How tall is Roger Waters

Roger Waters Height

6ft 0 (182.9 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 1 ½ (186.7 cm)
English Musician, known for Pink Floyd. In a 2001 book by Dave Parker, in a profile describing his likes and dislikes, it also mentioned he "is 6ft 1in tall.".
In a 1967 fact-file, the band gave their heights as such: "Roger Waters, 6ft 1in, 11st 6lbs", "Rick Wright, 5ft 10ins, 11st", "Nick Mason, 5ft 10in", "Syd Barrett, 5ft 11in".

Add a Comment117 comments

Average Guess (18 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.89in (187.7cm)
Current: 6ft 0.06in (183cm)
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 6/Sep/19
πŸŽ‚πŸŽˆπŸŽ‰πŸ•―οΈ Happy Birthday Roger! πŸ•―οΈπŸŽ‰πŸŽˆπŸŽ‚

Roger Waters turns 76 today.

Have a great day, Roger!

6ft2 peak,
6ft0.5 now.

πŸŽ‚πŸŽπŸ•―οΈπŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚πŸŽπŸ•―οΈπŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚πŸŽπŸ•―οΈπŸŽ‰πŸŽ‚πŸŽπŸ•―οΈπŸŽ‰
....... said on 19/Aug/19
6'2 peak, 6' current
Sandy Cowell said on 19/Dec/18
I just read in a comment from Arch Stanton that Roger has a son pushing 6ft7. Well, I never knew that!

πŸŽΌπŸŽΆπŸ’ΏπŸŽ§πŸŽΈπŸŽ™οΈπŸŽ›οΈ

Today, Roger gets 6ft1.5 peak and 6ft for his today's height. I saw them perform 'The Wall' live in the Summer of 1980, and it was brilliant - of course! Roger was indeed the tallest.
Zaccaria said on 15/Dec/18
Brian May is taller than him.
In my opinion 6'0.5 was the peak (without shoes and boots). About 5'10.5" now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Oct/18
Peak: 188cm
Today: 184cm
Sandy Cowell said on 24/Aug/18
@ Arch Stanton - I don't believe it! I think his way of bringing through his upset about losing his Dad in the War is poured out from the heart in 'Pink Floyd the Wall' and also his album 'Amused to Death'.

No doubt, a man of your intelligence will be aware of 'The Wall', but do listen to 'Amused to Death'.

He is doing a very constructive thing in relating to others the losses of war, not unlike Pete Townshend.

6ft2 peak and 6ft0.5 for now. I wish. I could meet him to verify the situation.... πŸ™ƒ
Sonnecker said on 6/Jun/18
Never saw him in thick shoes and in youth he had a bad posture... I saw hundreds of Waters' pics, and he's at least 188 cm, when not 189 cm....
Height loss? About 185 cm now.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Apr/18
His peak should at least be put back to 6ft2
Someone said on 13/Mar/18
Was mentioned further down on this page, but here is an article that includes self-reported heights for the band (pre-Gilmour).

Click Here
Editor Rob
Thanks for pointing out the link, I'll mention all the height/weights at the top.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Mar/18
Agreed Spencer...

I reckon today he's still at least 6ft range
Spencer said on 5/Jan/18
At least 6’2” peak maybe 6’2.5”
Zaccaria said on 27/Aug/17
Roger Waters height:
Peak: 6'1" (185cm)
Now: 6'0" (183cm)
David Gilmour height:
Peak: 5'11.5" (181.6cm)
Now: 5'10.5" (179cm)
Nick Mason height:
Peak: 5'9.5" (176,5cm)
Now: 5'9" (175 cm)
Rick Wright:
Peak: 5'11" (180cm)
2008: 5'10" (178cm)
Syd Barrett:
Peak: 5'11" (180cm)
2006: ????????????
Travis said on 4/Aug/17
May be necessary to add the equally important David Gilmour.
Arch Stanton said on 2/Aug/17
Maybe he lost height. I must admit he comes across as very arrogant and opinionated though, a nasty piece of work with an attitude. I wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of him as I think he could be a bully!!
Zaccaria said on 22/Jun/17
6'0 today
Peak height was 6'1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/17
I'm with Danimal on this one....
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Jun/17
What in God's name is this?!


6ft2 peak, 6ft1 today more like
HonestSlovene said on 9/Jun/17
@Dingus Mason is listed as 5'9"/175 cm on IMDB so I strongly doubt he would be over that mark since if anything IMDB tends to upgrade everyone. Gilmour was about 5'11", now 5'10", Richard Wright was 5'10", Syd also probably about 5'10".
HonestSlovene said on 9/Jun/17
@Danimal He never was over 6'2" peak, now probably closer to 6'0" but as you said he is old so no suprise.
Brad said on 7/Jun/17
Shook his hand on sunday. He's dropped to 6' 1.5".
Arch Stanton said on 2/Jun/17
@Rob, authors have also claimed 6'2 and 6'3. Why do you believe the one who says 6'1? 6'1.5 peak seems too low, if anything I'd have leaned on 189. OK he wasn't 6'3 or 6'4 but he looked a decent 6'2 peak I thought.
Editor Rob: there was another commenter a few years ago who said Roger had given 6ft 1 in another article, so to me it seems that is what he is claiming.
Danimal said on 25/May/17
Rob, why isn't this page updated for a before and after? He might be 6'2" today, but he was easily 6'3"-6'4" in his younger days. The man is well into his 70's now and has clearly lost height, as most men his age do, especially the very tall ones (you can see it in his upper back and neck which have curved).
Asnjunxtown said on 7/Feb/17
Well, he surely was 6ft3 in his prime and he looked kinda thin.I imagine him being 70kg in his prime,and now around 80kg.
Naturally thin guy,just like myself
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jan/17
Roger isn't standing his tallest there but the son does look near 6ft7…
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jan/17
Click Here I think his son has on flatter shoes too! Has to be a good 6'7 surely!
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jan/17
Click Here That one's even worse though his posture is poorer, but he might actually be near 6 ft 7 don't you think?
Arch Stanton said on 12/Jan/17
@Rob, how tall does his son look on the left? Click Here Like 6'6.5 or something? He has Brosnan son syndrome ;-)
Editor Rob: unless Roger had worse posture he looks a comfortable 6ft 6 range.
Mikhail said on 13/Dec/16
6ft4 in his prime?Really?His proportions would have been kinda small for a 6ft4 dude back in the day..
No more than 6ft3 in his youth.
Sonnecker said on 12/Dec/16
About 190 cm in his youth, very probably for Sir Roger....
187/188 cm now, so I agree with Rob.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Nov/16
Still looks about this mark today
Sandy Cowell said on 18/Nov/16
@ demy - Hi! I'm thinking back to the picture of all 4 of them on the inside sleeve of the album 'Meddle' and I remember that they were impressively muscle-bound, each and every one, including Waters! I wouldn't exactly describe him as skinny-looking in that picture!
But I do see what you mean when he stood up! Very tall and gangly, it must have been difficult to maintain a healthy weight with a rock'n'roll lifestyle!
Waters is responsible for creating some of the best music and lyrics ever, both with Pink Floyd and on his own. I recommend his solo album 'Amused to Death.'
I knew he was tall, but not quite THAT tall! Too busy listening to his lyrics to speculate on anything other than what is going on in his mind! A brilliant and addictive brand of music; I never, ever tire of it!
radu said on 6/Nov/16
6ft4 is way too much even for waters .6ft3 - young
6ft1 - 6ft2 - now
and for david
6ft - young
5ft11 - now
Danimal said on 5/Nov/16
This must be updated for before and after. He was easily 6'3", if not 6'4" in his youth. The man is 73 today and appears to be about 6'2" today.
demy said on 30/Oct/16
Waters was a skinny guy.He could have been the same height as gilmour,who was a bit chubby.Skinny guys always looks taller by 2 inches.
tk said on 24/Oct/16
I guess this needs to be split in peak and current height.

Back then, I would say 6'3'', today no more than 6'2''.
Sanj said on 15/Sep/16
Compare Waters with Clapton in this pic from a charity cricket match recently. He is wearing sneakers, and looks very tall. Click Here
Dingus said on 19/Jul/16
Based on pictures I've seen of the band I would estimate their heights as

Roger Waters: 6'02.50" - 6'03.00" (He is probably 6'02.00" even these days)

David Gilmour: 6'00.00" - 6'00.25" (About the same today maybe .25 inches shorter.

Nick Mason: 5'11.75" - 6'00.00" (Around 5'11.00" nowadays)

Richard Wright: 5'11.50" - 5'11.75"(Passed away around 5'11.00")

I can't make a proper assessment on Syd.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jun/16
I'd definitely rule out both 6ft1 and 6ft4 for sure.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Jun/16
A bit over this at peak, Rob?
Editor Rob: he's always been a guy you could argue can look over a wider range, so I wouldn't dismiss the idea of a fraction more.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jun/16
He could vary
Mathew said on 31/Jan/15
I thought he was almost 6'3".
New waver said on 21/Dec/14
Waters was nearly 6'4" in his youth. He was extremely tall, skinny, and he also -- like so many tall rockets -- tended to slouch when around the other band members. Waters towered over Syd and Gilmour in the old days (Gilmour was around 6'0" in his younger days)
Nick said on 4/Dec/14
Rob, could we get a listing for Gilmour, Wright or Mason? I'd be interested to see what you'd make of their current and peak height.
Sam said on 11/Aug/14
Gilmour's closer to the camera, the difference even today can look at least 2 inches between Waters and Gilmour.
Guy said on 14/Jun/14
Click Here looks about 184 here with 180 David Gilmour
luca said on 18/Feb/14
In a music magazine I read 1,91 or 1,92.
avi said on 17/Jan/14
yeah never seemed a whole lot taller than 5'11ish David Gilmore. 6'1.5 might be a better call
Pat C said on 28/Dec/13
I have met Bob Plant and he is pretty tall - at least 6ft!
truth said on 14/Sep/13
lol was? He still IS. Saw him on a concert in Split. Very tall and lanky, 6ft2 to 6ft3.
Sam said on 14/May/13
I agree. I think Plant never exceeded six foot in his barefeet. Hendrix could look lanky with long legs and big hands, it was kind of a shock to know like Lennon, McCartney, all of the Stones, Jim Morrison, etc. he was average height. My favorite guy of all time, Bob Dylan, is even shorter, Lennon looked lanky and big-boned next to Dylan. Waters literally towers above the rest because he was one of the few rock god-types to actually stand more than six feet tall.
Shaun said on 13/Sep/12
JustMyOpinion says on 13/Jun/12
In my opinion people tend to overestimate the heights of the legendary rock and roll stars in a lot of cases because: 1) the media tended to do so 2) their larger than life personality/legacies make them seem tall 3)cuban heels.

True. First time I saw Hendrix Woodstock DVD for some reason I thought he was 6'3" range! His legs looked lanky in those flares.
JustMyOpinion said on 13/Jun/12
In my opinion people tend to overestimate the heights of the legendary rock and roll stars in a lot of cases because: 1) the media tended to do so 2) their larger than life personality/legacies make them seem tall 3)cuban heels.

I think, based on nothing but photographs and such, that John Lennon, Jim Morrison and Paul McCartney were all within the 176-180cm out of bed range in their heyday, and honestly I think Gilmour was on the shorter end of that range. Robert Plant was probably about 178-182cm out of bed and Waters probably about 184-188cm.

A lot of men tend to overestimate and/or lie to themselves about their height-- my whole life my dad told me he was 5'11" until I found some measurements of him which placed him at 175cm even(probably mid-day), or a hair under 5'9". The strange thing is I went on believing up until that point that he could well be an inch and a half or so taller than me.

Even I refer to myself as 5'10" more often than not when in reality at the end of the day I only stand 175.5cm, or 177cm out of bed.
Jeoffrey said on 11/Feb/12
Yeah, Plant seems to be about 5-11ish (used to look taller being skinny w/ boots), maybe approaching 6 ft max in his hey-day.
Shaun said on 12/Dec/11
Click Here

Mmm, he's shorter than Robert Plant though. Is Plant really as low as 5'11"? I had him between 6' and 6'1".
Shaun said on 12/Dec/11
Gilmour is around 5'11". His son looks absolutely nothing like him and yes his son does look 6'3"-6'4" range. But his mother is tallish with dark coloring.
Gareth said on 26/Nov/11
Gilmoure 6 foot? LOL. Guess his son is 6'4 then. Click Here

And his wife is 6'1.
Lou Gubrius said on 13/Nov/11
Right, Gilmore is 5-11 max, and Roger hasn't seemed to have more than 2 inches on him last times they stood together.
Shaun said on 25/Oct/11
6'2" looks about right. Gilmour always looks 5'11" range.
ROGER said on 28/Jul/11
PROBABLY ROGER IS A LITTLE OVER 6'1" BUT GILMOUR NEVER REACHES 6'0, MAX 5'11"
Keith said on 25/Jul/11
All I know is David Gilmour is 6'0 and Roger looks three inches taller than Gilmour, and in the interview with Conan look almost the same height. He is 6'3.
Sugar Bear Blanks said on 21/Jul/11
Was reading thru a special Pink Floyd issue of a music mag last night, and stumbled across an interesting picture of an article from I believe Melody Maker from the late 60s where it lists all kinds of personal info about bands (stats, bio questions, interests, etc.), and Roger self reported his height there as 6-1.
roger said on 14/Mar/11
in the picture where roger seems to be 6"1 besides conan, take a look to glasses on the table, the same glass looks bigger than other set in unfavourable angle. Roger is at least 185cm, max 188-189.
roger said on 14/Mar/11
in the picture where roger seems to be 6"1 besides conan, take a look to glasses on the table, the same glass looks bigger (or, if you want, taller) than other set in unfavourable angle (imagine Dolph Lundgren in that position beside conan..). Roger is at least 185cm, max 188-189.
chester said on 12/Mar/11
not at all....Roger is 5"11 max...he looks the same height as John McEnroe and looks about 4 inches shorter than Conan.
Shaun said on 11/Mar/11
I remember watching the Live Eight concert back in 2005 and thought he looked around 189-190 "between 6'2" and 6'3" guy" . He can't be 6'3" today though, Conan is proof of that. On his show Conan did say though that he is extremely tall for a British rock star who tend to be midgets....
Shaun said on 11/Mar/11
Yeah I think 6 ft 2 is more likely now. He might have been 190 in his prime though. Dunno what was with the 6 ft 4 claims. He never looked that tall. Lanky frame but not over 6'3". He did look around 6'2" actually on Conan's show when he stood next to him in sneakers. The photo below though really makes him look 6'0.5"-6'1"!!! Its the Conan effect. Sometimes I swear that guy can look 6 ft 6 like he did with Dolph Lundgren too..
Shaun said on 10/Mar/11
Click Here

Roger Waters is most often listed as 6'3" or 6'4". Compare how he looks to Conan to Brien Rob. There is no way he is 191cm!!!!!! He looks 3.5-4 inches shorter!!!!!


[Editor Rob: there was a photo beside that of mcenroe/waters so maybe the 6ft 2 description for Roger, out of the 3, is nearer the truth afterall.]
TallGuy said on 27/Feb/11
Waters looked a little taller than Andy Richter, who is around 6'1", so I would say 6'1.5" max for Waters, 6'2.5" peak.
Shaun said on 26/Feb/11
Looks 190 MAX. I'd say 6'2.5"
Anonymous said on 29/Dec/10
When roger have met conan was wearing sneakers, so 6-2 should be definitely.
Martini N. Rossi said on 19/Dec/10
Tallguy, yeah I was one of the doubters who had been saying 6-1 max of late but he certainly looked a litle taller than I expected in the brief moment greeting Conan, I would wager on 6-2 and change after seeing that.
TallGuy said on 16/Dec/10
Looked taller than Andy Richter but shorter than Conan on the show last night, so 6'3" is possible. Though Richter's height is not listed on this site.
Brad said on 23/Nov/10
Straight up an hour ago 6' 3".
Drenter said on 16/Mar/09
I think he's about 188cm now, but when he was young he was at least 190 cm. In some photos he towers over Syd and the others.

Anyway Barrett is 180cm, not 178. I read it on a lot of magazines and books about Pink Floyd.

P.S. If there's a page about Waters, I think that also Syd Barret deserves a page about his height. Just a legend IMO.
The Truth said on 14/Mar/09
Roger Waters's real height:
185-186 cm at his "peak"
183-184 cm nowadays, due to a very bad posture.
So Roger Waters's height IS 6'1" approximately...
No way he's 6'3"...maybe with heels in the seventies...
However Chistopher Lee almost towered him in some recent photos, and he's 193-195 cm at his peak (and now he have a very bad posture too, due to his old age)

Finally, in my opinion:
Roger Waters 185 cm
David Gilmour 177 cm
Nick Mason 174 cm
Rick Wright 176 cm
Syd Barrett 178 cm (?)
monique said on 12/Feb/09
I dunno...I don't think pictures are that accurate a way of determining people's exact heights. It sometimes depends on the angle, where people are standing, etc.

Anyway, Roger definitely looks shorter than he used to be. And he does have odd posture - usually looks a bit hunched over to me, even as a young man.
Anonymous said on 11/Feb/09
MAX 6'1, Take a look to the picture whit Conan o'Brien
hermann said on 16/Dec/08
1,90- 1,92 m ~6'3''
Danimal said on 25/Nov/08
Probably 6'3.5"-6'4" up until the Final Cut era. Probably around 6'2"-6'2.5" today.
glenn said on 24/Nov/08
i see this guy what almost seems weekly now.can look 6-2 actually.im sure he is taller in reality.
Hugh said on 23/Nov/08
6ft4ish?
robin said on 1/Sep/08
Yeah, back in the day Roger was noticeably taller than Dave and Syd, who were around 6 ft. I'd say he used to be about 6'4''. He's possibly lost an inch or 2 with age now, so the listed 6'3'' seems pretty accurate to me.
Michelle said on 19/Aug/08
I would've guessed 6'4'', in his prime at least, maybe not now. He always looked really tall on camera, and he towered over Syd when he stood up straight.
peli said on 5/Mar/08
here with 7'2" Dikembe Mutombo.Click Here
nate said on 28/Jan/08
how old is this photo?
pino said on 21/Oct/07
i read on a book of pink floyd:1,92
Mr. T said on 23/Jun/07
Yeah, Waters was a rake back in the day (ever see how skinny he was in Pompeii?), and hasn't changed much in that sense.
Anthony said on 31/May/07
He looked around 6'2 or 6'3 when I saw him in concert last night. I was far but I could judge well enough. Tall guy still, and still very lanky. Gilmour's packed on the pounds over the years.
glenn said on 22/Apr/07
yes,mr.t.correct.
Mr. T said on 21/Apr/07
Click Here

From what I gather, Wright was 5'11" back then, Gilmour 6' even? If that's so, Waters was probably 6'3".
teo said on 29/Mar/07
An italian journalist said 1,92 about Waters.
Alexander said on 29/Mar/07
When you have a chance checkout the new P.F. book by Nick Mason, veddy intewesting pic of the Floy'd gang playing "football" and Roger is suprisingly not too far above heighthwise then everbody else - looks maybe 6-1 in the team pic. don't have page #, but intrewsting book worth checking out. Other pics seem to bare out this claim.
Tom T. said on 14/Nov/06
Yeah, from the Live 8 concert last year during the bows, he looked at most maybe two or three inches taller than 5-10-plush-ish Dave Gilmour.
Glenn said on 13/Nov/06
Yeah,I never understood that 6-3,6-4 stuff.maybe in his youth.he is around 6-2 now.
Tom T. said on 13/Nov/06
Used to think he was 6-3 or 6-4 but 6-2 or slightly less seems much more plausible from examining all the photographic evidence now.
Glenn said on 3/Nov/06
Possibly.always seemed 6-2 to me.
Anthony said on 2/Nov/06
6'4 peak IMO. Roger always looked very tall. And slim
Anonymous said on 4/Oct/06
and they'd if it was a person, they'd be referring to Pink. Bob Geldof is a tall guy also and is 6'1" at least!
Gonzalo said on 18/Sep/06
Very funny, Alex. But when Roger sang that phrase he meant if the wall needed to be so high (mother did it need to be so high?). The wall her mother built around him to protect Roger (his father died in the WW II before he was born). Sad story. In the Final cut Roger deepens into that subject.


Alex Monardez said on 5/Sep/06
Remember "Mother did i need to be so high?"...
Gonzalo said on 1/Sep/06
I think in many Pink FLoyd pictures he must be slouching because he doesnΒ΄t look much taller than the other members, who are around 5Β΄11. A 6`4 guy will dwarf those guys. I think he must be around 6`2.
Mr. T said on 17/Aug/06
He does have a very long head that would fit a 6'4" guy (reminds me of James Cromwell). Glenn said 6'2", but he does have weird posture that's not immediately noticable, especially involving his neck. I'll buy 6'3" completely straightened out now.
ande said on 15/Aug/06
hes 6-4 no less may have been 6=5 while with floyd, no doubt ive met him
Mr. T said on 14/Mar/06
That Piper-era line up photo does seem rather revealing, but Waters always looked like a lanky 6'4" guy in most photos from Floyd's peak, at least to me. Hmm...could have Barrett been well over 6' himself? Plus taking hair into account...

Click Here

Waters comes across as potentially 6'4" there, but seems like Barrett is in a bad position.

Plus their Live 8 photo from last year:

Click Here

Waters looks no more than 6'1" or 6'2" there if Wright was indeed 5'11" at his peak.

Damn, this group is really hard to pin down, especially for such a famous one. But I'm starting to go with Glenn on going down to 6'2", though I'll need to find better pictures before agreeing entirely.
Glenn said on 9/Mar/06
6-2 ish.
dsf said on 6/Mar/06
here you go,
http://www.marmalade-skies.co.uk/floydlineup.jpg

syd barrett who's second from right is 6' and i guess roger is like 6'1.5
dsf said on 6/Mar/06
how tall was syd barrett? i remeber waters looked maybe just one inch taller than syd barrett. i'm thinking syd was easily 6 feet tall so roger was closer to like 6'1 if this is the case
Gg said on 20/Feb/06
I really need pink floyd member heights, if someone knows exactly pleasy tell me
Glenn said on 18/Feb/06
I thought 6-2.
mr. t said on 16/Feb/06
I've read 5'11" for Wright. As I've said before though, I can't really find a good picture with the whole group standing up straight on the same terrain, but if 6'4" for Waters and 5'11" for Wright are correct, I'd gather very roughly that Gilmour is 6'1-ish and Mason at being maybe 5'10"-5'11". I'm really not completely sure, though.
Anonymous said on 13/Feb/06
I definitely look 6'4" in his younger years. David Gilmour and Syd Barrett are 5'11", Nick Mason is 5'9" and Rick Wright is 5'10". He was standing at least 4 inches taller than them so he's got to be taller than 6'2".
Viper652 said on 13/Feb/06
I thought he was taller then 6-3, at least 6-4.
Anonymous said on 12/Feb/06
I think he's an average sized guy with a very long face that turns him into a 6'4'' dude.
Anonymous said on 12/Feb/06
Although, how does Roger appear so much taller than Glenn in this photo, yet he only appears an inch or two taller than Clapton in some photos? But, Glenn says that Clapton is only about 5'9.5 max? Again, doesn't add up right. Waters' posture isn't that bad is it?
Anonymous said on 12/Feb/06
Something doesn't make sense if Roger is between 6ft2 and 6ft4 if we are to believe Glenn about Clapton (from the Clapton page):
"Glenn says on 28/Jan/06 [about Eric Clapton]
I've seen the guy 30 times.and have photo proof.5-9 and half tops.look at the cover to the blind faith cd.the cover where the group is on.not the rare original.clapton looks 5-7 to 5-9 next to ginger baker who I believe is 6-2."

Clapton played guitar on Roger's 1984 tour as well as a few other occasions and Roger doesn't really look much taller in photos next to Clapton. If Clapton really only is the "5-9 and half tops" that Glenn claims, then how can Waters be in the 6'3 range? Something doesn't add up then.
Tall Guy said on 11/Feb/06
I have heard somwhere that Rick Wright (also from Pink Floyd) is 5'11". When Roger and Rick stands beside each other, you can clearly see that Roger is 4-5 inches taller! I guess around 6'3-6'4.
Anonymous said on 11/Feb/06
Bad posture here. Could be very tall.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.