How tall is Kane

Kane's Height

6ft 7in (200.7 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7.5in (201.9 cm)
Glenn Jacobs is an American professional Wrestler. Has been billed 6ft 10 and some believe he stood 7ft. When wrestling under the name Yankem he may have been billed as 6ft 7.
I'm about Six-Eight...[and I weigh] a little over 300 pounds.

How tall is Glenn Kane Jacobs
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of The Undertaker
The Undertaker
6ft 6.5in (199 cm)
Height of John Cena
John Cena
6ft 0.5in (184 cm)
Height of Big Show
Big Show
6ft 10.5in (210 cm)
Height of Andre The Giant
Andre The Giant
7ft 0in (213 cm)

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (143 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 8.03in (203.3cm)
Current: 6ft 7.22in (201.2cm)
Height Sky said on 21/Sep/17
Between Undertaker and Kane the range of difference is between the same height to 1/2 inch

If Kane was 6'7.5, I should say Taker was 6'7.25
Shuvayu said on 19/Sep/17
Taker is definitely taller than sid.... Sid in 91-92 had huge lifts ...even as lord humungous he had too, coz taker was a newbie and sid was playing a character ... best check out kane with spivey, sid with spivey, taker with spivey ...taker edged sid by .5 inches
Chad said on 18/Sep/17
Dewie, I don't think that Sid or Taker were ever 6'8. Even Bruce Prichard said that Taker was 6'7 on his podcast. Although, I have heard several people refer to Kane as 6'8, I think that Kane is just a smidge under 6'8, thus the 6'7.75 that I always thought he was.

Sid is a difficult one. In some staredowns with Taker, he looks taller, in others he looks shorter, and in most of them, they look the same height.

Then in WCW, Sid and Nash had a stare down, Nash looked 2 inches taller, but when Taker fought Nash at WM12, Nash looked taller than Taker by 1.5 inches.
dewie 5ft9.5 177cm said on 14/Sep/17
Chad I disagree takers bio said he is 6ft8 barefoot thats if sid is 6ft8.25 look at you tube sid versus taker versus kane taker is taller than sid 1inche
Chad said on 13/Sep/17
Dewie, i agree with you on everything but Sid was actually taller than Undertaker. Go watch the episode of Raw where Sid and Taker took on Mankind and Vader. It was their first "Titan Tron" episode - Taker and Sid are in the ring together and Sid has him by about .25 inches and it doesnt look like Sid is on lifts. (Begining of episode Taker Sid in ring segment)

Taker - 6'7.25
Sid - 6'7.5
Kane - 6'7.75
Nash - 6'9
Big Show - 6'11
dewie 5ft9.5 177cm said on 8/Sep/17
Sid 6ft7 taker 6ft8 kane 6ft8.5 nash 6ft9.5 big show 6ft11.5 barefoot
Vegas said on 8/Sep/17
Chad if Kane was 2.25 inches taller than taker at mania and Kane stood 6'9.5-6'9.75 in his footwear wouldn't that put taker at 6'7.25-6'7.5 in his wrestling boots back in 1998 so sub 6'7 barefoot...
Chad said on 7/Sep/17
Anonymous, I am really sorry but I have to disagree with you. Kane was never struggling to go over the top rope. Ever. And at WrestleMania 14, Kane was TALLER than The Undertaker by 2.25 INCHES. Please go back and take a look at their staredown. Ofourse, it had a lot to do with the lifts, without the lifts, Kane would have been .75 of an inch taller. The lifts gave him another 1.5 inches of height.

They wanted to make Kane look GIGANTIC. Which they pulled off very well.

Undertaker at that time was 6'7.5. Kane was about 6'8.25.

Nash always looked shorter in staredowns with Big Show than Kane did. ALWAYS. Nash WAS taller than Kane, but Kane with his lifts was taller than Nash.

Nash - 6'9 | Kane in lifts - 6'9.5 - 6'9.75
Kane said on 7/Sep/17
I've seen Nash struggle to step over the ropes. I've even seen Nash get caught in them bc he couldn't step over them all the way. You obviously haven't seen many vids of Glenn in any of his gimmicks where he steps over the ropes. Sometimes he does it very easily. I've seen a 6'4 guy step over them so don't use that as an excuse to say Nash is taller.
Anonymous said on 6/Sep/17
I wouldn't criticize Kane for wearing lifts, but just watching back old stuff from 96/97 it's weird to see how much they pushed the lifts on him. At WM14 Taker didn't wear lifts, and Kane's are huge in order to make him look the same size. Just a year prior he was brought in as Fake Diesel and he could barely step over the top rope without those lifts (one of the main reasons I know Nash is really taller).
Shuvayu said on 6/Sep/17
Click Here check this to deduce heights .... nash, show wcw
Anonymous said on 4/Sep/17
Peak height 6'8" today 6'7"
Taker peak height 6'7.5" Today between 6'6" - 6'6.5"
Kane said on 21/Aug/17
Sheamus wears huge inner lifts. Kane wore MAX 2" thicker boots that's all.... big show and viscera wore the exact same ones. Randy Orton and hhh wear inner lifts also.
Kane said on 21/Aug/17
Sheamus wears huge inner lifts. Kane wore MAX 2" thicker boots that's all.... big show and viscera wore the exact same ones. Randy Orton and hhh wear inner lifts also.
dewie said on 21/Aug/17
Jim ross said taker was 6ft9 300 pounds
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 19/Aug/17
@Markus

Sheamus is one of the biggest lift wearers in wrestling history, along with Kane. But I don't know why everyone calls out Kane for wearing lifts, yet very few people have ever called out Sheamus for wearing them. Click Here
Phenom! said on 18/Aug/17
I still think Kane's peak was 6'8" and undertaker's being 6'7.5." But it seems that people are now downplaying kane by half an inch. I wouldn't be surprised if Kane and undertaker were the same height. Kane still seems taller to me.
dicksock said on 16/Aug/17
Here is Jim Ross talking with Kane about getting him started in WWE: Click Here

Ross described Jacobs as 6'7 or 6'8" and close to 300 lbs when he tried to get him signed. Sounds legit.
TheGrump said on 15/Aug/17
Sidd,ı think you should watch the match between them. kane looks 2 or 3 inches taller in the match
Markus said on 15/Aug/17
This line is nonsense. Sheamus´ top of the head is over that line and Kane wears bigger lifts than Sheamus.
So, 4 inches between the two is more likely.
Sidd said on 14/Aug/17
Kane and Sheamus.. Kane looks 5 inches taller IMO Click Here Click Here
Chad said on 14/Aug/17
Sidd, I agree, I think Kane might even be taller if he wasn't slouching BY .25-.5 inches, you can cearly see Kane is trying to sell Gallows' height in the ring but it was almost like when The Undertaker and Underfaker stood toe-to-toe. You could see that Mark Calaway had 2 inches on Brian Lee and it just didn't work. I think Kane was definitely a 6'8 peak. No way he was anything under that. Kevin Nash might have had him by 1.25 inches in their match back with Isaac Yankem vs Diesel
Sidd said on 13/Aug/17
A Kane and Matt Morgan comparison. Kane's slouching in his picture but still not much of a difference between them for mine Click Here
Kane said on 12/Aug/17
You know what.... regardless of all the pics we've seen and bad photo/video angles, the real one that proves he was at least 6'8 barefoot a while back was Kane and Tomko face to face recorded backstage. He towered Tomko and he was at least 6'6 barefoot.
Chad said on 12/Aug/17
Kane peak was 6'8, with the lifts he was 6'9 1/2. Undertaker was 6'7.5 in his boots 6'8. Big Show had about 2.25 inches on Kane in the lifts in '99 (both ar their peak). Show had Undertaker by about 3.75 in 99.
Kane said on 11/Aug/17
Look up The undertaker and Kane backstage, it's a 25 second video. Kane has at least 2" on taker. Looks just like the diesel v taker stare down back stage.
dewie said on 11/Aug/17
Kane was billed 6ft9 and later 7ft0 real height was 6ft8 barefoot
Sean said on 11/Aug/17
Hi Rob - A lot of going back and forth here recently on who is/was taller: Kane or Matt Morgan, in your opinion who is taller?

On this site you have Morgan 1 inch taller, which I agree with. You could even make the case that both were 1/2 inch taller at peak:
Kane: Peak 6'8", Current 6'7.25"?
Morgan: Peak 6'9", Current 6'8.25"?
Editor Rob: the question with kane is if he was 6ft 7.5 or 8 I feel...6ft 7 flat? I'm not sure he was that short.
ReturnofG said on 9/Aug/17
I agree if Nash and Morgan had same footwear, Nash would have an inch on Morgan. A peak Nash would have closer to two inches on Morgan.
Shuvayu said on 8/Aug/17
Yankeem was never billed as 6.7 ... its a lie ...
Kane said on 7/Aug/17
Like I said look at Matt morgans page and take a gander at the pic where he's wearing huge internal lifts. They draw a line where the bottom of his foot should be. Can you not tell how Kane is slouching big time to sell gallows height? Gallows is even wearing kanes big boots with that suit and Kane is STILL taller while slouching. Matt and Kane looked even in height when they went toe to toe so I think a prime Kane was taller. Final, there should be no debate about this. Kane was always closer to big shows height than Nash or Morgan.
Shuvayu said on 7/Aug/17
@vegas gallows as fake kane had possibly a 3.5 inch sole ... why dont you check kane vs gallows instead
Vegas said on 6/Aug/17
Kane said on 2/Aug/17
Still no proof where Morgan is taller. Have you not noticed the HUGE internal lifts inside his boots? Especially when he went against Kane. They looked even. He never was eye to eye with Nash oh and please provide proof where they said Yankem was 6'7.
-------------------


There is Nash and Morgan face to face at 14 minutes 30 seconds onward Click Here

Second it's next to impossible to determine 100% if someone is wearing internal lifts, you can speculate but you can't prove it unless you see the inside of the boot. There were people on here claiming Mike Tyson boxed in lifts which was ridiculous

Morgan moves quite well for a tall guy wearing something inside his footwear too, better than Nash ever did. Kane (post attitude era) and Morgan's wrestling boots look similar too..

Kane and Luke gallows (fake kane) Click Here
Morgan and gallows at 13 minutes 30 seconds Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Aug/17
Rob, is 6ft8 peak arguable?
Kane said on 5/Aug/17
Let's take a look at when Nash returned 2002 and him getting big shows face. Now go look when Kane got in big shoes face in 2002.... Kane was taller.
Wrath said on 3/Aug/17
PEAK - 6'8.5, today he is 6'7.5
Undertaker peak 6'7.75, today he is 6'6
Braun Stroman - 6'7.25
Big Show peak - 6'11, today 6'9.75
Kevin Nash - Peak - 6'9.5, today 6'8
Sycho Sid - Peak 6'7.75, today 6'6.75
Matt Morgan - Peak 6'8.5, today - 6'7.75
Brian Adams (CRUSH) 6'5.5
Test - 6'5.75
Dallas (Lance Hoyt) - 6'7.5
dewie said on 3/Aug/17
Taker was 3.5 inches shorter than show kane 2.75 inches shorter big show 7ft0.5 kane 6ft8.75 taker 6ft8 barefoot
Gazz said on 3/Aug/17
There's no way I can see Kane being any less than 6'8 barefoot in his peak just from evidence I have seen here. I think it is easy to skew camera advantages and footwear in your favour if you want a wrestler to be taller than he is. I wouldn't be surprised if he is still 6'8 going from the recent photos of him with big show and of him with Braun Strowman in a match in Europe where he is clearly taller by at least an inch - Braun is currently listed at 6'7 on here making Glenn around 6'8.
Kane said on 2/Aug/17
Go look at matts page on this site and see his pics of his huge inside lifts. WAY bigger than Kane's lifts ever were and he's still shorter than Nash! So stop going back and forth with me bc that is proof enough. Kane measured up taller to big show than all of them and STILL does and that's that.
Kane said on 2/Aug/17
Still no proof where Morgan is taller. Have you not noticed the HUGE internal lifts inside his boots? Especially when he went against Kane. They looked even. He never was eye to eye with Nash oh and please provide proof where they said Yankem was 6'7.
Shuvayu said on 2/Aug/17
@vegas I would say jones would inch kane by an inch but not morgan
miko said on 2/Aug/17
Kane barefoot peak anything between 6'7 and 6'8 is debatable.

Morgan looked 6'8.5 range. He was eye to eye with Nash over 10 years ago.
Sean said on 1/Aug/17
Great find Vegas! At 2:12 of the video Vegas attached, there is a staredown between Show and Morgan which shows maybe 1.5", 2" difference? Both looked to be in the same size footwear also. This is from 2005 and both have lost height since then. If Show was 6'11" range by this time where does that put Matt - 6'9"?
Rob - Maybe perhaps we change Matt peak 6'9", current 6'8.5"???

Total agreement with Vegas with Morgan being taller than Kane.
Chad said on 1/Aug/17
Vegas, Matt Morgan seems 2.5 inches under Big Show there.. The same as Kane at KOTR 99 in his lifts.. I don't know if Morgan is wearing internal lifts, but it he might. I see Morgan at about 6'8, the same as Kane. Kane being 6'7.75-6'8 at his peak. No way was Kane more than an inch shorter than Kevin Nash. Nash was taller than Taker about 1.75 inches, I'd peg him at 6'9.25.

Taker - 6'7.5
Kane - 6'8 (peak)
Matt Morgan - 6'8-6'8.25
Big Show - 6'10.75 - 6'11 (peak).. Now around 6'10
Vegas said on 1/Aug/17
Slim said on 12/Jul/17
Vegas Kane and Matt Morgan have wrestled each other. Kane was slightly taller. And everyone knows Matt wears those huge hidden lifts.
----------------

I met both Morgan and kane out of gear in the Hilton NYC lobby back in March 2004 within minutes of each other during mania 20 weekend and Morgan is taller. Morgan was listed taller in college basketball than Jacobs too, not that that really matters but still.

Kane even in his huge attitude era platforms didn't look that tall next to wight Click Here

As for Isaac Yankeem WWF billed him 6'9 but pwi continually listed him at 6'7 throughout the late 1990s.
dewie said on 30/Jul/17
Taker 6ft8 2.03m kane 6ft8.75 205m barefoot
Sidd said on 29/Jul/17
Kane with Andrew Napolitano, Who is listed 5'10 Click Here Click Here
Shuvayu said on 27/Jul/17
Click Here check this out and decide
Chad said on 25/Jul/17
Shuvayu, I agree too. There was one instance where Taker and Kane went face to face when Glenn was Isaac Yankem, and Glenn appeared about an inch taller than Taker. I can guarantee that Kane was always taller than Taker and they wanted him to wear the lifts so that he appears even more gigantic in stare downs with Undertaker. Taker had to have been 6'8 as he never came off as a guy who is 6'7 (mind you that a 6'7 man is still a giant). Kane looked a good .5 inches taller than Taker in stare downs. And in 1999 - KOTR ppv, when Kane and Big Show went toe-to-toe, Show was 6'10.75 he did wear lifts so I would guess in his boots he was 7 feet on the dot, and Kane was 6'8.5. + his 1.5 inch lifts, he would have been 6'10 in them.
Shuvayu said on 25/Jul/17
Some idiot said that as Isaac Yankeem he was billed 6.7. Can anyone show me that clip where JR or Vince or Lawler states that ... There was a steel cage match with Bret in 95 where Yankeem was billed 6.10 ... Listen to the commentary in the early part of the match ... As Yankeem Vince termed him a behemoth
Chad said on 24/Jul/17
DFENS, great find. Maybe Kane is still 6'8. If Big Show is 6'10, there hardly looks to be a 2 inch difference in that photo.
Slim said on 22/Jul/17
Great find of show and Kane! I told y'all Kane was close to shows height!!!! Most of you guys can't tell when someone is wearing lifts!
Tarinato 6'0.5 said on 22/Jul/17
Peak: 204.4 cm (6'8.5")

Current: 202.5 cm (6'7.75")
DFENS said on 21/Jul/17
The "Little" Show

Click Here
Chad said on 21/Jul/17
No problem Martin. Show does i deed wear lifts to the ring. There's a reason Show looked closer to Shaq's height in the ring and then when they were filming outside of the Awards show, Big Show looked 3 inches smaller than Shaq. Shaq is 7'1. Big Show today is 6'10. Kane today being at about 6'7.5 explains why he is close to Show's height. That's only a 2.5 inch difference. Kane in his prime was definitely between almost 6'8. Maybe not on the dot 6'8, but a strong 6'7.75. You can look back when 6'5.75 Luke Gallows (peak) played the fake Kane. No matter how much Glen tried to hunch to try and make Luke Gallows appear taller, it just wasn't working.

Then in '98, 2 big guys who were in the WWF who were a legit 6'6.5 each were the Harris Twins. Kane in his lifts always appeared a good 2 inches taller than the Harris twins. Haris Brothers in boots- 6'7, Kane (real height 6'7.75) in his boots - 6'9.25.
Martin 6'2 said on 21/Jul/17
Thank you Chad, something I didn't know.
And about Kane and Show looking a similar height in normal clothes, perhaps Show has also been wearing lifts in the ring, not sure.
Shuvayu said on 20/Jul/17
@slim yes hardly any difference ...both of them in formals
Slim said on 19/Jul/17
Shuvayu thanks! Also, have you seen Kane in his business suit with big show? He's almost even with him! Backstage.
Ustaad988 said on 17/Jul/17
He may have been 6'8" peak and 6'7" now though he is notorious to have worn lifts his entire career but before he was kane Isaac Yankem did look about 6'8" and taker looked just about as tall back in the day but 33 years of wrestling and hip surgeries and the bumps taker has taken through all these years play a vital role in losing about 1.75" or atleast 1.5" of height but in his staredown with roman and braun and against Corbin in the Royal Rumble he easily pulled off 6'6.5" according to me
Shuvayu said on 17/Jul/17
Yes that was royal rumble 2004, morgan tries to powerbomb kane but receives a chokeslam ... Kane is no way less than 6.8 today, considering TBS would be 6.11 ... kane at worst 3 inches shorter than TBS ....
Slim said on 16/Jul/17
Kane wrestles Matt Morgan in a royal rumble type match I've seen it on YouTube. One of the commentators said " 2 seven footers going at it!" Kane choke slams him I believe. Also, just look at Matt with Kevin Nash, he's shorter. Look at him with big show. He's WAY shorter. Now add Kane in there. Kane stacks up closer to big show.
Chad said on 15/Jul/17
Martin, yes - Kane looked 2 inches taller than Taker at WM14, but without the lifts, he would have still been taller than Taker vy .5 inches. Taker then was 6'7.25 and Kane was 6'7.75. Taker in boots was 6'7.75 (same height was Kane), Kane had 1.5 inches in his lifts - he was 6'9.25 in the lifts.
Sean said on 14/Jul/17
Kane I don't believe was taller than Matt Morgan. Peak Matt was about 6'8.75", Kane around 6'7.75".
Martin 6'2 said on 14/Jul/17
Guys please remember, although Kane looked a couple inches taller than Taker, back at WrestleMania 14, Kane was infact wearing a 1.5 - 2 inch sole.
So whatever their legit heights,(my guess being 6'6.5") they're probably both the same in bare feet.
Shuvayu said on 14/Jul/17
@slim please post the url where kane wrestles morgan
Takerfan said on 14/Jul/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 13/Jul/17
Takerfan said on 13/Jul/17
Still a good 6 foot 7 in my eyes

Click Here

****************************************

Flair is nothing more than 5´9" flat today, Kane would need a full head on him to be a good 6´7".

Kane had 2-2.5" on Swagger looking through different pics, between 6´6.25 and 6´6.75" is Kanes height today, with a peak of 6´7"-6´7.5".

I reckon Flair even these days with good posture would push 5'10 today, with his peak around 5'11. Kane's peak is around 6'8 and the days around 6'7. Just my opinion. I can't see Kane 6 inches shorter than Khali, who's definitely in the 7ft range
Chad said on 13/Jul/17
Tane, I think Kane was 3 inches taller than the Harris Brother in his lifts. Which were 1.5 inches. I think the Harris Brothers were around 6'6.25-6'6.5 and Kane's real height was 6'7.75 + 1.5 inch in lifts = 6'9.25.
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 13/Jul/17
Takerfan said on 13/Jul/17
Still a good 6 foot 7 in my eyes

Click Here

****************************************

Flair is nothing more than 5´9" flat today, Kane would need a full head on him to be a good 6´7".

Kane had 2-2.5" on Swagger looking through different pics, between 6´6.25 and 6´6.75" is Kanes height today, with a peak of 6´7"-6´7.5".
tane said on 13/Jul/17
I got news for ya! kane isnt 3 inches taller than harris twins. guarantee those guys are around takers height.could even be taller. taker at most was 2 inches taller thsn crush. they were about the same. my guess taker 6'6 1/4 harris twins 6'6" to 6'6 1/2" crush 6'4" kane 6'6 3/4" to 6'7". rob? what you think?
Takerfan said on 13/Jul/17
Still a good 6 foot 7 in my eyes

Click Here
Slim said on 12/Jul/17
Vegas Kane and Matt Morgan have wrestled each other. Kane was slightly taller. And everyone knows Matt wears those huge hidden lifts. Look into it. It's painfully obvious. Please show me wear anyone stacks up to Show closer than Kane does. Matt and Nathan looked WAY shorter than Show compared to Kane. Just look it up on YouTube and you'll see the comparisons.
Anynom said on 12/Jul/17
Vegas, that is not true. Kane in his lifts stacked up better to Big Show than Nash did. Nathan Jones I'll give you. But Matt Morgan no way. Morgan is another one who is 6'7.5. Kane at his peak was 6'8. Nash at his peak was 6'9, but never wore lifts. Kane in his lifts was 6'9.75. Big Show was 6'11 plus the lifts he wore - 7 ft. Big Show (7ft) > Nathan Jones > 6'10 > Kane 6'9.75 in lifts > Nash 6'9.5 in boots > Undertaker 6'8 in boots
Shuvayu said on 12/Jul/17
I would still say he might edge big cass in height today on F2F stand off .... Just saw the F2F between cass and show
Vegas said on 12/Jul/17
Slim said on 10/Jul/17
He's always stacked up taller to big show than any wrestler on the roster except khali. Idc what ppl say about his lifts.... you CANNOT wrestle like he did or anything for that matter in anything above 2" he was at least 6'10 in his boots.

--------------
Numerous people stacked up better next to big show like matt morgan, Nathan jones, Nash and none of them were wearing platforms.

Speaking of platforms, nobody is arguing Kane wore lifts but you can clearly wrestle in platforms given tiny lister (Zeus) worked shots in no holds barred and velvet sky does here and glen is a far more coordinated that those two

Click Here
Slim said on 10/Jul/17
He's always stacked up taller to big show than any wrestler on the roster except khali. Idc what ppl say about his lifts.... you CANNOT wrestle like he did or anything for that matter in anything above 2" he was at least 6'10 in his boots.
Sidd said on 9/Jul/17
Kane with Swagger Click Here . He looks a good 3 inches taller and he is standing behind Swagger so could be 4 inches
James B said on 8/Jul/17
Rob I remember Vegas said there was no more than 2 inches between Kane and Jack swagger when they stood next to each other

Maybe Kane is not as tall as we think he is?
Mark said on 7/Jul/17
Kane peak 6'7.25 (could maybe extend to 6'7.5) & Undertaker peak 6'7. Kane in the 2 inch lifts was 6'9.25, Undertaker in boots was almost 6'8. Today Kane is 6'6.5 with shoes almost 6'7, with boots probably 6'8. Taker is 6'5.5 today. Big Show's peak is 6'11. He always had boots that maybe him bigger. Probably 7 ft in them, but 7'1 no way. Today he's 6'10 and he sometimes wears those giant boots to look bigger. Nash was 6'8.75 at his peak. Today around 6'7.5. Tyler Mane was 6'7.5 and Nash had him by about an inch maybe a little more. Sid flustered between 6'6.75 and 6'7.25. There is a pic of him being taller than Taker in one match, then the WrestleMania match, he was identical in height with Taker, with Taker being slightly taller. Kurgan was 6'9, today 6'8.
even said on 7/Jul/17
peak = 201 cm
right now = 200 cm
Chad said on 29/Jun/17
Lyle, I tried to post the link but it didn't let me. You can look it up on youtube if you type in "the destruction of Kane"..

Either he was 6'8.5 or 6'8 in 97, with 1.5 inch boots.. if he was 6'8.5, that would bring him to 6'10 in the boots. If he was 6'8, that would bring him to 6'9.5 in the boots, which I'm leaning more towards.
James B said on 28/Jun/17
More 6'6 if Jack Swagger is 6'4
Lyle said on 27/Jun/17
@Chad Link?
Chad said on 26/Jun/17
The more I review videos from 1997-1998, the more I want to say that Kane might have been 6'8.5. While the lifts would bring him up to about 6'10. When he destroyed Crush, Crush was 6'6, and Kane definitely looked about 4 inches taller. Then there was the instance when the DOA (Brian Lee, 8-ball, Skull and a bunch of other jobbers called Kane out) he came down to the ring. I know that the Harris brothers were both 6'7. And Brian Lee was 6'5. Kane had the Harris Brothers by 3 inches. What do you guys think?
Shuvayu said on 21/Jun/17
Do you have a face off between Kane & Corbn or Cass & Korbin .... Today Kane looks just 2.5 inches shorter TBS ...something cass recently looked like ... @marcus ... kane is taller than corbin, not sure of cass though
dewie said on 20/Jun/17
Kane billed 7ft 6ft8 barefoot
Shuvayu said on 20/Jun/17
To me today Kane - 6.7.5, taker 6.7, show 6.10.5 nash 6.9
Markus said on 20/Jun/17
Shuvayu,

man...not I but u got to be kidding! Kane has bigger boots than Corbin: Click Here
and: Click Here Kane here (Kane leaning his head slightly to the side but he has a little camera
advantage) with 6-6 Lee Smith (Oakland Riders): Click Here

"clearly an inch or more shorter than kane" - you are absolutely wrong.
S.J.H said on 19/Jun/17
@Markus said on 13/Jun/17

Kane is more like 6'7 at peak and 6'6.5 now
Shuvayu said on 19/Jun/17
Here Click Here
Shuvayu said on 19/Jun/17
Markus ... Kane 6.6.5 ... u got to be kidding ... Baron corbin a legitimate 6.6 (bileed as 6.8 by wwe) was clearly an inch or more shorter than kane when they had their in ring match
Chad said on 15/Jun/17
Abe, I also read that on Jr's Q and A. But, he also claimed that Undertaker was 6'9. Sorry, Undertaker was never 6'9. Kane was taller than Undertaker as Isaac Yankem (no lifts). Also he was taller than Taker as fake Diesel.
Slim said on 14/Jun/17
Post where JR said that
Big Poppa Pump said on 14/Jun/17
He was clearly taller when he faced the undertaker as isaak Yankem.
Abe said on 13/Jun/17
Chad, Um no. In 2001 as well, when Kane wasn't wearing those giant lifts Taker was taller. Even then he still had the footwear advantage. JR himself said on twitter that Taker was taller.
Markus said on 13/Jun/17
Shuvayu said on 13/Jun/17
Randy orton is still billed at 6.6 . Check wikipedia

Wikipedia is full of fake data with ridiculous heights (Kane at 2,13m/7)
Kane was 6-8 at peak and is now about 6-6,5.
Shuvayu said on 13/Jun/17
Randy orton is still billed at 6.6 . Check wikipedia
HMD said on 11/Jun/17
Peak 6'8" Current 6'7"
Slim said on 10/Jun/17
Test was billed at 6'8 very often
Height Collector said on 9/Jun/17
I don't remember Randy ever being billed at 6'6. He was build 6'4, and on occasion 6'5. Test was a legitimate 6'6 on the dot, but surprisingly was never billed more than that. I do remember on occasion when they would bill him at 6'7, but if Kane was billed at 7'0, I would have billed Test at 6'9. Randy Orton was no more than 6'3.5.
Shuvayu said on 7/Jun/17
Randy and test were both billed at 6.6 .... there is a match between them in 2002, where test clearly looks taller
Slim said on 5/Jun/17
Even tho I'm probably his biggest fan on this site lol I will admit that I think he is 6'6.... and for big show? Geez just look at him with 7'0 7'1 Shaq. Way shorter...
Sidd said on 5/Jun/17
There's no way Kane's only 275 pounds. Maybe he was in 2002 when he came back from the torn biceps and was lean as hell but currently, he's got to be comfortably over 300pounds and for most of his adult life, especially now that he isn't wrestling. I think he's at least 6'7 now, probably 6'8 in his prime
Height Collector said on 5/Jun/17
Thomas, i also read that article. It seems like they were trying to humanize him more for the article and just randomly put about 6 inches shy of 7 feet, and 50 pounds shy of 300. I am 6'4 myself. I have met Randy Orton and Kane, i was taller than Orton by about .5 inches. When i met Kane, he seemed to have had me by atleast a good 3 inches, this was in 2014. I still think he's 6'7.5 today. There is another article that recently claimed he was 6 ft 9. I believe someone posted it here. It said something along the lines of "the 6-9 300 pound behemoth".. His peak definitely was 6'8, but he didnt lose much height since his peak.
dewie said on 4/Jun/17
Taker peak 6ft7.5 202cm kane peak 6ft8 203.2cm barefoot today taker 6ft6.75 200cm kane 6ft7.23 201.2cm
Thomas Thomas said on 3/Jun/17
Click Here

Article says he is about 6'6" and 275 lbs
bobbyh3342 said on 31/May/17
rob he was a good 6'8 peak he has a big head so its misleading
Height Collector said on 31/May/17
Undertaker: 6'6.73
Kane: 6'7.5
Nash: 6'7.95
Big Show: 6'10.6
--- These are their current exact heights.

Peak Heights:
Undertaker: 6'7.4
Kane: 6'8 - college height | Wore 1.75 inch lifts to be 6'9.75
Nash: 6'9 | With boots: 6'9.5
Big Show: 6'11 - With boots - 7'0.5

Reading below, someone mentioned Kane always appearing closer to Big Show's height than Nash in staredowns, in this instance, Kane's mega boots in 1997-2000 would have him at 6'9.75. When dealing with men of this size, everyone has to remember that just .25 inches can make a huge difference in how tall someone appears. Nash never wore thick boots. Nash was taller, but with Kane having a .25 inch advantage in his boots over Nash's height in boots, Kane always appeared taller to Show's height than Nash did in staredowns, but Nash was taller in reality.

An email to a former certain creative team member confirmed that Kane was indeed taller than Undertaker, (wont mention the creative team member's name as he is well liked by some but well hated by others :), back in 1997, the debut of Kane was rehearsed starting a mlnth in advanced, with Kane in full ring gear, but he did not have the massive boots at the time. He remebers the instance in which Vince McMahon and Bruce Prichard had been rehearsing with Kane and Taker, and Mcmahon wanted them to get closer, as they needed Kane to be taller than The Undertaker. Kane was SLIGHTLY taller than The Undertaker, but McMahon felt that Kane needed to be "more gigantic" and not have Taker looking straight at him, but looking "up" at Kane. The decision was then made to order Kane 1.75 inch platform boots and another pair that had 2 inches, and bill him at 7 feet tall, as they were billing Undertaker at 6'10 at the time. Kane stuck with the 1.75 inch platform boots as the 2 inch platform had felt "wobbly".
dewie said on 30/May/17
Shuvayu I saw the Undertakers bio on the sid verses taker versus Kane the height on YouTube.
Shuvayu said on 30/May/17
@dewie where di you get takers bio .... Scot hall's mugshot in 2009-10 says he is 6.5 , taker was always a good 3 inches taller than him in their prime ... way before they came to wwe ...
Logan said on 29/May/17
Kane is 6,8 maybe 6,7 great Khali said Kane was 4-5 inches shorter than him and Khali is 7,1 they said in wwe Kane was 7,0 and Big show was 7,0 but no way they are not they same height Big Show is a good 4 inches taller than Kane.
Chad said on 24/May/17
I think Taker was under 6'8 at his peak, probably 6'7.75. Kane was 6'8-6'8.25. Nash i would peg an inch taller than Kane. So 6'9.25. Big Show was 6'11-6'11.25 at his peak. There is a picture of Shaq and Show recently, and Shaq is 7'0.5 barefoot. He looked a good 3 inches taller than Show.

Today: Taker: 6'6.5 | Kane: 6'7.5 | Nash: 6'7.75 | Show: 6'10.5
dewie said on 23/May/17
Takers bio said he is 6ft8 barefoot chad so kane 6ft8.5 nash 6ft9 big show 6ft11 more accurate peak heights what do you think chad
Chad said on 22/May/17
Dewie, I think you're spot on. I would put Kane and Nash a little closer. Kane 203, Nash 205. I don't think Big Show was ever exactly 7 feet tall. I would say 6'11.5 at his peak, and today 6'10.5. There is a match between Isaac Yankem and Diesel that I had posted a link to not too long ago on here, Nash and Kane were very very close in height.
phil said on 21/May/17
he look 6'4 -6'5
dewie said on 18/May/17
Peak heights sid 199cm taker 202cm kane 203cm nash 207cm big show 213.5cm
Chad said on 16/May/17
Abe, I think you're talking about Royal Rumble 2003. Which is the only time Taker looked slightly taller than Kane as Kane was hunched while Taker was standing straight. Reason - Taker's footwear was noticeably bigger than Kane's boots. In 2003, Kane didn't wear the 2 inch heels. Kane was always .5 inches taller than Taker. I said this before and Ill say it again, I think the reason they had Kane wear lifts when he became Kane was to have him appear NOT slightly taller than Taker, but noticeably taller than Taker. The WCW had The Giant and Kevin Nash at the time, who were being promoted as 7'4 and 7'1. The WWE had to have a giant that was at least 7'0 too, which is probably why the gave Kane that billing. Taker was 6'7, with boots around 6'7.5. Kane was 6'7.5, with the 2 inch heels 6'9.5.
Slim said on 15/May/17
I don't give a damn how big his heels looked on tv but you CANNOT wrestle or move like he did in heels 3". They were 2" max.
Abe said on 15/May/17
In 2001, 'Taker was noticeably taller than Kane. So this "Kane is taller" stuff you're all saying is bull****
Chad said on 15/May/17
Listen to the recent E&C Podcast w Kane.. Edge tells Christian to watch his mouth because he's speaking to a "6 foot 8, 320 pound human being".. I think Kane is 6'7.5 now and was 6'8 at his peak.. In college, he was listed as 6'8 on his Basketball team.
Lyle said on 15/May/17
Kane has always been taller than Taker. Its as simple as that
dewie said on 13/May/17
Taker was 3cm taller then 6ft7 sid so taker 6ft8.5 peak kane 3inches padded boots kane was never taller than undertaker kane peak 6ft7.5.
Chad said on 12/May/17
I myself am 6'4.5 and I met Kane in 2014. When I stood next to him, he definitely seemed taller than when I stand next to my friend who is 6'7 on the dot. Not much taller, but if I had to guess, I would think that Kane is probably 6'7.5 now, and was 6'8 prime. I did meet Kevin Nash in 2013 with my 6'7 friend, Nash was taller by about an inch and called him a big boy, I want to say that Kane might have been taller by exactly as much as Nash was than him. I'm not sure, but, maybe Nash has lost some height since he was Diesel as I thought he would have been 6'10, but was only an inch taller than my 6'7 friend.
Shuvayu said on 12/May/17
WWE screws up in height every now and then .... When glen wrestled as diesel he had a match with taker .... Taker as usual was billed as 6'10.5", while glen was billed as 6'9" ..... On a very honest note kane has really looked tall, but not taker .... In the early years taker looked small compared to Sid, but things changed in 97
dewie said on 11/May/17
Taker 6ft6.5 199cm kane looked 1cm shorter than lee smit so kane is 6ft5.75 197cm barefoot today
Slim said on 11/May/17
Ive seen Kane duck for an elevator, and multiple door frames so idk where you've seen him under one. 7 foot doorframes are very common here so that's probably where you've seen him walk under one.
dicksock said on 10/May/17
Chris said on 5/May/17
(****sock said on 3/May/17
There is enough evidence to drop Kane's height to 6'6". The picture of him with 6'6" Lee Smith pretty much confirms he's about 6'6" these days. I don't see any other way of looking at it. Here is the picture:
Click Here

He was maybe 6'6.5"/6'7" peak, but looked like a solid 6'8" in his big heels with his big hair. Now he is about 6'6".)


IF YOU ZOOM IN CLOSELY YOU'LL NOTICE GLEN IS TILTING SLIGHTLY AND IS STILL AROUND 0.5 INCH TALLER. SO WITH STRAIGHT POSTURE, HE IS EVERY BIT OF 6'7+

_____________________

Trust me, I looked closely. They are identical in height in that picture. Kane's posture is only slightly worse. If Kane stood at his tallest, he would maybe have .5" on him. I would go as high as 6'6.5" for Kane, but no more. He was probably 6'7" at his peak, but is now about 6'6.5".
Martin 6'2" said on 9/May/17
I'm a huge Kane fan, but I always knew he wasn't really 7 feet, it was to obvious when he stood next to other people, or more importantly doorframes, here in England an average doorframe is 6'6.25" I hear that in America they're around 6'8" Kane is never quite at the doorframe, close but not quite there.
Canson said on 7/May/17
@Benzac: agreed Kane is 6'7" like listed
Patrick said on 5/May/17
Dewey said earlier that Taker was taller than Kane. That's wrong, Sid Vicious was a STRONG 6'7" tall guy and I mean 'maxxed'. Kane is 6'7 1/2 tall PRIME and now hasn't lost that much height. Him standing next to Vince and them being equal is because we can't see footwear and also, Vince is not 6'5", he's actually 6'5" 3/4, possibly a very weak 6'6" guy. Kane was in his prime, taller than Taker and Sid Vicious, clear and simple.
Chris said on 5/May/17
(****sock said on 3/May/17
There is enough evidence to drop Kane's height to 6'6". The picture of him with 6'6" Lee Smith pretty much confirms he's about 6'6" these days. I don't see any other way of looking at it. Here is the picture:
Click Here

He was maybe 6'6.5"/6'7" peak, but looked like a solid 6'8" in his big heels with his big hair. Now he is about 6'6".)


IF YOU ZOOM IN CLOSELY YOU'LL NOTICE GLEN IS TILTING SLIGHTLY AND IS STILL AROUND 0.5 INCH TALLER. SO WITH STRAIGHT POSTURE, HE IS EVERY BIT OF 6'7+
Kane and Abel said on 5/May/17
Kane could be shorter Than Taker Right now, you only see Kane and Taker in Ring, where Kane got always thicker boots. Barefoot id say he isn't taller than Taker.
Shuvayu said on 5/May/17
TBS will be 6'8.5" then,
BennZac said on 4/May/17
If Kane is only 6'6 then Taker is struggling to be 6'5, Randy Orton is 6'2. Etc.
u would have to downgrade everyone a couple inches if Kane is only 6 foot 6, He's got to be taller than that, he slouches 95% of the time.
dicksock said on 3/May/17
There is enough evidence to drop Kane's height to 6'6". The picture of him with 6'6" Lee Smith pretty much confirms he's about 6'6" these days. I don't see any other way of looking at it. Here is the picture:
Click Here

He was maybe 6'6.5"/6'7" peak, but looked like a solid 6'8" in his big heels with his big hair. Now he is about 6'6".
dewie said on 25/Apr/17
Kane said he is about 6ft8 barefoot taker said he is about 6ft8.5 6ft8.75 barefoot kane 2inches thicker boots
Tatjhana Saphira said on 24/Apr/17
I don't know which was true because someone said 6'8 and when i search it was like 7 f
Omid said on 22/Apr/17
It' seems that no matter how many times I've posted this evidence on this page here, people simply refuse to believe that the gigantic boots he wore wasn't the same boots he wore after 2000 or 2001

You are free to search, the footwear Kane has been using since around 2000 is virtually identical to what Bigshow uses and has used to this day.
Slim said on 21/Apr/17
Can someone tell me how to post pics on here with my iPhone? I work with a 6'7 and 6'9 guy and they will gladly stand with a tape measure. Kane is a legit 6'8.
Joey34 said on 20/Apr/17
Kane and Jack Swagger with a man that looks 6'3 with Nathan Fillion Click Here Click Here
Abdi said on 20/Apr/17
Click Here
Thomas Veil said on 20/Apr/17
Kanes a big dude, definetly bigger than Taker. Id say he's about 6'7
Dave said on 15/Apr/17
A recent article calls Kane a "6'9, 300 pound behemoth" Click Here
James B said on 12/Apr/17
Just because he claims 6'2-6'3 doesn't mean he is that tall
Shuvayu said on 11/Apr/17
@James B ... Have you seen table for 3 with the giants ??? Henry claims to be 6'2"-6'2.5"
Slim said on 10/Apr/17
Mark Henry wore big outerlifts.
Backstage said on 10/Apr/17
Kei, this is their barefoot height. If you are 6'8 like you claim, you, Big Show would ofcourse tower over you at 6'10.25, with shoes, he'd be 6'10.5, with boots, just under 7 feet. I myself am 6'4, and i have a friend who is 6'6.5 and they tower over me. Nash with shoes is around 6'9, but no more than that.
Kei said on 9/Apr/17
I used to be a big WWE fan and trust me Big Show is a good 6'11 7 feet now, I met him 5 years ago he towerd me and i'm a barefoot 6'8 also Kevin Nash is about 6'10. The others I never met.
James B said on 9/Apr/17
That would make mark Henry 6'0.5 but does his weight effect his posture?
Dave said on 9/Apr/17
Kane and Mark Henry standing side by side.. Kane makes Henry look pretty small. Looks to me around 7 inches of difference in height? Click Here
Backstage said on 7/Apr/17
Peak Taker: 6'7.5
Peak Kane: Just a mm under 6'8 (With lifts - 6'9.25)
Peak Nash: 6'8.5
Peak Paul Wight: 6'10.25 (Most of the time, Paul had wore boots that added 1.5 inches making him roughly just under 7 feet)
Slim said on 4/Apr/17
When Vince originally posted the pic with him and Kane, he clearly states that he was on his tip toes. Look at his face and body and then look at Kane kind of laughing.
Dave said on 3/Apr/17
@Alan Clarke yes i believe Vince was tippy toeing and Kane was relaxed because Vince is similar height to Randy Orton, maybe half an inch taller and Kane is at least 3 and a half inches taller than Randy, so Kane would be noticeably taller than Vaughn if they were both standing the same Click Here
Ryan Clarke said on 2/Apr/17
Does anybody think the photo of him and Vince Vaughn, that Vince is on his tippy toes
dewie said on 25/Mar/17
Sid 201cm kane 202cm taker 203cm nash 207cm
Shuvayu said on 24/Mar/17
Wwould be interesting to see this guy in action babatunde aiyegbusi. Even NFL lists him at 6'9"
Phenom! said on 23/Mar/17
Peak undertaker was at LEAST 6'7.25." 6'7" is a downgrade for undertaker, you're talking more like Sid or strowman at 6'7." Undertaker I feel was closer to 202cm than 201cm. His head outstretched nearly everyone except Kane and diesel back in the 90s, and if it wasn't for Kane's footwear, they would've been nearly identical.
rikashiku said on 23/Mar/17
@DFens said on 13/Mar/17

Kanes posture isn't that bad in the pic, so it's entirely believable that Kane is 6'7".
Slim said on 23/Mar/17
I am 24 years old. If I lean to one side (all weight on one foot) slouch my back and relax my neck it's pretty easy...
Canson said on 22/Mar/17
@Slim: how is that possible? 3.5"? How old are you?
Slim said on 20/Mar/17
I can shrink down to 5'9 with bad posture. I'm 6'1.5 in the morning.
Omid said on 18/Mar/17
Kane isn't standing straight in that picture.

Anything less than 6'8 prime and 6'7 now and you need to downgrade virtually everybody, Randy Orton for example would be 6'3 instead of 6'4.
Slim said on 16/Mar/17
Kane has probably lost at least 2 inches. My dad is 42 has already lost 2 inches and he hasn't even done as much wresltling as Kane has all throughout his life
Chad said on 16/Mar/17
@Braun Stroman - Kane was taller than peak Taker (6'7) by .25-.5 inches
dginzu said on 16/Mar/17
Lee Smith was measured at 6'5.6 in the morning, so not even 6'6.
A Man said on 16/Mar/17
I love how everyone clambers to find a way to make Kane look taller there. He obviously isn't, even if they had identical posture they'd be about the same.

It's like the pictures of Undertaker with the basketball players. Next to legit 6,6", 6,7" and 6,8" guys Taker and Kane are gonna come up short.
Braun Strowman said on 14/Mar/17
This Lee Smith guy is standing with a very good posture, Kane Didn't. Kane is about 200 cm right now. 6.6'75. And peak Kane was never taller than Undertaker.
Chad said on 14/Mar/17
@Dfens - It looks like Kane is leaning in for the picture, but, Lee Smith is 6'6.. Looks like Kane has him by about an inch, or about 1.25 inches. Which makes Kane today 6'7.25 roughly. Which is exactly where he should be. His peak was 6'7.75. He lost about .5 inches over the years.
Chet said on 14/Mar/17
I think Kane was slouching in that pic with Lee Smith and standing with his feet apart. He's probably 6'7 these days before he goes to bed and maybe wakes up at about 6'8
DFens said on 13/Mar/17
If Lee Smith (Oakland Raiders) is really 6 ft 6 in, i'm very sad...

Click Here
DFens said on 13/Mar/17
Kane wasnt wearing his ring boots.
_____________________________________

Vegas said on 11/Mar/17
Kane and Eric Rowan with the same guy
Click Here
Click Here
Joey34 said on 12/Mar/17
Kane and Big Show with the same guy from 2002

Click Here
Click Here

This guy also had a picture with Randy Orton which I can't find at the moment but he was around 2 inches shorter than Randy
James B said on 12/Mar/17
Yeah Eric looks taller than Kane compared to that guy
Joey34 said on 12/Mar/17
Kane looks a good 3 or 4 inches taller than Albert/ A Train in this segment Click Here Click Here
Lowe said on 12/Mar/17
Kane and Road Dogg Click Here
Shane said on 11/Mar/17
Wwe official roster on wwe.com still has Kane at 7'0".
Vegas said on 11/Mar/17
Kane and Eric Rowan with the same guy
Click Here
Click Here
Brothers of destruction said on 11/Mar/17
Kane is always 1 inch taller than the Undertaker

During their prime (attitude era)(with boots)
Kane: 6'10
Undertaker: 6'9

During their prime (attitude era)(without boots)
Kane: 6'8.75
Undertaker: 6:7.75

Today(getting older)
Kane: 6'8
Undertaker: 6'7


Considering the fact that they never wore boots with 2 inches lifts and they only had 1 inch boots
And you cant base your guess on pictures since we really dont know the angle,quality of the pics
Kane is taller a little bit than corbin and strowman but not obvious while undertaker is little smaller and little obvious than them
Brothers of destruction said on 11/Mar/17
Kane is always 1 inch taller than the Undertaker

During their prime (attitude era)(with boots)
Kane: 6'10
Undertaker: 6'9

During their prime (attitude era)(without boots)
Kane: 6'8.75
Undertaker: 6:7.75

Today(getting older)
Kane: 6'8
Undertaker: 6'7


Considering the fact that they never wore boots with 2 inches lifts and they only had 1 inch boots
And you cant base your guess on pictures since we really dont know the angle,quality of the pics
Kane is taller a little bit than corbin and strowman but not obvious while undertaker is little smaller and little obvious
Chad said on 9/Mar/17
If anyone goes back to Royal Rumble '96, Kevin Nash and Glenn Jacobs are in the match and interact a lot. From the looks of it, Glenn at this point is about 6'8, and Nash was about 6'9.5.

I would say it goes like this:
Kevin Nash: 6'9.5
Kane: 6'8.5
Undertaker: 6'8
Sid: 6'7.75
nelo said on 6/Mar/17
201cm
Sterlo said on 3/Mar/17
How big would Kane's head be? He's a tiny bit more than a whole head taller than the just shy of 5'10 Chris Jericho. Click Here Click Here
dewie said on 28/Feb/17
Taker peak 6ft8 2.03m kane 6ft8.5 2.04m barefoot
Chad said on 24/Feb/17
Taker was always 6'7.25 until recent years. He's probably around 6'6.5 today. The reason he looked huge during the rumble against Reigns and Goldberg, you have to remember Reigns is around 6'2 and so is Goldberg. Taker looked exactly 4.5 inches taller than both. Kane was always 6'7.75, today around 6'7.25. I had e-mailed Paul Bearer while he had his Percy Pringle site, and he confirmed that Kane was taller but not by much.
A Man said on 23/Feb/17
Yeah Kane could have legit been 330+ lbs in his initial run in 1997-98 and again in 2001-early 2002. He was massive during those times, and strong as hell.

He looked sub 300 lbs in 1999 and after he came back in August 2002 though.
Tubaki said on 22/Feb/17
Kane at his biggest could make Taker (who's a massive dude himself) look like a freakin stringbean at times, this guys arms were impressive as hell, no pun intended .
I'd be surprised if at around 203/204cm tall, Kane never hit the 150Kg mark at some point.
Click Here
Bradshaw said on 22/Feb/17
In my opinion:

Kane PRIME: 6'8.5
Taker PRIME: 6'7.75

and now Kane is about 6'7.75 and Taker is 6'6.5
Omid said on 22/Feb/17
Bear in mind that Taker is sorta enhancing his height with that bandana, the hair that would've fallen is standing higher because of that.

EVEN with that the best Taker pulls off is equal height, guys, Kane was and is taller by a fraction, a mere CM but taller nevertheless.
Mcnallz said on 22/Feb/17
Both men's posture is terrible there in the rumble, especially Kane's . They are VERY close in height but i think Kane edges him out slightly
Philip McMullin said on 22/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft Yet you still dont mention the fact taker wore lifts here and kane had a wider stance
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 21/Feb/17
Click Here
56min onwards

Click Here

Both in equal footwear and Kane is for sure not taller
Omid said on 21/Feb/17
Kane's been wearing the same standard big man boot as someone like Bigshow after 2000 or 2001 and don't take my word for it:

Click Here

In every single occasion when the camera angles are decent, they are either the same height or Kane's slightly taller which strongly suggests that Kane is a fraction taller.

Taker being taller argument has not merit whatsoever.
Omid said on 21/Feb/17
Kane's been wearing the same standard big man boot as someone like Bigshow after 2000 or 2001 and don't take my word for it:

Click Here

In every single occasion when the camera angles are decent, they are either the same height or Kane's slightly taller which strongly suggests that Kane is a fraction taller.

Taker being taller argument has not merit whatsoever.
Kane and Abel said on 21/Feb/17
Yeaton. Post a picture from SMW match, and prove it that Kane was Taller.
Kane and Abel said on 21/Feb/17
JoetT. You're funny guy LOL. Kane in 2010 stil had thicker footwear, and Taker lost more height than Kane by 2010, and Kane looks only .25 taller.
JoeyT said on 21/Feb/17
In 2010 Kane and Undertaker had the exact same footwear, Taker's might have even be a small fraction bigger and Kane was still taller (even when he's bald and Taker has hair)
Click Here
Slim said on 20/Feb/17
HeightcrazyRed6ft when did I get proven wrong? Lol you are confused and clearly your eyesight needs adjusting.
Slim said on 20/Feb/17
BIG SHOW are you blind? He's clearly taller lol wow.
Yeaton said on 20/Feb/17
As far as the SMW match, Kane was clearly taller. Both guys are standing in the same stance. Kane was obviously taller.

Reason behind the lifts in 1998, the WWF at the time wanted Kane to look even more gigantic than he already is. Kane was taller than Taker by .5 inches. Undertaker at the time was 6'7, Kane was 6'7.5. They added 2 inch lifts to Kane, which made him 6'9.5. Thus Taker being billed as 6'10 and Kane being billed as 7 feet tall. Nobody can really tell between a man who is almost 6'10 in ring gear, and a 7 footer.
BIG SHOW said on 20/Feb/17
JoeyT.

Kane footwear was at least inch thicker :D
Joe said on 20/Feb/17
JoeyT - Simply wrong. Kane had atleast 1.5 inches footwear advantage at wrestlemania 1998.

Click Here
Click Here

Also, the one time i've seen Undertaker look taller than kane was in the royal rumble 2003 where he helped kane up. Kane looked just a little shorter due to them having them same footwear. Undertaker peak - 6'8 - kane peak - 6'7.5
JoeyT said on 20/Feb/17
Kane and Undertaker's footwear were pretty similar in their match at Wrestlemania and Kane was taller that day. I think Mark was a weak 6'8 barefoot and Glenn was a strong 6'8 when they were in their prime Click Here
Click Here
Tuga said on 20/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft is right.

Click Here
Click Here
Full video:
Click Here

Good camera angle and BOTH standing straight.
Take away the footware advantage from kane:
Click Here
And the result is obvious.
BIG SHOW said on 20/Feb/17
Slim. I Notice that when Kane didn't Wore his monster boots Taker was Taller than him(SMW Unabomb vs Taker).
Fui said on 19/Feb/17
Kane is much taller than Taker here Click Here and his boots couldn't be any smaller/flater Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 19/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft The day you ACTUALLY show us a pic of kane and taker with kanes head below takers, NO SOLE advantage on EITHER man in different gimmics is the day we'll all believe you, you've produced no HARD factual evidence that shows kane being the shorter man. You can remove yankems hair all you want hes still taller
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 19/Feb/17
Slim said on 19/Feb/17
HeightcrazyRed6ft do you not realize that it's fishy how Glenn was taller than Mark back when neither wore lifts under different gimmicks? Do you not notice that?

*
*
*
Do you notice that you were porven wrong and now just trolling and bitching around with nonsense?!
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 19/Feb/17
Fui said on 19/Feb/17
Kane when he was with Xpac in 1999 was not wearing big boots...
Click Here

***********************************************************


Just look at the pic you posted, Kane is clearly in big 2" soled boots and still only 2cm taller than Taker Click Here
Slim said on 19/Feb/17
HeightcrazyRed6ft do you not realize that it's fishy how Glenn was taller than Mark back when neither wore lifts under different gimmicks? Do you not notice that? Do you also not notice how Kane was bending his knees and hunched for some reason when taker got in his face? Lifts or no lifts, show me where takers head was EVER over Kane's. I'll wait.
Ray Rocker said on 19/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 17/Feb/17
Click Here

1:25 onwards, Kane in bigger boots and the top of their heads are equal ..."

Good video, I agree peak Taker was just a little bit taller than Kane (talking less than 1/2 inch and maybe even 1/4 inch). Also during that time/video, not only was Taker slightly taller, but he looked to be more massive/heavier than Kane at that point in time as well. Today it may be reversed and Kane may be the slightly taller one.
Fui said on 19/Feb/17
Kane when he was with Xpac in 1999 was not wearing big boots, he slimed down significantly and was doing much more athletic moves, no way he'd be doing that stuff in them.
Kane has obviously always been taller than Taker, idk why some people don't accept that.
Click Here
Kane and Abel said on 19/Feb/17
But Kane still wore thicker than Taker.
Philip McMullin said on 19/Feb/17
Again your comment has a hole in it. (you forgot to show the face to face head levels AAAANNND sole advantages. Taker wore pretty big boots in his ministry days
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 17/Feb/17
Click Here

1:25 onwards, Kane in bigger boots and the top of their heads are equal ...
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 17/Feb/17
Click Here 6min onwards, Kane clearly in bigger footwear - put away the wron hair and their boots and Kane for sure isn´t taller
Slim said on 15/Feb/17
Take away his puffy hair all you want but he's still taller with a bald head. Lol fail.
Glenn said on 14/Feb/17
From the looks of it, the platform is about 4 inches. If Crush and Wrath are 6'5, that means they're 6'9 in that photo.. Where does that put Nash?
Vegas said on 13/Feb/17
Yeaton said on 10/Feb/17
For anyone who think that Nash is anything above 6'8, please refer to the photo below.. Here is Nash, Crush and Wrath, 3 gigantiv men who over the course of their careers had been billed anywhere from 6'7 to 6'11.. Crush looks the tallest in this backstage photo
--------------------------

Crush (Brian Adams) and bomb (Bryan Clarke) are standing on a platform in that photo. Neither guy was over 6'5 and Nash was noticeably taller than both at 94 rumble

Click Here
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 13/Feb/17
JoeyT said on 11/Feb/17
Isaac Yankem was absolutely taller by a small amount and Taker's footwear was thicker than his

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



Yeah Taker could´ve a bit more footwear, but he has also a much wider stand, wouldn´t surprise me if he would gain 2cm by closing his feet...
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 13/Feb/17
Click Here

Lets take away Yankems puffy hair advantage....
Kane and Abel said on 13/Feb/17
LOL at this guys, PEAK KANE WASN'T TALLER than Peak Taker, you guys are so funny LOL
Alex Marlin said on 13/Feb/17
6'7".75 but 6'8" at the most
Tarinator said on 12/Feb/17
Yep! Just verified. Kane's eye line is 2.5" taller than the top of Miz's head so he must be 6'0.5" + 2.5" + 4.75" = 6'7.75" right now. Your thoughts Rob? For sure he has lost at least 1-2 cm from his 204 cm peak.
Nia said on 12/Feb/17
Yeaton, But Crush and Adam Bomb are standing higher than Nash. both guys wasn't taller than 6'6.5 and Nash was over 6'9
Slim said on 11/Feb/17
The split pic of Kane and taker staring down show is WRONG. I've seen almost every damn episode of raw. That taker and show staredown was show with flat black dress looking shoes on. And Kane starring him down was in his wrestling attire. Both Kane and show were wearing lifts. Stop trolling and get your facts straight. Kane has been proven taller than taker when they bother weren't wearing lifts. Kane was MONSTROUS over taker with his lifts on and still obviously is. Denial.
JoeyT said on 11/Feb/17
Isaac Yankem was absolutely taller by a small amount and Taker's footwear was thicker than his at this time Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 11/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft youre still wrong, go look at a few of their current staredowns notably the NEWEST one!
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 11/Feb/17
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft If you wanna know whos taller, kane has stood taller next to big show than taker ever did, and still does!




LOL
I don´t talk about how tall Kane in special made boots is, I talk about their barefootheight.
Kane in big big heeled boots onls comes out 1-1.5" taller than Taker, so not taller barefoot
Click Here
Kane and Abel said on 11/Feb/17
Peak Kane was NOT taller than Taker, and no way Kane is the same size as Nash. Now Kane is max weak 6'7 and maybe even under this mark. Nash 6'8.5.
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 11/Feb/17
Don´t see Unabomb taller - do you really see were Undertakers top of the head is in the high angle pic...

Click Here

If anything Taker looks taller in equal footwear, they´re nose to nose and Taker has the longer head...


Glen doesn´t look any different to what 6´6.5"-6´7" Sid Eudy looked next to Taker in 1997...
Slim said on 10/Feb/17
Why would UNDERTAKER be selling YANKEMS height??? What an excuse. With or without lifts, Kane has always been seen obviously taller than taker.
Yeaton said on 10/Feb/17
For anyone who think that Nash is anything above 6'8, please refer to the photo below.. Here is Nash, Crush and Wrath, 3 gigantiv men who over the course of their careers had been billed anywhere from 6'7 to 6'11.. Crush looks the tallest in this backstage photo

Click Here
Glenn said on 10/Feb/17
@Heightcrazyred6ft, I don't know how to upload here, but if you go to google search and type in "Undertaker vs Unabomb", you will see not 1, but 2 images of their staredown. Taker is not selling Kane's height in thos images, one is a close up where you can clearly see Taker staring up into Kane, another is from far away and you can most definitely tell Glen is about .75 inches taller than Taker. (SAME footwear advantage). I believe Kane was about 6'8 here, and Taker was 6'7.25.

The reason Glen was given lifts when he became Kane was because they wanted Kane to look monstrous against The Undertaker. Glen WAS taller than Taker, BUT, because they were almost identical in height any slight slouch by Kane could look as if Taker was taller, they wanted to make sure that never happened, in that case, they gave him 1.5 inches of lifts to make sure Kane always looked taller than Taker, even though he already was. If Kane had been smaller than Taker, he would have never been given even the gimmick of fake Diesel. Vince McMahon would have not wanted someone was smaller than the original to play the fake Diesel. I'm in no way saying that Kane was taller than Kevin Nash, BUT, I believe Kane was definitely 6'8, and Nash was almost 6'9. Today, if you put Nash and Kane next to each other, they would be the same exact size.
Vegas said on 10/Feb/17
I also met Penn jillette in person over a decade ago and he clearly stated on stage that night he was 6'6. In person he looked 6'5.5-6'6 not 6'7

Kane was also not 4 inches taller than Ben, Kane still in ring gear obviously given he has the elbow pads and contact still in looks about 2.5 inches taller Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 10/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft If you wanna know whos taller, kane has stood taller next to big show than taker ever did, and still does!
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 10/Feb/17
Glenn said on 9/Feb/17
Kane and Abel, peak Kane WAS taller than peak Taker by about .75 inches to 1 inch. If you don't believe me, look up Mike Unabomb Vs Undertaker from Smoky Mountain Wrestling back in 95. The staredown, you can clearly see Kane is taller than the Undertaker by an inch (no lifts)

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________



WRRRRRRROOOONNNNNGGG, stop spreading out such nonsense as fact.

There´s no camera angle or quality shot proving Kane as Unabomb to be taller. As Yankem, Kane was already in ~1.25-1.4" soled footwear and Taker was selling Yankems height with a wide stand.

For Facts, look at WM 14, watch close at their gap AND their footwear! Click Here


The gap is 1.5" and thats about Kanes footwear advantage, Taker and Kane were within a fraction the same height barefoot.

The only question is how much over 6ft7in they could measure peak barefoot evening.
Kane and Abel said on 10/Feb/17
LOL, in This Staredown SMW in 95, Kane isn't taller than Taker, not even half inch taller.
JoeyT said on 10/Feb/17
Just a reminder that Kane is not any shorter than the 6'6.5 or 6'7 Penn Jillette. Click Here Click Here
Glenn said on 9/Feb/17
Kane and Abel, peak Kane WAS taller than peak Taker by about .75 inches to 1 inch. If you don't believe me, look up Mike Unabomb Vs Undertaker from Smoky Mountain Wrestling back in 95. The staredown, you can clearly see Kane is taller than the Undertaker by an inch (no lifts)
Slim said on 9/Feb/17
Vegas we've seen Kane with Big Ben. The 6'4.75 guy you posted a pic with snitsky and the 6'7 guy. Kane was at least 4" taller.
Slim said on 9/Feb/17
Peak Kane has been proven taller than taker. We all saw the staredown of him as Isaac Yankem vs Taker.
Kane and Abel said on 9/Feb/17
Funny thing is that Peak Kane wasn't Taller Than Peak Taker, and you people try to make Kane the same height as Nash, even that Nash was taller than Taker by two inches.
Joey said on 8/Feb/17
How tall do u guys think Edge is? Click Here
Click Here I thought he was a good 6'2 or 6'3 but Kane has a lot of height on him so I'm not sure.

Also what about JBL? Click Here I can't find the video of this segment atm but JBL usually looks 2 inches shorter than "Corporate" Kane,
Apparently Tom Phillips is a legit 6'0 which is why he crouches down when interviewing guys that are 6'0 and shorter
Kosta188 said on 8/Feb/17
@heightcrazy6ft there, now that comparison is much better.
As u said there is about a inch difference there where as the oversized version showed a much bigger difference, so yes it does make a big difference to the comparison. I'm sure It's common knowledge that Nash is slightly taller than Kane( I believe it's an inch difference but that's just my opinion) despite there never being a staredown between the 2.
Philip McMullin said on 8/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft Kane doesnt wear HUGE heeled dress shoes, but nash does wear quite largely heeled trainers/sneekers. Nash will have a footwear advantage
Vegas said on 8/Feb/17
The guy on the left is a measured 6'7.2 barefoot, the chap on the right 6'4.75 Click Here

Kane wasn't 6'8 when I met him in person 13 years ago for first time never mind in 2017 at nearly 50 years old
Slim said on 7/Feb/17
Coming from someone who actually played football (myself) middle school all throughout high school, they do not fudge heights. They always measure you and do not bill it at all.
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Feb/17
Click Here

Nash was within 1.5"-1.75" of Big Show not to long ago...

Wich I believe was always their barefoot gap, The Giant had 1" footwear advantage in WCW so it looked 2.5"

Peak Big Show 6´11-11.25"
Peak Kevin Nash 6´9.5"
Peak Kane 6´7.5"
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Feb/17
Click Here

the famous Kane Strowman staredown, with their footwear zoomed. Strowman has insidelift but still no footwear advantage over Kanes boots.

*******************************************************************************************************************




Kosta188 said on 7/Feb/17
@HeightcrazyRed6ft that comparison doesn't work at all, the pictures are waaaaay different in size and so is their posture and the position of them (HHH is standing way closer to Kane which lessens the height difference)

___________________________________________

Didn´t read such nonsense in a long time. look at HHH head, the size is good. Nash has one of the largest heads, nothing wrong there. its a rare case of Nash standing tall, he can lose alot with a slouching back... Click Here and still comes out an inch taller than Kane.

HHH always comes out under Nash´s nose if both stand straight.
HHH always comes up to Kanes eyeline if both stand straight. Don´t count Kane in his munsterboots...

Its a 2inch difference, minimum 1.5 but closer to 2"

Kane today 6´6.75-6´7"
Nash today 6´8.5"-6´9"


And don´t post crappy angle pics, they don´t show anything close to reality
@HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Feb/17
Vinny said on 6/Feb/17
No @HeightcrazyRed6ft it wasn't a typo Click Here he was listed 6'7 in college football...
______________________________________________________________________________________________


it was sarcasm...
Snitsky was never more than 6ft5in, college football listings prove nothing, most of them are made up to gain attention.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.