Add a Comment8685 comments
Average Guess (1298 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.04in (185.5cm)
Current: 5ft 11.07in (180.5cm)
Peak: 6ft 1.04in (185.5cm)
Current: 5ft 11.07in (180.5cm)
josey wales said on 28/Jun/15
Must say estimations and opinions on arnold is pribably the most under or over estimated of any celebrity on this fun sight. Yes personally i am.pro Arnold fir various reasons. That asside, i dont think he was much above 6'1" at his peak or under 5 '11" today if strecthed fully. He can appear 5'10"ish at times due to bad posture. I think if you reckon he was much over 6'1" peak or reckons much under 5'11" today you probably have persoonal motives to try boost or degrade the man. On a pwrsonal note, what we think of the man is not important. But it is a fact that he reached all of his proffessional goals he set for hisself, however bad or good he was at it.
Must say estimations and opinions on arnold is pribably the most under or over estimated of any celebrity on this fun sight. Yes personally i am.pro Arnold fir various reasons. That asside, i dont think he was much above 6'1" at his peak or under 5 '11" today if strecthed fully. He can appear 5'10"ish at times due to bad posture. I think if you reckon he was much over 6'1" peak or reckons much under 5'11" today you probably have persoonal motives to try boost or degrade the man. On a pwrsonal note, what we think of the man is not important. But it is a fact that he reached all of his proffessional goals he set for hisself, however bad or good he was at it.
MJKoP said on 28/Jun/15
Nemo is about right with those figures. But I can't see him as less than 6'2" peak. I believe he woke up at at least 6'3" or a hair over and due to his immense mass, shrunk down to maybe 6'1.75" after a long, rigorous day of working out. That's right, since Vince Basille didn't like him very much, I believe he deprived Arnold of as much height as he could without it costing him his own credibility. 6'1.5" is the barest of bare minimums Arnold could've measure before bedtime during his prime years. I do have a strong hunch that Arnold came up as 6'2" on the stadiometer and Vince knocked a half inch off out of spite, just so he'd be technically correct about Arnold NOT measuring a legit 6'2" as he had claimed.
Nemo is about right with those figures. But I can't see him as less than 6'2" peak. I believe he woke up at at least 6'3" or a hair over and due to his immense mass, shrunk down to maybe 6'1.75" after a long, rigorous day of working out. That's right, since Vince Basille didn't like him very much, I believe he deprived Arnold of as much height as he could without it costing him his own credibility. 6'1.5" is the barest of bare minimums Arnold could've measure before bedtime during his prime years. I do have a strong hunch that Arnold came up as 6'2" on the stadiometer and Vince knocked a half inch off out of spite, just so he'd be technically correct about Arnold NOT measuring a legit 6'2" as he had claimed.
hal said on 27/Jun/15
@Lothar
That story's either fake(like 95% of the other stories on here) or you're terrible at estimating heights. You seriously thought Arnold was only 5'9"?
On-topic: I'd say that Arnold is currently at least 181 cm, or at most 183.
@Lothar
That story's either fake(like 95% of the other stories on here) or you're terrible at estimating heights. You seriously thought Arnold was only 5'9"?
On-topic: I'd say that Arnold is currently at least 181 cm, or at most 183.
Sam said on 27/Jun/15
A little fraction over 6ft1 if not 6ft1.5 for his peak.
A little fraction over 6ft1 if not 6ft1.5 for his peak.
grizz said on 27/Jun/15
In your dreams,Nemo,in your dreams...
In your dreams,Nemo,in your dreams...
Nemo said on 27/Jun/15
Rob, Matt Smith height is 5ft 11.5in (182 cm).
Matt and Arnold Click Here
Arnold today height is 6ft 0.5in (184 cm).
Rob, Matt Smith height is 5ft 11.5in (182 cm).
Matt and Arnold Click Here
Arnold today height is 6ft 0.5in (184 cm).
Nemo said on 27/Jun/15
Arnold Schwarzenegger today height is 6ft 0.5in (184 cm).
Peak height was 6ft 1.5in(187cm) - 6ft 2in(188cm).
Arnold Schwarzenegger today height is 6ft 0.5in (184 cm).
Peak height was 6ft 1.5in(187cm) - 6ft 2in(188cm).
Dmeyer said on 26/Jun/15
I agree arnie when in same shoes and posture 10 yrs back looks only 2cm on bush so 5'11.75 since then but has looked 6ft too so it Been a while since arnie was 184cm more 182-3cm 10 yrs back now 181-2cm
I agree arnie when in same shoes and posture 10 yrs back looks only 2cm on bush so 5'11.75 since then but has looked 6ft too so it Been a while since arnie was 184cm more 182-3cm 10 yrs back now 181-2cm
Lothar said on 25/Jun/15
I met Arnold in 2003. I talked to him, I am 5'8". I didn't think he was more than an inch taller than me. I was struck on how short he was.
I met Arnold in 2003. I talked to him, I am 5'8". I didn't think he was more than an inch taller than me. I was struck on how short he was.
josey wales said on 25/Jun/15
Grizz ur post and height makes lot of sense to me. Although i wont go much over 5'11" for him..
Grizz ur post and height makes lot of sense to me. Although i wont go much over 5'11" for him..
Harold said on 25/Jun/15
If you go on various bodybuilding sites, that still treat Arnold like royalty, you'll find entire threads devoted to his billed height vs. his real height. As far back as the 1970's, paying customers who attended his 'bodybuilding seminars' estimated his height at five foot ten or eleven. Peak.
If you go on various bodybuilding sites, that still treat Arnold like royalty, you'll find entire threads devoted to his billed height vs. his real height. As far back as the 1970's, paying customers who attended his 'bodybuilding seminars' estimated his height at five foot ten or eleven. Peak.
Harold said on 25/Jun/15
And I agree with you, Danimal, that Arnie is five eleven MAX today (and probably struggles to reach that), but I disagree with you that he was ever six one. The IFBB program is no different than Jim McMahon's wrestling program. These are 'facts' for fools designed to put fans in the stands. They are in show business, not the accuracy business. But then again, the fans of wrestling and bodybuilding seek entertainment, not truth.
And I agree with you, Danimal, that Arnie is five eleven MAX today (and probably struggles to reach that), but I disagree with you that he was ever six one. The IFBB program is no different than Jim McMahon's wrestling program. These are 'facts' for fools designed to put fans in the stands. They are in show business, not the accuracy business. But then again, the fans of wrestling and bodybuilding seek entertainment, not truth.
grizz said on 24/Jun/15
...
1995-2000 -6'0.5
2000-2005 -6'0.25
2005-2010 -5'11.75 (seems like politics take a huge chunk on height :D)
2010-2015.-5'11.25-5'11.5
...
1995-2000 -6'0.5
2000-2005 -6'0.25
2005-2010 -5'11.75 (seems like politics take a huge chunk on height :D)
2010-2015.-5'11.25-5'11.5
grizz said on 24/Jun/15
@Nick,the reason why I don't seem him anything over 6'1 at peak is his photo with Bush Sr.-a legit,strong 6'2 guy that clearly had an inch over Arnold.
Arnold seemed to be sub-6ft from 2005-in every photo with Bush Jr.(who's 5'11) Arnold never has a clear inch over him-sometimes 0.75,while sometimes as low as 0.5in.
IMO,for Arnold :
1965-1990 -6'1
1990-1995 -6'0.75
@Nick,the reason why I don't seem him anything over 6'1 at peak is his photo with Bush Sr.-a legit,strong 6'2 guy that clearly had an inch over Arnold.
Arnold seemed to be sub-6ft from 2005-in every photo with Bush Jr.(who's 5'11) Arnold never has a clear inch over him-sometimes 0.75,while sometimes as low as 0.5in.
IMO,for Arnold :
1965-1990 -6'1
1990-1995 -6'0.75
grizz said on 24/Jun/15
@Nick, Carl Weathers and Arnold looked about the same in Predator. Perhaps Arnie slighlty edged him out by wearing military boots.
And I agree that his weight-to-waist ratio is impossible for sub6ft guy.
He was 6ft1 peak height,maybe even 6ft1.25, but nothing above that mark.
@Nick, Carl Weathers and Arnold looked about the same in Predator. Perhaps Arnie slighlty edged him out by wearing military boots.
And I agree that his weight-to-waist ratio is impossible for sub6ft guy.
He was 6ft1 peak height,maybe even 6ft1.25, but nothing above that mark.
Harold said on 24/Jun/15
I think it's really tough to tell Arnie's current height. Given the frequent boost of his footwear (fifty pairs of cowboy boots, he admitted to owning in a recent interview?), it's true conjecture. As to his peak height, we'll never know. The word of another bodybuilder from 40 years ago doesn't exactly qualify as the gold standard of veracity. As for Arnold's own word, "He's an actor. If it's any consolation, he really means it when he says it!" to paraphrase the movie, Sideways.
I think it's really tough to tell Arnie's current height. Given the frequent boost of his footwear (fifty pairs of cowboy boots, he admitted to owning in a recent interview?), it's true conjecture. As to his peak height, we'll never know. The word of another bodybuilder from 40 years ago doesn't exactly qualify as the gold standard of veracity. As for Arnold's own word, "He's an actor. If it's any consolation, he really means it when he says it!" to paraphrase the movie, Sideways.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 24/Jun/15
MJKoP says on 23/Jun/15
Here's the picture to compare. I was as generous as possible to Peter in making it, but it is blatantly apparent that Arnold is still easily over six feet tall in whatever he had on his feet.
Where´s the footwear comparison?
MJKoP says on 23/Jun/15
Here's the picture to compare. I was as generous as possible to Peter in making it, but it is blatantly apparent that Arnold is still easily over six feet tall in whatever he had on his feet.
Where´s the footwear comparison?
Dmeyer said on 24/Jun/15
To me arnie pulls off 5'11.5 often can évén look 11.75
To me arnie pulls off 5'11.5 often can évén look 11.75
Danimal said on 23/Jun/15
Jim Hopper says on 22/Jun/15
Its silly to say hes 6-0 today,wasnt much over that peak. Now 5-11" max. Click Here
He was over 6'1" peak and I agree with you that he is MAX 5'11" today.
Jim Hopper says on 22/Jun/15
Its silly to say hes 6-0 today,wasnt much over that peak. Now 5-11" max. Click Here
He was over 6'1" peak and I agree with you that he is MAX 5'11" today.
Danimal said on 23/Jun/15
Jim Hopper says on 23/Jun/15
Nice FULL BODY shot,Lewis 5-7 and a tiny bit!! Arnie with *strange* shoes on also?? Anyway I think hes pushing hard to be 5-11" here. Click Here
Arnie's entire body (neck and spine) looking EXTREMELY compressed. Poor guy. He used to have a long neck and longer upper torso. That's where the height loss has occured.
Jim Hopper says on 23/Jun/15
Nice FULL BODY shot,Lewis 5-7 and a tiny bit!! Arnie with *strange* shoes on also?? Anyway I think hes pushing hard to be 5-11" here. Click Here
Arnie's entire body (neck and spine) looking EXTREMELY compressed. Poor guy. He used to have a long neck and longer upper torso. That's where the height loss has occured.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Jun/15
I think he got measured at 187cm after a workout in the evening.
I think he got measured at 187cm after a workout in the evening.
Dmeyer said on 23/Jun/15
Arnie in several shots looks 4.5in over Hamilton arnold shoes are flat
Arnie in several shots looks 4.5in over Hamilton arnold shoes are flat
josey wales said on 23/Jun/15
thankyou rob.
thankyou rob.
MJKoP said on 23/Jun/15
Here's the picture to compare. I was as generous as possible to Peter in making it, but it is blatantly apparent that Arnold is still easily over six feet tall in whatever he had on his feet.
Click Here
Here's the picture to compare. I was as generous as possible to Peter in making it, but it is blatantly apparent that Arnold is still easily over six feet tall in whatever he had on his feet.
Click Here
Jim Hopper said on 23/Jun/15
Nice FULL BODY shot,Lewis 5-7 and a tiny bit!! Arnie with *strange* shoes on also?? Anyway I think hes pushing hard to be 5-11" here. Click Here
Nice FULL BODY shot,Lewis 5-7 and a tiny bit!! Arnie with *strange* shoes on also?? Anyway I think hes pushing hard to be 5-11" here. Click Here
MJKoP said on 23/Jun/15
This is YouTube sensation Lloyd Ahlquist with Schwarzenegger at a very recent photo-op event. Lloyd is listed on Google as 5'6" and, in comparison, Arnold looks taller than Lloyd's 6'0" listed business partner Peter Alexis Shukoff. I doubt Peter is lying about his height, as he clearly is NOT a short dude, and Arnold appears to have more height on Lloyd than Peter does. Maybe if I'm feeling motivated later I'll create and upload a composite picture complete with a horizontal line going from head to head.
Click Here
This is YouTube sensation Lloyd Ahlquist with Schwarzenegger at a very recent photo-op event. Lloyd is listed on Google as 5'6" and, in comparison, Arnold looks taller than Lloyd's 6'0" listed business partner Peter Alexis Shukoff. I doubt Peter is lying about his height, as he clearly is NOT a short dude, and Arnold appears to have more height on Lloyd than Peter does. Maybe if I'm feeling motivated later I'll create and upload a composite picture complete with a horizontal line going from head to head.
Click Here
Sam said on 23/Jun/15
Looks 1.5 inches taller than J.K. Simmons (who admittedly can look 5'10" flat at times) but I think Arnie has a footwear advantage.
Click Here
Looks 1.5 inches taller than J.K. Simmons (who admittedly can look 5'10" flat at times) but I think Arnie has a footwear advantage.
Click Here
Harold said on 22/Jun/15
If Arnold's own estimation of his height is used as 'evidence' of his height, then that calls into question his ability to discern fact from fiction. If, over a lifetime, he has shown an ability to, shall we say, 'gild the lily,' then that consistency when it comes to playing make-believe for a living is hardly a basis on which to set the bar when it comes to the veracity of his height. No one is saying Arnold is five foot six. But an awful lot of people have seen enough photos to believe he could not have had a straight face when he declared himself 'six foot two.'
If Arnold's own estimation of his height is used as 'evidence' of his height, then that calls into question his ability to discern fact from fiction. If, over a lifetime, he has shown an ability to, shall we say, 'gild the lily,' then that consistency when it comes to playing make-believe for a living is hardly a basis on which to set the bar when it comes to the veracity of his height. No one is saying Arnold is five foot six. But an awful lot of people have seen enough photos to believe he could not have had a straight face when he declared himself 'six foot two.'
Jim Hopper said on 22/Jun/15
Its silly to say hes 6-0 today,wasnt much over that peak. Now 5-11" max. Click Here
Its silly to say hes 6-0 today,wasnt much over that peak. Now 5-11" max. Click Here
Danimal said on 22/Jun/15
Nick says on 15/Jun/15
5'11"barefoot says on 13/Jun/15
He was only an 2 inches taller than Sergio Olivia who was an honest 5'9" barefoot.
----------------------------------
A statement like that shows how credible your statement is.
This is a picture of both Sergio Oliva and Arnold side by side from the 1972 Mr. Olympia. If that looks like 2 inches to you then you need to get your eyes checked.
Besides, Oliva was not 5'9". The lowest he has been given, is 5'10". Although, there were reports of him as high as 5'10.5".
Arnold was famous for trying to dominate Sergio Oliva with his towering height. You clearly know nothing about 70s bodybuilding.
This is a typical pose where Arnold is stretching his back out to bring his full height in order to dominate a much shorter Sergio Oliva
Click Here
There is at least 3.5 inches between Arnold and Sergio Oliva
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Even when the camera is closer to Sergio Oliva, Arnold still clearly towers over him by several inches
Click Here
Even in 1997 at the Mr. Olympia meet. Arnold is by and large the tallest Mr. Olympia even when he was 50 years of age. Both 5'9.5" Dorian Yates and 5'11" Lee Haney are much shorter than Arnold
Dorian Yates was minimum 5'10".
Nick says on 15/Jun/15
5'11"barefoot says on 13/Jun/15
He was only an 2 inches taller than Sergio Olivia who was an honest 5'9" barefoot.
----------------------------------
A statement like that shows how credible your statement is.
This is a picture of both Sergio Oliva and Arnold side by side from the 1972 Mr. Olympia. If that looks like 2 inches to you then you need to get your eyes checked.
Besides, Oliva was not 5'9". The lowest he has been given, is 5'10". Although, there were reports of him as high as 5'10.5".
Arnold was famous for trying to dominate Sergio Oliva with his towering height. You clearly know nothing about 70s bodybuilding.
This is a typical pose where Arnold is stretching his back out to bring his full height in order to dominate a much shorter Sergio Oliva
Click Here
There is at least 3.5 inches between Arnold and Sergio Oliva
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Even when the camera is closer to Sergio Oliva, Arnold still clearly towers over him by several inches
Click Here
Even in 1997 at the Mr. Olympia meet. Arnold is by and large the tallest Mr. Olympia even when he was 50 years of age. Both 5'9.5" Dorian Yates and 5'11" Lee Haney are much shorter than Arnold
Dorian Yates was minimum 5'10".
Danimal said on 22/Jun/15
Jim Hopper says on 18/Jun/15
No way over 6-0 today,5-11" max
I give him somewhere between 5'10" and 5'11" today depending on the time of day.
Jim Hopper says on 18/Jun/15
No way over 6-0 today,5-11" max
I give him somewhere between 5'10" and 5'11" today depending on the time of day.
80´s Freak said on 21/Jun/15
Thanx for replying Rob.
Here is another pic, showing Sly being really tall, though he is wearing some kind of cowboy boots. Never seen him as tall. If Arnold was a real 6´1 inch guy back then, then Sly could pull that off at times.
Click Here
Thanx for replying Rob.
Here is another pic, showing Sly being really tall, though he is wearing some kind of cowboy boots. Never seen him as tall. If Arnold was a real 6´1 inch guy back then, then Sly could pull that off at times.
Click Here
Ian C said on 21/Jun/15
I just saw a few minutes of Arnold in the movie Commando, and I was struck by how slow and clumsy he was. This man couldn't have run a hundred yards in under two days. He would have had to have hired a stuntman to dance at his wedding. And yet, because he looks athletic, nobody seems to notice what a klutz he was.
Also, he is the only movie star I can think of who really couldn't act. Elvis Presley and Clint Eastwood and Marilyn Monroe were all better actors then Arnold Schwarzenegger.
I just saw a few minutes of Arnold in the movie Commando, and I was struck by how slow and clumsy he was. This man couldn't have run a hundred yards in under two days. He would have had to have hired a stuntman to dance at his wedding. And yet, because he looks athletic, nobody seems to notice what a klutz he was.
Also, he is the only movie star I can think of who really couldn't act. Elvis Presley and Clint Eastwood and Marilyn Monroe were all better actors then Arnold Schwarzenegger.
80´s Freak said on 18/Jun/15
Click Here
Rob what do you think is Arnold´s heigh here dancing with Sly? Sly looks pretty much the same height here, though I know he is naturally shorter. But back in 1992 there is another video of them standing on a stage and Sly wasn´t much shorter than him, wearing ordinary business shoes.
Editor Rob
Click Here
Rob what do you think is Arnold´s heigh here dancing with Sly? Sly looks pretty much the same height here, though I know he is naturally shorter. But back in 1992 there is another video of them standing on a stage and Sly wasn´t much shorter than him, wearing ordinary business shoes.
Editor Rob ah, true love on the dance floor...they are a few inches apart I think, Arnie's up and down in that clip.
Jim Hopper said on 18/Jun/15
No way over 6-0 today,5-11" max
No way over 6-0 today,5-11" max
josey wales said on 18/Jun/15
Arnold is 5'11".tall. i watched the making of the last stand and beleive forest withaker is mebe
2 1/2 to 3 rinches taller. Having workes with forest in 2012 i can factually statw he is 6'2" or damm near it.
Arnold is 5'11".tall. i watched the making of the last stand and beleive forest withaker is mebe
2 1/2 to 3 rinches taller. Having workes with forest in 2012 i can factually statw he is 6'2" or damm near it.
Celebheights 6'1.75/187 CM said on 18/Jun/15
Jai Courtney is listed as being 6'0.75" actually.
Jai Courtney is listed as being 6'0.75" actually.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jun/15
Nick has a valid point. If Arnold was 6ft or less peak, there's no way he'd be so lean and diced up at 250lbs. He had to be closer to 6ft2 in order to go onstage with a 32in waist while carrying that weight.
Nick has a valid point. If Arnold was 6ft or less peak, there's no way he'd be so lean and diced up at 250lbs. He had to be closer to 6ft2 in order to go onstage with a 32in waist while carrying that weight.
Sam said on 17/Jun/15
The several pictures of Arnold posted recently by Nick and Vladimir do a good job to support Rob's peak and current heights for him.
The several pictures of Arnold posted recently by Nick and Vladimir do a good job to support Rob's peak and current heights for him.
GP said on 17/Jun/15
That's a great photo with Cortney, which proves that Arnold is nothing more than 5'11". He is also wearing his famous boots and still looks shorter
That's a great photo with Cortney, which proves that Arnold is nothing more than 5'11". He is also wearing his famous boots and still looks shorter
Nick said on 17/Jun/15
Rob with clearly a strong 6'1" Carl Weathers.
Click Here
His NFL football career puts him at the same height. Moreover, when Carl Weathers was asked about Arnold's height in the Predator movie, he said Arnold was "about the same height as himself".
Here are "Predator" pictures of 6'1" Carl Weathers with Arnold. Arnold was slightly taller than Carl Weathers in "Predator". With Carl Weathers consist with how Arnold (as the pictures below) looked a strong 6'2" next to Jesse Ventura, he looked 6'2" next to Carl Weathers as well.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Arnold was 6'1.5" - 6'1.75" peak and shrunk down to around 5'11.5". Sometimes I get a sneaking suspicion he is now a flat 5'11" with all of the surgeries he has had due to the skiing accidents and the hip replacement surgeries, but he still appears to be in the 5'11.5" range.
Rob with clearly a strong 6'1" Carl Weathers.
Click Here
His NFL football career puts him at the same height. Moreover, when Carl Weathers was asked about Arnold's height in the Predator movie, he said Arnold was "about the same height as himself".
Here are "Predator" pictures of 6'1" Carl Weathers with Arnold. Arnold was slightly taller than Carl Weathers in "Predator". With Carl Weathers consist with how Arnold (as the pictures below) looked a strong 6'2" next to Jesse Ventura, he looked 6'2" next to Carl Weathers as well.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Arnold was 6'1.5" - 6'1.75" peak and shrunk down to around 5'11.5". Sometimes I get a sneaking suspicion he is now a flat 5'11" with all of the surgeries he has had due to the skiing accidents and the hip replacement surgeries, but he still appears to be in the 5'11.5" range.
Rifle said on 16/Jun/15
Rob,
How tall do you think the big guys in this pic are? Arnold might have some shoe advantage here.
Click Here
Regards
Editor Rob
Rob,
How tall do you think the big guys in this pic are? Arnold might have some shoe advantage here.
Click Here
Regards
Editor Rob 6ft 9-10?
hijopotamus said on 16/Jun/15
Vladimir, that pic is going to bring a lot of theories! If if if...let's think Sly forgot his elevators because if not he'd be under 5'7...
Vladimir, that pic is going to bring a lot of theories! If if if...let's think Sly forgot his elevators because if not he'd be under 5'7...
Nick said on 15/Jun/15
5'11"barefoot says on 13/Jun/15
He was only an 2 inches taller than Sergio Olivia who was an honest 5'9" barefoot.
----------------------------------
A statement like that shows how credible your statement is.
This is a picture of both Sergio Oliva and Arnold side by side from the 1972 Mr. Olympia. If that looks like 2 inches to you then you need to get your eyes checked.
Besides, Oliva was not 5'9". The lowest he has been given, is 5'10". Although, there were reports of him as high as 5'10.5".
Arnold was famous for trying to dominate Sergio Oliva with his towering height. You clearly know nothing about 70s bodybuilding.
This is a typical pose where Arnold is stretching his back out to bring his full height in order to dominate a much shorter Sergio Oliva
Click Here
There is at least 3.5 inches between Arnold and Sergio Oliva
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Even when the camera is closer to Sergio Oliva, Arnold still clearly towers over him by several inches
Click Here
Even in 1997 at the Mr. Olympia meet. Arnold is by and large the tallest Mr. Olympia even when he was 50 years of age. Both 5'9.5" Dorian Yates and 5'11" Lee Haney are much shorter than Arnold
Click Here
5'11"barefoot says on 13/Jun/15
He was only an 2 inches taller than Sergio Olivia who was an honest 5'9" barefoot.
----------------------------------
A statement like that shows how credible your statement is.
This is a picture of both Sergio Oliva and Arnold side by side from the 1972 Mr. Olympia. If that looks like 2 inches to you then you need to get your eyes checked.
Besides, Oliva was not 5'9". The lowest he has been given, is 5'10". Although, there were reports of him as high as 5'10.5".
Arnold was famous for trying to dominate Sergio Oliva with his towering height. You clearly know nothing about 70s bodybuilding.
This is a typical pose where Arnold is stretching his back out to bring his full height in order to dominate a much shorter Sergio Oliva
Click Here
There is at least 3.5 inches between Arnold and Sergio Oliva
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Even when the camera is closer to Sergio Oliva, Arnold still clearly towers over him by several inches
Click Here
Even in 1997 at the Mr. Olympia meet. Arnold is by and large the tallest Mr. Olympia even when he was 50 years of age. Both 5'9.5" Dorian Yates and 5'11" Lee Haney are much shorter than Arnold
Click Here
Nick said on 15/Jun/15
Arnold Schwarzenegger's competition measurements from 1968 Mr. Universe measurement log. Arnold was 21 years old at that time. This is before he moved to the US and was still living in Munich, Germany where he ran a gym.
Common sense tells you, only a tall man could weigh 254 pounds and at the same time have only a very lean 32 inch waist. I have training the gym for many years and weigh 185 pounds at 5'11" and have only 12% body fat. I even have a 33 inch waist. Most of today's short bodybuilders who are 5'8" or 5'9" and weigh 250 pounds have 38 - 39 inch waists.
Arnold always modestly says he used to weigh 240 - 245 pounds in competition in interviews. However, in fact he had weighed over 250 pounds for several competitions including the 1971 Mr Olympia when he weighed in at 251.8 lbs, but Arnold modestly says "240 - 245 pounds" since that is how much he weighed later in the 1973 - 1975 Mr Olympia when he focused more on proportions, conditioning and definition with less emphasis on size.
Remember, as per the rules, all of the competitors back in the day were measured. This log was created once all of the competitors were measured.
Click Here
Age: 21
Height: 6'2"
Weight: 254 pounds
Calves: 18.5 inches
Waist: 32 inches
Thighs: N/A
Neck: 19 inches
Biceps: 21.5 inches
Chest: 58 inches
Arnold Schwarzenegger's competition measurements from 1968 Mr. Universe measurement log. Arnold was 21 years old at that time. This is before he moved to the US and was still living in Munich, Germany where he ran a gym.
Common sense tells you, only a tall man could weigh 254 pounds and at the same time have only a very lean 32 inch waist. I have training the gym for many years and weigh 185 pounds at 5'11" and have only 12% body fat. I even have a 33 inch waist. Most of today's short bodybuilders who are 5'8" or 5'9" and weigh 250 pounds have 38 - 39 inch waists.
Arnold always modestly says he used to weigh 240 - 245 pounds in competition in interviews. However, in fact he had weighed over 250 pounds for several competitions including the 1971 Mr Olympia when he weighed in at 251.8 lbs, but Arnold modestly says "240 - 245 pounds" since that is how much he weighed later in the 1973 - 1975 Mr Olympia when he focused more on proportions, conditioning and definition with less emphasis on size.
Remember, as per the rules, all of the competitors back in the day were measured. This log was created once all of the competitors were measured.
Click Here
Age: 21
Height: 6'2"
Weight: 254 pounds
Calves: 18.5 inches
Waist: 32 inches
Thighs: N/A
Neck: 19 inches
Biceps: 21.5 inches
Chest: 58 inches
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 3/Sep/12
@Lucio:
With Obama he looks a good 2-3cm shorter.
Sometimes 182, sometimes 183, but not 184, since Obama is 185.5.
182-183 is good for him today.
186-187 at peak.
@Lucio:
With Obama he looks a good 2-3cm shorter.
Sometimes 182, sometimes 183, but not 184, since Obama is 185.5.
182-183 is good for him today.
186-187 at peak.
RisingForce said on 2/Sep/12
I don't think Arnold's peak height is much of an issue 6'1.5"-6'1.75" midday/evening, but I saw a strange old newspaper article where it had a full body shot of Arnold and Brigitte Nielsen(has claimed both 6' and 6'1", listed here at 6') and the caption said "Arnold Schwarzenegger is no taller than Brigitte Nielsen and he didn't look any taller in the picture. They were in costume for Red Sonja.
I don't think Arnold's peak height is much of an issue 6'1.5"-6'1.75" midday/evening, but I saw a strange old newspaper article where it had a full body shot of Arnold and Brigitte Nielsen(has claimed both 6' and 6'1", listed here at 6') and the caption said "Arnold Schwarzenegger is no taller than Brigitte Nielsen and he didn't look any taller in the picture. They were in costume for Red Sonja.
Lucio said on 2/Sep/12
I can't understand why it's said that Arnie today is under 6 feet.
Next to David Cameron he is closer to 184 cm than at 182 cm.
Click Here
Click Here
To me, it's just a matter of good or bad posture.
In fact, next to Cameron he is in good posture and can still hit 6'0.5".
Most likely, 5'11.5" is possible yes, but at his lowest and especially when he is in a bad posture, but not in good posture.
I can't understand why it's said that Arnie today is under 6 feet.
Next to David Cameron he is closer to 184 cm than at 182 cm.
Click Here
Click Here
To me, it's just a matter of good or bad posture.
In fact, next to Cameron he is in good posture and can still hit 6'0.5".
Most likely, 5'11.5" is possible yes, but at his lowest and especially when he is in a bad posture, but not in good posture.
Danimal said on 2/Sep/12
JT says on 1/Sep/12
I’m pretty sure these have not been posted here before
Click Here
Click Here (camera advantage for Wilt – the woman claims she is 5’2”)
Click Here Since Wilt’s knees are definitely bent here and he's leaning in a bit towards Arnold, the ~6’1” in shoes (6'0" barefoot)
So Arnold was only 6'0" barefoot at his peak now was he??? WOW... I'm not even going to touch that one.
JT says on 1/Sep/12
I’m pretty sure these have not been posted here before
Click Here
Click Here (camera advantage for Wilt – the woman claims she is 5’2”)
Click Here Since Wilt’s knees are definitely bent here and he's leaning in a bit towards Arnold, the ~6’1” in shoes (6'0" barefoot)
So Arnold was only 6'0" barefoot at his peak now was he??? WOW... I'm not even going to touch that one.
Danimal said on 2/Sep/12
Lucio says on 30/Aug/12
@Henrik:
True. Eastwood has always had the legs too long compared to the torso and so not proportionated. And he also lost more height than Arnold.
However, imo, he was never 193 cm at the peak, perhaps 187-188 cm max and the proof of this are the pictures next to Arnold where they are basically eye to eye with Eastwood in his 50s, so not far from his peak.
Click Here
Look how much longer Arnie's neck was before he started to get compressed.
Lucio says on 30/Aug/12
@Henrik:
True. Eastwood has always had the legs too long compared to the torso and so not proportionated. And he also lost more height than Arnold.
However, imo, he was never 193 cm at the peak, perhaps 187-188 cm max and the proof of this are the pictures next to Arnold where they are basically eye to eye with Eastwood in his 50s, so not far from his peak.
Click Here
Look how much longer Arnie's neck was before he started to get compressed.
Lucio said on 1/Sep/12
@JT:
Ok, but you can not make comparisons like that. First of all, the picture is angled, taken from the top and so a little difficult to get an accurate measurement.
Second, Wilt is slightly closer to the camera than Arnold and third, they are not side by side.
So I see it hard to make a comparison reliable under these conditions.
@JT:
Ok, but you can not make comparisons like that. First of all, the picture is angled, taken from the top and so a little difficult to get an accurate measurement.
Second, Wilt is slightly closer to the camera than Arnold and third, they are not side by side.
So I see it hard to make a comparison reliable under these conditions.
JT said on 1/Sep/12
I’m pretty sure these have not been posted here before
Click Here
Click Here (camera advantage for Wilt – the woman claims she is 5’2”)
Click Here Since Wilt’s knees are definitely bent here and he's leaning in a bit towards Arnold, the ~6’1” in shoes (6'0" barefoot) Arnold looks more likely as Wilt was reportedly down to 7’0.5” at this time (1983-1984). It looks like Wilt would gain at least an inch if he straightened out like Arnold. It's only one pic but the height difference is pretty significant.
I’m pretty sure these have not been posted here before
Click Here
Click Here (camera advantage for Wilt – the woman claims she is 5’2”)
Click Here Since Wilt’s knees are definitely bent here and he's leaning in a bit towards Arnold, the ~6’1” in shoes (6'0" barefoot) Arnold looks more likely as Wilt was reportedly down to 7’0.5” at this time (1983-1984). It looks like Wilt would gain at least an inch if he straightened out like Arnold. It's only one pic but the height difference is pretty significant.
Lucio said on 1/Sep/12
Yes, Lucio, it's true that most people lose .75-1 inch throughout a day. You forget though, 50% of the lost morning height goes on the first 2 hours out of bed, the editor made his point in his height fluctuation, and I've experience the phenomenon myself. So by noon most people are near their low height, and the difference from noon to night is small, 1/8 in. Can be slight more if the person is in intense activity, like long sport game, lifting, but the fluctuation won't be that big compare to early morning
Hmm I don't know if the majority thinks Arnie was just strong 6'1 at peak, but the listed height holds up pretty well, right on between 6'1 and 6'2. So I guess it can go either mark, but I think at peak Arnie would lean closer to 6'2, seeing him with people w/ legit height
--------------------
I agree, most of the height is lost between the morning and noon, I checked on myself the phenomenon: between noon and evening there is very little difference, perhaps less than half of inch.
However, I still think that at peak Arnie should be around 186 cm during the day and maybe 185 cm in the evening. At least that's the impression that I get from Pumping Iron next to a strong 6'1" Mike Katz, as listed in many sources (he is listed also 6'2" on some site, but I think it's wrong). And besides, he was almost always barefoot throughout the whole movie.
Strong 6'1" to me it means very close to 186 cm.
For Clint Eastwood, I do not know. Maybe he was really 6'4" at peak. You see, I would like there was a picture of a young Clint Eastwood next to Arnold to see the difference, but I know it's hard.
But it is also true that next to 6'2" George Bush Sr., he is about an inch shorter and this confirms the possibility that he was more 186 cm rather than 188 cm.
Yes, Lucio, it's true that most people lose .75-1 inch throughout a day. You forget though, 50% of the lost morning height goes on the first 2 hours out of bed, the editor made his point in his height fluctuation, and I've experience the phenomenon myself. So by noon most people are near their low height, and the difference from noon to night is small, 1/8 in. Can be slight more if the person is in intense activity, like long sport game, lifting, but the fluctuation won't be that big compare to early morning
Hmm I don't know if the majority thinks Arnie was just strong 6'1 at peak, but the listed height holds up pretty well, right on between 6'1 and 6'2. So I guess it can go either mark, but I think at peak Arnie would lean closer to 6'2, seeing him with people w/ legit height
--------------------
I agree, most of the height is lost between the morning and noon, I checked on myself the phenomenon: between noon and evening there is very little difference, perhaps less than half of inch.
However, I still think that at peak Arnie should be around 186 cm during the day and maybe 185 cm in the evening. At least that's the impression that I get from Pumping Iron next to a strong 6'1" Mike Katz, as listed in many sources (he is listed also 6'2" on some site, but I think it's wrong). And besides, he was almost always barefoot throughout the whole movie.
Strong 6'1" to me it means very close to 186 cm.
For Clint Eastwood, I do not know. Maybe he was really 6'4" at peak. You see, I would like there was a picture of a young Clint Eastwood next to Arnold to see the difference, but I know it's hard.
But it is also true that next to 6'2" George Bush Sr., he is about an inch shorter and this confirms the possibility that he was more 186 cm rather than 188 cm.
Ka said on 1/Sep/12
Yes, Lucio, it's true that most people lose .75-1 inch throughout a day. You forget though, 50% of the lost morning height goes on the first 2 hours out of bed, the editor made his point in his height fluctuation, and I've experience the phenomenon myself. So by noon most people are near their low height, and the difference from noon to night is small, 1/8 in. Can be slight more if the person is in intense activity, like long sport game, lifting, but the fluctuation won't be that big compare to early morning
Hmm I don't know if the majority thinks Arnie was just strong 6'1 at peak, but the listed height holds up pretty well, right on between 6'1 and 6'2. So I guess it can go either mark, but I think at peak Arnie would lean closer to 6'2, seeing him with people w/ legit height
Yes, Lucio, it's true that most people lose .75-1 inch throughout a day. You forget though, 50% of the lost morning height goes on the first 2 hours out of bed, the editor made his point in his height fluctuation, and I've experience the phenomenon myself. So by noon most people are near their low height, and the difference from noon to night is small, 1/8 in. Can be slight more if the person is in intense activity, like long sport game, lifting, but the fluctuation won't be that big compare to early morning
Hmm I don't know if the majority thinks Arnie was just strong 6'1 at peak, but the listed height holds up pretty well, right on between 6'1 and 6'2. So I guess it can go either mark, but I think at peak Arnie would lean closer to 6'2, seeing him with people w/ legit height
sid said on 31/Aug/12
Lucio in that pic, clint has about a inch on arie
Lucio in that pic, clint has about a inch on arie
tom said on 31/Aug/12
as said in the pic below he looks same as clint,BUT his shoes are carrying the height for him match clints height,arnie was never 6.2",6.1" prime,now 5.11",he is the master of trick boots,like sly,vin diesel,etc etc. they all use them,trust me.
as said in the pic below he looks same as clint,BUT his shoes are carrying the height for him match clints height,arnie was never 6.2",6.1" prime,now 5.11",he is the master of trick boots,like sly,vin diesel,etc etc. they all use them,trust me.
RisingForce said on 31/Aug/12
I'm pretty sure Eastwood is in his 60's there. Clint wasn't 6'2" max at his peak. That's pretty ridiculous. He could have been closer to 6'2" by the mid 90's (when I believe that picture with Arnold was taken), but in the 60's and 70's, he was definitely around 6'4".
As for Arnold, his height can look to vary quite a bit, but in the last year or so, he looks like he's lost a little more height, I'd say 6'0", and I can see why some are saying he's a little under 6'.
I'm pretty sure Eastwood is in his 60's there. Clint wasn't 6'2" max at his peak. That's pretty ridiculous. He could have been closer to 6'2" by the mid 90's (when I believe that picture with Arnold was taken), but in the 60's and 70's, he was definitely around 6'4".
As for Arnold, his height can look to vary quite a bit, but in the last year or so, he looks like he's lost a little more height, I'd say 6'0", and I can see why some are saying he's a little under 6'.
Lucio said on 31/Aug/12
In my opinion, the measurement made by Vince Basille albeit in good faith, must not be very good one, because:
according to the measurement, he would have been 6'1.5" (186.69 cms) in the afternoon, when we all know that in the evening we are all shorter than a couple of centimeters.
But if the measurement refers to the afternoon, then this it means that during the day he was at least a full 6'2" (188 cm) and the thing which is not possible because we all know that he has never been a full 6'2", but rather closer to the measure of 186 cm during the day.
And again, if he was 6'1.5" in the afternoon, then out of bed and in the morning he would been 6'2.5", which is highly unlikely.
I believe that Basille has not simply well leaned the measurement bar to contact of the Arnie's head and this is the reason why it's coming off a measure of an half of inch more.
In my opinion, the measurement made by Vince Basille albeit in good faith, must not be very good one, because:
according to the measurement, he would have been 6'1.5" (186.69 cms) in the afternoon, when we all know that in the evening we are all shorter than a couple of centimeters.
But if the measurement refers to the afternoon, then this it means that during the day he was at least a full 6'2" (188 cm) and the thing which is not possible because we all know that he has never been a full 6'2", but rather closer to the measure of 186 cm during the day.
And again, if he was 6'1.5" in the afternoon, then out of bed and in the morning he would been 6'2.5", which is highly unlikely.
I believe that Basille has not simply well leaned the measurement bar to contact of the Arnie's head and this is the reason why it's coming off a measure of an half of inch more.
Ka said on 31/Aug/12
Lucio, Eastwood was a legit 6'4'ers, look at him next to 6'3.5 Donald Sutherland. Arnold is more than flat 6'1 at peak. Agree, he edges out flat 6'1'ers like Tom Arnold and Carl Weathers, but got edge out by strong 6'2 guys like Bush Sr and James Cameron. The 6'1.5 measurement is as accurate as it get. To me this guy is at peak up to the mid 90s, late 90s 186 cm, early 2000s 184-185 cm, 2005-2011 183-184 cm, and this year no more than 183, maybe a smidge under. Still think he's a decent 6 ft. Believe it or not, and this is fact, that people do shrink at different rate. It's shocking to see big shrinking yeah, but it can and will happen to people, it's genetic. Unfortunately for Arnold his spine is most vulnerable to aging. See guys like Stallone, and you'll be amaze how his spine holds up to aging
Lucio, Eastwood was a legit 6'4'ers, look at him next to 6'3.5 Donald Sutherland. Arnold is more than flat 6'1 at peak. Agree, he edges out flat 6'1'ers like Tom Arnold and Carl Weathers, but got edge out by strong 6'2 guys like Bush Sr and James Cameron. The 6'1.5 measurement is as accurate as it get. To me this guy is at peak up to the mid 90s, late 90s 186 cm, early 2000s 184-185 cm, 2005-2011 183-184 cm, and this year no more than 183, maybe a smidge under. Still think he's a decent 6 ft. Believe it or not, and this is fact, that people do shrink at different rate. It's shocking to see big shrinking yeah, but it can and will happen to people, it's genetic. Unfortunately for Arnold his spine is most vulnerable to aging. See guys like Stallone, and you'll be amaze how his spine holds up to aging
Lucio said on 30/Aug/12
@Henrik:
True. Eastwood has always had the legs too long compared to the torso and so not proportionated. And he also lost more height than Arnold.
However, imo, he was never 193 cm at the peak, perhaps 187-188 cm max and the proof of this are the pictures next to Arnold where they are basically eye to eye with Eastwood in his 50s, so not far from his peak.
Click Here
What do you think?
@Henrik:
True. Eastwood has always had the legs too long compared to the torso and so not proportionated. And he also lost more height than Arnold.
However, imo, he was never 193 cm at the peak, perhaps 187-188 cm max and the proof of this are the pictures next to Arnold where they are basically eye to eye with Eastwood in his 50s, so not far from his peak.
Click Here
What do you think?
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 30/Aug/12
At peak he was at 100% over 6'1, he was all the time taller than strong 6'1 Tom Arnold in True Lies. 6'1.5 for his peak suits him perfectly.
At peak he was at 100% over 6'1, he was all the time taller than strong 6'1 Tom Arnold in True Lies. 6'1.5 for his peak suits him perfectly.
Danimal said on 29/Aug/12
DERF says on 28/Aug/12
I love Arnold and his work.
I had the honor of visiting Stan Winston Studios back in the 90's and they had a lifesize full body casting (to be used to fit costume pieces for the Mr. Freeze" role in Batman) of him and he was considerably shorter than myself ( 6' 1").
I was amazed.
I have also met and been photographed with him at 2 "Arnold Classic" Events in Columbus Ohio and he visibly has a significant added shoe sole thickness and as I understand elevating shims inside the shoes as well.
I mention these realities not as disrespect but as a example of how a larger than life persona can be formed through film. Regardless...his dedication to body building and success in so many areas of life make his height irrelevant.
Now Lou Ferrigno...that dude is massive, even today!
He would have edged you out in height before his height loss occurred.
DERF says on 28/Aug/12
I love Arnold and his work.
I had the honor of visiting Stan Winston Studios back in the 90's and they had a lifesize full body casting (to be used to fit costume pieces for the Mr. Freeze" role in Batman) of him and he was considerably shorter than myself ( 6' 1").
I was amazed.
I have also met and been photographed with him at 2 "Arnold Classic" Events in Columbus Ohio and he visibly has a significant added shoe sole thickness and as I understand elevating shims inside the shoes as well.
I mention these realities not as disrespect but as a example of how a larger than life persona can be formed through film. Regardless...his dedication to body building and success in so many areas of life make his height irrelevant.
Now Lou Ferrigno...that dude is massive, even today!
He would have edged you out in height before his height loss occurred.
Henrik said on 29/Aug/12
@Lucio:
Clint Eastwood was also a man who was very long-legged. Even at his peak height, he looked like he barely had a torso:
Click Here
He shrunk more than Arnold. He is of course older, though.
@Lucio:
Clint Eastwood was also a man who was very long-legged. Even at his peak height, he looked like he barely had a torso:
Click Here
He shrunk more than Arnold. He is of course older, though.
Lucio said on 28/Aug/12
Take a look at this interesting thing:
this one is the terrible picture that depicts an unrecognizable Arnie to the limits of the grotesque
Click Here
and this one instead
Click Here
is the original one (the first from left) and as you can see, he is obvious fat, but not as horrible as we were led to believe that he was, putting around this photoshopped picture.
Take a look at this interesting thing:
this one is the terrible picture that depicts an unrecognizable Arnie to the limits of the grotesque
Click Here
and this one instead
Click Here
is the original one (the first from left) and as you can see, he is obvious fat, but not as horrible as we were led to believe that he was, putting around this photoshopped picture.
Zach said on 28/Aug/12
Peak morning height: 6'2
Peak post-morning height: 6'1.5
Current height: 5'11.5
Peak morning height: 6'2
Peak post-morning height: 6'1.5
Current height: 5'11.5
Wham said on 28/Aug/12
Arnie was measured at 6'1.5 at night, so that means he was at least 6-2 out of bed or early morning.
He really has shrunk a lot.
Arnie was measured at 6'1.5 at night, so that means he was at least 6-2 out of bed or early morning.
He really has shrunk a lot.
johnnyfive said on 28/Aug/12
Arnold looks the same height as 5'11 listed Willis in Expendables 2 when they are next to one another. I think Kevin Sorbo is on the money with 5'11. Looks it pretty much throughout Expendables 2.
Arnold looks the same height as 5'11 listed Willis in Expendables 2 when they are next to one another. I think Kevin Sorbo is on the money with 5'11. Looks it pretty much throughout Expendables 2.
DERF said on 28/Aug/12
I love Arnold and his work.
I had the honor of visiting Stan Winston Studios back in the 90's and they had a lifesize full body casting (to be used to fit costume pieces for the Mr. Freeze" role in Batman) of him and he was considerably shorter than myself ( 6' 1").
I was amazed.
I have also met and been photographed with him at 2 "Arnold Classic" Events in Columbus Ohio and he visibly has a significant added shoe sole thickness and as I understand elevating shims inside the shoes as well.
I mention these realities not as disrespect but as a example of how a larger than life persona can be formed through film. Regardless...his dedication to body building and success in so many areas of life make his height irrelevant.
Now Lou Ferrigno...that dude is massive, even today!
I love Arnold and his work.
I had the honor of visiting Stan Winston Studios back in the 90's and they had a lifesize full body casting (to be used to fit costume pieces for the Mr. Freeze" role in Batman) of him and he was considerably shorter than myself ( 6' 1").
I was amazed.
I have also met and been photographed with him at 2 "Arnold Classic" Events in Columbus Ohio and he visibly has a significant added shoe sole thickness and as I understand elevating shims inside the shoes as well.
I mention these realities not as disrespect but as a example of how a larger than life persona can be formed through film. Regardless...his dedication to body building and success in so many areas of life make his height irrelevant.
Now Lou Ferrigno...that dude is massive, even today!
Lucio said on 28/Aug/12
Honestly I don't understand where is all this "much short torso"
It seems that he has the torso like an disabled by as it's described here.
Ok, undoubtedly he has the shorter torso than when he was young, but define it "much compressed" and "he has lost 2 full inches on his upper torso," seems exaggerated, imo.
Then where he would lose these 2 inches of height? In his back?
Come on, that's ridiculous!
He has had accidents in his back as far as we know? No.
He has had back surgery to his back as far as we know? No.
And then, why he would lose so much height in his upper torso?
Because he has been training with bodybuilding for years?
There is no documented study about it, saying that the bodybuilding lose height, if anything rather the opposite.
It keeps your muscles toned and prevents loss height.
Therefore, the only simple reason of his height loss, imo, is due to the normal contraction of the spinal discs that become thinner with age.
At least is my opinion.
Honestly I don't understand where is all this "much short torso"
It seems that he has the torso like an disabled by as it's described here.
Ok, undoubtedly he has the shorter torso than when he was young, but define it "much compressed" and "he has lost 2 full inches on his upper torso," seems exaggerated, imo.
Then where he would lose these 2 inches of height? In his back?
Come on, that's ridiculous!
He has had accidents in his back as far as we know? No.
He has had back surgery to his back as far as we know? No.
And then, why he would lose so much height in his upper torso?
Because he has been training with bodybuilding for years?
There is no documented study about it, saying that the bodybuilding lose height, if anything rather the opposite.
It keeps your muscles toned and prevents loss height.
Therefore, the only simple reason of his height loss, imo, is due to the normal contraction of the spinal discs that become thinner with age.
At least is my opinion.
Shaun said on 28/Aug/12
@Danimal. Mike Katz's forehead alone is 6'2"!!
@Danimal. Mike Katz's forehead alone is 6'2"!!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 28/Aug/12
Yeah, today 5'11-6' must be his range...
Yeah, today 5'11-6' must be his range...
Danimal said on 27/Aug/12
Lucio says on 27/Aug/12
Zach says on 27/Aug/12
@JoeJoe - I'm going to be Devil's Advocat to my own post now. Whilst he is clearly wearing boots with David Cameron as you can all see now, it might not necessarily have lifts in them. I did read once he had a collection of 200 boots. But I do agree with you its strange to wear boots with a suit and its also too much of a coincidence that he's wearing such boots with greater frequency in recent years. In my opinion he either has lifts in them, or wears boots which give more height than normal shoes anyway.
--------------------
Zach you're right: those of Arnie are some kind of boots, is true, but are not cowboy boots, there is a big difference!
These are cowboy boots:
Click Here
These instead are the boots worn by Arnie on that occasion:
Click Here
In fact, if you look carefully at this magnification from porch 10 Downing St, you will notice that the heel is around 3 cm thick max, and then compatible with that of Cameron.
Click Here
Then another thing: first, he has never been a full 6'2" at peak but rather 185.5 - 186 cm, as you can see clearly in Pumping Iron next to 6'1" Mike Katz. They are basically the same height.
Mike Katz has also been listen at 6'2". I've even seen 6'3" listings for him. Arnold was never a full 6'2" walking around during the day. More like 6'1.5"-6'1 3/4". Out of bed though, he was at least a solid 6'2".
Lucio says on 27/Aug/12
Zach says on 27/Aug/12
@JoeJoe - I'm going to be Devil's Advocat to my own post now. Whilst he is clearly wearing boots with David Cameron as you can all see now, it might not necessarily have lifts in them. I did read once he had a collection of 200 boots. But I do agree with you its strange to wear boots with a suit and its also too much of a coincidence that he's wearing such boots with greater frequency in recent years. In my opinion he either has lifts in them, or wears boots which give more height than normal shoes anyway.
--------------------
Zach you're right: those of Arnie are some kind of boots, is true, but are not cowboy boots, there is a big difference!
These are cowboy boots:
Click Here
These instead are the boots worn by Arnie on that occasion:
Click Here
In fact, if you look carefully at this magnification from porch 10 Downing St, you will notice that the heel is around 3 cm thick max, and then compatible with that of Cameron.
Click Here
Then another thing: first, he has never been a full 6'2" at peak but rather 185.5 - 186 cm, as you can see clearly in Pumping Iron next to 6'1" Mike Katz. They are basically the same height.
Mike Katz has also been listen at 6'2". I've even seen 6'3" listings for him. Arnold was never a full 6'2" walking around during the day. More like 6'1.5"-6'1 3/4". Out of bed though, he was at least a solid 6'2".
Danimal said on 27/Aug/12
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 27/Aug/12
If we met, I would be for sure 2 inches taller than him today, 5'11.5 is a possibility, he looks 182 more often than 183 today.
If he was younger we will be for sure eye to eye.
6'1.5 peak
5'11.5 now
6'1.5"-6'1 3/4" peak
5'11.5"-6'0" today
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 27/Aug/12
If we met, I would be for sure 2 inches taller than him today, 5'11.5 is a possibility, he looks 182 more often than 183 today.
If he was younger we will be for sure eye to eye.
6'1.5 peak
5'11.5 now
6'1.5"-6'1 3/4" peak
5'11.5"-6'0" today
Danimal said on 27/Aug/12
Lucio says on 27/Aug/12
These instead are the boots worn by Arnie on that occasion:
Click Here
It's very obvious in this pic of Arnold sitting down how much height he has lost in his upper torso. It looks much shorter (compressed) than it used to be. Majority of his 2" height loss is in his upper torso imo.
Lucio says on 27/Aug/12
These instead are the boots worn by Arnie on that occasion:
Click Here
It's very obvious in this pic of Arnold sitting down how much height he has lost in his upper torso. It looks much shorter (compressed) than it used to be. Majority of his 2" height loss is in his upper torso imo.
Danimal said on 27/Aug/12
miko says on 27/Aug/12
5'11.5 today. Still probably a little over 6' out of bed.
He just doesn't give off a tall impression at all today.
I agree. 6'0" out of bed today and 5'11.5" during the day. A full 2" height loss since his healthy prime.
miko says on 27/Aug/12
5'11.5 today. Still probably a little over 6' out of bed.
He just doesn't give off a tall impression at all today.
I agree. 6'0" out of bed today and 5'11.5" during the day. A full 2" height loss since his healthy prime.
joe joe said on 27/Aug/12
I agree with Larc. I think it's time Rob downgraded Arnold to a 5'11.5. He just doesnt seem to be 6 ft anymore. Everything must come to an end
I agree with Larc. I think it's time Rob downgraded Arnold to a 5'11.5. He just doesnt seem to be 6 ft anymore. Everything must come to an end
Zach said on 27/Aug/12
Lucio if you read my most recent post I said theyre boots of some sort, not cowboy boots. You don't need heels for elevation. Easy enough to put lifts in.
My 6'2 estimate is for his peak morning height.
Lucio if you read my most recent post I said theyre boots of some sort, not cowboy boots. You don't need heels for elevation. Easy enough to put lifts in.
My 6'2 estimate is for his peak morning height.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 27/Aug/12
If we met, I would be for sure 2 inches taller than him today, 5'11.5 is a possibility, he looks 182 more often than 183 today.
If he was younger we will be for sure eye to eye.
6'1.5 peak
5'11.5 now
If we met, I would be for sure 2 inches taller than him today, 5'11.5 is a possibility, he looks 182 more often than 183 today.
If he was younger we will be for sure eye to eye.
6'1.5 peak
5'11.5 now
Henrik said on 27/Aug/12
miko says on 27/Aug/12
5'11.5 today. Still probably a little over 6' out of bed.
He just doesn't give off a tall impression at all today.
-----
Which is kind of ironic, I guess. According to me, he used to look taller than he was. When he didn't stand next to taller actors, one could have easily guessed that he was 6'3"-6'4".
miko says on 27/Aug/12
5'11.5 today. Still probably a little over 6' out of bed.
He just doesn't give off a tall impression at all today.
-----
Which is kind of ironic, I guess. According to me, he used to look taller than he was. When he didn't stand next to taller actors, one could have easily guessed that he was 6'3"-6'4".
Zach said on 27/Aug/12
@JoeJoe - I'm going to be Devil's Advocat to my own post now. Whilst he is clearly wearing boots with David Cameron as you can all see now, it might not necessarily have lifts in them. I did read once he had a collection of 200 boots. But I do agree with you its strange to wear boots with a suit and its also too much of a coincidence that he's wearing such boots with greater frequency in recent years. In my opinion he either has lifts in them, or wears boots which give more height than normal shoes anyway.
@JoeJoe - I'm going to be Devil's Advocat to my own post now. Whilst he is clearly wearing boots with David Cameron as you can all see now, it might not necessarily have lifts in them. I did read once he had a collection of 200 boots. But I do agree with you its strange to wear boots with a suit and its also too much of a coincidence that he's wearing such boots with greater frequency in recent years. In my opinion he either has lifts in them, or wears boots which give more height than normal shoes anyway.
miko said on 27/Aug/12
5'11.5 today. Still probably a little over 6' out of bed.
He just doesn't give off a tall impression at all today.
5'11.5 today. Still probably a little over 6' out of bed.
He just doesn't give off a tall impression at all today.
joe joe said on 27/Aug/12
@Dandahman I think your right the only explination for the boots can be that he is now a lift wearer. Given that in the pictures he is only just scraping 6ft. how tall would he be in reality? without the boots. I never noticed them befor but can clearly see them in your first pic, and its just wierd to wear boots with a suit.
@Dandahman I think your right the only explination for the boots can be that he is now a lift wearer. Given that in the pictures he is only just scraping 6ft. how tall would he be in reality? without the boots. I never noticed them befor but can clearly see them in your first pic, and its just wierd to wear boots with a suit.
Danimal said on 27/Aug/12
I say he walks the earth during the day at somewhere between 5'11" and 6'0" these days.
I say he walks the earth during the day at somewhere between 5'11" and 6'0" these days.
Dandahman said on 26/Aug/12
My dad took a picture with arnold and my dad is like 5.8 and when I saw the picture my dads head was up to Arnold ear I ask my dad to ask Arnold how tall he was this was around 2008 and Arnold said 5.11 but in the movies it makes him look like 6 foot
My dad took a picture with arnold and my dad is like 5.8 and when I saw the picture my dads head was up to Arnold ear I ask my dad to ask Arnold how tall he was this was around 2008 and Arnold said 5.11 but in the movies it makes him look like 6 foot
joe joe said on 26/Aug/12
I think given all the evidence it is clear that arnold was a 6'1.5 man at peak and he is now around 6ft to 5'11. I dont think there can be any argument there. I do not belive he wore lifts as a younger man. check this pic.
Click Here
Hes in boat shoes and it's nigh on imposible to throw lifts in that right. Plus any right minded person can see he is a stron 6'1 in the pic and dominating stallone even though he has herman munsters on.
In lot of fotos around this time he is bear foot so the lift wearer claim doesnt wash with me. he was always just under 6'2 ie 6'1.5 as a young man, but his heavy frame has compressed with age and he is now just under 6ft. which isnt that bad. My dad has lost about 3 inches with age so an inch and a bit for arnie is highly likely considering his weight.
I think given all the evidence it is clear that arnold was a 6'1.5 man at peak and he is now around 6ft to 5'11. I dont think there can be any argument there. I do not belive he wore lifts as a younger man. check this pic.
Click Here
Hes in boat shoes and it's nigh on imposible to throw lifts in that right. Plus any right minded person can see he is a stron 6'1 in the pic and dominating stallone even though he has herman munsters on.
In lot of fotos around this time he is bear foot so the lift wearer claim doesnt wash with me. he was always just under 6'2 ie 6'1.5 as a young man, but his heavy frame has compressed with age and he is now just under 6ft. which isnt that bad. My dad has lost about 3 inches with age so an inch and a bit for arnie is highly likely considering his weight.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 26/Aug/12
joe joe:
I sayed that 182-183 for him is suitable today.
joe joe:
I sayed that 182-183 for him is suitable today.
tom said on 26/Aug/12
shoes lifts do alot to a guy around 5-11 or 6' think about it,add 3-4" in there and you have a tall{ish} guy now a geniune tall guy. arnie worked this out years ago. barefoot hes around 5-11.5".
shoes lifts do alot to a guy around 5-11 or 6' think about it,add 3-4" in there and you have a tall{ish} guy now a geniune tall guy. arnie worked this out years ago. barefoot hes around 5-11.5".
Dmeyer said on 26/Aug/12
Arnie is probably 6'0.5 out of bed and 5'11.75 night how does hé prétend 6'1
Arnie is probably 6'0.5 out of bed and 5'11.75 night how does hé prétend 6'1
Lucio said on 26/Aug/12
ali says on 25/Aug/12
Lucio wrote:
''Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.''
I think you are delusional. He is clearly more than an inch
shorter than Cameron. Cameron is an overal bigger man as well.
Arnold was always under 6ft tall, but wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
-----------------------------
Seriously Ali, did you ever take in consideration buying a good pair of lens?
However you are forget these ones:
"Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more."
and:
"he always wore his magic shoes that give him 2 inch of extra height, like his good friend Stallone.." and so on.
And fortunately I'm here to remind you!
Troll.
ali says on 25/Aug/12
Lucio wrote:
''Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.''
I think you are delusional. He is clearly more than an inch
shorter than Cameron. Cameron is an overal bigger man as well.
Arnold was always under 6ft tall, but wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
-----------------------------
Seriously Ali, did you ever take in consideration buying a good pair of lens?
However you are forget these ones:
"Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more."
and:
"he always wore his magic shoes that give him 2 inch of extra height, like his good friend Stallone.." and so on.
And fortunately I'm here to remind you!
Troll.
Dmeyer said on 26/Aug/12
If i meet arnie wearing same shoes we will be close
If i meet arnie wearing same shoes we will be close
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 26/Aug/12
@ali:
No offence but you must be blind, Arnold is barely 0.5-0.75 shorter than 6'0.5 Cameron in those pics with the same footwear.
In the bodybuilding competitions he was classified in the "tall" category and his height was listed as 6'2.
He was measured at 6'1.5 by a guy who didn't even like him, and was barefeet all the time during the competitions.
But maybe you're right, they implanted lifts on his foots...who knows?
@ali:
No offence but you must be blind, Arnold is barely 0.5-0.75 shorter than 6'0.5 Cameron in those pics with the same footwear.
In the bodybuilding competitions he was classified in the "tall" category and his height was listed as 6'2.
He was measured at 6'1.5 by a guy who didn't even like him, and was barefeet all the time during the competitions.
But maybe you're right, they implanted lifts on his foots...who knows?
GUY said on 26/Aug/12
ali says on 25/Aug/12
Lucio wrote:
''Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.''
I think you are delusional. He is clearly more than an inch
shorter than Cameron. Cameron is an overal bigger man as well.
Arnold was always under 6ft tall, but wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
----------------------------
Either you're completely naive and utterly simple informing Lucio of this "fact", or you just take pleasure in trolling these boards like a punk.
Here's one for you Ali: Arnold was always over 6ft tall, and never wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
ali says on 25/Aug/12
Lucio wrote:
''Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.''
I think you are delusional. He is clearly more than an inch
shorter than Cameron. Cameron is an overal bigger man as well.
Arnold was always under 6ft tall, but wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
----------------------------
Either you're completely naive and utterly simple informing Lucio of this "fact", or you just take pleasure in trolling these boards like a punk.
Here's one for you Ali: Arnold was always over 6ft tall, and never wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
joe joe said on 25/Aug/12
i think even taking into consideration posture, ground level and shoes etc Arnie is still clearly shorter than David Cameron (184cm) in most pics. i cant buy arnie being 184 larc. he is max 182 for me, which is still a good height for an old guy.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
i think even taking into consideration posture, ground level and shoes etc Arnie is still clearly shorter than David Cameron (184cm) in most pics. i cant buy arnie being 184 larc. he is max 182 for me, which is still a good height for an old guy.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Dmeyer said on 25/Aug/12
When in good posture near 184cm Cameron hé dosnt look under under 182.5cm near 6 ft
When in good posture near 184cm Cameron hé dosnt look under under 182.5cm near 6 ft
ali said on 25/Aug/12
Lucio wrote:
''Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.''
I think you are delusional. He is clearly more than an inch
shorter than Cameron. Cameron is an overal bigger man as well.
Arnold was always under 6ft tall, but wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
Lucio wrote:
''Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.''
I think you are delusional. He is clearly more than an inch
shorter than Cameron. Cameron is an overal bigger man as well.
Arnold was always under 6ft tall, but wore lifts to
appear 2 inches taller.
Lucio said on 25/Aug/12
I agree, his upper body looks compressed today, and the fact of pulling his pants up to his armpits, doesn't help him.
But I'd be curious to see him today without the fat around the waist if he would give the same impression.
Personally, I am convinced no, surely he would give a better impression and attenuated the impression of a short torso.
Then I would like to dispel a rumor: it is not true that he always had a short torso and legs disproportionately long compared to the torso even in his prime. Sure, he has always had long legs, but not disproportionate to the torso and these few photos are a clear testimony
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I agree, his upper body looks compressed today, and the fact of pulling his pants up to his armpits, doesn't help him.
But I'd be curious to see him today without the fat around the waist if he would give the same impression.
Personally, I am convinced no, surely he would give a better impression and attenuated the impression of a short torso.
Then I would like to dispel a rumor: it is not true that he always had a short torso and legs disproportionately long compared to the torso even in his prime. Sure, he has always had long legs, but not disproportionate to the torso and these few photos are a clear testimony
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
joe joe said on 24/Aug/12
i would have to agree with lucio. Arnie is not wearing cowboy boots. but for me in the picture i posted where i feel they are both standing straight cameron seems a hair taller. Cameron even made a joke on british tv after their meeting saying" I can tell his kids he's taller than the terminator". i would put arnold at 182 /183 now- 186-187.5 peak
i would have to agree with lucio. Arnie is not wearing cowboy boots. but for me in the picture i posted where i feel they are both standing straight cameron seems a hair taller. Cameron even made a joke on british tv after their meeting saying" I can tell his kids he's taller than the terminator". i would put arnold at 182 /183 now- 186-187.5 peak
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 24/Aug/12
Found a pic with Arnold and another bodybuilder named Mario Rieger, the pic is dated 2009, the bodybuilder claims 171cm on his profile on myspace.
Arnold looked a good 11-12cm taller, he's still 182-183 range.
Found a pic with Arnold and another bodybuilder named Mario Rieger, the pic is dated 2009, the bodybuilder claims 171cm on his profile on myspace.
Arnold looked a good 11-12cm taller, he's still 182-183 range.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 24/Aug/12
Boots? lol...he wears normal shoes with David Cameron.
I agree that his body looks a bit compressed today, that's maybe due to age and weight, but let's be realistic, Arnold was always a leg-man (he still has long legs), the shrinkage is in his upper body.
Boots? lol...he wears normal shoes with David Cameron.
I agree that his body looks a bit compressed today, that's maybe due to age and weight, but let's be realistic, Arnold was always a leg-man (he still has long legs), the shrinkage is in his upper body.
Lucio said on 24/Aug/12
Zach says on 23/Aug/12
If you scroll through the pics posted by Joe Joe in one of them you can clearly see Arnold is wearing cowboy boots. He still looks slightly shorter than David Cameron. Incidentally Cameron's upper body looks broader than Arnold's too. Big Arnie has really compressed from all directions in recent years.
----------------------
@Zach, in these series of pictures
Click Here
Click Here
Arnie doesn't wearing cowboy boots, but normal shoes and they looks exactly the same height. It will also because Arnie has a better posture than Cameron, however they are substantially at the same height
Zach says on 23/Aug/12
If you scroll through the pics posted by Joe Joe in one of them you can clearly see Arnold is wearing cowboy boots. He still looks slightly shorter than David Cameron. Incidentally Cameron's upper body looks broader than Arnold's too. Big Arnie has really compressed from all directions in recent years.
----------------------
@Zach, in these series of pictures
Click Here
Click Here
Arnie doesn't wearing cowboy boots, but normal shoes and they looks exactly the same height. It will also because Arnie has a better posture than Cameron, however they are substantially at the same height
Zach said on 23/Aug/12
If you scroll through the pics posted by Joe Joe in one of them you can clearly see Arnold is wearing cowboy boots. He still looks slightly shorter than David Cameron. Incidentally Cameron's upper body looks broader than Arnold's too. Big Arnie has really compressed from all directions in recent years.
If you scroll through the pics posted by Joe Joe in one of them you can clearly see Arnold is wearing cowboy boots. He still looks slightly shorter than David Cameron. Incidentally Cameron's upper body looks broader than Arnold's too. Big Arnie has really compressed from all directions in recent years.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 23/Aug/12
At peak, he was for sure an hair taller than Obama, unfortunately we can't compare at 100% both their peak heights, because Arnold is 14y older.
At peak, he was for sure an hair taller than Obama, unfortunately we can't compare at 100% both their peak heights, because Arnold is 14y older.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 23/Aug/12
Still holds his own next to 185-186 Obama, he is at least 182cm today.
Still holds his own next to 185-186 Obama, he is at least 182cm today.
Lucio said on 23/Aug/12
Rob, I would like to know your opinion on this pic
Click Here
To me, he looks the same height of Cameron i.e. 6'0.5" with Arnie in good posture and the ground seems to be flat without slope, whereas in this pic posted by Joe Joe
Click Here
Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.
Rob, I would like to know your opinion on this pic
Click Here
To me, he looks the same height of Cameron i.e. 6'0.5" with Arnie in good posture and the ground seems to be flat without slope, whereas in this pic posted by Joe Joe
Click Here
Arnie has the posture disadvantage and that is why he is shorter than Cameron.
What do you think?
Thanks.
Lucio said on 23/Aug/12
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 22/Aug/12
You can argue between 186 and 188 for a peak Arnold, there's no way he was under or over that. He claimed 186cm in a foreign interview time ago, and converted badly to 6'2.
186-187 range is 100% attendible, I know when I see someone around my height, and he was for sure around my height.
And Kevin Sorbo doesn't know what the hell he's saying...5'11...he's crazy, Arnold looks clearly taller than that even now at 65y.
---------------------
Kevin Sorbo has to be a fuc*ing troll like Metric! Lol
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 22/Aug/12
You can argue between 186 and 188 for a peak Arnold, there's no way he was under or over that. He claimed 186cm in a foreign interview time ago, and converted badly to 6'2.
186-187 range is 100% attendible, I know when I see someone around my height, and he was for sure around my height.
And Kevin Sorbo doesn't know what the hell he's saying...5'11...he's crazy, Arnold looks clearly taller than that even now at 65y.
---------------------
Kevin Sorbo has to be a fuc*ing troll like Metric! Lol
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 22/Aug/12
You can argue between 186 and 188 for a peak Arnold, there's no way he was under or over that. He claimed 186cm in a foreign interview time ago, and converted badly to 6'2.
186-187 range is 100% attendible, I know when I see someone around my height, and he was for sure around my height.
And Kevin Sorbo doesn't know what the hell he's saying...5'11...he's crazy, Arnold looks clearly taller than that even now at 65y.
You can argue between 186 and 188 for a peak Arnold, there's no way he was under or over that. He claimed 186cm in a foreign interview time ago, and converted badly to 6'2.
186-187 range is 100% attendible, I know when I see someone around my height, and he was for sure around my height.
And Kevin Sorbo doesn't know what the hell he's saying...5'11...he's crazy, Arnold looks clearly taller than that even now at 65y.
joe joe said on 21/Aug/12
Danimal says on 19/Aug/12
Since when is Cameron 6'0"? He was 6'2". May be shorter now, but that pic is 11 years old.
Danimal I think you are mistaken. the picture I am refering to is a 2 year old picture of Arnie and david cameron the british Prime minister not james cameron the director. yes the director is 6'2 but david cameron the british prime minister is 6 ft. please read carefully. I have reposted the foto i was referring to again so you dont get it twisted again.
Click Here
Danimal says on 19/Aug/12
Since when is Cameron 6'0"? He was 6'2". May be shorter now, but that pic is 11 years old.
Danimal I think you are mistaken. the picture I am refering to is a 2 year old picture of Arnie and david cameron the british Prime minister not james cameron the director. yes the director is 6'2 but david cameron the british prime minister is 6 ft. please read carefully. I have reposted the foto i was referring to again so you dont get it twisted again.
Click Here
Dmeyer said on 21/Aug/12
Rob is 185.5cm at his very lowest after weight training at peak possible
Rob is 185.5cm at his very lowest after weight training at peak possible
maximus said on 20/Aug/12
yes, today he is probably 5'11" to 6'...but in his prime he was likely 6'1"
yes, today he is probably 5'11" to 6'...but in his prime he was likely 6'1"
gabe said on 20/Aug/12
i think arnold is and always was 6 feet flat to 6 and a half feet always. In commando bill duke fricking towered over him like a giant. I doubt arnold ever wore lifts. Even in running man he looked like the shortest guy out of all those guys. I think hes always been 6 feet he never was 6'2" ever i dont think. He did look like it though when he was around other guys like david caruso. In raw deal he was shorter than robert davi whos 6'2". In expendables he still looked like he was around 6 feet. Only thing i noticed is that his hair is thinning out
i think arnold is and always was 6 feet flat to 6 and a half feet always. In commando bill duke fricking towered over him like a giant. I doubt arnold ever wore lifts. Even in running man he looked like the shortest guy out of all those guys. I think hes always been 6 feet he never was 6'2" ever i dont think. He did look like it though when he was around other guys like david caruso. In raw deal he was shorter than robert davi whos 6'2". In expendables he still looked like he was around 6 feet. Only thing i noticed is that his hair is thinning out
Dmeyer said on 20/Aug/12
By 75 hé will be 5'10.5-11 and sly might drop just 2cm from peak at 75 and be 5'8.25
By 75 hé will be 5'10.5-11 and sly might drop just 2cm from peak at 75 and be 5'8.25
Dmeyer said on 20/Aug/12
The 6'1 claim for now is probably With 1-1.25 in shoes or touching his hair at 10am , Èven wearing 1.5-1.6 boots hé looks under 6'1
The 6'1 claim for now is probably With 1-1.25 in shoes or touching his hair at 10am , Èven wearing 1.5-1.6 boots hé looks under 6'1
maximus said on 19/Aug/12
Arnold never came across as being short in body building competition and most definetly on the taller side versus the other heavy weights.
Arnold never came across as being short in body building competition and most definetly on the taller side versus the other heavy weights.
maximus said on 19/Aug/12
I think in his prime he was at least 6'1"....if you look closely he dwarfs Franco Columbu by at least 7 to 8 inches....Columbu was listed at 5'5" and in pictures with arnold its obvious a prime arnold has more than 5" on Franco so 5'10" for a prime arnold is highley unlikely...so the claimed measurement which was supposedly a true physical measurement in 1969 had Arnold being 6'1.5....it may well be accurate.
I think in his prime he was at least 6'1"....if you look closely he dwarfs Franco Columbu by at least 7 to 8 inches....Columbu was listed at 5'5" and in pictures with arnold its obvious a prime arnold has more than 5" on Franco so 5'10" for a prime arnold is highley unlikely...so the claimed measurement which was supposedly a true physical measurement in 1969 had Arnold being 6'1.5....it may well be accurate.
Danimal said on 19/Aug/12
joe joe says on 17/Aug/12
I think it's fair to say that with age Arnold has lost a lot of height and from the photos with David Cameron we can clearly see he isn't even 6ft anymore. Cameron is a strong six foot and clearly taller than arnie who is pretty much standing with military posture. Cameron's posture is rather more relaxed
Since when is Cameron 6'0"? He was 6'2". May be shorter now, but that pic is 11 years old.
joe joe says on 17/Aug/12
I think it's fair to say that with age Arnold has lost a lot of height and from the photos with David Cameron we can clearly see he isn't even 6ft anymore. Cameron is a strong six foot and clearly taller than arnie who is pretty much standing with military posture. Cameron's posture is rather more relaxed
Since when is Cameron 6'0"? He was 6'2". May be shorter now, but that pic is 11 years old.
GUY said on 18/Aug/12
Milosss says on 16/Aug/12
This is Arnold in 2001 with 6'2 James Cameron: Click Here . I think Arnold was always shorter then Cameron.
-------------------
Hard to say. Arnold is a little closer to the camera and it seems like a high angle shot, so Cameron looks to be favored. They aren't standing side by side.
Milosss says on 16/Aug/12
This is Arnold in 2001 with 6'2 James Cameron: Click Here . I think Arnold was always shorter then Cameron.
-------------------
Hard to say. Arnold is a little closer to the camera and it seems like a high angle shot, so Cameron looks to be favored. They aren't standing side by side.
BOBO said on 18/Aug/12
Ahnold has said he was 6'1" from day one. Read his autobiography "Arnold". Van Dam insists that he is 5'10" and this website lists Dolphf Lundgren at 6'4.5" then the dang pictures are accrate! Now stop bickering like a bunch of women!!
Ahnold has said he was 6'1" from day one. Read his autobiography "Arnold". Van Dam insists that he is 5'10" and this website lists Dolphf Lundgren at 6'4.5" then the dang pictures are accrate! Now stop bickering like a bunch of women!!
Lucio said on 17/Aug/12
themotorbikeman says on 15/Aug/12
Just watched Commando (1985) with Arnold and Rae Dawn Chong, she's listed as 5ft 8, and in the film she looks to be wearing 3 inches heels, possibly 4 inch? Lets assume she's wearing 3 inch heels, this makes her 5ft 11. Arnold looks to have 2 inches on her making him 6ft 1, but he's in boots. If the listing for Rae is 5ft 8 barefoot then arnold isn't the 6ft 1 he looks in the film because obviously you have to minus the footwear. Also most people judge the distance from the top of the head to eyebrows as 4 inches i belive, but in fact i have a distance of 3.25-3.5 inches which is what i've based the 2 inches arnold has on Rae in the film on. I'd go with 6ft barefoot in 1985.
What's everyone's thoughts on this then? Doesn't look 6ft 1 let alone 6ft 2 to me in this film. Maybe he hasn't lost as much height as you all think, perhaps he was shorter than 6ft 2 in the first place, but a lot of info states 6ft 2 or close to that as his true height, so i guess we'll never know since he's not in his prime anymore.
------------------------------
I agree, in Commando he seems closer to 6 feet rather than 187 cm.
Rob, I'd like to ask you a question: if you watch Commando, you realize that next to Vernon Wells, he seems to be closer to 6 feet rather than 6'1.5" even judging from this pic
Click Here
Do you think it may be possible that he was 6 feet at his peak?
In my opinion, since he seems to be only 6 feet in this film, I attribute it to possible lifts worn by Vernon or other environmental variables such as ground, shoes, etc.
In fact, if you'll notice, in all the movie, they are never side by side in standing position, so this fact raises doubts about the possibility that he may actually have been 6 feet at his peak, partly because a only pictures of them side by side is still too little to judge.
What do you think?
themotorbikeman says on 15/Aug/12
Just watched Commando (1985) with Arnold and Rae Dawn Chong, she's listed as 5ft 8, and in the film she looks to be wearing 3 inches heels, possibly 4 inch? Lets assume she's wearing 3 inch heels, this makes her 5ft 11. Arnold looks to have 2 inches on her making him 6ft 1, but he's in boots. If the listing for Rae is 5ft 8 barefoot then arnold isn't the 6ft 1 he looks in the film because obviously you have to minus the footwear. Also most people judge the distance from the top of the head to eyebrows as 4 inches i belive, but in fact i have a distance of 3.25-3.5 inches which is what i've based the 2 inches arnold has on Rae in the film on. I'd go with 6ft barefoot in 1985.
What's everyone's thoughts on this then? Doesn't look 6ft 1 let alone 6ft 2 to me in this film. Maybe he hasn't lost as much height as you all think, perhaps he was shorter than 6ft 2 in the first place, but a lot of info states 6ft 2 or close to that as his true height, so i guess we'll never know since he's not in his prime anymore.
------------------------------
I agree, in Commando he seems closer to 6 feet rather than 187 cm.
Rob, I'd like to ask you a question: if you watch Commando, you realize that next to Vernon Wells, he seems to be closer to 6 feet rather than 6'1.5" even judging from this pic
Click Here
Do you think it may be possible that he was 6 feet at his peak?
In my opinion, since he seems to be only 6 feet in this film, I attribute it to possible lifts worn by Vernon or other environmental variables such as ground, shoes, etc.
In fact, if you'll notice, in all the movie, they are never side by side in standing position, so this fact raises doubts about the possibility that he may actually have been 6 feet at his peak, partly because a only pictures of them side by side is still too little to judge.
What do you think?
joe joe said on 17/Aug/12
I think it's fair to say that with age Arnold has lost a lot of height and from the photos with David Cameron we can clearly see he isn't even 6ft anymore. Cameron is a strong six foot and clearly taller than arnie who is pretty much standing with military posture. Cameron's posture is rather more relaxed
I think it's fair to say that with age Arnold has lost a lot of height and from the photos with David Cameron we can clearly see he isn't even 6ft anymore. Cameron is a strong six foot and clearly taller than arnie who is pretty much standing with military posture. Cameron's posture is rather more relaxed
Dmeyer said on 17/Aug/12
To me arnie at very lowest in his 20s was never more than 185.5cm 6'1 waking Back on 6'2 could have get measured 6'1.4 at 11 am , or 6'1.5 just touching his hair at 60 was 183cm
To me arnie at very lowest in his 20s was never more than 185.5cm 6'1 waking Back on 6'2 could have get measured 6'1.4 at 11 am , or 6'1.5 just touching his hair at 60 was 183cm
Dmeyer said on 17/Aug/12
To me at peak looks 185-6cm now 182-3cm its possible hé just lost 1 in
To me at peak looks 185-6cm now 182-3cm its possible hé just lost 1 in
Milosss said on 16/Aug/12
This is Arnold in 2001 with 6'2 James Cameron: Click Here . I think Arnold was always shorter then Cameron.
This is Arnold in 2001 with 6'2 James Cameron: Click Here . I think Arnold was always shorter then Cameron.
joe joe said on 16/Aug/12
I think as i said in the picture of him and stallone earlier a peak of 6.1.75 or 6'1.5 is a fare assesment for Arnold now though i would def say he is around 5'11/ 5'11.5 here he is with David cameron who is on the No10 website as 184cm he is a good cm or 2 even shorter even with the hair
Click Here
I think as i said in the picture of him and stallone earlier a peak of 6.1.75 or 6'1.5 is a fare assesment for Arnold now though i would def say he is around 5'11/ 5'11.5 here he is with David cameron who is on the No10 website as 184cm he is a good cm or 2 even shorter even with the hair
Click Here
Lucio said on 16/Aug/12
Ok, I'd be a little tired of hearing things that are not very credible, so in my opinion, things are so:
1) He has not lost 2 full inches of height, it's already quite rare in a person with different problems, let alone for a person who, like Arnold, had no accident to his back (at least as far as we we know).
2) To be honest, I didn't feel to say that bodybuilding lose height, neither years of squat, because once ceased the load, spinal disks, being elastic, they come back to their original shape.
3) To me, from the many photos and videos seen in years, I got the idea that at his peak had to be: morning out of bed 188 cms (6'2"), during the day 186 cms (6'1.25"), in the evening 185 cms (6'1").
To me, these measures are those that are closest to reality, but then again, not because I say so, but because if you carefully observe the many photos in his bodybuilding days and those with celebrities such as Clint Eastwood, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Tony Blair and other celebrities, it can be seen that he is ALWAYS very close to this measures of 186 cms, or at worse 185 cms next to these celebrities.
So, it's true: he has lost height from his peak, but in my opinion, not more than 3 cms (1.5 inches) at max and it is mainly due to age and normal contraction of the spinal discs that after a certain age lose elasticity and become thinning.
However, this is normal for anyone, who doing sport or not.
Ok, I'd be a little tired of hearing things that are not very credible, so in my opinion, things are so:
1) He has not lost 2 full inches of height, it's already quite rare in a person with different problems, let alone for a person who, like Arnold, had no accident to his back (at least as far as we we know).
2) To be honest, I didn't feel to say that bodybuilding lose height, neither years of squat, because once ceased the load, spinal disks, being elastic, they come back to their original shape.
3) To me, from the many photos and videos seen in years, I got the idea that at his peak had to be: morning out of bed 188 cms (6'2"), during the day 186 cms (6'1.25"), in the evening 185 cms (6'1").
To me, these measures are those that are closest to reality, but then again, not because I say so, but because if you carefully observe the many photos in his bodybuilding days and those with celebrities such as Clint Eastwood, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Tony Blair and other celebrities, it can be seen that he is ALWAYS very close to this measures of 186 cms, or at worse 185 cms next to these celebrities.
So, it's true: he has lost height from his peak, but in my opinion, not more than 3 cms (1.5 inches) at max and it is mainly due to age and normal contraction of the spinal discs that after a certain age lose elasticity and become thinning.
However, this is normal for anyone, who doing sport or not.
Danimal said on 15/Aug/12
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 13/Aug/12
He's 6'0 flat today, he lost only 1.5 at 65y, it's not an huge amount.
We have to count the fact that he was a bodybuilder (they lose more height than average, because they stress their spine), he was injured a lot of times (especially in his spine), plus the steroid use has caused him heart problems, all these things together contributed to his height loss.
Dolph Lundgren lost already the same amount of height, a good 4cm (he looks bang on 190cm today), and he's also 10y younger than Arnold and in good shape.
joe joe says on 8/Aug/12
I think a 6' 1.75 as a peak for arnie is fair check this picture. arnie is in boat shoes that give minimal lift. Sly has some monsters on though ha.
Click Here
Arnold was just so much longer back then.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 13/Aug/12
He's 6'0 flat today, he lost only 1.5 at 65y, it's not an huge amount.
We have to count the fact that he was a bodybuilder (they lose more height than average, because they stress their spine), he was injured a lot of times (especially in his spine), plus the steroid use has caused him heart problems, all these things together contributed to his height loss.
Dolph Lundgren lost already the same amount of height, a good 4cm (he looks bang on 190cm today), and he's also 10y younger than Arnold and in good shape.
joe joe says on 8/Aug/12
I think a 6' 1.75 as a peak for arnie is fair check this picture. arnie is in boat shoes that give minimal lift. Sly has some monsters on though ha.
Click Here
Arnold was just so much longer back then.
themotorbikeman said on 15/Aug/12
Just watched Commando (1985) with Arnold and Rae Dawn Chong, she's listed as 5ft 8, and in the film she looks to be wearing 3 inches heels, possibly 4 inch? Lets assume she's wearing 3 inch heels, this makes her 5ft 11. Arnold looks to have 2 inches on her making him 6ft 1, but he's in boots. If the listing for Rae is 5ft 8 barefoot then arnold isn't the 6ft 1 he looks in the film because obviously you have to minus the footwear. Also most people judge the distance from the top of the head to eyebrows as 4 inches i belive, but in fact i have a distance of 3.25-3.5 inches which is what i've based the 2 inches arnold has on Rae in the film on. I'd go with 6ft barefoot in 1985.
What's everyone's thoughts on this then? Doesn't look 6ft 1 let alone 6ft 2 to me in this film. Maybe he hasn't lost as much height as you all think, perhaps he was shorter than 6ft 2 in the first place, but a lot of info states 6ft 2 or close to that as his true height, so i guess we'll never know since he's not in his prime anymore.
Just watched Commando (1985) with Arnold and Rae Dawn Chong, she's listed as 5ft 8, and in the film she looks to be wearing 3 inches heels, possibly 4 inch? Lets assume she's wearing 3 inch heels, this makes her 5ft 11. Arnold looks to have 2 inches on her making him 6ft 1, but he's in boots. If the listing for Rae is 5ft 8 barefoot then arnold isn't the 6ft 1 he looks in the film because obviously you have to minus the footwear. Also most people judge the distance from the top of the head to eyebrows as 4 inches i belive, but in fact i have a distance of 3.25-3.5 inches which is what i've based the 2 inches arnold has on Rae in the film on. I'd go with 6ft barefoot in 1985.
What's everyone's thoughts on this then? Doesn't look 6ft 1 let alone 6ft 2 to me in this film. Maybe he hasn't lost as much height as you all think, perhaps he was shorter than 6ft 2 in the first place, but a lot of info states 6ft 2 or close to that as his true height, so i guess we'll never know since he's not in his prime anymore.
Dmeyer said on 15/Aug/12
To me arnie was 6'2-2.25 out of bed 6'1.5 afternoon 6'1-1.25 after weights , about 184cm in his 50s 6 ft at 60 now close to 5'11.5-11.75 peak height 186 now 182 , people who met him 5-10 years ago say we are similar height 5'11-6'
To me arnie was 6'2-2.25 out of bed 6'1.5 afternoon 6'1-1.25 after weights , about 184cm in his 50s 6 ft at 60 now close to 5'11.5-11.75 peak height 186 now 182 , people who met him 5-10 years ago say we are similar height 5'11-6'
Lucio said on 15/Aug/12
Danimal says on 14/Aug/12
Lucio says on 14/Aug/12
Another good one from Expendables
Click Here
Van Dam looking 6'0" there. This picture is not accurate.
---------------
Sure, but only because Van Damme is closer to the camera.
As here in this pic for example
Click Here
where he also seems 6'1", but of course he is closer to the camera.
This picture for example
Click Here
is more accurate and shows about 7 cms diff between them.
Danimal says on 14/Aug/12
Lucio says on 14/Aug/12
Another good one from Expendables
Click Here
Van Dam looking 6'0" there. This picture is not accurate.
---------------
Sure, but only because Van Damme is closer to the camera.
As here in this pic for example
Click Here
where he also seems 6'1", but of course he is closer to the camera.
This picture for example
Click Here
is more accurate and shows about 7 cms diff between them.
Zach said on 15/Aug/12
Larc - you said Arnold's had some serious spine injuries. I'm an Arnold fan and I've never heard of him having 'serious spine injuries'. When I asked you to provide details of your spine injuries claim you come up with cracked ribs and a broken femur. You do know where ribs and the femur are right??
As for your claim that bodybuilding causes loss of height, I asked you to cite a reliable scientific study that shows this and you couldnt up with any.
I do actually agree with Rob and the others that Arnold has lost height, 2 full inches IMO, but I don't buy into these wive's tales and made up 'serious spine injuries' stories you're coming up with.
Larc - you said Arnold's had some serious spine injuries. I'm an Arnold fan and I've never heard of him having 'serious spine injuries'. When I asked you to provide details of your spine injuries claim you come up with cracked ribs and a broken femur. You do know where ribs and the femur are right??
As for your claim that bodybuilding causes loss of height, I asked you to cite a reliable scientific study that shows this and you couldnt up with any.
I do actually agree with Rob and the others that Arnold has lost height, 2 full inches IMO, but I don't buy into these wive's tales and made up 'serious spine injuries' stories you're coming up with.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 15/Aug/12
@Zach:
You're not funny, Metric fanboy.
Do you realize that squat increase the chances of losing height? Because it stresses your spine like hell.
@Zach:
You're not funny, Metric fanboy.
Do you realize that squat increase the chances of losing height? Because it stresses your spine like hell.
Danimal said on 14/Aug/12
Lucio says on 14/Aug/12
Another good one from Expendables
Click Here
Van Dam looking 6'0" there. This picture is not accurate.
Lucio says on 14/Aug/12
Another good one from Expendables
Click Here
Van Dam looking 6'0" there. This picture is not accurate.
Danimal said on 14/Aug/12
El C says on 13/Aug/12
I met him 18 years ago. He was 1 inch taller than my wife, she is 5 foot 9 inches.
News flash. Women wear heels. Men don't.
El C says on 13/Aug/12
I met him 18 years ago. He was 1 inch taller than my wife, she is 5 foot 9 inches.
News flash. Women wear heels. Men don't.
Zach said on 14/Aug/12
Larc - you clearly don't know where the spine is. Try googling it.
Guy - those are some probably some of the best pics for comparison. Arnold's just clearing 6ft these days - in cowboy boots.
Larc - you clearly don't know where the spine is. Try googling it.
Guy - those are some probably some of the best pics for comparison. Arnold's just clearing 6ft these days - in cowboy boots.
Robban said on 14/Aug/12
Those shoes of Arnold is elevator shoes...
Those shoes of Arnold is elevator shoes...
ANDREA[ITA] said on 14/Aug/12
Lol, its not much different 5'11.5 or 6'...
Lol, its not much different 5'11.5 or 6'...
Lucio said on 14/Aug/12
Another good one from Expendables
Click Here
there are about 7 cms of difference between Dolph and Arnie. if Dolph is 6'3.5" then Arnold is 184-185 cms. But Arnold has such type of cowboy boots that's maybe give him an 1 cms extra, also if I don't think it's so, because his shoes seem like these
Click Here
which seem to have a normal heel of 2.5 cms.
Another good one from Expendables
Click Here
there are about 7 cms of difference between Dolph and Arnie. if Dolph is 6'3.5" then Arnold is 184-185 cms. But Arnold has such type of cowboy boots that's maybe give him an 1 cms extra, also if I don't think it's so, because his shoes seem like these
Click Here
which seem to have a normal heel of 2.5 cms.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 14/Aug/12
5'11.5 is not impossible today, isnt it, rob?
Editor Rob
5'11.5 is not impossible today, isnt it, rob?
Editor Rob under 6ft, say that to Arnie's face ;)
Dmeyer said on 14/Aug/12
Guy arnie looks 3 in under dolph but arnie has Brown cowboy With a good 0.5 in more
Guy arnie looks 3 in under dolph but arnie has Brown cowboy With a good 0.5 in more
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 14/Aug/12
@Zach:
- He broke six ribs and was hospitalized for 4 days after a motorcycle crash in Los Angeles. (December 9, 2001)
- He tripped over his ski pole and broke his right femur while skiing in Sun Valley, Idaho, with his family. (December 23, 2006)
@Zach:
- He broke six ribs and was hospitalized for 4 days after a motorcycle crash in Los Angeles. (December 9, 2001)
- He tripped over his ski pole and broke his right femur while skiing in Sun Valley, Idaho, with his family. (December 23, 2006)
Zach said on 14/Aug/12
With all due respect Larc every one of those statements are rubbish. There are no studies to show weight lifters lose more height, on the contrary there are many which show bodybuilding increases bone density. Then Arnold's heart surgery was due to a congenital aortic valve defect i.e. from birth NOT related to steroid use. Finally, you say Arnold had a lot of spine injuries - really? Please provide details.
With all due respect Larc every one of those statements are rubbish. There are no studies to show weight lifters lose more height, on the contrary there are many which show bodybuilding increases bone density. Then Arnold's heart surgery was due to a congenital aortic valve defect i.e. from birth NOT related to steroid use. Finally, you say Arnold had a lot of spine injuries - really? Please provide details.
GUY said on 14/Aug/12
Another shot showing about 3 inches diff between Arnie and Dolph
Click Here
Another good one
Click Here
Another shot showing about 3 inches diff between Arnie and Dolph
Click Here
Another good one
Click Here
El C said on 13/Aug/12
I met him 18 years ago. He was 1 inch taller than my wife, she is 5 foot 9 inches.
I met him 18 years ago. He was 1 inch taller than my wife, she is 5 foot 9 inches.
Lucio said on 13/Aug/12
GUY says on 13/Aug/12
Dmeyer says on 12/Aug/12
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
--------------------
I don't know here
Click Here
3 inch diff here
Click Here
Still looks around 6 feet next to Van Damme(5'9.5"), Stallone(5'9"-lifts?), Statham(5'9").
Click Here
------------------
Absolutely true. Nothing less than 183 cms, possibly even more next to Van Damme where the difference is huge.
GUY says on 13/Aug/12
Dmeyer says on 12/Aug/12
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
--------------------
I don't know here
Click Here
3 inch diff here
Click Here
Still looks around 6 feet next to Van Damme(5'9.5"), Stallone(5'9"-lifts?), Statham(5'9").
Click Here
------------------
Absolutely true. Nothing less than 183 cms, possibly even more next to Van Damme where the difference is huge.
Lucio said on 13/Aug/12
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 12/Aug/12
Arnold looks bang on 183 next to 177 Van Damme in the Expendables 2 premiere pics, there's no way he's less than that today, maybe only with bad posture.
------------------
Also close to 185 cms if in good posture if compared to 6'2" Avi Lerner, Expendables producer, as evidences by this pic, where there are about 3 cms of difference.
Click Here
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 12/Aug/12
Arnold looks bang on 183 next to 177 Van Damme in the Expendables 2 premiere pics, there's no way he's less than that today, maybe only with bad posture.
------------------
Also close to 185 cms if in good posture if compared to 6'2" Avi Lerner, Expendables producer, as evidences by this pic, where there are about 3 cms of difference.
Click Here
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 13/Aug/12
He's 6'0 flat today, he lost only 1.5 at 65y, it's not an huge amount.
We have to count the fact that he was a bodybuilder (they lose more height than average, because they stress their spine), he was injured a lot of times (especially in his spine), plus the steroid use has caused him heart problems, all these things together contributed to his height loss.
Dolph Lundgren lost already the same amount of height, a good 4cm (he looks bang on 190cm today), and he's also 10y younger than Arnold and in good shape.
At the end, Arnold didn't do that bad, considering all his problems.
He's 6'0 flat today, he lost only 1.5 at 65y, it's not an huge amount.
We have to count the fact that he was a bodybuilder (they lose more height than average, because they stress their spine), he was injured a lot of times (especially in his spine), plus the steroid use has caused him heart problems, all these things together contributed to his height loss.
Dolph Lundgren lost already the same amount of height, a good 4cm (he looks bang on 190cm today), and he's also 10y younger than Arnold and in good shape.
At the end, Arnold didn't do that bad, considering all his problems.
Zach said on 13/Aug/12
Look what's on Arnold's feet. Apart from Lundgren I don't trust any of their footwear, but Arnold's big leather boots appear to be the biggest.
Look what's on Arnold's feet. Apart from Lundgren I don't trust any of their footwear, but Arnold's big leather boots appear to be the biggest.
GUY said on 13/Aug/12
Dmeyer says on 12/Aug/12
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
--------------------
I don't know here
Click Here
3 inch diff here
Click Here
Still looks around 6 feet next to Van Damme(5'9.5"), Stallone(5'9"-lifts?), Statham(5'9").
Click Here
Dmeyer says on 12/Aug/12
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
--------------------
I don't know here
Click Here
3 inch diff here
Click Here
Still looks around 6 feet next to Van Damme(5'9.5"), Stallone(5'9"-lifts?), Statham(5'9").
Click Here
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 12/Aug/12
Arnold looks bang on 183 next to 177 Van Damme in the Expendables 2 premiere pics, there's no way he's less than that today, maybe only with bad posture.
Arnold looks bang on 183 next to 177 Van Damme in the Expendables 2 premiere pics, there's no way he's less than that today, maybe only with bad posture.
Danimal said on 12/Aug/12
Dmeyer says on 12/Aug/12
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
Wo there buddy, where is it stated that Dolph is 6'4.5" with shoes today? He's not even a flat 6'4" with shoes today most likely. The man has lost height.
Dmeyer says on 12/Aug/12
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
Wo there buddy, where is it stated that Dolph is 6'4.5" with shoes today? He's not even a flat 6'4" with shoes today most likely. The man has lost height.
Dmeyer said on 12/Aug/12
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
Editor Rob
Rob considering dolph is 6'4.5 shoes on how come arnie is towerd so hard Èven in cubans.
Editor Rob today Arnie doesn't look over 6 foot, he's now at an age were he could lose a little more height
Themotorbikeman said on 11/Aug/12
Just made a mistake in my newest post, Rae Dawn Chong is listed at 5ft 8 as said in my more detailied comment further down the page. Apologies for saying she was 5ft 7.
Just made a mistake in my newest post, Rae Dawn Chong is listed at 5ft 8 as said in my more detailied comment further down the page. Apologies for saying she was 5ft 7.
Themotorbikeman said on 11/Aug/12
Did anyone read my post regarding Arnold in the film Commando?
Looked 6ft 0.5 at best judgeing from rae dawn chong's height of 5ft 7 and that was after the deduction of 1.5 inches for boots for Arnold. He looks different heights in a lot of films. Looked close to if not marginely shorter than Jeff Bridges, can't remember the name of the film though.
Did anyone read my post regarding Arnold in the film Commando?
Looked 6ft 0.5 at best judgeing from rae dawn chong's height of 5ft 7 and that was after the deduction of 1.5 inches for boots for Arnold. He looks different heights in a lot of films. Looked close to if not marginely shorter than Jeff Bridges, can't remember the name of the film though.
Danimal said on 10/Aug/12
Beefo says on 10/Aug/12
To lose 2 inches height at 65 years old is normal for a tall guy. The taller you are the more you lose. Lou Ferrigno has lost almost 4 inches.
Lou has not lost almost 4". He was just over 6'4" at his peak and is just under 6'3" today.
Beefo says on 10/Aug/12
To lose 2 inches height at 65 years old is normal for a tall guy. The taller you are the more you lose. Lou Ferrigno has lost almost 4 inches.
Lou has not lost almost 4". He was just over 6'4" at his peak and is just under 6'3" today.
Lucio said on 10/Aug/12
Beefo says on 10/Aug/12
To lose 2 inches height at 65 years old is normal for a tall guy. The taller you are the more you lose. Lou Ferrigno has lost almost 4 inches.
-----------------------
And so today Lou would be only 6 ft 0 ??
Beefo says on 10/Aug/12
To lose 2 inches height at 65 years old is normal for a tall guy. The taller you are the more you lose. Lou Ferrigno has lost almost 4 inches.
-----------------------
And so today Lou would be only 6 ft 0 ??
Beefo said on 10/Aug/12
To lose 2 inches height at 65 years old is normal for a tall guy. The taller you are the more you lose. Lou Ferrigno has lost almost 4 inches.
To lose 2 inches height at 65 years old is normal for a tall guy. The taller you are the more you lose. Lou Ferrigno has lost almost 4 inches.
somedude said on 9/Aug/12
I talked to a guy at the Univ Of Washington gym in the mid-late 90s who said they saw Arnold and he was smaller than expected. Of course that guy was a 6'2 and 235 lb former linebacker. So maybe arnie is only 184 cm. Some earlier pics ive seen of him and he looks closer to 185-186
I talked to a guy at the Univ Of Washington gym in the mid-late 90s who said they saw Arnold and he was smaller than expected. Of course that guy was a 6'2 and 235 lb former linebacker. So maybe arnie is only 184 cm. Some earlier pics ive seen of him and he looks closer to 185-186
Zach said on 9/Aug/12
Agree with both of you D'Animal and Mike. 5'11.5 at most today, possibly even 5'11 flat. 6'1.5 or even a flat 6'2 morning height back in his peak.
Danimal - I think it's a combination of things re his upper body looking small. Firstly, Arnolds always had disproportionately long legs, he's mentioned this several times in his encyclopaedia. Then his training has been lax in recent years and so other people such as Crews, Lundgren look bigger physique wise. Thirdly, he wears cowboy boots/elevated shoes almost regularly now which will only serve to make his legs look longer. Fourth - he is 65 and so yes it's possible his spine has compressed somewhat as happens with age. Also, it doesn't help that he insists on pulling his trousers up right up to his armpits.
Agree with both of you D'Animal and Mike. 5'11.5 at most today, possibly even 5'11 flat. 6'1.5 or even a flat 6'2 morning height back in his peak.
Danimal - I think it's a combination of things re his upper body looking small. Firstly, Arnolds always had disproportionately long legs, he's mentioned this several times in his encyclopaedia. Then his training has been lax in recent years and so other people such as Crews, Lundgren look bigger physique wise. Thirdly, he wears cowboy boots/elevated shoes almost regularly now which will only serve to make his legs look longer. Fourth - he is 65 and so yes it's possible his spine has compressed somewhat as happens with age. Also, it doesn't help that he insists on pulling his trousers up right up to his armpits.
joe joe said on 9/Aug/12
Put this on the sly page by mistake but it belongs here guys. Just a bit of fun
Click Here
Click Here
Put this on the sly page by mistake but it belongs here guys. Just a bit of fun
Click Here
Click Here
Danimal said on 9/Aug/12
Mike says on 8/Aug/12
Danimal: To answer your question, Arnold from what I have seen has shrunk to just under 6 foot. I would say he is in the 5'11" region these days. In his prime, there is no doubt in his barefoot pictures, he used to be TALL. He always stood out like a needle in a haystack barefoot next to 5'8" - 5'11" people.
I was looking at a new picture of Arnold with Forrest Whitaker and Forrest is 6'2.5" - 6'3" and Arnold looks a good 3 - 3.5 inches shorter than Forrest.
Arnold was 6'1.5" - 6'1.75" inches in his prime and nowadays, I reckon he is in the 5'11" - 5'11.5" region.
I agree with you. He's definitely nothing over 5'11.5" today and that's being generous. Imo, he's lost over 2" in height since his peak and it looks like a lot of the height loss is in his upper torso. It appears as though his spine has collapsed on him.
Mike says on 8/Aug/12
Danimal: To answer your question, Arnold from what I have seen has shrunk to just under 6 foot. I would say he is in the 5'11" region these days. In his prime, there is no doubt in his barefoot pictures, he used to be TALL. He always stood out like a needle in a haystack barefoot next to 5'8" - 5'11" people.
I was looking at a new picture of Arnold with Forrest Whitaker and Forrest is 6'2.5" - 6'3" and Arnold looks a good 3 - 3.5 inches shorter than Forrest.
Arnold was 6'1.5" - 6'1.75" inches in his prime and nowadays, I reckon he is in the 5'11" - 5'11.5" region.
I agree with you. He's definitely nothing over 5'11.5" today and that's being generous. Imo, he's lost over 2" in height since his peak and it looks like a lot of the height loss is in his upper torso. It appears as though his spine has collapsed on him.
joe joe said on 8/Aug/12
I think a 6' 1.75 as a peak for arnie is fair check this picture. arnie is in boat shoes that give minimal lift. Sly has some monsters on though ha.
Click Here
I think a 6' 1.75 as a peak for arnie is fair check this picture. arnie is in boat shoes that give minimal lift. Sly has some monsters on though ha.
Click Here
Lucio said on 8/Aug/12
Metric says on 2/Aug/12
Also I agree that Arnolds build today is non-existant. I was just reading the boards over at ArnoldFans and all the posters there seem quite delusional. They all rant on about how Arnold can get into top shape "easily" and that he is going to be flexing and showing off huge guns and pecs in his new movies.
ook at this pic. He doesn´t have ANY biceps at all: Click Here
And this is him in his MOVIE "shape" for crying out loud! He is currently filming The Tomb with Sly.
-------------------------
Arnold out of shape?
Redone eyes with these pics:
this one is from the "Tomb" movie
Click Here
These one are from 2011
Click Here
Click Here
The only thing here is your pathological envy for Arnold.
Troll.
Metric says on 2/Aug/12
Also I agree that Arnolds build today is non-existant. I was just reading the boards over at ArnoldFans and all the posters there seem quite delusional. They all rant on about how Arnold can get into top shape "easily" and that he is going to be flexing and showing off huge guns and pecs in his new movies.
ook at this pic. He doesn´t have ANY biceps at all: Click Here
And this is him in his MOVIE "shape" for crying out loud! He is currently filming The Tomb with Sly.
-------------------------
Arnold out of shape?
Redone eyes with these pics:
this one is from the "Tomb" movie
Click Here
These one are from 2011
Click Here
Click Here
The only thing here is your pathological envy for Arnold.
Troll.
Mike said on 8/Aug/12
Danimal: To answer your question, Arnold from what I have seen has shrunk to just under 6 foot. I would say he is in the 5'11" region these days. In his prime, there is no doubt in his barefoot pictures, he used to be TALL. He always stood out like a needle in a haystack barefoot next to 5'8" - 5'11" people.
I was looking at a new picture of Arnold with Forrest Whitaker and Forrest is 6'2.5" - 6'3" and Arnold looks a good 3 - 3.5 inches shorter than Forrest.
Arnold was 6'1.5" - 6'1.75" inches in his prime and nowadays, I reckon he is in the 5'11" - 5'11.5" region.
Danimal: To answer your question, Arnold from what I have seen has shrunk to just under 6 foot. I would say he is in the 5'11" region these days. In his prime, there is no doubt in his barefoot pictures, he used to be TALL. He always stood out like a needle in a haystack barefoot next to 5'8" - 5'11" people.
I was looking at a new picture of Arnold with Forrest Whitaker and Forrest is 6'2.5" - 6'3" and Arnold looks a good 3 - 3.5 inches shorter than Forrest.
Arnold was 6'1.5" - 6'1.75" inches in his prime and nowadays, I reckon he is in the 5'11" - 5'11.5" region.
Danimal said on 8/Aug/12
tom says on 6/Aug/12
6.1" max in prime,now 5.11-11.5" abouts.
No, he was measured at 6'1.5" barefoot height in the evening in 1969 by a very well respected man in the bodybuilding industry, who didn't even like him.
tom says on 6/Aug/12
6.1" max in prime,now 5.11-11.5" abouts.
No, he was measured at 6'1.5" barefoot height in the evening in 1969 by a very well respected man in the bodybuilding industry, who didn't even like him.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 7/Aug/12
There's also a chance that he was even 6'1.75 (the height that he claimed in that interview with Bronstein). He looked closer in height to Muhammad Ali (when he was younger) in almost all their pics together, and Ali at his peak was for sure almost 6'3.
He looked also clearly taller than Tom Arnold in True Lies, who is at 100% nothing less than a strong 6'1, and looked sometimes a bit taller than Carl Weathers in Predator.
What do you think Rob, is 6'1.75 peak possible? Or maybe he just measured himself in the late morning?
There's also a chance that he was even 6'1.75 (the height that he claimed in that interview with Bronstein). He looked closer in height to Muhammad Ali (when he was younger) in almost all their pics together, and Ali at his peak was for sure almost 6'3.
He looked also clearly taller than Tom Arnold in True Lies, who is at 100% nothing less than a strong 6'1, and looked sometimes a bit taller than Carl Weathers in Predator.
What do you think Rob, is 6'1.75 peak possible? Or maybe he just measured himself in the late morning?
ali said on 7/Aug/12
if he was 5'11.5-6 ft he must look nearly average but he look clearly tall in movies and bodybuilders career.my ques he was 6'1.5-6'2 but 6'1 is possible.
if he was 5'11.5-6 ft he must look nearly average but he look clearly tall in movies and bodybuilders career.my ques he was 6'1.5-6'2 but 6'1 is possible.
the shredder said on 7/Aug/12
Judging height is about guessing a realistic looking range not internet or magazine listings . Anybody with good eyes can see that a 5'7 Stallone is nuts .
Judging height is about guessing a realistic looking range not internet or magazine listings . Anybody with good eyes can see that a 5'7 Stallone is nuts .
Danimal said on 6/Aug/12
Mike says on 6/Aug/12
Arnold's off-season weight used to be 250 - 260 lbs from 1960s through 1974. In 1975, he dropped his weight to only 210 lbs for the "Stay Hungry" movie and he looks incredibly skinny in the movie. Arnold looked skinny when he was 210 lbs even after he stopped competing.
In competition form, he used to reduce his fat down to only 7 - 8% and carrry 235 - 245 lbs of pure muscle. He was absolutely massive in the 1971 Mr. Olympia where he weighed in at 251.8 lbs. He weighed 242 lbs in the 1974 Mr. Olympia and in the 1975 Mr. Olympia Serge Nubret said he saw Arnold stepping on the scale at only 228 lbs because he never regained all of his muscle back after doing the "Stay Hungry" movie.
Mike Mentzer also said Arnold at 1980 Mr. Olympia weighed in at only 225 pounds and he looked very skinny at the pre-judging because of his tall height. He overpowered everyone else with his chest, arms and height. Nothing else.
To say, Arnold weighed only 235 lbs shows Metric knows nothing about musculature and pure muscle. Arnold only had a 33 inches waist 235 - 240 lbs. A 33 inches waist at 240 lbs means he was carrying exceptionally low fat at that weight.
Arnold was every bit 6'1.5" inches in his prime and nothing less.
Mike, you nailed it out of the park with your post. Couldn't have said it better myself. What do you think Arnold's present day height is?
Mike says on 6/Aug/12
Arnold's off-season weight used to be 250 - 260 lbs from 1960s through 1974. In 1975, he dropped his weight to only 210 lbs for the "Stay Hungry" movie and he looks incredibly skinny in the movie. Arnold looked skinny when he was 210 lbs even after he stopped competing.
In competition form, he used to reduce his fat down to only 7 - 8% and carrry 235 - 245 lbs of pure muscle. He was absolutely massive in the 1971 Mr. Olympia where he weighed in at 251.8 lbs. He weighed 242 lbs in the 1974 Mr. Olympia and in the 1975 Mr. Olympia Serge Nubret said he saw Arnold stepping on the scale at only 228 lbs because he never regained all of his muscle back after doing the "Stay Hungry" movie.
Mike Mentzer also said Arnold at 1980 Mr. Olympia weighed in at only 225 pounds and he looked very skinny at the pre-judging because of his tall height. He overpowered everyone else with his chest, arms and height. Nothing else.
To say, Arnold weighed only 235 lbs shows Metric knows nothing about musculature and pure muscle. Arnold only had a 33 inches waist 235 - 240 lbs. A 33 inches waist at 240 lbs means he was carrying exceptionally low fat at that weight.
Arnold was every bit 6'1.5" inches in his prime and nothing less.
Mike, you nailed it out of the park with your post. Couldn't have said it better myself. What do you think Arnold's present day height is?
tom said on 6/Aug/12
6.1" max in prime,now 5.11-11.5" abouts.
6.1" max in prime,now 5.11-11.5" abouts.
Mathew said on 6/Aug/12
Prime: 6'1.75" morning, just over 6'1" night. Now: 5'11.5" morning, 5'10.75" night.
Prime: 6'1.75" morning, just over 6'1" night. Now: 5'11.5" morning, 5'10.75" night.
Hob said on 6/Aug/12
arnold is defintely shrunk down 5'10 to 5'11.5 range , never 6'0 from now.
arnold is defintely shrunk down 5'10 to 5'11.5 range , never 6'0 from now.
Mike said on 6/Aug/12
Arnold's off-season weight used to be 250 - 260 lbs from 1960s through 1974. In 1975, he dropped his weight to only 210 lbs for the "Stay Hungry" movie and he looks incredibly skinny in the movie. Arnold looked skinny when he was 210 lbs even after he stopped competing.
In competition form, he used to reduce his fat down to only 7 - 8% and carrry 235 - 245 lbs of pure muscle. He was absolutely massive in the 1971 Mr. Olympia where he weighed in at 251.8 lbs. He weighed 242 lbs in the 1974 Mr. Olympia and in the 1975 Mr. Olympia Serge Nubret said he saw Arnold stepping on the scale at only 228 lbs because he never regained all of his muscle back after doing the "Stay Hungry" movie.
Mike Mentzer also said Arnold at 1980 Mr. Olympia weighed in at only 225 pounds and he looked very skinny at the pre-judging because of his tall height. He overpowered everyone else with his chest, arms and height. Nothing else.
To say, Arnold weighed only 235 lbs shows Metric knows nothing about musculature and pure muscle. Arnold only had a 33 inches waist 235 - 240 lbs. A 33 inches waist at 240 lbs means he was carrying exceptionally low fat at that weight.
Arnold was every bit 6'1.5" inches in his prime and nothing less.
Arnold's off-season weight used to be 250 - 260 lbs from 1960s through 1974. In 1975, he dropped his weight to only 210 lbs for the "Stay Hungry" movie and he looks incredibly skinny in the movie. Arnold looked skinny when he was 210 lbs even after he stopped competing.
In competition form, he used to reduce his fat down to only 7 - 8% and carrry 235 - 245 lbs of pure muscle. He was absolutely massive in the 1971 Mr. Olympia where he weighed in at 251.8 lbs. He weighed 242 lbs in the 1974 Mr. Olympia and in the 1975 Mr. Olympia Serge Nubret said he saw Arnold stepping on the scale at only 228 lbs because he never regained all of his muscle back after doing the "Stay Hungry" movie.
Mike Mentzer also said Arnold at 1980 Mr. Olympia weighed in at only 225 pounds and he looked very skinny at the pre-judging because of his tall height. He overpowered everyone else with his chest, arms and height. Nothing else.
To say, Arnold weighed only 235 lbs shows Metric knows nothing about musculature and pure muscle. Arnold only had a 33 inches waist 235 - 240 lbs. A 33 inches waist at 240 lbs means he was carrying exceptionally low fat at that weight.
Arnold was every bit 6'1.5" inches in his prime and nothing less.
DJ Nick said on 6/Aug/12
Rob, as a way to understand a bit better how you analyze celebrities heights. Do you list them at the height you think is their night and final height or do you round up or something?
Just that, I know its a weird question but if you could answer, thanks!
Editor Rob
Rob, as a way to understand a bit better how you analyze celebrities heights. Do you list them at the height you think is their night and final height or do you round up or something?
Just that, I know its a weird question but if you could answer, thanks!
Editor Rob I try to be as fair from my own 5ft 8 (afternoon) height with guesses. Sometimes if say I'm thinking this person is looking around 5ft 10.5 or 11, I might go with the 11 moreso than the 10.5.
I'm sure there might also be cases where somebody might measure a 1/4 inch more than a listing, but mostly you are guessing a range - it helps also when a celebrity stands beside someone whose height I've already measured.
I'm sure there might also be cases where somebody might measure a 1/4 inch more than a listing, but mostly you are guessing a range - it helps also when a celebrity stands beside someone whose height I've already measured.
Ace said on 5/Aug/12
Rob, I don't like complaining, but these posts by Metric are ridiculous. He makes such foul comments, and is relentlessly aggressive. Do you have to always let them come through?
Editor Rob
Rob, I don't like complaining, but these posts by Metric are ridiculous. He makes such foul comments, and is relentlessly aggressive. Do you have to always let them come through?
Editor Rob metric is on a warning, less foulness
mike 6 feet out of bed said on 5/Aug/12
Rob deffinitley can be interesting with the people who are gonna be in the new movie the expendables 2 with stallone couture shwartznegger being in it when there's controvery about there heights even though stallone will most likely lift up
Rob deffinitley can be interesting with the people who are gonna be in the new movie the expendables 2 with stallone couture shwartznegger being in it when there's controvery about there heights even though stallone will most likely lift up
Metric said on 4/Aug/12
Danimal says on 3/Aug/12
Oh my God. Arnold's entire upper torso looks like it has literally been squished together. Has he had vertebrae removed? We know he had a hip replacement (reducing height), but his upper torso seems to be collapsing on his and his neck is shorter too. Believe it or not, he WAS a tall man until well into in the 1990's. Over 2" height loss for sure for Arnold. I WORSHIPED this man when I began lifting weights and his current body has a deformed look to it these days. COMPLETELY compressed.
What UTTER nonsense! The height difference between Arnold and Crews is the same in the 2012 pic as it is in the one from 2000. That´s because Arnold is 5-11 in both of the pics! He HASN´T mysteriously lost a gazillion inches during the last 12 yrs. He was ALWAYS 5-11 to begin with. The reason his torso looks weird nowadays is because he is a LAZY f*ck and doesn´t work out anymore and therefore he has gained A TON of weight around his waist. It´s a lazy grandpa GUT nothing else. It´s NOT his spine compressing like a human slinky or secret super mutant space aliens from galaxy no. 431-X who are stealing his vertebrae for future experimentation.
** "Arnold and the martians - A SciFi novel by Danimal" **
Danimal says on 3/Aug/12
Oh my God. Arnold's entire upper torso looks like it has literally been squished together. Has he had vertebrae removed? We know he had a hip replacement (reducing height), but his upper torso seems to be collapsing on his and his neck is shorter too. Believe it or not, he WAS a tall man until well into in the 1990's. Over 2" height loss for sure for Arnold. I WORSHIPED this man when I began lifting weights and his current body has a deformed look to it these days. COMPLETELY compressed.
What UTTER nonsense! The height difference between Arnold and Crews is the same in the 2012 pic as it is in the one from 2000. That´s because Arnold is 5-11 in both of the pics! He HASN´T mysteriously lost a gazillion inches during the last 12 yrs. He was ALWAYS 5-11 to begin with. The reason his torso looks weird nowadays is because he is a LAZY f*ck and doesn´t work out anymore and therefore he has gained A TON of weight around his waist. It´s a lazy grandpa GUT nothing else. It´s NOT his spine compressing like a human slinky or secret super mutant space aliens from galaxy no. 431-X who are stealing his vertebrae for future experimentation.
** "Arnold and the martians - A SciFi novel by Danimal" **
Danimal said on 3/Aug/12
Zach says on 2/Aug/12
Even with suspect shoes, Arnold is really struggling with present day 6'2-3ers Click Here
Oh my God. Arnold's entire upper torso looks like it has literally been squished together. Has he had vertebrae removed? We know he had a hip replacement (reducing height), but his upper torso seems to be collapsing on his and his neck is shorter too. Believe it or not, he WAS a tall man until well into in the 1990's. Over 2" height loss for sure for Arnold. I WORSHIPED this man when I began lifting weights and his current body has a deformed look to it these days. COMPLETELY compressed.
Zach says on 2/Aug/12
Even with suspect shoes, Arnold is really struggling with present day 6'2-3ers Click Here
Oh my God. Arnold's entire upper torso looks like it has literally been squished together. Has he had vertebrae removed? We know he had a hip replacement (reducing height), but his upper torso seems to be collapsing on his and his neck is shorter too. Believe it or not, he WAS a tall man until well into in the 1990's. Over 2" height loss for sure for Arnold. I WORSHIPED this man when I began lifting weights and his current body has a deformed look to it these days. COMPLETELY compressed.
Dmeyer said on 3/Aug/12
Rob 5'11.5 181.6cm after a hard day possible for arnie at 66
Editor Rob
Rob 5'11.5 181.6cm after a hard day possible for arnie at 66
Editor Rob more likely in few years, today there's always a chance dippinb little below six feet
Metric said on 3/Aug/12
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 3/Aug/12
Metric:
Man...just STFU you're like a child, seriously...and why the hell do you hate Arnold this much? He is a cool guy, it's the envy that makes you talk...ahah
Yeah OBVIOUSLY I´m the child around here when CLEARLY you are able to debate on such a heightened and mature level. Rofl
Editor Rob
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 3/Aug/12
Metric:
Man...just STFU you're like a child, seriously...and why the hell do you hate Arnold this much? He is a cool guy, it's the envy that makes you talk...ahah
Yeah OBVIOUSLY I´m the child around here when CLEARLY you are able to debate on such a heightened and mature level. Rofl
Editor Rob come on guys, lets ditch any insults to each other.
Zach said on 3/Aug/12
Some real hate you got there for the man, Metric!
@dmeyer, yes I would agree with your estimates.
Some real hate you got there for the man, Metric!
@dmeyer, yes I would agree with your estimates.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 3/Aug/12
Metric:
Man...just STFU you're like a child, seriously...and why the hell do you hate Arnold this much? He is a cool guy, it's the envy that makes you talk...ahah
Metric:
Man...just STFU you're like a child, seriously...and why the hell do you hate Arnold this much? He is a cool guy, it's the envy that makes you talk...ahah
dmeyer said on 3/Aug/12
5 ft 11.5 is a good guess nowadays for him looking 5'11 with bad posture and 6 ft -6 ft 0.25 with cowboy heels
5 ft 11.5 is a good guess nowadays for him looking 5'11 with bad posture and 6 ft -6 ft 0.25 with cowboy heels
Zach said on 2/Aug/12
Those pics from 12 years ago are tilted against Arnold, look at the background. Regardless of height, he still had a powerful frame back then and seldom wore suspect shoes. Now he's looking like a little old man unfortunately struggling to keep up his image using cowboy boots/elevator shoes on a regular basis. My guess is that he's probably in the 5'11 range these days.
Those pics from 12 years ago are tilted against Arnold, look at the background. Regardless of height, he still had a powerful frame back then and seldom wore suspect shoes. Now he's looking like a little old man unfortunately struggling to keep up his image using cowboy boots/elevator shoes on a regular basis. My guess is that he's probably in the 5'11 range these days.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/12
Barefoot nowadays he doesn't look over 6ft...
Barefoot nowadays he doesn't look over 6ft...
Dr JJ said on 2/Aug/12
If you google Kevin Peter Hall and search images there is a picture of the 7' 2" Predator actor with Herr Schwarzenegger. There seems to be amuch greater than 12" height difference. It could be up to 16" difference. That would fit with the 5' 10" that has been around for decades. The picture is a black and white job. Check it out.
If you google Kevin Peter Hall and search images there is a picture of the 7' 2" Predator actor with Herr Schwarzenegger. There seems to be amuch greater than 12" height difference. It could be up to 16" difference. That would fit with the 5' 10" that has been around for decades. The picture is a black and white job. Check it out.
Ace said on 2/Aug/12
It's a shame that Arnold is standing closer to Randy Couture in that picture Zach, it would let us see what he looks like next to a legit six-footer. It's also interesting that in Zach's photo his inseem looks the same length as Crews. His torso looks pretty small in proportion to his legs. Obviously he has lost a lot of height in his spine.
It's a shame that Arnold is standing closer to Randy Couture in that picture Zach, it would let us see what he looks like next to a legit six-footer. It's also interesting that in Zach's photo his inseem looks the same length as Crews. His torso looks pretty small in proportion to his legs. Obviously he has lost a lot of height in his spine.
Metric said on 2/Aug/12
Also I agree that Arnolds build today is non-existant. I was just reading the boards over at ArnoldFans and all the posters there seem quite delusional. They all rant on about how Arnold can get into top shape "easily" and that he is going to be flexing and showing off huge guns and pecs in his new movies.
Well sadly I don´t think so. I wish he would because even though it may seem that I hate Arnold from my posts here I can still appreciate a good action movie and I like beefy badas*es as much as the next guy. But fact is that Arnold is far from a beefy badas* today. I haven´t seen ONE pic of him from the last few years where he looks anywhere in decent (muscular) shape. Oh yeah alot of pics of him riding his bicycle around L.A but that doesn´t make your guns grow! I don´t think he even bothers with weights anymore and hasn´t done so for YEARS. He just looks like your typical 65 year old grandpa with small arms, big gut, narrow shoulders and sagging pecs.
In 2002 he said on his own homepage in an answer to a fan that he hadn´t done a single bench press for 20 yrs (since 1982)!! That just sickens me. And he said that for his T3 workout he didn´t do deadlifts or squats (!!). Jezus...Mr. Bodybuilding can´t even bother to do a decent workout!?? Wow.
He keeps saying to this day that he trains 1 hr everyday with weights but I don´t believe that for a second! If you train that much you will look ALOT better than Arnold does! I think he ONLY does machines if (and that´s a big IF) he does them at all. Because he sure don´t look like one who works out hard...
Look at this pic. He doesn´t have ANY biceps at all: Click Here
And this is him in his MOVIE "shape" for crying out loud! He is currently filming The Tomb with Sly.
**Shaing my head**
Also I agree that Arnolds build today is non-existant. I was just reading the boards over at ArnoldFans and all the posters there seem quite delusional. They all rant on about how Arnold can get into top shape "easily" and that he is going to be flexing and showing off huge guns and pecs in his new movies.
Well sadly I don´t think so. I wish he would because even though it may seem that I hate Arnold from my posts here I can still appreciate a good action movie and I like beefy badas*es as much as the next guy. But fact is that Arnold is far from a beefy badas* today. I haven´t seen ONE pic of him from the last few years where he looks anywhere in decent (muscular) shape. Oh yeah alot of pics of him riding his bicycle around L.A but that doesn´t make your guns grow! I don´t think he even bothers with weights anymore and hasn´t done so for YEARS. He just looks like your typical 65 year old grandpa with small arms, big gut, narrow shoulders and sagging pecs.
In 2002 he said on his own homepage in an answer to a fan that he hadn´t done a single bench press for 20 yrs (since 1982)!! That just sickens me. And he said that for his T3 workout he didn´t do deadlifts or squats (!!). Jezus...Mr. Bodybuilding can´t even bother to do a decent workout!?? Wow.
He keeps saying to this day that he trains 1 hr everyday with weights but I don´t believe that for a second! If you train that much you will look ALOT better than Arnold does! I think he ONLY does machines if (and that´s a big IF) he does them at all. Because he sure don´t look like one who works out hard...
Look at this pic. He doesn´t have ANY biceps at all: Click Here
And this is him in his MOVIE "shape" for crying out loud! He is currently filming The Tomb with Sly.
**Shaing my head**
Metric said on 2/Aug/12
Oh, man those pics of Arn and Terry Crews from 12 yrs ago are priceless! Couldn´t have dug up something better myself. They CLEARLY show Crews being 2 inches taller than Arn and he is standing hunched over while Arn is standing military straight. If Crews stood straight he would be no less than 3 inches taller than Arnold.
These pics should knock some sense into the head of Arnold nuthuggers and fanboys everywhere! ARNOLD IS 5-11 IN THESE PICS! Period.
The 6-2 BULLS*IT has to end NOW!
Oh, man those pics of Arn and Terry Crews from 12 yrs ago are priceless! Couldn´t have dug up something better myself. They CLEARLY show Crews being 2 inches taller than Arn and he is standing hunched over while Arn is standing military straight. If Crews stood straight he would be no less than 3 inches taller than Arnold.
These pics should knock some sense into the head of Arnold nuthuggers and fanboys everywhere! ARNOLD IS 5-11 IN THESE PICS! Period.
The 6-2 BULLS*IT has to end NOW!
dmeyer said on 2/Aug/12
in cowboy boots nowadays he dosnt look over 6 ft
in cowboy boots nowadays he dosnt look over 6 ft
Vegas said on 2/Aug/12
Zach says on 2/Aug/12
Sadly, in terms of both height and build. Even ten years ago (T3) he would've given Terry Crews a run for his money.
______
well thats 12 years ago with crews Click Here Click Here
Zach says on 2/Aug/12
Sadly, in terms of both height and build. Even ten years ago (T3) he would've given Terry Crews a run for his money.
______
well thats 12 years ago with crews Click Here Click Here
Mathew said on 1/Aug/12
Sure he was 186 - 187 cm prime, but he's only 180 - 182 cm now. Body builders tend to loose a fair amount of height it seems.
Sure he was 186 - 187 cm prime, but he's only 180 - 182 cm now. Body builders tend to loose a fair amount of height it seems.
Josip Croatia said on 1/Aug/12
In Croatian newspaper there was an article where author said that he was shocked how is Arnold short, he said that he is 185 and Arnold is around 175
In Croatian newspaper there was an article where author said that he was shocked how is Arnold short, he said that he is 185 and Arnold is around 175
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 31/Jul/12
He was still 186-187 range at 47y in True Lies, he looked all the time taller than Tom Arnold who is at least 185cm (he looked around 10cm taller than Maggie Gyllenhaal in Happy Endings).
He was still 186-187 range at 47y in True Lies, he looked all the time taller than Tom Arnold who is at least 185cm (he looked around 10cm taller than Maggie Gyllenhaal in Happy Endings).
dmeyer said on 30/Jul/12
to me arnie was never more than 186cm dinner time , today dinner time 182-182.5 183cm is arguable defenetly 184cm 10-15 years ago , i think he didnt stay long at 186cm probaly up to 40 then 40s was 185 heading towards 184cm , he went quicly from 186 to 183cm within 15 years
to me arnie was never more than 186cm dinner time , today dinner time 182-182.5 183cm is arguable defenetly 184cm 10-15 years ago , i think he didnt stay long at 186cm probaly up to 40 then 40s was 185 heading towards 184cm , he went quicly from 186 to 183cm within 15 years
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 30/Jul/12
@Metric:
Arnold Schwarzenegger's height is 6 ft 0 in (183 cm)
Peak height was 6 ft 1.5 in (187 cm)
----
He admitted a few years ago that his daughter is almost as tall as him, and she wear boots in that pic, plus, Arnold isn't standing that good and wears flat shoes, don't speak if you don't know the facts.
You can't do nothing to change his height listing here, get a life, Rob still thinks he is close to 6 foot range today, and me too.
@Metric:
Arnold Schwarzenegger's height is 6 ft 0 in (183 cm)
Peak height was 6 ft 1.5 in (187 cm)
----
He admitted a few years ago that his daughter is almost as tall as him, and she wear boots in that pic, plus, Arnold isn't standing that good and wears flat shoes, don't speak if you don't know the facts.
You can't do nothing to change his height listing here, get a life, Rob still thinks he is close to 6 foot range today, and me too.
the shredder said on 30/Jul/12
6'1 or more prime , 6'0 at 65 .
6'1 or more prime , 6'0 at 65 .
leonari said on 29/Jul/12
To say he was 5'11 max is pathetic. Today he may be that height. He turned 65 today for chris sake. The man was tall in his prime- I'm not a fan. Never have been. But this guy only average in his prime? With the amount of muscles he had 35 years ago he would have looked stumpy. He never did Danimal. Get a grip.
To say he was 5'11 max is pathetic. Today he may be that height. He turned 65 today for chris sake. The man was tall in his prime- I'm not a fan. Never have been. But this guy only average in his prime? With the amount of muscles he had 35 years ago he would have looked stumpy. He never did Danimal. Get a grip.
Metric said on 29/Jul/12
Danimal says on 28/Jul/12
Matt, Arnold was measured at 6'1.5" barefoot in 1969. This HAS been documented. It was also a nighttime measurement. FACT.
Oh pleaase! This would be a fact only if there existed a full body PICTURE of Arnold getting measured on a stadiometer. Also he would preferrably be measured in the presence of two doctors. As it is the only thing we have is a shady email from someone who belongs to the BB community. Vince Basille depends on his living by not upsetting the biggest name in the industry or his demented benefactor Joe Weider. I´m sure that if Vince had said Arnold was 5-10 Joe Weider or Arn himself would have soon severed his head and made sure he never worked again in the BB industry. So I don´t give a SH*T for your "documentation". It´s NOT! It´s an email from a biased guy.
Now THAT´s a FACT!
Danimal says on 28/Jul/12
Matt, Arnold was measured at 6'1.5" barefoot in 1969. This HAS been documented. It was also a nighttime measurement. FACT.
Oh pleaase! This would be a fact only if there existed a full body PICTURE of Arnold getting measured on a stadiometer. Also he would preferrably be measured in the presence of two doctors. As it is the only thing we have is a shady email from someone who belongs to the BB community. Vince Basille depends on his living by not upsetting the biggest name in the industry or his demented benefactor Joe Weider. I´m sure that if Vince had said Arnold was 5-10 Joe Weider or Arn himself would have soon severed his head and made sure he never worked again in the BB industry. So I don´t give a SH*T for your "documentation". It´s NOT! It´s an email from a biased guy.
Now THAT´s a FACT!
Metric said on 29/Jul/12
Anon says on 29/Jul/12
Metric, that guy has completely different proportions to Arnold and is carrying CONSIDERABLY more fat as well as water retention. And that guy is certainly not 275lbs, that's proposterous. Arnold came in at 240 cut up, that guy would be lucky to hit 240 carrying all of that body fat (looks around 14%) and water.
1. HOW can this guy have completely different proportions than Arnold when he is the same height Arnold supposedly was/is??? Oh yeah, because Arnold WAS NEVER/IS NOT his billed height! There now you said it yourself!
2. This guy IS 275 lbs. He says so on his FB page. To be honest he is "only" 260 lbs in that youtube vid. It says in the description: 116 kgs = 260 lbs. But he is 275 lbs today and still looking nowhere near young Arnold.
This dude won the Danish BB Championship last year. Funny thing is he says everywhere in interviews and on FB that he doesn´t do gear. But I have talked with him many times in the gym and one of the first times we spoke he told me that he has been taking DECA since age 17. Lol.
Anyway this page is not about him but I think he is a good example of how PREPOSTEROUS Arnolds body weight is compared to his billed (and FAKE) height. You CANNOT look like Arnold did and weigh only 235-240 lbs at a height of 6-2. It´s impossible!
I repeat: IMPOSSIBLE!
Anon says on 29/Jul/12
Metric, that guy has completely different proportions to Arnold and is carrying CONSIDERABLY more fat as well as water retention. And that guy is certainly not 275lbs, that's proposterous. Arnold came in at 240 cut up, that guy would be lucky to hit 240 carrying all of that body fat (looks around 14%) and water.
1. HOW can this guy have completely different proportions than Arnold when he is the same height Arnold supposedly was/is??? Oh yeah, because Arnold WAS NEVER/IS NOT his billed height! There now you said it yourself!
2. This guy IS 275 lbs. He says so on his FB page. To be honest he is "only" 260 lbs in that youtube vid. It says in the description: 116 kgs = 260 lbs. But he is 275 lbs today and still looking nowhere near young Arnold.
This dude won the Danish BB Championship last year. Funny thing is he says everywhere in interviews and on FB that he doesn´t do gear. But I have talked with him many times in the gym and one of the first times we spoke he told me that he has been taking DECA since age 17. Lol.
Anyway this page is not about him but I think he is a good example of how PREPOSTEROUS Arnolds body weight is compared to his billed (and FAKE) height. You CANNOT look like Arnold did and weigh only 235-240 lbs at a height of 6-2. It´s impossible!
I repeat: IMPOSSIBLE!
Anon said on 29/Jul/12
Metric, that guy has completely different proportions to Arnold and is carrying CONSIDERABLY more fat as well as water retention. And that guy is certainly not 275lbs, that's proposterous. Arnold came in at 240 cut up, that guy would be lucky to hit 240 carrying all of that body fat (looks around 14%) and water.
And Arnold was at least 6'1'', look at him barefoot next to the likes of Mike Katz.
Metric, that guy has completely different proportions to Arnold and is carrying CONSIDERABLY more fat as well as water retention. And that guy is certainly not 275lbs, that's proposterous. Arnold came in at 240 cut up, that guy would be lucky to hit 240 carrying all of that body fat (looks around 14%) and water.
And Arnold was at least 6'1'', look at him barefoot next to the likes of Mike Katz.
Metric said on 29/Jul/12
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 29/Jul/12
Explain me then how he looks the same height or taller than strong 6'1 guys like Carl Weathers and Tom Arnold, and don't dare to say "because he use lifts" because I'm gonna hunt you.
Explain to me how 5-9 Eddie Murphy is only 1 inch shorter in that pic below!!
And don´t dare to say "becuase he uses lifts" because I´m gonna hunt you!
**lol**
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 29/Jul/12
Explain me then how he looks the same height or taller than strong 6'1 guys like Carl Weathers and Tom Arnold, and don't dare to say "because he use lifts" because I'm gonna hunt you.
Explain to me how 5-9 Eddie Murphy is only 1 inch shorter in that pic below!!
And don´t dare to say "becuase he uses lifts" because I´m gonna hunt you!
**lol**
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 29/Jul/12
@Metric:
Also it´s funny that whenever Arnold is around legit 6-2 men, Jeff Bridges, Elliout Gould or Bush Sr. he is ALWAYS dwarfed. Fanboys need to wake up.
----
Dwarfed? I don't think so, he was barefoot in that scene with Bridges and Gould,
so don't say stupid things.
Explain me then how he looks the same height or taller than strong 6'1 guys like Carl Weathers and Tom Arnold, and don't dare to say "because he use lifts" because I'm gonna hunt you.
@Metric:
Also it´s funny that whenever Arnold is around legit 6-2 men, Jeff Bridges, Elliout Gould or Bush Sr. he is ALWAYS dwarfed. Fanboys need to wake up.
----
Dwarfed? I don't think so, he was barefoot in that scene with Bridges and Gould,
so don't say stupid things.
Explain me then how he looks the same height or taller than strong 6'1 guys like Carl Weathers and Tom Arnold, and don't dare to say "because he use lifts" because I'm gonna hunt you.
johno said on 28/Jul/12
It will be interesting to see how eddie matches up with the legend in Twins 2
It will be interesting to see how eddie matches up with the legend in Twins 2
johno said on 28/Jul/12
Arnold would be 1.5 inches max taller then eddie in that picture. Eddie is about 5'9.
Arnold would be 1.5 inches max taller then eddie in that picture. Eddie is about 5'9.
Ace said on 28/Jul/12
150 at 6'1 or 6'2 would not make him anorexic by any standard. It would make him skinny, but certainly not anorexic. Tommy Hearns was a famous boxer who was 6'1 at 147, and certainly wasn't anorexic. Paul Williams is another boxer who was about 6'1-2 who fought as low as 147. You really need to be careful about making these pronouncements.
150 at 6'1 or 6'2 would not make him anorexic by any standard. It would make him skinny, but certainly not anorexic. Tommy Hearns was a famous boxer who was 6'1 at 147, and certainly wasn't anorexic. Paul Williams is another boxer who was about 6'1-2 who fought as low as 147. You really need to be careful about making these pronouncements.
Danimal said on 28/Jul/12
matt789 says on 27/Jul/12
i'm 5 foot 10 1/2 and people often think i'm like 6 foot 1 i'm like i'm a little over 5 foot 10 thats what probably happens with schwarzengger he's probably only 5 foot 11 but people thinks he;s taller beacause they think there taller
Matt, Arnold was measured at 6'1.5" barefoot in 1969. This HAS been documented. It was also a nighttime measurement. FACT.
matt789 says on 27/Jul/12
i'm 5 foot 10 1/2 and people often think i'm like 6 foot 1 i'm like i'm a little over 5 foot 10 thats what probably happens with schwarzengger he's probably only 5 foot 11 but people thinks he;s taller beacause they think there taller
Matt, Arnold was measured at 6'1.5" barefoot in 1969. This HAS been documented. It was also a nighttime measurement. FACT.
Metric said on 28/Jul/12
Again about the weight: I read an interview where Arnold said he weighed 150 lbs before he started bodybuilding. Wait a second: 150 lbs at 6-2?? That would make him an anorexic. He was 5-11 max. Then 150 lbs makes more sense. Still skinny but not anorexic. Also it´s funny that whenever Arnold is around legit 6-2 men, Jeff Bridges, Elliout Gould or Bush Sr. he is ALWAYS dwarfed. Fanboys need to wake up.
Again about the weight: I read an interview where Arnold said he weighed 150 lbs before he started bodybuilding. Wait a second: 150 lbs at 6-2?? That would make him an anorexic. He was 5-11 max. Then 150 lbs makes more sense. Still skinny but not anorexic. Also it´s funny that whenever Arnold is around legit 6-2 men, Jeff Bridges, Elliout Gould or Bush Sr. he is ALWAYS dwarfed. Fanboys need to wake up.
Ace said on 28/Jul/12
Metric, Arnold's legs are actually bent a bit, and Eddie's head is closer to the camera. Plus we have no concept of footwear in this shot.
Plus, simply put, there is no evidence to ever suggest Arnold was 5'11 in his prime. Hell, there is limited evidence to even suggest that he is as short as 5'11 nowadays! All of those barefoot pictures of him during his body-building days are pretty conclusive in that regard.
You really need to start displaying better evidence if you want to convince anyone. A photo with no clear demonstration of footwear, and a visibly bending Arnold really doesn't cut it.
Metric, Arnold's legs are actually bent a bit, and Eddie's head is closer to the camera. Plus we have no concept of footwear in this shot.
Plus, simply put, there is no evidence to ever suggest Arnold was 5'11 in his prime. Hell, there is limited evidence to even suggest that he is as short as 5'11 nowadays! All of those barefoot pictures of him during his body-building days are pretty conclusive in that regard.
You really need to start displaying better evidence if you want to convince anyone. A photo with no clear demonstration of footwear, and a visibly bending Arnold really doesn't cut it.
Lucio said on 28/Jul/12
Metric says on 28/Jul/12
Click Here
This pic should ONCE AND FOR ALL end EVERY discussion of 6-2 prime!! Indeed Arnold looks all of 5-10 here. Eddie Murphy is 5-9.25 according to this site AND he is slouching in this pic while Arnold stands straight as an arrow. Furthermore Arnold is CLOSER to the camera and despite all of these factors ONLY appears 1 inch taller than Eddie !!! Arnold was MAX 5-11 prime and possibly shorter. Let´s see the usual nuthuggers try and explain this away!??
-----------------------
1 INCH taller than Eddie??????????
Hahah, my God! This guy is really gone out of mind.
And we are still here to listen to him...
Metric says on 28/Jul/12
Click Here
This pic should ONCE AND FOR ALL end EVERY discussion of 6-2 prime!! Indeed Arnold looks all of 5-10 here. Eddie Murphy is 5-9.25 according to this site AND he is slouching in this pic while Arnold stands straight as an arrow. Furthermore Arnold is CLOSER to the camera and despite all of these factors ONLY appears 1 inch taller than Eddie !!! Arnold was MAX 5-11 prime and possibly shorter. Let´s see the usual nuthuggers try and explain this away!??
-----------------------
1 INCH taller than Eddie??????????
Hahah, my God! This guy is really gone out of mind.
And we are still here to listen to him...
Jason said on 28/Jul/12
So many factors to consider; eddies footware, arnold actually looks like hes dropping height. Eddie is actually closer to the cam than arnold (hes leaning his head forward). Also he may be standing on an elevated position. OMG just look at some of his barefoot prime pictures. Can a 5 10 guy possibly look that huge?
So many factors to consider; eddies footware, arnold actually looks like hes dropping height. Eddie is actually closer to the cam than arnold (hes leaning his head forward). Also he may be standing on an elevated position. OMG just look at some of his barefoot prime pictures. Can a 5 10 guy possibly look that huge?
Metric said on 28/Jul/12
Click Here
This pic should ONCE AND FOR ALL end EVERY discussion of 6-2 prime!! Indeed Arnold looks all of 5-10 here. Eddie Murphy is 5-9.25 according to this site AND he is slouching in this pic while Arnold stands straight as an arrow. Furthermore Arnold is CLOSER to the camera and despite all of these factors ONLY appears 1 inch taller than Eddie !!! Arnold was MAX 5-11 prime and possibly shorter. Let´s see the usual nuthuggers try and explain this away!??
Click Here
This pic should ONCE AND FOR ALL end EVERY discussion of 6-2 prime!! Indeed Arnold looks all of 5-10 here. Eddie Murphy is 5-9.25 according to this site AND he is slouching in this pic while Arnold stands straight as an arrow. Furthermore Arnold is CLOSER to the camera and despite all of these factors ONLY appears 1 inch taller than Eddie !!! Arnold was MAX 5-11 prime and possibly shorter. Let´s see the usual nuthuggers try and explain this away!??
Lucio said on 28/Jul/12
Schwarzeneggers body weight has ALWAYS given his height LIE away. In my gym there is a guy who is on gear and has been training like a madman for years. He is 6-1.25 and weighs exactly 275 lbs of pure muscle. But let me tell you that he looks NOTHING like Arnold did when he was in his prime. So Arnold at 6-2 and weighing a measely 235 lbs (looking way more massive than this 275 lbs guy) is pure undiluted BS!
Now if instead you realize that his true prime height was only between 5-10 to 5-11 then all of a sudden it makes more sense. Arnold was "smart" enough to lie about his height but he forgot to lie about his weight as well. Probably he doesn´t even understand the concept that height and weight are intimately intertwined and the bigger the height the higher the bodyweight.
But 6-2?? FORGET IT!!! In ya dreams nuthuggers
-------------------
It's incredible how a combination of height complex and envy can lead a guy to say so many stupid things at once.
Indeed, in addition to the height, to determine the weight of a guy, there are other factors such as the bone's thickness, the percentage of lean body mass and other.
Therefore, comparing two guy only for the height and weight, neglecting all these factors I have listed is from shallow person.
106 kg for 186 cm in height, I'd say an excellent weight/height for a bodybuilder.
Schwarzeneggers body weight has ALWAYS given his height LIE away. In my gym there is a guy who is on gear and has been training like a madman for years. He is 6-1.25 and weighs exactly 275 lbs of pure muscle. But let me tell you that he looks NOTHING like Arnold did when he was in his prime. So Arnold at 6-2 and weighing a measely 235 lbs (looking way more massive than this 275 lbs guy) is pure undiluted BS!
Now if instead you realize that his true prime height was only between 5-10 to 5-11 then all of a sudden it makes more sense. Arnold was "smart" enough to lie about his height but he forgot to lie about his weight as well. Probably he doesn´t even understand the concept that height and weight are intimately intertwined and the bigger the height the higher the bodyweight.
But 6-2?? FORGET IT!!! In ya dreams nuthuggers
-------------------
It's incredible how a combination of height complex and envy can lead a guy to say so many stupid things at once.
Indeed, in addition to the height, to determine the weight of a guy, there are other factors such as the bone's thickness, the percentage of lean body mass and other.
Therefore, comparing two guy only for the height and weight, neglecting all these factors I have listed is from shallow person.
106 kg for 186 cm in height, I'd say an excellent weight/height for a bodybuilder.
Metric said on 28/Jul/12
Click Here
This is the guy from my gym. 6-1.25 and 275 lbs. Now tell me he looks like Arnold?? DIDN´T THINK SO!
Click Here
This is the guy from my gym. 6-1.25 and 275 lbs. Now tell me he looks like Arnold?? DIDN´T THINK SO!
Metric said on 27/Jul/12
Schwarzeneggers body weight has ALWAYS given his height LIE away. In my gym there is a guy who is on gear and has been training like a madman for years. He is 6-1.25 and weighs exactly 275 lbs of pure muscle. But let me tell you that he looks NOTHING like Arnold did when he was in his prime. So Arnold at 6-2 and weighing a measely 235 lbs (looking way more massive than this 275 lbs guy) is pure undiluted BS!
Now if instead you realize that his true prime height was only between 5-10 to 5-11 then all of a sudden it makes more sense. Arnold was "smart" enough to lie about his height but he forgot to lie about his weight as well. Probably he doesn´t even understand the concept that height and weight are intimately intertwined and the bigger the height the higher the bodyweight.
But 6-2?? FORGET IT!!! In ya dreams nuthuggers.
Schwarzeneggers body weight has ALWAYS given his height LIE away. In my gym there is a guy who is on gear and has been training like a madman for years. He is 6-1.25 and weighs exactly 275 lbs of pure muscle. But let me tell you that he looks NOTHING like Arnold did when he was in his prime. So Arnold at 6-2 and weighing a measely 235 lbs (looking way more massive than this 275 lbs guy) is pure undiluted BS!
Now if instead you realize that his true prime height was only between 5-10 to 5-11 then all of a sudden it makes more sense. Arnold was "smart" enough to lie about his height but he forgot to lie about his weight as well. Probably he doesn´t even understand the concept that height and weight are intimately intertwined and the bigger the height the higher the bodyweight.
But 6-2?? FORGET IT!!! In ya dreams nuthuggers.
matt789 said on 27/Jul/12
i'm 5 foot 10 1/2 and people often think i'm like 6 foot 1 i'm like i'm a little over 5 foot 10 thats what probably happens with schwarzengger he's probably only 5 foot 11 but people thinks he;s taller beacause they think there taller
i'm 5 foot 10 1/2 and people often think i'm like 6 foot 1 i'm like i'm a little over 5 foot 10 thats what probably happens with schwarzengger he's probably only 5 foot 11 but people thinks he;s taller beacause they think there taller
Vegas said on 27/Jul/12
Matt says on 26/Jul/12
Isn't it true that taller people lose more height than short people?
__________________
well there are still lots of really tall ex nba players walking around like kareem who is 65 and bill russell who is 78, russell still looks close to his ~6'9 peak height at nearly 80 years old
Matt says on 26/Jul/12
Isn't it true that taller people lose more height than short people?
__________________
well there are still lots of really tall ex nba players walking around like kareem who is 65 and bill russell who is 78, russell still looks close to his ~6'9 peak height at nearly 80 years old
Matt said on 26/Jul/12
Definitely looked 6'2-6'3 (help from shoes of course.) Isn't it true that taller people lose more height than short people?
Definitely looked 6'2-6'3 (help from shoes of course.) Isn't it true that taller people lose more height than short people?
Brad said on 25/Jul/12
He looks no more than 6 feet nowadays
He looks no more than 6 feet nowadays
Ramirez Gonzales R. said on 25/Jul/12
Arnold's height is my life. I missed the comments so much.
..and all believers are aboard.
Arnold's height is my life. I missed the comments so much.
..and all believers are aboard.
Danimal said on 25/Jul/12
megagogula says on 24/Jul/12
he's definitely taller than 6'0
Not today he isn't.
megagogula says on 24/Jul/12
he's definitely taller than 6'0
Not today he isn't.
megagogula said on 24/Jul/12
he's definitely taller than 6'0
he's definitely taller than 6'0
ali said on 24/Jul/12
in peak,he look so tall.183 cm to low for him in peak.I am 182 cm but he look too much taller than me.According to him, even at 187 cm.he might be strong 6'2 but 6'1.5 is minumum in peak
5'7 branh warren and arnold
Click Here
in peak,he look so tall.183 cm to low for him in peak.I am 182 cm but he look too much taller than me.According to him, even at 187 cm.he might be strong 6'2 but 6'1.5 is minumum in peak
5'7 branh warren and arnold
Click Here
Lucio said on 24/Jul/12
Here in this pic next to 6'2" Avi Lerner, he looks a legit 6'1".
Also, notice his perfect posture.
Click Here
This pic show what I always said: in bad posture he looks as 182-183 cms, in good posture he looks as 184-185 cms.
Here in this pic next to 6'2" Avi Lerner, he looks a legit 6'1".
Also, notice his perfect posture.
Click Here
This pic show what I always said: in bad posture he looks as 182-183 cms, in good posture he looks as 184-185 cms.
Lucio said on 24/Jul/12
Yaspaa says on 23/Jul/12
The king of the trolls speaks. 6'0 peak, max.
Metric says on 16/Jun/12
Good lord: Click Here
Schwarzenegger´s son is 5-11.
Ali says on 12/Jun/12
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
---------------------------
The Trolls Company are back!
Yaspaa says on 23/Jul/12
The king of the trolls speaks. 6'0 peak, max.
Metric says on 16/Jun/12
Good lord: Click Here
Schwarzenegger´s son is 5-11.
Ali says on 12/Jun/12
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
---------------------------
The Trolls Company are back!
Henrik said on 17/Jun/12
Haha, Rob brings the comments back, and all the height-complexed Arnie trolls seem to come back at the same time. Jesus.
Haha, Rob brings the comments back, and all the height-complexed Arnie trolls seem to come back at the same time. Jesus.
GUY said on 16/Jun/12
Metric says on 15/Jun/12
Arnold has NEVER been 6-2. PRIME Arnold was noticeably SHORTER than 6-2 Bush Senior in late 80s early 90s.
Yaspaa says on 15/Jun/12
Wearing cuban heels and still being shorter than Jeff Bridges in the seventies makes him nowhere near 6'2 or 6'1. Clearing 6'2 is a fanboys dream. Peak Arnold was 184 it's right in front of you. he lies about his height now and he did then then, just like every bodybuilder, they all lie.
Ali says on 12/Jun/12
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
Arnold was never a tall man. He always wears
lifts. The ridiculous idea that Arnold once
was almost 6'2, but nowadays is 5'11 because
he shrunk. Only somebody without brains would
believe this. Shrinking 3 inches is for people
that have scoliosis. Has Arnold lost height?
Probably. How much? maybe half an inch or slightly
more.
Arnold is in good shape. He does not yet
have the old man's body. Arnold in his
lifts is still 3 inches shorter than 6'2.5
Lou Ferrigno making Arnold 5'11.5 in lifts.
--------------------------------------
It's funny how all three of you clowns make the exact same statements you always have from day one. So here we go again with another pointless week of George Bush Sr comparisons, and another week of being made to look like fools going over Say Hungry for the 40th time. And Ali.......what can you say about that guy. Don't bother answering back anything he says. He doesn't want to debate. He's just a dreamer who wishes he owned this page. He longs for everyone in the world to be awestruck by his demented fantasy world. It's funny how he says it so seriously and matter of fact as if anyone would sit up and not take it as a joke.
Metric says on 15/Jun/12
Arnold has NEVER been 6-2. PRIME Arnold was noticeably SHORTER than 6-2 Bush Senior in late 80s early 90s.
Yaspaa says on 15/Jun/12
Wearing cuban heels and still being shorter than Jeff Bridges in the seventies makes him nowhere near 6'2 or 6'1. Clearing 6'2 is a fanboys dream. Peak Arnold was 184 it's right in front of you. he lies about his height now and he did then then, just like every bodybuilder, they all lie.
Ali says on 12/Jun/12
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
Arnold was never a tall man. He always wears
lifts. The ridiculous idea that Arnold once
was almost 6'2, but nowadays is 5'11 because
he shrunk. Only somebody without brains would
believe this. Shrinking 3 inches is for people
that have scoliosis. Has Arnold lost height?
Probably. How much? maybe half an inch or slightly
more.
Arnold is in good shape. He does not yet
have the old man's body. Arnold in his
lifts is still 3 inches shorter than 6'2.5
Lou Ferrigno making Arnold 5'11.5 in lifts.
--------------------------------------
It's funny how all three of you clowns make the exact same statements you always have from day one. So here we go again with another pointless week of George Bush Sr comparisons, and another week of being made to look like fools going over Say Hungry for the 40th time. And Ali.......what can you say about that guy. Don't bother answering back anything he says. He doesn't want to debate. He's just a dreamer who wishes he owned this page. He longs for everyone in the world to be awestruck by his demented fantasy world. It's funny how he says it so seriously and matter of fact as if anyone would sit up and not take it as a joke.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 16/Jun/12
Check that pic of his profile on Twitter, he is side by side with 50 Cent and looks exactly the same height as him (50 Cent is at 100% 183cm tall).
Check that pic of his profile on Twitter, he is side by side with 50 Cent and looks exactly the same height as him (50 Cent is at 100% 183cm tall).
Lucio said on 16/Jun/12
And we have to consider, that the Rob's estimate of 183 cm at the top of this page, is made on the basis of the impression you get of Arnold during the day, referring to other people, NOT out of bed in the morning.
So it follows that his height out the bed, it is very likely greater.
And we have to consider, that the Rob's estimate of 183 cm at the top of this page, is made on the basis of the impression you get of Arnold during the day, referring to other people, NOT out of bed in the morning.
So it follows that his height out the bed, it is very likely greater.
Anonymous1 said on 16/Jun/12
Barefoot next to Jeff Bridges who is wearing sneakers, Arnie looks 187 to me.
Barefoot next to Jeff Bridges who is wearing sneakers, Arnie looks 187 to me.
Metric said on 15/Jun/12
Arnold has NEVER been 6-2. PRIME Arnold was noticeably SHORTER than 6-2 Bush Senior in late 80s early 90s.
Arnold has NEVER been 6-2. PRIME Arnold was noticeably SHORTER than 6-2 Bush Senior in late 80s early 90s.
Yaspaa said on 15/Jun/12
Wearing cuban heels and still being shorter than Jeff Bridges in the seventies makes him nowhere near 6'2 or 6'1. Clearing 6'2 is a fanboys dream. Peak Arnold was 184 it's right in front of you. he lies about his height now and he did then then, just like every bodybuilder, they all lie.
Wearing cuban heels and still being shorter than Jeff Bridges in the seventies makes him nowhere near 6'2 or 6'1. Clearing 6'2 is a fanboys dream. Peak Arnold was 184 it's right in front of you. he lies about his height now and he did then then, just like every bodybuilder, they all lie.
Tom said on 15/Jun/12
Here´s Arnold picture with Finland former prime minister Matti Vanhanen (197 cm). Arnold look like 185 cm. Click Here
Here´s Arnold picture with Finland former prime minister Matti Vanhanen (197 cm). Arnold look like 185 cm. Click Here
Lucio said on 15/Jun/12
Danimal says on 15/Jun/12
Definitely. Arnold had 2 measurements taken of him in the late 1960's. One at 6'1.5" (nighttime barefoot height) and one at 6'1 3/4" (Arnold's own personal claim). I'm SURE he was 6'2" straight out of bed. Today, I'd give him MAX 6'0" out of bed and around 5'11.5" during the day. 2" height loss.
Mmmmm... i dont't think he has lost so much height, to me is too much.
I think he has lost at worst 1 inch, because is true that bodybuilder losing much height than normal perople, but he seems in very good shape lately as these recent pics attest
Click Here
Click Here
So, to me today he fluctuates between 6 ft and 6'0.5" and much depend by good or poor posture.
Danimal says on 15/Jun/12
Definitely. Arnold had 2 measurements taken of him in the late 1960's. One at 6'1.5" (nighttime barefoot height) and one at 6'1 3/4" (Arnold's own personal claim). I'm SURE he was 6'2" straight out of bed. Today, I'd give him MAX 6'0" out of bed and around 5'11.5" during the day. 2" height loss.
Mmmmm... i dont't think he has lost so much height, to me is too much.
I think he has lost at worst 1 inch, because is true that bodybuilder losing much height than normal perople, but he seems in very good shape lately as these recent pics attest
Click Here
Click Here
So, to me today he fluctuates between 6 ft and 6'0.5" and much depend by good or poor posture.
Danimal said on 15/Jun/12
Definitely. Arnold had 2 measurements taken of him in the late 1960's. One at 6'1.5" (nighttime barefoot height) and one at 6'1 3/4" (Arnold's own personal claim). I'm SURE he was 6'2" straight out of bed. Today, I'd give him MAX 6'0" out of bed and around 5'11.5" during the day. 2" height loss.
Definitely. Arnold had 2 measurements taken of him in the late 1960's. One at 6'1.5" (nighttime barefoot height) and one at 6'1 3/4" (Arnold's own personal claim). I'm SURE he was 6'2" straight out of bed. Today, I'd give him MAX 6'0" out of bed and around 5'11.5" during the day. 2" height loss.
Zach said on 14/Jun/12
[Editor Rob: for sure, I think he'd clear the 6ft 2 mark.]
Why is his peak height only 6'1.5 then?
Editor Rob
[Editor Rob: for sure, I think he'd clear the 6ft 2 mark.]
Why is his peak height only 6'1.5 then?
Editor Rob out of bed I'm referring to
mr handsome said on 14/Jun/12
ROB DO YOU THINK ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER IN HIS PRIME AT PEAK HEIGHT AFTER LIKE 10 HOURS OF SLEEP ON HIS BACK OUT OF BED ON THE BEST DAY OF HIS LIFE HE COULD HAVE BEEN A FULL 6'2" OR MAYBE EVEN A FRACTION OVER BUT STILL OF COURSE UNDER 6'2.25" AT ABSOLUTE BEST POSSIBLE MORNING HEIGHT.
Editor Rob
ROB DO YOU THINK ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER IN HIS PRIME AT PEAK HEIGHT AFTER LIKE 10 HOURS OF SLEEP ON HIS BACK OUT OF BED ON THE BEST DAY OF HIS LIFE HE COULD HAVE BEEN A FULL 6'2" OR MAYBE EVEN A FRACTION OVER BUT STILL OF COURSE UNDER 6'2.25" AT ABSOLUTE BEST POSSIBLE MORNING HEIGHT.
Editor Rob yrs straight out of bed I think solid six two very probable
Ka said on 14/Jun/12
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 14/Jun/12
Nothing under 186cm for this guy, he looked clearly tall in almost all his movies
Very true. On a small note, personally I think at peak he was dead on 186.7 cm. Not that decimals matter that much. I guess sure, he could go to 186 cm, albeit after a hard workout. For me though, that's not true height, being compressed like a spin. So he was as listed "shrug". Now fluctuated at 182-183 cm, so 6 ft is fair.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm says on 14/Jun/12
Nothing under 186cm for this guy, he looked clearly tall in almost all his movies
Very true. On a small note, personally I think at peak he was dead on 186.7 cm. Not that decimals matter that much. I guess sure, he could go to 186 cm, albeit after a hard workout. For me though, that's not true height, being compressed like a spin. So he was as listed "shrug". Now fluctuated at 182-183 cm, so 6 ft is fair.
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 14/Jun/12
Nothing under 186cm for this guy, he looked clearly tall in almost all his movies.
Nothing under 186cm for this guy, he looked clearly tall in almost all his movies.
Hob said on 13/Jun/12
posture as poor he can look nothing over 5'9 with stallone.
posture as poor he can look nothing over 5'9 with stallone.
Morgan said on 13/Jun/12
Arnold is 6'1. He's not 5'10, 5'11, or 6'0. 6'2 at peek, nowadays 6'1.
Arnold is 6'1. He's not 5'10, 5'11, or 6'0. 6'2 at peek, nowadays 6'1.
Henrik said on 12/Jun/12
Ali says on 12/Jun/12
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
Arnold was never a tall man. He always wears
lifts. The ridiculous idea that Arnold once
was almost 6'2, but nowadays is 5'11 because
he shrunk. Only somebody without brains would
believe this. Shrinking 3 inches is for people
that have scoliosis. Has Arnold lost height?
Probably. How much? maybe half an inch or slightly
more.
Arnold is in good shape. He does not yet
have the old man's body. Arnold in his
lifts is still 3 inches shorter than 6'2.5
Lou Ferrigno making Arnold 5'11.5 in lifts.
------
The idea of Arnold being 5'10" with those legs that he has is way more ridiculous than believing him to have been around 6'2" in his prime.
Click Here
Click Here
That's the typical inseam of a 5'10" guy, LOL.
Compare his leg-to-torso ratio with Sean Connery's:
Click Here
Ali says on 12/Jun/12
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
Arnold was never a tall man. He always wears
lifts. The ridiculous idea that Arnold once
was almost 6'2, but nowadays is 5'11 because
he shrunk. Only somebody without brains would
believe this. Shrinking 3 inches is for people
that have scoliosis. Has Arnold lost height?
Probably. How much? maybe half an inch or slightly
more.
Arnold is in good shape. He does not yet
have the old man's body. Arnold in his
lifts is still 3 inches shorter than 6'2.5
Lou Ferrigno making Arnold 5'11.5 in lifts.
------
The idea of Arnold being 5'10" with those legs that he has is way more ridiculous than believing him to have been around 6'2" in his prime.
Click Here
Click Here
That's the typical inseam of a 5'10" guy, LOL.
Compare his leg-to-torso ratio with Sean Connery's:
Click Here
Ali said on 12/Jun/12
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
Arnold was never a tall man. He always wears
lifts. The ridiculous idea that Arnold once
was almost 6'2, but nowadays is 5'11 because
he shrunk. Only somebody without brains would
believe this. Shrinking 3 inches is for people
that have scoliosis. Has Arnold lost height?
Probably. How much? maybe half an inch or slightly
more.
Arnold is in good shape. He does not yet
have the old man's body. Arnold in his
lifts is still 3 inches shorter than 6'2.5
Lou Ferrigno making Arnold 5'11.5 in lifts.
Go look at the Roland Dantes pictures. Arnold
is tiptoeing to look taller than Dantes. Even
doing this he is only 2 inches taller. Without
tiptoeing he is about 5'10, nothing more.
Arnold was never a tall man. He always wears
lifts. The ridiculous idea that Arnold once
was almost 6'2, but nowadays is 5'11 because
he shrunk. Only somebody without brains would
believe this. Shrinking 3 inches is for people
that have scoliosis. Has Arnold lost height?
Probably. How much? maybe half an inch or slightly
more.
Arnold is in good shape. He does not yet
have the old man's body. Arnold in his
lifts is still 3 inches shorter than 6'2.5
Lou Ferrigno making Arnold 5'11.5 in lifts.
Lucio said on 11/Jun/12
Henrik says on 11/Jun/12
To me, Arnold was that he claimed he was, 6'1 3/4" peak. Why would anyone lie about quarter inches, lol? He normally looked this height, with fairly long legs, in his movies. You should check out Red Heat, in case you haven't seen it.
Click Here
Click Here
He also doesn't seem to be wearing lifts these days, and he had no problems appearing with bigger guys before (in The Running Man, he was actually one of the "smallest" of the cast). In other words, he doesn't seem to have a height complex.
Lol, the only one who has the height complex here is a certain danish...
Henrik says on 11/Jun/12
To me, Arnold was that he claimed he was, 6'1 3/4" peak. Why would anyone lie about quarter inches, lol? He normally looked this height, with fairly long legs, in his movies. You should check out Red Heat, in case you haven't seen it.
Click Here
Click Here
He also doesn't seem to be wearing lifts these days, and he had no problems appearing with bigger guys before (in The Running Man, he was actually one of the "smallest" of the cast). In other words, he doesn't seem to have a height complex.
Lol, the only one who has the height complex here is a certain danish...
Larc-186.7cm-188.6cm said on 11/Jun/12
6'1.25-6'1.5 peak
5'11.5-5'11.75 now
Rob, do you think a peak Arnold would've measured around 6'2-6'2.25 out of bed?
Editor Rob
6'1.25-6'1.5 peak
5'11.5-5'11.75 now
Rob, do you think a peak Arnold would've measured around 6'2-6'2.25 out of bed?
Editor Rob for sure, I think he'd clear the 6ft 2 mark.
Henrik said on 11/Jun/12
To me, Arnold was that he claimed he was, 6'1 3/4" peak. Why would anyone lie about quarter inches, lol? He normally looked this height, with fairly long legs, in his movies. You should check out Red Heat, in case you haven't seen it.
Click Here
Click Here
He also doesn't seem to be wearing lifts these days, and he had no problems appearing with bigger guys before (in The Running Man, he was actually one of the "smallest" of the cast). In other words, he doesn't seem to have a height complex.
To me, Arnold was that he claimed he was, 6'1 3/4" peak. Why would anyone lie about quarter inches, lol? He normally looked this height, with fairly long legs, in his movies. You should check out Red Heat, in case you haven't seen it.
Click Here
Click Here
He also doesn't seem to be wearing lifts these days, and he had no problems appearing with bigger guys before (in The Running Man, he was actually one of the "smallest" of the cast). In other words, he doesn't seem to have a height complex.
Danimal said on 10/Jun/12
6'1.5"-6'1 3/4" Peak
5'11.5" Today
6'1.5"-6'1 3/4" Peak
5'11.5" Today
Martin said on 10/Jun/12
"John says on 10/Jun/12
This is Ahnuld in '91 with 6'2 James Cameron: Click Here"
Could be with lifts for his role as the Terminator.
"John says on 10/Jun/12
This is Ahnuld in '91 with 6'2 James Cameron: Click Here"
Could be with lifts for his role as the Terminator.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.