Add a Comment408 comments
Average Guess (100 Votes)
6ft 2.04in (188.1cm)
6ft 2.04in (188.1cm)
ANDREA[ITA] said on 12/Aug/11
6ft2 was better for john cusack! In high fidelity scene, if John Cusack is 6ft2.5, Tim Robbins must be at least 6ft6.5! do you think that it is possible, rob? IMO its not! Then it's ridicolous that you have him at the same height of Tom Welling because he never looked as tall as Tom looks! There are some heights on this site that are pretty ridicolous and invented...
6ft2 was better for john cusack! In high fidelity scene, if John Cusack is 6ft2.5, Tim Robbins must be at least 6ft6.5! do you think that it is possible, rob? IMO its not! Then it's ridicolous that you have him at the same height of Tom Welling because he never looked as tall as Tom looks! There are some heights on this site that are pretty ridicolous and invented...
James said on 8/Aug/11
6'7 in shoes in the morning for sure but i don't think tim robbins would measure over 6'6 (198cm) in the early morning.
at night tim robbins could be 194cm and during the afternoon around 195cm.
Yep Cusack is defenintly 6'3 in the morning.
By the way 6'7 is a big BIG joke for Tim Robbins. Can you honesly say he looks almost tall as peter crouch? 6'4.75 is fine though, near enough 6'5.
6'7 in shoes in the morning for sure but i don't think tim robbins would measure over 6'6 (198cm) in the early morning.
at night tim robbins could be 194cm and during the afternoon around 195cm.
Yep Cusack is defenintly 6'3 in the morning.
By the way 6'7 is a big BIG joke for Tim Robbins. Can you honesly say he looks almost tall as peter crouch? 6'4.75 is fine though, near enough 6'5.
James said on 7/Aug/11
okay then i can accept 189cm for cusack over my 187cm estimate
okay then i can accept 189cm for cusack over my 187cm estimate
Danimal said on 6/Aug/11
Is probably 6'3" early in the morning. I still believe that Tim Robbins wakes up at 6'6" and is at least 6'5" and change by night (rumors had circulated years ago that he was even 6'7", which I wouldn't rule out as morning height and 6'6" at night).
Is probably 6'3" early in the morning. I still believe that Tim Robbins wakes up at 6'6" and is at least 6'5" and change by night (rumors had circulated years ago that he was even 6'7", which I wouldn't rule out as morning height and 6'6" at night).
5'8.76784 said on 4/Aug/11
He could look similar in height next to less than 6'3 Oliver Platt, and he still dwarfed lift-wearing 5'10 Billy Bob Thornton in "The Ice Harvest". He wasn't that much shorter than 6'4.5 Randy Quaid either. Pretty cool movie indeed. Rob has him spot on at 6'2.5.
He could look similar in height next to less than 6'3 Oliver Platt, and he still dwarfed lift-wearing 5'10 Billy Bob Thornton in "The Ice Harvest". He wasn't that much shorter than 6'4.5 Randy Quaid either. Pretty cool movie indeed. Rob has him spot on at 6'2.5.
the shredder said on 4/Aug/11
At least he is honest about 6'2 and a half ... unlike Will Smith who says it just to support his 6'2 claims !
At least he is honest about 6'2 and a half ... unlike Will Smith who says it just to support his 6'2 claims !
Mr. R said on 3/Aug/11
A few years ago, John stood back to back with Letterman, and was clearly more than an inch taller. I think Rob has this one perfectly. DID YOU HEAR THAT ROB? I AM AGREEING WITH YOU........Somewhere in hell, there is a small snowflake.
Editor Rob
A few years ago, John stood back to back with Letterman, and was clearly more than an inch taller. I think Rob has this one perfectly. DID YOU HEAR THAT ROB? I AM AGREEING WITH YOU........Somewhere in hell, there is a small snowflake.
Editor Rob 6ft 2.5 wasn't improbable, it's rare to find actors saying half inches
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Aug/11
Great stuff Rob!
Great stuff Rob!
Danimal said on 3/Aug/11
Tim Robbins is 6'5" at night. Cusack is every bit 6'2.5" he claims to be.
Tim Robbins is 6'5" at night. Cusack is every bit 6'2.5" he claims to be.
jtm said on 2/Aug/11
i think he is a weak 6'2.rob why is tim robbins still listed at 6'4.5 when he was more than just 2 inches taller than cusack?
Editor Rob
i think he is a weak 6'2.rob why is tim robbins still listed at 6'4.5 when he was more than just 2 inches taller than cusack?
Editor Rob maybe he wore bigger footwear, or maybe 6ft 5 for Tim is something I should really consider over the 6ft 4.5. It seems a good amount believe 6ft 5 is more accurate than 4.5
Jack said on 2/Aug/11
Described himself as "62 and a half..." on Twitter - So I think 6'2.5" would definitely be fair.
Editor Rob
Described himself as "62 and a half..." on Twitter - So I think 6'2.5" would definitely be fair.
Editor Rob since he has now included the half inch, then it is fair to put him at that mark.
James said on 25/Jul/11
I am unsure if Robbins is 6'4.5 or 6'5????
True as well we do not know what the footware is like with robbins and cusack.
I think if there footware was similar then Cusack looked 186cm if Robbins is 6'4 1/2.
I am unsure if Robbins is 6'4.5 or 6'5????
True as well we do not know what the footware is like with robbins and cusack.
I think if there footware was similar then Cusack looked 186cm if Robbins is 6'4 1/2.
Bon_ said on 23/Jul/11
No, Cusack looked 6'1 next to 6'4.5 Robbins.
No, Cusack looked 6'1 next to 6'4.5 Robbins.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Jul/11
Tim Robbins looked 6ft6 opposite Cusack...
Tim Robbins looked 6ft6 opposite Cusack...
5'8.56784 said on 15/Jul/11
I think in the musicshop scene in High Fidelity, Robbins is wearing dress shoes (or boots) so that's why he looks a solid 6'5 compared to 6'2 Cusack, who is wearing flats.
I think in the musicshop scene in High Fidelity, Robbins is wearing dress shoes (or boots) so that's why he looks a solid 6'5 compared to 6'2 Cusack, who is wearing flats.
RobertJ said on 12/Jul/11
Not the the greatest photo below, can't see footwear and Cusack's wearing a hat but he looks about an inch taller than Jim Carrey whose ~6'1''. Anything below 6'2'' for Cusack is absurd in my opinion. He certainly isn't 6'3'' but I bet next to Brandon Routh for example, you wouldn't see a noticeable difference.
Click Here
Not the the greatest photo below, can't see footwear and Cusack's wearing a hat but he looks about an inch taller than Jim Carrey whose ~6'1''. Anything below 6'2'' for Cusack is absurd in my opinion. He certainly isn't 6'3'' but I bet next to Brandon Routh for example, you wouldn't see a noticeable difference.
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jul/11
Jackson is wearing a cap and clearly has camera angle in his favour...
Today Samuel L. Jackson is 6ft2(188cm) and John Cusack is 6ft2.25(189cm)
Jackson is wearing a cap and clearly has camera angle in his favour...
Today Samuel L. Jackson is 6ft2(188cm) and John Cusack is 6ft2.25(189cm)
James said on 6/Jul/11
looks no taller than 186cm next to Jackson.
looks no taller than 186cm next to Jackson.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jun/11
Tim Robbins 196cm
Cusack 189cm
Tim Robbins 196cm
Cusack 189cm
James said on 16/Jun/11
sorry rob don't mean to be annoying but say if robbins is not over 6'4.5 would you say that cusack looked 6'1.5 in comparison?
Editor Rob
sorry rob don't mean to be annoying but say if robbins is not over 6'4.5 would you say that cusack looked 6'1.5 in comparison?
Editor Rob yeah he could look that
James said on 15/Jun/11
Rob do you agree cusack looked just under 6'2 near tim robbins?
Editor Rob
Rob do you agree cusack looked just under 6'2 near tim robbins?
Editor Rob well if Robbins is 6ft 5 rather than just under, then 6ft 2 might is probably on the money aswell for Cusack.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jun/11
That's fine, James...but further down the page Rob has said that 6ft2.5 is more probable than 6ft1.5. I totally agree with him on that. Aswell Jackson is most likely still around 6ft2
That's fine, James...but further down the page Rob has said that 6ft2.5 is more probable than 6ft1.5. I totally agree with him on that. Aswell Jackson is most likely still around 6ft2
James said on 10/Jun/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 9/Jun/11
Never looks under. I think 6ft2.5 is more probable than say 6ft1.5. He's taller than Samuel L. Jackson I believe is hovering around 187-188cm today
Sam looks closer to 6'1 today. I am sorry but i disagree rampge i think higher chance that cusack is 6'1.5 than 6'2.5. Just look how much shorter he was than tim robbins.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 9/Jun/11
Never looks under. I think 6ft2.5 is more probable than say 6ft1.5. He's taller than Samuel L. Jackson I believe is hovering around 187-188cm today
Sam looks closer to 6'1 today. I am sorry but i disagree rampge i think higher chance that cusack is 6'1.5 than 6'2.5. Just look how much shorter he was than tim robbins.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Jun/11
Never looks under. I think 6ft2.5 is more probable than say 6ft1.5. He's taller than Samuel L. Jackson I believe is hovering around 187-188cm today
Never looks under. I think 6ft2.5 is more probable than say 6ft1.5. He's taller than Samuel L. Jackson I believe is hovering around 187-188cm today
James said on 8/Jun/11
I do think on screen Cusack looks 6'2 but then again he might be under?
I do think on screen Cusack looks 6'2 but then again he might be under?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Jun/11
He was like almost an inch taller, James
He was like almost an inch taller, James
James said on 6/Jun/11
Yeah rampage true but sam is like between 6'1-6'2 these days. that and cusack might have had hair advantage.
Yeah rampage true but sam is like between 6'1-6'2 these days. that and cusack might have had hair advantage.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Jun/11
Cusack was slouching maybe?
Cusack was slouching maybe?
Bon_ said on 3/Jun/11
He's a weak 6'2 at best. 187 cm max.
He's a weak 6'2 at best. 187 cm max.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/11
He was taller than Samuel L. Jackson
He was taller than Samuel L. Jackson
James said on 31/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/May/11
He's 6ft2.5 just like Hugh Jackman and Ben Affleck
then why did Robbins have 3 inches on him?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/May/11
He's 6ft2.5 just like Hugh Jackman and Ben Affleck
then why did Robbins have 3 inches on him?
Pat said on 30/May/11
I think Cusack is gorgeous. I've always thought he might be about 5'10", but was pleasantly surprised when I noticed he's much taller. I'm 5'10" and have always felt like a giant around everyone. Being female, that's a difficult height, especially when you want to wear 3" heels but don't want to tower over everyone.
I think Cusack is gorgeous. I've always thought he might be about 5'10", but was pleasantly surprised when I noticed he's much taller. I'm 5'10" and have always felt like a giant around everyone. Being female, that's a difficult height, especially when you want to wear 3" heels but don't want to tower over everyone.
Bon_ said on 23/May/11
Robbins is 194 cm, nowadays maybe 193.
Robbins is 194 cm, nowadays maybe 193.
Bon_ said on 23/May/11
@ Danimal I am not a troll, just a little more progressive discutant than real trolls like yourself.
6'1.5 for Cusack.
@ Danimal I am not a troll, just a little more progressive discutant than real trolls like yourself.
6'1.5 for Cusack.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/May/11
John Cusack 189cm
Tim Robbins 196cm
John Cusack 189cm
Tim Robbins 196cm
James said on 18/May/11
hungy says on 14/May/11
I met him personally, coz I was an extra in his new movie. He IS tall, much more so than I thought. I'm short, but comparing Cusack to my uncle who's 195 cm, Cusack is still tall, around 190 cm.
Tim Robbins must be 197-198cm then?
hungy says on 14/May/11
I met him personally, coz I was an extra in his new movie. He IS tall, much more so than I thought. I'm short, but comparing Cusack to my uncle who's 195 cm, Cusack is still tall, around 190 cm.
Tim Robbins must be 197-198cm then?
hungy said on 14/May/11
I met him personally, coz I was an extra in his new movie. He IS tall, much more so than I thought. I'm short, but comparing Cusack to my uncle who's 195 cm, Cusack is still tall, around 190 cm.
I met him personally, coz I was an extra in his new movie. He IS tall, much more so than I thought. I'm short, but comparing Cusack to my uncle who's 195 cm, Cusack is still tall, around 190 cm.
James said on 10/May/11
John Cusack 6'1.5 (187cm)
Tim Robbins 6'4.5 (194cm)
John Cusack 6'1.5 (187cm)
Tim Robbins 6'4.5 (194cm)
Andrea [ITA] said on 9/May/11
In that vid, he looks no more than 185 if robbins is only 194! Its what i go on saying! Tim robbins is more than 194! Come on! He towers over 188-190 listed stars... So, or he gets upgraded or others gotta be downgraded!
In that vid, he looks no more than 185 if robbins is only 194! Its what i go on saying! Tim robbins is more than 194! Come on! He towers over 188-190 listed stars... So, or he gets upgraded or others gotta be downgraded!
James said on 5/May/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/May/11
189cm is closer than 187cm
In Identity he was 3 inches taller than Ray Liotta
Have u not seen the video i posted Hugh????????
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/May/11
189cm is closer than 187cm
In Identity he was 3 inches taller than Ray Liotta
Have u not seen the video i posted Hugh????????
T said on 5/May/11
@rampage(---)Clover
I cant believe u think this guys taller than landham
@rampage(---)Clover
I cant believe u think this guys taller than landham
Godred said on 3/May/11
I could buy 187 - 189 - so lets meet in the middle hey?
I could buy 187 - 189 - so lets meet in the middle hey?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/May/11
189cm is closer than 187cm
In Identity he was 3 inches taller than Ray Liotta
189cm is closer than 187cm
In Identity he was 3 inches taller than Ray Liotta
Bon_ said on 1/May/11
I absolutely don't buy full 6'2 for him. He never looks so tall.
I absolutely don't buy full 6'2 for him. He never looks so tall.
James said on 30/Apr/11
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 29/Apr/11
Have considered moving Cusack to 189cm, Rob?
No i think he is more 187cm than 189cm look at him in this clip compared to 194cm tim robbins looks 187 or 186cm to me in comparison
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 29/Apr/11
Have considered moving Cusack to 189cm, Rob?
No i think he is more 187cm than 189cm look at him in this clip compared to 194cm tim robbins looks 187 or 186cm to me in comparison
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Apr/11
Have considered moving Cusack to 189cm, Rob?
Have considered moving Cusack to 189cm, Rob?
RobertJ said on 25/Apr/11
Not that this needs posting since most agree Cusack is legit 6'2'' but these are some old photos of him with Chaz Palminteri whose listed as 6'2.5'' and they're pretty even (Cusack may have a slight edge). We can't see footwear but it's more evidence to justify adding a half inch to his listed height, as well as further show he's a solid 188cm.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Not that this needs posting since most agree Cusack is legit 6'2'' but these are some old photos of him with Chaz Palminteri whose listed as 6'2.5'' and they're pretty even (Cusack may have a slight edge). We can't see footwear but it's more evidence to justify adding a half inch to his listed height, as well as further show he's a solid 188cm.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Apr/11
Ben Affleck and John Cusack are both 6"2.5(189cm)...
Anything under 6"2 for either of them is off the mark
Ben Affleck and John Cusack are both 6"2.5(189cm)...
Anything under 6"2 for either of them is off the mark
Bon_ said on 17/Apr/11
186-187 cm definitively, 6'1.5
186-187 cm definitively, 6'1.5
TruebloodFan said on 13/Apr/11
he's in Ben Affleck's height range. 189 morning 188 day 187 at night. 6ft2 is totally ok for Cusack to claim. 188 night is also a strong possibility.
he's in Ben Affleck's height range. 189 morning 188 day 187 at night. 6ft2 is totally ok for Cusack to claim. 188 night is also a strong possibility.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Apr/11
6"2.5(189cm) is closer
6"2.5(189cm) is closer
Johan Cruyff said on 5/Apr/11
I saw him once and i belive he's:
Morning (out of bed)= 6'2.5" (1.89 m)
After 1,5-3 hrs= 6'2" (1.88 m)
After 5-10 hrs= 6'1.75" (1.87 m)
6'2" it's fine for him but if he claims to be 6'2.5" it's fine, too. However i think he's not over that measure.
I saw him once and i belive he's:
Morning (out of bed)= 6'2.5" (1.89 m)
After 1,5-3 hrs= 6'2" (1.88 m)
After 5-10 hrs= 6'1.75" (1.87 m)
6'2" it's fine for him but if he claims to be 6'2.5" it's fine, too. However i think he's not over that measure.
Menace 195cm said on 29/Mar/11
I personally know John and we used to hang out sometimes. Those were the old days. He is a little shorter than 188cm, i think he is 187cm to be exact (as I could remember)
I personally know John and we used to hang out sometimes. Those were the old days. He is a little shorter than 188cm, i think he is 187cm to be exact (as I could remember)
anon said on 28/Mar/11
189? no way. Always thought this guy was 6'1'' but I suppose 188cm isn't unreasonable though I would guess 187cm.
189? no way. Always thought this guy was 6'1'' but I suppose 188cm isn't unreasonable though I would guess 187cm.
Bon_ said on 27/Mar/11
6'2.5 is ridiculous no offense
6'2.5 is ridiculous no offense
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Mar/11
Rob you should really put some consideration into the 6"2.5
Rob you should really put some consideration into the 6"2.5
Bon_ said on 24/Feb/11
yeah Rob I'm not suggesting anything definitively but I go on side with those who said that Cusack doesn't appear SO tall in his movies, It's obvious he's more than legit tall but I'm not sure of 189 cm
yeah Rob I'm not suggesting anything definitively but I go on side with those who said that Cusack doesn't appear SO tall in his movies, It's obvious he's more than legit tall but I'm not sure of 189 cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Feb/11
Rob perhaps 6"2.25(189cm) could be on the ball?
Rob perhaps 6"2.25(189cm) could be on the ball?
Bon_ said on 16/Feb/11
He might be as low as 6'1.25
Editor Rob
He might be as low as 6'1.25
Editor Rob there is an argument he could be 6ft 2.5, it's not an improbable, it's probably more probable than 6ft 1.25.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Feb/11
Anything below 188cm is not a fair argument
Anything below 188cm is not a fair argument
paciugo said on 28/Jan/11
looked about 1-2 cm taller tha Samuel L. Jackson in 1408
looked about 1-2 cm taller tha Samuel L. Jackson in 1408
Bon_ said on 25/Jan/11
I say he's like 6'1 and 7/8ths
I say he's like 6'1 and 7/8ths
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jan/11
6"2.25(189cm) is spot on
6"2.25(189cm) is spot on
Anonymous said on 15/Jan/11
he had 2"on G.Hackman face to face,in the movie "runaway jury",easily 6'3" as many people here say who have met him,and should be believed.
he had 2"on G.Hackman face to face,in the movie "runaway jury",easily 6'3" as many people here say who have met him,and should be believed.
Legend said on 11/Jan/11
He's 6'1.5
He's 6'1.5
MARKO said on 9/Jan/11
JOHN IS 190 CM
JOHN IS 190 CM
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jan/11
Looked 0.5in taller than Jackson...but remember Jackson is not over 6"2 flat today
Looked 0.5in taller than Jackson...but remember Jackson is not over 6"2 flat today
Truth Teller said on 31/Dec/10
Was one inch taller than Samuel L. Jackson in "1408".
Was one inch taller than Samuel L. Jackson in "1408".
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Dec/10
Chow Yun Fat is 6"0.5(184cm)
Chow Yun Fat is 6"0.5(184cm)
Bon said on 4/Dec/10
Closer to 6'1 than 6'3 IMO.
Closer to 6'1 than 6'3 IMO.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Nov/10
Looks near 6"3 in Gorsse Point Blank like 190cm.
I think this guy is a strong 6"2
Looks near 6"3 in Gorsse Point Blank like 190cm.
I think this guy is a strong 6"2
James said on 16/Nov/10
Rampage with Robbins he does not look over 6'2.
Rampage with Robbins he does not look over 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Nov/10
188-189cm range..about the same as Samuel L. Jackson
188-189cm range..about the same as Samuel L. Jackson
Anonymous said on 7/Nov/10
I met him in Moscow 1 year ago - he is very tall, about 189-190 cm.
I met him in Moscow 1 year ago - he is very tall, about 189-190 cm.
Hugh 190cm said on 16/May/09
Big Sam doesn't look under 6ft2 to me at all. If anything he may 188cm-189cm. Big sam at his peak was 190cm or 6ft3 flat at the most.
Big Sam doesn't look under 6ft2 to me at all. If anything he may 188cm-189cm. Big sam at his peak was 190cm or 6ft3 flat at the most.
James said on 11/May/09
Yeah but Samuel L Jackson could be as low as 6'1.5 today.
Yeah but Samuel L Jackson could be as low as 6'1.5 today.
Hugh 190cm said on 9/May/09
Actually wouldn't rule out 6ft2.5 for this guy. He looked the exact same height as Samuel L. Jackson.
Actually wouldn't rule out 6ft2.5 for this guy. He looked the exact same height as Samuel L. Jackson.
Hugh 190cm said on 10/Apr/09
Ali let me stop you there. Personally I think Cusack is a 6ft2 guy plain and simple. Big Sam likewise stands tall at 188cm and probably closer to 6ft3 in his youth. A young Clint Eastwood would easily clear John Cusack by a good 2 inches and today Eastwood stands maybe 1cm under Cusack or completely eye level.
Ali let me stop you there. Personally I think Cusack is a 6ft2 guy plain and simple. Big Sam likewise stands tall at 188cm and probably closer to 6ft3 in his youth. A young Clint Eastwood would easily clear John Cusack by a good 2 inches and today Eastwood stands maybe 1cm under Cusack or completely eye level.
Ali said on 6/Apr/09
I used to think this guy was 5'9 or so. He never looked
tall to me, but looking at pictures of Cusack and other
celebs, I would say he is about 185 cm.
Same height as Samuel L Jackson and an old Clint Eastwood.
6'2 I don't buy. Neither Jackson or the old Clint are
6'2.
I used to think this guy was 5'9 or so. He never looked
tall to me, but looking at pictures of Cusack and other
celebs, I would say he is about 185 cm.
Same height as Samuel L Jackson and an old Clint Eastwood.
6'2 I don't buy. Neither Jackson or the old Clint are
6'2.
Hugh said on 25/Jan/09
I doubt Cusack was that much taller than Big Sam. At the premiere of 1408 Jackson looked a good inch taller than John Cusack.
I doubt Cusack was that much taller than Big Sam. At the premiere of 1408 Jackson looked a good inch taller than John Cusack.
Matt said on 18/Jan/09
Just watching 1408, cusak looks 1 or 2 inches taller than sam jackson, they stand face-to-face several times in the movie and he is consistantly taller...
Just watching 1408, cusak looks 1 or 2 inches taller than sam jackson, they stand face-to-face several times in the movie and he is consistantly taller...
Hugh said on 10/Jan/09
6ft2.25 maybe.
6ft2.25 maybe.
sarah said on 20/Dec/08
i've been watching his movies for years,i'd say 6'2-6'2 and a half sounds reasonable.being john malkovich was strange,but entertaining as well.
i've been watching his movies for years,i'd say 6'2-6'2 and a half sounds reasonable.being john malkovich was strange,but entertaining as well.
Aaron said on 10/Dec/08
Big King, what else could you possibly mean by 6'3" on a website concerned with height? Give us more credit than that...
Big King, what else could you possibly mean by 6'3" on a website concerned with height? Give us more credit than that...
Hugh said on 1/Nov/08
Sorry. I meant Cusack was slightly TALLER than Ramis. Ramis isn't 6ft2 anymore. More 6ft1.5 range these days. I met that fat four eyed slob back in 1997. Incredibly rude guy. Much more rude than say Bill Murray.
Sorry. I meant Cusack was slightly TALLER than Ramis. Ramis isn't 6ft2 anymore. More 6ft1.5 range these days. I met that fat four eyed slob back in 1997. Incredibly rude guy. Much more rude than say Bill Murray.
Big King said on 21/Oct/08
Cusack doesn't look even shorter than Samuel L. Jackson. Both are around 6'3" and, yes I mean 6 FEET 3 INCHES!!!
Cusack doesn't look even shorter than Samuel L. Jackson. Both are around 6'3" and, yes I mean 6 FEET 3 INCHES!!!
Hugh said on 17/Oct/08
Looks slightly shorter than Harold Ramis in the Ice Harvest.
Looks slightly shorter than Harold Ramis in the Ice Harvest.
Chris said on 22/Jun/08
well, in 1408 which i watched for the second time this morning, it seems like 6'2" is perfect for cusack, when compared with with samuel l jackson, who is listed as 6'2" to 6'3", there was almost no diff in height, jackson looked only just taller at some angles during the film, so id say 6'2" is perfect for him
well, in 1408 which i watched for the second time this morning, it seems like 6'2" is perfect for cusack, when compared with with samuel l jackson, who is listed as 6'2" to 6'3", there was almost no diff in height, jackson looked only just taller at some angles during the film, so id say 6'2" is perfect for him
Ivan 6'2.25 said on 13/May/08
He is no more than 6ft2 and appear sometimes shorter than 6'1 depend to his posture while wearing boots.
He is no more than 6ft2 and appear sometimes shorter than 6'1 depend to his posture while wearing boots.
glenn said on 30/Mar/08
i just obtained a recent one.he is either very sweet or runs away.
i just obtained a recent one.he is either very sweet or runs away.
Hugh said on 29/Mar/08
Glenn I'm suprised you even got a picture with him because he normally hates being spotted in public.
Glenn I'm suprised you even got a picture with him because he normally hates being spotted in public.
Hugh said on 28/Mar/08
Yeah 6ft2 alright. He's a pretty broad guy yet he slouches aswell.
Yeah 6ft2 alright. He's a pretty broad guy yet he slouches aswell.
C said on 20/Mar/08
He's either 6'2'' or 6'3''. I didn't notice how tall he was until I watched Better Off Dead recently. He towered over everyone on screen, including the guy who was supposed to be the new stud boyfriend of his ex-girlfriend. Only Cusack can pull off underdog roles despite his towering presence.
He's either 6'2'' or 6'3''. I didn't notice how tall he was until I watched Better Off Dead recently. He towered over everyone on screen, including the guy who was supposed to be the new stud boyfriend of his ex-girlfriend. Only Cusack can pull off underdog roles despite his towering presence.
glenn said on 20/Mar/08
thats a classy thing to say fern.
thats a classy thing to say fern.
glenn said on 20/Mar/08
he can sure leave a 6-3 impression sometimes.i see him almost what seems monthly.6-2ish.
he can sure leave a 6-3 impression sometimes.i see him almost what seems monthly.6-2ish.
nate said on 19/Mar/08
is 6-3 possible?
is 6-3 possible?
SABELLA said on 6/Mar/08
hey, james noway that he is 6ft1,5 , he looks 188cm in this pictures and in other movies
hey, james noway that he is 6ft1,5 , he looks 188cm in this pictures and in other movies
glenn said on 22/Jan/08
thanks for the support mms.anytime for you people.everyone misspells my name.lol.
thanks for the support mms.anytime for you people.everyone misspells my name.lol.
MMS said on 21/Jan/08
Uh I just noticed I misspelled your name twice...sorry GLENN!!! -_-
Uh I just noticed I misspelled your name twice...sorry GLENN!!! -_-
MMS said on 21/Jan/08
Thanks for the answer back Gleen you're a cool guy :)
Thanks for the answer back Gleen you're a cool guy :)
glenn said on 19/Jan/08
he was actually nice above.but,yes can be a jerk.obtained a recent one.this was 2 years ago.nice in the newer pic too.
he was actually nice above.but,yes can be a jerk.obtained a recent one.this was 2 years ago.nice in the newer pic too.
MMS said on 18/Jan/08
Gleen-is he a jerk I've heard differencing in opinions?...he looks slightly annoyed in the picture.
Pretty cute for an older guy though...
Gleen-is he a jerk I've heard differencing in opinions?...he looks slightly annoyed in the picture.
Pretty cute for an older guy though...
x-me said on 11/Jan/08
correct, 6'2 only in his shoes(1,84 barefoot)
correct, 6'2 only in his shoes(1,84 barefoot)
Anonymous said on 10/Jan/08
he DWARFED 5'8" jeremy pivens in Serendipity. Has to be near 6'2
he DWARFED 5'8" jeremy pivens in Serendipity. Has to be near 6'2
glenn said on 6/Jan/08
its only a picture.and pics can be decieving.i have a very recent one where he appears taller.
its only a picture.and pics can be decieving.i have a very recent one where he appears taller.
msn87 said on 5/Jan/08
looks no more than 6'0 in that picture, and Glenn's not even standing straight up, so maybe even 5'11. If the angle in this pic favors Glenn, then MAYBE 6'1 but no more then that. *DOWNGRADE PLEASE*
looks no more than 6'0 in that picture, and Glenn's not even standing straight up, so maybe even 5'11. If the angle in this pic favors Glenn, then MAYBE 6'1 but no more then that. *DOWNGRADE PLEASE*
Robbie H said on 2/Jan/08
he looked the same height as samuel l jackson to me in 1408, it was just his hair that made him look a bit taller
he looked the same height as samuel l jackson to me in 1408, it was just his hair that made him look a bit taller
Sara said on 25/Nov/07
Yea when I watched 1408 he seemed little taller then Samuel L. Jackson so i believe he is a solid 6.2
Yea when I watched 1408 he seemed little taller then Samuel L. Jackson so i believe he is a solid 6.2
KingNick said on 9/Nov/07
If you watch 1408 (which is a great movie btw) he looks he same height as Samuel L. Jackson. I thought they were both 6'3", maybe they're both 6'2"?
If you watch 1408 (which is a great movie btw) he looks he same height as Samuel L. Jackson. I thought they were both 6'3", maybe they're both 6'2"?
J-Dog said on 7/Nov/07
I am starting to wonder if Cusack is slightly taller than 6'2"?
I am starting to wonder if Cusack is slightly taller than 6'2"?
saga said on 3/Nov/07
Cusack is definitely a solid 6'2. There's a scene in 1408 where he's standing beside Samuel L. Jackson in the elevator, John is clearly 1 inch taller.
Jackson is probably 6'1-6'1.25 i guess.
Cusack is definitely a solid 6'2. There's a scene in 1408 where he's standing beside Samuel L. Jackson in the elevator, John is clearly 1 inch taller.
Jackson is probably 6'1-6'1.25 i guess.
Chris said on 30/Oct/07
John Cusack was taller then Samuel L Jackson in "1408" by an inch or so. Jackson is no more then 6'1'' maybe 6'1
John Cusack was taller then Samuel L Jackson in "1408" by an inch or so. Jackson is no more then 6'1'' maybe 6'1
Ed said on 22/Oct/07
He was only looking an inch shorter than Conan O'Brien when he was on the other night. O'Brien in that very show claimed he was 6ft4.5, and said Cusack was really tall for a celeb, and that most who come on his show are shorter then they're made out to be. Cusack was the exception to the rule he said.
He was only looking an inch shorter than Conan O'Brien when he was on the other night. O'Brien in that very show claimed he was 6ft4.5, and said Cusack was really tall for a celeb, and that most who come on his show are shorter then they're made out to be. Cusack was the exception to the rule he said.
Valeri said on 3/Oct/07
yeah.I can give Cusack 6'2 for sure. it looks like 6 inches too with glenn. tall guy,nice height.much like hugh jackman and clive owen.
yeah.I can give Cusack 6'2 for sure. it looks like 6 inches too with glenn. tall guy,nice height.much like hugh jackman and clive owen.
Anonymous said on 1/Oct/07
Just saw 1408 and he looked taller than 6'2" Sam Jackson
Just saw 1408 and he looked taller than 6'2" Sam Jackson
Marco said on 19/Sep/07
He looks at least an inch taller than 6 ft 2 Samuel L. Jackson in "1408"
He looks at least an inch taller than 6 ft 2 Samuel L. Jackson in "1408"
Ted said on 19/Sep/07
the film with Tim Robbins was Tapeheads. I thought Cusack was 6'3 but in the movie against Robbins there was 3 inches difference. So 6'2
the film with Tim Robbins was Tapeheads. I thought Cusack was 6'3 but in the movie against Robbins there was 3 inches difference. So 6'2
Kate said on 25/Aug/07
I knew he was 6ft 2 i knew it!! john always always looked tall and broad in many of the films ive seen..but here he only looks a few inches taller than that guy..whos technically 5ft 3! Omg well i'm 5ft7 and abit so waht does that make me compared to john!? well maybe you guys should change the other guys height to make those many veiwers worry less..like me..
but yeh cool picture..i do like the way john has his hand near to his face..as if hes rob in High Fidelity and was about to say "alright everybody..i do like 'love your way'.but by marie de-salle"
I knew he was 6ft 2 i knew it!! john always always looked tall and broad in many of the films ive seen..but here he only looks a few inches taller than that guy..whos technically 5ft 3! Omg well i'm 5ft7 and abit so waht does that make me compared to john!? well maybe you guys should change the other guys height to make those many veiwers worry less..like me..
but yeh cool picture..i do like the way john has his hand near to his face..as if hes rob in High Fidelity and was about to say "alright everybody..i do like 'love your way'.but by marie de-salle"
sam said on 13/Jul/07
Although in certain pictures he looks taller, Cusack looked about the same height to me as Jackson in 1408. I guess it's a question of perception.
Although in certain pictures he looks taller, Cusack looked about the same height to me as Jackson in 1408. I guess it's a question of perception.
RobertJ said on 12/Jul/07
Not a great pic since you can't see footwear but he looks at least Jackson's height. Looks like Cusack has put on some weight.
Click Here
Not a great pic since you can't see footwear but he looks at least Jackson's height. Looks like Cusack has put on some weight.
Click Here
mcfan said on 7/Jul/07
Anthony is correct. Jackson was an inch shorter than Cusack in all of the scenes in 1408. The shoes were just normal footwear. Either Jackson or Cusack needs to be revised. Cusack was an inch taller than 6'1 Dan Aykroyd so I would say Jackson might only be 6'1.
Anthony is correct. Jackson was an inch shorter than Cusack in all of the scenes in 1408. The shoes were just normal footwear. Either Jackson or Cusack needs to be revised. Cusack was an inch taller than 6'1 Dan Aykroyd so I would say Jackson might only be 6'1.
cusackfan said on 13/Jun/07
Yup I have it confirmed now. (hes tall) And that explains why even with all the photographers in my way on the 1408 red carpet, I was still able to see his smiling face clearly and get a nice pic, LOL. :)
Yup I have it confirmed now. (hes tall) And that explains why even with all the photographers in my way on the 1408 red carpet, I was still able to see his smiling face clearly and get a nice pic, LOL. :)
Anthony said on 12/Jun/07
If Cusack 6'1 or less than Sam Jackson is 6' at the most. Cusack has at least an inch on him in all the still photos from "1408" I've seen.
If Cusack 6'1 or less than Sam Jackson is 6' at the most. Cusack has at least an inch on him in all the still photos from "1408" I've seen.
Mr. R said on 12/Jun/07
A few years ago he was on Lettermen, and they stood back to back and Cusack was taller! If Dave is not the 6-2 as cliamed, then Cusack sure is. If Dave IS the 6-2 he claims, then Cusack is between 6-2 and 6-3.
A few years ago he was on Lettermen, and they stood back to back and Cusack was taller! If Dave is not the 6-2 as cliamed, then Cusack sure is. If Dave IS the 6-2 he claims, then Cusack is between 6-2 and 6-3.
G-unit said on 2/Jun/07
he looks so much 6', but when you compare him to others he definintely is about 6'2
he looks so much 6', but when you compare him to others he definintely is about 6'2
anonymous said on 26/May/07
maaybe 6`2.25, but likely closer to 6`1.5. i had a friend who met him who told me that they could not believe how tall he was. she is 5`11 (and beautiful beyond all reason), and she said that he was huge.
maaybe 6`2.25, but likely closer to 6`1.5. i had a friend who met him who told me that they could not believe how tall he was. she is 5`11 (and beautiful beyond all reason), and she said that he was huge.
anonymous said on 17/May/07
I always thought of him as being 6`1. 6`2 is plausible, but 6`2 MAX!
I always thought of him as being 6`1. 6`2 is plausible, but 6`2 MAX!
anonymous said on 7/May/07
like Travolta, Quaid (dennis), and the rest of the bunch viper?
like Travolta, Quaid (dennis), and the rest of the bunch viper?
Franco said on 1/May/07
now that i think about it he doesn't look taller than 6'1
this guy goes into the downgrade list, doesnt look anywhere as tall as Dr.House hugh laurie who's 1.88m
now that i think about it he doesn't look taller than 6'1
this guy goes into the downgrade list, doesnt look anywhere as tall as Dr.House hugh laurie who's 1.88m
Viper said on 11/Apr/07
Ive always thought he was one of those many 6-0 guys billed at 6-2.
Ive always thought he was one of those many 6-0 guys billed at 6-2.
TheJerk said on 9/Apr/07
I always thought 6-1 or a bit more.
I always thought 6-1 or a bit more.
G-MANN said on 13/Jan/07
I think he's being modest in that quote, he's about 6'2.5".
I think he's being modest in that quote, he's about 6'2.5".
Jason said on 27/Dec/06
Might just be bad posture, I think he's about 6'2''.
Might just be bad posture, I think he's about 6'2''.
Viper said on 26/Dec/06
Does this guy wear lifts? Half the time he looks 6-0.
Does this guy wear lifts? Half the time he looks 6-0.
julie said on 26/Dec/06
watching high fidelity, towers jack black, not surprised at hearing he's 6'2.
watching high fidelity, towers jack black, not surprised at hearing he's 6'2.
Glenn said on 15/Dec/06
Appeared 6-2.
Appeared 6-2.
sam said on 13/Dec/06
Glenn, what was your estimates of Cusack?
Glenn, what was your estimates of Cusack?
James said on 6/Dec/06
I doubt he's under 6'2". He's usually the tallest person in his scenes, so this would make sense. He also doesn't strike me as someone who cares how tall he appears, hence the relaxed posture. You can't downgrade someone based on just one picture.
I doubt he's under 6'2". He's usually the tallest person in his scenes, so this would make sense. He also doesn't strike me as someone who cares how tall he appears, hence the relaxed posture. You can't downgrade someone based on just one picture.
Viper652 said on 1/Dec/06
Haha, Cantstop is great. I bet some people think I look like a linebacker just because I have pretty broad shoulders too. Cantstop, 6-0 1/2 is probably right on the money, wouldnt rule out a flat 6-0 either.
Haha, Cantstop is great. I bet some people think I look like a linebacker just because I have pretty broad shoulders too. Cantstop, 6-0 1/2 is probably right on the money, wouldnt rule out a flat 6-0 either.
Viper652 said on 12/Oct/06
I see 185-186 in the picture.
I see 185-186 in the picture.
sam said on 9/Oct/06
A Philadelphia Inquirer article from years ago listed him as 6'3", although he's certainly not looking that next to Glenn.
A Philadelphia Inquirer article from years ago listed him as 6'3", although he's certainly not looking that next to Glenn.
David said on 22/Jun/06
I was on an airplane with him once years ago. I am 6ft 1.5 in. He seemed at least 6ft 3in. to me. I was actually shocked at how tall he was (and pale skinned too!).
I was on an airplane with him once years ago. I am 6ft 1.5 in. He seemed at least 6ft 3in. to me. I was actually shocked at how tall he was (and pale skinned too!).
elliottsmithfan said on 9/Jun/06
Saw him yesterday in Malibu... I'm pretty sure he's 6'2 or even 6'3ish... and BROAD. He looks like a linebacker.
Saw him yesterday in Malibu... I'm pretty sure he's 6'2 or even 6'3ish... and BROAD. He looks like a linebacker.
TheJerk said on 5/May/06
anonymous: are you then saying he is 6 foot even? 6 foot one would be a better estimate
anonymous: are you then saying he is 6 foot even? 6 foot one would be a better estimate
Anonymous said on 26/Apr/06
All actors round up a bit. I used to be an x-ray technician and saw John's chart which showed his height at 73" but they always measure patient's with shoes on.
All actors round up a bit. I used to be an x-ray technician and saw John's chart which showed his height at 73" but they always measure patient's with shoes on.
matthew said on 9/Mar/06
hes definitely never looked even 6feet!! , thats amazing
hes definitely never looked even 6feet!! , thats amazing
Anonymous said on 27/Jan/06
Actually taking into account postures (of which Glenn's may be slightly worse) I think he looks more 6'1" - 6'1.5ish guys...
Actually taking into account postures (of which Glenn's may be slightly worse) I think he looks more 6'1" - 6'1.5ish guys...
Glenn said on 23/Jan/06
celebs arent always nice.
Editor Rob
celebs arent always nice.
Editor Rob yeah, he looks kind of annoyed ;-)
Danimal said on 22/Jan/06
I see 6'2". Didn't know he was this tall.
I see 6'2". Didn't know he was this tall.
J-Dog said on 22/Jan/06
An strong 6'2", by the way Glenn it's amazing you have gotten all these shots, and each celebrity seems to have the same look of their face, less smiles than I expected, keep it up man!
An strong 6'2", by the way Glenn it's amazing you have gotten all these shots, and each celebrity seems to have the same look of their face, less smiles than I expected, keep it up man!
Anonymous said on 22/Dec/05
i think it's too much for him. in identity he looks max 5 cm taller than liota and i think maybe 185-186cm is more fair
i think it's too much for him. in identity he looks max 5 cm taller than liota and i think maybe 185-186cm is more fair
Anonymous said on 20/Dec/05
He is definitely 6'2". I bumped into him at a club in Chicago several years ago - I'm 6" tall in heels and he was a couple of inches taller than me.
He is definitely 6'2". I bumped into him at a club in Chicago several years ago - I'm 6" tall in heels and he was a couple of inches taller than me.
Anonymous said on 29/Nov/05
rob i think he is a strong 6'2"
Editor Rob
rob i think he is a strong 6'2"
Editor Rob yes, he can be one of these guys who may push 189, but I remember Tim Robbins facing up to this guy once, forget the film but...robbins would make any guy look short!
Anonymous said on 28/Nov/05
Because the part specified a character 6' tall!!??
Because the part specified a character 6' tall!!??
movielover said on 11/Nov/05
In the movie money for nothing, there was an annoucment over the PA at the airport saying be on the look out for a 6 feet tall white american male. So why would he annouced at 6 feet tall in the movie if he was actually 6'2
In the movie money for nothing, there was an annoucment over the PA at the airport saying be on the look out for a 6 feet tall white american male. So why would he annouced at 6 feet tall in the movie if he was actually 6'2
Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.
Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.
Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.