How tall is The Undertaker

The Undertaker's Height

6ft 6 ½ (199.4 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 7 ½ (201.9 cm)
Mark Calaway is an American Wrestler. In a 2001 documentary he referred to himself as being "About Six foot Eight, Six Nine". On another occasion he said "I used to be 6-foot-10 but I got dropped on my head a few times so I'm 6-foot-9 now."

How tall is The Undertaker
By AngelCaroll-Ann0770 [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons

You May Be Interested

Height of John Cena
John Cena
6ft ½ in (184 cm)
Height of Big Show
Big Show
6ft 10 (208 cm)
Height of Triple H
Triple H
6ft 2 (188 cm)
Height of  Kane
Kane
6ft 7 (201 cm)

Add a Comment7133 comments

Average Guess (452 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.79in (202.7cm)
Current: 6ft 6.6in (199.6cm)
Phenom89 said on 21/Jan/19
Mark Calaway is a great performer, and really a great "actor". Only him could be the undertaker. His size is important for his character, but not important as his charisma is. ( because not only The Rock is charismatic).

I think, only after i knew this page, that he never was over 2M peak barefoot.
With shoes on 2,03 cm..2,05 at times probably is a possibility. But if i have to see him 6'8 barefoot and 6'10 in shoes no...i wouldn't .

About now its very hard, but of course i would not be surprise if he still 6'6.
I can make my guess, 6'5 range, but i dont forget Ali Baba picture...still the best one
Ashley123 said on 20/Jan/19
Sotiris Gravas, Stop please..., It was proven that Taker is still 6'6, and pictures you posted here, some angles were horrible, like Taker picture with Fallon.

Fallon(closer to the camera) and Taker(probably not standing very well)
Click Here.

Wiz Khalifa and Fallon(standing better than in your picture, head fully stretched)
Click Here
rawdshaq said on 20/Jan/19
@sotiris Lmao I agree. 14 inches is a joke. 18" inches is a good bet.

Also in those pictures, keep in mind that the Undertaker has a GIANT head. Like 10 - 11 inches, normal people like Wiz have 6 - 7 inch heads. That still puts Undertaker in 6' 5" - 6' 6" region. In some photos he really can look even lower than 6' 5" but in some other ones when he has good posture in public with fans he can look as high as 6' 7" still but I safe bet for him is going to be 6' 5 1/2".
Canson said on 20/Jan/19
@Phenom89: I actually think in his prime that he was a guy who woke up to 6’8” or a hair over and was maybe 6’7.25 at a low barefoot but no higher. Today 6’6” still tho
edwards said on 19/Jan/19
@phenom189 i personally think there is no way taker is less than 6'6.yes he is not a strong 6'6 i believe,he maybe weak 6'6.even if he is only 6'5.5,he would have rounded to 6'6
edwards said on 19/Jan/19
@sotiris gravas khalifa is closer to camera than fallon whereas taker is behind fallon,if both stood side by side,then we would see the real difference.
Ashley123 said on 19/Jan/19
Sotris Gravas never showed a pic with Rodman Taller Than Taker, he posted a pic with Taker standing closer to camera, it's really hard to tell who was taller. Please stop downgrading Taker, he's still 6'6 or little bit over 6'6, and he was 6.7+ barefoot at his Peak, he's noticeable shorter now than he used to be before, no way he wasn't at least 6'7 at his peak.
Vegas' said on 19/Jan/19
Phenom89, as I mentioned before photos aren't always the best unless they are full length and even then it's not 100%. Here kane looks close in height to Show Click Here
In reality Show had lots of height on him out of gear on video Click Here

Meltzer said Khali measured 7'0.5 barefoot during training camp in California in 90s. He was spot on about Wilt Chamberlain's measurement (even though for years folks on Andres page debated it). Looking at Khali with Giant Silva who was listed 216cm at 88 Olympics not sure you could debate below 7 foot for peak Khali if Silva was over 7 foot himself
Sotiris Gravas said on 19/Jan/19
Wiz Khalifa (Rob has at 6'2.75") and 5'11" Jimmy Fallon (2015)... Click Here
Khalifa footwear that day... Click Here

Taker and Fallon (2015)... Click Here

Soooo... is Taker still supposed to be 6'6" according to some ppl...? Sorry, but no.



@rawdshaq Mick Foley and 6'5" Howard Stern (1999)... Click Here

6'2" Foley and Stern (2017)... Click Here



I can't believe someone thought Taker's biceps were only 14.5"... That's funny. (I saw them listed as 17" online somewhere.) When a guy is tall, that means he has long arms.... which means it's very hard to get them big... especially when steroids aren't involved. That's why I always respected a guy like 6'3.5" Christopher Reeve who trained hard for the Superman movies while being all natural -- no 'roids. At 6'7", back up to 275 lbs, my arms are 18.5", no "Hogan vitamins." Here's Hogan when he was apparently off his special vitamins:
Click Here Always remember... Click Here
rawdshaq said on 18/Jan/19
I am pretty sure Triple H is bigger than me. I am 239 pounds, 5' 10"ish, and Triple H looks like an overall bigger person than me.

Understand this. Triple H was probably much heavier back in the day, lost weight, and put it as his billed weight because he's proud of it and wants everybody to know that he is 255 pounds. Also that's a very exact number, too. If it truly was inflated then it would be 265 or 280.
edwards said on 18/Jan/19
@dan trojan same here dude,i also think taker and rodman are equal.
Phenom89 said on 18/Jan/19
Dan Trojan
I doubt they are the same height, but Sotiris Gravas showed a pic where Rodman seems to be over an inch taller and i dont think that is the real gap.
In less words i think taker is under 6'6, but no way he is 6'4 range... to be clear
Ozzy said on 18/Jan/19
Sorry, other post didnt work too well. Just posting link again. Hope it works. Kevin Love & Yao Ming

mobile.twitter.com/yahoosportsnba/status/1028029205911490560
Phenom89 said on 18/Jan/19
@Canson: well ok,but sometimes i think we talk about height lost more for give a reason to a downgrade that, for us seems absurd, that for a real height lost problem.
I mean that sometimes i really think Taker was genuinely a 6'6 guy. Even in his 20s. And with boots on 6'7.5. But no barefoot , with shoes on.
Phenom89 said on 18/Jan/19
@Vegas: I trust you, because i didnt see him in person and you did it. But on Show's page i saw a picture with LeBron , who i think is 6'7. Well go to give a look at that picture, than you will understand my 6'9 range guess.
Khali i seriously doubt is 7'feet tall barefoot.
But since im on this site i understood that guess some heights is very hard. Undertker's height above all.
Ashley123 said on 18/Jan/19
No way that Rodman is taller than Taker, Taker forehead is way bigger and longer than Rodmans,
Id say both are little bit over 6'6 right now.
edwards said on 17/Jan/19
@phenom89 .yes canson is true.i agree with canson.he’s lost 2-3” more like 1-1.5 which is easy with the life he lead and the back problems he has had. Hulk Hoganhas lost around 2” from his. You see another guy David Prowse that has lost several inches. Rob pegs him at 6’1” today and judging by his head size he had tohave been a good few inches taller. I don’t know if he was ever really 6’6 as I’m undecided on his peak but I’d say he could easily have been 6’5” or a bit over. I don’t completely rule out 6’6”. So that’s 4” if not more.
edwards said on 17/Jan/19
yes taker may be bit lesser than 6'6 but at night at extreme low.i personl guess is he wakesup at 6"7 and through out the day he remains in 6'6 and at night he shrinks to 6"5.75 .the only time i see taker being lesser than 6'6 is at night at extreme low.his night night maybe 6"6.75.i dont even buy 6'5.5.even at night 6'5.5 is extremely low for him.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Jan/19
@rawdshaq

Define "bigger". Do you mean Triple H has more muscle than you, or he has overall more mass? His body today isn't an example of how a 6'1"-6'2" 255lbs man should look like. 10-20 years ago yes, but not today.
rawdshaq said on 17/Jan/19
Nishanth Hegde Dude 14-15 biceps for Undertaker is a joke. He has minimum 17" biceps. You can't compare his biceps to smaller people. His arms are very big. There are scrawny kids with a little bit of extra weight who have 15 inch biceps. Undertaker biceps are 18" - 20".
rawdshaq said on 17/Jan/19
I think Undertaker was 6' 7 1/2" at peak for sure or even 6' 8" but today you have to consider that Undertaker is 53 years old with a countless amount of surgeries done to him and he also looks barely 4 inches taller than Triple H which puts him at 6' 5" if Triple H is 6' 1". Obviously he was slouching so 6' 5 1/2" which any normal human would round up to 6' 6". He can have 6' 6" but I think his exact height is 6' 5 1/2".

A good example of Undertakers height loss are his matches with Mick Foley. Back in 1998 Undertaker was 4 - 5 inches taller than Mick Foley who was 6' 3" at his peak which puts him at 6' 7" or 6' 8", but when he announced that he was going to the royal rumble 2 years ago in 2017 he walked right next to Mick Foley and appeared 2.5 inches taller max.
Dan Trojan said on 17/Jan/19
Phenom nice pic i was actually looking for a better pic with undertaker and rodman taker looks taller than rodman of course he's a little closer to the camera but honestly i'd say they'd be the same height just my opinion
Phenom89 said on 17/Jan/19
Click Here

Excluding camera angle and other things, i would say half inch difference between Rodmann and Taker.
Ozzy said on 17/Jan/19
We seen Love and undertaker photos.
Check this out Love measures well next to Yao Ming mobile.twitter.com/yahoosportsnba/status/1028029205911490560
Phenom89 said on 17/Jan/19
There is a video of Ric Flair's wedding , in the beginning of it Taker and Rodmann shaking hands. Angle is awful, but you wouldnt say Rodmann is the taller guy. If he is, he is not even a full inch taller than Taker.
6'5.5 or a hair less for the dead man
edwards said on 16/Jan/19
@moheez yes man,he is still in 6'6 range,dont know whether he is hair over it or a weaker 6'6.i can see this man being less than 6'6.
Canson said on 16/Jan/19
@Phenom89: I doubt he’s lost 2-3” more like 1-1.5 which is easy with the life he lead and the back problems he has had. Hulk Hogan has lost around 2” from his. You see another guy David Prowse that has lost several inches. Rob pegs him at 6’1” today and judging by his head size he had to have been a good few inches taller. I don’t know if he was ever really 6’6 as I’m undecided on his peak but I’d say he could easily have been 6’5” or a bit over. I don’t completely rule out 6’6”. So that’s 4” if not more
Canson said on 16/Jan/19
6’7.5 at a low is possible for his peak but really more Magic Johnson size 201cm at a low or a hair less. He would’ve been 6’8 out of bed most likely. Today 6’6” at a low is prob best case
Vegas' said on 16/Jan/19
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
My opinion is that undertaker never saw 6'7.5 peak. A hair over 6'6.5 is the max i buy for him. And this fits with 6'9.5 Big show. With 6'1.5 peak Hhh. With 6'11 khali ecc. ecc.
----------

Peak 6'9 range for Show? I didn't meet him when he was peak fitness but I did meet him a number of times in person between 2001 and 2010 and he was taller than 6'9 out of gear then. Taller in person in 2010 than Michael Kingma who Rob has here at 6'9.

A 6'9 peak Show would drop Kane and Taker down to 6'5 peak range.

Khali was measured 7'0.5 barefoot according to Meltzer.
Canson said on 16/Jan/19
@Rob: to what you said, I think Taker is a guy who measures taller than he stands and walks. He may be able to stretch to 6’6” still. If not probably still weak 6’6” but in pics with guys his size in the Ring he still looks the full 6’6”. But someone said it once I believe Bobby3342 that a 6’6 guy can give the impression of being 6’4 at times if he has poor posture
edwards said on 16/Jan/19
@canson yes dude,he is one of the greatest ,if not the greatest in wwe.its pretty much disgusting when someone else brings other topic for dabate.the site is totally height related.and bty some photos postef here do no justice,all are to show that taker is not as tall as people seems but i personally still think even 6'5.5 is too low given the fact that he rarely stand straight and has a big head for his height.at the end of the i still think he is 6'6 not a cm less.above all we all know that guy aint low as 6'5 or 6'5.5 as much people here consider him to be.
rawdshaq said on 15/Jan/19
I'm about 235-240 pounds and Triple H is bigger than me. I'm 5' 10", too. Triple H was 270 pounds at his prime probably but lost weight, and he is proud of that and he chooses to have that as his billed weight.

And yes, I'm very fat. Don't comment on it
Moheez said on 15/Jan/19
Rob, would you say undertaker current height is 6"5.5-6"6.25? I agree he was 6"7.5 Mark during his younger days.
Editor Rob
Undertaker might look sub 6ft 6 now...what he measures though is one of the tougher guesses. Can he really stretch up still over 6ft 6? Or max out at that....
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
My opinion is that undertaker never saw 6'7.5 peak. A hair over 6'6.5 is the max i buy for him. And this fits with 6'9.5 Big show. With 6'1.5 peak Hhh. With 6'11 khali ecc. ecc.
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
One more thing i want say is that Undertaker's bad posture has become the only Undertaker's posture. Opposite to the ministry era, 1999, he has completely changed his posture. He does not standing straight and you can see it in every step he takes.

Yeah height loss...but how can a man lose 2-3 inches like that?
Lose 2-3 inches means become an other person, completely.
I should belive he was same height of Love now?? Looking at their picture?? Come on is not possible.
Phenom89 said on 14/Jan/19
Talking about joshua, he is 0.5/0.25 inch shorter than Vladimir Klitschko. So now i dont know how much taker can be taller.

About taker shape...when you are so big, and "old"(wrestling age) and you stop training the result is obviously that one.
I think he is training less than half of the times he used to train before(until 6-7 year ago), so its normal that he does not look huge as before.
If you look at his interview with pastor Young, hoe can you say tha he still hige as before? Come on , he looks retired.
Canson said on 14/Jan/19
@Edwards: I think we can all agree he is one of the greatest but I agree with you. This site is about determining his height
edwards said on 14/Jan/19
@rawdshaq i dont wanna argue with some desperate guy like you.the page is totally height related.everybody knows taker is arguably of the greatest if not the greatest to step in squared circle.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 13/Jan/19
@rawdshaq

Triple H is no 255lbs nowadays. He was in the 2000's though.
edwards said on 13/Jan/19
damn it was a mistake and i said 6'6.5.the lowest i can possibly see for taker is 6'5.5.if he was only 6'5 then how can he holdup well against corbin and strowman. for me personally,even 6'5.5 is too low.i think he is weak 6'6 at his low.maybe he may drop down to 6'6.5 at night.but 6'5 is too hard to believe.he is still 6'6 maybe isnt strong 6'6 but i believe he is weak 6'6 at his low.less than 6'5.5 is absolute joke for him.if he is 6'5 than every other wrestler should need a downgrade.cena should be 5'11 or 5'11.5'triple h should be 6 and michaels should be 5'9 lol.bty
rawdshaq said on 13/Jan/19
What does "increase my English" mean? Please man put some effort into your English please! Who cares if he is any height, he's a legend.
Dan Trojan said on 13/Jan/19
Rawdshaq i'm sorry i don't think triple h is really 255lbs maybe back in the early 2000's when he was jacked up on steroids but right now i would say around 220-30 maximum and edwards is right there is times where the undertaker looked out of shape like for example at wrestlemania 33 against roman reigns he did look out of shape but more recently he's looked like he's gotten in better shape
Nishanth Hegde said on 13/Jan/19
Coming to Undertaker's biceps, I think he has got a 14.5 to 15 inch biceps. He has lost his shape as he is not actively involved in wrestling or training anymore. I just saw a photo of Taker and Andrew Bird (Birdman) and he looks to be 2 inches shorter than Birdman. However I have also seen photos where Taker genuinely looks like a 6ft4 human as well as photos where he looks 6ft7.
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
those who think taker is only 6'5 must really be desendant of dwarf.the guy has worse posture and stand straight occasionally.i admit that at times,i also ones thought that taker was 6'5 but after seeing so many proofs.taker aint low as 6'5.if he stand straight for measurement i am personally 100% sure that the guy hovers at 6'6.the lowest i see for him is 6'6.5. (6'5 is obviously joke for him)many people who have met him guessed him at 6'6.if the guy was only 6'5 then how could he stack up against guy like corbin and stroman.and for some people here who still goes by billied height and weight,i have nothing to say but a troll.taker is still 6'6 and thats my word.some photos posted here do no justice.i have no words for people who still goes by billed height and weight
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
@rawdshaq dude,i may have to increase my english but i aint no desperate like you,lets cut to the chase.man its not like that but you sound so desperate man.you are the only one who didnt understand my english.
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
@rawdshaq mate those photos do no justice,i never told taker wasnt muscular.he was muscular at past mainly from 2005-2008.i am talking about current state of taker.have you seen taker being muscular lately??you told why the hell would a company want somebody to be listed heavier than they are?yes bro wwe makes its star taller then they actually are and heavier than they actually are,thats billed height and weight.if you wanna go by billed weight you can go.you are one of those guys who believes in billied height,you have much to learn about billied height and weight.i dont wanna argue more.255 is his billied weight.if you wanna believe thats upto you.i am talking about current state of taker.the photos posted do no justice.those are of past when taker was at prime.
Canson said on 12/Jan/19
@Vegas: not much different than upgrading
edwards said on 12/Jan/19
@rawdshaq i never told taker wasnt muscular.i only told he is out of shape and past his prime.if you wanna think taker is still very lean and muscular,thats upto you,thats no problem to me,lol ,if you wanna beleve taker has 20 inch biceps.believe atleast i personally dont think so.
rawdshaq said on 12/Jan/19
Also please work on your English man! Not trying to sound like that but it's really hard to read your paragraphs sometimes @edwards
rawdshaq said on 12/Jan/19
@edwards Dude are you kidding me? Undertaker is not fat. He still has great muscle and he is lean.

Click Here Does he look out of shape and weak there? Those are real big biceps, and also why the hell would a company want somebody to be listed heavier than they are? If anything they will list their weight under to make them seem more athletic. Triple H is 255 pounds, and is proud of it and wants it to be his listed weight.

Click Here Still looks great there.

Click Here That's 2007 Undertaker. Looks in amazing shape.

Bro find a picture where Undertaker looks fat. He is in great shape. Also he is very muscular. If he wasn't muscular then he would have never been able to pick up 95% of the people he has lifted.

I did wrestle in high school and yes wearing a singlet does make you look more muscular however, I think Undertaker has 18" - 20" biceps.
Canson said on 11/Jan/19
Taker was definitely taller at his peak than Joshua. Taker was 6’7” peak while AJ is 6’5.75 today
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
i never said joshua is taller than taller.i meant how person physique can help them appear taller.taker is still 6'6 or may be weak 6'6.but joshua or deontay wilder is much leaner and muscular if you cimpared them with current physique of taker.i didnt mean they are taller,i only meant they can appear taller due to their physique.taker on the otherhand who i believe is weak 6'6 developing bad posture through out years and is physically out of shape.maybe taller is as taller than wilder or joshua,who know?i am just saying about their appearance and how being lean can contribute in someone appearing taller.
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
damn i mistakely said taker was taller than taker,i mean taker maybe taller than joshua
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 11/Jan/19
Mark calaways bio real height 6ft8 310 pounds billed 6ft10.5 210cm.
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
@dan trojan yes dude,i agree with you.i personally believe he is 6'6 but i think that he is 1 cm to max 1.5 cm shorter than corbin.weak 6'6 may also be arguable.
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
@rawdshaq a big Lol dude,i never told that taker wasnt muscular.he was only myscular in 1999 (his ministry days) and early 2007 and 2008.after 2008 taker was never muscular again.maybe he is in good shape but not muscular.good look at hulk hogan who is older than taker,look at gold berg,those guys are in shape for theur,everyone knows he aint in shape these days.atleast for me,i have hard times seeing taker being myscular except un 1999 to 2007-08 which were his geydays.lol he is fat when you compared his physique through out the year,he has grown fatter through out the years.he was leaner back then.and bty personally i dont think triple h is 255 pounds,its his billied weight, wwe likes to make or claim their stars taller than they actually are,they also like to make their stars heavier than they really are.look at his matches with roman reign at wrestlemania 33,you will see he was getting fatter since then.bty taker was biggest in 1999-2002 during his ministry and biker days but he was leaner from 2007 onwards for his physiques through out his career.and bty taker wasnt that muscular back in 90s and 2000,obviously he was in great shape but wasnt muscular.he was muscular only from 2006-2008,afterwards he suffered several injuries and concussion and wasnt muscular.taker aint in shape these days
edwards said on 11/Jan/19
@xpac99 viscera aka mabel is i guess strong 6'6 and taker looks an inch taller.maybe taker looked 6'7 at those times since it was one of taker's tallest days.
edwards said on 10/Jan/19
@tim181 at peak obviously taker was taller than taker,no doubt over there.even today i dont know that but taker maybe taller than joshua.but due to joshua's leaner and muscular body .he can appear taller than current taker.who knows,taker maybe taller in reality but joshua looks taller due to the given reason.i only told that its persons physiques that plays a great role.anoether example is a lean and skinny 6 feet dude can appear taller than a big and obese 6'2 dude.but in reality,we all know that obese dude is taller cause he is 6'2.i only told how physique can play great role on how someone would look and appear.
Vegas' said on 10/Jan/19
tim181 said on 10/Jan/19
@edawrds Taker always gave of a taller impression than Joshua, in fact its Joshua who looks short for 6'6 to me. Wilder on the other hand looks taller because he's slim. But Taker I think is still over 6'6
--------------

Peak Taker was taller next to peak Rock than Joshua is next to older Rock

Click Here

Click Here

If Joshua was a wrestler we would have many downgrading him to 6'4 lol Click Here
Canson said on 10/Jan/19
Kanter is closer to 6’9 than 10. NBA measurements are in the morning. I don’t rule 206-207 or a full 207 out but 208 I do.
rawdshaq said on 10/Jan/19
@edwards Undertaker always has been ripped. He had insane muscles back in the 90s and especially the late 2000s (surprisingly) and he might have lost some muscle over the years but he still has no problem delivering a tombstone to a 255 pound man (Triple H). He is not obese and he is not fat either, he has a bit of a belly, yes, but he is still in great shape for his age.
Canson said on 10/Jan/19
@Joe: that’s not more than about 5” difference between them. Maybe Chandler is 6’11 and some change but Melo isn’t under 6’6” Unless he didnt have time on his feet when I saw him. With Kobe he also looks at least 6’6” as he does with Lebron
Dan Trojan said on 10/Jan/19
Sorry i meant canson i was responding to your question from earlier
Dan Trojan said on 10/Jan/19
Edwards honestly with shaen michaels i'd say it looks around 7 inches it's hard to tell because the undertaker is doing what he usually does with shorter guys and leaning down to their level so i'd say still around 6'6" and with triple h it was harder to tell but there is a photo of a faceoff between them at the event and it looked like 5 inches so again i'm concluding 6'6"
tim181 said on 10/Jan/19
@edawrds Taker always gave of a taller impression than Joshua, in fact its Joshua who looks short for 6'6 to me. Wilder on the other hand looks taller because he's slim. But Taker I think is still over 6'6
Xpac99 said on 10/Jan/19
Click Here
In this video how was the difference ? Over 1 inch is arguable ?
edwards said on 10/Jan/19
on the other days, i personally though that persons physique plays a great role on how tall a person look.for example , baron corbin who is also 6'6 is leaner and have small head for his height appears taller than undertaker who is at worst 6'5.5 to max weak 6'6.even if corbin and taker maybe same height even so corbin can appear taller for most part due to his straight posture,leaner body and small head.on the other hand taker who has a developed relatively worse posture through the years,taker has larger head,taker is also physically out of space is obese these days growing big belly and big fats through out body.taker is obese these days and may look shorter and its my personal opinion and idk about others.taker and corbin maybe equal and taker maybe man 1cm to 1.5cm shorter than corbin.i can also tell that back untill 2014 taker still looked strong 6'6 or maybe 6'6.5 due to fact that taker was leaner and bit skinny and had that kind of tall aura.other example include pro boxers like anthony joshua and deontay wilder who are also also 6'6 looks too tall due to fact that they are muscular and so leaner,on the other side guys like taker is obese and physically out of shape with big belly and becoming fatter everyday,so thats all corbin and taker maybe equal due to corbin being leaner,having straight posture and small head while taker being obese,big head and worst posture,if you measure those guys corbin and taker,i personally think both could be equall while corbin being only 1 cm to max 1.5 cm taller and thats my personal opinion.
edwards said on 10/Jan/19
@ dan trojan hope you will meet mate
rawdshaq said on 9/Jan/19
You know guys, whether Undertaker is 6' 10", or 6' 4", in the end of day, he still puts on the greatest matches and is the greatest wrestler of all time. At this point of career, I'm sure he can give 0 Fs about his height, and I am sure he is aware that he isn't as tall as he used to be. He has 6' 5 1/2" and maybe even 6' 5" flat from me. I'm sure if he was even lower he would still be just as successful as a wrestler as he would have with a 6'7 1/2" peak.

Just close the discussion guys, if you wanna believe he is 6' 5" or 6' 8", that's up to you. Although my opinion was changed, you aren't going to be lucky with most people. Just respect the legend for what he has done for the business and not how tall he is.

Final note, and not to sound like a douchebag, but who really cares? He towers over everybody anyway so he is clearly tall enough.
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
Click Here

Love is not 2” taller than Lebron in this picture. Compare to the top of their heads not Love’s hair which people here are doing, and also factor that Love is favored slightly in the first pic

Click Here

Love with 6’10 Joakim Noah

Click Here

Love with 6’10 Chris Bosh

Click Here

Click Here

Lebron with Bosh

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

I could make the same argument here if I wanted and say Lebron is taller than Love but I know he’s not. If Love is taller it’s by around a CM or half inch but not 2”. Love was described by Dan Majerle as 6’7” below. Maybe not flat 6’7” but could be something like 6’7.25 or 6’7.5 max and Lebron could even be a hair under 6’7” perhaps. Even possible it’s a little less than 1cm

Click Here
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
@Dan Trojan: how tall would you say Taker looks with Shawn Michaels in 2018? I’d say it’s easier with Triple H since he still looks 6’1” range

Click Here

Or Triple H?

Click Here
joe###ro said on 9/Jan/19
Canson
6'11 for Tyson so Carmelo would have to be demoted to less than 6'6
Canson said on 9/Jan/19
Love and Lebron are around the same height. It’s not more than half inch difference between them maximum. The pics that were posted here aren’t that good
Vegas' said on 9/Jan/19
Photos you normally can't trust, even videos can be deceiving at times.

Take this one. Taker looks 6'4 range next to Big Show in 1999 after 15 second mark Click Here
Phenom89 said on 9/Jan/19
If there is only 1.5 inch between taker and kanter it means that im blind
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 9/Jan/19
Rob enes kanters instagrem he said undertakers 6ft7 barefoot billed 6ft9 6ft10 enes 2.75 inches taller 6ft9.75. Barefoot.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 9/Jan/19
Enes kanter 6ft9.75 207cm taker looked 1.5 2inches shorter 6ft7.5 201.9 6ft7.75 203cm.
Phenom89 said on 9/Jan/19
looking at picture with Thompson, the basketball player seems as tall as could be big show...no? Taker and big show would have about same height difference...How tall is Thompson than..? 7 feet...6'10 :)?
Phenom89 said on 9/Jan/19
Love and lebron are not the same height.
Phenom89 said on 8/Jan/19
My guess is that in the meeting with the Cavaliers, with 5 cm boots, he was 202cm(Love 205-206cm in the pic). Today 196/197cmm (198 morning)barefoot is real possibility. His neck seems different compared with his 30-40s. His posture put him as low as a 6'4.5 sometimes.
He looks, even with bad posture included, to short near 6'8 6'9 guys.
I think barefoot he never was more than 199/200cm.

Remember that the best picture around still the one with AliBaba.
In end come on, Taker is a 2 M range guy
Dan Trojan said on 8/Jan/19
Edwards like i said earlier he's possibly making an appearance in my area i'm not 100% sure yet but when i know for sure i'll let everyone know and i will get a picture anf post it
Canson said on 8/Jan/19
Chandler is 6’11” not 7’1”. His pre draft depending on how early it was taken was 6’11.5 likely less than that in the afternoon
Ashley123 said on 8/Jan/19
miller, in your picture LeBron is standing good couple of inches closer to the camera than Love.
Dan Trojan said on 8/Jan/19
Rawdshaq the funny thing with that is undertaker never claimed he was 6'10" that was wwe's billing he's always claimed to be about 6'8" of course that's always been a slight exaggeration all i'm saying is he never claimed 6'10"
Monkey knees said on 7/Jan/19
Peak height 6ft 7in. Now just below 6ft 6in.
rawdshaq said on 7/Jan/19
Final decision currently 6' 5 1/2". Until he gets measured and is proven to anything above that that's what he can get from me. 6' 7 1/2" peak is fine.

If somebody meets Undertaker, ask him as tall is he, I can't wait to hear him claim 6' 10" lol.
Canson said on 7/Jan/19
There’s no way he’s 6’7” today. 6’6 max
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 7/Jan/19
Undertaker is the same height as richard jefferson both 6ft7.25 201cm.
Ozzy said on 7/Jan/19
@Arut Agreed.

@Ashley123 yeah nice pic. Number 4 Tyson Chandler 7'1". Love measures up quiet well even next to #5 Durant. Again comparing Love and takers pic, Lebron and taker around the same size.
Canson said on 7/Jan/19
We must not be looking at the same pictures. Love is not 2” taller than lebron. In some pics they are the exact same height. In the one where Love is extremely favored by the camera is the only exception. Both are 6’7” guys
Demon87 said on 7/Jan/19
Peak taker about the same height of big cass is possible ?
miller said on 7/Jan/19
Ozzy that are bad picture lebron is almost the same height als Love Click Here
Click Here

Kevin love is 6.7 1/2
Lebron james is 6.7
Undertaker is 6.5 1/2
edwards said on 7/Jan/19
@tim 181 that was back then
edwards said on 7/Jan/19
hope taker to have public appearance.can see how tall he actually is,in public appearance he is out of his wrestling gear.
Canson said on 7/Jan/19
@Ozzy: the 2nd pic with Lebron he is but the first one that’s not that’s half inch.
Arut said on 6/Jan/19
Nice Love-LeBron pics. I've been saying all along that Love is taller than he's getting credit for on this site. Undertaker peak 6'8". Today 6'6.5". If he stands tall, peak 6'7" today. The site has him listed correctly
Ashley123 said on 6/Jan/19
Love sometimes looks more than two inches taller than Lebron
Click Here
Love is number ''11'', Lebron ''6'', Love looks easily over two inches taller than Lebron.
Taker is still solid 6'6 right now.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 6/Jan/19
Click Here listed barefoot heights sid 6ft6 3/4 2.00m kane 6ft8 2.03m undertaker 6ft8 3/4 2.05m. True or lies.
tim181 said on 6/Jan/19
Those claiming he is 6'5 look here with Mark henry at 4:12 whom Rob has just met and estimated 6'1.5-6'2.
Click Here
Canson said on 6/Jan/19
@Rawdshaq: Rob is very good at what he does. Not just estimating height but with his management of this site and of the people here.” As well as his reasoning behind his listings. As far as listing them a certain way he is not going to downgrade or upgrade unless burden of proof is there. He’s got a job to do with the site and has said before that he has to protect the site and the posters from exposure to liability etc. I have had times as have other where we mention that we believe a celeb is underlisted or overlisted where he didn’t change it even with strong evidence such as Shawne Merriman or Rick Fox who he even admitted didn’t look 6’6” in person but said since he isn’t certain he would leave it as is since he didn’t spend a lot of time around him. Then you have an example with Tyler Mane where he had pics with 6’6” Ali Baba looking less than an inch shorter than Mane and Mane came out with 6’7 so Rob reduced the listing. On the flip you had Bo Burnham where he looks taller than most 6’5 or weak 6’5s out there and we pointed out that he said 6’5 6’6 on a good day so he upgraded the listing to 6’5.25
Canson said on 6/Jan/19
@Dan Trojan: well said and I agree with everything you said. I believe a combination of better posture and camera angle. Taker we all agree has abysmal posture just like Hulk Hogan. I know Alan32080 said he looked 6’3-6’4 still as did a couple others who met him. I could buy a strong 6’3” for him perhaps but 6’3.5 seems high. He would in the morning but wouldn’t maintain that. I have 6’3/6’3.25 for Hulk today
Ozzy said on 6/Jan/19
Here are a couple photos of Love looking tall. about 2" taller than Lebron in this pic. Makes Lebron look around Takers height when he pictured with Love...

Click Here

Click Here

therockreportsquad.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/1-the-new-big-three-in-cleveland-2/ described as 6'10" here. Love had a combine height 6'7 3/4" barefoot. He must be at 6'9 in shoes
Dan Trojan said on 5/Jan/19
I agree with canson i don't feel there is 2 inches between love and taker i admit at times it did look like it but other times it only looked like an inch which goes to show that different camera angles can change the height perception also i think people are going by the eye level which everyone knows taker has a low eye level just look at the photos with him and sid sid clearly has a higher eye level but taker is taller because of his huge forehead i'm not here to argue with anyone it's just my opinion
Canson said on 5/Jan/19
Posture being bad is not an excuse. He has notoriously bad posture. That’s a fact and he’s had multiple surgeries. Love probably is 6’7” and change like 6’7.5 tops maybe even 6’7.25. Taker likely isn’t a full 2” shorter. Very possible of posture were better it would be 1.5”. Weak 6’6” is possible but anything less than 6’5.5 or .75 is low especially with how he matches up in the ring to other 6’6” guys like Baron corbin or Strowman
rawdshaq said on 5/Jan/19
Whoever runs this site or if his name is Rob which I had seen needs to downgrade Undertaker to at least 6' 6" flat. Maybe even 6' 5 1/2". He definitely isn't anything over 6' 6". His peak is fine though.

I personally think Undertaker is 6' 5 1/2".
Canson said on 5/Jan/19
Thompson looks at least 6’8” these days. He mentioned he grew an inch which is believable with love or Lebron
Canson said on 5/Jan/19
Thompson looks at least 6’8” these days. He mentioned he grew an inch which is believable
edwards said on 5/Jan/19
taker dont give such a tall aura that he onces gave,dont know how tall he is,how many inch has he lost is matter of debate.tbh we cant tell how tall he is,the only way to know is measurement itself.some time he can look shorter than baron corbin while other time he can appear same or can stack against corbin and strowman.the lowest i see is 6"5.5 and the highest is weak 6"6.
miller said on 5/Jan/19
the poor posture excuse is funny there is no way that kevin love is 6.7 and undertaker is 6.6 that is not possible. Love is maybe 6.7 1/2 that would make undertaker max 6.5 1/2 anything less than 2 inches between undertaker and love is not possible.
Riccardo89 said on 4/Jan/19
*Taker does not lie better
Riccardo89 said on 4/Jan/19
Why in your opinion wwe allow guys like Taker to pose near guys suppose to be shorter than him like Love or Thompson? Taker does not fell embarrass hearing pastor young call him 6'10 after that all the world saw him with Clevelands?
Why, as Kane , Taler dies not lie better? Come on say 6'8 too, but not 6'10.

And also what you think about other players like Jones or Jefferson looking the same height, cm more cm less, that undertaker?
Canson said on 4/Jan/19
@Dan Trojan: problem is people here keep using the pictures with Cavs players. And I can tell that love is not but 6’7” or 6’7 1/4 next to lebron and that’s Thompson is not 6’9” with him. Thompson May have grown but he’s in the 6’8” range. Taker wouldn’t be almost 4” shorter maybe 2.5-3” if he stood straight. It’s funny that people actually don’t realize how poor Taker’s posture really is. Taker while max 6’6” today is not as low as a solid 6’5”. His range which you and I agree on pretty much is easy to see that he’s somewhere between a weak 6’6” up to a solid 6’6”. Either of those I could buy for him or right between
Canson said on 4/Jan/19
@Dan Trojan: problem is people here keep using the pictures with Cavs players. And I can tell that love is not but 6’7” or 6’7 1/4 next to lebron and that’s Thompson is not 6’9” with him. Thompson May have grown but he’s in the 6’8” range. Taker wouldn’t be almost 4” shorter maybe 3”. It’s funny that people actually don’t realize how poor Taker’s posture really is
edwards said on 4/Jan/19
sotiris was right on this one, he said At 6'7" or 6'6", a 6'0" dude come upto his nose.on the other side,i dont get this one,5'9 ric flair comes upto takers nose.i myself encountered a 6'6 or 6'7 dude last night,being 183 cm myself which is about exactly 6 feet.i came upto his nose or a bit lesser.but a 5'9 flair came to takers nose.(no puns).
Canson said on 4/Jan/19
Meant to say Strowman. Damn autocorrect
edwards said on 4/Jan/19
@rawhshaq glad dude,you understood.
Ozzy said on 3/Jan/19
@rawdshaq Yes I hear what your saying mate. I always thought he was at least 6'10". Been a fan of his since 1994. And I share the same birthday 24 March, I couldnt grow as tall so birthday in common it is lol.
I first start noticing things werent adding up when he was wrestling guys like Edge Randy orton, they were big guys but not advertised as giants as such. And here they were sizing up fairly well. I thought, you know someone who is near 7' would be huge next guys like 6'3 etc.
When we first watched I remember my matrs and I were like undertaker is a big guy about 6'7. Then we were watching SS 93 vs Giant Gonzalez and we heard them say he was 6'10" we were like woah thats even bigger than we thought.
But theres too much evidence hes not that size. Whether be a little over 6'6 or under. He can certainly pass as a 6.6 rather than 6'9, 6'10 or 6'11".lol
Wasnt Lurch from addams family 6'10"? Maybe kayfabe wwe wanted to relate IDK? Good discussion people
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Jan/19
@rawdshaq Actually, Tristan Thompson is NBA-listed as 6'9" in shoes, only 6'7.5" barefoot. Here he is w/ 6'7" barefoot Kevin Love... Click Here

This, of course, means that Taker is 100% not more than 6'5".

When I was a kid I would marvel at Big John Studd being 6'10(!!!), only to be very disappointed when learning that he was only around 6'5".

The way ppl can look at Taker next to guys like Thompson and Love and STILL insist he's at least 6'6" b/c of bad posture is pretty funny.
Dan Trojan said on 3/Jan/19
I don't know this for sure but a comic con in my area has been hinting at the undertaker to make an appearance in june i should know within the next couple of months but if he does you can bet i will be getting a photo with him and i promise right now i will npt exaggerate if he's shorter than i thought i will admit i was wrong i'll even post the picture on here
Canson said on 3/Jan/19
These comparisons to Love and Tristan Thompson tho aren’t necessarily good. But this proves my point about other pictures that are used on this site. A lot of people tend to use pics like that to say another celeb is taller or that much taller when they aren’t. Tristan Thompson I doubt is even 6’9”. He isn’t that much taller than Love who is 6’7”-6’7.5 range. Thompson May have an inch on him tops. Thompson measured 6’7.5 when he was drafted likely a morning measurement so he’s not much over 6’8” and he did say he grew an inch and it’s believable as he had height on Lebron and Love both. But point here is that Taker true to form isn’t standing well there. Love I doubt had 2” on him and doubt Thompson had 4” on him. I’d bet money that if we had a better pic with even footwear for all parties that they would be much closer. Taker looks 6 6” or very near it in the ring with Corbin or Stroessner and was about 2” taller than Hogan at his peak maybe 1.5-2”
edwards said on 3/Jan/19
@ dan troyan i mean no argument here dude,i may be wrong but he looks taller than taker maybe due to fact that he has a good posture but taker only stands straight occasionally.maybe both could be equal.yes i have never met taker and i am going it through photos,he appears taller to me than how taker appears with other peoples.i could be wrong and he and taker could be equal.i am just saying my words dude.
rawdshaq said on 2/Jan/19
I am so confused it's not even funny. I saw this thread one day while looking at WWE stuff, came in here believing Undertaker was 6' 10", (my whole life I have) and now I know how tall he really is. I am actually believing he is 6' 5". This is him with Kevin Love who is 6' 7". Click Here

He will lucky to be called 6' 5" there. He is wearing boots in those photos and Kevin Love is wearing some normal sneakers.

Here he is with Tristan Thompson who is supposed to be 6' 10" but hes actually 6' 9". Click Here He looks 6' 5", again, maybe lower without boots.

People are gonna be like "arent you the guy who thought Undertaker was 6' 10"?? looool what??" but it really is depressing that WWE always has to lie about their workers heights and can't just be honest. You can't blame me for thinking Undertaker was 6' 10" when the WWE site itself lists him as 6' 10".
Dan Trojan said on 2/Jan/19
Yeah that photo is photoshopped the one picture with them together in my opinion it looks like taker has 4 inches on him and i met sting and he is legitimately 6'2" i'd bet my life on it just dsyin
Dan Trojan said on 2/Jan/19
Edwards just a question how can you say this guy looks taller than the undertaker if you've never seen the undertaker in person not trying to start an argument or anything just curious
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 2/Jan/19
Iam sorry 6ft9 was billed height 6ft7 barefoot 6ft8.5 in 1.5inches boots today 6ft6.
Ozzy said on 1/Jan/19
@Samsneed Yeah I thought it may have been. Some good editing there.
Its one reason I prefer to see full photos. As in the other photo Sting is on his toes if you look.
Thanks buddy.
edwards said on 1/Jan/19
i have a one neighbour named arthur,the dude is 6'6 or atleast he has claimed that height and says he weights like 134 kg.he looks taller and jacked than taker.
Lyle said on 1/Jan/19
@Shock Taker is closer to the camera in that pic, Kane is and has always been taller than Taker, even without lifts
Ozzy said on 1/Jan/19
@ Shock said on 31/Dec/18

I agree with your comment. Taker usually has a relaxed stance. I havnt seen too many photos outside the ring with ppl where he uses his height to "show off" .. he tends to try blend in with shorter people.
SamSneed said on 31/Dec/18
Ozzy, that Photo with Sting and Taker is photoshopped, only legit pic between Taker and Sting, is from Airport before Wrestlemania 31.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 31/Dec/18
@Shock Takers not over 6'7" but looks around 6'6". Kane looks around 6'7" with the possibility of being slightly under. You're right about Taker having relaxed posture which is why he seems to be guessed low.
Ozzy said on 31/Dec/18
Couple interesting photos came across,

Taker (looking extreme short) and Sting Click Here

Sting with others and Kevin Nash.
But sting is standing up on his toes
Click Here
Shock said on 31/Dec/18
Been a long time since I dropped a Taker height post, Undertaker was still as much taller than Kane (.5" to 2cm) as he ever was earlier this year, but yet Kane is still granted 6'7" today. I can count on you guys to argue about wiggle room, but look at this picture and acknowledge that either Kane is 6'6" or Taker is still over 6'7". Everything about Taker's missing bit of height has always been about his relaxed posture. Change my mind.

Click Here
edwards said on 30/Dec/18
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 27/Dec dude taker was never 6'9 barefoot
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 30/Dec/18
@rawdshaq Lol those images in no way prove Taker is 6'10" which everyone knows he isn't. He was billed at that just as Kane was billed at 7'0" to make them appear larger than life.
Canson said on 30/Dec/18
@Sotiris: that’s not a full body pic but agreed he doesn’t there. If we see pics inside the ring however he is similar to guys like Strowman and Corbin and was a good 1.5-2” taller than Hulk Hogan at his peak. 6’6” today is still very believeable especially since it’s proven he doesn’t have good posture just like Hogan doesn’t
Sotiris Gravas said on 30/Dec/18
Taker and King Kong Bundy (1995)... Click Here

King Kong Bundy w/ 6'1" peak height "Al Bundy" (1995)... Click Here

Al Bundy (Ed O'Neill) and 6'7" Bubba Smith/poor posture(1991)... Click Here


Now 6'0" Ed O'Neill w/ now 6'4" Rick Barry... Click Here

Rick Barry and 6'4.5" Charles Barkley... Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 29/Dec/18
Again, not to sound like a broken record, but... 6'7" Magic and maybe 5'8.5" Mario Lopez... Click Here , Click Here

Now, look at Undertaker and Lopez... Click Here

If anyone sees Undertaker at 6'6", you're looking w/ your wrestling-fan heart and not your eyes. Seriously.
Riccardo89 said on 29/Dec/18
This guy , on google, is 203cm. So i think no more than 200cm in reality.
Click Here
Riccardo89 said on 29/Dec/18
What about Taker be same height as Richard Jefferson, in your opinion?
Sim1993 said on 29/Dec/18
Taker has had these big boots that he wore when he was against bray wyatt at wm31 and till today I’ve got some like his and they are 2 inches so it would make taker 6ft 8-6ft 8.1/2in and face to face with braun at a wwe live event made him look mostly 6ft 8 cause with the footwear that Braun had on were probably the same but Braun would made taker look a bit bigger cause taker is a legend so from Romans height of 6ft3.1/3in in the ring, takers 6ft 8.5 and Braun’s being 6ft 8.75in but Braun would slouch down over taker being more over to the crowd.
Ozzy said on 29/Dec/18
I think taker is def 6'6" today, prob 6'7" peak. Ive seen a few photos now, but lets not forget its hard to make an honest guess when we cant see the whole picture, footwear, ground and camera angles, distances etc. I have stood on my toes a little to be taller in photos lol. I often wonder looking back on staredowns in wrestling, the tricks used to make one wrestler bigger than the other. Eg. Kanes debut Taker was looking up. Then the video posted below where they are "same" height. It makes me wonder what about the wrestling ring. Is the floor slightly slanted a little less on one side so when they come nose to nose it favours the wrestler more they are puting over. Eg Braun and kane first staredown, where Braun looked bigger? .. Full of tricks, thats my thought anyway.
rawdshaq said on 29/Dec/18
I stated that I think Undertaker was 6' 8" at peak and 6' 6" now because I changed my mind on the subject and tbh Ive been exaggerating the height differences of the wrestlers Taker faced. I really wish he could be 6' 10" but he was probably only like 6'8" and now like 6' 6" or maybe 6'7"
edwards said on 28/Dec/18
@ rawdshaq you believe andre was also 6'10 and again taker was also 6'10,taker was not even nearer to andre's height
184guy2 said on 28/Dec/18
Taker has never seen 6'10
Only if he gets measured straight out of bed using boots with a decent sole at his 20's
tree said on 28/Dec/18
Kane thicker boots.Taker still within half inch,wierd Click Here
rawdshaq said on 28/Dec/18
Wow @62B, that's crazy. I am going to trust you and change my decision. I think Undertaker was at most 6'8" at peak and maybe 6' 7" or 6' 6.5" now. I think I overestimated his height quite a bit lol.
62B said on 28/Dec/18
@rawdshaq. I have stood right next to Dibiase and Andre, and I have been within 15 feet of Taker. Taker was know where near Andre's height
edwards said on 28/Dec/18
infact, LOL who will believe in the fact that taker was 6'10 at peak and still 6'7.arguing over billed height make no sense
edwards said on 28/Dec/18
arguing over taker height of 6'10 at peak and still over 6'7 makes no sense,infact its hard to believe
edwards said on 28/Dec/18
rawdshaq dude,those photos do no justice,if you wanna believe taker was 6'10 at peak and still 6'7,thats upto you dude, but none of us are believing in the fact that taker was 6'10 at peak and still 6'7.
Canson said on 28/Dec/18
@Burn: way over. That’s consistent with WWF and WWE
Canson said on 28/Dec/18
@rawdshaq: That 6’8-6’9 he used to claim was his boot height. If you see the pics with Hogan and Taker there was at absolute most a 2” difference and Hogan was 6’5”-6’5.5” himself. He was max 6’7.25 maybe just 6’7 at his peak
rawdshaq said on 28/Dec/18
Why is it so hard to believe Undertaker was once 6' 10"? I have some even more evidence to prove my claim. Here is Undertaker with Ted Dibiase who is billed at 6' 3" and he could have been. His eyes line up around his jaw. Click Here

Now here is Ted Dibiase with Andre the Giant who was 6' 10" (Billed at 7' 4", 7' 5" after WM3 lol)
Click Here

It looks like a very similar height gap. Undertaker was 6' 10" and now is 6' 7" and with bad posture he'd drop to 6'6".
rawdshaq said on 28/Dec/18
No no Andre the Giant was 6' 10" nowhere near 7'5"
62B said on 28/Dec/18
@rawdshaq. In this video Kamala's height was exaggerated by at least 6". Click Here billing him at 6'10" when he is clearly shorter than Ernie Ladd billed at 6'9". So yes they would bill Undertaker 3" taller than his actual height. They do it all the time.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 27/Dec/18
@rawdshaq

You're probably one of those people who also believe that Andre The Giant was legit 7'5".
rawdshaq said on 27/Dec/18
Guys look at the photo evidence I have he only looks 6' 7" in one and that was with his matches months back and in every other photo he looks 6'9" or taller. I don't think they would bill Undertaker at 6' 10" if he was 6'7". I request some real photo evidence that Undertaker was 6' 7" peak and 6' 6" now.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 27/Dec/18
Kevin nash said back in 1999 iam 6ft11 barefoot taker was 1.5inches shorter undertaker 6ft9 1/2 barefoot.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 27/Dec/18
The 6'10" is WWE's billing nothing more.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 27/Dec/18
Taker said back in 2001 iam about 6ft8.5 204cm 6ft8.75 205cm.
Sim1993 said on 26/Dec/18
In his early years before being the undertaker mean mark was built 6ft 9 cause he was 6ft 7.5 so when he became taker vince said we’ll add another inch to make him 6ft 10 same for sycho Sid he was 6ft 6.5 and built 6ft 6ft 8 then with vince he was put upto 6ft 9
Arut said on 26/Dec/18
Undertaker Khali pic and any Big Show and Undertaker pic from 1999 show Undertaker was easily 6'8" peak. Today if good posture still hovering around 6'7" but mostly dipping below it with òld man creakiness. 6'5" talk on here is ridiculous.
Vegas' said on 26/Dec/18
Massive camera angle advantage for Hogan that photo. There isn't any good comparison of Hogan and Taker from 91. There is of Sid and Hogan (summer 91 and early 92) and obviously plenty of footage of Sid and Taker over the years
Riccardo89 said on 26/Dec/18
Ahahah Undertaker is 6'10 yeah, but
Mark Calaway is 6'5.5 today and under 6'7 peack
edwards said on 26/Dec/18
@rawdshaq sorry dude, sorry to say .you must be troll if you still believe taker was 6'10 at peak and still 6'7,you gotta understand this dude,there is difference between billed height and real height,you are going by billed height,wwe or any other pro wrestling promotions bills their supertstars taller than they really are making them larger than life.sorry to say but taker was neveeeeeeeeeeeeeeer 6'10 at peak and he aint 6'7 now.he was strong 6'7 at peak and maybe weak 6'6 now,if you want to believe that taker was 6'10 at peak and still 6'7 then you can believe that.there's no problem with me.
rawdshaq said on 25/Dec/18
Christmas is over... yay.

Anyway Undertaker is listed on Google at 6' 10" and if you go onto WWE.com and if you go to Undertaker, click on Superstar stats and he is listed as 6' 10". Vince McMahon referred to Undertaker as being 6' 10", JR referred to him as "Six-ten and a half!", Michael Cole refers to him as "near 7 foot!". I wanna really believe that the majority of people who have actually met the Undertaker say he is 6' 10", then he is 6' 10" or maybe near it. I do believe that now he is 53 he is 6' 7" now. Here he is with The Great Khali where he looks 6' 10" or 6' 9" and this was in 2006 or 2007 when he was in his early 40s. Click Here The Great Khali is about 7' 1" although WWE says he is 7' 3" but we all know that isn't true. Undertaker looking 6' 10" there.

Click Here This is a picture earlier this year and tbh he only looks 6' 6.5" there and remember he is a near 54 year old man with a countless amount of surgeries over the year... so round up and just say he is 6' 7" there. I believe Triple H is 6' 2".

Click Here Here he is with Braun Strowman. I believe Braun Strowman is 6' 8" which is his listing.... and he looks about the same height as Undertaker so he looks actually 6' 8" there.

Click Here Here is their battle at WM27, Undertaker before hips got jacked up which is where I believe he went to 6' 7", and again Undertaker looks 6' 9" there if Triple H is 6' 2" or maybe 6' 3" or 6' 4" idk I need to look at him more

Click Here And if any of yall wanna joke around saying Undertaker is fkin 6' 3" and yes I saw somebody say that.... here he is with 6' 3" Roman Reigns and he looks 6' 9" there again and that was actually just about 2 years ago

Click Here He is here with Goldberg in 2017 and he looks 6' 10" here actually so I really dont know if he got surgery back a few years to fix his height, again he looks 6' 7" with Triple H which was earlier this year.

Click Here This picture kinda sucks but its Kane and Undertaker walking side by side and Kane was elected mayor and on his medical report he was said to be 6' 8" and weigh 295 pounds. Undertaker looks a tiny bit shorter. I went back and looked at the Triple H photo and I think Undertaker was slouching big time.


I really believe that Undertaker was at least 6' 10" when he was younger and he went to 6' 9" for awhile then dropped to 6' 7". I think he isn't any shorter than 6' 7" and for gods sake not under 6' 6". That makes 95% of the roster under 6 feet if Undertaker was 6' 5", and if he was 6' 3" that means most wrestlers are 5' 6". Undertaker still a strong 6' 7" and when he was younger at least 6' 10".
Riccardo89 said on 25/Dec/18
What about this pic in your opinion?Click Here
SamSneed said on 25/Dec/18
Sotiris,
This pictures of Taker with Flair and Dutch Mantell are not good.
Flair in 2008 was easily taller than he is now, and in this Pic Taker is looking down at him(not a good posture). Picture with Dutch, mantell is stading closer to the Camera.
Undertaker in good posture had almost full head on Paul Bearer, who is taller than both Dutch Mantel and Regis Philbin.
6,7.5 peak, 6'6.25 right now with good posture.
Canson said on 25/Dec/18
This is both around their peaks. Hogan isn’t even standing at his tallest and it’s still not 4” and that’s with Taker being closer to the camera. That’s up to 2”. Really probably just 1.5-2” range 4-5cm.

This is at their peaks. Today Taker is 6’6” with good posture and Hulk 6’3-6’3.25 range imho a solid or strong 6’3”

Click Here
Canson said on 25/Dec/18
This is both around their peaks. Hogan isn’t even standing at his tallest and it’s still not 4” and that’s with Taker being closer to the camera. That’s up to 2”. Really probably just 1.5-2” range 4-5cm

Click Here
edwards said on 25/Dec/18
@ rawdshaq dude can we have a look where taker looks 6'7 currently since you told you have lots of evidence to back that he was 6'10 at peak and 6'7 currently.lol
edwards said on 25/Dec/18
@ rawdshaq lol,taker was neveeeeeeeeeeeer 6'10 at any point of his career,he was strong 6'7 at most.he was 6'8 in boot at his peak.nor he has 4"on hogan.get this man 6'10 is his billed height.like canson said most of the shots were 4 to 5 cm difference.the photo you posted is of mike tyson who is 5'10 at peak and at most and maybe 5'9.5 now.you can see 7 to 8 inch difference .which put taker to 6'6 or a bit over it since it was back in 2013 and taker didnt have lost much height like he has lost now.taker current is between 6'5.5 to weak 6'6.
Canson-6'4 3/8 said on 25/Dec/18
Undertaker was not 6’10” at his peak nor did he have 4” on Hogan. He had max 2” on him. Most shots of them were around 4-5cm difference. A peak Taker maxed out (best case) at 6’7.25 and Hogan 6’5-6’5.5
rawdshaq said on 24/Dec/18
Edwards I just put a really long comment and I accidentally clicked a link and it got deleted!! Anyway, I guess I'll have to shorten it. No, Undertaker was definitely 6' 10" at peak. He had 4 inches on peak 6' 6" Hogan, and he was 8 inches shorter than Gonzalez. He was referred to as being 6' 10" for most of his career. When he came back in 2004 he looked 6' 9"ish and now in post 2019 he looks about 6' 7". He still towers everybody he wrestles. I had lots of evidence to back that he was 6' 7" now but again the post quit out so here is only one Click Here
Canson said on 24/Dec/18
@Burn: while I agree I would also say Strowman isn’t quite that high at a low. Meaning I see his low being more like 199cm than 200. He’s not noticeably taller than baron Corbin. Corbin is an early morning 6’6.5 meaning 6’6 flat is likely for someone his size at their low. Rob’s listing for Corbin was better before honestly. Maybe 6’6 1/8” but I really say 6’6
62B said on 24/Dec/18
@Sotiris. Nice pic of Brody and Super Star. Graham is closer to the camera and we cant see their shoes, but Brody could be about 2" taller putting him in the 6'4.5" range. Hard to put a young Undertaker as Texas Red above 6'7".
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 24/Dec/18
@dewie 5ft9 175cm That's what was surprising to me and what people don't see. I was expecting Strowman to be taller but when I was saw them together I was surprised to see Taker look quite close in height to Strowman and I don't remember a big difference in footwear. I just can't see 6'5" like people here are saying they're not considering his poor posture.
edwards said on 24/Dec/18
@ rawdshaq he was never 6'10 in anypart of his career.he was strong 6'7 at most.i think you are new to wrestling and going by billied height. bty wwe billed its wrestlers to make them larger than life.even in lifts he was 6'8 or close to it during his tallest.dude today he is about 6'5.5 to weak 6'6.dude you mean taker is still 6'7 and 6'10 during his peak,LOL
Sotiris Gravas said on 23/Dec/18
@62B Here's Brody w/ Billy Graham, (who I don't think was ever more than 6'2.5"):
Click Here

Graham w/ 6'1" Vince (1977 promo)... Click Here

Funny how Graham looks very short next to Nick Bockwinkel (billed 5'10"):
Click Here

Here w/ Arnie, who I now think was actually 5'11" peak height... Click Here

Arnie w/ 5'9.5" Sarah Douglas... Click Here
rawdshaq said on 23/Dec/18
Undertaker is in the 6' 7" range. He slouches a lot and has a poor stance during promos which is why he looks 6' 5" sometimes. I believe when he was younger and before all his injures he was 6' 10" (Mick Foley said he was 6'10", too) but he is in his mid 50s now and he is also a 320 pound man and big people lose a lot of height. I believe if he stood straight up against a wall and was measured, he would be a little over 6' 7". In boots I'm sure he is still close to 6' 10". He was even listed as 6' 10.5" when he was younger so I'm sure he was at least 6' 10".

Peak Height: 6' 10"
Current height: 6' 7"
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 23/Dec/18
Taker is not 6ft5 he was the same height as strowman 6ft6 3/4 200cm undertaker does not always standing straight.
edwards said on 23/Dec/18
@rob merry christmas rob,bty i think rob its time to downgrade taker height,i personally think downgrading to atleast weak 6'6 is reasonable,6'5 maybe low and strong 6'6 is high,maybe i think its time to downgrade .downgrading to weak 6'6 is reasonable.i think its time to downgrade taker height,he is not getting any younger(infact none of us are)the man is getting older and has enough surgeries,i think its time to downgrade taker height.what do you think rob?
Canson said on 23/Dec/18
@Sotiris: I believe Watt is a legit 6’5” for sure. Campbell tho looks 2”+ taller not 3” there which confirms it being a morning height as 6’5 3/8 and 6’7 3/4 which come out about 6’5 and 6’7.25-.375
edwards said on 23/Dec/18
@ canson yes,dude i was saying the same
edwards said on 22/Dec/18
@sotiris gravas i respect your thought dude but i think 6'5.5 is possible,tho,he can look 6,5 at time.
edwards said on 22/Dec/18
@canson yes dude
Canson said on 22/Dec/18
@Edwards: I think downgrade to 6’6” but no lower than that. He may surprise us
Sotiris Gravas said on 21/Dec/18
@SamSneed I've seen that pic before, and yes, he does look tall there; let's not forget Flair is doing the slouching here... and we don't know about footwear. Taker doesn't look more than 6'5" here w/ Flair... Click Here

Here's an old pic w/ Dutch Mantel (billed as 5'8"), who's exactly 1" under his nose:
Click Here At 6'7", a 5'8" guy comes at least 1" under my chin, not my nose.

Here's Taker (poor posture) w/ 5'6" peak height Regis Philbin at WrestleMania 7 (1991): Click Here
edwards said on 21/Dec/18
i think its time to downgrade takers height ,he is not getting any young(infact none of us are)but the guy is ageing and had multiple surgeries,i thinks its time to downgrade taker's height
Canson said on 21/Dec/18
@Burn: very true
Canson said on 21/Dec/18
@Edwards: he does still look shorter but not by 2”. However he is much closer to the camera. I’m glad someone else other than I finally said that. Others use that pic to “prove” that Barkley is underlisted or downplays his height. They never acknowledge that he is closer to the camera
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 21/Dec/18
Campbell's 6'7.75" combine measurement Click Here he's not even quite 6'8"
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 21/Dec/18
May 2 cousens very tall barefoot 6ft6 198cm the tallest one 6ft6 3/4 200cm iam 5ft9 175cm afternoon barefoot no lies.
Sotiris Gravas said on 20/Dec/18
@Dan Trojan It's all good, dude. Happy holidays.


@Canson Just for fun, here's Calais Campbell w/ The Rock... Click Here

The Rock w/ Alonzo Mourning... Click Here

Calais and 6'5" J.J. Watt... Click Here
SamSneed said on 20/Dec/18
Click Here

Undertaker is still 6'6 easily, but his posture is poor sometimes,
don't forget he has long neck, but he often slouches.
edwards said on 20/Dec/18
in that photo Barkley doesn’t look shorter but he is closer to the camera than Wilkins.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 20/Dec/18
@Canson I'm not surprised. That's why I wouldn't trust other people's perception unless they are honest about their own height. I mean if someone is inflating themselves you're not really going to take them seriously when it it comes to judging height differences. Sometimes though they can genuinely not be good at it and I suppose you'd be able to tell.
Dan Trojan said on 19/Dec/18
Sotiris sorry about the remarks I've been making idk I think I was letting all this get to me in the end it's just height and I respect your decision there are some I agree on like giant Gonzalez for example I he was measured at 7'6" so I do agree with that one and also Andre the giant I used to think he was over 7'0" but now I don't think he ever was especially looking at the staredowns with hulk hogan
Canson said on 19/Dec/18
@Sotiris: in that particular pic Barkley doesn’t look 2 inches shorter but he is closer to the camera than Wilkins. I agree on Mourning. 6’8” range somewhere in there maybe not flat but maybe a strong 6’8” to 6’8.5. Campbell actually measures 6’7.75 at the combine so he’s less than that. 6’7.25 is even possible although he may have camera advantage with Barkley there. I know Jonathan Ogden shows a 6’8” flat so he’s probably even less than that perhaps 6’7.5-.75 and he looked around 3” taller than barkley too.
Canson said on 19/Dec/18
@Sotiris: in that particular pic Barkley doesn’t look 2 inches shorter but he is closer to the camera than Wilkins. I agree on Mourning. 6’8” range somewhere in there maybe not flat but maybe a strong 6’8” to 6’8.5. Campbell actually measures 6’7.75 at the combine so he’s less than that. 6’7.25 is even possible although he may have camera advantage with Barkley there. I know Jonathan Ogden shows a 6’8” flat so he’s probably even less than that and he looked around 3” taller than barkley too
Canson said on 19/Dec/18
@Sotiris: in that particular pic Barkley doesn’t look 2 inches shorter but he is closer to the camera than Wilkins.
Riccardo89 said on 19/Dec/18
Also there are many tall guys here commenting, but the average(5'8 5'9) would not really notice the difference between a 6'7 and a 6'6. And even between a 6'7 and 6'5,5'. This is why wwe or people in general push heights so much
Riccardo89 said on 19/Dec/18
The only sure thing here is that Taker's height is definitely all in 1 inch, between 6'5 and 6'6. Less is impossible, more also.
Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Dec/18
Just for fun, here's a young Brody playing b-ball... Click Here ,
Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Dec/18
Here's another Barkley/Flair pic to compare w/ Taker... Click Here

Keep in mind that Barkley's around 6'4.5", seen here w/ 6'6.5" barefoot Dominique Wilkins:
Click Here

Wilkins is NBA-listed as 6'8". Here he is w/ a 6'8" w/o shoes gentleman, Alonzo Mourning:
Click Here

Barkley w/ 6'8" Calais Campbell... Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Dec/18
Here's Bruiser Brody (billed 6'8" LOL) w/ Stan Hansen (billed 6'4")... Click Here ,
Click Here


Compare that w/ Hogan and Hansen (equal footwear)... Click Here ,
And here (maybe Hogan's in cowboy boots here)... Click Here
Here w/ Hansen and Takahashi (maybe 5'5")... Click Here

Brody w/ Bill Anderson... Click Here

Bruiser and Hogan on a magazine cover in what looks to be a Photoshop situation: Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Dec/18
Canson I used to think Conan was 6'3.5", but can't see him as more than 6'3" now. Here's Conan and Roman Reigns... Click Here

Compare legit 6'3" Titus w/ Roman... Click Here , Click Here ,
Here in a group shot (Strowman included)... Click Here
Canson said on 18/Dec/18
@Burn: it varies. My 6’3” friend will consider someone my height or his “our height”. When I’m about 3cm taller than he is actually more like 3.5cm. Then I have a coworker who claims 6’2 likely was at one point (6’1 range today) and said he doesn’t even see height. If someone is tall like he is he just sees them as similar in his eyes. Then of course a colleague who is 6’1-6’2 that says he’s almost 6’3” and thinks everyone is taller than they are. It’s clear that he’s a sneaker measurer and wears flats all the time which damages his claim
Canson said on 18/Dec/18
@Sotiris: if McHale possibly has footwear advantage on Conan then I see 6’3.5 and 6’3.25. At worst they may be the same height 6’3.25
Canson said on 18/Dec/18
McHale looks taller than Conan at points in the video Vegas posted. It’s hard to tell who has the footwear advantage on the video however. However, I don’t have Conan as anymore than 6’3.25 (191cm). That would still make McHale at least a weak 6’4” if anything else
Canson said on 18/Dec/18
McHale looks taller than Conan at points in the video Vegas posted. It’s hard to tell who has the footwear advantage on the video however
62B said on 17/Dec/18
Click Here Here you can see that Brody is bigger and taller than Rick Rude, but there doesn't seem to be the same height difference that taker had over Brody. So I don't know, if Rude was 6'3"? Brody looks maybe 6'4.5"? Puts peak Taker 6'6 3/4"-6'7"? I don't know lol. Its late and the footage is all old and grainy
62B said on 17/Dec/18
Actually. The more Bruiser Brody footage I watch the more I think he could have been closer to 6'4" than 6'5". I think Taker as Texas Red looked about 2 inches taller than Brody. I did think in person from across the room Taker looked 6'7" in the early 90's, so I will stick with that for a peak right now. But if I had to choose a fraction over or a fraction under 6'7" I'd go a fraction under.
62B said on 17/Dec/18
Click Here A young Undertaker vs Bruiser Brody. I always thought Brody was pretty close to a peak Hogan
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 17/Dec/18
@edwards I also wouldn't put too much trust into other people's perception. The average person isn't going to be very height aware like people on here and if they are edged out by a small amount the chances are it'll go unnoticed.
Canson said on 17/Dec/18
@Edwards: the weak 6’6” is possible for him. It’s also possible his posture didn’t align with the guy you met. I’d be hard pressed to believe Kevin Love has that much height on him in those pics but then again to be fair to everyone here including Sotiris, we don’t know if Taker has had some type of injury or medical issues with his back or frame which is common with taller guys
edwards said on 17/Dec/18
@sotiris gravas ,i totally agree with you ,i have to be honest with you dude,all these are living proofs,taker looking up to both thompson and love,i can still see at least 2 inches between them in a photo you posted of taker and love and taker and thompson.i agree now,taker is wearing higher heel shoes than love but also taker cant appear taller than love who is 6'7.dont distract from the fact that taker was looking up to both thompson and love.taker is lucky to be even 6'5. taker seems to be struggling even to appear 6'5 in the photo posted.taker is wearing higher heels than love and again he is looking up to love and thompson,dont know about others opinion but i can clearly see more than 2 inch between taker and love and even thompson.taker is wearing higher heel shoes than love.i agree fully dude.thats hell of a proof.i told what i saw
edwards said on 17/Dec/18
@sotiris gravas i admit dude,i agree with you on this one.dude.i admit i agree w/you dude.
johnson71 said on 17/Dec/18
through 1988 to around 1991 i used to help my buddy run a weekly wrestling show that he'd put on for the town every sunday. he had a lot of good workers and he made a lot of good money. we used to be creative and make tale of the tapes for main events and made championships for big guys just so underdogs can win them. our logic was anybody who was over 6ft was instantly 6ft 8 and anybody under that was auto billed to 5ft 10. one of the dudes there was named arthur and he was really 6ft 6 and weighed 270 pounds, but we decided what we would do is say why not and said he was 7 ft 2 and weighed 400 pounds. people bought that and brought even more visitors to see this giant, and since he looked so tall in the ring compared to guys everyone thought was 6ft 5 who were really only around 6 feet made him look that tall

wwf has this knowledge. they say undertaker is 6ft 11 or 7 feet something like that because all the real 6ft guys are billed past 6ft 3. like the rock is supposed to be 6ft 8, so obviously undertaker has to be over 7 feet right? wrong, rock is only 6ft 5 and undertaker is only 6ft 9. every single wrestling show says everyone is taller than they really are

im 5ft 11 and when i worked, i said i was 6ft 4. it works, trust me
Vegas' said on 16/Dec/18
Conan and McHale side by side on video Click Here
Canson said on 16/Dec/18
@Robby: that appears more like a morning measurement for Love. He looks closer to 6’7” to people who’ve met him and with Lebron they’re virtually the same height. But on the same token Taker probably doesn’t stand completely straight with him either because at times it looks even more than a 2” difference which I find extremely hard to believe. I could see if he looked 2” taller and attribute that to footwear and maybe slightly better posture but his posture likely is horrendous there
Canson said on 16/Dec/18
@Sotiris: we can’t see footwear. While I don’t rule out 6’3” for Conan only because he has thick hair, I think he’s more like 191cm
Riccardo89 said on 16/Dec/18
The shoes he wears in the pic with Love are really big...how you think is Taker's height in the pic and with that shoes then?
Im confuse because he cant be so "short" as some of you say, but also clearly he cant be that tall(6' 6,5" and over) looking at that pictures.

Btw Flair dies not arrive at taker nose in my opinion, he is shorter than that.
But does not change a lot, undertaker is less than 2 meters and , before read your comments, i could never imagine that. This means that for all the others is the same.

Undertaker 6'5,5(max?)
HHH 6'1
Orton 6'3,5
Big show 6'9
Kane 6'5,5 (6'6?)
Nash 6'8 or a hair less
Jones 6'7.25 6'7,5
Lesnar 6'2.5
Reigns 6'2.25(?)
Cena 6'0
Hbk i dont know, 5'9.5.
All barefoot.
Vegas' said on 16/Dec/18
Rob has Zach Levi at 6'3 Click Here

Conan and Levi on video Click Here
edwards said on 16/Dec/18
back 6 months a ago,i met a huge big black 6'5 dude in austin,the dude told he was 6'5 and he told that he met taker in texas longhorns match.he said he and taker was of same height and both of them were wearing normal shoes.no offence here,i dont mean to say that taker is 6'5 the dude told me that but i personally dont agree with him as he said both of them were same height,but i personally think that between 6'5.5 to a weak 6'6 for taker.
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Dec/18
@Canson Conan (looking very 6'3") w/ 6'3" (not 6'3.5") Joel McHale... Click Here

Joel and 6'3" Mike Colter... Click Here

Joel looks very 6'3" next to Nick Young, who's maybe 6'4.5", not even full 6'5":
Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Dec/18
@edwards Dude, maybe I'm wrong about Taker... I can see him being 6'5.25", but even 6'5.5" is a stretch (pun intended). Guys like Dan Trojan think I'm out to get Taker or something... Pics can be deceptive, so, who knows, maybe I'm wrong. But I don't think so.

Here's Taker and 5'9" Flair... Click Here At 6'7", a 6'0" dude comes up to my nose, yet here's a 5'9" (maybe 5'8.5") guy coming up to Taker's nose. How in the world is Taker supposed to be 6'6.5" like Rob has him here...? Seriously. How?
Here's Flair and 6'4.5" Barkley... Click Here
Here's Flair and 6'7" Kevin Love... Click Here
Does Undertaker look taller than 6'5" next to Flair by comparison...? No.



Here's 6'7" Magic w/ NBA-listed 6'5.25 w/o shoes" DeMar DeRozan... Click Here or even Magic and 6'4.75" Kobe... Click Here...


Compare that w/ Taker and Tristan Thompson... Click Here , Click Here
or w/ 6'7" Kevin Love... Click Here , Click Here

Remember, Love is listed as 6'10" in shoes (LOL) and Thompson only 6'9".


THIS WAS TAKER AND LOVE'S FOOTWEAR THAT DAY... Click Here , Click Here




Here's 6'2" Terry Crews w/ 6'9" Kanter... Click Here
Compare Taker (closer to camera) and Kanter... Click Here... Kanter leaning to one side in both pics.



Just for a fun comparison, here's 6'4.5" Zlatan Ibrahimovic and Luke Walton (NBA-listed as 6'8" in shoes... Click Here


@Vegas I don't think I ever said 6'4" for Taker... pretty sure I said 6'5", if I'm not mistaken. Though sometimes Taker does look that short... Click Here seen here w/ Goldberg who's maybe 6'1" now. (I think Momoa might be more 6'3.5" than 6'4".)



BOTTOM LINE... the pics w/ Thompson and Love (and James Jones)prove there's ZERO chance Taker is now 6'6". NO WAY. He is completely dwarfed by both men. No offense to anyone on this forum, but I don't buy that Taker always has poor posture; it's become a hackneyed excuse.

Undertaker is around 6'5". I'll buy 6'5.25", not much more than that. I can understand how ppl might think Taker is HUGE if they think Kevin Love is really 6'10"(!!!) But he's not. Love is around 6'7" barefoot, which means Taker simply is NOT as tall as ppl make him out to be. The reason Taker might look 6'6" w/ other wrestlers is b/c they, too, are not as tall as ppl think.

If I'm proven wrong, I'll humbly admit I was wrong.
Michael Allen said on 15/Dec/18
6'8" peak
6'6" currently
Robby said on 15/Dec/18
So my question is if Kevin Love is around 6'8" barefoot. Love 6'10" in his basketball shoes. Was Love 6'10" in that pic with Undertaker? Was he wearing his basketball shoes in those pics with Taker? If Love was wearing the basketball shoes than he has footwear advantage over Taker in the pic? I believe Taker is in the 6'6" range. Especially with the Alibaba pic from a few years ago. I met Taker as well in 2015.

I have met Kevin Nash, Tyler Mane, John Morrison, Jerry Lawler, DDP, Jake Roberts, Jim Duggan, Nasty Boys, Brutus Beefcake, Ted Dibiase, Virgil, Tugboat, Hulk Hogan, CM Punk, Daniel Bryan, Sting, Randy Orton, Kane, Mick Foley, John Cena, Dean Ambrose, Seth Rollins, Roman Reigns and plenty of ladies as well Charlotte Flair, Becky Lynch, Bayley, Alexa Bliss, The Bella Twins & Paige. I have met celebs as well. All have pics with names mentioned above. Let me know if you want to see any of them. I will post them. My height is 5'9.5" barefoot. 5'10.5" in shoes. So I won't be much help with the larger wrestlers Taker, Kane, Nash etc
edwards said on 15/Dec/18
my personally guess is anywhere from 6'5.5 to weak 6'6 barefoot.some photos posted here do no justice.i am not trying to downgrade or upgrade takers height and thats just me.
Canson said on 15/Dec/18
@Dan Trojan: that’s a very fair assessment about opinions
Canson said on 15/Dec/18
@Sotiris: love would only have about 2-3cm or maybe a full 3 on Taker in reality if both are as tall as they’re supposed to be
Canson said on 15/Dec/18
@Dan Trojan: actually I agree with you on the listing for sure! And your logic has always been great and you post intelligently man! I see the opposite all the time for example on Klitschko’s page there is a poster who has been trying to make him 6’6” for years and has gone to trying to make Foreman 6’4” for years when they’re appropriately listed. I don’t understand why. And with suspect pics, many of Sotiris’s are for sure. I can’t say that I have not posted a dodgy pic before myself though. Sometimes we get caught up but if it’s pointed out then it shouldn’t be replicated on the same celebrity. I will say that the Taker pic with the guy Has him closer to the camera than the Hopper pic. l have Hopper at a weak 6’5” with Rob but at the same time, I put two and two together like you and Vegas and can tell even with all of that that he’s 6’6” not only because of the difference in the pics but because he looks that height still in the ring and in many other pics. Its proven that he’s got horrendous posture
edwards said on 15/Dec/18
@sotiris gravas dude i agree with you on some photos but are you sure he aint over 6'5.
Riccardo89 said on 14/Dec/18
Click Here

Anyway if that guy (Ali Baba) is 6,6 or just a bit less means that there is nothing more to say about Undertaker's height.
Canson said on 14/Dec/18
@Sotiris: that’s a true statement. However, if we say that about those pics that Vegas posted we have to say the same about the ones that were posted with Kevin Love and Taker as Love appeared favored in at least one of them
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 14/Dec/18
@Dan Trojan I think he's just clutching at straws. The images provided aren't very good. Based on the face offs I've seen Undertaker involved in he looks around 6'6" certainly not a flat 6'5" and 6'4" is just ridiculous. Keep in mind he tends to stand quite relaxed so if he looks near 6'6" in that stance I'm sure he would be right around the mark if measured.
Dan Trojan said on 14/Dec/18
I get what you're saying canson it just seems like he's so determined to prove undertaker is 6'5" I get it he has his opinion and I accept that but whenever somebody posts their opinion he's all over them that's what bothers me he can't seem to accept anyone else's opinion
edwards said on 14/Dec/18
backed in 2014 taker edged or was atleast same as ali baba who is 6'6,dont know he has shrink or not but taker had surgery some months ago,everybody shrink with ages.
Canson said on 14/Dec/18
@Dan Trojan: to add to that, I’m not singling out one person because we have all been guilty of it. Even some of Sotiris’s pics are suspect as I mentioned
Canson said on 14/Dec/18
@Dan Trojan: to Sotiris’s defense, we can’t see footwear in those pictures. That doesn’t prove much really. I’m gonna play Devil’s advocate and say that by that Logic Taker can look at least 2” shorter than Kevin Love who looks 6’7” more often than not. However, I look inside of the ring and Taker looks near 6’6” with other wrestlers. I’m not advocating Sotiris’s measurement but some of the pics Vegas posts in general (not just this page) are just as suspect (if not more) than Sotiris’s. I’m not saying that Vegas doesn’t prove his point there because I agree Vegas and you that he is about 6’6” but I doubt he’s over the mark still. However, I’m just saying that we can’t just use pics that are convenient for proving our points
Canson said on 14/Dec/18
@Dan Trojan: to Sotiris’s defense, we can’t see footwear in those pictures. That doesn’t prove much really. I’m gonna play Devil’s advocate and say that by that Logic Taker can look at least 2” shorter than Kevin Love who looks 6’7” more often than not. However, I look inside of the ring and Taker looks near 6’6” with other wrestlers. I’m not advocating Sotiris’s measurement but some of the pics Vegas posts in general (not just this page) are just as suspect (if not more) than Sotiris’s.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Dec/18
@Vegas Nice pics of Tom Hopper vs. Taker, though, Taker is WAY closer to the camera, and Tom Hopper... isn't.
Canson said on 13/Dec/18
@Vegas: Nonso May have advantage but not sure how much. But for Momoa, he’s been under 6’4” imho ever since I saw that pic with Rob. Imho Rob has him about a Cm maybe half inch too high. I had 6’3.5-.75 but now just 6’3.5 really
Canson said on 13/Dec/18
@Sotiris: I actually agree on Conan but maybe still a fraction over the mark. Imho he’s never been anything more than maybe 191-192 peak. I honestly don’t see him having lost much height at all. Maybe a mm or a couple. He doesn’t look anything over 191 range at his peak either. But You see all of the people on Celebheights making the arguments that he’s 6’3.75 and that others such as Hasselhoff and Neeson were likely over 6’4 or that there is 1/4” difference???? How can we see 1/4” that easily is my question. People want Conan to be taller for some reason or as close to 6’4 as possible when he wasn’t. He gave it away with his claim of 6’4:6’4.5 that’s his shoe height. He wasn’t as tall as Michael jordan was. Jordan is a true 6’4.5 guy without shoes and that’s his low. If we see Conan with 6’4.75 Kobe Bryant that’s close to 2” at least 1.5”.
Canson said on 13/Dec/18
@Vegas: taker decided to stand properly in that pic.
Dan Trojan said on 13/Dec/18
Nice pic there Vegas that shows undertaker definitely at least 6'6" look out for sotiris he's gonna say that guy isn't really 6'5" and he's gonna start posting pictures to try and prove it
Vegas' said on 13/Dec/18
Sotiris, Rob met Momoa and Anozie on flat ground and only estimates them 1.5 inches apart and those photos have them 3-4 inches difference so clearly Anozie is on higher ground..

As far as Fallon goes, looks like standing behind him with floor camera makes the person seem shorter. I am roughly Fallons height and the difference you are attempting to show between Fallon and Taker is similar to how I measure up to people who are 6'4 range. Clearly Taker is more than 6'4!

You also didn't explain how Taker went from edging out 6'6 Ali Baba in late 2014 to looking 6'4ish with Fallon 9-10 months later?
tree said on 13/Dec/18
That proves that 6ft5 for current taker is bs
Good find Vegas

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.