How tall is Kane

Kane's Height

6ft 6 ¾ (200 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7 ½ (201.9 cm)
Glenn Jacobs is an American professional Wrestler. Has been billed 6ft 10 and some believe he stood 7ft. He once claimed in a video interview: "I'm about Six-Eight...[and I weigh] a little over 300 pounds."

How tall is Glenn Kane Jacobs
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of The Undertaker
The Undertaker
6ft 6 (198 cm)
Height of John Cena
John Cena
6ft ½ in (184 cm)
Height of Big Show
Big Show
6ft 10 (208 cm)
Height of Andre The Giant
Andre The Giant
7ft 0 (213 cm)

Add a Comment7383 comments

Average Guess (476 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.87in (202.9cm)
Current: 6ft 7in (200.7cm)
heightchecker34 said on 30/Nov/20
Well whats interesting, was this was the first time I ever watched Kevin Nash vs Isaac Yankem in 1996 and if Nash was 6'9.5, than he made Kane look 6'7.5 which is what I believed both their peak heights were. If Nash was 6'9, than Kane may have been 6'7, but IMO would make Undertaker 6'6.75 which I doubt. I always believed Kane was slightly taller than Taker, but sub 6'7 for Taker in his prime would be surprising. So Kevin Nash: 6'9.5, Kane: 6'7.5, and Undertaker: 6'7.25.
Resurrection of Edward said on 30/Nov/20
i’m not taking pierre seriously as this dude continuously post the same photo of kane with vaughn and show with shaq to back up his evidence while he ignores rest of photos.smh
Roderick said on 29/Nov/20
Kane is maybe 6'5.5".

He is not in the same height range as guys like LeBron James or Braun Strowman. He's shorter than them, and it's noticeable.

Before you argue that Kane is taller than Strowman, Undertaker even said on the Broken Skulls session that Kane wears platform boots. In an outside-of-ring photo, Kane IS shorter than Braun.

Even in the 90s, while Undertaker and Kane were both built and young, it's hard to comfortably say that they were both 6'7" dudes. Sometimes it's questionable, but maybe I'm wrong.
Pierre said on 28/Nov/20
Click Here here no big wrestler shoes,Kane looks max same height as Undertaker.
Roderick said on 27/Nov/20
Something very interesting! I haven't posted in awhile, but on the new Broken Skull sessions with the Undertaker, Austin pulls up this picture on the TV and shows it to Undertaker.



Undertaker looks at it and says, "Now there may have been some camera angle there, and he may have had some platform boots on, because he's not that much taller than me."

Interesting find for sure.
Resurrection of Edward said on 24/Nov/20
braun strowman and kane were both dubbed as “monster” but braun never looked intimidating as a peak kane.strowman never looked as tall as peak kane.
J2Frenzy said on 24/Nov/20
@Res of Edward it’s difficult to notice if a guy is only half an inch taller than you
Resurrection of Edward said on 23/Nov/20
@ Editor rob

Again, on the new episode of broken skull sessions, Taker says Kane he wasn't that much taller than me.

The 'may' part obviously comes across as a joke and secondly you don't say someone 'isn't that much taller than me' if he isn't actually taller.

@editor rob

do you think undertaker was joking when he said”kane wasn’t much taller than me”.secondly you don't say someone 'isn't that much taller than me' if he isn't actually taller.you can see that in the latest taker documentary.need your opinion.
Editor Rob
he could have felt Kane edged him out and was saying it like he seen it...
Resurrection of Edward said on 23/Nov/20
Lyle said on 22/Nov/20
Again, on the new episode of broken skull sessions, Taker says Kane 'may' have worn platform boots, he wasn't that much taller than me.

The 'may' part obviously comes across as a joke and secondly you don't say someone 'isn't that much taller than me' if he isn't actually taller








fully agreed with everything you said.
Lyle said on 22/Nov/20
Again, on the new episode of broken skull sessions, Taker says Kane 'may' have worn platform boots, he wasn't that much taller than me.

The 'may' part obviously comes across as a joke and secondly you don't say someone 'isn't that much taller than me' if he isn't actually taller
recapa said on 20/Nov/20
6ft7.5 peak,6ft6.5 today.
Pierre said on 18/Nov/20
@Resurrrection of Edward = Kane stands nearly one meter closer to the camera here of course he looks taller than Taker.And the camera is low here Kane has a big advantage !
Resurrection of Edward said on 18/Nov/20
i bet that neither show is 6’7.5 nor kane is 6’5.its very hard for people to convince me.nothing and no amount of photo evidence can change my mind.sorry.
Resurrection of Edward said on 18/Nov/20
Hyper said on 18/Nov/20
Kane really did look taller than Dennis Rodman, with Undertaker.

And Dennis Rodman has constantly made Michael Jordan look 6’4”. Not to mention Kane was at least an inch taller than Lee Smith (who was measured 6’5.75” but comes down to 6’5.25”-6’5.375”.)

Clearly 6’5” is a myth for Kane (based on meeting him in person and other pictures of him.) He’s really clears 6’6” for sure.



agreed with everything you said.
Hyper said on 18/Nov/20
Kane really did look taller than Dennis Rodman, with Undertaker.

And Dennis Rodman has constantly made Michael Jordan look 6’4”. Not to mention Kane was at least an inch taller than Lee Smith (who was measured 6’5.75” but comes down to 6’5.25”-6’5.375”.)

Clearly 6’5” is a myth for Kane (based on meeting him in person and other pictures of him.) He’s really clears 6’6” for sure.
PLk4521 said on 18/Nov/20
Edward, I thought you said you watched the actual documentary.

Here is the footage of when Undertaker and Kane met and shook hands:
Click Here

Hard to tell from here but Undertaker does edge him:
Click Here

Now whether those boots are Chelsea's or Cowboys, I'm not sure but either way I don't see how you can tell the exact height he's gaining from those.
Resurrection of Edward said on 17/Nov/20
PLk4521 said on 17/Nov/20
Undertaker was wearing Chelsea boots not cowboy boots lol. They probably added just over an inch. Doubt it was closPierre said on 16/Nov/20

@resurection of Edward=please give the link of this famous video Undertaker/Kane with Undertaker wearingcowboy shoese to 2 inches.



here is the footage of kane and kane,some people will say kane is near to camera and blah blah blan
here is the shoes that both guys wore.Click Here

pause@4:11
Click Here


now,i have nothing to say for some people who thinks kane is 6’5 and big show at 6’7.5/6’8
PLk4521 said on 17/Nov/20
Undertaker was wearing Chelsea boots not cowboy boots lol. They probably added just over an inch. Doubt it was close to 2 inches.

He did edge out Kane when they met. The quote he used was "they brought out someone who was as tall, if not taller than me" when referring to Kane's debut.

Then again, in the state down photo of Undertaker and Unabom which was Kane's earliest gimmick, Taker looked taller.
Click Here

Hard to tell the difference.
Robbe said on 17/Nov/20
That comparison with Barkley vs Kane wasn't so bad actually, Barkley's posture is also very relaxed there. But anyway, my point was, just like i said earlier, picture comparisons are more than often nowhere near the truth. Kane and Barkley here with Boomer.

Click Here

Once again, Kane looks only hair taller. But Kane looks the same height as 6'6.5 Wilder here with Boomer Click Here

Kane 5in shorter than Big Show Click Here

Kane taller than 6'6 Guy Click Here

Picture comparisons are fun to do, but most often just waste of time. But anyway, current listing for Kane is close enough in my opinion.
Pierre said on 16/Nov/20
@resurection of Edward=please give the link of this famous video Undertaker/Kane with Undertaker wearingcowboy shoes
Big Lul said on 16/Nov/20
Agree
Resurrection of Edward said on 16/Nov/20
@pierrie

i can’t even buy your single photo from the very beginning since you photos.you cherrypicked photo where kane and show are looking shorter dude.there is the whole video footage of kane and taker in the latest documentary and taker in cowboy foot is nowhere near kane in normal 1 inch shoes.your photo’s are very much misleading.
Resurrection of Edward said on 16/Nov/20
Robbe said on 16/Nov/20
Looks hair over 6'8 with Mamun.

Click Here

But Kane's head looks pretty big there, so he is probably closer to the camera.

Kane doesn't look any taller than 6'4.75 Charles Barkley in this comparison, with 5'9 Rick Flair.

Click Here

But these kind of comparisons are more than often not so accurate, so i wouldn't pay much tension on it. Kane may very well be like 2in taller than Sir Charles.



lol.that is worst comparison and most laughable thing i have ever seen in kane’s page so far.kane is clearly leaning with flair and losing 2 easily in that photo.nice try buddy.i love how you compare flair with the joke photo to mislead.
J2Frenzy said on 16/Nov/20
@Pierre why does big shoes mean he’s got lifts in them? He’s a huge guy, his feet are probably massive
Robbe said on 16/Nov/20
Looks hair over 6'8 with Mamun.

Click Here

But Kane's head looks pretty big there, so he is probably closer to the camera.

Kane doesn't look any taller than 6'4.75 Charles Barkley in this comparison, with 5'9 Rick Flair.

Click Here

But these kind of comparisons are more than often not so accurate, so i wouldn't pay much tension on it. Kane may very well be like 2in taller than Sir Charles.
Resurrection of Edward said on 15/Nov/20
Lyle said on 15/Nov/20
Just finished watching the brothers of destruction documentary, Undertaker pretty much admits that Kane is taller, at the end they hug and Taker does look taller than Kane, but Taker is wearing cowboy boots which probably give 2inch whilst kane is in normal shoes, every clip shown throughout is nothing new and it still shows they were/are very close in height, with Kane getting the slight edge



@editor rob

rob in “brother of destruction “documentary airing in wwe network,undertaker hugs kane and pretty much admits that kane was bigger and taller one at peak.rob undertaker in cowboy boot that might give him 2/2.025 inch and kane in normal common 1 inch shoes,kane still looks taller when both were standing in similar posture .i personally think there is enough to see that mark calaway has never been as taller as jacobs in peak or currently.if mark calaway was really 6’7 1/4 then i could buy 6’7 3/4 for jacobs but attimes looked even half inch between jacobs and calaway.rob,you gotta to see the documentary.either it is jacobs who is still 6’7 if mark calaway is 6’6 or it is mark calaway who is 6’5.5 and jacobs at 6’6.5 currently.i fully agree with everything poster lyle says, Lyle said on 15/Nov/20
Just finished watching the brothers of destruction documentary, Undertaker pretty much admits that Kane is taller.maybe jacobs wasn’t far off his claim at peak?there is footage of these guy at 1995 and undertaker looks much shorter than glen and both guy’s were at peak.
Canson said on 15/Nov/20
@J2Frenzy: agreed. He would’ve probably been a 204-205 range guy out of bed at 6’7.5”
Pierre said on 15/Nov/20
Resurrection of Edward said on 15/Nov/20
@j2frenzy

kane wore outer but undertaker wore internal lifts.

@chris n

agreed with everything you said.


Why Kane wearing big external soles would exclude internal helps ?His shoes are looking very big ,it seems to me possible to insert lifts in them.
Pierre said on 15/Nov/20
Click Here here I don't bet a dollar Kane is the tallest guy

Click Here Who is the guy who has to looking down to talk to the other guy in the eyes here...that's not Kane to me...Plus remember Undertaker's forehead is big...
Lyle said on 15/Nov/20
Just finished watching the brothers of destruction documentary, Undertaker pretty much admits that Kane is taller, at the end they hug and Taker does look taller than Kane, but Taker is wearing cowboy boots which probably give 2inch whilst kane is in normal shoes, every clip shown throughout is nothing new and it still shows they were/are very close in height, with Kane getting the slight edge
Resurrection of Edward said on 15/Nov/20
@j2frenzy

kane wore outer but undertaker wore internal lifts.

@chris n

agreed with everything you said.
Pierre said on 15/Nov/20
Chris n said on 14/Nov/20
Pierre you just do not understand how camera angles make significant changes in height comparisons in pictures. Not just the photo below of Kane and UT, but many others you have posted here throughout time.

Look at the floor of the ring, the angle in which the photo is taken. Can you see that? Yes? The undertaker is always going to appear taller from that angle since they are close in height.


The only case Taker could have an advantage by standing more distant to the camera is if the camera was very high that is not the case here =the camera is max same height as their heads here...
J2Frenzy said on 15/Nov/20
Yeah yeah, Kane wore lifts, we get it. That’s why we didn’t use in-ring photos
Chris n said on 14/Nov/20
Pierre you just do not understand how camera angles make significant changes in height comparisons in pictures. Not just the photo below of Kane and UT, but many others you have posted here throughout time.

Look at the floor of the ring, the angle in which the photo is taken. Can you see that? Yes? The undertaker is always going to appear taller from that angle since they are close in height.
Pierre said on 14/Nov/20
Click Here Undertaker in poor posture,Kane wearing shoes that are looking massive ,Kane no mask with toupee this time and standing easily closer to the camera than Undertaker
Pierre said on 14/Nov/20
Robbe said on 13/Nov/20
Yeah, can somebody post a link where Vince says he is tiptoeing in that pic with Kane. Otherwise this picture will be posted here like 100 times a month..

Lol I posted lots of pics here that are not this pic(and that each time show the same thing...).Well I have to understand you have no links about this anecdot of Vince tiptoeing...
ced said on 13/Nov/20
Anyine see that picture of Big Show / Kane staredown from Insurextion 99 i posted below?

Both were at peak height there — Kane was 6’8 out of bed in 1999 for sure.

There’s not a chance he was underneath that in 99. If Big Show’s peak was 7 foot, (i believe 6’11.5) + boots and he also had a thick sole, that would make him 7.05 in boots.

They have about 2 iches between each other in that photo.

Kane was 6’8 out of bed and 6’7.75 afternoon. + 2 inch lifts = 6’9.75

That’s exactly how much height difference is between them in that photo give or take .25 inches.
Robbe said on 13/Nov/20
Yeah, can somebody post a link where Vince says he is tiptoeing in that pic with Kane. Otherwise this picture will be posted here like 100 times a month..
Pierre said on 12/Nov/20
Robbe said on 12/Nov/20
It has been said many times Vaughn is tiptoeing with Kane, so it's pretty useless to post that pic over and over again..

Each time I post this pic a guy say Vince was tiptoeing but never give me a link in which Vince would explain this...
J2Frenzy said on 12/Nov/20
If 6’7.5 was Kane’s afternoon height he probably woke up at strong 6’8, maybe 6’8.25
Resurrection of Edward said on 12/Nov/20
J2Frenzy said on 11/Nov/20
@Res of Edward depends if 6’7.5 was afternoon or evening height

its a afternoon height.all the height listed in site are afternoon height if i’m not mistaken.
Robbe said on 12/Nov/20
It has been said many times Vaughn is tiptoeing with Kane, so it's pretty useless to post that pic over and over again..
J2Frenzy said on 11/Nov/20
@Res of Edward depends if 6’7.5 was afternoon or evening height
Pierre said on 11/Nov/20
Here is Jack Swagger who looks hardly 78 inches(6"5') by this mugshot and who very probably wear shoes,then hardly full 6"4' barefoot Click Here Click Here

Here is how much tall looks Kane next to Jack Swagger in relaxed posture(opposite to his posture with the mugshot)(Jack standing a bit closer to the camera )= Click Here

Click Here Kane /Vince Vaughn

Vince Vaughn/Stephen Merchant 6"7' wearing flat sneakers and standing each time in a terrible posture and a lot more distant to the camera in first pic = Click Here Click Here
Pierre said on 11/Nov/20
J2Frenzy said on 8/Nov/20
6’5.5 current is ridiculous but so is over 6’7. I’d put him at a strong 6’6 now, and an inch taller in his prime

Lol here is another comparison = Shaq 7"0' range /Randy Orton ,Randy closer to the camera and low camera=good advantage for the clothest guy = Click Here

Randy Orton this time more distant to the camera/Big Show = Click Here


Kane /Big Show both without wrestler shoes = Click Here
Resurrection of Edward said on 11/Nov/20
@j2 frenzy

a peak kane might be 6’8.5 or 6’8.25 immediately out if bed.
ced said on 10/Nov/20
@J2Frenzy - Agreed.

Found this hidden gem - From 1999 - WWE Insurextion PPV -

Kane/Big Show Staredown:

Image:
Click Here
J2Frenzy said on 10/Nov/20
Definitely 6’8 out of bed peak
Canson said on 9/Nov/20
@Philip McMullan: I agree to an extent. He isn’t anything close to what Pierre is saying but I’m not sure he’s 6’7” today. Hyper has met him and guessed 6’7” but I don’t know when that was. I’d still give Kane a weak 6’7 however. I’d say 6’6.5 afternoon height
Resurrection of Edward said on 9/Nov/20
Ben Bell said on 7/Nov/20
For me Kane, Taker and Sid are all within 0.5”
Peak.
Isaac Yankem and Taker had a stare down before the Kane lifts and they were pretty much bang on the exactly same height. Just like Taker and Sid.
If I had to stretch to my very limit id say 6’7 for one of them but I think with Sid being a hard over 6’6 you’re looking at 6’6.75 max for Kane or Taker which you could round up.
Today Taker has retained his height better than Sid, Sid certainly stands more hunched.
The Sid 6’6 makes me question everything and downgrade all heights that I once was pretty solid on.


dude.again,i have to disagree here.with mamun,glen jacobs looked 6’7.i doubt sid,kane and taker are same height.kane tallest of the three.i have to say sid 6’6/6’6.25 ,taker 6’7/6’7.25 and kane 6’7.5 if i’m not mistaken.rob has listed very very accurately now.i fully agree with rob on his listing.i also agree with canson snd christian on their estimation.bang on.
J2Frenzy said on 8/Nov/20
6’5.5 current is ridiculous but so is over 6’7. I’d put him at a strong 6’6 now, and an inch taller in his prime
Resurrection of Edward said on 8/Nov/20
Philip McMullin said on 7/Nov/20
@Pierre in no way shape or form are your images a good representation of Kane's real height. Also in no way shape or form is Kane anything under 6ft6.3/5..i myself am CONFIDENT that kanes still 6'7 or just over


while i respectfully disagree that he is 6’7 today,i can see the 6’6.5 argument today as he typically looks it.he was taller than some legit combined measured guys.if anything,i have to say a peak height of 6’7.5 and current height of 6’6.5.he did looked noticeably taller than braun strowman out of gear last time.
Resurrection of Edward said on 8/Nov/20
@ben bell

dude,you said you haven’t seen kane next to tall celebs,for your interest in kane with tall celebs.here is kane next to pen jillete.kane is obviously the the taller one.Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 7/Nov/20
@Pierre in no way shape or form are your images a good representation of Kane's real height. Also in no way shape or form is Kane anything under 6ft6.3/5..i myself am CONFIDENT that kanes still 6'7 or just over
Ben Bell said on 7/Nov/20
Pierre
I wonder how tall Haftor really is. Hard to say. Significantly taller than Kane looking at pics. Looks to have 2” or a little more.
If Triple H is 6’2. I think Kane today could be 6’5.5 with 6’6 peak.
I haven’t seen a single photo of Kane with a tall celebrity where he looks over 6’6.
Also when he first came in as Isaac Yankem them said he was 6’7. When he was Yankem and without lifts he certainly never looked taller than Sid or Taker. Yankem vs Taker with no visible lifts they were eye to eye. With takers long head he edged it slightly.
As Diesel and Kane with obvious lifts at times he did look huge. You have to wonder if there’s a 2”’sole how much lift is inside the boots.
I can’t think of any wrestler apart from Zeus who had lifts as obvious as Kane.
Pierre said on 6/Nov/20
Kane /Triple h one time a bit closer to the camera one time a bit more distant = Click Here Click Here

Triple H /Hafthor 6"7.5' = Click Here

Around 6"5.5' here.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 6/Nov/20
Click Here take a look at 3:08...taker and kane exact same..and this was when stopped wearing monster boots..
Resurrection of Edward said on 6/Nov/20
i’m sorry i just mistakenly said 1999 podcast,it was 1996 “bad blood” podcast by bruce pitchard who was a one of the major person behind wwe’s creative team in the 90s.he did managed undertaker and kane.bruce pitchard aka brother love had a 1996 bad blood podcast where he talked about taker and kane.the poscast is more than 1 hours,maybe 1 and half if i’m not mistaken.he talks about undertaker,kane and vince mcmahon.he also talks about how taker’s boot were custom made designed to enhance max height.he also talks about the character “kane”.he also added how wwe were very close to find a person to fit in the character kane.glenn jacobs was only guy who could fit the gimmick.the character “kane” needs to be taller and bigger than the undertaker gimmick.brother love added that glen jacobs was only guy that was taller/bigger than the undertaker at that time and was only person that could fit the character.he also discussed how the first hell in a cell was made for kane’s debut.he also said the cage door wasn’t that hard and jacobs could destroy the cage door and go face to face with his brother the undertaker.
Resurrection of Edward said on 6/Nov/20
@canson

dude,i agree with everything you said.i have to add,in 1999 taker did towered guy’s like rock,stone cold,hhh and even vince mcmahon.he was closer in height with guy’s like kane and nash.one year later,circa 2000,callaway even struggled to tower or look big next to guy’s like rock,stone cold,hhh or even vince mcmahon.it did looked obvious that callaway did had his internal lifts.in 1999,he did looked 6’9 or near it in boots but come circa 2000,callaway struggled to look anything over 6’8.25 or max 6’8.5 in boot.it even became more obvious.there is bruce pitchard 1999”bad blood” podcast where he revealed that calaway had his lifts.as for kane,pitchard said he was already taller and bigger but vince mcmahon and the create team wanted him to be even taller and bigger so they planned monster boot for kane.kane did have his monster boot that help him stack with legit big guy’s like nash and show.kane was eye to eye with show.pitchard dud managed borh taker and kane before paul bearer.he did described undertaker who was at peak.he did described mark calaway as tall “6’7” guy.he also said that jacobs was over 6’7.excluding footwear,6’7.25 is the “absolute highest” a peak mark calaway has ever looked.i feel he was just 6’7 if anything.


@Editor rob

how much do internal shoes lifts give?how much they add rob?
Editor Rob
In some boots you could get an inch inside, but any more and the angle would not be great for wrestling. It would be better with a custom made boot with bigger sole (and front platform) to add height.
Canson said on 5/Nov/20
@Edward: that estimate is even more realistic. I could see a small fraction on Taker. I wouldn’t have taken Calloway to wear lifts but looking back maybe that’s why some thought he looked 6’8” or over
Resurrection of Edward said on 4/Nov/20
@ben bell

dude,i have to partially disagree with you.Yankem was taller than taker in that match with staredown, same sized soles on boots, yankem didn’t had lifts but yankem was a jobber so wwf would be trying to make Taker the bigger, badder, tougher, etc. If either had lifts it would be taker.but to me personally,either had similar shoes and yankem was barely taller than taker.it looked even as high as 1/2 attimes but i still had them 1/4 apart.yankem was taller.undertaker has even been described as 6’6 range guy at peak?but i doubt he was that low.he was 6’7 or 6’7.25 at absolute most.


@canson

dude,kane wasn’t even under wwe contact in 1996,he was a jobber and he did came to wwf straight out of puerto rico if i’m not mistaken.he was at rico that time according to bruce pitchard.taker was already a draw at wwe along with michaels,bret hart and hogan.kane was a jobber and had small footwear and he did edged the undertaker who was in boots.bruce pitchard even revealed that taker wore internal lifts to get closer to jacobs height.he did said undertaker was 6’7 and kane being bit over 6’7.say taker at 6’7 or 6’7.25 and kane(yankem) at 6’7.5.bruce pitchard was one of the major person behind gimmick kane.he has clearly stated undertaker had his internal lifts and glen had his outer lifts but jacobs was taller between the two by a fraction.bruce pitchard said that taker wore internal lifts to go eye to eye with yankem but jacobs was still taller.
J2Frenzy said on 4/Nov/20
@Vincent Id give Lesnar flat 6’2 but he probably drops under it as an extreme low. I’d also give current Taker 6’6

@Ben Bell I thought Yankem was billed 6’10
ced said on 4/Nov/20
@Ben Bell

Ben, I respectfully disagree, take a look below. This is from a 1995 Battle Royal, Kane (wearing flat boots) and Sid are in the ring together.

Who is taller? I'll let you be the judge.

Image 1:
Click Here

Image 2:
Click Here
Canson said on 4/Nov/20
@Vincent Caleb: excellent estimates!
Ben Bell said on 3/Nov/20
The bad thing with Kane is he generally wore lifts, sometimes monster lifts.
It’s easier to judge him on his Isaac Yankem height as he had flat boots.
He was billed at 6’7 at times as Yankem so I struggle to see any more than this.
He really never looked taller than Sid and Taker to me so I’d have to say 6’7 max which is still huge!
He certainly looks shorter today.
Canson said on 2/Nov/20
@Edwards: I agree. He is another one of those big wrestlers who doesn’t stand his best. I’d def say a peak Kane would’ve cleared 6’7” at a low. Maybe 6’7.25 and I don’t rule out .5 yet either
ced said on 2/Nov/20
Here is a picture of a pre lifts Kane as the Fake Diesel Vs Undertaker.

You can tell Glenn has about an inch on Taker here.

Click Here
Vincent Caleb said on 2/Nov/20
Here are my edited guesses of WWE wrestlers after closer inspection:
Hulk Hogan 6-5.25 peak(minimum) 6-3 currently(maximum)
Kane 6-7.25 peak 6-6.25 currently
Baron Corbin 6-5 7/8
Roman Reigns 6-2(solid one)
Kevin Nash 6-9.25 peak 6-8.25 currently
Triple H currently 6-1.25
Andre the Giant 6-11(anything within a half inch below or above is ok)
Viscera peak 6-6 range
Braun Strowman 6-6.25
Dwayne Johnson 6-2.75 peak 6-2 current
Brock Lesnar 6-1 7/8
John Cena 6-0.25
Stone Cold Steve Austin 6-0 7/8 peak current is 6-0 MAX
Big Show 6-11.5 peak Current 6-9.5
Shad Gaspard 6-4.75(RIP)
Undertaker 6-7 peak 6-5.75 current
LOL I really have too much time on my hands due to the pandemic nowadays. I will try not to spam comments anymore lol.
Resurrection of Edward said on 2/Nov/20
i saw in one of the comments in youtube.some body said that at one point,peak kane was ones the tallest wrestler in wwe.with big show in hiatus and nash no longer in contact with wwe,kane was tallest super star in the wwe at ine point.
Hyper said on 1/Nov/20
Even when he lost height, he gave a taller impression than Dennis Rodman next to Undertaker.

Current and peak listings are legit for Kane.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 1/Nov/20
esurrection of Edwards said on 31/Oct/20
@Kan

yeah dude,i can get and i agree with what you said.i personally still feel that there is easily 1 inch between kane and viscera and attimes looked even 1.25/1.5 in some particular photos.then again,i might be wrong and there might have been only an inch difference.i can get what you’re trying to say dude.
Editor Rob
if anybody had forgotten, here is what Kane looked like with 5ft 8 mamun. It's a sizeable difference, I guess it depends how big you estimate Kane's head was. He'd be nearer his peak there.



@Editor rob

glad you found out the photo of kane with mamum.rob,it a feet difference or slighty under.how tall do you think kane looks there?he really looked 1.5/2 inch taller than how sid stood and looked with mamum if i’m not mistaken.rob,i heard guy’s like undertaker and kane might lose a fraction height even in early part of their career given the toll taken bybtheir body due to wrestling.in your honesty opinion,how tall kane looked next to mamum and how tall do you believe a peak kane to be.prior to becoming kane or say even before becoming kane,glen jacobs did had himself next to mark calaway,kane was always slightly taller than mark calaway.as for mamum photo and peak kane,where would you put a peak glen jacobs at rob?
Editor Rob
I could buy 6ft 7.5 range with Mamun there.
Kan said on 1/Nov/20
Editor Rob
if anybody had forgotten, here is what Kane looked like with 5ft 8 mamun. It's a sizeable difference, I guess it depends how big you estimate Kane's head was. He'd be nearer his peak there.

In my opinion Kane head isn’t under 25 cm, so i think whit mamum looked 6ft7 1/2 peak mark and i believe this photos was taken in 2005-2006.@edwards in my opinion back to 2007 when Kane and viscera had the staredown, i still think that Kane was near his peak, but i’m not sure that viscera still in his peak considering his weight. Though personally the most i ever see his an inch, 1.5 seems a very big difference, i really doubt. But for sure Kane is taller
Resurrection of Edwards said on 31/Oct/20
@canson

dude i think you might disagree but there is atleast sn inch difference between kane and viscera,atleast 1 inch.i wouldn’t be surprised if kane was 1.25 taller than viscera.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 31/Oct/20
@canson

i personally think that if stood in military posture,kane could measure hair over 6’7 in that particular photo.then again,i could be wrong and he might only be 6’7 like you said.but in my personal opinion,he looked the listed height or say he looked what rob lists him in that particular photo.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 31/Oct/20
@Kan

yeah dude,i can get and i agree with what you said.i personally still feel that there is easily 1 inch between kane and viscera and attimes looked even 1.25/1.5 in some particular photos.then again,i might be wrong and there might have been only an inch difference.i can get what you’re trying to say dude.
Editor Rob
if anybody had forgotten, here is what Kane looked like with 5ft 8 mamun. It's a sizeable difference, I guess it depends how big you estimate Kane's head was. He'd be nearer his peak there.
Canson said on 30/Oct/20
Ben only measured 6’4 7/8 at the combine. I’d say he can look closer to that mark so maybe 6’4.75”. No less than maybe 6’4 5/8”. Usually combines are early morning but he looks taller than Eli. Kanelooks 6’7 there imho
Canson said on 29/Oct/20
Viscera couldn’t be only 6’5.25”. He looks to be every bit of 6’6” range
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 29/Oct/20
@Mattlogan...lol today viscera is no more!
Kan said on 29/Oct/20
@edwards Rob
Though for kane and viscera like a Said camera angle make the difference
If you watch the video when they walked, both can looks taller or shorter than they are.
Click Here
Here viscera could looks only half inch shorter i think even Rob can confirm it
In this kane looked over an inch taller
Click Here
But kane walked and he was near the camera
Here they looked very close
Click Here
I think it’s half inch at most. So i don’t know what Rob think, but in my opinion both man standing straight, the difference wasn’t as much ad 1.25 inch
Click Here
Kan said on 29/Oct/20
@edwards
It’s difficult to judge because both walking in that segment .
This is the whole videos
Click Here
Kane probably looks about 1 inch taller, but i believe viscera lost more height than Kane because of his mass and i think his posture isn’t great especially in that moment.
Click Here
Instead kane stayed in a very good posture
It’s really hard to judge how tall is viscera, but Rob in viscera’s page doesn’t rule out 6ft6.75 for peak viscera
Resurrection of Edwards said on 28/Oct/20
Kan said on 27/Oct/20
Rob
If big ben is a full 6ft5
Click Here
Footwear is unknow, but how tall do you think is Kane ? In my opinion seems over 2 inch taller
Editor Rob
A bit more than 2 inches, not 3 though



@kan
he looks his listed height in that particular photo.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 28/Oct/20
@Kan

i can get what you’re saying dude.
Matt logan said on 28/Oct/20
Kane is 6'6 vecara is like 6'5.25
Kan said on 27/Oct/20
Rob
If big ben is a full 6ft5
Click Here
Footwear is unknow, but how tall do you think is Kane ? In my opinion seems over 2 inch taller
Editor Rob
A bit more than 2 inches, not 3 though
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 27/Oct/20
@kaneeeee..bro sid himself stated that he was 6'6 peak..now considering it he was suppose a full 6'6..which puts kane at max 6'7 at peak.
Matt logan said on 27/Oct/20
No kane is 6'6 today viscera has to be 6'5ish
ced said on 27/Oct/20
@Big Lul,

I think the camera angle in that instance is more so helping Viscera. Reason: take a look at the top rope in your photo, look how it’s angled behind Kane and how it is angled behind Vis. The top rope is angling downwards behind Kane and upwards behind Viscera giving Vis an advantage.
Resurrection of Edwards said on 26/Oct/20
@Editor rob and kan

here is another shot that i found sometimes a go.clearly a 1.25 inch difference at this particular photo between big daddy v and kane.i might be wrong but the photos looks clear.ofcourse i might be wrong but here is kane in military posture.Click Here
Editor Rob
could be full 3cm range there
Kaneeeee said on 25/Oct/20
Vicera is about 6ft8 himself, kane inches him out, braun strowman is 6ft8 measured by strongman competition who again kane has a inch over him, sid was a good 6ft8 in real life if you look at his documentary and stood as tall as taker, yet again kane is taller than taker too.
James Brett 172cm said on 25/Oct/20
rob would you say kane 6ft7.25 and bigg daddy 6ft6.25 at the time they had a staredown?
Editor Rob
roughly those figures
Kan said on 25/Oct/20
@edwards
The camera angle always makes a difference
Click Here
Kan said on 25/Oct/20
Though with undertaker doesn’t look shorter who looks only half inch shorter at most than Kane
Click Here
Mr.SixfeetOne said on 25/Oct/20
Man Kane definitely looked quite taller than Dwayne Johnson who in his peak was about 6.3, maybe more than 4 inches taller. 6.9 at peak max!!
Kan said on 24/Oct/20
@edwards
Despite what Rob Paul said, i think the camera does help kane, i doubt as much as a full inch..
Click Here
I really doubt is more than half inch or 3/4 inch
Kan said on 23/Oct/20
@rob
Maybe this two videos are better
Click Here
Click Here
It seems more half inch than a full inch in my opinion
Big Lul said on 23/Oct/20
@edwards, Canson and Riky

To be honest, in the last ride documentary taker in the first 2 episodes looked at best 6’5-6’5.5 especially with guys like Roman, Orton and JBL. Then episode 3 he looked consistently 6’5.5. Then the last two episodes taker looked 6’5.75-6’6 max especially when he was around with Braun Strowman and the nxt big guys. So basically what I’m trying to say is that some times taker has really bad posture but not as bad as people say. But I will say this, he probably only looked 6’5-6’5.5 max in the first 2 episodes because it was pre 2nd hip surgery.
Kan said on 21/Oct/20
Probably this segment it's easier to judge
Click Here
2:00 mark
The camera probably help Kane, but he doesn’t look an inch taller to me, but you are a better guesser than mine
Resurrection of Edward said on 21/Oct/20
Kan said on 21/Oct/20
For you @rob
How is the difference in height between viscera and Kane ?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Kane looks taller, a full inch? Maybe, the video looks slightly squashed


@editor rob

rob here is the closer one,as your response to kan.how much do you think is possible between kane and big daddy v Click Here
Editor Rob
In that still you could say 3cm between them...in the clip itself, overall I'd still go with about 1 inch
Kan said on 21/Oct/20
For you @rob
How is the difference in height between viscera and Kane ?
Click Here
Editor Rob
Kane looks taller, a full inch? Maybe, the video looks slightly squashed
Nik said on 20/Oct/20
@ Christian 6'5 3/8" - Good spot!
Resurrection of Edwards said on 18/Oct/20
@Kan

yeah dude,i can get what you’re saying and i can see the argument.i fully agree with everything you said.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 18/Oct/20
@Nik
And Kane's real name happens to be Glenn as well.
Kan said on 18/Oct/20
@edward
Thanks! It’s really hard to judge the difference height between 2 wrestler. Camera angle, boots and even the ring may not be completely flat like a floor. So i respect every guess as long as it is likely. In my opinion i think that Kane peak height is between 6ft7 - 6ft7 1/2, i doubt is 6ft8... i mean if sycho sid is 6ft6, peak kane and undertaaker are about 6ft7 - 6ft7 1/2
Today is taller than undertaker, half inch at least i think
Resurrection of Edward said on 16/Oct/20
Kan said on 13/Oct/20
@edwards
No question about Kane looked taller than viscera, but i really don’t think the difference was as much as 1” - 1.5” inch.
I can see 0.5” - 1” inch, but i respect your position on kane and viscera height. In my opinion you are one of the best to judging heights


@Kan

thanks dude.we can all agree to disagree and still be respectful and appreciate each other.yeah dude,you too,your estimation are bang on.i agree on all of your estimation.you too has really good estimation overall.
Nik said on 16/Oct/20
He's over a foot taller than Glenn C!
ced said on 14/Oct/20
Would have been interesting to see Kane of 2002 (after his comeback with the half mask) - he didn't have lifts on his boots and Viscera of Attitude Era (I believe peak height Vis), in 06/07 when he was Big Daddy V, he obviously wore lifts but then so did Kane.

Sid and Viscera were about the same height.

I think the peak heights are Kane - 6'7.25, Viscera - 6'6 - 6'6.25, Sid 6'6.25 - 6'6.5, Undertaker - 6'7. Diesel - 6'8.8, Big Show - 6'10.9 (Just a smidge under 6'11).
Hyper said on 14/Oct/20
@Pierre

I measured at 5’8.5”-5’8.75” at a low, on my bare feet.

He’s a lot taller in person than he looks in pictures.


@Canson

I definitely believe him to be over 6’6”, today.
Kan said on 13/Oct/20
@edwards
No question about Kane looked taller than viscera, but i really don’t think the difference was as much as 1” - 1.5” inch.
I can see 0.5” - 1” inch, but i respect your position on kane and viscera height. In my opinion you are one of the best to judging heights
Resurrection of Edward said on 12/Oct/20
@kan

another one.Click Here
Resurrection of Edward said on 12/Oct/20
@kane

ofcource i could be wrong but here is........

Click Here
Resurrection of Edward said on 12/Oct/20
@kan

camera angles might be huge factor especially when determining or estimating someone’s height.not a good quality photo but here,kane looks taller.Click Here
Pierre said on 11/Oct/20
@Hyper= how tall are you?
Kan said on 11/Oct/20
@edwards
I really doubt kane had 1” to 1.5” on viscera in every staredown i see... show me this photos, i’m interested
Resurrection of Edward said on 11/Oct/20
i personally don’t think kane was ever 6’8 and i still don’t believe that he ever was that taller.but again,i’ll be honest.few people met or did encountered with a peak kane out of gear and said he can look near 6’8.i still don’t believe them though.
Canson said on 11/Oct/20
@Hyper: he still looks comfortably over 6’6” today in pics. See the ones with the football player that were posted. Lee smith I believe. He was measured 6’5 3/4 so probably something like 6’5.25-.5 range in the afternoon and Kane had at least 1”. I have Kane around 6’6.5 give or take
Resurrection of Edward said on 11/Oct/20
@Kan

i respectfully disagree with you.in other footages,kane has 1” to even 1.5 on viscera.
Hyper said on 10/Oct/20
@Pierre

I did meet him in person. I said it multiple times. I didn't a picture unfortunately, because it was expensive.

He is taller in person than he looks in pictures. He's definitely over 6'6". He had a footwear advantage, but he is over 6'6", without a doubt. I would've thought he was over 6'7", but he had a footwear advantage over me.
Hyper said on 10/Oct/20
@Pierre

I did meet him in person. I said it multiple times. I didn't a picture unfortunately, because it was expensive.

He is taller in person than he looks in pictures. He's definitely over 6'6". He had a footwear advantage, but he is over 6'6", without a doubt.
6'3 Julian said on 10/Oct/20
@SeanR Kane could definitely get himself upwards of 6’10 in lifts, he wasn’t particularly agile so it wouldn’t cause him problems
Kan said on 9/Oct/20
I know i asked you @rob many times if Kane in his peak was as tall as 6ft7 1/2.
I just found this match with viscera back to 2007 and kane struggling to look over half inch taller in my opinion
Click Here
And i really doubt kane lost half inch or so back 2007. He was 40 and his posture looks great.
I mean or viscera could look over 6ft6 1/2 or maybe Kane as 6ft7 1/4 peak is probably closer the truth
SeanR said on 8/Oct/20
Hi Rob,

What’s the most height increase you have seen someone with lifts have?

It looks like Kane could have add 3 inches + in footwear with his staredowns with Big Show.
Editor Rob
It really is tough getting anywhere near 4 inches from a boot and being able to walk, let alone wrestle.

However if there is a decent thickness to the front of the boot (like 1-1.5 inches) then a lifted boot might bring you to 3 inches and you could kinda wrestle, just have to be very careful you don't topple your ankles.
Kan said on 8/Oct/20
@chris
I really dubit Kane being 3 inch taller than orton back to 2015. Mauve in 2000’s but the most i can see is 6ft6 1/2 next to Randy and o really think isn’t over than that today
Scott 5'6 said on 8/Oct/20
6’8 now 7’0 peak
Pierre said on 8/Oct/20
Hyper said on 6/Oct/20
If Kane is 6’5”, Anthony Joshua is 6’4” and Wladimir 6’3.75”, with Kobe at 6’3.25”.

@Hyper I don't understand your logic about downgrade all this guys if Kane is around 6"5'?
Canson said on 7/Oct/20
Kane is not not under 6’6 let alone closer to 6’5”
Hyper said on 6/Oct/20
If Kane is 6’5”, Anthony Joshua is 6’4” and Wladimir 6’3.75”, with Kobe at 6’3.25”.
James Brett 172cm said on 5/Oct/20
orton looks quite a bit under 6'4 there unless kane wears lifts?
Pierre said on 5/Oct/20
Kane closer to 6"5' than to 6"6' to me
Chris Nehmes said on 4/Oct/20
Kan said on 4/Oct/20
Rob
I really doubt kane still near 6ft7
Click Here
-
If Kane stood straight in that pic, then there’s easily 3 inches on Orton.
Vegas' said on 4/Oct/20
Nwo2020, Kane definitely bigger boots there Click Here

Pierre, Nowitzki has similar posture in both photos I posted...
Kan said on 4/Oct/20
Rob
I really doubt kane still near 6ft7
Click Here
Editor Rob
I'd still have said that moment he's over 6ft 6.
Pierre said on 4/Oct/20
Nwo2020 said on 3/Oct/20
so what so you think of this image. Both peak heights in the 90s and both obviously wearing lifts if you care to watch the actual match

Click Here

I believe Kane here was wearing massive helps while Big Show was wearing slimer helps
Nwo2020 said on 3/Oct/20
so what so you think of this image. Both peak heights in the 90s and both obviously wearing lifts if you care to watch the actual match

Click Here
Canson said on 2/Oct/20
@Vegas: yea Show was taller than Durant in their pic years ago. Probably not as much as the camera suggests but he was taller by at least 1”. Durant, if he really grew, it was only maybe 1cm or maybe he was rounded down to begin with when he was measured
Pierre said on 30/Sep/20
@Vegas but your pic of Joakim is different to mine,you can see the middle man is not in same posture and so Joakim stands closer to the camera in your pic.Plus in my pic Joakim leans a lot all his bust and head opposite to the camera and so stands around same distance to the camera as gabrielle,probably a bit closer ,but in your pic Big Show stands closer to the camera than gabrielle.

In your pic Dirck Nowitzki has a bad posture next to big Show,he clearly leans a lot to try to place his head around same height as Big show's head for the photo.
Vegas' said on 28/Sep/20
Pierre, Noah was measured 6'10 1/2 barefoot (6'11 3/4) in shoes, he is much closer to camera Click Here

We have a full length photo of Wight and Nowitzki Click Here

Nowitzki similar posture with 6'9 barefoot measured Kevin Durant Click Here

Pierre if your estimate was correct Durant should be significantly taller than Wight today and taller than peak Wight playing college basketball..that's not very likely is it comparing those two photos of an older obese Wight!
Pierre said on 27/Sep/20
@Vegas = Click Here Joakim Noah (listed 209 cm/ 6"10' in French site of heights of celebrities,211cm/6"11' in web) leaning a lot/Gabrielle Reece

Click Here Big Show straight/ Dirck Nowitzki leaning a lot on opposite side to the camera and so loosing a lot height ,Dirck still looks taller than Big Show.

Click Here Dirck /Shaq listed 7"0.25' other Click Here
Big Lul said on 27/Sep/20
@Riky maybe studd was a around 6’5.5-6’6 max who just wore massive footwear to look 6’7 with people like Andre and hulk hogan. But I know this, out of the ring he looked max 6’6
Vegas' said on 26/Sep/20
That should have stated over 150 measured college players not 50..
Vegas' said on 26/Sep/20
Pierre, James and Wight are not similar height..

Big show in black T-shirt, Lebron in white Click Here

Rob has Gabrielle Reece at 6'2 3/4 Click Here
Vegas' said on 26/Sep/20
Robert Carter was listed 6'9 officially in college. If he was described 6'10 online it's irrelevant really. 2 1/4 inches is still within the limit I mentioned, I think 22 players from over 50 were overlisted at least 2 inches.
Riky said on 25/Sep/20
Big Lul said on 24/Sep/20

You know I thought Studd was between 6'5.5 and 6'6" max.
Taller than Hogan but shorter than someone like Taker in his prime.
Pierre said on 24/Sep/20
Click Here Lebron James 6"7.25' leaning a lot on Big Show
Pierre said on 24/Sep/20
again = Kane plus his mask with advantageous toupee plus his boots looking huge is JUST a bit taller than Taker ! Click Here

Kane and Undertaker in classic shoes = Click Here Try to guess who leans the most here...

I found this = Click Here = Big Show wearing classic shoes next to Rafael Nadal(left guy with blue tee shirt),so both wearing sneakers .

Click Here = here is how tall looks Rafael straight next to Prince Albert Click Here

and how tall looks Ronaldo in a very poor posture next to Prince Albert = Click Here

or also how tall looks Robert Knepper here next to Rob Click Here and here next to Prince Albert = Click Here Click Here
Canson said on 24/Sep/20
@Vegas: I’ve seen Robert Carter for example. Typically he was listed 6’9” but I’ve seen a listing as high as 6’10” which Viper mentioned before. He measured 6’6.75 most likely in the morning.
Big Lul said on 24/Sep/20
@riky I would have big John studd at around 6’6-6’6.5 barefoot who wore lifts to look closer to 6’11.5-7’0 Andre and to look way bigger than 6’5 max peak hulk hogan

And undertaker 6’7 peak max barefoot and probably 6’8 in ring gear
And Kane at 6’7.25-6’7.5 peak max barefoot and 6’9-6’9.5 in ring gear
Vegas' said on 24/Sep/20
Riky I was talking college sports not pro wrestling. Wrestlers have been overlisted nearly a foot.. Uncle Elmer an example listed 7'7 in one promotion when he was closer to 6'8

Canson who? Mentioned few times that I looked at every college basketball player listed 6'5 and over past 5 years (over 150) who went through the NBA draft and were measured barefoot. The most anyone was overlisted was 2 3/4 inches and that was one solitary player out of over 150. From memory only 20 players from the group were overlisted 2 or more inches so quite a small % of the overall number.
ced said on 23/Sep/20
Going on his peak height, which i believe had to have been 6’7.5-.6, Taker at around 6’7.2..

Take a look at Braun Strowman.. did Braun at his peak height look as tall as Kane did when Kane debuted in 97? Not a chance. Braun is a lift wearer too and Kane was THE closest to Big Show’s height in staredowns as far as giants are concerned. Show was about 6’11 peak in boots he was 7ft.

This includes Kevin Nash. If Nash was 6’9.25 peak, Kane (in his big boots would have been 6’9.5.)

At King of the Ring 99, Kane looked about 2 inches shorter than Show in their staredown, maybe max 2.5 inches. There is no way a peak Kane was under 6’7.5 because if that was the case, he would have never measured up to Show the way he did in 99 and again in 2002 at the Royal Rumble. Again, there was about a 2 inch difference in between Show and Kane in that staredown as well. AND Insurrextion 99.

So if someone can explain this to me (the guys who say Kane was shorter than Taker and that nonsense, please do). I think Kane edged Taker by about .4-.5 inches. But since Vince wanted Kane to be even more massive, he made him wear the big boots, that way he’s 6’9.5 in them and they can add the extra 2 tv inches and say he’s 7 feet.

Another detail, take a look at the staredown backstage leading up to WrestleMania 12 between Taker and Diesel. Diesel had Taker by 1.75 inches max. Kane and Taker had even a bigger difference at WM14.

Now by no means is Kane taller than Kevin Nash, but Kane in his big boots had Nash by About .25 inches.
Riky said on 23/Sep/20
Vegas' said on 21/Sep/20
Pierre, Big Show was listed 7'1 in division 1 college basketball so the suggestion he was 6'8 3/4 peak or 4.25 inches overlisted is quite frankly ridiculous, nobody is ever overlisted that much or even close Click Here


4 inches is really possible, I believe most of all in the 80s 90s it was really common to overbill someone by that much.
I agree with Canson that I never saw someone overbilled more than 4 inches.

Undertaker or Big Jhon studd were probably overbilled by 3 to 4 inches.

Example : Undertaker barefoot peak of 6'6.5, measured about 6'8" in shoes...at that point let's say 6'10", why not....
Roderick said on 22/Sep/20
A 6'8.75" guy wouldn't get listed at 7'1" in college basketball. Peak Show was at least 6'11".

Kane was not as low as 6'6.25" peak I don't think, a little over that. 6'7" now, and he could be 6'6" today.
Pierre said on 22/Sep/20
@Canson = look at the help Big Show's wrestler shoes give him in the good pic of Kan on 16/sep.Big Show with his big left bare foot has to tiptoeing as much as if he wore a stiletto ...

Click Here Compared to to your pic(Big Show wrestler shoes/Shaq sneakers) , Big Show here wear very probably shoes a lot slimer than wrestler shoes = here the camera is very low plus a bit closer to Big Show and imo doesn't pay much tribute to Shaq's height ,but you can imo watch how much higher are Shaq's shoulders next to Big Show's shoulders compared to your pic .Here with both guys in probably around same help of shoe, Shaq looks like he dwarfs Big Show

Click Here Other angle Shaq leans to talk to Big Show, watch their respective shoulders

Click Here again camera very low that advantage a lot the closest guy = Big Show here is a lot closer to the camera than Shaq ,but finally Shaq's top of head still is comfortable higher than Big Show's top of head in the picture.
Canson said on 22/Sep/20
Vegas' said on 21/Sep/20
Pierre, Big Show was listed 7'1 in division 1 college basketball so the suggestion he was 6'8 3/4 peak or 4.25 inches overlisted is quite frankly ridiculous, nobody is ever overlisted that much or even close Click Here

I’ve seen a 3-4” but not above 4”.
Canson said on 21/Sep/20
Riky said on 20/Sep/20
Pierre said on 19/Sep/20
My guess=Kane peak around 6"6.25' now around 6"5.25'

Big Show peak around 6"8.75' now around 6"7.5'

The wrestler shoes makes the difference.

Wrestling shoes sure make difference, but I think you are a bit exaggerating.
They were and are clearly taller than that

@Pierre: be serious bro. Peak Big Show at 6’8.75?

Click Here
Vegas' said on 21/Sep/20
Pierre, Big Show was listed 7'1 in division 1 college basketball so the suggestion he was 6'8 3/4 peak or 4.25 inches overlisted is quite frankly ridiculous, nobody is ever overlisted that much or even close Click Here

6'8 range peak Wight would also make that surely the shortest division college division 1 team ever Click Here

You keep mentioning footwear, well here in Wight (past his peak) in wrestling boots with ~6'8 Akebono who is barefoot Click Here

Now Wight and Akebono both barefoot Click Here

Wight is still significantly taller barefoot suggesting his boots are not giving him this huge advantage you claim. And in reality how would be huge dude like Wight move around and wrestle without breaking an ankle in giant boots...
Ben Calimer said on 21/Sep/20
Big Show 6'7.5"? LOL
Riky said on 20/Sep/20
Pierre said on 19/Sep/20
My guess=Kane peak around 6"6.25' now around 6"5.25'

Big Show peak around 6"8.75' now around 6"7.5'

The wrestler shoes makes the difference.

Wrestling shoes sure make difference, but I think you are a bit exaggerating.
They were and are clearly taller than that
Big Lul said on 20/Sep/20
My estimates goes something like this

Sid peak: 6’6-6’6.5 max and now 6’5-6’5.25 max
Undertaker peak: 6’7-6’7.25 max and now 6.5.75-6’6 max
Kane peak: 6’7.25-6’7.5 and now 6’6.25-6’6.5
Kevin Nash peak: 6’9-6’9.25-6’8-6’8.5 max
Big show peak:6’11 max and now 6’9-6’9.5 max

I put Sid at 6’6-6’6.5 because he looked a max an inch shorter than taker and a 1-1.5 taller than 6’5 peak hulk hogan. I also gave him 6’5-6’5.25 because he barely looked taller than 6’4.75-6’5 Shad Gaspard

And I gave Taker 6’7-6’7.25 peak because he always looked 2 inches shorter than Kevin Nash and 4 inches shorter than big show. Then I gave him 6’5.75-6’6 max because he’s similar in height with Baron Corbin and most likely .25- .5 inch shorter than 6’6-6’6.5 people like Kane and Braun Strowman.
6'3 Julian said on 19/Sep/20
My thoughts
Kane: peak very weak 6’8 310, 6’6.5 285 now
Undertaker: peak 6’7.5 280-290, 6’6 flat and 300 pounds now
Big Show: 7’0 peak and barely 500 at his heaviest, weak 6’10 380 now
James B 172cm said on 19/Sep/20
Kane’s been looking 6’6 in recent years in my opinion.

10 years ago yeah he looked over 6’6 but not now.
Pierre said on 19/Sep/20
My guess=Kane peak around 6"6.25' now around 6"5.25'

Big Show peak around 6"8.75' now around 6"7.5'

The wrestler shoes makes the difference.
Riky said on 18/Sep/20
I definitely think Kane was a 2.01cm guy max at his tallest and waight 300/305 pounds at his heavier.
Today 1.99m I believe is his current height, weight around the same that his peak.

Undertaker 1.99m peak and a peak weight in 2000 of 295 pounds.
Today 1.97m and he did lost a lot weight compared to Kane.
Big Lul said on 18/Sep/20
@Christian 6’5 3/8
I 100% agree taker is at best 6’5.75 - 6’6 max and big show is anywhere from 6’9-6’9.5 max seeing with people like Taker, Kane and Braun Strowman nowadays
Pierre said on 17/Sep/20
@Kan =Very good pic! In fact we can guess around the help Big Show has here with his wretler shoes, by tiptoeing a lot with his left bare foot to be straight on his two legs = his wrestler shoes are giving him a massive advantage,the same as he was tiptoeing a lot .And when a giant guy is tiptoeing a lot with his big feet he has a massive help!
The only pic I know Hafthor / Braun inwhich they are standing on a floor looking regular is this pic= Click Here .And here the difference isn't only an inch imo = Hafthor slouching a lot still looks taller than Braun's cap = the difference to me is no less than 2 inches imo.

I don't know how much help Braun has in his wrestler shoes.That's why I generally prefer pics with guys in suits and classic shoes.
Click Here = here both guys very probably in very similar shoes= you can see Braun's shoulder is nearly same height as Big Show's shoulder.Then I believe in your pic Big Show has a good advantage of shoe on Braun,because Big Show's shoulder is a lot higher than Braun's shoulder in your piccompared to mine.
This time again I believe there is not a big difference between Big Show and Hafthor,Big Show a bit taller but not a lot imo
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Sep/20
@Canson
Taker has the better chance of being the full 6'6", than Show being the full 6'10" IMO. I give Taker 6'5.75" and Show 6'9.5" today.
Kan said on 16/Sep/20
@vegas
Kane head is about 10 inch, and big show head about 11 - 11.2 inch
Of course if kane tilt his head up and big show down the difference seems much bigger. But remeber big show eyelevel is about 5 - 5.2 inch like undertaker or strowman for example and his eye-chin range seems half inch to 3/4 of an inch longer, obviously not 7 inch or anything like that.
Click Here
This si a good comparison
Kan said on 16/Sep/20
@pierre
Big show seems about 2 inch taller in those pic than hafthor. Hafthor and strowman there are several photo with both and hafthor looks about an inch on him, at most 1.5 inch. While big show looks extremely taller than him, not by an inch only.
Click Here
I know big show stands on one foot who gave him half inch probably, but the difference still very big.
At least 3 inch taller
Darren.r said on 15/Sep/20
Always seemed slightly taller than the Undertaker
Vegas' said on 15/Sep/20
Kan said on 12/Sep/20
@vegas
2 inch longer head than hafthor or Kane is insane. An inch longer or a bit over is clearly possible.
--------

Is it really?

Face to face at 27 seconds onward..looks more than inch to me Click Here
Pierre said on 13/Sep/20
Click Here Here is again Hafthor 6"7.5' with probably around 1 cm more shoe(Braun has 2 cm vans) but Braun wear a cap ,not Hafthor.Hafthor's feet are a bit closer to the camera but Hafthor slouch to the opposite side of the camera then both heads are around same distance to the camera to me.Braun stands a lot straighter than Hafthor here and Hafthor still is easily taller than Braun's cap

Click Here Now Wrestlers without very probably their special shoes = Braun Strowman standing a bit closer to the camera but Big Show's head imo looking a bit more upward,Big Show imo has the better posture,not a lot but a bit.Also you can try to compare their shoulders with the first pic,Braun's left shoulder and Big Show's right shouder are same distance to the camera.

Even if very probably Big Show has a bigger head than Hafthor I doubt there is finally a lot more than an inch difference between Big Show's overall height and Hafthor's overall height here.

If Big Show'head is an inch bigger than Hafthor's head this does not means Big Show systematically has an inch advantage of head on their overall heights,it depend how much the highest part of his head is higher than his neck and how much the lower part of his head is lower than his neck.


Another pic I found Big Show/Taker Click Here Taker with a big advantage of camera , this time both in classic shoes
Pierre said on 13/Sep/20
@Vegas Big Show in your pic stands a lot closer to the camera than Hafthor then Big Show'shead looks logically a lot bigger. You compare Kane's head to Big Show's head= Kane for a tall guy has not particularly a big head compared to Triple H , Triple H more distant to the camera here = Click Here .
Dean Cain of course is not as low as 5"8' or 5"9' but I don't exclude around 5"10'/5"10.5' peak,he looks clearly shorter than Christopher Lloyd to me.
Kan said on 12/Sep/20
@vegas
2 inch longer head than hafthor or Kane is insane. An inch longer or a bit over is clearly possible.
However big show is taller than kane, how Much ? I think near 3 inch
Is even clearly taller than hafthor i would have said
Hahahahajjj said on 11/Sep/20
Big show is pretty much taller than haftor by a big margin really, haftor is 6ft9 people get over it and so is Kane, 6ft9 easy, strowman 6ft8 easy, strongman or boxing promotions got no reason at all to lie about heights, they are not claimed heights they are measured.

Unlike wwe who base the characters height due to the characters story not the actual people itself.
Canson said on 11/Sep/20
@Christian: yea I don’t rule that out. 6’10” is possible is what I was referring to but I can’t see much over 6’10”. 6’9.5” is possible but I can’t see any less than that. It’s a similar situation to Undertaker. May still be the full 6’6” or in that 197.5-198 range but likely isn’t any lower than 6’5.5” if even that low. My guess would be more of a low around 6’5.75” as opposed to 6’5.5 though
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 11/Sep/20
@Canson
I'd doubt it though. Maybe he was 5 years ago. Today, he barely seems 6'9.5"
Vegas' said on 11/Sep/20
Pierre not sure your argument? Are you saying Rob can't differentiate between 5'11 and 5'8-9 in person?

Once again that's a photoshop, two images used to market the movie. I think Rob has measured enough people to give a decent estimate in person so I trust him, anyway Cain looks as tall as Bret Hart next to Rob and I have met on a number of occasions..

As regards Big Show and Hafthor their head sizes are not the same. Wight is an acromegalic so his head is much bigger, probably 2 inches longer. You can see massive difference there, Wights hands will also be much bigger than Hafthors Click Here

Even a big dude like Kane closer to camera has a smaller head than Wight Click Here
Pierre said on 11/Sep/20
@Vegas= Why this pic with Vince Vaughn is not as good than some other pics?Because the pic show Kane is just a bit taller than Vince? But it's probably the reality by watching other comparisons...the low camera advantage a bit Vince's head who stands just a bit closer to the camera(not a lot closer),but we can see in this pic their closest shoulders are around the same height.I agree the best pic is the pic inwhich we can see shoes,floor,both guys exactly same posture same distance to the millimeter to the camera and neutral camera,and exactly same shoes.But this pics are rare...

I know this pic Big Show/Hafthor.The camera is low here ,very close to Big Show and directed towards the ceiling, that give a big advantage to Big Show on Hafthor.Is Big Show wearing wrestler shoes...

Click Here how much is the probability Kane is even close to Stephen Merchant's height(listed 6"7') here in a terrible posture next to Vince Vaughn ...Imo very slim.I agree it's just one comparison.But there is some other comparisons with other guys that show the same thing.

Another Stephen Merchant /Vince = Click Here

Click Here Click Here Click Here
Canson said on 11/Sep/20
@Editor Rob: which do you think is more likely today? 6’8 or 6’8.5?
Editor Rob
I'm not sure who this is for, Big SHow?
6'3 Julian said on 11/Sep/20
@Vegas you can’t see the feet of anyone there. Punk is wearing lifts, Vaughn next to Kane is probably wearing lifts
Vegas' said on 10/Sep/20
Couple of examples why photo comparison isn't good..

Kane and Vince Vaughn Click Here
Dwayne Johnson and Vaughn Click Here

Are Rock and Kane of similar height...

CM Punk and Rock look similar height Click Here

On video different story Click Here
Vegas' said on 10/Sep/20
Pierre we have a photo of Big Show with Hafthor Click Here

Once again unless we can see ground and stance comparison photos are not very good evidence

Click Here
6'10 1/4 barefoot measured Chris Bosh Click Here
Pierre said on 10/Sep/20
Comparisons Kane/Big Show =

Click Here =Big Show /Triple H = Triple H same height as Big Show lower ears ;Big Show looking straight

Click Here Hafthor 6"7.5' /Triple H .Hafthor looking not perfectly straight,Triple H max same height as Hafthor's lower ears.

Click Here Big Show looking around same posture as Hafthor this time = Watch Triple H's top of head and Big Show's ears .

Big Show's head looks a bit longer than hafthor's head but I doubt there is even an inch between them by this comparisons.
6'3 Julian said on 10/Sep/20
@ced Kane was known to wear lifts a lot which got him to 6’9 or 6’10
Pierre said on 9/Sep/20
@Vegas = Maybe Rob overstimate a bit Dean Cain's height.Here is Eric Roberts with a bit more shoe than Rob= Click Here Rob guess him 5"8.5' .
Now Dean Cain next to Eric Roberts = Click Here

Here is Hafthor who people generally guess him max 6"7.5' Click Here He has confortably a bit more than a complete head on Rob while Big Show isn't looking exactly a complete head taller than Dean (who tilts a bit his head)

Click Here Dean and Mario Lopez who some people guess around 5"8' Click Here = here Mario and 5"8' Robert Duvall

Dean Cain /Christopher Lloyd with a bit more shoe than Rob ( 2008) Click Here = Click Here =2004 Christopher in poor posture compared to Dean still looks taller than him, he still is same height as Dean's top of cap. Click Here = here their shoes,Dean has a comfortable sole here(Cristopher looks shorter here but standing comfortably more distant to the camera ,plus low angle that advantage the closest guy and Chritopher looks in a terrible posture here again )

And possible Dean in his 54 now lost a bit height.Maybe Big Show had a bit more shoe too...
Canson said on 9/Sep/20
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 8/Sep/20
@canson..there is no way show is above 6'9 today..just compare him with legit 7 feet Shaq..he looks a barely inch taller than Nash who is 6'8 now..

I’m not sure when Rob met Nash but he looked taller than 6’8” with him and Rob had him at 6’9” before reducing his current to 6’8.75” in the last year or so. Show may very well still be 6’10” today. You have to remember that with these big wrestlers, accelerated height loss is realistic. And the severity of it for some of these guys is also realistic. So take Hulk Hogan for example. He likely is around the 6’3” as Rob lists him today. I’d give him a +/- 1/4 as he could be 6’3.25” or 6’2.75”, imho of course. I doubt he’s less or more than that though. Hogan was at least 6’5” peak so while I don’t necessarily believe a 3” height loss, I do believe that he’s lost 2”. Very possible that it could’ve been upwards of 2.5” with something like 6’5.25 or 6’5.5” range (meaning realistically 6’6” or a bit more out of bed) and 6’3” today. My honest guess is about 6cm height loss or 5.5 cm from 196-196.5 range to 190.5-191 range today for Hogan. Undertaker is another. About a 1” or 3cm height loss. 1.5” is possible too

As for Shaq and Big Show that’s not a 3” difference although I don’t know if Show is quite as tall. Show looks around 6’10 range still

Click Here
Editor Rob
I seen Nash at 2013 Collectormania, the seen him at blackpool comic con 2015 (you can see Nash with James Cosmo at that event).

Last time a couple of years ago at Wales Comic Con. I think latterly, he looked under 6ft 9
ced said on 9/Sep/20
Don't know about you guys, but Kane looks about pretty much the same height as Kevin Nash next to Big Show in some one the photos below.
The big lul said on 9/Sep/20
Big show looks no taller than 6’9-6’9.25 max (6’9.5 max with perfect posture )
Only looks 3-3.25 inches taller than undertaker who we all is 6’5.75-6’6 max and 2.5 inch taller than 6’6.5 max Kane and Braun Strowman nowadays. And obviously looked 2.5-3 inches shorter than 7’0 max Shaq. The only way big show could be 6’9.75-6’10 is when he’s in his wrestling gear.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 8/Sep/20
@canson..there is no way show is above 6'9 today..just compare him with legit 7 feet Shaq..he looks a barely inch taller than Nash who is 6'8 now..
6'3 Julian said on 8/Sep/20
@Canson I’m gonna agree with you there
Canson said on 6/Sep/20
Show may still be 6’10”. That’s reasonable as is Kane at 6’6.5”. Taker isn’t as tall as Kane today. He’s 6’6” flat
Vegas' said on 6/Sep/20
Nash has similar posture he has with Rob in that photo and you said Show was alot closer in your photo..

Paul Wight at 6'8 range would be huge shock to me. That's ~3 inches dropped since I last met him in 2010.

He looks taller than 6'8 next to Dean Cain Click Here Cain and Rob for reference Click Here

Or next to Billy Gunn Click Here Rob and Gunn Click Here

Both of those photos are after I last met Wight in person.
Riky said on 5/Sep/20
Vegas' said on 5/Sep/20
Pierre what about this photo then..

Click Here

Ops, fanboys are crying now.
Pierre said on 5/Sep/20
@vegas= clearly Big Show stand closer to the camera that is a bit low(so a good advantage) plus has a better posture than Kevin here,Big Show stand very straight here.
Vegas' said on 5/Sep/20
Pierre what about this photo then..

Click Here
Pierre said on 4/Sep/20
Comparisons Kane /Bog Show = Click Here another pic Big Show /Shaq 7"0' ,very low camera that advantage a lot Big Show a lot closer to this camera .Watch the height difference between their shoulders. Click Here= here you can see the height difference between their shoulders looks noticiably slimer,probably because Shaq wear only sneakers while Big Show wear advantageous wrestler shoe,and so imagine the difference of height between us in the first pic inwhich probably both are wearing very similar shoes.

Click Here =here apparently Kane standing straighter than big show

Click Here =Kane /Triple H both wearing shoes looking regular ,camera distant of them so more neutral angle

Other = Click Here

Triple H /Big Show probably without wrestler shoe Click Here Click Here
Canson said on 4/Sep/20
6'3 Julian said on 3/Sep/20
@Canson I’ll stop believing Andre was 7’0 when Rob downgrades him

There is absolutely nothing wrong with believing it but he was listed at 6’10 and 6’11 in other programs such as the Olympics. All I was saying is that you go around making those arrogant statements about people if their estimates don’t equate to yours or if they don’t align with Rob’s. Rob is very good at what he does but he is not perfect just like anyone else here. Just because he lists someone at a peak height or current doesn’t mean that they were in fact that
6'3 Julian said on 4/Sep/20
I’ll accept 6’6.5 for Kane and Taker now, and 6’10 for Big Show currently
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 4/Sep/20
@Julian
I think you mistook my quote for Canson. Anyways, most of the pics you find of Show with Flair are old though. In 2020, he was only around a head taller than him on Raw, and mind you that Show was in his ring gear while Flair was in dress shoes. Click Here
6'3 Julian said on 4/Sep/20
Canson do you realise this site lists Andre at 7’0 and the average guess for Andre is pretty close at 6’11.92. It would seem like a lot of people agree with me
The big lul said on 3/Sep/20
Kane is at best 6’6.25-6’6 5 max now, he’s identical to people like 6’5.5-6’6 max taker and max 6’6.5 Braun Strowman. And he’s 2.5-3 inches shorter than 6’9-6’9.25 max big show
6'3 Julian said on 3/Sep/20
Also Canson you claimed Big Show was, in your words “no more than a head taller than Ric Flair”. If you google Big Show Ric Flair and click on images, you’ll see plenty of photos that disprove your point
6'3 Julian said on 3/Sep/20
@Canson I’ll stop believing Andre was 7’0 when Rob downgrades him
Chris David's said on 2/Sep/20
Everyone just choose and believe what you want to believe. And if someone else doesn’t agree with you = who cares

Everyone has an opinion.

My opinion is he is between 6’6.5 - 6’7
Canson said on 2/Sep/20
He’s still over 6’6” but 6’7” i doubt. 6’7.5 out of bed 6’6.5 afternoon height is my guess. If not maybe he dips to 199cm flat. But Rob is pretty close. Better than his previous 6’7” current listing
Riky said on 2/Sep/20
Slim 92

You talk about Kurrgan boots and you don't say something about Kane footwear. And it's not true that he wore them for a short period. He always had footwear advantage against everyone, prove me I'm wrong.

Said that I'm not saying he isn't taller than Taker. I'm saying that there are now max 2cm and there was never a full inch between the two, in my opinion.

Kane isn't above 6'6.25 barefoot in the afternoon. He isn't 6'5" either.
I don't see something so wrong with his posture considering his height age and weight. Sure his posture it's better the undertaker posture.
Pierre said on 2/Sep/20
Hahahahajjj said on 29/Aug/20
Pierre said on 25/Aug/20

Are you brain dead, haftor is 1inch taller than strowman, his wearing a cap that's why he seems 2 inches, of course the cap is covering his head, i dont know why i had explain this but it shows why people put peoples height lower than it really it, some people on here listing Kane as 6ft5 what a joke lol

Hahahahajjj said on 1/Sep/20
This Pierre guy is pretty brain dead not even joking lol, anyways haftors real height is 6ft9 and strongmen competitions dont need to lie like www, because wwe use billed heights as part of their storyline.

Taking this into note, haftor is 1 inch taller than strowman but Kane is also about 1inch taller than strowman.

In my personal opinion Kane is 6ft9 or near that.



6"9'?! You probably need glasses

Click Here = another example = Kevin Nash Rob guess 6"8.75' by the scale he's 6"8'

Click Here = Big show a lot closer to the camera and very low camera that advantage him a lot on Kevin (you can see how much tall is Kevin's left shoulder compared to Big Show's right shoulder because their shoulders are around same height as the camera and so the camera is more neutral for their shoulder's than for the top of their heads plus this shoulders are around same distance to the camera)

By this comparison very slim probability(0.001% ?...) Big Show as tall as Kevin (himself big max 6"8.75')

Now Big Show /Kane Click Here
Hahahahajjj said on 2/Sep/20
If Kane was 6ft6 or 6ft5 a 7footer would tower him but that's not the case, his not even that much shorter than a 7 footer.
Matt logan said on 1/Sep/20
he is at most 6'6"
Canson said on 1/Sep/20
6'3 Julian said on 1/Sep/20
If you think Kane is 6’5 you’re as smart as my sweaty socks

I’d be careful saying about people being you have some questionable estimates such as Andre being 7’0” in his prime. You’re new to the site and coming on here attacking people
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 1/Sep/20
@Pierre

Lots of camera angle tricking your sights and some others. Kane is pretty much same height as Strowman at worst.
Slim92 said on 1/Sep/20
Riky, ok and? It was for a very short time. Explain how he was still taller than taker before he was kane? And how everyone that has seen them out of ring gear together, says that Glenn is taller? He has a relaxed stance and always has his knees bent. He never walks around with his chest poked out or head tilted up
Hahahahajjj said on 1/Sep/20
Tyson fury, haftor and Kane all stand the same next to strowman a inch taller than him, 2 being confirmed 6ft9.

Pierre posted pictures of hhh with Kane, hhh with haftor, while hhh is actually standing below both of their earlobe identicalheight (pierre needs to re examine both pictures again look at kane right earlobe and not the left because he angled his face for the camera)

Also Tyson fury is actually 6ft9, the only reason why wlad looked as tall as him, because he wears big ass construction shoes to look near Tyson furys height.

Just Remember guys boxing just like strongman competition dosent need to lie about heights like wwe. Because wwe lists height due their storyline of their characters.
Hahahahajjj said on 1/Sep/20
This Pierre guy is pretty brain dead not even joking lol, anyways haftors real height is 6ft9 and strongmen competitions dont need to lie like www, because wwe use billed heights as part of their storyline.

Taking this into note, haftor is 1 inch taller than strowman but Kane is also about 1inch taller than strowman.

In my personal opinion Kane is 6ft9 or near that.
6'3 Julian said on 1/Sep/20
If you think Kane is 6’5 you’re as smart as my sweaty socks
Riky said on 31/Aug/20
Canson

While I wouldn't go to far with Kane (200cm as best option seems to me high todat), I must say that he could be even 2 cm taller than Undertaker, as you also think I guess, and similar to Strowman. So I agree on 199cm and 198 worst case absolutely but I struggle going above/below thes 2 options since I have Taker at 197cm at 99%.

But I would also say that with these tall, heavy, half broken, and no longer young guys their heights can change from a day to an other and most of all during the same day. Depending on how they feel and what they do.
Pierre said on 30/Aug/20
Philip McMullin said on 27/Aug/20
@Pierre putting Kane at 6ft5 is like putting Mysterio at 5'10, frigging ludicrous! Kane is still about 6ft7.

Oh yeah very solid arguments....
Riky said on 30/Aug/20
Slim92 said on 27/Aug/20

No one in the history of the wwe wire bigger soled boots than Kane. Absolutely no one maybe except Jake the snake.
Hahahahajjj said on 29/Aug/20
Pierre said on 25/Aug/20

Are you brain dead, haftor is 1inch taller than strowman, his wearing a cap that's why he seems 2 inches, of course the cap is covering his head, i dont know why i had explain this but it shows why people put peoples height lower than it really it, some people on here listing Kane as 6ft5 what a joke lol
Matt logan said on 27/Aug/20
no hafthor is 6'7.5
Slim92 said on 27/Aug/20
Riky, Kurrgan had on huge boots with lifts as well, looked just like Big Shows boots.
Philip McMullin said on 27/Aug/20
@Pierre putting Kane at 6ft5 is like putting Mysterio at 5'10, frigging ludicrous! Kane is still about 6ft7.
The big lul said on 26/Aug/20
@Canson I would say that Kane is in the 198cm-199cm and with perfect posture maybe 200cm and his peak I would say 6’7 maybe 6’7.25 and I agree with your undertaker estimates of peak: 6’7 and now his no taller than 6’5.5-6’6 max
Pierre said on 25/Aug/20
Hahahahajjj said on 24/Aug/20
Haftor next to strowman is 1 inch taller... same as Kane when he stood taller than strowman, haftor is 6ft9.

Hafthor sleeping on Braun is still higher than Braun's cap ....difference easily 2 inches here
Click Here

Click Here = Kane /Braun both without wrestler shoes Braun closer to the camera

Click Here Kane with shoes looking big Click Here

Click Here = Braun with probably bigger shoes than in my first comparison

Braun Strowman /Tyson both sneakers = Click Here Click Here

Tyson Fury supposed 6"7.5'/Wladimir Klitchko 6"5' = Click Here Click Here

Again Tyson Fury supposed 6"7.5' /Magic Johnson 6"7.5' slouching = Click Here

Hafthor isn't 6"9 here to me = Click Here (also video with scale at his page).But more 6"7.5'. So Braun to me isn't 6"6.75' or a full 6"6' ,so Kane to me very slim probability full 6"6' .

My guess = By Magic Johnson /Hafthor probably both real 6"7.5' =

Tyson Fury 6"5.75'/6"6' (Wlad Klitchko 6"5')
Braun Strowman around 6"5.25'
Kane around 6"5'

Remember = Hafthor /HHH = HHH max same height as Hafthor's lower ears Click Here

Kane /HHH ,Kane closer to the camera HHH do a bit the splits(big space between his own feet )=HHH here is around same height as Kane's top of ears = Click Here

the height of ears is lots of time easily more than 2 inches
Canson said on 24/Aug/20
Riky said on 23/Aug/20
Click Here

Awful quality video, but if you pause at second 9 you can see 6'9"MAX peak, maybe less, Robert Maillet and a prime Kane.
It was 1997.
The quality it's awful but if you pause at right moment, watching it for a second, you can see Kane (in his prime and in gear = laaarge footwear) is of course shorter.
More than 1 inch in my opinion.

Kane was 200cm barefoot and nothing above it. Today 198.5.
Robert Maillet was 205cm max and today 203.5/204cm.
Nash 205cm, today 203cm.
Undertaker 199.5cm, today 197cm.
Sid Vicious 198cm,195.5cm today.
Big Show 210cm, today 206cm.
Great Khali 212cm, today 208cm.
Hulk Hogan 195cm,today maybe 190cm.

We have enough evidence that those are the real heghts or btw damn close to the real heights even if Sametimes someone comes out with absurd claims.

@Riky: I would say:

Kane 199-200
Hogan 196-196.5 peak and 191 today perhaps (maybe 190.5)
Taker 6’7” peak and 197-198 today
Hahahahajjj said on 24/Aug/20
Haftor next to strowman is 1 inch taller... same as Kane when he stood taller than strowman, haftor is 6ft9.
Riky said on 23/Aug/20
Click Here

Awful quality video, but if you pause at second 9 you can see 6'9"MAX peak, maybe less, Robert Maillet and a prime Kane.
It was 1997.
The quality it's awful but if you pause at right moment, watching it for a second, you can see Kane (in his prime and in gear = laaarge footwear) is of course shorter.
More than 1 inch in my opinion.

Kane was 200cm barefoot and nothing above it. Today 198.5.
Robert Maillet was 205cm max and today 203.5/204cm.
Nash 205cm, today 203cm.
Undertaker 199.5cm, today 197cm.
Sid Vicious 198cm,195.5cm today.
Big Show 210cm, today 206cm.
Great Khali 212cm, today 208cm.
Hulk Hogan 195cm,today maybe 190cm.

We have enough evidence that those are the real heghts or btw damn close to the real heights even if Sametimes someone comes out with absurd claims.
Ben Calimer said on 21/Aug/20
Kane looked pretty much 6-8 with Mamun.
Ben Calimer said on 21/Aug/20
Kane looked pretty much 6-8 with Mamun.
6'3 Julian said on 21/Aug/20
Mate is this a setup for a joke? Kane is eye to eye with Strowman of all people, maybe slightly taller.
Canson said on 20/Aug/20
@Riky: I don’t rule out 6’6.5” today for Kane. 6’7” flat is not terrible for an estimate but clearly not 6’8”.
Riky said on 19/Aug/20
Kane isn't 6'7" leave alone 6'8" barefoot, it's laughable.

There are millions of photographic evidences that he can't be above 6'6. 25.
And that in perfect posture barefoot.
In his prime in boots he was 6'9" comfortably, that's why some of you thinks he is 8' feet tall
Mikey97 said on 19/Aug/20
I recently DM'd a guy who had just met Kane at a biking park of some sort. I asked him how tall he thought Kane was and he said he was 6'2" and Kane was 5 or 6 inches taller than him.

So if Kane is still possibly 6'7", I wonder how tall Undertaker is.
Canson said on 18/Aug/20
He struggles to look 6’7” let alone over that mark. But under 6’6” or even a solid 6’6” looks low for him.
Lyle said on 18/Aug/20
@Hahahahajjj, whilst I agree with you that Kane is taller than everyone you have listed (except Big Show) Strowman ain't 6'8, he's like 6'6 and Luke Gallows is around 6'4-6'5 not 6'7-6'8
Mazhar Malim said on 18/Aug/20
Really big person, at least 1.97m looking at recent photos. Maybe peak height was 2.01m.
Hahahahajjj said on 18/Aug/20
You all need to know Kane does not stand up straight anymore, as a wrestling fan for 25 years you all are appealing and dont know how to judge. To me it looks yall are kids or something who are new to wrestling.

Strowman: kane is taller than strowman who is a legit 6ft8 by real height due to strongman competition, kane stood taller & it was noticeable.

Eric Rowan: who edges out strowman also got edged out by Kane.

Big show: whos a legit 7footer standing next to Kane has to be atleast 6ft8.5 to 6ft9 and with lifts 6ft10 in his prime wrestling career. He cannot be 6ft6 next to big show. Yall deluded.

Taker: Kane has always been taller than taker too, only pics and footage I've seen in 20 years where taker looks taller are like 5% compared to all the footage and pictures that kane 95% of the time looks taller than taker.

Like gallows: who played fake Kane is a legit 6ft7 to 6ft8 by reports still got edged out by Kane and came out shorter

Only people who are legit taller than kane in wrestling were kevin nash 6ft10 legit, big show and the great khali
Riky said on 17/Aug/20
Roderick said on 16/Aug/20
Kane really isn't as tall as people think. A 6'5.5" guy who's the size of Kane can easily give an impression of being much taller, in person. He ain't over 6'6". He MIGHT BE 6'6", but I'd say 6'5.5" is more likely. He's shrunk.


I understand your point, and I agree that Kane isn't tall as many here think.
But 6'5.5 is likely the Undertaker's range. And lately I had to change my mind a bit, I thought they were same height but I give 90% that Kane is and was slightly taller.
By this logic , I give 6'6.25 Max today for Kane and 6'5.5 for Taker, MAX barefoot.
Peaks 6'7" MAYBE 6'7.25 Kane and 6'6.5/75 for Taker barefoot.
Pierre said on 17/Aug/20
Hahahahajjj said on 14/Aug/20
Kane is not 6ft6 or 6ft7... You lot are blown people who don't know shut. Kane is easy taller than strowman and his partner in the wyatt family

Lol Kane wear big shoes in ring plus there is a pic in web Hafthor towering over Braun Strowman= Braun is never as tall as his list next to Hafthor
Pierre said on 17/Aug/20
Slim92 said on 15/Aug/20
Pierre. Gotta do your research, Vince vaughn admitted to tip toe in the photo with kane.

@Slim82 Then give me the link in which he say that I don't find it
Matt logan said on 17/Aug/20
rodrick I agree im a legit 6'3 some belive im 6'5 lol so ya i agree people tend to get a bigger height listing an over exaggerate a bit
George Damonial said on 16/Aug/20
Various pictures compared together show a variety of camera angles and complexions for Kane.

He is currently around 6’7.
Roderick said on 16/Aug/20
Kane really isn't as tall as people think. A 6'5.5" guy who's the size of Kane can easily give an impression of being much taller, in person. He ain't over 6'6". He MIGHT BE 6'6", but I'd say 6'5.5" is more likely. He's shrunk.
Slim92 said on 15/Aug/20
Pierre. Gotta do your research, Vince vaughn admitted to tip toe in the photo with kane.
Creeper said on 15/Aug/20
@Haha I agree that Kane is taller than Strowman but not by much. In 2017 I'd say he was 6'6.75" against Braun who is 6'6.5".

A lot of people rarely see Kane when he stands as tall as he could. He's a tower. He's not just 6'6" or under, I'd say 6'6.5".
Riky said on 15/Aug/20
Pierre

6'7" S. Marchant is taller than Kane, in fact Kane is 6'6"1/4
Hahahahajjj said on 14/Aug/20
Kane is not 6ft6 or 6ft7... You lot are blown people who don't know shut. Kane is easy taller than strowman and his partner in the wyatt family
Pierre said on 13/Aug/20
Click Here = Jack Swagger's mugshot,advantageous low camera here,certainly wearing shoes = imo max 77.5 inches(6"4.5') with shoes = around 6"3.5' barefoot

Click Here Jack Swagger /Kane

Vince Vaughn/Stephen Merchant listed 6"7' wearing flat sneakers and who shrunk a lot here = Click Here

Kane / Vince Vaughn = Click Here
Ben Calimer said on 12/Aug/20
6'7" current height in socks, maybe 6'6.5" @ eod.

Pierre, Big Show came out much better against Shack when he was in the suit and tie than when in gear. So much for wrestling gear being a huge height booster.
Canson said on 11/Aug/20
Pierre said on 10/Aug/20
Current under 6"6' .

How?
Matt logan said on 11/Aug/20
Exactly 6'6" is max for kane
Pierre said on 10/Aug/20
Current under 6"6' .

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.