Roger Cross Height
6ft 1 ¼ (186.1 cm)
Jamaican/Canadian Actor best known for roles in TV series such as 24, Arrow and Continuum. His official website listed him as standing 6ft 2 in height with a weight of 198 pounds. He also said that height on twitter when commenting how he rarely Feels Short at "6' 2"".
5ft 8 Rob and Roger @ London Expo (26th May 2007)
24 Cast @ London Expo (27th May 2007)
You May Be Interested
Carlos Bernard
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
Stephen Lobo
5ft 10 (178 cm)
5ft 10 (178 cm)
Lexa Doig
5ft 5 (165 cm)
5ft 5 (165 cm)
Mary Lynn Rajskub
5ft 6 (168 cm)
5ft 6 (168 cm)
Add a Comment83 comments
Average Guess (42 Votes)
6ft 1.14in (185.8cm)
6ft 1.14in (185.8cm)
(Hicqs) said on 27/Nov/23
6'1-6'1.5
6'1-6'1.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/May/23
No less than 6ft1.
No less than 6ft1.
Andrea said on 24/Aug/21
Probably just about 6'1 flat, no more.
Probably just about 6'1 flat, no more.
Sakz said on 27/Feb/21
@Rob Hm interesting. Going by the picture above, it looks like his head is comfortably smaller. Then again, his head is at a slight angle which probably gives that impression. So it would be near 9.5"? I believe your head is around 9.5" if I'm not mistaken.
Editor Rob
@Rob Hm interesting. Going by the picture above, it looks like his head is comfortably smaller. Then again, his head is at a slight angle which probably gives that impression. So it would be near 9.5"? I believe your head is around 9.5" if I'm not mistaken.
Editor Robit's quite close in the single, harder to tell with double as his head is a bit in front
Sakz said on 25/Feb/21
@Rob How big would you say his head is?
Editor Rob
@Rob How big would you say his head is?
Editor Robactually looking at this photo, it could do with a rescan, which I'll do as I type...as for head, I would say it is very close to my head size in the top picture.
just a shame the early Expo photographer used onboard camera flash (giving some dark shadowing behind heads) and insisted on a border/log round their prints like this.
just a shame the early Expo photographer used onboard camera flash (giving some dark shadowing behind heads) and insisted on a border/log round their prints like this.
stefkat said on 24/Feb/21
Rob if he stood tall for a measurement what height would come in his eye level? Cause you look to be between his eyebrows
Editor Rob
Rob if he stood tall for a measurement what height would come in his eye level? Cause you look to be between his eyebrows
Editor RobI am sure if he was at his tallest my hair would brush the middle of his eyes.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Nov/20
Strong 6ft1 is fine....probably 6ft2 first thing upon waking
Strong 6ft1 is fine....probably 6ft2 first thing upon waking
Slim 6'1" said on 28/Sep/20
Flat 6’1”
Flat 6’1”
Nik Ashton said on 16/Sep/20
He’s losing height in the top pic!
He’s losing height in the top pic!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Sep/19
Rob, do you think Roger would edge out guys like Mark Gatiss, Luke Mitchell or John Reardon?
To me he can look a very strong 6ft1 guy...often enough to pass for 186-187cm range
Editor Rob
Rob, do you think Roger would edge out guys like Mark Gatiss, Luke Mitchell or John Reardon?
To me he can look a very strong 6ft1 guy...often enough to pass for 186-187cm range
Editor RobI think I mentioned the last time I seen him up close was 2016, and I thought this guy is a solid 6ft 1, you can see a photo of him With Zoe and Jodelle Ferland to get an idea how big he was looking that weekend. Well over a head taller than Jodelle...
daad1234 said on 18/Aug/19
Hi Rob, weird question, but is a solid 6'1 188cm/186cm, 187.5cm/185.5cm or something in between that?
Editor Rob
Hi Rob, weird question, but is a solid 6'1 188cm/186cm, 187.5cm/185.5cm or something in between that?
Editor RobA guy who won't really fall under the mark, even at night...so during the day is a fraction over it. I'd class Roger in that zone, from the few conventions I've seen him at.
berta said on 12/Dec/18
is he really taller than anhony lemke? i just looked at photos of them together and sometimes it could really looks the other way around. I dont believe he is 1 cm taller than Lemke
Editor Rob
is he really taller than anhony lemke? i just looked at photos of them together and sometimes it could really looks the other way around. I dont believe he is 1 cm taller than Lemke
Editor RobWell the last time I seen Roger I still would say solid 6ft 1 rather than weak 6ft 1...they can look quite close on Dark Matter.
Nik said on 11/Nov/18
I think he is at least 6'1.25" in bare feet!
I think he is at least 6'1.25" in bare feet!
Nik said on 6/Sep/18
The only way he could feel short is if he is in the company of a group of basketball players!
The only way he could feel short is if he is in the company of a group of basketball players!
Mel said on 28/Aug/18
Rob, 188-189 morning height?
Editor Rob
Rob, 188-189 morning height?
Editor RobLast time i seen him, I still though 186 range afternoon was likely so 188-9 zone straight out of bed is a possibility.
Slim 184 said on 3/Nov/17
Lol at my 5 month old comment. So yeah he’s somewhere inbetween 185-186.5 Legit 6’1” guy.
Lol at my 5 month old comment. So yeah he’s somewhere inbetween 185-186.5 Legit 6’1” guy.
Average height and slim said on 6/Jun/17
185 cm. no more, no less
Editor Rob
185 cm. no more, no less
Editor Rob up close, this guy is I think a solid 6ft 1 range.
World Citizen said on 19/May/17
He looks more 6 ft 0.5 in the picture above, but I can be wrong.
He looks more 6 ft 0.5 in the picture above, but I can be wrong.
Paleman said on 25/Apr/17
He looks huge in the bottom pic, definitely not under 185cm. 186cm is a good listing.
He looks huge in the bottom pic, definitely not under 185cm. 186cm is a good listing.
Jared said on 24/Jul/16
Edged out a weak 6'1 Dean Ambrose in 12 Rounds 3, so 6'1.25 may be the best listing.
Edged out a weak 6'1 Dean Ambrose in 12 Rounds 3, so 6'1.25 may be the best listing.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Mar/16
Rob, which range is most likely?
A) 189cm/187cm
B) 188.5cm/186.5cm
C) 188cm/186cm
D) 187.5cm/185.5cm
E) 187cm/185cm
Editor Rob
Rob, which range is most likely?
A) 189cm/187cm
B) 188.5cm/186.5cm
C) 188cm/186cm
D) 187.5cm/185.5cm
E) 187cm/185cm
Editor Rob the second time I seen him I got a solid 6ft 1 impression, I believe he edged out john reardon when they were together.
Andrea said on 19/Nov/15
Rob, i was gonna say he claimed 6'2 on Twitter but you already put the quote :D
He also said, talking about a photo with some guys from the Arrow cast, that they average 6'1 and that the avengers average 5'7!
Editor Rob
Rob, i was gonna say he claimed 6'2 on Twitter but you already put the quote :D
He also said, talking about a photo with some guys from the Arrow cast, that they average 6'1 and that the avengers average 5'7!
Editor Rob big Josh pointed that quote out.
Sam said on 13/Nov/15
Looked a big guy in his appearance on Chuck, the camera was angled to make him look intimidating even though he'd actually measure a couple inches under Levi or Baldwin.
Editor Rob
Looked a big guy in his appearance on Chuck, the camera was angled to make him look intimidating even though he'd actually measure a couple inches under Levi or Baldwin.
Editor Rob the last time I seen Cross he looked a decent 6ft 1 range, he seemed like he had an edge on John Reardon who looked around 6ft 1
Andrea said on 5/Nov/15
Yeah, 185-186 seems ok for this guy!
Actually, if he's 186, Kiefer isn't under his listing...
From reading old comments, it seems you yourself thought he was 187-188, Rob, which is not the case, though!
Rob, you used to be a lot more generous back in 2005-2007! If i'm not wrong, you also had this G guy at a very optimistic 5'8 :)
Editor Rob
Yeah, 185-186 seems ok for this guy!
Actually, if he's 186, Kiefer isn't under his listing...
From reading old comments, it seems you yourself thought he was 187-188, Rob, which is not the case, though!
Rob, you used to be a lot more generous back in 2005-2007! If i'm not wrong, you also had this G guy at a very optimistic 5'8 :)
Editor Rob he is pretty much in person 186ish, at least last time i seen him, he was right there talking with john reardon and it looked like he'd be the taller of the 2 slightly...
keeping big G happy was hard work, in fact we probably exchanged a thousand emails in that time...no wonder I got RSI!...ultimately it is better off without having influence like that.
keeping big G happy was hard work, in fact we probably exchanged a thousand emails in that time...no wonder I got RSI!...ultimately it is better off without having influence like that.
Verba said on 9/Oct/15
Why exactly 186cm and not 185cm?
Editor Rob
Why exactly 186cm and not 185cm?
Editor Rob I saw this guy and john reardon together, I believe Roger actually would measure a little more than John.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Aug/15
188cm out of bed
186cm evening
188cm out of bed
186cm evening
Judd said on 23/Nov/14
6'1.25" is spot on! He had also a little role in the day the earth stood still, i think...
6'1.25" is spot on! He had also a little role in the day the earth stood still, i think...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Oct/14
Not under 6ft1
Not under 6ft1
richkid123 said on 26/Oct/14
looks 6' in top pic, but looks real tall in the bottom. like almost 6'3 in the bottom
looks 6' in top pic, but looks real tall in the bottom. like almost 6'3 in the bottom
mike said on 22/Oct/14
Night: 6ft 1in (185.5 cm)
Morning: 6ft 1.75-6ft 2in (187.5-187.96 cm)
Or he could've measured 6ft 2 in footwear.
Night: 6ft 1in (185.5 cm)
Morning: 6ft 1.75-6ft 2in (187.5-187.96 cm)
Or he could've measured 6ft 2 in footwear.
Lenad said on 28/Jan/14
looks a strong 6'1 in bottom pic
looks a strong 6'1 in bottom pic
Alex 6ft 0 1/8 said on 4/Jan/14
Top pic he's not standing straight but bottom pic he looks 6'1
Top pic he's not standing straight but bottom pic he looks 6'1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Dec/13
The original 6ft1.5/187cm might be closer, actually.
The original 6ft1.5/187cm might be closer, actually.
Matt 184.7-186.7cm said on 2/Nov/13
why does the top pic only look like 3.5 inch difference
Editor Rob
why does the top pic only look like 3.5 inch difference
Editor Rob not standing at his fullest...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jun/13
John Reardon looked max 185cm with Rob. More like 6"0.5 - 6"0.75.
But this guy is near 6"2 for definite. He towers Kiefer Sutherland.
Editor Rob
John Reardon looked max 185cm with Rob. More like 6"0.5 - 6"0.75.
But this guy is near 6"2 for definite. He towers Kiefer Sutherland.
Editor Rob him and john reardon were standing right in front of me, they looked very similar, except john obviously had thicker hair.
Lo sgozzatore said on 16/Jun/13
Rob, in these pics he looks similiar with the young 184 guy... Did he look taller than him in person?
Editor Rob
Rob, in these pics he looks similiar with the young 184 guy... Did he look taller than him in person?
Editor Rob I saw Roger again last year and he is 185-6cm, I watched him standing with John Reardon and they really were very close in height, obviously reardon had hair advantage over Roger, but hard to tell any difference.
hurricane brat said on 5/Jun/13
Rob I get that you like to claim your lowest, but in my opinion you should use your mid afternoon height as that is when you are probably present at these expos or cons meeting these people. In the latest video you posted too, you are a solid 173.5 or 5-8.25' (actually 5-8.30') at 4 pm!
Rob I get that you like to claim your lowest, but in my opinion you should use your mid afternoon height as that is when you are probably present at these expos or cons meeting these people. In the latest video you posted too, you are a solid 173.5 or 5-8.25' (actually 5-8.30') at 4 pm!
snoopy said on 28/May/13
are you sure rob is 5ft 8 dead on
Editor Rob
are you sure rob is 5ft 8 dead on
Editor Rob As of today, I'm still 5ft 8. I haven't shrunk yet ;)
The day I shrink below 5ft 8 I'll be sure to document it :)
The day I shrink below 5ft 8 I'll be sure to document it :)
Masanori said on 1/May/13
Learn to correct for posture guys. 6'1" or slightly more is easily believable.
Learn to correct for posture guys. 6'1" or slightly more is easily believable.
Emil said on 25/Apr/13
He doesnt look more than 6'0-6'0.5 in this pic
He doesnt look more than 6'0-6'0.5 in this pic
LG69 said on 21/Mar/13
6'1" for Roger. His website says he's 6'2" but that is with shoes on, no doubt. I see 5" between he and Rob.
6'1" for Roger. His website says he's 6'2" but that is with shoes on, no doubt. I see 5" between he and Rob.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jul/12
He's 186-187cm judging by those pics
He's 186-187cm judging by those pics
tom said on 8/Jun/12
Doesnt look 6-2" imo,6-0,6-1" max looking at the pics.
Doesnt look 6-2" imo,6-0,6-1" max looking at the pics.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 21/Dec/11
Rob, you reaches his eyes or a bit above them! I cant really see him over 6'0.5-6'0.75!
Rob, you reaches his eyes or a bit above them! I cant really see him over 6'0.5-6'0.75!
Sean73 said on 13/Dec/11
He looks more than 198lbs.
He looks more than 198lbs.
jake, 1.82 m said on 19/Oct/11
This listing is indeed spot on, I see 5 inches separating Rob and Roger Cross here.
This listing is indeed spot on, I see 5 inches separating Rob and Roger Cross here.
xyz.reg(6 ft 1.5 in) said on 18/Sep/11
Hi Rob...i think he is 186cms on the dot...but if v compare him with mark pellegrino..specially in the upper pic...it will be clarified even more..!!!
Hi Rob...i think he is 186cms on the dot...but if v compare him with mark pellegrino..specially in the upper pic...it will be clarified even more..!!!
Mathew said on 28/Aug/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 27/Aug/11
6"0.75(185cm) or just under 6"1 in the top pic.
6"2(188cm) at least in the lower pic and possibly 6"3 up straight
---
No chance at 6'3" in the second pic. Height as listed.
Editor Rob
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 27/Aug/11
6"0.75(185cm) or just under 6"1 in the top pic.
6"2(188cm) at least in the lower pic and possibly 6"3 up straight
---
No chance at 6'3" in the second pic. Height as listed.
Editor RobRampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Aug/11
6"0.75(185cm) or just under 6"1 in the top pic.
6"2(188cm) at least in the lower pic and possibly 6"3 up straight
6"0.75(185cm) or just under 6"1 in the top pic.
6"2(188cm) at least in the lower pic and possibly 6"3 up straight
Martin said on 26/Aug/11
He looks just over 6ft in the first pic.
He looks just over 6ft in the first pic.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Aug/11
The thing with the bottom pic is that the camera is clearly in Roger's favour and there's always the chance that his shoes may be a little higher heeled than the other people in the picture.
That is why he looks 6ft2 minimum in the pic.
The thing with the bottom pic is that the camera is clearly in Roger's favour and there's always the chance that his shoes may be a little higher heeled than the other people in the picture.
That is why he looks 6ft2 minimum in the pic.
5'8.76785 said on 5/Aug/11
The thing with the bottom pic is that Rob is losing like 1.5 inches in height, isn't that right Rob?
The thing with the bottom pic is that Rob is losing like 1.5 inches in height, isn't that right Rob?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jul/11
188cm out of bed, Rob?
Editor Rob
188cm out of bed, Rob?
Editor Rob it's quite possible
James said on 27/Jun/11
I do struggle to see 186cm with rob.
I do struggle to see 186cm with rob.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Jun/11
I think 186-187cm is spot on
I think 186-187cm is spot on
Alex said on 11/Jun/11
Looks 6'2 in the bottom pic but in the top pic looks 6'0 1/2-6'1.
Looks 6'2 in the bottom pic but in the top pic looks 6'0 1/2-6'1.
James said on 8/Jun/11
No 186cm is fine for now
No 186cm is fine for now
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jun/11
I estimate 190cm in the lower pic and 187-188cm in the upper pic. Perhaps the original 6ft1.5 is closer to the truth?
I estimate 190cm in the lower pic and 187-188cm in the upper pic. Perhaps the original 6ft1.5 is closer to the truth?
James said on 29/May/11
Yeah he looks close to 6'3 in the bottom photo. LOL looks like he could also be 6'3.5 if he straightend up
Yeah he looks close to 6'3 in the bottom photo. LOL looks like he could also be 6'3.5 if he straightend up
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/May/11
Actually come to think of it...he looks 189cm(6"2.5) in the group photo because he's closest to the camera.
Actually come to think of it...he looks 189cm(6"2.5) in the group photo because he's closest to the camera.
James said on 4/May/11
Yeah he does look 6ft in the top pic
Yeah he does look 6ft in the top pic
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/May/11
Looks 184cm(6"0.5) in the top picture with that slouch...below that he looks 188cm(6"2) but he's closest to the camera. 6"1.25-6"1.5 is spot on, 6"2 out of bed. But hes been listed as high as 6"3 in the past which I think is garbage
Looks 184cm(6"0.5) in the top picture with that slouch...below that he looks 188cm(6"2) but he's closest to the camera. 6"1.25-6"1.5 is spot on, 6"2 out of bed. But hes been listed as high as 6"3 in the past which I think is garbage
James said on 26/Apr/11
seems like a 6'1 guy to me
seems like a 6'1 guy to me
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Mar/11
Definitely bad posture...
Definitely bad posture...
James said on 26/Feb/11
In the top pic with rob looks 6ft.25 (184cm). bad posture?
In the top pic with rob looks 6ft.25 (184cm). bad posture?
SolidSnake said on 26/Feb/11
He does look a solid 200 pounds. Clearly he works out. And looks a good 6'1
He does look a solid 200 pounds. Clearly he works out. And looks a good 6'1
James said on 9/Feb/11
Dwarfs everone in the bottom pic. Tall guy.
Dwarfs everone in the bottom pic. Tall guy.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Nov/10
186cm is dead on....can look anywhere from 6"1.25 to 6"2
186cm is dead on....can look anywhere from 6"1.25 to 6"2
Anonymous said on 16/Nov/10
Thanks for replying Rob! :D
Thanks for replying Rob! :D
dmeyer said on 13/Nov/10
looks about 6 ft 2 on 24 186 cm fits him i dont think he is less
looks about 6 ft 2 on 24 186 cm fits him i dont think he is less
Mathew said on 7/Jul/09
Looks 6'1".
Looks 6'1".
J.J. said on 9/Jun/09
Am sorry but he looks a solid 6'1" considering his lean posture.
Am sorry but he looks a solid 6'1" considering his lean posture.
Anonymous said on 18/Dec/08
rob, he can't be near 6'2.
rob, he can't be near 6'2.
Haze said on 2/Nov/08
6'1 with rob looks like.
6'1 with rob looks like.
dmeyer said on 2/Mar/08
he is 6 ft with loose posture so 6 ft 1 to 6 ft 1.5 but not 6 ft 2
he is 6 ft with loose posture so 6 ft 1 to 6 ft 1.5 but not 6 ft 2
Gary said on 28/Feb/08
Im 6'2 and a guy barefoot at 5'8 would come to the tip of my nose, so I would say this 5'8 guy is about 2 inches taller than that, I would put Roger at 6'0 even
Im 6'2 and a guy barefoot at 5'8 would come to the tip of my nose, so I would say this 5'8 guy is about 2 inches taller than that, I would put Roger at 6'0 even
Adam Brennon said on 4/Feb/08
My God! I thought he was 5' 10"! Perhaps Sutherland portrays a more assertive character than his as an explanation.
My God! I thought he was 5' 10"! Perhaps Sutherland portrays a more assertive character than his as an explanation.
Matt said on 13/Nov/07
He is huge i would say 6'3
He is huge i would say 6'3
dmeyer said on 7/Dec/06
at the shortest 6'1.5 or 6'2 strong 187 fits him good since he looks about 3 inches taller
at the shortest 6'1.5 or 6'2 strong 187 fits him good since he looks about 3 inches taller
J. said on 9/Jul/06
It looks like he's leaning in a little, straightened up, near 6'2" could be possible ...mind you, I've never seen this guy in anything before.
Editor Rob
It looks like he's leaning in a little, straightened up, near 6'2" could be possible ...mind you, I've never seen this guy in anything before.
Editor Rob 24 and first wave, tv shows really this guy was in
Larry said on 9/Jul/06
This pic shows a 5'11" to maybe 6' guy. Not above 6'. You've got him nailed, Rob.
Editor Rob
This pic shows a 5'11" to maybe 6' guy. Not above 6'. You've got him nailed, Rob.
Editor Rob to be fair, he is losing a bit with lean, how much I'm still not sure on this guy, I did think he could look 6ft 1-1.5, my friend guessed 6ft 1
the shredder said on 8/Jul/06
well rob , it looks like alfonso is near his 5'7 clame after all.
well rob , it looks like alfonso is near his 5'7 clame after all.
dave said on 28/Jun/06
If Kiefer Sutherland is only 5'9 then Roger's height would be no more than 6'0 but if Kiefer is 5'11 as listed in most places then Roger's 6'2 is right on the mark.
If Kiefer Sutherland is only 5'9 then Roger's height would be no more than 6'0 but if Kiefer is 5'11 as listed in most places then Roger's 6'2 is right on the mark.
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.