How tall is Kane

Kane's Height

6ft 7 (200.7 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7 ½ (201.9 cm)
Glenn Jacobs is an American professional Wrestler. Has been billed 6ft 10 and some believe he stood 7ft. When wrestling under the name Yankem he may have been billed as 6ft 7.
I'm about Six-Eight...[and I weigh] a little over 300 pounds.

How tall is Glenn Kane Jacobs
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of The Undertaker
The Undertaker
6ft 6 ¼ (199 cm)
Height of John Cena
John Cena
6ft ½ in (184 cm)
Height of Big Show
Big Show
6ft 10 (208 cm)
Height of Andre The Giant
Andre The Giant
7ft 0 (213 cm)

Add a Comment6448 comments

Average Guess (348 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.95in (203.1cm)
Current: 6ft 7.13in (201cm)
Creeper said on 19/Sep/19
Edwards Im saying he was walking poorly in 2016 so he could have only been able to stand up at max 6'5.75. But his posture improved and now he can stand up at 6'6.5 again. Look at him with Roman Reigns at Extreme Rules. He had 4.5 inches on Roman Reigns who is 6'2. And with 6'4.5 Drew Mcintyre he had 2 inches on him 1.5 with bad posture. He is not under 6'6.5 today maybe 6'6.25 at worse but no argument for sub 6'6 range from me
Canson said on 19/Sep/19
@Edwards: agreed
Canson said on 19/Sep/19
Creeper said on 19/Sep/19
Christian do we have any proof that that measurement was taken during Kevin Loves tall hours aka his early hours? What if he got up at 6 AM and got measured at 10 AM. The 6'7.75 measurement backs up how tall he looks next to other players any way.

Also Vegas thats a joke saying Kane looked awful first off he's 52 years old so he isnt going to f------ be in the amazing shape a 20 year old Glenn Jacobs would be in and second he didnt look awful at all he does still workout but its a lot more cardio now like he mentioned on Stone Colds podcast. He does still lift weights, but I think he mentioned how its a lot lighter, less intense. Maybe curling 35lb dumbbell for reps, repping 315 bench, and he doesnt squat anymore because of his bad knees. Thats my guess. Hes still in good shape for his age and its just disrespectful as hell to say he looked terrible when its his first time coming back in almost a year. Have some freaking respect for the legend. I don't mean to sound douchey or anything but its seriously so frustrating when people say Kane or any other wrestler "got in bad shape" or "lost muscle". Do you seriously have any respect? Do you think its easy for a middle aged mayor to stay in fantastic shape and be absolutely ripped to shreads? No! His body can't handle the excess weight anymore, and Kane doesnt use steroids so he doesnt just keep his physique until his 80s. So obviously a little weight gain and muscle-loss will occur. Im sorry but its just so annoying when people say bad stuff about Kane's physique you act like hes not a full time mayor who is still middle aged but wanting to show up for RAW when he can.

But he really didnt look that bad. Im not seeing what you're seeing, hes still well built. Built better than all of us, thats for sure.

Also Kane did look 6'7 next to R-Truth and he had 2 inches on 6'5 Luke Gallows so yep again more evidence Kane is still 6'7.

I actually believe the measurement took place In the afternoon being he was measured in 2008 unless others were measured at different times. It did say 2009 they did morning. However, who is to stop someone from laying around before being measured? It happens all the time. I have heard stories of people being carried inside just to keep them from being on their feet. As for Love, I’m not seeing him at 6’7.75 next to anyone. See the pics below. As far as Love’s height I agree with Christian that he’s 6’7.25. With Bosh or Noah there’s no way he’s 6’8”. That’s around 3” (2.5-3”) with both of them. Also remember Love was near 6’10 in shoes from his supposed 6’7.75? That’s another red flag.

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

With 6’10 Joakim Noah

With 6’10 range Chris Bosh

Click Here
edwards said on 19/Sep/19
@christian
I agree with you dude.how can a 50+ guy gain any height which is ridiculous.

@creeper
You mean taker gained height dude.taker did looked 6’5.25 with kevin love,you mean he gained 1.25 inch lol sorry i have to disagree
Roderick said on 19/Sep/19
Hey Rob, you've been on a good path as of recent, making a lot of good changes, maybe Kane is next? He looked only 6'5" next to R-Truth who is max 5'10". I think Kane should be lowered to 6'6.5" at least.
Editor Rob
Kane I am not so sure on just now, but 6ft 6.5 for Kane today is very possible.
Creeper said on 19/Sep/19
Christian do we have any proof that that measurement was taken during Kevin Loves tall hours aka his early hours? What if he got up at 6 AM and got measured at 10 AM. The 6'7.75 measurement backs up how tall he looks next to other players any way.

Also Vegas thats a joke saying Kane looked awful first off he's 52 years old so he isnt going to f------ be in the amazing shape a 20 year old Glenn Jacobs would be in and second he didnt look awful at all he does still workout but its a lot more cardio now like he mentioned on Stone Colds podcast. He does still lift weights, but I think he mentioned how its a lot lighter, less intense. Maybe curling 35lb dumbbell for reps, repping 315 bench, and he doesnt squat anymore because of his bad knees. Thats my guess. Hes still in good shape for his age and its just disrespectful as hell to say he looked terrible when its his first time coming back in almost a year. Have some freaking respect for the legend. I don't mean to sound douchey or anything but its seriously so frustrating when people say Kane or any other wrestler "got in bad shape" or "lost muscle". Do you seriously have any respect? Do you think its easy for a middle aged mayor to stay in fantastic shape and be absolutely ripped to shreads? No! His body can't handle the excess weight anymore, and Kane doesnt use steroids so he doesnt just keep his physique until his 80s. So obviously a little weight gain and muscle-loss will occur. Im sorry but its just so annoying when people say bad stuff about Kane's physique you act like hes not a full time mayor who is still middle aged but wanting to show up for RAW when he can.

But he really didnt look that bad. Im not seeing what you're seeing, hes still well built. Built better than all of us, thats for sure.

Also Kane did look 6'7 next to R-Truth and he had 2 inches on 6'5 Luke Gallows so yep again more evidence Kane is still 6'7.
Creeper said on 18/Sep/19
Sorry, I posted the same photo of Undertaker and Reigns by accident.

Heres what I meant to also post Click Here

Exactly 4.5 inches taller than 6'2 Roman Reigns and he isn't even standing his tallest. He's definitely still 6'6.5 for measuring, and Kane is still 6'7 when he measures.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Sep/19
@Creeper
But Love isn't even 6'7.75" at his low, if he measured that at the combine. More like 6'7.25" max, which means Undertaker couldn't have looked over 6'5.25". You mean to tell me that he regained at least 1.25"? Lol
Vegas' said on 17/Sep/19
Viper, strong 6'4 but it was outside so maybe I was off a little. But he was noticeably taller than Orton out of gear and taller than McIntyre. If it was only 1/4 inch I doubt I would notice. Physically bigger guy than those two though McIntyre has big time increased his muscle mass since I met him 10 years ago.

Jacobs definitely looked taller than 6'5 range next to Ron Killings last night and he was wearing pretty flat dress-shoes.

Thought be looked awful in Kane costume though later. He obviously hasn't worked out or gone to raining booth since getting into politics.
Dan Trojan said on 17/Sep/19
Does anyone know how tall r truth is i've always guessed him around 5'11" and on raw kane towered over him by at least 7 inches in my opinion kane is still over 6'6"
Johan 185 cm said on 17/Sep/19
I guessed 6'4.5"-6'5" for the fan with Kane. Putting Kane at 6'6.5-6'7" range today.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Sep/19
@Roderick
Yeah, and I didn't even guess Lesnar that low. I said that 187 (6'1 5/8") is the worst case scenario, but I've always put him at 6'1.75" for quite a while now. I've lowered my guess by barely 1/2" and I got criticized for it, lol. I bet that if it was the other way around (1/2" higher), the same people who criticized me will be silent.
Creeper said on 16/Sep/19
Ok so here we go I thought people would take my word for it and also the website itself but nope so here we go.

First off, these Kevin Love pics were taken not long after Undertaker had a hip-replacement surgery which definitely can take a little bit of height off for a little while. He could have been 6'5 for a little while but definitely regained height after that to at least 6'6.

Click Here If Kevin Love is 6'7.75, then Undertaker is 6'5.75 in 2016. That's a solid 2 inches, wont deny it

Now here is Undertaker with Kane just a month later, i think Kane edges Undertaker by 1.5 inch here, which is more than normal, but Undertaker was short in 2016, he regained height, I'll show it later.

Click Here Undertaker is looking up at Kane here. Kane looks at least 6'7.

You can clearly see the height difference between Undertaker and Love is just a little bit more than it was with Kane and Undertaker, maybe 0.5-75 of an inch. So if Kevin Love is 6'7.75, then Kane is 6'7 minimum.

Undertaker and 6'2 Roman Reigns, pretty obvious he's back up to 6'6.5 again. Click Here

Click Here Another pic, he isnt even standing straight and looks 6'6.5 minimum with Roman Reigns

Here is Undertaker caught back up with Kane in height Click Here

Kane is still 6'7 and Undertaker is still 6'6.5, guys, the listings here are correct. Of course a 6'7 man with bad posture like these two can look shorter like 6'5-6'6 at times, but I think I provided enough evidence to prove that neither of these guys are as short as most of y'all say they are.

The cherry on top is everyone who says Kane is 6'7 in person anyway and Undertaker doesn't look more than 0.5 shorter than Kane in any recent matches so puts him again at a minimum of 6'6.5.
Canson said on 16/Sep/19
@Viper: he said 194ish. If I had to guess Swagger is no taller than me (weaker 194cm) 193-194
Roderick said on 16/Sep/19
@edwards I personally think those are reasonable. Remember you are completely entitled to your opinion brother and hell maybe I'm the one who's wrong and maybe Kane can still pull off 6'7", nobody knows for sure how tall Kane is. But I think Corbin and Taker are about right Edwards I completely agree on those two.
Canson said on 16/Sep/19
@Christian: the more I see it the more I agree. I would’ve said more like 2.5 before but 2 is feasible
viper said on 16/Sep/19
Vegas where do you have Swagger.
viper said on 16/Sep/19
I've been posting here since 2005 and I've always thought Kane was max 6-7 peak.
viper said on 15/Sep/19
6-6 could be right.

He can look as short as 6-5 and as tall as 6-7.
edwards said on 15/Sep/19
@roderick
dude correct me if i am wrong but i personally think taker maybe 6'5.75 today,baron corbin 6'6 and kane 6'6.25-6'6.5,ofcourse i can be wrong.
edwards said on 15/Sep/19
@ canson
agreed
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 15/Sep/19
@Canson
I don't see more than 2" between Kane and that fan though. Kane's wearing his mask with that thick wig attached to it.
rawdshaq said on 14/Sep/19
Kane is probably only 6'5.5" now.
Vegas' said on 14/Sep/19
Rob said this guy Dale is about 6'2 in person give or take Click Here

6'4 max or in truth 6'3 range.. Click Here
Editor Rob
If he stands well he might measure near it. That other guy claiming 6ft 6 looks quite tall generally.
Roderick said on 14/Sep/19
What's funny is how on Brock Lesnar's page, someone was criticizing 6'5" Christian for saying Brock Lesnar was 6'2.25" in 2016 and now he was saying he was 6'1.5" I think in 2019, and Christians response was how he got more knowledgeable about height since then.

When I first found CH like maybe only three months ago, I thought Kane was 6'7.75" peak and currently 6'6.5". Since then, I now think Kane was max 6'7.25" peak, (most likely just 6'7") and is currently MAXXXXX 6'6.25", probably only just 6'6".

As for Undertaker, I've always said max 6'6" since I came on here for his current, and I've never ruled out 6'5.5"-6'5.75", but I thought his peak was 6'7.5", now I am positive it was just 6'7".

For the record, yes, I'm weird, and I like to scroll through the old posts, even back in 2006, (When I'm bored) and I noticed the common estimate for Kane was actually 6'8", and it was widely accepted as being a normal estimate. What blew my mind is that actually a few posters who I seen on here now, were posting then... wow. I guess height is a lifetime obsession, haha

I think now most of can agree that Kane being anywhere from 6'7"-6'7.5" is reasonable and we can rule out 6'8" for his peak. Honestly, I can't see it being possible barefoot without the help of his skyscraper lifts. Seriously, those gave him minimum 1.5". Likely 2". So if he was 6'7.25" barefoot, he would have been 6'9.25", which is what explains why that sometimes in 1999, he looked very close to Big Show at times, who I think was minimum 6'11.5" peak.

I think Kane could have measured 6'8" in the morning, or just in tennis shoes, which is probably why he claims 6'8". Today, if Kane is 6'6", then he would be 6'7.5"-6'8" in his boots. That kinda lines up with his WM 34 staredown with Baron Corbin, when he looked around 0.5"-0.75" taller, and I assume Corbin is 6'7" in his boots/shoes. Even in 2016, Kane actually looked an inch taller than Corbin, but with the footwear of course. I bet they are the same height, with maybe Kane having the slightest edge.

So, does anyone agree?
Canson said on 14/Sep/19
Kane has a lot of height on him. He has to still be somewhere around 6’7” if that guy is around 6’4-6’5
Canson said on 14/Sep/19
Vegas' said on 11/Sep/19
Roderick said on 10/Sep/19
There is NO WAY that dude in the pic with Kane is 6'6". That would mean Kane is still 6'8", which we all know isn't Kane's height
___________________

That guy has lots of photos. He looks ~6'5 I would say in many of them. He is taller than Moose in one and Moose measured 6'4 1/2 barefoot at NFL combine
Click Here

Maybe a solid 6’5”. Moose hitting 6’4.5 probably puts him closer to 6’4” at his low. But this guy here has the proportions of someone who could be 6’6”. He has the long neck/face etc
Vegas' said on 14/Sep/19
Swagger was taller than max 6'4 in person late at night when I met him. Max 6'4 would put him 6'3 range and he was taller than that. He looked taller in person than this guy i stood next to after a game back in March. I would ssume he was measured 194cm because the AFL are usually accurate and he gets 6'6 descriptions regularly on Irish tv and media but is obviously ~6'4 range Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 14/Sep/19
@Sotiris
All I know is that Ryder can't be anything over 6'1" since he was billed 6'1" before. Even if he's legit 6'1", Kane doesn't look over 6'6" in that pic with him.
viper said on 14/Sep/19
I instantly knew all those pics were at Dorton Arena.

Fascinating arena architecture from the 1950s
viper said on 14/Sep/19
That Bobby Mitchell guy looks to have really tall proportions but yeah,he isn't 6-6.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Sep/19
@Roderick

Rob lists Kurt Angle at 5'9.5", when he might be as low as 5'8.5", and don't forget that Kane looked max 6'5" w/ Zack Ryder (maybe he forgot to wear his lifts).
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Sep/19
@Christian

I'm guessing you would have been a more imposing wrestler...

Maybe 6'3.5" Randy Orton w/ Christian and max 6'1" Edge (there's video of Edge w/o shoes next to max 6'2" Sheamus)... Click Here Christian isn't standing straight, but neither is Orton.

Next to max 6'3" Cesaro and max 6'4" Luke Gallows, that fan, Bobby Mitchell, looked max 6'4". That said, we don't know about footwear...


Max 6'4" Jack Swagger w/ Tommy Dreamer and Christian... Click Here
Bobby Mitchell w/ Tommy Dreamer (2015)... Click Here

Christan w/ 6'2" DDP (2018)... Click Here
DDP w/ maybe 6'4.5" Cam Newton... Click Here

Maybe Bobby Mitchell is 6'4", same height as a peak height Henry Simmons :)

Then again, maybe he's 6'4.5".




Just to remind everyone... This was Kane w/ Zack Ryder (2019)... Click Here Kane looks 6'5" here, not 6'7".



Ryder w/ maybe 6'2.75" (measured 6'3.25 morning) Dean Muhtadi (aka Mojo Rawley):
Click Here

Mojo w/ 6'5.75" Gronk and Ryder... Click Here
Mojo/Gronk... (2018) Click Here , (2015) Click Here

Mojo w/ 6'6" Braun Strowman... Click Here
Xpac99 said on 13/Sep/19
The guy with kane i think he is about 6ft4 1/2 maybe not a full 6ft5
Click Here
Btw kane looks about 6ft7
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 12/Sep/19
@Sotiris
That fan also looks around 6'4.5" with 6'0" listed Christian. Click Here I doubt he's low as 6'4", but 6'4.5" is very possible.
Roderick said on 12/Sep/19
@rawdshaq Someone finally said it. Dude I completely agree with what you said. Seriously that David Hull guy even proportionally doesn't look 6'5" he looks 6'2". Lol seriously where did 6'5" come from and who even is he
Roderick said on 12/Sep/19
@Sotiris Kane looks 6'6" with Kurt there. Honestly with good posture he still seems like a 6'6" guy but no more
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 12/Sep/19
Another pic with the 6'6" claiming guy (bobbymitchelldx) with Kane. Click Here Clearly he doesn't look 6'6", as he looks 2" shorter than Kane.
Roderick said on 11/Sep/19
No pressure or anything but it would be dope if a tall guy on here like Canson Christian or Sotiris met Kane. I don't even need a picture honestly I get that it's expensive. But you are all seemingly honest ppl and I would take your words for it. Honestly the tallest person we have who met Kane is BOD and he claims he is 6'3.5" and thought Kane was 6'5". I think if Sotiris met Kane that would be golden to put these 6'7" claims to rest. I think Christian would look Kane in the eye, but Kane might be literally a hair taller bc of his pointy ass head.
Vegas' said on 11/Sep/19
Roderick said on 10/Sep/19
There is NO WAY that dude in the pic with Kane is 6'6". That would mean Kane is still 6'8", which we all know isn't Kane's height
___________________

That guy has lots of photos. He looks ~6'5 I would say in many of them. He is taller than Moose in one and Moose measured 6'4 1/2 barefoot at NFL combine
Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Sep/19
1) Here's another pic of that fan, Bobby Mitchell, w/ KANE... Click Here

2) W/ 6'4" Luke Gallows... Click Here

3) Here he is w/ maybe 6'3" Billy Gunn... Click Here
Billy Gunn w/ maybe 6'3.5" Jason Momoa... Click Here
6'2" Von Miller w/ Momoa... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

4) W/ max 6'3" Cesaro... Click Here
Cesaro w/ 6'3" Titus... Click Here , Click Here


5) W/ 6'2" DDP... Click Here , Click Here
Maybe 6'4.5" Cam Newton w/ DDP... Click Here


6) That fan is MAX 6'4". His claim of 6'6" is absolute bull(bleep) and a reminder not to simply believe whatever height ppl on here claim.

7) Here he is w/ 6'8" Kevin Nash (and Scott Hall)... Click Here , Click Here
Max 6'4.25" Drew McIntyre w/ Hall and Nash... Click Here




Again, Kurt Angle w/ Kane (2019)... Click Here

W/ Big Show (2006)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'7.75" Chris Wilcox... Click Here
W/ 6'5" Matt Bloom (A-Train)... Click Here
W/ 6'5" Howard Stern... (2015) Click Here , Click Here
W/ 6'5" Vince Carter... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'4.5" Gene Snitsky... Click Here , Click Here
W/ maybe 6'4.5" JBL (maybe cowboy boots)... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'3.5" Randy Orton... Click Here
W/ 6'3" Cesaro and 6'2" Sheamus... Click Here
W/ 6'2" Jason Kidd... Click Here

Younger Angle w/ Undertaker... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

W/ Hogan... Click Here


So, no... Kane isn't 6'7".
rawdshaq said on 10/Sep/19
This David Hull guy is not 6'5". Kane looks 3.5"-4" taller than Hull in that shot, which would mean Kane is almost 6'9", Lol, but we have more solid evidence of Kane pictured with people who we have a better guage of what their heights are and I can say with certainty that Kane isn't 6'7" anymore.

IMO, he's still 6'6" on a good day, but 6'5.5" is arguable.

The black dude who says he is 6'6": let's be realistic, he could be claiming shoe height or simply slightly inflating, come on we know Kane can't be over 6'7" in 2019. That dude might be 6'4.5" and Kane looks 6'6" there.

For real why is that when someone claims a certain height that makes someone look as listed it's not questioned at all and seen as "solid evidence" but let's say someone is 6'3" and meets Kane and gets a picture and Kane only looks 6'5" then it's hella questioned and gets a huge observation and people will start to say oh wow bad angles or he's downplaying etc etc. I agree with Roderick and Carls he isn't 6'7" anymore.

For people who don't want to read the whole thing, I don't think that black dude is 6'6" and I don't think David Hull is 6'5". Kane looks too tall in those pics for them to be the height they claim.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 10/Sep/19
@DFens
How do you know if that guy's a legit 6'6"? Just because he may have claimed 6'6", doesn't mean that he is. Some guys as low as 6'4" claim 6'6", I've even seen it personally before.
Roderick said on 10/Sep/19
There is NO WAY that dude in the pic with Kane is 6'6". That would mean Kane is still 6'8", which we all know isn't Kane's height. I'd say Kane looks 2 inches taller, placing that guy at around 6'4". He is probably adding 2 inches to his height. But that pic does go to show that Kane still looks around 6'6" with good posture. He probably isn't as low as 6'5" flat.
NM said on 10/Sep/19
That guy that claims 6’6 (probably a bit shorter) also has a photo with Nash

Here’s what he looks like with both Kane and Kevin Nash
Click Here

He also has pictures with DDP and Billy Gunn and he’s about an inch taller than them so maybe he’s 6’4.5 or 6’5 with a shaved head when standing completely upright
Roderick said on 10/Sep/19
@Lyle I don't know personally, I doubt he was as low as 6'5" barefoot at his peak.
Carls110 said on 10/Sep/19
If this guy with afro is 6'6, Kane looks over 6'8 lol, impossible
Kane is 6'6.5 max right now, at best.
Carls said on 10/Sep/19
@DFens Kane looks about 2 inches taller than that guy. The shoulder height difference in particular is really noticable. Kurt Angle just posted his recent photo with Kane and the height difference is still about the same as during their wrestling days. I mean if Glenn Jacobs really standing straight up, Kurt's head would be below his chin.

Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Sep/19
@rawdshaq
Weightlifting straps don't do anything when it comes to increasing your weight or reps, at least not from my experience and the experience from many others. I believe it's just a marketing scam.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 9/Sep/19
6'6" is not hilarious at all, he is right around that, actually just down to 6'5.75. Peak 200cm, 201cm is possible but in my opinion start to be pushing him. With shoes on he did look 6'8" in his prime for who met him back than
Chris Williams said on 9/Sep/19
@vegas

Great video of corporate Kane next to Randy Orton. They were both also wearing dress shoes. Further evidence showing Kane is still min 6’7

Stop with these dumb claims of him being 6’6 and 6’5
ced said on 9/Sep/19
In that picture with the 6'6 guy, Kane looks about 6'7.5 still (depending on footwear). He almost looks 6'8. But if that guy is truly 6'6, then Kane is still 6'7.5
Lyle said on 8/Sep/19
@Roderick I really want to see this UK Magazine with his 6ft5 claim in it
Canson said on 8/Sep/19
Roderick said on 6/Sep/19
@Canson There is a YouTube comment of a 6'2" guy who met Kane and said he was short and thought he was "like 6'5".

Somebody also claims that there was a UK magazine with an interview with Kane that he admitted he was only 6'5".

Claims, not facts, but definitely interesting claims....

Very interesting! And even in my case while I believe he’s a bit taller, stranger things have happened. And we are talking about pro wrestling lol
DFens said on 7/Sep/19
Kane with a legit 6'6" guy (@bobbymitchelldx on Instagram)

That makes Kane at least 6'7" with good posture.

Click Here
DFens said on 7/Sep/19
Anthony T said on 21/Aug/19
I'm sorry if this has been posted. Here is Glenn Jacobs with 6'5 David Hull. I'm happy with the 6'7-6'7.5 listing. I would say he would've been very close if not bang on 6'8 earlier in his career
Click Here
------------------

That makes Kane at least 6,7" today.
rawdshaq said on 6/Sep/19
I think it is to note that Kane claimed 290lb last year going into 2019.

He mentioned that he could squat 600lb, deadlift 550, and bench 525 in his prime years.

I think with a bench shirt, some straps, and maybe a little warmup, on a strong day for Kane he might have been able to PR 525.

But the problem is: he claimed that it was 100% raw. That might be a little hard to believe, but I suppose it's not impossible. It might have been in 2000-qq2002 when he was in his prime physique. I can believe the other two claims, just a little iffy on the bench.

He did have the arms and the chest for a bencher though. An absolute beast in his prime, heck he still is today.
Roderick said on 6/Sep/19
@Canson There is a YouTube comment of a 6'2" guy who met Kane and said he was short and thought he was "like 6'5".

Somebody also claims that there was a UK magazine with an interview with Kane that he admitted he was only 6'5".

Claims, not facts, but definitely interesting claims....
edwards said on 6/Sep/19
@riccardo
yes he may not be 6'7 anymore but i know one thing for sure he us def taller than the undertaker.yes not by much maybe by 1/4 or 2/4 but he def is taller.ofcourse bros of destruction met him,there are so may posters here who have met kane and taker both and said kane is taller.yes kane towers over taker in wrestling ring due to his lifts .he edges taker by 2/2.5 inch in wrestling ring.lifts are the suspect in this case but only bros of destruction has said taker is taller but rest of posters who have met says kane is taller.this is the first time i heard in my life snd celebs height that someone said taker is taller.kane isnt inch or two taller than taker but ofcourse he is taller whether it is by less than cm or mm or even half inch and i am def sure.not trying for excuses or anything.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 6/Sep/19
Canson@

I suspect that people who met Kane and guessed him at 6'7"/6'7.5" are not counting his footwear. So I agree he was 6'7" 6'7.5 when they met him, minus the shoes we have a 6'6"/6'5.75 guy.

Come on guys, we all know he is not 6'7.5 leave alone absurd 6'8".
This man is max 6'6.25 and it would still surprise me because I think he is definitely less then that.
Creeper said on 5/Sep/19
Kane being 6'6" is absolutely hilarious let alone 6'5". It's a joke.

I can see Kane being 6'6.75 after a day in the gym now. He does a lot of cardio nowadays so yeah he might drop under 6'7 at 8 PM after his shower. It's possible. I am 100% certain his height is 6'7. Nobody who meets Kane ever says anything less. I can't see him with good posture on a stadiometer only being read as 6'6. Just no way in hell.

Just watch the clip "Randy Orton jokes with the authority" on YouTube. He clearly has Orton by a solid 3 inches and is just 2-3 inches shorter than Big Show, who is about 6'10 today. He is at LEAST 6'7. Prove me wrong
Canson said on 5/Sep/19
Riccardo 5'7" said on 5/Sep/19
Canson@

Why you are so surprised reading Undertaker is taller than Kane?

You always saw both of them inside a WWE ring and we all saw wich kind of footwear kane wore. (A-train inside WWE always looked 6'6" but he isn't, who knows why...)

I'm 5'7" and my brother I guess is no more than 1 cm shorter than me. Everyone guess me confortably taller than him like 4-5 cm just because I use to wear more high shoes than him. He wears flat shoes, is his style.
I always have a footwear advantage, but in reality we are both same height and people think that I'm definitely the taller one.

Bros of distruction can be wrong, but what I care about is to show you that wrestling is fake and that the gap between kane and Undertaker is not what appear in television but they are equal.

Yea to me it still seems odd but you made some great points. It may have had to do with footwear. But even people who have met Kane believed him to be 6’7”. I don’t know of anyone personally who has met him though. 6’5” seems extremely low based on how he looked next to Hogan before too. Then again I’ve seen maybe once or twice where they looked much closer but not sure if that was Hogan at his peak
Riccardo 5'7" said on 5/Sep/19
Canson@

Why you are so surprised reading Undertaker is taller than Kane?

You always saw both of them inside a WWE ring and we all saw wich kind of footwear kane wore. (A-train inside WWE always looked 6'6" but he isn't, who knows why...)

I'm 5'7" and my brother I guess is no more than 1 cm shorter than me. Everyone guess me confortably taller than him like 4-5 cm just because I use to wear more high shoes than him. He wears flat shoes, is his style.
I always have a footwear advantage, but in reality we are both same height and people think that I'm definitely the taller one.

Bros of distruction can be wrong, but what I care about is to show you that wrestling is fake and that the gap between kane and Undertaker is not what appear in television but they are equal.
Creeper said on 4/Sep/19
Obviously 6'5 for Kane is just playing around, right?

I swear I would bet a million dollars that this guy isn't under 6'7 when he's standing his tallest to be measured. Maybe 6'6.75 after a long day at the gym but his afternoon height I promise he is still 6'7 mid day standing tall. I swear time after time people meet this guy and still say he looked 6'7 there is just NO way he's under that afternoon height!
viper said on 4/Sep/19
I'm open to the possibility of Kane being 6-6. I doubt shorter.
edwards said on 4/Sep/19
@canson
i seriously cant digest listening that taker is taller than kane.maybe i could wrong but taker had a beanie cap which may add him half inch to inch and also he may have footwear advantages.honestly snd personally,i myself i am not seeing taker bding taller or atleast same as kane.how is it even possible.taker looks visibly shorter thsn strowman and again kane out of gear/wwe looks visibly taller than strowman,bros of destruction himself aint sure and sometimes says max 6'6 but chance of being under is likely and again he says he is 6'3 or 6'3.5 and max 3 inch,tbh o personally doubt on bros of destruction honestly.there is something wrong seriously.
Canson said on 4/Sep/19
edwards said on 3/Sep/19
@riccardo
bros of destruction never said taker is 6'6.he said 6'6 is most taker or said the max height taker can be 6'6 today.but chances of taker being under 6'6 is likely.he never said taker is 6'6,he said taker is likely under 6'6 but flat 6'6 is most he would give to taker.

@Edwards: it’s a strange case with his encounter. Once he said max 6’6” but then said max 3” taller on the Taker page yesterday. Bros of Destruction did look around 6’6” with him being a claimed 6’3.5”. Wonder if he meant that Taker has a shot at 6’6.5”??? That seems awfully high. I agree with your estimate for him. Full 6’6” def possible and 6’5.5-6’6 is equally. But Kane being shorter would mean 6’5 range lol
Canson said on 4/Sep/19
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Sep/19
@Canson
If Kane's 6'7" today, then Undertaker would be no less than 6'6.25", which I can't see.

@Christian: Taker is a weird case. His posture is bad in pics. I agree that he doesn’t look anything over a solid 6’6” but at the same time I’ve seen some pics where he can look 6’5” such as at first glance with Kevin Love. I think his posture has some issues. I think a measurement of 6’6” is more likely than a flat 6’5” just as 6’5.5” or .75 would be. Interestingly Bros of Destruction thought that he was taller than Kane which really surprised me. That would make Kane effectively 6’5” range today if He’s shorter than Taker

@Edwards: I would’ve definitely said Kane at their peak! And I would still say it today. What Bros of Destruction said really shocks me as like Christian said he can look taller than Taker. Thanks for all of your support!
Roderick said on 3/Sep/19
IMO, Kane is visibly shorter than 6'7" range guys like Magic Johnson and Kevin Love, but visibly taller than 6'5" range guys like Kobe Bryant and Michael Jordan. I think 6'6" for Kane is perfect, but he could be as low as 6'5.5" too.
Dream said on 3/Sep/19
@Canson

If not 6’7” today, he’s probably like 1/16th under it or 1/8 under it, at worst. Maybe 6’6.75” today, but no lower. 6’6.25”-6’6.5” seemed much too low.

I don’t think he was 6’8”, but I do think he was over 6’7”, in his heydays.
edwards said on 3/Sep/19
@canson
first of all i miss you and take care
lets say a peak taker was 6'7.25 and peak kane 6'7.50 or simply 6'7.5.i always thought that kane was tad taller than taker.
edwards said on 3/Sep/19
@riccardo
bros of destruction never said taker is 6'6.he said 6'6 is most taker or said the max height taker can be 6'6 today.but chances of taker being under 6'6 is likely.he never said taker is 6'6,he said taker is likely under 6'6 but flat 6'6 is most he would give to taker.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Sep/19
@Canson
If Kane's 6'7" today, then Undertaker would be no less than 6'6.25", which I can't see.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 2/Sep/19
Click Here

In this video for few seconds you can see the poster brosofdestruction with his brother, Kane and Undertaker.

Everyone is claiming 6'7" or even 6'8"(😂😂) is simply wrong.
Canson said on 2/Sep/19
I’m now of the belief that he was always slightly taller than Undertaker even at Taker’s peak. 6’7” is possible today but so is something like 200cm
Xpac99 said on 2/Sep/19
@roderick
If mcintyre is 6ft4 1/2 and sometimes he looks taller than that, why do you think taker is 6ft5 next to him?
Click Here
Did you see only 1/2 an inch between this 2? Came on undertaker looks decent 6ft6. He listed at 6ft6 1/2 but 6ft6 6.25 is arguable not less
Creeper said on 1/Sep/19
Kane has never looked under 6'7 in a pair of dress shoes with good posture. He is still very close to 6'8. Seriously someone post a pic of Kane standing tall and still looking just 6'6 let alone 6'5. I'm not denying that he doesnt look short at times but only with bad posture. I still believe that Kane going to the doctor in his early hours and getting measured they might still read him as 6'8. He's massive.
Creeper said on 31/Aug/19
Click Here

Rare video of Kane standing with good posture. Not under 6'7 when he was at age of 48
Roderick said on 31/Aug/19
Did we forget how tall Undertaker looked next to Drew Mcintyre? Undertaker looked 6'5". People who still go over 6'6" for this guy.... .....
edwards said on 31/Aug/19
@christian
yes dude i agree fully with you,when the last time kane and taker met,which was in super showdown in melbourne,kane has 3/4 on taker when both guys were standing straight.the listing for baron corbin is also too high which he should be flat 6'6 and strowman too is too high.rob still wont downgrade undertaker which everyone can agree has lost height and seems mostly under 6'6 even with straight posture.he still wont downgrade taker so its very very very unlikely he will ever lower corbin and strowman who are too young to lose any height unlike taker who is losing height drastically.eventually rob should /will downgrade taker as it will become even more obvious.
edwards said on 31/Aug/19
@christian
yes dude,what you said is absolutely reasonable but we havent seen taker and kane itogether in 2019,the lasttime was in supershow in melbourne ,australia and few episodes of raw before.glenn has minimum half inch on taker.taker with straight posture was easily half inch shorter than slouching kane.i maybe wrong dude and you msy not agree with me but in suershowdown lasttime with dimilar footeear and similar posture,taker looked more than half inch shorter than kane imho.taker looks noticeably shorter in 2019 than he was in lets say 2017/18
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 30/Aug/19
@Edwards
But I can't quite see Kane being a full inch taller though. 1/2"-3/4" is my estimate.
rawdshaq said on 30/Aug/19
Click Here

Click Here

Kane could have been a little over 6'7" at his peak. I can believe 6'7.5" but I'm not too sure on the full 6'8". He can look it sometimes but with help of some extra footwear (lifts).

He has shrunk a lot. This is what a now 52 year old Kane looks like next to a 5'7" guy like Daniel Bryan, he clearly isn't 6'7" anymore. Click Here

I'm going to say he is 6'6" at most today. It's possible he is even shorter than that, like a weak 6'6". Similar to Undertaker. He also looks really cut now, probably nowhere near 300 pounds. 275 at the absolute most IMO.
Johan 185 cm said on 30/Aug/19
Click Here

-------

Last year at a fund raiser.

Click Here

As of 2018 there is absolute max 0.5 inch between them if that.

I have Taker today at 6'6.25" so Glenn would be 6'6.25-6'6.75" absolute max. I will go with 6'6.5" in the middle.
Chris Simon said on 30/Aug/19
@Sotiris great photo there with Ron Paul, further evidence Kane is still 6’7
edwards said on 30/Aug/19
@christian
dude,i agree on all and every think you said. Kane's still 1/2" taller than Taker minimum. If Taker's 6'5.75" , then Kane's 6'6.25" at least.but dude i personally think kane has more height on taker than ever because taker is losing height drastically.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 30/Aug/19
@Edwards
Me either. Kane's still 1/2" taller than Taker minimum. If Taker's 6'5.75" (IMO), then Kane's 6'6.25" at least.
Sotiris Gravas said on 29/Aug/19
Ron Paul (footwear advantage) w/ 5'10" Jay Leno (2011)... Click Here

Recent pic of height-loss Paul (now 84 years old) w/ Kane... Click Here

If ppl still wanna think that this guy is 6'7", then go for it, you have my blessing. I'll stick to what I think.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 29/Aug/19
Look here Click Here Kane make Nathan Jones 6'8 3/4 max and that is what i estimate NJ to be not 6'10 as he claim. Rob had Kane current height correct but not Nathan Jones.
edwards said on 29/Aug/19
@roderick
sorry but personally i cant see taker being similar in height to kane currently
The Ben said on 28/Aug/19
Looks like a 6'6 guy to me these days. Perhaps 6'7 peak.
Dan Trojan said on 27/Aug/19
Yes sotiris i have my umbrella with me right now short jokes i've heard them so much they don't even bother me so nice try keep going it's only gonna prove my point that you ridicule and bully people on this site all the time but i'm the hot head right lol give me a break
Roderick said on 27/Aug/19
@edwards Well last year both in Knoxville and in the ring Kane didn't look much taller than Undertaker. Keep in mind, Kane has a footwear advantage over Undertaker when wrestling. The best current pics we have of the two date all the way back to March 2018 when they were in equal footwear in Knoxville when Undertaker came to support Kane for his mayor run (which he won).

IMO, they looked the same height. Some pics Undertaker even looked taller, and of course there were some when Kane looked taller, it's really hard to tell who the taller of the two is. I really can't see Kane being anymore than 0.25" taller than Undertaker. Kane is MAX 6'6.25", not 6'7". He looks 6'5" in the pic with Zack Ryder Sotiris posted.
Hany Roberts said on 27/Aug/19
Keyboard wars about height involving the same people. Face to face there is peace

😏🤧
Dan Trojan said on 27/Aug/19
I wouldn't wanna and btw kane is still over 6'6" watch people he's gonna blow up on me for saying he's wrong
Riccardo 5'7" said on 27/Aug/19
People think Kane is same height of kavin love, as consequence they think the gap between taker and Kane is like this...
Click Here

Ahhh, my god.
Philip McMullin said on 27/Aug/19
Roderick Kane is still minimum 6ft7. Hate to break it to ya.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 27/Aug/19
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Aug/19
@Christian

"If a 6'5" and change guy like you who's very good at assessing height met Kane and said he was 6'7" -- I'd believe it. I'd still question if the footwear was suspect b/c I firmly believe this man is not 6'7". No 6'7" guy looks that short next to a 5'6" guy like Rand Paul. I would definitely say that looking 6'7" is not the same as actually being that height."

Yeah exactly what I always said.
It's not an insult, but I'm simply waiting a 6'5" range guy that csn meet one of this wrestlers.
If I meet Kane right now the first thing I would do is look at his boots. Because if he looks 6'7" there it's because of his footwear.
But, most likely, I would still be wrong at guessing his height because I'm almost a foot shorter. Almost... 😉
Anthony T said on 27/Aug/19
Skip to the 3min mark and you can clearly see with both men standing straight and on level ground, Kane is the taller man
Click Here
Anthony T said on 27/Aug/19
You guys seem to be ignoring a photo of Glenn with a legitimate 6'5 guy. Glenn is a little relaxed and over 50 and is still easily 2+ inches taller than a young guy standing as straight as possible who even says in the caption that Glenn is 6'8
Dan Trojan said on 27/Aug/19
Sotiris you know what the funny thing is if i had said taker was 6'5" after i met him you wouldn't have questioned it but because i said i believed he was over it you do because you truly believe he's not which is fine i've already said i respect your opinion but in the end this has nothing to do with my height and you know it
Riccardo 5'7" said on 27/Aug/19
Roderick

I agreed with your post, if I can say something I would say that inside WWE they didn't look identical in height because of kane's footwear advantage.
But outside ring no, they are equal
Riccardo 5'7" said on 27/Aug/19
Roderick said on 25/Aug/19
Honestly Sotiris isn't really wrong I mean there is just no damn way Kane is 6'7". Personally, I think I'm okay at guessing heights. I met 6'5"-6'6" guys who I thought were like 6'8" before but that was before they came clean and told me their real height, which wasn't close to 6'8".

I don't think people are accurately guessing Kane's height, a 6'6" guy can easily be mistaken for 6'7".

Kane is just no way in hell 6'7" today. If he pulls off measuring 6'7", then he sure in hell is really good at looking 6'5" range a lot.

Kane is probably 6'6" (6'6.25" max) now.




I completely agree, completely
rawdshaq said on 26/Aug/19
Can we not argue beyond the height seriously its so childish from everyone. We shouldn't be laughing at each other and making personal attacks we should be respecting each other's opinion and try to reason with it and see how we can apply it to our own estimates. I mean most of us get along but sometimes people insult each other and just create a bad vibe. Just be nice to each other, it's not hard.

Also @Roderick I agree. In 2019 he isn't 6'7" anymore. He has shrunk a lot.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 26/Aug/19
@Creeper
I doubt that Kane was ever 6'8" though. He was known to have worn lifts back in the day. I can maybe see peak 6'7.5" max like Rob has listed him, but also 6'7" peak too.

@Sotiris
You're right, it's not concrete evidence that Kane's 6'7". But meeting someone is a better method than just going by pics and clips. I don't know about Yoinkers, but Dream is a credible (at least IMO) poster, so I doubt he would be that off. But then again, he's only 5'9" range, so guessing someone around 9"-10" taller isn't easy and can lead to a bigger margin of error.
edwards said on 26/Aug/19
@roderick
I dont know what you say whether you agree or not but kane has more height on taker now than he has before.in the past ,both were equal with kane being .25 taller than taker at peak.have you seen kane and taker recently.and the answer is NO.yes but not at the same time.taker has shrink more height than kane.even at wwe supershow down in australia last year 2018,kane had half inch to almost .75 on taker.
Philip McMullin said on 26/Aug/19
@John barrett Thats a hell of a reply...nice come back! Are you this fan? killed me lol I believe kane is still at weakest 6ft7.25 and his morning height is 6ft8.25
Sotiris Gravas said on 26/Aug/19
@John barrett I'm Batman... Click Here (In real life, the Penguin isn't that 5'6" actor, Robin Lord Taylor... It's Dan Trojan, who claims 5'6".)


P.S. I use pics of different fans, not just one. (What I love is that there was a small smudge on my laptop screen -- a small dot that lined up perfectly w/ the period of the previous sentence; pretty cool. I'm easily amused. Damn, no dot at the end of that sentence. Rats! Nor that one.)



@Dan Trojan Don't forget to kiss my (bleep).
Roderick said on 25/Aug/19
Honestly Sotiris isn't really wrong I mean there is just no damn way Kane is 6'7". Personally, I think I'm okay at guessing heights. I met 6'5"-6'6" guys who I thought were like 6'8" before but that was before they came clean and told me their real height, which wasn't close to 6'8".

I don't think people are accurately guessing Kane's height, a 6'6" guy can easily be mistaken for 6'7".

Kane is just no way in hell 6'7" today. If he pulls off measuring 6'7", then he sure in hell is really good at looking 6'5" range a lot.

Kane is probably 6'6" (6'6.25" max) now.

@Yoinkers You are probably mistaking 4'-4.5" for 6". It's a common mistake in guessing heights for tall guys. Dude, there is just no way in hell Kane is 6'7.5", even at his peak that's a little too much.

@Dan Trojan No hard feelings, it's cool. Just to think how hard it is for me as a 5'11" guy to guess the heights of tall people, I could only imagine how hard it would be to guess a tall guy, like Undertaker's height, at 5'6". Now you said he is 6'6" which honestly isn't bad considering you are 5'6". I personally place him a little bit under that at 6'5.5"-6'5.75" but 6'6" is still POSSIBLE, just pretty unlikely. I've rolled out everything over 6'6".

Final note, it's hilarious how the same people who say 6'5.5" or so for Undertaker would say 6'7" for Kane, but they both identical in the ring? If one is taller, imo, it's Kane, but it's not by much at all. They are pretty much the same height. Undertaker is 6'6" max, and Kane is 6'6.25" max, both probably 6'5.75" and 6'6".

@edwards I see your point with the Undertaker shrinking vs Kane shrinking thing, but honestly with my eyes, they look the same height.
Dan Trojan said on 25/Aug/19
I have a volatile personality that's hilarious i see you lash out at people all the time especially when they don't agree with you your estimates are only pictures half if them you haven't even met rob has met a lot and you still say most of his estimates are wrong i'm sorry but i'd trust him more than you and i don't plan on apologizing you can say whatever you want about me
Yoinkers 6'1.5" said on 25/Aug/19
Christian, also I met him, and he looked at least 6'7 to me when standing tall. I'm 6'1.5" (6'2" in the morning, when the meeting was held) and he had 6 inches on me. So he looked 6'8 for a morning height, but his afternoon height is actually probably 6'7.5 or just 6'7. People here who say 6'4-6'5 are CRAZY.
John barrett said on 25/Aug/19
I love when Sotiris Gravas uses a fan to show wrestlers height next to this fan but isn't strange this fan is always used by Sotiris? Are you this fan Sotiris?
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Aug/19
@Christian

If a 6'5" and change guy like you who's very good at assessing height met Kane and said he was 6'7" -- I'd believe it. I'd still question if the footwear was suspect b/c I firmly believe this man is not 6'7". No 6'7" guy looks that short next to a 5'6" guy like Rand Paul. I would definitely say that looking 6'7" is not the same as actually being that height.

Let's all remember how Kane looked very not 6'7" in wrestling boots next to a MAX 5'7" guy like Daniel Bryan... Click Here


If a guy like Dan Trojan -- who claims to be 5'6" -- meets Undertaker, and swears up and down that the man is 100% 6'6" or more, it's of very little value to me (pardon the pun).
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Aug/19
@Dan Trojan

I had a feeling you might explode like that b/c you definitely suffer from an emotionally volatile personality which causes you to lash out at ppl for any perceived threat. You're pathetic.


Please try and keep your massive Napoleon complex in check, little man.


I simply said you were "supposedly" 5'6". When, if ever, did I say you or anyone else was lying about their height, save for a proven liar like Ben Bell? Never, that's when. Do I believe that ppl are often wrong about their height? Yes. I've read about posters on this site who were measured by Rob and much to their surprise and chagrin -- they were much shorter than they had believed.

Do I think that a 5'6" guy can accurately gauge if someone is 6'5" or 6'6" when meeting them? Of course not. You're too short. Or haven't you noticed?


All of this vitriol aimed at me simply b/c I said you were supposedly 5'6". Your histrionics are an embarrassment. And to think you have the nerve to call me childish, you ridiculous joke.


I have news for you, I couldn't care less if an emotionally disturbed person like you disapproves of my posts. Feel free to ignore ALL of them. Do you honestly think the opinion of someone like you could ever be of any great import to actual adults?

NEWSFLASH: my estimates are far more accurate than the delusional ppl who troll this site.

And please, spare me any future apologies. I don't give a damn.
Dan Trojan said on 24/Aug/19
Sotiris i've respected your opinion lately i've even defended you on multiple occasions but i don't respect you accusing me of lying about my height
Creeper said on 24/Aug/19
Christian ya But he certainly looks it too so we have evidence to back up that claim. He looked 6'8+ next to Big Show in every staredown they had in the 90s. So with photographic evidence + nice, kind, seemingly guy + 6'8 claim leaves me to believe this dude was at least 6'8.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Aug/19
@Sotiris
I don't know about that. At least two people now have claimed to met Kane and said that he looks at least 6'7".
Creeper said on 23/Aug/19
Um Sotiris Gronk is standing like hes getting measured whereas Kane is standing loose and like Yoinkers says he stands loose in public but getting measured its a different story.

Kane is minimum 6'7 today when being measured he is 52 so hes lost a lot of good posture
Canson said on 23/Aug/19
@Sotiris: Strahan May be 6’4” still but I doubt over that
Dan Trojan said on 23/Aug/19
Sotiris i love how whenever something doesn't suit your needs you claim someone is lying about their heigh you've said that about every single person who has met the undertaker i am 5'6" and yes that is an evening height my morning height is 5'6.75" i made sure i measured myself the day before i met him i know how tall i am you don't believe me that's fine i don't have time to argue with you about childish crap just because it doesn't suit your needs so go ahead show all your pictures more than half thw people on here don't even pay attention to you anyway
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 23/Aug/19
@Creeper
You're being too naive to believe someone's a certain height just because they claimed it. Kane might be a nice guy but that doesn't mean he's being honest with his height.
Yoinkers said on 23/Aug/19
Resident of Knoxville :)

I got to shake hands with Kane this week when he was giving a speech about politics or whatever and when I heard Kane was doing this not too far from my house I had to see him JUST to see how tall he looked. Yeah, Im height obsessed.

So what I first seen is that wow hes actually not that tall I thought he was like 6'3 (Lol!) from the distance when he was talking to people but now heres the thing Im 6'1.5 to be exact and I didnt feel he was much taller than me. Even when he was on stage talking I felt like he only appeared as a 6'2 6'3 guy which was super strange.

Now at the end I seen Kane shaking hands and talking with people so I wanted to go up and say thank you Mayor without it being weird and yes I was shy because Im just a citizen and you have all these people who are actually interested in the speech Lol and so I built up the courage to say thank you and MAN was he built and all the sudden it felt like he had grown a LOT just by turning around and smilimg to say "my pleasure!". He was a huge guy.

Now in those like 15 seconds I could tell he loses a lot of height by standing loose but he stood up when he faced me and he looked 6'7.5 he was like 6 inches taller than me. With loose posture no joke he can look like he's a 6'4 guy but he stood up for a second to shake my hand (his hands were massive and he has a tight grip) and he did look 6'7.5. Also, he was wearing an ordinary dress shoe, and so was I so it cancels out.

My data I gathered that day is that Kane is probably still getting measured at at least 6'7 still but can stand really short. Also just by his handshake I could tell he was as strong as an ox.
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Aug/19
I love the way that 6'5.75" Gronk TOWERED over Zack Ryder (who's NOT 6'2" LOL), MORE than Kane in the pics I posted... and ppl here are STILL insisting he's 6'7"...

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA... You get the idea...


No, please... LOL... go back to simply ignoring ANYTHING I post which proves you wrong, lol.
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Aug/19
Again, Kane and 5'6" Rand Paul... Click Here , Click Here

Maybe 6'3.75" Michael Strahan and 5'6.5" Jon Stewart... Click Here

Strahan w/ 6'5" CC Sabathia... Click Here

Strahan w/ maybe 6'6.5" Aaron Judge... Click Here

Sabathia w/ maybe 5'7" (Rob says 5'7.5") Robert De Niro... Click Here

Undertaker w/ supposedly 5'6" Dan Trojan... Click Here
Creeper said on 21/Aug/19
Honestly Kane interviews he comes off as a real nice and kind guy no ego no nothing and he absolutely doesn't appear to have any shame in his career why would he lie about his height 6'8 seems just about right for Kane and if anything he states the lowest estimation of 6'8 he was probably 6'8.5 peak and probably is now down to about 6'7. 6'8 is still what he measures in shoes so for me its perfectly safe to claim as long as he can measure it without lifts tippy toes etc. Kane for me has shrunk about an inch since peak and hes 52 so ya 6'7 seems right.
Anthony T said on 21/Aug/19
I'm sorry if this has been posted. Here is Glenn Jacobs with 6'5 David Hull. I'm happy with the 6'7-6'7.5 listing. I would say he would've been very close if not bang on 6'8 earlier in his career
Click Here
edwards said on 21/Aug/19
@roderick
kane has pulled 6'10 at times at peak ofcource with boots.
as for barefoot at peak i have peg kane at 6'7.5 and 6'10 in boots.
as for taker,i have him at 6'7.25 at peak barefoot and 6'8.5 on boots.
in the podcast by bruce pitchard in 1999,he revealed that taker also wore inner lift whereas kane wore outer visible lifts.he said both were similar in height with kane being a hair taller than taker.

ofcource your and sotirus estimation is also reasonable.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 20/Aug/19
@Creeper
There's no way Ryder's 6'2". He was billed 6'1" a long time ago. Click Here He doesn't look 6'2" next to other wrestlers anyway.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 20/Aug/19
Ps:

Sure Kane lies about his weight.
But, in general, I don't think these guys measured them self every day, and I doubt they know how much height they lost during the day.
They simply claim their height in shoes, probably from past mesuraments, and they keep claiming that.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 20/Aug/19
My opinion, without any proves, is that Kane has always been between 6'6.5 and 6'7". With shoes on about 6'8", wich is the height he claims.

Today he is 6'6" max(6'7" in normal shoes and 6'8" and change still in WWE boots) he lost less height compared to the undertaker who in a recent interview claimed 6'8.
He isn't 6'8" not even in shoes today, he is stuck with the past.
Roderick said on 19/Aug/19
Zack Ryder is probably 6'0" lol
ced said on 19/Aug/19
@Sotiris, wow.. What do I think? I think that Kane has lost a lot of height since 2004 lol. Probably a good inch.

As for the Harris Brothers, judging by the photos you posted of everyone:

DOA: 6'5 - 6'5.25.
Sid: 6'6.5-6'6.75
Brian Lee: 6'3.25-6'3.5
Crush: (interesting one - looks as if he's the same height as the Harris Bros, but then the stare down with Taker, Taker looks like he only has him by an inch, or 1.5 by the most. I'll say 6'5 for Crush, Undertaker between 6'6.5 and 6'6.75.
Kane: Prime: 6'7.25 | 2008: 6'7 | 2019: 6'6.5
Roderick said on 18/Aug/19
So I've been watching TONS of Kane interviews and what is funny is Kanes height is actually a common question from most interviewers. He is VERY consistent with the 6'8" claim, and can say it with a straight face.

It makes me wonder if Kane thinks he is really 6'8"... Now I peg him at 6'7" peak and maybe now 6'6.25"... does he just claim his shoe height? Or did he just add 1 inch to make his 6'7" turn into 6'8"?

What's funny is one dude brought up Kane's 7'0" billing on Wikipedia and Kane laughed and said, "well, you can't trust everything you read on the internet."

I really don't blame wrestlers for lying about their heights I mean who knows maybe they are taught to or something to help protect kayfabe. If all wrestlers were honest then the billings would be pointless.

But that logic may not make sense because a lot of wrestlers are honest about their heights to some degree. John Cena is probably the only 100% honest wrestler.

Also one last opinion from you guys, I'm 5'11", but sometimes I say 6 feet, is that really that bad? Thoughts? Am I lying?
Creeper said on 17/Aug/19
Sotiris Zack Ryder is probably 6'2 as billed and I see 5 inches there so Kane is 6'7 still and he really isn't even standing that straight so maybe 6'7.5 but hes for sure not less than 6'7.
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Aug/19
@ced I doubt the DOA were as tall as Kane and Undertaker, seeing as they were only billed as 6'7", especially given that as "The Harris Brothers," they were only billed as 6'5". What's very interesting is that they look just as tall as Kane when seen w/ the same fan:

Here they are w/ a fan (2008)... Click Here

Same fan w/ Kane... (2004) Click Here , (2008) Click Here Click Here , Click Here , and here Click Here
Kane/Sid comparison w/ same fan... Click Here

W/ Big Cass (2011)... Click Here

W/ Matt Morgan (2009)... Click Here

W/ Braun Strowman (2010)... Click Here



Harris brothers w/ Chris, a CelebHeights poster who claims he's 6'1.25"... Click Here
Chris w/ an older Hillbilly Jim... Click Here , Click Here
Chris w/ Eugene and William Regal... Click Here

Here's DOA w/ Chainz, billed as 6'7" (LOL), and Crush (billed as 6'6")... Click Here , Click Here

DOA and Chainz... Click Here

Chainz (aka Underfaker) w/ Undertaker... Click Here
Crush w/ Taker (1993)... Click Here , and here... Click Here



So, what do you think, dude?
ced said on 15/Aug/19
@Sotiris.. Do you think the DOA was as tall as Kane and Undertaker? Specifically 8-Ball and Skull. Those were some big boys.

The reason I ask is because there is a match on Sunday Night Heat they had, and it looked as if 8-Ball and Skull were told to sell height for Taker and Kane. If you look at the match, they're very "slouchy" with their posture.

Also there's another video when Brian Lee (Chainz) called out Kane and he got in the ring. Then Taker came to save him. Taker and Kane were standing in the middle, and one of the Harris Brothers was behind Taker and looked to have been the same height as him.

What do you think?
Sotiris Gravas said on 14/Aug/19
Here's max 6'2.5" Hogan w/ (billed 6'2") Zack Ryder (2019)... Click Here

Ryder w/ Kane (2019)... Click Here

Does Kane look 6'7" there? Hell, no.

6'5.75" Gronk w/ listed 6'4" Dean Muhtadi (aka billed 6'4" Mojo Rawley) and Zack Ryder:
Click Here

Mojo Rawley and Zack Ryder... Click Here
Nik Ashton said on 14/Aug/19
341 voters think he is currently 6 foot 7 1/8!
Riccardo 5'7" said on 14/Aug/19
I don't understand why people enjoy claiming Kane is 6'7". While he is equal with Sid and Undertaker both 6'5" and 6'5.5/6'5.75.

Edwards did you ever saw Kane boots? Wearing them he was 1 inch/1 inch an a half taller the Undertaker.
Kane, excluding footwear and WWE lies, could easily be just 6'5.5 today. But let's say 6'6".

Really... How Kane is 6'7", please someone show me.
There are pictures in wich he is taller or equal with guys like Kavin Love? Because I didn't see these pics.
He doesn't look 1 foot taller then 5'6"/5'7"/5'8" guys absolutely.
So where you all take informations about kane being 6'7"?
Riccardo 5'7" said on 14/Aug/19
I don't understand why people enjoy claiming Kane is 6'7". While he is equal with Sid and Undertaker both 6'5" and 6'5.5/6'5.75.

Edwards did you ever saw Kane boots? Wearing them he was 1 inch/1 inch an a half taller the Undertaker.
Kane, excluding footwear and WWE lies, could easily be just 6'5.5 today. But let's say 6'6".

Really... How Kane is 6'7", please someone show me.
There are pictures in wich he is taller or equal with guys like Kavin Love? Because I didn't see these pics.
He doesn't look 1 foot taller then 5'6"/5'7"/5'8" guys absolutely.
So where you all take informations about kane being 6'7"?
edwards said on 13/Aug/19
@roderick
Maybe for you,kane is 6’5 range but for rest of us,kane is more than 6’5 range.atleast weak 6’7 from me.post a photo where kane look 6’5.
Dream said on 13/Aug/19
@Sotiris

When Rob meets him, you’d probably reject his view too. Wouldn’t be a surprise, either.

Pictures only provide so much evidence. They’re helpful, but they can do so much. If anything, 6’6” seemed too look, from what I saw in person.
Roderick said on 12/Aug/19
@edwards What the hell kind of angle is that??? You can take a picture like that with a 6'1" guy and a 5'9" guy and make them look similar in height. Serves no height justice at all.

Kane isn't 6'7" anymore and it's hilariously obvious.
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Aug/19
Guys, this is 6'7" Magic w/ max 5'8" Ric Flair (2019)... Click Here

Max 6'8" Nash w/ Flair (2018)... Click Here

Again, Kane w/ only 5'6", I repeat, ONLY 5'6" Rand Paul... Click Here

See the difference? Trust me. I do. No 6'7" or even 6'6" guy on Earth looks that short next to a small dude like that.


6'7" for Kane...? Ahahahahahahahhahahhha... No offense, guys. The only way I see this guy as anywhere close to 6'7" is in lifts when making public appearances for fans.
samson said on 12/Aug/19
If you think kane was 290 300, your wrong does this look like a guys whose only 290 or 300 he looks 320 or even heavier. Click hereClick Here
Crunchy said on 12/Aug/19
I almost lost my composure laughing when I saw him standing next to Shaq and Big Show. He looked like a child compared to them.
edwards said on 11/Aug/19
@dfens
Strowman is quite close to camera while kane is back.kane is relaxed and still taller than strowman
edwards said on 11/Aug/19
@ricardo and roderick
Here is kane with big show,he is atleast minimum weak 6’7

Click Here
Canson said on 10/Aug/19
@Dream: I could see him being weak 6’7” today. The bigger wrestlers have all lost height
DFens said on 10/Aug/19
Let's not forget about these pics.

Kane, Show and Strongman.
Click Here

Kane rarely standing straight with a 6'8 guy (at his page, he's huge).

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Riccardo 5'7" said on 10/Aug/19
Kane is clearly no more then 198, no less then 197cm. Today 200cm is too much.
He is equal with undertaker, cm more cm less.
If undertaker is 197 today as I believe, Kane is max 198
Roderick said on 10/Aug/19
@Sotiris What is funny is although my friend is a legitimate 6'10", he gets a lot of guesses at like 7'1", Lol. A lot of people overestimate tall people. Maybe people who see Kane as 6'7" today, are really seeing 6'6", maybe.

My interest of height actually came in my recent years, too. Idk, I just randomly started to Google heights and I used to think Kane and Big Show were both 7'0". I remember on this episode of Smackdown, I seen Big Show and Kane together on the ropes and seen how much taller Big Show was than Kane. I never really noticed it before bc I never paid much attention to heights. I was curious so I went online many years back and found an interview of Kane saying he was 6'8". So I stuck with 6'8" for many years regarding Kane, until just a month ago when I found this website. I orginally said 6'7.75", then 6'7.5", and now just 6'7".

I used think Andre was 7'6", Lmao. I used to think Hogan was 6'8", too. Most people did and still do. We are a small community, honestly. It seems like common knowledge for us, but the average civilian when asked will tell you "Andre? He was like 7'4" wasn't he?". Just proves that WWF did a good job at billing them.

As for Studd, honestly, I just thought he was like a "boss" kinda character, Idk why.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Aug/19
I wouldn't put Kane at anything under 6'6", but not anything more than 6'7" either. 6'6.5" could be the sweet spot. He could've had more footwear advantage than Dream thought he did when he met him.
ced said on 9/Aug/19
Peak heights:

Sid: 6’7
Taker: 6’6.75-6’7
Kane: 6’7.5-6’7.75 (in lifts: 6’9ish)
Nash: 6’9
Dream said on 9/Aug/19
@Sotiris

Best to meet him in person, rather than use pictures, all the time. Not that I’m offending anyone, but Kane was a lot bigger in person than he would seem in pictures.
Roderick said on 9/Aug/19
Dude, Sotoris, in that picture with Rand Paul, Kane looks 6'3".
Sotiris Gravas said on 9/Aug/19
@Roderick It's funny... growing up, I was never height obsessed. I never stopped to think about how tall Elvis Presley might be or Lee Majors... I honestly never even once gave a single thought to how tall, say, Arnold Schwarzenegger might be (can't believe I wrote out his whole name instead of just typing "Arnie," lol), or Hulk Hogan... Same goes for the opposite end of that spectrum. Not once did I ever stop to think about how short Sly Stallone supposedly was.

I never cared about anyone's height as a kid or young adult... It was never part of my thinking process.

The only person that ever stood out to me for some reason was Big John Studd, who we all know was billed as 6'10". I can't explain it. Even though Andre was supposedly a 7'4" or even 7'5"(!) GIANT... there was no interest on my part.

Maybe he stood out from the rest b/c he was so tall, but still w/i human proportions -- a good balance between man and mountain.

Let's just say that when I found out Studd wasn't as tall as advertised, I was devastated. (Don't think he was ever more than max 6'5.5".) Here's a great video that was posted on Studd's page, showing just how "short" he could look when not wearing his internal lifts... Click Here

It was only when I stumbled upon CelebHeights about a year ago that my interest in height was piqued. Learning about "morning height" blew me away. I honestly don't think most ppl have a clue as to their real height, let alone the height of others.

So, I'm glad your friend is a legit 6'10". Give him a friendly shout-out from me. Also, was he ever a Studd fan? How 'bout you?
Dream said on 9/Aug/19
@Canson

6'6.75" would be the absolute worst, I see Kane at, today. 6'6" or 6'6.25" looked way too low. He'd definitely be taller than guys like Vitali Klitschko and Ryan Stiles.
edwards said on 8/Aug/19
@dreams
Agreed dude
edwards said on 8/Aug/19
I maybe wrong but personally i think kane is 1 inch taller than taker today.
edwards said on 8/Aug/19
@roderick
Yes dude,i agree on that.now i can buy 260-265 for taker.
Sotiris Gravas said on 8/Aug/19
@Canson I respectfully disagree, dude. At 6'7", I TOWER over 5'6" ppl...

Remember: this was Kane w/ little 5'6" Rand Paul... Click Here A 6'7" guy should look taller than that.

Look at Kane w/ 5'8" Flair (2018)... Click Here , Click Here
Flair w/ 5'8" Ludacris (2018)... Click Here

Now, look at listed 6'1" Todd Gurley w/ Flair... (2018) Click Here , Click Here

Gurley w/ 6'7.25" (listed 6'8") Calais Campbell... Click Here
W/ maybe 6'7.5" Brandon Ingram... Click Here

I'm just not seeing what you guys are seeing. Does Kane resort to wearing enhanced footwear when making public appearances w/ fans so as to appear 6'7"...? I honestly don't know what to say.



@John Tamseo Once again, you emphatically say that Vaughn was on his tippy toes... And you know this for sure how? Based on what? His shoulders? No actual proof, just "his shoulders." Gotcha.
Roderick said on 8/Aug/19
Of course 6'5.5" for Kane is possible. It's not "for sure impossible", Canson. He has actually looked that range many times even when he was a little younger.

Do I think he's 6'5.5"? No. Do I think it's possible? Yes.

IMO... I don't think there is a single chance he is 6'7". No way. He is not taller than Braun Strowman, they are at best the same height, but I'm favoring towards Braun more. What I see in those staredowns is 6'6.25" vs 6'6.5", and Kane even has a footwear advantage.

I'm starting to think Kane might be 6'6" flat.... and Undertaker at just 6'5.5".
edwards said on 8/Aug/19
@ dream dude i personally think weak 6'7 can be arguable for kane considering today.
samson said on 7/Aug/19
This is what kane looked like back in the 90s click here Click Here
Canson said on 7/Aug/19
@Sotiris: Kane is for sure not as low as 197cm. He’s easily at least 199-200 bare minimum really a solid 200 is the lowest i see for him. I’d say closer to 6’7” like Dream said he was when he met him but weak 6’7” I’ll leave open since he said he had thick shoes
Canson said on 7/Aug/19
@Dream: I would have him taller than Taker today honestly. He looks near the 6’7” mark to me. Maybe 6’6.75 worst case
John Tamseo said on 7/Aug/19
And once again Sotiris is back to the Kane and Vince Vaughn. How you cannot see that Vince is on his toes there, boggles my mind. Look at his shoulders!

Abs Kane under 6’6 is a big LOL mate
Roderick said on 7/Aug/19
@Sotiris My 6'10" friend has actually met Edge, Bad News Barrett, Bray Wyatt, Dolph Ziggler, Mark Henry, and even Hornswoggle.

This was before he was all that height obsessed so he really didnt care much about seeing how tall they were. He did tell me that Wade Barrett was almost as tall as he was, and that Edge wasn't so much shorter than him either.

He said 6'4" for Edge and 6'7" for Wade Barrett, which is obviously ridiculous and inaccurate. But this was before he knew anything about height.

I for one, have had the honor and privilege to meet The Great Khali. He was the biggest person I had ever seen. He honestly looked like he was like 370-380 pounds, and I thought he was at least 7'0". Man was an absolute GIANT. I would say he was 6'11.25"-6'11.5" without the monster shoes he was wearing.

He also looks really old and grey now for some reason, and he has chicken legs. A very impressive upper body but doesn't look like he worked out his legs a day in his life.

Honestly Kane does look 6'5" with Vince Vaughn but it looks like Vaughn is on his tippy toes. In my honest opinion I still go with 6'6.25" for Kane
Roderick said on 7/Aug/19
@edwards.. Dude your math makes no sense. You say Undertaker was "no way" 280lb (as you are always certain) and is currently 270lb. Undertaker said on Insta that he lost 20 pounds. Undertaker was fat in 2018, so yes I believe he could have easily been 280.

My money is on 280 last year and currently 260. 270 now would mean Undertaker was 290 last year.
Dream said on 7/Aug/19
@edwards

Truthfully, Kane looked sky north of 6’6” flat, in person. Couldn’t imagine him being that short, today. He looked 6’7” on the nose. He looked 6’8” because he had bigger shoes than me, but even without the bigger shoes, 6’6” flat seemed impossible, especially when I saw him at Galaxycon.
Shane Gray said on 6/Aug/19
@Creeper a 1.5 inch shoe isnt a lift. Heck, there are some basketball shoes that give that much. I wouldn't count anything as a lift that is under 1.75 inches at minimum. 2+ in general.
Sotiris Gravas said on 6/Aug/19
@Roderick Getting photos w/ celebrities isn't something that particularly interests me if they're not actresses I might have a crush on... Also, the thought of handing over $200 or more is an even bigger deterrent.

I'm not fond of putting out personal information online, given the real threat of identity theft, and don't need crazy ex-girlfriends or ppl I owe money knocking at my door, lol...

That said, I was born in Canada and I'm of Greek heritage, dude.

Would your 6'10" friend ever consider it?

I would put Kane at max 6'5.5" now, but maybe I'm wrong... but no way is he 6'7", on that I'm certain.

I actually have Vince Vaughn at 6'4" now (not 6'4.5"). Here he is w/ 6'5.75" Gronk:
Click Here

Vaughn and Kane... Click Here

Vaughn and maybe 6'3.75" Michael Strahan... Click Here

Strahan and 6'4.75" Kobe... Click Here



Vaughn and 6'5" JJ Watt (2016)... Click Here , Click Here

Watt and 6'7.25" Calais Campbell (2015)... Click Here
Creeper said on 6/Aug/19
Kane is obviously still 6'7. People don't realise that he doesn't care about looking tall anymore and now just wears normal shoes and doesn't stand straight. If he went to the doctor to get measured, no doubt he would still be 6'7+.

For those who are confused, Kane is lying about benching 525. His best bench was probably like 450. People with long arms struggle to do bench press.

Kane could definitely squat a good amount, his legs were huge. I would vote a 600 pound squat for Kane...

Anyone who thinks Kane is weak would have a great time telling that to his face... Lol
edwards said on 6/Aug/19
@canson
yes dude,i always thought that kane was .25 taller than taker.i fully agree on your estimation.as for today i personally think taker is 6'5.5-6'6 range while i personally think kane is 6'6.50-6'6.75 ,there was one dude who was also my neighbour and he said kane still pulled 6'7 with good posture but i personally dont agree with him a bit.
edwards said on 6/Aug/19
@sotiris
Maybe at peak it was arguable for kane but current i say no way,taker is like maybe 270lbs now
Roderick said on 6/Aug/19
@Sotiris Have you ever thought about meeting Kane or Undertaker at a photo convention? I think that would be an amazing piece of evidence for their heights, not saying you have to, but it would help a lot.

Some people in 2019 still think Kane is 6'7" afternoon height today. Hearing as you are 6'7" afternoon height, if you went to meet Kane and if you were taller than him, then that would put these 6'7" claims to rest. Simple. If he is the same height as you, then yes, Kane is still 6'7".

My bet is Kane would come up to around your hairline and look 6'6.25" or just 6'6" flat.

Sotiris, mind if I ask, but where are you from? Also, how tall do you think Kane currently is? I know you say 6'7" for his peak but Idk if I remember you talking about his current..
Canson said on 5/Aug/19
@Edwards: Kane May have been say 6’7.5 and Taker 6’7.25.
edwards said on 5/Aug/19
@roderick
No way was taker 280lbs in 2018 .kane easily looked much bigger and heavier than taker at 2018.more than 10lbs lol
shuvayu chakraborty said on 5/Aug/19
Guys for more information do visit Dustin Runnels (Goldust) instagram profile. There is pic from mid to late 90s when wwf toured india ... All wrestlers posing in front of Taj Mahal (All Standing in casuals). The pic says it all about their heights ... Kane was never below 6.8 in his prime
edwards said on 5/Aug/19
@canson and sotiris
I dont know what exactly guy like taker measures but personally i know that peak kane was .25 taller than peak taker.
samson said on 5/Aug/19
edwards kane was billed as 326 to 328. His real weight which he said 320 the most he ever weighed. 295 for kane is too low.
Canson said on 4/Aug/19
@Sotiris: the one thing with the heavier guys is that it takes away from their height. Gravity is more of a factor
Pierre said on 4/Aug/19
Click Here Kane and Big Show

Click Here Kane and Shaquille O'Neal

Click Here Click Here with Vince Vaughn Rob guess 6"4.5' (60 votes give 6"4.77')Vince a little bit closer to the camera imo and camera low.How many difference?1 / 1.5 inches ?
Roderick said on 4/Aug/19
@Sotiris Undertaker and Kane were both billed at around 325 pounds in the attitude era. Kane was announced usually at 326lb or 328lb. Undertaker was announced at 326lb normally but sometimes as high as 330lb.

I think it's entirely possible both their peak weights were 300 pounds. Watch some 1999 matches of Undertaker, he was massive. Kane in 2000-2002 was enormous, but after his injury and unmasking he got waaaay smaller.

Kane 1997-1999: 290lb

Kane 2000-2002: 300lb

Kane 2003-2011: 270-280lb

Kane 2012-2015: 280lb

Kane 2016-present: 290lb

Now onto UT

Undertaker 1990-1996: 280lb

Undertaker 1997-1998: 290lb

Undertaker 1999: 300lb

Undertaker 2000-2003: 285lb

Undertaker 2004-2006: 280lb

Undertaker 2007-2009: 270lb

Undertaker 2010-2013: 265lb

Undertaker 2014-2017: 275lb

Undertaker 2018: 280lb

Undertaker 2019-present: 260lb
Canson said on 4/Aug/19
@Edwards: yea for me a Peak Kane would be 6’7” and change. The about 6’8” isn’t a stretch because he would be in the morning
edwards said on 4/Aug/19
@samson
Dude,actually sotiris is true,kane aint 300 lbs neither is taker.maybe you’re going by billied height and weight.
edwards said on 4/Aug/19
@xpac99
If taker is 6’5.5 then love should be 6’8 because these dude are easily 1.5 inch apart.c’mon no way is kevin love 6’8
Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Aug/19
Just a reminder to ppl who believe kayfabe, lol: Kane was billed as 323 lbs -- meaning his real weight wasn't even close to that.

Undertaker was billed as 309 lbs -- meaning his real weight was not even close to that.

Understand, fanboys?

Let's say they exaggerated their weight by only 25 lbs... That would put Kane at 298 lbs and Taker at 284 lbs. According to "Toxxic," a wrestling magazine, Taker's billed weight was 305 lbs and his real weight was 285.

If it was by 30 lbs, that puts Kane at 293 and Taker at 279; w/ Taker at only 305, then it's 275.


I'm confused... Is samson still sticking to his story that he counted the plates...? LOL.


@Roderick No way Kane could bench more than Cena IMHO, especially given Kane's long arms.
edwards said on 3/Aug/19
Riccardo 5'7" said on 2/Aug/19
Edwards

6'7" for Kane is safe?
He is at most 6'6.25 today. And Im generous because I believe more 6'6".
If he is taller the Calaway, he is about max 0.25 today. There was never more then half inch between the 2 guys with equal footwear.
Also with vince Vaughn he is barely 1.5 inch taller, and Vaughn is a 6'4.5 max. Peak 6'5.
Absolutely impossible 6'7 today, no way.

It seems to me that a 6'2.5 guy head reach the eyes level of a 6'6 guy.
As I see from few pics. Your friend isn't 6'4.5 probably.

—————————————————————————————————
I can see that people really want to use kane/vince vaughn comparison as a reason to downgrade kane’s height,i can see it clearly.
Now downgrading my friend’s height to fit the agenda.he was always a solid 6’4.5 range guy measured on a stadio meter at 12 o clock.he is honest with his height and he records his height and weight every six months.you said if he is taller than calaway 0.25 today,taker losing much height at fast rate dosent mean kane is also losing or shrinking in same rate.for example if taker is 6’6 that dosent meant kane is 6’6.25 and again of taker is 6’5.75 that dosent mean kane is 6’6.every time taker shrinks dosent mean kane will also shrink,dosent meant that they will shrink in same rate.every time taker shrinking dosent mean kane is also shrinking.kane have clearly edged and is visibly taller than 6’6 guys like taker,strowman and corbin.he still pulls atleast weak 6’7 inside the ring.taker shrinking dosent mean kane is slso shrinking same,i can see people downgrading kane everytime’s they see taker appearing shorter.no way kane is flat 6’6
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Aug/19
Let me just say that Riccardo and Roderick are both a welcome change, in that they are a breath of fresh air to this site... as opposed to guys like samson, lol. (Hopefully, there'll be another perceptive guy w/ an "R" name that comes along.)
samson said on 2/Aug/19
Sotiris Gravas No way kane was 295 max, he was well over 300. 295 is too low for kane
Roderick said on 2/Aug/19
This is a staredown between Kane and 6'2.5" Vader. Honestly, Kane does look about 6'8" there, but it's really hard to tell who has the bigger heel in their boots (both had lifts on).

Click Here
Roderick said on 2/Aug/19
@edwards Kane still being 6'7" would mean Big Show is still 6'11" which we all know is too tall for him.

Kane is 6'6"-6'6.5" today IMO. Maybe your 6'4.5" friend didn't have the same footwear as Kane. Kane does wear big shoes. A lot of ppl who know/met him, like Dream, have said that.

He always has a footwear advantage in the ring, which makes him appear taller than he really is. If Kane had flat boots, I would have guessed him at 6'8" peak height, but that's clearly not the case.

IMO, Kane 6'7" peak, 6'6.25" today

@Sotiris I think Kane could have been 300lb in 2000-2002 which is when I believe he was at his heaviest. His arms were absolutely massive, as well as his chest and thighs.

Undertaker in 1999 might have actually been near 300lb, he was massive then.

As for Cena vs Kane in strength, here is what I think.

Bench Press - Kane (500 vs 481)

Squat - John Cena (611 vs 600)

Deadlift - John Cena (602 vs 550)

Even Big Show said John Cena was the strongest wrestler in the WWE. He said he was stronger than Lesnar even. John Cena is probably one of the strongest pro wrestlers of al time, along with Mark Henry and Big E.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 2/Aug/19
Edwards

6'7" for Kane is safe?
He is at most 6'6.25 today. And Im generous because I believe more 6'6".
If he is taller the Calaway, he is about max 0.25 today. There was never more then half inch between the 2 guys with equal footwear.
Also with vince Vaughn he is barely 1.5 inch taller, and Vaughn is a 6'4.5 max. Peak 6'5.
Absolutely impossible 6'7 today, no way.

It seems to me that a 6'2.5 guy head reach the eyes level of a 6'6 guy.
As I see from few pics. Your friend isn't 6'4.5 probably.
samson said on 1/Aug/19
Mo Obeidallah Kane in 1997 to 2001 looked well over 300, like 290 300 is too low for kane. I believe what kane said most he ever weighed was 320. Kane has no reason to lie. Undertaker I dont know about that one its possible 300
samson said on 1/Aug/19
Roderick I got a gimp shoulder, thats all I can bench press. 405 is still heavy thats good enough for me. If I didnt have a gimp shoulder perhaps I could bench more,
edwards said on 1/Aug/19
I talked to someone last time who was from same knox county and the dude was 6’4.5 and kane edged him by 2.5 and i asked him whether he was a bit height concern or just guessing what ever comes to mind and he said he was honest and height concern and according to him that kane still pulls 6’7 with a good posture.rob’s listing for kane is more accurate and reasonable.maybe with poor posture he can look under 6’7 at times but standing straight and stretching for measurement may clear it
@rob your listing for kane is safe👍
Roderick said on 1/Aug/19
@Sotiris That was the most pathetic thing I have ever seen. Lmao thanks for the good laugh. The way he put the bar back onto the holder too.... so pathetic and egotistical.

I would much rather enjoy someone doing 1 plate legitimately and say "hey, Im working out" than some skinny dude pretending to bench what is pretty much 500 pounds, Lol.
Roderick said on 1/Aug/19
@Dream Pretty much yeah. To be honest, he admitted that he never even seen Kane or Undertaker up close, but said that everyone knew how tall they both were. Kane was 6'7" and Undertaker was slightly shorter. So yeah, my original hypothesis was wrong.
Sotiris Gravas said on 1/Aug/19
First off, I doubt Kane was ever more than 295 lbs.

@Roderick You're right, dude, it's easier for a 5'10" guy to bench b/c of his shorter arms, but this is samson we're talking about, a proven liar. I don't take anything he has to say seriously.

As for John Cena, he's a former bodybuilder who LIVED in the gym, taking copious amounts of steroids over many years... Here's Cena struggling to bench only 481 lbs... Click Here (I'm guessing the red plates are 25 kg and the blue are 20.)

Cena is one of the strongest wrestlers to ever grace the WWE. If even he can't bench 500 lbs, there's no way in hell Kane could bench 500 lbs, let alone the 525 he claims, lol. ZERO chance.

Here's Big Show saying that Cena is the strongest wrestler he's seen... Click Here



That being said, let's all remember how samson COUNTED THE PLATES, lol, or that Bigger Man (no steroids) was able to bench 608 lbs at 6'11.75", 293 lbs, ahahahahaahahahahahaha...
Creeper said on 31/Jul/19
Kane was about 1 inch taller than Undertaker.

Kane's billed height was 7'0, which places his height around 6'10 in lifts.

Kane without his lifts was only 6'8.5. So he was really barely taller than Undertaker.

Im voting 6'8.5 for Kane at his prime, what do you guys think?
Sotiris Gravas said on 31/Jul/19
As for Kane supposedly being able to bench 650 lbs (more like lol), here's a big guy like Baron Corbin struggling to do 2 reps of 405 lbs... Click Here

Reminder: samson puts the "BS" in lbs.
samson said on 31/Jul/19
Sotiris Gravas I been working out since knee high to a grass hopper
Mo Obeidallah said on 30/Jul/19
If Kane's peak weight is 320 pounds, what about Undertaker? Did he weigh 320 pounds at his peak too? Taker looks massive during 1998 and early 2000.
Dream said on 30/Jul/19
@Roderick

That's exactly how I saw Kane. 6'8"+ with big shoes. 6'7" or a shade more without footwear. I guess your friend and I shared the same view about Kane. At least, that's what I saw in person.
Sotiris Gravas said on 30/Jul/19
Here's Gabriel Luna pretending to bench 495 lbs, lol... Click Here

Those plates make no sound and are obviously 100% fake.
samson said on 29/Jul/19
Sotiris Gravas Yes I'm 50 and yes I'm around 5'10 weigh 250 my best bench press is 405 for 2 reps been doing it for donkeys years 1 good rep, and one force rep with a spotter
Roderick said on 29/Jul/19
@Sotiris To be fair, 5'10" 250lb benching 405 isn't that unbelievable. John Cena is 6'0" 245 and benches much more than that. His story is complete BS though, especially when he said he seen Kane bench 650, when Kane himself said 525 which still might be exaggerated or he did it with the help of a spot.

Kane's 6'8" claim was a morning or shoe height. I think he was 6'7.5" max but probs more just 6'7" now.

Undertaker was definitely nowhere near 300 pounds. Some of you guys don't know what 300 pounds looks like.

@Christian I can agree with that mostly.
samson said on 26/Jul/19
roderick, check out the segment between rock and kane and hogan, does that look 290 or 300, he looks over 300 like 320, heres the linkClick Here
samson said on 26/Jul/19
roderick at '6'7, 6'8 320 is normal for his height if your huge, and yes kane was huge in 1997 to 2001. 280, 290, even 300 too low for him. Hones he looked 320 in his hay days. There are other times when he looked lean back in 1997 to 1999 cause of his suit makes him lose weight cause its so hot in the suit. Then in 2001 he wore the tank top he was huge again. I don't see kane under 320 back in 1997 to 2001
samson said on 26/Jul/19
Why would kane lie, he's forthright. He has no reason to lie. Kane back in 2001 looked over 300 pounds
Sotiris Gravas said on 26/Jul/19
@Roderick Let's not forget that samson claims he's 5'10", 250 lbs, and can bench 405 for 2 reps, lol...


@samson Is that 405 in reality or just the world of bull(bleep) that you live in? Are you even 250 lbs or is that yet another lie? Don't bother answering. I'm not interested in anything you have to say. You say you're 50, yet you come across as a naive 12-year-old.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 26/Jul/19
@Roderick
My opinion

Kane 300 peak
Triple H 250 peak
The Rock 260 peak
Stone Cold 240 peak
Big Show around 500 peak
Roderick said on 25/Jul/19
I don't know if anybody has heard of this guy but his name is Michael Gonzalez. He is my friend of mine and he worked as a security guard for WWF.

So I actually told him about this website, and asked him if he ever seen Kane and Undertaker before up close and he told me no, but he said he knew how tall they were.

He said Kane was 6'7" without his lifts and that Undertaker was just barely shorter than him, and said Undertaker was "like 6'6 and a half".

I asked how he knew without seeing them, and he said it was "well known" how tall they both really were. He said some people would say Kane was 6'7 and some people said he was as tall as 6'10", but in reality Kane was only 6'7 and had lifts to measure as tall as 6'10".

One thing he mentioned to me is how also weights weren't actually that exaggerated back then, and he told me Big Show was actually 500 pounds, but I called BS and said "no way", lol.

He didn't get to meet the superstars but he talked to a lot of the people that did and that's apparently how he got all his info on their sizes.

I hope this is a reliable source to everyone. If anybody knows the guy Im talking about, please help confirm this story so it doesnt look like Im pulling it out of my ass.

I really don't want this to just slide like samsons story, apparently seeing Undertaker spot for Kane doing 650lb in 1999, LOL.



P:S Kanes hair was actually real he said, he didnt start wearing a wig until 2002 apparently. Just a cool fact.
Roderick said on 25/Jul/19
@samson I've listened to the podcast, lol. Just because he claims it means it's true? If you're going by that logic, I'm really 7'8" 500lb of pure steel and muscle. Wheres the evidence? Oh, right here, I said I was so it must be true. Right, samsom? Just like how you seen Kane bench 650 in 1999 before he unmasked right? Undertaker was also spotting for him? Lol if you're going to make up a story at least try to make it more reasonable.
Dream said on 25/Jul/19
I don't think Kane was 6'8" flat, but I think he was over 6'7". Today, 6'7" on the nose is likely, or maybe a shade more, in person.
Sotiris Gravas said on 25/Jul/19
@Editor Rob How do you feel about guys like samson who blatantly lie as if to the manner born? Personally, I think he should be banned from this site.

Samson said he saw Kane bench 650 lbs -- that he COUNTED THE PLATES -- even though Kane has gone on record as saying his best bench was 525 lbs (not that I believe it). Let's not forget that he said he saw Kane back in 1999, even though Kane didn't even unmask till 2003! The man is a bull(bleep) artist.

I take offense to trolls like this guy, whose lies assail the integrity of this site. He should at least be suspended for an extended period of time, and be made to apologize.
Editor Rob
Fake plates don't count and of course 650 isn't a believable claim, even when he admits a lot less.
samson said on 25/Jul/19
roderrick heres the interview scroll down to On His Actual Size & Weight heres the link Click Here
samson said on 25/Jul/19
Roderick wrong kane said himself the most he ever weighed was 320 i'll try to find the interview
Roderick said on 24/Jul/19
@samson Lol Kane was never 320. Even if he was, they wouldn't have only billed him at 328 like they did and instead he would have been billed as high as 365-400. Yeah, they would exaggerate pretty hard.

Kane at his biggest, most impressive physique, would have been lucky to weigh 300lb after a long day of work.

Triple H billed 255-260 was only 230 max imo

The Rock 260 max, billed 275

Stone Cold was maybe 230 max, billed 250

Big Show was 500 pounds in 2006 but not during his debut. I would have said 400 max then. Now he hovers around 380.

These are all my personal estimates. Open to critism
Roderick said on 22/Jul/19
There is a photo of Kane and Daniel Bryan backstage comparing heights with each other (in fun for the difference) and to god honest truth Kane looks 6'5 max in the photo.

On the other hand, there is a photo of Kane hanging out with Shaq where he only looks 4 inches shorter, looking MINIMUM 6'8".

Kane is truly a weird one. Honestly he doesn't look that tall next to short guys but stacks up amazingly well next to tall guys.

Next to Big Show, he always struck me as a 6'8 guy. I never thought he was shorter than that until I looked at him next to Randy Orton and Damien Sandow, and he didn't look much taller than those guys at all.

A possible theory is Kane is really 6'5 but wears lifts next to super tall guys to help sell his 7 foot billing. Keep in mind, an actual 4 inch difference in reality looks like a 2 inch difference on TV. When Kane teamed with Big Show, Show was billed at 7'2 while Kane was billed at 7'0. It worked, bc there was a period in my life where I trusted and believed in billed heights.

So Kane 6'5 + 2" lifts = 6'7" vs Big Show 6'11 no lifts, will appear to only look like 2 inches on TV, which makes sense out of the billed heights.

Or Kane is really 6'7 range and people who wrestle him wear lifts to look close in height to him. What wouldn't make sense is how much that hurts Kanes image of being 7 foot.

In 2012-2013, it became hilariously obvious that Kane was nowhere near 7'0. They actually lowered his billed height to 6'10 I think in 2013. Actually even during the RA era, he was lowered to 6'10 and I might be wrong, but i think he even got a few 6'9 listings.

I will trust that he is really 6'7" range and people wear lifts to look taller next to him. No chance a 6'5" guy will get billed at 7'0". No chance.
Vegas' said on 22/Jul/19
Stevens is on video stating his height as 210cm
edwards said on 22/Jul/19
@xpac99 not trying for excuses and starting arguments just figuring it out.the camera angles are heavily pointed in takers favour.you can see the segment between taker and strowman at raw before wrestlemania 33,takers hat is not even as high as strowman's head.see that segement dude.see that segement when strowman calls roman reigns and taker appears instead and bty taker was never 6'8 at peak,maybe in the morning but no way was he ever 6'8,when people say near or almost 6'8 that means he was 6'7.25 or 6'7.5.he was 6'8.5 at boots tho at peak.
Roderick said on 21/Jul/19
6'6.5" downgrade honestly.

In a short staredown between Kane and Undertaker last year, Kane looked to have about an inch on Undertaker.

Kane aged much better than Undertaker IMO. Still much bigger.

Undertaker: 6'7.25" now 6'5.5

Kane: 6'7.5" now 6'6.5"

I downgraded both their peaks slightly. Much more reasonable.
Sotiris Gravas said on 21/Jul/19
Google lists Conan Stevens at 7'1", lol, and Rob lists him as 6'11", even though he's around 6'9". Stevens says he weighs 300 lbs and that his best bench was 420 lbs. That being said, here he is struggling just to lift 315 lbs... Click Here Big guys w/ long arms and the bench press just don't mix. Right, Kane? Click Here
samson said on 20/Jul/19
Roderick kane said in a interview, he said he weigh the most was 320 not 280 seems too low for him. Test was 270 280 kane looked much more bigger then him.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 20/Jul/19
Canson, I agree
Icehole said on 19/Jul/19
There is actually a match between Kane and Matt Morgan on line from 2003. It was an OVW match.
Roderick said on 18/Jul/19
It's not easy to guess someones weight. Im not an expert, but I think it has something to do with the amount of musclefat percentages in the persons body.

I would guess Kane carried around 10% body fat into his career but maybe I'm wrong. Nowadays I'm sure it's a lot higher.

Kane was pretty big and he visibly outweighed the Undertaker, at least in my eyes.

Originally I said 280 for Kane, but maybe he was bigger. He was definitely not smaller than Batista and Batista was a legitimate 300lb steroid freak. The slim, cut down version of Batista was still 265lb in MMA. Batista was billed at 318lb and claimed 310 in an interview with Sheamus. Batista looked massive, too. Nowadays Batistas 270 claim seems legit.

Kane might have been 300lb especially during 2000-2001 when he was huge.

When he made his remasked return, he did look small. Cut down arms and smaller chest. He was still a big, strong guy compared to everyone else, but not to his own 2000 self. He wasn't able to lift Big Show anymore and couldn't do the legitimate one handed chokeslam, but he wasn't young anymore so that major cut-down in size was probably a good decision. I would say Kane wasnt bigger than 280 pounds then, bc even a slim, cut down Kane, is still stronger than everyone in this forum by miles.

Now that Kane is a little fatter, he might be back up to 290 like he claims. Undertaker might only be 260 max now, but he is still strong enough to lift ppl up for the tombstone, which is all that matters, lol.
Canson said on 18/Jul/19
@Riccardo: I think kane and Taker were taller than Sid. Those two were 6’7” range whereas Sid was weak 6’7 6’6 range or even strong 6’6” peak
Roderick said on 18/Jul/19
@Canson I completely understand, same here. But some people act like 6'8" for Kane is completely out of touch with reality when it really isn't. Do I personally think there is a chance of it? Yes, but probably very unlikely bc of his boots, just can't see him measuring 6'8" barefoot. Even when he was in equal footwear with his match against Matt Morgan, he was clearly almost a full inch shorter. If Kane didn't wear those huge boots and still looked the same height, then yes I'd go with 6'8", but that's clearly not the case.

Undertaker is closer to 6'7" than 6'8", I agree fully on that. I would say Undertaker could have been 6'7.5" but probs more like 6'7.25". In his staredowns with guys like Kevin Nash and Sid Eudy he doesnt look the full 6'7.5", but he doesn't always stand as tall as them. So yes, I list UT at 6'7.5" just to be safe.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 18/Jul/19
Roderick

I actually don't think Sid eudy was taller then taker but sure he put more motivation during a staredown compare to Calaway. If you look at some recent pics you see how tsker is clearly taller today so he was even at his peak.
Also on Kane i have doubts, because he did edge taker as isac yaankem but for all his career he had footwear advantage on his "brother". And outside the ring, in their real life, the music sounds different (Knoxville pics).

Undertaker 200.5cm now 197
Kane 201cm Now 198
Sid 199cm Now 195.5
Canson said on 17/Jul/19
@Roderick: people go for precision on this site. I personally have Taker peak (afternoon) 6’7.25 201cm. I think he was always closer to 6’7” than 6’8”
samson said on 17/Jul/19
Sotiris Gravas kane 280 max no way kane said most he weighed was 320
Roderick said on 16/Jul/19
Some of you guys are funny Lol

6'7.5" isnt much different than 6'8"

People estimating both Kane and Undertaker at 6'8" isnt that bad if most of you guys believe Undertaker was 6'7.5" and Kane was 6'7.75".

I can see how Kane gets 6'8" guesses sometimes but that dude wore monster sized boots and I just can't see him measuring the full 6'8" barefoot.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 16/Jul/19
Honestly I never saw Undertaker with monster boots, most of all in the beginning of his career. Probably some lifts yeah, but people like Kane and Jake the snake always had footwear advantage on him.
ced said on 16/Jul/19
@Sotiris.. The weird thing about Kane and Sid - A while back I posted a video of a Battle Royal i believe it was 1995, Both Kane and Sid were in the match. At one point, Sid walks in front of Kane, and Kane looked to have him by AT LEAST one inch but it looked even more. But to be safe, let's just stick to one inch. Keep in mind at this time, he was Isaac Yankem, and wore pretty flat boots, and it didn't look like he had internal lifts, I could be wrong.

Now, if I take a guess at their peak heights, judging from all evidence that we have, I agree with you that Sid was taller than Taker by .25 inches.

Undertaker: 6'6.75
Sid: 6'7
Now, here's where it gets tricky, I would guess Kane at 6'7.5, but in that battle royale, he looked to have Sid by at least an inch but I don't necessarily see Kane at 6'8, at most, 6'7.75, at least 6'7.25.
Alex 6'3.25 said on 16/Jul/19
He always wore lifts and/or big boots to be slightly taller than Undertaker, probably they were at same height, around 202 cm max.
edwards said on 16/Jul/19
@sotiris gravas
yes dude i agree on some of your estimation.taker was never ever 6'8.there is 0 % chance of taker being 6'8.some of poster in taker's page are desperate in proving him 6'8.inflating everyone's height just to make taker 6'8.i agree that kane wore monster lifts and taker too wore inner monster lifts.
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Jul/19
@edwards I think Taker, Kane, and Sid Eudy were all close in height. I actually think Sid was slightly taller than Taker, as seen in this 1989 staredown... Click Here
Rob has Sid at 6'6.75" peak height, so make of that what you will.

Kane wore "Herman Munster" boots and maybe he and Taker both wore internal lifts, so figuring out their real height isn't easy.


Here's a video where Taker (aka Master of Pain) is described as only 6'8", and The Soultaker (aka The Godfather) is touted as 6'7" (1989)... Click Here

So, to answer your question, I'm not sure.
Roderick said on 13/Jul/19
I see that a lot better now that I've rewatched that clip. Now that I think about it, Kane benching 525 is definitely very unlikely. I bet he pulled off a 500lb bench on a super good day and just added 25lb to the claim.

Or possibly he was never even able to do that much and completely made a number up... regardless of him being 6'7" or 6'8", 280 pounds or 320 pounds, or on juice or not, even the 500lb bench claim sounds unbelievable. Kane wasn't as massive as he looked on TV, they do a good job at making these guys look stronger and bigger then they really are.

Kane was definitely built and strong, but maybe not as strong as some people think.
edwards said on 13/Jul/19
@ sotiris gravas who do you think is taller at peak,taker or kane who do you think has chance of measuring a tad taller at peak?
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Jul/19
@ced I was actually offered a job by an elderly gentleman who I believe was a wrestling promoter or something back in 1997. He had seen me working out at my gym w/ a whole bunch of wrestlers and told me that I was big and strong, but that he would make me BIGGER. Obviously, he was talking about steroids, and that was something I was definitely not interested in. Also, I heard that these guys are on the road for long stretches of time, away from home, which is also something that didn't appeal to me.

Never met Kane, I'm afraid.

Being tall has its perks and disadvantages. TBH, very tall guys often look scrawny and weird. No one is going to be intimidated by a skinny stick figure of a man. I'm impressed by tall guys that are able to pack on some muscle mass, which isn't easy.



@Roderick Kane was definitely a strong dude. Keep in mind, however, when he picked up Show, he held him close to his chest, and Show wasn't resisting and actually helping and holding on. Click Here It's not the same as lifting a dead weight for a bench press, where you have to extend your long arms vertically, resisting gravity. Kane definitely looks fatter now.

I, too, was a hefty kid. I think I was around 140 lbs when I was 8 years old, maybe younger, maybe 6. I remember my legs would give out b/c I was gaining weight too rapidly. I would be walking and then collapse to the ground. My folks even took me to get x-rays to see if I had problems w/ my bones or something.

My first day of kindergarten, a teacher came up to me, screaming, telling me to stop bothering the little kids and get back to my grade -- suffice it to say, I started crying.

Belated b-day wishes on the The Big 4-0, dude. (I can still pass for 35 when I shave, maybe younger. At 40, I had virtually no gray in my hair or beard; now, seven years later, it's a different story, but still not a lot, thank goodness.)



@edwards Just b/c Kane claimed he was 6'8" doesn't make it true. Hogan still claims he was 6'7" and insists he's around 6'5" now, lol. A height of 6'8" for Kane would definitely have been a morning measurement.
Roderick said on 11/Jul/19
Also Lmao, samson if you still lurk here, how would you know it was Kane in 1999 if he didn't unmask until 2003?

@Edwards I'm talking about afternoon heights. I'd say the tallest possible height for Kane until we enter the fairytale zone is 6'8" flat. 6'7.5"-6'7.75" range is much more realistic.

Undertaker in the afternoon/evening was never taller than 6'7.5". More like 6'7.25", but 6'7.5" really isn't much different

Also just a note, something that's been bothering me, what are your guys guesses on Sid Eudy's height? I notice how he is listed as 6'6.75" here, but I am 100% convinced he is taller than Undertaker. He has to be 6'7.5". Its what I have him at. It's that or Undertaker was 6'6.5". It's one or the other.
edwards said on 11/Jul/19
On Bruce Pritchard's latest podcast on Bad Blood 1997, he stated that both Kane and Undertaker both wore lifts,kane wore outer while taker wore inner lifts but that Kane was taller or have a slighest edge over taker.
Riccardo 5'7" said on 10/Jul/19
@Sotiris Gravas

I found what you said logical. But I don't agree on a pair of things.

I don't doubt that you are pritty much the same size or that you are as strong as someone like Kane.
But I doubt, athletically, you have the same background.
We are not talking about powerlifter maybe, but not even about ordinary men.
Guys that are in gym since 30 years, sure not at a low level.

Also i think bench more then someone depends also from wich muscle fibers you have more developed, so people can always surprise you sometimes.

Said that I don't know your background actually, so probably I'm saying nothing. But I think he did edge 500lb
Roderick said on 10/Jul/19
Picture Shaq but kinda with a leaner body, that's basically what my friend looks like. He is happy with his weight I'm sure.

It is honestly so hard to look at someone and say "oh, he can probably bench this much". As for Kane, I don't think 525 is impossible, but it might be a little exaggerated as you said. He might have done 500 before with the aid of a spotter, and added 25 pounds to the claim. Remember, he DID lift the 500lb peak weight Big Show up at his chest and did dump him over to rope... so I really don't know if he could have done the same with a bar, laying down.

My heaviest I ever weighed was 235, and that was actually growing up. I was a fat kid. Right now, I am 5'11" and I weigh 190 pounds, and I don't look fat anymore. I just turned 40 a few weeks ago, and even some of my friends tell me I can still pass for being in my 20s.

As for Undertakers' weight, I'd say he was never heavier than 270. Kane was 280 MAX imo. Nowadays, Undertaker is probably 240-250, yes, 240, and Kane probably didn't lose much mass, he might have actually gained some weight if you looked at his last few runs, he had a belly. Maybe 290 for Kane today.

Kane is way bigger than UT imo.
ced said on 10/Jul/19
@Sotiris, wow I didn't know you yourself are a giant. 6'7 285 pounds?? How come you never go into pro wrestling? You would have been a perfect 3rd brother of destruction. Also, have you ever met Kane? If so, was he taller or shorter than you or you would say pretty much the same height?
edwards said on 10/Jul/19
@Roderick said on 8/Jul/19
Hearing as Kane himself has claimed 6'8", we know that there is zero chance of him being 6'8.25" or 6'8.5" like some people have estimated him at. Just zero chance.dude peak kane could clear 6'8 quite easily in the morning,i mean in the morning kane could clear 6'8 easily,he may wake aup at 6'8.5 and kane may wakeup at 6'8.both of them dudes at peaks.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.