How tall is Kane - Page 21

Add a Comment6996 comments

Average Guess (407 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.92in (203cm)
Current: 6ft 7.07in (200.8cm)
DAMN said on 6/Jun/08
so big show's 6'11 1/2'', i really doubt that he's still a legit 7-footer, maybe in the past...
Alex said on 6/Jun/08
Assuming the footwear is equal Khali has 5 inches on Kane and has an inch on Big Show, that does put 4 inches between Kane and Big Show.
Rantsrob said on 6/Jun/08
4inches MAX
hs2008 said on 6/Jun/08
I see 4" between Kane & Big Show usually depending of course on footwear.
Anonymous said on 6/Jun/08
there is a big difference in height in this match, looks 5 inches at times when they are next to each other Click Here
Clay said on 5/Jun/08
Explain to me how Kane looks 5.5/6 inches under Khali, and Big Show can look as close as .5 of an inch from Khali then, Alex2?
Alex said on 5/Jun/08
I think Big Show had at least 4 inches on Kane but not quite 5 inches though. It looked as low as 2 inches because of Kane's lifts back then.

Here they go again, billing them at the exact same height while Big Show is clearly a couple inches taller.
DAMN said on 5/Jun/08
Size will not hinder either contender at Night of Champions between the 7-foot, 441-pound Big Show and the 7-foot, 326-pound monster, ECW Champion Kane. (wwe.com)

just ridiculous!
Alex said on 3/Jun/08
Big Show has 4-4.5 inches on Kane I'd say. Big Show's eye level to the top of his head gotta be 5-5.5 inches and Kane is only a little above that.
Alex2 said on 3/Jun/08
LOL, Show NEVER had 5" on Kane, 3-5" tops, it even looked as low as 1.5-2" sometimes, but probs cause Kane had lifts, 5" my ass.
Clay said on 3/Jun/08
Disagree Shows has a 4 or 5 inches on both Kane and Undertaker that is ovbvious when you see them all square off with Khali.
Eric said on 2/Jun/08
Between kane and big show theres no more then 3 inches. 3.5 inches tops.
Eric said on 2/Jun/08
I dont know if you guys realize but big show has more boost on his boots then he used to and still looks like he lost a little height. His boots are now as big as kanes.
wwwffan said on 31/May/08
I just popped in a video of kane vs. show on raw. It was when kane had his mask and show looked much smaller, weight size, even compared to today. They stood toe-to-toe, very, very close, and kane was almost the same height as Show. JR said show is 7'2" and kane is 6'10" or 6'11" or so. I watched it a few times to make sure kane wasn't on his tippy-toes. So, I can come to only three conclusions: 1) Kane was wearing lifts (probably the most sensible explanation); 2) Show is not as tall as people think (unlikely); or 3) Kane is taller than people think (maybe). From what I saw on the tape, big show's nose came about maybe a 1/2-inch higher than kane's in the staredown (again, they were "looked like they were gonna kiss" close). Kane was standing upright, while Big Show was standing SLIGHTLY forward but mostly upright, if that makes sense. I emphasize slightly because it'd take big show practically kneeling to make their heights that discernible, at least on the tape. Again, I think Kane was wearing lifts. Hell, he probably wore lifts quite a bit when he battled the big men as masked kane and current kane.
Anonymous said on 30/May/08
interesting that staredown is not on video and he walks away at the end Click Here
KingNick said on 30/May/08
I'm open to the possibility Show may have lost an inch or two in height. He wasn't as tall next to Khali when he returned as he was when Khali debuted.
Clay said on 29/May/08
Batista is definitely 6'3'' in real life, 6'5'' in boots.
rantsrob said on 29/May/08
There was wacky angle on ecw but clear cant see anymore then 3in
Alex2 said on 29/May/08
Surely all of use here can agree that Kane is 6'8" give or take, c'mon he looks 6'8" or more most of the time, unless of his poor posture he has with his knees.
Alex2 said on 29/May/08
Rantsrob, yea I saw the pic on WWE.com (I haven't been watching lately) but he did look within 2" of BS, humm maybe WWE are starting to give him lifts again? I wouldn't be suprised if he has started wearing lifts again as he barely looks 6'8 half the time and especially if WWE have seen this page lol.
Nick Cantan said on 29/May/08
Looking at ECW on the website Kane looked about 6'10!, though wasn't a great angle, but he normally only comes upto Big Show's eye brows if that!!

Maybe a 2 inch boost in shoes would make him 6'10 from 6'8.
MK said on 29/May/08
Last week on Raw J.R called Batista at 6'4'', 297lbs right after he defeated Y2J, yet they still bill him at 6'5''-6'6''? Strange how Orton can be billed 1'' shorter than Batista when in reality he's 1'' less than 6'7''-6'8'' billed Snitsky.
icehole73 said on 29/May/08
Wouldn't it be an interesting comparison with Kane and Big John Studd. Funny how the guys now at that height are only around 320-340 lbs. Studds weight was inflated to 360+ to make him seem like a more realistic opponent for a 475+ Andre. I met Studd way back when and he was about 6'7" at most, I think Kane would have him in height but Studd in body hair.
Alex said on 29/May/08
I didn't watch it but I just saw pics at WWE.com and Big Show does only look 2-2.5 inches taller than Kane. 2 years ago Big Show had 4 inches or so on Kane. So it makes you wonder if Kane is in lifts or something last night.
Ghost said on 29/May/08
Actually Batista is currently listed as 6'6 on WWE.com.

As Leviathan he was billed as 6'7.

It's ridicolous since he isn't even 6'3 in real life.
Rantsrob said on 28/May/08
Anyone watch ecw last night. Kane stacked up to big show extremly well
Rantsrob said on 28/May/08
Vegas says on 27/May/08
yankem was listed at 6'9 by the WWE, in this video jim ross describes him as 6'8 or 6'9 Click Here

Way to steal my material vegas ; )
Alex said on 28/May/08
Cena is billed at 6'1 and is at least 6'0 minimum. Orton I think looks his billed height of 6'4. Big Show is his billed height or maybe a bit less.

Orton could be billed at 6'6 if they wanted. They bill Batista at 6'5 and hes shorter than Orton.
KingNick said on 28/May/08
Not to get off topic, but I don't think Mark Henry is anything taller than 6'1" and he can look Batista in the eyes because of his shoes Click Here

This may be the camera angle but check out this Kane/Big Show photo (last one) Click Here
anonymous said on 28/May/08
i,d have to say big show 6,11" kane 6,8".
Vegas said on 27/May/08
yankem was listed at 6'9 by the WWE, in this video jim ross describes him as 6'8 or 6'9 Click Here
Alex2 said on 27/May/08
Cobra yea like Orton, I think Orton could be pushing 6'5" but is builled 6'4" but in reality should be builed 6'6" in WWE standards.
RiverRat said on 27/May/08
I sat next to this guy at the Libertarian National Convention. He is truly a large man but he is a good guy and well educated. I'm not a wrestling fan so I didn't recognize him but I respected his political opinions and we did have some serious discussions. Anyway, I wish him the best.
D-Lurker said on 26/May/08
Yea, wrestlers heights are fantastic aren't they. 6ft1 Mark Henry can stare billed 6ft5 batista eye to eye..
Alex said on 26/May/08
Alex2, I have that on tape too. That would mean Big Show 3 1/2 inches taller but looked more 2 inches because of Kane's lifts. But in reality Big Show I think would have at least 4 inches on Kane. Still thats better than billing them both at 7'0.
RAZOR said on 25/May/08
Well, 6'7 1/2" is critical because he looks about 6'9" but he's still a monster of a man, I wouldn't mess with him although I'm 6'6".
Alex2 said on 25/May/08
I was watching King Of the Ring 1999 on DVD the other day and it was Kane vs. The Big Show, now I have no idea if Kane was wearing his lifts or not, but he had a great staredown with Big Show, both were straight etc, and Show had MAX 3" on him, and during the staredown J.R said "Kanes about 6'10 1/2, Big Show 7'2" - That would make more sense for billing the two giants.
Cobra said on 25/May/08
Just because WWF billed him as 6ft9, that doesn`t mean he couldn`t be 6ft9. There is absolutely no sense in WWE`s billed heights. Big Show gets billed 7ft, but as a basketballer they said 7ft1. Mark Henry is billed 6ft1, but he is really closer to 6ft2.
Rantsrob said on 24/May/08
MK says on 23/May/08
JT says on 22/May/08
Vegas says on 19/May/08
Alex2; WWF billed him at 6'9 don't forget before he became kane


IIRC, JR referred to him as 6'9" when he was the fake Diesel. Lawler referred to him as 6'10" as Yankem.

And then came Kane and his magic boots, i dont honestly think there would have been anything between Undertaker/Yankem or fake Deisel.



JR referred to him as "almost 7ft" when he was fake deisel. as yankem jr called him 6.8 or 6.9 and as unabomb in smw he was 6.10
MK said on 23/May/08
JT says on 22/May/08
Vegas says on 19/May/08
Alex2; WWF billed him at 6'9 don't forget before he became kane


IIRC, JR referred to him as 6'9" when he was the fake Diesel. Lawler referred to him as 6'10" as Yankem.

And then came Kane and his magic boots, i dont honestly think there would have been anything between Undertaker/Yankem or fake Deisel.
Clay said on 23/May/08
I've heard JR call Kane 6'10''. During his wrestlemania match with Khali he kept going on how incredible it was to see a 6'10'' 300 pounder manhandled.
D-Lurker said on 22/May/08
Snitsky got the dubious distinction of being labeled 6ft6 in the royal rumble by JR, then he went back to being 6ft8 not a week later..commentators, tsk.

i've mentioned this before but the very first Raw is War game for the n64 had Kane at 6ft9..Whilst it is just a game, the stat came from somewhere :)...

from 6'9" to 7'0", one of the most stretchable wrestlers in history!
KingNick said on 22/May/08
He was flipped between 6'8", 6'9", and 6'10" as Yankem. Primarily they stuck to 6'9". I believe JR did refer to him as 6'9" when he was the fake Diesle and then of course 7' as Kane. But in the later years with the mask, I even heard JR refer to him as 6'10.5" a few times. Ahh!
JT said on 22/May/08
Vegas says on 19/May/08
Alex2; WWF billed him at 6'9 don't forget before he became kane


IIRC, JR referred to him as 6'9" when he was the fake Diesel. Lawler referred to him as 6'10" as Yankem.
OOFatman said on 21/May/08
When Kane wore huge lifts like back in '99 he could get away with near 7'0", but no way can he now w/o them, ESPECIALLY w/ guys such as Show and Khali.
Rantsrob said on 21/May/08
Clay says on 21/May/08
Its pretty laughable they bill him ta 7'0'' when he comes up to the Great Khali's mouth.

Or his eyeline?
Clay said on 21/May/08
Its pretty laughable they bill him ta 7'0'' when he comes up to the Great Khali's mouth.
Alex2 said on 20/May/08
KingNick, was that as Yankem? Cause I didn't watch it back then lol!
Rantsrob said on 20/May/08
Imo Kane is just to large to be a flat 6'7''. No one on this site can say before coming to celebheights they didnt think kane was taller then the height claimed. At age 16 kane was a flat 6'7'' 4 years+ left of growing i can see kane 6'8.5'' peak 6'7.5'' now
OOFatman said on 20/May/08
Kane is 6-7 to 6-7.5 IMO.
Alex said on 19/May/08
Its possible for a 5 inch inflation. Wouldn't be suprised, but Kane is billed at 6'10 sometimes too though.
Vegas said on 19/May/08
Alex2; WWF billed him at 6'9 don't forget before he became kane
KingNick said on 19/May/08
Vegas, could you post the pic of your 6'4" friend and Kane again?
Alex2 said on 19/May/08
Lol, if Kane was only 6'7" then WHY ON EARTH do WWE build him 7'0"! LOL! Id say 6'8-6'8.5 though.
Vegas said on 19/May/08
no i said he claims 6'5 for himself and at times can look it
Alex said on 19/May/08
Vegas, I also remember you said your friend was 6'4.5 at first or was that his out of bed height or something?
Vegas said on 19/May/08
if anyone was hunching it was my friend, kane was standing straight for the photo, i remember because i took it; i posted the video my brother filmed and in it he looks within 2.5" of kane before moving to the far wall. I stood right up beside kane, he ain't over 6'7-6'7.5
Clay said on 19/May/08
Keep in mind the tall guy will hunch. I mentioned this on the Hogan page....Hulk looked within 6/7 inches of the Big Shw on his reality show however Show was hunched over like a mother ****er.

Kane may have only looked 3 inches taller than yor 6'4'' friedn but lets call a spade a spade he was probably hunching right the **** over. I think Kane is closer to 6'8'' than 7''.
Vegas said on 19/May/08
yes roughly 3-3.5 inches
OOFatman said on 18/May/08
Hey Vegas, didn't Kane have 3" on your 6-4 friend???
samir said on 18/May/08
Brothers kane & Undertaker hav the best moves and are mi favorite wrestlers they also are the same height i want more ACTION from you two.UNDERTAKER AS PRESIDENT.
Alex2 said on 17/May/08
Anyway Kane has said himself hes 6'8.5" and its not like all of us are THAT accurate when it comes to telling our height, I believe Kane on that one, and 6'8.5" is highly beliveable i think. Rob can we atleast upgrade him to 6'8"?
Bryan said on 17/May/08
Look at him birds eye view not camera view or worms eye view. I would say Kane is a half skull taller. No offence but kane has a bigger skull. Giving him the advantage anyways. Both great wreslters anyways. Hope they both retire from wrestling. Kanes knees probably bent because who knows maybe his knees hurt. Or he has gained a little weight shifting his feet different than the Old Kane.

Kane for president!
Ben the GP said on 16/May/08
If Kane is or was a good 6'9 in his prime he is 6'8.5 now. He used to have a height advantage of 2' of the undertaker now with his 1.5' lifts its .5' no offense takers boots give him nea 1' himself but taker is 6'7.5 mabye 6'8 kanes plus .5' too.
Alex said on 16/May/08
Nick, Kanes boots probably give normal 1-1.5 inches to his height. His old boots I can bet can 2-2.5 inches if not closer to 3 inches. So say he's 6'8 barefoot and with his big boots he's going to be 6'10-6'11 and get away with 7'0 on TV back then.
Da Man said on 16/May/08
Kane's knees look permenantly bent nowadys.
KingNick said on 15/May/08
I agree with Alex, and also Kane doesn't stand as straight as he use to. When he first donned the mask, he use to stand as straight as an arrow to appear much taller than 'Taker. I think he is just not by much, like .5". Nowadays he has a much more relaxed posture no matter who he's facing plus I think his boots don't give him as much give as they use to.
Alex said on 15/May/08
Kane hasn't shrunk at all. He's always been the same height I think. Just the fact he gave a taller impression and had lifts on back then.
Jiga said on 15/May/08
Yeah and if he's billed 7' but goes around saying he's 6'8.5 that's pretty good evidence he's telling truth!!!
Alex2 said on 14/May/08
Its not impossible that Kane was 6'9" at one point in time, or at least damn near it!
Da Man said on 13/May/08
I agree with Dave 100%, and I too am a nuetral between these guys. I've been a big Taker fan since I was in elementary school, and usually only tune into wrestling to watch the Undertaker. Whether Taker is 6'6.5" or 6'8", doesn't matter one bit, I just call it like I see it.
Mamun said on 13/May/08
Yes he did Rantsrob .

Regards

Mamun
Dave said on 13/May/08
its a well known fact that bald men look shorter, not only this but undertaker stands very straight nowadays as hes probably close to 30lbs lighter than kane also, which allows for a straighter posture.... also, notice how often kane staggers around the place with his neck arched forward and with horrible posture, and taker is very quick to stand up straight holding his back and head when 'hurt'...... its little things like this that can make the difference when giving an 'impression' of height. All i can say is that the last time i saw kane standing near khali (some weeks ago) he didnt size up at all very badly, it was obvious there was a considerable advantage on khali's part, but still, he was no dwarf..... also, i am a neutral, i think kane and undertaker are both great, but having met them both in real life (in trainers) i have to say that kane DOES appear taller in real life, even just only a little, but he does appear slightly higher to look up to. And not only this, but there have been many many occaisions to suggest than if any of the two are taller its kane, whether that be 0.5 of a cm or 4 inches! (joke)...... its obvious there is very very little between these two big men, and on the basis of me meeting them, AND the lack of undertaker pics or footage to suggest hes taller than kane (when there IS plenty of footage suggesting kane is the taller)..... im going with kane having anything from 0.5 - 1 inch advantage.
mike said on 11/May/08
kane definitely has a 8 inch advantage on eric in the above pic,so 6,8" is a possibility.
chris said on 11/May/08
Kane and Taker differ from khali due to camera angles and shots. "Ghost" said Kane looked smaller next to Khali than Taker did, AGAIN, due to camera angles, posture, bla bla bla we've heard it b4
Rantsrob said on 10/May/08
Mamun Did Kane look 6'9.5'' or 6'9'' im person?
Da Man said on 10/May/08
We don't need to compare Taker and Kane to Khali when we have LOADS of comparisons between Kane and Taker directly. This is nothing new.
Rantsrob said on 10/May/08
It comes down to Taker fans want Taker to be taller Kane fans want Kane to be taller. We'll never know.
Ghost said on 10/May/08
The pics of Taker and Kane next to Khali clearly show that Kane is no taller than Taker atleast today. If anything, next to Khali Kane looks shorter. It's odd.
Alex2 said on 9/May/08
6'7-6'7.5" for taker but NO WAY below 6'8" peak, it is even possible he was pushing the 6'9" mark peak but no more than that, you can just see how tall he really was with Gonzalez.
Mamun said on 9/May/08
I was wearing my favourite 1 inches heals Sktchers brand and Kane had some
Huge boots in which from my observations may have given him 2 inches or at
least 1.5 inches for sure .

Regards

Mamun
Rantsrob said on 8/May/08
Mamun what kind of footwear were you and kane both wearing.
Scott B. said on 8/May/08
Kane looks to be 6'8. The Undertaker looks to be 6'7.
chris said on 8/May/08
Kane has always been taller than UT. Glen Jacobs has always been taller than Mark Galloway
mike said on 8/May/08
have to agree with you nick,6'7.5 for taker maybe even 6,7".khali has a good 5 inches on the man.
Rantsrob said on 8/May/08
Lol, at the 6'7.5'' Kane and the 6'9'' Taker. you need to realize takers boots arnt flat people. They in fact boost him 1'' while kanes give him a boost of 1.5
nick said on 7/May/08
taker definetly isnt 6'9, that is a definate, the undertaker is 6'7.5
Da Man said on 7/May/08
Anonymous says on 7/May/08
"I was recently watching SmackDown and Undertaker and Kane faced each other. Kane was wearing lifts, and Undertaker was wearing flat boots, and Taker has a good half an inch on him. Even Michael Cole mentioned that Kane weighs a little more, and that Undertaker was a little bit taller. I'd give Kane 6'7.5", with Undertaker being 6'8.5"-6'9"."

Never happened. Kane is CONSISENTLY about 1" taller than Taker in gear, like any two people seperated by only an inch camera angles and posture can easily make one appear taller the other or make them appear the same height. But as we've seen time, and time, and time again IN GEAR Kane is just about 1 full inch taller than Taker. You can argue lifts all you want, but I can see almost no way Kane is shorter than Taker barefoot. I can accept some might see them as the same height barefoot, but I think Kane is about .5" taller barefoot.
Rantsrob said on 7/May/08
Anonymous says on 6/May/08
Rantsrob I NEVER said the Undertaker wears lifts. You need to learn how to read. Mmhm you must of read wrong you said taker does not wear lifts but in reality he has 1inch lifts. Kane has a .5 boost over taker from his boots. So the lift argument is a very WEAK argument at that. Thanks for the insult also, rather childish
Anonymous said on 7/May/08
I was recently watching SmackDown and Undertaker and Kane faced each other. Kane was wearing lifts, and Undertaker was wearing flat boots, and Taker has a good half an inch on him. Even Michael Cole mentioned that Kane weighs a little more, and that Undertaker was a little bit taller. I'd give Kane 6'7.5", with Undertaker being 6'8.5"-6'9".
mike said on 7/May/08
without a doubt if you look at the soles of takers boots they do appear thicker.imo they give him an inch an a half boost tops.i,d be willing to bet that barefoot taker is no more than 6,6".
Anonymous said on 6/May/08
Rantsrob I NEVER said the Undertaker wears lifts. You need to learn how to read.
Rantsrob said on 6/May/08
Anonymous says on 3/May/08
From what I have seen, The Undertaker dose Not wear Lifts. Kane on the other hand DOES wear Lifts. The WWE claim's the Rock is 6'5. He is 6'3. Taker is either 6'6 or 6'7 Barefoot. Big Show is either 6'10 or 6'11. Kane is 6.7 Barefoot. You sir are far late on this discussion and your opinions are stupid. Undertaker doest not wear lifts, Just 1in wrestling boots. while kane only gets a 1.5 boost from his. So please dont post until you read up on the disscusions
chris said on 6/May/08
all shoes have lifts one way or the other. others have bigger ones but once a person wears shoes they are measured taller no matter what.
Jiga said on 6/May/08
Anonymous = NO!
Anonymous said on 3/May/08
From what I have seen, The Undertaker dose Not wear Lifts. Kane on the other hand DOES wear Lifts. The WWE claim's the Rock is 6'5. He is 6'3. Taker is either 6'6 or 6'7 Barefoot. Big Show is either 6'10 or 6'11. Kane is 6.7 Barefoot.
Rantsrob said on 1/May/08
If you are talking about the regis and cathi lee segment Brother_h take into account both regis and kelly are 5'5'' 5'4''.
brother_h said on 1/May/08
"kane a bit heavy while undertaker slightly taller"...nice one michael cole. xD

but anywhooo. it seems we need undertakers height in order to really know kanes real height. they are both big dudes being over 2meters they already have a head over alot of people.

visit youtube, search undertaker tv show paul bearer and undertaker is wearing his flat shoes no lifts visible and the top is very thin and with the other people he has a chin and a neck over them.
Daniel said on 30/Apr/08
One thing is for sure, Glen Jacobs is an amazing physical presence. I'm going for 6' 7.5" for him, as I'm quite sure Mark Callaway (The Undertaker) is just over 6' 7" and Glen Jacobs (Kane) seems to be a tiny bit taller.
Alex2 said on 30/Apr/08
I think that celebs like Kane may well have visited this site by simply Googling their name etc. Would be good if they came on lol, oh and thankyou Rantsrob, it is possible i guess...
Rantsrob said on 30/Apr/08
How would you know if it were night or day?
Alex said on 30/Apr/08
That was at night where Ben met Kane so Ben could have been as low as 6'4 1/2 since he was measured at 6'5 in the morning (not sure how long after out of bed it was though). Kane did look between 2 and 3 inches taller than Ben. Couldn't see footwear but assuming both had 1-1.5 inch footwear on. Ben 6'6ish in footwear and Kane around 6'8.5 in footwear at least. Still puts Kane a little over 6'7 barefoot likely. Could be 6'8 barefoot still but I doubt over that.
chris said on 30/Apr/08
we will never know unless we can get in contact with either of them. now that would be a very low possibility.

all we can do is speculate (shoes no shoes etc) with that pic of kane and ben
Rantsrob said on 29/Apr/08
Alex2 says on 29/Apr/08
Since that was a backstage photo, it is even possible Kane was barefooted for changing purposes etc. Just a thought. < Good point
Alex2 said on 29/Apr/08
Since that was a backstage photo, it is even possible Kane was barefooted for changing purposes etc. Just a thought.
Mark said on 28/Apr/08
Big ben was measured barefoot a shade under 6'5'' so with 1inch+ soles on his shoes would be roughly 6'6''. Kane stood 2.5inches possibly 3 taller then ben in the picture and it does not look like kane is in his in ring gear. so 6'8 1/2 in shoes 6'7'' 1/2 barefoot kane is my final decesion. But there is no way of knowing footwear in the picture
Alex said on 28/Apr/08
With 6'4 1/2-6'5 Ben Roethlisberger, Kane looks no more than 6'7 1/2.
Rantstrob said on 27/Apr/08
Click Here I'd reccomend people look at this gallary. No person makes kane look below 6 ft 7 1/2. New Hampshire primary 2008
Rantsrob said on 27/Apr/08
I can see kane as tall as 6'9'' peak back in his late 20s early 30s. I mean he was 6'7'' at the age of 16. Surely could of grow another inch, inch and haft. But today i cant see kane being anymore than a smidge over 6'8'' or 6'7 1/2. I mean 16 years in the wrestling buisness is harsh work. In 1992 when he debut he could of stood a proud 6'9'' 270 but now i see him 6'8'' or 6'7 1/2 310. He's surely lost some height. Height loss can start as low as 35 or 40 and with a man over 6'6'' You have a much greater chance of loosing height.


,Rantsrob
Alex said on 27/Apr/08
It depends. Some doorways can be as low as 6'6.
I still see Kane at 6'7 minimum and 6'8 max. I think the majority of the posters here agree with me on that.
Honestly a few years ago I thought Kane was a legit 6'10 and years before that I thought a legit 6'11.
Alex said on 27/Apr/08
I think Orton is the only one who is as tall as his billed height. Cena I think is very close to his. Christian was taller than his 5'10 billed height though. Hes the only one.
Hugh said on 27/Apr/08
A lot of peaople claim that wrestlers are taller than their billed heights.
Da Man said on 26/Apr/08
Mr. 6'5'' says on 24/Apr/08
the toe area of the lift doesnt really matter how big it is, its all in the heel, thats why its so umconfortable to wrestle in them da man. and that on wwe.com was not the normal pair of boots kne wears.

That's his usual footwear, and the toe area matters a great deal when trying to boost height with footwear. I suggest you click on the heel height truth link to see why, it's due to the pivot point of the foot (and that isn't at the heel).
Rantsrob said on 25/Apr/08
Click Here check out the photo comarion of Kane and the supossed boyguard whos 6'9'' on this site
Rantsrob said on 25/Apr/08
Click Here Only video thats shows kane bearfoot he looks enourmous nothing to base his height on thou. Doctor looks roughly 5.11
Rantsrob said on 25/Apr/08
If you take 1.5 inches from 6'9'' you get 6'7'' 1/2, Kane is almost 6'8'' 1/2 in sneakers. We seen Kane with ATLEAST an inch on a standard 6'8'' doorway in street clothes. To take Kane for under 6'7'' is ridiculous. Even 6'7'' sounds stupid.

Rantsrob
Mr. 6'5'' said on 24/Apr/08
the toe area of the lift doesnt really matter how big it is, its all in the heel, thats why its so umconfortable to wrestle in them da man. and that on wwe.com was not the normal pair of boots kne wears. but like you said, at the most boost he is getting 1.5 inches, well that means with being compared to big show and khali, hes no more then 6'9'' in ring gear. well, take away from that the 1.5 inch advantage, and you have a 6'6.5 or 6'7'' barefoot kane. so the 6'7.5 is dead on for sneakers i think
Rantsrob said on 24/Apr/08
Click Here That picture goes over well for kane with Tom Welling from what people are saying is 6.2-6.4
Rantsrob said on 24/Apr/08
Can we take the billed 6.7 in the past thing off when we have proof of the 6.8/6.9 listing
Rantsrob said on 24/Apr/08
Kane is 6.7 1/2 at the least. And can we please take into a account the evidence i found where J.R says Isaac Yankem aka Kane is 6.8 or 6.9
Da Man said on 24/Apr/08
Nice job on the tilt elimination, JT.
Da Man said on 24/Apr/08
A 2" thick heel would only boost height (over barefoot) by about 1.5".

Kane isn't getting massive amounts of lift from his boots, the toe area is way too thin for that. I seriously, seriously doubt Kane's wrestling boots offer any more height boost than a pair of Nike Shox (likely less).

Click Here and then Click Here (page 1, picture 25 of 50)
KingNick said on 24/Apr/08
Da Man says on 24/Apr/08
2" heels (which he virtually never wears) doesn't boost height by 2".

what do you mean?
hs2008 said on 24/Apr/08
Nice find Da Man! Kane looks 6'8" with Edge & Foley IMO from what I can see, since it won't enlarge when I click on it :D

If Edge stood up straight he might hit Kane's eyeline, but probs just below. I don't see Edge being more than 4" shorter, in that pic anyway. Foley looks more like 6" shorter from what I can see.
Da Man said on 24/Apr/08
Edge is below Kane's eyeline, even in regular (dress) footwear. As is Foley. Click Here
Da Man said on 24/Apr/08
2" heels (which he virtually never wears) doesn't boost height by 2".
JT said on 23/Apr/08
Kane with Eric and Mamun with the camera tilt eliminated Click Here

Kane with Road Dog, who I don
Rantsrob said on 23/Apr/08
If Kane is 6'6'' ill set myself on fire.
Rantsrob said on 23/Apr/08
Hence Click Here personally stuggle to find 3inch between Show and Kane
Rantsrob said on 23/Apr/08
That Kane khali comparison was weird. Kane can look with in 3inches of the big show but can look 4-5 shorter then khali.When we can barely seen .5 between big show khali. Maybe they made kane wear smaller boots and khali had lifts to get over his enourmous stature. I personally cant see a 6'6'' kane. But im no expert.
KingNick said on 23/Apr/08
Mark, great find there. Like you said, RVD was about 6' Kane looks to be at least 8" taller. And Kane didn't wear huge soled boots during that period.

One thing I noticed too, Kane had amazing posture before he lost the mask. Anyone notice since he ditched the mask he doesn't really try standing up straight? Look at the old staredowns with him and UT when he had the mask, he stands completely straight and tilts his head back like Sid does.

Something else I've been thinking about too. A normal wrestling boot has to automatically add some height just like a shoe does. So if the WWE wants a wrestler, like Kane, to be extra tall, there has to be EXTRA boost in the boots.

Now no one knows for sure, but lets say a normal wrestling boot not intending to be a lift gives an extra .75" in height.

So for example (and for argument's sake). Say Undertaker is 6'8" barefoot. That means in a normal wrestling shoe he would be 6'8.75". Now say (again for argument's sake) that Kane is 6'8.5" barefoot. That means a Normal wrestling boot would make him 6'9.25"

So if they want to bill him as near 7' they have to put EXTRA boosts in his shoes to make up the difference for a normal wrestling boot.

Kane in his debut always looked about 2" taller than Undertaker. So his boots had to make him a minimum of 6'10.75" to make him 2 full inches taller than UT, giving him a 2.75" boost in his boots.

Nowadays, Kane is only looking 1" if that taller than UT. So that means, if they're 6'8" and 6'8.5" respectively, UT has to be 6'8.75" in boots and Kane 6'9.75" in boots, which mean Kane should be wearing a sole that gives him a 1.5" boost in his boots.

Wow. I can't believe I just wrote all that. Does that make sense to you guys or does it just sound nuts?

What I'm saying is if the WWE is trying to make a wrestler extra taller they have to take into account how much boost is in a NORMAL boot to enhance new boots for them.
Mr. 6'5'' said on 23/Apr/08
I have a question for someone on here who knows what they are talking about( sorry olga haha) but i was watching the staredown between kane and khali. and im trying to figure something out. the tallest he could of been in gear compared to khali was 6'8'' maybe 6'8.5'' and we all know he wears about 2 inch heels, no joke. so barefoot, would that make him around 6'6'' or what? i dont know
Rantsrob said on 23/Apr/08
I HAVE DONE IT! i have found proof that isaac yankem was NOT billed 6.7 when he wrestled he was billed i quote "I guess you can call yankem the largest dentist in the world-vince. Yankem running about 6.8 or 6.9.-J.R Click Here


I rock, Rantsrob
MP said on 23/Apr/08
Kane used to put things in his boots to make him taller. It was hard to run with his heals constantly at an angle. 6'8" is a fair height for him.
Rantsrob said on 23/Apr/08
Edge was a shade under Kanes eyeline when they stood erect but kane slotched and edge stood proud in the face to face shot where no accurate assumption could be made
Rantsrob said on 22/Apr/08
Eric comes up to Kanes lips. Mamun is 2in under Kanes chin. Mamun head is tilted upward slightly to.
Ben the GP said on 22/Apr/08
To Yaspaa-
I don't extremely respect him but considering his death and all Ifeel I should show respect but I think that he was not to be respected for what he did. Anyway Bigshow has 5 inches on kane so he is 6'7.5 or 6'8 too.
Anonymous said on 20/Apr/08
If big shows 7ft kane is 6.8 cause we all agree there is no more the 4in between the two
Mark said on 20/Apr/08
Click Here Kane with 5 ft 11.5 rvd kane looks a head taller with rvd closer to the camera
Mark said on 20/Apr/08
Kane probably gets up out of bed at the upper end of 6.7 mayb 6.8 throwing on a pair of shoes. Now probably standing 6 ft 8.5 or 6.9. goes to work meeting you people who haft to look up at him. And unless your amazing a judging heights your not gunna mistake this guys got anything less that 6.10. After working all day probably goes to bed a solid 6.7 1/2
Yaspaa said on 20/Apr/08
Why the hell do you respect Benoit.
Eric said on 19/Apr/08
Chris i asked him how tall he was he said 6ft8.5 I met him at the sunrise mall in Long Island n.y. Thats where that pic was captured.
Ben the GP said on 18/Apr/08
Enough with Benoit I extremely respect him but this is kanes page kane is at least 6'7.5 because prime he could esily be 6'8.5 too.............
chris said on 17/Apr/08
Eric you were there with him, you spoke to him, you saw how tall he is..

What did he say?

how do we know this is the real Eric posting a message? anyone can have eric as there name
Eric said on 17/Apr/08
Mark he does not have great posture at all . If you look in the pic his posture isnt the best, but when he stood up straight when he first got up i was like whoa. Hes a big guy. I met him 3 times Once in 1999 but he wasnt standing up. 2 times in 2006. The first time i was with my friend fred who is 6ft6. Boy oh boy i wish i took a pic of them cause kane had an easy 2 to 3 inches on him .
Mark said on 17/Apr/08
Sorry, wasnt trying to insult anyone. im not experience in the camera thing at all just from what i drew me little lines on in paint. But Eric how did kane seem to you when you met him? Huge? did he have a large presence to him?
Alex said on 17/Apr/08
Back then I did believe Benoit was a legit 5'11 but also thats when I thought Angle was 6'0, Rock 6'5, HHH 6'4, Jericho 5'11-6'0. Benoit is probably 5'10-5'11 in gear and more 5'9 barefoot or could be a bit less than that.

Finlay is more 5'10 legit?
Christian said on 17/Apr/08
Viper says on 15/Apr/08
"You must be confusing Benoit for somebody else. Thats the craziest thing Ive ever heard."

Do you know that WWE gives Finlay's height as 6'2"?
Eric said on 16/Apr/08
So Mark what are you saying I am?? Im a little over 5ft11. I can easily say im 6ft but i dont cause im not.
chris said on 16/Apr/08
taker never looked taller
Ray said on 16/Apr/08
On ECW last night and whenever Taker and Kane appear together, there usually looks like .5-1" height advantage to Kane in most angles but let's not forget that Kane sports bigger boots than Taker. Also, in some spots/angles they look the same and Taker actually looks a psot taller here and there.
D-lurker said on 16/Apr/08
Yes, I remember the listing of Benoit @ 6ft1 aswell..
(real)brother_h said on 16/Apr/08
oh yes viper. theres was a link below saying benoit is 6'1 in wcw time. theres a pic of him towering eddie and malenko and the other guy. i cant remember the whole thing and the boots dont have any boost on them.

Yaspaa what do we agree on?

it was 2-3 inches at wrestlemania 20 with eddie and chris.

i miss them both =[. ever since eddie died wrestlings been real boring now and with benoit gone i dont have many favorites left =[. i never got to meet them =[
chris said on 16/Apr/08
not once did kane look smaller than taker on ECW
Mark said on 15/Apr/08
Lol, Eric is Not 5ft 11.25 if kane is 6 ft 7.5. That would put Kane a 6.10 plus Click Here
Mark said on 15/Apr/08
Also i have so big daddy v kane stare downs where kane has 1.5 inches on v if anyone would like to see them
Mark said on 15/Apr/08
After tonights ecw im submitting to the 6ft 7.5 listing. Kane had taker by barley .5. Kane in his prime would have been a strong 6.8 but now a days in his age hes slouching and his legs arent as sturdy. Kane will still always be my favorite wrestler and the big red monster
john groper said on 15/Apr/08
Chris Benoit was 6'2 and ricky martins aunty is 5'11.25
Ben the GP said on 15/Apr/08
chris Benoit is 5'8.5 I thought sonce/ also WWE billed him to 5'10, too.
Viper said on 15/Apr/08
brother_h says on 15/Apr/08
in WCW benoit was listed at 6'1 and he even looked it.

You must be confusing Benoit for somebody else. Thats the craziest thing Ive ever heard.
Alex said on 15/Apr/08
Benoit had more 1-1.5 inches on Eddie I thought.
Frank said on 15/Apr/08
Rob Big Mistake letting Ola back on here...Shame on you Rob :o) (lol)
Yaspaa said on 15/Apr/08
Whow,Brother_h,we agree on something.
brother_h said on 15/Apr/08
in WCW benoit was listed at 6'1 and he even looked it. but the news have listed him as 5'8 and 218lbs.
but benoit did have 3-4 inches on eddie in 2004. in the 90's it was more 5 inches.
Kane should stay on 6'7-6'8
Alex said on 14/Apr/08
They tried to bill Benoit at 6'1? I dont ever remember seeing that. He was almost always billed at 5'10, sometimes 5'11. I think he was being billed at 6'0 when he was World champion in 2004. Benoit is more 5'9 if that. Could be a little less.
brother_h said on 14/Apr/08
wow, someone bann Ola plz.
Mark said on 12/Apr/08
Click Here If todd grisem as most of you say is 6.0-6.1 kane is well of 6 ft 7.5. todd grisem comes up to kanes lips
Ben the GP said on 12/Apr/08
Okay judgeing by all the video's kane has a hard height to pin no puns... also he has 1inch on bigdaddy V who ias 6'6 possibly 6'6.5 so kane should be 6'7 to 6'7.5 yet he seems to be 6'8 or even 6'9 too.As usuall you guys will not read my comments oh well...//...............
Ben the GP said on 12/Apr/08
Okay judgeing by all the video's kane has a hard height to pin no puns... also he has 1inch on bigdaddy V who ias 6'6 possibly 6'6.5 so kane should be 6'7 to 6'7.5 yet he seems to be 6'8 or even 6'9 too.
Jiga said on 12/Apr/08
KingNick i think the difference is bigger there than the isaac yanken taker staredown. looks to be about 2"+ there but yankem looked about 1" taller. Due to kanes lifts. I still think 6'8 - 6'9. Glen Jacobs says himself 6'8.5, he's said it on numerous occasions. Also remember he's got bad knees/posture. BTW i think it's time he gets upgraded to at least 6'8. Since this page started I would say we've shown ample evidence of Glen Jacobs is 6'8+
MK said on 11/Apr/08
Ola says on 10/Apr/08
mamum looks like a flat 5'5

What in gods name are you basing that on?

[Editor Rob: I let Ola back on...maybe this wasn't wise!]
Alex2 said on 11/Apr/08
Ola the troll is back again lol...
Hugh said on 11/Apr/08
Hears the real crap that WWE think they can pull off.

Bret Hart:188cm
Bulldog:192cm
Beniot:186cm
HBK:188cm
Owen Hart:182cm
Ric Flair:187cm
Vegas said on 11/Apr/08
Ola; he has a photo with undertaker, a mega downgrade from your estimated 6'7 would happen if Mamun is 5'5

do you think bruce willis is 5'8 Click Here and mamun certainly doesn't look 10 inches shorter than your man Lou Click Here
neville said on 10/Apr/08
cheers Alex2 bro, really appreciate fella
Tom said on 10/Apr/08
Neville is on crack.
Alex said on 10/Apr/08
Thing is Kane was billed at 6'7 a while back. I doubt he'd be over 6'8 and be listed over an inch shorter. I can see 6'7.5 and maybe rounded down though.
Alex2 said on 10/Apr/08
Neville are you on crack?
brother_h said on 10/Apr/08
i still think kane is in the 6'8 mark. not to mention his legs are in really bad shape.
KingNick said on 10/Apr/08
Something interesting/fishy here. Look at the UT/Kane staredown at the 2:46 mark. The height difference there looks the same as it does when UT stared down Yankem yet during the Kane era Jacobs had much higher boots ... Click Here
neville said on 9/Apr/08
ide say downgrade Kane to 6'6.25 and upgrade UT to 6'9. its the only possible way
Alex2 said on 9/Apr/08
Hes at least 6'7.5 but more likely 6'8-6'8.5
Alex said on 9/Apr/08
Alex 2, I would still say downgrade UT to 6'7. Kane is at least 1/2 inch taller.
Frank said on 9/Apr/08
If kane is taller (without lifts) its more like .5 difference
Mr. 6'5'' said on 9/Apr/08
hey man someone is posting comments under my name, rob how do i stop this
brother_h said on 8/Apr/08
mr 6'5 wtf are you talking about? troll!

and watch my vid i posted before. its undertaker, kane and 6'1 tod grishem. both wrestlers wearing their gear.
Eric said on 8/Apr/08
Brother H thats a pretty good video you found. Kane had about 1 inch on undertaker.
Alex said on 8/Apr/08
Actually Kane could have looked as much as 2 inches taller than UT at times in his lifts. I think barefoot there is an inch difference or pushing it. UT I don't put more than 6'7 today and Kane is at least a solid 6'7 (6'7.5).
Alex2 said on 8/Apr/08
We seriously need to upgrade Kane a little, he should be at least 6'8
brother_h said on 8/Apr/08
Click Here

watch.
Eric said on 7/Apr/08
Not only that jiga but he also said that kane is more agile. He totally messed up . Undertaker is way more agile.
MK said on 7/Apr/08
Yes Kane did look to have an inch on Taker, assisted as usual by massive lifts. Barefoot i doubt there's any more than 0.5'' between these two, and Undertaker looks 6'7'' to me nowadays. **NO UPGRADES**
brother_h said on 7/Apr/08
between 6'9-6'8

idk, they looked the same in that match. kane actually looked like he was looking up at taker. with his chin in the air.
Anonymous said on 6/Apr/08
Compared to these guys I think Kanes got to be 6'9.
brother_h said on 6/Apr/08
i was about to post that jiga.
Ghost said on 6/Apr/08
Michael Cole says the stupidest things all the time.

I believe Kane is slightly taller than Taker.
Jiga said on 6/Apr/08
listen to what Cole says "Kane outweighs Taker by a bit but Taker just a bit taller than his brother" I think Cole goofed. Why all along since Kane characters been in WWF/E he's been billed as taller (which he is anyway) then all of a sudden Cole says Taker taller??? Click Here
brother_h said on 6/Apr/08
barley an inch.
KingNick said on 5/Apr/08
Look at all these 6'8"s! Please upgrade him Rob!
ShawnG said on 5/Apr/08
kane had about a 1nch or so on UT but im saying kane is around 6'9 and 6'10 - 6'11 in ring gear and UT is around 6'8 and 6'9 - 6'10 in ring gear but kane is a legit 6'8.5 and could easily be 6'9 to 6'9.5
Ray said on 5/Apr/08
Yes, I believe that to be true also chris - Kane seems to always have around 1" on Taker but Kane does have bigger boots and may be getting around .5" in height advantage in his boots over Taker. I really think these guys are darn close to the same height and Kane wears the bigger boots since he is billed and supposed to be taller than Taker. Kane is the bigger baby brother of Undertaker; I'd say both men are around 6'8" barefoot.
Alex said on 5/Apr/08
Alex 2, its a bit tough to say. But based on most pictures I can't say Kane is over 6'8. Possible hes a weak 6'8. Like maybe just over 6'8 out of bed and most of the day at least 6'7 1/2. The picture with Ben makes him under 6'8 though and Ben is about 6'5 legit.
chris said on 5/Apr/08
Kane had around an inch on UT in all scenes on smackdown, both backstage and in-ring
brother_h said on 4/Apr/08
no, bigshow has a bigger head and bigger chest. mayweathers head came under shows shoulders. thats more than 12 inches and show is rumoured to have a 12 inch head.

also, ive watched the noway out PPV and that 7'1 guy was looking up at bighow the whole time, he looks shorter than show.
Rosario said on 3/Apr/08
i love this picture and i love kane,he is my idol and some i will will like to now him ....im inlove with him ..i love u kaaneee...
Mr. 6'5'' said on 3/Apr/08
are you serious spike, you're trying to say that kane is the same height as big show. you need to check your facts again homeboy. and no, kane does not have as much height on Mamun as Big Show does on Floyd. Big Shows got about 4 more inches on Floyd if you open your eyes son.
Spike said on 3/Apr/08
im going for 6'8 1.5 or 6'9 for kane, comopare that mamun guy against Floyd mayweather, floyd was 5'8 or 5'8 1.2 and big show had about the same height over him as kane does on this guy


Think about it
chris said on 2/Apr/08
kanes a def. strong 6'8
Alex2 said on 2/Apr/08
Alex, you really think Kane's struggling with 6'8? Id say a strong 6'8 (6'8.25) But i dunno.
Alex said on 1/Apr/08
6'7-6'7 1/2 is a safe bet on his height. 6'8 at the most though. I don't buy Jason's 6'5 estimate of him though. Thats too low now.
Anonymous said on 1/Apr/08
Click Here here is the video. We've settled that kane is no taller then 6.10 no shorter then 6.7. But to roll out anything in between is ridiclous. Kane is ducking his head throughout the hallway and easily was as tall as the door frame. No 6.7 fat human would have to watch to hit his head off the ceiling. Just look at all the other average size men deside him. From my research, a Door frame in the U.S stands 6.8 or above i will never buy kane for even a 0.1inch shorter then 6.9 flat in his prime. Now sure you can make the argument hes 6 ft 7.5 today but to me he's 6.8.Now on hieght loss. Being a Physical therapist. I Know you peak in strength at mid 30s and height loss can start at late 30s in average size men in men above the height of 6.5 have a great chance of losing there height earlier. Being a kane fan for 11 years now i notice his terrible in ring posture. it seems when facing shorter men he almost never tries to sell his height because i think there might be a knee problem. Also he was build 6.7 at age 16 mouths before his 17th birthday average man stops growing in his late teens but a man of kanes stature can grow into his early 20s. so kane could have easily grown 2-3 more inches.Just my 2 cents
Mark said on 1/Apr/08
Why has everyone forgotten about the video with kane in hotel room where he CLEARLY stood just as tall as the door frame if not an inch taller...
Eric said on 1/Apr/08
Brother H as Isaac Yankem kane was billed at 6ft9 not 6ft7
MK said on 1/Apr/08
Thats yet another pic where Kane does NOT look 6'9'' or 6'8''.
Viper said on 1/Apr/08
Kane is 6-7 or maybe 6-7 1/2. Its been so obvious for ages with the Big Ben picture and other sightings, pictures.
brother_h said on 1/Apr/08
kane looks 6'8 easy. or 6'9. as yankeem he was billed at 6'7, everyone says it man.
bulldog was 5'10, he wasnt that much shorter than rock and mick who are both 6'2-6'3.
chris said on 31/Mar/08
if that kids 6'4, kanes around 6'9 there
Alex said on 31/Mar/08
Kane is looking no more than 2.5 inches taller than Ben who is a weak 6'5. Bed was measured at 6'5 at the combine which is going to be earlier in the day so he might be as low as 6'4 1/2 but more likely 6'4 3/4 for most of the day.
JT said on 30/Mar/08
Mark says on 29/Mar/08
Kane with a ligit 6.5-6.4 3/4 kid kane leaning and easily dwarfs him i give kane 4 1/2inches on him Click Here


Serious camera tilt there Mark in Kane's favor. With the pic straightened. Click Here Kane is leaning but is closer to the camera too. That kid looks at least 6'4" though based on other pics from his album.
KingNick said on 30/Mar/08
oh duh, sorry Da Man :>)
HBK said on 30/Mar/08
I want Kane &Under Taker tagteam like the past
Mark said on 29/Mar/08
Kane with a ligit 6.5-6.4 3/4 kid kane leaning and easily dwarfs him i give kane 4 1/2inches on him Click Here
Da Man said on 29/Mar/08
KingNick says on 28/Mar/08
"Da Man, I disagree with the 2.5" difference, but I have to be fair, there's no gaurantee Big Ben is wearing Timbs there, we cant see either ones footwear."

Oviously we don't know what either one was wearing, and that was my point.
hs2008 said on 29/Mar/08
Yeah, i always though Bulldog was 5'9". He was very similar in height to Owen Hart from what I remember. Because he weighed upto 270lbs legit I guess WWE wanted him to seem like a proper monster so billed him 3" over 6'0" when really he was 3" below.
Frank said on 29/Mar/08
Hugh he looked alot shorter than me and im 5ft 11 1/2 The Bulldog was no more than 5ft 9 that i do know
KingNick said on 28/Mar/08
Da Man, I disagree with the 2.5" difference, but I have to be fair, there's no gaurantee Big Ben is wearing Timbs there, we cant see either ones footwear.
Da Man said on 28/Mar/08
JT says on 27/Mar/08
"More like 2.5" Click Here Kane's head looks at least 10-10.5" long. Ben probably has tennis shoes or casual boots on with at least a 1-1.25" boost. Who knows what footwear Kane has on."

With that attire I bet Ben was sporting a pair of Timbs. No way of knowing what Kane was wearing.
Hugh said on 28/Mar/08
If Bulldog is 5ft8-5ft9 then why did WWE bill him at 6ft3. That's the craziest billed height I've seen.
Frank said on 28/Mar/08
Actually the Bulldog looked 5ft 8 to 5ft 9 to me and i seen him up close
He was in street clothes
eric said on 28/Mar/08
I agree upgrade the guy to 6ft8 at least. .5 of an inch more. Thats not hard to believe were talking half an inch. If we do that then i can see undertaker being 6ft7.5 since there very very close in height. He told me in person when i met him he was a little over 6ft8.
eric said on 28/Mar/08
Brother h your wrong about that. Kane as yankem was billed at 6ft9. I know that for a fact.
MK said on 28/Mar/08
There's no more than 2'.5'' between Kane/Ben in that pic, it also looks like Kane might be in wrestling gear if you'll notice the right arm brace, and we all know what that means.
brother_h said on 28/Mar/08
wrestlers in the 60's-80's were mostly billed 4 inches above their real heights. British bulldog billed at 6'2 but was really 5'10. chris benoit at 6'1, closer to 5'9-5'10, before death 5'8.

in the 90's afew people were billed 4 inches above their real heights.
rock 6'5 but was closer to 6'3. farooq 6'2 but looks more 6'1. or now he does.
8-ball and crash 6'8 each, really 6'5-6'4.
god father 6'8 but looked more 6'5.

yankeem was billled at 6'7 and looked the same height as taker. back then i wouldnt put undrtaker under 6'8. he looked to tall next to gonzalez.
JT said on 27/Mar/08
More like 2.5" Click Here Kane's head looks at least 10-10.5" long. Ben probably has tennis shoes or casual boots on with at least a 1-1.25" boost. Who knows what footwear Kane has on.
Anonymous said on 27/Mar/08
Click Here theres 13+ inches between mamun and kane
KingNick said on 27/Mar/08
MK, how about the two pics above with Kane in street clothes towering over a 5'8" Mamum and around a 6' Eric?

Or Kane with the 6'5" football player (I see 3" here) Click Here

Since I posted my last post, this is the score:

In favor of raising Kane's hieght: 10

In favor of staying the same: 2

Rob, I love this site man. I'm not trying to degrade you in anyway what's great about this site is we can have a disagreement like this and a vote like this. All I'm asking is to take it into consideration like the Sid page.

[Editor Rob: the footballer was almost 6ft 5 measured.

If he does have 3 inches over him then he has a head between 12-12.5 inches...]
Da Man said on 27/Mar/08
DAMN says on 27/Mar/08
i truly believe that kane is no taller than 6'7''. he used to have been billed 6'7'' in his early wrestling days and why should he be anything bigger now?

Except Kane was listed at 6-7 by HS basketball team at 16 y/o. He was billed at 6-9 as isaac yankem, I've ever seen a 6-7 wrestling figure for Kane except at the top of this page.
Cobra said on 27/Mar/08
Upgrade Kane to 6ft8.5
Anonymous said on 27/Mar/08
Its quite apparent that most wrestlers are billed atleast an inch or in some case many more inches above their true barefoot height. From understanding the rough area in which someone's true height is, you can sort of figure out these height brackets.
1" above BAREFOOT= John Cena(6'1"), Randy Orton(6'4"), Big Show(7')etc..
2"= Chavo Guerrero(5'9"), Umaga(6'4"), Stone Cold(6'2")etc..
3"= Undertaker(6'10.5"), TripleH(6'4"), Khali(7'3"), Edge(6'5"), Shawn Michaels(6'1")etc..
4"= Batista(6'6"), Rey Mysterio (5'6")etc..
5"= Kane(7')
This is just my opinion, but it could be the case. I think their barefoot heights may be in the region of the their billed height takeaway the number of inches shown.
hs2008 said on 27/Mar/08
Sometime people are under billed when they first start in wrestling. Not saying Kane was, just that some people are. I do think Kane is 6'8" barefoot looking at all the pics of him with Mamun and Big Ben etc.
DAMN said on 27/Mar/08
i truly believe that kane is no taller than 6'7''. he used to have been billed 6'7'' in his early wrestling days and why should he be anything bigger now?
brother_h said on 27/Mar/08
in that video he is clearly standing on a box. like i say time after time dont trust backstage segments. in the andre the giant doco, it said that in order to make andre look more of a giant they had him stand on a box.
chris said on 26/Mar/08
Marley 6'9 1/2" is abit out of reach for kane. the pic with kane and Ben Roethlisfogar (whatever his name is LOL) shows about 3" which would make kane 6'8 tops if Ben is under 6'5
chris said on 26/Mar/08
there is 3 inchs on the dot there between those two
Mark said on 26/Mar/08
Im done posting. i've done all i can to prove kanes height but its not gunna change whats the use arguing
Marley said on 26/Mar/08
Rob, are you joking. That guy, Kane looked almost 7 inches taller than The Rock and Hulk Hogan. I'll show you a video as an evidence. Kane is 6'9 1/2" but not 6'7 1/2"!!!
Frank said on 26/Mar/08
Big Ben is not 6ft 6 he is just under 6ft 5 i read
Kane said on 25/Mar/08
Click Here
Kane with a ligit 6 foot 6 inch in street clothes make your own assumption
brm86 said on 25/Mar/08
I personally think anything under 6'7.5" is rediculous for Kane and UT. Imho Kane is still an easy 6'8". Maybe slightly taller.
Red said on 25/Mar/08
Anonymus, It dosn

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.