How tall is Kane

Kane's Height

6ft 6 ¾ (200 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7 ½ (201.9 cm)
Glenn Jacobs is an American professional Wrestler. Has been billed 6ft 10 and some believe he stood 7ft. He once claimed in a video interview: "I'm about Six-Eight...[and I weigh] a little over 300 pounds."

How tall is Glenn Kane Jacobs
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of The Undertaker
The Undertaker
6ft 6 (198 cm)
Height of John Cena
John Cena
6ft ½ in (184 cm)
Height of Big Show
Big Show
6ft 10 (208 cm)
Height of Andre The Giant
Andre The Giant
7ft 0 (213 cm)

Add a Comment7154 comments

Average Guess (430 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.9in (203cm)
Current: 6ft 7.05in (200.8cm)
Ben Calimer said on 12/Aug/20
6'7" current height in socks, maybe 6'6.5" @ eod.

Pierre, Big Show came out much better against Shack when he was in the suit and tie than when in gear. So much for wrestling gear being a huge height booster.
Canson said on 11/Aug/20
Pierre said on 10/Aug/20
Current under 6"6' .

How?
Matt logan said on 11/Aug/20
Exactly 6'6" is max for kane
Pierre said on 10/Aug/20
Current under 6"6' .
Glenn 6'6" said on 8/Aug/20
Selfishly, I kinda wish Kane never got into politics. I understand that he wants to leave a lasting legacy in his family, for his kids, and of course himself, but looking at the dudes Twitter, it seems like he's getting frustrated. Also I always just wanted him to be known as the Big Red Machine, but by the looks of it, he might not be with politics after his term as mayor. He's also such a healthy guy, he had a few more good dream matches in him, and I'm sure he still does.
Canson said on 7/Aug/20
@Glenn 6’6: I’m not doubting you. I’m just saying I know people that, and I’m one of them in an early morning before, where they just told Me 6’5”. Im 6’5” out of bed and 6’4 5/8-3/4 around when I was measured as I’ve measured myself before. I’m about 6’4.25 afternoon height. I claim 6’4” when asked
The big lul said on 6/Aug/20
I personally have Kane no taller than 6’6.5 max now and 6’7.25 in his peak. Also have big Show no taller than 6’9-6’9.25 max barefoot now and his peak 6’11
Mikey97 said on 6/Aug/20
Here it is, and also Lol at "Mickey"

Click Here
Glenn 6'6" said on 5/Aug/20
True Canson. But I really think I am 6'6". I've never been to the doctor when they said I wasn't 6'6". It's possible he's the exact height listed here.



Kane is bigger than some football players I've met who are listed at 310lb-320lb. Not saying he weighs that much, but he's seriously huge still.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Aug/20
Kane is currently the Mayor of Knox County (US) , well done for his real life career.
Pierre said on 4/Aug/20
Click Here =Shaq 7"0.25' towering over Big Show when Big Show does not wear wrestler shoes

Click Here Kane Big Show when both have noth wrestler shoes ,here Kane a bit closer to the camera

Click Here Big Show a bit closer but not particularly straight.

6"7' or close is too high for Kane imo
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 3/Aug/20
@ mickey 97..kindly send the link of video u r describing below.. Atleast u can do that sir..
Canson said on 2/Aug/20
Glenn 6'6" said on 2/Aug/20
Canson, I went to the doctor a few weeks ago and they said I was 6'6". The appointment was at 4pm~.

I really think he's 6'7". He was taller than me by an inch. In his prime, he was likely sub-6'8", maybe 6'7.5" or even 6'7.75". He has lost height, his legs look in moderately poor condition. Not a Khali situation (who I also met), but his knees did look a bit weak.

Regardless, I think he's 6'7".


That could line up with Rob’s listing esp if footwear is off and Dream said he was 6’7” too. In your case, they may have rounded you up to 6’6” from something like 6’5.75. My wife is a hair under 5’8” and they just tell her she’s 5’8” at the physical. And it was an early afternoon when they measured her last time and I was there and they got her around where I do 5’7.75” or so and said 5’8”
Glenn 6'6" said on 2/Aug/20
Canson, I went to the doctor a few weeks ago and they said I was 6'6". The appointment was at 4pm~.

I really think he's 6'7". He was taller than me by an inch. In his prime, he was likely sub-6'8", maybe 6'7.5" or even 6'7.75". He has lost height, his legs look in moderately poor condition. Not a Khali situation (who I also met), but his knees did look a bit weak.

Regardless, I think he's 6'7".
Riky said on 1/Aug/20
Pierre said on 31/Jul/2

I agree on kane's big soles, he always had a footwear advantage
Glenn 6'6" said on 1/Aug/20
LOL I definitely know what you mean by "stood out". He was huge. Definitely bigger than Undertaker.
Pierre said on 31/Jul/20
Slim92 said on 30/Jul/20 = if Taker had advantageous shoes on Kane in ring how can you explain finally Kane's shoes are looking higher and bigger...Kane had massive external heels and very possibly massive internal sole....

Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here even without considering external soles Kanes shoes are looking globally bigger and higher
Hyper said on 31/Jul/20
@Glenn 6'6"

A year ago, at my first trip to Galaxycon. He definitely stood out too well, without question. Can't say he was as low as 6'6" flat. He looked closed to 6'8", but his footwear was bigger than mine. Still, I thought he could've been 6'7" at the time i met him, maybe. Peak, I do believe he was over 6'7"

I agree he isn't as low as some estimate him. He's a lot bigger in person, than in pictures. He's certainly taller than someone like Anthony Joshua and Spencer Wilder, I can say that much.
Canson said on 30/Jul/20
@Glen6’6: are you a legit 6’6”? Meaning someone who measures it in the afternoon or are you a person who goes Under the marK late in the day? I don’t have Kane that low myself but I have him as 6’6.5 perhaps as opposed to 6’7” flat. 6’6.75 I don’t rule out tho
Slim92 said on 30/Jul/20
@Pierre you totally went around the fact that I mentioned taker has internal lifts. Kanes were always on the outside bc mcmahon wanted the Munster look. Everyone else mainly hid there's, Orton HHH etc. If you look close its obvious. Glenn as Isaac Yankem had obvious flats on in his staredown with Taker. Commentators even mention Yankems size. Hes clearly taller outside of the ring in normal shoes. Again... Taker had internal lifts in the ring. Which wouldn't always keep them the same height difference if kane had is munster boots and taker had is internal lifts.
Mikey97 said on 30/Jul/20
Just found something very interesting. On YouTube, there is a video of a man and his son meeting Kane at Toys R Us. Kane doesn't hear the two, but his son goes "dad he's 7 foot, I'm telling you dad, he's 7 foot."

The dad says, "He ain't 7 foot, he's 6'6" maybe, maybe 6'7" and then the video ends. It was a very interesting find for sure.
Glenn 6'6" said on 29/Jul/20
@Hyper When did you meet him? I met him over 2 years ago and he was an inch taller than me. I forgot what his shoes were but yes, he would be close to 6'7" worst case. I'm 6'6" and he was 100% the taller man. He was also easily like 7 inches taller than 6ft range people.
ced said on 29/Jul/20
Rob, question. One current guy who is very comparable to Kane and Undertaker in height I think is Lance Archer. How tall do you think Lance is?

Click Here

^^ Here is a comparison.. (it's not fitted to size, but you can compare Archer - Jake and then Taker - Jake), to me, it seems as if Archer is just as tall as Taker and Kane? What do you think?
Editor Rob
Classic 2 inch billed inflation.
Hyper said on 29/Jul/20
@Glenn

I also met Kane myself. I thought he was still near 6’7”, without the footwear advantage.
Matt logan said on 29/Jul/20
Kane is 6'6" and yes his hair was always real it was only on the night of the unmasking when kane wore the wig Glenn's hair was always real
Pierre said on 29/Jul/20
Watch again the comparison I posted recently Kane next to Triple H and Hafthor Julius 6"7.5' /Triple H=

Kane looks easily shorter than Hafthor by around 2 inches!
Riky said on 29/Jul/20
The big lul said on 27/Jul/20
Also
@riky here’s a more accurate pic of them standing together where the hopes aren’t slanted in the background in Kane’s favor
Click Here

Yeah on tho a picture yes, they look about sane height with Kane slightly taller
Kal Mar said on 28/Jul/20
Kane and Taker were exactly the same height in their prime. Kane wore lifts even when he was Isaac Yankem. Both about 6ft 7 barefoot, and both about 6ft 8 in wrestling boots.
Anthony T said on 28/Jul/20
@pierre that was Glenn's real hair, the wig only on the night of the unmasking
Glenn said on 27/Jul/20
Please read this.

For everybody that is saying Glenn is 6'6", I am a 6'6" man myself. I have met Glenn at a houseshow in March of 2018. He was taller than me by an inch. He's still 6'7". He was also much bigger than me physically, (I weigh about 270). He's not lying about his size, when he claims he is about 6'8" and 300 pounds. When he says he is about 6'8", it's his height in shoes, or his early morning height.

I can guarantee you that he is not as low as some of you think. You have to see him in person. He's a lot bigger in real life than he is on TV.
The big lul said on 27/Jul/20
Also
@riky here’s a more accurate pic of them standing together where the hopes aren’t slanted in the background in Kane’s favor
Click Here

Looking identical in height and maybe Kane has a solid .5 inch on taker which makes taker 6’5.75 to 6’6 if Kane is a max 6’6.5
The big lul said on 27/Jul/20
I think it’s about time that Kane gets a downgrade imo.

Peak 6’7.25
Now 6’6.5 max

I’m also surprised that Kane and Nash and maybe taker really didn’t lose that much height compared to hogan, big show, piper, and Scott hall.
Pierre said on 27/Jul/20
@Slim92 = Kane shoes are not looking more spongious than Taker's shoes but they are looking bigger lots of time with a solid heel. Click Here in this pic I really doubt Kane bends his knees,his global posture looks very straight! He stand closer to the camera,wear very probably bigger heels than taker,plus he wear a mask with a toupee....and looks just a bit taller than Taker despite this advantages
Click Here = his knees are not bent here
Click Here = his shoes are not looking more spongious than Taker's shoes here,the heel looks solid not spongious,logically Taker's shoes a lot closer to the camera here have to look very big compared to Kane's shoes if both type of shoes give the same advantage....But this is not the case here.

Maybe one of the reasons why Kane bent his knees( like in the last pic)more frequently than Taker is= I imagine his feet a lot vertical in his shoes.
Roderick said on 26/Jul/20
Can't deny how there is a lot of evidence today that Kane is taller that Undertaker now. And also wow at that photo... Kane still huge and jacked at age 53.
Joe Crook said on 25/Jul/20
That recent picture isn't accurate. Look at the ring ropes. Once you correct this the Undertaker appears taller, but he is closer to the camera, so they're very close in height.
Slim92 said on 24/Jul/20
Pierre what you have to understand is that a max weight kane was heavier than taker and making his outer lifts sink in more and sink in more to the ring as well. When they were both young and much lighter, glenn as yankem was obviously taller than taker in their staredown. Again, taker wore inner lifts and kane had munster boots bc mcmahon wanted that look. Kanes knees were also obviously bent most of the time. He didn't have to stand straight bc he was comfortably taller than taker regardless. There were times where kane looked MUCH taller when he stretched up, like when taker tought kane the last ride. Its on YouTube.
Riky said on 24/Jul/20
NRM said on 22/Jul/20
Recent Kane and Taker picture. Click Here
Kane again noticeably taller despite taker being closer to the camera and wearing his beanie. This and the footage of them in The Undertaker documentary show the difference between them in normal clothes


Well it looks like Kane would have at least an inch on Taker today. Many of you probably aren't, but I'm surprised.
It seems like Taker is loosing a fraction every 1or2 years while Kane isn't.
I don't know.... In my opinion Kane isn't over 199cm today, I would say he is at most 199 but then Taker looks again 6'5" flat
Riky said on 24/Jul/20
NRM said on 22/Jul/20
Recent Kane and Taker picture. Click Here
Kane again noticeably taller despite taker being closer to the camera and wearing his beanie. This and the footage of them in The Undertaker documentary show the difference between them in normal clothes


Well it looks like Kane would have at least an inch on Taker today. Many of you probably aren't, but I'm surprised.
It seems like Taker is loosing a fraction every 1or2 years while Kane isn't.
I don't know.... In my opinion Kane isn't over 199cm today, I would say he is at most 199 but then Taker looks 6"+'5 foat
Pierre said on 24/Jul/20
NRM said on 22/Jul/20
Recent Kane and Taker picture. Click Here
Kane again noticeably taller despite taker being closer to the camera and wearing his beanie. This and the footage of them in The Undertaker documentary show the difference between them in normal clothes

Kane stand straighter than Taker here and the pic seems inclined in favor to Kane= the middle guy looks straight but inclined by the pic and Kane too plus the black lines in the wall are looking inclined too...
NRM said on 22/Jul/20
Recent Kane and Taker picture. Click Here
Kane again noticeably taller despite taker being closer to the camera and wearing his beanie. This and the footage of them in The Undertaker documentary show the difference between them in normal clothes
Dream said on 21/Jul/20
@Canson

It was over a year ago I saw him at my first trip to Galaxycon. (Floor was even.) He stood out, way too much, to be just 6’5”-6’6” range. I can guarantee that much.

Honestly, without the footwear advantage, he would be near 6’7” today, when I saw him. A little under at worst. 6’5”-6’6” is as likely as Jake Paul becoming a decent person, at all.
Pierre said on 20/Jul/20
Click Here Lol in the ring Kane was wearing massive shoes and a big toupee with mask next to Taker but was looking just a bit taller than him ! Here closer to the camera and advantageous low camera
Click Here Kane's shoe next to Taker's shoe

other Click Here

shoes again = Click Here

other Click Here

Click Here =Kane wearing classic sneakers Taker a bit closer to the camera but standing in terrible posture ....
Canson said on 19/Jul/20
@Dream: how long ago did you meet him? It’s possible that he was still at or near 6’7” depending on when it was. Agree today he’s not a flat 6’6 but probably a 199cm ranger
Ghoshen Ali said on 18/Jul/20
He is more than 6’6 flat. Still shapes up towards the 6’7 end. Clear evidence shows it when he was walking next to Undertaker in the Last Ride.

If he is only 6’6 flat then Undertaker is about 6’5 flat. 👎🏼👎🏼
Riky said on 17/Jul/20
If a guy like Gronk claims 269 pounds so Kane could easily be 290/295 pounds
Dream said on 16/Jul/20
@Matt

He’s over 6’6” in person. Not quite 6’7” today, but definitely over 6’6”.
Riky said on 15/Jul/20
Roderick said on 7/Jul/20
He's not over 6'6". In person can easily be seen as someone who is 6'7".

I would guess 6'6" and 285 pounds. Huge guy


It sounds perfect, 6'6" 285 pounds. Not 6'7"
Riky said on 15/Jul/20
Come on he isn't 6'7" today, 6'6.25 is the most I give to him today and 6'5.75 is the minimum.
He isn't more than 0.5 taller than guys like Taker and he is same height or almost same height as Strowman.
6'7" is pushing it to much.
Roderick said on 14/Jul/20
@Tim Harris


He definitely isn't 300-310lb. He's stated in interviews that he weighs 290lb currently. And it's obvious that he lost a lot of the muscle size he was known for in his prime.
Matt logan said on 14/Jul/20
no only at most 6'6" flat
Tim Harris said on 12/Jul/20
He is still around 6’7 300-310lbs
mrtguy said on 9/Jul/20
Kane looks a like guy that has some African American in him from paternal grandparent.
Matt logan said on 9/Jul/20
ok I ill go with 6'6"
Canson said on 9/Jul/20
@Roderick: he’s comfortably over 6’6 with Lee Smith but I agree not 6’7”
Roderick said on 7/Jul/20
He's not over 6'6". In person can easily be seen as someone who is 6'7".

I would guess 6'6" and 285 pounds. Huge guy
Dream said on 7/Jul/20
@Matt Logan

He’s certainly not 6’5” either. He’s clearly taller than that, in person.
Pierre said on 6/Jul/20
If according Kane and Taker are very close in heights ,go to Kevin Nash's page here = there is a guy who posted on 21/Feb/2020 a pic of him next to 6"8.75' Kevin Nash(who slouch in the pic) and another pic of him next to Taker = Kevin by this comparison has easily 3 inches on Taker ...
Matt logan said on 6/Jul/20
I'll say 6'6" is max for glen jacobs today
Matt logan said on 6/Jul/20
Kane is obviously not 6'7 today I
Know that
Canson said on 5/Jul/20
Estim8r said on 2/Jul/20
In the 90s he wore lifts that made him 6’11. Why did you claim he’s 6’6 when he literally said he’s 6’8? It’s well below his billed height so he’s probably telling the truth

He doesn’t list him 6’6”. He’s listed 6’6.75”. And speaking of literally saying, The Rock says he’s 6’5” but clearly isn’t. If Rob went off what someone claims, he would have no credibility and likely not have been successful in what he does because everyone would be overlisted. In a nutshell, his site would be no different than Google
Pierre said on 5/Jul/20
@Vegas = In your pic Braun /Hafthor we don't know if the floor is regular.In my pic Hafthor looks bigger because he's bigger and largest than Braun then his shoulder is closer to the camera than Braun's shoulder.Plus the camera is high and Hafthor's right shoulder in this posture is very high so all the more closer to the camera than Braun's shoulder and so all the more looks a lot bigger.But both heads Hafthor and Braun are looking around same height then both head around same distance to the camera
Click Here

here is how large/big can look Hafthor Click Here Click Here

Braun never looks as large/as big,then both men with heads at same distance to the camera,a bit in profile like in the pic I posted,Hafthor's shoulder will be always standing closer to the camera than Braun's shoulder.


Here is Braun next to Drew McIntyre 6"4.5' (both men very probably without sometimes generous wrestler shoes ) = Click Here .In this Drew slouch on the opposite side to the camera so a lot more distant to the camera than Braun = Click Here here Drew a bit closer to the camera = Click Here

here Braun a bit closer to the camera Click Here .

I never see 2 inches between both guys .By Drew listed 6"4.5' I guess Braun 6"5' /6"5.5'
Canson said on 4/Jul/20
Dream said on 1/Jul/20
@Matt Logan

Problem with that is this, there was a Football player, who was measured 6’5.75”/6’5 3/8” in the afternoon. Kane is ‘at least an inch taller’ if not a bit more, ruling out that for sure.

@Dream: you’re right on both fronts. And to your point about the variance with the football players, I know someone who has met Dwayne Haskins and said that he’s a solid 6’3” guy in person not 6’4 like he’s listed (he measured 6’3 3/8 early morning). And that’s consistent with what we’ve seen with other players who measure at the combine
Matt logan said on 4/Jul/20
what about the pic with Vince voughn
Vegas' said on 4/Jul/20
Peak Kevin Nash in 1979 #43 Click Here
berta said on 4/Jul/20
only 2 meters now? i think went from weak 203 to maybe 201,5
Pierre said on 3/Jul/20
Braun looks 6"5.5' at most next to Hafthor,with floor looking regular.He was not in advantageous wrestler shoes probably this time.
Estim8r said on 2/Jul/20
In the 90s he wore lifts that made him 6’11. Why did you claim he’s 6’6 when he literally said he’s 6’8? It’s well below his billed height so he’s probably telling the truth
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 2/Jul/20
@matt logan..today braun is def not shorter than kane..refer to a recent pic of him kane and big show together.
Vegas' said on 2/Jul/20
Ced, Nash at ~55 years old and 4 decades of bad injuries and invasive surgeries looked around 203cm with Rob Click Here

Are you saying he basically lost nothing compared to say 1979 when he was at his peak physical fitness!
Dream said on 1/Jul/20
@Matt Logan

Problem with that is this, there was a Football player, who was measured 6’5.75”/6’5 3/8” in the afternoon. Kane is ‘at least an inch taller’ if not a bit more, ruling out that for sure.
Vegas' said on 1/Jul/20
Matt Logan it's obvious you don't know what 6'4 1/2 looks like in a WWE ring.

Ben Roethlisberger was measured 6'4 7/8 barefoot at NFL combine. Focus on 2 minute mark to 3 minutes. Has Strowman looked shorter than that next to Big Show in-ring and if so please post video..

Click Here
John peters said on 1/Jul/20
Anyone who thinks strowman, Kane, and taker are in the 6’4-5 range, is an idiot
Matt logan said on 30/Jun/20
braun 6'4¾" to 6'5" kane 6'5¼" undertaker 6'5"
Canson said on 30/Jun/20
Pierre said on 29/Jun/20
@Canson = Braun around 6"7' ?! Hafthor 6"7.5' has Braun by around 2 inches in the pic...Hafthor sleep on Braun so shrunk a lot and looks again taller than Braun's cap ! Click Here

Around 6’7 means he could be 6’6.5”. As stated that’s the highest he is. I indicated strong 6’6 to weak 6’7. He could be 6’6.25” but I’ll give you a possibility of a little over 6’6 since one poster saw him at that when he met him
ced said on 30/Jun/20
Undertaker and Sid 198cm
Kane 200.5 cm
Kevin Nash 203cm

Prime heights
Vegas' said on 30/Jun/20
Pierre, Thor looks 200lb bigger in that photo. He is much closer to camera. We know other photos don't show that difference Click Here

Thor and Brian Shaw Click Here
Shawn with Strowman slightly closer to camera Click Here


Strowman and Kanter photo is as good as you will possibly get. It's on flat ground, full length so we can see feet and posture, back to back with a person whose measured height is documented. Kanter is ~6'11 in shoes so Strowman comes out ~6'8 in his footwear in that photo.
Pierre said on 29/Jun/20
@Canson = Braun around 6"7' ?! Hafthor 6"7.5' has Braun by around 2 inches in the pic...Hafthor sleep on Braun so shrunk a lot and looks again taller than Braun's cap ! Click Here
Dream said on 29/Jun/20
@Canson

Truthfully, I totally get the Current 6’6.5” estimates. I do think he’s over 6’6” today. 6’5”, no. Never that low, especially in person. I’d be very amazed if he was that low.

He looked significantlybtaller than Kobe Bryant, with a prime Shaquille.
Dream said on 29/Jun/20
@Canson

Truthfully, I totally get the Current 6’6.5” estimates. I do think he’s over 6’6” today. 6’5”, no. Never that low, especially in person. I’d be very amazed if he was that low.
Mikey97 said on 28/Jun/20
Just a theory. What if Glenn hasn't lost any height at all, and has actually always been a weak 6'7"/flat 6'7"?

Luke Gallows has told me Kane is 6'8". Although I am not sure if that's an accurate barefoot measurement, I could buy it in shoes.

I'm fine with Kane being lowered to 6'6.5".
Dream said on 27/Jun/20
He's sky north of 6'5" range, today. Over 6'6", today. Definitely a strong 6'7", peak.
Canson said on 27/Jun/20
@Pierre and Vegas: even deducting maybe 1/2” from both still safely puts Braun in the strong 6’6- weak 6’7 range same with Kane most likely. We saw Lee Smith next to Kane and it was minimum 1”
Pierre said on 27/Jun/20
Vegas' said on 26/Jun/20
Pierre here are measurements. Scroll along for height w/o shoes Click Here

Hayward is listed in 2010-11 and Kanter in 2011-12

The photo you reference with Thor is outside (never reliable) and Thor is closer to camera

My pic Hafthor/Braun(16 June) is very probably closer to the reality than yours,because as you said they are outside,we can see the floor,and Braun for this time is very probably with classic shoes,not advantageous Wrestler shoes like very probably in your pic....Hafthor does not stand really closer to the camera than Braun here ,opposite to your second pic Kanter /Hayward ( 19 June )= Kanter stand easily closer to the camera than Hayward here with camera not particularly high that can give him a good advantage
Vegas' said on 26/Jun/20
Pierre here are measurements. Scroll along for height w/o shoes Click Here

Hayward is listed in 2010-11 and Kanter in 2011-12

The photo you reference with Thor is outside (never reliable) and Thor is closer to camera
Canson said on 26/Jun/20
Dream said on 25/Jun/20
@Pierre

You’d have to downgrade a lot of people, if he were 6’6.5”. Seeing him in person, he would definitely be taller than someone like Anthony Joshua, even today.

Also, Anthony Joshua looked 195 cm with Barack, yet Rob met him and confirmed he is a legitimate 6’5.75”.

@Dream: I’d say there’s even a chance AJ is only 6’5 5/8 or 6’5 1/2”. Rob just mentioned that he looked “at most 6’6” and that Joshua had the footwear advantage. However given Wlad is listed at 6’5.25” the 6’5.75 is ok for him being he did look 6’6” next to Ibra. But a peak 6’6.5 for Kane is way too low. I agree. I would have had an easier time believing that he was 6’7-6’7.5 range before believing he was a weak 6’7” peak. But then again Vegas saw him and said 6’7” and someone at 6’6 7/8” or 6’6 3/4” could pass for 6’7” just as easily. But today he doesn’t look more than about 6’6.5” to tell you the truth. That’s got more to do with him shrinking however

@Vegas: that’s more believable being 6’7” peak or when you saw him last in 2012 but having lost height over the last 8 years to still be 6’6.5” today perhaps. He obviously is not 6’5” and we debunked that a long time ago with the 6’5.75 measured football player (more like 6’5 3/8” if we use afternoon heights) and Kane still had at least an inch on him if not a bit more
Lyle said on 26/Jun/20
Probably just over 6'7 peak, now sitting just under, +2 inch boots =6'9 hence the reason he looked similar in height with Kurrgan, Mark Henry stated on table for 3 that Kane is 6'7-6'10 which we all know the first height is more realistic, just under 6'8 in dress shoes and a little over in his 'smaller current' wrestling boots
Matt logan said on 25/Jun/20
I agree 6'5¼" today
Canson said on 25/Jun/20
@Riky: it’s possible that he was just that at his peak. It’s the same as Taker being seen as 6’7” peak when 62B saw him. Both guys are listed closely together and Rob doesn’t believe Taker was as tall as once thought in his prime. Initially he had him 6’7.5
Vegas' said on 25/Jun/20
It's highly unlikely Glen Jacobs lost close to 2 inches.

I did meet him in early 2004, saw him again in 2010 and saw him outside a Raw taping late at night (12am) in 2012. He looked just as tall in 12 as 2004.
Dream said on 25/Jun/20
@Pierre

You’d have to downgrade a lot of people, if he were 6’6.5”. Seeing him in person, he would definitely be taller than someone like Anthony Joshua, even today.

Also, Anthony Joshua looked 195 cm with Barack, yet Rob met him and confirmed he is a legitimate 6’5.75”.
Pierre said on 24/Jun/20
Click Here here we can see their respective shoes
Pierre said on 24/Jun/20
Peak 6"6.5'/6"7' Current 6"5.25'/6"5.5' .Wrestler shoes do the rest
Riky said on 22/Jun/20
Canson

Yes of course, in fact I asked him how tall he was for this reason. Vegas guessed him 6'7" in early 2000s if I'm not wrong, which doesn't surprise me
Kan said on 22/Jun/20
Is time to downgrade kane.. 6ft7 1/4 peak and 6ft6 1/2 is his real height. Isn’t bigger than taker in his peak
Click Here
And today about half of in inch taller seems very likely
Click Here
Canson said on 21/Jun/20
@Riky: have to remember Dream is almost a foot shorter. He’s A bit under 5’9” But Kane today could still be 6’6.5” which could pass for 6’7” with someone who isn’t close in height. And remember Vegas said he met him in the early and said he’s 6’7” then. It also depends on when Dream met him
Kan said on 21/Jun/20
Kane today is probably half of an inch taller. I can see kane 6ft6 1/2 today and peak 6ft7 1/4
Canson said on 21/Jun/20
@Dream: I’d definitely say at least a solid 6’7” peak but not sure how much over. Vegas said he saw him in the early 2000s and looked 6’7” which he could look then. Then again with these big wrestlers we aren’t sure if they lost height prior to thah
Pierre said on 21/Jun/20
Vegas' said on 19/Jun/20
Strowman 6'4...

He must wear huge boots because thats him with 6'9 3/4 barefoot measured Enes Kanter Click Here

Kanter and #20 Gordon Hayward measured 6'6 3/4 barefoot Click Here


@Vegas I don't find the article in web that talk about their barefeet measurements can you give the link eventually ?
Braun was wearing shoes that are looking generous here,maybe wrestler shoes(his pant looks like the pant he wear in ring)

Next to Hafthor listed 6"7.75' (pic with Rob,average guess around 6"7.5'),Hafthor sleeping on Braun still stand higher than Braun's cap... (pic on 16 June).6"6.75' seems to me too high for Braun.Agree he's above 6"4'.
Riky said on 20/Jun/20
Pierre said on 19/Jun/20
Stephen Merchant 6"7' wearing sneakers sleeping on Vince Vaughn = Click Here Click Here

Kane and Vince Vaughn = Click Here


Vince /Mel Gibson big max 5"9' wearing sneakers = Click Here

Click Here Mel and Danny Trejo 5"5.75' .Here Danny with Rob Click Here

I already saw those pictures. In my opinion Kane is an inch shorter than Merchant
Dream said on 20/Jun/20
@Canson

Indeed. Not under 6’6”, today. Peak, I can believe over 6’7”.
Riky said on 19/Jun/20
Matt Logan

6'5"1/4 it's too low, definitely. He is 198 to 199 cm range.
I don't think higher, and not even shorter than that. At least i hope it for Taker

Dream

I believe you, but I don't think he is 6'7" or btw 200cm. Absolutely not.
198/199 is his range today.
I saw the documentary and yes, he looks taller than Taker but it's hard to say by how much.
Same with Strowman.

Lyle

They look at best same height, i don't see an inch in advantage for no one of them
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 19/Jun/20
@matt logan..lol..strowman at 6'4 wud put drew mcintyre at 6'3 and orton at 6'2..cud it be!
Vegas' said on 19/Jun/20
Strowman 6'4...

He must wear huge boots because thats him with 6'9 3/4 barefoot measured Enes Kanter Click Here

Kanter and #20 Gordon Hayward measured 6'6 3/4 barefoot Click Here
Pierre said on 19/Jun/20
Stephen Merchant 6"7' wearing sneakers sleeping on Vince Vaughn = Click Here Click Here

Kane and Vince Vaughn = Click Here


Vince /Mel Gibson big max 5"9' wearing sneakers = Click Here

Click Here Mel and Danny Trejo 5"5.75' .Here Danny with Rob Click Here
Canson said on 19/Jun/20
@Dream: he’s taller in a picture with A measured football player too. Around 6’6” 1/2 with him
Dream said on 18/Jun/20
@NRM

Kane even has more worse posture than Taker, in those pictures, yet he's still taller than Undertaker. In person, Kane currently looked around 6'7.75", but his footwear was certainly bigger than mine. He would still measure over 6'6", without much question. I would've thought he's close to 6'7", today. At worst, a little under it. Definitely still over 6'6".
Dream said on 18/Jun/20
@NRM

Kane even has more worse posture than Taker, in those pictures, yet he's still taller than Undertaker. In person, Kane currently looked around 6'7.75", but his footwear was certainly bigger than mine. He would still measure over 6'6", without much question. I would've thought he's close to 6'7", today. At worst, a little under it.
Hanov said on 18/Jun/20
@khaja

In my list, Taker, Strowman and Corbin are 201 flat, 199 flat and 198 flat
Dream said on 18/Jun/20
@Matt Logan

He’s well taller than 6’5” for sure, in person.
Dream said on 18/Jun/20
@NRM

He really does look taller than Taker.

From I’ve seen in person, close to 6’7”, today, is believable. Peak, definitely over 6’7”.
Lyle said on 17/Jun/20
@Roderick if you pause around the 35:55 Mark I can't really see an inch between them, to me Taker seems to be looking down at strowman? But yeah the question between who's is taller between Kane and Taker has surely been settled, Kane has always been taller

Click Here
Matt logan said on 17/Jun/20
kane 6'5¼ broun strowman 6'4½
NRM said on 16/Jun/20
Here’s Kane and Taker backstage last year (from the documentary), Taker is closer to the camera but Kane is still noticeably taller
Click Here Click Here
Matt logan said on 16/Jun/20
6'5¼ barefooted
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 16/Jun/20
@hanov..good estimates may be..but why some in inches and some in cm..??
Pierre said on 16/Jun/20
Lyle said on 15/Jun/20
Just watch the latest episode of The Last Ride, Taker is taller than Braun, Kane is taller than Taker

I don't find your video .Here is Braun supposed 6"6.5' and Hafthor 6'7.5' sleeping on him = Click Here Hafthor in his terrible posture still looks taller than Braun's cap....
Hanov said on 16/Jun/20
Kane 201.5 cm
Taker 201 flat
Rowan 6'6.5"
Viscera 6'6.5"
Strowman 199
Sid 6'6.25"
Corbin 198
Heidenreich 6'5.75"
Roderick said on 15/Jun/20
I watched it yesterday, and @Lyle, while I agree that Kane clearly looked taller than Taker while they were hanging out together with the Miz and some other douchebag, I disagree that Taker looked taller than Strowman. Strowman could be a full inch taller than Taker.

6'5.5" Undertaker

6'6" Kane

6'6.5" Strowman
Dream said on 15/Jun/20
Of course, here's another picture. -- Click Here

Another picture, where Kane is bending his knees and legs, while the Undertaker is standing a bolt. Undertaker looks slightly taller, but stretch Kane out and he will edge out Undertaker. -- Click Here

Of course, here's Kane looking down while Undertaker is looking straight. Yet, Kane looks comfortably taller. (Ear levels and Top of their heads and their eye levels.) -- Click Here

And another picture where Kane edges out Undertaker -- Click Here


Today, Kane still looks taller and honestly, maybe he has a tiny edge on the Undertaker.
Dream said on 15/Jun/20
An Angle? Right. Not like yours is any different. Undertaker is closer to the camera, after all. --
Click Here


Going by that similar angle, you might as well say Yao is 7'7", with Sun Ming Ming. -- Click Here

While in reality, Sun Ming Ming is more than 2 inches taller than Yao. -- Click Here


How about that.
Dream said on 15/Jun/20
An Angle? Right. Not like yours is any different. Undertaker is closer to the camera, after all. --
Click Here


Going by that similar angle, you might as well say Yao is 7'7", with Sun Ming Ming. -- Click Here

While in reality, Sun Ming Ming is more than 2 inches taller than Yao. -- Click Here
Canson said on 15/Jun/20
@Pierre: they listed a measured athlete here at 6’5.75 morning height (so 6’5 3/8 most likely) and Kane was at least an inch taller
Lyle said on 15/Jun/20
Just watch the latest episode of The Last Ride, Taker is taller than Braun, Kane is taller than Taker
treefroggy said on 14/Jun/20
"Matt Morgan was 6-8 was in OVW he was clearly taller than Kane. In WWE it was different but Kane had lifts." - Dave Meltzer in a June 13th tweet

I think many here believed Kane wore lifts or at least suspected it. Kane at the very least always had big clunky shoes. I don't believe everything Meltzer says but I think his comment on Kane is true. The question is how big were the lifts?
Dream said on 14/Jun/20
@Dan Trojan @Riky @Lyle

Fair point. However, what about this angle, that I just posted, in the same post? -- Click Here

Clearly Kane looks taller, and Undertaker is closer to the Camera.

Again, I really don't know who was taller between Kane and Undertaker, during their peaks. They edge each other out, but what I do know is Kane didn't look as low as 6'6" flat, in person.
Pierre said on 13/Jun/20
@Dream = Click Here I don't bet a dollar Kane is taller than Taker here.
Pierre said on 13/Jun/20
@Dream = The angle of the camera isn't neutral in your pic,the camera is too low.Plus I doubt when Kane stand in a ring( like your pic) he wear just classic shoes without lifts.This is the show then I don't exclude advantageous shoes.Thats why I think my comparisons out of ring and camera sufficently neutral present an interest.
Dream said on 13/Jun/20
@Pierre

What about here — Click Here

Pictures aren’t gonna be consistent, depending on which angle it’s taken. It’s usually better when you meet them in person.
Riky said on 12/Jun/20
Dream

The second picture it's fake, that was 6'4" Swagger next to Kane.

Btw there are other pictures of that day that I can't find now. Also brosofdistruction, a poster of this site, was in Knoxville that day and said Taker was taller even..
This poster has a picture with both Kane and Taker.
Lyle said on 12/Jun/20
@Dream, that photo has been posted about a hundred times and it's a fake, the one with Kane and 'Taker' posting in suits is Kane and Jack Swagger, but I do agree Kane has always been taller than Taker
Dan Trojan said on 12/Jun/20
Dream that photo with undertaker and kane is clearly photoshopped that's actually a photo with jack swagger if you're gonna post photos at least post some that are lgit
Pierre said on 12/Jun/20
Click Here Click Here Kane and Hafthor around same posture next to Triple H .Triple H a lot more distant to the camera next to Kane and generous space between his own feet.Hafthor 6"7.5' = Kane max 6"5'/6"5.5' by this comparison.(Triple H's top of head is around same height as the start of Hafthor's ears and around the same hieght as the top of Kane's ears
Dream said on 12/Jun/20
@riky

I am somewhere between 5’8.5”-5’8.75”, at an extreme low, barefooted.

Kane doesn’t look tall in pictures, but when you do see him in person, anyone would think he’s still well over 6’6”, even without the footwear advantage he had.

If he was as low as 6’6 1/4”, Anthony Joshua would be 6’5” flat at a low. And Daniel Cudmore 6’5.75”. You’d also have Joe Manganiello at 6’4 1/4” and Alexander Skarsgard at 6’3 3/4”.

Yeah. I had to compare myself to the others. I also measure how high my arms go. Based on that and what I’ve seen in person, he’s going to be over 6’6”, even today.

Here’s another picture where Kane edges out Undertaker, who is closer to the camera. — Click Here

And another picture picture where Kane is clearly taller than Undertaker — Click Here
Matt logan said on 11/Jun/20
6'5¼" ill say might even be kanes barefoot height today
Riky said on 11/Jun/20
@Dream

Can I ask how tall are you?
Dan Trojan guess for Taker was perfect or almost, probably if he was wrong it was by 0.5 which for a 5'7" guy it's a really good guess.
And Rob at 5'8" is most of the times perfect.
But it's clear that more tall you are better you judge tall guys.

Click Here
This is 6'5.5 in my opinion Undertaker with 6'7.25/6'7.5 Kavin Love. Undertaker has the footwear advantage here.

Click Here
This is Kane and Taker, even if it's not the best picture because of the angle, in Knoxville. As you can see the gap between the 2 guys it's not even close to the gap between Taker and Kavin Love.
Ergo Kane it's not 6'7" obviously, but he could be easily 6'6"/6'6" 1/4.
Hanov said on 11/Jun/20
2 meters is the start of giant.
Dream said on 11/Jun/20
@Roderick

Physically, he still looked extremely well in shape. I wouldn't exactly call him fat. He still looks a lot more buffed and shredded, than say fat.

He's extremely huge, in person.
Roderick said on 10/Jun/20
@Dream How would you say Kane looked physically? Is he still in good shape, or, ya know, fat. Is he still huge?
Dream said on 7/Jun/20
Rob, I know I said it many times, but when I saw Kane in person (In my first trip to Galaxycon), he wasn’t as short as 6’6”. He looked significantly taller, in person, than he looks in pictures, and this was just him, casually walking around.

I would’ve guessed him near 6’7” today. I wouldn’t put him as low as 6’6”. I wish I got a picture, but it costed too much.

What I am saying is, I would rule out 6’6” flat, today. 6’6 3/4” is the worst, I would put him at, today.
Dream said on 7/Jun/20
Again, he didn’t look as low as 6’6”, in person. In pictures, he doesn’t seem as tall. However, in person, he’s visibly taller than he looks in pictures.

The current listing is really the absolute worst I see him at.
6’6”, is too low, even today. Today, He’s easily taller than guys like Carmelo Anthony and Ryan Stiles.

Whether Kane is 6’6.5” or near 6’7”, today, is debatable. However, 6’6” is way too low. Definitely taller than guys like Derek Theler for sure.
Mahesh said on 7/Jun/20
Click Here Kane backstage during attitude era. Here he is seen with some one taller than him. Is it kurrgan? If yes Kane seems 2 inches shorter considering his thick boots
NRM said on 6/Jun/20
Kane with Edge and Foley around 15 years ago, looks 5 inches taller than both Click Here
Canson said on 6/Jun/20
@Christian: that’s a good point. I have him 6’6 and change based on how he looked next to the football player and also a couple other wrestlers. I think 199cm or maybe even 6’6.5”.

@Roderick: I gotta see the pic. That’s shocking that he looks as low as 6’5.5”. I could see 6’6” on occasion but I’d have guessed him around 199 still. Maybe 6’6.5” afternoon height
Canson said on 6/Jun/20
@Christian: that’s a good point. I have him 6’6 and change based on how he looked next to the football player and also a couple other wrestlers. I think 199cm or maybe even 6’6.5”.
Vegas' said on 6/Jun/20
Kane looks taller than 6'5 range out of gear last year with 5'10.5 Ron Killings Click Here

Killings and 5'9 1/2 barefoot NFL measured Pacman Jones at 2 minute mark Click Here
Neaz said on 6/Jun/20
Hey rob, If stroman is 6’6.5 dont you think than kane should be atleast 6’7? Both of them are standing straight here.

Click Here
Editor Rob
They seemed very close in height there.
Roderick said on 6/Jun/20
@Creeper Kane was probably like max 305lb at his biggest. Obviously he was a big dude, but 320lb is a bit of a stretch IMO.

@Canson He can look 6'6.5"ish in the ring, but outside is a different story. Next to a 5ft11 listed baseball player, he looks 6'5.5" max. I'll post the photo tomorrow
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/Jun/20
@Canson
He can sometimes look that in pics, so I can completely understand the 6'6" guesses that some posters here make, but I'd put him at a strong one at worst, maybe 6'6.5"
Slim92 said on 6/Jun/20
If he wasn't much taller in his lifts than taker (which he was) then why did he look clearly taller when he was in flats as yankem? Bc taker had internal lifts which has been said on many podcasts. Kanes external lifts were made to look like that bc Vince wanted the Frankenstein Munster look. Case closed.
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
@Hanov: very true. I’ve got a 200.6-.7 Solid 6’7” friend that’s like 203cm out of bed (around 6’7 7/8). He has good posture and looks extremely tall if there were ever a saying
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
Kane doesn’t look as low as 6’6 flat
Hanov said on 3/Jun/20
@canson

But 2 meters looks like a giant
Riky said on 3/Jun/20
After Sid words, I can't give more than a 6'7" peak for Kane. But very max.
Today he isn't above 6'6".
Basecly the same height as 6'5.5 undertaker but with a more solid body structure that maybe makes him looking taller most of the times. BTW i would rule out something less than 198cm

Ps: in ring pictures of Kane are completely useless, unless you don't take away 2 inches from his boots when you make comparisons
ced said on 3/Jun/20
@Jake Willis.. They ran into a problem because of billing Undertaker at 6'10 all those years and even 6'10 1/2. Had Taker been billed at 6'8, or even 6'9, Kane would have been billed at 6'10-6'11. They wanted the Kane character to be huge and even bigger than his brother.

As Philip says, during that time, WCW had a "Battle of the Giants" as well. Kevin Nash (Who was about 6'9.5) was being pushed as 7'1 while The Giant was being pushed at 7'4 (who was about 6'11 without his boots).

Size in 1997 was important. So WWE had to do 2 things with Kane. 1 - Make him bigger than The Undertaker, 2- Call him 7 feet tall because 7 FT sounds better than 6'10).

When you take a billed Taker at 6'10, and then Kane shows up and is 2 inches taller than Taker (in his lifts), then you have to promote him at 7 feet.
Pablo13 said on 2/Jun/20
Kane is closer to 6'6 than 6'7 right now, maybe even flat 6'6, whe doesn't look taller than Undertaker at all.
Creeper said on 2/Jun/20
For those who have ever seen Kane in person (especially in the 90s), huge is definitely an understatement. He was massive. I can believe he was 320lb.
Philip McMullin said on 2/Jun/20
@Jake wills The 7 foot billing is because WWE wanted THEIR 7foot giant as WCW had theirs with The Giant AKA Big show.
Slim92 said on 1/Jun/20
Can't find the video segment of kane and kurrgan
Roderick said on 1/Jun/20
@Philip No, he's definitely under 6'7". If you've watched him in the ring for the past few years, it's obvious he's only 6'6" range now.
Canson said on 1/Jun/20
He’s not a full 6’7” today
Jake wills said on 1/Jun/20
I don't know why they listed him as 7ft in WWE. It is absurd. The great Khali who is a true 7 ft is clearly much taller than kane, also Big show who is around 6'11 is also clearly taller than Kane. I think he was probably 6'9 in wwe at prime height. Maye 6'8 nowadays. 6'6 is too far imo.
Philip McMullin said on 30/May/20
@Rob please get kane back up to 6ft7 hes NOT under it.
Dream said on 30/May/20
@Roderick

That’s fine If you believe that. Again, when you see him in person, you’d be very surprised. Picture can often be deceiving of how tall one looks.

‘In person,’ He looked a lot taller than 6’6.5” Daniel Cudmore, in comparison of Rob with Daniel and myself with Kane, hench the footwear advantage. He certainly wasn’t as short as 6’6.5”, let alone 6’6” flat.

Close to 6’7” flat, today, is easily believable. 6’7 1/2” peak is perfectly fine.
Canson said on 30/May/20
@Roderick: he still looks over 6’6” flat. Maybe 6’6.5” ish
Pierre said on 30/May/20
Click Here =Kane and Taker when around same soles
Roderick said on 30/May/20
@Dream There is no denying that Kane is a huge man, especially in his prime. Shawn Michaels once said that Kane was gigantic compared to the Undertaker.

I still find it hard to believe he's currently over 6'6".
Dream said on 28/May/20
He wasn’t as low as 6’6”, in person. Looked well above it, for sure.

He’s really a lot taller in person, than he looks in pictures.

Again, if anyone else meets him in person, they would really be surprised by the size of him.
Dream said on 28/May/20
He wasn’t as low as 6’6”, in person. Looked well above it, for sure.

He’s really a lot taller in person, than he looks in pictures.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 28/May/20
@slim92..lol..at the beggining of their segment look at their whole bodies..kane looks at least a full inch short.If kurgan was 6'11in boots kane was 6'10.
Slim92 said on 27/May/20
It is obvious that kane looks taller than kurrgan. Kurrgan is even closer to the camera. Yes kane looks like he may have his boots on still but they are actually just slightly taller than a cowboy boot heel. You physically couldn't do what he did with anything taller. They actually were in the ring together and if I remember correctly kane chokeslammed or closelined kurrgan. Kane looked at least 1" taller. Don't forget that kurrgan also had huge boots on too. Not flats. It has been said on many podcasts that taker had lifts inside his boots and kanes boots looked the way they did bc Vince McMahon wanted the "Munster" look. Do research guys.
Pierre said on 27/May/20
Kane's shoes are generally looking very massive with a big external sole (plus maybe advantageous internal sole ?)then compare Kane wearing his wrestler outfit next to another guy will be very possibly very advantageous for Kane's height.
Vegas' said on 27/May/20
Kurrgan was ~6'8 not 6'11

Those photos posted don't tell us much however
ced said on 26/May/20
Click Here

^^ Kurgan's platform on his boots.

Click Here

Clear Close up of Kurgan and Kane.

BTW, these 2 would have been an awesome tag team. I always wanted to see Kurgan in the ring destroying somebody and the lights go out and Kane comes out and they go face to face.
ced said on 26/May/20
@Lyle, I'm not sure.. If you take a look at the angles, when the camera is far away (and when Kurgan is closer to the camera, it looks as if Kurgan is taller), but, when they get close to them, it looks like Kane is taller.. I paused it a couple times - different angles, obviously, they look so close you can't really tell - but, if you look at the eye level, Kane's eyeline is a little higher, and the top of his head is a little taller..

Now don't forget, Kurgan had some big boots as well back then.. He had about an inch platform.. And I don't believe Kurgan was 6'11.. I believe he was the same as Nash - 6'9.25 - 6'9.5.
Pierre said on 26/May/20
ced said on 24/May/20
Oh, and here is a PRIME Kane and Prime Kurgan - who is taller? Kane is (and is not even standing straight)

(Kane is in his full outfit - no mask - and has the black eye makeup w long hair)

Click Here


Kane looks relatively straight here and in fact the other guy seems to slouch a bit.And depending if Kane had his famous wresler shoes...
Kane99 said on 26/May/20
@lyle
Not 3 inches, maybe 1,5 inches... kane wore very big boots sole in this segment, probably an inch over kurrgan who was out of gear. I really do think kurrgan was slightly taller than kane in this segment.
A Man said on 26/May/20
It’s a cool picture but Kurrgan looks like he would come out slightly taller than Kane if they went face to face.

It must be from 1997-1998 as well which is when Kane wore huge lifts to make him appear much larger than Taker.
Glady said on 26/May/20
Rob who could be taller today Kane or undertaker. What’s ur guess?? I think today Kane is easily taller than undertaker at least by 1/2 inch??
Editor Rob
Kane's been looking 6ft 6 at times with people too recently.
Dan Trojan said on 26/May/20
Ced lol that's funny kurgan looks taller but hey you keep believing what you want
Lyle said on 26/May/20
@Ced I agree on the Taker one, but I do believe Kurrgan is taller than Kane, Kane has his monster boots on and isn't taller than him
Roderick said on 25/May/20
Kane did look noticeably taller than Undertaker backstage, but it might have been thanks to footwear.

He was looking great at 51, but it's obvious he's caring less and less about working out now that he's 53.

@Rob You should lower Kane to 6'6.25" now that Undertaker is only at 6'6".
Dream said on 25/May/20
I didn’t get a photo, but in my first trip to Galaxycon, Kane was massively bigger in person, than in pictures. He honestly looked significantly taller than Daniel Cudmore, based on comparison. Of course, he was wearing some serious footwear advantage over me, for sure. 6’6” is way too low. Closed to 6’7” is more than believable. He looked 6’8”+, but he had a serious footwear advantage over me.

The second time I went to Galaxycon, I showed my pictures with Tom Welling and Charles Martinet to Rob, Junior, Carson, and even Andrea.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 25/May/20
Wow..pause at 41:03 in the chap 3 of last ride..to those who doubted man beneath the mask..kane looks only an inch or two less than legit 6 11 kurgan.
ced said on 25/May/20
@ Lyle, take another look at that photo.. here’s a clearer picture:

Click Here

To me, Kane looks taller than Kurgan, also — search a full picture of Kurgan on google and you will see he also had about an inch sole on his boots.
Lyle said on 25/May/20
@Ced, I saw the exact same thing, I was shocked so see footage with Kane and Kurrgan from backstage, Kurrgan must have had 3 inches on Kane if they were barefoot?
Pierre said on 25/May/20
@ced 24/May = Your pic seems to myself a lot inclined here and we can not see really the top of his head(I presume Undertaker has the black and white tee-shirt?) ...
Dan Trojan said on 25/May/20
Ced you just never stop with the bad camera angles do you just give up already
MikeV10 said on 25/May/20
There is a short clip on this video - kurrgan kane at about 41:02

Click Here
ced said on 24/May/20
Oh, and here is a PRIME Kane and Prime Kurgan - who is taller? Kane is (and is not even standing straight)

(Kane is in his full outfit - no mask - and has the black eye makeup w long hair)

Click Here
ced said on 24/May/20
Ok, the msytery is truly over between who is taller between Taker and Kane.. Below is a snip taken from Taker's documentary..

NO WRESTLING GEAR ON... Kane is CLEARLY taller and always was.

Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 24/May/20
Chapter 3 of Taker's new doc ''The Last Ride'' Theres shots backstage of kane out of ring boots looking taller than taker with taker not wearing his overly baggy beanie. ALSO there's footage of Kane talking to Kurrgan backstage in similar footwear looking the same size.
Lyle said on 24/May/20
Kane looked shorter than Kurrgan... My bad!
Lyle said on 24/May/20
Can easily see a difference between kane and Taker on episode 3 of the last ride, also a great backstage segment between Kane and Kurrgan back in the day showing them about the same height, although Kane was in gear and most likely had his big boots on but obviously Kurrgan ain't barefoot
Canson said on 24/May/20
If Taker got the 1/4” peak downgrade he could probably use it. I’m starting to believe that he wasn’t any taller than him. And his current is too high. Maybe 6’6.5 but no higher
Paul Atherton said on 22/May/20
I think tsker and kane are same height in real life easy match to predict this is taker vs isaac yankee both had level boots on stood up straight I'd say both were 6.9 in their prime but now 6.6 for kane n 6.5 for taker
Kane99 said on 22/May/20
In similar type of boots they looked identical...
Click Here
For me isn’t possible to determinate who is taller between this two unless measured. So I definitely think you can give the same height
as you have done so far, otherwise they will think that kane is taller, but without his big boots sole there would be nothing to make him assume
Kane99 said on 21/May/20
Do you think kane was taller than taker or we can wait a 6ft7 1/4 list for kane very soon ?
Editor Rob
He could be similar, 6ft 7 up to 7.5 range.
Trinity Samuels said on 19/May/20
Matt Logan - go jump
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 19/May/20
@Matt Logan

You should have say Kane is 6'5 1/4 now with boots on 6'6 3/4 bingo for the listing and 6'6 peak. He clearly lost 2cm since peak if you check on him more. But for me i trust Rob listing close to 202cm peak and 200cm now.
Kane99 said on 18/May/20
@ced
Please stop man. Kane was never taller than Nash even in his big boots. The pic you posted it just no make any sense.
Click Here
Stop
Matt logan said on 17/May/20
Kane is 6'5" barefooted now and 6'6" barefooted in the wwf. put a regular pair of sneakers on kane it adds 1½ inches in height 6'5" barefoot plus 1½ inches equals 6'6½ in shoes
Pablo13 said on 14/May/20
Ced: Dude you're still trolling, Kane is STANDING WAY CLOSER TO THE Camera, dude just chill out, you give here worst angles ever, did you hear about Camera Angles dude?, Kane has Camera Advantage over Taker in that picture...
Pierre said on 14/May/20
@ced = in you pic Kane is a lot closer to the camera that give him a big advantage here.

Click Here = here there is a slim difference between both guys ,and Kane's shoes are looking generally like good elevator shoes ....like here with big heels and hard angle above his feet = Click Here Click Here =here only his external sole/heels give him imo no less than 2 inches. I can make a mistake but his shoes are looking generous next to Taker's shoes.

Click Here =here Kane looks comfortably taller but he wear a toupee while Taker's real hairs are looking slim above his head...Plus Kane probably a bit more shoe ...and a bit closer to the camera here...
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 14/May/20
@pablo..i agree man.
Pablo13 said on 14/May/20
Khaja Qadaruddin: Yes he got maybe half inch on Taker here, But still had Thicker boots than Undertaker in that picture. If Kane was taller than Undertaker at his peak, it only 0.25 inches. But i don't think he ever was never taller, Also right now if he's taller, only 1 cm at best.
Both Kane and Taker were 6'7.25-6'7.5 inches peak height. Right Now Undertaker 6'6-6'6.25, Kane 6'6.25-6'6.5
ced said on 13/May/20
@Pablo, not trolling.. But if you're going to include a backstage a photo and an in ring photo, how are you not trolling?

Here is a backstage photo of Kane in his prime with Undertaker.. Kane in his lifts was taller than Nash..

Click Here

Does Nash look as tall as Kane here? We all know that Nash is taller than Kane of course, but he wasn't taller when Kane wore his ring boots.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 13/May/20
@pablo..have a good look kane still have a good half inch on taker in that pic..presently may be they may be almost same..but peak kane sure had some advantage due to his built..see unabomb or yankem vs taker.
Pablo13 said on 13/May/20
Undertaker peak was 6'7.25-6'7.25, Kane too, he was never taller than Undertaker. Taker boots in 2000 were bit thicker than in 1998-1999, and he looked close to Kane here(2000).
Click Here


Nash Was 6'9.25-6'9.5, he looked taller than Kane(in his huge boots). next to Undertaker, here is picture with Nash and Taker with normal camera angle(not this trolling angles like Ced posted)
Click Here
Pablo13 said on 13/May/20
He was 6'7 or 6'6 or 22e
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 8/May/20
@mikey97...the website u listed below dosent seems to have it..can u mention exactly which site?
Roderick said on 7/May/20
@Mikey Must have been a little bit later into his career, as he said he uses a phone to track his best lifts.

@Khaja It was still the same person, but my theory is he got sick and lost a lot of weight. He really did look much thinner in 1999 than say, 97, 98, early 99... he was huge in 98.
Dan Trojan said on 7/May/20
Khaja if you're asking if another guy ever portrayed kane the answer is no glenn jacobs has always been kane except for the time they had 2 kanes luke gallows played the fake one
Mikey97 said on 6/May/20
YES! I managed to finally find a workout routine from Kane. I don't know exactly what stage of his career this is from, but I found it off a website called amazonaws.com. I will make it as simple as possible, he wrote a pretty long summary of it.
Monday: Leg/Shoulders
Wednesday: Chest/Biceps
Friday: Back/Triceps
He said for chest he does incline bench and dumbbell press (I assume on incline as well) as his next line is flat bench and dumbbell press. He does weighted dips and uses machines for super sets
For back, he does deadlifts, weighted pull ups/chinups, barbell/dumbbell rows, and t-bar rows. and he also does machines for back
For shoulders, he does military press, (standing OR sitting, both behind and in front of the neck), and he wrote dumbbell press again, im assuming dumbbell shoulder press and dumbbell raises, assuming thats front raises. He does lateral raises and wrote "any of rear delt exercises".
For legs, he does squat variations (narrow, normal, and wide), leg press, walking lunges with dumbbell or bar, romanian deadlifts, he super sets leg extensions and hamstring curls.
For biceps, he does something called scott curls, standing barbell curls with grip variations, dumbbell curls, supersets cable bicep movements with seated dumbbell curls.
For triceps (Kane's specialty IMO), close grip bench press, skull crushers (writes a side note as "his favorite") close grip dips, bench dips and supersets triceps extensions with close grip pushups. He says go heavy on your first set in every exercise with 85% of your max so the intensity stays high the entire workout
He says he rests for 3 minutes between ssets as well
He also uses his phone to track his PRs to help him keep improving

This is such a cool find and sounds like the key to look like Kane.. Click Here
Pierre said on 6/May/20
Undertaker in recent pics never looks shorter than Kane.I know Undertaker is closer to the camera with a bit more shoe but Undertaker has a terrible posture here = Click Here Click Here and remember that Undertaker has a long forehead under his bonnet too...

If I had to bet who is the tallest here I would'nt bet on Kane...
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 6/May/20
@roderick..i may agree they were both 6'7 at peak..but kane had 0.75 inch on taker when young..iam reffering to taker vs issac yankem staredown..both in equal footwear and posture.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 5/May/20
If anyone wud excuse me..i know its irritating but still got a doubt since childhood..i always wonder the kane in 1999 was much thinner and smaller..was it someone else and wwe nvr disclosed it..Click Here
ced said on 5/May/20
Rob, take a look below.. I put these photos side by side (not to compare photo to photo, but just to see how much Kevin Nash and Kane were taller than Taker).

Looking at this photo below, would you say that Kane was indeed taller than Taker at their peaks and was Kane in his lifts taller than Kevin Nash? (Again, in his lifts, we all know Nash is taller, but would Kane be taller than Nash in his liftS?)

Click Here
Editor Rob
Kane has a bit of camera advantage beside Taker, making him seem taller by several inches, but I still would put Kane/taker closer for peaks.
Roderick said on 4/May/20
I think Undertaker and Kane were the same height. Both 6'7". But I believe Undertaker has aged much worse than Kane, and Kane is 6'6" currently, while Undertaker is 6'5.5".
Michael186 said on 1/May/20
202 Peak barefoot
Dan Trojan said on 30/Apr/20
Ced i won't argue with you there i believe kane is taller too
ced said on 29/Apr/20
@dan trojan, no. I post photos I can find, and if you read my post, I stated that the Sid - Goldberg staredown is a better angle, but even so Kane has a taller impression against Goldberg. Now, does that mean that Kane is taller? NO. It's one guys opinion and to me looks as if Kane is taller against Goldberg.
A Man said on 28/Apr/20
@ Khaja
A picture of Kane in ring gear standing next to two guys who I have no idea who they are or how tall they are? Yep still plenty of doubt
Pablo13 said on 27/Apr/20
Pierre that Picture outside the Ring with Taker and Kane is Fake, Orginal Photo is Swagger with Kane.
Click Here

Kane for 100% at his peak, wasn't taller than Taker at All, its impossible to tell who was taller, both guys 6'7.25-6'7.5 peak height. If Kane was easily taller Than Undertaker, why Vince Mcmahon put biggest soles in wrestling to Kane?. And Right Now Kane isn't more than 6'6.5, that's MAX.
Lyle said on 27/Apr/20
@Pierre, that last photo of Kane and 'Taker' is fake. The original is kane and Jack Swagger
Dan Trojan said on 27/Apr/20
Pierre just stop embarrassing yourself that onw photo with undertaker and kane outside of the ring is photoshopped that's actually jack swagger someone put the undertaker's head on his body
Dan Trojan said on 26/Apr/20
Hey ced do you intentionally post bad angle pics or what
Roderick said on 26/Apr/20
Happy birthday to the Big Red Machine. It's unreal that he's 53 now. These new kids have no idea how cool the Kane storyline with Paul Bearer against the Undertaker was in 1997/1998.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 25/Apr/20
Common man..u all still doubt his peak over 6.7.. Click Here
Pierre said on 24/Apr/20
Click Here Kane and Undertaker in ring ,Kane's shoes looking very big with a very vertical angle = Click Here

Click Here =here out of ring Undertaker looking not particularly straight
Roderick said on 24/Apr/20
Honestly Kane would have probably looked at least an inch taller than Sid. 6'7.5" peak isn't necessarily impossible, but he still doesn't look over 6'7" with guys like Test and Albert. In a quick staredown with Kane and Albert (Matt Bloom, who I believe was 6'5" barefoot but wore lifts to look 6'6") looked an inch shorter than Kane. Just an inch, which would make Kane look 6'7".

It's possible Kane never actually wore lifts, instead just really thick soled boots. In 2014/2015 he was in dress shoes a lot and didn't look any shorter than he did in his wrestling boots.
ced said on 22/Apr/20
Found some images of Kane Vs Goldberg and then Sid Vs Goldebrg..

The Sid - Goldberg staredown is a better angle, but even so, Kane does give a taller impression than Sid against Goldberg..

Click Here
Goldberg - Sid ^^

Click Here
Goldberg - Kane
Pablo13 said on 21/Apr/20
Ced is putting Kane at his peak close to 6'8 or 6'8, and Undertaker below 6'7, thats amazing LOL.
Undertaker 6'7.25-6'7.5 peak, Kane 6'7.5 peak, not more not less.
ced said on 21/Apr/20
Here is Vader and Sid.

Click Here

Here is Vader and Kane:

Click Here

Look how much taller Kane is wih Vader than Sid (Even if Kane took off his lifts.. You can tell that Kane was the taller man)
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Apr/20
@ced
Lol
Pierre said on 17/Apr/20
Triple H and Hafthor 6"7.5' Click Here = the top of HHH's head is max the same height as the start of hafthor's ears = Click Here

Now Triple H and Kane = Click Here = the top of HHH's head is around the same height as,this time,the top of the highest ear of Kane

Kane by this comparison again is 6"5.5' max.Wrestler shoes give him lots of height imo
Roderick said on 16/Apr/20
@ced That's hilarious Lol. I'd be pretty scared too if a guy Kane's size walked into my hotel with my girlfriend as well
ced said on 14/Apr/20
In reading the book "Mayor Kane", he mentions a story where he was at a hotel in Anaheim after a RAW taping, and he went to a hotel where they gave him the wrong room key and walked into an older Japanese couple and scared the living shizzles out of them. He said "here I am, 6'8 315 pounds, I haven't taken off my black eye makeup that went under my mask yet, and I walk in on this couple and they're jumping on the bed screaming"..

I think think happened somewhere around 1998..

Is he 6'8 today? No. But in the Attitude era, I believe he was 6'7.75, in his lifts he would have been 6'9.25 - 6'9.5 roughly.
Roderick said on 12/Apr/20
@Mikey97 Wow man, I found two interviews when Kane straight up said he was 7'0". One from 2006, and one from 2009. Rob it's worth an add I'd say.
Mikey97 said on 10/Apr/20
I was watching some Kane interviews and Kane is very consistent with his interviews and usually everything he says can be backed up by his past interviews. It is interesting that he claims 6'8" often, but there was a specific interview from March 2013 when Daniel Bryan and he were on a radio show and Kane did claim he was 7'0". Kane also was on the News with the weather man and Kane was standing on a box and the weatherman claimed he was 6'4" to really exaggerate the height of Kane, and even called Kane 7'0" and Kane didn't deny it.

Kane said he could bench 525lb at his best and he said he was able to squat 500lb for ten repetitions. He then added, "nowadays? Not so much?" and then laughed.
Big ed said on 8/Apr/20
As Dr Yankeem dds he was called 6'9 by Jr in commentary they later gave him 6'11 he was 6'11 on cards then he was billed 7ft as Kane he may have been 6'8 at his tallest but probably 6'7 now or a shade under it now
Pierre said on 8/Apr/20
I maybe confuse Kane with Abyss... while some guys make mistakes on Kane's height...They probably confuse Kane with Big Show 🙂
Dan Trojan said on 7/Apr/20
Lol how is anyone supposed to take this pierre guy seriously when he posts a photo of abyss trying to say it's kane i'm sorry it's just too funny
MikeV10 said on 7/Apr/20
Click Here

Kane and Matt Morgan backstage

@Pierre its very hard to believe that you think that is Kane in your Picture ?
Did you ever watch wrestling ?
Thats Abyss , he was about 6'5-6'6
Pierre said on 7/Apr/20
Roderick said on 6/Apr/20
@Pierre That's definitely not Kane. How can you even look at that photo and think that's Kane lmao

Because when I search "Kane and Matt Morgan" Google give me this pic.And In fact his mask looks a lot like Kane's mask here.But Maybe this is not Kane ,I always see Kane in ring with big soles that is not the case here...

Click Here = here Kane with probably his advantageous wrestler shoes closer to the camera than Shaq plus very low camera that advantage him.

Click Here = Kane again closer to the camera very low(good advantage) with good wrestler shoes .Shoes = Click Here

Click Here = Great Khali a bit closer to the camera that is low and logically give him an advantage /Shaq 7"0.25'
ced said on 7/Apr/20
@Pierre..

I hope you're just joking, but that's not Kane.. That's Abyss (he's 6'5)..

Kane has lost a lot of height since his peak.. I believe at his very peak he was 6'7.75 (listed 6'8 in college)..

Today, he's either 6'6.25 or 6'6.5
Roderick said on 6/Apr/20
@Pierre That's definitely not Kane. How can you even look at that photo and think that's Kane lmao
Lyle said on 6/Apr/20
Matt Morgan has the bigger boots there it's clear, they would be very similar in height but yes Morgan may just have edged him barefoot back then
Canson said on 6/Apr/20
Kane could use a downgrade to 6’6 1/2”
Roderick said on 5/Apr/20
Matt Morgan looks like he had an inch on Kane. Morgan at 6'8" peak and Kane at 6'7" peak works.
Pierre said on 5/Apr/20
Kane closer to the camera and wearing toupee(wig) /Matt Morgan shrinking maybe a bit more than Matt,not sure= Click Here

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.