, footwear, posture, eye level etc. You can see Clooney was not taller than 5'8" Sharon Stone in heels in 2007. Her 2.25" footwear advantage would likely be the difference between the two barefoot and you can compare George to 5'11" men.

Clooney with 5'11" Bruce Willis in November 2006: Click Here Click Here Click Here
With 5'9.75" Matt Damon in socks and 5'11" Brad Pitt in slippers in 2004: Click Here Click Here Click Here

5'11" Ving Rhames was also taller than George in Out of Sight(1998) as you can see in the elevator scene: Click Here and many doubt Pitt is even 5'11" while I have some doubts about Rhames being a full 5'11" and wouldn't guess Damon over 5'9.5".
RP said on 7/Sep/18
JamesG,
I was in Learherheads with him. I was one of the Extra Football players. Was with him face to face, shoulder to shoulder for 5 weeks. He was 5’11” barefoot in Spring of 2007. Exact same height as myself. I’m sure 11 years later & now well into his 50’s, he’s down to at least least 5’10.75” with his neck issues. Maybe eve. 5’10.5” ?? His neck is all jacked up! Had an accident while filming Syrania...almost died! Fractured his neck/spine & was leaking spinal fluid!
JamesG said on 2/Sep/18
Guys, Clooney has plenty of barefoot pics out there and no way is he under 5’11”. I would guess his peak was just under 6 (strong 5’11”), and he’s currently 5’11.25”-5’11.5”. Rob?
Rising - 174 cm said on 16/Jul/18
@Rob: That makes sense, but I wouldn't think she was much more than 5'11.5" in them. The 3rd pic made me wonder if she was bending her knees more than I thought, but I guess you always have to wonder how well Clooney is standing too.
Rising - 174 cm said on 15/Jul/18
I was posting this on the Sharon Stone page so I figured it might be of interest here as well. Clooney and 5'8" Sharon Stone(in heels) back in 2007: Click Here The first 3 photos are from the Michael Clayton premiere the Dubai International Film Festival while the last one is from an Aids benefit in Cannes. Clooney was only 45-46 in these photos while Sharon was 49 so he should have been right around his peak, but he doesn't look taller than her overall. Sometimes she might have a camera advantage, but then she's bending her knees at other times.
Editor Rob
Her footwear advantage could be close to 2.5, at least 2.25 more footwear in any case.

Sandy Cowell said on 15/Jul/18
I agree that in the picture sent in by Rising 174, George Clooney definitely edges Mel Gibson out. A great pointer was made by CDS that Mel's footwear often consisted of cowboy boots at the time that picture was taken. Clooney is of above average height - anyone can see that, but he doesn't always stand bolt upright.

George gets 5ft10.75.
viper said on 13/Jul/18
This guy has some guardian angel by his side. To not even break a bone in that crash doesn't seem possible
Rising - 174 cm said on 13/Jul/18
@CDS: Yeah, Mel has often wore cowboy boots up to the present day, rarely if ever wears shoes that add less than 1.25" and appears to wear lifts at times. He certainly seems to have become conscious of his height, especially since I saw him tip-toeing for recent premiere photos. But I'd personally be surprised if Clooney measured under 5'10" except with loose posture so I think it's likely Mel was looking taller than his actual height that day. I believe Sigourney Weaver was spot on when she said Mel was 5'9" since height was a big factor when they worked together. Barry Norman also said 5'8"-5'9" and he went back to back with Mel. I see Kurt as more 5'9"-5'9.25" and that is the one film where I can understand the 5'8" guesses for Mel because the difference is at least an inch face to face in the hallway at the beginning, but Mel wore shoes like 1" Reeboks while Kurt's footwear had enough heel to give him a 1-2 cm advantage. That still suggests Kurt was taller, but less than it looked in the film. He looks about the same height as 5'9" Anthony Hopkins in The Bounty(1984) and they even have the same footwear for some scenes. Similarly, he wasn't more than an inch shorter than Michael Parkinson(about 5'10") and it's unlikely Mel had lifts that day. Mel also always seemed taller than 5'8" guys like Joaquin Phoenix and Gary Sinise.

I've never seen Clooney with Woody, but they both look shorter than Matthew McConaughey: Click Here Click Here Clooney was 51 there and I'd guess he was a bit shorter than his peak by that age. I think Clooney, McConaughey and Russell Crowe were also similar at their peak, but if there was a difference, I'd guess Clooney the shortest of the 3 and maybe McConaughey the tallest.
CDS said on 13/Jul/18
I would say Clooney is definitely taller than Mel Gibson, yes, and he is , per his usual posture, slouching in that video, and Mel was seen wearing cowboy boots often back in the 90s. All I'm saying is the fact they could look dead even at all is evidence certainly Clooney could go as low as a barefoot, end of day height of 5'9.5" or 5'9.75", which is woody harrelsons listed height too btw, and I've seen photos where the 2 looked very close as well , height wise. Plus, remember, many have said Mel Gibson is not even 5'9", but I've read as low as 5'8.5" in shoes in a movie magazine in the 90s. I refer to the 1988 film, tequila sunrise, where Mel looked noticeably shorter than 5'9.5" Kurt Russell...
Rising - 174 cm said on 12/Jul/18
@CDS: Clooney would almost certainly round to at least 5'10" if he were 5'9.5" or 5'9.75" so I just don't believe the license claim unless Kidd provides proof. Clooney's license would almost certainly say 5'11" since he's consistently claimed 5'11" or 5'11.5" since the 80's. I think that video with Mel is more evidence Clooney was never more than 5'10.5", but he is slouching noticeably for most of the video and Mel's footwear is unknown. Mel had normal shoes at the Lethal Weapon 4 premiere since he didn't look more than about 5'9" in cast photos, but Clooney is leaning and still looks taller at that event: Click Here Normally, I'd say a video was better evidence, but not without a clear shot of Mel's shoes. If you go back to Mel's famous appearance on Michael Parkinson's show when they compared height in 2002, Mel was shorter than Parkinson, but Clooney was on the show in 2003 and taller than Parkinson. Fwiw, there's also group photos with Mel and Clooney for a Haiti telethon in 2010: Click Here I'd say the chances the two would measure the same height barefoot are slim to none, but Mel can look 5'10"-5'11" with cowboy boots or lifts and Clooney could always look as short as 5'9.5" with a slouch, even 5'9" now judging by how he looked with Wahlberg last year so it's not surprising they could look close.
CDS said on 11/Jul/18
Watching that video someone posted below of Mel Gibson and Clooney, ok, wow, they looked dead even. Now that driver's license height of 5'9" may very well be spot on??
CDS said on 10/Jul/18
Per the comment below about Clooney s drivers license saying he was 5'9". 1st off, can you find a pic of this? And secondly, remember that with driver's licenses there is no half inch, so you're given the option to either round up or down, and maybe Clooney was either 5'9.5" or 5'9.75", and chose the more honest rounding down? This would make him very close to the in-shoes height of 5'11" he's claimed all these years AND would go an awful long way in explaining how Clooney has measured up shorter than so many over the years, including many legitimate 5'11"-ers.. Would explain an awful lot actually. And a 5'9.5" guy claiming 5'11" is as standard as it gets, since just like that famous Burt Reynolds 1970s interview, "no actor is 5'11"", legitimate 5'11" guys will claim 6 foot every time (or even 6'1" in some cases..)
Rising - 174 cm said on 17/Jun/18
I highly doubt his driver's license said 5'9", but I also doubt he was ever 5'11" barefoot except for in the morning. It seems probable he measured 5'11.5" in shoes in his prime.

For newer posters who haven't seen this, 45 year old Clooney was clearly shorter than 51 year old Bruce Willis: Click Here

Bruce himself was clearly shorter than 182 cm Timothy Olyphant a mere 10 months later: Click Here Click Here Also note 5'9" Justin Long, who is at a disadvantage wearing Converse and the same was true at other events: Click Here Click Here

I posted that one photo because it's a full one, but other photos from the same day show Willis taller than Clooney and unless Bruce lost height in those 10 months between the photo and the release of Live Free or Die Hard, he was only about 5'11" himself at the time. Otherwise, it's doubtful he'd look shorter than a man not even 6 feet himself in Olyphant and Bruce doesn't look more than maybe 6' in shoes if Long is 5'9.6" in Converse. Clooney doesn't measure up 2" taller than Long does compared to Bruce and it's not likely he would have lost anything worth mentioning by the time he was 45.

As for the photo above with Bullock, I struggle to see any more than an inch between them in that footwear. If she was around 179 cm in those heels, I'd guess him around 181 cm in shoes there. Posture is always a fair point with Clooney, but in another pic like this one: Click Here Bullock seems to be slouching a bit herself and still no more than an inch shorter. But I do think Clooney was probably a fraction shorter by that point and it shouldn't be that surprising for a 52 year old with a bad back. Nowadays at 57, I think he's a flat 5'10" or slightly more. Basically from 179 cm peak to 178 cm, which is pretty normal for a man in his mid 50's.
S. Kidd Marx said on 20/May/18
Clooney's driver's license says 5'9" - at least it did 15 years ago...
Nik said on 15/May/18
@ Sandy Cowell - Thanks for that!

I appreciate what you have said and I think the same, chatting with you on Rob's site is a pleasurable part of my life!

Keep listening to your music!

George Clooney is 5'10.75" - 5'11", I don't know whether to go with your or Rob!
sam1.78 said on 10/May/18
Rob, is it fair to say that he's 5 10.25 bald and 5 10.75 with the half inch thick hair he trademarks ?
Joel Martus said on 6/May/18
He 5’10, I meet him at sea world.
Micky said on 4/May/18
I see 5'10" tops, especially these days. Perhaps he was a small fraction decades ago but I don't see much loss for him honestly.
Sandy Cowell said on 4/May/18
Oooooh! Can you imagine writing a synopsis on George Clooney when you remember his part in 'From Dusk Till Dawn' and listening to David Bowie's 'Chant of the Ever Circling Skeletal Family'? (TOGETHER!)

I tell you height doesn't come into it! Headbanging does though - and then some!

Peopleoids listen now! (Quotation!), I am listening to 'Diamond Dogs', and I'm in a really Bowieque Mood! Hmmmm! Two heart throbs together! Tres Bien et Merci Beaucoup!

Minus the accents!

(Ignore that!)

Where are my friends Archie Stanton and MaryAnne? I miss you guys! (Very much indeed and Gladstone Screwer, I miss you too!)

Hey, Man! Rebel Rebel! I love you so! 😀 This is for my friend Nik, my very best friend.

As far as this sexy personage is concerned, he can have 5ft11, and I say that as my long blonde hair drapes around my arms and I am left in an island of mystery...

Next record PLEASE?
sam1.78 said on 3/May/18
Rob, does he look closer to 510 or 511, if bullock pictured above is 507, she's got on 4 inch heels. Making her 511, they're head to head, eye to eye. So he can't be 511 barefoot. Must be between 5 10 and 5 10.25
Editor Rob
I think it is possible he's lost a fraction of height compared to how he looked in the 90's...but it can also be his posture isn't as great as it used to be, which is why sometimes he seems just 5ft 10-10.25
OJ said on 3/May/18
Look we can agree Sandra bullock is 5 7. In the picture above she is the same height as him. She is wearing 4 inch heels ( making her 5 11 ) so how could he look 5 11 barefoot, he has shoes on ( my guess is 1 inch tall ) so he has to be 5 10 !?!
OJ said on 3/May/18
He's between 5 10.5 and 5 10.6 period. I know this because I met him once and we were eye to eye and I'm 5 10.55

Just wondering though if people consider hair as inclusion of height. For example Simone like Bernie sanders who claims 6 ft has 2 inch long strands of hair that somehow stay afloat. A more classic example is walton goggins who is 5 10 but claims 5 11 because of an inch thick worthy of spikes hair. When you measure these people do you include hair? Most celebs have anywhere from a half inch to 1 inch thick hair. Very few are bald like vin diesel or bruce Willis
abckk said on 30/Apr/18
clooney - 175cm
pitt - 177cm
Smiles03 said on 24/Apr/18
Peak 5'11 now 5'10
viper said on 20/Apr/18
5-9.5 max
Yht said on 18/Apr/18
He is 5'11
c-mo said on 8/Apr/18
night heights :

Matt Damon - 177cm

George Clooney - 179cm now and 179.5cm peak - has often loose posture too

Brad Pitt - 180cm who sometimes wears lifts and can look 6'1 with them
Jafars said on 19/Mar/18
Rob, would you say this is his absolute low? Does he spend most of his days in the 180 range?
Editor Rob
Clooney has likely lost a fraction but not like 3/4 inch or anything, maybe 1/4 or so is likely...he might be falling to 179cm range soon, but I think if you measure the man, he's still going to be not far off the 180cm mark.
berta said on 19/Feb/18
Rob maybe take away half inch today? barely 180 peak and barely 179 today. he may just have bad posture but somethin about him seems like he have lost 1 cm today
inspector said on 18/Feb/18
178cm. little bit taller than brad pitt(176~7cm).
Rising - 174 cm said on 8/Feb/18
Mel wasn't barefoot on Parkinson, he briefly took off his shoe while sitting and declared he had no lifts, but it's not like we could actually see if there were lifts. But I'd agree Mel is about 5'9", though he can look taller due to footwear, which may be the case there and Clooney has much worse posture there. With that said, I wouldn't guess George any taller than 5'10.5" Nicole Kidman from the Peacemaker. Was George shorter than David Zayas in Michael Clayton too? I can't remember for sure if there's a scene where we can clearly see their height compared to each other. I could see George having never been more than a strong 5'10", though, especially since Bruce Willis was clearly near an inch taller back around 2006 and Willis wasn't much, if anything over 5'11" by that point.
meezemaker said on 5/Feb/18
We can more and less be sûre about the Mel Gibson s height since he did barefoot the showtime in the famous Michael Parkinson s late show. Just watch these few minutes shot 20 years ago. M Gibson and Clooney barely same height.

Click Here

ROB, THERE IS NO MORE THAN ONE INCH BETWEEN THOSE BOTH.
Don Julio said on 18/Jan/18
Looks 178 max now, used to be a solid 179, not anymore
Anna MN said on 15/Jan/18
Hello rob!
I’ve seen this video of clooney next to rihanna in heels at the ellen degenres show.
Here is the link:
Click Here
I think he might have shrunk by now, as 5’8 rihanna looked quite a bit taller in my opinion...
What do you think rob??
Editor Rob
In the clip I didn't think she looked any taller than George, given that she was always closer to the camera. I'd have said both were very close there.
HonestSlovene said on 13/Jan/18
@Rob Ah, ok.

@Psychedelic 187 Yes, I'm perplexed to what lenghts some people go to validify their claims. :o
Psychedelic Earth 187 said on 11/Jan/18
@Honestslovene, remember guys like Willes and French guy were constantly making alt accounts to agree with their own claims?

This absolutely destroys it.
HonestSlovene said on 10/Jan/18
Peak 5'10.5"
Now 5'10"

PS: What's up with the email adress, Rob?
Editor Rob: your email is never shown, it's just a small change to help me hopefully manage comments quicker and get rid of people labelled anonymous.
5'10 lad said on 7/Jan/18
Time for a peak height now Rob?
Anonymous said on 29/Dec/17
5'10.25" peak at day
5'9.75" now
Clooney is height lyer, he was 1,5 cm shorter than Brad pitt who have 5'10.5 - 5'10.75" zone now
George always giving himself he's morning height.
Anonymous said on 28/Dec/17
This guy claiming to be 5'11-1/2 is down right laughable!!ya,mabey standing on a cinder block!I stood right beside him in New York signing autographs once.im 5'10 and was wearing 1/2" thick flip flops and he was wearing 2" heeled western style boots and we were standing eye to eye.that tells me he was around 5'8"-5'8-1/2"
Anonymous said on 24/Dec/17
5'9.5 is too low
Anonymous said on 22/Dec/17
He never have 5'11"
peak: 5'10.5
now : 5'9.5
Natalie said on 22/Dec/17
5'10.5
c-mo said on 21/Dec/17
Hijopotamus said on 19/Dec/17
@c-mo, how do you know what shoes was Matt Damon wearing? Lifts inside? Insoles? Who knows ...

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

first of all there are many photos where george clooney is together with matt damon and clooney looks a little taller than him in most pics . so the shoes matt wears seem to be always the same or similar at least

besides of that it doesnt matter if damon would wear lifts because even if he did (which I doubt) it would mean that he wears them often including on the pic where he stands with golovkin who himself looks around 177cm with tyson (who rob met ;) )

btw. there is also a photo of golovkin together with legit 178cm james toney (who rob also met ;) ) . the angle of the photo is not that good but it is still visible that golovkin is similar height to toney . I would say that golovkin is a legit 177cm guy or something around that . at the very least a strong 176cm guy (like myself)

so when we just take the fact that damon looks 177-178cm with golovkin but looks a little shorter than george clooney this means that george clooney is around 180cm with more of a chance of being 179cm than 181cm of course

my guess for clooney is that he is 179cm in the evening and maybe 180cm in the evening when he was younger

what I can absolutely say with a certainty from my analytic judgement is that 5'9 - 175.3cm that some claimed is IMPOSSIBLE . the very very very lowest he can be is 178cm in 2017
Hijopotamus said on 19/Dec/17
@c-mo, how do you know what shoes was Matt Damon wearing? Lifts inside? Insoles? Who knows ...
c-mo said on 19/Dec/17
@Anonymous

no we are not the same person . this is the only nick I post with . ask rob

you are just a bitter hater and try to downgrade the man thats all

he obviously is around 179-180cm

do this :

1. go to google
2. search for a pic of golovkin with 5'10 mike tyson who rob met . golovkin and tyson are similar . golovkin seems legit 177cm
3. then search for a pic of golovkin with matt damon . they are very similar height wise . matt damon seems 177-178cm
4. then look at photos of matt damon with george clooney . clooney is a little taller so 180cm


/ period
Anonymous said on 18/Dec/17
5'9" or 5'9.5"
LOL 5'11" is impossible
Anonymous said on 18/Dec/17
c-mo
MAD SAM
JustME
We know that you are all one person and a clooney fan and try to mark him higher but the truth is that George only has a strong 5'9 "or 5'10" Maximum. Period
JustME said on 16/Dec/17
I saw this guy at La Guardia airport. I'm legit 5'10. Some would even think I'm 5'11 but I'm really 5'10. This guy is an inch taller than me and we're both wearing the same foot wear. This was 5 years ago. This guy could really be 5' 10 1/2 or 5'11. I don't understand people downgrading them Who haven't seen him.
MAD SAM said on 15/Dec/17
He’s definitely 178 cm

Lol 5’9” is impossible
c-mo said on 13/Dec/17
lol at 5'9

why are you guys such haters ? downgrading him will not make your life any better
Anonymous said on 11/Dec/17
strong 5'9
Will said on 1/Dec/17
The man is 5’9
Anonymous said on 27/Nov/17
really 5'9.5 around, definitely not 5'10.5 and 5'11 claim is funny.
Kate said on 26/Nov/17
He has to be 5´11! He is! Rob,I actually saw him once when I was walking my dog.I passed right next to him and he was at least an inch taller than me. I´m 5´10.
Anonymous said on 22/Nov/17
Today not 5'10.25 but 5'9.5 or 5'9.75
5'10.25 he was in peak, never 5'11 (maybe only in the morning)
Rising - 174 cm said on 18/Nov/17
I don't see any chance he was the full 5'11". He'd most likely have claimed 6' then and really at times could always look 5'10.5" max, which is the most I could give him peak. It also adds up with 5'11.5" as a shoe height. Nowadays, 5'10"-5'10.25" max, imo.
Anonymous said on 13/Nov/17
Absolutely 1.77 cm
Bard said on 12/Nov/17
5'10 range at his peak, maybe this.
Bwk said on 10/Nov/17
Perfect listing for this guy. He's never looked 5'11" in my opinion, 5'10.5"-5'10.75" is definitely more reasonable.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Nov/17
Rob, is 5ft10 flat today possible?



I think he might've been 5ft11 in his prime.
Editor Rob: 5ft 10.25-10.5 might be arguable today.
joe### said on 4/Nov/17
jay leno is taller
Junior said on 4/Nov/17
@highlysuspect

Agree with you. I highly doubt 5'10 for Clooney not above and 5'10.75" out of bed.
Edimar1.84 said on 3/Nov/17
Sorry Rob, but today he is 5ft10 flat, no more. At Peak maybe he can be around 5ft10.5.
highlysuspect said on 3/Nov/17
Flat 5’10” at best. Never saw 5’11” barefoot in his life. He doesn’t have a full inch on Damon. More like .25-.5
Frost said on 28/Oct/17
@Anonymous tbh those pics showcase him being at least 5'10

His stance is looser in the first and third pic. He's easily 5'10.
Devon Larratt said on 26/Oct/17
5'8". Marky Mark is probably around 5'6" in reality. Damon looks about 5'8.5".
Anonymous said on 24/Oct/17
177 cm now
178,5 - 179cm peak height and 180,5 morning peak height
He never have a full 5'11" at day
Anonymous said on 23/Oct/17
Clooney is a little guy, probably not over 175 cm.

Look at him barefoot with Damon and Pitt:

Click Here

Sitting on the same chair as Damon, where his footwear doesn't come into play, it's obvious he's slight and considerably smaller:

Click Here

And again, with Damon, it's obvious he's a smaller, shorter guy:

Click Here

Last, look at the two-shots in his Nespresso ad with 5'11" Malkovich, where again he's sitting and it's obvious he's not only shorter, but much smaller:

Click Here
Anonymous said on 22/Oct/17
A strong 178 cm nowadays

Maybe 179 cm in peak

180 cm in the morning.
Slim 6' said on 21/Oct/17
Today he'll be nothing over 5'10".
Frost said on 18/Oct/17
@Rising

Thought I saw him at 5'11...
Rising - 174 cm said on 15/Oct/17
@Frost: He hasn't been downgraded in fact, he use to be listed 5'10.5".

As for the subject of height loss
With 5'8" Mark Wahlberg in 2000: Click Here
With 5'8" Mark Wahlberg this year: Click Here

George really did look at least 2" taller in every photo of the two around 1999-2000, but even considering Marky Mark's Timberlands probably give him a fraction advantage in the recent photo and it's not a full photo, it's difficult for me to believe at least 1 cm height loss wasn't a factor in such a dramatic change.
Anonymous said on 15/Oct/17
177cm, Period.
Slothee said on 14/Oct/17
5'10.5". He looks half an inch shorter than Brad Pitt, who may in fact be a slight fraction under 5'11".
Frost said on 12/Oct/17
5'10.5-5'10.75

He's certainly over 5'11 when he wakes up. Perfection listing and smart downgrade
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Oct/17
Even back in 2005, a 44 year old Clooney only looked about an inch taller than 5'9" Grant Heslov: Click Here
More recently 2015 and I'm only seeing a 1-2 cm difference: Click Here

Then we've seen the two more than enough in between.

Not much difference here around 2011 either: Click Here
Didn't look much taller than Heslov at various 2012 events either: Click Here
Looks 1" max taller than Heslov in 2013: Click Here
Videos: Click Here Click Here

Also looked an inch or less taller than Heslov at 2013 Oscars: Click Here Clooney honestly doesn't even look that much taller than 5'8" Jack Nicholson if you look at the 3rd pic.

Either Heslov needs an upgrade or Clooney needs a downgrade and peak height. A 44-45 year old Clooney wasn't much closer in height to a 5'11" Bruce Willis than he was to a 5'9" Heslov. Pretty much in between the two. I think 177 cm is a bit harsh even nowadays, but I don't see how he could even still be 179 cm, which is also the most I think he could have been peak. I'd give him a range of 5'10.25"-5'10.5" peak and 5'10"-5'10.25" current. more likely 5'10.5" peak and more likely 5'10" current, imo.
handsome guy said on 10/Oct/17
175cm
Richardspain said on 6/Oct/17
178-179 cm nowadays

180 cm when he was young
mitt said on 26/Sep/17
Btw, sorry for my first comment I messed up the link. Delete it and this one as well, ty.
mitt said on 26/Sep/17
Click Here

Jonah Hill is 5'6", Channing Tathum is around 6'1", Explain how Clooney is 5"10"?
Slim said on 19/Sep/17
Or maybe even 179range(5'10.5"-5'10.75")
And 177 range (5'9.75"-5'10") today
Ted said on 18/Sep/17
5' 11'' is believable.
Rising - 174 cm said on 12/Sep/17
I honestly see more 5'10.25"-5'10.5" range in his prime than 10.5"-10.75". 179 cm is fine and probably spot on in his prime, but I can't see Clooney ever closer to 5'11" than 5'10". If he had been then a 45 year old George probably would have looked indistinguishable from a 5'11" Bruce Willis. Instead, he looked at least an inch shorter in the full pic and visibly shorter in all the pics. But 5'10" and 5'10.25" are both possible today depending on just how much he can stretch up for a measurement, imho. Maybe he was still 5'10.25" when the pic above was taken and is now down to a flat 5'10", but either way, I'd bet more on the flat 5'10". Pitt on the other hand, I see as more of a 5'11" guy than 5'10" or maybe 5'10.75". I'm convinced George has always been somewhere between 5'10" and 5'10.5" and measured 5'11.5" in shoes in his prime.
Edimar1.84 said on 12/Sep/17
On the Picture he is looks like 5ft10.
Slim said on 11/Sep/17
Rob, you know he's only 5'10.25" today,
But in youth 5'10.5"-5'10.75" is alright.
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Sep/17
Ving Rhames is nowhere near 6 feet without shoes. He's lucky if he's even 5'11". I doubt Bullock's heels add 10 cm, but I could be wrong on that. I assume they give about 8, but then she doesn't look more than inch shorter than Clooney. So actually Bullock does look 5'7" and 5'10ish in heels if George is about 5'11" in shoes and solid 5'10" without.

I do agree with Rob he's still at least 5'10" standing straight for a measurement, but I still don't see him anything above 5'10.5" peak. He's probably lost about 1 cm going from 179 to 178, maybe even finally the half inch seeing him with Marky Mark this year. Actually, he's 56 now so with the back injury, it's not even that big of a loss.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Sep/17
Rob, do you still think he measures over 5ft10 today?
Editor Rob: at least 5ft 10, though he may be reaching the point of half inch lost soon.
Fred said on 6/Sep/17
Sondes Bullock's here with more than 10cm heels , she can't be 5'7 as Clooney's 5'10. She's 5'6 the most.
cobra said on 4/Sep/17
Also shorter than Bruce Willis here: Click Here
cobra said on 4/Sep/17
He looks a couple of inches shorter than 6 foot Ving Rhames in Out of Sight. There's a scene at night on a highway where they are standing next to each other.
Slothee said on 4/Sep/17
Bang on 5'10.5"
Original said on 3/Sep/17
5'10.
Height Professor said on 2/Sep/17
5'10-5'10.5.. probably he doesn't know that you can shrunk when you get older
hardguy said on 2/Sep/17
peak 5'11
Rising - 174 cm said on 29/Aug/17
I agree, highlysuspect. After seeing him with Willis -- who was probably a flat 5'11" himself by that point based on Live Free or Die Hard -- there's a chance George was never quite 5'10.5", but he at least never looked like a guy who would be over it, imo. George is shorter than Ving Rhames in the elevator at 53 seconds in this clip from Out of Sight: Click Here He really doesn't look that much taller with Rhames than Adam Sandler did. I think Rhames is about 5'10.5" himself, but he could be 5'10.75"/weak 5'11".
highlysuspect said on 28/Aug/17
This guy never saw 5'11 in his life. Looked near 3 cm shorter than Willis and appears to have bigger shoes than Willis , is 6 years younger, and has hair. Peak 5'10.5", now nothing over flat 5'10
James B said on 22/Aug/17
Slim 182 cm said on 17/Aug/17
James b, pics or it didn't happen.

Glad the average guess has risen! Almost to 179.



Oops I was meant to post that on the Ben afflick page
Slim183 said on 22/Aug/17
Mesomorphic build helped him look taller tbh, in up in the air he easily looked the 5'11" range.
Slim 182 cm said on 17/Aug/17
James b, pics or it didn't happen.

Glad the average guess has risen! Almost to 179.
Brad said on 16/Aug/17
Same as Pitt, 5' 10"
James B said on 16/Aug/17
Even from a a distance looking down from a bridge in London I could tell he was a big tall guy
Slim183 said on 15/Aug/17
Brad:5'10.75"
Clooney 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" now.
Rising - 174 cm said on 14/Aug/17
I can't see much chance of anything over 5'10.5", especially now. In addition to that full pic, there's a series of pics with Willis that day and Willis is taller in all of them. 177 cm peak is too low, but I do believe he could look it with bad posture. I see a better chance of Pitt being near 180 cm than George.
Slim 182 cm said on 13/Aug/17
Ok, he was 5'10.5 and measured on an inch worth of shoes, not a mystery at all. But those 177 guesses are quite harsh...
But I do think there's a small chance of 5,10.75 in the early evening...
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Aug/17
Clooney at 45 looked more than just a 1/4" shorter than a 51 year old Bruce Willis in this full pic I'm seeing for the first time: Click Here Now if you look at Willis during Live Free or Die Hard around that same time, he really looked a flat 5'11" and at times, even a weak 5'11", but even if he was still the 181 cm he could look a few years earlier, Clooney would be struggling with 179 himself in that pic. Footwear and posture look pretty comparable, at least within a fraction so 5'10.5" is still the most I could buy for George in his prime.
Tyson said on 11/Aug/17
Clearly shorter than 180 cm and shorter than under 180 cm Brad Pitt
all haters said on 11/Aug/17
177cm
Rising - 174 cm said on 10/Aug/17
I'd say he'd lost at least 1 cm by about 50, which is actually not uncommon, particularly with his back. 179 peak, imo and 178 current. I agree he hit about 181 cm out of bed at his peak. George did supposedly wear lifts when he was with Stacy Keibler around 2012-2013 and I think he was already closer to 178 by that time as you can see him looking about 5'11" in shoes with Bullock above, but I don't know if he's worn them before or since. If he did, I'd bet it was for some scenes with Nicole Kidman in the Peacemaker. Even the elevators he was said to wear may have been just for red carpets when Stacy had heels. I do think the story is believable, though, especially with the video I posted of George repeatedly remarking on Stacy's height and the photos of George forcing his posture like I've never seen him do before. He probably doesn't care that Amal is a bit taller in heels, but when you had Stacy sometimes looking 3 inches taller in heels, that probably got to him a bit more.
Slim 182 cm said on 10/Aug/17
Lmao, he hasn't lost an inch... he just broke his back, and he's in his mid 50's... I do think 181 out of bed peak is entirely possible, I wouldent compare him to brad as that guy lives in his lifts... maybe Tarantino in that dusk till dawn film, or three kings to mark and ice cube.
adam said on 8/Aug/17
5'9.75 or 177 cm is nearer nowdays.
Tom said on 7/Aug/17
I still think that Gyllenhaal can edge him out by 0.5-0.75
Rising - 174 cm said on 31/Jul/17
@Slim: George is not wearing elevator shoes above with Bullock. Outside of there being no visible signs, the fact that he only looks about 5'11" in shoes if she's 5'10" in heels makes it obvious he's not wearing elevators. However, I had read some time back that George wore lifts at times with Stacy Keibler. In particular, it was said by Star Magazine George got inserts for his Gucci shoes. While searching for it, I actually found a celebrity shoemaker who names George as a client who ordered elevators! Click Here

But he clearly wasn't wearing them here since he looks a good 3" shorter than her in heels: Click Here Nor here as he looks more 179-180 cm in shoes than barefoot: Click Here

The following year, we do see George with posture I really can't remember seeing from him: Click Here I'm not saying the posture is a result of lifts, but it may suggest he was more conscious of his height with Keibler. Either that, or he got tired of his mother reminding him not to slouch! We see him holding better posture once again at those same Academy Awards in 2013: Click Here You can see on this video, Stacy in heels is still easily a couple of inches taller at the very least: Click Here Now at the Oscars the previous year, George mentions Stacy's height several times: Click Here

Who knows how much of what you read is true. It may be that a combination of losing a bit of height, posture worsening and a tall girlfriend who wore big heels to red carpets did make him more conscious of his height than he'd been before or even since because Amal can look taller than him when she wears heels, but she's at least 2" shorter than Stacy, maybe more, so George won't look nearly as short as he does with Stacy. Or, Donald Trump's short comment could have gotten under his skin more than he'd care to admit!
Rising - 174 cm said on 29/Jul/17
I might give Clooney bang on 181 cm out of bed at his peak, but no more, imo as the most I could see for his low at peak is 179 cm, but I wouldn't be surprised if he dipped a bit below it. 5'11.5" was clearly a shoe height, imo since Clooney does not seem the type to measured right out of bed and even then, it seems a bit high. Nowadays, he might be 180 out of bed and it's possible with his back and posture, he's a guy who loses an inch these days. While I'm sure it will bring a smile to Mr. R's face as he insisted Clooney was even shorter than 177 a dozen years ago, I do think 177 is a bit harsh, even today.

But he can undoubtedly look that short. I was shocked to see him with 5'8" Marky Mark at Cinemacon this year. For those that haven't seen the pics, here they are: Click Here Click Here I know they're not full pics, so it's not proof, but it's shocking to see Clooney struggling with 5'9". Back during The Perfect Stporm and Three Kings, Clooney consistently looked a 5'10.5" guy with Wahlberg. Mark was wearing Timberlands, but any suggestions he put lifts in them are erroneous since he was still much shorter than 182 cm Peter Berg: Click Here Further proof is Wahlberg was only slightly taller than 79 year old Anthony Hopkins that day with those Timberlands and better posture. Clooney's shoes are pretty thick as well - perhaps only 1/4" less than Wahlberg's Timberlands.

Certainly, Clooney looks a mile from 5'11" with Wahlberg.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jul/17
181.3cm out of bed
Slim 182 cm said on 24/Jul/17
Wears boots like brad and Johnny. I'd argue as low as 177 today. In the photo above, look how abnormally placed his right leg is.
even said on 20/Jul/17
his real height = 5'10.5"
Rising - 174 cm said on 20/Jul/17
I wouldn't say George seems that short there, but I do think he only looks about 5'11" in shoes next to Bullock if she's 5'10" or a bit over in heels.

Btw, here's George and Tom Cruise 20 years ago: Click Here

George looks about 3 cm taller, but Cruise has noticeably better posture and while I can't see shoes clear enough there, I'd be surprised if Tom didn't have more footwear, but I don't quite see George a weak 5'11" even back then.

I highly doubt Pitt has lost anything. He looked shorter in the late 80s/early 90s than he does now. But I'll guess rounded to the nearest 0.5 cm:

Clooney: 179 peak, 178 current
Damon: 176.5
Pitt: 179
DiCaprio: 180.5
Stallone: 175 peak, 174 current
Arnold: 187 peak, 181.5 current
Ford: 183.5 peak, 179.5 current

Some can change depending on what I think that day. DiCaprio could be 180 or 181, I'm not so sure and other days, I think Stallone was 174.5 peak and 173.5 current.
Richardspain said on 18/Jul/17
In that picture he seems 176/177 cm Next to Sandra.

My last guess

Clooney 177 and peak 179
Damon 176
Pitt 179 peak 180
Dicaprio 180
Stallone 174 peak 176
Arnold 181 peak 185
H.Ford 180 peak 184
Slim 181 cm said on 15/Jul/17
179 cm, before spinal cord injury
178 cm, after spinal cord injury
Think carefully, on Nortons page, rob said norton has most likely lost mms of his height after the injury, and I do believe Clooney has as well.
highlysuspect said on 13/Jul/17
This guy is lucky to be 5'10" let alone near 5'11"
Slim 181 cm said on 13/Jul/17
TBH, there is nothing impressive about Clooney, Pitt and DiCaprio's heights.
RisingForce said on 12/Jul/17
A few more comparisons from Cinemacon 2017

With 6'2.5" Rock: Click Here Click Here

In this case, George doesn't have worse posture, Rock may even slouch more than him! In the first pic, George is a bit closer to the camera and then looking up in the 2nd one while Rock is looking down and George winds up just a bit above his eye so a 4.5" difference wouldn't surprise me.

Rock's shoes look like they may be flatter than Clooney's: Click Here Clooney had decent shoes at the event: Click Here Click Here Click Here

George could look shorter than Damon with bad posture: Click Here Though I think this one shows George will still be taller standing straight: Click Here

I wish we had better pics from this event, but George's height is all over the place. He mostly looks somewhere from 5'9" to 5'10" at this event, but he can go from struggling with 5'9", but then still look as tall as 5'10.5" at this very same event!
Hijopotamus said on 12/Jul/17
RichardSpain, Sly in that movie is wearing massive lifts and thick soles that are not even funny.
Guys, Letterman asked Mathew McConaughey how tall he was and Mathew replied 5'11 and 3/4 and that he never reached the 6 foot mark and people started laughing as Letterman was saying 5'10"...and Matthew did not say a word....
So that may shed some light on the matter.
Slim 181 cm said on 12/Jul/17
RichardSpain. Okay, I'd now peg sly at 175.5 cm(5ft9) as for schwarznegger, 186(strong 6ft1), both badass actors with oversized muscles! 💪🏻In all truth and honesty they do have the proportions of a taller man!
As for tom cruise I think he's 5ft6-5ft8, and for brad pitt, I'm convinced the man was 5ft11.25 but he's shrunk due to hard drug use(possible health problems) and ageing
So, yeah I do believe downgrading brad to 179 was just the bandwagon effect, all lies starting from 1 person, now everyone believes brad is shorter than he actually is.
RichardSpain said on 11/Jul/17
@slim 181 cm:

I think he was a solid 176 not more.
I don't know if he was 176 in the morning or in the afternoon is only my guess to him.

Nowadays he is under 174cm. The problem he wears lifts and sometimes tall hair in his movies.

Here next to Arnold. As you see Sly has good look younger.

Click Here
RisingForce said on 8/Jul/17
I think Sly at 177 cm morning is possible, but he could have topped out at 176.5 out of bed. I do think he was about the same height as a number of people listed at 5'9.25"-5'9.5" here, but more because I think those celebs are also 5'9" tops.

Arnold I'd give 187 peak and 181.5 cm now. Cruise is 171.5 cm, imo, I'd give DiCaprio somehwere in the 180-181 range. Basically 5'11"-5'11.25". And I'd give Sly 174.5 or 175 cm peak and 173.5 or 174 now. Slim, you've only seen 1 Sly Stallone film?! That surprises me. I know not everyone is as big of a Stallone fan as me, but considering at the least the Rocky and Rambo films are so iconic, it's very surprising you've never seen one, even on TV.

Back to Clooney, here's a clip with 5'2" Roseanne: Click Here Difficult to say due to posture, but I don't see an 8.5" difference. It's possible they had Roseanne on a box though for aesthetic purposes. Now if Laurie Metcalf really is 5'5.5" then I'd say George would be about 5" taller standing straight: Click Here I wouldn't have thought she'd be quite that tall, though. The best comparison from that show would be George and John Goodman.
Slim 181 cm said on 8/Jul/17
RisingForce, Great minds think alike. Agree with your brad, Depp and Clooney estimates.,Damon too, And close to Garcias.

Richard Spain, Bro, Are you sure Stallone is 177 in the mornings? I've only seen 1 of his films(escape plan, yes i know he shrunk.) but that doesn't appear closest to the truth, id say 5'8.5, 5'8.75 or 5' 9
Richardspain said on 7/Jul/17
Clooney 178
Pitt 179
Damon 177
Cruise 171
DiCaprio 180
Arnold: 185 peak 181 now
Stallone: 176 peak 173now
RisingForce said on 7/Jul/17
We're starting to agree too much, Slim! Definitely 5'10.5" peak, imo and while I'd guess 5'10" flat now, I had thought 5'10.25" until I saw George at this year's CinemaCon and it's still possible he's 5'10.25" and his posture has simply gotten even worse making him shorter. Clooney, McConaughey and Russell Crowe are all very similar in height, I'd give them all 5'10.5" peak, but McConaughey has the best chance of 5'10.75", imo with Clooney the least likely to have reached that.

Here's George in 1985 on the Merv Griffin show: Click Here It's a shame the greeting was partially blocked out, but Griffin's height isn't really known anyway. All I could find was a 5'9" for him. Of interest is George was claiming 5'11" back then as well, as you can hear around 2:20.

Jim, Tom never claimed a 3/4". Tom claimed an even 5'9". 5'7 3/4" is Rob's estimate of Tom's height.
Slim 182 cm said on 6/Jul/17
5'10.5 peak
5'10.25 now.
even said on 5/Jul/17
five ten and a half
Jim arnold said on 4/Jul/17
Tom cruise just has to put that 3/4 in there. I always just say an even number like 6'2" not 6'2ans 7/8 or some **** like that. So he must be shorter than that
RisingForce said on 2/Jul/17
It's been years since I've seen it, but I think they made George slightly taller than Nicole Kidman during some scenes in The Peacemaker so that'd be pulling off 5'11" at times that film without considering footwear since she didn't wear heels. I can't think of him ever pulling off 6 feet, though.

He really does look more 180 in shoes to me in recent years rather than barefoot. Like here with Amal last year: Click Here
Hijopotamus said on 1/Jul/17
178 for George
177 for Brad Pitt.
Posture and lifts make Brad look taller tho'
...but height should be about being barefoot, right?
Slim 181 cm said on 26/Jun/17
Georges before he broke his back in Syriana: 5'10.75, after injury 5'10.5, now by age 58 he'll be a flat 5' 10, it's still a pretty decent height.
184guy said on 25/Jun/17
@Rob , How much those sneaks gives ?
Click Here
I have one idêntical
Editor Rob: I think between 2-2.8cm range for George shoes and 1.5-2cm range for Chris.
Slim 181 cm said on 25/Jun/17
Rob, George broke his back while filming "Syriana", perhaps he lost a 1/4 of an inch from that injury?
Editor Rob: Clooney is probably a candidate for a 1/4 inch loss, although has he lost half inch yet? Maybe not quite, but he could be near it in a few years.
Slim 181 cm said on 24/Jun/17
Descent 179 fella but he's on the road to falling to 178 id say give it two more years till he shrinks.
Slim 181 cm said on 23/Jun/17
@RichardSpain- ok... still believe Pitts height is unknown as you can see he's a subtle lift wearer probably 179 but mimicking 182 with lifts and covering his heels with long pants. The reason he gave away his lift wearing is because his kneecap was abnormally high at the Troy premiere. And his waist was at the same height as taller bigger chested Eric bana. Yes the stadiometre is an amazing system! As for guys inflating their heights... it's unnecessary!
RichardSpain said on 22/Jun/17
@Slim , the stadiometre gives the real height sure if you use stadiometre barefoot. Good system

@HonestSlovene: maybe as you said about our friend Clooney. 179cm in peak and 178 cm today is very possible. but if Clooney is 178cm we must give to Pitt 179 cm or max 180 cm not more. the problem Pitt uses elevator shoes is very difficult know his real height. But I think Pitt is a strong 180cm not less

Regards!
Slim 181 cm said on 22/Jun/17
I think if he got measured on a stadiometre he'd fall in the 179 range probably .4 or .5
HonestSlovene said on 14/Jun/17
@RichardSpain I agree however I still think 179 cm is slightly taller than average in the west (average is 177 to 178 cm), but Clooney is 178 cm (was 179 cm peak though) and 1 cm shorter than Pitt both look decent height without any lifts and younger generations aren't even that much taller than the overall average, maybe 1-2 cm.
Sammy Derrick said on 13/Jun/17
Let it be known,I'm a massive BATMAN fanboy,however if you watch this video,Click Here George Clooney wasn't imposing enough to play the character...180cm/5'10.75 is a pretty decent height though...
James B said on 8/Jun/17
Rob I thought in some of his old movies he could pass for 6ft
Editor Rob: not sure about 6ft, but he could seem a 5ft 11 range guy.
Slim 181 cm said on 7/Jun/17
Looks 179 next to 186 Paul adelstein

Click Here
Morningheight 181.5cm said on 4/Jun/17
Rob would there be a considerable difference in height if I stand next to Mr.Clooney ?
Editor Rob: no, you would probably seem quite similar, unless Clooney dropped an inch.
Hijopotamus said on 3/Jun/17
George 178
Pitt 177

Pitt wears lifts 24/7
Pierre said on 2/Jun/17
Click Here ...
Nb said on 1/Jun/17
Rob, what would you say is a 5'10.75 guy's general low in the evening? would you say some of the real 5'11'ers here listed ever fall a fraction under (~7/8)? Thanks
Editor Rob: 1/8th isn't much, I think if you only drop under by that amount, you can still be a decent enough 5ft 11 guy, when you get 1/4 or 1/3rd, maybe that's what we can say is 'weak' 5ft 11 range.
RichardSpain said on 29/May/17
Between Pitt and Clooney I see only 1 cm of difference max 2 cm. The problem is Pitt likes wear lifts or elevator shoes and Clooney no.

Is possible that Clooney was 180cm when he was young but I dont believe it. To me he always moves range 178-179cm barefoot. And Pitt is a solid 180 cm max 181cm not more.

Recently I watched movie "Up on the air" . You can see him away from people in passenger control because nowadays a person 179cm is not tall. I think the producers care the casting around clooney because today many people is taller than clooney.

My vote,

Clooney 179 cm
Pitt 180 cm Max 181cm

Barefoot of course!
RisingForce said on 26/May/17
That's true, George was definitely taller that day, but it's possible George's chunkier shoes were 3 cm, while Brad's could have been 2 cm or at least 1" giving George a slight advantage. But if you look at George with Grant Heslov from 2006-2009 and then more recently, it's obvious he's losing height. Here, George standing better with boots can pass for 5'11" with 5'9" heslov and 176-177 cm Kevin Spacey: Click Here But here at the 2015 Toronto Film Festival, George struggles with 5'10" looking barely taller: Click Here In photos like this one from 2012, they can even look almost the same height: Click Here I was shocked seeing George look almost the same height as Wahlberg this year. Regardless of Wahlberg wearing his Timberlands and standing better, it'd be almost inconceivable a decade ago that those two would ever look even close.
Pierre said on 25/May/17
(and i think Brad had a little advantage of shoes this time but a little advantage)
Pierre said on 25/May/17
Georges Clooney was taller than Brad when around the same shoes at 2008 venise event,in lot's of angle of camera
RisingForce said on 14/May/17
I agree George was never 180 cm, even at peak, but Pitt usually had at least a 1 cm footwear advantage and a 1 cm posture advantage, sometimes more and Pitt tends to position himself closer to the camera. I think they were just about the same height in their prime, maybe Pitt was 1/4" taller, but now, I bet Pitt is 1 cm taller barefoot.
Jani said on 11/May/17
I would say that George is slightly under 180cm. Most of the time Brad Pitt seems to be a bit taller than Clooney (about 2-3cm taller).
RisingForce said on 8/May/17
Actually, Clooney may very well be down a half inch to 5'10" flat in 2017! Clooney can look barely taller than 5'8" Mark Wahlberg! Click Here It's true Clooney will drop more height than Wahlberg standing and Wahlberg was wearing his Timberlands, but even in them, Wahlberg looks way shorter than 5'11.5" Peter Berg: Click Here Marky Mark in Timberlands still looked similar to a 79 year old Anthony Hopkins that night as well, so just as you'd expect, the boots made Wahlberg no more than the equivalent of 5'8.5". Speaking of Hopkins, even considering posture, Clooney wasn't looking too much over 5'9" with Hopkins either: Click Here Compare this to back during The Perfect Storm where Clooney consistently looked no less than a solid 5'10.5" next to Wahlberg: Click Here Click Here It's not like Clooney's posture was good back then either, but George is now at a stage where he can apparently look about 5'9" with bad posture. I'll have to see more because they aren't full pics at Cinemacon, but I definitely think Clooney at 55 going on 56 is now 178 cm range, whether 5'10" flat or 5'10.25", down from 179 cm peak.
RisingForce said on 4/May/17
Seeing him with Keibler and Bullock, I think Clooney is now 5'10.25" down from 5'10.5" peak. Clooney actually was consistently taller than Pitt at the 2008 Venice Film Festival for Burn After Reading, but usually he does look noticeably shorter, but posture is usually at least 1 cm difference between them, same with footwear even assuming Pitt doesn't have lifts and then Pitt often positions himself closer to the camera.
berta said on 4/May/17
rob maybe a downgrade for cloney to atleast 179? bradd pitt is 2-3 cm taller in every photo and matt damon looks almost the same height
Editor Rob: I was waiting to see if he had lost 1/3 or 3/4 inch, I think he's lost a fraction but as much as that?
Richardspain said on 23/Apr/17
I agree with some people here. Clooney is 180cm WITH shoes or boots.
Jug said on 22/Apr/17
A strong 5'10 I would say
RisingForce said on 21/Apr/17
If Sandra Bullock is 5'10" or a bit over in those heels then Clooney looks roughly 5'11" in shoes. I bet Clooney's 5'11.5" claim was his height in shoes.
MissA said on 19/Apr/17
I have seen both Clooney and Sandra in real. Sandra is a tiny bit shorter than me and I am 5 feet 7 or 1,70m. Clooney was on my eye level when I wore medium height high heels. I'd say he is no taller than 1,75m. He really didn't appear tall to me and I spoke to him. Brad Pitt is taller but not fully 1,80m, actually I also met him in real.
Arthur said on 18/Apr/17
Rob, what do you think of this? Click Here Clooney looks at least 5'11 to me here...
Editor Rob: he could be about 3 inches smaller, he probably has a fraction more footwear.
RisingForce said on 15/Apr/17
Was Clooney shorter than 5'10.5"-5'11" Ving Rhames in Out of Sight? I can't remember for sure. 176-177 cm is spot on for Damon same with 178-179 for Clooney, though more 179 peak and at least strong 178 range today, if not still 179. But Pitt is 179-180 range barefoot. If he were 181 cm any time except morning a guy like Pitt would have never claimed and been listed at only 5'11". He'd have said 6 feet in a heartbeat.
Christian-196.9cm(6ft5.5)Noon said on 15/Apr/17
If Clooney was really 180, that would put Dwayne Johnson at 192, since he looks 12 cm taller. 178 max for Clooney, and even then that would put Dwayne at 190, which he isn't nowadays.
mister_lennon said on 15/Apr/17
My be
Peak: 177-178
Today:176-177
Asdaprice said on 14/Apr/17
I think pitt 180-1, Clooney 178-9, damon 176-7 and I would say these were their peak heights.
RisingForce said on 14/Apr/17
He could always look shorter, likely due to postire. Here he looked similar to a 5'9"-5'9.5" Mel Gibson, but never quite stood straight: Click Here But he stood better with Bruce Willis who was 180-181 cm range in 2005 or let's just say a solid 5'11" and Clooney looked dead on 179 cm: Click Here Click Here I get how he could look either 5'10" or 5'11" to some.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Apr/17
Might still be 5ft10½-5ft10¾ today if measured. He probably hasn't lost much to be honest


But Rob, maybe he was 5ft11 on the dot in his prime?
berta said on 14/Apr/17
in a new the rock video with the rock he could look about 12 cm shorter than dwayne. dont think he have lost more than 1 cm from peak but maybe he never was taller than barely 179 and is 178 today?
RisingForce said on 13/Apr/17
I don't think he needs much of a downgrade. 1/4" back to Rob's old listing of 5'10.5" would be perfect, imo. 3" shorter than Arnold who was likely still close to his prime height of 6'1.5"-6'1.75" at age 50: Click Here Click Here Worse posture, but more footwear. Clooney actually doesn't look like he's lost much seeing him with Ben Affeck since he still looked 5'10.5" there, although if Stacy Keibler is about 6'1.5" in heels then Clooney actually looks more 5'10.5" in shoes here! Click Here I think it's the posture. 179 cm guy who can look 177 cm with bad posture. Maybe he's 5'10.25" now at age 55, but no less.
Cobra said on 12/Apr/17
He needs to be downgraded, to 5-10 even. No way is he 5-11 range.
RichardSpain said on 3/Apr/17
180cm is his official height but I think Clooney is 179cm or 178cm.
adam said on 3/Apr/17
Clooney looks 177 cm at this moment
berta said on 24/Mar/17
he is claryl taller than matt damon i dnt thin he can be shorter than at worst 179 peak, today i dont know
joe### said on 19/Mar/17
nowadays 178 range
joe### said on 19/Mar/17
Click Here
Whaaat said on 18/Mar/17
If George wears lifts as Pitt does he will be taller...
mister_lennon said on 9/Mar/17
I think that he was more 178 peak and 177 today. He never did give me the 180 impression. He always looked to me pretty average. Solid 5'10 and not more.
179 out of bed at peak is possible.
Bobby said on 8/Mar/17
You should also mention that Clooney was in Batman and Robin, where he played Batman. I know it's not considered the best Batman film but he was in that one.
HonestSlovene said on 8/Mar/17
More like 179 cm peak and 178 cm today, no more or less.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Mar/17
177/178cm is too low even today.

Peak: 180cm give or take
Today: 179cm give or take
mister_lennon said on 4/Mar/17
Peak: 177-178.
Now, maybe he has lost some fraction.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Feb/17
Rob, how likely is 178cm today?
RisingForce said on 25/Feb/17
Yeah, at 55 with his posture and I believe back problems, I'd be surprised if he hasn't at least lost a fraction. I think his old listing here of 5'10.5" was perfect for peak, but probably a quarter to half an inch shorter today. I still can't imagine him being under 5'10" standing straight, though even today.
horacle said on 25/Feb/17
Last night in france he looked at least 1 inch smaller than Jean Dujardin (5'11.5).

Click Here
joe### said on 22/Feb/17
peak 5´10.75 Click Here
Click Here
Jake said on 21/Feb/17
Think we might be getting into peak height with this one. Looked solid 5'11" at his peak but does appear to be trending closer to 5'10".
Guest66 said on 16/Feb/17
Rob, would you say it's unrealistic for Clooney to be 178cm at his peak ? A lot of people here estimate him even less than that
Editor Rob: 179cm is a figure I think you could argue...178 I personally wouldn't try to argue that low.
S.J.H said on 16/Feb/17
At worst 176 plus cm for clooney so 5'9.5 i wouldn't go with 5'9 this low because i met ben affleck he look a good 186cm in person (almost lunch hour) and always top over clooney by near 4"
Free said on 14/Feb/17
This one is way off.

Clooney is in the 5-9-5-9.5 zone like Mr says when he sees him.

He looks the same physically in movies as Woody Harrelson
HonestSlovene said on 13/Feb/17
@c-mo Well put, I agree with your estimate.
JimboJones said on 13/Feb/17
Met George Clooney at the Toronto International Film Festival 2009. I'm 184cm/6'0 and, wearing normal runners and standing about 5 feet from him, my line of sight was almost at the top of his head. There is absolutely no way he is 5'11. Best guess is 5'9.
Alex Marlin said on 13/Feb/17
5'11" flat
c-mo said on 10/Feb/17
I think

peak : 181cm out of bed and 179cm in the evening/night

as far as I know he had an accident where he hurt his back . and he is not the youngest man anymore so since some years I think he is 180cm out of bed and 178cm evening/night

looks definitely in the strong 5'10 to weak 5'11 range on every pic and/or video/film I have seen of him

needless to say that he definitely has a good height and that he is/was one of the best looking male celebs there is . I hope I will age as good as him :)
S.J.H said on 6/Feb/17
Mr R saw Clooney at 5'9.5 which is accurate. 177cm is bang on and Brad Pitt is 5'10
Johnny said on 31/Jan/17
@Rob how tall do you think his wife Amal is?
Editor Rob: seems above 5ft 7, near to 5ft 8
RisingForce said on 28/Jan/17
I also believe Mr. R saw him at 5'9.5", though I do believe he could have been AS tall as 5'10.5" standing up straight when he was younger, but I have little doubt he's closer to 5'10" than 5'11" today. Even more than a decade ago, he was only perhaps half an inch taller than Matt Damon with both in socks and he's pretty consistently been shorter than Pitt who is probably just shy of 5'11".
RisingForce said on 25/Jan/17
Rob, do you really think he's a solid inch taller than Damon? He was clearly shorter than Bruce Willis more than a decade ago, even with his hair advantage. He's 55 now and with his back and posture, I'd bet he's lost at least a fraction. Any more than 5'10.5" even at his peak seems like a stretch to me, he may have been 5'11.5" in shoes, though, hence his claim. Nowadays, I'd imagine about 5'10"-5'10.25" range.
Editor Rob: I'd say he was taller than Damon, the question is if in the 90's it was a full inch or not.
berta said on 23/Jan/17
i have read many of mr r comments and i think he is very good as guessing heights. so when he said he thought clooney was only 177 i take that in to account. in movies he can look up to 181 sometimes and in photos he looks a weak 180 guy but if mr r saw 177 then my guess is he is max 179 tall. and probably could be 178. dont think mr r saw 3 cm wrong when he met him.
Jake said on 17/Jan/17
Peak height anyone????
Edimar1.82cm said on 17/Jan/17
Azulon said
he is 4 ınch shorther than Affleck he is 5'10


Perfect, Affleck looks like 1.88 And George Clooney likes 1.78.
Simon said on 16/Jan/17
Rob, can you downgrade him to 5'10.25? I know for a fact he's not this tall.
mc said on 2/Jan/17
why is he pigeon toed? lmao
HonestSlovene said on 1/Jan/17
5'9.5" isn't exactly a thought crime Mr. R but there is strong evidence he is still much more likely slightly over 5'10" than under it. 5'10.25" now and 5'10.5" (maybe 5'10.75" at the tallest) peak.
Giacomo Quaresima said on 1/Jan/17
5'10.25" - 5'10.5"
Sam said on 30/Dec/16
I can't see above 5'10 for Clooney but is probably spot on the mark now or at least not very far from it. Could have been a little taller peak but doubt he's lost that much. Rob would have listed it otherwise so 5'10.75 seems like a stretch even for prime Clooney.
joe### said on 25/Dec/16
Is actually a few years ago it seemed to be 5'11
Dmeyer said on 20/Dec/16
I cant see under 5 ft 10,5 peak And likely 5 ft 10,75 today 5 ft 10,25
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 17/Dec/16
Mr. R said on 1/Dec/16
On this one we fight. I saw George several times when I lived in Hollywood and he is 5-9.5. A lot of times he wears biker boots to look taller.

---

I honestly wouldn't be surprised if he could dip down close to that after a long day.
Steve said on 13/Dec/16
Looks just over 5'10 to me. 179cm max.
Greg said on 9/Dec/16
@Adam Pitt is probably wearing lifts in that picture, but what kind of lifts would be difficult to tell.
Adam said on 7/Dec/16
Do you seriously think there's a quarter of an inch between Clooney and 5'11" Brad Pitt?

Just look
Click Here
Mr. R said on 5/Dec/16
Thanks Shredder for at least respecting my view. The first time I saw George, he was maybe 5-10.5. But he had on shoes with big rubber souls. After that, I was on stage with him and stood next to him. He wears motorcycle boots A LOT. I stand by my 5-9.5.
Shredder said on 3/Dec/16
I believe Mr.R saw him at that height , but I doubt he would measure that.
Ami said on 2/Dec/16
Brad Pitt is taller than him... like an inch
Max 5'10
Mr. R said on 1/Dec/16
On this one we fight. I saw George several times when I lived in Hollywood and he is 5-9.5. A lot of times he wears biker boots to look taller.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 20/Nov/16
S.J.H said on 15/Nov/16
Arch is funny.. I remember he say 6'4.75 kobe bryant atually look 6'4 in real where kobe even look over 3" taller than 6'3 actors like both phelps twins and kobe look easily 4" taller than samuel l jackson few years ago and believe george clooney at least 5'11. I wouldn't think about kobe can be only 5" taller than clooney. I wouldn't surprise if that clooney 5'11 is with shoes and atual fact most people here don't agree because most actors just claim an inch higher than they are. Charles barkley and kobe bryant have proven it for quite sometimes

---

Kobe at about 6'4.75" would probably be closer to 7 inches taller than Clooney as well.
HonestSlovene said on 20/Nov/16
@S.J.H I 100% agree with you. I think he is a typically strong 5'10" guy that claims to be 5'11"-6'0" (his dress shoe height). 178-179 cm or 5'10"-5'10.5" would be most likely his height range.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.