Frank Stallone's Height
5ft 10 ½ (179.1 cm)
American actor and singer. On his twitter he claimed to be "6' 1" 200 pounds" and also claimed "6'"
Add a Comment70 comments
Average Guess (29 Votes)
5ft 10.19in (178.3cm)
H? Th?nh said on 15/Jun/19
5'10 bit over
Jtm said on 11/Jun/19
syl claiming almost 5'11 is even more laughable.
Jimbo hopper said on 10/Jun/19
Crazy claim 6-1!!! Take off at least 2,5 inches
TheBat said on 8/May/19
Lol at 6'1".
6james94 said on 8/Apr/19
When I was 18.I knew a guy from church who wore cowboy boots and he looked 5'11" at the lowest and 5'10 at the highest, and I was wearing Nike shox. So I went to the bowling alley to go bowl with a couple girls and her family because I liked one of them. He was there too, and he bowled with us. Though the thing is when he took his boots off and both of us where in bowling shoes, he appeared only a half inch taller he could of been my height actually maybe a half inch less at the shortest. I caught glimpse of this and was like how tall are you? He was like "I'm 6 foot and a quarter." The girls where like no your not your 5'10 even the mom was like yeah your not 6ft and a quarter and he kept convincing them that he was 6 foot and a quarter. And I was like thinking how is he eye to eye when I'm measured at 5'9 and he got measure at a height that's actually consider tall and he's possibly my height at the lowest. There was another guy I know that's a inch shorter then me that claimed 6ft-6ft1. So I'm not shocked too see this weird claim from Frank Stallone in the pic with Sylvester Stallone he doesn't look like a 6'1 guy..
said on 18/Jan/19Click Here
= Franck Stallone in cow boy boots and Tom Sizemore(Rob is in a picture with Tom and listed him 5"10.25')= here i think Franck has a little bit the advantage of the posture.
In this we can see the boots = Click Here Click Here
here at the same festival this shoes are looking very similar than in the first pic = Click Here
= here in another event Franck closer to the camera and now = Click Here
= at arund the same distance to the camera in around the same posture.I don't know the shoes,in all the pics i have seen of Tom,his shoes are looking classic like here to = Click Here Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jan/19
Frank's a garbage 6ft1 (i.e. may if he's lucky come within 1in of it in dress shoes)
I'd love to see this putz claim 6ft1 in front of Kevin Costner, Mark Gatiss or even a solid 6ft range guy like Ryan Gosling. If he was genuinely a 6ft guy (which I thought he was before I found out about Sly) it wouldn't be as bad...
Sandy Cowell said on 23/Dec/18
I have never found Sly's brother in anything, and I consider myself a fairly experienced film buff, though hardly on the lines of people like Arch Stanton, whose knowledge far exceeds mine, especially in the old film department! Well, I can but keep my eyes peeled, and until I find something that convinces me otherwise, Frank's flat-footed, shoeless height will be 5ft10.
Bradley said on 18/Sep/18
Weak 5-10. 6-1 is G-zuss stuff.
Rising - 174 cm
said on 16/Sep/18
If anything, I'd guess Frank has lost more than Sly. This is just 4 years ago with Sly in dress shoes and Frank in loafers: Click Here Click Here
Both have small heels, but I think dress shoes will usually give a fraction advantage over loafers, but even assuming that's the case, Frank would be 1.5" max taller barefoot. I just don't see the angle you'd expect from lifts, nor the extra room to accommodate more than a foot: Click Here
Here they are at the Golden Globes last year when Sly had dress shoes: Click Here
The photo favors Sly a bit, but I don't see anywhere near 2". When Sly does have at least 2" footwear, possibly even 2.5", if anything he winds up edging Frank in flat loafers. Here they are in 2012 in similar footwear: Click Here Click Here
Sly may have very well been at his peak height then and Frank was only 62 so he could as well. I wouldn't be surprised if Frank was 179 peak and 177 today, but no lower. He does look good for his age, but the height difference between him and Sly does not appear to have grown and I think Sly has lost about a half inch.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Sep/18
He’s in reasonably good shape so may not have lost much. Next to Sly (whose most likely in lifts) he still looks a good 2in taller…
Rising - 174 cm
said on 15/Sep/18
Like most people, Frank has an ego of his own, which is likely the reason he's claimed 6'1". He wears some pretty decent heels at times himself: Click Here Click Here
If anything, Frank's claim only makes Sly's lifts particularly obvious in photos like this from '03: Click Here
or even full photos like this from '05: Click Here
and last year for that matter: Click Here Click Here Click Here
Frank may very well be down to 5'10" flat these days, yet he's still claiming 6'1".
Kyuss101 said on 12/Sep/18
I think he claims this to hide Slys real height if they are together. People will say Franks 6-1 so slys 5-10 or more. ;)
Nik said on 27/Aug/18
That's a pretty high claim!
Bradley said on 24/Aug/18
At a 3" add he's worse than Sly in height fibbing. Very few celebs rock the 3" over their barefoot pose, Vin gives it a shot to the head up and down people.
Jim hoppa said on 14/Jul/18
Next to Ernie Shavers -[6-0] he is min of 2" shorter! 5-10 max! How he can say 6-1" is just insanity.
said on 24/Jun/18
Rob, could you meet this guy in the future?
I'd say very unlikely to meet him.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Jun/18
5ft11 peak is possible
Boba Fett said on 22/Mar/18
Weird, usually someone in the 5'10" range will claim 6 feet, 6'1" is a bit much. Kinda like someone who's 5'7" trying to convince people that they're 5'10".
Jim Hopper said on 8/Mar/18
Total bs. 5-10.5 max
robson said on 17/Jan/18
With Stallone(supposed to be truth on this site as 174cm)he looks no more than 176-177. So this is hilarious claiming himself to be 6'0 or even 6'1. That is like me while I'm 5'11 to be claiming 6'2 which would be funny to hear.
Jeremy said on 24/Dec/17
LMFAO he is nothing over 5’10” he looks 5’9-5’9 1/2. Wtf why would he claim 6’1”
Anonymous said on 23/Nov/17
@james b, Jimmy Kimmel?
James B said on 22/Nov/17
A 5'10.5 claiming 6'1 is uncommon
Slim 185 said on 21/Nov/17
I wish everyone was honest about their height.
Shame on him for claiming 185.
Brad said on 7/Nov/17
Height liar like his brother. He's 5-10 tops.
said on 12/Oct/17
I agree. After having another look at the pic of Stallone with Sinatra, there really isn't more than a 2" difference, but Sinatra was obviously an avid lift-wearer at the time and even claimed as much as 5'11" for himself (according to his biographer). Now let's forget Corey Feldman and Glenn's invisible proclaimed inches; Sinatra definitely takes the cake for the most bizarro claims!
Anyway, he looked at least an inch taller than Paul McCartney: Click Here
about 2 inches taller than Michael Jackson: Click Here
slightly shorter than 183 cm listed (by Google) Michael Dudikoff: Click Here Click Here
and here he's with 5'11" listed (again, by Google) Chuck Zito: Click Here
and Zito did look taller than Mike Tyson: Click Here Click Here Click Here
so I definitely wouldn't rule out a full 180 cm for Frank Stallone's peak.
Also, here's a photo of Frank with 6'6" Rick Fox: Click Here
he looks no shorter than 7 inches shorter to me there.
Rising - 174 cm
said on 8/Oct/17
@Harris: Sinatra was actually still pulling off a good height around that time. With Michael Jackson around 1984: Click Here
an with Tom Cruise in the late 80's: Click Here
So I don't think Sinatra lost much and he may have worn lifts more later on.
Richardspain said on 8/Oct/17
If he claimed 6'1 and later he said is 6 ft is obvious he lies. To me he looks 5'11 nowadays no a solid 6 feet and his brother sly is nearly 5'9 today
said on 2/Oct/17
Frank Stallone looked a solid 5'10.5" with 5'7.5" Frank Sinatra (but I'm not certain if Sinatra lost height by this time, and/or if he's wearing lifts here, admittedly): Click Here
Nonetheless, his 6'1" claim was pretty bizarre, but the 6' claim could really be normal if he was more a 5'11" and change guy (he could look that range) and just claimed his morning height. That's something to consider. I've not seen anything to suggest he's under Rob's listing, and I wouldn't be surprised if he was taller.
Rising - 174 cm
said on 29/Jul/17
I think Rampage's guess is possible for peak, somewhere between 179-180 cm, but no less, imo. He looked around 2" shorter than 6'1" Carl Weathers, about 2" taller than 5'9" Sugar Ray Leonard and clearly taller than a possibly then 5'9" Tony Danza from 2003-2005.
But I think it may be time for a peak height. Sly is pulling off taller this year in maybe 2.5"-2.7" type footwear at the GUardians of the Galaxy 2 premiere: Click Here
And 3 years ago at the Expendables 3 premiere, Sly didn't look much shorter in dress shoes: Click Here Click Here
Maybe 177-178 cm today? Frank only looks 2, maybe 3 cm max taller at the Expendables 3 premiere and I'd say Sly was 5'8.5"-5'8.75" 3 years ago and 5'8.25"-5'8.5" now.
Btw, I'm not quite sure how to vote for the guess when you think someone who doesn't have a peak height yet has shrunk? I've done both, but I guess I'll vote for Frank's peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/May/17
I think 5ft11 peak is fair and 6ft1 in boots
176.5 cm guy said on 21/Feb/17
He's probably 1 cm taller than me.
nobody said on 19/Dec/16
Mr. R said on 10/May/05
Actually, Frank's main claim to fame, besides "Eye of the Tiger"
Lol. Frank had nothing to do with this classic tune. Have you heard Frank Stallone's 'music'?
berta said on 11/Oct/16
he was the same height as arnold at the gym so he still looks to be 179 rangeeee and at his age he must have lost 1 cm so maybe 180 peak
said on 14/Aug/16
Rob, how likely is 5ft11 peak for Frank?
I can believe that especially if Sly was strong 5ft9 range
Editor Rob: you definitely can argue that figure.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jul/16
Lol...I can just imagine the third brother being even more juiced than Sly with a much deeper voice but not quite the sharpest tool in the shed. Just a gym rat and Slys bodyguard who makes occasional appearances in his films
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 15/Jul/16
If I was part of their family I could make my handle: Mathew Stallone (196 cm)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jun/16
An almost 5ft11 guy claiming 6ft1 makes me wanna put my fist through a wall…the sheer arrogance of it
Grant said on 6/May/16
Ha! I'm assuming Sam Witwers role model?
Paleman said on 11/Apr/16
Classic Stallone indeed to add 2-3 inches to your real height. The 5'8" Sly is 5'10"5 and the 5'10"5 Frank is 6'1". If there was a six feet tall third brother he'd probably be claiming 6'3"...
120 said on 9/Mar/16
Well, that's the Stallone family there for ya lol.
Niggurd said on 27/Feb/16
5'10.5 but claims 6'1? Hahaha! Another "wanna be tall man" lol
Brad said on 4/Feb/16
6' 1" is classic Stallone brothers enhancing. He's 5' 10" flat.
TJE said on 14/Jan/16
I'm not surprised he claimed 6'1 since Sly claims 5'11.
said on 24/Dec/15
Rob, is a flat 5'10 possible?
Editor Rob: it's entirely possible he has lost a bit of height, he could look at times just 5ft 10
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Nov/15
He actually does not look much taller than Sly.
Arch Stanton said on 2/Sep/15
It's what I call Savalas/Martin Syndrome Jim.
Jim Hopper said on 30/Aug/15
Its a desperate man who is 5-10.5 to say really I'm 6-1"...sad
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/15
The stupidity of that claim.
Matthew said on 12/Jul/15
6'1" claim is ridiculous.
Emil 182-183 cm said on 3/Jul/15
At least give him credit for only claiming 6'0 now. Good job, Frankie boy.
Shawn said on 5/Jun/15
I guess all the men in the Stallone family like to inflate their height. Rob's got this one accurate.
Ed said on 5/Jun/15
This guy is 6'1"? That's overwhelmingly laughable. I'm sure he'd throw a fit to see this listing then. Haha
said on 17/Apr/15
So I'm guessing you didn't add that to the stop to save him from embarrassment, hmmm Rob? He's probably best friends with Sam Witwer.
[Editor Rob: yes, I linked to that in a comment on sly's page back on 23/Jan/15, but then it should be mentioned really, no hiding from it! ]
said on 15/Apr/15
Didn't he claim 6'1" on twitter? LMAO
[Editor Rob: yeah it was an extravagant claim.]
Frankie68 said on 14/Dec/14
I thought sly is 5'10 1/2...rob....sly is 5'7 flatfooted rob...put it up already....
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Sep/13
This is funny. He's listed at the height that his noticeably shorter brother has been claiming for years.
jtm said on 8/Jul/11
K. Lake said on 7/Jul/11
Don't talk crap that you know nothing about. He's 6 ft.
Ejel Khan said on 12/Feb/09
See frank in Celebrity Wrestling with Hulk Hogan ..... doesn't look more than 5'10".
Davidoff said on 1/Oct/08
179 is peak height guys.This guy was never 6 foot lets relax about that.
dmeyer said on 7/Dec/07
then he was easy 6 ft peak sly is no more than 2 in shorter so 5'10
glenn said on 7/Dec/07
did seem 5-11.75 to 6ft.
said on 6/Dec/07
rob wath was frank peak height
[Editor Rob: I thought glenn saw him looking near 6ft last year?]
dmeyer said on 31/Jul/07
he does aleast the height above and taller in 20s
dmeyer said on 21/Jun/07
he looks 1.5 in taller than sly even in later years pictures he is noticably taller than sly even when sly wears lifts so sly can look 5'9 in pics exept if frank is 5'11.5 to 6 ft
Aussie Bloke said on 19/Nov/06
He's the same damn height as SLY, so he can't be this height unless his bro wears lifts in his shoes all the time.
Mr. R said on 10/May/05
Actually, Frank's main claim to fame, besides "Eye of the Tiger", is that he is taller than his more famous brother. He used to talk about this all the time when he was popular, and whenever he had the opportunity, he made sure that he got pictures proving that he was taller. If you check around the time of Rocky II, you will find a lot of pictures showing Frank to be taller. He also did a celeb boxing match with Geraldo Rivera a while back, and Geraldo noted that Frank was taller than him. Geraldo was listed at 5-10 at first, then grew to 5-11 when he got popular. A few years ago, there was a tv show, whose name escapes me, that had Frank, Patrick Swayze's brother, and two other brothers of famous men, and their constant joke is that they should be more famous because they were all taller than their famous siblings. Anybody remember this?
said on 9/May/05Picture
He looks more about his brothers height, unless his brother is wearing lifts in the picture. I'd say he is shorter then 5 ft 10, more like 5 ft 9 or shorter, because we don't even know the exact height of his brother because his brother loves to wear elevstor shoes.[Editor Rob: On his site I am certain I read '6ft']