Mark Christopher Lawrence's Height
5ft 8 ¾ (174.6 cm)
American actor best known for playing Big Mike on TV series Chuck. In this convention photo, Mark had near to 0.4 inch more sneaker than us.
5ft 8 Rob, Mark, 5ft 8 Jenny @ Starfury's T3, 2011
You May Be Interested
Add a Comment27 comments
Average Guess (25 Votes)
5ft 8.47in (173.9cm)
Yang (5 footer 8, 173, Aries) said on 4/Jun/20
Id give him 5ft 8 and half for this guy.
6'4 and a half leperchaun said on 22/Apr/20
0.4 inch more footwear my guess would be 5'7 and a half''.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 16/Nov/19
I noticed Mark Christopher Lawrence turn up in 'Chucky 3' last night. I found it quite shocking when I first saw it, but yesterday, it was bordering on the funny side!
Mark looked a sturdy 5ft8.5, possibly a quarter inch more - so that's what he gets.
5ft8.75 this time.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 28/Jul/19
I found out only the other day where I had seen Mark Christopher Lawrence before!
He was working in the mental institution where Linda Hamilton was staying in 'Terminator 2' - the guy who made sure that she was tied to her bed properly, and finishes off by licking her face! URGHH! 😛😖
Canson said on 17/Nov/18
@Christian: I could see more that I look at it that he may just be a strong 5’8. I’d say right at 5’8.5 which is borderline
Zampo said on 17/Nov/18
Nailed it. Based on the photo, no more than 5'8.5. Somewhere between 5'8.25-5'8.5 is how he looks here.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 16/Nov/18
He doesn't even look 5'9 with the shoe advantage. He looks very similar in height to 5'8.25" (at the time) Jenny accounting for the 3/8" shoe advantage. The very most is 5'8.5", but 5'8 3/8" is ok for Mark.
said on 11/Nov/18
I can't see him being so tall when his sneaker advantage is taken into account, I love the word sneaker!
I mean we never really use that word in Scotland, I'm sure you use word 'Trainers' like many Brits...but since this site's main body of visitors is from America, even I use it a lot more.
I still stick mostly to English spelling though.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 5/Jun/18
This listing suits him perfectly. He obviously wouldn’t have a full inch on Rob without the footwear advantage.
Canson said on 7/Apr/18
@Rampage: Thats a tough one! He looks “probably” at best an inch taller than Rob with the advantage. Without it he could look still taller than Rob but probably negligible difference. He’s likely a weak 5’9”. Then again with his weight he may lose more height than Rob does in a day
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Dec/17
He looks a good 5ft9 but has a sizeable amount of heel over Rob...
MJKoP said on 5/Sep/17
I'd say a rather weak 5'9" is the ULTIMATE height he could be. ;)
even said on 21/Jul/17
almost exactly 5'8.5" , but upwards 250 pounds
World Citizen said on 2/Jun/17
Looks no more than 5 ft 8.25
John said on 29/Jan/16
Lawrence is the same exact height as Rob. Even when he has the 1cm shoe advantage, he only edges Rob by 1cm. And both have similar posture.
said on 8/Jun/15
My guess is 176,even with footwear advantage i think he would measure 176 flat,so really a solid 5'9(ofcourse that's only my guess,you know better).
[Editor Rob: in person he would have looked near 5ft 9.5 range...I never saw that personally]
OneNamePlease said on 17/May/15
5'8.5 ITS OK
said on 20/Feb/15
Rob, looking at the photo again, is there a slight tilt in your favour? If you draw a straight line he looks 5ft 8.5 and therefore your height taking into account his footwear, but given the angle of the photo I can believe he looked 5ft 9 and thus 5ft 8.5-8.75 barefoot. Click Here
Obviously skewing the image puts the angle in Jenny's favour instead but I think angle is an important thing to consider when judging height from a photo.
[Editor Rob: I know I have a lean here myself and mark a slight lean towards jenny (she stood beside him first). I think I adjusted the photo a half degree back to Jenny's side to what I think is how much I'm leaning, which matches up to how Jenny pretty much stands (see Jenny in the stephanie jacobsen photo which I think is quite level).
In many photos there'll be small half degrees here and there due to not using a tripod. Remember how I am standing and my head tilt helps me know if there is anything obvious more than a small amount.]
lelman said on 1/Feb/14
Between just shy of 5'9" I'd say, very close in height to the both of you.
said on 7/Jan/14
5'8.5 plus you look to be slouching a tad. i really think theres about .5-.6 inch difference here. is he dropping more than you or something?
[Editor Rob: he can look 174 but I thought might just be 175]
LG69 said on 11/Sep/13
He looks 5'9" max.
Emil said on 29/Aug/13
He's bald which leaves a shorter impression
James said on 8/Feb/13
I guess rob this pic is an example of how people like mark and john candy can look shorter because of the weight they have too carry around.
said on 16/Jan/13
Rob im not trying too funny he could do with losing a few pounds he is way too big for his size.
[Editor Rob: big mike turning to skinny mike...yeah, it'd be better for health, but I'm sure anybody with a lot of extra weight doesn't need to be told it.]
said on 1/Dec/12
well im going to go for 5ft 7.5 if then that he has the sneaker advantage
[Editor Rob: 8.5 maybe is possible]
Candyman said on 29/Sep/12
Nope nope, he's definitely 5'8.567". I can see a 5'8.721" maybe in the morning but certainly no more. Just stepping on toes here.
Mathew said on 3/Aug/12
Looks 5'8.5" here but 5'9" is fine.