How tall is Kane

Kane's Height

6ft 7 (200.7 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7 ½ (201.9 cm)
Glenn Jacobs is an American professional Wrestler. Has been billed 6ft 10 and some believe he stood 7ft. When wrestling under the name Yankem he may have been billed as 6ft 7.
I'm about Six-Eight...[and I weigh] a little over 300 pounds.

How tall is Glenn Kane Jacobs
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of The Undertaker
The Undertaker
6ft 6 ½ (199 cm)
Height of John Cena
John Cena
6ft ½ in (184 cm)
Height of Big Show
Big Show
6ft 10 (208 cm)
Height of Andre The Giant
Andre The Giant
7ft 0 (213 cm)

Add a Comment6226 comments

Average Guess (337 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.96in (203.1cm)
Current: 6ft 7.14in (201cm)
Roderick said on 16/Jul/19
Some of you guys are funny Lol

6'7.5" isnt much different than 6'8"

People estimating both Kane and Undertaker at 6'8" isnt that bad if most of you guys believe Undertaker was 6'7.5" and Kane was 6'7.75".

I can see how Kane gets 6'8" guesses sometimes but that dude wore monster sized boots and I just can't see him measuring the full 6'8" barefoot.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 16/Jul/19
Honestly I never saw Undertaker with monster boots, most of all in the beginning of his career. Probably some lifts yeah, but people like Kane and Jake the snake always had footwear advantage on him.
ced said on 16/Jul/19
@Sotiris.. The weird thing about Kane and Sid - A while back I posted a video of a Battle Royal i believe it was 1995, Both Kane and Sid were in the match. At one point, Sid walks in front of Kane, and Kane looked to have him by AT LEAST one inch but it looked even more. But to be safe, let's just stick to one inch. Keep in mind at this time, he was Isaac Yankem, and wore pretty flat boots, and it didn't look like he had internal lifts, I could be wrong.

Now, if I take a guess at their peak heights, judging from all evidence that we have, I agree with you that Sid was taller than Taker by .25 inches.

Undertaker: 6'6.75
Sid: 6'7
Now, here's where it gets tricky, I would guess Kane at 6'7.5, but in that battle royale, he looked to have Sid by at least an inch but I don't necessarily see Kane at 6'8, at most, 6'7.75, at least 6'7.25.
Alex 6'3.25 said on 16/Jul/19
He always wore lifts and/or big boots to be slightly taller than Undertaker, probably they were at same height, around 202 cm max.
edwards said on 16/Jul/19
@sotiris gravas
yes dude i agree on some of your estimation.taker was never ever 6'8.there is 0 % chance of taker being 6'8.some of poster in taker's page are desperate in proving him 6'8.inflating everyone's height just to make taker 6'8.i agree that kane wore monster lifts and taker too wore inner monster lifts.
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Jul/19
@edwards I think Taker, Kane, and Sid Eudy were all close in height. I actually think Sid was slightly taller than Taker, as seen in this 1989 staredown... Click Here
Rob has Sid at 6'6.75" peak height, so make of that what you will.

Kane wore "Herman Munster" boots and maybe he and Taker both wore internal lifts, so figuring out their real height isn't easy.


Here's a video where Taker (aka Master of Pain) is described as only 6'8", and The Soultaker (aka The Godfather) is touted as 6'7" (1989)... Click Here

So, to answer your question, I'm not sure.
Roderick said on 13/Jul/19
I see that a lot better now that I've rewatched that clip. Now that I think about it, Kane benching 525 is definitely very unlikely. I bet he pulled off a 500lb bench on a super good day and just added 25lb to the claim.

Or possibly he was never even able to do that much and completely made a number up... regardless of him being 6'7" or 6'8", 280 pounds or 320 pounds, or on juice or not, even the 500lb bench claim sounds unbelievable. Kane wasn't as massive as he looked on TV, they do a good job at making these guys look stronger and bigger then they really are.

Kane was definitely built and strong, but maybe not as strong as some people think.
edwards said on 13/Jul/19
@ sotiris gravas who do you think is taller at peak,taker or kane who do you think has chance of measuring a tad taller at peak?
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Jul/19
@ced I was actually offered a job by an elderly gentleman who I believe was a wrestling promoter or something back in 1997. He had seen me working out at my gym w/ a whole bunch of wrestlers and told me that I was big and strong, but that he would make me BIGGER. Obviously, he was talking about steroids, and that was something I was definitely not interested in. Also, I heard that these guys are on the road for long stretches of time, away from home, which is also something that didn't appeal to me.

Never met Kane, I'm afraid.

Being tall has its perks and disadvantages. TBH, very tall guys often look scrawny and weird. No one is going to be intimidated by a skinny stick figure of a man. I'm impressed by tall guys that are able to pack on some muscle mass, which isn't easy.



@Roderick Kane was definitely a strong dude. Keep in mind, however, when he picked up Show, he held him close to his chest, and Show wasn't resisting and actually helping and holding on. Click Here It's not the same as lifting a dead weight for a bench press, where you have to extend your long arms vertically, resisting gravity. Kane definitely looks fatter now.

I, too, was a hefty kid. I think I was around 140 lbs when I was 8 years old, maybe younger, maybe 6. I remember my legs would give out b/c I was gaining weight too rapidly. I would be walking and then collapse to the ground. My folks even took me to get x-rays to see if I had problems w/ my bones or something.

My first day of kindergarten, a teacher came up to me, screaming, telling me to stop bothering the little kids and get back to my grade -- suffice it to say, I started crying.

Belated b-day wishes on the The Big 4-0, dude. (I can still pass for 35 when I shave, maybe younger. At 40, I had virtually no gray in my hair or beard; now, seven years later, it's a different story, but still not a lot, thank goodness.)



@edwards Just b/c Kane claimed he was 6'8" doesn't make it true. Hogan still claims he was 6'7" and insists he's around 6'5" now, lol. A height of 6'8" for Kane would definitely have been a morning measurement.
Roderick said on 11/Jul/19
Also Lmao, samson if you still lurk here, how would you know it was Kane in 1999 if he didn't unmask until 2003?

@Edwards I'm talking about afternoon heights. I'd say the tallest possible height for Kane until we enter the fairytale zone is 6'8" flat. 6'7.5"-6'7.75" range is much more realistic.

Undertaker in the afternoon/evening was never taller than 6'7.5". More like 6'7.25", but 6'7.5" really isn't much different

Also just a note, something that's been bothering me, what are your guys guesses on Sid Eudy's height? I notice how he is listed as 6'6.75" here, but I am 100% convinced he is taller than Undertaker. He has to be 6'7.5". Its what I have him at. It's that or Undertaker was 6'6.5". It's one or the other.
edwards said on 11/Jul/19
On Bruce Pritchard's latest podcast on Bad Blood 1997, he stated that both Kane and Undertaker both wore lifts,kane wore outer while taker wore inner lifts but that Kane was taller or have a slighest edge over taker.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 10/Jul/19
@Sotiris Gravas

I found what you said logical. But I don't agree on a pair of things.

I don't doubt that you are pritty much the same size or that you are as strong as someone like Kane.
But I doubt, athletically, you have the same background.
We are not talking about powerlifter maybe, but not even about ordinary men.
Guys that are in gym since 30 years, sure not at a low level.

Also i think bench more then someone depends also from wich muscle fibers you have more developed, so people can always surprise you sometimes.

Said that I don't know your background actually, so probably I'm saying nothing. But I think he did edge 500lb
Roderick said on 10/Jul/19
Picture Shaq but kinda with a leaner body, that's basically what my friend looks like. He is happy with his weight I'm sure.

It is honestly so hard to look at someone and say "oh, he can probably bench this much". As for Kane, I don't think 525 is impossible, but it might be a little exaggerated as you said. He might have done 500 before with the aid of a spotter, and added 25 pounds to the claim. Remember, he DID lift the 500lb peak weight Big Show up at his chest and did dump him over to rope... so I really don't know if he could have done the same with a bar, laying down.

My heaviest I ever weighed was 235, and that was actually growing up. I was a fat kid. Right now, I am 5'11" and I weigh 190 pounds, and I don't look fat anymore. I just turned 40 a few weeks ago, and even some of my friends tell me I can still pass for being in my 20s.

As for Undertakers' weight, I'd say he was never heavier than 270. Kane was 280 MAX imo. Nowadays, Undertaker is probably 240-250, yes, 240, and Kane probably didn't lose much mass, he might have actually gained some weight if you looked at his last few runs, he had a belly. Maybe 290 for Kane today.

Kane is way bigger than UT imo.
ced said on 10/Jul/19
@Sotiris, wow I didn't know you yourself are a giant. 6'7 285 pounds?? How come you never go into pro wrestling? You would have been a perfect 3rd brother of destruction. Also, have you ever met Kane? If so, was he taller or shorter than you or you would say pretty much the same height?
edwards said on 10/Jul/19
@Roderick said on 8/Jul/19
Hearing as Kane himself has claimed 6'8", we know that there is zero chance of him being 6'8.25" or 6'8.5" like some people have estimated him at. Just zero chance.dude peak kane could clear 6'8 quite easily in the morning,i mean in the morning kane could clear 6'8 easily,he may wake aup at 6'8.5 and kane may wakeup at 6'8.both of them dudes at peaks.
Sotiris Gravas said on 8/Jul/19
@Roderick I'm not an expert on weight, nor on height for that matter, lol... If I had to hazard a guess, maybe Kane was 285 lbs, max. Undertaker maybe 270. Not much more than that IMO. At around 6'7", I'm currently a muscular 285 lbs, so I don't think Kane looked much more than myself.

When I was around 305 lbs and had a higher body fat percentage, I looked HUGE. That's b/c someone w/ more fat will always look bigger. Even my 6'4" brother who was always skinny went up to 240 lbs at one point, but w/ a good amount of fat, and he looked like a mountain. He actually looked at least 50 lbs heavier b/c a fat person will always look bigger.

When I wear loose-fitting clothes, ppl will say I look skinnier, but when the clothes come off, they're quick to point out that I look massive.

Is your 6'10" friend happy at 285 lbs, or does he feel skinny?

I actually eat like a bird and sometimes skip meals... I'm afraid to even think what would happen if I started eating a lot. At my heaviest, I was forced to wrap my 30-inch upper thighs w/ medical bandages b/c my inner thighs would chafe and bleed when I'd go for brisk 4-hour-long walks. I know, TMI. (Damn, I just measured them, and they're still 30". At least they don't bleed anymore.)


As for Kane benching 525, considering Hafthor (one of the strongest men in the world) could only bench 551, I think even Kane's claim of 525 is exaggerated b/c he's not a professional strongman or powerlifter, but I could be wrong. I prefer to see something w/ my eyes rather than take someone at their word on a podcast, especially from a wrestler whose whole persona is fake.

My best advice to guys like samson: don't believe wrestlers when they say they can bench 650 lbs. Trust me, they can't, especially if they're very tall. It's called bull(bleep), for lack of a better word. That way, you won't get caught in a lie and be forced to double down and then triple down on that lie, rather than own up to your mendacity.


I love the way a scumbag troll like houss -- who probably soils his pants at the sight of a real man -- called me an old man... I'm 47 years young w/o a wrinkle on my face, and Kane, on the other hand, is 52. As for me being stronger than Kane, I never said that, but it wouldn't surprise me if I was. You see, I'm a strong mother(bleep).
Roderick said on 8/Jul/19
So from the polls, within one day of it being up, it got 10 votes.

7 for 6'8"
3 for 6'7"
0 for 6'6"

This means that we can throw any argument of Kane under 6'7" peak height out of the window... as nobody voted for 6'6".

This also means that the majority of voters can agree that Kane wasn't just 6'7" flat but a small fraction over.

Hearing as Kane himself has claimed 6'8", we know that there is zero chance of him being 6'8.25" or 6'8.5" like some people have estimated him at. Just zero chance.

The average peak guess has him at 6'7.96", which is pretty much 6'8" on a stadiometer.

The average current guess is 6'7.14" which is going to read as 6'7.25" on a stadiometer, probably.

Both averages seem off, but just by a little fraction of height.

Kane being 6'7.75" peak height seems absolute bang on to me. For his current height I would say 6'6.75" max but probably more like 6'6.5". I think we might be able to elimate 6'6.75" from the equation however, since he looked 3.5" shorter than 6'10" Big Show last year, which would make him 6'6.5".

I think I nailed Kane guys, not trying to brag. 6'7.75" and 6'6.5" just seem like the two perfect numbers for this man.
Roderick said on 7/Jul/19
Sotiris is right. When samson said Kane benched 650, that is almost impossible.

Kane stated on Stone Colds' podcast that his best bench was 525. So yes, samson is a liar.

I am 40, 5'11", 14.5" biceps, 5'11.5" wingspan, and 190lb. I can bench 220lb and I can squat 385lb. I don't know how big my chest is. I have a friend who is a legitimate 6'10" who I mentioned on Khalis' page, and he can only bench 240lb and he is 285 pounds.

I doubt Kane was ever a full 300lb, more like 280 max. If you've seen what 6'8" 300 pound men look like, you will know why seeing Kane at 300lb is very hard to believe. What do you think about both brothers of destructions weight, Sotiris?
Sotiris Gravas said on 7/Jul/19
Just to put things into perspective:

Maybe 6'7.5" (Editor Rob has him at 6'7.75") 448.64 lbs Hafthor Bjornsson, a VERY strong guy, was only able to bench 250 kg/551 lbs... Click Here

Bigger Man says that he (6'11.75", only 293 lbs) was able to bench 276 kg/608 lbs, despite his VERY long arms which makes lifting heavy weight VERY hard.


Hmmm...

Rather than hit the gym, I'm just gonna go eat a donut.
Sotiris Gravas said on 7/Jul/19
Addendum: For the record, yes, I'm stupid, and no, I didn't bother watching the very end of that Shaq/Barkley video or even bother to read the comments section, until now. Turns out Barkley was using fake weights (I think the first 2 were real), so even he couldn't do one rep of 405 lbs. I was so focused on Shaq (and had the volume down really low) that I failed to notice Barkley's weights weren't even clanking together; translation: fake. Bottom line: I'm dumb, so don't try and copy off of me on a test.

P.S. Shaq isn't Hercules, but he can still throw ppl around like rag dolls, so don't try and pick a fight w/ him when you're drunk.
Lyle said on 6/Jul/19
@Ced he's listed as 6foot9 on WWF War zone
Riccardo 5'7" said on 6/Jul/19
Kane has good chances of be 6'7 at his peak, I wouldn't roule out 6'6.5/6'6.75 barefoot.
Now something like 6'5.75/6'6".
The shoes he used to wore were to big to ignore, shoes on wich i think he was 6'8.5 or something
Riccardo 5'7" said on 6/Jul/19
I used to bench 245lb just for 1 at my best, not alone but with the help of (I don't remember the name, spotter?).
I used to train bicipes with 35lb.
I'm 5'7" and I was pretty big phisically training in this way. (big compared to my height)

An other guy, 194 cm, struggled to reach good results as many others phisically similar to him.

It's true that more tall you are more it's hard make muscles and be strong , at 7' tall most of all.

So, for me it's hard reading about 650lb here, 600lb there. But of course I'm an other "kind of human" compare to many here.
Roderick said on 6/Jul/19
I hope this doesn't defy the rules of the website but I made a poll because I was curious to what every one thinks. I made a poll of what height everyone thinks Kane was closest to: 6'8", 6'7", and even as low as 6'6". So for example, if you think Kane was 6'7.25", you would select 6'7". If you think he was 6'7.5", you would select 6'8".

Click Here

My vote is 6'8" because I believe he was 6'7.75" or at least 6'7.5".
Sotiris Gravas said on 6/Jul/19
Okay, so I spelled Schwarzeneggbeater, I mean, Schwarzenegger wrong in my previous post. It was either a typo or a series of minor strokes that were to blame; maybe both. Real glad I got the last part of Arnie's last name correct. Phew! Click Here


@Roderick His post hadn't popped up yet when I visited this page. I see it now (so it does exist).

The way I see it, Bigger Man is one of three things:

1) Exactly what he claims; a very rare breed of human.
2) Around the height he states, though used hyperbolic claims regarding feats of strength to embellish his story.
3) A dime-a-dozen troll who purports bull(bleep) and lives in a world of fantasy b/c real life is too depressing.

I seriously doubt it's the first one, but I could be wrong. Anything is possible, but I doubt it. Again, a BIG, strong guy like Shaq tried to bench only 405 lbs... and it was an epic fail.

Superman tattoo or not, the bench press is basically Kryptonite for very tall guys with very long arms:
Click Here
Pierre said on 6/Jul/19
There is a proverb in France= je suis comme Saint Thomas je ne crois que ce que je vois(I'm like Saint Thomas i bealive only that i see with my own eyes).Or other = the man who has seen the man who has seen the man who has seen the bear (they are only proverb)🙂
Roderick said on 6/Jul/19
@Sotiris Gravas But Bigger Man did answer all your questions... He wrote a whole essay for you.
Sotiris Gravas said on 5/Jul/19
@Bigger Man While not from the "Show Me State" of Missouri, if I don't see it w/ my eyes, it doesn't exit -- bacteria and air included, which I'll never believe in. Kidding.

The Internet was created for ppl w/ wish fulfillment fantasies that live to bull(bleep), so you'll forgive me if I approach grandiose claims like yours w/ a certain amount of incredulity.

My disbelief isn't an indictment of your character, simply me assessing the law of averages.

How many professional basketball players that tall do you think can bench in excess of 600 lbs...? I lean towards zero.

A guy the size you claim to be is very rare. A guy that size w/ that strength level is more rare.


I already posted pics of myself on CeleHeights proving my height and mass, which trolls immediately claimed were Photoshopped... so, granted, even posting photos is still never enough for some ppl.



Here's something a troll like houss would be interested in knowing. Between 1966 and 1968, Arnold Schwarznegger (hope I spelled that right), who was never more than 6'0.5" had an official bench press of only 440.9 lbs.

Arnie's best unofficial gym lift was supposedly only a 500-lb bench press, and this guy LIVED in the gym. I needn't remind you, he even had help from steroids, which you intimate wasn't the case for yourself.

So, Bigger Man, until I see real evidence... it doesn't exist. No offense.

P.S. Do you know how difficult it would be for a 6'11.75" guy not on steroids w/ extremely long arms to get 22.5" of solid muscle biceps? I'm guessing you don't, which is why I call bull(bleep) on your claims. Also, only 133 kg is kinda skinny for a guy that tall, claiming to be so strong.

P.P.S. A guy w/ the username "Bigger Man" screams troll to me. If I'm wrong and proven wrong, I'll humbly apologize.


P.P.P.S. This is 6'11.5" Shaq almost killing himself, not being able to bench only 405 lbs, while 6'4.5" Charles Barkley barely could... Click Here AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA And I'm supposed to believe you, 6'11.75" BIGGER MAN, could do 600 lbs...? I don't think so, lol.
Roderick said on 5/Jul/19
@Edwards I never said he was 6'7" flat at his peak. I said that during that stage of his career during the Viscera staredown that he was 6'7" mark flat. I too believe he was 6'7.75" and is now currently 6'6.5". These are all our estimates and we could all be wrong. I am just sticking to those two numbers.

Also anybody who estimates Kane taller than 6'8" is a clown. I can how some people can get 6'8".... But past that is pure reality denial.
ced said on 5/Jul/19
Kane's height is truly a weird one. I use to think he had to have been a 6'8 peak, but the more I look into older videos, the less I believe he was.

I don't know how tall Sid Vicious was (another weird one), but, in a battle Royal, Glenn looked to have had him by AT LEAST 1.25 inch. (There's a clip where Sid walks by Yankem, and Yankem is absolutely taller. But then you look at the Jake Roberts - Yankem match, and he doesn't look over 2 inches taller. Maybe 1.75.

The Viscera-Kane staredown that Sotiris posted is telling. Obvisouly, Viscera had huge lifts on, but, Kane also has lifts on.

Also, if anyone has ever played the WWF War Zone game from 1998, in it, they have Kane listed as 6'7. I always wondered if they had accidently revealed his real height in the game.. By that I mean, Kane comes into the graphic department at Acclaim, and they take his real his real height and put it in before WWE was able to tell them "hey , we promote his as 7 Feet tall".
edwards said on 5/Jul/19
@roderick
there's no way he(kane) was only 6'7 at peak.he imho was 6'7.75 at peak.kane was 6'10 or even 6'10.5 at peak with those boots.as for taker he was 6'7.5 or 6'7.25 at peak imho personally.
Roderick said on 5/Jul/19
@Sotiris Gravas I actually agree with you on Viscera. I don't think he was 6'6.5" either, I would think more 6'6" flat, as he was billed it at one point. I think Kane looks about an inch taller than Viscera though, which places Kane at around 6'7" flat at that point in his career.
Heisenberg89 said on 4/Jul/19
How is logically possible that, after 2000500675368 pictures of monster heels or heights comparison with fans, still someone that will sure come out with a "Guys Kane was 6'8/6'9"...

Why many of you don't accept that few of these guys are shorter then you think, and not by little amounts.

Looking at Jake the snake Roberts vs Kane boots, everybody should stop to guess and think a bit.
Heisenberg89 said on 4/Jul/19
"Maybe Kane is really 10 feet tall but our minds just don't allow us to perceive it. Only Chosen Ones can peer into this cosmic realm. What we thought was abject stupidity w/ Daniel reynolds might actually be divine grace.

Here's Kane TOWERING(!!!) over maybe 6'1" Triple H by maybe 30 or 40 feet... Click Here"

This is the post of the year.
Bigger Man said on 4/Jul/19
Sotiris... you asked the size of my chest, biceps and my weight.

Asked and answered, look carefully.
But tbh whatever you read into it bothers me not one bit.
Joshua C said on 4/Jul/19
Ced.... Jake had obvious huge lifts on while yankem had boots that couldnt get any flatter. Yankem was still obviously more than 2 inches taller. Jake was what, 6'3 6'5 without lifts?
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Jul/19
@ced To be fair, Jake "The Snake" Roberts had monster heels on... Click Here

Kane looks to be sporting internal lifts, which can be better observed from the highlight that's picked up on his boot... Click Here



Here's Kane vs. Viscera, where Kane's monster heels are a little bit bigger... Click Here

Despite the slight footwear advantage, both men look to be around the same height, and I actually think Viscera may have been only 6'6", not 6'6.5"... Click Here , Click Here

I doubt Kane was ever more than 6'7", and he certainly isn't that now.


Not sure what footwear Roberts had on here, but here he is w/ Outback Jack (1987):
Click Here Both men were billed as 6'6", and Outback Jack looks to be the taller man.


The heels Roberts wore against Stone Cold in 1996 were HUGE.. Click Here

Roberts and a fan... Click Here
Same fan and Viscera... Click Here
Same fan and Kane... Click Here

Same fan w/ Tarik Glenn (listed 6'5")... Click Here Notice how tall Glenn looks. Again, listed as only 6'5".
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Jul/19
Here's the Brooklyn Brawler w/ 5'9" Chris Jericho... Click Here

Brawler and Kane... Click Here

Brawler and 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg... Click Here



Maybe Kane is really 10 feet tall but our minds just don't allow us to perceive it. Only Chosen Ones can peer into this cosmic realm. What we thought was abject stupidity w/ Daniel reynolds might actually be divine grace.

Here's Kane TOWERING(!!!) over maybe 6'1" Triple H by maybe 30 or 40 feet... Click Here

@Joshua C Clearly.


@Dream Forget about my post, dude. Pretend it was all just a bad dream.
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Jul/19
@ced TBH, I'm not sure, dude. There's always the issue of footwear that can be suspect at times.



@Bigger Man I noticed you chose not to answer any of my questions. I'll read into that accordingly.
ced said on 3/Jul/19
I think Sotiris might be right about Kane.. i just found a match on youtube, Jake the Snake Vs Isaac Yankem.. and Yankem is taller, but only looks to be about a 1.5-1.75 inch difference.

Click Here
Joshua C said on 2/Jul/19
Kane does NOT have big heels on with the big show segment. Clearly.
Dream said on 2/Jul/19
@Canson

He did look about 6'8", with obvious footwear advantage, in person. 6'7"-6'7.25" today, in person, minus the footwear advantage.
Dream said on 2/Jul/19
@Sotiris

I'm surprised you haven't said the same thing to me. Truthfully, I did see Kane in person, btw. He looked around 6'8", but he had bigger shoes. He seemed around 6'7"-6'7.25" in person, taking footwear advantage out. Also, I didn't get a picture because the photos costed too much, but I saw him up close.
Bigger Man said on 2/Jul/19
Incidentally my dad was 6’7 and my mum 6’0.
It was only ever gonna end one way for me and my siblings.
My brother is 6’8 and my two sisters are 6’1 and 5’10. The 5’10 sister is imaginatively called Shorty!
Bigger Man said on 2/Jul/19
Sotiris...of course any of us can reel out any figures we want on a site like this because there’s no way of anybody proving or disproving it. But for me I don’t see a reason to bother telling tall tales...pun intended! I’m not gaining anything. Nobody knows me so I’m not gonna get any recognition. In fact I half expected not to be believed but I only mentioned it in relation to the the stories of Kane and others and what weights they were or were not pressing or curling.

As for my measurements. When I was at my strongest, tallest and heaviest muscular weight when I was in the gym every other day I was 6’11.75, chest 60, weight 21stone or just over 133kg. And bicep measured 22.5 inches. Growing up I was pretty solid but like most tall guys putting on really huge muscle was harder for me than much shorter guys. My muscle building genetics were pretty decent though despite my extreme height but I was never gonna be super awesome. So I settled for pretty strong and used my height and decent build to get work n bodyguarding and security.
Nowadays I’m 51 and though I still workout, it’s more a maintenance and health thing now. Being this tall is hard enough without carrying any excess weight, especially at my age.
houss said on 2/Jul/19
@sotirisjackass you think you are stronger than kane old man hhh 😭🤣😂😭
Roderick said on 1/Jul/19
I think a better listing for Kane would be 6'6 1/2 rather than the full 6'7"... What do you think guys? I think his peak listing is fine.
ced said on 1/Jul/19
@Sotiris.. Brian Clark is another hard one.. In his match with Kevin Nash in WCW, what would you say was the height difference between them? Let's say Nash was 6'9, or 6'9.25, Clark looked about 3-3.5 inches shorter..

In that case, I'd say 6'4.75-6'5.25..
Sotiris Gravas said on 1/Jul/19
@samson Wrong. Once again, you don't know (bleep). It's way harder for tall guys b/c of long limbs which move the weight a greater distance. More distance equals more work... meaning harder.

Being tall, especially 6'11" would mean that Bigger Man would have to be packing a lot of dense muscle, which is harder to build when you're very tall. Kane was max 6'7", never 6'8". Again, you said Kane was using 150-lb dumbbells for curling... which 100% means you're a liar. You counted nothing. You saw nothing. You're obviously a liar... and I can't stand liars. Move along, troll. You've been exposed. It's over.

If Bigger Man is really that tall and can bench that much (obviously just once), then kudos to him. Do I personally believe it? No. I'm not calling him a liar, just that I find it very hard to believe.



@Bigger Man How much do you weigh and how spectacular are the size of your arms and chest? W/ all due respect, more often than not, guys that tall are lanky and weak. Prove me wrong, dude. Don't expect me to believe anything if you look like Dirk Nowitzki or Pau Gasol. Also, fat doesn't equate to muscle... meaning still no. A very tall guy like 7'0" (not 7'2") Olivier Richters would be nowhere w/o steroids.



Anybody know how much Richters can bench?
Pierre said on 1/Jul/19
@Sotiris Gravas = Yeah Sotiris one more time this pic too with Sally Field is convincing me he was never 6"1' range Click Here .With her proportions Sally clearly isn't looking a tall girl and i even ask me if her list is not a little bit generous,but even with her actual list Arnold does not looking to me 6"1' range.Vince Basile(if my memory is good)has said,the others bodybuilders he has measured have lost 0.5 inch on his stadiometer,but when you take pics of (for example)the bodybuilder Ken Waller next to Joe Weider = Click Here ,ken looks max 5"10' and was factured 6"0'....Then i understand if Ken was measured only 5"11.5' on Vince's stadiometer his measure was always very generous.And when i compare some bodybuilders in this era i think(it's just my opinion of course)other of this guys had a generous official height.
samson said on 1/Jul/19
Sotiris Gravas Your not old, your still young. I'm 50 and I;m sticking to what I'm saying
Sotiris Gravas said on 30/Jun/19
@ced I accidentally closed the tab before submitting my post, so I'm gonna have to type everything all over again... How nice.

Given that Bryan Clark was billed as 6'6", I'm guessing he was around 6'4".



Here's a fan/wrestler named Tony Fury w/ Bryan Clark in flip-flops (1994)... Click Here

W/ Bart and Billy Gunn (1994)... Click Here

W/ Kevin Nash (1991)... Click Here

Same guy w/ Fred Ottman (billed 6'3") in 1991... Click Here

W/ 5'8" Mean Gene for height confirmation... Click Here





Here's a different fan w/ Bryan Clark (2008)... Click Here

W/ Sid Eudy (2009)... Click Here

W/ Viscera (2009)... Click Here


Here's the match between Sid and Clark as "The NightStalker":
Click Here Staredowns at around 1:37 and 2:17.


What do you give him? Funny how Fred Ottman and Billy Gunn were both billed as 6'3".
Qadaruddin said on 29/Jun/19
Click Here at 1:40 u see kane looks only one inch short than nash..
Xpac99 said on 29/Jun/19
Click Here
In this segment with the same boots sole do you think is taller, kane or taker?
samson said on 29/Jun/19
Bigger Man If your 6'11 and can bench press 600 so can kane who was 6'8 at his peak, usually guys your size like you and kane are stronger then your average guys. Ya its true I saw kane bench press 650 I counted the plates.
Pierre said on 28/Jun/19
Kane is tall but has not specially the physic of a very strong man,you can see in the video of Samson(27/June) his shoulders/pelvis/legs for his height are not specially large
Sotiris Gravas said on 28/Jun/19
@Pierre That's a cool pic, dude, and he's using 100% fake weights Click Here

At 52 seconds into this video, you can see Arnie and 5'2" Sally Field, both barefoot from 1976... a pic I'm pretty sure I already posted on Arnold's page. Maybe I should post it again and ask Rob what he thinks, or even now... Rob, your thoughts? What height do you give him, Pierre, based on him w/ Sally Field? I'm sure houss will hate it, lol.
Editor Rob
He might struggle to look much over 6ft with sally
Sotiris Gravas said on 28/Jun/19
@samson Thanks for the "kid" reference. As a 47-year-old man, it makes me feel young again (I hate when ppl call me sir). As for you sticking to your story, I'd much rather you stick it up somewhere... a specific part of your anatomy. Don't ever reveal your secret identity, Spider-Man. Click Here

As for your Kane/Show video... Kane wears skyscrapers for heels and internal lifts, too, just in case you didn't know.
ced said on 28/Jun/19
@ Sotiris, out of curiosity, how tall do you think Brian Clark was who performed as Wrath and Adam Bomb? He had a couple stare downs with Nash and Sid was promoted as 6'8 - 6'9 in WCW, how do you think he fares compared to other wrestling giants?
MelvinJones said on 28/Jun/19
BiggerMan Andre really was 9 feet tall and weighed 2000 pounds when I slammed him at Wrestlemania brother.
samson said on 27/Jun/19
Heres kane and bigshow up close together, big show looked 2 inches taller. Pause it at 1:26 Click Here
samson said on 27/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas Nice come back kid. I know what I saw I'm sticking to what I'm saying
Bigger Man said on 27/Jun/19
Sotiris...Haha! You had me laughing my head off, dude! Great!
Great humour. Tbf to me though, I really am 6’11 and I really did press 600lbs.
Honest! Haha!
Loving this site
Pierre said on 27/Jun/19
Click Here = do you believe this guy can really pump this weights? They are sometimes real weights and sometimes....I don't know for this case
Sotiris Gravas said on 27/Jun/19
I actually saw MelvinJones bench that 1000 lbs; I counted the plates. Samson and houss were also there but they were too busy trembling in fear at the sight of men w/ actual muscles. Bigger Man was outside guarding the place to make sure Daniel reynolds didn't get in.

I know what I saw!
MelvinJones said on 26/Jun/19
I'm really 7'6 and solid muscle and can bench press 1000 pounds. Great site but too many trolls now.
samson said on 25/Jun/19
edwards I counted the plates, it was 650, 525 no way. There people in the wwe who benched 600 back then theres no way there stronger then kane
Takerfan said on 25/Jun/19
On this weeks episode of Raw, it was said Strowman benched 585 and Lashley 535. I would say Kane could do around the 550 mark surely
Manpreet Singh Virk said on 25/Jun/19
Kane has never stood 6'6 and 6'7 in his real life. His height is 6'8 among all the time. Actually his billed height in professional wrestling is 6'10 but the problem is when he's in wwf/e they listed him as 7'0.
Manpreet Singh Virk said on 25/Jun/19
Kane has never stood 6'6 and 6'7 in his real life. His height is 6'8 among all the time. Actually his billed height in professional wrestling is 6'10 but the problem is when he's in wwf/e they listed him as 7'0.
Pierre said on 24/Jun/19
Click Here
Pierre said on 24/Jun/19
Click Here =Kane shoes in another angle
Pierre said on 24/Jun/19
Samson a déclaré le
20/19/19 Voici un segment avec kane et daniel byran, mettez-le en pause à 5h58, vous pouvez voir qu'il est plus grand que les portes qui mesurent environ 6'8. Donc, Kane dans ses bottes est peut-être 6'8
cliquez ici Cliquez ici
for me he's shorter than the doors and at 5"23' you can see his shoes,they are looking very advantageous with even maybe an internal help,the angle of the laces is very hard
Mihhhh said on 24/Jun/19
Mat marogan is the same height but in a podcast when they spoke about morgans time in the wwe they said he wore lifts, in q different podcast they said when kane made his debut he didnt wore lifts and was naturally taller and bigger than taker, and they only wear lifts for certain segments, and not for a long period of time
samson said on 24/Jun/19
MelvinJones I know what I saw, I counted the plates. Even Dave metzer the radio host said that kane can bench 650. I'm sticking to what I'm saying.
Bigger Man said on 24/Jun/19
Hmm...some huge weights being talked about there. I’m 6’11 and a former bodyguard and doorman. I was a keen power lifter...my heavier bench was 276 Kg for one rep...over 600lbs. So with these juiced up guys I can well believe 655. Definitely!
Dream said on 24/Jun/19
I would’ve thought 6’7-6’7.25” today, in person. He was really big.
Joshua C said on 23/Jun/19
Ummmm those are standard 7' doors
edwards said on 23/Jun/19
@samson sotiris is right here
houss said on 23/Jun/19
@Samson i believe every word you said i think he was 6'8 and he's stronger than everyone in this site 😉
MelvinJones said on 22/Jun/19
Kane himself said he benched 525 which is a lot of weight. Google the interview. Samson is just trolling.
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Jun/19
@samson You said you saw Kane using 150-lb dumbbells for arm curls. Based solely on that, no one should believe anything you have to say. You're a bull(bleep) artist. I don't care if you don't care. You said Kane was taller than those 6'8" doors, when he clearly wasn't. You're either blind or the opposite of smart. I'm not trying to be mean here, I'm simply calling you out, b/c you need to be called out.
samson said on 22/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas Both Ken Shamrock and Faroqq aka Ron Simmons said they both hoisted 600, theres no way there stronger then kane. If Ken and Ron simmons can bench press 600 so can kane. I know what I saw I'm sticking to what I'm saying kane benched 650
samson said on 21/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas Matt morgan benched 655 he was taller then kane, like i said Brock Lesner benched 655 back in the ovw days he's smaller then kane, if Brock can do it so can kane. I don't give a flip flopping fly if you don't believe me, I know what I saw I counted the plates. I'm 5'10 weigh 250 benching 405 for 2 reps, one good rep and one force rep with a spotter.
samson said on 21/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas I'll try to find the interview. I know what I saw I counted the plates it was 650. Brock who is even smaller benched 655, so if brock can bench that much so can kane.
Heisenberg89 said on 21/Jun/19
I give at Kane a 6'6 max today barefoot. In his prime I guess him max 6'7.25 but I think more just 6'7".

In his legendary boots 6'9 range few times, strong 6'8 range most of the times.

In my opinion he always had max 0.25 on taker barefoot if not same height.
Heisenberg89 said on 21/Jun/19
I give at Kane a 6'6 max today barefoot. In his prime I guess him max 6'7.25 but I think more just 6'7".

In his legendary boots 6'9 range few times, strong 6'8 range most of the times.
Sotiris Gravas said on 21/Jun/19
Here's Kane next to the doors that samson wanted you to see... Click Here Samson said Kane was taller than the doors... He obviously isn't. Once again, samson doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

As for the Kane/Show video, you can clearly see at the very beginning that Kane has on monster footwear.
samson said on 20/Jun/19
Heres a segment with kane and daniel byran, pause it at 5:58 you can see he's taller then the doors which is about 6'8. So Kane in his boots is possibly 6'8
click here Click Here
Xpac99 said on 20/Jun/19
Rob in this match
Click Here
And in this segment
Click Here
Morgan clearly was in footware advantage and he was taller than kane by 1 inch o probably 1 inch and 1/2..
after looking at these segments do you still think Morgan peak height 6ft 8 1/2 and kane 6ft 7 1/2 ?
MelvinJones said on 20/Jun/19
Kane admitted in an interview that his best bench was 525. The only wrestlers that could ever bench 650 was Bill
kazmaier and Ted Arcidi
Sotiris Gravas said on 20/Jun/19
@samson At 6'7" afternoon barefoot height, 285 lbs, 19" biceps, 55" chest (no steroids), benching just 4 plates on each side plus the bar (around 400 lbs) for 6 reps isn't easy b/c of my long arms. And I'm supposed to believe he did 650 lbs...? Raw lift or bench shirt? Let me guess, he had a spotter doing all the work for him and he just let the weight fall and then bounced it off his chest for a grand total of one rep. How far apart were his arms? I'm guessing a very wide grip which is a lot easier b/c you're lifting a shorter vertical distance, akin to a short guy w/ short arms. Or maybe you're just making it all up and didn't see squat.

Dude, the reason I know for a FACT that you're full of (bleep) is b/c you say he curled 150 lb dumbbells. LOL. Dude, my arms are VERY strong and I do up to 100 lb one-arm curls. There's no way in Hell you saw him do 150 lbs -- which means you're lying. Even the biggest steroid freaks at my gym could NEVER lift that heavy.

I've never tried doing more than 100 lbs so as not to hurt myself. Maybe next time at the gym I'll see how much I can do for just one rep of a concentration curl, which is a lot easier than standing curls when done right, not using your back and swinging momentum to cheat.

Kane and Taker were never more than 6'7" and there's no way in Hell this guy's 6'7" today.
samson said on 20/Jun/19
Heres Kane and Big show in a segment, and show looked 3 inch taller then kane. Heres the video Click Here
samson said on 18/Jun/19
Dream Ya he was wearing sneakers, I dont know what size shoe he wore, maybe size 16 to size 18 didn't pay attention. He was laying down on the bench. I could be wrong, he could be 6'7 or 6'8 my guess is he was 6'8 I don't know to me when he stood up he looked 6'8 thats my guess I could be wrong. And yes I saw him bench 650 I counted the plates.
Canson said on 18/Jun/19
I doubt ever 6’7”. I think he was similar to Sid and Taker. Maybe more Taker peak and still close to 6’7” today
ced said on 18/Jun/19
Kane is truly a weird one.. On one hand, bakc in 1999, he stacked up to Big Show better than anyone else in WWF or WCW until Great Khali came in.

On the other hand, when he returned in 2002, with the half mask, and wa wearing flat boots, he looked CONSIDERABLY smaller. He looked around the 6'7 mark.

Then when he returned with the current mask, in 2011, after he chokeslammed Cena, he looked HUGE, but his boots weren't his 1997 monster boots, but take a look at that video and he looks every bit of 6'8.

Could it be that his height just fluctuates? In 98, I can see him at just under the 6'8 mark, with the boots, just under 6'10, OR 6'9 1/2. You have that WrestleMania 14 match against Taker where he just looked GIGANTIC against Taker. They had more of a height difference between them than when Taker faced Diesel 2 years prior at WrestleMania 12.

My guess is Kane with his boots monster boots was 6'9.5, and just under 6'8 (in 1997).. 2002, he was around the 6'7 mark, and now he's at 6'6.5.
samson said on 18/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas yes he was at my gym, and i counted the plates it was 650. I don't care if you dont believe me or not I know what I saw
Dream said on 17/Jun/19
@Sotiris Gravas

I’d be hard press to see him at 6’6” flat today. He’s well over it, in person. He looked around 6’7”, minus the footwear advantage he had.
Dream said on 16/Jun/19
@samson

I'm not sure about 6'8", but did he have bigger shoes than you? I think peak, he's over 6'7". When I saw him up close, he looked nearly 6'8", but he had much bigger shoes than my runner shoes.
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Jun/19
@samson I don't believe a single word of what you posted, nor should anyone else.
samson said on 13/Jun/19
Dream I'd say back then he was 6'8. I saw Kane and Undertaker at my gym back in 1999, back then there was not any cameras on the phones, I saw Kane benched 650 pounds and curled 150 pound dumbells. He said he curled 150 pounds in a interview. I counted the plates. Kane back then ever bit of 6'8. I'm good with estimating heights. I couldn't tell who was taller between Undertaker and Kane. He spotted Kane so, he was lying on the bench Kane was huge back then, he looked his billed weight I'd say 326 to 328pounds. I'd say he was 2nd strongest next to Mark Henry
Dream said on 12/Jun/19
Rob, I think Peak and current listing are fine. I saw him up close, recently. He looked nearly 6'8", but he had bigger shoes than my runner shoes. (I didn't take a photo because it costed too much.) Ground was even and it was mid afternoon to early evening.
SeanR said on 11/Jun/19
Matt Morgan I meant to say...
SeanR said on 11/Jun/19
Matt recently did an interview with Chris Van Vliet (Check out Chris YouTube and Instagram pages for more) where Matt claims he was “shoot” measured for American Gladiators at 7’0” by several different methods (one of them lying on a table - lol). He also stated that he was 6’10.5” as a freshman in college and grew to eventually be 7’0”. I agree with Matt’s assessment being measured in the 6’10” range in college but it was probably in basketball shoes which gives at least 1.5” boost. He did not mention if his heights were barefoot or in shoes so we have to assume he meant the latter. The 2nd pic of Chris and Matt on Chris’s Instagram account does give credence of a large height disparity but Chris looks to be in socks there and Matt in dress shoes. Seeing other pics of Chris with other celebs/wrestlers I will give him 5’8”. Matt is somewhere in the range of 6’7.5” to 6’8.5” today but it’s possible his peak barefoot evening height could have been 6’8.75” or 6’9”. There is no way he is 7’0” when he measured just short of Big Show, Kevin Nash and Nathan Jones who are all 6’9” and above.
Chris n said on 9/Jun/19
I heard Jim Ross on an interview talking about Glen Jacobs, I honestly can’t remember which one it was but it’s fairly recent if anyone else has heard of it. He mentioned a young Glen coming through the wrestling ranks as “a 6’7 or 6’8 guy”.
Big ed said on 7/Jun/19
He was never billed 6'7 ever
As yankeem he was billed 6'9 then jr continuous ly refered him to 6'11 then as Kane he was billed 7ft wcw he was billed 6'8 and 6'10
Dream said on 6/Jun/19
I got a 6’7.25” or 6’7.125” impression from him, in person. He looked 6’8”, but he had some thick shoes on.
samson said on 4/Jun/19
Xpac99 where did you find that
Joshua C said on 4/Jun/19
Yeah its clear that Matt has those wierd internal lifts that makes it look like hes walking on several layers of padding. Kane has his flaaaat boots on.
NCL said on 4/Jun/19
MikeV10 said on 2/Jun/19
Click Here

Whoa another awesome find thanks!!
Xpac99 said on 3/Jun/19
Morgan is 1 inch taller because he was in big boots. I think whit the same boots they was about the same height
MikeV10 said on 2/Jun/19
Click Here

Kane and Morgan face to face ,
The angel is not the best .I thing Morgan is a little bit taller but is wearing big boots most of the time. In this boots he was very close to kevin Nashs height
Dream said on 1/Jun/19
Rob, I saw him up close. He still looks about 6’7”, but had some big shoes on.

The neighbor of mine (the one my step-dad thought was 6’4”-6’5”, but looked much taller) looked a bit shorter than Kane, but he had flip flops, while Kane was in much thicker footwear.
DFens said on 29/May/19
Morgan was clearly taller in that match.

BUT, Kane is always in a poor posture, If he stood straight they would be the same height.
NCL said on 29/May/19
shuvayu chakraborty said on 28/May/19
kane's bigger than matt morgan - Click Here . Match - OVW Spring Breakout in 2003, held on April 11, 2003 at Six Flags Over Kentucky Kingdom.

Wow what a great find I've been looking for that forever thanks for posting!

It's real hard to tell the height difference b/c there's no exact staredown. If you pause at 13:25, that's the closest thing. Morgan has a little bit of a camera angle advantage. My bet is without that he is an inch taller, but only because of the boots. Without the boots, I bet they'd be about the same height.

Click Here (pause exactly at 13:25)
shuvayu chakraborty said on 28/May/19
kane's bigger than matt morgan - Click Here . Match - OVW Spring Breakout in 2003, held on April 11, 2003 at Six Flags Over Kentucky Kingdom.
Stormcoach said on 24/May/19
Peak kane ft6'7.5" now ft6'7.25"
edwards said on 22/May/19
@heisenberg89 dont know about boots or other but kane is clearly taller than taker,look isaac yankem as kane and undertaker staredown kane is taller than taker,also there are mid 90s matches and staredown which shows kane wasnt wearing any lifts and you can easily see kane is taller,yes he may be barely taller but personally i am sure he is taller than taker.my bet is peak taker at 6'7.5 and peak kane at 6'7.75 or even 6'8
Joshua C said on 21/May/19
The Matt Morgan vs Kane match, kane had his small boots on and you can obviously tell, if you actually look, that Matt has his HUGE internal lifts on.
Heisenberg89 said on 21/May/19
Edwards

Kane was and maybe is taller, but barely. I never meet both together side by side barefoot, so I can't be sure like you are.
The only thing I saw, as everyone, is that Kane appeared always a lot taller then he really is.

Pichard said " no no, Kane didn't wore lifts because he was actually bigger".
Well he was drunk, or it was a lie.
Kane wears lifts since he was born maybe.

But my point is... You saw or not his boots and his legs posture? Of course you did. So I don't understand your point..
Kane was maxxx 6'7 at his peak, taker probably barely shorter like 6'6'75.

And guys... Kane, as almost all wrestlers, can't absolutely be judged inside a wwe ring.
So has no sense talk about his WWE staredown
edwards said on 20/May/19
Heisenberg89 said on 19/May/19
yes i agree with on this.Bruce pichard said Kane was bigger then taker, in fact he was.yeah,kane was always taller and much bigger than taker.the only times i saw undertaker bigger or atleast same as kane was only in 1999 and 2000.taker has bigger head but kane has much bigger body and proportion ofcource body and biceps,lets say huge body and his bigger mass.taker only edged or stack against kane was in 1999 or 2000,in all of the stare down and matches you can see kane is much bigger than taker in 90 percent of 100 staredown and appearance
Heisenberg89 said on 19/May/19
@Ironman092289

The problem with Kane, in my opinion, is that he always wore big boots with lift added. And his television appearances always showed him taller then he really was, and the 99% of us are all influenced by this factor.
Bruce pichard said Kane was bigger then taker, in fact he was. But bigger does not means necessary taller. If he was, he was barely taller.


Without shoes, camera angles, and wrestling ring tricks he could never handle a staredown with big show like he did in some occasions, since the moment that there are barefoot almost 4 inch between them at their peaks (6'7" MAXvs 6'10.75/6'11"MAX) and 3.25 nowadays.

Kane is the only one I remember, together with Jake the snake, that probably wore almost 5/6cm boots.
Philip McMullin said on 18/May/19
@miko you seen the video i was talking about?
miko said on 17/May/19
Kane in his boots would have pushed Matt Morgan pretty close in a staredown.
Philip McMullin said on 17/May/19
There's an interesting vid on YouTube (Kane vs. Matt Morgan) Back in '03. Very hard to tell who's the taller of the two.
Fred Mullen said on 17/May/19
A 6’7 or 8 man slouched over in a photo can easily look in the 6’5-6 range, which we see evident in many photos of Glen Jacobs and Mark Calaway. If Kane stood straight, to be measured that is, he would be min 6’7
edwards said on 16/May/19
he is likely in 6'6.5-6'6.75 range today.as for undertaker,taker is around 6'5.5-6'6 range today.
both of these dude were above 6'7 at peak with taker being 6'7.5 and kane being a tad taller at 6'7.75
Troy Tippett said on 15/May/19
@Samson

You can’t see the ground level you can’t see shoes, bad camera angles, there are many factors

That estimate is inconclusive really
Ironman092289 said on 15/May/19
I read somewhere that in a UK Magazine or interview that Kane admitted to being 6'5", which I find interesting. I think he was about 6'7" max, but maybe he was able to fraud it for years because of his boots. Just throwing stuff out there. I will still remain solid with the idea that he is 6'6.5" today and 6'7" peak, but again I could be wrong.

@Heisenberg In my all honest opinion, Undertaker did look taller. I am going to look into Kane a bit more, maybe even 6'6+ range for him is too high, like it is for Undertaker.
samson said on 14/May/19
Heres a video posted 6 days ago, its a video about Glenn jacobs as mayor and put on alittle skit for the people, he became kane. And he looks 6'7 the guy he choked slammed was was just under 6ft. Glenn had about 5inches on the guy he choked slammed. Just watch the video and see for yourself heres the link Click Here
Heisenberg89 said on 14/May/19
I think Kane now is max 6'6" but probably 6'5 and 3/4.
At his peak just 6'7".
He lost less height then undertaker.
But...i still think that in Knoxville he didn't look taller then Calaway.
He really didn't.
Ironman092289 said on 14/May/19
Maybe Kane isn't even 6'6.5" today if Khali is 6'11", and if he is really only 6'10" then Kane is 6'4".

I think a more realistic approach would be a 7'0.5" Khali vs a 6'6.5" Kane? I'm not too sure on Khali's height.
ced said on 13/May/19
Kane was 6'7.75 peak.

In the Khali staredown (2008?), Kane: 6'6.5, Khali 6'11.5
Annonymous said on 12/May/19
@Vegas

And Khali's eye level is lower than most people's as he quite obviously has an abnormally large skull.

Some people just suck at this height guessing game, Kane is 6'5" if we have a 6 '11 Khali.
Sotiris Gravas said on 10/May/19
Reality: Shane McMahon and Glenn Jacobs... Click Here
Shane and 5'10" Kevin Owens... Click Here

Fiction: Shane and Kane... Click Here

Reality: Shane and Kevin Nash... Click Here
Vegas' said on 10/May/19
Erik C. said on 9/May/19
6'6.5"-6'7" range today imo. 6'7.5" possibly close to 6'8" range peak.
---------

On Big Shows page you have Khali down at 6'11 and here you think Kane was 6'8 peak? Khali had close to six inches on Kane in 2007. Top of Kane's head is below Khali's eyeliner (white line) there Click Here
Erik C. said on 9/May/19
6'6.5"-6'7" range today imo. 6'7.5" possibly close to 6'8" range peak.
Ironman092289 said on 28/Apr/19
If Undertaker was 6'6.5" at his peak, and Kane was 1/4-1/2 taller, then I believe Kane was 6'7" at his peak, but no more than that. Today, Kane is likely in the 6'6" - 6'6.5" range, as he is about 0.75"-1" taller than Undertaker today, instead of the 1/4-1/2" in the 90s (Undertaker lost more height imo)
edwards said on 13/Apr/19
@ rawdshaq taker was not even close to 6'8.5 or even strong 6'8 let alone 6'9,the max i could see for peak taker is 6'7.5 and 6'8.5 in boot.kane was always taller than taker maybe a cm or half inch,whether he was fake diesel,isaac yankem or kane.at times,either seems to edge other but most of the time kane was taller and much bigger than taker,the onlytime taker seems to edge kane was 1999,dude bty it has been often said that taker too wore inner enhanced lifts,i say no chance of taker being taller than kane.my bet is peak taker 6'7.5 at best and peak kane 6'7.75 or 6'8.
rawdshaq said on 12/Apr/19
@Nyjuan That is a really good point I recently found out but I do still believe that Kanes lifts were more enhanced and that if they were both barefoot I believe Undertaker had 1/4 inch on Kane. I believe Undertaker was a really underestimated guy at his peak and I believe he was near 6ft 9 (6'8.5").
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Apr/19
@Canson 6'8" Dellin Betances and Aaron Judge... Click Here

The Yankees listed Betances as 6'8" on their 2014 roster, which is why he chose the number 68:
Click Here
Nyjuan said on 11/Apr/19
Kane is obviously taller than taker. Maybe 1/2 to 3/4 an inch. Taker also wore lifts inside his boots
ced said on 10/Apr/19
@Grezza.. Great photo man.. I just wish they had seated Nash next to Kane at the Hall of Fame.. all these years they're together at the same event and they never take a picture together.

I tink Braun is about 6'6 and Kane is 6'7 now judging from your photo.
Grezza said on 9/Apr/19
Here's Kane at the 2019 Hall of fame, standing behind Strowman but he is taller than Braun Click Here
Exile said on 9/Apr/19
Both Taker and Kane were very, very similar in height in the WWF days, but I'd Kane has lost less height than Taker.
Canson said on 5/Apr/19
@Sotiris: the jury is out. If he’s sub 6’7 it’s not by a lot. He’s likely close to 6’8 with shoes
edwards said on 5/Apr/19
@ rawdshaq 1999 was a year when kane lost large portion of his muscle and masses,yes that is the only time i saw taker bigger than kane. everytime kane appeared much bigger than taker.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 5/Apr/19
@rawdshaq
While he looked slim in that clip, I'm not sure if he was as light as 250 there.
Peter Grasham said on 4/Apr/19
@sotiris you are at it again with your cute examples, and yes you are contributing and I am not. I’m just a crap talker
Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Apr/19
@Canson Judge is probably 6'6.25" and maybe I'm wrong and he's really 6'6.5", but I can't see 6'7" for him...
Canson said on 4/Apr/19
@Sotiris: I’m not sure about Judge. He may be 6’7”
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Apr/19
@Psycho B If someone is demonstrably shorter relative to others whose heights have been established, that qualifies as being shorter. I don't need to measure Kane, as you suggest, to know he's not 6'7".

In "Star Trek IV", Spock has to do time-travel computations in his head, and they all make it out A-ok. Estimates work wonders, dude... Click Here Let me guess, you're only a Star Wars fan. Figures.
rawdshaq said on 2/Apr/19
I found it weird that Kane looks so small here, Click Here

Looks 250 pounds there
tree said on 2/Apr/19
With 6ft bret hart at 6:30 Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 2/Apr/19
YouTube footage of 6'6" (not 6'7") Aaron Judge w/ Big Cass and Braun Strowman:
Click Here

Big Cass and 5'7" Daniel Bryan... Click Here
Kane and Bryan... Click Here
Just a reminder that Bryan is a VERY small man in this group shot (2014)... Click Here A 6'0" guy like Cena towers over him.

Aaron Judge and 6'4" (not 6'6") Giancarlo Stanton... Click Here
Stanton and Derek Jeter... Click Here
6'4.5" Michael Jordan and Jeter... Click Here


Big Cass and Big Show... Click Here
Psycho B said on 2/Apr/19
LOL Sotiris you proved NOTHING. By proving you have to have him measured, which you didn't.
You just estimated his height and made up your mind thinking Kane is 6'6" and that's it.
Kane 6'8" peak and nowadays a little over 6'7"
edwards said on 31/Mar/19
@canson
imho the stare down between kane as isaac yanken and undertaker proves that kane was half a inch if not more taller than taker.since it was in 1996 and both were at peak and kane didnt have lifts.
Canson said on 29/Mar/19
I would believe that Taker and Kane were similar at their peaks both around 6’7”
rawdshaq said on 29/Mar/19
As someone who doesnt agree with Sotiris and his heights, @ced Im sorry but thats a horrible way to compare heights of two people. I can get a picture of Shaq and get a picture of me and make one of those side by side pictures and make a 5'9" guy like me look the same height as 7'1" Shaq
ced said on 29/Mar/19
Here is a good comparison of Nash and Kane.. It provides a general idea of how they would look next to each other in size.

Click Here

If Kane was only 6'6.5 in peak height as Sotiris claims, there is no way he would look this tall next to Nash. Kane was a minimum 6'7.75 peak (day height), and probably woke up around 6'8 or 6'8.25
edwards said on 29/Mar/19
rawdshaq said on 17/Mar/19 dude you mean taker taller than kane lol
edwards said on 28/Mar/19
@sotirios chatzi
taker was never ever taller than kane,pretty much everyone know about that,at times either seems to edge other or either would appear taller but i say no way taker is taller than kane.kane is atleast half inch taller than taker.
Sotiris Gravas said on 27/Mar/19
@Geoff T You sound pretty sure of yourself. Why not post some pics where you actually back up what you say, like I do...?

P.S. My WiFi is pretty fast; it doesn't take long to Google something and post it here. I'm great at multitasking and can even walk and chew gum at the same time. W/ all due respect, I've already proven that Kane is not 6'7" now, at least IMHO. Just b/c Rob the editor happens to disagree w/ me is not definitive proof that I'm wrong.


@Rob Always happy to contribute.
Sakz said on 27/Mar/19
@Rob Does it not come across as spam though? I'm pretty sure I see the same pictures over and over posted.
Editor Rob
Yeah I understand some comments/photos could be seen as repetitive.

But then, I've been reading the site all these years, so a lot of arguments can seem that way too.

Going off topic and turning a page into an argument beyond just the height in question is something I don't like to see. I have been very lenient really, but sometimes there is a limit.
sotirios chatzi said on 27/Mar/19
My dad worked in wrestling during the 90s, he told me Kane and Undertaker were about the same height, and said if one is taller it was Undertaker.
Geoff T said on 27/Mar/19
@sotiris do you spend 80% of your day sources pictures of peoples heights, then get excited when you create links for them? By the way kane is 6’7
Editor Rob
Even though I may not agree with a lot of his estimates, he is making an effort contributing.
Vegas' said on 26/Mar/19
Here is Kane/ Taker faceoff from 1999 3 mins 55 seconds Click Here

Big Show out of gear and Kane in 1999 @ 5 mins 30 seconds Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 25/Mar/19
@Grezza Any yet this is max 5'8" Flair (not 5'9") next to Kane (2018)... Click Here

Again, Ludacris and Flair... Click Here
Luda and around 5'8" Mario Lopez (2017)... Click Here
Luda and 5'7.5" Ryan Seacrest (2009)... Click Here
Luda and 5'7.5" Usher... Click Here



Here's Ludacris w/ height-loss Dominique Wilkins(poor posture) and a slouching 6'7" Magic:
Click Here Compare Wilkins and Luda to Kane and Flair. Wilkins and Magic are clearly taller than Kane.

Mind you, Wilkins is slightly shorter than 6'6" Deontay Wilder (2018)... Click Here
6'6" Wilder and 6'6" Audley Harrison... Click Here
Wilder and maybe 6'4.5" Wade Barrett... Click Here


Wilkins and slouching height-loss Scottie Pippen... Click Here
Wilkins and 6'8" Alonzo Mourning... Click Here
W and Larry Bird (6'9" peak/6'8" current)... Click Here
W and 6'10.25" Chris Bosh (2015)... Click Here


Undertaker and 5'8" Mario Lopez (2018)... Click Here
ced said on 25/Mar/19
Another Big Show/Kane | Kevin Nash-Big Show comparison

Click Here ----- Show and Nash

Click Here ----- Show and Kane

What do you guys think?
ced said on 25/Mar/19
@Vegas, I don't think your video is the best comparison either.. Kane is slouching big time in the video..

I think a better comparison to that Nash Video would be when Kane was in the ring with McMahon when he first "spoke" with the voicebox gimmick.. That's where you can truly see the comparison.

@Sotiris, I am not by any means saying that Kane was taller than Nash.. BUT, if Nash was 6'9 or 6'9.25, Kane had 2 inch lifts.. That means that Kane without his 2 inch lifts was minimal 6'7.5 at his peak.. But he was even taller than Nash in his lifts, meaning (at his peak) he had to be 6'7.5 OR 6'7.75 in order to be taller than Nash in them.
Dan Trojan said on 25/Mar/19
Christian i here you on that i remember google had the rapper madchild at 4'11" i knew that was a joke i met him and he was a little shorter than me and i'm 5'6" so yeah google definitely lies
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Mar/19
@rawdshaq
Lol, hell no. Google listings are all over the place most of the time. They are rarely accurate. Most of the time they're too high, but occasionally you see low listings as well. There was once a 5'11.5" listed actor that was listed as 5'0" on Google before, but it has now changed to 6'0".
Matt Haines said on 24/Mar/19
6'7 range sounds pretty legit for Kane here I am at 6.0.5" standing next to him Click Here
Dan Trojan said on 24/Mar/19
Ced your pictures don't prove anything kane was known to wear lifts that's why he looks taller than nash i believe nash was 6'9" at peak and kane 6'7" or maybe a bit more seeing as he always looked slightly taller than the undertaker kane was never taller than nash
Grezza said on 24/Mar/19
Actually here's a picture of Kane and Bryan out of gear with a fan compared to the Joey/Bryan picture Click Here

And as u can see, Kane's clearly got a foot in height on DB there, where as Joey looks to have 6.5 inches on DB
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Mar/19
@ced Internal lifts, dudester.

Here, look at this pic of little 5'7" (not 5'7.75") Daniel Bryan next to fellow poster Joeyb33 (6'2.25") w/ a 0.5" footwear advantage (2017)... Click Here You see how Joe TOWERS over him?

OK, now look at this YouTube clip of Bryan and Kane (2013)... Click Here Does Kane look GIGANTIC here...? That would be no.
Vegas' said on 22/Mar/19
Nash was taller than Kane once Kane dropped the 2+ inch platforms

Kane with Vince Click Here

Nash with Vince Click Here
ced said on 22/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. take a look below.. Kevin Nash with Shane McMahon and then Shane Mcmahon with Kane

Granted, the photo is not the best conparison, but what you can see here is how tal Kane was next to Shane compared to Nash.. yes, Kane has lifts on, but he would not be taller than Nash in his lifts if he was only 6’6.5 peak.. he defi itely looks taller than Nash in this photo

Click Here
edwards said on 21/Mar/19
@rawdshaq
bye the way dude,its not only kane,it has been often claimed that taker too wore inner lifts.
edwards said on 21/Mar/19
@rawdshaq watch kane as isaac yankem stare down with undertaker in 1996 since both are young and at peak.both has normal shoes.
Lyle said on 21/Mar/19
@rawdshaq it was revealed Taker wore lifts to but inside his boots rather than outside like Kane
rawdshaq said on 20/Mar/19
I think Undertaker was 1/2 taller than Kane at their peaks. Kane had huge lifts, Undertaker didn't, and still held up with him very easily.

Watch this video

Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 20/Mar/19
Ric Flair and 5'8" Ludacris... Click Here

Flair and Kane... Click Here , Click Here

Flair and 6'7.5" (listed 6'8") Calais Campbell (2019)... Click Here I'm supposed to believe Kane is 0.5" shorter than Campbell? NO THANK YOU. Kane is NOWHERE near his height.

Flair and legit 6'7" Magic, leaning forward, as usual (2019)... Click Here

Younger Flair and 6'4.5" Charles Barkley... Click Here
Flair (maybe barefoot, looks very short) and Barkley... Click Here

Flair and 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg (2017)... Click Here



@John Albertson So, buddy, was what I posted "sloppy" enough for you...? All I get is weak comments from ppl that offer nothing.


@Jake Warren Was that "outside the box" enough for you, Your Highness...? Milord...? Is everything to your liking...? Are you not entertained?



This is the face Flair and I make when we have to deal w/ silly ppl... Click Here Right, John? Right, Jake?
John Albertson said on 20/Mar/19
Posting a picture of a man that is close to 7ft and someone who is well under 6ft to make a judgement for the taller man, is so inconclusive @Sotiris. your examples and point of view Is very sloppy
edwards said on 19/Mar/19
@rawdshaq
undertaker was never taller than kane,at times both seems equal or eithers seems to edge the other but i say taker was never taller than kane,watch those staredown between kane as isaac yanken and undertaker in 1996 ,noth were at peak and kane was half inch taller.you have listed taker as taller than kane at peak height.i say no chance taker is taller than kane.
ced said on 19/Mar/19
Im not saying Sotiris is not correct for the NBA guys. This is Kane’s page.. im soecifically wondering wbout Kane.

Kevin Nash is being a peak height of 6’9.5yet im every staredown, (like i posted below - Kane is closer to Show’s height than is Nash)... yet somehow Kane’s peak height is lower than Nash’s..

In both pictures, scenarios I posted below, Nash and Kane look the same height and Kane slightly taller in the staredown with Big Show.. if he’s no more than 6’7 peak or 6’6.5 (as Sotiris states), if you put 2 inch lifts on Kane, he would be at 6’8.5 in them or 6’9. That still doesn’t add up. Kevin Nash was 6’9.5 in 98, and measured to Show’s eyebrow, but Kane measures up to halfway of Show’s forehead..
Canson said on 19/Mar/19
@Sotiris: Lebron May be taller than Bell by a touch. Bell I could believe 6’6.5 Lebron 6’7” or 6’6.75-6’7”. Funny thing Bell said he towered over draymond green when Green is supposedly 6’5”ish.
rawdshaq said on 19/Mar/19
@Christian I do that for any celebrity that isn't a wrestler, because most of the time they are pretty accurate.
edwards said on 18/Mar/19
@Ced sotiris is correct dude,love is 6'7
Heisenberg89 said on 18/Mar/19
Rawdshaq

Sorry man, but those are peak height barefoot or w/ shoes on?
Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Mar/19
@ced Dude, these guys wore HUGE boots... Click Here and internal lifts were also used when the situation presented itself...

Here's notorious lift-wearer, Matt Bloom , aka A-Train, around 6'5" (billed 6'7") w/ Taker:
Click Here


Bloom and Matt Morgan... Click Here

Bloom and Big Show... Click Here



This is Blooms's real height next to max 5'9" Finn Balor (2013)... Click Here




Keep in mind, this was Big Show's real height next to Shaq, both men in dress shoes: Click Here , Click Here , Click Here Show looks around 3" shorter than a legit 7-footer when he's deprived of footwear enhancement.


I recently posted this again on Show's page... Show and 5'11 Jarvis Landry:
Click Here I'm around Kevin Love's height of 6'7" and a height of 5'11" reaches my lip area, meaning Show is not as tall as ppl think.
Here's a slouching maybe 5'11.5" (not 6'0.5") The Miz w/ Love... Click Here

Now, look at what fellow poster JT recently submitted on Show's page... Show and Dion Dawkins, who has a listing of 6'4" and 6'5"... Click Here Show is now wearing elevator shoes or lifts out in public to compensate for his height loss.


Even slouching Shaq seems to have lost height. Here he is w/ 5'9.5" Adam Sandler (2019):
Click Here

Slouching Stephen Merchant (6'7" peak height) (2009) and Sandler... Click Here

Height-loss Kareem w/ height-loss Shaq (2019)... Click Here


One last thing, LOL... Here's Lebron (listed 6'7.25" w/o shoes morning height/6'8" w/ shoes, LISTED 6'8") next to Jordan Bell (6'7" w/o shoes/6'8.5" w/ shoes, LISTED 6'9"):
Click Here Jordan Bell is basically 6'6.5", and he and LeBron look the same height.

Kevin Love's morning height is only 0.5" more than LeBron, yet he's listed 2 WHOLE INCHES MORE than LeBron. NBA heights are fake... The same goes for WWE heights.
ced said on 18/Mar/19
Click Here

Nash and Hogan 2002 ^^

Click Here

Kane and Hogan 2002 ^^
ced said on 18/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. Here, Kane and Big Show '99 (Both at their peaks)

Click Here

Here's Nash and Big Show in '98, (peak heights):

Click Here

Now, if Kane wasn't at least 6'8 at his peak, please explain to me how could he have looked closer to Show's height than Kevin Nash?

The top of Kane's head comes up halfway to Show's forehead.. The Top of Nash's head comes to the top of Nash's head comes to Show's eyebrow..
Jake Warren said on 18/Mar/19
@Sotiris my friend you are unable to read nor see outside the box. Your pictures are awful examples to judge height from. Kane is 6’7
Christian 6'5 3/8 said on 18/Mar/19
@ced
You're really using Google of all websites to find out the heights of celebrities? Lol, you're clearly a rookie.
Editor Rob
Unfortunately the huge majority of people who search for a celebrities height, actually never venture beyond the infobox, so they are reading whatever is displayed in it by Google. It's quite natural for Google to want to keep searchers on their property and not venture away onto other sites. That's why they introduced them many years ago, to the detriment of websites really.

Say someone like Tom Cruise, every month on google he might get around 150,000 people asking about his height.

The massive majority are simply not going beyond the infobox. My estimate (based on data for my site from google itself) is that 90% or more get their answer from google for heights and never bother to venture any further.

The remaining 10% might actually click through to one of the many sites that competes for the term (not all people get shown the same sites in the same order, so one person might see my site at position 1, another at position 4 etc), or onto youtube, because they also cross promote videos a lot more - it makes sense, they own youtube and want to keep people on their properties for as long as possible.

Their tactics work, because just look at Google's quarterly revenue reports Click Here 😲
ced said on 17/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. i get what you’re saying.. but, if Kane was only 6’7 peak, how could have he been even remotely close to Big Show’s peak height in all their staredowns? King of the Ring 1999, just look at their staredown, and then Royal Rumble 2002, they were very close in height, more than a peak Kevin Nash ever was with Show. (Of which you think Nash was 6’9.25.

Let’s say Kane was 6’7 in 1999, with his 1.5 inch lifts, he would have been 6’8.5 in them.. now take a peak Show, which i believe was 6’11, add another inch if boots on him, he is 7 foot in his boots.. Kane only looked 2.25 inches smaller than Show then.. (In both staredowns).
Canson said on 17/Mar/19
@Ced: Sotiris is correct. Love is 6’7”. He only measured 6’7.75 at the combine and that was likely equivalent to a morning measurement as people who have seen him such as Dan Majerle even say he’s 6’7”. Love isn’t much taller than Lebron if even
DFens said on 17/Mar/19
@Lyle, the guy's facebook page is locked, couldn't find the picture.
Sotiris Gravas said on 17/Mar/19
@DFens Your pic proves the exact opposite. Kane looks nowhere near 6'7". I already posted a pic of Kane and Donovan Smith... Here's Kane w/ Lee Smith, listed 6'6" , which is a morning height, so, let's say 6'5.5"... Click Here Does Kane look anywhere near the 6'7" that you think you proved...? Let me answer that for you... No.

All your pic proves is that Big Show is not as tall as ppl think... Click Here


Have a nice day.
Lyle said on 17/Mar/19
@DFens what's the guys name? I'm curious to see his fb page with the picture of him and Kane
rawdshaq said on 17/Mar/19
Ok, all peak heights from me @Sotiris

Undertaker: 6'8 1/2"
Kane: 6'8"
Big Show: 7'
Kevin Nash: 6'9 1/2"
Andre the Giant: 7'
Dan Trojan said on 16/Mar/19
Ced kevin love isn't 6'10" he was measured at 6'9.5" with his shoes on and 6'7.75" barefoot and also there isn't 3 inches between him and taker it lools to be about 2 but undertaker's posture isn't very good so i'd say about an inch in a half so taker is at about 6'6" basketball players get overlisted too
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Mar/19
@Vegas I'm surprised you think politicians don't always tell the truth; JK :)

As for Big Cass being measured at 6'8" in college, they're notorious for inflating heights. I would take that w/ a grain of salt, as well. I give Cass 6'7.5".

I used to believe the hype that Aaron Judge was 6'7"... I now understand that he's 6'6" and that Giancarlo Stanton (listed 6'6") is only 6'4"... Click Here , Click Here
Stanton and 6'4" Michael Strahan... Click Here


Here Cass looks 6'8" w/ 6'6" Judge... Click Here
Here, more 6'7.5"... Click Here , Click Here

Judge and Blake Griffin (slouching)... Click Here
Griffin and 6'4.75" Kobe... Click Here
6'7" Magic and Kobe... Click Here

Kobe and 6'9.25" Kevin Durant... Click Here Cass is definitely not 6'9".

Funny how Cass looks taller than Big Show... Click Here
viper said on 16/Mar/19
Lol Kevin Love is only 6-10 in women's high heels.
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Mar/19
@ced I don't want to offend you, but you just don't know what you're talking about w/ regard to NBA-listed heights... Kevin love was measured at 6'7.75" w/o shoes (morning height) at the combine, 6'9.5" w/ shoes, rounded up to 6'10". His "real" height is around 6'7". He's at the most 6'7.25". Personally, I think Love was 2.5" taller than Taker, not the 3" that you saw. That being said, Taker is not as tall as you think, dude, and neither is Kane for that matter. What I just explained to you (and others, obviously) is not my humble opinion, it's indisputable fact. Ppl want to argue something that cannot be argued.

This was Taker w/ Love... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

This is Love w/ 6'9.25" (not 6'9.5") Kevin Durant... Click Here Love looks all of 6'7", max.

I can understand how you might believe Taker is 6'6.5", given how that's the height Rob the editor lists him at. No offense to either of you, but both you and Rob are wrong.

The most I'd give Kane is 6'5.5". Kane was never more than 6'7" peak height... he's certainly not that now. The pics I've already posted 100% proves this. Taker looks 6'5" now.

This is Stephen Merchant (6'7" peak height) w/ 6'2" (not 6'2.5") John Krasinski (2019):
Click Here
Compare that w/ Taker and 5'11" Jimmy Fallon... Click Here Taker is NOWHERE near Merchant's height.

Kane and Taker are NOWHERE near as tall as ppl/fans think. We've all been PUNK'D:
Click Here Sorry, not that guy... THIS guy... Click Here



Please respond... I really wanna hear what you have to say.
Philip McMullin said on 16/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas You really have lost it if you think kane and taker were 6ft6.5 peak!! Kane 6ft8 minimum peak and taker about a quarter to a half inch less peak.
DFens said on 15/Mar/19
I can say this is a rare pic of Kane standing STRAIGHT proving he still 6'7".

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Have a nice day.
Heisenberg89 said on 15/Mar/19
Kane is never been taller than 6'7", otherwise as yankem he would have been downgraded and it's not possible.

Now he is 6'6" max and around 1.5 inches taller than 6'4.75 Vaughn.

Undertaker is 6'5.75 6'6 now, not shorter than Kane.

Kane, at his peak plus boots, was even 6'9" reason why he was so close to big show in one staredown.
Bruce Pichard can say what he wants, Kane always had more advantage from shoes than Taker not the opposite.
Chris n said on 15/Mar/19
Well @sotoris being human we all are emotional. But this is just height dude, just correcting your view what you are seeing
ced said on 15/Mar/19
@Sotiris, if you google Kevin Love's Height, it states 6'10. This is NBA, not WWE.. They might bump him up 1 inch or round to the nearest inch, but, he is 6'10.

With that said, Tkaer looks about 3 inches under him, making him around 6'6.5-6'7.
Philip McMullin said on 15/Mar/19
@rawdshaq

Kane peak - 6ft8.5
Taker peak - 6ft7.75
Big Show peak - 7ft0.5
Nash peak - 6ft9
Andre peak - 7ft1.5

are my guesses
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Mar/19
@rawdshaq I think Kane and Taker were around 6'6.5" peak, but maybe I'm wrong and they were around 6'7"... maybe 6'10.5" peak for Big Show, not more than 6'11"... 6'9" peak for Nash, but maybe he was 6'9.5".... 6'10" for Andre in the '80s, but maybe he was 6'11" in the early '70s. Where do you have them, my good man...?
Vegas' said on 15/Mar/19
Kane is a politician and it's best to take what they say with grain of salt lol.

As for Cass he was listed 6'8 in college so unlikely as tall as 6'9 though he does look 6 inches taller than Joey. Cass looked ~3 inches shorter than Big Show in-ring in 2017 Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 15/Mar/19
rawdshaq my eyes may be deceiving me but sotiris's group pic inc; kane & cass etc...Kane seems quite behind cass...i reckon if he stepped forward and ditched his pathetic ''rested'' stance...wish he stood up and let everyone in the room know ''hes there'' hahahah he'd be as tall as cass
rawdshaq said on 14/Mar/19
@Sotiris May I ask, how tall do you think Kane, Undertaker, Big Show, Kevin Nash, and Andre the Giant were at their peak heights? You don't have to post pics or give description if you choose not to, but can you make a list?
Philip McMullin said on 14/Mar/19
@rawdshaq IKR...Kane just wouldn't lie about anything..hes too much of a good and upstanding man to lie.
Philip McMullin said on 14/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas we're not frantic over people's height...we just have to correct people when they're wrong from time to time.
rawdshaq said on 14/Mar/19
Also forget to mention Big Cass is actually about 6'9".
rawdshaq said on 14/Mar/19
@Sotiris Okay first off, you pick the worse pictures to compare Undertakers height. There is another video of Undertaker having about 3/4 of a head on Jimmy Fallon (or maybe even more) which means he is 8 inches taller than him making him still around 6'7" or a little under, 6'6 1/2".

How about we settle on 6'6"?
Vegas' said on 14/Mar/19
Cass looks 6 inches taller than Joey there given he could easily stand straighter.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Mar/19
There are ppl here that persist in mentioning Vince Vaughn w/ Kane... Guys, the pics I posted of 6'3.5" Troy Aikman and 6'7" Kevin Love vs. 6'5" Taker and Kevin Love proves I'm right. Taker and Kane are around the same height. You have no leg to stand on in your argument (pardon the pun). I recently posted a pic of Stephen Merchant (legit 6'7" peak height) w/ 5'11" Jimmy Fallon vs. Taker and Fallon on Taker's page... Taker is NOWHERE near his height. Seriously, some of you here are way too emotionally invested in these guys. Being frantic over someone's height, anybody, to the point where you're about to have a stroke is not normal behavior, at least not for adults.
Canson said on 13/Mar/19
@Philip: how does Sotiris’s pics of Kane have anything to do with him having a problem with Kane? How does Sotiris not thinking he’s as tall as he’s listed translate to him having a problem with him? They’re two completely independent things. I surely don’t agree he’s only 6’5” but Sotiris saying that he is does not mean he doesn’t like him. Height has nothing to do with someone liking or disliking someone
rawdshaq said on 13/Mar/19
@Sotiris You post pictures to make Kane look as short as possible. Do you know what kind of human Kane is? He's a mayor, why would a mayor need to lie about his height? He said he is 6'8" which is probably him in his dress shoes which is okay. If you ask Kane "how tall are you actually, without shoes?" he would probably give you an honest response.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Mar/19
@Ced The heads of Titus and Kane in the pic I posted were cropped by my Image Downloader app, which happens sometimes, almost as weird as this... Click Here I checked online and this is what I should have posted... Click Here

Here's 6'3" Titus getting towered by 6'4" Jameis Winston... Click Here
Towered by 6'5" Vince Carter... Click Here
Towered by 6'6" Alex Zverev... Click Here
Towered by Aaron Judge (listed 6'7", but I now realize is 6'6")... Click Here (Giancarlo Stanton is listed at 6'6", but he's only 6'4".)



Also, here's Jimmy Fallon w/ Stephen Merchant (6'7" peak height) TOWERING over Fallon:
Click Here

Taker and Fallon... Click Here


Kane and Taker are nowhere near 6'7". Whenever I post pics of Taker or Kane looking short, I immediately hear trite remarks like, "Oh, poor posture is to blame... bad angles..." Yet, these are the same ppl that will post their pic where their beloved wrestler is favored -- or not post anything at all -- and proceed to swear up and down that said wrestler is, in fact, as tall as they had imagined, if not taller, i.e., way too tall. That gets real old, real fast.

This is a group shot of Titus (poor posture) next to Kane... Notice how Kane and 6'7.5" (not 6'8") Big Cass are not close in height... Click Here

Cass and 6'2.25" Joeyb33... Click Here
Chris n said on 12/Mar/19
@Sotiris. Dude seriously, can you NOT SEE that Vince Vaughn is on his toes in that pic? Seriously?

If that pic Is legit, then Kane is 6’5- but that is truly False. And it is ridiculously obvious too.

Kane is 6’7
Philip McMullin said on 12/Mar/19
@Keaner Cometson I wouldnt pay a damn bit of notice to Sotiris's estimations!
Philip McMullin said on 12/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas you clearly have a problem with Kane...Your pic of Kane and Vaugn...you have no idea on what Vaugn's stance is..whether he is on his tip toes or standing on a small box etc...the ground they're standing on may be higher on Vaugn's side of the pic ... you are a height pest who clearly has an issue with Kane..you literally downgrade the crap out of him! Kane aint gonna lie about his height...hes not the lying type to be honest
Qadaruddin said on 12/Mar/19
How do i upload pics..plz help..i got lot of evidence
Editor Rob
no actual uploads are allowed, but you can just link to other sites (use bit.ly to create short links)
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Mar/19
@Pauli No, what you have to stop doing is assuming you have any authority to dictate anything whatsoever, to anyone. Ever. Donovan Smith's 6'5 5/8" is a morning height. The man is not more than 6'5". The photos I posted proves this unequivocally. I post pics of different wrestlers so as to gauge height; the same goes for celebrities. Perhaps you'd prefer only pics of wrestlers staring at their own height in a mirror... Click Here



This is 6'3.25" (not 6'3.75") Jon Jones (poor posture) next to a max 6'9" Big Show... Show is in socks and Jones is barefoot... Click Here

6'3.5" Troy Aikman and 6'7" Kevin Love (2014)... Click Here
6'5" Undertaker and Love (2016)... Click Here

This is 6'3.5" Jinder Mahal w/ 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg... Click Here
Jinder and max 6'10" Khali, not in big wrestling boots... Click Here
Khali and 7'0" Satnam Singh... Click Here
7'0" Satnam and now 6'7" A.C. Green... Click Here
Green w/ height-loss Kareem (poor posture)... Click Here

So, no, Big Show is not 6'11", Taker is not 6'6.5", and Khali is not 7 feet tall, "all within very precise levels," LOL. I offer photographic evidence as substantive proof; you offer nothing.







@rawdshaq No, Kane is not 6'7".

Kane and Vince Vaughn... Click Here

Vaughn and 6'4", max Michael Strahan... Click Here

Vaughn and 6'6" Gronk... Click Here

Vaughn and 6'5" J.J. Watt... Click Here , Click Here

J.J. Watt and 6'7.25" (listed 6'8") Calais Campbell... Click Here

Calais Campbell and 6'4.5" Charles Barkley... Click Here

The next time you change your mind every 3 seconds regarding Kane's height, hopefully, it will be more congruent w/ reality and not a kayfabe lovefest.
ced said on 12/Mar/19
Here are some worthy comparisons.. I believe this guy was definitely a 6'8.25 peak, and currently still 6'7.

Recent photo of Kane and his wife: Click Here

Kane in 2002: (Look at the door frame to his left, door frames are 6'8) Click Here

Now, take a look how much taller he is next to his wife back in his peak days:

Click Here

Click Here
ced said on 12/Mar/19
@Sotiris, the 2nd picture you provide with Snoop and Titus, Titus looks .25 inches taller than Snoop there.. Unless you and I see something different.

I am a very weak 6'4, on the dot means that I'm not 6'4.25, but exactly 6'4.. Maybe I drop down to 6'3.75 during the day, I don't know, but, I know that Titus is semi-strong 6'3. Let's meet somewhere in the middle with him, and say he's 6'3.25

Here's the unedited photo of Kane and Titus.. Click Here

Kane looking 4 inches taller than Titus there.
Keaner Cometson said on 12/Mar/19
If you label kane at 6’5 tops. Then @Sotiris would be your friend
Pauli said on 12/Mar/19
Sotiris Gravas you need to stop spamming these pages with photos of wrestlers and celebrities. Only photos of Kane in this page, Undertaker on his page and so on

The only relevant photo you posted there was this one of Donavon Smith and Kane Click Here

Smith is a confirmed measured 6ft 5 and 5/8ths barefoot so Kane looks 6ft 7 there or 6ft 6 1/2 at the worst. Both are side by side too so excellent comparison.

If we know Kane is within that height range we can guess Big Show (6'10 1/2-6ft 11), Undertaker (6ft 6-6ft 6 1/2), Dalip Singh (6'11 1/2-7 foot) all within very precise levels.
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Mar/19
@ced 6'3" Titus, 6'2" Tim Tebow, and 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg... Click Here
6'3" Titus and 6'2.75" Wiz Khalifa (2014)... Click Here , Click Here
6'3" Titus and 6'3.5" Snoop... Click Here

6'3.5" Snoop and 6'6" Gronk... Click Here



To reiterate, Titus O'Neil is not more than 6'3"... he most certainly is not 6'3.75"... which leads me to believe you are not the height you claim... the same can be said of rawdshaq, it would seem.



@Philip McMullin Stop wasting everyone's time.
rawdshaq said on 11/Mar/19
@Sotiris Dude Kane looks taller than Vince Carter by about 2 inches he is still close to 6'7" maybe exactly but he definitely isn't as low as 6'5". I used to think he is and I know why you see him as 6'5", but pay attention to how he stands next to people, he usually tilts in his head and stands with loose posture and loses like 2 inches. Trust me, he is still about 6'7".
ced said on 11/Mar/19
@Sotiris, Titus is not 6'3. He is 6'3.75.. I know this for a fact as I am 6'4 on the dot, and have met Titus on numerous occasions.. I always only had about .25 inches on Titus.
Philip McMullin said on 10/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas What the hell is your problem with Kane? He is still every bit of 6ft7 maybe plus
Qadaruddin said on 10/Mar/19
Peak kane should have been around 6'8 without a doubt i believe.
rawdshaq said on 9/Mar/19
I think Kane was peak 6'8" Christian. I never said he was the same height as Kevin Nash but he was similar in height to him, like he was about an inch shorter
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Mar/19
@rawdshaq
So you're saying that Kane was peak 6'9"? Because you said he was the same height as Nash and Nash's peak was 6'9" range.
edwards said on 8/Mar/19
@Heisenberg89
taker is much closer to camera dude.
Canson said on 8/Mar/19
@Rawdshaq: just like others here use pics when a celeb looks taller than they are. It’s no different
Sotiris Gravas said on 8/Mar/19
@rawdshaq Here's 6'3" Titus and Kane (2018)... Click Here

Titus and 6'5" Vince Carter... Click Here
Titus and 6'5" Jadeveon Clowney... Click Here
Titus, 6'4 Jameis Winston, and 6'5" (not 6'6") Donovan Smith... Click Here , Click Here

Kane (closer to camera) and 6'5" (not 6'6") Donovan Smith... Click Here
6'5" Vince Carter and Donovan Smith... Click Here
Donovan Smith and 6'5" Devon Still... Click Here


Titus and 6'9" Dwight Howard... Click Here , Click Here
Titus and Big Show... Click Here , Click Here Show looking VERY short here.
Here Show looking taller (closer to camera) w/ Titus, 6'4" Jameis Winston and 6'5" Donovan Smith (2016)... Click Here , Click Here I think Big Show wears orthotics in his shoes which makes him look taller (same w/ Charles Barkley). When he's not wearing wrestling boots or orthotics, his true height is exposed.

Titus and 6'7.5" Hafthor... Click Here
T and now 6'8" Ed "Too Tall" Jones... Click Here
T and 6'9" Etan Thomas... Click Here
T and Tyson Chandler (listed 6'11.5" w/o shoes)... Click Here

So, is Kane 6'7" like Rob the editor has him...? Absolutely not.
rawdshaq said on 8/Mar/19
Kane always had a full head on 5'10" Paul Bearer (9-10 inches)

Kane had a full head on 5'11" Jim Ross as Fake Diesel (9-10 inches)

Kane has always been 2-3 (maybe 4 at his peak) inches taller than 6'4 1/2" Randy Orton

Kane has always been similar in height to the Undertaker who I believe was 6'8" at his peak

Kane had an inch on 6'7" peak Psycho Sid

Kane has always been billed at 7 feet tall by EVERY org he has worked in (except one time as that dentist dude he was billed at 6'9")

@Sotiris I respect that you have lots of evidence to back up your claims but out of respect you post pictures that make Kane look as short as possible, if you had a photo gallery I could go through photos when you look like you're 6'5" and only post those. Kane was always billed very tall, if he was really 6'5" he will be billed at 6'6" - 6'7" like most guys that range were billed. Titus may have been described as 7 feet but he was always a 6'3" range guy billed at 6'6". Kane was similar in height to Kevin Nash in one of his matches with him as another character, and he towered over EVERYBODY.

Now that Kane is in his early - mid 50s, sure he might have lost some height. I doubt he went from 6'8" to 6'5" though, 6'7" today seems legit.
Heisenberg89 said on 8/Mar/19
Click Here
@edwards
edwards said on 8/Mar/19
i personally dont get why people are assuming taker and kane to be same height atleast at peak,i can clearly see kane being taller than taker ,kane as isaac yankem was clearly taller than taker as both were at peak and kane didnt have lifts. personally i am sure that kane was clearly taller than taker at peak and is clearly taller than taker today.either times both of em seems to have edge due to camera angle or lifts but personally i think no chance of taker and kane being same and thats me personally.
Ned Dukes said on 7/Mar/19
Some of you post the worst pictures to judge height from. Kane is still min 6’7. Anything under is truly silly
Heisenberg89 said on 6/Mar/19
What about 6'7" peak 6'6" today?
JoshL said on 5/Mar/19
Kane was actually several inches talker than Fake Razor when standing straight Click Here
ced said on 5/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. Man, come on.. those are some horrible angles and fake Razor is on top of a podium..

Here you can see the real difference between them.. (and what Kane looked like behind the mask during '97)

Click Here

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.