How tall is Evanna Lynch

Evanna Lynch's Height

5ft 2 ¼ (158.1 cm)

Irish Actress best known for playing Luna Lovegood in the Harry Potter films. On her imdbResume she had 5ft 2 as her height.

How tall is Evanna Lynch
5ft 8 Rob and Evanna @ Entertainment Media Show 2011

You May Be Interested

Height of Tom Felton
Tom Felton
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
Height of Devon Murray
Devon Murray
5ft 1 ¾ (157 cm)
Height of Natalia Tena
Natalia Tena
5ft 5 ¾ (167 cm)
Height of Anna Shaffer
Anna Shaffer
5ft 6 (168 cm)

Add a Comment72 comments

Average Guess (51 Votes)
5ft 1.98in (157.4cm)
Sandy Cowell said on 25/Jan/23
When I bought my Luna Lovegood doll, little did I know that my kitten, Luna, was almost fully grown in her mother cat! She came to me as Luna and the name stayed.

Evanna gets 5ft2.25. πŸ‘±β€β™€οΈπŸ˜πŸ‘πŸΌπŸ’πŸˆβ€β¬›
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 10/Jan/22
I have a little Luna Lovegood doll and she's delightful, with long, blonde hair and she's wearing a tweed jacket.

She's 10 inches tall!

I reckon Evanna grew to 5ft2.25, as Rob has actually met her, and that's his guess. πŸ‘±β€β™€οΈ
RJT said on 13/Sep/21
Rob has black hair but bluer eyes than the blonde girl

That's Supermanlike feature!
Elene said on 10/Aug/21
No less than 5’2
Vishal Das said on 16/Jun/21
Evana is looking so pretty
heyyyyyyyy said on 26/Mar/21
5'2" on the dot
Realist said on 21/May/20
She is 5'2 on the money
ladeez said on 8/May/20
classic 5' 2 woman
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/May/20
I agree with you, she's not more than 5'2".
Yang (5ft 8 Chinese men) said on 15/Feb/19
She is INDEED true lister for her heights like she said!!!!! Plus, her voice and accent are so cute!!!!
Jordan87 said on 8/Jan/19
Why The extra 1/4"? Pat her hair down, she is not past 5'2, she would be under it unless her footwear was lower than Rob's.
Editor Rob
Actually, I think 5ft 2 flat is very possible, but in person I'd have said she looked taller than devon murray.
World Citizen said on 31/Dec/18
Looks a flat 5 ft 2
Nik said on 11/Jun/18
I think that Evanna Lynch is at least her stated height but she is probably taller!
MAD SAM said on 15/Dec/17
Definitely 5’2
NBAer said on 26/Jun/15
157cm is what i see
Hydroxyproline said on 23/Mar/15
She's one of the most beautiful women I've ever laid my orbs upon. I have her at exactly 160 cm barefoot which is an ideal height for a woman to me as I am 178 cm. Best actress in the Harry Potter movies and was a real stand out from the first minute I saw her. She's absolutely gorgeous!
Hypado said on 24/Feb/15
5ft 2.5in (159 cm) is the best guest for Evanna Lynch.
Bro11 said on 14/Apr/13
I Think She's 5'4. Cute :"))
marla singer said on 28/Jul/12
She's 5'2" (considering that Rob is leaning a bit..)
Me said on 1/Aug/11
Actually she is 5'1. Or less.
Jane said on 14/Jul/11
She's 5'2"? Wow. She always looks tiny in pictures... I saw one of her the other day when she looked no taller than 5'.
Johan said on 9/Apr/09
Im exactly 2 meters now..
TallerThanRaghav said on 22/Oct/08
I have actually stood right next to raghav, and he was just shorter than me (5'9), no way he is 5'11.
umad80 said on 20/Mar/08
They are hard to tell. They're so weird. They look rubber! LOL And really big on her... She almost looks like a little girl wearing her mom's high-heels. I'd say Katie has a half inch to an inch in her shoes. Those types are definitely harder to say. As I mentioned, I have shoes that give an illusion of half inch, but they actually give me an inch. If given a half inch, I still think Evanna is most likely 5'2.5" simply because she looks a half inch taller than Katie in most pictures. If 3" is right, she'd be 5'5.25" to Katie's 5'5" with her shoes, and she looks more like a half inch taller... a quarter would be so much harder to see and only one picture does she look the same height, and she has her head down a bit in it.
umad80 said on 19/Mar/08
Yeah, I'm no heel expert either. lol My initial thought was that they looked regular size, but the extra platform put her right up over the norm. What say you Rob?

But it's hard to tell Evanna's. Again, they can look regular, but I think maybe the style is deceiving? I don't know. That'll have to be Rob's department again. lol

Katie's shoes look like they'd be about what Rupert's shoe would normally give, maybe a bit more. Hard to tell. I actually have shoes where the soles and all is half inch, but inside the shoe at the heel of my foot, it lifts me up, so the entire shoe gives me an inch extra in height. It's kind of cool 'cause I'm so used to shoes just be all about the bottom of the shoe. Feels like I'm wearing heels because the back of my foot is lifted. LOL

Editor Rob
the yellow ones? I'd say they do give a proper 3-inches
Evanna said on 19/Mar/08
I'm no expert on high heels, I rarely ever wear them, but according to Rob's tutorial, platform heels add more height than regular heels, which makes sense.
Anyway Emma seems to have developed a taste for really high heels lately, mind her Burberry/Vanity Fair monsters: Click Here

As for my namesake Evanna's shoes, this is the best picture I was able to find: Click Here
Well her shoes are biggish too (maybe not as big as Emma's); and Katie's shoes (trainers?!) are definitely as flat as can be. I guess Rob's listing is correct...
umad80 said on 18/Mar/08
Hard to tell, but the way her shoes are setup, looks like Katie's shoes would still give her an inch, much like a man's dress shoe. I wish I could tell what Evanna's shoes are. I'm not convinced they're 3" until I see them. But you think Emma's adds 4"? They still look much how the NMA shoes looked... which gave her about 3".
Evanna said on 15/Mar/08
Guess what, Katie was wearing flats after all, Click Here while Emma's shoes add 4" at the very least, lookie: Click Here
Her feet are literally in a vertical position, and the platforms help add more height as well. Just looking at those shoes makes my feet hurt.
Barefoot Emma and Katie are approximately the same height, as they've always been.
umad80 said on 13/Mar/08
That picture doesn't do anything for me at all considering it's not even of the event. And please, both Alfonso and Emma have very relaxed posture. Neither has much of an advantage.

And I think Evanna needs to be upgraded or Katie needs to be downgraded. Click Here and Click Here and Click Here - Evanna is about the same height or slightly taller. If Katie is 5'4.5" with about an 1" heel, even if Evanna had on 3" heels, she'd only have a 2" advantage. She'd be 5'5.25" with her heels and Katie would be 5'6.5", but Evanna is the same height or taller. I think it's obvious that Evanna is around 5'3"!
Evanna said on 12/Mar/08
?!?!?! All I can see is a picture of Emma solo; the windy London weather has taken its toll on her hairdo... Should I use the word "repulsive" for her hair now? Nah, it would be too mean. :D
Anonymous said on 12/Mar/08
He seems to be standing up straight and she slouching (at least her neck), yet she is still past his eyebrows, which means she is at the most 3.5" shorter, but, calculating posture, 3". That's how I got it.... and this photo seems like a better one to judge heights than Evanna's.... Click Here
umad80 said on 12/Mar/08
Emma looks 4.5" to 5" shorter than Cauron. (Please pay attention to Rob's chart. The 4" mark would be from eyebrows to top of the head, Emma's head is below that.) He's probably got the slight advantage in the picture. However, Rob has him listed here as 5'11.75". So if Emma is 5'5" on the nose then 3" heels would put her at 5'8". As I said, Cauron looked 4.5" - 5" taller than Emma easily. That fits, then. Emma is 5'5" and 5'8" in her heels putting Cauron around the listed 5'11.75" height on here.

Maybe Katie was wearing actual heels because I can't see why she'd be standing on her tip toes. lol

I still think it's obvious that Evanna is a bit taller than what she is listed here.
Evanna said on 11/Mar/08
Ain't playing, sorry. And I don't see Rob rushing to upgrade Emma, sorry again.
Anonymous said on 11/Mar/08
OH! Cuaron is listed as 6', so if Emma were 5'9" in those heels, she'd be 3 inches shorter....hmmm....seems to fit, innit? Dunno, how tall is Cuaron? 6'. Yes. Perhaps, possibly over, mother.
Anonymous said on 11/Mar/08
Then, according to your logic, Emma is around 5'3.5", depending upon what constitues as massive in your book. And, you know, it fits my picture; Emma Watson has got to be somewhere between 5'1" and 6'1", I'm telling you, it's the TRUTH!
Evanna said on 11/Mar/08
5'9" my arse, have you seen Emma next to Alfonso Cuaron? Click Here Besides, Emma only looks about 2" taller than Katie in that pic (thanks to her massive heels), so you're exaggerating again. Anyway An(na)nymous, we've been through this many times already, I ain't playing this game anymore.
Anonymous said on 11/Mar/08
Well, if Katie is 5'5.5" in her shoes, then Emma is easily 5'9" because she looks close to 3 inches taller (looks more but I won't say anything, just did) and she's not standing up straight in a lot of the photos, whereas Katie is on her tippy toes, or at least that's how it lokos...Evanna looks about the same height as Katie, which means she's around 5'2.5" or, around this listed height.
umad80 said on 11/Mar/08
Yeah, I think Katie's shoes were probably a solid inch, maybe just above that. I couldn't tell Evanna's because I never saw any pictures showing off those heels. Got a nice look at Emma's and they're definitely near 3" so she's bordering on 5'8" for sure in those shoes. I would say Evanna is a half inch to three quarters taller than what she is listed here.

Yeah, Anonymous, Emma has the better shoes of Evanna and Katie but Evanna has better shoes than Katie.
Evanna said on 10/Mar/08
Emma's shoes had about 1/2" platform and at least 3" heel, lookie: Click Here Click Here
Evanna's shoes were similar to Emma's, at least when it comes to height gain.
Katie's shoes weren't flats either, but definitely not so high-heeled as the other two girls'.
Anonymous said on 10/Mar/08
Possibly umad80, but I'm not sure of the heel height of Emma's shoes. They look pretty normal, but, unfortunately, there is no good photo to show this. Anyway, does she not tower over the other two? Also, are you saying Evanna has better shoes in regards to just Evanna and katie or all 3? personally, i think Emma's look slightly shorter, but not sure.
umad80 said on 10/Mar/08
To be fair, Evanna most likely has the better shoes (Katie's looks flat) and probably closer to the camera. That said, I don't think it would be that much. I still say 5'3" is more appropriate for Evanna! Emma also looks to be wearing close to 3" heels. I'm not sure exactly, but they don't look like the normal 2.3" but nothing like she wore at the NMAs either.
Anonymous said on 9/Mar/08
Yes, I saw those photos and was thinking that as well, but then realized that Katie was not wearing as high of heels as Evanna, thus explaining the sudden spurt on Evanna's part. I would say that Evanna's heels are about 3 inches, Emma's are 2-3 inches (?, I can't really tell), and Katie's shoes give her about 1 inch, but she is on her tippy toes trying to hold on to Emma, so it's perhaps like wearing 2 inch heels? haha, I have no idea, but it LOOKS like she is on her toes, but that may be the angle. I dunno. Emma looks huge compared to the other two, suggesting that she is 5'1" to 6'1".
Anonymous said on 9/Mar/08
In this picture from today's Empire Awards, Evanna looks exactly the same height as 5' 4.5" Katie Leung:
Click Here
Evanna said on 16/Dec/07
Oh cool. Good to know we are still friends :)
Evanna said on 15/Dec/07
Wow, this is the first time you deleted one of my comments, Rob. Should I feel honoured?

Editor Rob
about 300 comments got deleted due to having to revert to a backup.
Evanna said on 12/Dec/07
"its not as much diff as visually it appears" - ?!?!
Well then, I give up.

Editor Rob
because of the camera and their positions it looks a little more than it is to me, that's all...
Evanna said on 11/Dec/07
Hmm Rob, in this case silence isn't golden. I mean, you still maintain that there is 2.25" difference between 5'2.25" Evanna and 5'4.5" Katie, Click Here although the top of Evanna's head is just under Katie's hairline; but then again you also maintain that there is only 2.75" difference between 5'5" Dan Radcliffe and 5'7.75" Rupert Grint, although the top of Radcliffe's head only reaches Grint's eyebrows Click Here
Click Here
Wow, I thought 2.75" - 2.25" = 0.5" !?... I mean, it really makes no sense.

Editor Rob
the socks photos, its hard to explain but its not as much diff as visually it appears. To me anyway, still about 3 inches yes.
Evanna said on 11/Dec/07
Come on Rob, you can't possibly see 2.25" between Katie and Evanna here Click Here Evanna is in flipflops, for God's sake!
I know that there aren't enough 5'2.25" listings here, but Evanna really looks a bit taller than that.
umad80 said on 4/Dec/07
You think two inches between Katie and Evanna? It looks like an inch to me. Can you show me why you think 2 inches? I know why you think that when comparing her to Rupert. lol But I'm really curious as to how you can say that when comparing Katie and Evanna in those latest pics.

Just comparing her to Matt... I know he's behind her more, so maybe it'd be more like 8 inches rather than the 7.5" that it looks but that wouldn't put Matt anywhere near 6' to her 5'2". And even her with the hell advantage wouldn't help all that much.

Editor Rob
yes I think there is in those pics.
astralopytecus said on 4/Dec/07
she has 5'1"...end of discution!!!
umad80 said on 3/Dec/07
Very good. ;)

So, do you think Evanna might actually be around 5'3"? Just the pictures with Katie Leung alone suggest that. She never seems that much more than inch shorter. Maybe just a tad, but definitely at least an inch. It would explain why Rupert seemed around 4" taller than her in heels. Click Here (Of course, you'd have to believe that Rupert is a strong 5'8" and very possibly close if not at the exact mark of 5'9".)

Editor Rob
I did finally fix it you'll see ;)

lookin at them I still think 2 inches difference and in the late sep pics I don't look much more than 5ft 2 there.
umad80 said on 2/Dec/07
Actually Rob, if you're a Buffy fan, you should be able to figure it out. ;) And yes, it annoys me! I'm a virgo, it annoys me. :P Actually I didn't notice you had put my last comment up. haha Sorry about that.

Editor Rob
I was a buffy fan in the past so...Dawn?
I'm a virgo too but the spelling don't bother me that much ;)
umad80 said on 2/Dec/07
She has to be a strong 5'3" by now, if not over. Did you see pictures of her with the 5'4.5" Katie Leung? Same type of footwear and everything. Click Here (If that doesn't work go to getty and look up Evanna Lynch.) Just like I said, the pictures of them at the photocall showed that Evanna was not at this mark. It was painfully obvious when you stood her next to the 5'5" Emma.

And Rob, when are you going to fix the spelling of Phoenix? LOL

Editor Rob
does that still annoy you, maybe tell me your first name and I will change it.
Evanna said on 30/Nov/07
It is possible that she's grown a bit, she's the youngest of the lot, and she was only about 14 when they did the OotP promo pics. She does seem to be around the 5'3" mark now.

Editor Rob
i will relook, because I guess just over 16 now, could have grown.
umad80 said on 30/Nov/07
Okay, it's obvious that Evanna is taller than the just over the 5'2" mark. She was at the Golden Compass premiere with Katie Leung who is supposedly 5'4.5" according to this site, and they both had on similiar footwear and she was about an inch shorter. Click Here and Click Here and Click Here

I think it's pretty obvious that if Katie 5'4.5" (which seems pretty much since she never seems to be shorter than Dan and Emma) then Evanna cannot just be over 5'2". Evanna has to be a legit 5'3" or taller.

And also, Rob, can you fix Phoenix? The spelling has been bothering me. LOL
umad80 said on 9/Nov/07
My point more was that with Rupert's lean it's clearly around 6". It's definitely around 5" and he's leaning to the left quite a lot so you have to figure it's any where from 5.5 inches to a good 6". Maybe more depending on how bad the lean is.

But yeah, I think it's clear that if you look at the picture of just Emma, Evanna, Dan and Katie, that it's obvious that 5'2.25" isn't quiet accturate. That would make Emma shorter than 5'5". It's practically a 4" difference between Emma and Evanna which means that if Evanna is only 5'2.25" Emma's about 5'6" in the heels. At least when I went to school, 4+2=6. lol And if she's only 5'6" in heels, that would only make her 5'4" in reality. And when you add Dan to the mix, Evanna only seems to be 1.5" to 2" shorter than Dan in similiar footwear making him 5'3.75" to 5'4.25". And I think it's pretty obvious that both Dan and Emma are 5'5". Maybe not a strong 5'5", but definitely close enough that you might as well say 5'5".

Oh, and isn't Katie like 5'4.5"? She's got on 3" heels it looks like and she and Emma are definitely seem to be around the same height. (Hard to tell because Katie never seems to stand straight.) But really, if Emma was only 5'4", she'd be a lot shorter than Katie. But she looks close to a half inch taller with Katie's head down, so if Katie stood straight it's obvious they'd be the same height.

No offense intended, but I think the focus is too much on Rupert being about 5.5" difference putthing him at the 5'7.75" range he is listed here. But it's clear that would mean everyone else would have to be downgraded and that Katie isn't 5'4.5". I think Evanna is around 5'3". Probably an inch or so taller than what she is listed here which would be perfect. Because Emma being around 4" taller in heels would put her at 5'7" thus making 5'5" accurate. And Dan being 1.5" to 2" taller would put him at 5'4.75" to 5'5.25" which would be accurate. And Rupert would be in the 5'8" range. About 5'8.5" if it's definitely only 5.5". Which makes sense considering that he didn't seem that much shorter than the 5'9" Tom Felton who probably had shoe advantage and was always standing better. So my guess for Evanna is 5'3" to 5'3.25".
anonymous no-name said on 9/Nov/07
i don't think there is 6" between Evanna and Rupert? Not in that picture anyway, more like 4.5-5". If Rupert would just stand up straight once that would make it so much easier :p Evanna is not under 5'2" though, that's for sure, or even Rupert wouldn't be 5'7" which i think he definitely is.
I'm not sure if she's a full 5'3", but I do think she's probably closer to 5'3" than 5'2". That would fit the best with Emma and Dan at 5'5" and Rupert around 5'8".
umad80 said on 5/Nov/07
Are you sure it's 5'2.25"? If you look here: Click Here Emma is about 4" taller in heels, which would only make her about 5'6" in heels. Which means she's not near 5'5". More like 5'4" to 5'4.5". And with Dan it only looks an inch to an inch and a half meaning that Dan would only be about 5'3" or so. And they're both wearing simliar footwear. And if you take a picture where she is closer to Rupert, definitely a legit 6". (Both hard to tell because they didn't stand straight together, but that's what it looks like.) Click Here which if Evanna is 5'2.25" would definitely put him over 5'8". But I think Evanna might be closer to 5'3" just based on Dan and Emma if they're truly 5'5" and they just look it to me.
Hugo said on 26/Sep/07
I would say that Evanna is somewhere around 5'.

Editor Rob
if she's 5ft then rupert grint is struggling to reach 5ft 6...go look at photos and laugh at anybody saying she's 5ft and he's 5ft 10.
casa said on 22/Sep/07
i would say she is about 5ft 2 inches. everyone says hes 5 foot, but dan is 5ft 6 and she doesnt look THAT short compared to him.
anonymous1 said on 28/Aug/07
Click Here she does look a good 5'2" here.
Anna said on 17/Aug/07
Wow, she gets listed as 5' on some other sites and I thought that's what most people thought she was. This is quite a bit more than I thought she would get listed at. She looked a lot shorter than everyone at the London photo call, even Dan. hmm...
an said on 16/Aug/07
I thought she was slightly taller than this? 5'3" or so? At the London photocall, she comes up to Emma's eye/eyebrow in most pictures, considering .5" for Emma's slouch that would make her about 4.5" smaller, right? If Emma is the 5'6" she says she is, and she has about a 1.5" shoe-advantage on Evanna in her 2" heels. That would mean that Evanna is actually 3" smaller than Emma, making her 5'3"? Maybe Emma is smaller, but Evanna could have grown a bit as well?
ras said on 7/Aug/07
It's a curious thing it's the first 5 ft 2.25 I've seen in the site.

Editor Rob
there's a distinct lack of em.
Chip said on 3/Aug/07
I agree with this height, too. Evanna looks about 3-4 inches shorter than people like Emma, who is about 5'5.5"-5'6."
Ferna said on 24/Jul/07
I agree with this height, i love Evanna...
lily said on 18/Jul/07
she definitly seems taller because in the pictures of her standing next to daniel radcliff she seems only maybe 2/3 inches shorter
Bertha said on 17/Jul/07
i agree with this height. she's definitely too tall to be 5' like it says other places
alex said on 15/Jul/07
i thought she was slightly taller than this. bless her, she's so cute.
faiza said on 7/Jun/06
i've seen him near Bipasha Basu and he doesnt look much taller than her but she is 5'8.5"
UK BOI said on 30/May/06
Ragav 5 11 no way! i cant believe that! even in his videos he doesnt look that tall! no way is he 5 11! i agree with the last comment 5 7, 5 8
DA 1 who saw raghav said on 24/Apr/06
that is like so not true..ive seen him in real life in a sheesha bar..hes no taller den 5'8

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.