How tall is Kane - Page 3

Add a Comment6639 comments

Average Guess (364 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.95in (203.1cm)
Current: 6ft 7.12in (201cm)
samson said on 24/Jun/19
MelvinJones I know what I saw, I counted the plates. Even Dave metzer the radio host said that kane can bench 650. I'm sticking to what I'm saying.
Bigger Man said on 24/Jun/19
Hmm...some huge weights being talked about there. I’m 6’11 and a former bodyguard and doorman. I was a keen power heavier bench was 276 Kg for one rep...over 600lbs. So with these juiced up guys I can well believe 655. Definitely!
Dream said on 24/Jun/19
I would’ve thought 6’7-6’7.25” today, in person. He was really big.
Joshua C said on 23/Jun/19
Ummmm those are standard 7' doors
edwards said on 23/Jun/19
@samson sotiris is right here
houss said on 23/Jun/19
@Samson i believe every word you said i think he was 6'8 and he's stronger than everyone in this site 😉
MelvinJones said on 22/Jun/19
Kane himself said he benched 525 which is a lot of weight. Google the interview. Samson is just trolling.
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Jun/19
@samson You said you saw Kane using 150-lb dumbbells for arm curls. Based solely on that, no one should believe anything you have to say. You're a bull(bleep) artist. I don't care if you don't care. You said Kane was taller than those 6'8" doors, when he clearly wasn't. You're either blind or the opposite of smart. I'm not trying to be mean here, I'm simply calling you out, b/c you need to be called out.
samson said on 22/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas Both Ken Shamrock and Faroqq aka Ron Simmons said they both hoisted 600, theres no way there stronger then kane. If Ken and Ron simmons can bench press 600 so can kane. I know what I saw I'm sticking to what I'm saying kane benched 650
samson said on 21/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas Matt morgan benched 655 he was taller then kane, like i said Brock Lesner benched 655 back in the ovw days he's smaller then kane, if Brock can do it so can kane. I don't give a flip flopping fly if you don't believe me, I know what I saw I counted the plates. I'm 5'10 weigh 250 benching 405 for 2 reps, one good rep and one force rep with a spotter.
samson said on 21/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas I'll try to find the interview. I know what I saw I counted the plates it was 650. Brock who is even smaller benched 655, so if brock can bench that much so can kane.
Heisenberg89 said on 21/Jun/19
I give at Kane a 6'6 max today barefoot. In his prime I guess him max 6'7.25 but I think more just 6'7".

In his legendary boots 6'9 range few times, strong 6'8 range most of the times.

In my opinion he always had max 0.25 on taker barefoot if not same height.
Heisenberg89 said on 21/Jun/19
I give at Kane a 6'6 max today barefoot. In his prime I guess him max 6'7.25 but I think more just 6'7".

In his legendary boots 6'9 range few times, strong 6'8 range most of the times.
Sotiris Gravas said on 21/Jun/19
Here's Kane next to the doors that samson wanted you to see... Click Here Samson said Kane was taller than the doors... He obviously isn't. Once again, samson doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

As for the Kane/Show video, you can clearly see at the very beginning that Kane has on monster footwear.
samson said on 20/Jun/19
Heres a segment with kane and daniel byran, pause it at 5:58 you can see he's taller then the doors which is about 6'8. So Kane in his boots is possibly 6'8
click here Click Here
Xpac99 said on 20/Jun/19
Rob in this match
Click Here
And in this segment
Click Here
Morgan clearly was in footware advantage and he was taller than kane by 1 inch o probably 1 inch and 1/2..
after looking at these segments do you still think Morgan peak height 6ft 8 1/2 and kane 6ft 7 1/2 ?
MelvinJones said on 20/Jun/19
Kane admitted in an interview that his best bench was 525. The only wrestlers that could ever bench 650 was Bill
kazmaier and Ted Arcidi
Sotiris Gravas said on 20/Jun/19
@samson At 6'7" afternoon barefoot height, 285 lbs, 19" biceps, 55" chest (no steroids), benching just 4 plates on each side plus the bar (around 400 lbs) for 6 reps isn't easy b/c of my long arms. And I'm supposed to believe he did 650 lbs...? Raw lift or bench shirt? Let me guess, he had a spotter doing all the work for him and he just let the weight fall and then bounced it off his chest for a grand total of one rep. How far apart were his arms? I'm guessing a very wide grip which is a lot easier b/c you're lifting a shorter vertical distance, akin to a short guy w/ short arms. Or maybe you're just making it all up and didn't see squat.

Dude, the reason I know for a FACT that you're full of (bleep) is b/c you say he curled 150 lb dumbbells. LOL. Dude, my arms are VERY strong and I do up to 100 lb one-arm curls. There's no way in Hell you saw him do 150 lbs -- which means you're lying. Even the biggest steroid freaks at my gym could NEVER lift that heavy.

I've never tried doing more than 100 lbs so as not to hurt myself. Maybe next time at the gym I'll see how much I can do for just one rep of a concentration curl, which is a lot easier than standing curls when done right, not using your back and swinging momentum to cheat.

Kane and Taker were never more than 6'7" and there's no way in Hell this guy's 6'7" today.
samson said on 20/Jun/19
Heres Kane and Big show in a segment, and show looked 3 inch taller then kane. Heres the video Click Here
samson said on 18/Jun/19
Dream Ya he was wearing sneakers, I dont know what size shoe he wore, maybe size 16 to size 18 didn't pay attention. He was laying down on the bench. I could be wrong, he could be 6'7 or 6'8 my guess is he was 6'8 I don't know to me when he stood up he looked 6'8 thats my guess I could be wrong. And yes I saw him bench 650 I counted the plates.
Canson said on 18/Jun/19
I doubt ever 6’7”. I think he was similar to Sid and Taker. Maybe more Taker peak and still close to 6’7” today
ced said on 18/Jun/19
Kane is truly a weird one.. On one hand, bakc in 1999, he stacked up to Big Show better than anyone else in WWF or WCW until Great Khali came in.

On the other hand, when he returned in 2002, with the half mask, and wa wearing flat boots, he looked CONSIDERABLY smaller. He looked around the 6'7 mark.

Then when he returned with the current mask, in 2011, after he chokeslammed Cena, he looked HUGE, but his boots weren't his 1997 monster boots, but take a look at that video and he looks every bit of 6'8.

Could it be that his height just fluctuates? In 98, I can see him at just under the 6'8 mark, with the boots, just under 6'10, OR 6'9 1/2. You have that WrestleMania 14 match against Taker where he just looked GIGANTIC against Taker. They had more of a height difference between them than when Taker faced Diesel 2 years prior at WrestleMania 12.

My guess is Kane with his boots monster boots was 6'9.5, and just under 6'8 (in 1997).. 2002, he was around the 6'7 mark, and now he's at 6'6.5.
samson said on 18/Jun/19
Sotiris Gravas yes he was at my gym, and i counted the plates it was 650. I don't care if you dont believe me or not I know what I saw
Dream said on 17/Jun/19
@Sotiris Gravas

I’d be hard press to see him at 6’6” flat today. He’s well over it, in person. He looked around 6’7”, minus the footwear advantage he had.
Dream said on 16/Jun/19

I'm not sure about 6'8", but did he have bigger shoes than you? I think peak, he's over 6'7". When I saw him up close, he looked nearly 6'8", but he had much bigger shoes than my runner shoes.
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Jun/19
@samson I don't believe a single word of what you posted, nor should anyone else.
samson said on 13/Jun/19
Dream I'd say back then he was 6'8. I saw Kane and Undertaker at my gym back in 1999, back then there was not any cameras on the phones, I saw Kane benched 650 pounds and curled 150 pound dumbells. He said he curled 150 pounds in a interview. I counted the plates. Kane back then ever bit of 6'8. I'm good with estimating heights. I couldn't tell who was taller between Undertaker and Kane. He spotted Kane so, he was lying on the bench Kane was huge back then, he looked his billed weight I'd say 326 to 328pounds. I'd say he was 2nd strongest next to Mark Henry
Dream said on 12/Jun/19
Rob, I think Peak and current listing are fine. I saw him up close, recently. He looked nearly 6'8", but he had bigger shoes than my runner shoes. (I didn't take a photo because it costed too much.) Ground was even and it was mid afternoon to early evening.
SeanR said on 11/Jun/19
Matt Morgan I meant to say...
SeanR said on 11/Jun/19
Matt recently did an interview with Chris Van Vliet (Check out Chris YouTube and Instagram pages for more) where Matt claims he was “shoot” measured for American Gladiators at 7’0” by several different methods (one of them lying on a table - lol). He also stated that he was 6’10.5” as a freshman in college and grew to eventually be 7’0”. I agree with Matt’s assessment being measured in the 6’10” range in college but it was probably in basketball shoes which gives at least 1.5” boost. He did not mention if his heights were barefoot or in shoes so we have to assume he meant the latter. The 2nd pic of Chris and Matt on Chris’s Instagram account does give credence of a large height disparity but Chris looks to be in socks there and Matt in dress shoes. Seeing other pics of Chris with other celebs/wrestlers I will give him 5’8”. Matt is somewhere in the range of 6’7.5” to 6’8.5” today but it’s possible his peak barefoot evening height could have been 6’8.75” or 6’9”. There is no way he is 7’0” when he measured just short of Big Show, Kevin Nash and Nathan Jones who are all 6’9” and above.
Chris n said on 9/Jun/19
I heard Jim Ross on an interview talking about Glen Jacobs, I honestly can’t remember which one it was but it’s fairly recent if anyone else has heard of it. He mentioned a young Glen coming through the wrestling ranks as “a 6’7 or 6’8 guy”.
Big ed said on 7/Jun/19
He was never billed 6'7 ever
As yankeem he was billed 6'9 then jr continuous ly refered him to 6'11 then as Kane he was billed 7ft wcw he was billed 6'8 and 6'10
Dream said on 6/Jun/19
I got a 6’7.25” or 6’7.125” impression from him, in person. He looked 6’8”, but he had some thick shoes on.
samson said on 4/Jun/19
Xpac99 where did you find that
Joshua C said on 4/Jun/19
Yeah its clear that Matt has those wierd internal lifts that makes it look like hes walking on several layers of padding. Kane has his flaaaat boots on.
NCL said on 4/Jun/19
MikeV10 said on 2/Jun/19
Click Here

Whoa another awesome find thanks!!
Xpac99 said on 3/Jun/19
Morgan is 1 inch taller because he was in big boots. I think whit the same boots they was about the same height
MikeV10 said on 2/Jun/19
Click Here

Kane and Morgan face to face ,
The angel is not the best .I thing Morgan is a little bit taller but is wearing big boots most of the time. In this boots he was very close to kevin Nashs height
Dream said on 1/Jun/19
Rob, I saw him up close. He still looks about 6’7”, but had some big shoes on.

The neighbor of mine (the one my step-dad thought was 6’4”-6’5”, but looked much taller) looked a bit shorter than Kane, but he had flip flops, while Kane was in much thicker footwear.
DFens said on 29/May/19
Morgan was clearly taller in that match.

BUT, Kane is always in a poor posture, If he stood straight they would be the same height.
NCL said on 29/May/19
shuvayu chakraborty said on 28/May/19
kane's bigger than matt morgan - Click Here . Match - OVW Spring Breakout in 2003, held on April 11, 2003 at Six Flags Over Kentucky Kingdom.

Wow what a great find I've been looking for that forever thanks for posting!

It's real hard to tell the height difference b/c there's no exact staredown. If you pause at 13:25, that's the closest thing. Morgan has a little bit of a camera angle advantage. My bet is without that he is an inch taller, but only because of the boots. Without the boots, I bet they'd be about the same height.

Click Here (pause exactly at 13:25)
shuvayu chakraborty said on 28/May/19
kane's bigger than matt morgan - Click Here . Match - OVW Spring Breakout in 2003, held on April 11, 2003 at Six Flags Over Kentucky Kingdom.
Stormcoach said on 24/May/19
Peak kane ft6'7.5" now ft6'7.25"
edwards said on 22/May/19
@heisenberg89 dont know about boots or other but kane is clearly taller than taker,look isaac yankem as kane and undertaker staredown kane is taller than taker,also there are mid 90s matches and staredown which shows kane wasnt wearing any lifts and you can easily see kane is taller,yes he may be barely taller but personally i am sure he is taller than bet is peak taker at 6'7.5 and peak kane at 6'7.75 or even 6'8
Joshua C said on 21/May/19
The Matt Morgan vs Kane match, kane had his small boots on and you can obviously tell, if you actually look, that Matt has his HUGE internal lifts on.
Heisenberg89 said on 21/May/19

Kane was and maybe is taller, but barely. I never meet both together side by side barefoot, so I can't be sure like you are.
The only thing I saw, as everyone, is that Kane appeared always a lot taller then he really is.

Pichard said " no no, Kane didn't wore lifts because he was actually bigger".
Well he was drunk, or it was a lie.
Kane wears lifts since he was born maybe.

But my point is... You saw or not his boots and his legs posture? Of course you did. So I don't understand your point..
Kane was maxxx 6'7 at his peak, taker probably barely shorter like 6'6'75.

And guys... Kane, as almost all wrestlers, can't absolutely be judged inside a wwe ring.
So has no sense talk about his WWE staredown
edwards said on 20/May/19
Heisenberg89 said on 19/May/19
yes i agree with on this.Bruce pichard said Kane was bigger then taker, in fact he was.yeah,kane was always taller and much bigger than taker.the only times i saw undertaker bigger or atleast same as kane was only in 1999 and 2000.taker has bigger head but kane has much bigger body and proportion ofcource body and biceps,lets say huge body and his bigger mass.taker only edged or stack against kane was in 1999 or 2000,in all of the stare down and matches you can see kane is much bigger than taker in 90 percent of 100 staredown and appearance
Heisenberg89 said on 19/May/19

The problem with Kane, in my opinion, is that he always wore big boots with lift added. And his television appearances always showed him taller then he really was, and the 99% of us are all influenced by this factor.
Bruce pichard said Kane was bigger then taker, in fact he was. But bigger does not means necessary taller. If he was, he was barely taller.

Without shoes, camera angles, and wrestling ring tricks he could never handle a staredown with big show like he did in some occasions, since the moment that there are barefoot almost 4 inch between them at their peaks (6'7" MAXvs 6'10.75/6'11"MAX) and 3.25 nowadays.

Kane is the only one I remember, together with Jake the snake, that probably wore almost 5/6cm boots.
Philip McMullin said on 18/May/19
@miko you seen the video i was talking about?
miko said on 17/May/19
Kane in his boots would have pushed Matt Morgan pretty close in a staredown.
Philip McMullin said on 17/May/19
There's an interesting vid on YouTube (Kane vs. Matt Morgan) Back in '03. Very hard to tell who's the taller of the two.
Fred Mullen said on 17/May/19
A 6’7 or 8 man slouched over in a photo can easily look in the 6’5-6 range, which we see evident in many photos of Glen Jacobs and Mark Calaway. If Kane stood straight, to be measured that is, he would be min 6’7
edwards said on 16/May/19
he is likely in 6'6.5-6'6.75 range for undertaker,taker is around 6'5.5-6'6 range today.
both of these dude were above 6'7 at peak with taker being 6'7.5 and kane being a tad taller at 6'7.75
Troy Tippett said on 15/May/19

You can’t see the ground level you can’t see shoes, bad camera angles, there are many factors

That estimate is inconclusive really
Ironman092289 said on 15/May/19
I read somewhere that in a UK Magazine or interview that Kane admitted to being 6'5", which I find interesting. I think he was about 6'7" max, but maybe he was able to fraud it for years because of his boots. Just throwing stuff out there. I will still remain solid with the idea that he is 6'6.5" today and 6'7" peak, but again I could be wrong.

@Heisenberg In my all honest opinion, Undertaker did look taller. I am going to look into Kane a bit more, maybe even 6'6+ range for him is too high, like it is for Undertaker.
samson said on 14/May/19
Heres a video posted 6 days ago, its a video about Glenn jacobs as mayor and put on alittle skit for the people, he became kane. And he looks 6'7 the guy he choked slammed was was just under 6ft. Glenn had about 5inches on the guy he choked slammed. Just watch the video and see for yourself heres the link Click Here
Heisenberg89 said on 14/May/19
I think Kane now is max 6'6" but probably 6'5 and 3/4.
At his peak just 6'7".
He lost less height then undertaker.
But...i still think that in Knoxville he didn't look taller then Calaway.
He really didn't.
Ironman092289 said on 14/May/19
Maybe Kane isn't even 6'6.5" today if Khali is 6'11", and if he is really only 6'10" then Kane is 6'4".

I think a more realistic approach would be a 7'0.5" Khali vs a 6'6.5" Kane? I'm not too sure on Khali's height.
ced said on 13/May/19
Kane was 6'7.75 peak.

In the Khali staredown (2008?), Kane: 6'6.5, Khali 6'11.5
Annonymous said on 12/May/19

And Khali's eye level is lower than most people's as he quite obviously has an abnormally large skull.

Some people just suck at this height guessing game, Kane is 6'5" if we have a 6 '11 Khali.
Sotiris Gravas said on 10/May/19
Reality: Shane McMahon and Glenn Jacobs... Click Here
Shane and 5'10" Kevin Owens... Click Here

Fiction: Shane and Kane... Click Here

Reality: Shane and Kevin Nash... Click Here
Vegas' said on 10/May/19
Erik C. said on 9/May/19
6'6.5"-6'7" range today imo. 6'7.5" possibly close to 6'8" range peak.

On Big Shows page you have Khali down at 6'11 and here you think Kane was 6'8 peak? Khali had close to six inches on Kane in 2007. Top of Kane's head is below Khali's eyeliner (white line) there Click Here
Erik C. said on 9/May/19
6'6.5"-6'7" range today imo. 6'7.5" possibly close to 6'8" range peak.
Ironman092289 said on 28/Apr/19
If Undertaker was 6'6.5" at his peak, and Kane was 1/4-1/2 taller, then I believe Kane was 6'7" at his peak, but no more than that. Today, Kane is likely in the 6'6" - 6'6.5" range, as he is about 0.75"-1" taller than Undertaker today, instead of the 1/4-1/2" in the 90s (Undertaker lost more height imo)
edwards said on 13/Apr/19
@ rawdshaq taker was not even close to 6'8.5 or even strong 6'8 let alone 6'9,the max i could see for peak taker is 6'7.5 and 6'8.5 in boot.kane was always taller than taker maybe a cm or half inch,whether he was fake diesel,isaac yankem or times,either seems to edge other but most of the time kane was taller and much bigger than taker,the onlytime taker seems to edge kane was 1999,dude bty it has been often said that taker too wore inner enhanced lifts,i say no chance of taker being taller than bet is peak taker 6'7.5 at best and peak kane 6'7.75 or 6'8.
rawdshaq said on 12/Apr/19
@Nyjuan That is a really good point I recently found out but I do still believe that Kanes lifts were more enhanced and that if they were both barefoot I believe Undertaker had 1/4 inch on Kane. I believe Undertaker was a really underestimated guy at his peak and I believe he was near 6ft 9 (6'8.5").
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Apr/19
@Canson 6'8" Dellin Betances and Aaron Judge... Click Here

The Yankees listed Betances as 6'8" on their 2014 roster, which is why he chose the number 68:
Click Here
Nyjuan said on 11/Apr/19
Kane is obviously taller than taker. Maybe 1/2 to 3/4 an inch. Taker also wore lifts inside his boots
ced said on 10/Apr/19
@Grezza.. Great photo man.. I just wish they had seated Nash next to Kane at the Hall of Fame.. all these years they're together at the same event and they never take a picture together.

I tink Braun is about 6'6 and Kane is 6'7 now judging from your photo.
Grezza said on 9/Apr/19
Here's Kane at the 2019 Hall of fame, standing behind Strowman but he is taller than Braun Click Here
Exile said on 9/Apr/19
Both Taker and Kane were very, very similar in height in the WWF days, but I'd Kane has lost less height than Taker.
Canson said on 5/Apr/19
@Sotiris: the jury is out. If he’s sub 6’7 it’s not by a lot. He’s likely close to 6’8 with shoes
edwards said on 5/Apr/19
@ rawdshaq 1999 was a year when kane lost large portion of his muscle and masses,yes that is the only time i saw taker bigger than kane. everytime kane appeared much bigger than taker.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 5/Apr/19
While he looked slim in that clip, I'm not sure if he was as light as 250 there.
Peter Grasham said on 4/Apr/19
@sotiris you are at it again with your cute examples, and yes you are contributing and I am not. I’m just a crap talker
Sotiris Gravas said on 4/Apr/19
@Canson Judge is probably 6'6.25" and maybe I'm wrong and he's really 6'6.5", but I can't see 6'7" for him...
Canson said on 4/Apr/19
@Sotiris: I’m not sure about Judge. He may be 6’7”
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Apr/19
@Psycho B If someone is demonstrably shorter relative to others whose heights have been established, that qualifies as being shorter. I don't need to measure Kane, as you suggest, to know he's not 6'7".

In "Star Trek IV", Spock has to do time-travel computations in his head, and they all make it out A-ok. Estimates work wonders, dude... Click Here Let me guess, you're only a Star Wars fan. Figures.
rawdshaq said on 2/Apr/19
I found it weird that Kane looks so small here, Click Here

Looks 250 pounds there
tree said on 2/Apr/19
With 6ft bret hart at 6:30 Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 2/Apr/19
YouTube footage of 6'6" (not 6'7") Aaron Judge w/ Big Cass and Braun Strowman:
Click Here

Big Cass and 5'7" Daniel Bryan... Click Here
Kane and Bryan... Click Here
Just a reminder that Bryan is a VERY small man in this group shot (2014)... Click Here A 6'0" guy like Cena towers over him.

Aaron Judge and 6'4" (not 6'6") Giancarlo Stanton... Click Here
Stanton and Derek Jeter... Click Here
6'4.5" Michael Jordan and Jeter... Click Here

Big Cass and Big Show... Click Here
Psycho B said on 2/Apr/19
LOL Sotiris you proved NOTHING. By proving you have to have him measured, which you didn't.
You just estimated his height and made up your mind thinking Kane is 6'6" and that's it.
Kane 6'8" peak and nowadays a little over 6'7"
edwards said on 31/Mar/19
imho the stare down between kane as isaac yanken and undertaker proves that kane was half a inch if not more taller than taker.since it was in 1996 and both were at peak and kane didnt have lifts.
Canson said on 29/Mar/19
I would believe that Taker and Kane were similar at their peaks both around 6’7”
rawdshaq said on 29/Mar/19
As someone who doesnt agree with Sotiris and his heights, @ced Im sorry but thats a horrible way to compare heights of two people. I can get a picture of Shaq and get a picture of me and make one of those side by side pictures and make a 5'9" guy like me look the same height as 7'1" Shaq
ced said on 29/Mar/19
Here is a good comparison of Nash and Kane.. It provides a general idea of how they would look next to each other in size.

Click Here

If Kane was only 6'6.5 in peak height as Sotiris claims, there is no way he would look this tall next to Nash. Kane was a minimum 6'7.75 peak (day height), and probably woke up around 6'8 or 6'8.25
edwards said on 29/Mar/19
rawdshaq said on 17/Mar/19 dude you mean taker taller than kane lol
edwards said on 28/Mar/19
@sotirios chatzi
taker was never ever taller than kane,pretty much everyone know about that,at times either seems to edge other or either would appear taller but i say no way taker is taller than kane.kane is atleast half inch taller than taker.
Sotiris Gravas said on 27/Mar/19
@Geoff T You sound pretty sure of yourself. Why not post some pics where you actually back up what you say, like I do...?

P.S. My WiFi is pretty fast; it doesn't take long to Google something and post it here. I'm great at multitasking and can even walk and chew gum at the same time. W/ all due respect, I've already proven that Kane is not 6'7" now, at least IMHO. Just b/c Rob the editor happens to disagree w/ me is not definitive proof that I'm wrong.

@Rob Always happy to contribute.
Sakz said on 27/Mar/19
@Rob Does it not come across as spam though? I'm pretty sure I see the same pictures over and over posted.
Editor Rob
Yeah I understand some comments/photos could be seen as repetitive.

But then, I've been reading the site all these years, so a lot of arguments can seem that way too.

Going off topic and turning a page into an argument beyond just the height in question is something I don't like to see. I have been very lenient really, but sometimes there is a limit.
sotirios chatzi said on 27/Mar/19
My dad worked in wrestling during the 90s, he told me Kane and Undertaker were about the same height, and said if one is taller it was Undertaker.
Geoff T said on 27/Mar/19
@sotiris do you spend 80% of your day sources pictures of peoples heights, then get excited when you create links for them? By the way kane is 6’7
Editor Rob
Even though I may not agree with a lot of his estimates, he is making an effort contributing.
Vegas' said on 26/Mar/19
Here is Kane/ Taker faceoff from 1999 3 mins 55 seconds Click Here

Big Show out of gear and Kane in 1999 @ 5 mins 30 seconds Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 25/Mar/19
@Grezza Any yet this is max 5'8" Flair (not 5'9") next to Kane (2018)... Click Here

Again, Ludacris and Flair... Click Here
Luda and around 5'8" Mario Lopez (2017)... Click Here
Luda and 5'7.5" Ryan Seacrest (2009)... Click Here
Luda and 5'7.5" Usher... Click Here

Here's Ludacris w/ height-loss Dominique Wilkins(poor posture) and a slouching 6'7" Magic:
Click Here Compare Wilkins and Luda to Kane and Flair. Wilkins and Magic are clearly taller than Kane.

Mind you, Wilkins is slightly shorter than 6'6" Deontay Wilder (2018)... Click Here
6'6" Wilder and 6'6" Audley Harrison... Click Here
Wilder and maybe 6'4.5" Wade Barrett... Click Here

Wilkins and slouching height-loss Scottie Pippen... Click Here
Wilkins and 6'8" Alonzo Mourning... Click Here
W and Larry Bird (6'9" peak/6'8" current)... Click Here
W and 6'10.25" Chris Bosh (2015)... Click Here

Undertaker and 5'8" Mario Lopez (2018)... Click Here
ced said on 25/Mar/19
Another Big Show/Kane | Kevin Nash-Big Show comparison

Click Here ----- Show and Nash

Click Here ----- Show and Kane

What do you guys think?
ced said on 25/Mar/19
@Vegas, I don't think your video is the best comparison either.. Kane is slouching big time in the video..

I think a better comparison to that Nash Video would be when Kane was in the ring with McMahon when he first "spoke" with the voicebox gimmick.. That's where you can truly see the comparison.

@Sotiris, I am not by any means saying that Kane was taller than Nash.. BUT, if Nash was 6'9 or 6'9.25, Kane had 2 inch lifts.. That means that Kane without his 2 inch lifts was minimal 6'7.5 at his peak.. But he was even taller than Nash in his lifts, meaning (at his peak) he had to be 6'7.5 OR 6'7.75 in order to be taller than Nash in them.
Dan Trojan said on 25/Mar/19
Christian i here you on that i remember google had the rapper madchild at 4'11" i knew that was a joke i met him and he was a little shorter than me and i'm 5'6" so yeah google definitely lies
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Mar/19
Lol, hell no. Google listings are all over the place most of the time. They are rarely accurate. Most of the time they're too high, but occasionally you see low listings as well. There was once a 5'11.5" listed actor that was listed as 5'0" on Google before, but it has now changed to 6'0".
Matt Haines said on 24/Mar/19
6'7 range sounds pretty legit for Kane here I am at 6.0.5" standing next to him Click Here
Dan Trojan said on 24/Mar/19
Ced your pictures don't prove anything kane was known to wear lifts that's why he looks taller than nash i believe nash was 6'9" at peak and kane 6'7" or maybe a bit more seeing as he always looked slightly taller than the undertaker kane was never taller than nash
Grezza said on 24/Mar/19
Actually here's a picture of Kane and Bryan out of gear with a fan compared to the Joey/Bryan picture Click Here

And as u can see, Kane's clearly got a foot in height on DB there, where as Joey looks to have 6.5 inches on DB
Sotiris Gravas said on 24/Mar/19
@ced Internal lifts, dudester.

Here, look at this pic of little 5'7" (not 5'7.75") Daniel Bryan next to fellow poster Joeyb33 (6'2.25") w/ a 0.5" footwear advantage (2017)... Click Here You see how Joe TOWERS over him?

OK, now look at this YouTube clip of Bryan and Kane (2013)... Click Here Does Kane look GIGANTIC here...? That would be no.
Vegas' said on 22/Mar/19
Nash was taller than Kane once Kane dropped the 2+ inch platforms

Kane with Vince Click Here

Nash with Vince Click Here
ced said on 22/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. take a look below.. Kevin Nash with Shane McMahon and then Shane Mcmahon with Kane

Granted, the photo is not the best conparison, but what you can see here is how tal Kane was next to Shane compared to Nash.. yes, Kane has lifts on, but he would not be taller than Nash in his lifts if he was only 6’6.5 peak.. he defi itely looks taller than Nash in this photo

Click Here
edwards said on 21/Mar/19
bye the way dude,its not only kane,it has been often claimed that taker too wore inner lifts.
edwards said on 21/Mar/19
@rawdshaq watch kane as isaac yankem stare down with undertaker in 1996 since both are young and at peak.both has normal shoes.
Lyle said on 21/Mar/19
@rawdshaq it was revealed Taker wore lifts to but inside his boots rather than outside like Kane
rawdshaq said on 20/Mar/19
I think Undertaker was 1/2 taller than Kane at their peaks. Kane had huge lifts, Undertaker didn't, and still held up with him very easily.

Watch this video

Click Here
Sotiris Gravas said on 20/Mar/19
Ric Flair and 5'8" Ludacris... Click Here

Flair and Kane... Click Here , Click Here

Flair and 6'7.5" (listed 6'8") Calais Campbell (2019)... Click Here I'm supposed to believe Kane is 0.5" shorter than Campbell? NO THANK YOU. Kane is NOWHERE near his height.

Flair and legit 6'7" Magic, leaning forward, as usual (2019)... Click Here

Younger Flair and 6'4.5" Charles Barkley... Click Here
Flair (maybe barefoot, looks very short) and Barkley... Click Here

Flair and 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg (2017)... Click Here

@John Albertson So, buddy, was what I posted "sloppy" enough for you...? All I get is weak comments from ppl that offer nothing.

@Jake Warren Was that "outside the box" enough for you, Your Highness...? Milord...? Is everything to your liking...? Are you not entertained?

This is the face Flair and I make when we have to deal w/ silly ppl... Click Here Right, John? Right, Jake?
John Albertson said on 20/Mar/19
Posting a picture of a man that is close to 7ft and someone who is well under 6ft to make a judgement for the taller man, is so inconclusive @Sotiris. your examples and point of view Is very sloppy
edwards said on 19/Mar/19
undertaker was never taller than kane,at times both seems equal or eithers seems to edge the other but i say taker was never taller than kane,watch those staredown between kane as isaac yanken and undertaker in 1996 ,noth were at peak and kane was half inch have listed taker as taller than kane at peak height.i say no chance taker is taller than kane.
ced said on 19/Mar/19
Im not saying Sotiris is not correct for the NBA guys. This is Kane’s page.. im soecifically wondering wbout Kane.

Kevin Nash is being a peak height of 6’9.5yet im every staredown, (like i posted below - Kane is closer to Show’s height than is Nash)... yet somehow Kane’s peak height is lower than Nash’s..

In both pictures, scenarios I posted below, Nash and Kane look the same height and Kane slightly taller in the staredown with Big Show.. if he’s no more than 6’7 peak or 6’6.5 (as Sotiris states), if you put 2 inch lifts on Kane, he would be at 6’8.5 in them or 6’9. That still doesn’t add up. Kevin Nash was 6’9.5 in 98, and measured to Show’s eyebrow, but Kane measures up to halfway of Show’s forehead..
Canson said on 19/Mar/19
@Sotiris: Lebron May be taller than Bell by a touch. Bell I could believe 6’6.5 Lebron 6’7” or 6’6.75-6’7”. Funny thing Bell said he towered over draymond green when Green is supposedly 6’5”ish.
rawdshaq said on 19/Mar/19
@Christian I do that for any celebrity that isn't a wrestler, because most of the time they are pretty accurate.
edwards said on 18/Mar/19
@Ced sotiris is correct dude,love is 6'7
Heisenberg89 said on 18/Mar/19

Sorry man, but those are peak height barefoot or w/ shoes on?
Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Mar/19
@ced Dude, these guys wore HUGE boots... Click Here and internal lifts were also used when the situation presented itself...

Here's notorious lift-wearer, Matt Bloom , aka A-Train, around 6'5" (billed 6'7") w/ Taker:
Click Here

Bloom and Matt Morgan... Click Here

Bloom and Big Show... Click Here

This is Blooms's real height next to max 5'9" Finn Balor (2013)... Click Here

Keep in mind, this was Big Show's real height next to Shaq, both men in dress shoes: Click Here , Click Here , Click Here Show looks around 3" shorter than a legit 7-footer when he's deprived of footwear enhancement.

I recently posted this again on Show's page... Show and 5'11 Jarvis Landry:
Click Here I'm around Kevin Love's height of 6'7" and a height of 5'11" reaches my lip area, meaning Show is not as tall as ppl think.
Here's a slouching maybe 5'11.5" (not 6'0.5") The Miz w/ Love... Click Here

Now, look at what fellow poster JT recently submitted on Show's page... Show and Dion Dawkins, who has a listing of 6'4" and 6'5"... Click Here Show is now wearing elevator shoes or lifts out in public to compensate for his height loss.

Even slouching Shaq seems to have lost height. Here he is w/ 5'9.5" Adam Sandler (2019):
Click Here

Slouching Stephen Merchant (6'7" peak height) (2009) and Sandler... Click Here

Height-loss Kareem w/ height-loss Shaq (2019)... Click Here

One last thing, LOL... Here's Lebron (listed 6'7.25" w/o shoes morning height/6'8" w/ shoes, LISTED 6'8") next to Jordan Bell (6'7" w/o shoes/6'8.5" w/ shoes, LISTED 6'9"):
Click Here Jordan Bell is basically 6'6.5", and he and LeBron look the same height.

Kevin Love's morning height is only 0.5" more than LeBron, yet he's listed 2 WHOLE INCHES MORE than LeBron. NBA heights are fake... The same goes for WWE heights.
ced said on 18/Mar/19
Click Here

Nash and Hogan 2002 ^^

Click Here

Kane and Hogan 2002 ^^
ced said on 18/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. Here, Kane and Big Show '99 (Both at their peaks)

Click Here

Here's Nash and Big Show in '98, (peak heights):

Click Here

Now, if Kane wasn't at least 6'8 at his peak, please explain to me how could he have looked closer to Show's height than Kevin Nash?

The top of Kane's head comes up halfway to Show's forehead.. The Top of Nash's head comes to the top of Nash's head comes to Show's eyebrow..
Jake Warren said on 18/Mar/19
@Sotiris my friend you are unable to read nor see outside the box. Your pictures are awful examples to judge height from. Kane is 6’7
Christian 6'5 3/8 said on 18/Mar/19
You're really using Google of all websites to find out the heights of celebrities? Lol, you're clearly a rookie.
Editor Rob
Unfortunately the huge majority of people who search for a celebrities height, actually never venture beyond the infobox, so they are reading whatever is displayed in it by Google. It's quite natural for Google to want to keep searchers on their property and not venture away onto other sites. That's why they introduced them many years ago, to the detriment of websites really.

Say someone like Tom Cruise, every month on google he might get around 150,000 people asking about his height.

The massive majority are simply not going beyond the infobox. My estimate (based on data for my site from google itself) is that 90% or more get their answer from google for heights and never bother to venture any further.

The remaining 10% might actually click through to one of the many sites that competes for the term (not all people get shown the same sites in the same order, so one person might see my site at position 1, another at position 4 etc), or onto youtube, because they also cross promote videos a lot more - it makes sense, they own youtube and want to keep people on their properties for as long as possible.

Their tactics work, because just look at Google's quarterly revenue reports Click Here 😲
ced said on 17/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. i get what you’re saying.. but, if Kane was only 6’7 peak, how could have he been even remotely close to Big Show’s peak height in all their staredowns? King of the Ring 1999, just look at their staredown, and then Royal Rumble 2002, they were very close in height, more than a peak Kevin Nash ever was with Show. (Of which you think Nash was 6’9.25.

Let’s say Kane was 6’7 in 1999, with his 1.5 inch lifts, he would have been 6’8.5 in them.. now take a peak Show, which i believe was 6’11, add another inch if boots on him, he is 7 foot in his boots.. Kane only looked 2.25 inches smaller than Show then.. (In both staredowns).
Canson said on 17/Mar/19
@Ced: Sotiris is correct. Love is 6’7”. He only measured 6’7.75 at the combine and that was likely equivalent to a morning measurement as people who have seen him such as Dan Majerle even say he’s 6’7”. Love isn’t much taller than Lebron if even
DFens said on 17/Mar/19
@Lyle, the guy's facebook page is locked, couldn't find the picture.
Sotiris Gravas said on 17/Mar/19
@DFens Your pic proves the exact opposite. Kane looks nowhere near 6'7". I already posted a pic of Kane and Donovan Smith... Here's Kane w/ Lee Smith, listed 6'6" , which is a morning height, so, let's say 6'5.5"... Click Here Does Kane look anywhere near the 6'7" that you think you proved...? Let me answer that for you... No.

All your pic proves is that Big Show is not as tall as ppl think... Click Here

Have a nice day.
Lyle said on 17/Mar/19
@DFens what's the guys name? I'm curious to see his fb page with the picture of him and Kane
rawdshaq said on 17/Mar/19
Ok, all peak heights from me @Sotiris

Undertaker: 6'8 1/2"
Kane: 6'8"
Big Show: 7'
Kevin Nash: 6'9 1/2"
Andre the Giant: 7'
Dan Trojan said on 16/Mar/19
Ced kevin love isn't 6'10" he was measured at 6'9.5" with his shoes on and 6'7.75" barefoot and also there isn't 3 inches between him and taker it lools to be about 2 but undertaker's posture isn't very good so i'd say about an inch in a half so taker is at about 6'6" basketball players get overlisted too
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Mar/19
@Vegas I'm surprised you think politicians don't always tell the truth; JK :)

As for Big Cass being measured at 6'8" in college, they're notorious for inflating heights. I would take that w/ a grain of salt, as well. I give Cass 6'7.5".

I used to believe the hype that Aaron Judge was 6'7"... I now understand that he's 6'6" and that Giancarlo Stanton (listed 6'6") is only 6'4"... Click Here , Click Here
Stanton and 6'4" Michael Strahan... Click Here

Here Cass looks 6'8" w/ 6'6" Judge... Click Here
Here, more 6'7.5"... Click Here , Click Here

Judge and Blake Griffin (slouching)... Click Here
Griffin and 6'4.75" Kobe... Click Here
6'7" Magic and Kobe... Click Here

Kobe and 6'9.25" Kevin Durant... Click Here Cass is definitely not 6'9".

Funny how Cass looks taller than Big Show... Click Here
viper said on 16/Mar/19
Lol Kevin Love is only 6-10 in women's high heels.
Sotiris Gravas said on 16/Mar/19
@ced I don't want to offend you, but you just don't know what you're talking about w/ regard to NBA-listed heights... Kevin love was measured at 6'7.75" w/o shoes (morning height) at the combine, 6'9.5" w/ shoes, rounded up to 6'10". His "real" height is around 6'7". He's at the most 6'7.25". Personally, I think Love was 2.5" taller than Taker, not the 3" that you saw. That being said, Taker is not as tall as you think, dude, and neither is Kane for that matter. What I just explained to you (and others, obviously) is not my humble opinion, it's indisputable fact. Ppl want to argue something that cannot be argued.

This was Taker w/ Love... Click Here , Click Here , Click Here

This is Love w/ 6'9.25" (not 6'9.5") Kevin Durant... Click Here Love looks all of 6'7", max.

I can understand how you might believe Taker is 6'6.5", given how that's the height Rob the editor lists him at. No offense to either of you, but both you and Rob are wrong.

The most I'd give Kane is 6'5.5". Kane was never more than 6'7" peak height... he's certainly not that now. The pics I've already posted 100% proves this. Taker looks 6'5" now.

This is Stephen Merchant (6'7" peak height) w/ 6'2" (not 6'2.5") John Krasinski (2019):
Click Here
Compare that w/ Taker and 5'11" Jimmy Fallon... Click Here Taker is NOWHERE near Merchant's height.

Kane and Taker are NOWHERE near as tall as ppl/fans think. We've all been PUNK'D:
Click Here Sorry, not that guy... THIS guy... Click Here

Please respond... I really wanna hear what you have to say.
Philip McMullin said on 16/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas You really have lost it if you think kane and taker were 6ft6.5 peak!! Kane 6ft8 minimum peak and taker about a quarter to a half inch less peak.
DFens said on 15/Mar/19
I can say this is a rare pic of Kane standing STRAIGHT proving he still 6'7".

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Have a nice day.
Heisenberg89 said on 15/Mar/19
Kane is never been taller than 6'7", otherwise as yankem he would have been downgraded and it's not possible.

Now he is 6'6" max and around 1.5 inches taller than 6'4.75 Vaughn.

Undertaker is 6'5.75 6'6 now, not shorter than Kane.

Kane, at his peak plus boots, was even 6'9" reason why he was so close to big show in one staredown.
Bruce Pichard can say what he wants, Kane always had more advantage from shoes than Taker not the opposite.
Chris n said on 15/Mar/19
Well @sotoris being human we all are emotional. But this is just height dude, just correcting your view what you are seeing
ced said on 15/Mar/19
@Sotiris, if you google Kevin Love's Height, it states 6'10. This is NBA, not WWE.. They might bump him up 1 inch or round to the nearest inch, but, he is 6'10.

With that said, Tkaer looks about 3 inches under him, making him around 6'6.5-6'7.
Philip McMullin said on 15/Mar/19

Kane peak - 6ft8.5
Taker peak - 6ft7.75
Big Show peak - 7ft0.5
Nash peak - 6ft9
Andre peak - 7ft1.5

are my guesses
Sotiris Gravas said on 15/Mar/19
@rawdshaq I think Kane and Taker were around 6'6.5" peak, but maybe I'm wrong and they were around 6'7"... maybe 6'10.5" peak for Big Show, not more than 6'11"... 6'9" peak for Nash, but maybe he was 6'9.5".... 6'10" for Andre in the '80s, but maybe he was 6'11" in the early '70s. Where do you have them, my good man...?
Vegas' said on 15/Mar/19
Kane is a politician and it's best to take what they say with grain of salt lol.

As for Cass he was listed 6'8 in college so unlikely as tall as 6'9 though he does look 6 inches taller than Joey. Cass looked ~3 inches shorter than Big Show in-ring in 2017 Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 15/Mar/19
rawdshaq my eyes may be deceiving me but sotiris's group pic inc; kane & cass etc...Kane seems quite behind cass...i reckon if he stepped forward and ditched his pathetic ''rested'' stance...wish he stood up and let everyone in the room know ''hes there'' hahahah he'd be as tall as cass
rawdshaq said on 14/Mar/19
@Sotiris May I ask, how tall do you think Kane, Undertaker, Big Show, Kevin Nash, and Andre the Giant were at their peak heights? You don't have to post pics or give description if you choose not to, but can you make a list?
Philip McMullin said on 14/Mar/19
@rawdshaq IKR...Kane just wouldn't lie about anything..hes too much of a good and upstanding man to lie.
Philip McMullin said on 14/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas we're not frantic over people's height...we just have to correct people when they're wrong from time to time.
rawdshaq said on 14/Mar/19
Also forget to mention Big Cass is actually about 6'9".
rawdshaq said on 14/Mar/19
@Sotiris Okay first off, you pick the worse pictures to compare Undertakers height. There is another video of Undertaker having about 3/4 of a head on Jimmy Fallon (or maybe even more) which means he is 8 inches taller than him making him still around 6'7" or a little under, 6'6 1/2".

How about we settle on 6'6"?
Vegas' said on 14/Mar/19
Cass looks 6 inches taller than Joey there given he could easily stand straighter.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Mar/19
There are ppl here that persist in mentioning Vince Vaughn w/ Kane... Guys, the pics I posted of 6'3.5" Troy Aikman and 6'7" Kevin Love vs. 6'5" Taker and Kevin Love proves I'm right. Taker and Kane are around the same height. You have no leg to stand on in your argument (pardon the pun). I recently posted a pic of Stephen Merchant (legit 6'7" peak height) w/ 5'11" Jimmy Fallon vs. Taker and Fallon on Taker's page... Taker is NOWHERE near his height. Seriously, some of you here are way too emotionally invested in these guys. Being frantic over someone's height, anybody, to the point where you're about to have a stroke is not normal behavior, at least not for adults.
Canson said on 13/Mar/19
@Philip: how does Sotiris’s pics of Kane have anything to do with him having a problem with Kane? How does Sotiris not thinking he’s as tall as he’s listed translate to him having a problem with him? They’re two completely independent things. I surely don’t agree he’s only 6’5” but Sotiris saying that he is does not mean he doesn’t like him. Height has nothing to do with someone liking or disliking someone
rawdshaq said on 13/Mar/19
@Sotiris You post pictures to make Kane look as short as possible. Do you know what kind of human Kane is? He's a mayor, why would a mayor need to lie about his height? He said he is 6'8" which is probably him in his dress shoes which is okay. If you ask Kane "how tall are you actually, without shoes?" he would probably give you an honest response.
Sotiris Gravas said on 13/Mar/19
@Ced The heads of Titus and Kane in the pic I posted were cropped by my Image Downloader app, which happens sometimes, almost as weird as this... Click Here I checked online and this is what I should have posted... Click Here

Here's 6'3" Titus getting towered by 6'4" Jameis Winston... Click Here
Towered by 6'5" Vince Carter... Click Here
Towered by 6'6" Alex Zverev... Click Here
Towered by Aaron Judge (listed 6'7", but I now realize is 6'6")... Click Here (Giancarlo Stanton is listed at 6'6", but he's only 6'4".)

Also, here's Jimmy Fallon w/ Stephen Merchant (6'7" peak height) TOWERING over Fallon:
Click Here

Taker and Fallon... Click Here

Kane and Taker are nowhere near 6'7". Whenever I post pics of Taker or Kane looking short, I immediately hear trite remarks like, "Oh, poor posture is to blame... bad angles..." Yet, these are the same ppl that will post their pic where their beloved wrestler is favored -- or not post anything at all -- and proceed to swear up and down that said wrestler is, in fact, as tall as they had imagined, if not taller, i.e., way too tall. That gets real old, real fast.

This is a group shot of Titus (poor posture) next to Kane... Notice how Kane and 6'7.5" (not 6'8") Big Cass are not close in height... Click Here

Cass and 6'2.25" Joeyb33... Click Here
Chris n said on 12/Mar/19
@Sotiris. Dude seriously, can you NOT SEE that Vince Vaughn is on his toes in that pic? Seriously?

If that pic Is legit, then Kane is 6’5- but that is truly False. And it is ridiculously obvious too.

Kane is 6’7
Philip McMullin said on 12/Mar/19
@Keaner Cometson I wouldnt pay a damn bit of notice to Sotiris's estimations!
Philip McMullin said on 12/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas you clearly have a problem with Kane...Your pic of Kane and have no idea on what Vaugn's stance is..whether he is on his tip toes or standing on a small box etc...the ground they're standing on may be higher on Vaugn's side of the pic ... you are a height pest who clearly has an issue with literally downgrade the crap out of him! Kane aint gonna lie about his height...hes not the lying type to be honest
Qadaruddin said on 12/Mar/19
How do i upload pics..plz help..i got lot of evidence
Editor Rob
no actual uploads are allowed, but you can just link to other sites (use to create short links)
Sotiris Gravas said on 12/Mar/19
@Pauli No, what you have to stop doing is assuming you have any authority to dictate anything whatsoever, to anyone. Ever. Donovan Smith's 6'5 5/8" is a morning height. The man is not more than 6'5". The photos I posted proves this unequivocally. I post pics of different wrestlers so as to gauge height; the same goes for celebrities. Perhaps you'd prefer only pics of wrestlers staring at their own height in a mirror... Click Here

This is 6'3.25" (not 6'3.75") Jon Jones (poor posture) next to a max 6'9" Big Show... Show is in socks and Jones is barefoot... Click Here

6'3.5" Troy Aikman and 6'7" Kevin Love (2014)... Click Here
6'5" Undertaker and Love (2016)... Click Here

This is 6'3.5" Jinder Mahal w/ 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg... Click Here
Jinder and max 6'10" Khali, not in big wrestling boots... Click Here
Khali and 7'0" Satnam Singh... Click Here
7'0" Satnam and now 6'7" A.C. Green... Click Here
Green w/ height-loss Kareem (poor posture)... Click Here

So, no, Big Show is not 6'11", Taker is not 6'6.5", and Khali is not 7 feet tall, "all within very precise levels," LOL. I offer photographic evidence as substantive proof; you offer nothing.

@rawdshaq No, Kane is not 6'7".

Kane and Vince Vaughn... Click Here

Vaughn and 6'4", max Michael Strahan... Click Here

Vaughn and 6'6" Gronk... Click Here

Vaughn and 6'5" J.J. Watt... Click Here , Click Here

J.J. Watt and 6'7.25" (listed 6'8") Calais Campbell... Click Here

Calais Campbell and 6'4.5" Charles Barkley... Click Here

The next time you change your mind every 3 seconds regarding Kane's height, hopefully, it will be more congruent w/ reality and not a kayfabe lovefest.
ced said on 12/Mar/19
Here are some worthy comparisons.. I believe this guy was definitely a 6'8.25 peak, and currently still 6'7.

Recent photo of Kane and his wife: Click Here

Kane in 2002: (Look at the door frame to his left, door frames are 6'8) Click Here

Now, take a look how much taller he is next to his wife back in his peak days:

Click Here

Click Here
ced said on 12/Mar/19
@Sotiris, the 2nd picture you provide with Snoop and Titus, Titus looks .25 inches taller than Snoop there.. Unless you and I see something different.

I am a very weak 6'4, on the dot means that I'm not 6'4.25, but exactly 6'4.. Maybe I drop down to 6'3.75 during the day, I don't know, but, I know that Titus is semi-strong 6'3. Let's meet somewhere in the middle with him, and say he's 6'3.25

Here's the unedited photo of Kane and Titus.. Click Here

Kane looking 4 inches taller than Titus there.
Keaner Cometson said on 12/Mar/19
If you label kane at 6’5 tops. Then @Sotiris would be your friend
Pauli said on 12/Mar/19
Sotiris Gravas you need to stop spamming these pages with photos of wrestlers and celebrities. Only photos of Kane in this page, Undertaker on his page and so on

The only relevant photo you posted there was this one of Donavon Smith and Kane Click Here

Smith is a confirmed measured 6ft 5 and 5/8ths barefoot so Kane looks 6ft 7 there or 6ft 6 1/2 at the worst. Both are side by side too so excellent comparison.

If we know Kane is within that height range we can guess Big Show (6'10 1/2-6ft 11), Undertaker (6ft 6-6ft 6 1/2), Dalip Singh (6'11 1/2-7 foot) all within very precise levels.
Sotiris Gravas said on 11/Mar/19
@ced 6'3" Titus, 6'2" Tim Tebow, and 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg... Click Here
6'3" Titus and 6'2.75" Wiz Khalifa (2014)... Click Here , Click Here
6'3" Titus and 6'3.5" Snoop... Click Here

6'3.5" Snoop and 6'6" Gronk... Click Here

To reiterate, Titus O'Neil is not more than 6'3"... he most certainly is not 6'3.75"... which leads me to believe you are not the height you claim... the same can be said of rawdshaq, it would seem.

@Philip McMullin Stop wasting everyone's time.
rawdshaq said on 11/Mar/19
@Sotiris Dude Kane looks taller than Vince Carter by about 2 inches he is still close to 6'7" maybe exactly but he definitely isn't as low as 6'5". I used to think he is and I know why you see him as 6'5", but pay attention to how he stands next to people, he usually tilts in his head and stands with loose posture and loses like 2 inches. Trust me, he is still about 6'7".
ced said on 11/Mar/19
@Sotiris, Titus is not 6'3. He is 6'3.75.. I know this for a fact as I am 6'4 on the dot, and have met Titus on numerous occasions.. I always only had about .25 inches on Titus.
Philip McMullin said on 10/Mar/19
@Sotiris Gravas What the hell is your problem with Kane? He is still every bit of 6ft7 maybe plus
Qadaruddin said on 10/Mar/19
Peak kane should have been around 6'8 without a doubt i believe.
rawdshaq said on 9/Mar/19
I think Kane was peak 6'8" Christian. I never said he was the same height as Kevin Nash but he was similar in height to him, like he was about an inch shorter
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Mar/19
So you're saying that Kane was peak 6'9"? Because you said he was the same height as Nash and Nash's peak was 6'9" range.
edwards said on 8/Mar/19
taker is much closer to camera dude.
Canson said on 8/Mar/19
@Rawdshaq: just like others here use pics when a celeb looks taller than they are. It’s no different
Sotiris Gravas said on 8/Mar/19
@rawdshaq Here's 6'3" Titus and Kane (2018)... Click Here

Titus and 6'5" Vince Carter... Click Here
Titus and 6'5" Jadeveon Clowney... Click Here
Titus, 6'4 Jameis Winston, and 6'5" (not 6'6") Donovan Smith... Click Here , Click Here

Kane (closer to camera) and 6'5" (not 6'6") Donovan Smith... Click Here
6'5" Vince Carter and Donovan Smith... Click Here
Donovan Smith and 6'5" Devon Still... Click Here

Titus and 6'9" Dwight Howard... Click Here , Click Here
Titus and Big Show... Click Here , Click Here Show looking VERY short here.
Here Show looking taller (closer to camera) w/ Titus, 6'4" Jameis Winston and 6'5" Donovan Smith (2016)... Click Here , Click Here I think Big Show wears orthotics in his shoes which makes him look taller (same w/ Charles Barkley). When he's not wearing wrestling boots or orthotics, his true height is exposed.

Titus and 6'7.5" Hafthor... Click Here
T and now 6'8" Ed "Too Tall" Jones... Click Here
T and 6'9" Etan Thomas... Click Here
T and Tyson Chandler (listed 6'11.5" w/o shoes)... Click Here

So, is Kane 6'7" like Rob the editor has him...? Absolutely not.
rawdshaq said on 8/Mar/19
Kane always had a full head on 5'10" Paul Bearer (9-10 inches)

Kane had a full head on 5'11" Jim Ross as Fake Diesel (9-10 inches)

Kane has always been 2-3 (maybe 4 at his peak) inches taller than 6'4 1/2" Randy Orton

Kane has always been similar in height to the Undertaker who I believe was 6'8" at his peak

Kane had an inch on 6'7" peak Psycho Sid

Kane has always been billed at 7 feet tall by EVERY org he has worked in (except one time as that dentist dude he was billed at 6'9")

@Sotiris I respect that you have lots of evidence to back up your claims but out of respect you post pictures that make Kane look as short as possible, if you had a photo gallery I could go through photos when you look like you're 6'5" and only post those. Kane was always billed very tall, if he was really 6'5" he will be billed at 6'6" - 6'7" like most guys that range were billed. Titus may have been described as 7 feet but he was always a 6'3" range guy billed at 6'6". Kane was similar in height to Kevin Nash in one of his matches with him as another character, and he towered over EVERYBODY.

Now that Kane is in his early - mid 50s, sure he might have lost some height. I doubt he went from 6'8" to 6'5" though, 6'7" today seems legit.
Heisenberg89 said on 8/Mar/19
Click Here
edwards said on 8/Mar/19
i personally dont get why people are assuming taker and kane to be same height atleast at peak,i can clearly see kane being taller than taker ,kane as isaac yankem was clearly taller than taker as both were at peak and kane didnt have lifts. personally i am sure that kane was clearly taller than taker at peak and is clearly taller than taker today.either times both of em seems to have edge due to camera angle or lifts but personally i think no chance of taker and kane being same and thats me personally.
Ned Dukes said on 7/Mar/19
Some of you post the worst pictures to judge height from. Kane is still min 6’7. Anything under is truly silly
Heisenberg89 said on 6/Mar/19
What about 6'7" peak 6'6" today?
JoshL said on 5/Mar/19
Kane was actually several inches talker than Fake Razor when standing straight Click Here
ced said on 5/Mar/19
@Sotiris.. Man, come on.. those are some horrible angles and fake Razor is on top of a podium..

Here you can see the real difference between them.. (and what Kane looked like behind the mask during '97)

Click Here
Timothy Al-Akeem Soubal said on 5/Mar/19
6’7 is quite accurate for Kane. I see some people think he is under 6’6.5 which is comical really. 6’7 and 6’6.75 min when he takes photos with his head slouched over. I wish there was a modern pic of him standard straight and tall again, I bet he would look close to the 6’8 mark.
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Mar/19
6'3.5" (not 6'4.5") Jinder Mahal and 6'3.5" Snoop Dogg... Click Here

Jinder and 6'2.75" Wiz Khalifa... Click Here

Jinder and around 6'5.5" Rick Bognar (fake Razor Ramon)... Click Here

Fake Razor and Kane (fake Diesel) were very close in height... Click Here ,
Click Here (Kane is the dude in black.)
James Brett 172cm said on 3/Mar/19
rawdshaq said on 1/Mar/19
@James Where is this? I can only find him being listed as 6'6" in the WWE.

Some old wwe article
Jim Mohammad Kabul said on 1/Mar/19
This human being is min 6’7. Even at his age, still solid at that height. Just remember that he still trains and still looks great, apart from the slightly bowing legs. This questions me of his height loss, in which I imagine is only half an inch or so. So Rob’s estimate is spot on
rawdshaq said on 1/Mar/19
@edwards I think the lowest Kane would be is 6'6 1/2".
rawdshaq said on 1/Mar/19
@James Where is this? I can only find him being listed as 6'6" in the WWE.
Dan Trojan said on 1/Mar/19
Sorry i meant to say that to rawdshaq
Dan Trojan said on 1/Mar/19
James brett that's not necessarily true andre the giant was billed at 7'4" but i honestly think he was no more than 6'11" also giant gonzalez was billed at 8'0" but he was actually 7'6" even the big show at one time was billed at 7'4" but he admitted he was never over 7'0" so the wwe does inflate heights more than 2 inches sometimes
James Brett 172cm said on 28/Feb/19
rawdshaq said on 27/Feb/19
@edwards I shouldn't have said 100%, I personally don't think he's less than 6'7". He sure in hell isn't no 6'5" guy, if he was then everybody on the site would have to be downgraded. He still claims 6'8" which might be a shoe height. I have him at exactly 6'8 1/5" at his peak and at 51 he could have lost an inch or so 6'7" seems on the mark for me.

A lot of people don't realize it but Kane doesn't stand the tallest either. He has a weird stance and leans down when he talks to people. And let's use logic here, if he was REALLY always 6'5" would he be billed at 7 feet tall? No, obviously not.

Well Titus O’Neil has been described as 7ft before
edwards said on 28/Feb/19
@rawdshaq yes i agree dude but i doubt he is strong 6'7.he maybe weak 6'7 .he seems an inch taller than taker who i think is 6'6 or atleast a weakone.same goes to kane,he maybe weak 6'7
Chris R said on 28/Feb/19
Anyone can lose 1-2 inches with their head tilted. Which is what kane does a lot in his pictures
rawdshaq said on 27/Feb/19
@edwards I shouldn't have said 100%, I personally don't think he's less than 6'7". He sure in hell isn't no 6'5" guy, if he was then everybody on the site would have to be downgraded. He still claims 6'8" which might be a shoe height. I have him at exactly 6'8 1/5" at his peak and at 51 he could have lost an inch or so 6'7" seems on the mark for me.

A lot of people don't realize it but Kane doesn't stand the tallest either. He has a weird stance and leans down when he talks to people. And let's use logic here, if he was REALLY always 6'5" would he be billed at 7 feet tall? No, obviously not.
edwards said on 27/Feb/19
@ rawdshaq dude maybe,it seems likely that kane maybe under 6'7 currently .
Hasan said on 26/Feb/19
Mr Jacobs is 6’7. Yes there are pictures of him with around 6’6 men, appearing to be the same height. It all depends on camera angles, ground level etc, creates illusions. I’m 6’2 and I look 6’ next to 6’ men many times. Then other pictures I can see the clear 2 inch, even more.
Philip McMullin said on 26/Feb/19
ced doesnt matter. found it...that pif of kane and those women in a line...kane is so much taller than them all!!
DaveBern said on 26/Feb/19
IMO, peak heights:

Nash = Sid = Kane Taker (but Taker only under by a hair)
rawdshaq said on 25/Feb/19
@edwards I understand man but Kane has a very fluctuating height and I thought Paul Bearer was 5'10" but remembered he was actually around 6 feet or 5'11", which still puts a 6'8" peak Kane legit.

Today Kane is 100% nothing under 6'7".
ced said on 25/Feb/19
@ Martin 6'2.. There is a still of Kane next to a door frame.. if you go to youtube and type in "Kane with long hair no mask".. There's a video of what he looked like behind the mask during 2000 I believe, and he's holding a puppy in the video.. The door frame is a little away, but he definitely looks a tad taller than the door frame.
Martin 6'2" said on 24/Feb/19
I think k the best thing to do, is see if there's any footage of Kane next to doorframes, weather in or out of character, as I know most doorframes in the US are apparently 6'8"
edwards said on 24/Feb/19
i am not pointing any one but here are posters who changes his/her mind whenever he/she sees new photos.just stick to one.changing mind so manytimes when ever they see new photos being posted .
JoshL said on 23/Feb/19
Kane looks several inches taller than Viscera in the pictures Sotiris posted Click Here
Canson said on 23/Feb/19
@Rawdshaq: easy 6’7” peak
Canson said on 23/Feb/19
@Sotiris: I’m not sure how I would class Ben. He can look 195cm at times but If that’s an early morning measurement I would say 6’4.5 is the lowest I could see. He really does look weak 6’5”
rawdshaq said on 22/Feb/19
I am so sorry, I forgot that Paul Bearer was 6 feet, lol. Kane does look 6'8" there. My guesses are still the same
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Feb/19
@rawdshaq Kane (w/ better posture) and same guy (leaning in for the pic)... Click Here

@ced Sid and Kane w/ another guy comparison... Click Here

Sid and Hillbilly w/ the same dude... Click Here JT found these great pics.
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Feb/19
@rawdshaq Snitsky isn't even 6'5", he's max 6'4.5". Look at him w/ Ben Roethlisberger who's only 6'5" closer to a morning height.
Sotiris Gravas said on 22/Feb/19
@rawdshaq Here's Kane and some guy... Click Here

Same guy w/ around 6'4" John Tenta... Click Here

Same guy w/ 6'5" Tarik Glenn... Click Here

W/ 6'5" (NOT 6'6") Gene Snitsky... Click Here

W/ 6'6" Viscera... Click Here

So... how tall is Kane now...?
ced said on 22/Feb/19
@TravonLays.. Kane was indeed taller than BOTH Sid and Undertaker in their prime. Just take a look at their SMW staredown, Kane always had half inch to .75 of an inch on Taker. ALWAYS. Forget the attitude era lifts as Kane, Bruce Prichard even confirmed this. Bruce also confirmed that they both wore lifts. Undertaker's was internal.

Look at the staredown between Undertaker and Isaac Yankem.. You can see Taker staring up at Kane. Same thing with their SMW staredown. Both pre-lifts Kane.
rawdshaq said on 22/Feb/19
OH MY, I've given up. I don't even have an exact guess anymore. He doesn't look any more than a weak 6'5" here (AND THIS IS HIS PEAK!)

Click Here
tree said on 22/Feb/19
he is the Mayor of Knox County, Tennessee
TravonLays said on 21/Feb/19
Peak Kane wasn't Taller than Undertaker.
Sid was 6'6.5, 6'6.75 MAX
Taker was 6'7.25 to 6'7.5
Kane Was 6'7.25 to 6'7.5 MAX
Nash was 6'9 or even 6'9.25 on Good day.
ced said on 21/Feb/19
@Hasan.. it sure is. If you looked at the photo i posted below with Nash and Kane, you can see that Nash’s eye level is just slightly above Kane’s. Meaning if Nash’s peak height was 6’9, then Kane was 6’8.5. Today Kane is 6’7, when slouching, about 6’6.75.
Martin 6'2" said on 20/Feb/19
Hey guys, it's been a while.
I've just read a very interesting comment on a YouTube video, and I quote... "Glenn Jacobs stated in a British magazine called Powerslam, that he was actually 6'5" and his wrestling boots plus the lifts inside boosted him another 3 inches."
So perhaps when Kane said he was 6'8" he was talking about in his ring gear.
Hasan Alkayoubh said on 20/Feb/19
It is ridiculous to label Mr Jacobs anything under 6’7. Yeah sure on a lazy slouchy day he may be slightly under, like we all are, but that is it.
edwards said on 19/Feb/19
@ Mohammad El Jalal Thompson lol,what are you saying dude?Glen Jacobs is around 6’4.8 to 6’5. Undertaker is around 6’8-6’ who is an inch taller than mark calaway is 6'4.8 to 6'5.Undertaker is around 6’8-6’8.5. seriously what a joke.
rawdshaq said on 19/Feb/19
@Sotiris Well, do you have any idea how much Kanes height fluctuates? I can't think he's 6'5" when he looks 6'10" sometimes or think he's 6'8" when he looks 6'5" sometimes. That's why I redid my height with Kane starting from the bottom and I think I nailed it.

@Mohammad Anything under 6'5" for Kane is an absolute joke. Even anything under 6'6"
rawdshaq said on 18/Feb/19
At the 1:16 mark of this video they described Kane as 6'9" Click Here

Kane looks really similar in height to Kevin Nash there
Mohammad El Jalal Thompson said on 18/Feb/19
Glen Jacobs is around 6’4.8 to 6’5. Undertaker is around 6’8-6’8.5.
Sotiris Gravas said on 18/Feb/19
Something tells me rawdshaq will change hid mind another 5 times by week's end... And ppl say I post pics w/ bad angles. LOL
ced said on 18/Feb/19
@Phillip McMullin.. I've always wondered that too.. The perfect opportunity would have on SmackDown just before the first initial draft where it was nWo Vs Rock Hogan and Kane.

I don't know why they never did a staredown. I think they were promoting Kane as 7 Feet (with the occasional reference to him being 6'10-6'11) and they were promoting Nash as 6'11.

I believe that without the lifts (as proven in the picture I posted), Nash had only 1/2 inch on Kane at their peak. With the lifts that Kane wore, he could have been an inch taller than Nash. (Which explains Kane stacking up closer to Big Show's height than Nash in staredowns).

Sid, Kane, Nash, and Taker I'd put in the same category:
Peak Heights:
Nash: 6'9
Kane: 6'8.25-6'8.5
Undertaker: 6'7.5
Sid: 6'7.5-6'7.75 (Sid was indeed taller than The Undertaker)
Lyle said on 17/Feb/19
@rawdshaq in boots YES barefoot definitely NOT
Jim brice said on 17/Feb/19
Ok kane I’d actually 6’5.8 today and 6’6.9 in 3 weeks time. Why? And how? Because the the undertakers cornflakes Mohammad’s big showd their peak heights to 6’’8
rawdshaq said on 16/Feb/19
Call me Nemo because I'm lost. I know I said Kane was 6'5", I said Kane was 6'8", but I honestly don't even know at this point. I'm going to completely ERASE all my previous guessing. Starting from his peak

Kane w/ 6'2" Vader Click Here

Kane w/ 6'7" Undertaker Click Here

So let's get some things out of the way. Yes, Kane looks taller than Undertaker, but look at these MONSTER lifts in his boots Click Here. That looks like it makes him 3 inches taller! God knows what is going on inside the boot. Kane has always wore enhanced boots.

In the picture with Vader (both wearing enhanced boots) and he looks like 4-5 inches taller. So 6'6"-6'7". Kane is probably the same height if not even slightly shorter than the Undertaker.

Kane w/ 6'4" Billy Gunn (both wearing boots) Click Here Both are slouched a little, but Kane is obviously 3-4 inches taller. 6'7" or 6'8" in that picture

Kane w/ 6'3" Rock (wearing boots) Click Here Kane looks 6 inches taller lol, so he looks unusually 6'9"

Kane w/ 7 feet Big Show Click Here Again, I don't know. He looks 6'10" there. We know he's not that tall.

Kane w/ 5'11" Chris Beniot Click Here I know nothing about head size, but lets just say 10 or 11 inches for Kane, then Kane looks 9 or 10 inches taller. 6'8"

Now I have several pictures of peak Kane next to people and we need to remember his enhanced boots. We got:

6'6 1/2", 6'7 1/2", 6'9", 6'10", and 6'8".

The mean is 6'8 1/5".

So right now, Kanes peak height is 6'8 1/5" from me.

Now finding Kanes current height shouldn't be too difficult. Just heres one picture of him with 6'5" Vince Vaughn Click Here

Vince has camera advantage, posture advantage, and is even younger. I will say Kane looks 2-3 inches taller than him based off other pictures of them standing next to the same people. Kane is currently 6'7".

Peak: 6'8 1/5"
Current: 6'7"
rawdshaq said on 16/Feb/19
I know I'm starting to get ridiculous but is THERE ANY CHANCE AT ALL that Kane had a 6'9" peak? I'm not gonna go much further than that but if he was only 1/2 inch shorter than Nash...
Philip McMullin said on 16/Feb/19
ced Wonder why WWF kept them away from each other competitively? Would've loved a kane/nash staredown
ced said on 15/Feb/19
Nash had maybe 1/2 inch on Kane in their only WWF singles match (both at peak height here)..

Click Here
Philip McMullin said on 15/Feb/19
rawdshaq IDK man, i always thought and STILL think that there's no one on the main roster PRESENT who stacks up to the big show as well as kane does...hes the only guy big show doesnt look down to
rawdshaq said on 15/Feb/19
Great Khaki at 7' 3/4" seems legit
rawdshaq said on 14/Feb/19
I have Kane at 6'8" at peak now and 6'6 3/4" currently (same height as Braun Strowman). Kane probably claims peak height, like most people do.
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 14/Feb/19
The guy said khali is 7ft0.75 big show 6ft11 kevin nash 6ft8.75 kane 6ft7 taker 6ft6 1/2 barefoot.
Philip McMullin said on 13/Feb/19
rawdshaq I dont know man, Kane (glenn) doesnt seem like the lying type tbh
rawdshaq said on 12/Feb/19
Kane actually pulled off looking 6'10" with Peak 7 feet Big Show Click Here
rawdshaq said on 11/Feb/19
I think Kane claims shoe height. He said he was 6'8" on Stone Colds podcast so maybe 6'7" but 6'7 1/2" with shoes then rounds up to 6'8".
Lyle said on 11/Feb/19
Jim Brice - I agree, Taker has never looked taller than Kane, maybe more or less level but he's definitely not taller
Jim brice said on 10/Feb/19
undertaker has always been and always will be .5 of an inch shorter than the big red mayor
Public Enemy said on 10/Feb/19
Peak 203 cm
Current 200 cm
rawdshaq said on 9/Feb/19
The Great Khali said that Kane was 1/2 inch taller than Undertaker according to some dude who met him.
rawdshaq said on 9/Feb/19
@Ashley He did, my bad, but I have a hard time believing Kane is anything under 6'7" after recent pictures
Ashley123 said on 9/Feb/19
He said that Undertaker was inch taller than Kane, not Kane taller than Taker.
rawdshaq said on 9/Feb/19
A dude on Undertakers page has met Undertaker and even got a picture with him. Undertaker is easily 6'6" today if not higher. He said that Kane was an inch taller than the Undertaker. So 6'7"-6'8" is right on the money.
The Name said on 8/Feb/19
He looked about half an inch taller than Taker as Unabomb in 95. He stopped wearing the lifts in 2001 (noticeable when he enters the ring, the top rope use to come to his waist with the lifts, without them they come up to his stomach) I believe he’s a legit 6’8 and taker about 6’7.5 peak.
Beedle said on 6/Feb/19
He said he's 6'8 so he's 6'8. Glenn Jacobs as a person is never full of himself. If any, he's probably stated his lowest estimation of his own height.

Click Here

Clearly more than 1 inch taller than Mark Calaway in real life without wrestling boots.
rawdshaq said on 6/Feb/19
@Qadaruddin Probably 2-3 inches
Ozzy said on 6/Feb/19
I cant say 100% but there was a caption to Kane and Vaughn, where it said Vince was on his toes for that picture.
But also lets not forget its an outside pic, the ground could be uneven?

In 1997 there was a ALMANIC wrestling book I bought with wrestler bios. It has Glen Jacobs at 6'7" 300lbs. He was billed around 6'10" by WWE.

I think an honest 6'6" guy barefoot...
edwards said on 5/Feb/19
Treee said on 4/Feb/19
dude taker was never taller than time either seems to have an edge or either seems to appear taller than other but taker was never taller than kane.look those guys staredown at 1996 ,kane as isaac yanken faced taker and kane wasnt on height and was clearly taller than taker by half inch if not more.
Qadaruddin said on 5/Feb/19
I wonder how much differnce between kane and nash currently..
rawdshaq said on 4/Feb/19
Some of you guys are right. I'm reconsidering Kanes height, too. After looking through more pictures he does look closer to 6'7", he might still be 6'7" today. He doesn't look like a guy who has lost much height and I don't even think he has a peak or current now. He may have lost like a quarter of an inch due to old age but other than that he looks the same height from his early wrestling days to his mayor days. He said he is 6'8" which is him probably rounding up from 6'7". I thought he was 6'5" because of how looked next to Bryan Josser but he was standing weird and it wasnt a good camera angle anyway. I think he has always been a 6'7" guy and still maintains it. Maybe he is unsure of his height which is why he says "I'm about 6'8"". I always say I'm 5'10" but really I'm not sure I could be 5'9 1/2" or even over 5'10".
Treee said on 4/Feb/19
6ft 7 1/2 at peak. Based on my research taker was taller of the two at peak height barefoot. Kane wore really big lifts while taker have always used a flat shoe. Today i would say a solid 6ft 6 1/2
dewie 5ft9 175cm said on 4/Feb/19
Kane 6ft6 taker 6ft5 1/2 today peak both 6ft6 3/4 6ft7. Barefoot.
rawdshaq said on 4/Feb/19
Kane is definitely not 6'6" barefoot. He is barely taller than the Undertaker with 2" - 3" lifts. Who knows honestly, he has 6'5" from me with a 6'7" peak.
Jim brice said on 4/Feb/19
@Sotiris Gravas Vince’s posture doesn’t appear to be all that bad there. Even if he stood straight, he wouldn’t gain much more, if anything more really. Kane’s posture wasn’t also the best there either. I can clearly see that 3” difference in those pics, and even at almost 52, he is still a strong 6’7 in my opinion.
Sotiris Gravas said on 3/Feb/19
@jim brice Vaughn has very poor posture w/ Rand Paul. On the other hand, look at how Vaughn towers over Ron Paul. Maybe I'm wrong and Kane is actually still 6'6"... but there's now way, at least IMHO, that the man is 6'7". (Those pics were taken in 2013; it's now 2019. He's 51 years of age and will soon be 52 this April. Not exactly in the "bloom of youth," to borrow a phrase from the Bible, in keeping w/ his moniker.)
Canson said on 3/Feb/19
@Burn: I think rounding half inch is ok but only because everyone does it. I wish half were more properly used. I think half should be its own entity and be used by someone falling maybe to 1/3-2/3” or 3/8-5/8” instead of rounding up. That distinguishes the half from a full inch
Canson said on 3/Feb/19
@Phenom89: I’ve always had Love as a strong 6’7 to weak 6’8. Now I would just say strong 6’7 knowing what I do

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.