How tall is The Undertaker - Page 3

Add a Comment8781 comments

Average Guess (703 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.7in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.44in (199.2cm)
mrtguy said on 10/Jul/20
Rob, I can imagine him and Dennis Rodman have similar head length but Undertaker's head is longer from eyes and up and Rodman below nose maybe?
Editor Rob
I'd agree Rodman has a longer eye-chin, whilst Undertaker has a kinda balanced head with eyes nearer middle, compared to Rodman.
Canson said on 9/Jul/20
@Roderick: I used to think 6’7 and change peak but now 6’7” flat. Sid at 6’6 though is what I believe
Dan Trojan said on 9/Jul/20
I have to call bs on that mexican mentor site anyone can claim they worked WWE events doesn't mean they actually did I agree with Roderick they said Andre was 7'4" we all know that's not accurate so they got a few right so what I would trust Rob's opinion over theirs any day
Roderick said on 7/Jul/20
I mean its not hard to make a fake list.

Having Andre at 7'4.5" should be a red flag.


Sid Eudy has admitted he was 6'6". He wasn't taller than that. Undertaker might have only been 6'6.5" peak now that I think of it. For sure not more than 6'7".
Canson said on 7/Jul/20
@Brosofdestruction: how tall did you think he was in person? 6’6? Or under? I saw you post that he was at least and then at most
Kan said on 7/Jul/20
If you pull a line in the middle of his eyes
Click Here
You can see that his top-eye range is longer than eye-chin.
But I don’t know if he is the camera angle
Kan said on 7/Jul/20
If undertaker head is 10.5 inch and he have a 5.25 inch eyelevel.
If you see several pic
Click Here
He seems to have a top head- eyes range longer than eyes-chin range and I doubt he doesn’t have a 10.5 inch range up close with guy who have 10 inch like triple h.
This means that his eye level is longer than 5.25 inch ?
brosofdestruction said on 6/Jul/20
My Instagram is bikertaker
There is a black and white photo of us standing together.
Greg lee said on 6/Jul/20
I worked security for a WWF event once and stood next to Mark, he's MUCH taller than 6'6''.
Danimal 176.7cm said on 6/Jul/20
viper said on 4/Jul/20
Disagree Viper. The Mexican Mentor List is not reliable.


100 percent disagree. A lot of the heights are correct imo

A lot of, but not all. Definitely not Andre the Giant at 225cm, which is equal to 7'4.5".
Danimal 176.7cm said on 6/Jul/20
Alex 6'3.25 said on 5/Jul/20
I think he wasn't never taller than 6'7 and now he looks 6'6

He wasn't never? That means he was. You used a double negative ;-).
Danimal 176.7cm said on 6/Jul/20
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 3/Jul/20
Sid said he is 6ft6 today takers is taller 6ft6 3/4 barefoot.

Sid said he WAS 6'6", which I believe he was (used to think he was 6'7"). He's definitely not 6'6" today.
Kan said on 6/Jul/20
Rob,
In your opinion there are a lift inside this boots or they are simply ornaments that are used to stiffen the boots ?
Click Here
Undertaker used this boots in 1999 and kane looked at least an inch taller, while out of gear they looked the same. So I doubt are lift, but I don’t know
Editor Rob
Looks just like the style of boot, some firmer heel padding.
brosofdestruction said on 5/Jul/20
People just need to accept the fact that Taker is not as tall as they want him to be!
I would share my Instagram which has another angle of the time I met him, but it doesn’t get approved on here for some reason.
Alex 6'3.25 said on 5/Jul/20
I think he wasn't never taller than 6'7 and now he looks 6'6
viper said on 4/Jul/20
Disagree Viper. The Mexican Mentor List is not reliable.


100 percent disagree. A lot of the heights are correct imo
Canson said on 4/Jul/20
Danimal 176.7cm said on 1/Jul/20
viper said on 26/Jun/20
David, there was a Mexican mentor height list that had Taker and Sid at 198cm from 1996

I don't think that Taker was a flat 6'6" in his prime. He was taller than 6'6" Mabel/Viscera in their staredowns, which was before Taker began to lose height. I can live with 6'7" for his peak (same as Kane), but today, he's at best 6'5.5".

Agree with the peak for sure but I disagree with current. He can still look near 6’6” today in some of the pics and the encounters with other posters so the 6’5.5” probably is a worst case as opposed to a best case.
Estim8r said on 3/Jul/20
If Taker is under 6’8.5 then Michelle is like 5’7, which doesn’t seem accurate at all. I’m saying 6’10 peak, 6’8 now
Vegas' said on 3/Jul/20
Viper you think Flair was 5'9 1/2 peak??
NCL said on 3/Jul/20
Thanks, Rob! I agree, I think the list is off. I think he also has Andre at 7’4”
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 3/Jul/20
Sid said he is 6ft6 today takers is taller 6ft6 3/4 barefoot.
Estim8r said on 2/Jul/20
Either Taker’s above 6’6, which does seems low, or Michelle-McCool is below 5’9. I’d believe Taker being 6’9 in his prime and in Last Ride Michelle was shoulder high
Danimal 176.7cm said on 1/Jul/20
viper said on 26/Jun/20
David, there was a Mexican mentor height list that had Taker and Sid at 198cm from 1996

I don't think that Taker was a flat 6'6" in his prime. He was taller than 6'6" Mabel/Viscera in their staredowns, which was before Taker began to lose height. I can live with 6'7" for his peak (same as Kane), but today, he's at best 6'5.5".
Public Enemy said on 1/Jul/20
Disagree Viper. The Mexican Mentor List is not reliable.
Nishanth Hegde said on 1/Jul/20
The Mexican Mentor list stats that The Undertaker was only an inch taller than Scott Hall and Hulk Hogan which is not believable. Taker had Scott hall by 2.5 inches and Hogan by 2 inches in their prime.
Linke said on 1/Jul/20
Glen Gilberti aka Disco Inferno never worked for WWE, so safe to say that Mexican Mentor list is fake.
ced said on 1/Jul/20
One of the things that didn't make sense on the list is Crush being 193cm.. While Scott Hall is listed at 195cm.. I just looked up Crush Vs Razor Ramon and Crush has about an inch on Razor.

Click Here
Editor Rob
I'm going to namedrop the Mentor in a future video on a random wrestler from his list. Immortalise his list of 'true barefoot heights' for future generations 🤪
viper said on 30/Jun/20
That list has a lot of correct wrestler heights.

Shawn Michaels, Austin, HHH, Hogan, Scott Hall, Sid, Goldberg, Godfather, Benoit, Flair.

Also pretty damn close on Rock's height
Riky said on 30/Jun/20
Mincer said on 29/Jun/20

Yeah and I read about it as a legendary list, called out every time as a prove.
Al Wilson said on 30/Jun/20
Al Snow is short so I already know The Mexican Mentor's List is bogus.
Mincer said on 29/Jun/20
Some of those Mexican mentor heights are certainly wrong such as Billy Gunn as what I presume to be 188cm, when you can see him with Rob ane he is definitly taller, DDP was also taller than 188cm. Lkewise Mick Foley only 183cm when he was definitly a few inches above 6'.
Canson said on 29/Jun/20
@Riky: I would expect Strowman to lose more than Taker esp being Taker may even have less room to compress than him due to the aging spine and the surgeries. Not to mention Strowman is heavier. If either guy is over 6’7 out of bed I would expect it to be Strowman. I could buy 6’7.5 out of bed or very worst case 6’7.25. I doubt Taker is over 6’7 if he even still reaches it. Very possible he’s 6’6.5 or 6’6.75 out of bed today
Canson said on 29/Jun/20
@Vegas: I wouldn’t doubt it 15 years ago. He looked more 6’6.5 or very worst 199 when Ali Baba met him in the early to mid 2010s. He’s had surgeries too
Riky said on 29/Jun/20
Most of these Mexican mentors guesses are too low, and others too high.
Riky said on 29/Jun/20
@Rob

This Mexican mentors list is way far from the truth.
Jesus, I think except for Sid, Guerrero and a couple of others they are almost all wrong.
At least in my opinion
Editor Rob
There's a lot of heights most would say were hard to imagine, guys like Bret Hart for instance!
184guy2 said on 29/Jun/20
This list is ridiculous
EVERYONE wrong just Paul Wight and maybe Sid nearer
NCL said on 29/Jun/20
What is this Mexican Mentors list everyone keeps talking about? Has anyone seen it? Does anyone have a link?
Editor Rob
The Mexican Mentor's List:

"Hi all, I am a mexican menthor who works for the WWF for few years.
Casually I saw this site and of course I want to give you the hide List,
since 1996 in my hands, the real height and of course weight of then Wrestling SUPERSTARS.
Ahmed Johnson - 180/120
Al Snow - 182/122
Andre The Giant - 225/235
Bam Bam Bigelow - 182/166
Bill Goldberg - 186/131
Billy Gunn - 188/115
Bob Backlund - 176/106
Bob Holly - 179/104
Bret Hart - 175/106
Brian Adams - 193/144
Brian Pillman - 174/102
British Bulldog - 173/114
Chris Benoit - 175/98
Dean Malenko - 172/97
Diamond Dallas Page - 188/117
Disco Inferno - 177/107
Droz - 188/138
Eddy Guerrero - 172/100
Faarooq - 183/123
Goldust - 191/117
Goodfather - 192/154
Haku - 177/123
Honky Tonk Man - 183/117
Hulk Hogan - 195/137
Hunter Hearst Helmsley - 186/111
Jeff Jarrett - 176/104
Jerry Lawler - 177/119
Ken Shamrock - 177/106
Kevin Nash - 203/161
Konnan - 175/107
Lex Luger - 187/120
Marc Mero - 176/106
Mick Foley - 183/130
Owen Hart - 177/102
Paul Wight - 213/264
Randy Savage - 180/115
Rey Mysterio Jr - 159/63
Ric Flair - 177/110
Rick Steiner - 174/112
Road Dogg - 181/108
Savio Vega - 172/116
Scott Hall - 195/131
Scott Steiner - 180/129
Sgt. Slaughter - 184/140
Shane Douglas - 176/101
Shawn Michaels - 178/115
Sid Vicious - 198/141
Steve Austin - 183/116
The Rock - 187/122
The Undertaker - 198/148
Vader - 187/205
X-Pac - 178/96
Yokozuna - 182/281"
Vegas' said on 29/Jun/20
Undertaker was taller than 6'6 1/4 (6'7 in sneakers) when I met him 15 years ago.

There was a legit 6'4 and 6'2 guy to compare him too there.
Riky said on 28/Jun/20
Maybe it's a possibility that Strowman lose less height during the day compared with Undertaker who at this stage struggles to keep a good posture too.
I mean strowman has a more solid posture, he really almost never duck or look down at his opponent in the ring, and outside "he walks taller" than undertaker for sure.

With all this I mean that probably when they wake up they would be closer in height compared to the evening.
But most in general Strowman is slightly taller, not an inch
Kan said on 27/Jun/20
@Battery
Undertaker never looks taller than Braun at this stage of his life. Braun strowman is taller in ring gear and out of gear if you see the last ride documentary. If you compared taker next to lesnar or reign and strowman next to lesnar or reigns, strowman is clearly taller than taker in every staredown with probably a fraction less footwear. Is absurd over 6ft6 for taker today
viper said on 26/Jun/20
David, there was a Mexican mentor height list that had Taker and Sid at 198cm from 1996
Canson said on 26/Jun/20
Riky said on 25/Jun/20
Battery 6565

Cansin is right, at this stage of his life Taker isn't taller than strowman.
If both measured, maybe but MAYBE the could be same height but more likely strowman is taller by 1 or 2 centimeters.
With big show there is something weird like angle or footwear or I don't know, sure the gap between the 2 guys it's larger than 2 inches like it seems from that pic.

You are talking about evidence while you don't bring proves or anything.
How can undertaker could be 6'7.5 peak is he was at most 2 inches taller than Spivey (6'5" peak)?
Sid was 6'6", it's time to accept it.

@Riky: I’d bet money that Strowman is taller if they measured. He looked close in height with Tyson Fury. Rob’s listing for him is close enough, maybe 6’6.25, But Taker is max 6’6”. The picture Bros of Destruction posted proves that. And that’s “max”. He could look as low as 6’5.5” at times but I would say generally he looks 6’5.75” or so. 6’6” is ok for him because he could likely measure that at lunch being a bigger/taller guy who could stand to lose a full inch. If Strowman is the same height as Taker it means Strowman is only 6’6” flat too but then again a poster met him here once and said he only looked 6’6”. I will say that he only had 1/4” or a cm on Baron Corbin once and Corbin is max 6’6” as well
Riky said on 25/Jun/20
Battery 6565

Cansin is right, at this stage of his life Taker isn't taller than strowman.
If both measured, maybe but MAYBE the could be same height but more likely strowman is taller by 1 or 2 centimeters.
With big show there is something weird like angle or footwear or I don't know, sure the gap between the 2 guys it's larger than 2 inches like it seems from that pic.

You are talking about evidence while you don't bring proves or anything.
How can undertaker could be 6'7.5 peak is he was at most 2 inches taller than Spivey (6'5" peak)?
Sid was 6'6", it's time to accept it.
Davido said on 25/Jun/20
No way Taker was 6’7. 25 peak if Sid was 6’6 peak. Sid looked taller Than Taker when he had that Jason mask. Back then both was in their prime. If Barkley was 6’4.75 how could Taker be 6’7.25. Did Taker ever look that much taller with Mean Gene?

Peak heights
Sid 6’6.25
Taker 6’6.25
Kane 6’6.75
Nash 6’8.5
Big show 6’10.5
Hogan 6’4
Andre the Giant 6’10

Kane, Jake Roberts, Big Show had huge footwear advantages mostly over other wrestlers. Andre had thin soles.
Davido said on 25/Jun/20
No way Taker was 6’7. 25 peak if Sid was 6’6 peak. Sid looked taller Than Taker when he had that Jason mask. Back then both was in their prime. If Barkley was 6’4.75 how could Taker be 6’7.25. Did Taker ever look that much taller with Mean Gene?

Peak heights
Sid 6’6.25
Taker 6’6.25
Kane 6’6.75
Nash 6’8.5
Big show 6’10.5
Hogan 6’4
Andre the Giant 6’10

Kane, Jake Roberts, Big Show had huge footwear advantages mostly over other wrestlers. Andre had thin soles.
Canson said on 25/Jun/20
Battery6565 said on 23/Jun/20
Sid could have easily been 6'6.375" or something and not bothered with the extra fraction like JOHN CENA does.

Stop talking about Sid again and again, he said ABOUT.

First of all don’t tell people what they can and cannot do here being you aren’t the Site moderator. Sid could’ve also been 6’5 5/8 at his peak being he said he’s “about 6’6”. You use the glass half full approach vs half empty because you can’t accept the fact that Taker isn’t as tall as you have him listed here. Obviously Rob lists him lower than 6’6.5 because he isn’t. Fact is Sid said he himself was about 6’6 so that is relevant. But I bet if Sid admitted to being 6’8 you would accept it. And There’s no proof that Cena is a fraction over and doesn’t bother with it. You on the other hand have provided Nothing relevant
Canson said on 25/Jun/20
Battery6565 said on 23/Jun/20
Sid could have easily been 6'6.375" or something and not bothered with the extra fraction like JOHN CENA does.

Stop talking about Sid again and again, he said ABOUT.

First of all don’t tell people what they can and cannot do here being you aren’t the Site moderator. Sid could’ve also been 6’5 5/8 at his peak being he said he’s “about 6’6”. You use the glass half full approach vs half empty because you can’t accept the fact that Taker isn’t as tall as you have him listed here. Obviously Rob lists him lower than 6’6.5 because he isn’t. Fact is Sid said he himself was about 6’6 so that is relevant. But I bet if Sid admitted to being 6’8 you would accept it. You on the other hand have provided Nothing relevant
Canson said on 24/Jun/20
Riky said on 22/Jun/20

@Riky: another person Black Hat lists him at 6’5.5” on his YouTube video of Taker’s height. To be honest, maybe Corbin’s height is off too and he’s 6’5.75 being he didn’t appear any taller than Gronk and could appear shorter at times. I can see as low as that but as high as 6’6”. I agree with you that collectively we may have gotten about as good as it gets with 6’6”. You made a good point because Rob also said Rick Fox isn’t 6’6” in appearance when he met him but he’s still listed 6’6” here. He said that Cudmore and Joshua both looked taller, in Joshua’s case due to footwear more than likely. I’ll be honest and say that your estimate of 6’5.5 is reasonable. He really doesn’t look all that “6’6” if there is such a saying. Meaning he looks like he’d be more weak 6’6” these days. 6’5.75 may be pushing our luck tho
Nishanth Hegde said on 24/Jun/20
An interesting photo of Matt Bloom with HHH here Click Here. Matt Bloom looks 6ft3 MAX going by this photo.
Battery6565 said on 23/Jun/20
Sid could have easily been 6'6.375" or something and not bothered with the extra fraction like JOHN CENA does.

Stop talking about Sid again and again, he said ABOUT.
Battery6565 said on 23/Jun/20
@Canson

Such as where!? Show me where Strowman looks taller lol! He's clearly the same height as Doc Disrespect nearly, at most an inch difference. The camera angle is fair to both men.

People on this site maybe see 1 photo where someone looks shorter than they're meant to disregarding things like posture, injuries etc (something this man has accrued A LOT of), and ignore the rest of the evidence suggesting otherwise.

Check Undertaker's instagram. Please tell me how on Earth that looks like a 4"+ difference with Big Show. Please tell me how he is shorter than Strowman. Please do show me.

Any "evidence" posted on here got debunked my measurements by me. I am surprised people are still arguing over this.

PEAK: MINIMUM 6'7.5" (ABSOLUTE LOWEST)
CURRENT: MINIMUM 6'6.5"
Riky said on 23/Jun/20
I would like to know your opinion about this.

Scroll down about few pages I found a comment of a poster who said that Kavin Love measurement of 6'7.75 was taken in the afternoon (2008)

Now I doubt about it. But let's say that Love isn't that tall as a low but more like 6'7.5. To me he is more 6'7.5 rather than 6'7" flat which it's more LeBron territory.

When Love met Taker it was I believe evening, or late afternoon because he also took a picture with Webber(?) outside the building and it was dark if I remember.

Love did wear max 1.5 inches shoes but it could have been just 1.25 because I dont think those were the same shoes he wears to play basketball.
Undertaker had no less than 1.75/1.5 inches boots.

We must be honest, bad posture or not Taker was shorter. It wasn't just an inch. I would say that counting these factors undertaker looked max 6'5.5/6'5.25 back then.

He looked that range also with T. 6'8"/6'8.25 Thompson but there we don't see Thompson footwear.

He looked closer to 4 inches than 3 shorter than 6'9.5 Kanter.

He is shorter than Corbin, barely. And Corbin also drop under 6'6" I suspect during the day. In 2017 undertaker looked shorter than Corbin, sure no taller.


The guy can't be the full 6'6" today, he is max 6'5.5.

@Christian
I guess you got guessed 99% 6'6" or above it. I doubt that someone guessed you exactly 6'5"3/8.
Same reason why undertaker in footwear will be always guessed at 6'6", but in reality he is 6'5.5 max
Canson said on 22/Jun/20
Strowman at 6’5.5 is too low. He looked at least his full listing here with Tyson Fury
Hanov said on 22/Jun/20
He is officially retired at 6'6.
rikashiku said on 22/Jun/20
Canson said on 21/Jun/20

"That’s the camera angle. Other times Strowman looks taller than Taker."

If the Angle is to be factored, then shouldn't Strowman, being closer, appear taller? Footwear should also be considered too, fi they are all wearing their usual wrestling boots, which seem to add 2" each.
Riky said on 22/Jun/20
Canson

Knowing Rob has hard time to downgrade someone drastically I would say that 6'6" it's already a pretty good listing today. But as you also say from few months 6'5.75 would be just perfect on this site.
I saw Taker list at 197cm even somewhere else, that is also my personal guess for him.

With strowman today I think he is shorter but not by an inch. There is between 1 and 2 cm max. I would say 198.5cm Vs 197cm both men barefoot.
I'm sure Corbin Strowman and Taker are all 3 men in 0.5 of an inch. And Kane same height as Strowman or btw 199cm max.

Btw to be honest undertaker looked 6'5" range (which does not necessarily means just 196cm) most of the times in pictures in the last 3-4 years.
I remember a few of them as Fallon, Love, T. Thompson, Ike, Kanter.
No taller than Rodman, Corbin, strowman that are all 6'6". Maybe Corbin even 6'5.75.
And I guess he wouldn't be taller than guys like Gronk also.
Peak I can buy the full 2M, 1.5 centimeters taller than Sid.
Kan said on 22/Jun/20
@battery
Only you say that he’s taller than strowman, but undertaker isn’t taller than strowman for sure and probably isn’t taller than corbin. I don’t know why do you insist to think that he’s near 6ft7 today. It’s absurd
Undertaker Frank said on 21/Jun/20
I believe Strowman maybe 6ft 5 to 6ft 5.5 we was a good amount shorter than 6ft 7 Aaaron Judge he looked more than an inch shorter Taker is taller than Strowman !!!
Canson said on 21/Jun/20
Danimal 176.7cm said on 19/Jun/20
Taker has gradually lost height since 2000. I believe he is at best 6'5.5" today. As for his peak height, I used to think he was a full 6'8", but if Sid Vicious was only 6'6" at his peak (according to the man himself), I can live with 6'7" for Undertaker at his peak, because he WAS taller than 6'6" Mabel/Viscera in their late 90's stare downs, but then again Taker could have been just shy of 6'7" at his peak.

I agree with what you said too. But i would give Taker the full 6’7” peak. Maybe today 6’5.5-6’6 range. He can still look 6’6” at times but maybe 6’5.5 others. Maybe 6’5.75
Canson said on 21/Jun/20
Battery6565 said on 20/Jun/20
I am laughing at these essays being written. He looks taller than 6'6.5" Strowman.
Click Here

I have proven his height with measurements on paint. Keep making absurd claims.

Also looks similar height as Dr Disrespect, similar to Big Show on latest IG photo.

That’s the camera angle. Other times Strowman looks taller than Taker.
Battery6565 said on 20/Jun/20
I am laughing at these essays being written. He looks taller than 6'6.5" Strowman.
Click Here

I have proven his height with measurements on paint. Keep making absurd claims.

Also looks similar height as Dr Disrespect, similar to Big Show on latest IG photo.
Riky said on 19/Jun/20
Danimal 176.7cm said on 19/Jun/20

I agree 100%
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 19/Jun/20
Peak taker 6ft8 current 6ft6 3/4.
Danimal 176.7cm said on 19/Jun/20
Taker has gradually lost height since 2000. I believe he is at best 6'5.5" today. As for his peak height, I used to think he was a full 6'8", but if Sid Vicious was only 6'6" at his peak (according to the man himself), I can live with 6'7" for Undertaker at his peak, because he WAS taller than 6'6" Mabel/Viscera in their late 90's stare downs, but then again Taker could have been just shy of 6'7" at his peak.
Dan Trojan said on 18/Jun/20
I have never met braun but i did see him at a live event and i was pretty close to the ring if i was to make a comparison between him and taker well it's hard to tell i'd say they looked very similar but i can't tell you with certainty who is actually taller between the two
Public Enemy said on 18/Jun/20
@Ricky
Could be just posture.
Riky said on 18/Jun/20
Sid got measured, and he said 6'6". It was a measurement, not just his opinion.
And today he is no more than 6'5"1/4 in my opinion.
That btw puts Taker at no more than 6'6. 5- 3/4 max peak. And also other wrestlers I'm not sure anymore about.

My estimates

Sid 198.5 cm today 195
Taker 199.5 today 197

Kane 200.5cm today 198.5
Hogan 195 cm today 189.5
Big show 210cm today 207cm
Strowman 198.5 cm
Corbin 198cm
Nash 204 today and 206 peak
Khali 208 cm today 211.5 peak
Drew McIntyre 194 cm
Randy Orton 192 cm

Barefoot, out of gear, heights
Nishanth Hegde said on 18/Jun/20
In the Chapter 04 of "The Last Ride", Taker clearly looked taller than Braun Strowman when they were standing too close next to each other and also with Taker slightly bending to his left. It goes to show that Braun Strowman (without his big boots) is not taller than either Kane or Taker.
Miiiiiiighty_- said on 18/Jun/20
Just rewatched an old match between Scott Hall as Razor and Taker.
No way there's only 2" difference between the two.

Btw Sid's claim doesn't mean jack sh*t, tallish people often don't even know how exactly tall they are.
I have a friend who has been claiming 192cm for years and when we measured him he was actually 195 without even standing as tall as possible ( like most of us 5'11er will do when measured )..

6'6 is just something people using the imperial system will say for commodity same way in Europe we will say he is " 1m90 " for a 192 or 193 guy or " He is 2M tall " for a guy that ranges from 1.97-2m02..
And remember even Mamun's cousin who is 6'6 was slightly shorter than past his prime, post horrendous leg break Sid, who was 199 ( current height ) on this site back then.

@Ben Bell met Nash tiwce in 1995, had pics with him, no way he was under 207cm ( I asked him and he told me 6'11 back then which was probably his shoe height or very close to it) , looked 30 cm taller than myself and I was 177 on the spot back then, measured less than a month before meeting him as a teenager.

@Sotiris Gravas
Something is off with Charles Wright's pic.
Met him in 1995 at California's Great America when he " was " Kama, was there with his family.
There is no way in hell he was under 6'4 back then ( I'd say a strong 6'4.5 personally ) because I was with one of my best friend who is 186cm and he absolutely towered over him.
Btw the way the guy was HUGE, must have been way over 300 in 320 territory, first thing I thought when seeing him was " does he make the weight/size limit of the roller coasters ? "
Taker didn't look more than 2 inches smaller to me during their face offs at this time.
5 cm difference is what I would say there was.
Monkey knees said on 16/Jun/20
Peak 6ft 7.75in.
Now 6ft 6in.
Riky said on 16/Jun/20
Im curious about one thing.
I was watching few segments of the documentary "The last ride".
I saw Taker talking to jbl and Taker was much taller than him. It seemed over 2 inches. More than what I saw during their feud in TV.
The same with Randy Orton, with him Taker looked huge like minimum 3 inches..
But then he also looked slightly shorter than Kane and not taller as you would expected next to McMahons or most of all next to Austin.
Strange
James roy said on 15/Jun/20
6 foot 5.5 now, peak 6 foot 7 for taker
Jo123 said on 15/Jun/20
Last Ride Chapter 4 confirms it. Kane is taller than the undertaker. Not sure if that was always the case or taker has lost significant height but there is a section in the first half of the documentary where Kane is clearly taller. Interestingly, there is also a clip of taker and Braun Strowman together where they look quite similar in height.
Dream said on 15/Jun/20
@Canson

I think Kane is definitely taller today. Look at him and the Undertaker. Kane is looking down while Undertaker is looking straight, yet Kane still looks taller. -- Click Here
Canson said on 12/Jun/20
@Riky: 6’6.25 and 6’5.5 are possible for both of those guys today. My actual guess

Taker 6’5.75 or 6’6”
Kane 6’6.5 or 6’6.25
Canson said on 12/Jun/20
@Dream: I think today Kane does give the taller impression
Canson said on 12/Jun/20
Riky said on 10/Jun/20
Im not able to text as Riccardo 5'7", so I changed but I know it's not allowed by the rules of the site.

@Canson

I think Calaway was likely same height as Kane, both not in gear.
If someone was taller probably, as you said, this man was Kane.
Also because I believe that undertaker has always been between 6'6.5 and 6'7" range peak and I give Kane more chances of being 6'7" or a hair higher rather than Taker.
But we are talking probably about a fraction in my opinion, worst case 0.5 but not more than that.

Today undertaker looks to have lost 1.25/5 ish and Kane about an inch.
I can't see Taker in the 6'6" range today but I think 6'5"(196cm) it's to low.

6'5"3/4 optimistic but really possible,
6'5.5 barefoot it's where I bet my money on.
Peak 200cm barefoot max.

Remember Sid was 6'6", Hulk Hogan 6'4.5..

Rob doesn’t have an issue with changing your name for that reason being its valid and you told everyone that that’s your new name. As for the estimates I think 6’5.5-.75 is possible today. I think 6’6” is max but not over that mark. I do feel Hogan in his prime was the full 6’5, however not 6’4.5”
Riky said on 11/Jun/20
@Canson

Sorry I read your comment in a wrong way, you meant to say today Kane looks taller. You were not talking about their peak sorry.
Well today Taker could be 6'5.5 and Kane no taller than 6'6"1/4. We can't rule out 6'6" either
Riky said on 10/Jun/20
Im not able to text as Riccardo 5'7", so I changed but I know it's not allowed by the rules of the site.

@Canson

I think Calaway was likely same height as Kane, both not in gear.
If someone was taller probably, as you said, this man was Kane.
Also because I believe that undertaker has always been between 6'6.5 and 6'7" range peak and I give Kane more chances of being 6'7" or a hair higher rather than Taker.
But we are talking probably about a fraction in my opinion, worst case 0.5 but not more than that.

Today undertaker looks to have lost 1.25/5 ish and Kane about an inch.
I can't see Taker in the 6'6" range today but I think 6'5"(196cm) it's to low.

6'5"3/4 optimistic but really possible,
6'5.5 barefoot it's where I bet my money on.
Peak 200cm barefoot max.

Remember Sid was 6'6", Hulk Hogan 6'4.5..
Dream said on 10/Jun/20
@Canson

From what I've heard and read, it seemed like Kane gave a taller impression to most people, than the Undertaker. I'll take a look though.

I haven't met Undertaker, but Kane is damn imposing. His frame fits his current stature.

Funny thing. My former neighbor friend (the one we talked about) is almost as tall as current Kane, yet I couldn't believe my parents thought my neighbor was only just 6'4"-6'5". LOL!
Dream said on 10/Jun/20
@Canson

From what I've heard and read, it seemed like Kane gave a taller impression to most people, than the Undertaker. I'll take a look though.

I haven't met Undertaker, but Kane is damn imposing. His frame fits his current stature.
Canson said on 8/Jun/20
@Dream: peak height is a good question. Today I’d bet money Kane
Dream said on 7/Jun/20
I don’t know if Kane or Taker was taller.

However, when I saw a current Kane in person, he didn’t look as low as 6’6” flat. Without the footwear advantage, he looked near 6’7”. With the footwear advantage, he looked near 6’8”.

Kane was only casually walking around, yet he stood out too much, among the crowd. I wouldn’t be surprised if he measured over 6’6” flat for sure, not less than 6’6.5” and maybe 6’6 3/4”. Absolute worst.
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
UndertakerFrank said on 4/Jun/20
Sid walked right by me in Street Clothes going into Madison Square Garden 6ft 6 is about right

He doesn’t look to have lost a lot of height either. Not like the other guys. I could believe him being that hair over 6’5” still today
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
@Kane: I know you posed the question to Rob but my guess would be that Corbin May edge him by 1/4” or they may be identical. More likely that they’re identical or so close that it’s too hard to tell. People made a big deal about Corbin and Rob Gronkowski when In reality Gronk was not taller than Corbin. Both guys were likely early morning combine measurements. Corbin is likely just a solid 6’6” and if Taker is, it’s the same. Both guys could even be in the 6’5.75-6’6” range in reality
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
@Vegas: that explains a lot. It explains why Hogan only looked 4.5-5” shorter than him and why Hogan only looked 6’5” range next to Sid and probably even that with Tiny Lister given the footwear advantage he had on Hogan. Maybe Andre was just 6’10” and Show 6’11 peak.

@Dan Trojan and Christian: Thanks! You all have seen where I’ve posted before where I’ve disagreed with Roderick or Riccardo and a few others when they say that Taker is only 6’5”. I have always felt he was at very worst today a weak 6’6”. I think Battery also said that to me for standing up for Christian. But I didn’t take offense to it. But with Sid coming out with 6’6, it’s hard to fathom a peak Taker much over 6’7” like 62B said. Hence why Rob downgraded Taker’s peak to 6’7.25 lol. Sid’s 6’6” claim was very damning for a lot of people lol. Means a peak Hogan wasn’t any taller than what we all (including 62B as well) said. I’d give him something like 6’5.25” peak like previously or even 6’5” flat now perhaps. A good start for Rob would be 6’5.5” although that seems too high even with what Rob said about Hogan possibly having lost height earlier than the rest

And Dan Trojan said it very well. He does have poor posture. Not to mention, your 6’6” encounter lines up with Bros of Destruction’s and Ali Baba’s encounter was more 199 but that was back in 2013 or 2014. As Christian said very Well, he’s had some surgeries But not to the same degree as Hogan. Hogan had an easy 2” loss maybe even slightly more whereas Taker had maybe 1-1.5” I agree with both of your estimates, along with 62B’s, more often than Not.

@62B: I know lol! But you seem to be a very respectful and honest poster. Not to mention, Rob just lowered him to 6’7.25 for his peak. And now that Sid has come clean and admitted that he’s only 6’6” that 6’7” that you saw Taker looks much better.
Canson said on 5/Jun/20
Battery6565 said on 2/Jun/20
@Canson

And why are all of your posts below where you quoted me in favor of making someone else taller? You said that Sid could be 6’6.5”. He claimed 6’6”. When someone else on the site claims 6’3 that is really 6’2.5” we take it at face value but someone is downgrading himself? As for 62B sure there’s no proof he met him but Rob lists him at 6’7.25 peak height. 62B met him closer to his prime and said he looked 6’7” flat to him
62B said on 4/Jun/20
Battery6565 said on 2/Jun/20
@Canson

Another person making absurd claims with 0 evidence whatsoever to back anything up.

__________________________________________-

Sorry I didn't carry a camera with me everywhere I went back in the early '90s. Cell phones weren't a thing back then. I saw him and a few others at the YMCA gym. He was tall. Taller than Brian Adams, but not by a lot. I don't think 6'7" is an absurd guess. It was early morning when I saw him, 7 am-8 am or so since the time of day is a big deal on this site.
UndertakerFrank said on 4/Jun/20
Sid walked right by me in Street Clothes going into Madison Square Garden 6ft 6 is about right
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 4/Jun/20
@Battery6565
Undertaker may have had many major surgeries and might be slightly broken up, but he's no Hogan. If Taker had lost as much height and is in terrible of a shape that you're making him out to be in, then he wouldn't have been able to wrestle for the last decade, let alone in 2019. He has officially "wrestled" two matches in 2020 as well, but one of them was a 5-10 second squash finish, and the other was just a cinematic graveyard match, but he still had to use his body a lot in the match. Also, you have zero evidence that Sid rounded down his height, or that he was careless in the interview, so you have no right to tell Canson that he doesn't have any.
Riky said on 3/Jun/20
Battery6565

Is undertaker taller than kavin love right? Just for fun.
Dan Trojan said on 3/Jun/20
Battery6565 i met the undertaker last year and i am certain he's not over 6'6" canson's estimation is pretty accurate yes he has bad posture but when he does he looks 6'5" you know it's ok if you don't agree with people but show a little respect and don't go off on people like that just because they disagree with you
Vegas' said on 3/Jun/20
Canson, Andre was listed 6'10 in UK and France in late 60s so it's unlikely he was taller than that. Wight looks taller than 6'11 flat in those 91-93 basketball photos. In my opinion based on alot of video comparison standing next to same people peak Wight was taller than peak Andre.

Strowman and Taker video seems to be favouring those on the right hence why Taker looks taller than Strowman and Reigns looks taller than he should next to Taker.

Strowmans about 6'8 in gear next to ~6'11 measured in shoes Kanter Click Here
Battery6565 said on 2/Jun/20
@Canson

Another person making absurd claims with 0 evidence whatsoever to back anything up.

Any evidence that is posted of Taker being more than his listed height seems to get conveniently ignored by most of the commenters on here.

"I know that 62B said he met Taker years ago and that he looked just a solid 6’7”. I’m beginning to wonder if the solid 6’7” was his peak afternoon height. Kane also looked only 6’7” in person to Vegas when he met him In the early 2000s. It’s possible that Both guys are 1/4” less at their peaks. Taker 6’7” Kane 6’7.25 or 6’7” flat."
It doesn't matter what he "looked like". He has had surgeries to fix broken ankles, injured knees, torn groins, hips, chronic injuries to his back, torn rotator cuff in his shoulders, torn pectoral muscles and many more injuries so it's very laughable of you to assume an already tall man, carrying as much weight on his frame as he does with so many injuries/ surgeries to fix them would be standing at his full height when casually walking around.


"It’s possible that a further reduction is needed for their current heights too. Kane I doubt is more than 6’6.5” today if not a hair under in the afternoon and Taker could be 6’5.75” which I’ve never ruled out. He really struggles to look 6’6” at times and Rob’s friends have said he doesn’t look over it. That could mean just what he said or it could mean he’s at most 6’6” which usually signals that he could be a hair under the mark."
No single evidence of anything you said. Show me any valid evidence of these senseless claims.

"And The revelation of Sid being only a peak 6’6” guy tells a lot."
No it doesn't. He said "I considered myself to be ABOUT 6'6"." Could have even measured 6'6.5" at his peak and not bothered with the extra fraction. He seemed to not care about his height clearly from his tone in that interview. It's not that hard to tell.
Kane99 said on 2/Jun/20
@battery
In this case undertaker looks 6ft6 at most.. I see at least an inch over undertaker eyes if not more. And you are not pull the line on the top of his head, but on the top of his hair so you are increasing the height probably 3/4 of an inch. if you think he’s near 6ft7, taller than 6ft6 1/2 , the top of 6ft2 guy head should be about taker eye level and I really don’t see this.
Click Here
And taker was in thick boots
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Jun/20
@Battery6565
Lol, who are you to tell me that I posted a bad photo, when the Rodman pic you posted is way more atrocious? At least I admitted that mine wasn't the best pic, since I said that we couldn't see footwear.

@Canson
I appreciate you for backing me up, as usual! I've been posting on here for 4+ years, (known it since 2013) but there's always room for improvement, and none of us our perfect at it.
Guy Pacitto said on 2/Jun/20
Currently undertaker looks 6'6.25 tops, he has lost abit of height in last 7 - 8 years.
Kane99 said on 2/Jun/20
@rob
Sid today is 6ft5 flat. Judging by the mugshot he is near 6ft6 in shoes, so it’s not possible he’s 6ft5 1/2 barefoot because every shoes, boots ecc gives over half of an inch. So I don’t know why you still go with 6ft5 1/2, but do you think that undertaker in shoes is near 6ft7 today ?
Riky said on 1/Jun/20
Rob I'm Riccardo, a poster who wrote here until few months ago. Any reason why I couldn't be able to write here?


And btw I keep the occasion to say that after Sid words I can confirm what I always thought.
Undertaker is 197 cm today, and 200 cm max barefoot peak height.. Max.

Sid peak 6'6.25 max
Undertaker 6'6"3/4 max
Riky said on 1/Jun/20
Battery6565

With all the respect, but you need a pair of glasses man
Undertaker Frank said on 1/Jun/20
Strowman maybe 6ft 5.5 Taker 6ft 6 or Strowman 6ft 6 Taker 6ft 6.5 Taker is taller
Canson said on 1/Jun/20
@Ben Bell and RP: I know that 62B said he met Taker years ago and that he looked just a solid 6’7”. I’m beginning to wonder if the solid 6’7” was his peak afternoon height. Kane also looked only 6’7” in person to Vegas when he met him In the early 2000s. It’s possible that Both guys are 1/4” less at their peaks. Taker 6’7” Kane 6’7.25 or 6’7” flat. It’s possible that a further reduction is needed for their current heights too. Kane I doubt is more than 6’6.5” today if not a hair under in the afternoon and Taker could be 6’5.75” which I’ve never ruled out. He really struggles to look 6’6” at times and Rob’s friends have said he doesn’t look over it. That could mean just what he said or it could mean he’s at most 6’6” which usually signals that he could be a hair under the mark. And The revelation of Sid being only a peak 6’6” guy tells a lot. Including the fact that Hulk Hogan was overlisted. No chance he was ever 6’6”. 6’5” is as real as it gets which means that most of the other big wrestlers such as Big Show need a downgrade. Show was never 7’0” tall. He was Max 6’11” range peak just like Andre the Giant. Andre would have been 6’10 max in that picture Rob used of he and Hogan to compare.
Canson said on 1/Jun/20
@Ben Bell and RP: I know that 62B said he met Taker years ago and that he looked just a solid 6’7”. I’m beginning to wonder if the solid 6’7” was his peak afternoon height. Kane also looked only 6’7” in person to Vegas when he met him. It’s possible that Both guys are 1/4” less at their peaks. Taker 6’7” Kane 6’7.25 or 6’7” flat. The revelation of Sid being only a peak 6’6” guy tells a lot. Including the fact that Hulk Hogan was overlisted. No chance he was ever 6’6”. 6’5” is as real as it gets
Kane99 said on 1/Jun/20
@battery
Much over 6ft6 like you said it’s hard to believe, he looks in 6ft6 range no doubt. It’s difficult to judge undertaker height because most of the time he stand in terrible posture.. the most that I give him is 6ft6 1/4 and repeat the most. It would be interesting to hear rob who has more chances to measure taller between corbin and taker today
Battery6565 said on 1/Jun/20
@Ben Bell

Do you realise how terrible his posture is lmao? If your friend is really 6'2.5" then it just adds fuel to my argument even more.

Thanks for that.


@Canson
I know it was a bad photo but I did it to prove my point how different camera angles completely change the perception of reality.

@Rob
I mean when compared to Strowman who is listed 6'6.5", he's clearly a bit taller. Hopefully there is no debate that he's taller than a 6'6.5" man. He was looking down at Roman which reduces the difference.

If that's the case then even Strowman deserves downgrade.

@Kane99
I drew lines on the photo you said.
Click Here

Are you seriously trying to suggest that he is 2" above Taker's eye level but the difference between the top of their heads is 3" ?

I took the liberty to measure the lines on paint as well.
The difference between Taker's eye level and top of Goldie's head was 67 pixels. The difference between Goldie's head and Taker's top of head was exactly 135 PIXELS.

Meaning if you are trying to suggest that he is 2" above Taker's eye level then the difference between their heads is 4". And Goldberg is 6'2.5" anyway, I don't know where you got 6'2" flat from.

If you think i'm lying then draw lines on paint and see for yourself. Even on the worst photo, you were proven wrong......n
Ben Bell said on 31/May/20
Houss and Rob

My friend Brendan is a hair over 6’2.5 barefoot measured by me. He always said he was 6’3 so we measured.
We both thought Taker was 6’6 tops, Sid around 6’5.
Ben Bell said on 31/May/20
Met Goldberg 5 times. I’d say he’s around 6’1.
Battery6565 said on 31/May/20
Click Here

@Rob
Why is he listed so much shorter than people he's clearly taller than lol?

He's clearly taller than 6'6.5" Strowman, I don't know what else needs to be said.
Editor Rob
When he faces Roman, the difference wasn't as big as you'd expect.
Kane99 said on 31/May/20
@battery
First of all i’m not suggesting 2.5 inch. Goldberg is 6ft2 flat and in that segment he looks well over undertaker eyes. I said 6ft5, so 3 inches.
Second thing undertaker eye level is about 5.2 inch like rob said, so in the middle of his eyes he have about this distance to the top of head.
Third if you pull a line in the photo I posted, Goldberg is about 2 inches over is eyes easily.
I don’t say taker is only 6ft5, I said in this pic looks that but the camera at times help the shorter guy.
Canson said on 31/May/20
Battery6565 said on 31/May/20
It seems like too many people on here will stop at nothing until he's listed at 5'10" probably.

@Kane99
I hope you are joking. His forehead is huge, that looks like a 3.75"-4" difference. Are you seriously suggesting this is 2.5"? Also, I can't help but admire how talented you are at cherrypicking photos.
Click Here

@Christian 6'5 3/8"
Are you seriously trying to use a photo where he is looking down, with absolutely terrible neck posture?

Why not use this photo where he's standing with better posture. Here he is looking taller than listed 6'6.5" Dennis Rodman.
Click Here

@Battery6565: Well, having interacted with Christian regularly for the better part of the 4 years he’s been here, he does use good pictures. He’s actually up there as one of the best on the site with that regard and as a poster. And if we want to talk about bad pictures, how is your picture with Taker and Rodman a good picture? Rodman is much further away from the camera. If you don’t know by now, that alters the perception of how tall someone is and looks. In his prime I would say Taker was slightly taller than Rodman, but I will bet money that Taker is not taller than Rodman today. At worst they’re around the same height today. At best, Rodman is taller than him today as Taker has lost more height. Rodman still looks close to what he was in his prime where Taker is clearly shorter than 6’7” today. But there is nothing wrong with the picture Christian posted. There is an issue, however, with the one you posted
Battery6565 said on 31/May/20
@houss
You're right. He doesn't look 198 cm. He looks MORE than that.
Click Here

Even with absolutely terrible posture due to a 30 year career riddled with numerous crippling injuries and health issues, he looks 4" taller in that photo. And this guy is a height conscious guy clearly standing with bust-a-gut posture for this photo. I'm laughing hard at this ridiculous comparison.

According to Rob, that guy is slightly above 6'2" so let's say 6'2.25". Taker looks 6'6.25".

Stop cherrypicking photos. His forehead is ridiculously huge and his eye level is very low.
Click Here

I can't help but feel sorry for people who o
Battery6565 said on 31/May/20
It seems like too many people on here will stop at nothing until he's listed at 5'10" probably.

@Kane99
I hope you are joking. His forehead is huge, that looks like a 3.75"-4" difference. Are you seriously suggesting this is 2.5"? Also, I can't help but admire how talented you are at cherrypicking photos.
Click Here

@Christian 6'5 3/8"
Are you seriously trying to use a photo where he is looking down, with absolutely terrible neck posture?

Why not use this photo where he's standing with better posture. Here he is looking taller than listed 6'6.5" Dennis Rodman.
Click Here
juggernaut said on 30/May/20
Undertaker is most likely 6'6' today, not even a hair taller..he doesn't look over it anymore.. perhaps in early 2000 he was 6'7'
Kane99 said on 30/May/20
@houss
That guy is 6ft2 1/2 from what I remember.
Click Here
In this segment probably does’t look more than 6ft5
houss said on 29/May/20
He doesn't look 198cm with this 188cm guy
Click Here
Editor Rob
Bell's friend height varied a bit like most, looking sometimes over 6ft 2 in some photos.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 29/May/20
Back in 2006 taker was 6inches shorter than khali 7ft1 taker 6ft7 1/4. But taker climed back in 2001 hes about 6ft8 6ft9 so 6ft8 1/2.
Kane99 said on 28/May/20
In your opinion there are a chance of peak taker become 6ft7 1/2 or 6ft7 1/4 is the most that you argued after sid statements ?
Canson said on 27/May/20
@Dan Trojan: yea I can’t either. I could see slightly under it but only maybe 1/4” under
Canson said on 26/May/20
@Viper: a peak Taker was listed at 198?
Canson said on 26/May/20
@Public Enemy: I don’t Quite rule out 6’7.5” peak. But I rule out anything over 6’6” for him today. In fact I could even buy 6’5.75 as his afternoon height today
Vegas' said on 26/May/20
Viper it also had Billy Gunn 188cm which we know from Rob's photo is wrong and Andre at 225cm which is laughably bad estimate.
miko said on 26/May/20
Taker wasn't under 6'7 prime.

That being said him and Sid were very close in height. I've still got Sid at 6'6.5/6'6.75, throughout the 90's he always looked that, unless he was always in lifts.

Today I think if Taker stands as straight as physically possible he would still be a hair over 6'6. In a recent staredown with a booted 6'4.5 McIntyre, he still had over an inch on him and his posture around the neck was absolutely terrible.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 26/May/20
Looked around 6'4.5" next to Ric Flair, but we can't see their footwear. Click Here
viper said on 26/May/20
The Mexican mentors list had both Sid and Taker at 198cm
Dan Trojan said on 25/May/20
I agree it was a good move putting him at 6'6" i definitely couldn't see him more than that especially after meeting him
Hanov said on 25/May/20
Is Heidenreich 6'6 like Taker nowadays? Woaw this is funny. Rob please, add to Heidenreich
Public Enemy said on 25/May/20
@Canson
That’s a good shout from you for sure on current listing but don’t you think he was 6’7.5 peak?
His debut in wwe which I shared earlier shows a peak Taker at 26 years looking even taller than 6’7.5 and I don’t believe he wore lifts.
Canson said on 24/May/20
Public Enemy said on 23/May/20
I get the current downgrade but am really not sure about the peak downgrade of only 0.25 inches. He looked taller than his old peak listing as a young man when he debuted in 1990 in the wwf survivor series.

The funny thing is that a few of us such as Roderick, Riccardo, Edwards, Christian and I all predicted or suggested that it would or should come to this sometime in 2020. He was overlisted before at 6’6.5 and even 6’6.25 was high. I was able to foresee even more imminently after Corbin was reduced to 6’6” recently
Christian 6'5 3/8 said on 24/May/20
@Rob
Are those "folks" just posters, or people who you personally know and are credible?
Editor Rob
Personally know who paid money to meet him, however it's still guesses.
Hanov said on 24/May/20
6'7 1/8, Lebron is his twin height or 1/8 taller
Hanov said on 23/May/20
He lost 3 cm from 201 cm flat to 198 cm
Ben Bell said on 23/May/20
Vegas
I met taker in 94, he was huge but it was peak cowboy boot era.
I met Taker and Sid last year and they both seemed 6’5 to 6’6 max.

Peak barefoot taker at 6’6 isn’t out of the question but I’ll never argue anything definitively.

The only time taker ever looked his billed height was meeting UFC fighter Tim Silvia in 03. Apart from that I can’t think of a time any wrestler has matched up to somebody in mainstream sports with a similar billed height. Even Kane with 6’5 Vince Vaughan or Teller the magician.
All those basketball players looking taller than taker a couple of years ago who were billed at the same height.

6’6 is very tall, nothing wrong with that.
I never stood near big show but I was fairly close to ringside in 03 and he didn’t seem as tall as I expected.

With all that being said I’ve met Nash twice and I would have said 6’9 min. He was HUGE, noticeably taller than Sid and taker. If anything my judgement is probably off with Nash.
In the last few years I’ve met a ton of wrestlers. The only one who was taller than I expected was Jesse Ventura who was at least 6’3. Even Sting was only 6’1”.
UndertakerFrank said on 23/May/20
James B Its tall but i was expecting a 6ft 8 to 6ft 9 guy
Public Enemy said on 23/May/20
Click Here
Public Enemy said on 23/May/20
I get the current downgrade but am really not sure about the peak downgrade of only 0.25 inches. He looked taller than his old peak listing as a young man when he debuted in 1990 in the wwf survivor series.
Kane99 said on 23/May/20
@maesh
I understand what you are saying, but remember that sting when he faced Goldberg looked slightly shorter like triple h and lesnar did, and there is a guy Brendan (6ft2 1/2) who posted a photo with sting and they are very similar. Sting is a legit 6ft2
Click Here
And I think no one believe that Sid was only 4 inches taller and like i said I do think he wasn’t shorter than strowman today
Click Here
And for undertaker peak I don’t think he was 6ft7 flat, 6ft7 1/4 minimum and 6ft7 3/4 at most
Canson said on 22/May/20
Hmm I called this downgrade to 6’6 from a mile away. The peak looks better too. Rob, what made you lower him on both?
Editor Rob
A lot of folk meeting Taker last 2 years are struggling to see him over 6ft 6.
James B 172cm said on 22/May/20
frank-you dont consider a guy who is 6'5-6'6 as "that tall"???????
Kane99 said on 22/May/20
Also because there are many other people like John cena who claims several time that he’s 6ft and rob listed him as 6ft 1/2 or peter crouch that said “i’m 6ft7” and rob gave him a 6ft7 1/2 list.
I think that as he applies it to others, he can also apply it to sid. And sid don’t say i’m 6ft6, but only “about” 6ft6
Mahesh said on 22/May/20
@kane99

I may be wrong about big show..but I don't think he would have measured more than 209 cms in prime. Rob had snitsky at 6'6 once . But his real prime measurement was only 6'4.5 and now the listing is changed. Similarly most of the wrestles are atleat one inch shorter than their heights listed in this site. When Kane faced snitsky he was only 3 to 4 cms taller. Atrain/ tensai / mattbloom and snitsky had a picture together and they were exactly the same height. check Matt blooms Instagram. He looks max 6'4 now.. so his peak height would have been max 6'5 and he was only slightly shorter than peak Kane and taker. Sid appears like 12 cms taller than sting. That's because sting was only 186 in his prime and not 6'2. Kurt angle once said most of the wrestlers are atleast 4 inches shorter than their listed heights.
Battery6565 said on 22/May/20
I agree with the posters below.

Basing other wrestlers' heights based off someone saying "i've CONSIDERED myself ABOUT 6'6" is inaccurate".

He gave off the vibe that he doesn't really care about his height. So yeah, when was the measurement taken? After a workout? In the evening? What was the actual measurement? 6'6 3/8"? Or 6'6" flat?

Would he really claim the 3/8" since he doesn't care if he DID even measure at that mark?
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 22/May/20
If Undertaker got a downgrade, so should Kane.
Pablo13 said on 21/May/20
Vegas: Big Show boot sole here, i think 1.5 easily, Way thicker than Undertaker boots.
Click Here
3:45
Vegas' said on 21/May/20
Mahesh, for one majority of those wrestlers you named never stood next to Sid so why should we lower their heights?

Secondly I researched 155 college basketball players over passed five years who were measured 6'5 or more barefoot at NBA combine. Only 3 were listed 2.5 inches more in college than they measured barefoot. So at worst if Wight was listed 7'1 in college he was 6'10.5 barefoot but that's at worst because vast majority of players measured within 2 inches of their listings meaning it's unlikely Wight was less than 6'11 barefoot if he was listed 7'1 in college.

Third Sid is a well known bs artist, right up there with Hogan. Maybe he is telling the truth but that would put him no taller than Gronk or Corbin (both measured just over 6'6 barefoot) yet he looked taller in a WWE ring than both. So either a. He is lying or b. He had footwear advantage every time on tv
UndertakerFrank said on 21/May/20
Yes Vegas i met Mamun He was about 5ft 8 Im 5ft 11.5 & Alex looked 6ft .5 When i met Sid in 94 in Street Clothes he really didnt appear that tall too me for some reason 6ft 5 to 6ft 6 The Godfather looked 6ft 3 to 6ft 4 British Bulldog looked 5ft 9 I could be wrong but The Bulldog was shorter than 5ft 10 that i bet money on !!
Kane99 said on 21/May/20
@maesh
But he’s not an official measuerament. We don’t know if he mueasured yourself in the morning or late afternoon, after workout. We have nothing. He only said
“I've always considered myself about Six-Six”
Lesnar has been measured 6ft2 3/8 at nfl combine so I doubt the rock and Batista were only 6ft2 flat and sheamus 6ft1.5... big show 6ft10 peak wouldn't make any sense and considering that corbin has been measured 6ft6 1/2 at nfl combine and looks at least half of inch shorter than sid did when he faced a 6ft2 guy... i have no doubt that sycho sid was a good 6ft6 1/2 and for sure not shorter than strowman in his peak
Vegas' said on 21/May/20
Photo with ~5'8 Mamun, Sid looks taller than 6'6 flat for sure.

Mamun had photos with 5'11 Frank and Alex who was 6 foot 1/4 measured barefoot by Rob and Mamun looked his 5'8 claim in them.

Of course Sid could be wearing lifts there in his sneakers (how likely is that?).

But if Sid was only 6'6 flat with Mamun (6'7-6'7.5 in his sneakers) then guys like Adam Bomb (Bryan Clark) and Tiny Lister look much shorter than 6'5 a decade ago with Mamun
Mahesh said on 21/May/20
@kane99: sid's new revelation should be an eye opener to everyone. His own claim of 6'6 is the most honest statement made by a wrestler ever. We should reduce 1 inch, from the heights of each wrestler given in this site , to get the actual heights. Eg both Kane and undertaker were around 6'6 peak. Now 6'5 .Big show around 6'10 peak and now 6'8 .5 . Sheamus 6'1.5 , batista and rock 6'2 peak, hhh 6'1 current etc..
Meat said on 21/May/20
Click Here

I keep posting this. Best evidence of Undertakers size in general. We know there are camara tricks all the time in wrestling. Yes there is an angle here. But still best evidence of how big Undertaker was. No question he's dropped height to 6'6" or a bit. But peak is above 6'7.5". Poor choice to reduce him further on here.
Vegas' said on 21/May/20
Pablo13, Big Shows WWE 99-2000 boots were nowhere near 2 inches. He wore the exact same boot type as Kurt Angle at the time except bigger shoe size snd colour obviously Click Here

His boots aren't 2 inches now, more 1.5 inches, similar to Shaqs sneaker soles Click Here

As for his peak height (1992-96) I dunno but he could pass for taller than 6'11 max. His basketball stats listed him 7'1 Click Here and he looked at least 7 foot on his NCAA Division 1 team
Kane99 said on 21/May/20
@rob
Honestly it’s just a claim, many people claims his height more or less than they really are. But always sid gave a taller impression than strowman. Next to 6ft2 guy like sting
Click Here
I really don’t put only 4 inches between this 2, is clearly under sid eye level.
While undertaker if he have a 5.2 inches eye level and he’s 6ft7 1/4 so the top of the 6ft2 guy head is right of the middle of his eyes..
Click Here
Click Here
I really doubt, if taker standing straight lesnar triple h ecc are under his eyelevel without any doubt .
And yes with show back 1999 looked 5 inches shorter, but nobody pointed out the difference in the sole of the boots at the time...big show was in big boots sole all year long.
for me this list for both sid and taker (peak height) makes much less sense than the previous one
JT said on 21/May/20
6’6” flat is too low for Sid. Click Here IIRC the other guy here is 5’8” based on the accounts of several long-time posters here. A 6’6” guy would normally have a full head size on a 5’8” guy. Sid had more than that on ~5’8” Gene Okerlund as well. If Sid is no more than 6’6” Hogan was never more than 6’4”.
Public Enemy said on 20/May/20
@Hanov
Agree with those estimates. Taker did look taller than Editor Rob revised peak estimate but it’s difficult to argue against his old peak of 6’7.5 which is a 0.25 inch difference.

@Editor Rob
Do you think Taker wore lifts ? I don’t think he did. I think his posture is just poor these days which was really evident in the recent wwe last ride documentary on him.
Pablo13 said on 20/May/20
Vegas: Angle from your video also is not great, it's from Big Show side. Also Big Show wore second biggest sole in WWF Next To Kane back then, his boots add easily two inches to his height. He was never 7 ft in my opinion, 6'11 at best.
Battery6565 said on 20/May/20
@Vegas
Well yes, you're just backing up my point.

Big Show had a peak height of 7', so even assuming the difference is 4", that still puts Taker at a peak height of 6'8". The top of his head is clearly above Show's eye level.
Click Here

At this point it was still more likely for Taker to have had shrunk a fraction if anything because he already accumulated a lot of injuries by then and had been in the game much longer than Show.

My points still stand.

If anyone deserves a bit of leeway with regards to their posture, it has to be a 2 metre + man, who has been doing a physically demanding sport for 36 years, with more than a dozen (literally) injuries and surgeries, who also carries a large amount of weight.

I'm surprised he's still standing at this point (thankfully) considering the amount of strain he's put on his body his whole life...
Hanov said on 20/May/20
Kane 6'7.5"
Taker 6'7 1/8
Viscera 6'6.5"
Big John Studd 6'6.5"
Strowman 6'6.5"
Sid 6'6 1/4
Corbin 6'6 1/8
Hogan 6'5 5/8
Vegas' said on 20/May/20
Ben Bell I never met Sid but I did meet Taker out of gear and he looked taller than 6'6 flat 15 years ago.

He looked solidly 6'6 range with Ali Baba in 2014 so had he not lost by that point?

Frank who posts here has maintained Sid looked no taller than 6'6 out of gear 25-30 years ago when he met him.

Sometimes wrestlers look taller in gear, Albert/A-Train is another example. He looks 6'7+ in gear but in person 6'5 at most
Vegas' said on 20/May/20
Battery6565,that's a bad angle re: Show and Taker, that's the video, no less than 4 inches between them and Wight is looking down Click Here
Battery6565 said on 20/May/20
@Rob

In the podcast, he said he was "about 6'6"" and surely that could still mean he measured a fraction over, maybe around 6'6.25" or 6'6 1/8". Even John Cena claims 6', when he's a fraction higher.

And see this photo with no advantageous camera angle to either man. Undertaker had a comfortable inch, if not a bit more on Sid.

Click Here

And that's just in comparison to one person anyway. In his old photos next to Big Show and Kevin Nash, he looks his old listed height of 6'7.5", if not a bit higher. See this photo from 2007 of him, Batista and Hatton. Him and Batista are not standing straight so it's a good comparison and it's just a photo of them in a gym so probably none of them are wearing lifts.
Click Here

The tip top of Batista's skull is just below Taker's eye level or at the same height and Undertaker already has a huge forehead, this makes the difference look like 4-5". And Batista is listed at 6'2.75".

Even now, I keep pointing it out that using photos next to young basketballers and other superstars is a bit pointless to make comparisons because considering he's crippled with numerous injuries which we normal people can't even fathom and had surgeries to fix them, his posture is completely messed up. And he's still a really tall guy anyway with so much weight on his frame, and his body is completely worn out, it's obvious he won't be standing at his full height when walking around.

@Ben Bell
Not really, that doesn't add up.
If Undertaker was really wearing lifts, then why would he suddenly take them off for ABA? Also, why do you assume Taker was the one wearing lifts and it wasn't Austin or Vince? How do you know who was wearing lifts and who wasn't?

Here's an old photo of Undertaker (actually standing semi-straight) and Jimmy Kimmel (5'11 1/4"). Keep in mind he's already past his peak at this point and look at how he absolutely towers over Kimmel. Does this not look like 8-9"?
Click Here

Also, I don't know how tall you are or anything but if you actually did meet Undertaker, i'm guessing it was at a convention. The same point applies.

He's crippled with injuries, what makes you think he can stand straight with perfect posture anymore?
I'm guessing since you're a user on this site, you're probably a height conscious person who would yourself stand fully straight in photos.

My own brother is 1" taller than me and he does 0 exercise and therefore, looks the same height as me in photos due to his horrible posture. For an already tall guy, with that much weight, and with that many injuries, the situation is going to be much worse.

Having said that, I do that think Kane has a slight edge on Taker.
Click Here

The difference is very minute though, about 0.25". Even Kane's 6'7.5" peak listing doesn't add up, he looked huge compared to Big Show back in the day. Think he deserves at least a 6'8" listing as well.
Click Here
Editor Rob
Yes, I would give him a fraction over 6ft 6 as he generally seems one of biggest 6ft 6 guys out there.
Pablo13 said on 20/May/20
Ben Bell: Kane did not wear lifts in 90s, he used huge boot sole, same with Big Show and other big guys.
Undertaker outside the ring in 2014, was 6'6.5, no way that, he was below 6'7 peak height. that would put Big Show at 6'10 peak, Kane 6'6.5 peak, Nash 6'8.5, Nash wasn't more than two inches taller than Undertaker(peak height), also who knows, Maybe Sid was using Lifts?, he often was on his tip-toes too, remember that at Wrestlemania 13,Undertaker easily looked over 1 inch taller than Sid. By the way, Undertaker as American Bad Ass in 2000-2001 looked bit taller than he looked in 1998-1999, especially next to Kane and Other Big Guys. Thing is, Big Show for 100%, never was 7 ft, 6'11 peak at best, Nash bit above 6'9.

Click Here

Ben Bell: 0:47-0:48, Undertaker easily over one inch taller than Sid.
Ben Bell said on 20/May/20
I’ve never seen any evidence of Taker having height on Sid. In USWA and WWF they stood face to face as tall as possible many times and there was nothing in it.
Taking variable in to account I could give taker 0.5” perhaps. I could also say Sid had 0.5” as well.
I have to say he’s equal to Sid. 6’6 barefoot.
Ben Bell said on 20/May/20
Battery 6565
Taker did wear lifts in the late 90’s as did Kane.
He was closer in height to Nash and Show than he should have been. It was more noticeable when he took the lifts out as American Bad Aas and he was next to Austin and Vince. He looked way shorter.
Going off Sid’s admission I’d say 6’9 peak Nash. There must be a legit basket ball listing for him and show, I’d guess taker as well.
Perhaps as Rob says Sid was over 6’6 slightly but doesn’t really care and just says 6’6.
Having met Nash, Sid and Taker in person I had Sid down as 6’5, Taker at 6’5.5-6’6. Nash on the other hand felt at least 6’9 to me. He was HUGE.

Hard to argue with Rob’s estimates on all the wrestlers he’s met now as they seem very accurate.

One interesting one is Hogan. Sid has around 1.5” on him in 92. 6’4.5 92 Hogan.
Editor Rob
Nash has looked smaller sometimes and after seeing his leg issues, that seems a good reason. He could have shrunk and regained 1/2 to 1 inch at one point. I seen him at least 3 events since 2013.
Dicko said on 20/May/20
Rob if you are downgrading Taker I expect the same to apply to Kane and Big Show etc or your point is invalid. I’ve always thought Taker was probably 6.7 peak btw and 6.8 in boots. He definitely had an advantage on Sid but by how much I’m not sure.
Roderick said on 19/May/20
No way... downgraded to 6'6" flat, and peak is now 6'7" flat.

Awesome downgrade!
Pablo13 said on 19/May/20
If Undertaker got downgraded from his peak, Kane also should be, Big Show, Kevin Nash, and couple of more wrestlers also. Kane was 6'7.25, Nash 6'9, Big Show 6'11 peak height.
Battery6565 said on 19/May/20
Some more photos:

Is this a 2.5" difference between Nash and Taker? Doesn't look like it .
Click Here

And is this a 5" difference between Big Show and Taker?
Click Here


Rob, please see these photos.

I think you are forgetting how crippled he is with injuries over the years and that's clouding your judgement. Just google "list of undertaker injuries" and you'll realise why his posture is messed up, considering he's had dozens of surgeries to fix them.
Editor Rob
Well, to be fair yeah his injuries probably justify 6ft 7-7.5 range from his youngest years.
I don't know if anybody seen Glenn and Undertaker before, he could look huge beside a 5ft 7 range guy..
Battery6565 said on 19/May/20
@Rob

Why he's been downgraded? The Peak guess is 0.75" more than what is listed and the current guess is 0.5" more..

In the photos with Dr Disrespect and Big Show recently, he looks much taller than his listing why has he been downgraded?

He probably cant stand straight anymore which is obvious considering his numerous injuries.
Editor Rob
If someone like Sid admits to measuring 6ft 6, I don't know how Taker could measure over 6ft 7
Ben Bell said on 19/May/20
Rob
I remember Meltzer and Powerslam magazine referring to Sid as 6’6 at times.
With that low listing from his mouth it throws all wrestler heights in to question.
He said on an earlier podcast his max bench was 425lbs which is way less than people would guess. He actually seems a very good honest man.
Editor Rob
Other wrestler's wouldn't like a flat 6ft 6 Eudy, but then if he were a fraction over 6ft 6 would he bother saying it.
Pablo13 said on 19/May/20
Khaja Quadaruddin, Batista used lifts, and Undertaker is not straight in that picture, he's looking down.

Click Here
Real difference between Taker and Batista outside the ring easily OVER 4 inches, Batista is standing bit closer to the Camera, and Undertaker posture is not perfect either.
Batista in 2007 was probably around 6'2.5(190 cm) + lifts, Undertaker was near 6'7 or flat 6'7 in 2007.
Ben Bell said on 19/May/20
22 minutes to hear Sid give his legit measured peak height of 6’6. Click Here
Interesting, it throws a lot others heights out. Taker has to be 6’6-ish peak which seems accurate as 6’7 measured basket ballers have at least an inch on him.
Editor Rob
It does call into question Taker being 6ft7+. I don't think many would have given Sid a flat 6ft 6, but then why would he lie about it...
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 17/May/20
Click Here he has three inch on prime batista here.
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 16/May/20
@Daniel webster..haha are u serious..jst go through this site full pages of kane taker and nash.
Canson said on 16/May/20
@Dan Trojan: well said!
Dan Trojan said on 15/May/20
Daniel webster you have anything to back up what you're saying because it's inaccurate
Pablo13 said on 15/May/20
Vegas: That's 100% true, I Put Taker at 6'7.25, or on a good day 6'7.5 peak height, Kane identical, Sid 6'6.75, 6'7 on a good day, Nash was over 6'9 tho. Kane was NEVER taller than Undertaker.
Vegas' said on 15/May/20
That's Kane and Taker in SMW in 1995. Not sure how you can determine Kane is half an inch taller from that Click Here

I mean you are arguing tiny fractions. To me anyway, Kane/Taker/Sid all looked pretty much same height. Nash was about 1.5-2 inches taller than those guys.
Daniel webster said on 15/May/20
Google list Kevin Nash is 6 + 10 Kane is 7 ft any Undertaker is 6 foot 10 these were accurate measures done by doctor and they are accurate now that the Undertaker has gotten older he's lost an inch which is quite common and he's six foot nine but Nash certainly is not taller than Kane by doctors measurements I don't care what the picture shows the picture can show anything that doesn't mean it's real I believe I'll go with the doctor. And whoever said the Undertaker is 6 ft 6 and 1/2 that's insane eye doctors not going to be off by 4 in or more and if he was six foot six Razor Ramon would be taller than him and that certainly is not the case The Undertaker's six-foot-nine now height is exaggerated but the Undertaker is 6 foot 9 by doctor measurement
Daniel webster said on 15/May/20
Nothing is more exaggerated than a wrestlers weight and height few wrestlers were bigger than 600 pounds because if they were and you watch their matches when they were over 600 pounds they stood in the corner inside the wrestling ring because they were too big to stand outside and height is probably even more exaggerated they still list Andre is 7 ft 4 I've heard on my life he's actually 7 ft 2 The Undertaker is 6 foot 9 not 6 ft 11 and Kane is 6 ft 11 not 7 FT 1 and Gonzalez is certainly not eight-foot he was actually 7 ft 7 in a man that take foot tongue can't even wrestle could hardly move they used to do the same thing with Big Show the announcers would say he 7 foot 4 he 7 foot 5 please actually 7 foot even. Nash always said he was 7 foot and he's actually six foot nine
Canson said on 14/May/20
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 11/May/20
@canson..still believe kane had atleast 0.5 on taker peak..look taker vs una bomb.

I used to but not sure now. They may have both been 6’7.25. I changed my tune after Vegas said what he did months Back about seeing Kane in 2004 and being max 6’7”. So I’d wager as little as 1/4” between them being possible
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 11/May/20
@canson..still believe kane had atleast 0.5 on taker peak..look taker vs una bomb.
Dan Trojan said on 11/May/20
Ced no he's really not they're the same height there
Pablo13 said on 11/May/20
Ced: Dude are you trolling?, Kane had a camera advantage cause Camera angle is from his side LOL.
Also Undertaker got wider stance, Kane was 100% not taller than Undertaker.
Canson said on 11/May/20
Dan Trojan said on 9/May/20
I see people arguing over who's taller between taker and kane in my personal opinion i think they were the same height that staredown with kane as isaac yankem kane only looks taller because he has a higher eye level if we go by top of their heads they're the same height

@Dan Trojan: I agree at their peaks for sure!
A Man said on 11/May/20
Watched the first part of Undertaker’s Last Ride documentary yesterday. There’s numerous occasions in it where he looks sub 6,6” next to various people, just watch it and you’ll see. He generally gives the impression of a 6,5” guy.

But what you also notice watching him in day to day life out of the ring is just how crippled he is. He can’t turn his head properly, neck and back look very siezed up and his posture is terrible. Does make you think there’s a good chance he’s lost some significant height.

I don’t buy that he was ever a 6,8”+ guy in his prime but maybe before his body was ruined by decades of punishment he might have stretched out to 6,7”.

Nowadays it’s anyone’s guess, he’s certainly not over 6,6” though.
ced said on 11/May/20
@Dan Trojan,

here's the link to the video, pause at 1:33.. no camera advantage for either man.. Kane is clearly taller.

Click Here
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 10/May/20
Peak heights barefoot big show 7ft0 nash 6ft9 1/2 taker 6ft8 kane 6ft8 sid 6ft7.25 stroman 6ft7 corbin 6ft6.5.
Dan Trojan said on 9/May/20
I see people arguing over who's taller between taker and kane in my personal opinion i think they were the same height that staredown with kane as isaac yankem kane only looks taller because he has a higher eye level if we go by top of their heads they're the same height
Dan Trojan said on 9/May/20
Pablo he always posts photos with bad angles he does it on purpose so suit hia needs he tries to make people think he's a height expert but in reality he has no clue what he's talking about
Kane99 said on 9/May/20
And for all people that believe kane in his big boots looks near Kevin Nash height...
Click Here
I don’t think so ;)
Kane99 said on 8/May/20
Fake Diesel (kane) vs undertaker
If you watched the entire match, they looked identical. I don’t know why you say that kane was taller.
Click Here
Wrestlemania 14 kane taker staredown
If you remember kane wore a boot who gave him 2 inches or more while taker probably less than an inch
Click Here
Click Here
If taker was really shorter than kane, the difference between them in this staredown considering the huge difference of footwear, it had to be more than 2 inches and I wouldn't say so
Pablo13 said on 6/May/20
Ced: Worst Angles Ever, no face to face, no nothing, Undertaker wasn't shorter than Kane, if he was max 0.25 inches(peaks).
Vegas" said on 5/May/20
That Russian height site has some terrible comparison photos. It has Big Showing think 207cm peak..
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 5/May/20
@ kane99..then wat abt taker vs issac yankem staredown..dont say yankem used to wear huge lifts too..huh?
Khaja Qadaruddin said on 5/May/20
Easily 6.7 peak...Click Here
ced said on 5/May/20
Here is a still of Undertaker vs Fake Diesel.. (Since there is no staredown in this match):

Look at the top rope, and look how much taller Kane is is from the top rope than Taker:

Click Here
ced said on 5/May/20
@kANE99,

Take a look at that video again and pause it when Taker gets in the ring and he's standing straight as Kane is outside by the ropes. Take a look at the top rope. Look at Undertaker, then look at Kane (From the top rope vertically), Kane has more height than Taker from the top rope.

Kane here is at his very peak (I believe 202 - just above 6'7.5 meaning 6'7 and 3/4ths)

Taker here is probably 6'7.25 (in his boots - without them, 6'6.75).
Dan Trojan said on 5/May/20
Ced so we're supposed to believe some unreliable russian site lol give me a break
ced said on 4/May/20
@Pablo, I am refering to the "Battle of the Giants" storyline in WCW between Kevin Nash and The Giant. Nash was billed at 7'1, Giant at 7'4.

I don't believe I underestimate Taker. There is a Russian celeb heights that has markings to the side.. It shoes Kane at 202 peak, and taker at 200 peak.
Kane99 said on 4/May/20
If you watch this video
Click Here
Kane and undertaker was the same height in my opinion. Maybe when they went face to face, taker tilted his head up because his eye level is very low, but that doesn't mean he’s smaller.
Lyle said on 3/May/20
@Pablo, I believe Ced is referring to Nash in WCW as being billed at 7'1
Undertaker Frank said on 3/May/20
Pablo i believe Nash was billed @ 7ft in the WWF He had claimed 6ft 10 & 6ft 11 for himself
Pablo13 said on 2/May/20
Ced: Undertaker was 6'6.5(199 cm) in that picture with Alibaba, and that was in 2014, Undertaker was 49 years old back then. No way he was only 6'6.5 at his peak, you dude underestimate Undertaker peak height, and overestimate Kane's, bot guys were 6'7.25-6'7.5 peak height, Kane never was taller, if he was only by 0.25 inches. Also Kevin Nash wasn't billed 7'1 in WWF, he was billed 6'11.
ced said on 1/May/20
@Big Ed.. Nash at his very peak was around 205cm.

Taker around 200cm (in boots around 2000-2001).

Today, Taker is 197cm. Nash - 204cm. (I believe Nash had dropped to around 201cm before he had surgery that straightened him back up an inch).

Kane was around 202cm in his biggest boots.

When you think about it, it isn't that far fetched that Undertaker was 6'6.5 and wore 1 inch soles to be 6'7.5 and be promoted as 6'10.

Kane needed to be promoted as 7 feet for 2 reasons. 1 - He needed to be bigger than The Undertaker. 2 - During the time that Kane was debuting, WCW had a "Battle of the Giants" storyline going.. If you guys remember, Kevin Nash was being promoted as being 7'1, while The Giant was 7'4. Vince thought that they needed a "giant" that was at least 7 feet thus the listing for Kane.

Undertaker - 6'6.5 Peak. Kane - Peak: a little over 6'7 (maybe a cm - maybe)
Pablo13 said on 29/Apr/20
Not to mention in that picture i posted with Batista and Taker, Undertaker posture isn't that great, also Batista is bit closer to the camera, i think Undertaker in 2007 was flat 6'7. And i think he lost like 0.75 inches since then not more, but his posture is even worse right now.
Canson said on 29/Apr/20
I'm seeing this one ok.

I've said the same thing in the past about guys like Taker and Hogan, that yes, they might look a certain height, but still manage to eek out a bit more if pushed for a measurement.

@Editor Rob: I agree on both. Hogan can look sub 6’3 and it wouldn’t surprise me if he straightened up and pulled out 6’3.25 range still. However Taker can look 6’5. I doubt he’s that low but I would say that 6’6” flat is probably as high as he would actually measure. That’s if he can reach that high. But I highly doubt he’s going to stand straight enough to still measure 6’6.25” in the afternoon. That’s around where he would have been with Ali Baba years ago maybe 199 or 6’6.5. He’s not taller than Corbin Today I doubt and a guy like Strowman looks taller. He’s needed the 6’6 flat for quite some time now. You even said people you know who have met him don’t think he’s as tall as he’s billed or listed (previously at 6’6.5)
Pablo13 said on 27/Apr/20
Kane99: I think for 99% that Batista used lifts in his boots, and Undertaker is not standing well in that picture. Batista Used lifts for sure, he was close to Orton, looked only 1 cm shorter sometimes back in 2003-2005, and was noticeably Taller than HHH, but when he returned last time, he was like two inches shorter than Orton easily without Wrestling boots. For Taker I think he was 6'7.25 or 6'7.5 Peak, in 2007 he was weak 6'7 or 6'6.75, right now he's bit above 6'6, but his posture is sometimes horrible, he can look shorter.
Click Here
That's real difference between Taker and Batista, and Batista was around 6'3 back then.
Dan Trojan said on 25/Apr/20
Ced your photo of undertaker and adam bomb is a joke it's not even a good camera angle either way undertaker looks taller you need glasses if you think clarke looks taller
Big ed said on 24/Apr/20
Get your sayin taker wore lifts and was 2" shorter than nash suppose Nash wrestled barefoot c'mon. Kevin Nash was legit 6'10 in his day with boots probably 6'11 taker couldn't of been 6'6.5" peak he's around that now a bit less maybe but peak he was in the 6'8 neighborhood
Vegas' said on 24/Apr/20
Yankem and Taker you cannot determine who is taller because you can't see top of heads and camera angle isn't great

As for Unabomb and Taker I personally can't determine who is taller there Click Here

Interesting they used same low behind Taker camera angle there they used at Summerslam 94 to make fake Taker Brian Lee look taller than he was to those watching on TV. You can see how much it helped him Click Here
Battery6565 said on 24/Apr/20
@Editor Rob
How come my comments don't get approved on this page lol?

I only spoke about how Undertaker is probably not able to stand at his full height due to his numerous injuries. You can google it, i'm not making it up. How can anybody expect a 2m+ man with all that weight on his frame and literally more than a dozen injuries including on his shoulders, legs, chest, back, knees etc. to stand straight?

No less than a weak 6'7".
Editor Rob
I'm seeing this one ok.

I've said the same thing in the past about guys like Taker and Hogan, that yes, they might look a certain height, but still manage to eek out a bit more if pushed for a measurement.
Vegas' said on 23/Apr/20
Sid was more than an inch taller than Adams (Crush) in WCW.

At most Adams was 6'5 but he doesn't look it with Wight in WCW or Hogan. If Crush was 6'6 then Hogan was 6'5 1/4 - 6'5 1/2 in 1997 and Rodman then becomes taller than 6'8
Kane99 said on 22/Apr/20
When do you think undertaker start to lose height ?
I start to watch undertaker in tv back 1999 and he looked huge next to triple h, lesnar, the rock ecc.. but after 2006-7 he didn’t looks so tall. I remember this staredown with Batista (2007)
Click Here
For me he looked more 6ft6 3/4 than 6ft7 1/2 and he was 42. Is possible that taker lost height very early respect to other wrestler ?
Editor Rob
Some guys like Undertaker could have started losing in mid 30's quite easily.
Ben Bell said on 22/Apr/20
Brian Lee was between 6’4 and 6’5.
I think peak crush was 6’6.
I spent quite a bit of time around Adam Bomb when he did a uk tour in 96. There was another guy who was with us who was 6’6 and they were eye to eye.
Peak taker I’d say a strong 6’7.
Today in the 6’6 range.
Kane wore ridiculous lifts in his career. The soles of his boots were huge.
Hard to call a height difference between Taker, Sid and Kane all at their peaks. I’d say 6’7 or as good as for them all.
Today Sid has lost the most height, that leg injury obviously makes a huge difference.
I had pics on here with Sid and I last year, taker and I last year and taker and I in 94.
I met both. I’d say 6’6 taker today with Sid being a bit over 6’5.
You could see Sid has lost more height in his posture.
On a related note Sid in person was a great guy. Very chatty and friendly. Really down to earth.
Cockstride said on 21/Apr/20
Was billed at one point as 6-11. Lol.
ced said on 21/Apr/20
@Shaka, definitely not trolling. Take a look at Sunday Night Heat where The Undertaker and Kane faced DOA in a tag match.. DOA - Both stood 6'5.5 -- Undertaker looked only an inch taller than them boys.

Taker was 6'6.5 in 1998.. Kane was 6'7.25 - 6'7.5.

Undertaker was NEVER taller than Kane.. Let me guess, you're referring to a the photo 2 years ago of them at Glenn's Knox County Event.. First - Taker is close to the camera, 2 - He has his hair tied up under a beanie.. You can tell by the shoulders that Kane is taller. He's STILL taller than Taker now and was definitely taller at their peaks..

Look up Taker and Isaac Yankem staredown.. Isaac is clearly taller (no lifts).. Look up Undertaker vs Unabomb - Glenn again is cearly taller..

Taker wore internal lifts.. 6'6.5 + 1 inch lifts = 6'7.5 -- Which explains why he was only 2 inches shorter than Kevin Nash (6'9.5) at WrestleMania 12, but looks about the same height as Brian Clark in their match I posted earlier.
Big ed said on 21/Apr/20
Peak Nash 6'10 taker 6'8 Kane 6'7.5 sid 6'7 crush 6'6 Adam bomb 6'5.75"
Dan Trojan said on 19/Apr/20
Harry sachs i think it's funny that people keep posting that video even though sid is wearing a mask and practically has an afro yeah he looks taller but i honestly don't think he was it's funny how that's the only time he looked taller people talk about undertaker wearing lifts but don't stop to think that maybe just maybe sid was wearing lifts there
Big ed said on 17/Apr/20
Taker was edged out Yankeem Kane. Kane wore huge boots from his debut at least 2". Sid always stretched himself out with taller wrestlers like Nash and Gonzalez he did it to taker too because taker was slightly taller sid was a legit 6'7 taker bout 6'8
Shaka12 said on 16/Apr/20
Ced: Undertaker was still 6'6.5 in 2014 dude, you're trolling or are you serious, putting Taker 6'6.25-6'6.75, and Kane over inch taller at their Peaks?, i dobut that Kane was even taller, not to mention inch difference. Outside the Ring, even two years ago Undertaker looked taller than Kane.
Bruce Prichard claimed that Undertaker may have used lifts, but that's not 100% sure, if he did not always, and other used too(other Big Men, Sid,A-Train and more).
Undertaker Frank said on 16/Apr/20
Ced I know Lee is not Crush I did see a 6ft 3 listing for Lee I believe Crush is no taller than 6ft 5
Kane99 said on 16/Apr/20
Editor rob: From top of his skull to middle of eyes, Undertaker could have 5.2 inches.

I think it is definitely possible to see undertaker no more than 6ft6 flat today judging by this pic
Click Here
But the posture of taker is unknown
Vegas' said on 16/Apr/20
Lee was listed 6'3 back in PWI in 90s. The low camera angle behind Lee makes it look less but that's more than 2 inches Click Here

Lee as fake Undertaker didn't look much taller than Ted Dibiase in previous weeks on Raw and in Heartbreak hotel. It was obvious he was much shorter man than Mark Calaway
Vegas' said on 16/Apr/20
Ced, Wight and Adams Click Here

Click Here
Big ed said on 16/Apr/20
If Lee was billed 6'3 it was a mistake
Harry Sachs said on 15/Apr/20
It is funny how people see what they want to see. Somebody put up this YouTube video with Sid Vicious who is listed at 6'6 or so peak with The Undertaker. Sid is clearly taller than the Undertaker. So how could Mark peak height be 6'7 1/2 when he was shorter than the 6'6 or so Sid Eudy? Click Here
ced said on 15/Apr/20
@Undertaker Frank.. Brian Lee is not Crush.. (He was Crush's henchman in the group DOA - Which had 4 members that were huge - Brian ADAMS was Crush - The leader of the group. He stood at 6'5.25. Skull and 8-Ball (The twins stood at about 6'5.5) and Brian Lee (Chainz) stood at 6'4 - 6'4.25.

Look up Undertaker Vs Fake Undertaker at Summerslam 1994 - When they stand in a staredown - There's about 2 inches to 2 and a quarter between them, meaning Chainz was not under 6'4).

Undertaker - between 6'6.25 and 6'6.75 (With internal lifts - 6'7.5)

Sid - 6'6.75

Kane - could be anywhere between 6'7 and 6'7.75 - when he was Isaac Yankem, he did not wear lifts and was about an inch taller than Taker in their staredown.

Bruce Prichard has claimed that Undertaker wore internal lifts - Thus was the reason in their first staredown (I think in Memphis) Sid was clearly taller. But When in the WWF, Taker had internal lifts and was taller than Sid.

Kevin Nash - Legit 6'9.

I believe Wrath was right there with Undertaker. If he had not, the photos I posted below, Taker would CLEARLY look taller even by a little, but he doesn't.
Kane99 said on 15/Apr/20
Rob,
In you opinion how long is undertaker forehead from the top of the head to the eyes ? Is like 12 cm or so
Editor Rob
From top of his skull to middle of eyes, Undertaker could have 5.2 inches.
NCL said on 15/Apr/20
Crush (Brian Adams) and Brian Lee:

Click Here

Bryan Clark and Brian Adams:

Click Here

Click Here
NCL said on 15/Apr/20
Bryan Clark and Bryan Adams:

Click Here

Click Here
Undertaker Frank said on 14/Apr/20
There was also a 6ft 3 listing for Brian Lee Crush looked alittle taller than Clark
ced said on 14/Apr/20
@Vegas,

here's Crush next to The Giant in WCW.. Does he look 6'4 next to Big Show? I don't think so. Minimum 6'5, about 6'5.25 to be exact.

Click Here
Shaka12 said on 14/Apr/20
Ced: They are Leaning LOL where?, they were standing STRAIGHT, only their legs were little bit apart. you need to put some glasses on, what a stupid comment.
By that Logic Undertaker wasn't standing in perfect position too, look at 5:46 in that Video i posted, his back was hunched over too. You really need to put some glasses dude.
Clark and Adams, both guys were between 6'5-6'6 range, and both probably used lifts.
Big ed said on 14/Apr/20
Fed as you can see I already corrected myself if you Google kronik crush and Clark together I see Adams taller. Taker was taller than both and earthquake seemed taller than Clark tenta was bout 6'6 the shortest peak I could give taker is 6'7 but I believe 6'8 I think he edged out sid and Kane so id say Clark was 6'5.5" taker 6'8 sid 6'7 Kane 6'7.5
Vegas' said on 13/Apr/20
Powerslam the old UK non kayfabe mag had Clarke as 6'5 back in mid 90s. They said Crush was 6'4.

6'4 flat for Crush probably a little too short otherwise Hogan was 6'3 range in mid 90s as Crush was taller face to face
ced said on 12/Apr/20
@Big Ed,

Brian Lee was the fake Taker, also known as Chainz. Lee was about 6'4-6'4.25.

@shaka12, this is your proof? Both Kronik members are leaning in to give Taker a chokeslam while Taker is in a stretched position..

When Crush and Taker faced off in 1994-95, Taker had about an inch on Crush. And in all Kronik photos, Brian Clark (6'6.25) has about an inch on Brian Adams (6'5.25)
MikeV10 said on 12/Apr/20
Ced , you can not realy judge height in this pictures.

Click Here
0:44 , 1:24

Sid is clearly taller than clark , and taker was about the same height as sid.

Clarke was about 6'5 -6'5,5, maybe close to 6'7 in wrestling boots.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 12/Apr/20
Peak undertaker 6ft8 203.2cm current 6ft7 200.7cm.
Big ed said on 12/Apr/20
Sorry was Brian Lee different wrestler Clark was with crush taker was taller either way
Big ed said on 12/Apr/20
Ced Adam bomb was the fake undertaker the real undertaker was clearly taller clark was around 6'5 or 6" billed 6'8 taker was 6'8 billed 6'10.5"
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 12/Apr/20
@houss
I'd say Strowman in 2020, although in their encounter in 2015, Taker looked no shorter.
Vegas' said on 11/Apr/20
Ced, Clarke was shorter next to Nash @2 minutes 40 seconds Click Here

Than what Nash was with a significant camera angle advantage right at start of this clip Click Here
Shaka12 said on 11/Apr/20
Ced: Dude you need to stop posting here and embarass yourself.
Click Here 5:47
Undertaker both with Clark and Adams easily two inches taller than them.
Both guys were probably bit over 6'5 at their peaks.
ced said on 10/Apr/20
The Undertaker was not taller than Sid (Unless he was wearing lifts) - Here he is with Wrath/Adam Bomb.

Taker is the same height as Brian Clark (Wrath):

Click Here

Click Here

-- Actually, in both images, Adam Bomb appears even taller than Taker.
Onepunchbob said on 9/Apr/20
Current - 6.5 and abit. Bout same height as Luke Gallows and a bit taller than McIntyre. Peak just over 6.7
Big ed said on 6/Apr/20
Ye undertakerfrank not far off sid 6'7 godfather 6'4 bulldog 5'10
UndertakerFrank said on 4/Apr/20
I seen Sid in the early 90's in street clothes he walked right by me and he appeared 6ft 5 to 6ft 6 i was surprised i thought he would have been taller !!! Also on the same day outside Madison Squared Garden i seen The Godfather he looked about 6ft 3ish too me also Davie Boy Smith looked about 5ft9 he was shorter than me for sure im 5ft 11.5 I believe these guys wear lifts in their Boots in the Ring
Canson said on 1/Apr/20
@Roderick: 62B also said that he was 6’7” in his prime when he met him
Big ed said on 1/Apr/20
Sid was a legit 6'7 so taker was taller
houss said on 31/Mar/20
Rob I'm wondering who's taller taker or stroman
Editor Rob
They can be very similar these days
Roderick said on 31/Mar/20
@treefroggy Yeah, that sounds about right. I've said Undertaker was 6'7" peak for awhile now. If he was 6'7.5" then that guy would have probably told you 6'8".

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.