Add a Comment9894 comments
Average Guess (932 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 7.69in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.41in (199.2cm)
Peak: 6ft 7.69in (202.4cm)
Current: 6ft 6.41in (199.2cm)
Ali Baba said on 24/Sep/15
Luke, you don't know what you're talking about. Taker was the one wearing boots and posture was very close.
Luke, you don't know what you're talking about. Taker was the one wearing boots and posture was very close.
josey wales said on 24/Sep/15
So now its a an age site to.. i reckon taker is half n inch taller than ali.
So now its a an age site to.. i reckon taker is half n inch taller than ali.
Luke 5'8.25 19 years said on 22/Sep/15
Undertaker looks 62 years old. D:
Undertaker looks 62 years old. D:
Luke 5'8.25 19 years said on 22/Sep/15
Undertaker today is 6'7 or 2.01m and Ali Baba 6'6. Ali use big boots and Undertaker has a bad posture.
Undertaker today is 6'7 or 2.01m and Ali Baba 6'6. Ali use big boots and Undertaker has a bad posture.
NCL said on 15/Sep/15
Interesting posts guys! There's a rumor Baron Corbin from NXT will be debuting soon, w i k i p e d i a has him being billed 6'8" in wrestling and listed at 6'6" in basketball. The rumor is he'll fight Strowman so maybe we'll get a staredown
Interesting posts guys! There's a rumor Baron Corbin from NXT will be debuting soon, w i k i p e d i a has him being billed 6'8" in wrestling and listed at 6'6" in basketball. The rumor is he'll fight Strowman so maybe we'll get a staredown
josey wales said on 12/Sep/15
Nice profile pic of taker rob.
Nice profile pic of taker rob.
CDK said on 12/Sep/15
Braun Strowman seems to be 6'7" to me!
Braun Strowman seems to be 6'7" to me!
Alex 6'0 said on 11/Sep/15
6'7.5 peak and today 6'6.5 possibly?
6'7.5 peak and today 6'6.5 possibly?
miko said on 10/Sep/15
I know Hugo Knox who is in NXT from his Burton Albion days, he's trained/travelled a lot with Braun and told me that BS is 6'8 'in his boots', but wouldn't give me a barefoot height!
I think he can look 6'6/6'6.5, I think he'd fall short in a staredown with Rowan who I think is nothing under 6'7.
I know Hugo Knox who is in NXT from his Burton Albion days, he's trained/travelled a lot with Braun and told me that BS is 6'8 'in his boots', but wouldn't give me a barefoot height!
I think he can look 6'6/6'6.5, I think he'd fall short in a staredown with Rowan who I think is nothing under 6'7.
Phenom! said on 10/Sep/15
Undertaker is probably the same height as Rowan, which is about 6'6.25", I can't go lower than that for the undertaker. Kane is a bit taller than Rowan. And Rowan might be taller than Strowman or the same height. But yeah Luke Harper looked only about an inch shorter than Strowman. Which could make Strowman like 6'6".
Undertaker is probably the same height as Rowan, which is about 6'6.25", I can't go lower than that for the undertaker. Kane is a bit taller than Rowan. And Rowan might be taller than Strowman or the same height. But yeah Luke Harper looked only about an inch shorter than Strowman. Which could make Strowman like 6'6".
Michael said on 10/Sep/15
Taker´s peak height was 2,03 m (6-8), now he´s 2,00 m (6-6,75).
Braun Strowman is 1,99 m now (6-6,25): Click Here
and Luke Harper is 1,97 m (6-5,5)
Taker´s peak height was 2,03 m (6-8), now he´s 2,00 m (6-6,75).
Braun Strowman is 1,99 m now (6-6,25): Click Here
and Luke Harper is 1,97 m (6-5,5)
184.3cm (Night) said on 9/Sep/15
If he was the same height as Shaw then he is 6'7 or maybe a smidge more. Thor who Rob met is just under 6'8 and he is taller than Shaw.
If he was the same height as Shaw then he is 6'7 or maybe a smidge more. Thor who Rob met is just under 6'8 and he is taller than Shaw.
Vegas said on 8/Sep/15
Stowman competed in strongman under his real adam scherr and was listed 6'8 there..he was same height as brian shaw who was also listed 6'8!
there is a guy who posted on andres page who claimed to personally know and had trained with scherr and said he was legit 6'8. to me however he looks 6'6 range, in nxt he looked about same height as baron corbin (measured 6'6 barefoot at the nfl combine) and shorter than big cass (who was listed 6'8 in college basketball)
Stowman competed in strongman under his real adam scherr and was listed 6'8 there..he was same height as brian shaw who was also listed 6'8!
there is a guy who posted on andres page who claimed to personally know and had trained with scherr and said he was legit 6'8. to me however he looks 6'6 range, in nxt he looked about same height as baron corbin (measured 6'6 barefoot at the nfl combine) and shorter than big cass (who was listed 6'8 in college basketball)
NCL said on 6/Sep/15
Not sure where else to post this - anyone seen the new Wyatt family member, Braun Stowman? BIG dude, actually steps over the top rope.
I believe he's being advertised as 6'8" 350lbs but I think 6'6" or so may be closer to reality. I have some pics below. Any thoughts?
I'm hoping we'll see some staredowns between him and Erick Rowan when Rowan returns, I'd put Rowan at 6'6" - 6'7"
Click Here with Luke Harper
Click Here Stowman footwear
Click Here Harper footwear
Click Here Roman Reigns and Stowman staredown at 5:58
Click Here Reigns footwear
Not sure where else to post this - anyone seen the new Wyatt family member, Braun Stowman? BIG dude, actually steps over the top rope.
I believe he's being advertised as 6'8" 350lbs but I think 6'6" or so may be closer to reality. I have some pics below. Any thoughts?
I'm hoping we'll see some staredowns between him and Erick Rowan when Rowan returns, I'd put Rowan at 6'6" - 6'7"
Click Here with Luke Harper
Click Here Stowman footwear
Click Here Harper footwear
Click Here Roman Reigns and Stowman staredown at 5:58
Click Here Reigns footwear
Mission five ten said on 6/Sep/15
Yeah i think 6'7".....
Yeah i think 6'7".....
184.3cm (Night) said on 6/Sep/15
Pic from Robby confirms my 6'6.5" guess that ive had since Ali posted his pic. To be honest it wouldnt surprise me if he is heading for 6'6 flat nowadays after a hard day.
Peak was still in the 6'7 range no doubt.
Pic from Robby confirms my 6'6.5" guess that ive had since Ali posted his pic. To be honest it wouldnt surprise me if he is heading for 6'6 flat nowadays after a hard day.
Peak was still in the 6'7 range no doubt.
joe @@ said on 5/Sep/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
morgan I think 6'7 is possible, at most 6'7.25
HeightcrazyRed6ft
morgan I think 6'7 is possible, at most 6'7.25
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 5/Sep/15
Phenom! said on 2/Sep/15
+HeightcrazyRed6ft do you think undertakers at least 6'6"
***
Yeah I think Taker is 6´6"-6´6.5" today, that´s still outstanding tall.
Peak 6´7"-6´7.5"max, around 6´8.5" in wrestlingboots he was.
Phenom! said on 2/Sep/15
+HeightcrazyRed6ft do you think undertakers at least 6'6"
***
Yeah I think Taker is 6´6"-6´6.5" today, that´s still outstanding tall.
Peak 6´7"-6´7.5"max, around 6´8.5" in wrestlingboots he was.
cdk said on 4/Sep/15
HE WAS A LEGIT 6'8" UNTIL AT LEAST 2005
HE WAS A LEGIT 6'8" UNTIL AT LEAST 2005
Phenom! said on 2/Sep/15
+HeightcrazyRed6ft do you think undertakers at least 6'6". Because he sure doesn't look under 6ft 6in. He post a lot of height but he's still taller than most guys in wwe
+HeightcrazyRed6ft do you think undertakers at least 6'6". Because he sure doesn't look under 6ft 6in. He post a lot of height but he's still taller than most guys in wwe
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/Aug/15
JT said on 26/Aug/15
Thanks for sharing, Robby. Other than Orton, the others look shorter than how I thought they would next to you.
Actually Orton looks 6´3.5" max imo, Taker could stand more straight but I doubt he would clean the 2,00m mark(6´6.75"), Brian looks weak 5´8" and Sting 6´1"-6´1.25"
JT said on 26/Aug/15
Thanks for sharing, Robby. Other than Orton, the others look shorter than how I thought they would next to you.
Actually Orton looks 6´3.5" max imo, Taker could stand more straight but I doubt he would clean the 2,00m mark(6´6.75"), Brian looks weak 5´8" and Sting 6´1"-6´1.25"
JT said on 26/Aug/15
Thanks for sharing, Robby. Other than Orton, the others look shorter than how I thought they would next to you.
Thanks for sharing, Robby. Other than Orton, the others look shorter than how I thought they would next to you.
Robby said on 25/Aug/15
@ Ali Baba. Yes He was wearing a black work boot type of shoe.
@ Ali Baba. Yes He was wearing a black work boot type of shoe.
Ali Baba said on 24/Aug/15
Taker looks much healthier this year. Was he wearing the same work boot type shoe?
Taker looks much healthier this year. Was he wearing the same work boot type shoe?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Aug/15
joe said on 21/Aug/15
matt morgan uses elevators I would say it could be something like 6'6.75 barefoot or 6'6.5
Right, Morgan used some heavy lifts Click Here ,these are easy 1.5-1.7" inside lifts with 0.75"-1" wrestlingboots so he was around 6´10" in them, but next to 6´6" Albert he was in normal wrestling boots.
I wouldn´t go under 6´7.5" for Morgan
joe said on 21/Aug/15
matt morgan uses elevators I would say it could be something like 6'6.75 barefoot or 6'6.5
Right, Morgan used some heavy lifts Click Here ,these are easy 1.5-1.7" inside lifts with 0.75"-1" wrestlingboots so he was around 6´10" in them, but next to 6´6" Albert he was in normal wrestling boots.
I wouldn´t go under 6´7.5" for Morgan
mj said on 23/Aug/15
thats more than 4 inches...his head is huge
thats more than 4 inches...his head is huge
Junior31 said on 22/Aug/15
Just went to a meet and greet for Bray Wyatt at the. Barclays center in Brooklyn. Have a pic with him. Big dude. Awesome guy. Asked him how tall are you? He said right around 6'2 and then "I laugh because rumors saying I'm 5'8 but that's because I'm usually standing next to guys 6'5 6'7" we laughed and took the pic. Will post when I get it
Just went to a meet and greet for Bray Wyatt at the. Barclays center in Brooklyn. Have a pic with him. Big dude. Awesome guy. Asked him how tall are you? He said right around 6'2 and then "I laugh because rumors saying I'm 5'8 but that's because I'm usually standing next to guys 6'5 6'7" we laughed and took the pic. Will post when I get it
joe said on 21/Aug/15
matt morgan uses elevators I would say it could be something like 6'6.75 barefoot or 6'6.5
matt morgan uses elevators I would say it could be something like 6'6.75 barefoot or 6'6.5
James B said on 20/Aug/15
Interesting rob in this dailymotion video taker does not not look over 6'6 1/2 compared to Albert who was listed at 6'6.
Click Here
A train does not look over 4 inches taller than lesner either when they square up here. Click Here
Your opinions rob?
Interesting rob in this dailymotion video taker does not not look over 6'6 1/2 compared to Albert who was listed at 6'6.
Click Here
A train does not look over 4 inches taller than lesner either when they square up here. Click Here
Your opinions rob?
James B said on 20/Aug/15
Albert liked to wear big footware?
Albert liked to wear big footware?
enos said on 19/Aug/15
Somethings fishy! I believe ali. Because taker and matt morgan both appeared to be alberts height who was listed at 6'6"
Somethings fishy! I believe ali. Because taker and matt morgan both appeared to be alberts height who was listed at 6'6"
James B said on 19/Aug/15
Probably 6'7-6'7.25 by 2001 since he only edged out 6'6 1/2 A train by a fraction
Probably 6'7-6'7.25 by 2001 since he only edged out 6'6 1/2 A train by a fraction
Ali Baba said on 18/Aug/15
Joe, we've never met each other. We live on the opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean, so it's a bit of a trip.
Joe, we've never met each other. We live on the opposite sides of the Atlantic Ocean, so it's a bit of a trip.
joe said on 15/Aug/15
Rob, you have viewed Ali baba personally
Rob, you have viewed Ali baba personally
Alex 6'0 said on 13/Aug/15
UT had like 5 inches on Brock back in 2002
UT had like 5 inches on Brock back in 2002
6'2 said on 10/Aug/15
enos he was taller than sid so what was sid 6'5-.5 peak come on. jake roberts is 6'5" he was taller than him bezerker was 6'6 taller shango 6'5 taller scott hall crush earthquake these are all wrestlers who were 6'5-7" and taker was taller id say 6'7 maybe 6'6.5" today but peak has to be 6'8
enos he was taller than sid so what was sid 6'5-.5 peak come on. jake roberts is 6'5" he was taller than him bezerker was 6'6 taller shango 6'5 taller scott hall crush earthquake these are all wrestlers who were 6'5-7" and taker was taller id say 6'7 maybe 6'6.5" today but peak has to be 6'8
184.3cm (Night) said on 9/Aug/15
Rob if Ali is ok with it maybe you should put that pic of them both here? Still many people who believe he is 6'8 or even more. He cant be more than 6'7 its impossible unless Ali had massive boots which i dont believe for a second.
Rob if Ali is ok with it maybe you should put that pic of them both here? Still many people who believe he is 6'8 or even more. He cant be more than 6'7 its impossible unless Ali had massive boots which i dont believe for a second.
Phenom! said on 8/Aug/15
I remember that undertaker had flats during the unholy alliance staredown with the big show who had freaking lifts! Undertaker was at his tallest, and straight posture, he looked only about 3 inches shorter than big show. That would've made undertaker a legit 6'9". I've seen certain times where undertaker apprears taller than Kane. During big evil era, and the ministry era offcourse
I remember that undertaker had flats during the unholy alliance staredown with the big show who had freaking lifts! Undertaker was at his tallest, and straight posture, he looked only about 3 inches shorter than big show. That would've made undertaker a legit 6'9". I've seen certain times where undertaker apprears taller than Kane. During big evil era, and the ministry era offcourse
Enos said on 8/Aug/15
Rob, Ali, How tall do you guys think taker was peak barefoot and in boots and current barefoot and in boots. im in between 5'10'' and 5'11'' barefoot, and ive been watching taker 91-94. and to be honest, it seems like the "jobbers'' they put him against were about my size but they billed em 6'' to 6'2''. taker didn't look to me like hed even be 6'8'' in boots. feedback please
Rob, Ali, How tall do you guys think taker was peak barefoot and in boots and current barefoot and in boots. im in between 5'10'' and 5'11'' barefoot, and ive been watching taker 91-94. and to be honest, it seems like the "jobbers'' they put him against were about my size but they billed em 6'' to 6'2''. taker didn't look to me like hed even be 6'8'' in boots. feedback please
enos said on 7/Aug/15
Ali and rob.peak height for taker barefoot and current. Id like both your opinions. Watchin old vids from 92-94 with jobbers he didnt look 6'8" even in boots to me. I think he is and always was a true 6'6"
Ali and rob.peak height for taker barefoot and current. Id like both your opinions. Watchin old vids from 92-94 with jobbers he didnt look 6'8" even in boots to me. I think he is and always was a true 6'6"
6'2 said on 4/Aug/15
He appeared to have at least 5" on Brock so would be around 6'7 he used to be 6'8
He appeared to have at least 5" on Brock so would be around 6'7 he used to be 6'8
slim said on 3/Aug/15
Where is Moody's quote? Show proof please. Bc kane was still taller in flats as Isaac yankem in the staredown with taker. Longer arms too.
Where is Moody's quote? Show proof please. Bc kane was still taller in flats as Isaac yankem in the staredown with taker. Longer arms too.
James B said on 2/Aug/15
Looked closer to 6'7 flat peak compared to sid and kevin nash
Looked closer to 6'7 flat peak compared to sid and kevin nash
Nick said on 31/Jul/15
William Moody (Paul Bearer, Percy Pringle III) said that Taker is about an inch taller than Kane and he knew both men well for many years and worked with both. Looking at the boots Kane used he had sizable lifts in them to mak him look much taller whereas Taker's were flat soles. This is the reason Kane looks taller than Taker as he was billed to be but in reality Mr Moody's assessment is probably accurate.
William Moody (Paul Bearer, Percy Pringle III) said that Taker is about an inch taller than Kane and he knew both men well for many years and worked with both. Looking at the boots Kane used he had sizable lifts in them to mak him look much taller whereas Taker's were flat soles. This is the reason Kane looks taller than Taker as he was billed to be but in reality Mr Moody's assessment is probably accurate.
josey wales said on 29/Jul/15
In 2000/2001 he was certainly well over 300 lbs. Reckon close to 330. He was rsther over weight before getting lean again in abt 2003. Nowadays his around 260 or just over. I reckon in 1999 during his ministry days he was a solid 300. Had massive shoulders. Was quite a beast even though was near chronicly injured most of the time
In 2000/2001 he was certainly well over 300 lbs. Reckon close to 330. He was rsther over weight before getting lean again in abt 2003. Nowadays his around 260 or just over. I reckon in 1999 during his ministry days he was a solid 300. Had massive shoulders. Was quite a beast even though was near chronicly injured most of the time
the beast 09 said on 27/Jul/15
Well he looks 6'7
Well he looks 6'7
Munna said on 24/Jul/15
Taker was 6'7.5" during his younger days & Kane was about 6'8". But it looks like both of them have lost some height now. So as per my opinion, Undertaker is now 6'6.5" or may be 6'7" & Kane is about 6'7.5"
Taker was 6'7.5" during his younger days & Kane was about 6'8". But it looks like both of them have lost some height now. So as per my opinion, Undertaker is now 6'6.5" or may be 6'7" & Kane is about 6'7.5"
Robert said on 24/Jul/15
I'd say Taker is now 6'6.5" and about 275lbs. At his biggest, he was 6'8",307lbs.
I'd say Taker is now 6'6.5" and about 275lbs. At his biggest, he was 6'8",307lbs.
Height183 said on 23/Jul/15
6'6.5'' Max for me today. Probably hits a flat 6'6'' at his lowest in the evening.
6'6.5'' Max for me today. Probably hits a flat 6'6'' at his lowest in the evening.
Jay said on 23/Jul/15
taker is 6'11" is he not?
taker is 6'11" is he not?
Kunoichi said on 22/Jul/15
Bad angle Taker and Hall,but Their feet seem a little.
blogs.c.yimg.jp/res/blog-63-fb/jackmasayuki74/folder/880174/16/27231116/img_1?1297692214
Bad angle Taker and Hall,but Their feet seem a little.
blogs.c.yimg.jp/res/blog-63-fb/jackmasayuki74/folder/880174/16/27231116/img_1?1297692214
6'2 said on 22/Jul/15
Unfortunately some people here are a bad judge of height difference the pic with Goldberg would be a 4-5" difference putting taker at still around or close to 6'7 and with hall in the ring he would be 6'8-9" if hall is in fact 6'5" I'd say he lost 1-2" over the crippling years like most past wrestlers
Unfortunately some people here are a bad judge of height difference the pic with Goldberg would be a 4-5" difference putting taker at still around or close to 6'7 and with hall in the ring he would be 6'8-9" if hall is in fact 6'5" I'd say he lost 1-2" over the crippling years like most past wrestlers
ken-6-4 said on 22/Jul/15
Dude. He is 50 years old and has been wrestling for ages.
The guy looks good for all that he has been through.
animal says on 15/Jul/15
Undertaker today with horrendous posture and a ravaged looking body. His neck/upper back is curving and he's a SHATTERED man today. I personally think he's about 6'5.5" barefoot today at best:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Compared to his PEAK:
Dude. He is 50 years old and has been wrestling for ages.
The guy looks good for all that he has been through.
animal says on 15/Jul/15
Undertaker today with horrendous posture and a ravaged looking body. His neck/upper back is curving and he's a SHATTERED man today. I personally think he's about 6'5.5" barefoot today at best:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Compared to his PEAK:
ken-6-4 said on 22/Jul/15
Seems like a knee issue with that big brace.
He is not getting any younger. :(
LoganNoll1996 says on 21/Jul/15
What do you think of his health at this point compared to last year, Rob?
Seems like a knee issue with that big brace.
He is not getting any younger. :(
LoganNoll1996 says on 21/Jul/15
What do you think of his health at this point compared to last year, Rob?
joe said on 22/Jul/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft diz em 20 / Jul / 15
it means a demotion for Joe Manganiello it looks the same height hall next to kevin nash, without citing peak height nash
HeightcrazyRed6ft diz em 20 / Jul / 15
it means a demotion for Joe Manganiello it looks the same height hall next to kevin nash, without citing peak height nash
Patrick said on 21/Jul/15
He's 6'7". Peak 6'8", but after Raw last night (07/20/15) he had an easy 4+ inches on everyone in that ring.
He's 6'7". Peak 6'8", but after Raw last night (07/20/15) he had an easy 4+ inches on everyone in that ring.
miko said on 21/Jul/15
6'5.5 is a disgrace.
6'5.5 is a disgrace.
Shuvayu said on 21/Jul/15
Sa a recent pic of taker ith khali... no more than a 3 inch difference
Sa a recent pic of taker ith khali... no more than a 3 inch difference
Shuvayu said on 21/Jul/15
Check scot hall mug shot...recent 6'5" height... taker still has 2-3" on him...so 6'7.5 min for taker
Check scot hall mug shot...recent 6'5" height... taker still has 2-3" on him...so 6'7.5 min for taker
pablo77bar(184cm) said on 21/Jul/15
Yesterday in RAW he still looked in the 2 meters tall range
Yesterday in RAW he still looked in the 2 meters tall range
LoganNoll1996 said on 21/Jul/15
Just watched RAW in which everyone from the locker room had to come out and separate him and Lesnar. Was easily the tallest guy in that ring and the height difference looked real noticible when a good bit of guys were holding him back including 6'4 Titus O'Niell. Guy looks to be in phenominal shape compared to last year(and earlier this year)by the way.
As for his current height I believe he's a flat 6'7. Just doesn't look to be in the 6'6 range if you ask me.
What do you think of his health at this point compared to last year, Rob?
Just watched RAW in which everyone from the locker room had to come out and separate him and Lesnar. Was easily the tallest guy in that ring and the height difference looked real noticible when a good bit of guys were holding him back including 6'4 Titus O'Niell. Guy looks to be in phenominal shape compared to last year(and earlier this year)by the way.
As for his current height I believe he's a flat 6'7. Just doesn't look to be in the 6'6 range if you ask me.
What do you think of his health at this point compared to last year, Rob?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 20/Jul/15
Great find Kunoichi!
Hall was 6´4.5" - at best 6´5" flat and Taker looks 2-2.5" taller
Great find Kunoichi!
Hall was 6´4.5" - at best 6´5" flat and Taker looks 2-2.5" taller
joe said on 20/Jul/15
Frank
ali baba said he had a boost of boots, I think it barefoot is the same height ali baba 6'6
Frank
ali baba said he had a boost of boots, I think it barefoot is the same height ali baba 6'6
Phenom! said on 18/Jul/15
Peak undertaker was a hair under 6'8". But you have to take into consideration the amount of stress, punishment, and even some pressure that this man took in the past 20 years. His injuries started in 1995, and carried on after that. He lost about 2 inches in this process. However, he is still not under 6'6" either. He seems that way because he slouches and bends his knees. Standing up straight, he is dead on or even taller than 6'6".
Peak undertaker was a hair under 6'8". But you have to take into consideration the amount of stress, punishment, and even some pressure that this man took in the past 20 years. His injuries started in 1995, and carried on after that. He lost about 2 inches in this process. However, he is still not under 6'6" either. He seems that way because he slouches and bends his knees. Standing up straight, he is dead on or even taller than 6'6".
Frank said on 17/Jul/15
He appeared alittle Taller then Ali Baba so hes 6ft 6 to 6ft 6.5
He appeared alittle Taller then Ali Baba so hes 6ft 6 to 6ft 6.5
joe said on 16/Jul/15
Danimal
also has a recent pictures with 6'2 Sting
Danimal
also has a recent pictures with 6'2 Sting
Austin said on 15/Jul/15
6'7" (6'7.5" peak) 275-280 lbs
6'7" (6'7.5" peak) 275-280 lbs
Danimal said on 15/Jul/15
Undertaker today with horrendous posture and a ravaged looking body. His neck/upper back is curving and he's a SHATTERED man today. I personally think he's about 6'5.5" barefoot today at best:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Compared to his PEAK:
Undertaker today with horrendous posture and a ravaged looking body. His neck/upper back is curving and he's a SHATTERED man today. I personally think he's about 6'5.5" barefoot today at best:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Compared to his PEAK:
onepunchbob said on 13/Jul/15
Taker is 6'6 today. Was same height as Ali. Peak height was 6'7 and no more. Fractionally taller than Sid. Always slightly shorter than Kane.
Taker is 6'6 today. Was same height as Ali. Peak height was 6'7 and no more. Fractionally taller than Sid. Always slightly shorter than Kane.
joe said on 13/Jul/15
still I think scott hall was 6'5 in height
still I think scott hall was 6'5 in height
Dougal said on 13/Jul/15
(Hall and UT that is). Taker is likely circa 6'7(2012).
(Hall and UT that is). Taker is likely circa 6'7(2012).
Dougal said on 13/Jul/15
Thanks for these. Looks to be a significant difference between the two.
Thanks for these. Looks to be a significant difference between the two.
Danimal said on 11/Jul/15
Not sure why Rob didn't upload my last post, but here is a pic comparison between then 6'5" Scott Hall and Undertaker from 1989:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Not sure why Rob didn't upload my last post, but here is a pic comparison between then 6'5" Scott Hall and Undertaker from 1989:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Dougal said on 10/Jul/15
I don't think was quite peak height by this stage as had been wrestling for in excess of 10 years by the year 2000 and during that time had a number of injuries.
I don't think was quite peak height by this stage as had been wrestling for in excess of 10 years by the year 2000 and during that time had a number of injuries.
Vegas said on 10/Jul/15
Danimal says on 9/Jul/15
Taker (still at his peak height) in street clothes and the Rock probably in around 2000:
________
how many inches difference do you see there?
Danimal says on 9/Jul/15
Taker (still at his peak height) in street clothes and the Rock probably in around 2000:
________
how many inches difference do you see there?
joe 193cm night said on 10/Jul/15
I think with the footwear difference between taker and Ali, perhaps taker is also about 6'6
I think with the footwear difference between taker and Ali, perhaps taker is also about 6'6
Danimal said on 9/Jul/15
Taker (still at his peak height) in street clothes and the Rock probably in around 2000: Click Here
Taker (still at his peak height) in street clothes and the Rock probably in around 2000: Click Here
VC said on 6/Jul/15
I think Undertaker is somewhat between 6'5"-6'6".
I think Undertaker is somewhat between 6'5"-6'6".
James B said on 6/Jul/15
Vegas says on 3/Jul/15
James B says on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5
______
i would have said 6'4. he didn't look taller next to orton than drew galloway did and galloway isn't more than a flat 6'4. jake had about half an inch footwear advantage on orton that night
Bear in mind also that orton could be 6'4.25
Vegas says on 3/Jul/15
James B says on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5
______
i would have said 6'4. he didn't look taller next to orton than drew galloway did and galloway isn't more than a flat 6'4. jake had about half an inch footwear advantage on orton that night
Bear in mind also that orton could be 6'4.25
Dougal said on 3/Jul/15
UT was neither the Kayfabe 6'10 or 6'10 1/2 at tallest height or merely 6'7 or so as often features on here, (although around that height now). The truth was likely somewhere in between. Although some uncertainty remains, around 6'8 1/2 seems about right taking into account all evidence of early/mid 1990's footage available on well known internet sites and there is an awful lot of it. Jake is right at around 6'5 although typically had a footwear advantage also.
UT was neither the Kayfabe 6'10 or 6'10 1/2 at tallest height or merely 6'7 or so as often features on here, (although around that height now). The truth was likely somewhere in between. Although some uncertainty remains, around 6'8 1/2 seems about right taking into account all evidence of early/mid 1990's footage available on well known internet sites and there is an awful lot of it. Jake is right at around 6'5 although typically had a footwear advantage also.
Vegas said on 3/Jul/15
James B says on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5
______
i would have said 6'4. he didn't look taller next to orton than drew galloway did and galloway isn't more than a flat 6'4. jake had about half an inch footwear advantage on orton that night
James B says on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5
______
i would have said 6'4. he didn't look taller next to orton than drew galloway did and galloway isn't more than a flat 6'4. jake had about half an inch footwear advantage on orton that night
Op said on 1/Jul/15
I wanna see undertaker and Lebron James standing next to each other
I wanna see undertaker and Lebron James standing next to each other
James B said on 1/Jul/15
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5 compared to legit 6'4 randy Orton 10 years ago in 2005 and that was with poor posture
Vegas jake looked 6'4-6'5 compared to legit 6'4 randy Orton 10 years ago in 2005 and that was with poor posture
6'2 Dan said on 1/Jul/15
@dougal, 202 cm peak for taker,what a joke!
@dougal, 202 cm peak for taker,what a joke!
Vegas said on 30/Jun/15
Danimal says on 30/Jun/15
All those trying to lower Jake.. yeah I'm looking at you Heightcrazy, he was a LEGIT 6'5" man at his peak.
_________
he doesn't look legit 6'5 in this clip barefoot next to paul bearer who was probably no more than 5'11 in shoes, 2 minute mark Click Here
Danimal says on 30/Jun/15
All those trying to lower Jake.. yeah I'm looking at you Heightcrazy, he was a LEGIT 6'5" man at his peak.
_________
he doesn't look legit 6'5 in this clip barefoot next to paul bearer who was probably no more than 5'11 in shoes, 2 minute mark Click Here
codeword said on 30/Jun/15
peak 210cm height 208
peak 210cm height 208
Danimal said on 30/Jun/15
All those trying to lower Jake.. yeah I'm looking at you Heightcrazy, he was a LEGIT 6'5" man at his peak.
All those trying to lower Jake.. yeah I'm looking at you Heightcrazy, he was a LEGIT 6'5" man at his peak.
joe 193cm night said on 28/Jun/15
Rob, kane and taker could have been a 6'8 flat when younger
Rob, kane and taker could have been a 6'8 flat when younger
Michael said on 28/Jun/15
More likely is that Calaway´s peak height was 2,03 m and 2,00 m now (fits better compared with guys like Nash).
More likely is that Calaway´s peak height was 2,03 m and 2,00 m now (fits better compared with guys like Nash).
josey wales said on 26/Jun/15
Them soles of jake makes kanes' 97 monstee heels look tiny
Them soles of jake makes kanes' 97 monstee heels look tiny
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 24/Jun/15
Dougal says on 23/Jun/15
That link is around Feb 1992 actually, Jake Roberts was renown for wearing chunky boots he bobbed up and down in height some over the years.
Exact Dougal
Click Here
Jake´s munsters gave him 6cm, boosting him from 195cm to 201cm.
Taker was still 4cm taller, so Taker was 205cm (6´8.75") in Footwear.
Takers footwear boosted him no less than 3cm during this time, so 201cm-202cm/ 6´7"-6´7.5" is as good as it gets for Takers peak evening.
Dougal says on 23/Jun/15
That link is around Feb 1992 actually, Jake Roberts was renown for wearing chunky boots he bobbed up and down in height some over the years.
Exact Dougal
Click Here
Jake´s munsters gave him 6cm, boosting him from 195cm to 201cm.
Taker was still 4cm taller, so Taker was 205cm (6´8.75") in Footwear.
Takers footwear boosted him no less than 3cm during this time, so 201cm-202cm/ 6´7"-6´7.5" is as good as it gets for Takers peak evening.
Dougal said on 23/Jun/15
That link is around Feb 1992 actually, Jake Roberts was renown for wearing chunky boots he bobbed up and down in height some over the years. Sid towered El Diablo Jake 1991 (albeit maybe the latter barefoot) and UT was then revealed to be taller than Sid in the same footage although Sid a bit more muscle bound.
That link is around Feb 1992 actually, Jake Roberts was renown for wearing chunky boots he bobbed up and down in height some over the years. Sid towered El Diablo Jake 1991 (albeit maybe the latter barefoot) and UT was then revealed to be taller than Sid in the same footage although Sid a bit more muscle bound.
Danimal said on 20/Jun/15
At 1:39 you can see the height loss in the Undertaker (it's a new pic of him): Click Here
At 1:39 you can see the height loss in the Undertaker (it's a new pic of him): Click Here
Matthew said on 14/Jun/15
hi says on 6/Jun/15
Click Here
next to the great khaki
---
Wow. Khali might be shorter than he's listed at.
hi says on 6/Jun/15
Click Here
next to the great khaki
---
Wow. Khali might be shorter than he's listed at.
NCL said on 3/Jun/15
Found an interesting video on youtube comparing the heights of Undertaker, Sid, and Kane:
Click Here
I don't agree with everything on there but it's an interesting video
Found an interesting video on youtube comparing the heights of Undertaker, Sid, and Kane:
Click Here
I don't agree with everything on there but it's an interesting video
Paul said on 2/Jun/15
Sid was photo'd folowing arrest in recent times and was measured at a shade over 6'6 although that was at 3am. Taller of course after a subsequent nights rest.
Sid was photo'd folowing arrest in recent times and was measured at a shade over 6'6 although that was at 3am. Taller of course after a subsequent nights rest.
joe 193cm night said on 1/Jun/15
I think Sid peak 6'6.75 "-6'7" a good listing
I think Sid peak 6'6.75 "-6'7" a good listing
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 31/May/15
joe 193cm night says on 29/May/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
these fighters already have a certain age almost everyone has more 50 years
Prime Sid with 6´3" Lex Luger, camera angle is a bit low but it´s rather 3.5" than a full 4 inches there.
barefoot evening height:
peak Sid imo 6´6.75"-6´7"
peak Taker 6´7"-6´7.25"
Click Here
joe 193cm night says on 29/May/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
these fighters already have a certain age almost everyone has more 50 years
Prime Sid with 6´3" Lex Luger, camera angle is a bit low but it´s rather 3.5" than a full 4 inches there.
barefoot evening height:
peak Sid imo 6´6.75"-6´7"
peak Taker 6´7"-6´7.25"
Click Here
josey wales said on 31/May/15
evilsecondtwin very realistic estimation in my view
evilsecondtwin very realistic estimation in my view
joe 193cm night said on 29/May/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
these fighters already have a certain age almost everyone has more 50 years
HeightcrazyRed6ft
these fighters already have a certain age almost everyone has more 50 years
josey wales said on 28/May/15
Vader never was near 6'4" . 6'2" peak at best.
Vader never was near 6'4" . 6'2" peak at best.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/May/15
joey says on 27/May/15
... To me Sid is his 6'8" he ever announes that often by himself...
Click Here
Nuff said
joey says on 27/May/15
... To me Sid is his 6'8" he ever announes that often by himself...
Click Here
Nuff said
josey wales said on 27/May/15
@heihtcrazyred, i really wasnt aware of a visitor or potser called doink .. acyually it was my reference to the doink the clown wrestler of the 90'ies..bit tongue in cheek.. will keep in mind next time.
@heihtcrazyred, i really wasnt aware of a visitor or potser called doink .. acyually it was my reference to the doink the clown wrestler of the 90'ies..bit tongue in cheek.. will keep in mind next time.
joey said on 27/May/15
Guys what i experience here is that taker, diesel and others are getting smaller and smaller every time, in the 90-ties i saw the undertaker and diesel live and at that time he had exactly 7-8 inches more than me and i am almost 6'3,5" already. Minimum height therefore is 6'9" for taker and 6'10" for diesel(which diesel and untertaker announced very often during interviews btw). To me Sid is his 6'8" he ever announes that often by himself. Seeing him with 6'4" Vader that is even too low becauyse he is minimum 6 inches taller than him.
Guys what i experience here is that taker, diesel and others are getting smaller and smaller every time, in the 90-ties i saw the undertaker and diesel live and at that time he had exactly 7-8 inches more than me and i am almost 6'3,5" already. Minimum height therefore is 6'9" for taker and 6'10" for diesel(which diesel and untertaker announced very often during interviews btw). To me Sid is his 6'8" he ever announes that often by himself. Seeing him with 6'4" Vader that is even too low becauyse he is minimum 6 inches taller than him.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/May/15
josey wales says on 25/May/15
I see clement you aret it again. Are you the doink the clown of the sight? Seriously bud.
Yeah clement is on the troll side but remember Doink was also a visitor with pretty good informations...
josey wales says on 25/May/15
I see clement you aret it again. Are you the doink the clown of the sight? Seriously bud.
Yeah clement is on the troll side but remember Doink was also a visitor with pretty good informations...
EvilSecondTwin said on 26/May/15
How's 6'6" for taker, 6'6.5" for kane, 6'9" for nash, 6'10" for big show, and 6'4" for someone like orton?
How's 6'6" for taker, 6'6.5" for kane, 6'9" for nash, 6'10" for big show, and 6'4" for someone like orton?
josey wales said on 25/May/15
I see clement you aret it again. Are you the doink the clown of the sight? Seriously bud.
I see clement you aret it again. Are you the doink the clown of the sight? Seriously bud.
Shuvayu said on 24/May/15
Rubbish...if Kevin Nash was 611" Peak, taker would have to be 6'8" minimum...
Rubbish...if Kevin Nash was 611" Peak, taker would have to be 6'8" minimum...
clement said on 23/May/15
THE UNDERTAKER IS HARDLY 6'5"...6'4"AND A HALF....
THE UNDERTAKER IS HARDLY 6'5"...6'4"AND A HALF....
ck said on 14/May/15
Im starting to think his peak height was 6'6.5" and today he is around 6'5.75" barefoot
Im starting to think his peak height was 6'6.5" and today he is around 6'5.75" barefoot
James B said on 10/May/15
I don't see much evidence to suggest he was 6'7.5 peak
I don't see much evidence to suggest he was 6'7.5 peak
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/May/15
Sam says on 6/May/15
Undertaker referred to as 6'7 in a Muscle and Fitness article about Triple H by trainer Joe DeFranco
Sara´s(Takers Ex-wife) father also said Taker´s 6´7"
Sam says on 6/May/15
Undertaker referred to as 6'7 in a Muscle and Fitness article about Triple H by trainer Joe DeFranco
Sara´s(Takers Ex-wife) father also said Taker´s 6´7"
Sam said on 6/May/15
Undertaker referred to as 6'7 in a Muscle and Fitness article about Triple H by trainer Joe DeFranco
Undertaker referred to as 6'7 in a Muscle and Fitness article about Triple H by trainer Joe DeFranco
6'1 dan said on 6/May/15
Soon,6'3 for taker
Soon,6'3 for taker
joe 193cm night said on 3/May/15
he was taller than 6'5 Jake snake I think he was 6'6 yes
he was taller than 6'5 Jake snake I think he was 6'6 yes
James B said on 3/May/15
Jake snake could have been 6'5-6'5.5 range peak. Hall was 6'4.5 peak I think?
Jake snake could have been 6'5-6'5.5 range peak. Hall was 6'4.5 peak I think?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 2/May/15
joe 193cm night says on 30/Apr/15
peak undisputed looked taller than hulk hogan 6'6
Take a look at hogans page and listen to "Zeus", Hulk was 6´5"
joe 193cm night says on 30/Apr/15
peak undisputed looked taller than hulk hogan 6'6
Take a look at hogans page and listen to "Zeus", Hulk was 6´5"
joe 193cm night said on 30/Apr/15
peak undisputed looked taller than hulk hogan 6'6, hall scoot 6'5, 6'5 jake anake etc.
peak undisputed looked taller than hulk hogan 6'6, hall scoot 6'5, 6'5 jake anake etc.
CDDK said on 26/Apr/15
PEAK HEIGHT WAS 6'8"
TODAY HEIGHT IS 6'7"
PEAK HEIGHT WAS 6'8"
TODAY HEIGHT IS 6'7"
James B said on 26/Apr/15
6'7 1/2 is questionable for undertakers peak
6'7 1/2 is questionable for undertakers peak
James B said on 25/Apr/15
Off topic but do you guys agree that Sid Eudy looked no taller than 6'6.25 compared to lex Luger?
Off topic but do you guys agree that Sid Eudy looked no taller than 6'6.25 compared to lex Luger?
Michael said on 25/Apr/15
Rob has Windham (mid 90ies) at 6-5, with 5-8+ Mamun: Click Here
Sid had about 2,5" on Windham (early 90ies), he was 6-7,5: Click Here
Sid had about 2,5 - 3" on Luger (Sid not fully streched, perhaps 0,5 more): Click Here
6-3 for Luger is a wrong listing, he was about 6-4 in the early 90ies.
Dirk Nowitski (6-11+) was wrong listed at 6-10 and he is taller than Big Show (about 6-11).
Rob has Windham (mid 90ies) at 6-5, with 5-8+ Mamun: Click Here
Sid had about 2,5" on Windham (early 90ies), he was 6-7,5: Click Here
Sid had about 2,5 - 3" on Luger (Sid not fully streched, perhaps 0,5 more): Click Here
6-3 for Luger is a wrong listing, he was about 6-4 in the early 90ies.
Dirk Nowitski (6-11+) was wrong listed at 6-10 and he is taller than Big Show (about 6-11).
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 23/Apr/15
Shuvayu says on 22/Apr/15
Here is a pic that shows taker would be a legit 6'9" in prime...if we consider scot hall 6'6" in his prime.... scot hall is 6'5" today, check his mug shots
just google undertaker height comparison
Scott Hall wasn´t even full 6´5" in his prime, here he´s next to 6´3" Lex Luger Click Here
Looks more 6´4.5" and Taker has about 2.5" on him.
Shuvayu says on 22/Apr/15
Here is a pic that shows taker would be a legit 6'9" in prime...if we consider scot hall 6'6" in his prime.... scot hall is 6'5" today, check his mug shots
just google undertaker height comparison
Scott Hall wasn´t even full 6´5" in his prime, here he´s next to 6´3" Lex Luger Click Here
Looks more 6´4.5" and Taker has about 2.5" on him.
Shuvayu said on 23/Apr/15
was watching sid vs taker from rampage, maina, raw & memphis in all case sid looked bigger... dunno y
was watching sid vs taker from rampage, maina, raw & memphis in all case sid looked bigger... dunno y
Shuvayu said on 22/Apr/15
Here is a pic that shows taker would be a legit 6'9" in prime...if we consider scot hall 6'6" in his prime.... scot hall is 6'5" today, check his mug shots
just google undertaker height comparison
Here is a pic that shows taker would be a legit 6'9" in prime...if we consider scot hall 6'6" in his prime.... scot hall is 6'5" today, check his mug shots
just google undertaker height comparison
MasterX said on 13/Apr/15
@Sandy Are you a boy or a girl?????
@Sandy Are you a boy or a girl?????
Danimal said on 12/Apr/15
Sandy says on 11/Apr/15
Big Show is 7'0 on the dot. I am 6'8 and have met him twice.
He's under 6'10.75" MAX today. Was 7'0.5" in the mid-late 1990's.
Sandy says on 11/Apr/15
Big Show is 7'0 on the dot. I am 6'8 and have met him twice.
He's under 6'10.75" MAX today. Was 7'0.5" in the mid-late 1990's.
Thomas said on 12/Apr/15
I´ don´t know the height of this guy.
My estimates (barefoot, fully strechted, average day height): Nash 6-9,25 (peak 6-10,5), Taker 6-6,75 (peak 6-8,25), Big Show 6-10,75 (peak 7) and Khali 7 (peak 7-1,5).
I´ don´t know the height of this guy.
My estimates (barefoot, fully strechted, average day height): Nash 6-9,25 (peak 6-10,5), Taker 6-6,75 (peak 6-8,25), Big Show 6-10,75 (peak 7) and Khali 7 (peak 7-1,5).
Danimal said on 11/Apr/15
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here
WOW. GREAT pics!! You need to upload those same pics on Big Show and Nash's page also. Those pics reveal A LOT of where these guys stand TODAY.
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here
WOW. GREAT pics!! You need to upload those same pics on Big Show and Nash's page also. Those pics reveal A LOT of where these guys stand TODAY.
Sandy said on 11/Apr/15
Big Show is 7'0 on the dot. I am 6'8 and have met him twice.
Big Show is 7'0 on the dot. I am 6'8 and have met him twice.
Phenom! said on 10/Apr/15
How tall do you guys think Kane is today compared to big show, khali, Nash, and undertaker. I think he's about 6'7" today, peak he must have been about 6'7.75", in boots he towered over undertaker, cuz he had 2.5inch lifts in his boots in the old days. Today he wears regular wrestling boots.
How tall do you guys think Kane is today compared to big show, khali, Nash, and undertaker. I think he's about 6'7" today, peak he must have been about 6'7.75", in boots he towered over undertaker, cuz he had 2.5inch lifts in his boots in the old days. Today he wears regular wrestling boots.
joe joe said on 10/Apr/15
i think undertaker is 6'10
i think undertaker is 6'10
Patrick said on 9/Apr/15
im 188 says on 7/Apr/15
@Thomas I say Taker is 6ft7 , Nash is 6ft8 , Big show is 6ft10
And khali is 6ft11
Agreed!
6'7" today, 6'8 1/2" peak.
Minimum of 3.5 inches on Randy Orton as shown:
Click Here
or
Click Here
im 188 says on 7/Apr/15
@Thomas I say Taker is 6ft7 , Nash is 6ft8 , Big show is 6ft10
And khali is 6ft11
Agreed!
6'7" today, 6'8 1/2" peak.
Minimum of 3.5 inches on Randy Orton as shown:
Click Here
or
Click Here
James B said on 9/Apr/15
Nash I'd say is 6'8.75 today and 6'9.5-6'10 peak.
He's still closer to the 6'9 mark than the 6'8 mark.
Nash I'd say is 6'8.75 today and 6'9.5-6'10 peak.
He's still closer to the 6'9 mark than the 6'8 mark.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 7/Apr/15
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here
Thx for sharing! What´s your barfoot height and your estimation for them?
Click Here
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here
Thx for sharing! What´s your barfoot height and your estimation for them?
Click Here
im 188 said on 7/Apr/15
@Thomas I say Taker is 6ft7 , Nash is 6ft8 , Big show is 6ft10
And khali is 6ft11
@Thomas I say Taker is 6ft7 , Nash is 6ft8 , Big show is 6ft10
And khali is 6ft11
Junior31 said on 7/Apr/15
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here
Sick pics dude. How tall are you and what are your impressions on each guy
Thomas says on 7/Apr/15
Nash, Taker, Big Show, Khali
Click Here
Sick pics dude. How tall are you and what are your impressions on each guy
joe 193cm night said on 7/Apr/15
the difference is the footwear I think the difference between maximum and there Taker, Taker should be around 1 cm or 1 cm and 5mmde difference taking the footwear.
Taker duty this around 6'6.5 or 6'6.75
the difference is the footwear I think the difference between maximum and there Taker, Taker should be around 1 cm or 1 cm and 5mmde difference taking the footwear.
Taker duty this around 6'6.5 or 6'6.75
just because said on 7/Apr/15
Click Here Heres undertaker and 6ft 4 billy gunn if he stood up straight he wouldnt be much more than 6ft 6 Maybe 6ft 6.5 for taker today.
Click Here Heres undertaker and 6ft 4 billy gunn if he stood up straight he wouldnt be much more than 6ft 6 Maybe 6ft 6.5 for taker today.
James B said on 7/Apr/15
I do agree 6'6 1/2 for sid does seem low as well if you see past segments of him with 6'9 or 6'10 kevin nash. Yet with Lex Luger Sid looked barely over 6'6 flat.
I do agree 6'6 1/2 for sid does seem low as well if you see past segments of him with 6'9 or 6'10 kevin nash. Yet with Lex Luger Sid looked barely over 6'6 flat.
6'1 dan said on 7/Apr/15
Kane had 3 inches footwear in his prime? I don't think so.Don't you know that he was also 300+ pounds? If so,he could not get more than 1,75 inches due to his weight
Kane had 3 inches footwear in his prime? I don't think so.Don't you know that he was also 300+ pounds? If so,he could not get more than 1,75 inches due to his weight
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 6/Apr/15
skinnykid says on 5/Apr/15
This post can put much to rest.
Domex says on 27/Mar/15
With 6'7 basketball player Tyrone White Click Here
Tyrone looks shorter than 6´6" AliBaba next to Taker so I call the 6´7" listing: maybe in big big Basketball shoes but not barefoot.
skinnykid says on 5/Apr/15
This post can put much to rest.
Domex says on 27/Mar/15
With 6'7 basketball player Tyrone White Click Here
Tyrone looks shorter than 6´6" AliBaba next to Taker so I call the 6´7" listing: maybe in big big Basketball shoes but not barefoot.
Shuvayu said on 6/Apr/15
Bigshot.... sid was 6'7" read arn andersons tale of the scissors incident that transpired between them....
Bigshot.... sid was 6'7" read arn andersons tale of the scissors incident that transpired between them....
Danimal said on 5/Apr/15
Today's version of Undertaker would have barely edged out a PRIME Hogan (1980's version).
Today's version of Undertaker would have barely edged out a PRIME Hogan (1980's version).
Danimal said on 5/Apr/15
im 188 says on 28/Mar/15
With the 6ft7 Tyrone white he was a tad taller but he had a bent poster which proves he is a tad over 6ft7
All it proves is that Tyrones listing of 6'7" is in basketball shoes.
im 188 says on 28/Mar/15
With the 6ft7 Tyrone white he was a tad taller but he had a bent poster which proves he is a tad over 6ft7
All it proves is that Tyrones listing of 6'7" is in basketball shoes.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 5/Apr/15
Thomas says on 5/Apr/15
.... The size of the scala is clearly wrong, ...
Yeah it´s basicly not self-explanatory
Let me explain how it was meant, I put Taker in what I believe was his barefoot height there: 6´7"-6´7.125" range and looked at the outcome:
Big Show 6´11.25"
Great Khali 7´0.75"
Kane in big boots 6´8.5"
Imo No one had less footwear than Taker there, Big Show was in equal boots, Kane had about 1.25" advantage and Great Khali about 0.25"-0.5"
So barefoot:
Big Show 6´11.25"
Great Khali ~ 7´0.5"
Kane ~6´7.25"
I wouldn´t argue about a quater inch but that´s it.
BTW
Few years ago I saw two barefoot listings for Shaq: one 7´0 7/8", the other 7´0 5/8", so Shaq is rather a weak 7´1" himself and IMO a tad taller than Khali in their pic were we can´t see footwear and the cam is to low to show us the actual gap between them.
Thomas says on 5/Apr/15
.... The size of the scala is clearly wrong, ...
Yeah it´s basicly not self-explanatory
Let me explain how it was meant, I put Taker in what I believe was his barefoot height there: 6´7"-6´7.125" range and looked at the outcome:
Big Show 6´11.25"
Great Khali 7´0.75"
Kane in big boots 6´8.5"
Imo No one had less footwear than Taker there, Big Show was in equal boots, Kane had about 1.25" advantage and Great Khali about 0.25"-0.5"
So barefoot:
Big Show 6´11.25"
Great Khali ~ 7´0.5"
Kane ~6´7.25"
I wouldn´t argue about a quater inch but that´s it.
BTW
Few years ago I saw two barefoot listings for Shaq: one 7´0 7/8", the other 7´0 5/8", so Shaq is rather a weak 7´1" himself and IMO a tad taller than Khali in their pic were we can´t see footwear and the cam is to low to show us the actual gap between them.
Ali Baba said on 5/Apr/15
Patrick says on 4/Apr/15
Head Stacking for kicks:
(I did my best in terms of accuracy)
Click Here
It is worth mentioning that Taker's waist appears higher in the original photo.
Click Here
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure what the head stacking thing has to do with anything. As far as the waist height you're incorrect.
Patrick says on 4/Apr/15
Head Stacking for kicks:
(I did my best in terms of accuracy)
Click Here
It is worth mentioning that Taker's waist appears higher in the original photo.
Click Here
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not sure what the head stacking thing has to do with anything. As far as the waist height you're incorrect.
Junior31 said on 5/Apr/15
To add to my post before. That was in regards to the early 90s. I think 6'7.5 is on he money but think it's more then plausible for a guy wrestling 30 years + to lose an inch 6'6.75 is where I think he's at today
To add to my post before. That was in regards to the early 90s. I think 6'7.5 is on he money but think it's more then plausible for a guy wrestling 30 years + to lose an inch 6'6.75 is where I think he's at today
Junior31 said on 5/Apr/15
Funny story : a friend of mine just turned 70. He used to own a security company that used to do some big security for bars,lounges,clubs and private events. In the 80's and 90's he would provide security for some bars and restaurants guys from the wwf and local shows would hang out st after a show. He was telling some stories of who was cool and who was cold, who had certain "habits" and who didn't. But I won't get Into that lol. I asked him have you ever did anything with the undertaker and his reply was "Mark? (Undertakers real name) sure he was a cool dude" I asked how tall he was and he answered " he was one big dude, awesome guy, he was 6'7 6'8" I trust his judgment as a big guy himself and someone who controls people and sizes them up real well he has a good grip on height. I asked him about others. Said ted dibiase was the best he could drink bourbon like it was water lol he said he was around his own height of 6'2. He said Shawn michaels was about 5'11. He said e berserker aka john nord was 6'5 but with a head like a bears. Said jake the snake was deceptively tall as he put it " about an inch shy of hogan". His stories were awesome.
Funny story : a friend of mine just turned 70. He used to own a security company that used to do some big security for bars,lounges,clubs and private events. In the 80's and 90's he would provide security for some bars and restaurants guys from the wwf and local shows would hang out st after a show. He was telling some stories of who was cool and who was cold, who had certain "habits" and who didn't. But I won't get Into that lol. I asked him have you ever did anything with the undertaker and his reply was "Mark? (Undertakers real name) sure he was a cool dude" I asked how tall he was and he answered " he was one big dude, awesome guy, he was 6'7 6'8" I trust his judgment as a big guy himself and someone who controls people and sizes them up real well he has a good grip on height. I asked him about others. Said ted dibiase was the best he could drink bourbon like it was water lol he said he was around his own height of 6'2. He said Shawn michaels was about 5'11. He said e berserker aka john nord was 6'5 but with a head like a bears. Said jake the snake was deceptively tall as he put it " about an inch shy of hogan". His stories were awesome.
skinnykid said on 5/Apr/15
This post can put much to rest.
Domex says on 27/Mar/15
With 6'7 basketball player Tyrone White Click Here
This post can put much to rest.
Domex says on 27/Mar/15
With 6'7 basketball player Tyrone White Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 5/Apr/15
Ali Baba says on 5/Apr/15
Although one wrestler did actually joke that I would destroy the illusion of wrestling if I took a picture with him (I'm looking at you, Rob Terry)
Yeah I was jokingly refering to that :)
Ali Baba says on 5/Apr/15
Although one wrestler did actually joke that I would destroy the illusion of wrestling if I took a picture with him (I'm looking at you, Rob Terry)
Yeah I was jokingly refering to that :)
im 188 said on 5/Apr/15
Look at the royal rumble 2009 undertaker looked 3-2.5 inches shorter than big show so either taker suddenly grew a inch and half (or wore lifts) or big show has shrunk
Look at the royal rumble 2009 undertaker looked 3-2.5 inches shorter than big show so either taker suddenly grew a inch and half (or wore lifts) or big show has shrunk
Thomas said on 5/Apr/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft
At this time, Big Show wore lifts, Kane his monster-boots and Taker not, which was seen more often. The size of the scala is clearly wrong, Khali, Big Show and Undertaker are too small. Khali under 7` in 2006? That makes Shaq under 7` - both men are equal in height. No chance for that.
HeightcrazyRed6ft
At this time, Big Show wore lifts, Kane his monster-boots and Taker not, which was seen more often. The size of the scala is clearly wrong, Khali, Big Show and Undertaker are too small. Khali under 7` in 2006? That makes Shaq under 7` - both men are equal in height. No chance for that.
Ali Baba said on 5/Apr/15
Although one wrestler did actually joke that I would destroy the illusion of wrestling if I took a picture with him (I'm looking at you, Rob Terry) I don't think most people believe wrestling's billed heights, so I'm not really destroying anything. About the only issue is how far off are the billings. I don't know who, if anyone, is coming to comic con this year. It's pretty random so it's hard telling.
Although one wrestler did actually joke that I would destroy the illusion of wrestling if I took a picture with him (I'm looking at you, Rob Terry) I don't think most people believe wrestling's billed heights, so I'm not really destroying anything. About the only issue is how far off are the billings. I don't know who, if anyone, is coming to comic con this year. It's pretty random so it's hard telling.
6'1 dan said on 4/Apr/15
I think you're wrong heightcrazy.big show in wcw,then the giant,was billed 7'4.do you think he was oversized by 5 inches?o of course not.show was no less than 7'(213cm)
I think you're wrong heightcrazy.big show in wcw,then the giant,was billed 7'4.do you think he was oversized by 5 inches?o of course not.show was no less than 7'(213cm)
Patrick said on 4/Apr/15
Head Stacking for kicks:
(I did my best in terms of accuracy)
Click Here
It is worth mentioning that Taker's waist appears higher in the original photo.
Click Here
Head Stacking for kicks:
(I did my best in terms of accuracy)
Click Here
It is worth mentioning that Taker's waist appears higher in the original photo.
Click Here
Patrick said on 4/Apr/15
cdk28 says on 12/Jan/15
Undertaker peak height 6'8" barefoot 6'10" in boots
Sid peak height barefoot 6'7.5" 6'9" in boots
Agreed!
Re: the awesome Ali photo! (Thank you Ali!)
Even if we look at the rules of proportions - looking at Undertaker's head and waste tells me he's likely still 6'7" - 6'7 1/2" at the most.
It is said that the human body is 7 1/2 to 8 heads tall.
If you look at the photo and stack the heads, Taker comes out at about 2.5 inches taller. Remove the footwear and you're looking at 6'7" - 6'7 1/2"
The only contention is whatever could have been lost via spinal, hips and knees.
I agree that his peak height was closer to 6'8" but never 6'9" or 6'10".
cdk28 says on 12/Jan/15
Undertaker peak height 6'8" barefoot 6'10" in boots
Sid peak height barefoot 6'7.5" 6'9" in boots
Agreed!
Re: the awesome Ali photo! (Thank you Ali!)
Even if we look at the rules of proportions - looking at Undertaker's head and waste tells me he's likely still 6'7" - 6'7 1/2" at the most.
It is said that the human body is 7 1/2 to 8 heads tall.
If you look at the photo and stack the heads, Taker comes out at about 2.5 inches taller. Remove the footwear and you're looking at 6'7" - 6'7 1/2"
The only contention is whatever could have been lost via spinal, hips and knees.
I agree that his peak height was closer to 6'8" but never 6'9" or 6'10".
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 3/Apr/15
Ali Baba says on 29/Mar/15
Domex, not a chance in the world that basketball player is a true 6'7".
Yeah, thats´what I thought too.
Any plans this year to destroy illusion of wrestling again? Who´s your next heightvictim :)
Ali Baba says on 29/Mar/15
Domex, not a chance in the world that basketball player is a true 6'7".
Yeah, thats´what I thought too.
Any plans this year to destroy illusion of wrestling again? Who´s your next heightvictim :)
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 3/Apr/15
6'1 dan says on 3/Apr/15
Taker's peak height couldn't be 6'7,5.do you remember how close he was with big show in the ministry of darkness??
************************************************************************
He was 4 inches shorter than 6´11" Big Show, 5.5" shorter than 7´0.5" Great Khali...
Click Here
6'1 dan says on 3/Apr/15
Taker's peak height couldn't be 6'7,5.do you remember how close he was with big show in the ministry of darkness??
************************************************************************
He was 4 inches shorter than 6´11" Big Show, 5.5" shorter than 7´0.5" Great Khali...
Click Here
6'1 dan said on 3/Apr/15
Taker's peak height couldn't be 6'7,5.do you remember how close he was with big show in the ministry of darkness??
Taker's peak height couldn't be 6'7,5.do you remember how close he was with big show in the ministry of darkness??
big shot said on 3/Apr/15
It makes sense for taker to be 6'6" barefoot. With footwear its possible around 6'7 1/2 6'8". Spivey is 6'5" 6'6" there wasnt much at all between em if any. Sid is around 6'6" maybe even shorter According to mugshot. Taker was the same height as 6'6" a train. Roughly same as mabel in that one photo from king of the ring mabel Had his Head Down. I mean It Does Make Sense. When He Was Younger He Couldve Been Like A Fraction Ta
ller But Not Much.
It makes sense for taker to be 6'6" barefoot. With footwear its possible around 6'7 1/2 6'8". Spivey is 6'5" 6'6" there wasnt much at all between em if any. Sid is around 6'6" maybe even shorter According to mugshot. Taker was the same height as 6'6" a train. Roughly same as mabel in that one photo from king of the ring mabel Had his Head Down. I mean It Does Make Sense. When He Was Younger He Couldve Been Like A Fraction Ta
ller But Not Much.
im 188 said on 1/Apr/15
Yeah he is 6ft6.5 when he bends his posture but when he isn't his is a 6ft7
His staredown with Bray he was bending his posture and he looked 4 inches shorter than taker who is 6ft2 but just bet if taker didn't bend his posture he would look 5 inches taller so I still believe he is 6ft7
Yeah he is 6ft6.5 when he bends his posture but when he isn't his is a 6ft7
His staredown with Bray he was bending his posture and he looked 4 inches shorter than taker who is 6ft2 but just bet if taker didn't bend his posture he would look 5 inches taller so I still believe he is 6ft7
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 1/Apr/15
NCL says on 31/Mar/15
Undertaker and Bray Wyatt from Wrestlemania:
Click Here
'Taker is leaning here and may be in walking motion but he did look noticeably shorter than usual to me and he had a footwear advantage I think. Not a lot of pictures online yet anyone have more?
Bray Wyatt 6'1"?
Straight Taker would look quite different, Wyatt is at least 6´1" imo
NCL says on 31/Mar/15
Undertaker and Bray Wyatt from Wrestlemania:
Click Here
'Taker is leaning here and may be in walking motion but he did look noticeably shorter than usual to me and he had a footwear advantage I think. Not a lot of pictures online yet anyone have more?
Bray Wyatt 6'1"?
Straight Taker would look quite different, Wyatt is at least 6´1" imo
James B said on 1/Apr/15
Downgrade then to 6'6.5 rob?
Downgrade then to 6'6.5 rob?
NCL said on 31/Mar/15
Undertaker and Bray Wyatt from Wrestlemania:
Click Here
'Taker is leaning here and may be in walking motion but he did look noticeably shorter than usual to me and he had a footwear advantage I think. Not a lot of pictures online yet anyone have more?
Bray Wyatt 6'1"?
Undertaker and Bray Wyatt from Wrestlemania:
Click Here
'Taker is leaning here and may be in walking motion but he did look noticeably shorter than usual to me and he had a footwear advantage I think. Not a lot of pictures online yet anyone have more?
Bray Wyatt 6'1"?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 31/Mar/15
Danimal says on 28/Mar/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.
Click Here
No, it was his PRE-height loss era.
Yeah Danimal... funny is he looked shorter in each staredown before Wrestlemania 13...
God bless you
Danimal says on 28/Mar/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.
Click Here
No, it was his PRE-height loss era.
Yeah Danimal... funny is he looked shorter in each staredown before Wrestlemania 13...
God bless you
James B said on 31/Mar/15
Do you think between 6'6-6'7 he could measure though rob?
Editor Rob
Do you think between 6'6-6'7 he could measure though rob?
Editor Rob 6ft 6.5?
James B said on 30/Mar/15
Do you think 6'6 is possible for undertaker today rob?
Editor Rob
Do you think 6'6 is possible for undertaker today rob?
Editor Rob if you measured him, he probably could still go over it, but how much exactly?
Ali Baba said on 29/Mar/15
the big shot says on 26/Mar/15
Ali,Straight posture, barefoot, How Tall Would You Give Taker Peak And Now?
--------------------------------------------
Peak height I couldn't tell you. I didn't get to see him in person until early 2013. And this picture was taken later in 2014. Now we're very close in height. He's in the area of 78". As said before he was wearing work type boots. I was wearing 1.25" old tennis shoes. I would guess he had more footwear, but there's no way to be sure. As far as the posture goes it was even. I mimicked his posture as Rob often does to try to make a better comparison. I suppose that from now on I should just stand straight and try to guess how much the other person is losing.
Domex, not a chance in the world that basketball player is a true 6'7".
the big shot says on 26/Mar/15
Ali,Straight posture, barefoot, How Tall Would You Give Taker Peak And Now?
--------------------------------------------
Peak height I couldn't tell you. I didn't get to see him in person until early 2013. And this picture was taken later in 2014. Now we're very close in height. He's in the area of 78". As said before he was wearing work type boots. I was wearing 1.25" old tennis shoes. I would guess he had more footwear, but there's no way to be sure. As far as the posture goes it was even. I mimicked his posture as Rob often does to try to make a better comparison. I suppose that from now on I should just stand straight and try to guess how much the other person is losing.
Domex, not a chance in the world that basketball player is a true 6'7".
Danimal said on 28/Mar/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.
Click Here
No, it was his PRE-height loss era.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.
Click Here
No, it was his PRE-height loss era.
Danimal said on 28/Mar/15
1punchbob says on 9/Mar/15
Taker is NOT taller than Sid. Both around 6'7 PEAK!!!!
I agree, as was Kane.
1punchbob says on 9/Mar/15
Taker is NOT taller than Sid. Both around 6'7 PEAK!!!!
I agree, as was Kane.
im 188 said on 28/Mar/15
With the 6ft7 Tyrone white he was a tad taller but he had a bent poster which proves he is a tad over 6ft7
With the 6ft7 Tyrone white he was a tad taller but he had a bent poster which proves he is a tad over 6ft7
joe 193cm night said on 28/Mar/15
Ali-197cm-198cm-199cm
taker-198cm-199cm-200cm
Ali-197cm-198cm-199cm
taker-198cm-199cm-200cm
Junior31 said on 28/Mar/15
Undertaker has taking a beating over his 30+ year career. People just don't understand how much here body goes through taking bumps 325 days a year for 30 plus.
His first time he stepped in a ring many many moons ago this guy was very close to 6'8 hovering around 6' 7.75ish. Now he might wake up 6'7 but genteelly think he is a hair under more In the 6'6.75 range. Guy is a legend
Find me one 50 something fighter who hasn't lost a good amount of height and I'll be shocked. And it seems the taller/bigger they were the more significant the height loss
Undertaker has taking a beating over his 30+ year career. People just don't understand how much here body goes through taking bumps 325 days a year for 30 plus.
His first time he stepped in a ring many many moons ago this guy was very close to 6'8 hovering around 6' 7.75ish. Now he might wake up 6'7 but genteelly think he is a hair under more In the 6'6.75 range. Guy is a legend
Find me one 50 something fighter who hasn't lost a good amount of height and I'll be shocked. And it seems the taller/bigger they were the more significant the height loss
im 188 said on 27/Mar/15
Taker peak 6ft7.5 inches with boots 6ft8.5
Taker now 6ft7 with boots 6ft8
Taker peak 6ft7.5 inches with boots 6ft8.5
Taker now 6ft7 with boots 6ft8
the big shot said on 26/Mar/15
Ali,Straight posture, barefoot, How Tall Would You Give Taker Peak And Now?
Ali,Straight posture, barefoot, How Tall Would You Give Taker Peak And Now?
im 188 said on 26/Mar/15
Undertaker's posture was a bit bent to
Undertaker's posture was a bit bent to
James B said on 26/Mar/15
I agree Sid could pass for 6'7 peak.
I agree Sid could pass for 6'7 peak.
Ali Baba said on 25/Mar/15
I could have, but I didn't. But whatever makes you feel good.
I could have, but I didn't. But whatever makes you feel good.
im 188 said on 24/Mar/15
We didn't see that footwear Ali could of wore 1inch boots
We didn't see that footwear Ali could of wore 1inch boots
Tim181 said on 23/Mar/15
Check the photo with Ali Baba, there shouldn't be any discussions on here after it at all, we won't get a better proof for years now. Taker is slightly taller, and not like 1.5 or 2 in.
Check the photo with Ali Baba, there shouldn't be any discussions on here after it at all, we won't get a better proof for years now. Taker is slightly taller, and not like 1.5 or 2 in.
im 188 said on 21/Mar/15
So he must be 6ft7-6ft8 I don't agree on the 6ft6 claims maybe in ten years when he is 60
So he must be 6ft7-6ft8 I don't agree on the 6ft6 claims maybe in ten years when he is 60
NCL said on 19/Mar/15
I'm not a football guy does anyone know who Undertaker is with here? I think this is a fairly recent pic
Click Here
I'm not a football guy does anyone know who Undertaker is with here? I think this is a fairly recent pic
Click Here
Tim 181 said on 19/Mar/15
Guest says on 18/Mar/15
Click Here
How about this picture with the great khali?
He is max. 5 in shorter than Khali, unless there is distortion like in Rockstar Spud photo.
Guest says on 18/Mar/15
Click Here
How about this picture with the great khali?
He is max. 5 in shorter than Khali, unless there is distortion like in Rockstar Spud photo.
im 188 said on 18/Mar/15
@Guest that looks around 4.5 inches it looks closer because of that but if khali is a legit 7 footer then those 6ft6 claims are ridiculous it all depends on posture.When someone like triple h,cm punk or Brock he bends his posture which at least loses an inch and half but when he is facing of with big guys like Kane,big show and khali his posture is up.
So I reckon
Taker is 6ft8 with good posture
Kane is 6ft7.5 and with massive boots 6ft8.5
Big show is 6ft10
Khali is 7footer
@Guest that looks around 4.5 inches it looks closer because of that but if khali is a legit 7 footer then those 6ft6 claims are ridiculous it all depends on posture.When someone like triple h,cm punk or Brock he bends his posture which at least loses an inch and half but when he is facing of with big guys like Kane,big show and khali his posture is up.
So I reckon
Taker is 6ft8 with good posture
Kane is 6ft7.5 and with massive boots 6ft8.5
Big show is 6ft10
Khali is 7footer
Phenom! said on 14/Mar/15
Kane is not under 6'6", yes he was known to wear 2" lifts back in attitude era, but he wears regular boots now, hell big show who is in ring gear usually only looks about 4in taller than him, when kanes in his corporate shoes.
Undertaker is dead on 6'6", but he lost way more height than Kane cuz undertaker used to be around 6'8".
They both look shorter sometimes because they slouch a lot, and the camera angle never favors their height. Standing straight with a good posture, I repeat, they are not under 6'6"
Kane is not under 6'6", yes he was known to wear 2" lifts back in attitude era, but he wears regular boots now, hell big show who is in ring gear usually only looks about 4in taller than him, when kanes in his corporate shoes.
Undertaker is dead on 6'6", but he lost way more height than Kane cuz undertaker used to be around 6'8".
They both look shorter sometimes because they slouch a lot, and the camera angle never favors their height. Standing straight with a good posture, I repeat, they are not under 6'6"
Junior31 said on 13/Mar/15
Booster says on 11/Mar/15
Kane is 6ft5.5 no more. Kane is known to wear lifts.
Golddust is 6ft3.5
Undertaker is 6ft6
Stood 2 feet away from Undertaker and no way he is over 6ft6. I am solid 6ft4 and his eyes were almost even with me, and I was wearing running shoes he was wearing Harley boots. That being said many people exaggerate their heights. They dont stand flat with no shoes or use a level and measure accurately. Regardless they are bigger than me I am only 240lbs
Wait what lol Kane 6'5.5? That's insane
Booster says on 11/Mar/15
Kane is 6ft5.5 no more. Kane is known to wear lifts.
Golddust is 6ft3.5
Undertaker is 6ft6
Stood 2 feet away from Undertaker and no way he is over 6ft6. I am solid 6ft4 and his eyes were almost even with me, and I was wearing running shoes he was wearing Harley boots. That being said many people exaggerate their heights. They dont stand flat with no shoes or use a level and measure accurately. Regardless they are bigger than me I am only 240lbs
Wait what lol Kane 6'5.5? That's insane
Omid said on 12/Mar/15
@Booster, so is everyone in WWE, 99 percent of all wrestlers wear boots to enhance their stature, Kane's boots were big sure but like 0.25 or .5 more advantage that others not more
@Booster, so is everyone in WWE, 99 percent of all wrestlers wear boots to enhance their stature, Kane's boots were big sure but like 0.25 or .5 more advantage that others not more
Booster said on 11/Mar/15
Kane is 6ft5.5 no more. Kane is known to wear lifts.
Golddust is 6ft3.5
Undertaker is 6ft6
Stood 2 feet away from Undertaker and no way he is over 6ft6. I am solid 6ft4 and his eyes were almost even with me, and I was wearing running shoes he was wearing Harley boots. That being said many people exaggerate their heights. They dont stand flat with no shoes or use a level and measure accurately. Regardless they are bigger than me I am only 240lbs
Kane is 6ft5.5 no more. Kane is known to wear lifts.
Golddust is 6ft3.5
Undertaker is 6ft6
Stood 2 feet away from Undertaker and no way he is over 6ft6. I am solid 6ft4 and his eyes were almost even with me, and I was wearing running shoes he was wearing Harley boots. That being said many people exaggerate their heights. They dont stand flat with no shoes or use a level and measure accurately. Regardless they are bigger than me I am only 240lbs
Junior31 said on 9/Mar/15
I'm convinced that Kane Sid and taker are within a quarter of an inch of one another peak height.
I'm convinced that Kane Sid and taker are within a quarter of an inch of one another peak height.
NCL said on 9/Mar/15
Robby says on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here
I've been looking for that video forever thank you!!
Sid appears the slightly taller of the two there. I searched through the video and can't really find any great shots of footwear. The closest I can see is at 1:26 for Sid's shoes but the image is real blurry Click Here
The two are so close that whatever their heights are it really comes down to their boots.
I suppose the video could be similar to this camera angle but I could be wrong: Click Here Sid appears taller but when the angle changes they're much closer in height: Click Here
Another WM13 pic: Click Here
Robby says on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here
I've been looking for that video forever thank you!!
Sid appears the slightly taller of the two there. I searched through the video and can't really find any great shots of footwear. The closest I can see is at 1:26 for Sid's shoes but the image is real blurry Click Here
The two are so close that whatever their heights are it really comes down to their boots.
I suppose the video could be similar to this camera angle but I could be wrong: Click Here Sid appears taller but when the angle changes they're much closer in height: Click Here
Another WM13 pic: Click Here
James said on 9/Mar/15
WOW Sid looks more muscular than brock lesner in that video.
Maybe Sid was slightly on tip toes in the video?
WOW Sid looks more muscular than brock lesner in that video.
Maybe Sid was slightly on tip toes in the video?
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 9/Mar/15
Robby says on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here
Great find !
Robby says on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here
Great find !
1punchbob said on 9/Mar/15
Taker is NOT taller than Sid. Both around 6'7 PEAK!!!!
Taker is NOT taller than Sid. Both around 6'7 PEAK!!!!
miko said on 8/Mar/15
In that 1994 staredown Sid is actually the taller of the two.
In that 1994 staredown Sid is actually the taller of the two.
Robby said on 7/Mar/15
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here
Another staredown between Undertaker and Sid in 1994 in the USWA. staredown starts at 1:12 Click Here
josey wales said on 3/Mar/15
@heightcrazyred6ft we badicly agree on taker/sid and mebe kanes height and just come from different angles. Mebe taker had a slight foitwear advantage he kinda looked same to sid as always. The guys are yrue big men but offcourse not there ridiculous billed heights.
@heightcrazyred6ft we badicly agree on taker/sid and mebe kanes height and just come from different angles. Mebe taker had a slight foitwear advantage he kinda looked same to sid as always. The guys are yrue big men but offcourse not there ridiculous billed heights.
josh777 said on 3/Mar/15
i think taker is about 6'6 now days
you can see this in pic that he and A-train ( lord tensai )
is in the same height as a-train and that was 12 years ago
i think taker is about 6'6 now days
you can see this in pic that he and A-train ( lord tensai )
is in the same height as a-train and that was 12 years ago
MikeV10 said on 3/Mar/15
Maybe thats why they bill him at 6'10,5
6'7,5 barefoot peak hight + 1 inch footwear = 6'8,5 + 2 inch overbilling they usually do = 6'10,5
Today I think he is about 200cm or close to 6'7
Maybe thats why they bill him at 6'10,5
6'7,5 barefoot peak hight + 1 inch footwear = 6'8,5 + 2 inch overbilling they usually do = 6'10,5
Today I think he is about 200cm or close to 6'7
Junior31 said on 3/Mar/15
Was at raw tonight in jersey 5th row. First of all Kane is massive and looked in unbelievable shape best I've seen in a while. Him and big show 10 feet from me. Big show looked to have 4 inches most on him and closer to 3. Also in the opening science with Rollins and reigns face to face. It would appear they were very similar in height but truth is reigns was slouching a bit. Also his boots aren't straight up boots more athletically made. Rollins looked 6'1 and when reigns stood up straight 6'2 to 6'2.5.
After being so close to the action these are my revised heights for the wrestlers I was 15ft from
Reigns low to mid 6'2
Rollins 6'1 and btw that dude has amazing posture
Kane 6'7
Big show 6'10.5. He's not at his peal anymore
Bray Wyatt 6'2
Ambrose. Tough one has terrible posture and is always bent but at least 6'1
Luke Harper. Easily 6'5
Cena 6'0.5
Ziegler 5'10 and prob a tad more
Tripple H 6'1.75
Daniel Bryan 5'8
Bad news Barrett 6'5.5
Some observations...
Kane was impressively massive the biggest I've seen didn't look a lock under 6'7
Harper was every bit his billed
Big show looked worn but leaner then he was a few years back
Rollins is definitely his billed height and because of his posture appeared taller
Cena is a beast
Hope this helps
Was at raw tonight in jersey 5th row. First of all Kane is massive and looked in unbelievable shape best I've seen in a while. Him and big show 10 feet from me. Big show looked to have 4 inches most on him and closer to 3. Also in the opening science with Rollins and reigns face to face. It would appear they were very similar in height but truth is reigns was slouching a bit. Also his boots aren't straight up boots more athletically made. Rollins looked 6'1 and when reigns stood up straight 6'2 to 6'2.5.
After being so close to the action these are my revised heights for the wrestlers I was 15ft from
Reigns low to mid 6'2
Rollins 6'1 and btw that dude has amazing posture
Kane 6'7
Big show 6'10.5. He's not at his peal anymore
Bray Wyatt 6'2
Ambrose. Tough one has terrible posture and is always bent but at least 6'1
Luke Harper. Easily 6'5
Cena 6'0.5
Ziegler 5'10 and prob a tad more
Tripple H 6'1.75
Daniel Bryan 5'8
Bad news Barrett 6'5.5
Some observations...
Kane was impressively massive the biggest I've seen didn't look a lock under 6'7
Harper was every bit his billed
Big show looked worn but leaner then he was a few years back
Rollins is definitely his billed height and because of his posture appeared taller
Cena is a beast
Hope this helps
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 2/Mar/15
Paul says on 2/Mar/15
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here
Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.
******************
This is still better than the Rumble pic, GG wasn´t complete straight there, watch WM9 and look how he stretched out.
Giant Gonzalez was listed 229cm in the guinness book and BB wich is just over 7´6" not 7´6.5".
At best GG was 7´7.75" in his boots, that makes Taker barely 6´8.5" in his boots/ around 6´7.25" barfoot, Takers heels are pretty visible there so no flat boots.
Taker in this is my yard claimed 6´8"-6´9" wich turns out to be his height in footwear, depending on how thick the sole is.
Click Here
Paul says on 2/Mar/15
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here
Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.
******************
This is still better than the Rumble pic, GG wasn´t complete straight there, watch WM9 and look how he stretched out.
Giant Gonzalez was listed 229cm in the guinness book and BB wich is just over 7´6" not 7´6.5".
At best GG was 7´7.75" in his boots, that makes Taker barely 6´8.5" in his boots/ around 6´7.25" barfoot, Takers heels are pretty visible there so no flat boots.
Taker in this is my yard claimed 6´8"-6´9" wich turns out to be his height in footwear, depending on how thick the sole is.
Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 2/Mar/15
josey wales says on 1/Mar/15
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style...
Look the top rope walk at WM13, clear to see Taker had minimum 3cm sole. In 1989 staredown the footwear was equal and Taker barely edged Sid...
Its clear to see that Taker had thicker footwear than usuall at WM13.
It´s also fact that Taker had more height on Sid at WM13 than in every single staredown before.
I´m not saying Taker had Kanemunsters there, but at least 0.5" footwearadvantage added to his barefoot height advantage of 0.25"-0.5"
With 0.5"-1" more footwear there wouldn´t be any problem with the topropewalk or landing. Taker has the balance and if you have it the footwear doesn´t really matter be it 0.5" or 1.5" sole.
josey wales says on 1/Mar/15
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style...
Look the top rope walk at WM13, clear to see Taker had minimum 3cm sole. In 1989 staredown the footwear was equal and Taker barely edged Sid...
Its clear to see that Taker had thicker footwear than usuall at WM13.
It´s also fact that Taker had more height on Sid at WM13 than in every single staredown before.
I´m not saying Taker had Kanemunsters there, but at least 0.5" footwearadvantage added to his barefoot height advantage of 0.25"-0.5"
With 0.5"-1" more footwear there wouldn´t be any problem with the topropewalk or landing. Taker has the balance and if you have it the footwear doesn´t really matter be it 0.5" or 1.5" sole.
Paul said on 2/Mar/15
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here
Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.
JT says on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here
Firstly wrong match, secondly bad angle, thirdly if you tip your head back as your link shows for GG, strangely enough chin level does rise. Just locate the RR match, you can see a more direct comparison. That said UT is 6'7 at most today, we would probably agree on that or thereabouts.
josey wales said on 1/Mar/15
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style. In all his mtches his boots always has a fairly normal flat sole, mebe one inch thick. It must be really hard to do thhat tope rope walk with lifts and then have the cinfidence to land rite. Sid, undertaker and Kane is bare foot and in general body size very very close to ea other. Either could be dressed to make look taller. Its realy a tossup between taker and kane with sid mebe an ich at the most shorter. Nash are noticeably taller but by max 2 inches. In turn he (nash) are no more than two inches shorter than bigshow with khali another inch ontop of that.
I think taker was the least likely of the taller guys to wear lifts on account of his inring style. In all his mtches his boots always has a fairly normal flat sole, mebe one inch thick. It must be really hard to do thhat tope rope walk with lifts and then have the cinfidence to land rite. Sid, undertaker and Kane is bare foot and in general body size very very close to ea other. Either could be dressed to make look taller. Its realy a tossup between taker and kane with sid mebe an ich at the most shorter. Nash are noticeably taller but by max 2 inches. In turn he (nash) are no more than two inches shorter than bigshow with khali another inch ontop of that.
James B said on 28/Feb/15
6'6.75 today and 6'7.25 peak is not exactly impossible for undertaker. A weak 6'7.5 would make more sense if Sid was 6'6.5.
6'6.75 today and 6'7.25 peak is not exactly impossible for undertaker. A weak 6'7.5 would make more sense if Sid was 6'6.5.
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/Feb/15
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.
Click Here
Still have no doubt that Taker had a footwearadvantage at WM13.
Click Here
NCL said on 27/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Feb/15
NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid
Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.
Oh ok my bad
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Feb/15
NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid
Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.
Oh ok my bad
JT said on 27/Feb/15
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here
Paul says on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
With both stretched out Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 27/Feb/15
Frula says on 27/Feb/15
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...
C´mon this site has great evidence with AliBabas pic and information that Taker today is at least 198cm and maximum 200cm.
6´6.5" might be on the money, Robs 6´7" is just a generous round up
Frula says on 27/Feb/15
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...
C´mon this site has great evidence with AliBabas pic and information that Taker today is at least 198cm and maximum 200cm.
6´6.5" might be on the money, Robs 6´7" is just a generous round up
Paul said on 27/Feb/15
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size
roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
If you watch the 1993 Royal Rumble you can see UT's head finishes 2 inches higher than where GG's starts. GG was known to be 7'6.5 at the time. Head size
roughly 1/8 of height. You can do your maths.
184.3cm said on 27/Feb/15
Not 6'5, he edged out Ali Baba who is 6'6 on user heights so how can he be 6'5? i still say 6'7.5 peak and today 6'6.5.
Not 6'5, he edged out Ali Baba who is 6'6 on user heights so how can he be 6'5? i still say 6'7.5 peak and today 6'6.5.
Frula said on 27/Feb/15
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...
Undertaker is around 196 cm
Lets be honest...
Tuga said on 26/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15
Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)
But it is from the same moment of the full body pic, no tip toes on sid or camera advantage, that´s why you see as it is :)
NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.
Thanks NCL, there are pics where the angle favours taker but I won´t even bother to post them.
The thing is sid´s trys really hard but still comes a bit shorter, and if, and I mean if someone has footware advantage is sid, look closer to his boots ;P), but still I would´nt go that way.
I really understand why Rob has them 1 inch apart, could be...still I can´t see peak sid at anything under 6'7, IMO he would rather be a bit over than under it, so I can still see 6'7 1/2 as possible, 6'7 minimum, since I don´t go with minimum I say IMO 6'7 1/2 ;P
Just to change a bit the subject (before everyone becomes bored of this page :D), I was watching the other day an old match with mane and nash teaming up:
Click Here
Look at the start, its problably the best I´ve seen (if anybody has seen better please post it)to compare both men heights, what do you think?
(I know at least you Red have been interested in poiting their differences ;) )
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15
Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)
But it is from the same moment of the full body pic, no tip toes on sid or camera advantage, that´s why you see as it is :)
NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.
Thanks NCL, there are pics where the angle favours taker but I won´t even bother to post them.
The thing is sid´s trys really hard but still comes a bit shorter, and if, and I mean if someone has footware advantage is sid, look closer to his boots ;P), but still I would´nt go that way.
I really understand why Rob has them 1 inch apart, could be...still I can´t see peak sid at anything under 6'7, IMO he would rather be a bit over than under it, so I can still see 6'7 1/2 as possible, 6'7 minimum, since I don´t go with minimum I say IMO 6'7 1/2 ;P
Just to change a bit the subject (before everyone becomes bored of this page :D), I was watching the other day an old match with mane and nash teaming up:
Click Here
Look at the start, its problably the best I´ve seen (if anybody has seen better please post it)to compare both men heights, what do you think?
(I know at least you Red have been interested in poiting their differences ;) )
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 26/Feb/15
NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid
Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.
NCL says on 25/Feb/15
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid
Never said Sid is taller, Undertaker is also in my opinion the taller man but more 0.25"-0.5" than 1" and the main point I differ with Tuga is that I can´t see Taker at legit 6´8" even at peak.
NCL said on 25/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15
I think Sid's got the camera advantage on these pictures: Click Here and Click Here
Regarding the second pic, this pic you posted is when Sid finally stood still and the two were equal to the camera: Click Here
This is a video from that Raw (they meet at about 8:43) Click Here
Undertaker's boots 1997: Click Here
Sid's boots 1997: Click Here
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.
Here, 'Taker must have a footwear advantage because he's unusually taller than Sid: Click Here
By the way, if anyone is interested, the road to Wrestlemania 13 is my favorite story line and I have a lot of the videos on my youtube page. The Raws that are missing are all on Daily Motion:
Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Feb/15
I think Sid's got the camera advantage on these pictures: Click Here and Click Here
Regarding the second pic, this pic you posted is when Sid finally stood still and the two were equal to the camera: Click Here
This is a video from that Raw (they meet at about 8:43) Click Here
Undertaker's boots 1997: Click Here
Sid's boots 1997: Click Here
I'm with Tuga with the height estimates. I think 'Taker has always been slightly taller than Sid.
Here, 'Taker must have a footwear advantage because he's unusually taller than Sid: Click Here
By the way, if anyone is interested, the road to Wrestlemania 13 is my favorite story line and I have a lot of the videos on my youtube page. The Raws that are missing are all on Daily Motion:
Click Here
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 24/Feb/15
Tuga says on 23/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P
"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."
Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because...
Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)
Just pointed out that he´s closer to the cam, still looked 2cm taller that night, never looked 2cm taller in the road to WM13 staredowns and I believe he had about 0.5" footwearadvantage.
Road to WM13 Staredowns:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Tuga says on 23/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P
"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."
Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because...
Naah I meant the closeup of their heads ;)
Just pointed out that he´s closer to the cam, still looked 2cm taller that night, never looked 2cm taller in the road to WM13 staredowns and I believe he had about 0.5" footwearadvantage.
Road to WM13 Staredowns:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Tuga said on 23/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P
"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."
Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because he has a bit of a wider stance, and footware? Really? And the walk?? What? He was back to his old attire, zombie deadman pacing style, did you expect him to dance to the ring? :D
Click Here
No way around it, the middle line represents sid´s top hair (as if tip toes werent enought), still not as tall.
But I see from your arguments alone that you´re seeing the difference and it turned out bigger than you expected.
Other evidence, well, peak sid staredown with jbl and most problaby non peak taker staredown with the same should be enough, as well the 1 inch billing (you´ve mentioned billings before ;P)difference between the 2 in both wcw and wwe(f)...
"Lets just agree to disagree"
I disagree! ;P
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Yeah, we both are ;)
Still sting´s head top is not over sid´s eye line there, no way, it is what it is :P
"Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam."
Oh you´re not getting away with this...taker is not closer to the camera, his left foot is because he has a bit of a wider stance, and footware? Really? And the walk?? What? He was back to his old attire, zombie deadman pacing style, did you expect him to dance to the ring? :D
Click Here
No way around it, the middle line represents sid´s top hair (as if tip toes werent enought), still not as tall.
But I see from your arguments alone that you´re seeing the difference and it turned out bigger than you expected.
Other evidence, well, peak sid staredown with jbl and most problaby non peak taker staredown with the same should be enough, as well the 1 inch billing (you´ve mentioned billings before ;P)difference between the 2 in both wcw and wwe(f)...
"Lets just agree to disagree"
I disagree! ;P
Slim said on 22/Feb/15
I agree with Omid!!!! Why would anyone in they're right mind say Kane is shorter than taker? Ok sid and taker looked same height but glen as Isaac Yankem WAS taller than taker. It's clear in they're staredown. Idk if taker wore hidden lifts but it looks like glen was wearing socks! his shoes were so flat. No lifts at all. He never stood straight bc he never had to. Now when he stared down with big show, he stood kind of straight and he was the ONLY person I ever saw come close to shows height. (Kane)
I agree with Omid!!!! Why would anyone in they're right mind say Kane is shorter than taker? Ok sid and taker looked same height but glen as Isaac Yankem WAS taller than taker. It's clear in they're staredown. Idk if taker wore hidden lifts but it looks like glen was wearing socks! his shoes were so flat. No lifts at all. He never stood straight bc he never had to. Now when he stared down with big show, he stood kind of straight and he was the ONLY person I ever saw come close to shows height. (Kane)
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 21/Feb/15
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Your line is higher than Sids eyeline in the sting staredown.
Lets just agree to disagree unless we have new evidence ...
@miko
yeah, Sid was a very weak 6´7" peak, Taker in 1991 had imo about 1cm footwear advantage. Also at WM13, Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam.
In the road to WM13 staredowns they look always around the same height.
Tuga, you´re getting to much into this ;)
Your line is higher than Sids eyeline in the sting staredown.
Lets just agree to disagree unless we have new evidence ...
@miko
yeah, Sid was a very weak 6´7" peak, Taker in 1991 had imo about 1cm footwear advantage. Also at WM13, Taker walks a bit unusual and looked 2cm taller being closer to the cam.
In the road to WM13 staredowns they look always around the same height.
Omid said on 21/Feb/15
@Josey:
how much difference is between Kane and Taker in their WM14 stare down?
Do You agree, there is a roughly 1.5 to 2 inch difference?
now we consider Kane's boots gave him a 2 inch advantage, that means that Kane looks two inches taller than a barefoot Taker, the issue is that Undertaker didn't wrestle barefoot, he had shoes on that would have gave him roughly one inch so if Taker and Kane were the same height their deference should have been 1 inch whereas its clear there is a good 1.5 to 2 full inches difference between them give or take
That makes Kane 1 to maximum 2 cm taller than Taker
Kane was always Bigger and Taller, however WWE maximized the effect by giving him those shoes, its kinda like the Big Show, he is a giant but still wears huge boots because they want to maximize his largeness
@Josey:
how much difference is between Kane and Taker in their WM14 stare down?
Do You agree, there is a roughly 1.5 to 2 inch difference?
now we consider Kane's boots gave him a 2 inch advantage, that means that Kane looks two inches taller than a barefoot Taker, the issue is that Undertaker didn't wrestle barefoot, he had shoes on that would have gave him roughly one inch so if Taker and Kane were the same height their deference should have been 1 inch whereas its clear there is a good 1.5 to 2 full inches difference between them give or take
That makes Kane 1 to maximum 2 cm taller than Taker
Kane was always Bigger and Taller, however WWE maximized the effect by giving him those shoes, its kinda like the Big Show, he is a giant but still wears huge boots because they want to maximize his largeness
miko said on 20/Feb/15
I think the Sid staredowns alone rule out anything over 6'7.5 for a peak Taker.
I think the Sid staredowns alone rule out anything over 6'7.5 for a peak Taker.
Tuga said on 20/Feb/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines
Its the best staredown we´ve got of the 2, the low angle is for both, you have far worse staredowndowns pics in your collection, how can you seriously dismiss this? Also remember the difference is the same as here:
Click Here
Line or no line taker is noticeably taller and sid´s streches himself beyond human comprehension :D
And look at your own lines :
Click Here
Sorry, but had to do it :)
"6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing..."
No he is not, sting´s hair is at sid´s eyeline, look again :P
Click Here
6'7 range there easily for sid...
My peak height estimates:
Sid between 6'7 and 6'7 1/2, kane 6'7 1/2, taker 6'8, tyler mane 6'8 1/2, nash at least 6'9 1/2 ;)
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines
Its the best staredown we´ve got of the 2, the low angle is for both, you have far worse staredowndowns pics in your collection, how can you seriously dismiss this? Also remember the difference is the same as here:
Click Here
Line or no line taker is noticeably taller and sid´s streches himself beyond human comprehension :D
And look at your own lines :
Click Here
Sorry, but had to do it :)
"6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing..."
No he is not, sting´s hair is at sid´s eyeline, look again :P
Click Here
6'7 range there easily for sid...
My peak height estimates:
Sid between 6'7 and 6'7 1/2, kane 6'7 1/2, taker 6'8, tyler mane 6'8 1/2, nash at least 6'9 1/2 ;)
josey wales said on 19/Feb/15
@omid
Plausible pics, but i have to raise the point that your last pic doesnt show footware or stance. And takers stance doesnt do him no height favors. Its worth temembeting that wwe always made a point to market kane as bigger . I cannot agree that kanes famous monster boots only gave him half n inch. I still stick to them bring near identical in height at their peak at abt 200cm.
@omid
Plausible pics, but i have to raise the point that your last pic doesnt show footware or stance. And takers stance doesnt do him no height favors. Its worth temembeting that wwe always made a point to market kane as bigger . I cannot agree that kanes famous monster boots only gave him half n inch. I still stick to them bring near identical in height at their peak at abt 200cm.
Omid said on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga:
I agree there is maximum 0.5 between Taker and Kane
but in all fairness, if two people are the same height, on TV with Camera angles, at different times each one of the can look taller with Camera angles, meaning if Taker is Kane's height, at least on one occasion he should look taller because of angles, the issue is that the lowest for Kane so far was him being Taker's height, because of that I believe Kane is taller by like 1 or 2 cms
and about the footwear, 2011 Kane was wearing those huge boots for a while but he changed them with a smaller boots now
@James B:
I agree he doesn't look 6'8 today, hell he sometimes can look barely 6'7 but with military posture and a little bit of stretching I think he can measure near 6'8
and have it in consideration that what we see of these wrestlers are their night low
@Tuga:
I agree there is maximum 0.5 between Taker and Kane
but in all fairness, if two people are the same height, on TV with Camera angles, at different times each one of the can look taller with Camera angles, meaning if Taker is Kane's height, at least on one occasion he should look taller because of angles, the issue is that the lowest for Kane so far was him being Taker's height, because of that I believe Kane is taller by like 1 or 2 cms
and about the footwear, 2011 Kane was wearing those huge boots for a while but he changed them with a smaller boots now
@James B:
I agree he doesn't look 6'8 today, hell he sometimes can look barely 6'7 but with military posture and a little bit of stretching I think he can measure near 6'8
and have it in consideration that what we see of these wrestlers are their night low
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 19/Feb/15
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines...
6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing...
For the Memphis Staredown I always said Taker is max 0.5" taller...
Khali was more like 7´0.5" than a full 7´1", the position favours Taker as you pointed out... I see at least 5" between them, in other staredowns 5.5" so again 6´7"- 6´7.5" for Taker.
Can´t see them taller than this at peak:
Sid 6´6.75"
Taker 6´7"-6´7.25"
Kane 6´7.5"-6´7.75"
Don´t forget even Sarahs Dad said Taker was 6´7"...
@Tuga
C´mon the WM 13 pic had a crappy low angle, no chance for your lines...
6´2" Sting is slightly over Sids eyeline so max 4.5" shorter, you just proved Robs listing...
For the Memphis Staredown I always said Taker is max 0.5" taller...
Khali was more like 7´0.5" than a full 7´1", the position favours Taker as you pointed out... I see at least 5" between them, in other staredowns 5.5" so again 6´7"- 6´7.5" for Taker.
Can´t see them taller than this at peak:
Sid 6´6.75"
Taker 6´7"-6´7.25"
Kane 6´7.5"-6´7.75"
Don´t forget even Sarahs Dad said Taker was 6´7"...
Tuga said on 19/Feb/15
Nice try Red with the memphis video, I was expecting that ;P
We can´t really see where is sid´s head top, can we? Tip toes anyone? We really see sid on his tip toes the 2nd time he stares taker, taker is at no point at his best (or even close) posture...and you´ve admmited before sid´d mask gives an illusion of looking taller...so you´ve changed your mind?
Don´t:
Click Here
But what do you know, we do have a full body staredown with no masks both men standing tall:
Click Here
A better quality close up of the same moment:
Click Here
And Red, be greatfull taker wasn´t standing like this:
Click Here
And since you´ve downgraded sid due to one staredown with luger, now I give you the chance to yet ignore this again:
Click Here
And for kane and taker:
Click Here
Pre "lifts kane".
Kane with still footwear advantage (not as big as before) and better posture (notice taker´s neck):
Click Here
Kane´s recent footware:
Click Here
I got to say kane is still in great shape compared with taker and in his "real" kane attire still looks great, a proper monster :)
Eitherway 3 men are close in height, all 3 also share in common "any moment they look shorter instant downgrade" syndrome :D
Nice try Red with the memphis video, I was expecting that ;P
We can´t really see where is sid´s head top, can we? Tip toes anyone? We really see sid on his tip toes the 2nd time he stares taker, taker is at no point at his best (or even close) posture...and you´ve admmited before sid´d mask gives an illusion of looking taller...so you´ve changed your mind?
Don´t:
Click Here
But what do you know, we do have a full body staredown with no masks both men standing tall:
Click Here
A better quality close up of the same moment:
Click Here
And Red, be greatfull taker wasn´t standing like this:
Click Here
And since you´ve downgraded sid due to one staredown with luger, now I give you the chance to yet ignore this again:
Click Here
And for kane and taker:
Click Here
Pre "lifts kane".
Kane with still footwear advantage (not as big as before) and better posture (notice taker´s neck):
Click Here
Kane´s recent footware:
Click Here
I got to say kane is still in great shape compared with taker and in his "real" kane attire still looks great, a proper monster :)
Eitherway 3 men are close in height, all 3 also share in common "any moment they look shorter instant downgrade" syndrome :D
James B said on 18/Feb/15
Kane could have been 6'7.5-6'8 peak and around 6'9 in wrestling boots whereas kevin Nash was 6'9 1/2 prime.
These days though Kane ain't looking 6'8
Kane could have been 6'7.5-6'8 peak and around 6'9 in wrestling boots whereas kevin Nash was 6'9 1/2 prime.
These days though Kane ain't looking 6'8
Omid said on 18/Feb/15
@Josey:
Kane wore those boots in his early times but after those times his boots weren't that big, besides every Body wears Boots with insoles in WWE specially big guys, even Bigshow wears them now
You could argue Kane might have a 0/5 inch advantage in that pic but there is a clear full inch between those two
take a look at these pics for example:
Click Here
Click Here
Specially this one:
Click Here
@Josey:
Kane wore those boots in his early times but after those times his boots weren't that big, besides every Body wears Boots with insoles in WWE specially big guys, even Bigshow wears them now
You could argue Kane might have a 0/5 inch advantage in that pic but there is a clear full inch between those two
take a look at these pics for example:
Click Here
Click Here
Specially this one:
Click Here
josey wales said on 16/Feb/15
Kane never was obese. The tsker kane staredown at wm 13 kane was wearing monster boots as he was billed as 7 foot vs the his 6'10 brother. Taker lost lot if weight and muscle over the years but kane always had heavier build. Biker taker vs rick flair uses boots with a sole that looks bigger than it ease. Look vloser its the style of boot. Taker had no reason to tower flair even more than he did. Both sre bsre foot too close to call almost in height. Around 6'6 today
Kane never was obese. The tsker kane staredown at wm 13 kane was wearing monster boots as he was billed as 7 foot vs the his 6'10 brother. Taker lost lot if weight and muscle over the years but kane always had heavier build. Biker taker vs rick flair uses boots with a sole that looks bigger than it ease. Look vloser its the style of boot. Taker had no reason to tower flair even more than he did. Both sre bsre foot too close to call almost in height. Around 6'6 today
Omid said on 16/Feb/15
@James B, Kane is obese!? wow!
you call this obese:
Click Here
also undertaker is in better shape?
Click Here
also this is undertaker in front of Kane both in their 20s
Click Here
and people always say how Kane wears big boots, guess what:
Click Here
about Kane not looking as tall as nash, first:
Nash is 6'9
second, its not about what they look, its about how they measure
you could easily look taller or shorter than your real height, that effect is worsened when you are watching tv angles
Taker has longer legs, therefore he can appear taller but without a doubt and based on the photos I posted Kane is the taller man
@James B, Kane is obese!? wow!
you call this obese:
Click Here
also undertaker is in better shape?
Click Here
also this is undertaker in front of Kane both in their 20s
Click Here
and people always say how Kane wears big boots, guess what:
Click Here
about Kane not looking as tall as nash, first:
Nash is 6'9
second, its not about what they look, its about how they measure
you could easily look taller or shorter than your real height, that effect is worsened when you are watching tv angles
Taker has longer legs, therefore he can appear taller but without a doubt and based on the photos I posted Kane is the taller man
Vegas said on 16/Feb/15
taker doesn't look taller than sid in that memphis video from 1989 and footwear is identical
speaking of mabel how tall would people estimate the guy standing with him Click Here
taker doesn't look taller than sid in that memphis video from 1989 and footwear is identical
speaking of mabel how tall would people estimate the guy standing with him Click Here
Danimal said on 15/Feb/15
dicksock says on 12/Feb/15
I think Undertaker and Sid were both about 6'7" in their prime.
I think a young and healthy Taker was taller than a flat 6'7". All we need to do is look at him next to 6'6" Mabel/Viscera. That was over 1" of height difference. Peak Taker was from the late 80's to around 2000 or so. After that he began to lose height. I think Sid was a flat 6'7" at his peak, but doesn't look over 6'6" today. While we're at it, I also think that Kane (without his lifts/platform boots) was a flat 6'7" as well. All 3 men were "around" the same height at their respective peaks and possibly Taker having been the tallest of the 3.
dicksock says on 12/Feb/15
I think Undertaker and Sid were both about 6'7" in their prime.
I think a young and healthy Taker was taller than a flat 6'7". All we need to do is look at him next to 6'6" Mabel/Viscera. That was over 1" of height difference. Peak Taker was from the late 80's to around 2000 or so. After that he began to lose height. I think Sid was a flat 6'7" at his peak, but doesn't look over 6'6" today. While we're at it, I also think that Kane (without his lifts/platform boots) was a flat 6'7" as well. All 3 men were "around" the same height at their respective peaks and possibly Taker having been the tallest of the 3.
James B said on 15/Feb/15
Kane has hardly got a healthy body the guys obese. Undertaker way more injuries but clearly is in better shape.
You never know though Kane could have been 6'8 peak but today i don't think he's that tall i mean kevin Nash is that height now and looks taller than Kane does on TV.
Kane has hardly got a healthy body the guys obese. Undertaker way more injuries but clearly is in better shape.
You never know though Kane could have been 6'8 peak but today i don't think he's that tall i mean kevin Nash is that height now and looks taller than Kane does on TV.
Omid said on 15/Feb/15
Kane was always, and I mean always taller than taker no matter when he was Kane or Issac Yankem
Kane 6'8 peak
Taker6'7.5 peak, however taker has aged terribly, compared to him kane has pretty much kept a healthier body
Today I think Kane can measure "around" 6'8 with military posture, but standing loose and hunching like he does on TV he some times appears barely 6'7
as for Taker I think at 6'6.5 is fair now
Kane was always, and I mean always taller than taker no matter when he was Kane or Issac Yankem
Kane 6'8 peak
Taker6'7.5 peak, however taker has aged terribly, compared to him kane has pretty much kept a healthier body
Today I think Kane can measure "around" 6'8 with military posture, but standing loose and hunching like he does on TV he some times appears barely 6'7
as for Taker I think at 6'6.5 is fair now
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.