How tall is The Undertaker - Page 2

Add a Comment8781 comments

Average Guess (703 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.7in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.44in (199.2cm)
Riky said on 25/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 25/Sep/20
If Big Show was 7'peak there is no chance on Earth, this a 4.75" gap between them


Again with this story? Again with big show 7 foot barefoot in his prime?? Again? I leave all the hopes :)

Again i didn't measured him of course but its pretty evident That he was max 6'11".MAXXXXX, not minimum. MAX.

Undertaker was around 4 inches shorter.
Battery6565 said on 25/Sep/20
"Braun Strowman is taller than Undertaker"

Click Here

@Rob I mean the MSG video made it clear but even this is a big indication of the truth to be honest.
Riky said on 25/Sep/20
Harry Sachs

Hmmm Ali Baba isn't listed somewhere I guess, and no one claims he was 6'5".
He said about 6'6" probably 6'5.75 and undertaker edged him out, with slightly footwear advantage for Taker. Ergo Taker there, in 2013, actually was slightly over 6'6".


Battery 6565

I never said Taker was peak 6'5", sure he can't be over 6'7" peak. It's impossible.
It's not what you guess, but the way you share your thoughts that is really stupid. Also Im pretty sure about the fact that no one really insulted you, I'm not English but I can read your lenguage and I don't find insults.
Most of all you are the aggressive one here sometimes.
And again Ike Catcher isn't 6'9" absolutely not! Check him next to 6'4.5 Ibrahimovic and you can see the truth.
Battery6565 said on 25/Sep/20
Yeah, I'm convinced of my claims. Even Goldberg is barely at Takers eye level. This right here is easily 4.5-5" and Goldberg is listed 6'2" current height.
Click Here
Canson said on 25/Sep/20
6'3 Julian said on 24/Sep/20
@Battery I don’t often call out trolls, but c’mon, in those photos with Scott Hall you can’t see footwear and they’re slouching in two of them. As for Khali, he’s easily got the same forehead size as Taker and Kane looks taller in photos next to Khali. But hey, I know you’re just gonna call me a downgrader for ignoring bad photos so why bother?

Yes anyone with an alternative opinion he will either accuse of throwing insults at him or call them out and force them to throw insults back at him.
Canson said on 25/Sep/20
@Editor Rob: that’s certainly possible. He could have been what you list him here 6’6.25” but also no guarantee he was measured at or near an afternoon height. Judging by how he looked with Taker, 6’6.25 is ok but if he were 6’6.5” he likely would’ve rounded up or claimed the half. Either way, it’s funny and sad how conveniently the poster below has to make him 6’6.5 or insinuate he’s rounding down half inch just to make Taker a certain height.
Battery6565 said on 25/Sep/20
If Big Show was 7'peak there is no chance on Earth, this a 4.75" gap between them
Click Here
Battery6565 said on 25/Sep/20
I took the time to read just about every comment and all you guys just resorted to your usual antics of name calling, throwing insults and getting worked up because you have no answer to my questions.

Anyway, there we have it. Rob has said Sid was a fraction above 6'6" like I said the whole time so instead of me rubbing it in all your faces, you can just soak in your own buffoonery of calling me out repeatedly for suggesting something which turned out to be correct. Now you guys look very smart, don't you!?

I'm not going to engage in throwing insults and passive aggressive arguments with any of you because most of you are angry that Undertaker is taller than you want him to be. Just learn to accept people can have a different opinion to you all and stop getting so worked up.

The man is crippled with injuries and broken down from surgeries, he isn't going to be standing at full height like I've always said.
Click Here

I'm sure if someone asked him to stand at his absolute tallest bust a gut in his prime or even now hed be taller.

Current Undertaker with 6'6.5" Strowman:
Click Here

2003 Undertaker with Nathan Jones:
Click Here

Late 1990s Undertaker with late 1990s Big Show:
Click Here

Current Undertaker with 6'7.5" Dr Disrespect:
Click Here

Young Undertaker and 6'3" Rock
Click Here

In the photos with Mcintyre he's literally standing with terrible posture and clearly tilting his head down to look at him. Does that look like bust a gut posture to anyone?

Anyway, like always, nobody will address all these videos because it doesn't fit their narrative.

Weak 6'8" for Undertaker is entirely feasible.

@Edward
Yes I'll meet him when he comes to my country next and I'll take a photo and post it along with proof of my own height.

@Canson
You got so worked up by me that you forgot to read my comment properly. You and @Edward said "nobody has claimed peak Taker was under 6'6"" and I responded showing you where someone said that very recently. And you are not the owner of this website. I havent broken rules by posting photos or videos, if I do anything wrong then my comments won't get approved. Simple as that. So stop trying to act as the gatekeeper of this page or website. I didn't even insult you in those comments you posted. I merely said you aren't acknowledging all the photos which suggest otherwise.
Embarrassing!

@6'3" Julian
The difference is so big that footwear doesn't even have to be considered to know what's the truth. Even if Undertaker is wearing Hulk Hogan Interactive or whatever it's called and Scott Hall is barefoot, only then it makes sense and you and I know both know that's not the case. And nah I'll take your word for it about Khali. If he does have the same forehead size as Taker then that's a 5.2" difference apparently which works out to be 6'7.8" since Taker is right at Khali's eye level. Thanks for proving my point!

Scott Hall is 6'4" today, Undertaker looks comfortably 2 inches+ taller:
Click Here

Taker is well over 2.25 inches taller than Prime Hall from all angles and all photos.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Even assuming they are in standard wrestling gear you can clearly see Undertaker is WELL above 2.25" taller. @Rob please check it out.

And now you guys ask me why I think a weak 6'8" was his height? Because he looks it in almost every photo and every angle other than few cherrypicked ones.

When something doesn't fit you guys narrative, them you just try to brush it under the mat instead of acknowledging it. That says enough for most of your aims on here.

Again the whole thing with claiming Ike Catcher is 6'7" despite the man measuring 6'9.6" in shoes is proof most of you look for any excuse to downgrade anyone.
Resurrection of Edward said on 25/Sep/20
Kan said on 24/Sep/20
@battery
Rob in your opinion There are more chance that undertaker was near 6ft8 or 6ft7 ?
so we (me, Battery) close this conversation
Editor Rob
Look at the amount of pages on Taker, I've probably read nearly every comment...I am not convinced a full 6ft 8, but then a flat 6ft 7 peak? Maybe that's why he's sat right in the middle for so long!


@editor rob

if undertaker was 6’8 like some of the posters claims then he should have been 1.75 to 2 inch taller than syco sid.i dont even see an inch between these guys.attimes,taker has looked only half inch taller than sid.sid might have been hair over 6’6,maybe 6’6.25 or even 6’6.5 but then again,that would put taker at 6’7.25 even if sid is hair over 6’6.i don’t see an inch different between sid and taker but ofcource i could be wrong.6’6.25 or a 6’6.25 sid would put taker at 6’7 flat or 6’7.25 at “ABSOLUTE MOST”.taker only looked at most half inch taller than @ali baba who was 6’6 but again that was around 6-7 years ago and taker was in his 40s.ali baba also admitted that taker had footwear advantage over the guy and still looked only 1/2 taller.people dosent want to accept the smoking gun photos where a 6’7 range kevin love “TOWERED” over the undertaker.undertaker has 0.75 or 3/4 footwear advantage over love and still looked 2” shorter and rob,even you have said in kevin love page that there looked even 3 inch different between taker and love in certain photos.i have hard time seeing mark calaway the guy over 6’7 barefoot.
Editor Rob
6ft 7 is a figure many might argue for Taker and with Sid of course if he didn't lose height by that stage, you could say he seemed no more than that.
Canson said on 24/Sep/20
Harry Sachs said on 26/Aug/20
@Canson I rarely ever read anything you type because I can't take anything you type seriously. I put up a factual video. Both Sid and a young Mark and clearly Sid was taller.

Also @Riky juts because Ali Baba is listed or claims to be 6'5 doesn't mean he is.

Something else to the person typed well Sid had puffy hair so that is why he looked taller. Or from certain angles The Undertaker looked taller. At 2:35 in this video I will put up again Sid and the Undertaker are standing face to face. If Sid was 6'6 then there is no way that the Undertaker is even 6'6. Years after this when the Undertaker became big, Mark started to wear thicker sole shoes to make him look taller like all "monsters" in wrestling do. Click Here

Gee Harry Sachs, Do you really think I care what you think about my guesses or my posts? Lol you think this site revolves around you or something. Not surprising because everyone here is well aware of that. Well I guess you have to behave that way just as you do toward others being nobody else here takes you seriously. 😂 😂 😂. This coming from someone who has asked Rob several times to find a way to “ignore” posts if he doesn’t like them. Sounds to me like you needed to post to someone just to get attention because your boys on the other pages don’t give it to you. They ridicule you instead.

By the way, learn how to read. For the record, I was the one who brought up Ali Baba and his height, not Riky. And Ali Baba said he was 6’6” which I also said. Not 6’5”. And Ali was shorter than Taker back in 2013 so that means Taker was clearly over 6’6” back then. Ali has himself next to Tyler Mane and in pics walking under a 7’ doorway and he clearly looked 6’6”. Next time you want to argue, argue facts.

I’ve looked at many pics of the two and Taker is not 1.5” taller than Sid was. Sid was about 1” shorter. Sid tilting his head up to influence the height difference shouldn’t be taken into account. Rob has a 1” difference between them at their peaks for a reason

Click Here
Canson said on 24/Sep/20
@Christian: That’s because no one did that. He’s making straw man arguments now because his “cause” isn’t being supported. everyone is disagreeing with him or dismissing and ignoring his comments altogether.

@Battery6565: quit making excuses and straw man arguments just because your feelings and your ego are hurt because nobody agrees with you. Just like Kan said (eloquently), you are getting upset because nobody agrees with you. And you said “You’re Not going to go through this again with him”? 😂 😂 😂? Well don’t. You don’t have to post here if you don’t want. It’s a free site. You don’t run it. It almost sounds as if you’re getting upset because he differs in opinion. Same with Edward. And He is right. You do cherry pick your pics. Same with Christian and Julian along with Vegas and JT. All credible posters.

Battery6565 said on 10/Aug/20
@Canson and @Riky

You keep pushing the fact Sid is below 6'6" when in all likelihood, he is probably a fraction over which is why he is listed OVER 6'6".

You did it here too. No one said Sid was under 6’6”. You put words in my mouth and Riky’s.

Same here:

The big lul said on 17/Aug/20 (Defending himself)

Battery6565 said on 9/Aug/20
@Canson
Do you even think about what you're saying before you type things out? So Rob has listed Sycho Sid at 6'6" "for a reason", but when it comes to John Cena being listed half inch above his claim, then there's "no evidence"?

Battery6565 said on 10/Aug/20
@Canson and @Riky

Ahhh as I expected. Throwing insults, passive-aggressive speech while trying to sound calm, and absolutely ZERO rebuttal to the photos

Yes throwing insults after you insulted both of us first.

Battery6565 said on 4/Sep/20
@Brock11
You are damn right.

Everyone on here wants to ignore the thousand photos where he looks taller than his listed height and repeatedly spam 1 or 2 photos where he doesn't look his listed height and even that got debunked by me.

And please point out to me where I “keep tabs on your guesses”. You sound pathetic. You’re looking for a reason to argue or attack someone or play the victim here now. And I haven’t responded to you since 9/22 and your last comment was to me that day which I didn’t respond to. So I’m going to assume Sotiris is the person youre referring in that broken link you sent, but even then I don’t see the evidence. Still that’s one person because most people here say he was 6’7” or 6’6.5 worst case. You said “all of these guesses at 6’6” or under”. I don’t recall Sotiris even saying he was 6’6” or lower. Nobody has said a peak Taker was under that mark for sure. But Convenient how 6’6.5 Or 6’6.75 is rounded down to 6’6” when you are “shining light on the low guesses” but 6’6” is rounded to 6’6.5” with Sid and you swear that he’s rounding down a whole half inch. But Wanna see another straw man below?

Battery6565 said on 24/Sep/20
Also @Edward.

6'5" Scott Hall with young Undertaker
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Tell me . Is this a 2.25" gap? You need to see an eye doctor if you think it is.

Conveniently enough, posters like @Kan @Julian and @Canson never acknowledge any evidence which suggests a taller peak height but spam 1 photo out of thousands which suggests he is at worst quarter inch more than his peak even in worst case.

How about another one?

Battery6565 said on 23/Sep/20
@Canson
Dude what is wrong with you? Why are you keeping a tab on all my comments and retaliating always? Nobody has ever claimed Taker was 6'6" peak? This guy is directly addressing you while saying this but you somehow forgot about this, did you?
Click Here

Lol where did I “keep tabs on any guess”?

Battery6565 said on 12/Aug/20
@Canson
Crazy.

You wrote a PhD level dissertation on how bad of a person I am instead of trying to explain how someone can be sub 6'6" and hold up against Big Show, Dr Disrespect, Braun etc. And in Braun's case, even be taller. Reason I didn't bother arguing before because you guys (You, @Christian 6'5 3/8" and others) don't bother debunking anything and go off on another tangent.

Just do yourself a favor and stop posting. You sound foolish. Goodbye
Editor Rob
Someone sent in the question again to Sid and he said barefooted he was a hair over 6ft 6.
6'3 Julian said on 24/Sep/20
@Battery I don’t often call out trolls, but c’mon, in those photos with Scott Hall you can’t see footwear and they’re slouching in two of them. As for Khali, he’s easily got the same forehead size as Taker and Kane looks taller in photos next to Khali. But hey, I know you’re just gonna call me a downgrader for ignoring bad photos so why bother?
Kan said on 24/Sep/20
@battery
Rob in your opinion There are more chance that undertaker was near 6ft8 or 6ft7 ?
so we (me, Battery) close this conversation
Editor Rob
Look at the amount of pages on Taker, I've probably read nearly every comment...I am not convinced a full 6ft 8, but then a flat 6ft 7 peak? Maybe that's why he's sat right in the middle for so long!
Resurrection of Edward said on 24/Sep/20
it would be great help if poster’s like @dan trojan,@bros of destruction,@ben bell and his friend and @ali baba come out and prove this @battery guy wrong that taker isn’t tall as he thinks.can you guys post again because y’all probably got photo with taker that clears everyone’s doubt.

i still believe that peak taker was 6’7/6’7.25 peak and 6’5.75/6’6 currey like i said few years ago.
Resurrection of Edward said on 24/Sep/20
@battery

are you trolling?its never a good idea putting words in someone’s mouth.i have never said that undertaker is only 2.25 taller than scott hall.i have said taker was 2” taller than “DAN SPIVEY” not goddamn scott hall.get this dude.can you keep it civil?


also don’t try to insist anyone.”THE ONLY TIME I SEE UNDERTAKER BEING 6’8 lS ONLY IF SYCO SID IS 6’7 or 6’7.25” BUT SID HAS ADMITTED HIMSELF AS 6’6” i don’t know if this dosent open your eyes,i dont know what will.get this.


i would love to call out @dan trojan,@bros of destruction,@ali baba.if you guys are watching this.can some of you guys prove this poster named@battery that the undertaker isn’t goddamn tall like this guy insist and wants him to be.can some of you guys post the photo’s you’ve taken with taker.

also posters like @canson,@kan and @biglul are sticking with their personal opinion like you are sticking with yours.thanks dude.
UndertakerFrank said on 24/Sep/20
Battery6565 I met Mark in 1993 and he looked Huge i asked him how tall he was & he said 6ft 9 he looked it but when i got the picture back he did not look 6ft 9 next to me On one of Bruce Prichards Podcast he said Mark was 6ft 7 and that height is more believable especially in ring gear
Canson said on 24/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 24/Sep/20
Also @Edward.

6'5" Scott Hall with young Undertaker
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Tell me . Is this a 2.25" gap? You need to see an eye doctor if you think it is.

Conveniently enough, posters like @Kan @Julian and @Canson never acknowledge any evidence which suggests a taller peak height but spam 1 photo out of thousands which suggests he is at worst quarter inch more than his peak even in worst case.


No. It’s just that you don’t seem capable of accepting those opinions. Try to convince Rob then since you failed to convince us.

And As far as what you said to Edward, please point out anyone who says a “peak Taker is less than 6’6” flat”? Most people here, If you look closely enough say he was 6’7” range
TheDon1528 said on 24/Sep/20
He wears cowboy boots in person to try and make himself look taller, I spotted him in a Florida airport over 10 years ago and he wasn't that much taller then my 6'5.5" step father.
Battery6565 said on 24/Sep/20
The whole Ike Catcher thing is proof that people on here like to downgrade some people's height without any reason despite being shown evidence. I mean the guy literally measured 6'9.6" in shoes which means he's either str9ng 6'8" or weak 6'9" and we still have people claiming that Ike is just 6'7" flat lol. What a joke.
Battery6565 said on 24/Sep/20
2006/07 Undertaker was at 7'1" Khali's eye level when he had already dropped by a fraction probably.
Click Here

Late 1990's Rock (6'3") wasn BARELY at 1990's Undertaker's eye level and it's said on here that he had a 5+ inch forehead
Click Here

So tell me, do Most photos lead to a 6'8" conclusion in prime or not?

But anyway let me guess the next excuse from @Kan and his buddies. Undertaker was jumping? He was tiptoeing? He was standing on stilts while The Rock and Khali were barefoot?
Big Lul said on 24/Sep/20
When drew McIntyre whose a 6’4.5 inch guy imo when face to face with the undertaker, taker looked a max 1.25 inches taller which would put him at 6’5.75. And was only 4-4.25 inches taller than 6’1.5 inch Goldberg. Or how he was 1.25-1.5 inch shorter than 6’7-6’7.25 Ike catcher. Taker is 6’5.5-6’5.75 max 6’6. And Kane is about the same height as Braun Strowman 6’6-6’6.5 max. So which proves my point that these big guys aren’t as tall as we thought they were.

Just me believe people like Edward, Canson, riky and Christian.
Battery6565 said on 24/Sep/20
Also @Edward.

6'5" Scott Hall with young Undertaker
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Tell me . Is this a 2.25" gap? You need to see an eye doctor if you think it is.

Conveniently enough, posters like @Kan @Julian and @Canson never acknowledge any evidence which suggests a taller peak height but spam 1 photo out of thousands which suggests he is at worst quarter inch more than his peak even in worst case.
Battery6565 said on 24/Sep/20
"NOBODY has claimed a peak taker was 6'6""
Click Here

We have people on here saying peak taker was less than 6'6", I guess you have weak comprehension skills though @Edward.

Taker and Kevin Love at a normal angle eye level isn't that far apart.
Click Here
Battery6565 said on 24/Sep/20
@Edward
Cringe.

You literally said you don't care if anyone disagrees with you and then you wrote me a novel about why I'm wrong.

How to contradict yourself 101

And I already spoke to that brosofdestruction guy on Instagram and he said Taker had horrible posture and he still looked 2 inches taller.

Just look at the shoulder slouching here and camer angle advantage to the brosofdestruction guy and you can still easipy see Taker is more than 2 inches taller. Now imagine if he stood at his full height or perfect posture.
Click Here

@6'3" Julian
In the morning in his prime he would comfortably measure a fraction above 6'8"
YordanDamyanov said on 24/Sep/20
Taker was 6'7 and a half in his prime. 7 foot Big show always had at least 4, 4 and a half inches over him. Now he might dropped to 6'6 and a half.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 24/Sep/20
If taker is 6ft4 khali is now more thane 6ft9 big show 6ft8 kane 6ft4.5 look back in 2006 khali taker staredown 7ft1 taker 6ft8.
Resurrection of Edward said on 24/Sep/20
@battery

for canson’s defence.i interracted with canson for the last three years and dosent have any problems.he dosent retaliate,thats just canson expressiing his opinion.if you think that’s retaliation then i cant help.everybody is sticking with their personal opinions and no body can insist and put words in someone’s mouth.i also disagree with your estimation respectfully like you disagree with my estimation.
Resurrection of Edward said on 24/Sep/20
@battery

taker is not barely but noticeably and visibly shorter than legit 6’7 range guys but not just by an inch but probably by 1.5-2” inches while you are here insisting here to believe in some ridiculous goddamn photos.leave it christ.do you know what is “CAMERA ANGLES”?have you met the guy mark calaway?here are people who met and got a photo with taker and go a few pages back and you can see that.a poster by the name “bros of destruction “met the guy and taker was 2.5 inch taller at absolute most then bris if destruction who met him some times ago,he got a photo with the guy.he even said taker is at “absolute most 6’6” but there is chance of being fraction lower.a poster “dan trojan “ met the guy out of gear and said the same.a poster “ben bell” who claims to be in 6 feet range,taker was at absolute most 5.5 inch taller than the guy.similary,ben bells friend who is 6’2,taker struggles to look 4” taller than the guy.now here,a guy who haven’t met taker insist everyone believe on his claims.sorry dude,sorry pal,a hard pass from my side.sorry,i couldn’t agree with you.i’m sorry.



HAVE YOU MET TAKER?have you,have you coughhhhh
if not then don’t insist others.here are posters who have met him and even got photo with him.go few pages back.there is a photographic evidence.all of them pegged him at “max 6’6”.i would agree with someone who have him than someone who haven’t met him and hust rely on some goddamn outdated photos.get it!
6'3 Julian said on 23/Sep/20
@Battery a weak 6’8 (like 6’7.5) may have been measured in the morning.
Canson said on 23/Sep/20
Kan said on 23/Sep/20
@battey
@edward

Don’t forget this
Click Here

@battery
We understand your position on undertaker, but if you see that nobody believes in what you say, I would ask myself many questions. there are people who saw him recently and there are people who saw him when he was young and no one of this guy gave him 6ft8 peak and 6ft6 1/2 now. after sid admitted to being 6ft6 I think even rob never upgrade undertaker peak over 6ft7 1/4.
it doesn't matter if he looks taller in a video, because there are 1000 factors that can affect for superstar height. the camera angle, if a superstar is closer to the camera etc.


Agreed.
Big Lul said on 23/Sep/20
Yea camera angles makes a huge difference to someone’s height. Jeez I didn’t know taker forehead was that big. So yea taker isn’t as tall as Braun Strowman. Taker is about a half inch shorter than Braun and Kane.

Taker and Corbin :6’5.75-6’6 max
Kane and Braun Strowman: 6’6.25-6’6.5
Big show: 6’9-6’9.5 max
Canson said on 23/Sep/20
@Christian: maybe a straw man?
Battery6565 said on 23/Sep/20
@Canson
Dude what is wrong with you? Why are you keeping a tab on all my comments and retaliating always? Nobody has ever claimed Taker was 6'6" peak? This guy is directly addressing you while saying this but you somehow forgot about this, did you?
Click Here

@Edward
Ahh classic. If someone disagrees with you just use the "fanboy" or "agent" line. Anyway, @Kan said it was the real difference and posted that photo and I responded hsing that EXACT same photo, so stop obsessing over my comments. This page is for posting photos and videos. Got it? If I do something wrong then my comments will be disapproved so again, don't tell me what to do.

@Kan
Dude just stop. I never posted a photo at an angle like that unless to illustrate how idiotic some of the photos you guys are posting are. If you really wanna play this game then sure let's do it. I can use this angle and claim Undertaker is 6'10" currently on your basis since he looks taller than 6'6.5" Dennis Rodman.
Click Here

As for the Strowman thing, what is this then? ;)
Click Here

Ignore Strowman's hair.

Also who met him in 1990? I am very curious who on this site net him when he was legitimately young. Please give me answers since you are making bold statements. Some 6'6" on this site apparently met him in 2013 when he already had most of his injuries and Taker still was taller. That can easily translate to a weak 6'8" peak.

Also please give me answers on all these.

With Nathan Jones (6'9.75"):
Click Here

With Big Show (7'):
Click Here

With Dr Disrespect (6'7.5"):
Click Here

Can you show me where Sara and Bruce Prichard said all this @Edward ? About him being 6'7"? Weird how you make these statements without linking the evidence.

Why should I reduce my perception of his height because he looks 2 inches taller than one 6'5" guy when compared to most he looks much taller?

Google Undertaker and The Rock.

Yet again. Everyone proven wrong and nobody can prove me wrong.
Resurrection of Edward said on 23/Sep/20
@canson

thanks for the welcome wagon dude.its been pleasure interacting with you.thats why i’m back here.people need to accept these guys aren’t tall as most of us have thought.even before sid admitted of being 6’6 ,there was enough evidence to believe that mark calaway the guy was 6’7 flat.sara(calaway’s ex wife) father claimed that calaway was 6’7.bruce pitchard who brought taker to wwe and was manager of taker at several occasions claimed that calaway was 6’7 and wore internal lifts and kane wore outer but both guys were exactly same height or kane was fraction or smidge taller than taker.it is a”bad blood 1996” podcast.taker at most looked 2” taller than 6’5 dan spikey at peak.

@battery

dont cherry pick an goddamn outdated photo where calaway is nearer camera.go and watch the last ride documentary and you can clearly watch the full footage where both of the guys are out of gear and backstage.taker is not barely but noticeably and visibly shorter than legit 6’7 range guys but not just by an inch but probably by 1.5-2” inches while you are here insisting here to believe in some ridiculous goddamn photos.leave it christ.do you know what is “CAMERA ANGLES”?have you met the guy mark calaway?here are people who met and got a photo with taker and go a few pages back and you can see that.a poster by the name “bros of destruction “met the guy and taker was 2.5 inch taller at absolute most then bris if destruction who met him some times ago,he got a photo with the guy.he even said taker is at “absolute most 6’6” but there is chance of being fraction lower.a poster “dan trojan “ met the guy out of gear and said the same.a poster “ben bell” who claims to be in 6 feet range,taker was at absolute most 5.5 inch taller than the guy.similary,ben bells friend who is 6’2,taker struggles to look 4” taller than the guy.now here,a guy who haven’t met taker insist everyone believe on his claims.sorry dude,sorry pal,a hard pass from my side.sorry,i couldn’t agree with you.i’m sorry.here is undertaker and kevin love footage.
pause@1:26.

Click Here



and he was at most 2”inch taller than dan spivey at peak who is listed 6’5 and go google it.and also nobody has claimed a peak taker was 6’6.
6'3 Julian said on 23/Sep/20
@HADS185 Giant Haystacks was 6’8 at his peak, Test was never billed 6’7
Kan said on 23/Sep/20
@battey
@edward

Don’t forget this
Click Here

@battery
We understand your position on undertaker, but if you see that nobody believes in what you say, I would ask myself many questions. there are people who saw him recently and there are people who saw him when he was young and no one of this guy gave him 6ft8 peak and 6ft6 1/2 now. after sid admitted to being 6ft6 I think even rob never upgrade undertaker peak over 6ft7 1/4.
it doesn't matter if he looks taller in a video, because there are 1000 factors that can affect for superstar height. the camera angle, if a superstar is closer to the camera etc.

otherwise I can tell you that here the undertaker is 6ft4 and no one would tell me anything 😉
Click Here
Big Lul said on 22/Sep/20
@Canson and @Edward I 100% agree with you on everything you said taker was at best 6’7 cause he was only a inch taller than king Mabel and .75- an inch taller than Sid. And now I do think that he’s very similar in height with Baron Corbin which is 6’5.75-6’6 max now. And about .5 shorter than 6’6.25-6’6.5 max Kane and Braun Strowman. People gotta realize that people like taker, Kane, and even Kevin Nash and big show aren’t as tall as they think.
big11 said on 22/Sep/20
Kan Big show used huge boots, without them he was never taller 5 inch than Taker. 4` max. Also Nash is closer to the camera in that pic with Taker. He was like 1.75 inches taller than UT.
Show 6'11 At best peak.
Nash 6,9
Taker 6'7.25
Big Lul said on 22/Sep/20
I personally think that taker is in between 6’5.75-6’6 with Baron Corbin and Kane around the same height as Braun Strowman 6’6-6’6.5 max now nowadays it could be .25- .5 inch difference between all four guys. Also I do think that taker a .5 inch shorter than Braun when we saw them in the documentary together. Also Taker could noticeably shorter because of that massive forehead just like Braun Strowman imo.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 22/Sep/20
@Battery
I've yet to see a "troll" here claim that Taker was 6'6" peak though.
Canson said on 22/Sep/20
Resurrection of Edward said on 21/Sep/20
@Editor rob

Welcome back!
Battery6565 said on 22/Sep/20
@Canson
Looks like more than 2 inches to me in those photos with Scott Hall and the 6'6" person who met him, met him in 2013 and he still got edged. So Taker could easily be a weak 6'8" in his prime considering he accumulated most of his injuries by 2013.

@Kan
I am not going through this again and again with you. Why don't you just compare a video of young Taker and Show?
Click Here

He's clearly above Big Show's eye level, I don't know what you're playing at.

@Resurrection of Edward
Funny how your last comment was an essay on camera angles then you want to make comparisons based off the most cherrypicked angles yourself. Here is the recent photo of them together:
Click Here

Here is young Taker and Kane
Click Here

Hard to tell with kanes mask and wig but they look very close to each other. There's no way that's an inch gap.
Kan said on 22/Sep/20
@battery
You are funny 😂😂😂
Undertaker is clearly shorter even if strowman tilt his head down and taker up
Click Here
HADS185 said on 22/Sep/20
I am unsure of how many of the so called big men (not giants) have ever seen the legit 6´7" number, barefoot.

Here is what I think (in no special order and without the very obvious ones)

Shorter, but billed at or over:
John Studd
Viscera
Dan Spivey
David Von Erich
Test
A-Train
Don Leo Jonathan
Killer Kowalski
Blackjack Mulligan
Earthquake
Hulk Hogan
Zeus
Braun Strowman
Brian Adams
Jake Hager
Kamala
Luke Harper
Bunkhouse Buck
Jake Roberts
Hillbilly Jim
Scott Hall

Unsure:
Brodus Clay
Sid Eudy
Heidenreich
Giant Haystacks
Giant Baba
Erick Rowan

Over or at 6´7":
Taker (barely)
Kane
Ernie Ladd
Ron Fuller
Tyler Mane
Jeff Bearden
Stan Frazier
Roadblock
Matt Morgan
Nathan Jones
Big Cass
Robert Maillet
Kevin Nash

Disagree? Did I miss anybody?
Resurrection of Edward said on 22/Sep/20
@battery6565

no disrespect here bro but you must be trolling.i dont know whether you’re taker’s agent or you’re fanboy but i dont care whether you post hundreds or thousand of photos.dont insist me to believe your claim’s.sorry a hard pass from my side.taker is clearly tilting his head up and anybody can see that.bty strowman is looking down.i know what excuse you are trying to make next.bty,we all are sticking with our estimation.
Resurrection of Edward said on 21/Sep/20
@Editor rob

its been a while,do you think kane could be an inch taller than taker in 2020.i personally think that.i personally think it could 6’5.75 for mark calaway and 6’6.75 for glen jacobs(kane) or it could be 6’6 for taker and 6’7 for kane.in a solid military posture.kane is still pulling 6’7 easily.i am beginning to think that jacobs could still be 6’7 and taker at absolute most 6’6.in a military poster,kane still looks towering compared to guys like taker,corbin or strowman.even at peak i used to believe that both of these guys were similar but i’m slightly leaning to kane.you got to listen bruce pitchard “brother love” who was manager to taker and kane snd he said undertaker wore internal lift while kane wore outer and both guys were similar at peak with kane being fraction or smidge taller.and attimes,kane has pulled of looking 6’8.you can see jacobs in the 90s snd i’m hard pressed to believed he was only 6’7/6’7.5 as he always looked near 6’8 in my eyes.i personally think taker was 6’7.25 and kane at 6’7.75 which could cover “6’8” claims.i don’t think there us sny problem when kane claimed 6’8.he really has looked that mark at times.i would either put taker at 6’7 and kane at 6’7.5 or if taker 6’7.25 then kane 6’7.75.


here,howmuch difference do you find between taker and kane in 2020,i personally think it could be inch or almost inch in 2020.hopefully,you’ll give your honest opinion.pause at 5:10 or you can watch from 5:9 to 5:12 in this video.4 seconds to watch.

pause@5:10
Click Here
Canson said on 21/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 19/Sep/20
@Danimal
Wow great photos. Absolutely absurd how Scott Hall is listed 6'5 peak and we have trolls on here claiming Taker was 6'6" peak lmao.

Yes a 6’6” Taker at his peak is not likely. 62B has claimed to have met him and said he’s peak 6’7 in person. Rob has him listed ok for both
Kan said on 21/Sep/20
@battery
I repeat you again. Big show in his prime and in perfect posture is clearly 5 inch taller than undertaker
Click Here
And if nash in his prime was 6ft9 1/2, obviously taker was not 6ft8
Click Here
At least 2 inch of difference
Big Lul said on 21/Sep/20
People gotta realize that Taker isn’t as tall or taller than Braun Strowman but he’s very similar in height with Baron Corbin and sometimes Kane. That should show how much camera angles make a huge difference to someone’s height.

Undertaker and Baron Corbin :6’5.75-6’6 max
Braun Strowman and Kane: 6’6.25-6’6.5 max
Battery6565 said on 21/Sep/20
@James B 172cm
More like Undertaker looks 6'8" range instead of 6'7" . And this is yet the hundredth example of another person compared to who he looks that height next to.
Battery6565 said on 21/Sep/20
@Kan
Why should I shut up? It's my comment? I'm allowed to say what I want if I'm not breaking rules. So don't tell me what to do. Your rude demeanour and strange way of typing clearly shows that I have you worked up.

Oh and let me jointly acknowledge you and @Resurrection of Edward with the Strowman/Undertaker angle .

You posted this photo saying this is the real difference. But even here Undertaker is taller ? LOL. Nice fail buddy. Although I will admit Taker is just a few pixels taller at this angle but he's still taller when you factor in Strowmans hair.
Click Here

Even still, I'm questioning how you're so confident in your assessment of judging a few pixels without zooming right in and drawing lines on Paint? You're on the losing side of an argument and you're resorting to utter foolishness to pull out anything to help you but you just posted a photo saying this is the "real difference" where Undertaker is taller. Anyway, thanks for proving my point ! :)

Oh and whether you admit it or not the first photo is at a completely distorted angle where even Reigns looks much shorter than he is, so there's no consistency there.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 21/Sep/20
Peak taker 6ft8 203.2cm current 6ft63/4 200cm.
Resurrection of Edward said on 21/Sep/20
people need to wakeup from their dreams.mark calaway aka undertaker was never taller as most of y’all have thought.even before sid admitted of being 6’6.there was enough evidence that mark calaway was just just 6’7 flat.idc if anyone agrees or not.

1)sara’(takers exwife)father said and defined mark calaway as 6’7 guy.there is the foremost evidence.

2)bruce pitchard aka brother love who brought calaway to wwe said that calaway was 6’7 guy.he also said that taker wore “INTERNAL LIFTS “to appear taller.he said jacobs and calaway were guys who were exactly similar in height or that jacobs was fraction or smidge/hair taller than calaway.maybe it was taker 6’7 vs kane 6’7.25.or taker 6’7.25 at most and kane was 6’7.50.he said taker wore internal lifts and kane wore outer lifts and both guys were similar with jacobs being fraction taller.

3)it is written somewhere in quora that shawn michaels said taker was 6’7 guy.

4)taker at most looked 2” inch taller than 6’5 dan spivey and anyone can google.

5)the greatest and most eye opening evidence is sid admitted of being 6’6 that would put taker at 6’6.75/6’7 at peak which seems obvious but i will still lean towards 6’6.25 for sid and 6’7 for taker.and i dont see how anyone thinks there is an inch difference between sid and taker.i doubt there was an inch between sid and taker.more like half inch or say 1/2 to 3/4 differences not inches.

as for now,i think he is 6’5.75 today snd 6’7 peak.now i don’t give a damn if anyone agrees or not.

i agree with poster like ricky and canson.
Meat said on 19/Sep/20
Danimal. In the 2 more recent pics; the one where Taker has a black eye is cropped. The full picture clearly shows Hall on his tip toes.
James B 172cm said on 19/Sep/20
Scott Hall looks closer to 6’4 than 6’5 in those young photos with undertaker
Resurrection of Edward said on 19/Sep/20
after seeing much of bull ,i have to step here.undertaker has never looked taller than strowman.its just camera angles.camera angle can play great role in making someone taller/shorter.here is the same clip in different angle.the undertaker ever looked taller than strowman and i say neveeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrr.the reason was the camera angles were heavily focused on taker not strowman.here is clip from different angle.
Click Here.
Battery6565 said on 19/Sep/20
@Danimal
Wow great photos. Absolutely absurd how Scott Hall is listed 6'5 peak and we have trolls on here claiming Taker was 6'6" peak lmao.

@Meat
Not only the strowman video, but videos next to big show and Nathan Jones show he's taller than his current listing and was taller than his peak. People kept mentioning the documentary but there was barely a moment where they even stood together let alone at a normal angle.

He looks close to Dr Disrespect even today when they faced off.

And you can forget that he's gonna have terrible posture being that tall, with that many injuries, surgeries and a long career.

Nobody will actually bother debunking how he looks so tall compare to

Dr Disrespect
Click Here

Big Show (in his prime)
Click Here

Nathan Jones
Click Here

@Rob don't you think his peak is a lowball??? How can there be close to 5 inches between show and Taker?
Kan said on 19/Sep/20
@battey
Came on my friend
You said taker is taller than strowman just because you've seen a video where the camera is lower than the subjects and undertaker is closer to the camera 😂
This is the real difference between strowman and undertaker in that Moment
Click Here
Click Here

you can finally shut up now 😉
Strowman is taller
big11 said on 19/Sep/20
I give him 6'7.5 peak, 6'6 max right now. Also that picture with hall and taker(cap), hall is standing on his toes.
Big Lul said on 19/Sep/20
Undertaker was build anywhere from 6’8-6’11.5 in wwe which is comical cause we all know that he was a best 6’7 peak and now no taller than 6’5.75-6’6 max nowadays.

But at least it wasn’t as comical as Kane build 7’0 tall height cause we definitely know that he was 6’7-6’7.5 max peak height and now no taller than 6’6-6’6.5 max nowadays.
Danimal 176.7cm said on 18/Sep/20
Undertaker and Scott Hall in the late 80's:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Undertaker and Scott Hall today:
Click Here
Click Here
Battery6565 said on 18/Sep/20
@Canson

Which video proves that Strowman is taller ? And even if there is 1, why should I believe that over this one where Taker is clearly taller?
Riky said on 18/Sep/20
Billed at 6'10.5, probably the classic 3 to 4 inches exaggeration
Meat said on 18/Sep/20
Can someone please post the video of Strowman looking taller than Taker? Several of us have posted multiple times the MSG video where clearly 100% definitely definitively Taker is taller. No tricks, no angles. Two men face to face. Taker edged Strowman.
Mo Obeidallah said on 17/Sep/20
What is the real weight of Mark Calaway though? 270-300 lbs? What about Kevin Nash?
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Sep/20
@Junior
There are quite a few who inflate 3 inches though. Especially with Undertaker being a wrestler, his 6'10" claim doesn't seem all that unexpected. Plenty of other wrestlers inflate 2-3 inches easily. It's not uncommon.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 17/Sep/20
Sid climed 6ft7 280 pounds back in 1990s.
Canson said on 16/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 15/Sep/20

Also stop making things up @Kan. Sid never admitted to measuring 6'6" flat, I'm sure he used the word "about" for a reason .

Undertaker is taller than Strowman even today , and was close to Jones and Show back then, it is what it is.

How is Kan making anything up? Sid (on camera) said he’s “about 6’6” without his shoes on That typically means that someone is closer to 6’6” than 6’5” or 6’7”. Of course that could mean he’s 6’6.5” but that could also mean he was 6’5.5”. He didn’t specify. But most guys would round up than down. So to be fair here, Rob’s listing is probably fair enough for him.

As far as Strowman, Taker is not taller than him. That’s already been proven in a video that Rob himself has seen. Rob has had the two listed 1/4” or 1/2” apart for probably the last 5 years. They were listed 6’6.75 (Strowman) and 6’6.5” just 2 years ago and 6’6.5 (Strowman) and 6’6.25 (Taker) last year and 6’6.5 and 6’6” this year. Taker and Corbin are about the same height and Strowman is slightly taller than both
Canson said on 16/Sep/20
The big lul said on 14/Sep/20
@Canson my money would be on C) for Takers peak and B) for taker nowadays seems more likely maybe A) for taker nowadays with perfect posture which would go with the most likely estimates for Undertaker heights

Peak:6’7 max
Now: 6’5.75-6’6 max (maybe with bad posture 6’5.5-6’5.75)

That’s as good a guess as any just like Julian’s guess is!
Canson said on 16/Sep/20
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 15/Sep/20
Taker: "I used to be 6-foot-10 but I got dropped on my head a few times so I'm 6-foot-9 now."


Solid 6'7 peak claiming 6'10 that was really a huge inflation. In reality some parts of america people are mostly claiming near two inches taller and that is already a big lies, i do respect more of people claiming an inch in shoe height that was more of a proper claim because people are walking out with shoes on so that is fine for claiming average footwear height with an inch. I wouldn't dare to claim 6'7 1/2 as a strong 6'5 1/2 guy. Three inch is way off.

Yea His 6’10” claim was a joke but The 6’8/6’9” that he claimed later is a believable shoe height for him. He would be that range even in a 1” shoe in his prime earlier in the day. I don’t see him under 6’7” prime. Lol even for me at a very strong 6’4.25” is too much. I don’t even claim 6’5” let alone 6’6””.
Kan said on 16/Sep/20
@battery
First of all nash is 2 inch easily taller than taker in his prime
Click Here
Click Here
Even big rob said in the past at least 2 inch, but seems even a bit over 😉

sid was measured around 6ft6, this means he didn't measure over 6ft6 1/2, otherwise he said about 6ft7, and even if he was 6ft6 1/2 I never see taker over an inch taller than him.
the difference between sid and undertaker were from half inch to an inch at most in every staredown 😉

6ft6 3/4 for taker back to 2013 ??????
The person who took the picture with taker said 1/4 of an inch between taker and him, at most half inch 😂
Big Lul said on 16/Sep/20
@Canson yea I would go with B and C for undertaker peak and A and B for taker nowadays
Canson said on 15/Sep/20
@Julian: B or C look good for his peak and current B or A to me
Battery6565 said on 15/Sep/20
@ced
I reckon you're close with the height difference.

But Kevin Nash is listed at 6'9.5" prime, so that would make taker 6'7.75" prime .

Comparisons with 10 people suggest he's taller and 1 ultracherrypicked comparison suggests he is at worst quarter inch more than his current listing.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 15/Sep/20
Taker: "I used to be 6-foot-10 but I got dropped on my head a few times so I'm 6-foot-9 now."


Solid 6'7 peak claiming 6'10 that was really a huge inflation. In reality some parts of america people are mostly claiming near two inches taller and that is already a big lies, i do respect more of people claiming an inch in shoe height that was more of a proper claim because people are walking out with shoes on so that is fine for claiming average footwear height with an inch. I wouldn't dare to claim 6'7 1/2 as a strong 6'5 1/2 guy. Three inch is way off.
Battery6565 said on 15/Sep/20
Anyway, point is that there is an explanation for that video but unfortunately nobody who is opposing me can explain videos like these can they? ;)

Undertaker and Strowman
Click Here

Undertaker and Nathan Jones
Click Here

Undertaker and Big Show
Click Here

Also stop making things up @Kan. Sid never admitted to measuring 6'6" flat, I'm sure he used the word "about" for a reason .

Undertaker is taller than Strowman even today , and was close to Jones and Show back then, it is what it is.
Battery6565 said on 15/Sep/20
@Kan
I understand that reading comprehension isn't something you're particularly good at but I said if he was taller than a confirmed 6'6" man in 2013 when he had posture then he was probably at least even 6'6.75" back then and obviously an inch more at least at his peak considering he accumulated most of his injuries by then.

As for the video, I already broke it down. Nice attempt to troll though :)

I'll repost what I said on 19/8/20
1) This is the only point in the video where both Taker and Sid are standing straight without anyone pulling them.
Click Here

Even over here he looks taller.

2) At the other point he starts to get pulled away by his manager or whoever that guy is diagonally away from the camera which makes Sid look bigger.
Click Here

See the direction he's pulled in.

When Undertaker is in the more favourable angle, he looks much taller.
Click Here

Even in this ultra cherrypicked video where he's wearing a mask which is puffing his hair up and he's tensing his chest, any person with basic IQ can study it and tell who's taller.
Vegas' said on 15/Sep/20
??

There is no staredown at Wrestlemania 12 between Nash and Undertaker and Kane wasn't 2 inches taller than Taker at Wrestlemania 14.
ced said on 14/Sep/20
Hmm.. If you take a look at WM12, Diesel and Taker staredown, Taker was about 1.75 inches shorter than Diesel, not more.

If Diesel was 6'9 at the time, Taker would have been 6'7.25 at his very peak.

Kane - 2 years later at WM14, had a full 2 inches on Taker in their staredown (Due to lifts).

Peaks:
Kevin Nash - 6'9
Undertaker - 6'7.25
Kane - 6'7.5 - With 2 inch lifts - 6'9.5 in gear
Sid - 6'6.75

Today:
Kevin Nash: 6'7.75
Undertaker - 6'6.25
Kane 6'6.75-6'7
Sid - 6'5.75
Braun Strowman - 6'6
Big Show - 6'8.75-6'9
6'3 Julian said on 14/Sep/20
Canson I’ll go with B for both
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 14/Sep/20
@The big lul
Can't see Show as low as 6'9" today. Maybe 6'9.25" at the very worst though. He might drop to a flat 6'9" within the next 5 years though.
The big lul said on 14/Sep/20
@Canson my money would be on C) for Takers peak and B) for taker nowadays seems more likely maybe A) for taker nowadays with perfect posture which would go with the most likely estimates for Undertaker heights

Peak:6’7 max
Now: 6’5.75-6’6 max (maybe with bad posture 6’5.5-6’5.75)
Kan said on 14/Sep/20
@battery
First of all if taker was about 6ft6 back to 2013 I don't know what makes you think he is taller today 😂
Second if taker was 6ft8 peak height
Click Here
How tall was sycho sid ? He was measured just 6ft6 flat, according to himself.
Canson said on 13/Sep/20
I’d say the possibilities are:

Peak:

A) 6’8.5 out of bed/ 6’7.5 afternoon
B) 6’8.25 out of bed/ 6’7.25 afternoon
C) 6’8” out of bed/ 6’7 afternoon

Today:

A) 6’7 out of bed/ 6’6 afternoon
B) 6’6.75/ 6’5.75
C) 6’6.5/6’5.5
The big lul said on 13/Sep/20
Also to note that if undertaker was still 6’6.5 which his not he would look taller next to someone like drew mcintyre who I think is 6’4.5 and 6’1.5 - 6’1.75 Goldberg. But does look 3-3.25 inches shorter than big show.

Drew McIntyre: 6’4.5-6’4.75 maybe With perfect posture
Undertaker: 6’5.5-6’6 max
Baron Corbin: 6’5.75-6’6
Kane and Braun Strowman: 6’6-6’6.5 max
Kevin Nash: 6’8-6’8.5 max
Big show: 6’9-6’9.25 max now
The big lul said on 13/Sep/20
@Riky also that’s I good observation maybe Sid was just a 6’6 flat who wore lifts in his wrestling gear to closer in height with people like undertaker and Kevin Nash. But I do think that taker was a legit 6’7 max at his peak seeing how he was 2-2.25 inches shorter than 6’9-6’9.25 max Kevin Nash and was obviously 4 inches shorter than the big show who was about 6’11- maybe 6’11.5 max. Nowadays he could anywhere from 6’5.5 to 6’6 max seeing him with people like Drew, Strowman, Ike catcher, Kane, and Goldberg even. But I do think that taker and Corbin are very similar in height with each other.
Kan said on 13/Sep/20
@battery
6 inch eyelevel for taker puts his head as near 12 inch, because his eye-chin range is very similar. It’s insane. Puts big show head over 13 inch . He has a head lenght similar to triple h and randy orton, Who can himself have a 10 inch long head. Hafthor has a 5 inch eyelevel
Click Here
If taker eyelvel is longer it’s probably a very small fraction my men.

However even in this photo
Click Here
The rock is clearly over taker eyelevel.
In his prime Triple h stands about taker eyelevel
Click Here
And the rock is clearly taller
Click Here

Came on man even after sid admitted to being 6ft6 measured you insist to say undertaker was 6ft8 😂
Canson said on 12/Sep/20
@Christian: yep and the bigger forehead is why people think he’s taller than Strowman when he’s not. Strowman has about as much height difference with him as he does with Corbin
Battery6565 said on 12/Sep/20
@Kan
What are you debating lmao? So you are saying a 6'6" guy from here met Taker in 2013 and Taker still edged him out? By 2013 he had already accumulated most of his injuries and he stands with horrible posture so even in 2013 he must have been 6'6.5" meaning his peak would be likely an inch more.

@Kan
Do you realise in that measuring stick the marks represent 1.2 inches and not 1 inch? In those shoes he is standing at 6'9.6" as compared to the scale. Stop making things up to suit your narrative, lol.

@Canson
No, I would have asked for photos regardless of what he said because for some reason everyone on this site seems to have met the celebs in question, yet for some weird reason, nobody ever has photos of the occurrence? I mean it seems pretty weird to me that if you meet a celebrity who's height you discuss everyday then why would you not take a photo , lol? Maybe because it didn't ever happen?

Taker and Dr Disrespect, their chin levels match up and Dr is listed at 6'7.5". Although you can't see the top of Taker's head, i'd argue he has a taller head than Dr, so make of this photo what you will.
Click Here
Riky said on 11/Sep/20
The big lul said on 10/Sep/20
@riky: thanks for helping cause I always knew that Ike catcher was around that 6’7-6’7.5 range and taker looked and best 1.25-1.5 shorter which would put him at 6’5.5-6’6 max now. And yep I agree with you on the picture with big show and Ike catcher which proves that big show is not 6’10 anymore unfortunately. People gotta come to the fact that these guys ain’t as tall as they used to be.


When The Undertaker, in gear, is 2 inches shorter than someone who is considered max 6'7.25/5 i have some problems believing he is 6'6".
And not even at his peak he used to be close to some guesses.
Remember Sid was 6'6" and Taker likely wasn't an inch taller. Maybe 0.5

With Ike he isn't in gear but he looks 6'5".5
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 11/Sep/20
@mrtguy
It's a combination of both. His receding hair accentuates his already bigger than average forehead.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 11/Sep/20
Taker climed 6ft8 1/2 back in 2001
Brock11 said on 10/Sep/20
Click Here
Imo that's Easily over 4 inches between Taker and The Rock back in 1999(The Rock and Taker at thier Peaks i think). He was easily over 6'7 peak, 6'7.25-6.7.5(201-202 cm) was his peak.
The big lul said on 10/Sep/20
@riky: thanks for helping cause I always knew that Ike catcher was around that 6’7-6’7.5 range and taker looked and best 1.25-1.5 shorter which would put him at 6’5.5-6’6 max now. And yep I agree with you on the picture with big show and Ike catcher which proves that big show is not 6’10 anymore unfortunately. People gotta come to the fact that these guys ain’t as tall as they used to be.
Canson said on 10/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 9/Sep/20

@Plassey
No pics = didn't happen

the estimate is a bit low and doesn’t sound believable but ask yourself the question of if he had insisted that Taker is 6’7” or 6’6.5 based on an encounter with him instead of McIntyre (hypothetically) And didn’t provide pics, would you still be saying No pics = didn’t happen?
Battery6565 said on 10/Sep/20
5 inch eye level? Seriously? If we take Goldberg to be average eye level (4.5 inches) then Takers eye level is more than 6 inches according to that. Anyone who doesn't believe me can do the measurements themselves on Paint
Click Here

And even if we do take 5 inches which im sure it's more than he is still 5 inches taller than prime Rock according to others on here
Click Here

So that's still 6'8" at his prime .
The big lul said on 10/Sep/20
Ok buddy 😂😂😂
Kan said on 10/Sep/20
@battery
First of all if ike don’t tilt his head looks 6ft8 😉
Click Here
In boots of course
The camera is lower than his head, this probably adds some height and those boots give more than half inch.
this means he is not much taller than 6ft7 barefoot 😉

Came on my friend 😎
Riky said on 10/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 9/Sep/20

Check Ike Catcher next to 6'4.5 max Slatan Ibrahimovic, I can't find the picture.

This is Ibrahimovic next to Gigi Donnarumma who is 6'5".
Click Here

Ike Catcher looks most of the times 6'7" range most likely just 6'7".
He has around 1.5 inches at least on the undertaker.
Undertaker today isn't above 6'5.5
Kan said on 10/Sep/20
@battery
Taker eyelevel probably looks 5.2 inch but of course not over than that. A 6ft2 guy like lesnar and reigns are over his eyelevel clearly, over taker eyebrowns very easiily, so taker is 6ft6 at very best.
I Said the rock was about 4 inch smaller than taker in his prime. The rock top head was clearly over taker eyelevel, therefore taker wasn’t for sure as tall as 6ft8.
With big show looks over 5 inch shorter.
Click Here
Click Here

I don’t know if you trolling, but you're insisting on something that doesn't make sense. there are various people who have met undertaker, including a legit 6ft6 guy who took a picture with taker that you can also find here and taker looks barely taller, and this appaned back to 2013.

So
6'3 Julian said on 10/Sep/20
@Battery we question his height cause he’s been taking bumps that might shrink him for 30 years, is a big man in a sport where they often claim the lads are bigger, and he’s a really big name so people will think he’s bigger than he is
Battery6565 said on 9/Sep/20
@The big lul
At this point, I don't know what to tell you. I can't tell if you're living in a state if delusion or you're trolling right now. Look, sometimes you just need to accept that some people are blessed with height and some aren't. I've posted this photo quite a few times before. Ike Catcher measured 6'9.6" in flats.
Click Here

Okay now let's assume the flats add 1.6" which they obviously don't. That still makes him 6'8" and Undertaker 6'6.5". Now stop trolling.

@Plassey
No pics = didn't happen

@JT
This better for you?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

You can't make excuses about a video.

@Kan
Really though?
Click Here

Is this a 5 inch eye level to you? Maybe you can comment on this @Rob
Click Here

And by the way 5 inches between him and Rock makes him 6'8" in his prime, you're just proving me right, lol.
Editor Rob
His eyelevel does look in 5 inch range
mrtguy said on 9/Sep/20
Rob, you really think Taker has receding hairline or is his forehead that huge??
Editor Rob
He did have a high hairline which accentuates his forehead length.
NCL said on 8/Sep/20
The big lul said on 7/Sep/20
Undertaker and Ike catcher: Click Here

Big show and Ike catcher: Click Here

I wonder, if Ike catcher is a legit 6’9 then taker looks 6’7.5-6’8 here and we all know that it’s false. Most knowledgeable people here all say that taker is 6’5.5-6’6 max nowadays which would mean the Ike catcher looks about an inch to 1.5 taller than taker which would put him around 6’7-6’7.5 max

As for big show he’s no taller than 6’9.25 nowadays and it looks like big show is maybe raising himself to look a bit taller which makes it look like a 2.5-3 inch difference. I personally think that if big show was barefoot it’ll be a 1.75-2 inch difference between them. But I guess imma need help on that picture specifically.


Ike Catcher measured. Not sure if this is a good camera angle though.

Click Here
Alex17 said on 7/Sep/20
Not sure why Taker and other wrestlers listed so low in her compared to other tall athletes. Anything below a weak 6’8 peak is out of the question, guaranteed. He was 5” Max shorter than 7’1” Khali back in 2008. And still likely around a weak 6’7 today. Would put all my bank on it.
6'3 Julian said on 7/Sep/20
Plassey what are you talking about? Strowman and Taker are both fine at 6’6. Drew is 6’4.5 or so
The big lul said on 7/Sep/20
Undertaker and Ike catcher: Click Here

Big show and Ike catcher: Click Here

I wonder, if Ike catcher is a legit 6’9 then taker looks 6’7.5-6’8 here and we all know that it’s false. Most knowledgeable people here all say that taker is 6’5.5-6’6 max nowadays which would mean the Ike catcher looks about an inch to 1.5 taller than taker which would put him around 6’7-6’7.5 max

As for big show he’s no taller than 6’9.25 nowadays and it looks like big show is maybe raising himself to look a bit taller which makes it look like a 2.5-3 inch difference. I personally think that if big show was barefoot it’ll be a 1.75-2 inch difference between them. But I guess imma need help on that picture specifically.
Plassey said on 7/Sep/20
I’m telling ya I met Drew McIntyre in 2017 he was at most 6’3 - 6’3 and a half - and Braun is 6’5 and taker is a little over 6’5 . Braun wears these huge boots in the ring go look at photos of him with Tyson fury in the ring and photos of them two out side the ring Braun drops at least 2 inches in height. They are all a lot shorter then we all think and we know this but when meeting them in the flesh it shocks you lol
JT said on 6/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 4/Sep/20
@Vegas
So this photo of Undertaker and Big Show isn't good evidence when it's a normal full body photo at a normal angle.
Click Here


That’s not a normal angle, that’s an extreme angle where the taller object always looks shorter than it really is. Click Here
JT said on 6/Sep/20
Here’s a recent pic of Undertaker with Godfather and Tracy Murray. I saw Murray up close about 25 years ago and he looked around 6’6”. Click Here

IMO Undertaker was at least 6’7” peak although his height can look anywhere from 6’6” to 6’8” or more – probably dependent on his posture and his or the other wrestler’s footwear.

Click Here
Click Here

Beginning in the late 1990s, he did wear some suspect footwear as he arguably looked 6’8” or even taller in the ring many occasions.

He initially was clearly shorter than Kane (in big heeled boots)
Click Here
Click Here
but then seemed to close the gap even though Kane kept wearing those boots
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

He also looked over 6’8” with the McMahons although no one here seriously believes he ever hit that height:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Battery6565 said on 6/Sep/20
@Vegas
Hahahaha, you say I am posting bad angle photos, see what kind of photos you are posting. Okay lets forget photos and look at a video of Undertaker and Show from 1999

Is this a 4.75" gap!?
Click Here
Kan said on 6/Sep/20
@battery
Are you trolling ? First of all taker eyelevel is in 5.25 inch range so if a 6ft2 Guy like reigns, golbderg, Brock lesnar go face to face with taker, he is 6ft7 if the top of this guys head are about the eyes of undertaker.
Click Here
Click Here
Every of this Guy are clearly over is eyelevel by an inch easily and taker was always in thick boots sole.

With the rock looked about 4 inch taller in his prime and next to big show (1999) taker looked even under his eyelevel this means there are at least 5 inches of difference
Click Here
Probably even 5.5 inch

Strowman is clearly taller than taker today.
There is no point to showing a photo where the camera is much lower than the subjects and taker is at least an inch closer to the camera lens 😉

Came on man don't embarrassing yourself !
Riky said on 6/Sep/20
Mazhar Malim said on 5/Sep/20
One of my most favourite wrestlers of all time! Atleast 1.94-1.95m today lucky to see him in person I am 1.98m and he was not that much shorter than me

He was shorter??
Battery6565 said on 6/Sep/20
According to some users, Goldberg and Taker gap is 2.5 inches.
Click Here

And Big Show and Taker Gap is 5 inches
Click Here
Click Here

No but for real can these photos be explained other than with the fact that Taker is taller than his listing? Are you gonna say he's jumping? Or standing on a stool? Or he's using his powers to float somehow? Does this look like a 4-5 inch gap?
Battery6565 said on 6/Sep/20
Hmmmm, the top of The Rocks head is at Undertaker's eyes, and Taker has a much larger than average 4.5" forehead and Rock is listed at 6'3", hmmm I wonder how tall Undertaker nust be then
Click Here
Battery6565 said on 6/Sep/20
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a 5 inch difference according to some geniuses on here. And please stop denying that these are the best photos for comparing Show and Taker.
Click Here
Click Here

And this is apparently a 3 inch difference
Click Here

And Strowman is apparently taller than Undertaker
Click Here

We have legitimate Einstein level intelligence users using this site.
Vegas' said on 5/Sep/20
Battery6565 no it's not good evidence. Extremely low camera angle means shorter guy looks taller.

And video of NYSE I posted is small balcony. Show is likely what woman on right in light blue is and Kane is where bald man in dark suit is Click Here
Mazhar Malim said on 5/Sep/20
One of my most favourite wrestlers of all time! Atleast 1.94-1.95m today lucky to see him in person I am 1.98m and he was not that much shorter than me
Canson said on 5/Sep/20
Battery6565 said on 4/Sep/20
@Brock11
You are damn right.

Everyone on here wants to ignore the thousand photos where he looks taller than his listed height and repeatedly spam 1 or 2 photos where he doesn't look his listed height and even that got debunked by me.

What about the pics where he looks like sub 6’6”? Or the personal accounts such as the pic that Bros of Destruction posted where he himself is 6’3.5” and Taker is not a full 3” taller? Taker is max what Rob lists him here today. 6’6”
Josey Wales said on 5/Sep/20
The broken skull interview with stone cold was entertaining and interesting. When asked abt when he replaced Sid Viscious in his WCW stint he said well yeah there weren't too many 6'8" guys around.. This us clearly his peak days and Robs listing for peak 6'7" and change could be on the money.
Josey Wales said on 5/Sep/20
The broken skull interview with stone cold was entertaining and interesting. When asked abt when he replaced Sid Viscious in his WCW stint he said well yeah there weren't too many 6'8" guys around.. This us clearly his peak days and Robs listing for peak 6'7" and change could be on the money.
6'3 Julian said on 5/Sep/20
Hmmm, why might a 55 year old man who’s spent the last 30+ years taking dangerous bumps and participating in a sport where physical stats are often exaggerated, especially for very tall people. Why might his height come into question?
Canson said on 4/Sep/20
Just because Rob lists someone at a certain height doesn’t mean it’s 100% accurate. There are a lot of celebs who are overlisted here if going off the site’s standards. Then there Is a case like Bo Burnham where almost everyone agrees that he doesn’t look as low as 6’5” flat which he was initially listed (maybe it was 6’5 1/8”). But he was pushed up to 6’5.25” then 6’5.5”. Whether he is that high is debatable but very possible. Some Even believe he’s higher.
JT said on 4/Sep/20
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 4/Sep/20
Peak taker 6ft8 currend 6ft7.25 barefoot
Battery6565 said on 4/Sep/20
@Vegas
So this photo of Undertaker and Big Show isn't good evidence when it's a normal full body photo at a normal angle.
Click Here

Yet your video where Big Show is standing in front of Kane is a good evidence? They are not even the same distance from camera dude. I hope you are joking.
Battery6565 said on 4/Sep/20
@Vegas
4 inches even would mean a 6'8" Peak since Show is listed at 7', not a 6'6" Peak like some people on here are suggesting.

@Julian
Lol I don't have any issue with you. I am just giving my opinion.

@Kan
I'm not sure if you're trolling or if you're genuinely being serious and you can't tell that Strowman has his head up and Undertaker looks down.
Also why don't you just compare both of them together instead of comparing both of them to the same guy?

Click Here

If Big Show is listed at 7 feet then Taker needs to be upgraded and even today he's taller than Strowman, whether you like it or not. It is what it is.
Battery6565 said on 4/Sep/20
@Brock11
You are damn right.

Everyone on here wants to ignore the thousand photos where he looks taller than his listed height and repeatedly spam 1 or 2 photos where he doesn't look his listed height and even that got debunked by me.
The big lul said on 3/Sep/20
Taker nowadays is only 3-3.5 inches shorter than 6’9-6’9.25 max big show which would put him in the 6’5.5-6’6 max range now. And I don’t think that he’s much shorter than Braun and Kane nowadays but I do think that him and Corbin are in the same height range
6'3 Julian said on 3/Sep/20
@Battery6565 if you take issue with Undertaker’s listing, I didn’t make it. Take it up with Rob
Canson said on 2/Sep/20
Big Show still being the full 6’10” afternoon height is debatable. If he’s lower than that it’s a weak 6’10 meaning 6’9.5-.75 range more than likely. But Taker being over 6’6.5 or 6’7” today is not. He’s max 6’6”. He was only maybe 1/2” taller than Ali Baba when he posted a pic of them 6 years ago or so and Ali was 198 or 197.5-198 by that stage. Peak height he may have been 6’7.5 afternoon and definitely was 6’8” out of bed or very close to it. He didn’t dip under 6’7” in the afternoon in his prime
The big lul said on 2/Sep/20
Taker was 6’7 peak now 6’5.5-6’6 and big show was only 4 inches which would put him at 6’11 peak and now no taller than 6’9-6’9.25
Vegas' said on 1/Sep/20
Those photos are not good evidence. There was 4 inches easy between Taker and Show back in day, met both guys out of gear a number of times.
4 inches there Click Here
More there Click Here

Last photo suggests Taker and Show are roughly sane height right now, that's highly unlikely considering how much height Show had in Kane out of gear on video not that long ago Click Here
Battery6565 said on 1/Sep/20
@Julian
Did you notice how I wrote this is a 4-5" difference after their prime photo? I was talking about their primes. You tell me yourself how much of a gap this looks like to you.
Click Here

Prime Taker is listed at 6'7.25" and Show at 7' , that's 4.75". The photo looks nowhere near that gap.
Kan said on 1/Sep/20
@battery
Undertaker today isn’t taller than strowman.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Strowman is a good half inch teller even if taker stand in a good posture.
For is peak isn’t impossible 6ft7 1/2 but if sid wasn’t much over 6ft6, probably taker wasn’t over 6ft7. For Me peak height 6ft7 - 6ft7 1/2 at most and today about 6ft6 flat but not over than that
Brock11 said on 1/Sep/20
There is no way Taker is 4 inches shorter right now than Big Show, and there is no way, that he was 6'6 range peak, he was 6'7 or even bit taller, Nash was 6'9 peak also, and Nathan Jones weak 6'9, there is no way that Nathan Jones was 3 inches taller than Taker in 2003. Sid said he was about 6'6, so he can easily be like 6'6.5 or 6'6.25 at his peak, also he was using lifts. Outside the ring he looked over 1 inch shorter than Taker.
The big lul said on 1/Sep/20
@6’3 Julian: Big show isn’t 6’10 barefoot anymore he’s at best 6’9-6’9.25 max now and in wrestling gear he’s a max 6’9.5-6’10 inch guy and with taker we all agree that taker is 6’5.5-6’6 max now and his peak is no taller than 6’7. And big show peak was 6’11 cause he only looked an 3.75 - 4 inches taller than the undertaker. Nowadays it’ll probably an 3-3.5 inch difference now between the two men.
lopo said on 1/Sep/20
max 1.95cm he walked pass me im 1.90cm 5cm taller
6'3 Julian said on 1/Sep/20
@Battery6565 when did I say it was a 4-5 inch difference? That would make current Taker barely 6’6, given that most of this site agrees current Show to be 6’10. If anybody’s delusional it’s you, making up quotes because I’d have guessed he’s 6’7
Battery6565 said on 31/Aug/20
@6'3 Julian
Don't take me serious if you don't want to, by "close" I am saying he can appear within a few inches and the photos speak for themselves.

Prime Undertaker and Show:
Click Here

Apparently this is a 4.75" difference. LOL!

Undertaker and Big Show now:
Click Here

Yeah dude, I don't know why anybody can be delusional enough to think this is a 4-5" gap.
6'3 Julian said on 31/Aug/20
@Battery6565 I almost took you seriously until you said he’s close to Big Show. Also in one of those photos it’s literally just Takers face and head and in the other you didn’t say who he’s with or how tall he is
The big lul said on 30/Aug/20
See taker no taller than 6’5.5-6’5.75 and max 6’6 with perfect posture and as for his peak he was no taller than 6’7 peak when you see him with 6’6-6’6.25 king Mabel and 6’6 sycho Sid, 6’9 peak Kevin Nash and 6’11 peak big show. ( but I do think Sid whore footwear through out his career to look a little bit closer in height with taker and Kevin Nash) people gotta realize that people like taker, Kane, Braun, big show and even Kevin Nash aren’t as tall as y’all think they are
Battery6565 said on 29/Aug/20
Video of Undertaker and Jones where footwear can be seen.
Click Here

According to the "genius" Ben Bell, this is a 3 inch difference.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 29/Aug/20
@Ben Bell
Cool, I also happen to have a cousin who's 6'7"-6'7.5" range, but he claims 6'9".
62B said on 28/Aug/20
Ben Bell said on 27/Aug/20
Battery6565
The pics with jones you can’t see the footwear. Also the close one taker is much close to the camera. Taker wore his big soled hi tec magnums in 03 and Jones in wrestling boots. That gives Taker 1” at least. Jones has 1.5” roughly. With the boots that’s 2.5”-ish. 6’8.5 Jones, 6’6-ish taker.
I met a cowboy boot wearing taker in 94 and he was 6’8 in big soled boots.
Last year again meeting him he was 6’6 tops.
With Sid and his admitted 6’6 standing eye to eye with taker I have to give them the same height.
At most 6’7 peak taker.
When you see Taker with 6’7 measured athletes he’s always noticeably shorter.
How do we know how tall Jones actually is? Again it’s all claimed heights.
I never saw Jones in person but I did see Matt Morgan close up at a TNA show and he looked no taller than my wife’s legit barefoot 6’7.5 cousin.
He could have been an inch or so taller.
Any heights I give I have to say could be 1” either way.
Andre 6’11.5
Giant-Big Show 6’11.5
Nash 6’9.5 (met in 94 and 2015)
Jones 6’9
Morgan 6’8
Taker 6’6-6’7 (giving him the edge in Sid) met
Sid 6’6 to 6’6.5 met
Razor 6’5 met
Jake 6’5
Adam bomb 6’5
Hogan 6’5 met
Crush 6’5
Luger 6’3.5 met
Warrior 6’1.5 met
Bret 6 met
Shawn 5’11 met
Angle 5’10 met
Piper 6’05 when I met him he was 5’9 tops, same as flair. Very hard to guess peak.
Flair 5’11.5
______________________________--
For sure Luger was not 6' 3 1/2". He was shorter than me in what was either 1988 or 1989. I was 6'3 1/4", Luger was at best 6'2 3/4" but could have easily been only 6' 2 1/2". I believe he was still in the NWA and before he started waring thick-soled boots. In person Dibiasi was taller than Luger.
Riky said on 28/Aug/20
DarkM said on 27/Aug/20

Silva isn't 6'8 or 6'7'.
Battery6565 said on 28/Aug/20
@Ben Bell
He might appear shorter because he barely can stand straight.
Click Here

Stop expecting him to stand at his bust a gut height.

He's taller than Braun Strowman even now, stop making me prove it again and again, and no matter how much anyone whines that's not going to change.
Click Here

He looks near the same as 6'7.5" Dr Disrespect.

@Rob
How much is the difference between The Rock and Undertaker in this photo from 1997?
Click Here
Battery6565 said on 27/Aug/20
No it did not prove anything.

Click Here
Click Here

Hundreds of injuries, surgeries, old age, worn out body, already tall, carrying a lot of weight. Stop expecting him to stand at full height.

He has easily lost 1.5 inches probably.

Even today he looks taller than Braun Strowman, holds up well against Dr Disrespect and looks close to Big Show. And that's after his height loss. How are people claiming anything below 6'7.5" peak , it's hilarious.
Ben Bell said on 27/Aug/20
Battery6565
The pics with jones you can’t see the footwear. Also the close one taker is much close to the camera. Taker wore his big soled hi tec magnums in 03 and Jones in wrestling boots. That gives Taker 1” at least. Jones has 1.5” roughly. With the boots that’s 2.5”-ish. 6’8.5 Jones, 6’6-ish taker.
I met a cowboy boot wearing taker in 94 and he was 6’8 in big soled boots.
Last year again meeting him he was 6’6 tops.
With Sid and his admitted 6’6 standing eye to eye with taker I have to give them the same height.
At most 6’7 peak taker.
When you see Taker with 6’7 measured athletes he’s always noticeably shorter.
How do we know how tall Jones actually is? Again it’s all claimed heights.
I never saw Jones in person but I did see Matt Morgan close up at a TNA show and he looked no taller than my wife’s legit barefoot 6’7.5 cousin.
He could have been an inch or so taller.
Any heights I give I have to say could be 1” either way.
Andre 6’11.5
Giant-Big Show 6’11.5
Nash 6’9.5 (met in 94 and 2015)
Jones 6’9
Morgan 6’8
Taker 6’6-6’7 (giving him the edge in Sid) met
Sid 6’6 to 6’6.5 met
Razor 6’5 met
Jake 6’5
Adam bomb 6’5
Hogan 6’5 met
Crush 6’5
Luger 6’3.5 met
Warrior 6’1.5 met
Bret 6 met
Shawn 5’11 met
Angle 5’10 met
Piper 6’05 when I met him he was 5’9 tops, same as flair. Very hard to guess peak.
Flair 5’11.5


Rough peak heights. Just my opinion.
DarkM said on 27/Aug/20
@Battery6565 Also around the same time in early 2000's (I'm sure this has been posted on here before) Undertaker was seen backstage at UFC 42 in 2003 taking a picture alongside 6'7"- 6'8" Tim Sylvia and looks taller. Search YouTube "The Undertaker BackStage At UFC 42" pause at 1.49
Harry Sachs said on 26/Aug/20
@Canson I rarely ever read anything you type because I can't take anything you type seriously. I put up a factual video. Both Sid and a young Mark and clearly Sid was taller.

Also @Riky juts because Ali Baba is listed or claims to be 6'5 doesn't mean he is.

Something else to the person typed well Sid had puffy hair so that is why he looked taller. Or from certain angles The Undertaker looked taller. At 2:35 in this video I will put up again Sid and the Undertaker are standing face to face. If Sid was 6'6 then there is no way that the Undertaker is even 6'6. Years after this when the Undertaker became big, Mark started to wear thicker sole shoes to make him look taller like all "monsters" in wrestling do. Click Here
Canson said on 26/Aug/20
He doesn’t need an upgrade. See him in front of 6’6.25 Sid and that’s not an inch between them in their primes which is why Rob lowered Taker’s prime. It can’t be “Well Sid is 6’6.5”. He said himself he’s 6’6”. Since we can’t seem to agree, let’s just use Rob’s listing of 6’6.25” being that’s the best possibility. Saying he’s rounding down 1/2” is even more speculative than someone saying he’s 6’6.25” as opposed to 6’6”. I used to believe 6’7.5” before which was what he was listed. And next to Brothers of Destruction he looked max 6’6”. With Dan Trojan’s encounter he also looked 6’6”. He looked slightly over 6’6” when Ali Baba met him in 2013ish but he isn’t that tall now. His current listing is fine because if he dips below it it’s prob just to 6’5.75” which is just being he could lose a full inch in a day
6'3 Julian said on 26/Aug/20
I agree but Jones is slouching in one of those pictures
Battery6565 said on 25/Aug/20
Can't wait to see the excuses people make for this one...

Undertaker and 6'9.75" Nathan Jones.
Click Here
Click Here

Literally nobody on here can counter my points with actual facts.

Prime Undertaker height needs to be upgraded and so does his current height listing.
Riky said on 25/Aug/20
The smoking gun pictures with Clevelands showed the evidence that Taker isn't in any way above 6'5.5 back then. Just impossible. It was 2017.
How much he lost is hard to say, but I don't see how he is supposed to be 6'7.5 peak like someone keep saying.
He was 6'6.5 peak, maybe 6'6.75 but maxxxx barefoot.
6'8" in shoes that's why he still claims this height today.
Canson said on 25/Aug/20
I agree with Big Lul
Battery6565 said on 24/Aug/20
He's not going to be standing straight wherever he goes all the time though? Considering his history with injuries and surgeries, adding in the fact that tall people have back issues anyway and plus he carries a lot of weight, what makes you think he's going to be at his full height while walking around or casually posing?
oliver d said on 24/Aug/20
Peak Taker and also Kane
6foot7 1/2
kane a tad bigger shoulder height
but taker has an bigger forehead
very difficult
The big lul said on 23/Aug/20
People need to come to realization that undertaker was only 6’7 at his peak and or a max 6’7 in his peak. If he was 6’7.5 he would look taller and closer to the 6’8 side. Taker was a max 4 inches shorter than 6’11 inch peak big show and 1.75-2.25 inches shorter than 6’9-6’9.25 peak Kevin Nash. Same goes for Kane. Kane was probably 6’7 max 6’7.25 and now Kane barely stand 6’6.5 and taker barely stands 6’6 nowadays
Undertaker peak:6’7
Undertaker now: 6’5.5-6’5.75 (6’6 max with perfect posture)
Kane peak: 6’7-6’7.25
Kane now: 6’6-6’6.25 (6’6.5 max with perfect posture)
Big show peak 6’11-6’11.25
Big show now: 6’9-6’9.25
Kevin Nash now: 6’8 -6’8.5
DarkM said on 23/Aug/20
I doubt Taker could walk the top rope wearing lifts, he wore flat footwear.
Canson said on 20/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 19/Aug/20
@Harry Sachs
1) This is the only point in the video where both Taker and Sid are standing straight without anyone pulling them.
Click Here

Even over here he looks taller.

2) At the other point he starts to get pulled away by his manager or whoever that guy is diagonally away from the camera which makes Sid look bigger.
Click Here

See the direction he's pulled in.

When Undertaker is in the more favourable angle, he looks much taller.
Click Here

And you wrote an essay on how people depicted as monsters are made to wear more favourable footwear, then wouldn't that be the case in this video clearly where Sid looks like a monster and Taker appears more like a normal guy?

I'm really starting to think I'm the only person who can do basic breakdowns and analysis over here. Like please study the video carefully before making such outrageous claims.

No you don’t use good pics which is why you believe that
Canson said on 20/Aug/20
Brock11 said on 19/Aug/20
Harry Sachs, stop trolling. He was like 6'6.5 when he met Alibaba in 2014, at 49 years old.
6'7.25 peak is fine, now maybe barely 6'6. Sid had lifts.

I will say 6’7” barefoot in his prime is pretty reasonable. 6’7” flat but I’m not sure about 6’7.25 now a days being Sid came out with his 6’6” claim.
Meat said on 20/Aug/20
Same old Sid-Taker video posted again for the millionth time on here. Wearing a mask with puffy curly hair. In EVERY Sid-Taker stare down, Mark has a relaxed posture while Sid is posturing on his toes, puffing his chest up and tilting his chin into Takers' face. Sid is about 1/2" shorter peak heights in their younger years. Funny how many people want to discredit Mark's height.
6'3 Julian said on 20/Aug/20
“The Undertaker was never 6’7. He was probably never even 6’6”
Is this guy joking? You’ve gotta be joking. What’s next? The Rock is 5’10? Orton is 6’1? Bret Hart is 5’8? Those all sound ridiculous but that’s the sense of scale you have
Riky said on 19/Aug/20
Harry Sachs said on 18/Aug/20

Well that video is probably the only moment in Wich Sid did look taller.
For few reasons...

1) He was taller.

2) the mask he was wearing and his hair played an important part in it plus footwear advantage over 6'6.5/75 Texas Red for make him looks huge in his debut.

3) Undertaker had footwear advantage over Sid after that first face off and for all his career after.

As you can read I don't exactly inflate height as in my opinion Taker was maybe even just 6'6.5 peak but (I give more chances to 200cm)
But less than that is really hard to imagine.
He was taller (with slightly footwear advantage) of 6'5.5/6'6" AliBaba in 2014 , a poster who did claim that height.
So at his peak he was closer to 6'7".

Today he is comfortably 197cm range barefoot, as we are talking about afternoon barefoot heights.
Battery6565 said on 19/Aug/20
@Harry Sachs
1) This is the only point in the video where both Taker and Sid are standing straight without anyone pulling them.
Click Here

Even over here he looks taller.

2) At the other point he starts to get pulled away by his manager or whoever that guy is diagonally away from the camera which makes Sid look bigger.
Click Here

See the direction he's pulled in.

When Undertaker is in the more favourable angle, he looks much taller.
Click Here

And you wrote an essay on how people depicted as monsters are made to wear more favourable footwear, then wouldn't that be the case in this video clearly where Sid looks like a monster and Taker appears more like a normal guy?

I'm really starting to think I'm the only person who can do basic breakdowns and analysis over here. Like please study the video carefully before making such outrageous claims.
Brock11 said on 19/Aug/20
Harry Sachs, stop trolling. He was like 6'6.5 when he met Alibaba in 2014, at 49 years old.
6'7.25 peak is fine, now maybe barely 6'6. Sid had lifts.
Canson said on 19/Aug/20
Harry Sachs said on 18/Aug/20
Here is a video of Sid and the Undertaker back when The Undertaker was Texas Red I believe. Go to 2:35 in the video. If Sid Vicious is 6'6 then again how is the Undertaker 6'7 plus in his prime? The way you people constantly inflate peoples height to fit your motive always cracked me up. Click Here

The Undertaker was never 6'7. He was probably not even 6'6. Also something else you people fail to realize. If a wrestler is suppose to be this monster in the ring, they will tend to wear really thick sole shoes to make them look taller The Undertaker, Braun Strowman, Kane ect wore thick shoes. Even though Baron Corbin is tall he doesn't wear thick soles because he isn't portrayed as being a monster.

Ali Baba posted pics with him back in 2013 or 2014 and estimated him to be slightly taller than he was. Ali Baba was a peak 6’6” flat afternoon height and guessed him to be 6’6-6’7 range so even if he wasn’t 6’7” peak he was at least 6’6.5 then.
6'3 Julian said on 18/Aug/20
You list Taker about the same as Viscera. There are two inches between those guys. No way peak Taker was under 6’8. As for now I think 6’7, the 5’9 (I think) AJ Styles was a head shorter than him and Takers head is probably 10 inches cause his forehead is huge.
Harry Sachs said on 18/Aug/20
Here is a video of Sid and the Undertaker back when The Undertaker was Texas Red I believe. Go to 2:35 in the video. If Sid Vicious is 6'6 then again how is the Undertaker 6'7 plus in his prime? The way you people constantly inflate peoples height to fit your motive always cracked me up. Click Here

The Undertaker was never 6'7. He was probably not even 6'6. Also something else you people fail to realize. If a wrestler is suppose to be this monster in the ring, they will tend to wear really thick sole shoes to make them look taller The Undertaker, Braun Strowman, Kane ect wore thick shoes. Even though Baron Corbin is tall he doesn't wear thick soles because he isn't portrayed as being a monster.
Canson said on 18/Aug/20
The big lul said on 17/Aug/20
Who said I claimed taker to be only 6’5. I said that he’s no taller than 6’5.5-6’6 maybe 6’5.75. Peak he was legit 6’7 cause he was 4 inches shorter than 6’11 big show and 2 to maybe 2.25 shorter than 6’9-6’9.25 peak height Kevin Nash.

He may be talking about another person here who may have claimed it in the past but not recently. Or he’s being petty by exaggerating what you said. Last I checked 6’5.5-.75” is not 6’5”. That’s 6’5 plus of course but not 6’5” flat. The majority of the posters who comment here have him max 6’6” many of them 6’5.75”
Alex3 said on 17/Aug/20
This new listing is way too low, the average guess is spot on IMO, he was 4/5" max. shorter than 7'1 Khali back in 2006.
Canson said on 17/Aug/20
Click Here

Knock 1” or close to 1” off both guys and you have their peak barefoot heights
The big lul said on 17/Aug/20
Who said I claimed taker to be only 6’5. I said that he’s no taller than 6’5.5-6’6 maybe 6’5.75. Peak he was legit 6’7 cause he was 4 inches shorter than 6’11 big show and 2 to maybe 2.25 shorter than 6’9-6’9.25 peak height Kevin Nash.
Canson said on 17/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 15/Aug/20
I literally posted a photo of Ike measuring 6'9"+ in shoes and u are still making absurd claims, this is just proof that even if rob were to measure undertaker in person at 6'6.5" or so you'd still be claiming that he's 6'5.

Who said Taker was 6’5? Most here are saying he’s a solid 6’6 (just half inch off your estimate) or 6’5.5-.75 range which is about 3/4-1” less
Battery6565 said on 15/Aug/20
I literally posted a photo of Ike measuring 6'9"+ in shoes and u are still making absurd claims, this is just proof that even if rob were to measure undertaker in person at 6'6.5" or so you'd still be claiming that he's 6'5.
Battery6565 said on 15/Aug/20
@The Big Lul
Stop comparing silly photos, can you genuinely not see that Taker has head tilted next to Drew?

And whats the logic in comparing undertaker to Drew to braun to drew when u can just compare undertaker and braun!?
Click Here

Undertaker and 6'7.5" listed guy. See who's chin is higher.
Click Here

Undertaker and 6'10" listed guy
Click Here

And keep claiming Goldberg is below 6'2 when he's listed 6'2.5" lmao. Well at least you admit there's 4 inches between them.
Creeper said on 15/Aug/20
Thank you Taker 1990-2020!
Riky said on 15/Aug/20
The big lul said on 13/Aug/20

Man I agree with you obviously, but I want to share a thought.
Undertaker shows, with McIntyre for example, such an amazing posture......
Jesus he drop height and tryes to be same height with almost everyone.
It seems that he does that on purpose, for make the other guy bigger I think for the storyline, or that btw he wants to be eye to eye with everyone.
This make more difficult judge his height, but in the end in my opinion he isn't taller than 6'5.5 and strowman max 6'6"1/4
Canson said on 15/Aug/20
The big lul said on 13/Aug/20
@Battery6565 Yep taker totally has his head tilted down here with drew mcintyre. Jk only looked an inch to 1.25 taller than him
Click Here

Here is what a legit 6’6.5 inch guy should look next to drew mcintyre. Yet strowman is shorter than taker, ok buddy Click Here

And If Taker is 6’6.5 then why does he look a max 4 inches taller than 6’1.5 to max 6’1.75 Goldberg Click Here

Taker is 6’5.5-6’5.75 Max 6’6 with perfect posture. Yet you say he’s taller than strowman. At best he’s as tall as Kane and Baron Corbin.

I agree with most of what you said but Kane is taller than Taker today. Kane is more like 6’6.5”

Here he is Kane with football player, 6’5.75 measured Donovan Smith. Now the combines are held Early morning so to arrive at the standard of afternoon height deduct about 3/8” and hes Prob 6’5 3/8 still. Kane is minimum 1” taller. I could give the full 1 1/8” to him and see 6’6.5” and 6’6.75 that Rob lists him as a mid morning or lunchtime height being a guy that size usually would lose 1” during the day. But Taker surely isn’t 6’6.5” today. In the pictures that Bro’s of Destruction (6’3.5”) posted Taker looked max 6’6” which you alluded to with your estimate. I could give Taker in the afternoon maximum 6’6” flat but that’s standing his absolute tallest in the afternoon. That said Rob’s estimate is probably reasonable but 6’6.5 is high for Taker

Click Here
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 14/Aug/20
Both taker and kane claimed 6ft8 203cm taker was not even standing straight with drew drew is 6ft5 196cm taker is 2inches 2.5inches taller 6ft7.25 201cm 6ft7.5 202cm.
The big lul said on 13/Aug/20
@Battery6565 Yep taker totally has his head tilted down here with drew mcintyre. Jk only looked an inch to 1.25 taller than him
Click Here

Here is what a legit 6’6.5 inch guy should look next to drew mcintyre. Yet strowman is shorter than taker, ok buddy Click Here

And If Taker is 6’6.5 then why does he look a max 4 inches taller than 6’1.5 to max 6’1.75 Goldberg Click Here

Taker is 6’5.5-6’5.75 Max 6’6 with perfect posture. Yet you say he’s taller than strowman. At best he’s as tall as Kane and Baron Corbin.
Canson said on 13/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 12/Aug/20
@Canson
Crazy.

You wrote a PhD level dissertation on how bad of a person I am instead of trying to explain how someone can be sub 6'6" and hold up against Big Show, Dr Disrespect, Braun etc. And in Braun's case, even be taller. Reason I didn't bother arguing before because you guys (You, @Christian 6'5 3/8" and others) don't bother debunking anything and go off on another tangent.

I don't blame you. There really is no way to explain it other than he's taller than you think.

I can guarantee if he was asked to stand under a stadiometer and stand as tall as he can, you'd be surprised.

As it stands, when Undertaker met Braun he visibly edged him out so logic says he is taller. What is there to debate in this?

Nothing you said makes sense. All I did was answer your first post to me in a very hostile tone. And youre wrong. I don’t see where Taker edged him
The big lul said on 13/Aug/20
First of all Goldberg is not 6’2.5 now, he’s at best 6’1.5 - 6’1.75 max now. He’s 4 inches shorter than 6’5.5-6’5.75 max undertaker. And as for Ike catcher. He’s not 6’9, he was 2 inches shorter than 6’9-6’9.25 max big show now and was 1.25-1.5 inches taller than undertaker which would make him 6’7. Also imma double down on what a said. Taker was only an 1-1.25 inch taller than a legit 6’4.5 drew mcintyre. Taker is not as tall as Braun today it's the truth . He’s identical in height with 6’5.75 to 6’6 Baron Corbin, if not he gets edged out by a fraction.
Battery6565 said on 12/Aug/20
@Canson
Crazy.

You wrote a PhD level dissertation on how bad of a person I am instead of trying to explain how someone can be sub 6'6" and hold up against Big Show, Dr Disrespect, Braun etc. And in Braun's case, even be taller. Reason I didn't bother arguing before because you guys (You, @Christian 6'5 3/8" and others) don't bother debunking anything and go off on another tangent.

I don't blame you. There really is no way to explain it other than he's taller than you think.

I can guarantee if he was asked to stand under a stadiometer and stand as tall as he can, you'd be surprised.

As it stands, when Undertaker met Braun he visibly edged him out so logic says he is taller. What is there to debate in this?
Battery6565 said on 12/Aug/20
Let's just get it straight that the celeb heights visitors expect someone with all these injuries to be standing at their full height with perfect posture at all times!
Click Here

And this list is from 2012, you can add on old age, more injuries and a more broken down body. Ahh how smart to assume he is standing at his full height everywhere!!

@The big lul
What are you even saying? Goldberg is listed 6'2.5" and when both stood straight there was a clear 4-5" height gap as I calculated. Stop debating it. And are you joking or what about Drew, dude had his neck tilted and was looking down at Drew, are you genuinely suggesting he was standing at his full height when he faced off with Drew?

As for Ike Catcher, he stands at slightly above 6'9" in shoes so how on Earth can he be 6'7" flat? He's like 6'7.5" to 6'8". This measuring scale goes up in 1.2" increments. You have 0 idea what you're talking about.
Click Here
Canson said on 11/Aug/20
Here is Taker with Roman Reigns.

Click Here

Here is Strowman with Reigns

Click Here

There is a greater height difference in the 2nd pic than the first. Even if Taker has worse posture I’d imagine Strowman edges him. Let’s not forget that Strowman’s posture is not great either. But Rob’s estimates of 6’6 and 6’6.5 fit both guys today
Meat said on 11/Aug/20
Amen Battery6565. The video in the ring with Strowman is obvious. 2 men side by side, face to face. Very little angle. Yet ppl here suggesting its "not good evidence". This height is too reduced.
Canson said on 11/Aug/20
The big lul said on 10/Aug/20

Kane at 6’6-6’6.5 is certainly possible but I’d narrow that margin to 6’6.25-.5 range being a worst case for him. I would really say he’s somewhere around what Rob lists him maybe 6’6.5 but doubt less than that. I can’t see him as low as 6’6”
Canson said on 11/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 10/Aug/20
@Canson and @Riky

You keep pushing the fact Sid is below 6'6" when in all likelihood, he is probably a fraction over which is why he is listed OVER 6'6". I'm sure you wouldn't take his word as th


This what I said in my last paragraph. So maybe you’re speaking to Riky and not me so if you are, please only address him.

Sid claimed 6’6” so that means he was somewhere around 6’6”. I would think based on the context in which he said it that he was closer to 6’6” than 6’7”. My guess is that he was 6’6” or maybe a touch over in his prime 6’6 1/8”.

Learn to read please or at least learn to comprehend what you read.

Again, Where did I say that Sid was under 6’6”? I didn’t. And If he had said he was 6’7, I likely would’ve assumed it was a round up to 6’7” correct because he didn’t look as tall as Taker. But I would’ve assumed 6’6.5-.75 range. My previous guess was 6’6.5” And again you don’t address what he actually said. He said “I’m about 6’6”. About 6’6 means you are very close to 6’6” exactly 6’6” or slightly over. You only address the latter. My guess has been 6’6” since he said he was 6’6”. You are free to disagree but please don’t go saying “Do you even think before you type”? You don’t agree with my estimate is all it is
The big lul said on 11/Aug/20
@Battery6565 It’s the truth, taker is not taller than 6’6.25-6’6.5 strowman taker is probably a .5 to 75. Inch max shorter. Which would put him at a max 6’5.5-6’5.75. He also gets edged out but legit 6’7 and above guys like Ike catcher and Kevin love. Taker looked 1.25 to max 1.5 inches shorter than 6’7 Ike catcher. And obviously looked 1.5 - 1.75 inches shorter than 6’7.25 Kevin love. I’m sorry to tell you but people like Taker, Kane, Strowman and big show aren’t as tall as you think they are.
The big lul said on 11/Aug/20
@Roderick
Taker is probably at best 6’5.5-6’5.75 max now and his peak was a legit 6’7.
Also I don’t see a full inch different between him and Braun nowadays. It’s probably a .5 inch to max .75 inch. So basically I think it’ll probably go like this nowadays.

Drew mcintyre: 6’4.5
Sid: 6’5-6’5.25 max.
Taker:6’5.5-6’5.75 max
Baron Corbin: 6’5.75-6’6
Kane:6’6-6’6.25
Braun Strowman: 6’6.25- 6’6.5
Big show:6’9-6’9.25 max
Canson said on 11/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 10/Aug/20
@Canson and @Riky

Ahhh as I expected. Throwing insults, passive-aggressive speech while trying to sound calm, and absolutely ZERO rebuttal to the photos I posted of him looking

As expected? You insulted us. Where did I comment to you recently prior to that? You said think before you post but you’re “mode” of thinking is what you believe in. So because I’m not out choosing biased pics and agreeing with you, that’s why it’s an issue. It’s not worth replying to you which is why I stopped when Christian had his back and forth with you previously. And You do realize that you’re the only one here saying Taker is 6’6.5”. Rob lists him at 6’6”. But let’s face it. The real reason you are singling Riky and me out is because we don’t agree with you. Next time use a better approach and you may get a better and less “passive aggressive” response from us since you feel that it was that. It was really just in regards to your insulting tone in your post
Roderick said on 11/Aug/20
I really don't buy more than 6'5.5" for Taker. He would look taller if he was 6'6".
Battery6565 said on 10/Aug/20
@Canson and @Riky

Ahhh as I expected. Throwing insults, passive-aggressive speech while trying to sound calm, and absolutely ZERO rebuttal to the photos I posted of him looking the same height as Dr Disrespect, towering over Goldberg, being very similar to Big Show, and most importantly being taller than Braun Strowman.

Let's get it clear.

I post photos, facts, figures and evidence with backing while you post your fantasies of Undertaker being 5'8" and wearing 12 inch stilts.

You keep pushing the fact Sid is below 6'6" when in all likelihood, he is probably a fraction over which is why he is listed OVER 6'6". I'm sure you wouldn't take his word as the "holy truth" if he claimed to being 6'7", would you? Again, I will bring up John Cena since he claims to be 6 feet while being fractionally taller, I don't get why it's so hard to fathom that someone could just not bother with an extra fraction? The reason why I choose to believe Sid being a fraction above 6'6" and why Rob also belives this is because then it makes MORE SENSE and it's easier to explain other heights.
Click Here

Let me guess your next statement. "He's actually 6'5"" - oh wait, let me guess, he probably has a below average sized head too which is why he has a FULL HEAD over his 5'9" wife wearing HEELS too? Lol.
Click Here

Again, let's remember you guys have zero explanation why he's taller than Braun, looks similar to Show and Dr Disrespect, and has a full head on his wife while there is indeed a simple enough explanation for the Sid situation.

As for the Kevin Love photo, I don't get why it's so hyped up, like the dude has a gigantic forehead why is it still brought up to this date? In this photo, there could easily be a 1 inch difference when they are at the same position.
Click Here
Click Here

And most importantly, he has like a million injuries and surgeries, what makes you think a tall 2 metre+ man carrying all that weight and having suffered so many injuries from an intense 30+ year career would be walking at their bust-a-gut height measurement everywhere?
The big lul said on 10/Aug/20
@Battery6565 sorry to tell you but taker is not as tall as you think he is. He’s at best 6’5.75-6’6 max now when you look at pictures of him with 6’7 Ike catcher, 6’1.5 to 6’1.75 Goldberg and notably with 6’4.5 drew mcintyre. Taker had an inch to 1.25 max on Drew McIntyre and was 4 inches taller than Goldberg and got edged out by Ike catcher by a solid 1-1.5 inch. Taker today is no taller than 6’5.75-6’6 max. Or maybe worse case 6’5.5 to 6’5.75 and same could be said to Kane. Kane is no taller than 6’6-6’6.5
The big lul said on 10/Aug/20
@Canson I say Sid is 6’5- 6’5.25 max cause he barely looks taller than 6’4.75 to 6’5 Shad Gaspard. Click Here
Vegas' said on 10/Aug/20
Strowman and Taker video isn't good evidence. Each guy looks taller than the other depending on how close to the camera they stand.

Strowman is ~6'8 in wrestling gear comparing him to Kanter and Tyson Fury. I doubt Undertaker is taller than 6'8 in gear in 2020
Canson said on 10/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 9/Aug/20

@Canson
Do you even think about what you're saying before you type things out? So Rob has listed Sycho Sid at 6'6" "for a reason", but when it comes to John Cena being listed half inch above his claim, then there's "no evidence"? Yes there is evidence. Plenty actually. Just go compare him to Vin Diesel or The Rock. You haven't proven anything. Sid said he is about 6'6" and Rob also agrees that he looked taller than that, so chances are he is a fraction higher and doesn't bother claiming it. Anyone could tell he didn't really care about his height from that interview. Do you really think he couldn't just say "yeah i'm ABOUT 6'6" if he measured around 6'6.375"". Jesus, dude...

Goldberg is listed at 6'2.5", meaning Taker is 6'6.5".

You do realize that you are the only one pushing any of this garbage here on this page. Taker was 6’7” peak and is struggling with 6’6” today. Everyone here knows that including Rob. And speaking of claims, so what if Sid were 6’5.625 (6’5 5/8)? He could’ve also rounded that up to 6’6”. But you only take what makes him taller of course and won’t consider the latter. So Too many what ifs. Sid claimed 6’6” so that means he was somewhere around 6’6”. I would think based on the context in which he said it that he was closer to 6’6” than 6’7”. My guess is that he was 6’6” or maybe a touch over in his prime 6’6 1/8”. It’s long been known that other wrestlers lie about their heights and he exposed them now
Riky said on 10/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 9/Aug/20

Ps: Goldberg is 6'1.5, not almost 6'3". Taker I s 6'5. 5 max today
Riky said on 10/Aug/20
Battery6565 said on 9/Aug/20
@Riky
No the situation is NOT different in the documentary. They barely stand together in the documentary and when they do, Undertaker looks taller. Find me a single frame where Braun looks taller. The fact of the matter that NOBODY is willing to admit is that UNDERTAKER is TALLER than BRAUN STROWMAN. There is proof to suggest this, like this video right here.
Click Here

Stop being in denial that Undertaker is taller than Strowman.
Click Here


The angle in that video is weird but I admitted that Taker there looks at least same height as strowman. Of course the difference between the two its really little.
But talking about evidence you forgot too many things, and the way you write is a bit silly.

Undertaker is 2 inches shorter than measured 6'7"3/4 in the morning kavin love (6'7.25 afternoon)
So 6'6.5/7 today? Pff you are simply wrong.
Battery6565 said on 9/Aug/20
And by the way, these are just a few photos I shots I got from the Last ride documentary:

W/ Roman Reigns (6'2.25" I believe)
Click Here

This is easily at least a 4"-4.5" difference. Why? Because according to the yellow line the difference between the top of both men's heads is 75 pixels. And the difference between the top of Reigns' skull and eyes is 71 pixels. I don't know the exactly where Reigns' eye level is but it looks regular, so this is a perfectly normal assumption.

Moving onto the Hogan (2002)
Don't know what you'll claim of his height in 2002, but here's a snapshot of him and Hogan back then. Make of it what you will.
Click Here

Onto Sheamus (6'2.25")
Click Here

Goldberg (6'2.5")
Click Here


Again, just a reminder that I bring real facts, figures, calculations and analysis to back up my argument while others argue based off their fantasies or their ego not allowing them to admit they are wrong.
Battery6565 said on 9/Aug/20
@Riky
No the situation is NOT different in the documentary. They barely stand together in the documentary and when they do, Undertaker looks taller. Find me a single frame where Braun looks taller. The fact of the matter that NOBODY is willing to admit is that UNDERTAKER is TALLER than BRAUN STROWMAN. There is proof to suggest this, like this video right here.
Click Here

Stop being in denial that Undertaker is taller than Strowman.
Click Here

And there is 0 EVIDENCE to suggest otherwise.

I have done some research and it's just so blatantly clear that he's most likely STILL 6'6.5" to 6'7" range, and in his prime was at the bare minimum 6'7.5".

@Canson
Do you even think about what you're saying before you type things out? So Rob has listed Sycho Sid at 6'6" "for a reason", but when it comes to John Cena being listed half inch above his claim, then there's "no evidence"? Yes there is evidence. Plenty actually. Just go compare him to Vin Diesel or The Rock. You haven't proven anything. Sid said he is about 6'6" and Rob also agrees that he looked taller than that, so chances are he is a fraction higher and doesn't bother claiming it. Anyone could tell he didn't really care about his height from that interview. Do you really think he couldn't just say "yeah i'm ABOUT 6'6" if he measured around 6'6.375"". Jesus, dude...

Goldberg is listed at 6'2.5", meaning Taker is 6'6.5". You don't believe me? Measure the pixels yourself and you will get the same result.

Click Here

You want more evidence?

Here.
Click Here

Big Show is 6'10" and Undertaker is 6'6"? Yeah right. Anyone can see this is NOT a 4" difference.

Still not convinced? Okay. Here's more.
Click Here

Undertaker looking the same height as Dr Disrespect.
"Oh but he's wearing a hat" - Well if you look at their chin heights, they are clearly level. And if anyone knows Undertaker, they know he has a GIGANTIC forehead. So if anything the hat is favouring Dr Disrespect.

Click Here
The big lul said on 9/Aug/20
Both Taker, Kane , Corbin and Strowman look very similar in height with each other in the documentary strowman probably had him by .25 to .5 max cause taker in the first two to three episodes taker looked a max 6’5.5 to 6’5.75. Then in the last two looked at max 6’6 maybe 6’5.75 . It’s probably like this now

Taker and Corbin : 6’5.75- 6’6
Kane 6’6- 6’6.5
Strowman: 6’6.25 - 6’6.5
And just for the heck of it
Big show: 6’9-6’9.25 max
Canson said on 9/Aug/20
@Big Lul: id give Sid 6’5.25-,5 range still. He doesn’t look a solid 6’5”
Riky said on 8/Aug/20
Meat

There undertaker looks taller or BTW sane height, not shorter. You're right but in other occasions, in the documentary for example, the situation looks different so I don't know.
When someone is 6'6"and the other 6'5.5 probably footwear are the factor that change constantly the taller man of the two.
Just my idea
The big lul said on 8/Aug/20
Harry Sachs: Sid always tried to maximize his height by standing straight and tall with his head tilted up while undertaker always stands relaxed cause he knows he’s the taller guy by .75 to 1 inch. Taker today even might have .5-.75
of an inch on him today. It’s was probably like this in there prime

Taker peak: 6’7
Taker now: 6’5.75 to 6’6 max

Sid peak 6’6
Sid now: 6’5-6’5.25 max
Brock11 said on 7/Aug/20
Harry Sachs: This picture is tricky, cause Sid is closer to the camera, and His Head looks longer than Undertaker, in reality it is otherwise. Undertaker was always taller than Sid, and still is.
Undertaker Frank said on 6/Aug/20
Meat I fully Agree Taker is Taller by atleast an inch I do believe Strowman is 6ft 5 & change !!
Meat said on 5/Aug/20
Click Here

Not so sure about Strowman being taller. Let me guess - he wrestled in flip flops while Taker had internal 5 inch lifts. This is one measurement on this site that has been too downgraded
Harry Sachs said on 4/Aug/20
One more picture of the 6'6 Sid Vicious and the Undertaker. Click Here
MRD said on 4/Aug/20
He was a strong 6'7" may be little above 6'7" at peak. Now he looks in the 6'6" range. Peak Taker was taller than Strowman.
177cmBOI said on 4/Aug/20
Personally i think that he is 6'9 Peak height and currently 6'7 ish.
Canson said on 3/Aug/20
The big lul said on 1/Aug/20
Strowman is taller than taker but .5- maybe .75 of an inch. Besides, they looked really close in the documentary together.

Strowman: 6’6.25-6’6.5 max
Taker now: 6’5.75-6’6 max

I agree with both of your estimates
Meat said on 2/Aug/20
Click Here
Strowman taller? Hardly
The big lul said on 1/Aug/20
Strowman is taller than taker but .5- maybe .75 of an inch. Besides, they looked really close in the documentary together.

Strowman: 6’6.25-6’6.5 max
Taker now: 6’5.75-6’6 max
Canson said on 1/Aug/20
Taker is not as tall as Strowman today
Gobgghbfffcnkj said on 1/Aug/20
@Meat. Yes. 6’8 prime at least. 6’7 at worst now
Glenn 6'6" said on 1/Aug/20
He's a bit shorter than Kane so 6'6" seems right. In his prime I'm sure he was 6'7" or a tad more.
Meat said on 30/Jul/20
Still taller than Braun Strowman. Evidenced the last time they were in the ring together. Viscera listed at 6'6.5", while 'Taker now listed at just 6'6" is hilarious. Taker and Kane as close to the same height as 2 ppl could be. Definitely closer to 6'8" in his prime.
Slim92 said on 30/Jul/20
@Kal Mar kane said in a recent interview on YouTube that he was a legit 6'9 guy with hair down to his back walking around the streets. That was his quote. His comment about his height now, is that he's about 6'8.
Gobgghbfffcnkj said on 29/Jul/20
Might’ve been 6’8 barefoot, not everyone lies about their height. Taker is definitely 1.5 inches taller than Viscera, who gets a 6’6.5 listing here
Canson said on 29/Jul/20
Kal Mar said on 28/Jul/20
Both Taker and Kane have said that they were about 6ft 8 inches tall in their prime. That woul include wearing wrestling boots, so barefoot they would have to be at least 6ft 7 inches tall.

See above. Taker claimed 6’8-6’9 and 6’10
Kal Mar said on 28/Jul/20
Both Taker and Kane have said that they were about 6ft 8 inches tall in their prime. That woul include wearing wrestling boots, so barefoot they would have to be at least 6ft 7 inches tall.
The big lul said on 28/Jul/20
Also I’m surprised the people like taker, Kane and Nash didn’t lose that much height from there peak. Taker only losing a 1-1.25 inches from his peak and Kane and Nash possibly only losing a .75 to an inch from there peak unlike people like big show and hogan. Imo I think big show is no taller than 6’9 to max 6’9.5 now and hogan is only 6’2.25 now who I think his peak was 6’5 at best maybe worst case 6’4.75.
Riky said on 28/Jul/20
4 or 5 inches on Orton?
There were, at their peaks, max 3 inches.
To be honest Orton 192.5 Taker 199.5 cm when they faced off.
Today I see about 2-2.25 inches difference, Orton 192 Taker 197cm.

Taker did always claim 6'8", which is likely a peak height with his gear on.
Gobgghbfffcnkj said on 25/Jul/20
I think he needs a bit of an upgrade. 6’8.5 peak where he had 4-5 inches on guys like Orton, easily 6’7.5 now next to 5’9 Michelle in Last Ride
Canson said on 25/Jul/20
@the big Lul: those are all very good estimates. Although Strowman may be more 6’6.25 or 6’6.5 barefoot. I’d give Taker around 6’5.75 or up to 6’6 but no higher and absolutely no lower than 6’5.5” I really think 6’5.75 is his afternoon height. Corbin could only be 6’5.75 but I still say 6’6” is possible
The big lul said on 24/Jul/20
I’ll probably have Corbin and taker very similar in height to each other maybe Corbin might be taller by a fraction so maybe like this

Taker: 6’5.5 to 6’5.75
Corbin: 6’5.75-6’6
Strowman maybe 6’6-6’6.25 barefoot and wrestling boots 6’6.5
Canson said on 24/Jul/20
The Big Lul is correct that Strowman is taller
Undertaker Frank said on 22/Jul/20
The big lul, You cant compare with that photo not a good angle Someone posted a picture of them awhile back & Taker looked alittle taller than Strowman
The big lul said on 22/Jul/20
So if strowman is 6’6.5, taker looks no taller than 6’6 maybe 6’5.75 in their stare down with each other Click Here
SeanR said on 21/Jul/20
Can’t believe this but it looks like Rob Gronkowski (6’6 1/4”) is currently taller than Undertaker (6’6”).

He is lucky to have lost only 1.25 inches off his peak, but guys like Hogan, Ric Flair, Roddy Piper and Big Show can’t say that. Those guys lost 2+ inches off their peak.
James B 172cm said on 21/Jul/20
canson-undertaker could look 6'6 range next to sid
The big lul said on 20/Jul/20
@canson
Looks like a domino effect has happened ever since Sid said he was 6’6 in his peak and now he’s no taller than 6’5 now

I know that taker was a legit 6’7 in his peak I guess my wording was very weird
So yea peak 6’7
Now 6’5.5 to 6’6 max
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 20/Jul/20
Peak taker 6ft7.25 201cm current 6ft6 198.1cm in boots he was 6ft8 1/2
Riky said on 19/Jul/20
The big lul

In my opinion Nash was 6'9" peak barefoot. Today he is about 6'8"1/4 I think but I wouldn't guess higher than that.
There is a face to face Diesel - Taker Click Here where it looks less than 2 inches. The problem is that we can't see footwear
Nash 6'9" prime berefoot 6'10.5 in wrestling boots
Undertaker 6'6"1/2 to 6'7" prime barefoot and 6'8"1/4-6'8"1/2 in wrestling boots.
Canson said on 19/Jul/20
The big lul said on 18/Jul/20
@riky I wonder if Kevin Nash was just only 6’9 or 6’9.25 max in his peak. Cause only looked 2 inches taller than a 6’7 peak undertaker and looked about 2.5 to 3 inches taller than a 6’6 to maybe max 6’6.25 Sid. Also 2 to 2.5 inches shorter than big show in his peak.

I have Nash around that. But Taker was a legit 6’7” peak. He wasn’t 6’6”
The big lul said on 18/Jul/20
@riky I wonder if Kevin Nash was just only 6’9 or 6’9.25 max in his peak. Cause only looked 2 inches taller than a 6’7 peak undertaker and looked about 2.5 to 3 inches taller than a 6’6 to maybe max 6’6.25 Sid. Also 2 to 2.5 inches shorter than big show in his peak.
Hotpots said on 18/Jul/20
Looked 1/2” taller than 6-6 prime Sid. Makes hogans 6-8 claim so absurd hahaha.
Canson said on 18/Jul/20
@Riky: i would throw a fraction of a cm on each end. 6’7 flat (200.66) peak and 6’5.75 today (197.4)
The big lul said on 17/Jul/20
@riky wouldn’t that make Nash no taller than 6’9 in his peak and hogan no taller than 6’4.5 to 6’5 max in his peak.
The big lul said on 17/Jul/20
@riky People just need to come to the conclusion that Sid was only 6’6 in his peak and now is only 6’5 max now. Taker had a solid .75 to 1 inch on Sid and Mabel which would make him a solid 6’7 in his peak.

So taker’s peak: 6’7
Now 6’5.5 to 6’6 max
Maybe nowadays he’s worst case 6’5.5 and best case 6’6 max base on how he looked next to strowman. So I’ll probably say generally he can look 6’5.75
UndertakerFrank said on 17/Jul/20
Riky when i met him in 93 he looked Hugh we took a Picture together and he didnt look as Big in the picture He told me he was 6ft 9 and i believed him but years later i realized he probably was 6ft 6ish to 6ft 7
Riky said on 15/Jul/20
Kal Mar said on 10/Jul/20

He was no where 6'8" in his prime, barefoot of course.
Sid was 6'6" so Taker was 6'6" to 6'7". I belive closer to 6'7" than 6'6" but that is the range.
Today he could be as low as 6'5.25/6'5.5 in the evening, legits 6'6" guys have an edge on him today.

200cm prime.
197cm right now.
Riky said on 15/Jul/20
Undertaker Frank said on 12/Jul/20

So in 1993 he looked a 200cm guy to you? That's interesting because it's exactly the range I give to him in his prime
Arko Mallick said on 14/Jul/20
Remember an old old match between him and Diesel in the early 90s where he was in flat soled shoes and Diesel was in heeled shoes. Still taker looked just 1-1.5 inch shorter than him. He may look 6'6" now because of multiple knee replacement and hip replacement surgeries but he was definitely a solid 6'8" in his prime.
Undertaker Frank said on 12/Jul/20
Kal Mar, Brother Love Bruce Prichard claimed the Undertaker was 6ft 7 I Met Taker back in 93 he was hugh guy and he told me he was 6ft 9 I took a picture with him and he looked 6ft 6 to 6ft 7 in the picture
Kal Mar said on 10/Jul/20
The Undertaker was about 6ft 8 inches tall in his prime, standing about 1.5 inches shorter than Diesel (though note that Diesel wore healed shoes, which raised his height a bit, and Taker wore very flat boots). Though barefoot he would probably drop to around 6ft 7.5 inches.
Riky said on 10/Jul/20
Roderick said on 7/Jul/20

I agree, probably undertaker was always around 6'6.5/7 at most

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.