How tall is Vince McMahon

Vince McMahon's Height

6ft 0 (182.9 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 1 ½ (186.7 cm)
American Wrestler, Promoter and Announcer.

Vince McMahon 2

Add a Comment759 comments

Average Guess (106 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.31in (186.2cm)
Current: 5ft 11.79in (182.3cm)
WWE fan said on 18/Aug/19
More guesses @ superstars shortest and tallest possible barefoot heights...

Vinny Mac (prime): 6'0-6'1
Ultimate Warrior: 5'11.75-6'1
Curt Hennig: 6'0.75-6'1.75
Road Warrior Animal: 6'0.75-6'1.75
Road Warrior Hawk: 6'1.5-6'2.5
One Man Gang/Akeem: 6'6-6'7
Barbarian: 6'2-6'2.75
Haku/Meng: 5'11.75-6'0.75
Warlord: 6'2.5-6'3
Bobby Heenan: 5'9.75-5'11.5
Gorilla Monsoon: 6'3-6'4
Papa Shango/Godfather: 6'3.5-6'4.5
Yokozuna: 6'0-6'1
British Bulldog: 5'8.75-5'9.25
Jim Neidhart: 5'10-5'11
Farooq/Ron Simmons: 6'0.5-6'1.5
Ted Dibiase: 6'1.75-6'2.5
Virgil: 5'10-5'10.75
Crush: 6'5-6'5.75
Earthquake: 6'4.75-6'5.25
Mic Foley: 6'1-6'2
Terry Funk: 6'0-6'1.25
Goldust: 6'2.5-6'3.5
Cody Rhodes: 5'11-6'0
Jim Ross: 5'9-5'11
Jerry Lawler: 5'9-5'10
Stone Cold: 6'0-6'1
Rob Van Dam: 5'9.5-5'10.5
Hacksaw Jim Duggan: 6'2-6'2.75
Demolition Axe: 6'1-6'1.5
Demolition Smash/Repo Man: 6'1.5-6'2.25
WWE fan said on 11/Aug/19
My guess at lowest and highest possible barefoot heights

Vinny Mac: 5'10.5
Lesnar: 6'1-6'2
Goldberg: 6'0.5-6'1.5
HHH: 5'11-6'0
Undertaker: 6'5-6'6
Kane: 6'6-6'6.75
Kurt Angle: 5'8-5'9
Chris Jericho: 5'7.5-5'8.5
Rey Meysterio: 5'1-5'2
Eddie Guerrero: 5'6-5'7
Chris Benoit: 5'7-5'8
The Rock: 6'1.75-6'2.75
Big Show: 6'10-6'11
Billy Gunn: 6'3-6'4
Shawn Michaels: 5'9-5'10.75
Road Dogg: 6'1-6'2
Xpac: 5'10-5'11
Scott Hall: 6'4-6'5
Kevin Nash: 6'9-6'10
Hogan: 6'3-6'5
Jake Roberts: 6'4-6'5
Vader: 6'2.5-6'2.75
Sting: 6'2-6'2.25
Cena: 5'11-6'0
Macho Man: 5'11-6'0
Ric Flair: 5'9-5'11.75
Arn Anderson: 5'11-6'0
Sid: 6'6-6'6.5
Kerry Von Erich: 6'1.75-6'2.5
Andre: 6'10-7'0
Bam Bam Bigelow: 6'2-6'3
Doink: 5'10-5'11
Bret Hart: 5'10.5-5'11.75
edwards said on 10/Aug/19
@roderick and canson
Totally agreed
Canson said on 8/Aug/19
Looks at most 5’11 1/2” today
Roderick said on 5/Aug/19
6'1" peak height

5'11" now

2 inch loss.
David Wolberg said on 29/Jul/19
Peak height for Vince McMahon of 6 feet 1 and a half seems accurate. By looking at recent pictures of Vince McMahon, I would place his current height at 5 feet 11 and a half.
Lasius said on 23/May/19
He's about 6 feet tall. You can clearly see in this picture that Trump who is reportedly 6'2" towers over him. The difference is at least 2 inches..
Click Here
Space said on 23/May/19
@ terry
Austin is taller than McMahon by a couple inches today. In the 2004 segments with McMahon Goldberg and Austin, McMahon was 6’1” legit and so was Austin 6’1”. Goldberg was 6’1.75” , Triple
H was 6’1.75” Lesnar was 6’1.75”. The rock was 6’2”-6’2.25” Batista was 6’2.5”-6’2.75” Orton was 6’3.5”
Terry said on 2/May/19
I think this is right. I remember watching wrestling back in the day and he looked about 6'2. He is certainly taller than 6ft in my opinion. I think him and Steve Austin are the same height.
tony t. said on 17/Apr/19
5'11.25
TheBat said on 13/Apr/19
I'd say 6'1.25" peak, currently 5'11.25".
Nasirjones said on 2/Apr/19
@jack
No hogan looked almost 3 inches taller than McMahon. I think McMahon was a weak 6’1” at his peak.
tree said on 31/Mar/19
He was 6ft years ago.. Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 25/Mar/19
Looks max 5'11" next to 6'1.25" Triple H. Vince consistently looks around 5'11" these days. He needs a downgrade. Click Here
Fisticuffs said on 18/Feb/19
Rob, might wanna downgrade McMahon a bit or upgrade the Rock cause the Rock has 4 inches on him here at 2:30

Click Here

It's only 1998 too, thoughts?
Editor Rob
I'd have said 3 inches or so, but remember on here Frank who is 5ft 11.5 had met him and Vince was taller.
rawdshaq said on 5/Feb/19
He could be 6' 1/2" but I wouldn't buy anything lower than 6 feet. He slouches a lot and when he stands up straight he looks 6' - 6'1" easily. He was a legit 6'2".
Canson said on 4/Feb/19
@Christian: agree
David Kinsella said on 20/Jan/19
Here is McMahon beside Trump and I was surprised how tall Trump looks beside him.

Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 17/Jan/19
Looked about 5'11" next to 6'0" John Cena. Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 11/Jan/19
@rawdshaq

It's just the thick hair. There's virtually no way he's 6'0" anymore. Today he's clearly shorter than his son Shane who's the real 6 footer.
rawdshaq said on 10/Jan/19
When he slapped Aj Styles, pause at the 5 second mark. He stood up straight for a second and you can see how much he slouches. Easily at least 6 feet today and 6' 2" at peak.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jan/19
6ft1½ is fine for his peak
184guy2 said on 4/Jan/19
@Rob

Do you think that the personnel in WWE ( Cameraman and Writers ) have advaced acknowledge about heights like 90% of users of this site ? Haha

I mean , they probably know a lot of heights and perception , about shoes to pull off looking taller and stances . In the video that @jack kok sent , the camera is obvious a lot nearer Vince Mcmahon for purpose , to make him looks equal to Hulk . For common people , like the guy who sent the video , they are the same height but It's kind obvious that Hulk was near 3'' taller by 2002
Jack kok said on 4/Jan/19
Hogan and him both looked 188cm Click Here
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 27/Dec/18
Looked 5'11" at best next to 5'8" listed AJ Styles. Click Here
edwards said on 26/Dec/18
he can look 5'11 now
michael loughrie said on 23/Dec/18
My own grandfather was about 5' 11" when he was younger, and now that he is 77 years old, he is about 5' 9" I'd say. I usually don't ask older people about their heights because I get this odd feeling that they don't care and they are aware of their height loss. I think Vince McMahon has similar height loss to him, he was 6' 2" when he was younger and maybe about 5' 11" or 6 feet today.

Good listing
Mighty D said on 7/Dec/18
Vince McMahon looked pretty huge back in the day, like 6’3” or 6’4”. His height now is rounded up to 6’2”.
184guy2 said on 19/Nov/18
@Rob
Don't you think that McMahon needs a downgrade or Piper a slightly upgrade at peak height ?
Click Here
Click Here
Editor Rob
I wouldn't have thought Vince was sub 6ft 1 at his prime.
Rising - 174 cm said on 27/Oct/18
He generally looked around 6'1" to me with a lot of wrestlers and I think Rob's listing is possible for his peak. He's lost a lot of height for a man who's stayed in such excellent shape. It wouldn't be surprising if it were mostly after his 2013 hip replacement when he was already 67 or if it was shortly after his 1994 neck surgery for a herniated disc, but he still looked around 6'1" for years after. It looks like it was overall wear and tear after the torn quads in 2005 that really did it since he was clearly shorter than Donald Trump in 2007 and 2009 and Trump himself is only a year younger and probably around 6'1" himself by that time.
Manpreet Singh Virk said on 21/Oct/18
Mcmahon is currently 6'0.5
maaa said on 18/Oct/18
Today he is probably 5 ft 11....Looked a tad taller than Kevin Owens
miko said on 26/Apr/18
Vince might get up to around 5'11.5 these days in his best posture. 6'1 prime. Still in great shape for his age.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 24/Apr/18
His current height needs to be updated. He looks nowhere close to being 6'0" today.
ReallyShortRussianDude said on 15/Apr/18
Click Here

Vince looks about the same height as 5'10 Kevin Owens.
Lawrence said on 13/Mar/18
Vince no taller than 5'11
Danimal said on 10/Mar/18
Up until his mid 50's (2001) Vince still had close to 3" on 5'10" Kurt Angle:
Click Here
Danimal said on 7/Mar/18
It's scary how much height and overall size Vince has lost. This is a RECENT video (2018) of Vince next to his son Shane in the ring. Shane is several inches taller than Vince now: Click Here

Here is a video of Vince with Shane in the ring from almost 20 years ago (1999). They were the same height back then: Click Here
berta said on 25/Feb/18
i dont think he was taller than peak kevin costner. but maybe 186 guy. IN my book he was about 186 or little under and today he looks to be 2,5 cm shorter than cena. Maybe legit 182 guy.that still can measure 183 if he is lucky.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 25/Jan/18
Nowhere near 6'0" today, this listing needs to be updated.
RandomDude said on 23/Jan/18
I would say he is about 5'10.5

looked a lot shorter than 6'1 Austin on Raw

it looks like he has lost a lot of height
Njp said on 24/Dec/17
Vince has lost height. My dad is a little older than Vince but his height was 6’1.5” when he was measured in the RAF. He’s now around 5’11” so it’s feasible that Vince in similar in height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Dec/17
He didn't look much shorter than Mick Foley in the 90's
mahon77 said on 13/Sep/17
looks to have lost around 4-5cm's, looked 188-187cm in his prime , now around 183cm. Rob, would there be any other explanation ,other than posture , that has caused such a dramatic loss?
ma said on 13/Sep/17
Rob, in the pas raw, Vince looked a little taller than Owens, but not over 1 inc.
I would say today Vince is 5 ft 11.5 in (KO had footwear advantage)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Aug/17
Shane's taller than Vince. I wouldn't argue under 6ft1 and he might actually be closer to 6ft2.
Danimal said on 16/Aug/17
Vince before height loss started to really kick in (with Steve Austin): Click Here
Tyson said on 4/Aug/17
Peak 6'1 flat
Nowadays 5'11.5
184guy said on 20/Jul/17
Shane is over 6'1
Mike 178cm. said on 19/Jul/17
Accurate listing, Rob. How tall do you think his son Shane is? I would guess 5ft 11.5 inches.
even said on 7/Jul/17
peak = 186 cm
now = 182 cm
Dan Chernau said on 15/May/17
Hey Phag, are you an imbecile or do you just portray one on celebheights.com? You're just sort of a walking lobotomy? Nice being owned innit?

prac·tice/ˈpraktəs/
noun

the actual application or use of an idea, belief, or method as opposed to theories about such application or use.
repeated exercise in or performance of an activity or skill so as to acquire or maintain proficiency in it.

verb

perform (an activity) or exercise (a skill) repeatedly or regularly in order to improve or maintain one's proficiency.
carry out or perform (a particular activity, method, or custom) habitually or regularly.
Canson said on 14/May/17
@Dan Chernau: you rock! It's about time someone else puts him in his place. Funny how WRS567 can "offend" and call people a liar but when someone makes a snipe back at him it "offends him" and he runs to Rob. He'll be doing it on you too btw
Wrs567 said on 13/May/17
@Dan Chernau: I see you have a real passion for chickens/c/ocks, by the way you type

Must have had your good share back in the day eh Danny boy? or is it Dan, or is it Daniella?

I'll just stick to calling you my favorite... Mrs Chernau

Like I said Daniella, I am here always to practise for you

I like how you changed the spelling too

Because spelling things wrong gives you brain cells right?......
Dan Chernau said on 12/May/17
Wrs567 said on 10/May/17
@Dan Chernau:

Speaking of cells, you seem to be lacking them in the Brain Department there Mrs Chernau

Oh don't worry.. I'm not going to quit anything any time soon

How about that then?? Was that better material for you?

I'm always here to practise better material just for you.

What you may want to practise is taking the c(ock) out of your mouth and putting it back in practiCe. There's no s, the only s is the s(hit) in your head. But for the sake of this board I'll put a ph in place of f for my new nickname for you, phag.
Wrs567 said on 10/May/17
@Dan Chernau:

Speaking of cells, you seem to be lacking them in the Brain Department there Mrs Chernau

Oh don't worry.. I'm not going to quit anything any time soon

How about that then?? Was that better material for you?

I'm always here to practise better material just for you.
Dan Chernau said on 5/May/17
Wrs567 said on 2/May/17
Yes Rob, take him down to the 5'11'' range

Or Danny over here, Will start calling himself Daniel instead of Dan

He will think he's the actual 'Damn Daniel' Meme Kid

We can't have Mister Chernau over here dropping the extra cool sounding 'Dan' for Daniel now...

Hardy har don't quit your day job. Keep it up, you'll have plenty of time to come up with better material when you're not posting here anymore. Or you could just do everyone a favor and donate yourself for stem cell research.
Wrs567 said on 2/May/17
Yes Rob, take him down to the 5'11'' range

Or Danny over here, Will start calling himself Daniel instead of Dan

He will think he's the actual 'Damn Daniel' Meme Kid

We can't have Mister Chernau over here dropping the extra cool sounding 'Dan' for Daniel now...
Dan Chernau said on 21/Apr/17
Rob, will you take him down to 5'11.25'' any time soon?

or at least 5'11.5''?

+1. Please Rob take him down. If not today then by noon Sunday! This 6'0 bs can't make it through the weekend. It just can't.
Wrs567 said on 19/Apr/17
Rob, will you take him down to 5'11.25'' any time soon?

or at least 5'11.5''?
berta said on 10/Apr/17
rob dont you thin that there is a big chanse for this guy to have been 6 fot 1 flat at peak? i think 186 listing could be the best at peak and today could still be 6 feet but probably little under because cena takes him with over 1 inch
The eckoman said on 9/Apr/17
6ft.05in
Bruce Prichard said on 29/Mar/17
Rumour and innuendo aside, I've been around the man a few times let's just say. Too put it mildly, he's a big man, 6'2, 260 pounds easily, at least when I was around him. Age, ya that's a factor. Two blown quads, that'll do it. I haven't been in his company in 8-9 years so suffice to say, any height loss isn't something I'd have insight on. Just from watching on TV like all y'all do, he might be a smidgen less now but still at 71 just a huge huge man. Goddamn pal, he's still bigger than much of the talent.
Dan Chernau said on 28/Mar/17
Wrs567 said on 25/Jan/17
That is more than 2 inches!

Click Here

I really think it's about time Vince gets taken down to 5'11'' at least

I would like to see the most accurate heights listed on here, compared to other websites

I agree. We're literally talking life or death on this accuracy, mental stability at the very least. I'm tired of grinding my teeth at the inaccuracies.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Mar/17
6ft2 peak is arguable
Danimal said on 17/Feb/17
Vince's height loss has been severe. Here he was next to Stone Cold Steve Austin in 1998. First pic is of him with Stone Cold who was liftless (regular dress shoes) and the second is with him and Stone Cold where Stone Cold was wearing his regular clunky boots. Both pics Vince was clearly taller. He was close to 6'2" at his peak (until maybe early/mid 2000's and then he appeared to drastically lose height (hip replacement, as well as both patella being surgically reattached. He's max 5'11" today.

In 1998 with Stone Cold:
Stone Cold in regular shoes: Click Here
Stone Cold in his clunky boots: Click Here
berta said on 11/Feb/17
no talle rhtan 186 peak i can actually see arnold littel taller than him 30 years back. today he is clearly shorter than cena with about 1 inch. i give him little under 6 foot toady
Sexton1 said on 30/Jan/17
This guy is more evidence for my claim that heavy lifting/wrestling doesn't have the effect on height loss that many people around here think.

He's over 70 years old, and by his account he's lifted since he was 14. He's also done crazy amounts at an advanced age—squatting 700 for reps in his 60s, by his own account (made possible by steroids, no doubt). And he's still only lost around an inch—average for his age—when he weights something like 250 pounds of steroid-enchanced muscle (well beyond his body's "natural" weight). '

Of course, there's always the apparent counter-example of Arnie, who's lost more than average for his age, but I think other factors must be involved there.
Chris said on 27/Jan/17
It's crazy to think Vince is 5'11 or 5'10. And the only way to realise that is to look at a person who is actually 5'10, pictured with Triple H or Cena, and see how small they look!

Vince is in the same ball park as the Triple H, Cena, Shane McMahon, The Rock for height. He's not as tall, but you're only talking an inch.

5'10 guys genuinely look small when standing with guys who are 6'2 or 6'3. That's not Vince. He's obviously a six footer. I think he looks closer to 6'1
Chris said on 27/Jan/17
I met Shane McMahon and he's genuinely big. He's not lying when he says he's 6'2 - he literally is. I'm 5'10 and he towered over me. He looked closer to 6'3 in fact.

And Vince isn't much shorter than Shane. Maybe 1 inch or something like that.
Chris said on 27/Jan/17
Vince is easily 6 feet. He looks about 6'1. He's only slightly shorter than Triple H
Wrs567 said on 25/Jan/17
That is more than 2 inches!

Click Here

I really think it's about time Vince gets taken down to 5'11'' at least

I would like to see the most accurate heights listed on here, compared to other websites
tony t. said on 22/Jan/17
Any chance of adding Shane McMahon?
Danimal said on 18/Jan/17
Sepanta said on 17/Jan/17
His real height probably is 6 feet.

He's not a wrestler. It's not about real or fake with him. The man in his younger days (up until the 90's) was at least 6'1"-6'2". Today in his early 70's, he's definitely lost minimum 2" in height.
Sepanta said on 17/Jan/17
His real height probably is 6 feet.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Dec/16
Rob, which of these is suitable for his peak?

A) 190cm/188cm
B) 189.5cm/187.5cm
C) 189cm/187cm
D) 188.5cm/186.5cm
E) 188cm/186cm
MDV said on 28/Nov/16
Vince - 182cm today
Stephanie - 170cm
Shane - 184 cm
heightchecker34 said on 27/Oct/16
I can't believe I haven't wrote my opinion on Vince McMahon! The true McDaddy of professional wrestling... I started watching around the 2003ish time, so I missed the Attitude Era as I was young and hadn't discovered wrestling. The hardest worker and a simply put a "genius" in the wrestling business. Sure, I may disagree with some of his decisions and choices as of late, and maybe there is a part of him that is a bit out of touch in this "Reality Era" but he will go down as the greatest entrepreneur who made gutsy decisions in time of great peril for the company, he put up his entire house and mortgage just to keep the company alive, as well as the greatest wrestling character of all time! As for his height, 6'1.5 prime without a doubt, when he was a just an interviewer in the late 1970's, many wrestlers had to stand on boxes to look taller and more intimidating next to him, as of now, he has dropped to around the strong 5'11 range. He won't step out of the business until his last breath... as he says himself "I am not to good lying still in the sun".
Scott said on 16/Oct/16
I'd say he was a solid 6'1'' in his youth. Today: about 6'.
Oanh said on 15/Oct/16
Always thought he looked 6'1" at his peak.
straightahead said on 12/Oct/16
He have had no reason or excuses to have lost any height except for age, and that isnt even a full inch.
Aza said on 7/Oct/16
He was 6'1 peak and about 5'11.25 today
straightahead said on 7/Oct/16
That photo of 6ft tops peak Vince and Billy Graham fom Danimal proves that Graham didnt lose any height at all, he was indeed that short in his peak as he is right now (below 6'0)
James B said on 6/Oct/16
Vince doesn't look 6'1.5 here with Sid and shawn michaels does he rob?

Click Here

Unless Vince lost some height at that point?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Sep/16
Sub--5ft7 for Stephanie?
Editor Rob: 5ft 6.5 maybe
berta said on 8/Sep/16
187 is to tal for peak i Think he was in the 185 range peak and now he is down to 182 cena is way taller than him these days
senu said on 4/Sep/16
Rob is it could be 5'10 today ? What do you say rob?
Editor Rob: I'd be surprised if he was that short.
Jared said on 31/Aug/16
Vince - 182cm
Stephanie - 172cm
Shane - 185cm
MDV said on 30/Aug/16
Rob, how tall do you think is Stefanie Mcmahon?
Editor Rob: probably 5ft 6.5
Pita ji said on 23/Aug/16
He is no more than 5'10" today clearly shorter than Cena and shane mcmahon. Who both are legit 6 feet
Man180 said on 22/Aug/16
This is accurate for vince, Shane looks to stand around 185/6cm in shoes, id go for 183 barefoot for shane
Attitude said on 30/Jul/16
Click Here

Vince is clearly an inch taller than Bret and their footwear seems to give the same raise.

Vince was a strong 6'1 back in the day no doubt. He edged out Austin all the time too.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jul/16
Rob, do you have any guesses for Shane McMahon and would you consider adding him?
Editor Rob: I'm still a bit unsure on that guy, I don't know if i will add him just now...maybe stephanie first.
straightahead said on 27/Jul/16
@RealTd said on 27/May/16
Vince was 183cm back in the day, 6'1 in shoes. Today 5'11, 6 ft in shies, period.

I wouldnt even go that far, he looked more like 5'11 1/2 peak since he Bret Hart always edged him out, and he have had no reason to lost any height (only besides age) today he's still close to 5'11
Man said on 13/Jul/16
He's only 5"10/5"11 look at him up to Cena
Marianito10 said on 11/Jul/16
This man and his walk loool...
Will you put Stephanie's height? Google lies most of the times...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jun/16
Vince was 187cm peak for sure and could look 188cm.
miko said on 29/May/16
Billy Graham was 6'1/6'1.5 range in his prime.
RealTd said on 27/May/16
Vince was 183cm back in the day, 6'1 in shoes. Today 5'11, 6 ft in shies, period.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/May/16
Danimal, how tall was Billy Graham in his youth?


Please don't say he was actually 6ft4...
Sammy Derrick said on 23/May/16
Click Here
If a 6'0 guy calls another guy tall,he is TALL/or WAS TALL.I think 70 year old Vince McMAHON IS 6'0,50 YEAR OLD VINCE McMahon slightly below 6'2.
Remember the guy is 70 YEARS OLD.He works out and is in better shape than most 20 year olds...
Click Here
He travels 250 plus days in a calendar year,he has to attend boardroom meetings,direct story lines,stock market...VERY little sleep hence the reason he LOST so much
height.
@Editor Rob, How tall is Stephanie McMahon?How tall is his son Shane McMahon?
James B said on 18/May/16
Danimal - He's still tall and yes he was a legit tall man in his prime but he certainly didn't look as impressive as Sid or Kevin Nash did he?

6'1.5 is nothing spectacular in the WWE or the real world for that matter.
Danimal (176-178cm) said on 14/May/16
He was a LEGIT tall man in his younger years. Here he is in the 1970's next to a YOUNG and HEALTHY Superstar Billy Graham who was in boots and at the other end we have 6'1"-6'2" Steve Reeves and 5'11"-6'0" Serge Nubret next to him. Vince is THE tallest of the bunch. The man was close enough to a legit 6'2" in his prime. Today he's well under 6'0": Click Here
kilrain said on 5/May/16
Just ran into him on the street today. Same height as me. 5'11"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/May/16
Rob, could 6ft flat be closer today?
Editor Rob: today it is probably more realistic yes.
LeonKen said on 28/Mar/16
Google says Shane (his son) is 3cm taller than him, imo they are kinda the same...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Mar/16
Rob, could you add Shane and Stephanie McMahon?
straightahead said on 22/Mar/16
Rob, when did Vince had his peak of 6'1 1/2? he has always been shorter than 6'0 tops Bret Hart, so even in 90's and 80's
Editor Rob: I'm not sure he looked shorter than bret...maybe the video angle at times made him look smaller.
Sam said on 18/Mar/16
Vince didn't look taller than 5'11 last few RAWs. Shane looks around 6'1 like his father was.
Stevy jaction said on 14/Mar/16
I think probably 5'10.
kreyzig 6ft 3 said on 8/Mar/16
Shane Mcmohan looks around 6ft 2.5 to 6ft 3 range with his father being 184cms.
Sam said on 2/Mar/16
5'11.5 tops today
heightpredictition said on 29/Feb/16
Rob is it argueable that Vince is 5ft 11 or 5ft 11 an a 1/2 throughout the day?
Editor Rob: a bit under six foot might be possible today
miko said on 26/Feb/16
Rob have you considered adding Shane McMahon? Back in the business quite now and quite famous in his own right.

Looked eye to eye with a late 90's Vince, Shane is likely around 6'1/6'1.5, taller than Vince today though.
Straightahead said on 15/Feb/16
Height183 said on 30/Jun/15
@Danimal: I still don't understand what you're trying to say Lol. Please explain the story behind the pictures.

Just ignore him (everyone else does) his only goal on this forums is to make a peak Hogan as tall as possible and the only way he can accomplish that is to make us (and himself) to believe that others who was close to Hogan, such as Vince, also has lost several inches, just like he claim Hogan has. (which ofc none of them has)
Straightahead said on 15/Feb/16
Vince was barely nose to nose with British Bulldog in mid 90's... he has never ever even been 6ft, and he was always shorter than Bret Hart.

Both Roman Reigns and HHH are both a little bit shorter than 6'2 Lesnar, in fact they seems to be 6'1 1/2 at the very best but they do have a minimum of 3 inches on Vince.
miko said on 30/Jan/16
Some people would believe that a prime McMahon would have been nose to nose with Reigns..
BorkLaser said on 29/Jan/16
Face to face with Roman Reigns. Click Here I think he's a fraction under 6'0"
abritishbat said on 23/Dec/15
what are you all getting your trunks in a wad over? every one of you has forgotten that Vince had hip surgery earlier this year and neck surgery in the 90s that's how he lost a couple of inches!
pablo77bar(184cm) said on 23/Dec/15
Rob,why do you list Vince at 6ft 1.5 (peak) and Piper at 6ft 1 when they were obviously the same height ?
Editor Rob: they could have been those marks
John said on 21/Dec/15
Looked about 2 inches shorter than 6'2.25 Roman Reigns last week on Raw Click Here
tony t. said on 20/Nov/15
6'0.25 at most these days.
BorkLaser said on 2/Oct/15
Here's a full body shot next to Steph (in heels) and Triple H Click Here so he's probably like 5'11.5" or so today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Sep/15
He's actually 70 now.

"Peak height was 6ft 1¾in (187cm)"
james said on 28/Sep/15
Vince was 6'1 in his younger years and now 6'0 today probably 5'11.5 due to old age at 69
rikashiku said on 4/Sep/15
To be fair Height183, Cenas shoes have more padding than McMahons which are completely flat.

Even so, that's a near 2" height difference and those shoes maybe give 1"-1.5" to Cenas height, who everyone has estimated to be around 6'0"-6'0.5".

McMahon could very well be 5'11" flat now a days.
Sam said on 25/Aug/15
Yeah Height183, the more I see of Vince the more he's looking just 5ft11 today, though I believed he consistantly looked 186cm through the 80s, 90s and possibly even some of the early/mid 2000s, just these last several years that probably from over-doing the weight-lifting has definatley taken its toll and produced more height loss. Arnie is another good example.
Height183 said on 23/Aug/15
This was back in 2011, where Cena once again made him look 5'11''

Click Here
Height183 said on 18/Aug/15
Rob, I'm just trying to help..

Surely you can't have both Vince and Cena at 184cm??

Click Here

Click Here
James B said on 17/Aug/15
Rob is just 6'1 peak possible?
[Editor Rob: he could look anywhere in 6ft 1 range peak, today yes he can look really just 6ft.]
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Aug/15
Vince looks no taller than Andy in that clip!
Vegas said on 3/Aug/15
Rob you have andy kaufman down as 183cm, this is 1979 and vince clearly isn't 4cm taller Click Here
[Editor Rob: vegas, it's harder to tell actual difference as the camera is high up pointing down, possibly reducing any difference further.]
daquf said on 2/Aug/15
So you counting his 2 inch of hair in that pic with Brock? Vince was shorter than 6ft Bret Hart even 20 years ago, and today hes 5'10-5'11. 1 inch height loss tops, since he never was a full 6'0
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 22/Jul/15
9673 says on 15/Jun/15
Click Here

Vince looks tiny next to Triple H here.


Rob what do you think about this pic? Imo he can´t be as tall as Cena there.
Jake T. said on 20/Jul/15
6'1.5 peak and 5'11.5 or 6'0 flat today
Danimal said on 11/Jul/15
Rob, here's the ULTIMATE proof. Vince and Brock PRE Vince's height loss:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Vince and Brock POST Vince's height loss:

Click Here

Click Here
Danimal said on 9/Jul/15
Rob, you are SOOOO off on this one. He's MAX 5'11" today. Vince has lost a tremendous amount of height. You see it with Ric Flair and now you will see it with Vince McMahon:

Before:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Today:

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here

Click Here
gaga said on 2/Jul/15
Rob, I have a question; why do pro wrestlers lose so much height compared to their peak? What do you think is the main reason.
[Editor Rob: joint/disc impacts is a big part of it, doing that for years takes it's toll.]
Danimal said on 1/Jul/15
Vince and Stone Cold before Vince's height loss: Click Here
Height183 said on 30/Jun/15
@Danimal: I still don't understand what you're trying to say Lol. Please explain the story behind the pictures.
Danimal said on 29/Jun/15
Vince and Stone Cold in the late 90's and Stone Cold wore big boots at that time: Click Here
Danimal said on 21/Jun/15
Vince with 6'1" PRO-bobybuilder Mike Christian in 1991 (Vince was in his mid-40's): Click Here
Height183 said on 21/Jun/15
Vince at his Peak could have been 184 - 185cm. Today 5'11'' is the best guess for him.
Danimal said on 20/Jun/15
And another pic of Vince with Ric from 2002 and Vince isn't even standing straight: Click Here
Danimal said on 20/Jun/15
Vince and Ric Flair in 2002: Click Here
Height183 said on 17/Jun/15
Wow, in that picture that 9673 posted he is looking in the 5'10'' range! No way he is over 5'11'' today.
BorkLaser said on 16/Jun/15
Looked a lot shorter than Triple H at Money in the Bank's tribute to the late Dusty Rhodes. I agree with Chucksta7 and James B that he's around 5'11.75" today. As for his peak height I would have guessed 186-187cm so I think it's good as it is.
9673 said on 15/Jun/15
Click Here

Vince looks tiny next to Triple H here.
Chucksta7 said on 4/May/15
Vince at his peak in the 80s and 90s was 6'1.Vince today is around 5.11.75 since he is nearly half an inch shorter than 6'0.5 Cena
Frank Ruiz said on 13/Apr/15
6'2 peak, 6'0 today
James B said on 8/Jan/15
Looked 1.5 inches shorter than Brock Lesner 12 years ago. I think 6'1 flat peak and 5'11.75 today is closer to the truth.
Height183 said on 26/Dec/14
Rob, would you take another look at Vinces current height?
MD said on 28/Nov/14
How much was this guy billed at in weight when he was ripped?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Nov/14
Rob, how tall would you estimate Shane McMahon to be?
Height182 said on 9/Nov/14
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover: Watch the whole video I posted on 18/Sep/14.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Nov/14
@Height182

Vince is hunching forward while Cena's neck is straight.
Height182 said on 7/Nov/14
Rob, you should definitely take another look at Vinces current height.
Equin0x said on 5/Nov/14
After watching Raw the past monday I have to say Vince looks like he's aged terribly since he was on air last and hos height seemed to have decreased too in the last few years, he was almost towered by 6'1.5 Triple H, I can't see him above 5'10 today, he use to look a big man but not anymore.
Height182 said on 30/Oct/14
Cena is not 6'0.5/6'0.75 range. The man said it himself that he is only 6'0''! He said he reached 6'0'' at 13 and didn't grow anymore.
miko said on 25/Oct/14
Cena is 6'0.5/6'0.75 range. I think Vince might have dropped below 6'0 today unless he's hiding some height in his posture.
Height182 said on 25/Oct/14
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover: So you think Vince is 6'1'' today. How tall do you think Cena is? Click Here Maybe 6'2''? 6'2.5'' even?? Oh wait... You must think Cena is standing on top of a Fruity Pebbles Box
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Oct/14
I'd give Vince 184-185cm today. But pushing 70, he's gotta be at least 1in down from his peak and I do think he was 6ft2. He was a genuinely big and tall man back in the 80s-90s. In fact, he wanted be a wrestler himself but his dad wouldn't let him. He had the size for it
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Oct/14
I'd give Vince 184-185cm today. But pushing 70, he's gotta be at least 1in down from his peak and I do think he was 6ft2. He was a genuinely big and tall man in the 80s-90s. In fact, he wanted be a wrestler himself but his dad wouldn't let him. He had the size for it
James B said on 5/Oct/14
Brett Hart could be 5'11.5 today
Height181 said on 18/Sep/14
Rob, do you still think Vince as tall as 184cm today? Look at this Video from 2011 Click Here Go to 3:11 and onwards, You can clearly see Vince is standing as straight as he can, but is still a lot shorter than Cena. What do you think?
Vegas said on 13/Sep/14
in photos he still looks over 6ft but not in videos, strange. thats may 2013 with brethart Click Here

rob has a shot with bret and i posted a shot a bret on punks page (not sure if its still there)
177cmGuy said on 12/Sep/14
He was always billed at 6'3 but I think his real height was 185cm or flat 6'1. Today he looks bareley 6'0
Attitude said on 20/Aug/14
That's the problem when comparing with Austin, he hunches over a lot making the other guys look bigger than they really are.
Kourosh177cm said on 19/Aug/14
rob time to downgrade vince like HBK. He is most likely 5'11.75. Cena had solid inch on him on all occasion when they were face to face.
SaveUsY2J said on 19/Aug/14
Vegas says on 9/Aug/14
Attitude says on 9/Aug/14
Click Here

Same footwear, and Austin is shorter.
____________

vinces footwear is bigger. i posted a shot back on 23/Aug/13

Yeah, and Austin is hunched over quite a lot. Vince has hair so he might look a bit taller, but in reality barefoot he wasn't.
James B said on 14/Aug/14
Lol rob is vince paying you to keep him at 6'0.5? So much evidence points to him being 5'11-6ft today.
James B said on 12/Aug/14
Something Austin screams 6ft.
Attitude said on 11/Aug/14
In the second video, there is a full body shot and they are wearing similar, if not the same, boots
Vegas said on 9/Aug/14
Attitude says on 9/Aug/14
Click Here

Same footwear, and Austin is shorter.
____________

vinces footwear is bigger. i posted a shot back on 23/Aug/13
Attitude said on 9/Aug/14
Click Here

Again, same footwear and Austin is shorter.
Attitude said on 9/Aug/14
Click Here

Same footwear, and Austin is shorter. Vince was a 6'1" dude for sure. Austin at peak was 6'0.5".
Alex 6'0 said on 8/Aug/14
I always thought Vince looked a bit taller than Austin in the 90's.
SaveUsY2J said on 8/Aug/14
Vegas says on 7/Aug/14
Height181 says on 3/Aug/14
It shows Vince is no taller than 5'11'' as of today
_________

you should go onto andres page and state that given vince at the 2013 hof was taller than bob backlund who a few on there think is over 6ft..

---------

He won't listen, he's still yet to come up with an explanation for how Stone Cold was at least an inch taller than proven 6'0" Bret Hart in 1997, or how Rock has looked consistently taller than proven 6'2" Mick Foley across the years.
SaveUsY2J said on 8/Aug/14
Vince was never taller than Austin, if anything Austin was a fraction taller.

Today 5'11.5-6'0, peak about 6'1
Vegas said on 7/Aug/14
Height181 says on 3/Aug/14
It shows Vince is no taller than 5'11'' as of today
_________

you should go onto andres page and state that given vince at the 2013 hof was taller than bob backlund who a few on there think is over 6ft..
Alex 6'0 said on 6/Aug/14
Vince was taller than Austin who could have been 6'0.5 at his peak which puts Vince 6'1 peak. Today 5'11 I agree. 2 inches lost in his 60s seems right
James B said on 5/Aug/14
He always looked 6'1 flat in his prime. Today looks 5'11.5.
Alex 6'0 said on 2/Aug/14
Vince going from 6'1 to 5'11 I can see at his age. 2 inches lost is very possible
Alex 6'0 said on 30/Jul/14
At least 6'1 peak. Was always a little taller than Stone Cold. Today 5'11.5 seems accurate.
Bernardo said on 6/Jun/14
6'0 spot on IMO.
ElRaloir said on 24/May/14
He doesn't look like he lost a lot of height. I'd say this current listing is accurate
Marcus Hickman said on 23/May/14
Jerry Lawler
5' 10.5" peak
5' 10" current
Cap said on 14/May/14
Doesen't look 6' to me, when he has segments with CM Punk, he wears shoes that obviously lift him abit, and he and Punk look level.
miko said on 6/Mar/14
6'1 at his tallest, probably down to 6'0.5 range in the mid/late 2000's and looks a bit under 6'0 today, although a 6'0 listing might be a fairer one at present.
Dannno said on 21/Feb/14
Daniel Bryan might have been given some lifts in his dress shoes for that segment, I mean look at him next to Stephanie who was in high heels, he was still at eye level with her.
Daniel Bryan 5'7.5 - 5'8.5 (5'9.5 in wrestling boots or dress shoes?)
Vince McMahon 5'11.5 - 6'0 (6'1.5 6'2 peak)
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Jan/14
"Peak height was 6ft 2in (188cm)"

Easily looked that even in the 90s. Was still looking 186-187cm range in the early 2000s.
James said on 11/Jan/14
I think 6'1 (185cm) peak and 5'11.5 (182cm) today
Lu said on 5/Dec/13
Omiko says on 29/Jan/13
Brock Lesnar dwarfed Vince last night, no way is he still 6'0 today.

He has never been... 5'11 peak tops
Doink said on 26/Oct/13
The big thing to keep in mind with Vince McMahon is he probably tried to wear as flat of dress shoes as he could when he was an announcer (to make the wrestlers look taller) and then likely switched to using bigger shoes/lifts once he became the "Mr. McMahon" character in 1997/98. Wouldn't surprise me if he goes back to flat shoes while in a segment with someone like Daniel Bryan.
FK said on 29/Aug/13
Looks to be either 5'11 or a weak 6' next to Daniel Bryan (Bryan Danielson) who himself claimed 5'8 on the August 5 RAW
Click Here
vegas said on 23/Aug/13
good shot of vinces footwear during the attitude era, if he was 6'0.5 barefoot he would stand about 6'2 in those boots Click Here
Conti said on 8/Aug/13
Brock lesnar isn't 6'2.5,he's 6'3.5.Vince McMahon didn't shrink that much maybe like an inch.Vince use to be 6'2,and now he's 6'1.
KT said on 7/Aug/13
He was a 5'11 guy who always wore lifts to pass as 6'1.

Today, he is around 5'10, and he doesn't wear lifts anymore. He was a lot shorter than Brock Lesnar (6'2.5) earlier this year, and he is only a few inches taller than self-claimed 5'8 Daniel Byran.

This 6'0.5 listing is inaccurate.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/13
Triple H 6ft2.5in(189cm)
Shane McMahon 6ft1.75in(187cm)
Vince McMahon 6ft0.5in(184cm)

That's how it looks today
dicksock said on 23/Jul/13
Vince was 6'1" in his prime and is 6' now.
Lorne said on 23/Jul/13
Brock Lesnat is 6ft2.25. He is no taller(and to me looked a tad shorter)than 189cm Goldberg.Vince is a tricky one. Clearly not more than 184cm Today, but how much did he really lose? 6ft1.5 is certainly believable, but he could struggle to look more than 185cm, while also sometimes looking near 6'2, so he is a tricky one.
vegas said on 17/Jul/13
here is vince and hhh side by side in 1996 @ 1min 20secs Click Here
Conti said on 15/Jul/13
Dicksock is demented,Shane McMahon was never taller than his father.Brock Lesnar is actually 6'3.5 and he was slightly taller than Vince when they were face to face in the ring 4 months ago.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Jul/13
WWE management claim he's 6"3", which I did at one point beleive.
But, I think he was 6"2" and measured 189cm out of bed. So, they rounded that up.

Today he is looking 6"1" tops, probably a bit shy of it. But, Triple H is 189cm and Shane McMahon is 188cm. They both look taller than Vince.
James said on 2/Apr/13
I dont really believe Vince was ever legit 6 ft 2.If triple is/was 6 ft 2 and a half,than vince should be 6 ft 1.Now Vince looks shorter than 6 ft 1 Cena.
dicksock said on 6/Mar/13
Conti says on 5/Mar/13
Shane McMahon is a solid 5'11 so therefore he looked 3 inches shorter than his father in the late 1990's and early 2000's.There heights are still the same.Vince McMahon is still a solid 6'2.

___________

What in the hell are you talking about? Shane has always looked taller than Vince. Vince is 5'11" now as he is 3" shorter than 6'2" listed Brock Lesnar. He was 6' in his prime as he was the same height as 6' Bret Hart.
Conti said on 5/Mar/13
Shane McMahon is a solid 5'11 so therefore he looked 3 inches shorter than his father in the late 1990's and early 2000's.There heights are still the same.Vince McMahon is still a solid 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Feb/13
Looked a solid 6ft2 in the 90s
Peyman-6ft said on 14/Feb/13
I know many people may disagree but his real height is
6ft 1in at peak at absolute max.
5ft 11.25in nowadays.
dicksock said on 31/Jan/13
Vince is 5'11"; Brock is 6'2" imo
Jamesy said on 29/Jan/13
Looked 5'10 compared too Brock leaner last night on raw
miko said on 29/Jan/13
Brock Lesnar dwarfed Vince last night, no way is he still 6'0 today.
dorkburger said on 27/Jan/13
Vince had neck surgery in 1999 which is why he's shorter now than he was back then. The same thing happened to Edge
Frank said on 17/Jan/13
What i believe he is about 6ft but wears lifts @ times to make him appear close to 6ft 2
James said on 10/Jan/13
Rob do u think he was only 184cm even back in 1999? Remember that video of him with the rock and big show
[Editor Rob: it's whether he lost any height in 90s ]
James said on 9/Jan/13
You considering seriously downgrading this guy rob?
[Editor Rob: well he's lost some height from his peak, whatever that truly is...it's true he can look barelyu over 6ft today.]
Ronster said on 4/Jan/13
Ronster: You are a clown and don't deserve access to the internet. You are such a complete and total fool that you honestly should be classified as mentally retarded. You are the epitome of a troll; even more than danimal. Everyone on this site is dumber for having taken the time to glance at your pathetic ramblings. I am usually against forced sterilization, but for you, I can make an exception.
See what i mean about lashing out at anyone who opposes you personally, i am above all your type of petty crap but after that you should pray i never run into you, I promise i would not use any words.
As for the whole Atlas thing, they were pretty much the same height so it's only logical and obvious that Atals would be an inch taller in wrestling boots you ignorant idiotic Troll! LOL.
James said on 2/Jan/13
Looked 5'11-6 next too the rock
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Dec/12
Peak - 6ft2/188cm
Today - 6ft1.25/186cm
Micheal "Ebis" Raja said on 20/Dec/12
Peak = 6 ft 2
Now = 6 ft and nothing over that (He's more than 2 inches shorter than booker t now)
James said on 17/Nov/12
He certainly did not look as tall as 6'1.5 compared too the rock who some believe is 6'2.5.

The rock really did make Vince look under 6'0 in the 90s. I just don't see how he could have ever been

His son Shane on the other hand looks like a tall man at 6'1.25.
dicksock said on 15/Nov/12
Pause at 1:47 on the Atlas video I posted the link to. He's clearly not within an inch of 6'2" BILLED Tony Atlas. Rob, a downgrade is long overdue. There is literally no proof of a 6'1.5" Vince and especially not within the last several years. He should be 6'1" prime and 6' now and that's being generous considering he could look the same height as 6' Bret Hart.

Ronster: You are a clown and don't deserve access to the internet. You are such a complete and total fool that you honestly should be classified as mentally retarded. You are the epitome of a troll; even more than danimal. Everyone on this site is dumber for having taken the time to glance at your pathetic ramblings. I am usually against forced sterilization, but for you, I can make an exception.
dicksock said on 15/Nov/12
Danimal says on 1/Nov/12
Taller than a legit 6'1" pro-bodybuilder in 1991, called Mike Christian. Had 2-3" on 5'11" Bobby Heenan. Was the same height as 6'2" Tony Atlas in 1980

__________

That's a blatant lie. Atlas was at least an inch taller than Vince. Also, Heenan was more like 5'10" as he was shorter than 5'11" Paul Ordorff. Plus, Vince was 2-3" shorter than 6'3" Ed Leslie in 1992. I've posted this proof on multiple occasions.

Here is Atlas looking an inch taller than Vince:
Click Here

Pause at 7 seconds. Pause at 1:42.

Vince was 6'0.5"-6'1" in his prime and is 5'11.5"-6' now.

The fact that you have Piper at 6'1.5" in his prime and Bret Hart at 5'11" is a joke.
James said on 23/Oct/12
I woulden't put him over 6'1 in his prime. Maybe he was over 6'1 In the morning though at one stage.

Today I would put money on him being measured at 5'11.75 and 5'11 (180cm) with slouched posture. This evident cause recently next too 5'11.25 cm punk looked a fraction with bad posture and when standing better looked too edge punk out.

I t
Hamd said on 23/Oct/12
I believe Mcmahon was at least 6'1 in his prime or a little taller........and ya Ronster is right about that HHH thing there are people claiming him to be 6'2 which cannot be believed as he always towered over legit 6'1 austin by a couple of inches and the funny part is that he was always taller than lesnar in all his encounters yet he is listed as 6'2 while lesnar is listed 6'2.5
Derek said on 17/Oct/12
Still looks around 6'1.5"-6'2" next to 6'0.5" John Cena on Raw last night. Looked about an inch to an inch and a half taller than Cena. I'm still wondering about CM Punk's height. He can't be any taller than 5'11" after I've seen him next to Vince and Cena.
Ronster said on 14/Oct/12
Dicksock says; Ok, I stopped reading your comment after this remark. If you really think this way then you don't know what you're talking about. NO ONE on this site admits his mistakes more than me; NO ONE. I once had Sheamus at 6'1"-6'2" when I first saw him. Vegas quickly corrected me and I admitted my error. But I guess that doesn't count. I once had Andre at 7'-7'1", but I after review more evidence, my estimate for Andre has changed to closer to 6'11". I used to think Andre lost a lot of height by the late 80s. After studying the subject more for myself and seeing evidence presented by other posters, I admitted my mistake. I used to think Vince McMahon was 6'2", but after seeing endless amounts of evidence I now think he was around 6'1". All the evidence in the world points to Vince being 6'1" at the most. If you are too stubborn to admit that, that is your problem. As I said in a recent post on Hulk Hogan's page; Trolls...Will they ever cease?
Dicksock, you and Vegas are the two biggest bashers on here, you two live on this site and are notorious for trying to lower just about every single big mans heights, especially wrestlers as you both have some exreme and disturbing fetish need to lower heights to satisfy some sort of envey. You study photos to find the few ones with either bad posture, camera angles or distance that alter things to make someone look a few inches shorter to try and support your ludicrous claims. HHH was easily accepted as 6'4" minimum for years until you true trolls came along and started saying he is only 6'2" which is equally rediculous. To all the people on here without bias and some maturity, ignore the trolls like Dicksock and Vegas who literally live on these pages simply to try to belittle great men.
Ronster said on 14/Oct/12
Miko says; He was clearly shorter face to face than CM Punk on RAW last night.
Are you on drugs or something while watching raw? First off Macmahon had Punk by a half inch in dress shoes, and Punk is 6'1" minimum as has been clearly shown and proven when he is only slightly shorter than the 6'3" HHH and even or just above Cena who is 6'1" himself! Vince is a solid 6'2" and was closer to 6'3" in his younger days without a doubt.
James said on 10/Oct/12
Yeah punk could be 181cm. I though Vince could look a little shorter than him at times because of his hunched back
miko said on 9/Oct/12
He was clearly shorter face to face than CM Punk on RAW last night.

Punk is maybe 5'11.5 at the very best, so McMahon is definately under 6'0 these days, posture or not.
James said on 7/Oct/12
6ft '183cm' today
6ft1'185cm' peak

These days can look 5'11 with bad posture although I he was probably a legit 6'1 in the wwe golden era. In the attitude era I think he was a solid 184cm. When he reaches 70 probably will not be over 182cm.
5ft10guy(Not Growing) said on 7/Oct/12
yeah I dont think 6'1.5 maybe just 6'0.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Sep/12
Okay maybe the difference is 1.5in. But those pictures are only in the last 5 years or so. He might be 6ft1 flat today down 1in from his peak. In those pictures I estimate Triple H to be 189cm, Shane McMahon 188cm and Vince 185cm.
dicksock said on 1/Sep/12
Danimal says on 28/Aug/12
dicksock says on 26/Aug/12

6'2" peak. 6'1" in the 1990's. 6'0" flat today.

___________________

How would Vince have shrunk an inch by the 90s? He wasn't a wrestler and had zero health problems. He was only 45 years old in 1990 and was in perfect shape. Plus, he was shorter than 6'2" Tony Atlas in 1980 (age 35) despite having a footware advantage.

Click Here

Vince was 6'1" at the most in his prime and is now about 6'. I can see Vince losing an inch by age 67, but not in his mid to late 40s.
Danimal said on 28/Aug/12
dicksock says on 26/Aug/12

6'2" peak. 6'1" in the 1990's. 6'0" flat today.
dicksock said on 26/Aug/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/Aug/12
I think the height difference between Triple H
and Vince McMahon is not as big as it may look.
Remember Triple H is a good 20-30lbs heavier
than McMahon do he may give the impression
he's much bigger and taller. He might also wear lifts to
be more convincing as the 6ft4 Cerebal Assassin

IMO there is about 1in between Mr. McMahon
and Triple H.

______________

That is absurd. HHH is clearly more than an inch taller than Vince today. Your lift theory is completely unfounded. Triple H is ~6'2.5" and Vince is a weak 6' at the most today.

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Aug/12
I think the height difference between Triple H
and Vince McMahon is not as big as it may look.
Remember Triple H is a good 20-30lbs heavier
than McMahon do he may give the impression
he's much bigger and taller. He might also wear lifts to
be more convincing as the 6ft4 Cerebal Assassin

IMO there is about 1in between Mr. McMahon
and Triple H.
dicksock said on 8/Jun/12
Vegas says on 25/Jan/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
________

thats 2000 Click Here

__________

Well, according to this site, there is only .5" between the two...
CLEARLY, this site is wrong when it comes to these two guys; not by much, but still...

HHH is 6'2.5"-6'3" and Vince was 6'1" in his prime and is probably 6'0.5" now.
Vegas said on 25/Jan/12
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/12
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
________

thats 2000 Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/12
Peak height was 188cm(6"2). Just look at the clips
from 10-15 years ago. He was easily the same height
as Shane McMahon and slightly taller than Steve Austin.
Looks 1in shorter than Triple H today. In 2000 was probably
only a fraction shorter...
The Truth said on 16/Dec/11
Wears lifts and is clearly shorter than 6'2 Shane Mcmahon, 5'11 - 6'0 i say
dicksock said on 6/Dec/11
tell-em says on 18/Oct/11
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong,

____________


Ok, I stopped reading your comment after this remark. If you really think this way then you don't know what you're talking about. NO ONE on this site admits his mistakes more than me; NO ONE. I once had Sheamus at 6'1"-6'2" when I first saw him. Vegas quickly corrected me and I admitted my error. But I guess that doesn't count. I once had Andre at 7'-7'1", but I after review more evidence, my estimate for Andre has changed to closer to 6'11". I used to think Andre lost a lot of height by the late 80s. After studying the subject more for myself and seeing evidence presented by other posters, I admitted my mistake. I used to think Vince McMahon was 6'2", but after seeing endless amounts of evidence I now think he was around 6'1". All the evidence in the world points to Vince being 6'1" at the most. If you are too stubborn to admit that, that is your problem. As I said in a recent post on Hulk Hogan's page; Trolls...Will they ever cease?
NCL said on 26/Oct/11
Here's a real interesting interview about Vince's life and such:

Click Here
tell-em said on 18/Oct/11
dicksock, ive read your comments, you aint confident or correct, you are a stubborn, stubborn goofball. You never admit that you are wrong, which most of the time u are, and you insult everyone, when you are wrong, which is all the time. That qualifies you as a big baby, and a joke. i saw your vids, replied, and i posted a video, and they show my accurateness and shows how wrong you are. its funny you say you guessed people's height correctly when you can't do it here. lol.
Ras said on 18/Oct/11
If Vince is 6'0" tops then Donald Trump is 6'1" tops.
dicksock said on 17/Oct/11
tell-em says on 10/Oct/11
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous.

Whatever loser. I don't think Vince is 5'10". I have said on numerous occasions that Vince McMahon was 6'1" tops and is around 6' today but probably a little under because he's shorter than 6' John Cena on a regular basis. You are the blind one if you can't see that. I have proven this for a fact. Even Rob questions whether or not Vince wore/wears lifts. "people" like you make me sick. I am very confident in all of my estimations. I've accurately guessed more people's heights in real life than you can imagine.
tell-em said on 12/Oct/11
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range. Click Here
tell-em said on 12/Oct/11
heres vince mcmahon in regular boots next to hbk w/ casuals. mcmahon has over an inch on hbk, but due to footwear advantage. probly .5 more than hbk. still shows vince at 6'0.5" and hbk at 5'11" range.
tell-em said on 10/Oct/11
blind tool. of course its true. but you think vince is 5'10 or 5'11". lol. thats ridiculous.
dicksock said on 5/Oct/11
tell-em says on 4/Oct/11
dicksock, shawn michaels was always a 5'11-5'11.5" man. vince mcmahon has always been taller than him. i have vince at 6'0.5" and in that vid of dx and vince,look at vince's leg and posture. hbk has shoe and posture advantage, which is why he looks taller.

That is just not true.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.