Add a Comment3556 comments
Average Guess (480 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 9.65in (207.4cm)
Current: 6ft 8.7in (205cm)
Peak: 6ft 9.65in (207.4cm)
Current: 6ft 8.7in (205cm)
Kevin Durant said on 20/Oct/07
Vegas says on 20/Oct/07
just after watching tna from last thursday and forget about nash having lost any height or being 6'7-6'8 either, lol.
he just totally dwarfed poor kurt angle in the middle of the ring, both were wearing similiar sneakers but nash had 11 inches on angle easy, maybe 12" when he stood up fully straight Click Here and Click Here
That is an excellent picture again Vegas and i believe that Kevin Nash is a minimum of 6'9.5" in that picture and he literally towered over the 5'10" Kurt Angle.
Vegas says on 20/Oct/07
just after watching tna from last thursday and forget about nash having lost any height or being 6'7-6'8 either, lol.
he just totally dwarfed poor kurt angle in the middle of the ring, both were wearing similiar sneakers but nash had 11 inches on angle easy, maybe 12" when he stood up fully straight Click Here and Click Here
That is an excellent picture again Vegas and i believe that Kevin Nash is a minimum of 6'9.5" in that picture and he literally towered over the 5'10" Kurt Angle.
Vegas said on 20/Oct/07
just after watching tna from last thursday and forget about nash having lost any height or being 6'7-6'8 either, lol.
he just totally dwarfed poor kurt angle in the middle of the ring, both were wearing similiar sneakers but nash had 11 inches on angle easy, maybe 12" when he stood up fully straight Click Here and Click Here
just after watching tna from last thursday and forget about nash having lost any height or being 6'7-6'8 either, lol.
he just totally dwarfed poor kurt angle in the middle of the ring, both were wearing similiar sneakers but nash had 11 inches on angle easy, maybe 12" when he stood up fully straight Click Here and Click Here
JT said on 20/Oct/07
Red says on 20/Oct/07
Click Here
Looks to me like Nash 208cm, UT 202cm, Sid 201cm
Red, it is interesting how even in comparison pics like yours, Sid measures up almost exactly with Taker as in their actual stare downs. I think your estimates are pretty close to reality. If Nash in both pics stared straight ahead instead of looking down at Sid and Taker, it would look like close to a three inch advantage since the line at the top of Taker
Red says on 20/Oct/07
Click Here
Looks to me like Nash 208cm, UT 202cm, Sid 201cm
Red, it is interesting how even in comparison pics like yours, Sid measures up almost exactly with Taker as in their actual stare downs. I think your estimates are pretty close to reality. If Nash in both pics stared straight ahead instead of looking down at Sid and Taker, it would look like close to a three inch advantage since the line at the top of Taker
Vegas said on 20/Oct/07
i think it is interesting that tna bill morgan taller though, i wonder what tna would bill khali and big show at if they bill morgan at 7'1??
i think it is interesting that tna bill morgan taller though, i wonder what tna would bill khali and big show at if they bill morgan at 7'1??
Kevin Durant said on 20/Oct/07
JT says on 20/Oct/07
here's a name for you buddy, BEN WALLACE of the bulls. Listed at 6'9 but admitted he's only 6'7.
I believe Ben Wallace is only 6'5 3/4" Barefooted or a weak 6'6" because Tyrus Thomas, who was measured at 6'7.25" in the 2006 NBA Draft his taller than him.
Click Here
6'5" Shawn Marion and 6'5 3/4" Ben Wallace
Click Here
Click Here
6'5.75" Ben Wallace, 6'9.75" Rasheed Wallace and 6'5" RIP Hamilton
Here is the 1995 NBA Pre Draft Measurement and they measured Rasheed Wallace at 6'9.75".
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Big Ben Wallace 6'5.75" with 6'7.25" Tyrus Thomas
Click Here
Ben Gordon 6'1" and 6'5 3/4" Ben Wallace
JT says on 20/Oct/07
here's a name for you buddy, BEN WALLACE of the bulls. Listed at 6'9 but admitted he's only 6'7.
I believe Ben Wallace is only 6'5 3/4" Barefooted or a weak 6'6" because Tyrus Thomas, who was measured at 6'7.25" in the 2006 NBA Draft his taller than him.
Click Here
6'5" Shawn Marion and 6'5 3/4" Ben Wallace
Click Here
Click Here
6'5.75" Ben Wallace, 6'9.75" Rasheed Wallace and 6'5" RIP Hamilton
Here is the 1995 NBA Pre Draft Measurement and they measured Rasheed Wallace at 6'9.75".
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Big Ben Wallace 6'5.75" with 6'7.25" Tyrus Thomas
Click Here
Ben Gordon 6'1" and 6'5 3/4" Ben Wallace
Anonymous said on 20/Oct/07
why are you comparing those pics when they're in wrestling gear. they always wear big ass boots on the program.
why are you comparing those pics when they're in wrestling gear. they always wear big ass boots on the program.
Alex said on 20/Oct/07
Nash at the very lowest would be 6'8 today.
Nash at the very lowest would be 6'8 today.
ck said on 20/Oct/07
The 6'6" comment was a joke I assume? I think alot of you guys have unrealistic expectations of how tall a 6'9"-7'0" guy looks like. Nash easily has 11 inches on the 5'8" guy in that picture.
The 6'6" comment was a joke I assume? I think alot of you guys have unrealistic expectations of how tall a 6'9"-7'0" guy looks like. Nash easily has 11 inches on the 5'8" guy in that picture.
Dave said on 20/Oct/07
how the HELL does he only look 6'6 here?!?!?!?!.... i am not angry, i am just dispairing.... how does THIS MAN in the pic above NOT look tall!? ARE you FROM this planet.... he is MASSIVE. And im sorry, but this site seems to have quite a strong prejudice against the taller people on this site, anyone here can see hes more than 6'6 here.... 5'8, or even 5'7 guys for that matter, are NOT this small next to a 6'6 guy. Who here genuinely agrees that on this pic he looks 6'6 max? cause i really think you need your eyes tested, that is PURE rubbish..... he looks a 6'9 MIN there!!!!, open your eyes and stop being so biased!!!!
how the HELL does he only look 6'6 here?!?!?!?!.... i am not angry, i am just dispairing.... how does THIS MAN in the pic above NOT look tall!? ARE you FROM this planet.... he is MASSIVE. And im sorry, but this site seems to have quite a strong prejudice against the taller people on this site, anyone here can see hes more than 6'6 here.... 5'8, or even 5'7 guys for that matter, are NOT this small next to a 6'6 guy. Who here genuinely agrees that on this pic he looks 6'6 max? cause i really think you need your eyes tested, that is PURE rubbish..... he looks a 6'9 MIN there!!!!, open your eyes and stop being so biased!!!!
Jason said on 20/Oct/07
I just think he was in his cowboy boots with Miller.
I just think he was in his cowboy boots with Miller.
Vegas said on 20/Oct/07
Jason; oliver miller was 6'6 at most so?? jason before 2005 you were saying nash was 6'7... making miller 6'5, lol. don't worry the video of him standing next to kareem from 1995 will pop up sooner or later and then you will be saying nash wore lifts :D
LV; please compare nash and andre with the same guy ie hogan not some guy we don't know the height of and for the last time mike graham was billed at 5'8.
Jason; oliver miller was 6'6 at most so?? jason before 2005 you were saying nash was 6'7... making miller 6'5, lol. don't worry the video of him standing next to kareem from 1995 will pop up sooner or later and then you will be saying nash wore lifts :D
LV; please compare nash and andre with the same guy ie hogan not some guy we don't know the height of and for the last time mike graham was billed at 5'8.
JT said on 20/Oct/07
Click Here
Anonymous says on 18/Oct/07
in response to a question below that made me laugh
"A 6
Click Here
Anonymous says on 18/Oct/07
in response to a question below that made me laugh
"A 6
Jason said on 20/Oct/07
Mark says on 18/Oct/07
''At last some 6'8 comments coming through. Compared to a 6'2 would be lucky to have 6' on him on latest paperview. Don't think lost much height either.''
Haha you new here? I've been saying Nash is like 6'8'' at most since 2005.
Mark says on 18/Oct/07
''At last some 6'8 comments coming through. Compared to a 6'2 would be lucky to have 6' on him on latest paperview. Don't think lost much height either.''
Haha you new here? I've been saying Nash is like 6'8'' at most since 2005.
LV said on 19/Oct/07
Andre with 5'8" Mike Graham (Click Here). By comparison, Andre is considerably taller. I feel Nash was 6'10" peak and may be closer to 6'9" now or maybe he just slouches more.
Andre with 5'8" Mike Graham (Click Here). By comparison, Andre is considerably taller. I feel Nash was 6'10" peak and may be closer to 6'9" now or maybe he just slouches more.
max said on 19/Oct/07
if that guy in the photo is really 5'8, kevin nash should be more than 6'9-- the height difference is a lot more than just a 12-inch (1 foot) ruler.
if that guy in the photo is really 5'8, kevin nash should be more than 6'9-- the height difference is a lot more than just a 12-inch (1 foot) ruler.
cantstop25 said on 19/Oct/07
im sorry but the fact that nash looked 6'10" standing next to kareem, yet seemed shorter in comparison to a 5'8" guy really does show a bias againt wrestlers on this site.
im sorry but the fact that nash looked 6'10" standing next to kareem, yet seemed shorter in comparison to a 5'8" guy really does show a bias againt wrestlers on this site.
Anonymous said on 19/Oct/07
looks nothing over 6'7 and if he is 6'9 somehow as you guys believe, then he is that in shoes, without he's 6'8 something but i honestly see him as 6'6. he doesn't look that tall at all. another thing is that is mamun really 5'8? i'm not the only one on this site who thinks otherwise
looks nothing over 6'7 and if he is 6'9 somehow as you guys believe, then he is that in shoes, without he's 6'8 something but i honestly see him as 6'6. he doesn't look that tall at all. another thing is that is mamun really 5'8? i'm not the only one on this site who thinks otherwise
mofo said on 19/Oct/07
lol ok your secret is safe with me Mamun or is that Clark Kent????
lol ok your secret is safe with me Mamun or is that Clark Kent????
glenn said on 19/Oct/07
thanks alex.i was trying to avoid that with a mamun page.guess nobody here gives a fuk about my veiws.
thanks alex.i was trying to avoid that with a mamun page.guess nobody here gives a fuk about my veiws.
Jason said on 19/Oct/07
Well, it's not like Nash is leaning in for him lol. Mamun's head's slightly further from the camera...
Well, it's not like Nash is leaning in for him lol. Mamun's head's slightly further from the camera...
Dave said on 19/Oct/07
btw, in that pic nash is leaning considerably james, stop searching the few pics where he looks shorter and observe the MANY pics where he looks much taller than people. Selective pics earn you nothing.
btw, in that pic nash is leaning considerably james, stop searching the few pics where he looks shorter and observe the MANY pics where he looks much taller than people. Selective pics earn you nothing.
Dave said on 19/Oct/07
WELL over a foot of height difference there, and manmun us stretched out, and nash is leaning.... this is conclusive, nash is 6'10
And someone down there, james i believe it was... said nash never looked that tall next to people.... what planet are you on?,... he towers most wrestlers he fights, the man IS that tall.... and this pic with 5'8 manmun CONCLUDES he is ATLEAST 6'9 and actually closer to 6'10. And unless you are going to start calling manmun a liar, nash needs an upgrade.
WELL over a foot of height difference there, and manmun us stretched out, and nash is leaning.... this is conclusive, nash is 6'10
And someone down there, james i believe it was... said nash never looked that tall next to people.... what planet are you on?,... he towers most wrestlers he fights, the man IS that tall.... and this pic with 5'8 manmun CONCLUDES he is ATLEAST 6'9 and actually closer to 6'10. And unless you are going to start calling manmun a liar, nash needs an upgrade.
Da Man said on 19/Oct/07
Nash easily has an over 10" head, IMO. His head is bigger than Kane and Takers.
Nash easily has an over 10" head, IMO. His head is bigger than Kane and Takers.
JT said on 19/Oct/07
Nice pic again Mamun. In that outfit, it looks like you could take down Nash with your little finger.
You
Nice pic again Mamun. In that outfit, it looks like you could take down Nash with your little finger.
You
Alex said on 19/Oct/07
Supes, Nash's head has gotta be what 11 inches you'd say? I'd say so. Manum is under his head by at least 2 inches so Nash looks 6'9 easy there.
Supes, Nash's head has gotta be what 11 inches you'd say? I'd say so. Manum is under his head by at least 2 inches so Nash looks 6'9 easy there.
Vegas said on 19/Oct/07
the one thing with nash is never looks that huge with smaller guys but then always looks tall with guys 6'8+
James in your photo nash is obviously leaning, hall is barely 2" shorter, yet hall is easily 5" shorter in this video where both are basically barefoot (flipflops give no height worth mentioning) Click Here
Nick; alex said nash looked 6'8 to him just last year, i am not going to ignore this statement. I keep hearing hogan lost 3", andre lost 3", arnie lost 3" etc etc, why couldn't nash after all his terrible injuries lose maybe 0.5-1"??? just look at nash in tna today, he looks about 65 with the grey hair and moves around the ring like an 80 year old, someone on another board said he looks like kenny rogers now, lol
the one thing with nash is never looks that huge with smaller guys but then always looks tall with guys 6'8+
James in your photo nash is obviously leaning, hall is barely 2" shorter, yet hall is easily 5" shorter in this video where both are basically barefoot (flipflops give no height worth mentioning) Click Here
Nick; alex said nash looked 6'8 to him just last year, i am not going to ignore this statement. I keep hearing hogan lost 3", andre lost 3", arnie lost 3" etc etc, why couldn't nash after all his terrible injuries lose maybe 0.5-1"??? just look at nash in tna today, he looks about 65 with the grey hair and moves around the ring like an 80 year old, someone on another board said he looks like kenny rogers now, lol
brother_h said on 19/Oct/07
my GOD nash looks thinner. hes loss muscle hasnt he!.
nash said he was 6'10 which was believable. rob say 6'9. maybe hes losing height. he is over 50 years old right.
money man mamun is here to save us!
my GOD nash looks thinner. hes loss muscle hasnt he!.
nash said he was 6'10 which was believable. rob say 6'9. maybe hes losing height. he is over 50 years old right.
money man mamun is here to save us!
D-Lurker said on 18/Oct/07
I see on tna, that the stats for nash and matt morgan favour morgan by one inch, despite the three inch increase in billed height. 7ft and 7ft1 respectively..Nash could well be 6'8"...Gotta love mamuns outfit! *snirks*
I see on tna, that the stats for nash and matt morgan favour morgan by one inch, despite the three inch increase in billed height. 7ft and 7ft1 respectively..Nash could well be 6'8"...Gotta love mamuns outfit! *snirks*
nick said on 18/Oct/07
dont forget to look at the height incrememnts, like from 5'0 to 5'8 is very close to 6'0 to 6'7.5, and 6'0 to 6'1.5 is very close to 6'9 to 6'11, 5'8 to 6'0 similiar to 6'7.5 to 6'11, BUT YOU CAN definetly see the little differences, this is as good as you can get.
dont forget to look at the height incrememnts, like from 5'0 to 5'8 is very close to 6'0 to 6'7.5, and 6'0 to 6'1.5 is very close to 6'9 to 6'11, 5'8 to 6'0 similiar to 6'7.5 to 6'11, BUT YOU CAN definetly see the little differences, this is as good as you can get.
supes78 said on 18/Oct/07
Nash looks well over a foot taller than Mamun. I think 6'10" is more accurate.
Nash looks well over a foot taller than Mamun. I think 6'10" is more accurate.
Alex said on 18/Oct/07
Manum needs to be listed on the User heights page I think now. He's got more than a couple photos with celebs.
Editor Rob
Manum needs to be listed on the User heights page I think now. He's got more than a couple photos with celebs.
Editor Rob remind me of this next week if I forget please.
nick said on 18/Oct/07
come on vegas are u that ignorant, he is obviously loosing an inch in this photo because of poor posture, and hes leaning in. Not to mention that the very top of the picture has to be atleast 18 inches high from MAMUNS HEAD. Do you ever think to take these things into account.
come on vegas are u that ignorant, he is obviously loosing an inch in this photo because of poor posture, and hes leaning in. Not to mention that the very top of the picture has to be atleast 18 inches high from MAMUNS HEAD. Do you ever think to take these things into account.
Mark said on 18/Oct/07
At last some 6'8 comments coming through. Compared to a 6'2 would be lucky to have 6' on him on latest paperview. Don't think lost much height either.
At last some 6'8 comments coming through. Compared to a 6'2 would be lucky to have 6' on him on latest paperview. Don't think lost much height either.
Mamun said on 18/Oct/07
I appologize for not answering your earlier questions . No I am not an
autograph dealer like Glenn . I am just a star obsessed fan who beleive
in chasing his dreams and making it happen ! As for my Job , well it's
very very boring ! Banking ! But my ultimATE GOAL is to act in Hollywood .
Best regards ,
Mamun
I appologize for not answering your earlier questions . No I am not an
autograph dealer like Glenn . I am just a star obsessed fan who beleive
in chasing his dreams and making it happen ! As for my Job , well it's
very very boring ! Banking ! But my ultimATE GOAL is to act in Hollywood .
Best regards ,
Mamun
Anonymous said on 18/Oct/07
in response to a question below that made me laugh
"A 6
in response to a question below that made me laugh
"A 6
Anonymous said on 18/Oct/07
looks 6'6 to me, but if he is 6'9 in that pic(which he don't look to me) then barefeet he's 6'8 and some odd
looks 6'6 to me, but if he is 6'9 in that pic(which he don't look to me) then barefeet he's 6'8 and some odd
derek said on 18/Oct/07
At least 6'9 he probably can appear and has appeared taller with different kind of shoes/boots.
At least 6'9 he probably can appear and has appeared taller with different kind of shoes/boots.
Kevin Durant said on 18/Oct/07
Antin says on 18/Oct/07
looks 6'7
Man, Check your eye sights, Kevin Nash look like a legit 6'9" - 6'9.5" in that picture. I still believe that before his countless surgeries Kevin Nash is indeed a solid 6'10" in the 1990's and one of the best big men wrestler of all yime.
Antin says on 18/Oct/07
looks 6'7
Man, Check your eye sights, Kevin Nash look like a legit 6'9" - 6'9.5" in that picture. I still believe that before his countless surgeries Kevin Nash is indeed a solid 6'10" in the 1990's and one of the best big men wrestler of all yime.
Alex said on 18/Oct/07
Nash looks about 2 inches taller on Manum than Kane did on him.
Also looking at this picture Nash would be a bit taller than Big Show comparing the picture of Big Show and 6'1.5 Mike.
Nash looks about 2 inches taller on Manum than Kane did on him.
Also looking at this picture Nash would be a bit taller than Big Show comparing the picture of Big Show and 6'1.5 Mike.
Mamun said on 18/Oct/07
Thank you all for the kinds comments your giving me . But make sure you give
Rob thanks too ! Because it's his site he he did me the favour of posting my
pics . About your questions , well I wish I could answer them all but it will
take too much space . This Photo was taken April 2004 for the movie Punisher .
Did you know what he told me ? These were exactly his words : -
" I like your cape "
regards , Mamun
Thank you all for the kinds comments your giving me . But make sure you give
Rob thanks too ! Because it's his site he he did me the favour of posting my
pics . About your questions , well I wish I could answer them all but it will
take too much space . This Photo was taken April 2004 for the movie Punisher .
Did you know what he told me ? These were exactly his words : -
" I like your cape "
regards , Mamun
Mamun said on 18/Oct/07
I am superman my friend and my job is saving people's lives .Mofo, please
don't let anybody know I am superman !
Regards ,
Mamun
I am superman my friend and my job is saving people's lives .Mofo, please
don't let anybody know I am superman !
Regards ,
Mamun
JB said on 18/Oct/07
Too sweeeet!
Mamun what the hell are you wearing?
Too sweeeet!
Mamun what the hell are you wearing?
mofo said on 18/Oct/07
Mamun are you an autograph dealer like glenn? You seem to meet a lot of celebs!
If your not an autograph dealer what is your job?
Mamun are you an autograph dealer like glenn? You seem to meet a lot of celebs!
If your not an autograph dealer what is your job?
lillo thomas said on 18/Oct/07
he look huge about a foot difference
he look huge about a foot difference
Anonymous said on 18/Oct/07
At LEAST 6'9", probably more.
At LEAST 6'9", probably more.
Kevin Durant said on 18/Oct/07
Kevin Nash looks like a legit 6'9.5" here along side the 5'8" Mamum, who is wearing a Superman costume. By the way i am still finding the link of Oliver Miller being measured at 6'9" in the 1992 NBA Draft.
Excellent photo once again and Mamum is already a popular person here in celebheights.com
Kevin Nash looks like a legit 6'9.5" here along side the 5'8" Mamum, who is wearing a Superman costume. By the way i am still finding the link of Oliver Miller being measured at 6'9" in the 1992 NBA Draft.
Excellent photo once again and Mamum is already a popular person here in celebheights.com
Alex said on 18/Oct/07
Miller could be 6'7 and Nash would still be 6'9 minimum.
Miller could be 6'7 and Nash would still be 6'9 minimum.
Viper said on 18/Oct/07
Id be SHOCKED If Miller is a legit 6-9. Blown away.
Id be SHOCKED If Miller is a legit 6-9. Blown away.
JT said on 18/Oct/07
Nash and Kerry Wood of baseball
Nash and Kerry Wood of baseball
LV said on 17/Oct/07
I still can't believe he was downgraded. Even if Oliver Miller is 6'8", Nash is still 6'10" since he's 2" taller in that picture.
I still can't believe he was downgraded. Even if Oliver Miller is 6'8", Nash is still 6'10" since he's 2" taller in that picture.
JT said on 17/Oct/07
Vegas, 6'9" is a huge height. I just don't see a peak Nash only 1.5" taller than a peak Taker though. I'd still like to find more pics of Nash early in his career, as well as the actual videos with Kareem and David Robinson. In one of the Master Blaster videos on YouTube from around 1990 or so, JR refers to Nash as being 6'10", so he's not going to be any taller than that.
Vegas, 6'9" is a huge height. I just don't see a peak Nash only 1.5" taller than a peak Taker though. I'd still like to find more pics of Nash early in his career, as well as the actual videos with Kareem and David Robinson. In one of the Master Blaster videos on YouTube from around 1990 or so, JR refers to Nash as being 6'10", so he's not going to be any taller than that.
Vegas said on 17/Oct/07
kevin durant; can you find a link to this 1992 draft camp listing?? even if miller was measured as low as 6'7.5, nash should be upgraded. That photo of nash and miller was taken in the late 1990s, his first operations took place in college in 1979 and his basketball career in europe ended in 1981-82 due to a terrible knee/Cruiate Ligament injury
kevin durant; can you find a link to this 1992 draft camp listing?? even if miller was measured as low as 6'7.5, nash should be upgraded. That photo of nash and miller was taken in the late 1990s, his first operations took place in college in 1979 and his basketball career in europe ended in 1981-82 due to a terrible knee/Cruiate Ligament injury
Vegas said on 17/Oct/07
JT; i think we can all live with Nash at 6'9 seeing as Big Show always had 3" on him and was listed 3" shorter in college basketball (but as you say kareem had no 5" on nash standing side by side in that video they showed on superstars back in 1995, he was above kareems eye level and he only looked 1.5" max shorter than david robinson in another video)
but i don't think certain wrestlers should be downgraded by comparing a photo of one guy standing next to a wrestler and then standing next to someone else, how tall are randy orton and david hasselhoff so next to the same 5'9.5 guy Click Here and Click Here is orton really 3" taller than hasselhoff as those photos show, i bet any money he isn't
JT; i think we can all live with Nash at 6'9 seeing as Big Show always had 3" on him and was listed 3" shorter in college basketball (but as you say kareem had no 5" on nash standing side by side in that video they showed on superstars back in 1995, he was above kareems eye level and he only looked 1.5" max shorter than david robinson in another video)
but i don't think certain wrestlers should be downgraded by comparing a photo of one guy standing next to a wrestler and then standing next to someone else, how tall are randy orton and david hasselhoff so next to the same 5'9.5 guy Click Here and Click Here is orton really 3" taller than hasselhoff as those photos show, i bet any money he isn't
Kevin Durant said on 17/Oct/07
I agree JT it seems like Kevin Nash is 6'10.5" in his prime because Oliver Miller was measured at 6'9" (barefeet)" during the 1992 NBA Draft Camp. I say Editor Rob need to list his peak height at least 6'10.5".
I agree JT it seems like Kevin Nash is 6'10.5" in his prime because Oliver Miller was measured at 6'9" (barefeet)" during the 1992 NBA Draft Camp. I say Editor Rob need to list his peak height at least 6'10.5".
JT said on 16/Oct/07
The picture of Kareem and Nash was unfortunately just a pic that comes up about 80% into this video Click Here In the actual video from that event (I think shown on WWF Superstars on Saturday morning), I recall around a four inch difference, which is why McMahon referred to Kareem as being 7
The picture of Kareem and Nash was unfortunately just a pic that comes up about 80% into this video Click Here In the actual video from that event (I think shown on WWF Superstars on Saturday morning), I recall around a four inch difference, which is why McMahon referred to Kareem as being 7
Vegas said on 16/Oct/07
kareem and nash have met Click Here JT will post the link to the video because i can't find it.
kareem and nash have met Click Here JT will post the link to the video because i can't find it.
Vegas said on 16/Oct/07
Is that why you downgraded him rob because of the photo of mamun with nash and then comparing that photo to kareem??
there is a video of kareem and nash standing side by side both wearing tux in 1995 on dailymotion and kareem wasn't 5" taller.
Editor Rob
Is that why you downgraded him rob because of the photo of mamun with nash and then comparing that photo to kareem??
there is a video of kareem and nash standing side by side both wearing tux in 1995 on dailymotion and kareem wasn't 5" taller.
Editor Rob after seeing 7ft 2 kareem and nash.
Frank said on 16/Oct/07
Rob can you post the piture witn Mamum & Nash
Editor Rob
Rob can you post the piture witn Mamum & Nash
Editor Rob on friday I will put it 1 mamun wrestler...this will be nash!
Supermanfan380 said on 16/Oct/07
Maybe they mean 6'9" currently? I think he was 6'10" at his peak in 1990s.
Maybe they mean 6'9" currently? I think he was 6'10" at his peak in 1990s.
Danimal said on 15/Oct/07
Because ROB felt like lowering him. No reason. He just felt like it. I think he's wrong. I give Nash a legite 6'10" if not taller in his prime.
Because ROB felt like lowering him. No reason. He just felt like it. I think he's wrong. I give Nash a legite 6'10" if not taller in his prime.
Doink said on 15/Oct/07
Nash wasn't any taller than 6-10, which is what he was listed at as a basketball player at TN. Definitely a huge guy though.
Nash wasn't any taller than 6-10, which is what he was listed at as a basketball player at TN. Definitely a huge guy though.
Dave said on 15/Oct/07
okay.... now HOW has nash been lowered to 6'9 when there has been SO much evidence to suggest hes closer to 6'10?... on what grounds has he been lowered again?
okay.... now HOW has nash been lowered to 6'9 when there has been SO much evidence to suggest hes closer to 6'10?... on what grounds has he been lowered again?
anonymous said on 14/Oct/07
i say nash 6'10",tyler mane 6'8" there imo looke like a 2 inch difference between the two.
i say nash 6'10",tyler mane 6'8" there imo looke like a 2 inch difference between the two.
LV said on 13/Oct/07
Did Nash get lowered again? I thought he was just listed at 6'9.5". Most of the recent pictures posted show him looking closer to 6'10" than 6'9".
Did Nash get lowered again? I thought he was just listed at 6'9.5". Most of the recent pictures posted show him looking closer to 6'10" than 6'9".
Supermanfan380 said on 13/Oct/07
Kevin, those pics also show Tyler Mane, a giant himself at 6'8"-6'10".
Kevin, those pics also show Tyler Mane, a giant himself at 6'8"-6'10".
Alex said on 13/Oct/07
I can't see Morgan as low as 6'6 like Jason said.
I think he's close to 6'10. 6'9 at the least.
I can't see Morgan as low as 6'6 like Jason said.
I think he's close to 6'10. 6'9 at the least.
Kevin Durant said on 13/Oct/07
I think Matt Morgan is 6'9" because Nathan Jones (6'10") is at least an inch taller than him during their brief run as a tag team in Smackdown. Anyway on topic here is Kevin Nash 6'9" and 6'4" Diamond Dallas Page. ( Click Here ( Click Here)
Kevin Nash with legit 6'3" Lex Luger
Click Here
Here are some classic pictures of Kevin Nash before he was a huge star in the WWE and WCW. They are known as the Masterblasters.
Click Here
Click Here
I think Matt Morgan is 6'9" because Nathan Jones (6'10") is at least an inch taller than him during their brief run as a tag team in Smackdown. Anyway on topic here is Kevin Nash 6'9" and 6'4" Diamond Dallas Page. ( Click Here ( Click Here)
Kevin Nash with legit 6'3" Lex Luger
Click Here
Here are some classic pictures of Kevin Nash before he was a huge star in the WWE and WCW. They are known as the Masterblasters.
Click Here
Click Here
cantstop25 said on 12/Oct/07
I do find it funny how wwe listed morgan at 6'10", and now TNA is listing him at 7'1". Hes a huge man I cannot possibly see under 6'9". I guess he could look 7'1" because he completely dwarfs everybody in TNA with the exception of nash. It is a shame we havent really got a good shot of those two side by side
I do find it funny how wwe listed morgan at 6'10", and now TNA is listing him at 7'1". Hes a huge man I cannot possibly see under 6'9". I guess he could look 7'1" because he completely dwarfs everybody in TNA with the exception of nash. It is a shame we havent really got a good shot of those two side by side
Supermanfan380 said on 12/Oct/07
Not a lot in wrestling really does anyhow.
Not a lot in wrestling really does anyhow.
Da Man said on 12/Oct/07
More than likely it has little bearing on reality.
More than likely it has little bearing on reality.
Supermanfan380 said on 11/Oct/07
Interesting news. TNA is listing Matt Morgan at 7'1" and 330 pounds, while they are listing Kevin Nash at 7'0" and 320 pounds.
Is Morgan slightly taller than Nash these days? Maybe Nash is not as big as he used to be?
I will wait until we see a good picture of the two together, but who knows? Maybe Matt is taller than Nash?
Interesting news. TNA is listing Matt Morgan at 7'1" and 330 pounds, while they are listing Kevin Nash at 7'0" and 320 pounds.
Is Morgan slightly taller than Nash these days? Maybe Nash is not as big as he used to be?
I will wait until we see a good picture of the two together, but who knows? Maybe Matt is taller than Nash?
Da Man said on 9/Oct/07
I'm not so sure about that. Nash looked to have 1.5" - 2" on Taker, and I'm fairly certain Kane has at least .5" on Taker.
I'm not so sure about that. Nash looked to have 1.5" - 2" on Taker, and I'm fairly certain Kane has at least .5" on Taker.
Dave said on 8/Oct/07
yup for sure, nash has an easy 2 inches on kane.
yup for sure, nash has an easy 2 inches on kane.
mike m said on 8/Oct/07
i say today if nash and big show went face to face we would see most likely a 2 1/2 difference in height.show as wcw giant definitely looked a little bit taller,most likely it was during his debut with bigger lifts,and it may have been for promotional reasons,like when they use to refer to him 7'4".batista on smackdown the other night referred to khali as 7'4" when he,s really only like 7'2" max.big show has always looked about 4 inches taller than kane who imo would be at least 2 inches shorter than nash.
i say today if nash and big show went face to face we would see most likely a 2 1/2 difference in height.show as wcw giant definitely looked a little bit taller,most likely it was during his debut with bigger lifts,and it may have been for promotional reasons,like when they use to refer to him 7'4".batista on smackdown the other night referred to khali as 7'4" when he,s really only like 7'2" max.big show has always looked about 4 inches taller than kane who imo would be at least 2 inches shorter than nash.
Supermanfan380 said on 6/Oct/07
It always looked to me like SHow had 4 inches (keeping in mind the lifts) on Nash.
Again, images and video from the ring are not very good to judge height. Odd camer angles and spacing of guys on a square plane (that is at an agnle due to the camera), and questionable footwhere and camera distance, can have a lot of change that would not be there in a level, barefoot, back to wall measurment.
It always looked to me like SHow had 4 inches (keeping in mind the lifts) on Nash.
Again, images and video from the ring are not very good to judge height. Odd camer angles and spacing of guys on a square plane (that is at an agnle due to the camera), and questionable footwhere and camera distance, can have a lot of change that would not be there in a level, barefoot, back to wall measurment.
cantstop25 said on 5/Oct/07
Im gonna have to disagree dave, I think ther was more three inches in that staredown, though shows botts could have had more in them and he was also clearly taller in his wcw days then his wwf days
Im gonna have to disagree dave, I think ther was more three inches in that staredown, though shows botts could have had more in them and he was also clearly taller in his wcw days then his wwf days
Dave said on 5/Oct/07
show always had huge footwear in wcw.... also show was NEVER alot taller than nash. Nash had very small soles because of his knee problems, he simply could not wear lifts. There was a staredown between the two in the match where nash botched the powerbomb, and nash had smaller boots than show by a GOOD inch, because he didnt want lifts when trying to powerbomb nash because of the danger... anyway big show looked 2 inches taller MAX in the staredown.... and because of shows weight and posture hes lost more height than nash, and id say nowadays they are close in height (in fair footwear)
show always had huge footwear in wcw.... also show was NEVER alot taller than nash. Nash had very small soles because of his knee problems, he simply could not wear lifts. There was a staredown between the two in the match where nash botched the powerbomb, and nash had smaller boots than show by a GOOD inch, because he didnt want lifts when trying to powerbomb nash because of the danger... anyway big show looked 2 inches taller MAX in the staredown.... and because of shows weight and posture hes lost more height than nash, and id say nowadays they are close in height (in fair footwear)
cantstop25 said on 5/Oct/07
nash appaears nearly the same heigh as show everytime until they are face to face then show looks a lot taller
nash appaears nearly the same heigh as show everytime until they are face to face then show looks a lot taller
Supermanfan380 said on 2/Oct/07
I figure his peak height of about 6'10", perhaps 6'9" with all the injuries he has had over the years now + age.
I figure his peak height of about 6'10", perhaps 6'9" with all the injuries he has had over the years now + age.
Dave said on 2/Oct/07
big shows footwear looks certainly bigger than nash's there.... also, on the brock pics, nash is nowhere near straight really, if he raised his head totally straight an easy 6'10... and @ juggernaut, back in those days show was an easy legit 7 footer, without problem. Hes lost height nowadays, plus his posture is his biggest enemy now. Probably because of his weight... nash looks very tall in that vid tho, TOWERS hogan and goldberg
big shows footwear looks certainly bigger than nash's there.... also, on the brock pics, nash is nowhere near straight really, if he raised his head totally straight an easy 6'10... and @ juggernaut, back in those days show was an easy legit 7 footer, without problem. Hes lost height nowadays, plus his posture is his biggest enemy now. Probably because of his weight... nash looks very tall in that vid tho, TOWERS hogan and goldberg
Supermanfan380 said on 2/Oct/07
Right, those backstage shots do more to show who is a real tower or not, as in-ring, half of the guys have lift boots.
There was an old rumor that after Nash left to go to WCW he actually started wearing regular boots, as the smaller rings they had actually made him look even bigger, in spite of not have lifts anymore.
Only Pro-Wrestling would put a 6'10" man in lifts. Nash’s boots were easy enough to conceal any lifts, as the black leather pants came down low enough to distract the audience eyes away from his feet at the time.
WCW he towered over 6'5" Hogan and Hall, and he did not likely have them in anymore. WWE is more concerned with this than he ever was. 6'10" is more than needed to be tall enough for being considered a giant.
Right, those backstage shots do more to show who is a real tower or not, as in-ring, half of the guys have lift boots.
There was an old rumor that after Nash left to go to WCW he actually started wearing regular boots, as the smaller rings they had actually made him look even bigger, in spite of not have lifts anymore.
Only Pro-Wrestling would put a 6'10" man in lifts. Nash’s boots were easy enough to conceal any lifts, as the black leather pants came down low enough to distract the audience eyes away from his feet at the time.
WCW he towered over 6'5" Hogan and Hall, and he did not likely have them in anymore. WWE is more concerned with this than he ever was. 6'10" is more than needed to be tall enough for being considered a giant.
Anonymous said on 2/Oct/07
I forgot to say before, in the pics with 6'2"-6'3" Brock, notice Nash's nose is at Lesnars top of head. So Nash's nose is at 6'2" or 6'3" at the tallest.
Most head to chin measurments are not more than 6-7 inches, so that puts nash at 6'10" or 6'9", a tower by all means.
I forgot to say before, in the pics with 6'2"-6'3" Brock, notice Nash's nose is at Lesnars top of head. So Nash's nose is at 6'2" or 6'3" at the tallest.
Most head to chin measurments are not more than 6-7 inches, so that puts nash at 6'10" or 6'9", a tower by all means.
Supermanfan380 said on 1/Oct/07
Nash is taller than taker, but in some pics looks the same height, and in others looks taller. Same thing with Jones. I saw them in person during the whole "student of taker" angle. In person Jones looked a lot taller. In some pics not so much, yet others he did look a lot more.
In his Prime, when he played basketball, Nash was measured at 6'10". Same with Morgan.
UT and Kane have both worn lifts in their boots at varying times as well.
We cannot really go by using in-ring pics, as the angles are messy, even if they look clean, one guy can be back further from the camera and appear taller or shorter too.
Then there is the footwear question.
Nash is taller than taker, but in some pics looks the same height, and in others looks taller. Same thing with Jones. I saw them in person during the whole "student of taker" angle. In person Jones looked a lot taller. In some pics not so much, yet others he did look a lot more.
In his Prime, when he played basketball, Nash was measured at 6'10". Same with Morgan.
UT and Kane have both worn lifts in their boots at varying times as well.
We cannot really go by using in-ring pics, as the angles are messy, even if they look clean, one guy can be back further from the camera and appear taller or shorter too.
Then there is the footwear question.
Da Man said on 1/Oct/07
I would agree with that assessment, Dave.
I would agree with that assessment, Dave.
Dave said on 1/Oct/07
id say that out of all the wwe/wcw/tna/ecw giants around the 300lb 6'10 range, (which obviously excludes big show and great khali) nash is easily the tallest IMO, from all of the pics posted over this website, comparing the likes of kane, undertaker, sid vicious, morgan, jones.... nash has at least an inch on ALL of them, the closest to him being morgan and jones.... They are two big guys, but they were both around the height of taker, both about an inch above him.... but when nash stands infront of taker (90s as diesel) nash has a clear few inches over taker, AT LEAST 2 if not more.... so i conclude IMO nash is between 6'9 and 6'10 nowadays, and a clear 6'10 in his day... The tallest of the 300lb big men. Numerous pics and videos go to clearly show this, and very very few if any can disprove it.... and JT, nash simply towers over brock there, looks an easy 6'10 beside him.
id say that out of all the wwe/wcw/tna/ecw giants around the 300lb 6'10 range, (which obviously excludes big show and great khali) nash is easily the tallest IMO, from all of the pics posted over this website, comparing the likes of kane, undertaker, sid vicious, morgan, jones.... nash has at least an inch on ALL of them, the closest to him being morgan and jones.... They are two big guys, but they were both around the height of taker, both about an inch above him.... but when nash stands infront of taker (90s as diesel) nash has a clear few inches over taker, AT LEAST 2 if not more.... so i conclude IMO nash is between 6'9 and 6'10 nowadays, and a clear 6'10 in his day... The tallest of the 300lb big men. Numerous pics and videos go to clearly show this, and very very few if any can disprove it.... and JT, nash simply towers over brock there, looks an easy 6'10 beside him.
Paul said on 1/Oct/07
Nash in his prime, maybe 6'11 waking up, 6'10.5 average daytime height, 6'10 at night. That would be my take on it anyway.
Nash in his prime, maybe 6'11 waking up, 6'10.5 average daytime height, 6'10 at night. That would be my take on it anyway.
Supermanfan380 said on 30/Sep/07
Paul, I don't agree with giving 1/2 inches, as height varies more during the day.
Men with an afternoon measurement of 6'9", may wake after their spine and joints expand durring the night at 6'10"+. Especially when they are young, like under 40 years of age, and in good spinal and knee and ankle health.
Even shorter men of say, 5’9”, may wake at 5’10”. Try it with yourself.
Everyone compresses throughout the day. I assume we are trying to get compressed height on this page, and not right out of bed measurements, however because an individual varies more than .5” at any given time, I think we should just “round the change”.
I would say a noon measurement for Nash of “about” 6’10” in his prime, and “about” 6’9” currently.
I know a lot of folks here like to put the half inch on people, but that is too small an increment to judge going by pictures.
Paul, I don't agree with giving 1/2 inches, as height varies more during the day.
Men with an afternoon measurement of 6'9", may wake after their spine and joints expand durring the night at 6'10"+. Especially when they are young, like under 40 years of age, and in good spinal and knee and ankle health.
Even shorter men of say, 5’9”, may wake at 5’10”. Try it with yourself.
Everyone compresses throughout the day. I assume we are trying to get compressed height on this page, and not right out of bed measurements, however because an individual varies more than .5” at any given time, I think we should just “round the change”.
I would say a noon measurement for Nash of “about” 6’10” in his prime, and “about” 6’9” currently.
I know a lot of folks here like to put the half inch on people, but that is too small an increment to judge going by pictures.
cantstop25 said on 30/Sep/07
I think sid looks the same height as nash in that video
I think sid looks the same height as nash in that video
Paul said on 30/Sep/07
Nash was about 6'10.5 back then. Sid was 6'8 I believe. Cowboy boots halved the gap in that footage. Made Sid appear to be 6'9 or fractionally over.
Nash was about 6'10.5 back then. Sid was 6'8 I believe. Cowboy boots halved the gap in that footage. Made Sid appear to be 6'9 or fractionally over.
Supermanfan380 said on 29/Sep/07
Cowboy boots can add a around 1 to 1.5 inches.
There may only be a 3" difference with say Nash and UT barefoot, but the difference can seem greater of less depending on footwear and camera placement.
There are videos and images of Sid, looking the same height as Nash, and UT looking the same height as Nash, but in others, Nash looks around 2 or even 3 inches taller than them.
My guess is footwear, and proximity to the camera, and the angle the shot (or video) is taken at.
Cowboy boots can add a around 1 to 1.5 inches.
There may only be a 3" difference with say Nash and UT barefoot, but the difference can seem greater of less depending on footwear and camera placement.
There are videos and images of Sid, looking the same height as Nash, and UT looking the same height as Nash, but in others, Nash looks around 2 or even 3 inches taller than them.
My guess is footwear, and proximity to the camera, and the angle the shot (or video) is taken at.
JT said on 28/Sep/07
Sid has cowboy boots on in that video, Cantstop25, so he's probably around 6'9" in the boots.
Sid has cowboy boots on in that video, Cantstop25, so he's probably around 6'9" in the boots.
cantstop25 said on 26/Sep/07
thats a good point supermanfan
thats a good point supermanfan
Supermanfan380 said on 24/Sep/07
cantstop25, I notice that, but I also mentioned that Morgan looks closer to the camera too.
You cannot see either of their footwear as the pic is only from the waist up, but like you said, it is probably regular shoes.
Most of the pictures used here are not any good for establishing height within any less than a 1" increment, and even then can easily be flawed with one person being closer to the camera, or one person leaning more than another etc…
Like I have mentioned twice, we will not know for sure if any of these guys have 1” on the other unless they are measured barefoot, with their back to a wall, at the same time. I would be fine with all Morgan, Nash, and Jones all being listed at 6’10”.
It is not like I am going to argue with Matt Morgan about 1” anyway. Even if by midnight he is only 6'9" he may wake up at 8:00 am at full 6'11", given his frame size anyway.
cantstop25, I notice that, but I also mentioned that Morgan looks closer to the camera too.
You cannot see either of their footwear as the pic is only from the waist up, but like you said, it is probably regular shoes.
Most of the pictures used here are not any good for establishing height within any less than a 1" increment, and even then can easily be flawed with one person being closer to the camera, or one person leaning more than another etc…
Like I have mentioned twice, we will not know for sure if any of these guys have 1” on the other unless they are measured barefoot, with their back to a wall, at the same time. I would be fine with all Morgan, Nash, and Jones all being listed at 6’10”.
It is not like I am going to argue with Matt Morgan about 1” anyway. Even if by midnight he is only 6'9" he may wake up at 8:00 am at full 6'11", given his frame size anyway.
cantstop25 said on 23/Sep/07
supermanfan in the second pic you say they are the same exact height but morgans hair makes it seem that way, bu actually morgans hair makes him look taller, if you measure the tops of their heads youll see what I mean. as for skeptical footwear, they are both probably weraing sneakers there. you cant see morgans boots but nathans look pretty big in that pic
supermanfan in the second pic you say they are the same exact height but morgans hair makes it seem that way, bu actually morgans hair makes him look taller, if you measure the tops of their heads youll see what I mean. as for skeptical footwear, they are both probably weraing sneakers there. you cant see morgans boots but nathans look pretty big in that pic
Supermanfan380 said on 23/Sep/07
Vegas, ok I see what you mean about having to level the pic. Thing is, Morgan still looks closer to the camera, and Jones appears the same height, even though he is bald, and Morgan’s hair is spiked up.
That is why I still figure Jones to have an inch on Morgan. I just think that based on the pics, Jones and Nash both have a pinch on Morgan.
However, I would not be shocked at all if Nash, Morgan, and Jones were all measured barefoot and really did come out at the same exact height.
We have never seen, a picture of all 3 of them together, at the same distance, barefoot, standing strait as possible, with their backs to a wall, with a certified height measure, then it would be settled.
That likely is not going to happen, as all these guys could really care less about proving who has a half inch on so and so.
so all the conjecture we put it to is ultimately moot, and the pictures we try to use to prove points are all flawed too, as they are not in the situation described above, or are second hand verbal accounts.
We end up with a so and so, is such to so and so, etc… But at the end of the day we really have no proof these guys are shorter than they themselves say, unless we find a pic showing them to be grossly shorter than claimed.
Morgan once said in an interview, during his Tough Enough interview for season 2, when asked his height, replied “I am about 6-9 or 6-10”, and his Bball team listed him at 6’10”.
Nash has said often that he is 6’10” and so was listed playing ball as well.
Jones has never said anything other than 6’10” or 6’11”, and the WSM listed him at 6’10” as well.
Vegas, ok I see what you mean about having to level the pic. Thing is, Morgan still looks closer to the camera, and Jones appears the same height, even though he is bald, and Morgan’s hair is spiked up.
That is why I still figure Jones to have an inch on Morgan. I just think that based on the pics, Jones and Nash both have a pinch on Morgan.
However, I would not be shocked at all if Nash, Morgan, and Jones were all measured barefoot and really did come out at the same exact height.
We have never seen, a picture of all 3 of them together, at the same distance, barefoot, standing strait as possible, with their backs to a wall, with a certified height measure, then it would be settled.
That likely is not going to happen, as all these guys could really care less about proving who has a half inch on so and so.
so all the conjecture we put it to is ultimately moot, and the pictures we try to use to prove points are all flawed too, as they are not in the situation described above, or are second hand verbal accounts.
We end up with a so and so, is such to so and so, etc… But at the end of the day we really have no proof these guys are shorter than they themselves say, unless we find a pic showing them to be grossly shorter than claimed.
Morgan once said in an interview, during his Tough Enough interview for season 2, when asked his height, replied “I am about 6-9 or 6-10”, and his Bball team listed him at 6’10”.
Nash has said often that he is 6’10” and so was listed playing ball as well.
Jones has never said anything other than 6’10” or 6’11”, and the WSM listed him at 6’10” as well.
Vegas said on 23/Sep/07
second picture is level, i had to rotate it a few degrees to level it up, the background pictures with "4400" are completely level now (they were not in the original pic)
second picture is level, i had to rotate it a few degrees to level it up, the background pictures with "4400" are completely level now (they were not in the original pic)
Supermanfan380 said on 22/Sep/07
I said 1” OR 2”. It may only be 1.
Could easily be only one inch, but Matt’s footwear always looked suspect to me.
Even if I am incorrect on that, and both of them had flats on, Matt had hair, while Jones was bald, and for them to still look the same height, in that case, Jones would have to be a solid 1” taller.
The second picture you posted, is tilted at an angle, easily noticeable, Matt is closer to the camera, and they both still look the same height. To me Jones always looks around an inch taller.
I see both Jones and Nash as about 6’10”, and Morgan about 6’9”, but maybe he was 6’10”, Either way they are all in the same class of height.
I said 1” OR 2”. It may only be 1.
Could easily be only one inch, but Matt’s footwear always looked suspect to me.
Even if I am incorrect on that, and both of them had flats on, Matt had hair, while Jones was bald, and for them to still look the same height, in that case, Jones would have to be a solid 1” taller.
The second picture you posted, is tilted at an angle, easily noticeable, Matt is closer to the camera, and they both still look the same height. To me Jones always looks around an inch taller.
I see both Jones and Nash as about 6’10”, and Morgan about 6’9”, but maybe he was 6’10”, Either way they are all in the same class of height.
Vegas said on 22/Sep/07
Supermanfan380; morgan and nash both played center in basketball, BOTH were listed at 6'10, so there is a very very strong chance that both are the exact same height.
As for Nathan Jones being up to 2" taller than Morgan Click Here and Click Here
Supermanfan380; morgan and nash both played center in basketball, BOTH were listed at 6'10, so there is a very very strong chance that both are the exact same height.
As for Nathan Jones being up to 2" taller than Morgan Click Here and Click Here
Mr. E said on 19/Sep/07
JT, good pic, but what are we calling Christian? I've heard 6'1" and Morgan did have some thick looking soles on the boots...
JT, good pic, but what are we calling Christian? I've heard 6'1" and Morgan did have some thick looking soles on the boots...
ben said on 18/Sep/07
ive got a cardboard cut out stand up thing of nash from 1994, just dug it out and its 7'1
ive got a cardboard cut out stand up thing of nash from 1994, just dug it out and its 7'1
Alex said on 17/Sep/07
Nash looks at least 6'9 with 5'6 Dave.
Nash looks at least 6'9 with 5'6 Dave.
cantstop25 said on 17/Sep/07
in that picture there is atleast 9 inches between morgan and cage, we still have no proof that morgan is shorter then nash. and normally staredown are not good for judgeing height when one is so much taller then the other. Side by side is better and morgan towered over samoa joe whos 5'11"(?)
in that picture there is atleast 9 inches between morgan and cage, we still have no proof that morgan is shorter then nash. and normally staredown are not good for judgeing height when one is so much taller then the other. Side by side is better and morgan towered over samoa joe whos 5'11"(?)
Dave said on 17/Sep/07
Morgan is a solid inch shorter than nash
Morgan is a solid inch shorter than nash
Mr. E said on 15/Sep/07
So far it looks like Nash has Matt Morgan by an inch. I noticed that they bill Morgan as a 7 footer on TNA. Is Morgan 6'9"? Is 6'9" close enough to 7 foot to exaggerate? In the staredown with Christian (whom they call 6'1") Morgan wasn't close to having 11 inches.
So far it looks like Nash has Matt Morgan by an inch. I noticed that they bill Morgan as a 7 footer on TNA. Is Morgan 6'9"? Is 6'9" close enough to 7 foot to exaggerate? In the staredown with Christian (whom they call 6'1") Morgan wasn't close to having 11 inches.
Ben said on 14/Sep/07
I only borrowed the shoot off someone so sorry cant download, i met the undertaker and had a photo taken with him, would have been a great height comparison, but i was 18 and i actually stooped so my friends would think he was taller! stupid me, im slightly over 6,1 and ive got a phot of me with al snow both wearing similar shoes and i was suprised he was the exact same height as me, and i do mean "EXACT".
I only borrowed the shoot off someone so sorry cant download, i met the undertaker and had a photo taken with him, would have been a great height comparison, but i was 18 and i actually stooped so my friends would think he was taller! stupid me, im slightly over 6,1 and ive got a phot of me with al snow both wearing similar shoes and i was suprised he was the exact same height as me, and i do mean "EXACT".
Anonymous said on 13/Sep/07
Click Here
This is a pic of a guy called 'Dave Miller' and kevin nash taken in 2005, his website is Click Here
I asked him in an email about his height, and he told me he was 5'6 barefoot, he unfortunatley could not remember the exact size of nash's footwear but he said they were very normal trainers. Nash is not fully straight in this pic, and i know its not the best pic ever for judging his height... but still, opinions anyone?
As you all know this is a recent pic of nash, and i believe hes about 6'9.5 nowadays and that hes lost anything up to an inch... but a 6'10 peak is very believable.... and for such a tall guy who was so heavy at times, i think a half inch loss of height at age 50 is believable for sure.
I claim 6'10 still.... but he could be 6'9.5 in this recent pic
Click Here
This is a pic of a guy called 'Dave Miller' and kevin nash taken in 2005, his website is Click Here
I asked him in an email about his height, and he told me he was 5'6 barefoot, he unfortunatley could not remember the exact size of nash's footwear but he said they were very normal trainers. Nash is not fully straight in this pic, and i know its not the best pic ever for judging his height... but still, opinions anyone?
As you all know this is a recent pic of nash, and i believe hes about 6'9.5 nowadays and that hes lost anything up to an inch... but a 6'10 peak is very believable.... and for such a tall guy who was so heavy at times, i think a half inch loss of height at age 50 is believable for sure.
I claim 6'10 still.... but he could be 6'9.5 in this recent pic
Jason said on 13/Sep/07
Yeah, but the police take your mug shot and height in shoes. The WWF would (most likely) have given him more than 6'7'' if he were a legit 6'6''.
Yeah, but the police take your mug shot and height in shoes. The WWF would (most likely) have given him more than 6'7'' if he were a legit 6'6''.
Danimal said on 13/Sep/07
I agree with Vegas.
I agree with Vegas.
Vegas said on 13/Sep/07
i never remember Spivey being listed at 6'5. He was arrested a few months ago and his arrest sheet clearly said 6'6, he was also taller than 6'5 HBJ and Bill Fralic; even if Spivey is just 6'5, Nash still has him by 4" minimum in that video; 6'9 is minimum for Nash at this stage with all the evidence we have..
i never remember Spivey being listed at 6'5. He was arrested a few months ago and his arrest sheet clearly said 6'6, he was also taller than 6'5 HBJ and Bill Fralic; even if Spivey is just 6'5, Nash still has him by 4" minimum in that video; 6'9 is minimum for Nash at this stage with all the evidence we have..
cantstop25 said on 13/Sep/07
ben do you think you could load this interview?
ben do you think you could load this interview?
Jason said on 12/Sep/07
RE: Spivey
Ok, we'll just conveniently forget the 6-5 listing. ;)
RE: Spivey
Ok, we'll just conveniently forget the 6-5 listing. ;)
Jason said on 12/Sep/07
These guys are so having people on it isn't funny. Two heights in the one interview? I've read the transcript before, he also says how he couldn't believe HBK's voice came out of a guy who was ''6'1 1/2'' when he first met him. 6'1 1/2'' isn't large enough to have a deep voice like that? HBK 6'1 1/2''? Himself 6'10'' and 6'11''? Man, gimme a break... lol
These guys are so having people on it isn't funny. Two heights in the one interview? I've read the transcript before, he also says how he couldn't believe HBK's voice came out of a guy who was ''6'1 1/2'' when he first met him. 6'1 1/2'' isn't large enough to have a deep voice like that? HBK 6'1 1/2''? Himself 6'10'' and 6'11''? Man, gimme a break... lol
Ben said on 12/Sep/07
Ive just watched the new Kevin Nash shoot interview (Its very good) and he refers to himself as 6'10 twice and 6'11 once..... I met him in 94 and he was huge, his legs were so long.
In the interview he says hbk is 6'1 or 6'2. ive stood next to hbk and im just over 6'1, he was wearing cowboy boots and i was still taller then him, hbk was heavier then he looked on tv though. And his mullet was a thing of true beauty!
Ive just watched the new Kevin Nash shoot interview (Its very good) and he refers to himself as 6'10 twice and 6'11 once..... I met him in 94 and he was huge, his legs were so long.
In the interview he says hbk is 6'1 or 6'2. ive stood next to hbk and im just over 6'1, he was wearing cowboy boots and i was still taller then him, hbk was heavier then he looked on tv though. And his mullet was a thing of true beauty!
Vegas said on 10/Sep/07
nash had closer to 3" on Sid circa 1994-95 Click Here
Sid was actually slightly shorter than taker Click Here and Click Here
nash was more 2.5" taller than Undertaker Click Here looks 4" taller here but Nash is slightly closer to the camera Click Here
Here is Nash towering 5-6" over a big cowboy booted Hulk Hogan
nash had closer to 3" on Sid circa 1994-95 Click Here
Sid was actually slightly shorter than taker Click Here and Click Here
nash was more 2.5" taller than Undertaker Click Here looks 4" taller here but Nash is slightly closer to the camera Click Here
Here is Nash towering 5-6" over a big cowboy booted Hulk Hogan
nova said on 10/Sep/07
Nash was 6'10 peak. He had at very most 2 inches on Sid Eudy who looks more 6'8 than 6'7. Sid was just slightly taller than Undertaker but Nash only looks to have 2 inches on Taker as well.
Nash was 6'10 peak. He had at very most 2 inches on Sid Eudy who looks more 6'8 than 6'7. Sid was just slightly taller than Undertaker but Nash only looks to have 2 inches on Taker as well.
Supermanfan380 said on 7/Sep/07
He has got to be 6'9" or 6'10", no shorter.
Lawrence Taylor is listed at 6'3", and when you see them together Nash towers of Taylor.
Granted Nash may have had thick boots that made him 1" or tops 2" taller than regular foot ware would have, but he would still have 6" on Taylor barefoot minimum.
I would not argue with him being 6'10".
He has got to be 6'9" or 6'10", no shorter.
Lawrence Taylor is listed at 6'3", and when you see them together Nash towers of Taylor.
Granted Nash may have had thick boots that made him 1" or tops 2" taller than regular foot ware would have, but he would still have 6" on Taylor barefoot minimum.
I would not argue with him being 6'10".
Danimal said on 5/Sep/07
Hogan was not less than 6'5" in his younger days. In that case, Spivey was 6'6".
Hogan was not less than 6'5" in his younger days. In that case, Spivey was 6'6".
JT said on 4/Sep/07
Danimal, if Spivey is 6'5", Fralic and Hillbilly Jim (and Hogan) are 6'4". Click Here Spivey has about the same height advantage over Fralic as John Studd did. Jim has also adopted his usual military posture to look as tall as possible. Go post us a full-body, side by side pic of Hogan being taller than Jim when both are in comparable boots.
Danimal, if Spivey is 6'5", Fralic and Hillbilly Jim (and Hogan) are 6'4". Click Here Spivey has about the same height advantage over Fralic as John Studd did. Jim has also adopted his usual military posture to look as tall as possible. Go post us a full-body, side by side pic of Hogan being taller than Jim when both are in comparable boots.
Danimal said on 4/Sep/07
JT says on 31/Aug/07
Click Here If you saw the video of the two at this awards banquet, Kareem was no more than 4 inches taller. That’s why McMahon referred to Kareem was being 7’4” (at least a 2 inch exaggeration).
Here’s Nash with 6’6” Dan Spivey (Click Here), who was not much shorter than Taker in the WCW days.
Do NOT use the word "IS" when describing someone's height as if you have established that to be his actual and official height. You are just guessing Spivey's height LT. Hilbilly was the same exact height as Spivey on Hilbilly's site and we ALL know that Hogan was taller than Hilbilly during those years (1985-1989). Spivey has been listed from 6'5"-6'7".
JT says on 31/Aug/07
Click Here If you saw the video of the two at this awards banquet, Kareem was no more than 4 inches taller. That’s why McMahon referred to Kareem was being 7’4” (at least a 2 inch exaggeration).
Here’s Nash with 6’6” Dan Spivey (Click Here), who was not much shorter than Taker in the WCW days.
Do NOT use the word "IS" when describing someone's height as if you have established that to be his actual and official height. You are just guessing Spivey's height LT. Hilbilly was the same exact height as Spivey on Hilbilly's site and we ALL know that Hogan was taller than Hilbilly during those years (1985-1989). Spivey has been listed from 6'5"-6'7".
Frank said on 3/Sep/07
JT. Your right i had that video on Tape and there was about a 4 inch difference topps
JT. Your right i had that video on Tape and there was about a 4 inch difference topps
Dave said on 3/Sep/07
Okay, maybe there is 4 inches.... but doesnt this give further proof to the claim that nash is a legit 6'10?
Okay, maybe there is 4 inches.... but doesnt this give further proof to the claim that nash is a legit 6'10?
JT said on 2/Sep/07
Nash is closer to the camera in the pic that I posted of him and Kareem (just compare the head sizes). As Frank said, there was about a 4 inch difference if you saw the actual video of the event.
Nash is closer to the camera in the pic that I posted of him and Kareem (just compare the head sizes). As Frank said, there was about a 4 inch difference if you saw the actual video of the event.
Dave said on 2/Sep/07
btw, look at reds pic below... further proof of nash's 6'10 height...
If nash is 6'9 or under, the undertaker couldnt, COULDNT be over 6'6. (and that pic was in his prime, when we all know he was at the very least 6'7.5.
Nash needs to be 6'10 here, editor rob? would you take a look at the pics and tell me if im wrong? thanks
btw, look at reds pic below... further proof of nash's 6'10 height...
If nash is 6'9 or under, the undertaker couldnt, COULDNT be over 6'6. (and that pic was in his prime, when we all know he was at the very least 6'7.5.
Nash needs to be 6'10 here, editor rob? would you take a look at the pics and tell me if im wrong? thanks
DS650 said on 2/Sep/07
NASH is 6'10".
NASH is 6'10".
Dave said on 2/Sep/07
btw, @ Frank.... i dont know what planet you are on, because there is NO way 4 inches difference there, besides nash is clearly leaning and not standing straight, i see a 3 inch difference, MAX (if they both stood straight)... Imagine nash was 6 feet tall in that pic, theres no way that a 6'4 guy looks that small beside a 6' guy, IMHO
btw, @ Frank.... i dont know what planet you are on, because there is NO way 4 inches difference there, besides nash is clearly leaning and not standing straight, i see a 3 inch difference, MAX (if they both stood straight)... Imagine nash was 6 feet tall in that pic, theres no way that a 6'4 guy looks that small beside a 6' guy, IMHO
Dave said on 2/Sep/07
@ JT
GREAT picture.... i think this pretty much proves nash's height.....
Look at the taker thread, scroll down a little and look at the pics of spivey with taker, spivey was 6'6-6'7 and was only a tad shorter than taker back in the day.... nash simply towers over him here, by quite a few inches, and even if hes wearing lifts for once open your eyes people, this man is a LEGIT 6'10....
ROB: look at JT's pic, spivey is a man we can all agree is 6'6. On the evidence of all of his old pics with taker (when he was taller than he is now).... and now take a look at this pic of nash with spivey.... hes AT LEAST 4 inches taller, almost more.... he needs to be upgraded to 6'10. because NO WHERE on this page have i see any evidence whatsoever to suggest hes under 6'10.... hes one of those guys who really lived up to his billed height. Even if he was wearing lifts, they are certainly not more than 2 inches, otherwise they would be un-wrestleable. Also, whose to say spivey wasnt wearing large lifts either?, its just as likely as nash wearing them.
I vote for a 6'10 nash, its really obvious hes this height, theres no proof whatsover of a lower height.
@ JT
GREAT picture.... i think this pretty much proves nash's height.....
Look at the taker thread, scroll down a little and look at the pics of spivey with taker, spivey was 6'6-6'7 and was only a tad shorter than taker back in the day.... nash simply towers over him here, by quite a few inches, and even if hes wearing lifts for once open your eyes people, this man is a LEGIT 6'10....
ROB: look at JT's pic, spivey is a man we can all agree is 6'6. On the evidence of all of his old pics with taker (when he was taller than he is now).... and now take a look at this pic of nash with spivey.... hes AT LEAST 4 inches taller, almost more.... he needs to be upgraded to 6'10. because NO WHERE on this page have i see any evidence whatsoever to suggest hes under 6'10.... hes one of those guys who really lived up to his billed height. Even if he was wearing lifts, they are certainly not more than 2 inches, otherwise they would be un-wrestleable. Also, whose to say spivey wasnt wearing large lifts either?, its just as likely as nash wearing them.
I vote for a 6'10 nash, its really obvious hes this height, theres no proof whatsover of a lower height.
Frank said on 1/Sep/07
Kareem had about 4 inches on Nash
Kareem had about 4 inches on Nash
mike m said on 1/Sep/07
kareem has what 2 inches, maybe 3 on nash
kareem has what 2 inches, maybe 3 on nash
JT said on 31/Aug/07
Click Here If you saw the video of the two at this awards banquet, Kareem was no more than 4 inches taller. That’s why McMahon referred to Kareem was being 7’4” (at least a 2 inch exaggeration).
Here’s Nash with 6’6” Dan Spivey (Click Here), who was not much shorter than Taker in the WCW days.
Click Here If you saw the video of the two at this awards banquet, Kareem was no more than 4 inches taller. That’s why McMahon referred to Kareem was being 7’4” (at least a 2 inch exaggeration).
Here’s Nash with 6’6” Dan Spivey (Click Here), who was not much shorter than Taker in the WCW days.
mike m said on 30/Aug/07
morgan is not taller than nash,he might just be about the same height ,but i can guantee he,s not any taller. my estimates nash 6'10",morgan,6'8",nathan jones 6'8",taker 6'7.5",kane 6'8",big show 6'11".
morgan is not taller than nash,he might just be about the same height ,but i can guantee he,s not any taller. my estimates nash 6'10",morgan,6'8",nathan jones 6'8",taker 6'7.5",kane 6'8",big show 6'11".
cantstop25 said on 30/Aug/07
"and to be honest, morgan is at least an inch shorter than nash, maybe more."
proof? big show may have shrunk over the years, but when he and morgan squared off they were nearly eye to eye, I cant say the same for nash(though like I mentioned big show was clearly taller as the giant in wcw)
"and to be honest, morgan is at least an inch shorter than nash, maybe more."
proof? big show may have shrunk over the years, but when he and morgan squared off they were nearly eye to eye, I cant say the same for nash(though like I mentioned big show was clearly taller as the giant in wcw)
Danimal said on 30/Aug/07
Scott Hall was billed at 6'9" before having made his debut in the WWF. When he arrived in the WWF, they billed him at 6'8" (same billed height as Hogan back then) and he really was the same height as Hogan (both legite 6'5" men). As Scott Hall in WCW, he was billed down to 6'7" (same as Hogan again).
Scott Hall was billed at 6'9" before having made his debut in the WWF. When he arrived in the WWF, they billed him at 6'8" (same billed height as Hogan back then) and he really was the same height as Hogan (both legite 6'5" men). As Scott Hall in WCW, he was billed down to 6'7" (same as Hogan again).
Dave said on 30/Aug/07
Click Here
This is nash beside a legit 5'11 michaels.... as i have met nash, asked him and stood toe to toe with him, im certain hes 6'10 flat.... he says it himself.... and to be honest, morgan is at least an inch shorter than nash, maybe more.
I think saying nash is ANYTHING shorter than 6'9.5 is simply wrong, hes a legit guy, and one of the few big men who really looked his billing (when he was called 6'10)...
Click Here
This is nash beside a legit 5'11 michaels.... as i have met nash, asked him and stood toe to toe with him, im certain hes 6'10 flat.... he says it himself.... and to be honest, morgan is at least an inch shorter than nash, maybe more.
I think saying nash is ANYTHING shorter than 6'9.5 is simply wrong, hes a legit guy, and one of the few big men who really looked his billing (when he was called 6'10)...
cantstop25 said on 29/Aug/07
I Dunno its seems Morgan towers over guys like jb and kurt much more then Nash does. Of course hes executing great posture now, unlike when he was in wwe
I Dunno its seems Morgan towers over guys like jb and kurt much more then Nash does. Of course hes executing great posture now, unlike when he was in wwe
mike m said on 27/Aug/07
i think imo that nash would have an inch to 2 inches on morgan,morgan to me only looks 6'8" maybe 6'9".
i think imo that nash would have an inch to 2 inches on morgan,morgan to me only looks 6'8" maybe 6'9".
cantstop25 said on 24/Aug/07
Matt Morgan and Kevin Nash were both in the ring together last thursday, but due to angles adn them being on different sides of the ring, there was no good height comparisons :/
Matt Morgan and Kevin Nash were both in the ring together last thursday, but due to angles adn them being on different sides of the ring, there was no good height comparisons :/
anonymous said on 21/Aug/07
So Scott hall would be 6'5 barefoot right? He does look a tiny bit taller than Hogan in the WCW/NWO days.
So Scott hall would be 6'5 barefoot right? He does look a tiny bit taller than Hogan in the WCW/NWO days.
Supermanfan380 said on 20/Aug/07
JT, that is a pretty good pic comparing Jones and Nash. I always figured they were about the same height.
Jones is leaning in just a bit more in the pic, and he is bald, but you can tell he and Nash are both in the 6'10" range.
JT, that is a pretty good pic comparing Jones and Nash. I always figured they were about the same height.
Jones is leaning in just a bit more in the pic, and he is bald, but you can tell he and Nash are both in the 6'10" range.
Estimation said on 16/Aug/07
WWF Days: Hulk Hogan (195 to 196 cm)
Scott Hall (195 to 196 cm)
WCW Days: Hogan -(194 to 195 cm)
Scott Hall - (195 to 196 cm).
WWF Days: Hulk Hogan (195 to 196 cm)
Scott Hall (195 to 196 cm)
WCW Days: Hogan -(194 to 195 cm)
Scott Hall - (195 to 196 cm).
Dave said on 14/Aug/07
agreed, if hall stands tall hes a pretty big guy, id say a legit 6'5 back in the day.... his body language, posture, movements and stance always made him appear shorter.... scott is a big tall guy when straight, one of the guys very close to his billed height.
agreed, if hall stands tall hes a pretty big guy, id say a legit 6'5 back in the day.... his body language, posture, movements and stance always made him appear shorter.... scott is a big tall guy when straight, one of the guys very close to his billed height.
JT said on 13/Aug/07
Here's Hall looking about 9 inches taller than 5'8" Mean Gene, or around 6'5" Click Here To me, Hall always looked a shade taller than Hogan in the WCW days. Anonymous, Hall had strange body language in the ring, which sometimes made him appear shorter. I doubt he's lost much height.
Here's Hall looking about 9 inches taller than 5'8" Mean Gene, or around 6'5" Click Here To me, Hall always looked a shade taller than Hogan in the WCW days. Anonymous, Hall had strange body language in the ring, which sometimes made him appear shorter. I doubt he's lost much height.
anonymous said on 12/Aug/07
does anyone know if Scott Hall grew shorter? He was around 6'5 i think as Razor Ramone in WWF and Scott hall as Nwo member. But when he came back with Hogan and Nash in 2002, he looked noticeabler shorter.
does anyone know if Scott Hall grew shorter? He was around 6'5 i think as Razor Ramone in WWF and Scott hall as Nwo member. But when he came back with Hogan and Nash in 2002, he looked noticeabler shorter.
Vegas said on 25/Jul/07
The atlanta paper claimed gonzales was 400lb when he was drafted in 1988. I don't know where the 325lb thing came from because at that weight he would have been lighter than shaq and yao ming!!
The atlanta paper claimed gonzales was 400lb when he was drafted in 1988. I don't know where the 325lb thing came from because at that weight he would have been lighter than shaq and yao ming!!
JT said on 25/Jul/07
This might surprise a few here (Click Here). This also rules out Gonzalez being around 325 lbs. given how much larger he is than Nash. He looks closer to 400 lbs. Here’s Gonzalez with Taker Click Here
This might surprise a few here (Click Here). This also rules out Gonzalez being around 325 lbs. given how much larger he is than Nash. He looks closer to 400 lbs. Here’s Gonzalez with Taker Click Here
Alex said on 24/Jul/07
Reggie Jordan is probably 6'2.5-6'3 and listed at 6'4.
Reggie Jordan is probably 6'2.5-6'3 and listed at 6'4.
anonymous said on 23/Jul/07
how much a difference in height would you say vegas? i,d say imo 7-8 inches.
how much a difference in height would you say vegas? i,d say imo 7-8 inches.
Vegas said on 23/Jul/07
found this on nash's website Click Here the guy next to nash is reggie jordan (i think??). Jordan is listed at 6'4 by the NBA.
found this on nash's website Click Here the guy next to nash is reggie jordan (i think??). Jordan is listed at 6'4 by the NBA.
Vegas said on 23/Jul/07
a great pic of nash and 7'6 jorge gonzales that Chris Owens posted earlier Click Here
a great pic of nash and 7'6 jorge gonzales that Chris Owens posted earlier Click Here
JT said on 18/Jul/07
Click Here Gene is around 5’8”. It looks like around a 13-14 inch height difference.
Click Here Gene is around 5’8”. It looks like around a 13-14 inch height difference.
LV said on 17/Jul/07
Mattiew, 6'11" was likely in shoes. I feel Nash was a legit 6'9.5" to 6'10" barefoot.
Mattiew, 6'11" was likely in shoes. I feel Nash was a legit 6'9.5" to 6'10" barefoot.
Mattiew said on 17/Jul/07
I'll retrieve those pics soon. I'll send them to Editor Rob .
Btw I was measured at 180cm (around 5'10"3/4) lesser than a month before and it was in 1995 when I was 15 . I'll try to go to my parents to find those old pics tomorrow and upload them soon .
I didn't know if I had mentionned it but I asked him and I answered 6'11
Also one of my father's good friends was the director of the Tenessee high school where Nash used to play basket and he told us Nash was measured at 6'11 back then .
I'll retrieve those pics soon. I'll send them to Editor Rob .
Btw I was measured at 180cm (around 5'10"3/4) lesser than a month before and it was in 1995 when I was 15 . I'll try to go to my parents to find those old pics tomorrow and upload them soon .
I didn't know if I had mentionned it but I asked him and I answered 6'11
Also one of my father's good friends was the director of the Tenessee high school where Nash used to play basket and he told us Nash was measured at 6'11 back then .
mike m said on 13/Jul/07
nash looks 4 inches shorter than dalip singh rana.nash 6'10",dalip 7'2" just as he stated on conan o brien.godsey i,d say 3 inches shorter than nash, 7 inches shorter than dalip,godey 6'7"legit.stone cold 6 inches shorter than godsey ,stone cold a legit 6'1" imo.nash appeared to be 3 inches shorter than wcw giant aka (big show).
nash looks 4 inches shorter than dalip singh rana.nash 6'10",dalip 7'2" just as he stated on conan o brien.godsey i,d say 3 inches shorter than nash, 7 inches shorter than dalip,godey 6'7"legit.stone cold 6 inches shorter than godsey ,stone cold a legit 6'1" imo.nash appeared to be 3 inches shorter than wcw giant aka (big show).
Thorgrim said on 12/Jul/07
mattiew, could you maybe post these pics?.... and yes i agree, he has the body of a 6'4-5 guy, but those legs are like 5 inches longer than they should be! hehe... and his head is huge.
I would really like to see gim beside a 5'11 guy.... because i am much taller.
In m opinion i think hes 6'9 bare minimum, i personally think he had a 6'10 peak.
mattiew, could you maybe post these pics?.... and yes i agree, he has the body of a 6'4-5 guy, but those legs are like 5 inches longer than they should be! hehe... and his head is huge.
I would really like to see gim beside a 5'11 guy.... because i am much taller.
In m opinion i think hes 6'9 bare minimum, i personally think he had a 6'10 peak.
Mattiew said on 12/Jul/07
By the way about John Tenta, he his measured at 198CM barefoot at the eve of his sumo career, wich is precisely 6'5.95" so rather 6'6 than 6'5
Plus about his weight 432 could very well be 450 or 465 some years later for it's like gaining/losing 10lbs for a "normal" people .
Nevertheless I remember the soil of Earthquake's boots seemed much thinner than casual wrestling boots so maybe the other wrestlers ( like Hogan ) appeared taller when standing next to him, and he surely didn't have any lifts (pointless because he didn't even have the thick soiled boots to gain an extra inch or two)
Two bad we haven't pics of Tenta with Taker and Nash, I think it would pretty much end the debate about their height.
By the way about John Tenta, he his measured at 198CM barefoot at the eve of his sumo career, wich is precisely 6'5.95" so rather 6'6 than 6'5
Plus about his weight 432 could very well be 450 or 465 some years later for it's like gaining/losing 10lbs for a "normal" people .
Nevertheless I remember the soil of Earthquake's boots seemed much thinner than casual wrestling boots so maybe the other wrestlers ( like Hogan ) appeared taller when standing next to him, and he surely didn't have any lifts (pointless because he didn't even have the thick soiled boots to gain an extra inch or two)
Two bad we haven't pics of Tenta with Taker and Nash, I think it would pretty much end the debate about their height.
Mattiew said on 12/Jul/07
"Hes one of the men who really seemed as tall as me. But i still have a bit on him. Btw, this man has huge legs, ive never seen legs so long in my life"
This is amusing because I thougt extactly the same when I met him.
Two things popped out in my spirit : he had "small" feet for such a tall man and his legs were endless ...
On the pics I have with him his belt his almost at my shoulders level ( and I were 5'11 back then)
I remember some grand ma recognized him and asked him a pic. The old woman was about 5'2/5'3 and Nash was still taller after kneeling to hold her and take the pose ...Jeez...
"Hes one of the men who really seemed as tall as me. But i still have a bit on him. Btw, this man has huge legs, ive never seen legs so long in my life"
This is amusing because I thougt extactly the same when I met him.
Two things popped out in my spirit : he had "small" feet for such a tall man and his legs were endless ...
On the pics I have with him his belt his almost at my shoulders level ( and I were 5'11 back then)
I remember some grand ma recognized him and asked him a pic. The old woman was about 5'2/5'3 and Nash was still taller after kneeling to hold her and take the pose ...Jeez...
LV said on 11/Jul/07
We've been over this before Viper, Godsey was listed at 6'8" and 6'9" in high school and 6'7" by the NFL, one 6'6" listing means nothing. I'll believe the NFL's measurements over anyone else. It seems you'll never believe an NFL measurement just because of your opinion on Shawne Merriman. Regardless, it doesn't matter, Magic Johnson and Oliver Miller are 6'7" or 6'7.5" and Nash was significantly taller than both of them.
We've been over this before Viper, Godsey was listed at 6'8" and 6'9" in high school and 6'7" by the NFL, one 6'6" listing means nothing. I'll believe the NFL's measurements over anyone else. It seems you'll never believe an NFL measurement just because of your opinion on Shawne Merriman. Regardless, it doesn't matter, Magic Johnson and Oliver Miller are 6'7" or 6'7.5" and Nash was significantly taller than both of them.
Frank said on 11/Jul/07
No Mike i had it on a VHS tape
No Mike i had it on a VHS tape
mike m said on 11/Jul/07
frank do you have that pic?
frank do you have that pic?
Vegas said on 11/Jul/07
interestingly Brennan Curtin was listed at just 6'7 by Notre Dame in that last link i posted and he was measured at 6'9 1/8" at the NFL combine
interestingly Brennan Curtin was listed at just 6'7 by Notre Dame in that last link i posted and he was measured at 6'9 1/8" at the NFL combine
Vegas said on 11/Jul/07
there are quite a lot of 6'8 listings for Godsey out there including Click Here and Click Here and Click Here I don't see him at 6'8 though, seems to tall.
Notre Dame's offical website has him listed him at 6'7 Click Here and Click Here
there are quite a lot of 6'8 listings for Godsey out there including Click Here and Click Here and Click Here I don't see him at 6'8 though, seems to tall.
Notre Dame's offical website has him listed him at 6'7 Click Here and Click Here
Viper said on 10/Jul/07
I dont see any place that has Godsey measured at 6-7. I see 6-7 listings but nothing specific about being measured at 6-7. He was listed at 6-6 in college. The odds of Godsey gaining an inch to 6-7 just in time for the combine is pretty slim.
I dont see any place that has Godsey measured at 6-7. I see 6-7 listings but nothing specific about being measured at 6-7. He was listed at 6-6 in college. The odds of Godsey gaining an inch to 6-7 just in time for the combine is pretty slim.
Frank said on 9/Jul/07
Yes Mike M I seen a clip on TV and Kareem was about 4 inches taller
Yes Mike M I seen a clip on TV and Kareem was about 4 inches taller
mike m said on 8/Jul/07
was nash 3 or 4 inches shorter than kareem abdul jabar?
was nash 3 or 4 inches shorter than kareem abdul jabar?
LV said on 7/Jul/07
We're in agreement here JT. Godsey was measured at 6'7" at the NFL Combine and Nash is at least a solid 2.5" taller.
We're in agreement here JT. Godsey was measured at 6'7" at the NFL Combine and Nash is at least a solid 2.5" taller.
JT said on 7/Jul/07
Gary Godsey is in the 6’6” to 6’7” range (Click Here). Singh is closer to the camera than both Nash and Austin. Nash looks to have around 3 inches on Godsey, which would make him 6’9” minimum as of 2006.
Gary Godsey is in the 6’6” to 6’7” range (Click Here). Singh is closer to the camera than both Nash and Austin. Nash looks to have around 3 inches on Godsey, which would make him 6’9” minimum as of 2006.
Duhon said on 25/Jun/07
Magic is 6'7" at the shortest, 6'7".5 is more likely. nba heights aren't just randomly exagerated their based on shoes width. 6'7.5"-6'8" is reasonable for a 6'9" listing in 1-1.5 inch shoes.
Magic is 6'7" at the shortest, 6'7".5 is more likely. nba heights aren't just randomly exagerated their based on shoes width. 6'7.5"-6'8" is reasonable for a 6'9" listing in 1-1.5 inch shoes.
Gollum said on 24/Jun/07
Thorgrim "steve"
I believe you because alot of your estimations are like mine.
Thorgrim "steve"
I believe you because alot of your estimations are like mine.
Alex said on 22/Jun/07
Paul was 420lbs in 1999 I know.
Paul was 420lbs in 1999 I know.
Viper said on 21/Jun/07
Magic being only 6-5 would shock the entire world.
Magic being only 6-5 would shock the entire world.
Danimal said on 21/Jun/07
Paul hasn't been 410 pounds since the '90's.
Paul hasn't been 410 pounds since the '90's.
Arjun said on 21/Jun/07
Magic is around 6'7", I believe.
Magic is around 6'7", I believe.
Anonymous said on 20/Jun/07
Mgaic Johnson is not listed on this website.I remember Howard Stern being the same height as Magic(6'5") when he went on Magic's talk show.Howard then talked about it with Shaq on his own show and Shaq was forcing that Howard must be over 6'8"
Editor Rob
Mgaic Johnson is not listed on this website.I remember Howard Stern being the same height as Magic(6'5") when he went on Magic's talk show.Howard then talked about it with Shaq on his own show and Shaq was forcing that Howard must be over 6'8"
Editor Rob should Magic get a place? Anyone remember what he was in olympics if he was there?
david . said on 20/Jun/07
i remember when Paul White was arrested some years ago for breaking a man's jaw the police saying he was 6'11" and 410 lbs
i remember when Paul White was arrested some years ago for breaking a man's jaw the police saying he was 6'11" and 410 lbs
mike m said on 19/Jun/07
kevin nash yes he looks 6'10 taker however does not.taker 6'7'6'8".
kevin nash yes he looks 6'10 taker however does not.taker 6'7'6'8".
Mattiew said on 18/Jun/07
No I'm French xD
By the way when I met kevin nash I asked him about his height and he answered 6'11 to me .
He was billed @ 7' by WWE back then ...
By the way, I also read an itw of taker in the early 2000 where he stated (in a newspaper not some WWE BS) being 6'9 320 ...
No I'm French xD
By the way when I met kevin nash I asked him about his height and he answered 6'11 to me .
He was billed @ 7' by WWE back then ...
By the way, I also read an itw of taker in the early 2000 where he stated (in a newspaper not some WWE BS) being 6'9 320 ...
mike m said on 18/Jun/07
imo probably close to 6'10" actually more like 6'8"peak for taker.the giant was billed at 7'4,which is about 3-4 inches taller than his actual height.
imo probably close to 6'10" actually more like 6'8"peak for taker.the giant was billed at 7'4,which is about 3-4 inches taller than his actual height.
anonymous said on 17/Jun/07
without a doubt there was a 3 inch difference between nash and the giant.it,s quite possible there could,ve been as much as 4 iches.imo nash is at least 6'9" no less than that
without a doubt there was a 3 inch difference between nash and the giant.it,s quite possible there could,ve been as much as 4 iches.imo nash is at least 6'9" no less than that
Arjun said on 16/Jun/07
UT was 6'8" at best at his peak, maybe 6'7.5".
UT was 6'8" at best at his peak, maybe 6'7.5".
Danimal said on 15/Jun/07
Actually Alex, isn't Taker quoted on the top of his own page here that he was 6'10", but after being dropped on his head he is now 6'9". BTW, he HAS said he was 6'10" on a RAW episode in 2000, when he got off his bike and was ready to kick Vince's @#$@. He said: "You don't want a piece of my 6'10" 330 pound $#@$" and at that point he was at his tallest and heaviest.
Actually Alex, isn't Taker quoted on the top of his own page here that he was 6'10", but after being dropped on his head he is now 6'9". BTW, he HAS said he was 6'10" on a RAW episode in 2000, when he got off his bike and was ready to kick Vince's @#$@. He said: "You don't want a piece of my 6'10" 330 pound $#@$" and at that point he was at his tallest and heaviest.
Alex said on 15/Jun/07
I really think most here will agree. UT wasn't more than 6'8 at his peak. The tallest UT admitted to was 6'8 that I've read myself.
I really think most here will agree. UT wasn't more than 6'8 at his peak. The tallest UT admitted to was 6'8 that I've read myself.
Thorgrim "steve" said on 15/Jun/07
It was just my opinion after meeting him, and he said that.... im not saying that it IS his height, i just gave my opinion as a very tall guy.
It was just my opinion after meeting him, and he said that.... im not saying that it IS his height, i just gave my opinion as a very tall guy.
Arjun said on 15/Jun/07
I agree Viper - 6'9" is too high for peak UT.
I agree Viper - 6'9" is too high for peak UT.
Viper said on 14/Jun/07
Undertaker at a peak 6-9? Thats hard to beleive. With these super tall guys its so easy to be off by 1-2 inches. Ive overestimated super tall basketball players before.
Undertaker at a peak 6-9? Thats hard to beleive. With these super tall guys its so easy to be off by 1-2 inches. Ive overestimated super tall basketball players before.
Danimal said on 14/Jun/07
Mattiew, are you from Quebec?
Mattiew, are you from Quebec?
Mattiew said on 13/Jun/07
I've met Nash in the US when I went in vacations there (in 1996).
i was 5'11 back then (been measured at highschool a monthe before I left for the US ) and he was at least 6'10" maybe 6'11 .
No way he is under 6'9 now .
Same as Thorgrim, i'll try to find the pic and upload it .
I've met Nash in the US when I went in vacations there (in 1996).
i was 5'11 back then (been measured at highschool a monthe before I left for the US ) and he was at least 6'10" maybe 6'11 .
No way he is under 6'9 now .
Same as Thorgrim, i'll try to find the pic and upload it .
Frank said on 13/Jun/07
So when Taker told me he was 6ft 9 back in 94 he was not lying ??
So when Taker told me he was 6ft 9 back in 94 he was not lying ??
Thorgrim "steve" said on 13/Jun/07
Yeah guys, i understand that its hard to prove my claims, i was in touch with rob, and im trying to find my old pics with the guys and scan them in. Ill post them here when i find them. And vegas, yeah i understand, there are many fakers on the internet.
I am from Norway, and i am about 6'11 without shoes, (210 cms i think).... I used to try strongman, but due to an injury i got when i was younger, my left arm was never strong enough for proper competition.
I met most of the wwe wrestlers during the wwf years, most noteably nash, kane, taker, big show, test and vicera. And for smaller guys, Paul Levesque (HHH), Bill Goldberg and more. I can tell you MY opinion on their heights, from my memory. And from the photos i took (which i will try my best and find) i can give you a relatively accurate estimate; (take it for what its worth guys, i can understand if you think my source is unreliable)
Big Show is between 6'10 and 7' depending on what way he stands, because his posture is so bad (due to weight i guess)... When he stood up really straight (i actually asked him to!) he had a cm or two on me, and he is one of the only ppl ive ever met who was taller than me. But with his usual posture he looked 6'9 - 6'10 even at times. I think shows true height is very near 7 feet. If he hadd kanes physique i think hed look every bit of 7ft. Nowadays tho with his worstening posture, id give him a firm 6'11, and not a cm under.
I Met Glen (kane) many many times. He says himself that he is 6'9... and i think thats a fair estimate, i had a good 2 inches on him, but no more really. And once again he has horrible posture, especially when posing with fans!, dont ask me why!.... i think its because they are usually much shorter than him, and he naturally stoops. I met kane when for the first time when he was wearing his wrestling attire, back about 99. And he was near eye level with me, and i thought... maybe he is near 7ft!. Then i met him many times after and without his boots, he had shrunk a good two inches. So i would say kane is between 6'8 and 6'9. Not a cm under 6'8 though, and if he looks it i think its because of bad posture or bad camera angle. Of course this is just my opinion, but being someone who has been around him a number of times, i can give you this information.
Undertaker is very similar to Glen, but has better posture. Taker usually stands quite slumped when close to people smaller than him, but if a guy comes along who challenges or beats his height, then he quickly stands up straight! LOL!.... his first words to me were actually; "your a big boy!" and i think this was back around 96'97. Taker was about 6'9 at this time, im sure of it, he was wearing normal sports shoes and a t-shirt, he looked every bit of 6'9 as i dont think that he was more than 2 inches shorter than me. BUT, when i met him about 2 years ago in the UK. he was a solid inch shorter, and im not joking. He was wearing similar clothing, and was standing up straight. I think he has shrunken a little over the years... back about 96, i would give mark a SOLID 6'9 but nowadays he is about 6'8 i believe, maybe a cm under.
I have never met matt morgan before, but nathan tells me that matt is a good 6'9 - 6-11, and he spoke highly of him. From what i seen of matt on tv, he has great posture and looks EVERY bit of 6'10 if you ask me. But thats simply opinion.
And im sorry arjun, but i have never met shaq.
And to answer a possible future question, i work out in many gyms accross the US when i travel for work. And i am a HUGE strength sport/wwe/f fan. and i try to meet the wrestlers whenever i can. I used to tour on the strength sport circles with guys like nathan and magnus samuelsson, between 94 and 98.
I will get a good picture of me soon, and i will prove my height. And i will send emails to rob whenever i find and scan those old shots.
Yeah guys, i understand that its hard to prove my claims, i was in touch with rob, and im trying to find my old pics with the guys and scan them in. Ill post them here when i find them. And vegas, yeah i understand, there are many fakers on the internet.
I am from Norway, and i am about 6'11 without shoes, (210 cms i think).... I used to try strongman, but due to an injury i got when i was younger, my left arm was never strong enough for proper competition.
I met most of the wwe wrestlers during the wwf years, most noteably nash, kane, taker, big show, test and vicera. And for smaller guys, Paul Levesque (HHH), Bill Goldberg and more. I can tell you MY opinion on their heights, from my memory. And from the photos i took (which i will try my best and find) i can give you a relatively accurate estimate; (take it for what its worth guys, i can understand if you think my source is unreliable)
Big Show is between 6'10 and 7' depending on what way he stands, because his posture is so bad (due to weight i guess)... When he stood up really straight (i actually asked him to!) he had a cm or two on me, and he is one of the only ppl ive ever met who was taller than me. But with his usual posture he looked 6'9 - 6'10 even at times. I think shows true height is very near 7 feet. If he hadd kanes physique i think hed look every bit of 7ft. Nowadays tho with his worstening posture, id give him a firm 6'11, and not a cm under.
I Met Glen (kane) many many times. He says himself that he is 6'9... and i think thats a fair estimate, i had a good 2 inches on him, but no more really. And once again he has horrible posture, especially when posing with fans!, dont ask me why!.... i think its because they are usually much shorter than him, and he naturally stoops. I met kane when for the first time when he was wearing his wrestling attire, back about 99. And he was near eye level with me, and i thought... maybe he is near 7ft!. Then i met him many times after and without his boots, he had shrunk a good two inches. So i would say kane is between 6'8 and 6'9. Not a cm under 6'8 though, and if he looks it i think its because of bad posture or bad camera angle. Of course this is just my opinion, but being someone who has been around him a number of times, i can give you this information.
Undertaker is very similar to Glen, but has better posture. Taker usually stands quite slumped when close to people smaller than him, but if a guy comes along who challenges or beats his height, then he quickly stands up straight! LOL!.... his first words to me were actually; "your a big boy!" and i think this was back around 96'97. Taker was about 6'9 at this time, im sure of it, he was wearing normal sports shoes and a t-shirt, he looked every bit of 6'9 as i dont think that he was more than 2 inches shorter than me. BUT, when i met him about 2 years ago in the UK. he was a solid inch shorter, and im not joking. He was wearing similar clothing, and was standing up straight. I think he has shrunken a little over the years... back about 96, i would give mark a SOLID 6'9 but nowadays he is about 6'8 i believe, maybe a cm under.
I have never met matt morgan before, but nathan tells me that matt is a good 6'9 - 6-11, and he spoke highly of him. From what i seen of matt on tv, he has great posture and looks EVERY bit of 6'10 if you ask me. But thats simply opinion.
And im sorry arjun, but i have never met shaq.
And to answer a possible future question, i work out in many gyms accross the US when i travel for work. And i am a HUGE strength sport/wwe/f fan. and i try to meet the wrestlers whenever i can. I used to tour on the strength sport circles with guys like nathan and magnus samuelsson, between 94 and 98.
I will get a good picture of me soon, and i will prove my height. And i will send emails to rob whenever i find and scan those old shots.
Arjun said on 13/Jun/07
Steve, if you are 6'11", perhaps you could meet Big Show and Shaq as well, as their heights (especially Show's) are under considerable debate. Perhaps you could tell us if Show is really only 6'8" and Shaq really only 6'10" ...... or otherwise.
Steve, if you are 6'11", perhaps you could meet Big Show and Shaq as well, as their heights (especially Show's) are under considerable debate. Perhaps you could tell us if Show is really only 6'8" and Shaq really only 6'10" ...... or otherwise.
Vegas said on 13/Jun/07
steve no offence man but on this site you need to prove your claims 100% using videos, pics, proof of your own height (about nash and jones), because tomorrow some guy will come on here and say he met Nash and he was just 6'4 or jones was just 6'5 etc. How do we know who is telling the truth then???
btw just wondering if you have met any of these guys; big show, matt morgan, kane or taker and your estimate on them
steve no offence man but on this site you need to prove your claims 100% using videos, pics, proof of your own height (about nash and jones), because tomorrow some guy will come on here and say he met Nash and he was just 6'4 or jones was just 6'5 etc. How do we know who is telling the truth then???
btw just wondering if you have met any of these guys; big show, matt morgan, kane or taker and your estimate on them
Steve said on 13/Jun/07
sorry, i made a mistake "he has great posture which makes him appear TALLER"
sorry, i made a mistake "he has great posture which makes him appear TALLER"
Steve said on 12/Jun/07
Once again, i knew nash from the vinnie vegas times, and i met him once or twice during the wcw days, this guy is a big big man. I am 6'11 WITHOUT shoes, and he was pretty much eye level with me, i think i had an inch on him, he has great posture which makes him appear shorter,
nowadays id give him about 6'9.5 but back in the vegas times and even wcw, id give him a very solid 6'10, maybe pushing 6'10.5
Hes one of the men who really seemed as tall as me. But i still have a bit on him. Btw, this man has huge legs, ive never seen legs so long in my life.
Once again, i knew nash from the vinnie vegas times, and i met him once or twice during the wcw days, this guy is a big big man. I am 6'11 WITHOUT shoes, and he was pretty much eye level with me, i think i had an inch on him, he has great posture which makes him appear shorter,
nowadays id give him about 6'9.5 but back in the vegas times and even wcw, id give him a very solid 6'10, maybe pushing 6'10.5
Hes one of the men who really seemed as tall as me. But i still have a bit on him. Btw, this man has huge legs, ive never seen legs so long in my life.
andre fan said on 9/Jun/07
nash definitely looked 6'10" in all those pics.
nash definitely looked 6'10" in all those pics.
JT said on 7/Jun/07
Nash in slippers and ~ 6’5” Hall in big boots, with the camera angle favoring Hall (Click Here) Hall could stand a little straighter however. I assumed Hall’s shoes give him only 0.5” in boost here (Click Here) One more screen cap of the two (Click Here) ~ 5’11” X-Pac is closest to the camera.
Nash in slippers and ~ 6’5” Hall in big boots, with the camera angle favoring Hall (Click Here) Hall could stand a little straighter however. I assumed Hall’s shoes give him only 0.5” in boost here (Click Here) One more screen cap of the two (Click Here) ~ 5’11” X-Pac is closest to the camera.
Alex said on 5/Jun/07
Vegas, I remember WM 11 and Nash was def at his tallest there. He could pass for a legit 7'0 guy there while really 6'10 barefoot.
Pam's height I'm unsure of, doubt as low as 5'3 but isn't as tall as 5'7 either. She could be as low as 5'5.
Vegas, I remember WM 11 and Nash was def at his tallest there. He could pass for a legit 7'0 guy there while really 6'10 barefoot.
Pam's height I'm unsure of, doubt as low as 5'3 but isn't as tall as 5'7 either. She could be as low as 5'5.
Viper said on 4/Jun/07
I wouldnt use Pam as your evidence. She might be as short as 5-3.
I wouldnt use Pam as your evidence. She might be as short as 5-3.
Vegas said on 4/Jun/07
nash looking approx 15" taller than Pam Anderson who is listed everywhere at 5'7 but here at 5'6. Anderson would also have major footwear advantage here too imo probably 1.5-2" over Nashs wrestling boots Click Here 2.44 mark onwards
nash looking approx 15" taller than Pam Anderson who is listed everywhere at 5'7 but here at 5'6. Anderson would also have major footwear advantage here too imo probably 1.5-2" over Nashs wrestling boots Click Here 2.44 mark onwards
Arjun said on 4/Jun/07
Nash has a biggish head for a non-acromegalic tall person, but his head looks really small next to Big Show's. It seemed that their chins were at nearly the same level in their staredown, though Show had an easy 2.5 inches on Nash .
Nash has a biggish head for a non-acromegalic tall person, but his head looks really small next to Big Show's. It seemed that their chins were at nearly the same level in their staredown, though Show had an easy 2.5 inches on Nash .
Arjun said on 4/Jun/07
Nash is unlikely to be under 6'9" barefoot in his prime.
Nash is unlikely to be under 6'9" barefoot in his prime.
Arjun said on 4/Jun/07
5 inches is the standard top-of-head to eye-level measurement - but that is with the person looking straight ahead, it becomes effectively less, more like 4", with a "proud" pose. 4.5 inches would probably be correct for a slightly proud pose.
5 inches is the standard top-of-head to eye-level measurement - but that is with the person looking straight ahead, it becomes effectively less, more like 4", with a "proud" pose. 4.5 inches would probably be correct for a slightly proud pose.
Jason said on 4/Jun/07
I think it'd just be the 4 1/2'' for Nash. He has a big head, but it's all from his eyes down. Look at the staredown pic with Viscera - Viscera's forehead is twice as big, though his head is smaller from the eyes down than Nash's.
I think it'd just be the 4 1/2'' for Nash. He has a big head, but it's all from his eyes down. Look at the staredown pic with Viscera - Viscera's forehead is twice as big, though his head is smaller from the eyes down than Nash's.
JT said on 3/Jun/07
Mike M, it's usually about 5 inches from a guy's eyes to the top of his head, especially for a large person like Nash. His eyes were definitely at least an inch above Greene's head in that match, putting Nash at no less than 6'9".
Mike M, it's usually about 5 inches from a guy's eyes to the top of his head, especially for a large person like Nash. His eyes were definitely at least an inch above Greene's head in that match, putting Nash at no less than 6'9".
mike m said on 2/Jun/07
funny in that pic nash appears to have only 5 inches on green,green,s probably more 6'4" with the boots.
funny in that pic nash appears to have only 5 inches on green,green,s probably more 6'4" with the boots.
Craiger said on 2/Jun/07
wow that is a very nice pic JT and those measurements seem spot on.
wow that is a very nice pic JT and those measurements seem spot on.
JT said on 1/Jun/07
I found a clip of Nash and 6'3" Kevin Greene having a stare down. Nash would come out to around 6'9" barefoot (assuming both had 1/2 inch heels) (Click Here). Greene is a little closer to the camera, which is also apparent since his upper body appears larger (mass-wise) than Nash’s when that was not the case. With a perfectly aligned stare down, that would probably get Nash to at least Editor Rob's 6'9.5" estimate, maybe 6’10”. Greene had Flair and Piper (both around 6’0” at this point) by an easy three inches so he’s no less than 6’3”.
Danimal, I suspect that Mane wore a good size heel and/or internal lifts since WCW probably wanted him and Nash to be close in height as tag team partners. As Vegas pointed out, Nash towered over a WCW Hogan, Piper, Mean Gene, etc. about like Andre did over these guys in the WWF days. That may make Andre a little taller than Nash but the difference is very small.
I found a clip of Nash and 6'3" Kevin Greene having a stare down. Nash would come out to around 6'9" barefoot (assuming both had 1/2 inch heels) (Click Here). Greene is a little closer to the camera, which is also apparent since his upper body appears larger (mass-wise) than Nash’s when that was not the case. With a perfectly aligned stare down, that would probably get Nash to at least Editor Rob's 6'9.5" estimate, maybe 6’10”. Greene had Flair and Piper (both around 6’0” at this point) by an easy three inches so he’s no less than 6’3”.
Danimal, I suspect that Mane wore a good size heel and/or internal lifts since WCW probably wanted him and Nash to be close in height as tag team partners. As Vegas pointed out, Nash towered over a WCW Hogan, Piper, Mean Gene, etc. about like Andre did over these guys in the WWF days. That may make Andre a little taller than Nash but the difference is very small.
Vegas said on 1/Jun/07
As I said on Andre page why stop with just comparing Nash/Andre to Mane (and nash was one inch taller than Mane in one photo btw). Nash was as tall or taller next to Hogan as Andre was, ditto Macho, Piper, Dusty, Gene, dibiase etc and we have video to prove this, not just jammy pictures (where we can't see footwear) Danimal didn't you say photos like this were useless???
not to mention the fact that in photos Dan Spivey looks as tall or taller than undertaker yet Nash was a good 4-4.5" taller than Spivey when the two had a staredown in the WWF.
As I said on Andre page why stop with just comparing Nash/Andre to Mane (and nash was one inch taller than Mane in one photo btw). Nash was as tall or taller next to Hogan as Andre was, ditto Macho, Piper, Dusty, Gene, dibiase etc and we have video to prove this, not just jammy pictures (where we can't see footwear) Danimal didn't you say photos like this were useless???
not to mention the fact that in photos Dan Spivey looks as tall or taller than undertaker yet Nash was a good 4-4.5" taller than Spivey when the two had a staredown in the WWF.
Danimal said on 31/May/07
JT, is Nash was 6'10", the so was Mane in 1990 and that means that Andre had a 6'10" Mane by 2" in 1990.
JT, is Nash was 6'10", the so was Mane in 1990 and that means that Andre had a 6'10" Mane by 2" in 1990.
Anonymous said on 31/May/07
wight definitely looked no less than 7 foot,nash may be as low as 6'9" today prime 6'10".
wight definitely looked no less than 7 foot,nash may be as low as 6'9" today prime 6'10".
JT said on 31/May/07
Alex is a good estimator of heights. He saw X-Pac in person and pegged him at 5’11”. Here, I made X-Pac (around 1996) 6’0” in his wrestling boots since his boots usually looked a little chunky (Click Here). Hall’s the only one not standing perfectly straight. I think he’d be around 6’4.5” to 6’5” barefoot if he did straighten up. Big Show would probably be ½” taller if he lowered his head. This shows that Nash was probably pretty close to that 6’10” mark barefoot, at least in the WCW days.
Here’s Hall as Razor Ramon looking around 6’5” with 5’10” Jerry Lawler (Click Here).
Alex is a good estimator of heights. He saw X-Pac in person and pegged him at 5’11”. Here, I made X-Pac (around 1996) 6’0” in his wrestling boots since his boots usually looked a little chunky (Click Here). Hall’s the only one not standing perfectly straight. I think he’d be around 6’4.5” to 6’5” barefoot if he did straighten up. Big Show would probably be ½” taller if he lowered his head. This shows that Nash was probably pretty close to that 6’10” mark barefoot, at least in the WCW days.
Here’s Hall as Razor Ramon looking around 6’5” with 5’10” Jerry Lawler (Click Here).
Alex said on 22/May/07
I remember about when Nash told a fan he was 6'10 a long time ago while he was billed at 7'0-7'1. He can easily go ahead and tell someone he's his billed height but instead says a height a few inches shorter which makes you think he's being honest.
I remember about when Nash told a fan he was 6'10 a long time ago while he was billed at 7'0-7'1. He can easily go ahead and tell someone he's his billed height but instead says a height a few inches shorter which makes you think he's being honest.
mike m said on 21/May/07
kevin nash is billed at 6'11".
kevin nash is billed at 6'11".
andre fan said on 20/May/07
kevin nash looks every bit of 6'10",remember this man as shawn michaels bodyguard deisel was billed at 7 foot.while his run in the nwo he had hogan and scott hall by five inches easy.
kevin nash looks every bit of 6'10",remember this man as shawn michaels bodyguard deisel was billed at 7 foot.while his run in the nwo he had hogan and scott hall by five inches easy.
Ben Enos said on 20/May/07
I strongly agree with paul! Everyone that I have ever chatted with in person that have met the undertaker and nash have stated that taker was every single bit of 6'9'' and nash at least 6'11! swear to it!
I strongly agree with paul! Everyone that I have ever chatted with in person that have met the undertaker and nash have stated that taker was every single bit of 6'9'' and nash at least 6'11! swear to it!
Frank said on 19/May/07
I seen Nash up close a couple of times He Looked very Tall 6ft 10 was very possible
I seen Nash up close a couple of times He Looked very Tall 6ft 10 was very possible
Jason said on 18/May/07
Nash has never physically looked over 6'8'' to me. I completely concur with Viper there. You have to remember he looks taller than he is because of his l-o-n-g legs. He was the exact same height as confessed 6'8'' Tyler Mane in the early 90s.
Nash has never physically looked over 6'8'' to me. I completely concur with Viper there. You have to remember he looks taller than he is because of his l-o-n-g legs. He was the exact same height as confessed 6'8'' Tyler Mane in the early 90s.
Alex said on 17/May/07
Paul, when I saw him in person he didn't even look 6'9 but I wasn't on the same level as him and he was 15-20 feet away.
Paul, when I saw him in person he didn't even look 6'9 but I wasn't on the same level as him and he was 15-20 feet away.
Paul said on 17/May/07
Alex, to be fair we haven't seen Nash in the limelight for ages so we can't say for definite. I would be very surprised if Nash was less than 6'9 even now. Taker is 6'6 plus, maybe even 6'7 probably more like 6'6.5 as you say.
Alex, to be fair we haven't seen Nash in the limelight for ages so we can't say for definite. I would be very surprised if Nash was less than 6'9 even now. Taker is 6'6 plus, maybe even 6'7 probably more like 6'6.5 as you say.
Alex said on 16/May/07
I think its more like this.
Nash- 6'10 peak, now 6'8.5
UT- 6'8 peak, now 6'6.5
I think its more like this.
Nash- 6'10 peak, now 6'8.5
UT- 6'8 peak, now 6'6.5
Paul said on 14/May/07
6'10 1/2 peak and now 6'9 1/2 - Nash
6'8 3/4 peak and now 6'7 1/4 - UT
How does that sound ?
6'10 1/2 peak and now 6'9 1/2 - Nash
6'8 3/4 peak and now 6'7 1/4 - UT
How does that sound ?
Red said on 8/May/07
After 1995 Survivor Series, Diesel and UT(with mask) had a Staredown in tv-interview and Diesel was at least 2" taller. I think Nash was nothing under 6´10" at his peak.
After 1995 Survivor Series, Diesel and UT(with mask) had a Staredown in tv-interview and Diesel was at least 2" taller. I think Nash was nothing under 6´10" at his peak.
mike m said on 6/May/07
imo the old kane and nash the same height.
imo the old kane and nash the same height.
Ray said on 2/May/07
That's possible for Taker mike m; Taker could have been 6'8" and lost 1"; I wouldn't believe he lost more than 1" height though thru the years; he's still fairly young at 42; plus I never heard of back or neck surgery for Taker but that doesn't mean he never had it; but it takes a lot to lose height; my good friend shattered his vertebrea and also herniated two discs at the same time after a sever car accident and lost 1" in height so it takes quite a bit to lose height. It's also possible though Taker could have been 6'8.25"-6'8.5" at peak and is now 6'7" and change (6'7.25"-6'7.5").
That's possible for Taker mike m; Taker could have been 6'8" and lost 1"; I wouldn't believe he lost more than 1" height though thru the years; he's still fairly young at 42; plus I never heard of back or neck surgery for Taker but that doesn't mean he never had it; but it takes a lot to lose height; my good friend shattered his vertebrea and also herniated two discs at the same time after a sever car accident and lost 1" in height so it takes quite a bit to lose height. It's also possible though Taker could have been 6'8.25"-6'8.5" at peak and is now 6'7" and change (6'7.25"-6'7.5").
mike m said on 2/May/07
today it,s hard to say if taker was 6'8" peak he coul,ve very well lost an inch over the years and now be only 6'7".
today it,s hard to say if taker was 6'8" peak he coul,ve very well lost an inch over the years and now be only 6'7".
mike m said on 1/May/07
i see 2 inches at most between nash and sid. sid always appeared the same height as taker 6'8",so nash definitely 6'10".
i see 2 inches at most between nash and sid. sid always appeared the same height as taker 6'8",so nash definitely 6'10".
Viper said on 1/May/07
"You're saying both Sid and Taker are 6'6" and Nash 6'8" because that's EXACTLY what the "Mentor's List" has them at. You base ALL wrestlers heights on the mentors list."
No, not everyone, but some. I only beleive Taker was that tall in his ring gear.
"You're saying both Sid and Taker are 6'6" and Nash 6'8" because that's EXACTLY what the "Mentor's List" has them at. You base ALL wrestlers heights on the mentors list."
No, not everyone, but some. I only beleive Taker was that tall in his ring gear.
Danimal said on 30/Apr/07
Viper, be honest. You're saying both Sid and Taker are 6'6" and Nash 6'8" because that's EXACTLY what the "Mentor's List" has them at. You base ALL wrestlers heights on the mentors list. Taker was taller than 6'6" in his prime. I give him between 6'7.5"-6'8" and Sid 6'7". Nash was at least 6'9".
Viper, be honest. You're saying both Sid and Taker are 6'6" and Nash 6'8" because that's EXACTLY what the "Mentor's List" has them at. You base ALL wrestlers heights on the mentors list. Taker was taller than 6'6" in his prime. I give him between 6'7.5"-6'8" and Sid 6'7". Nash was at least 6'9".
Viper said on 30/Apr/07
I think both Sid and Undertaker are of similar height LV. 6-6. It just so happens that Nash looks more 6-8 in comparison.
I think both Sid and Undertaker are of similar height LV. 6-6. It just so happens that Nash looks more 6-8 in comparison.
LV said on 30/Apr/07
Sid was 6'8" in wrestling gear. Barefoot, I don't know for sure, but he had a couple of inches on Hogan (I was theit WM match when I was a kid) in the ring. Good idea Viper, downgrade Sid to make Nash 6'8". You're right behind Ola in making ridiculous posts.
Sid was 6'8" in wrestling gear. Barefoot, I don't know for sure, but he had a couple of inches on Hogan (I was theit WM match when I was a kid) in the ring. Good idea Viper, downgrade Sid to make Nash 6'8". You're right behind Ola in making ridiculous posts.
mike m said on 30/Apr/07
no way is he 6'6" hogan was 6'5" to 6'6" when he wrestled sid ,and sid had him by 2-3 inches easy.
no way is he 6'6" hogan was 6'5" to 6'6" when he wrestled sid ,and sid had him by 2-3 inches easy.
Viper said on 30/Apr/07
2 inches you say Mike. I think Sid is 6-6 so that does put Nash at 6-8.
2 inches you say Mike. I think Sid is 6-6 so that does put Nash at 6-8.
mike m said on 29/Apr/07
don,t know,i,ve seen nash have 2-3 inches on sid.imo sid 6'7" 6'8" absolute max. nash i can,t give anthing less than 6'10".
don,t know,i,ve seen nash have 2-3 inches on sid.imo sid 6'7" 6'8" absolute max. nash i can,t give anthing less than 6'10".
Alex said on 29/Apr/07
Perfect was billed at 6'3-6'4. I forgot which one. He looked more 6'1 though.
Perfect was billed at 6'3-6'4. I forgot which one. He looked more 6'1 though.
JT said on 26/Apr/07
Here's Hall, Nash, DiBiase, and Mr. Perfect. (Click Here). DiBiase and Perfect would probably be about the same height if they were exactly side by side (6'2" - my estimate and supported by 6’1.5” Chris’s pic with DiBiase). With Perfect's eyes only a bit above Hall's, Hall would have to be at least several inches taller than Perfect if they stood side by side, with Nash another 4-5 inches taller than that.
Here's Hall, Nash, DiBiase, and Mr. Perfect. (Click Here). DiBiase and Perfect would probably be about the same height if they were exactly side by side (6'2" - my estimate and supported by 6’1.5” Chris’s pic with DiBiase). With Perfect's eyes only a bit above Hall's, Hall would have to be at least several inches taller than Perfect if they stood side by side, with Nash another 4-5 inches taller than that.
mike m said on 25/Apr/07
does anyone have a pic of nash next to kareem abdul jabar?
does anyone have a pic of nash next to kareem abdul jabar?
Shmuel said on 24/Apr/07
Kevin Nash's real height is about 6'9 1/2, because he's about a inch an 1/2 taller than Syhco Sid who's about 6'8 in boots. So I would say kevin Nashe's real height is slightly under 6'10. Because Kevin nash has about 2 inches on Kane, & about a inche an 1/2 on Syhco Sid
Kevin Nash's real height is about 6'9 1/2, because he's about a inch an 1/2 taller than Syhco Sid who's about 6'8 in boots. So I would say kevin Nashe's real height is slightly under 6'10. Because Kevin nash has about 2 inches on Kane, & about a inche an 1/2 on Syhco Sid
Alex said on 23/Apr/07
Vegas, your friend did look legit 6'4 though. Thing is here is that even with your own friends, people still argue about their heights and even weights when you are their friend and know their stats. Its not like its about a celebrity where you both can argue because neither of you know for sure. On the Nathon Jones page some months ago you probably remember where I posted 2 pics of 2 heavy kids I'm friends with and some people were off by as much as 50lbs underestimating, same with your friends height.
Vegas, your friend did look legit 6'4 though. Thing is here is that even with your own friends, people still argue about their heights and even weights when you are their friend and know their stats. Its not like its about a celebrity where you both can argue because neither of you know for sure. On the Nathon Jones page some months ago you probably remember where I posted 2 pics of 2 heavy kids I'm friends with and some people were off by as much as 50lbs underestimating, same with your friends height.
Viper said on 23/Apr/07
Hill is 6-7 in reality.
Hill is 6-7 in reality.
Arjun said on 23/Apr/07
McGrady does look taller AT THAT particular angle, Hill's head and body tilt make him look shorter there.At that particular head position of Hill and McGrady, the very top of McGrady's head is just a smidge higher than that of Hill. Does'nt mean Hill is shorter, it just means he looks slightly shorter in this particular leaning position.
Cheers,
Arjun
McGrady does look taller AT THAT particular angle, Hill's head and body tilt make him look shorter there.At that particular head position of Hill and McGrady, the very top of McGrady's head is just a smidge higher than that of Hill. Does'nt mean Hill is shorter, it just means he looks slightly shorter in this particular leaning position.
Cheers,
Arjun
Jason said on 22/Apr/07
Going just by that photo (I don't know how tall McGrady is exactly), Hill would clearly pip him. Hill's upper body is leaning about 20 degrees more than McGrady's and his head is virtually on it's side...
Going just by that photo (I don't know how tall McGrady is exactly), Hill would clearly pip him. Hill's upper body is leaning about 20 degrees more than McGrady's and his head is virtually on it's side...
Vegas said on 22/Apr/07
LV coming from a guy who considers cinderblocks and doors as a fool proof way of measuring height i find that last statement of yours funny. there is your photo again zoomed up Click Here I honestly couldn't give a crap about mcgrady or hill. Both guys look nearly exactly the same height there. Your whole point was that hill is 1" taller than mcgrady despite both being listed at 6'8, so hill is a legit 6'8 and mcgrady isn't, how exactly does that work again??? Both are 6'7 imo barefoot.
Viper for someone who was out by 2.5" on my the height of my friend I think you are probably drunk all the time when you post here. Of course my friend wasn't listed on the Mexican mentor list so you were confused and decided to pluck a number out the air for him :)
Look guys I may be the human punching bag on this site but smart ass remarks aimed towards me does not make you guys rite. Following the lead of Danimal only lowers my opinions of you.
LV coming from a guy who considers cinderblocks and doors as a fool proof way of measuring height i find that last statement of yours funny. there is your photo again zoomed up Click Here I honestly couldn't give a crap about mcgrady or hill. Both guys look nearly exactly the same height there. Your whole point was that hill is 1" taller than mcgrady despite both being listed at 6'8, so hill is a legit 6'8 and mcgrady isn't, how exactly does that work again??? Both are 6'7 imo barefoot.
Viper for someone who was out by 2.5" on my the height of my friend I think you are probably drunk all the time when you post here. Of course my friend wasn't listed on the Mexican mentor list so you were confused and decided to pluck a number out the air for him :)
Look guys I may be the human punching bag on this site but smart ass remarks aimed towards me does not make you guys rite. Following the lead of Danimal only lowers my opinions of you.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.