How tall is Kane - Page 2

Add a Comment5940 comments

Average Guess (312 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.94in (203cm)
Current: 6ft 7.13in (201cm)
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 9/Aug/18
@Christian 6'5 3/8" But then look at the pictures Vegas attached. Compare the pics between the two with Ric Flair and there's no way he's 6'5. As for Rand Paul there's a chance he may not be 5'6 either so I guess everything has to be taken into consideration.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Aug/18
@BURN

Kane was hunching down a bit but the difference still doesn't look more than 11"-11.5" Click Here Kane looks about 6'5.5" if we assume Rand Paul's 5'6.25" as listed, so Sotiris isn't wrong. This furthers my suspicions whether or not he wore lifts in the ring, since he looked taller than a 6'6"-6'7" Strowman.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 9/Aug/18
@Sotiris Gravas In the pic I've seen of the two Kane is hunching over and not standing at his tallest (he generally doesn't have the best posture now anyway). When you're that much taller than somebody it's natural to hunch over and stand poorly. Standing at his tallest he wouldn't measure that low.
Vegas' said on 9/Aug/18
July 17 with Flair Click Here
Jan 14, Flair with 6'4.75 barefoot measured Ben Roethlisberger Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 8/Aug/18
Yeah, NO WAY is he even more than 6-foot-5 now. Let me guess... NO ONE believes me. Check out the online pic of Kane (aka Glenn Thomas Jacobs) next to 5-foot-6 (MAX!) Rand Paul (who likes hand-delivering secret letters to Putin at the behest of Trump; yeah, that guy.) Overlook the belief that I might be some kind of "troll" and Google this pic. No way in hell this guy was ever 6-foot-7.5 peak height. Laughable!
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 6/Aug/18
@Christian 6'5 3/8" I don't know when that quote is from but if it's from when he was at his peak height then that's honest. He said 'about 6'8' hinting he's around the mark which tbf is pretty much honest keeping in mind he'd probably measure 6'8 early in the day so it's just rounded. Also we don't know for certain he wasn't the full 6'8 peak either.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/Aug/18
@viper

Yeah, 6'8" isn't the most honest claim but at least Kane didn't inflate it to the degree like Undertaker did when he claimed 6'10".
Poemyboy said on 5/Aug/18
Was watching a older video of WWE Table for Three. Big Show stated that Kane is 6'7".
MSJC said on 5/Aug/18
Mayor Kane, just elected mayor of Knox County.
viper said on 3/Aug/18
Kane is honest for a wrestler. States his shoe height
dewie 5ft9 1/2 177cm said on 1/Aug/18
Sid 6ft7 200.7cm taker 6ft8 203.2cm kane 6ft8 1/2 204.4cm peak barefoot.
berta said on 28/Jul/18
i think he edged the undertaker at peak. at 202-203
cade said on 26/Jul/18
Ced theres no way sid was 6'6, he's 6'7 max for peak
ced said on 23/Jul/18
Rob, I think there's enough evidence that supports that Kane was 6'8.25 at his peak.. If Sid was 6'6.75 as you state, in the battle royal I posted, Kane looks way more than 1 inch taller when they walk by each other.. And Kane with no lifts as Isaac Yankem was taller than Taker by .5-.75 of an inch. Why no upgrade for his peak height?
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 23/Jul/18
@Xpac99 Yeah 1/2 inch height loss does seem very little for Kane considering his age and the career he's had. It's highly possible he was 6'8 peak and 6'7 today so he could have lost an inch which makes sense. Either that or he's below 6'7 today which I can't see being the case. At the end of the day we're all estimating including Rob so the numbers can be slightly off.
Xpac99 said on 21/Jul/18
@BURN IT DOWWWWWN!
I agree with you... i don’t understand beacuse rob billed peak height at 6ft 7 1/2 and today bill kane 6 ft 7. It’s obviously over 50 years old the people lost over 1/2 inch (1,2 cm) especially who does fight sports . In my opinion kane peak 6ft 8 sound right
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 19/Jul/18
@Xpac99 Yeah Kane is definitely a bit taller as evident quite a few times. However I'm pretty sure Strowman wore thicker boots when he was in the Wyatt family, as opposed to now with the brown boots which seem to be a bit flatter. I think they're making Braun stand more upright in that image and Kane a bit looser to make Braun look taller (they've done it before with Kane and imposter Kane aka Luke Gallows). Also keep in mind Braun was bigger then compared to 2016 as he lost weight and looked leaner so that could explain what you mean.
Xpac99 said on 19/Jul/18
@BURN IT DOWWWWWN!
Kane is taller than strowman, only in this segment seems no taller . The boots are the same that strowman uses in another staredown and kane looks taller in everyone... in my opinion in that segment the camera angle looks strowman taller because the face of strowman looks extra size compared to that of kane but in reality and in every staredown the size of the face is similar...because of this strowman looks taller
cade said on 18/Jul/18
Your right ced
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 18/Jul/18
@Xpac99 I'm pretty sure Strowman had thicker boots back then either that or they made him stand better. If they had a staredown now Strowman wouldn't look taller like in that image (he actually looked shorter not long ago).
ced said on 18/Jul/18
Guys, how can Kane be 6'7.25 or 6'7.5 peak if there is living proof that he was taller than Sid by 1.5 inches? Let's just say Sid was 6'6.75 peak as I believe this site states, add another 1.5 inches to that and you have a peak Kane of 6'8.25
Canson said on 15/Jul/18
6’6’75 today 6’7.25 peak to 6’7.5
tree said on 12/Jul/18
With 6ft4 DDP,Kanes boots give bit more height,so i say he looks 6ft7.5 with him Click Here
Xpac99 said on 11/Jul/18
Rob i have a question... kane is taller than braun in every staredown, but in 2015 when kane and braun met for the first time, braun looks taller only in this segment... this is the real pic:
Click Here
In your opinion at this particolar moment braun looks taller ? but i don’t think because in another staredown at the same period kane looks taller with the same footware or the camera involved and looks strowman taller... because kane has his shoulders higher in this pic but the face of braun seems over size compared to that of kane...
Editor Rob
In that staredown again they looked quite close, sometimes one can look to have an edge, but it can be hard to tell exactly - the wrestling ring itself might not be uniformly flat.
Philip McMullin said on 11/Jul/18
Rob, during his latest stint of Team Hell No, Kane looks every bit of 6ft8 MAYBE even more! He looks a foot or more taller than a genuine 5ft8 inch Daniel Bryan!
niceguy82 said on 10/Jul/18
A good comparison is kane with triple h in 2002 (without extra footwear)Click Here Look at 2:23 and onwards, and triple h with kevin nash here Click Here at 4:30 and 7:58 and onwards, You can clearly see how much taller nash has always been, and never ever used big boots. You can google other staredowns with kane and hhh, and Nash and hhh also for good measure.
Xpac99 said on 9/Jul/18
Click Here
6ft 8 rob ???
Editor Rob
At that moment he seems not far off it.
ced said on 5/Jul/18
Kane looked 3 inches taller than 6’5.25 Rick Bogner as fake Diesel
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 5/Jul/18
Celeb true height said taker 6ft7.5 201.9cm kane 6ft8 203.2cm barefoot.
demon said on 3/Jul/18
why do you keep thinking that kane and taker were the same height ???
In equal footwear kane was taller and in monster boots kane was about 2 inches taller, but the difference of footwear wasn’t 2 inches... maybe 1 / 1-1/4 inch
Click Here
Slim999 said on 1/Jul/18
Click Here Looks taller than Nathan Jones did here again with taker
Slim999 said on 30/Jun/18
Gonna tell me kane was shorter than Nash? Kane always looked taller than Nash did with Big Show Click Here
cade said on 29/Jun/18
Ced sid was 6'7, kane must of been 6'8'5 if sids 6'7
shuvayu chakraborty said on 27/Jun/18
All doubts laid to rest ... Kane returns yesterday at SD Live and attacks bludegon brothers ...clearly 2 inches taller than rowan .... I dont think he is below 6.7.5 today ...if you consider rowan and strorman to be 6.6+
ced said on 26/Jun/18
@Phillip, actually he does.. now that i took a look at it again, Kane looks about 1.5 inches taller than Sid.. if Sid at that time was 6’6.75, that would have made Kane 6’8.25 (at that time).. i think when Kane put on the muscle he might’ve went down to 6’7.75-6’8..
DFens said on 25/Jun/18
Ced, they come face to face at 9:00.
Philip McMullin said on 24/Jun/18
Ced Kane looks more than 1 inch taller than did there
cade said on 22/Jun/18
Ced no way kane was 6'10 in his munster boots. He could walk if he had 4 inches lifts. He was 6'9 max in his munster boots.
MAD SAM said on 22/Jun/18
Probably peaked at 204 cm, right now he’s 201 cm ; dealing with people 2 metre + tall seems odd lol
Slim25 said on 22/Jun/18
Observe when kane stands straight as at 3:42 with LEGIT 6’4 DDP. Kane TOWERS DDP. Click Here
ced said on 22/Jun/18
Here's an interesting find.. Kane and Sid in the same match.. Pause at 5:34, Kane is taller than Sid by 1 inch..

Click Here
ced said on 19/Jun/18
@Jock, I agree maybe it's not the best comparison.. If you look at some of the episodes of Nitro, I don't know if it was the fact that maybe Big Show was at his real peak there, and therefor Nash looked 3 inches under, and when he got to the WWF in 99, his staredowns with Kane - he had about 2 inches on Kane.. Let's just say Kane was 6'8 in 99, with lifts on, he's 6'10. Nash was 6'9 so maybe that explains it..
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 16/Jun/18
Celeb true height said hogen 6ft4.5 sid 6ft6 undertaker 6ft7.5 kane 6ft8 kevin nash 6ft9 nathan jones 6ft9 andre the giant 6ft10 big show 7ft0. True barefoot height.
jock said on 14/Jun/18
@ced Nash is leaning forward so not giving a true comparison, its not really a good example to make a judgement,

Nash was a huge man, i am certain he has lost an inch over time, but i stand by what i think that Glen Jacobs was at least 1 inch shorter,

Big show would be the man to ask, he has had a stare down with both,
ced said on 13/Jun/18
@Jock, here is the link.. top of Goldberg's head comes up to Nash's eye line..

Click Here
jock said on 13/Jun/18
Just checked out a Goldberg/Nash video and Goldeberg comes nowhere near Nashs eyeline,

even if Kanes height is accepted as 6-8 its still at least an inch short of a peak Nash,
Slim25 said on 12/Jun/18
I agree @ced Nash just looked taller with his particular build and the way his body looked.
ced said on 11/Jun/18
Guys, take a look at Kane Vs Goldberg from WWE, then take a look at Nash Vs Goldberg in WCW.. The more I look at both matches, the more I'm convinced that Nash wasn't as tall as he's perceived to be. In the Kane match, the top of Goldberg's head comes up to Kane's mouth. In the Nash match, the top of Goldberg's head comes up to Nash's eye line.
Slim25 said on 8/Jun/18
It’s been on record that Bruce Prichard said taker wore lifts. That explains why he was dead even with sid once he was undertaker. In way younger years, sid was at least 1” taller in that stare down. Taker had internal lifts just like most wrestlers (Orton) (hhh) so when mentioning Kane’s “Munster Boot Lifts” as Mr McMahon would say, don’t forget taker had lifts too.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 7/Jun/18
@ced

I agree that both Kane and Undertaker were taller than Sid, but Sid wasn't as tall as 6'7.5" More like 6'6.5" like how he's listed here. I can see Kane at 6'7.25" and Undertaker 6'7" at their peaks.
ced said on 6/Jun/18
@Moheez, I'm not sure about 0.5 inches.. The weird thing with Sid and Taker was that at times, Sid appeared taller in their younger years, at other times Taker appeared taller in the WWF. If there was ANY difference between Sid and Taker, it could only be about 1/4 of an inch. Between Kane and Taker, in the SMW days, Kane was taller than Taker in their staredown by 1/2 an inch. Same thing when he was Yankem.

I could be wrong, but Kane (in his lifts) has always given me an impression that he is as tall as Nash in them. I always go to WrestleMania 12 when Taker faced Diesel. Diesel had him by about 1.5 inches. Then go to WrestleMania 14, Kane had Taker by at least 2 inches. Maybe even 2.5. (Granted - in his lifts).

That would explain why Kane stacked closer to Big Show's height than Nash did in staredowns. Big Show in his prime was 6'11. In his boots - 7 ft. Nash was 6'9, and maybe in his boots 6'9.25. If Kane was 6'8, with his 2 inch lifts he was 6'10.
jock said on 5/Jun/18
for what its worth hears my view of peak heights,

Sid 6-7
Undertaker 6-7 1/2
Kane 6-7 3/4
Nash 6-9 1/2
Kurgan 6-10

all giants in their own way,
Slim25 said on 5/Jun/18
Click Here Nobody ever stacked up this tall like kane did against big show like he did here too. Big show was in a prime stage still too.
Moheez said on 5/Jun/18
@ced would you say sid was 0.5 inch shorter then undertaker?
Omid said on 5/Jun/18
@Paddy, I don’t know for sure wether they are all as tall as we think they are or that you are right in your estimations about all of them being slightly shorter than we think....however I can see your point and I can accept that to be a reality as you present a realistic case by taking into account these wrestlers apparent differences.
ced said on 2/Jun/18
@Christian, do you agree that Undertaker was taller than Sid? By about .25 inches. Not much. Kane (as Yankem on several staredowns is taller than Taker by .5 inches).

Now take a look at Sid Vs Kevin Nash from WCW. Nash had about an an 1.5 inches on Sid meaning Nash could only have .75 inches on Kane.

Sid- 6’7.5
Undertaker- 6’7.75
Kane- 6’8-6’8.25
Nash-6’9
Paddy said on 2/Jun/18
I am going to be frank with you all. Glenn is 6'7" on the dot. Undertaker is 6'6" on the dot, Kevin Nash is 6'8" on the dot and Big Show is 6'10" on the dot. Is it really that hard to work those numbers out? All these men are literally giants.
Omid said on 31/May/18
@Christian, no one claimed Kane was as big as or even nearly as big as Bigshow, I even don’t claim that he is as tall as say Kevin Nash either but I know one thing almost for sure, if Big Show was 7’0 peak, Kane cannot be shorter than 6’8, and given that Kane’s boots, even his big ones had fairly big obvious platforms on them, it would be unlikely that he had even more in his shoes as you just can’t wrestle properly in heels that big let alone jump of the top rope which is what Kane used to do a lot in his prime.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 30/May/18
@jock

I agree, I don't get why some think otherwise.
Slim25 said on 30/May/18
@christian explain why kane has always looked close to big shows height (both wore lifts especially big show) Click Here here kane is in dress shoes and show is in ring gear. Also don’t ignore my previous list of kane and show in the ring.
jock said on 29/May/18
A peak Glen Jacobs would neither be taller or even the same height as a peak Kev Nash,
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 28/May/18
@Omid

That doesn't prove that Kane wasn't wearing lifts though. Lifts are usually difficult to spot, especially anything less than about 1.5" types. All I know is that Kane is and was nowhere near Big Show's height.
Slim25 said on 28/May/18
I agree Ced
Omid said on 27/May/18
Ample evidence has been provided to prove that for the most part Kane’s boots have been practically identical to other big men (since around 2000), in particular the Bigshow.
Slim25 said on 27/May/18
Click Here Here, a prime big show comes out in shoes with no lift, and we briefly see kane with his MAX 2” lift boots, is the same height if not taller than Show. Kane wasn’t standing straight at all while Show was in the ring.
ced said on 26/May/18
You’ve seen Kane with other wrestlers who were 6’6 range.

Test (6’6) - thought he was only 6’5, but had to have been more as I am 6’4 and i’ve met Test while he was still alive. Definitely 6’6.

Albert - Prime: 6’6.5. Kane had at least 3 inches on him in matches.

Harris Brothers: Each 6’7. Legit 6’7 for both men. Numerous times they were in the ring with Kane and he covered them by 2.75-3 inches. (Kane being 6’8 + 2 inch lifts).

Take a look at staredowns between Undertaker and Diesel at WM12, then take a look at WM14 with Undertaker and Kane. Kane was the same height as Nash in his boots. Without the boots, Nash maybe had 1 inch on Kane.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 26/May/18
@Omid

Gallows wore boots too but they didn't have an odd shape like Kane's. And Kane's a known lift wearer, he's been wearing them since the 90's. I think he stopped in recent years though.
And I already said that I don't think Big Show was ever 7'0". More like 6'11"-6'11.5" peak and today 6'10.25" at most, maybe 6'10" flat (looked easily 2" shorter than Shaq)
Omid said on 25/May/18
And we’re back At the Kane’s lifts argument again, Gallows wears boots too.

So everybody in WWE is an inch shorter according to you right? You cannot have a 7’0 feet Bigshow and an under 6’8 Kane as at his best he had 4 on Kane.
If Kane is not 6’8 then Show’s not 7’0 and if Show was under 7’0, everyone from Kevin Nash to Jericho would be shorter.
Slim25 said on 24/May/18
Uhhhh Gallows had huge boots on.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 22/May/18
@Omid

Just because Shaq measured 7'0.88" doesn't mean he's that tall at his low. Most basketball players are measured early in the day, and Shaq doesn't look as tall as 7'1" when standing next to people. He looks 7'0.25" at best like how Rob lists him.

@ced

While Kane did look 3 inches taller than Gallows, you can tell that Kane was wearing lifts as his boots looked very thick and clunky. Click Here He's not 6'8" barefoot.
ced said on 21/May/18
The mere fact that Kane was hunching down and Gallows who is 6'5 (6'6 in boots) looked 3 inches under Kane there (while Kane was hunching to try and make Gallows taller) proves that Kane was almost 6'10 in his monster boots. Without them - 6'8
Omid said on 19/May/18
Dude no one says 7’0.88....they just say 7’1.

I suppose if people were to be THAT accurate and borderline OCD you wouldn’t have so many people claiming 5’9 or 6’0 or etc which would be silly if you ask me.

It takes quite a lot of effort for some to say hey I’m 7’0.88 instead of just saying 7’1.....after all the difference between 1 inch and 0.88 of an inch is 2 millimeters.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 18/May/18
@ced

Kane being the fake Diesel doesn't prove he's the same height as Nash. Luke Gallows was impersonating Kane at one point and he's only about 6'5" range. (about 9 inches taller than 5'8" AJ Styles) Click Here The imposter doesn't have to be around the same height as the guy he's impersonating.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 17/May/18
@Omid

Shaq's not 7'1", as he was measured 7'0.63" during the draft and it was likely an early measurement at that. Click Here Also according to DraftExpress, he was measured 7'0" without shoes in 1992.
Omid said on 16/May/18
@Christian

I believe Nash is the taller man, I never argued Kane looked taller in front of Bigshow than Nash did so there’s that.

As for peak Bigshow, Given his several encounters with Shaq during the years (who’s 7’1) by the way, I believe his 7’0 foot billing...if he only looked maybe 2 inches shorter than Shaq in 2008, 2009, he definitely would have been a 7 footer a decade before.

I can’t find the 6’7 billing anywhere...this is literally the only place that I’ve even heard it.

@Slim, 6’7 is huge, most folks tend to be surprised how big these wrestlers are when they actually get to see them from a close proximity.
ced said on 16/May/18
@Christian -

Kane was never billed as 6'7 as Yankem.. He was billed as 6'9 as Yankem. Watch Isaac Yankem Vs Undertaker, when Yankem is outside of the ring, they're billing him as 6'9, then he gets in the ring, and dwarfs the Undertaker in a staredown, and you could tell that Vince (on commentary) and the other announcers were surprised that he was actually taller than Taker.

Unfortunately, there is no pic with Nash and Kane side by side, there was only 2 matches that they had together, one as Yankem Vs Diesel, and the other was a 6 man tag (Hogan, Kane, Rock) Vs The Outsiders and X-Pac, but unfortunately they never have a staredown in the 6 man match. The closest they get is Kane gIving the boot to Nash.

After all, Kane WAS the fake Diesel.. I don't think Vince would have put him in that role if him and Nash weren't identical in size, especially since WCW had Nash, and the new Diesel needed to be just as impressive.
Lyle1 said on 16/May/18
Listen to the table for 3 'Giants' with Mark Henry, Big Show and Kane, Henry refers to kane as being 6'7 or 6'10.

I think Henry kinda F'ed up by saying 6'7 then quickly added the 6'10. So I still believe nothing less than 6'7 today
bam said on 15/May/18
Click Here this would make him maybe same height as kane. his standing next to the undertaker
Slim said on 15/May/18
@Martin 6’2” post the vid. Kane said he was “6’8 6’9” legit with long hair down my back”
Omid said on 15/May/18
You cannot argue a 7 feet show and a 6’6 Kane Martin....again at no point in either man’s career has there been more than 4 inches of difference between them, if peak Kane would’ve been 6’6, Peak show would’ve been 6’10 not 7’0.

This is Show in front of Show at 2009.

Click Here

Shaq is 7’1 and at that point Show would have been 6’11, can you honestly observe more than 3 cms or 1.25 inches between them? And I’m not convinced Show I standing as tall as he could.

This is peak Bigshow in front of peak Kane (who’s wearing equal footwear to show at that point).

Click Here

In 09 Show looked no more than 3 cms shorter than Shaq who’s 216cm, factoring in his bigger boots that would be roughly 4 cms shorter...making him at least 212cms or 6’11.5 at 09.

At 01, Show would’ve been a 7 footer...there hasn’t, isn’t and never will be more than 4 inches of difference between Show and Kane 7’0 - 0’4 = 6’8.
MIR said on 15/May/18
Kane was much more than 5 inches taller than the Rock in 2002, it was close to 7 inches and again, It's not like the Rock was barefoot. Click Here
I'm confident Kane hit 6'8 at his tallest and and now would be 6'7 or slightly under like 6'6.75
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 14/May/18
@Omid

Just because Kane may have looked taller next to Show than Nash did, doesn't automatically mean Kane's taller than Nash. Remember, Rob met Nash in 2013 and estimated him at 6'9". He's hunching down in the pic but if stood straight he looks about 6'8.5" so that's the lowest I'd put him. And now look at Kane who claimed he's 6'8" and was billed 6'7" when he was known as Yankem. Btw, I don't think Show was ever a legit 7'0".

@Slim

I can't find a pic of Kane and Nash standing together unfortunately, but common sense should tell you that Nash is taller just by him meeting Rob and looking 6'8.5" in the pic and that Kane himself claimed 6'8" and was billed 6'7" when he was known as Yankem, and WWE isn't gonna underbill a wrestler.
Slim said on 14/May/18
I agree @Omid. On another note. IF Kane is 6’7 now. People must not realize just how huge 6 foot and 7 inches is.
Vegas said on 14/May/18
Nash was noticeably taller than Rodman in WCW like towards the end of this clip Click Here
Martin 6'2 said on 13/May/18
I was watching a clip from the Attitude era earlier, it was Kane, and The Rock w/ Mr McMahon and Shane.
Rock in his smart shoes that gave him half an inch, and Kane in his 2' boots at the time.
The Rock was standing at about 6'3" and I hate to admit this being a huge Kane fan, but Kane was clearly about 5' taller, putting him at 6'8" in those boots, and 6'6" barefoot.
So I think when Kane said he was 6'8" he was telling a half truth, he was talking about in his original boots.
Slim said on 12/May/18
Prove to me in photo evidence where Nash is much taller than Kane. Idc if he LOOKED taller, still doesn’t eliminate the fact that kane always looked taller than Nash did when staring down big show.
Omid said on 12/May/18
@Christian

At no point in either man’s career has been more than 4 inches of difference between them, If peak Show was 7’0....Kane could not have been less than 6’8.

As for today, Show has seemingly lost quite a bit more than Kane in height, their difference today is more in the realms of 3.5 than 4 and a 6’10.5 Bigshow today means Kane cannot be any lower than 6’7 today...with a fraction as margin of error.

Now if you wanna downgrade peak show, pull everyone else down with him too.
Slim said on 11/May/18
You’re implying kane typically exaggerated his height? Wrong. He never has or did. Nash has let ppl bill him to 7’1”. While he was the same height as ADMITTED 6’7 Tyler mane and Dennis Rodman. Try again.
james garcia said on 11/May/18
the undertaker is 6'7'' and kane is 6'8'' like baron corbin and braun strowman
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 11/May/18
@Ced

Kane admitted to being 6'8" (which is still high). He's just not as tall as Nash, no matter how you want to put it.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 10/May/18
@Slim

First off, JBL was never 6'6". He was about 6'5" peak and 6'4.5" today. As for Nash and Kane, Nash was easily 6'9" peak, while Kane admitted to being 6'8". If a wrestler (who typically exaggerates their height) claims to be 6'8", then more than likely he's not going to be any taller than that.
Ced said on 10/May/18
Take a look below. Here is a staredown with Big Show and Kane. Here is another with Big Show and Nash.

Click Here

Here is Kane and Show (with Kane looking close to Show's height than Nash)

Click Here
Ced said on 10/May/18
I wasn't talking about Kane where he wore lifts.. There's a backstage segment with Goldust, Booker T, and Kane in 2003 (no big lifts), and Goldust was wearing a plastic Kane Mask when Kane pulled it off. Take a look at that segment then taken a look at a backstage segment with Nash and Goldust the year before. Nash comes across as taller because Kane has a tiny head for his size, but they were pretty much the same.
Slim said on 9/May/18
Um no @Christian. That segament with show Nash and Goldust, that same night/year Kane was half masked and had flats on. He’s the same height as Nash if not taller. The backstage segment between Kane Goldust booker t and jbl, kane towered everyone including 6’6 jbl. Kane was half masked and had his flats on. 2003
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 9/May/18
@Caden

That's because Kane wore massive lifts back in the day. Barefoot he's nowhere near as tall as Nash.
Slim said on 8/May/18
Agreed @Caden. I think Nash just looks like he’s taller. They’ve wrestled each other before under different gimmicks and couldn’t tell a difference between them. Nash had his huge main up top too. I’ve seen people across the room that I thought were a good bit taller than me only to get up close and I end up being taller actually.
Caden said on 7/May/18
For everyone that says that Kane and Nash weren’t the same height, there is a backstage segment in which Goldust appears with Big Show and Nash, and Goldust goes face to face, Nash had the same exact height advantage over Goldust that Kane did.
mrtguy said on 6/May/18
Rob, Kane has a really tiny head for his height it looks 2 inches shorter than Big Show's and that's being a bit generous
Editor Rob
I'd never have thought it was that much smaller...
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 5/May/18
@Omid

I don't agree with you that Kane was ever 6'8", let alone today. And Big Show's not 7'0" today, more like 6'10" or at best 6'10.25"
Martin 6'2 said on 5/May/18
Click Here both wearing thick soles here, and why not, I do the same and can manage 6'3" lol
Omid said on 3/May/18
Look at the boots for comparision.

Click Here

Click Here

Kane’s boots are nothing special in anyway, at least haven’t been since 2000, between him and Big Show for example you only see 4 inches of difference at absolute best, and most people here agree that their difference is more like 3.5 than 4 anyway.

7 foot Bigshow = 6’8 Kane...andthat’s worst case scenario for Kane.
Slim said on 2/May/18
Click Here Show in ring boots. Kane in dress shoes. Yet another piece of evidence showing Kane was taller than anyone else against show. He’s not even in his prime anymore either.
Martin 6'2 said on 2/May/18
Slim, really? I didn't know that, so if Randy is 6'4" bare foot, are you saying he's like 6'5.5" in the ring?
Omid, you're absolutely right, I didn't really think about that at the time, and I know Kane doesn't wear those boots anymore, but to me they still look a good 1.5, today. Very tricky to tell.
Bare in mind the match I saw was going back to about 2003, so don't know if Randy wore lifts then.
I do love this debate though lol
Slim said on 1/May/18
Martin 6’2 Randy Orton is 6’4 barefoot. He is a huge internal lift wearer. Look close at his boots. I’ve seen him twist his ankle in several matches.
MIR said on 30/Apr/18
If Kane's boots gave him 2 inches, that would mean he has a 1 inch advantage, not 2 because the others are wearing wrestling boots too. Some people act like all other wrestlers other then Kane wrestle barefoot? The average wrestling boots give u an inch
Omid said on 30/Apr/18
@Martin there are two major issues with you conclusion:

A)we all here know that Kane hasn’t worn those monster boots ever since early 2000, since then he has been wearning practically the same type of footwear as other bigmen like Big show which is 1.5 at best.
B)You assume everybody else wrestles barefeet and you compare them with a 98 boot Kane, Randy Orton wears boots too.
Philip McMullin said on 30/Apr/18
@Slim wonder if it's time Rob Banned HeightCrazy's IP Address so he cant make anymore bogus comments on here?
Martin 6'2 said on 29/Apr/18
I've just watched a match between Kane and Randy Orton, and assuming Orton is about 6'4" Kane had about 4' on him, making Kane 6'8" in his boots, making him 6'6" bare foot.
Every peice of evidence I look at, I end up back at the same answer, 6'6" bare foot, 6'8" in boots.
Philip McMullin said on 29/Apr/18
@HeightcrazyRed6ft you really have no idea! I just think you love downgrading Kane, Rob, ban Heightred's IP Address
Slim said on 29/Apr/18
Ummmmm the photo of kane show and shaq has kane further away from the camera than both men! I’ve seen the entire match. Another poor attempt to downgrade kane.
Slim said on 29/Apr/18
What people need to understand about kanes boots is they were basically cowboy boot sized heels. They look so big bc they are “wedge” style with no gap after the heel. Some work boots have that style. As for the Vince Vaughn photo, in Vinces original post, he said he was on his tip toes. It looks like it bc look at his shoulders and expression. I have seen quite a few times where kane had to duck under doorways slightly out of ring gear and in normal shoes. So no he’s not under 6’6.5.
Ced said on 29/Apr/18
@ Heightcrazy, while I agree that today Kane is barely about 6'7, I can't agree with you on his height in his prime. Look at the backstage video of him with Hogan and Rock, Hogan at that time was about 6'4.5, Kane had him by about 5 inches. If Hogan in his boots was 6'5, Kane in his monster boots had to be about 6'10. Meaning without them, he was 6'8.
A Man said on 29/Apr/18
@ Ced, Kane would be in ring boots in that pic with Shaq so therefore it's completely inadmissible, as are all pictures of any wrestlers in ring gear because the boots inflate their heights to such a ridiculous degree.
Martin 6'2 said on 28/Apr/18
Click Here I'm hoping this pic will come out okay on here, it's a pause frame of Kane's wrestling boot, must be a good 2' and assuming the Rock is about 6'2"/6'3" seeing Kane stand next to him, Kane had about 5' on him, so I think when Kane said he was 6'8" he was talking about with his boots on, without he must be 6'6" judging by a pic I've seen of him with the 6'5" Vince Vaughn.
Philip McMullin said on 28/Apr/18
@HeightcrazyRed6ft you love downgrading Kane as low as possible dont you!!! I dont think you can accept that Kane is still potentially 6ft8! Show aint under 6'10, taker is is probably still 6ft7, but kane is deffo OVER 6ft7
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 28/Apr/18
Ced said on 26/Apr/18
Here is another rare Kane - Shaq photo.. If Shaq is 7'1, (plus Kane is almost bending in the photo) Kane looks like a strong 6'8 here.

Click Here

***************************************************************************************

Another wrestler closer to the camera low angle useless to heightestimation pic...

Click Here here´s Kane with Shaq with a higher camera level, means Kane has a little heightadvantage and bootadvantage and visualheight hair advantage....
He comes up to Shaqs nosetip in ring gear so easy 5.5"-6".

Shaq is max 7´0.25"barefoot there, means Big Show is max 6´10.125" minus footwearadvantage and Kane max 6´6.75" minus footwear and camera advantage...
samson said on 27/Apr/18
Heres undertaker and kane backstage with kevin kelly. Kane looked taller by 5cm heres the link Click Here
Ced said on 26/Apr/18
Here is another rare Kane - Shaq photo.. If Shaq is 7'1, (plus Kane is almost bending in the photo) Kane looks like a strong 6'8 here.

Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 26/Apr/18
Kane peak was 6´7.5" at best. Taker too

Today Kane is max 6´6.75", Big Show today 6´9.5"
D.C 6'2 said on 26/Apr/18
I'm saying 6'11
Slim said on 25/Apr/18
I agree @Ced. That same year Nash stood face to face with show and looked 2” shorter than Kane.
Philip McMullin said on 25/Apr/18
@Ced if kane's head was as long as shows, he would be the SAME height as big show, their shoulders and necks are dead level!
Aaron 6'2" said on 25/Apr/18
Kane is 6’8” Mick Foley said in a recent interview that Kane is 6’9”

Click Here
Ced said on 24/Apr/18
Tyson Tomko was a legit 6'6. (Surprised he wasn't promoted as being 6'8). But, I don't know how to put pictures on here, but if you guys can find a video of the staredown between Kane and Big Show at the 2002 Royal Rumble, you can see how Kane stood up to Big Show and Show had only 2 inches.

I'll try this link:

Click Here
Martin 6'2 said on 24/Apr/18
Thanks Slim, I'm gonna look that up now. I know that stretching for a good posture can add on at least 0.5inch, every little helps, so yeah makes sense why Kane did that.
Slim said on 23/Apr/18
@Lyle1 booker T was on commentary on a smack down match I think. It was when kane was unmasked and bald. It was years ago but I distinctly remember T say “SIX FOOT EIGHT!”
Slim said on 23/Apr/18
Great find! @samson. Kane’s not that far off from show.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 23/Apr/18
Taker said he is about 6ft8 1/2 kane said he is about 6ft8 barefoot taker is taller 0.5
Slim said on 22/Apr/18
Click Here Kane looks a strong 3” over 6’6 Tomko
Slim said on 22/Apr/18
@martin6’2 kane said on E&C podcast that he would lay flat on his back before matches, to stretch. He didn’t say why, but I assume it was to help stretch him out. Packing on all of that muscle he had I’m sure weighed him down. He was HUGE up top.
Omid said on 21/Apr/18
Bruce Prichard when asked about Kane’s lifts:

“They both had lifts....I think Glenn was bigger.”

Click Here
Lyle1 said on 21/Apr/18
@Slim, where did booker T state this? About Kane been 6'8 I'd love to see it.
samson said on 20/Apr/18
Heres big show with glenn jacobs at the meet and greet in knoxville tn show looked onlu 3 inches taller then kane this was last week. Heres the link Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 20/Apr/18
Ced said on 17/Apr/18
blablabla... ;)

Why not regard my post from:
9/Apr/18

Clear to see why Kane looks only 2" shorter to the untrained, footwear not regarding eye...

Regarding inring heights:

Nash was 6´10" in standard soled wrestlingboots
Kane was 6´9.5" in his 2.25"-2.5" munsters
Big Show was 6´11.5" in standard soles from KOTR1999
Big Show was 7´0.5" in his giant sized soles he wore with Nash


Here´s your 6´8"lol Kane with 6´4-4.5" Jack Swagger Click Here
MAYBE 6´7" there but thats it.

Here´s Kane with 6´4 7/8" morning measured Ben Roethlisberger and Kane is very likely in his second biggest ringboots. Click Here
Moheez Iqbal said on 19/Apr/18
Rob, Would you say kane peak height was 6"8.25/204cm he looks about 0.5 inch taller than undertaker 6"7.75 not that much smaller then big show 6"11.75 peak height what do you think?
Martin 6'2 said on 19/Apr/18
Just curious here, and this is still height related, just wondered if anybody has heard about stretching to get taller, and if anybody has proof or evidence of this?
If so, could they not use this in wrestling, at least to help with their posture, this would increase their heights by at least an inch surely?
Slim said on 18/Apr/18
I agree @Ced. They usually said kane was 6’10.5 on commentary. Lowest he’s ever been commented was 6’8 by booker T.
Ced said on 17/Apr/18
I don't know how to post pictures here, but, on an episode of RAW in 2002, Kane squared up against Big Show again and Big Show was taller by 1.75-2 inches. Matter of fact, I've never seen Nash or Undertaker square up to Show the way that Kane did in that staredown.

Let's take Logic here, if Kane was only 6'7 at HeightCrazy's estimated peak, if you put the 2 inch lifts on Kane, that means he would have been about 6'9 in them.

Well Show at that point was a legit 6'11, and he wore thick boots. Meaning he was probably around 7'0.5 in them. Show did not look 3+ inches taller than Kane in the staredown, only 2 inches MAX. So Kane had to have been at least 6'8 without his boots. Kane in his boots was 6'10, while Nash was 6'9.
viper said on 17/Apr/18
Titus is nowhere close to 6-4. He looks like a weak 6-3
Slim said on 16/Apr/18
Hmm show me where Nash ever looked as tall as kane did with show. Click Here
Slim said on 16/Apr/18
Hmmm why is Nash dead even with Rodman? Why does Jillette edge out Rodman? Why does Kane edge out Jillette? Just about everyone says I look taller than what I actually measure. I think that’s the case for Nash and Kane. Click Here
Omid said on 16/Apr/18
I think Nash’s always been taller than Kane, I really don’t think that can be disputed in any way.

The question here is to which point he’s closer to, 6’7 or 6’8.

In my opinion, a prime Kane would have measured much closer to 6’8 than 6’7.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 16/Apr/18
Slim said on 13/Apr/18
HeightcrazyRed6ft you really try to bury kane don’t you?

********************************************************

yeah I do... rolleyes...
now back to reality, Kane was pretty much Takers height and Nash was clearly about 2" taller than both.
Lyle1 said on 15/Apr/18
Regarding Titus O'Neil, on a recent episode of main event, Desmond Wolfe aka Nigel McGuinnesss the commentator stated 'Titus is a big man, 6'3 6'4' so definitely not over 6'4. I'm surprised he stated that due to him being usually billed at 6'6 by WWE
Slim said on 15/Apr/18
@PhilipMCMullin yeah he obviously tries too hard. I’ll wait for someone to show me ANYBODY who edged Kane’s height outside of show and Khali.
Slim said on 15/Apr/18
@HeightcrazyRed6ft soooo even if you take away 2” which was his biggest boot lift (kane) he still looked taller than Nash did inside and outside ring gear. I’m a Nash fan btw. Show me one person outside of show and Khali that edges kane out. I’ll wait.
Vegas said on 15/Apr/18
The most I have seen Titus billed in wwe be it main roster, nxt or fcw is 6'6. Billed higher in games don't count as wwe only license likeness and names/gimmicks for those. They are created by third parties.

Titus debuted on nxt standing close to Eli Cottonwood who was listed 7 foot in the NBA developmental league. Titus was completely dwarfed so it would be crazy for wwe to bill him 7 foot after that.
Miiiiiiighty_- said on 14/Apr/18
@Slim because he wore lifts and Big Show has lost height since his WCW days ( and gained tons of weight )..
He was clearly pushing 7'1 back then and not even 400lbs..

Nash looked a good 2" taller than Glen Jacobs when they wrestled in the 90's under Jacob's Yankem's gimmick.
Prime = Kane 6'8 Nash 6'10(at least)
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 14/Apr/18
@Slim

Lol, Titus was never billed 7'0", It's always been 6'6". Don't know where you got that from. Makes no sense for a 6'3" guy to be billed 7'0".
Philip McMullin said on 14/Apr/18
@Slim I think that Heightcrazy hates kane and tries his hardest but fails to make kane as short as he can. Your picture edit for kane nash and terri is again inacurate
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 14/Apr/18
Slim said on 13/Apr/18
Who cares what the currents heights are???

*****************************************

So Rob should delete the current height guesses?

Kane never looked taller than Nash compared to Big Show if you factor in footwear and posture PERIOD
samson said on 13/Apr/18
That pic with kane and nash, seems to be 1'5 inches not 2 inches. So makes nash 6'9, kane 6'7'5
Slim said on 13/Apr/18
Who cares what the currents heights are??? Many factors have reduced their height. Why did kane always look taller than Nash did with the big show?
Slim said on 13/Apr/18
HeightcrazyRed6ft you really try to bury kane don’t you? How about you push Nash and Terry BACK. Your edit brings them both closer to the “camera”. WHY would they bill a 6’3 man (Titus) as 7ft? He’s taller than 6’3. Goldust was billed 6’6”. So 2” shy of that is typical.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 13/Apr/18
Slim said on 11/Apr/18
Lol Titus at 6’3? He was once billed at 7ft. Goldust is 6,4” and thats been proven time after time.
********************************************************************************************

??? Fail to see logic sense there...

Goldust was 6´4" peak but lost noticable height and "thats been proven time after time."
viper said on 13/Apr/18
Titus was listed at 6-3 in college. He's not taller than that. He may be as low as 6-2.5 since 6-3 Vernon Davis edges him out in a couple of pics
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 12/Apr/18
MIR said on 9/Apr/18
This photo was posted before but ill upload it now.
Click Here Kane and Nash at the same event with Terry Runnels in the same footwear, definitely not 2 inches of difference between them.
************************************

Always tricky to compare pics with different cameraangles


Click Here
Omid said on 12/Apr/18
Why stop there dude?

Cena 5’10.5
Orton 6’2.75
Jericho 5’7
Khali 6’10

Totally reasonable....right?
Slim said on 11/Apr/18
Lol Titus at 6’3? He was once billed at 7ft. Goldust is 6,4” and thats been proven time after time.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 10/Apr/18
Click Here

Rob, you´ve met Ted. Big Show is clearly under 6´10" and he has better posture than Ted.

To me it looks like

Big Show 6´9"-6´9.5
Kane ... 6´6.5"-6´7"
Titus... 6´3"-6´3.5"
Goldust. 6´2"-6´2.5"

Cass is to close to the camera but it´s still clear, he would´ve about an inch on Kane so 6´7.5-6´8"
MIR said on 9/Apr/18
Kane is against standing behind in that video with Big Show. There's a photo from that event where Kane is much closer to Big Shows height

This photo was posted before but ill upload it now.
Click Here Kane and Nash at the same event with Terry Runnels in the same footwear, definitely not 2 inches of difference between them.
miko said on 9/Apr/18
In past pics, in and out of the ring Show is about 2.5' taller than Cass.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 9/Apr/18
Click Here
Both in equal footwear ~3.5-4" between Big Show and Kane

Click Here
Nash has 1" less footwear than Big Show, so the gap goes from 2.5" to 1.5" barefoot.

Studd was 0.5-0.75" taller than peak Hogan so peak 6´7.5" is out of question.
Click Here

**********************************************************************************************

caden said on 6/Apr/18
..at King of the Ring 99, there's EXACTLY 2 inches between Show and Kane in the face off.

Only in the closeup with Big Shows neck slouching to Kane.
Click Here

Big Show at this point wasn´t allowed as WCW guy to wear his big boots against Vinces Creation Kane
Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 9/Apr/18
Yet youre still failing to see how much further forward in the pic Cass is than Show and kane! Someone pull cass back in the pic or pull kane and show forward a bit?!
MIR said on 9/Apr/18
Cass is standing closer to the camera so it's hard to compare him to Show/Kane but the positive there is Kane looks close to 4 inches taller than Titus who i believe is in the 6'3.5-6'4 range which would have Kane still around 6'7 Click Here

Here's Titus with 6'2 Mark Henry Click Here
6'2 Flo Rida Click Here
6'4 measured Jameis Winston Click Here
and with Chris Jericho Click Here .
bam said on 8/Apr/18
big cass looks taller than the big show in that pic but its just camera angles i would take them pics lightly
A Man said on 8/Apr/18
Cass looks like he would come out the same height as Show there. Yet more proof of Show struggling for height out of his ring boots.

Suprised how much taller Cass looks than Kane as well. Can see 2+ inches there.
Hog said on 8/Apr/18
You can't really go off that picture, Cass is noticeably taller than even the Big show because of the fact he's standing a lot closer to the camera than everybody else there
Philip McMullin said on 8/Apr/18
@DFens again kane is behind everyone possibly losing 2 to 3 inches. Can someone re-upload these with kane standing DIRECTLY side by side with cass and show!? I wouldn't use these pics to determine who's taller than who
DFens said on 8/Apr/18
Some interesting pics with Kane, Big Show and Big Cass.

MY OPINION:
Kane 2,00cm
Show 2,06cm
Cass 2,03cm

Click Here
Click Here
caden said on 6/Apr/18
Re: Heightcrazy, can you go back somewhere and pull up a picture of Show and Nash, and then Show and Kane. Kane was always close to Show's height in face offs than Nash was. While I do agree with you on everyone else's height you posted on your list, I think Big John Studd was 6'7.5 and Kane was definitely 6'8/6'8.25. There's now way at his peak he can be anything under that. If Taker was 6'7.5, Kane HAD to be 6'8. With his 2.25 inch boots, he would have been 6'10.25 roughly, Big Show in his boots was 7'0.5, at King of the Ring 99, there's EXACTLY 2 inches between Show and Kane in the face off.
Slim said on 6/Apr/18
Remember when kane had his half mask? He wore flats. Prove me wrong. Even shortly after he unmasked, he still had flats. I’ve seen the face to face vid with kane. He still had flats.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 6/Apr/18
Caden said on 4/Apr/18
Re: Heightcrazy, don’t forget in the Big Daddy V days, Viscera wore HUGE boots..

Philip McMullin said on 3/Apr/18
@HeightcrazyRed6ft youre so far wrong its untrue! you have no idea btw what was in big daddy v's footwear, kane is NOT THAT much shorter than nash!!! youre blind if you think youre right!

Slim said on 2/Apr/18
That photo with kane face to face with big daddy v is kane in his flats. I’ve seen the video.
*********************************************************************************************

Don´t know what the Kane fanboys around here are smoking... Definitly the WRONG stuff

Kanes boots ar still about 0.5" thicker than BDV´s big boots, barefoot Nash could even have 2.5" on Kane regarding Nashs flat soles.
Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 5/Apr/18
Caden said on 4/Apr/18
Re: Heightcrazy, don’t forget in the Big Daddy V days, Viscera wore HUGE boots.. almost if not the same as Kane in ‘97. There wasn’t much difference between Nash and Kane at their peaks. Nash was 6’9, and Kane was 6’8.25 at his peak.

********************************************

Don´t forgett Mabel had also big soles, clearly bigger than Nashs sole...
Rob has them at a 2" gap, it could´ve been a bit more barefoot.

Kane was never ever within an inch of Nashs height. Nash in flat standard boots had about 2" on Taker, Kane in his biggest 2.25" munsterboots had 1.25" on Taker.

peak evening heights

Big Show 6´10.75"
Nash 6´9"
Kane and Taker 6´7"
Sycho Sid 6´6.75"
Hogan 6´5.5"
Studd 6´6.25"
Andre 6´10.75"
Great Khali 7ft
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 5/Apr/18
Slim said on 2/Apr/18
That photo with kane face to face with big daddy v is kane in his flats. I’ve seen the video.

********************************************************************************************

WRONG, Kane has same heelheight as BDV, only one wearing "flats" is Nash
MIR said on 4/Apr/18
Al Snow was barely shorter than a prime Mick Foley Click Here and Kane most of the time looked 8 inches taller than Al, so 6'7 prime is too short Kane IMO Click Here Click Here
Caden said on 4/Apr/18
Re: Heightcrazy, don’t forget in the Big Daddy V days, Viscera wore HUGE boots.. almost if not the same as Kane in ‘97. There wasn’t much difference between Nash and Kane at their peaks. Nash was 6’9, and Kane was 6’8.25 at his peak.
Philip McMullin said on 3/Apr/18
@HeightcrazyRed6ft youre so far wrong its untrue! you have no idea btw what was in big daddy v's footwear, kane is NOT THAT much shorter than nash!!! youre blind if you think youre right!
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 3/Apr/18
Nash 6ft9 taker was 1.5inches shorter 6ft7 1/2 kane 2inches 6ft7 barefoot.
Slim said on 2/Apr/18
That photo with kane face to face with big daddy v is kane in his flats. I’ve seen the video.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 1/Apr/18
Click Here

Nash, was 6´9" - Kane is easy 2" shorter and had more footwear.
Kane was 6´7"peak, 6´8" in normal footwear and 6´9" in his munsters. Give or take 0.25"
MIR said on 1/Apr/18
A rare picture i found from 20+ years ago where Kane looks to be 8 inches taller than 6'0 Al Snow in regular clothes outside the ring.
Click Here i think he definitely measured at 6'8 at his tallest
bam said on 31/Mar/18
Babatunde Aiyegbusi is billed at 6ft10 while kane is billed at 7ft in the wwe, but i think they are both 6ft9 as kane inches out strowman
Slim said on 30/Mar/18
@Martin6’2” only .5” taller peak? Lol I lose more than that by the end of the day and I’m 25. My father was 6’2 barefoot and now at 42 he’s a little taller that 6’. Kane has taken much abuse over the years. Take away height from knees and back, it’s more than .5”. He’s probably 2” shorter than his prime.
Philip McMullin said on 30/Mar/18
@Danimal kane in no way shape of form is under 6'7 today, he was 6ft8.5 to 9 peak! No questions asked!
Martin 6'2" said on 30/Mar/18
Personally, after studying numerous photos myself, I would say that Kane in normal footwear today, is about 6'6" and his peak would've been about 6'6.5" as he's not in his 80s or 90s, so he wouldn't have shrunk a hell of a lot.
I feel in his boots he had on at WM14, he probably stood about 6'8"-6'8.5"
Danimal said on 29/Mar/18
Murtuza said on 25/Mar/18
Kane in his peak (1997-2004) was about 6'9-6'10 but now (March 2018) I would say he's 6'7.75 and Undertaker is 6'6.5

No. At his peak he was 6'7". Now he's under that.
Lyle1 said on 29/Mar/18
@Slim, I believe he was 6'8 barefoot in his peak , 6'9 in shoes hence why he stated that, and 6'9.5-6'10 in prime gear, I believe now he's no less than 6'7
Slim said on 28/Mar/18
Good find @Lyle1. He really looked 6’10-11 in his big boots.
Murt said on 28/Mar/18
Kane in his peak was 6'10 but nowadays he's 6'7.5
Lyle1 said on 27/Mar/18
If you listen to the jericho podcast with Kane, at around 1 hour 10 minutes, he states 'I'm legitimately 6"8 6"9 with hair half way down my back'. They were talking about if fans ever recognised him without his mask back in the day.
Murtuza said on 25/Mar/18
Kane in his peak (1997-2004) was about 6'9-6'10 but now (March 2018) I would say he's 6'7.75 and Undertaker is 6'6.5
Philip McMullin said on 23/Mar/18
@Vegas hes done nothing though, he'll be released soon. I mean as part of the active roster.
Vegas said on 22/Mar/18
Babatunde Aiyegbusi is tallest person currently under contract to wwe.
Philip McMullin said on 22/Mar/18
@Jay kane still claims 6ft8. Kane isn't the type of person to lie about himself. He's too much of a classy guy to boost his own ego. I think Kane and Cass are JOIN the second tallest in WWE even today! I mean if Big show has no interest in signing another WWE contract, then Kane and Cass are joint THE TALLEST in WWE.
Jay said on 21/Mar/18
@Crane That’s too low for Kane. He’s taller than Strowman.
Crane said on 21/Mar/18
Prime Kane: 6'7, could be 6'7.25 on a good day.

Today Kane: 6'6
MIR said on 21/Mar/18
Kane looks 7 to 7.5 inches taller than Steve Austin here and i think he's in very flat footwear? Click Here Click Here
Slim said on 18/Mar/18
Lol no? Taker still doesn’t look taller. Idk where you see that.
NM89 said on 17/Mar/18
Jacobs is taller than Taker in that photo.
Kane 6'7. Taker 6'6.5 is perfect listings for current height. I think both were 6'8 when young, with Kane edging him out slightly
Old gregg said on 17/Mar/18
Niceguy82 Kane still looks taller there and he's standing like a foot behind Undertaker in that picture with much worse posture.
niceguy82 said on 16/Mar/18
"MIR said on 12/Mar/18
I found 2 unposted pictures of Kane's recent event with Taker that show Kane is still taller. Click Here Click Here
When u look at 99% of all the pictures taken u realise that they always put Taker a few inches in front of Kane to make him look bigger but he isn't"

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nice mirror image there, i guess Glenn likes to wear his wedding ring on his right hand :D

Here is the original, and somehow taker again looks taller than in your edited picture.

Click Here

Even so, those are from poor angles. Majority of pics from that event Taker looks taller i was suprised to see that even today when he's really lost height from all the operations done to him and age.
Slim said on 15/Mar/18
@MIR wow, with let’s say, huge basketball shoes, Glenn really would be damn near 7ft.
MIR said on 14/Mar/18
Here's a comparison I found online that somebody else did of Kane and the 7'0 "Tiny Ron" which shows Kane less than 4 inches shorter. Credit to whoever made this Click Here
Alex2 said on 13/Mar/18
Danimal said on 12/Mar/18
His peak height was 6'7" and today he's under that.

6'7" PEAK?! Really?!

Click Here
Danimal said on 12/Mar/18
His peak height was 6'7" and today he's under that.
MIR said on 12/Mar/18
I found 2 unposted pictures of Kane's recent event with Taker that show Kane is still taller. Click Here Click Here
When u look at 99% of all the pictures taken u realise that they always put Taker a few inches in front of Kane to make him look bigger but he isn't
Height downgraders said on 10/Mar/18
Kane is clearly taller.... you guys always downgrade his height.
Alex2 said on 9/Mar/18
6’8” peak for certain, never looked more than 4” shorter than Khali.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 9/Mar/18
Peak kane 6ft8 taker peak 6ft8.25 barefoot.
Lyle2 said on 8/Mar/18
That pic Bozmoz has shared, clearly shows Glen taller, not by much, but in other pics at the same event, Taker has the footwear advantage
Omid said on 8/Mar/18
MIR in all of the pictures posted here, Taker is standing some distance in front Kane, folks can just go and take a look at Rob’s height articles and see for themselves how he demonstrates that gives a pretty significant advantage to the guy closer to the camera.

It’s fairly obvious people, at no point Taker has been taller than Kane, I don’t claim Kane’s got a full inch on him or anything like that but I’d bet if you were to go back in time and measure the two of them out of their ring gear Taker would measure anywhere from 6’7.5 to 6’7.75 and Kane would measure anywhere from 6’7.75 to 6’8.

Every single one of the people involved with them say that Glenn was a little bit bigger and taller than Mark and Jacobs has been on the record saying around 6’8 while Taker has claimed 6’9 and 6’10.

Kane’s clearly not exaggerating his height like wrestlers tend to do.
Lkk said on 7/Mar/18
Peak was definitely 6'8
Rick Roll said on 7/Mar/18
We already saw them both fully stretched on this same event, and Taker looked easily one inch taller than Kane.
Undertaker got a long Neck, so standing good he looks taller than Kane.
MIR said on 7/Mar/18
If Kane was "Standing tall" and Taker wasn't wearing a beanie and sun glasses on his head, he would of been taller Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 6/Mar/18
Mark is not taller than glenn
Bozmoz said on 6/Mar/18
Kane looks slightly taller in this shot with Taker taken a few days ago Click Here . Very close but
luedo78 said on 6/Mar/18
I think it is clear now.Kane in his outfit is taller than the Undertaker. But in real life Mark Calaway is taller than Glenn Jacobs.
Omid said on 5/Mar/18
Why are you talking as if Taker wrestles barefeet?

Click Here

That’s at least one inch, more like 1.25 if I had to guess so however big is Kane’s boots nowadays, say 1.5, that means a half an inch advantage for Kane.

Except guess what? Kane’s nearly an inch taller than a 2010 undertaker

Click Here
juggernaut said on 5/Mar/18
@Rick Roll Kane indeed had bigger boots compared to Taker in his entire career that is why maybe Kane always looked taller by almost an inch compared to Taker.
Lyle2 said on 4/Mar/18
Just look at the footwear, Taker clearly has the advantage, wearing basketball type trainers whilst Kane just wearing normal trainers with a worse posture than taker
Rick Roll said on 4/Mar/18
Why Are you choosing Taker and Kane pics from WWE, when obviously Kane got way bigger sole than Taker?
Outside the Ring Taker looked Taller.
Philip McMullin said on 4/Mar/18
@MIR thankyou a more accurate comparison, kane IS taller than taker by over an inch here.
Omid said on 4/Mar/18
In all of the pictures presented so far, they are either not standing next to each other or even on the same line as each other or the camera is titled and the picture isn’t taken from roughly the same distance from both of them, not even taking into account the fact that Taker is wearing a beanie going up against a very short haired Kane.

If I was to choose photos and pictures with parameters that you’ve used in choosing your pictures, instead of choosing the pictures that I had I would have chosen these:

Click Here

Click Here

You should only post face to face and side by side pictures of the two without anyone tilting one way or the other and with roughly the same distance from the camera. one party standing half a foot behind the other one doesn’t produce pictures from which you can accurately compare their heights.
MIR said on 4/Mar/18
Another picture of Kane and Taker's recent event Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 4/Mar/18
@DFens come onnnn, you cant possibly use your second image as proof, i think we'd get a true measuring is taker took off his shaed and his stupid dennis the menace beanie hahahaha that pic of taker and masked kane awards the taller award to kane,
Rick Roll said on 4/Mar/18
Still Undertaker looks taller than Kane, so either Taker is still 6'7 or Kane is 6.6'5 only right now, because i don't see Kane taller.
DFens said on 4/Mar/18
More Undertaker and Kane.

Click Here
Click Here
MIR said on 3/Mar/18
Another recent picture of Kane and Taker that shows Kane being taller despite Takers beanie Click Here it's interesting to see them now but
luedo78 said on 3/Mar/18
I think the last pictures says a lot. We dont the see the footwear, but Undertaker have more than 1 inch against kane.
Philip McMullin said on 3/Mar/18
@Rick Roll both were standing tilted, kane was the more relaxed of the two, takers shades were at the top of his head, and his hat didnt look fully on. like there an inch of hat material sticking up
JoeyT said on 3/Mar/18
That photo is reversed and has been tilted to favour Taker. Here is a normal version of it Click Here. And Remember that Taker is wearing a beanie and sunglasses on his head. IMO The listings on this site are exactly right with Kane 6'7. Taker 6'6.5. In their peak they both may of been an inch taller
Omid said on 3/Mar/18
That’s a mirrored image.
DFens said on 3/Mar/18
Another pic.

Click Here
ChrisNt said on 3/Mar/18
Kane’s shoulders have always appeared higher than understakers -

undertakers head is bigger

There has never been a real clear picture who is genuinely taller between the 2. One is always slouching etc.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 3/Mar/18
Taker is taller takers bio said he is 6ft8 310 pounds kanes bio said he is 6ft7 320 pounds.
Dicko said on 2/Mar/18
Click Here
Rick Roll said on 2/Mar/18
Click Here

Undertaker looks taller than Kane.
Kane isn't taller than Undertaker.
MIR said on 2/Mar/18
An edited version of that recent Taker/Kane photo that shows if Kane wasn't standing a few feet behind him Click Here
MIR said on 2/Mar/18
That recent picture shows the guy up to the top of Takers shoulder and up to the middle of Kane's chest so I think Taker is an inch shorter now
Omid said on 2/Mar/18
Another shot:

Click Here

Just look at the shoulders, and Taker’s wearing a trench coat next to Kane’s exposed shoulders.

Find me a picture of the two with decent angle in which Taker DOESN’T look shorter than Kane.
DFens said on 1/Mar/18
The angle is poor but it seems that Kane is taller.

Click Here
Omid said on 28/Feb/18
Oh btw, 2001 onwards Kane has been wearing the same boots as Bigshow, I don’t claim to exactly know how big everybody’s boots are in the WWE but everyone from Big E to Big show has about the same boots from the looks of it.

Now Taker’s boots don’t look similar to them but given his status in the WWE and how they present him, it would be naive to think they sent him to the ring without any enhancements....obvious or not.
Omid said on 28/Feb/18
I think Enough evidence has been provided to demonstrate Kane and Taker’s heights on this page, he is taller, not by a full inch perhaps but definitely taller.
Slim said on 26/Feb/18
Niceguy82 that vid shows no staredown. Kane’s boots are basically the height of cowboy boot heels. No matter what footwear kane had on in his career, he always looked taller than taker.
niceguy82 said on 25/Feb/18
"Slim said on 24/Feb/18
And for those who say taker didn’t have lifts, well... do more research and look closer at his boots. Idk how he went from looking a good inch shorter than sid, to dead even with him or slightly taller at times. I’ve seen takers boots range from internal lifts, to curved shape up style therapeutic type lifts, all the way up to big show and Kane’s style boots."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sure but everybody in the WWE wears lifts, except those few who wrestled barefoot, that's how it is with ring gear.
The biggest and thickest boots with obvious lifts that come to my mind belong to Jericho, Steiner (when he was big poppa pump) and Kane, and even Big show sometimes clearly had bigger boots on.

As for Sid, well he also wore different size boots time to time as well no?

Click Here

Im looking closer here too and guess who has the bigger boots here? @ 0:09 Let's say kane is 1 inch taller barefoot there...and those boots sure as hell give him 1-2 inches over takers...and im still not seeing a 3" difference there sorry.

Prime Kane and prime Taker = impossible to say who's taller.
luedo78 said on 24/Feb/18
@Omid
The difference in your pick is all but not clear. I think the buttom of the heads are the same and Kane have more footwear
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 24/Feb/18
Taker 6ft8 kane 6ft8.25 barefoot.
Slim said on 24/Feb/18
And for those who say taker didn’t have lifts, well... do more research and look closer at his boots. Idk how he went from looking a good inch shorter than sid, to dead even with him or slightly taller at times. I’ve seen takers boots range from internal lifts, to curved shape up style therapeutic type lifts, all the way up to big show and Kane’s style boots.
Omid said on 24/Feb/18
Another paused video screenshot face to face comparision of Taker and Kane:

Click Here

The difference is very clear.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.