How tall is John Cusack

John Cusack's Height

6ft 2 (188 cm)

American actor best known for roles in films like Sixteen Candles, High Fidelity, Grosse Point Blank, Con Air, 2012, Better off Dead..., The Sure Thing, Say Anything, The Grifters, Bullets Over Broadway and Being John Malkovich. He has commented upon his height several times, saying both "I'm 6ft 2" and "62 and a half" on twitter. He also mentioned his weight "I’m 6’2 - 215 [pounds]".

How tall is John Cusack
John with Molly Shannon and Jennifer Coolidge
Photos by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Joan Cusack
Joan Cusack
5ft 8 ½ (174 cm)
Height of Adrien Brody
Adrien Brody
6ft 0 (183 cm)
Height of John Malkovich
John Malkovich
5ft 11 (180 cm)
Height of Nicolas Cage
Nicolas Cage
6ft 0 (183 cm)

Add a Comment408 comments

Average Guess (100 Votes)
6ft 2.04in (188.1cm)
Sandy Cowell said on 12/Sep/23
John starred with Samuel L in ‘The Cell’ AND in ‘1408’. What a wonderful combination of actors ! I’m watching ‘1408’ again and I’m feeling so sorry for John character, Michael. He’s been through so much, but this just about takes the biscuit.

I can see why so many women like him.
Sandy Cowell said on 12/Sep/23
John is so brave in Stephen King’s 1408. He’s determined to stay there to write a book, but little after he enters, he’s being tortured, and it just gets worse and worse.

The tragedy of his life’s story unfolds and it’s not an easy watch.

Somehow, John looks a little taller than Samuel L, but I don’t know whether it’s the angles or the shoes.

John’s performance is magnificent, but I can tell you one thing - I would have taken Samuel’s advice and stayed clear of that room.

I’m giving him 6ft2.5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/23
My thoughts exactly, Sh0ckeh.....I think he's still roughly around the 6ft2 mark today if measured but possibly a tad below. Peak I think just over was likelier.
Sh0ckeh said on 25/Aug/23
John Cusack was definitely 6'2.25 (188.5cm), no question about it. He has always looked a very comfortable 6'2. So yeah 6'2.25. Nowadays he's definitely 6'1.75 (187cm). He should have a peak and nowadays height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Apr/23
He's never had a good posture though. Always hunched over. Those rare occasion where he does stand tall his height is apparent.

6ft2¼ range peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Mar/23
Rob, is it possible he may have gone from strong 6ft2 to weak?
Editor Rob
At his age, it's arguable. A lot of actors in 50's might start losing small fractions and these 1/8th to 1/4 are harder to notice. When it gets to 1/2 to 3/4 I think it becomes more apparent.
Sandy Cowell said on 4/Feb/23
If Rob has 6ft2 for him, he’s got to be nearly 6ft3 in the morning. 🤭
Sandy Cowell said on 4/Feb/23
I’m watching John’s film ‘The Factory’, a really disturbing tale about the kidnapping and control of young girls. John, as Mike, has had his 17-year-old daughter kidnapped and as he’s a hot-tempered police officer, I don’t reckon the kidnapper is going to get the better of him!

I checked out the DVD on Amazon and it isn’t cheap. Someone else did the very same thing, so I had to buy the next best offer! John Cusack is worth it! 😍

6ft2 and well over twice my weight, even if I piled on a few pounds.
berta said on 4/Jan/23
at worst 187,5 and at best 189- I go with the middle at about 188,2. Legit 6´2
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Oct/22
I saw ‘Cell’ again the other night on the Legend/Horror Channel. John and Samuel L Jackson really did look neck-and-neck those days.

John has starred in a fair few horror films and chillers, but he’s far too pretty to look even remotely like a horror actor!

192cm Leprechaun said on 11/Sep/22
Tall actor that towered Daphne Zuniga in 1984 thought Cusack was barely taller than 6' Paul Dano. 6'0.75" peak.
Sandy C said on 26/Jul/22
That should have been Isabelle FUHRMAN.

Anyway, what a bleak and upsetting film Cell is. 😭
Sandy C said on 26/Jul/22
I don’t know any women who doesn’t think John is gorgeous, myself included!

I’m watching him in Stephen King’s Cell, in which he’s coupled with Samuel L Jackson, as was the case in King’s 1408. I like the way John protects young Isabelle Furman, whom he and Samuel both TOWER over!

6ft2. 😀👌🏼
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Jun/22
His 6ft2½ claim carries some weight, mid-morning could hit it I think
berta said on 5/Mar/22
i thinkhe is honest with the 6´2 and change. One of the more legit 6´2 guys.clearyl taller than samuel l jackson 15 years back in that movie where he is trapped in a room. 1408`? ore something like that. And if samuel had lost anything back then, we talk at most 1 cm. and that makes this guy at worst 188 cm. i think he could be 188,3 ish.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 17/Dec/21
👉 Correction Time! 👈

In the 4th paragraph of my comment on John yesterday, I should have written 'He PLAYS' instead of 'He's...'
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 16/Dec/21
Every so often, films come with alternative endings, 'Thelma and Louise' and 'Stigmata' to name but two.

I wish this had been the case with 'Room 1408'.

We are led to believe that John's writer character, Michael, is safely out of the hotel room from hell, and reunited with his wife, but I remembered from years ago that this simply isn't the case. The storyline is doomistic, eerie, sad in parts and messes with our emotions and I was wiping away tears at the end, feeling quite exhausted into the bargain!

As for the Cusack performance, I think he deserved awards for this movie, or at least nominations. He's plays a big, fearless man, and is reduced to a wreck pretty early into the story's plot, which doesn't take long to develop and terrify its audience, enhanced in no uncertain terms by the fear on John's face and understandably, the losing of his temper when he finds he can't leave that room.

I'd decided as soon as John meets Samuel L Jackson that he's a strong 6ft2. The two tall actors could indeed look one another in the face, but JC had a definite height advantage.

6ft2. 🏅😁👌🎄....😟📺🎶
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Dec/21
188.5cm zone peak...him, Affleck, Reynolds, Driver , Reddick and Appleman would all be identical
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 14/Dec/21
WHAT a performance John is giving in Stephen King's 'Room 1408'!

Samuel L Jackson has done his utmost to dissuade the writer of all things scary from staying in that particular hotel room, but hasn't succeeded. John is speaking into a recording device to let his fans know what's going on when the Carpenter's song 'It's Only Just Begun' starts playing on the radio.

I haven't seen this for a few years but know he's in for one heck of a night. It's not the sort of film one is likely to forget.....

Back later!
Tall Sam said on 9/Dec/21
A young Cusack has a chance to hold his own near someone like Ben Affleck.
Truthteller27 said on 7/Dec/21
He's atleast 6'1.5 as he is taller than Jennifer Coolidge in heels I guess I will give him 6'2 as she is almost 6'0 in heels.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/21
I wonder if he’s claimed 6ft3 as well...he’d get away with it easily
Editor Rob
On twitter his quotes were basically: "6-2 since I was 17", "6 -2 and change", "62 and a half" (responding to somebody calling him 6ft 3) and "I’m 6’2 - 215"
berta said on 11/Nov/21
i agrre with average guess. One of the more legit 6´2 guys.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 3/Nov/21
@Chaoscontrol: No, that' Clinton range and Trump easily edged him 20-30 years ago
viper said on 30/Oct/21
Paul Walker isn't taller than 186cm
Chaoscontrol. said on 29/Oct/21
@Rampage Trump at 6’2 1/8? The ma was 6’1.75 max at his peak
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Oct/21
Revised list...

6ft1⅞(187.6cm): Chris Cuomo, Eddie Hall, Jonah Hauer-King, Mahershala Ali, Vittorio Gassman, Rodrigo Santoro, Trent Garrett, John Taylor, Benjamin Bratt, Clive Owen, Tom Hiddleston, Garrett Wareing, Alex Rodriguez, Chris D'Elia, Charles Neslon Reilly, Andy Roddick, Andy Schulz, Kyle Edmund, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Simon Farnaby, Dele Alli, Julian Clary, Julian Assange, Alberto Del Rio, Tim Vine, Chris Addison, Duncan Lacroix, Jim Jarmusch, Calum Best, Jonathan Bennett, Eric Schweig, James Laffarty, Cameron Daddo, Ed Marinaro, Jim Brown, Rob Reiner, Elliot Cowan, Tamer Hassan, Robert Urich, Ronny Cox, Tim Matheson, Simon Rex, Sam Elliott, Bill Clinton, Hugo Weaving, Kip Pardue, Julian McMahon, Andy Hallett, Paul Walker, Michael Caine, Robert Leeshock

6ft2⅛(188.3cm): Roman Reigns, Ross Butler, Tim Tebow, Ray Fisher, Mark Cuban, Steven Crowder, Derek Jeter, Harold Ramis, Sean Connery, John Cusack, Donald Trump, DB Woodside, Hugh Jackman, Richard E. Grant, Bruce Boxleitner, Rhys Ifans, Amitabh Buchanan, Jerry O'Connell, Peter O'Toole, Marc Blucas, Samuel L. Jackson, Nick Chinlund, William Balwin, Peter Stormare, Jim Broadbent, Ryan Reynolds, John Goodman, Forest Whitaker, Terry Crews, Brian Thompson, Martin Landau, Martin Clunes, Chris Tarrant, Pete Doherty, David Koechner, Triple H, Brett Cullen, Guy Williams, Jon Pertwee, Christopher Judge, David Morrissey, Louis Emerick, Neil Morrissey, Brock Lesnar, Cameron Mathison, Dorian Gregory, Jeff Hepner, Gottfried John, Deidrich Bader, Kris Marshall, Laird Hamilton, David Warner, Lynn Red Williams, Patrick Duffy, Tommy Lee, Bruce Kulick, Nick Cave, Louis Theroux, Peter Bowles, Elliott Gould, Stephen Tobolowsky, James Martin, Joe Don Baker, RZA, Graham McTavish, John Newman, Jeremy Lin, Keith Allan, Scott Timlin, Will Traval, Jerry Doyle, Hacksaw Jim Duggan, Alastair Duncan, James Cameron, M.C. Gainey, Kevin Grevioux, Alistair McGowan, Benjamin Walker, Robert Rodriguez, Daniel Majstorovic, Will Poulter, Josh Gates, Barry Sloane, David Ramsay, Sam Heughan, Desmond Llewelyn, Walter Gotell, Nigel Green, Michael Gothard, Ben Johnson, Boris Becker, Meek Mills, Brian Wilson, Joe Nichols, George H.W. Bush, Henry Silva, Edmund Hillary, Gucci Mane, Mark Henry, Paul Joseph Watson, Gwilym Lee, Jacob Rees Mogg, Mario Mandzukic, Charles Robinson, Simon Day, Jerry Trainor, Timothy Carhart, Luke Eisner, Eric Allan Kramer, Kenny Loggins, Bob Golic, Brian F. O'Byrne, Coby Bell, Terry Nutkins

Jawilder said on 21/Oct/21
Average guess is what he measures peak
berta said on 21/Oct/21
he have looked 187-189 in movies. Overall i think he pulled of very legti 188. I can believe he have been measured a little over 188 cm, maybe 188,3.
Grifter said on 14/Oct/21
Click Here

Recently re-confirmed his height as a flat 6ft 2in on Twitter in response to a fan complimenting him on his White Sox argument video.

Also, just wanted to point out that Cusack is built like a linebacker, but it’s never really called attention to or shown in his movies.

Even with the baggy clothes and all the layers he wears you can tell the dude is broad.
Jameson said on 15/Aug/21
One of the few actors who’s honest about his height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jul/21
Definitely no less than 6ft2 peak, more likely a bit over than under...
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 17/Jun/21
You can see around half a head's difference when you compare him to Jason Patric. I don't think it's quite half a head but then John, being tall, is likely to have a head that's longer than the average 9".

6ft2. 😃👍
abdou. said on 12/Apr/21
i always thought he was 5.10 or 5.11 he dont look 6.2 at all
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/21
Morgan at peak would've edged Cusack, I'm confident
Sulu2021 said on 29/Mar/21
There are quite a bit more 6ft 2 listings for celebrity males than 5ft 6 in terms of their peak heights. This means that 6ft 2 is a little closer to average height for American adult males than 5ft 6 for the peak height.
Rapha said on 16/Mar/21
Hi Rob

Who do you think was taller peak out of bed height: John Cusack or Morgan Freeman ?
Editor Rob
I might say Morgan has a chance of measuring a bit taller.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Mar/21
@Almost 180cm guy: I think both of those guys you could argue were that peak
Almost 180cm guy said on 13/Feb/21
Overall I would give Cusack a 6ft 2.25 but there is something that doesn't give me peace. Well, in 2007 Cusack seemed shorter than Samuel L. Jackson (Cusack was 41 then and Samuel 58). There are a lot of their photos together which show that Cusack and Samuel looked like similar height despite Cusack having more shoes and hair than Samuel. Here are some photos: Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here
Rob, do you think Samuel has a better chance of a 6ft 2.25 in his prime than Cusack?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 14/Jan/21
I liked him in High Fidelity, had an everyman quality about him
MaskDeMasque said on 12/Jan/21
Towered over Jack black in high fidelity. 6'2. My second least favourite actor after Clooney. This guy rubs me the wrong way and I'm not sure why.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Jan/21
berta, I think that range is more likely than under. Something like 6ft3 out of bed, 6ft2-2¼ evening. Affleck, Bana and Sam Jackson were probably that aswell. He looks stand out tall in everything
berta said on 15/Dec/20
maybe just over 6´2 is better listing. 188 is minimum for his peak.
FrankR1 said on 9/Dec/20
If John Cusack was 6'2" in the 1980s, he must have been doing a lot if "hunching." On-screen he looks like a weak 6 feet tops. Today, he looks under 6 feet.
Average Heighted Male said on 23/Nov/20
Cusack is a tall guy, no doubt, but after watching High Fidelity this morning he was dwarfed by Tim Robbins(strong 6'5). Cusack only looked 6ft/6ft1 besides him. Never seen a legit 6ft2 guy look that small next to a 6ft5 guy before. Cusack, IMHO, is more of a weak 6ft1 guy. Not short by any means, but clearly not 1.88cm either.

The only way Cusack would be a strong 6'2 is IF only Robbins was more 6'6-6'7. I'd actually say Robbins would be a 6'6 easily in his youth out of bed and stretching upright and good posture.

I'm an average height male close to 5'11 and my 6'3 neighbor is barely bigger than me close up. But a 6ft5 guy would dwarf me easily.
Editor Rob
from the archives: 5ft 7 Big G with Tim and John, sidewalk unknown.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Aug/20
“Seldom slouches”

More like seldom stands erect. He’s got typical tall guy posture (something I’ve been guilty of myself in the past)
Jkiller said on 26/Jul/20
Guy is a legit 6'2. Could probably be 6'2.25
Hulk23 said on 13/Jul/20
I think this listing is perfect. He was for sure a strong 6’2/188cm guy when he was from 20 to 40 years old. Today? At 54 years old I don’t think he has lost much (actually I think he might be already a 6’2 guy but prudentially I may believe he‘s today 6’1.8”/187,5cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Jul/20
Nowadays he could be dipping below 6ft2 slightly but in the 90’s could look over it. Looked a legit 189cm in Gross Point Blank, in some scenes even pulling off 6ft3...
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 3/May/20
@190.5/189.5 said on 25/Apr/20

Then 6'1 1/2 listed Craig Robinson will be down to 6'0 1/2 a low.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 2/May/20
On the Horror Channel they've been advertising a film called 'The Cell' and I thought, "I can't wait that long! I want to see it NOW!"

Yes, it looks really interesting and I know it's a Stephen King film. I also knew that I had a copy, which I haven't seen yet, but could I find it? No! I have so many DVDs, you see, that sometimes I can't find the ones I want! They are distributed in three different rooms, but the bulk of them are upstairs. The 'important' 😂 stuff, for instance 'American Horror Story', is all downstairs. I'll take a trip upstairs to look for a particular film and chances are that I'll come back down with something completely different, which I'm just as eager to see. 🤔

It's a real fluke that I was able to find the DVD I wanted - BY MISTAKE! Apart from John Cusack, it stars Samuel L Jackson, Stacy Keach and 'Orphan' child actress Isabelle Fuhrman. This should be one great watch, and I'll have a fab opportunity to compare the height of John with Samuel L, the two of whom starred together in another of Stephen King's movies called '1408', which I highly recommend. It's a superior ghost story with an excellent, if sad, storyline. 👻😢

I know John is very tall so I have no hesitation in giving him 6ft2.25.
190.5/189.5 said on 25/Apr/20
6'1.5 for Cusack I'd say, he really doesn't pull off the full 6'2". Just compare him to a peak Jackman - Jackman would edge him.
191 cm Jason said on 3/Mar/20
6'2' looks like his morning height.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Dec/19
I think Cusack would edge out Fox
viper said on 25/Nov/19
What are the chances he's always been
6-1.5 like Matthew Fox, yet widely regarded as 6-2
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Nov/19
A little under 6ft2 today is arguable certainly...can look 6ft1 with loose posture but I’m not convinced he’d actually measure that low
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Nov/19
Rob, how likely would you say 6ft1 range is for Cusack today?
Editor Rob
If he's lost height he could be 6ft 1.5 today, at times it seems possible.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Nov/19
Canson, I still think 188cm is fair for him currently
Canson said on 17/Nov/19
@Rampage: I would say 187 best case today
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Nov/19
Chris I’d rule both of those out to be honest. Today I suppose he can look like a 187cm guy but 20 years ago I’d say 189cm was likelier. His posture is all round rubbish though

Right between those two listings for the time being is fair. He most likely hasn’t anything significant.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 12/Nov/19
Google now listed John Cusack at 6'1 1/2. That is funny he use to be listed 6'2 1/2 by google.
Joe van der Merwe said on 4/Nov/19
Is it just me who saw him as much shorter growing up ... like 5ft10 or so....
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 16/Oct/19
Or he never lost any height yet but gain too much of weight to look bulky and shorter. I doubt that he is under 6'2 now. Probably measure close to 6'2 1/2 morning by his doctor.
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Aug/19
He could be 188.6cm peak and still holding 6'2 now. 1/2 inch lost i can't see that.
179cm guy said on 2/Jul/19
Peak: 6'2.25 (188-189cm)
Current: 6'1.75 (187-188cm)
Now that he's well into his fifties I think that John's lost half-an-inch at most.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 28/Jun/19
🎈🎂🎁🎭 Happy Birthday John! 🎭🎁🎂🎈

Wishing the brilliant actor John Cusack a Very Happy Birthday! 😁👍🍰


Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Jun/19
He could certainly look 189cm range in the past.
Nik said on 4/Jun/19
He will be so pleased with the average vote!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/May/19
Berta I think a peak Freeman would edge out Cusack
RavenRiver said on 23/May/19
I’m currently between 188 (rarely, only in the mornings) but mostly 187.5- 186.5 which I never drop below, even after a heavy workout. Robert Pattinson came to my degree show fundraiser in 2010. He was definitely around 3-4cm shorter than me, and I was in very slim leather soled shoes. That would put John Cusack in my range I would imagine. Can’t see 189 for him judging by the photographs of him next to RP!
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 23/May/19
John never look a proper 189cm. 6'2 1/4 is the max. Average guess is 1/8 higher and worst low he falls into strong 6'2 as listed.
Nik said on 11/Apr/19
The average vote is 6'2.32" after 45 votes!
billionaireslayer said on 20/Mar/19
Peak 6'1 n half range
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 29/Dec/18
Anywhere in that 6ft2-2½ zone is arguable and 6ft3 first thing out of bed. When I think of stonewall 6ft2 guys (I.e. who don’t fall under 188cm evening) I automatically think of Cusack, Reynolds, Poulter, Driver, peak Jackman, peak Jackson and peak Connery.
berta said on 26/Dec/18
cusack usually looks bigger than other 6 foot 2 guys. he was taller than samuel l jackson back when samuel was 188 cm he was same height as morgan freeman back when he was fraction over 6 foot 2 and he even looked legit 6 foot 2 beside Tim Robbins while other guys like john c mcginley looked 4-4,5 inches shorter. I think he is atleast 6 foot 2 but if he wasnt that height then he could be 1/8-1/4 over. But probably just 1/8.
Gracian said on 10/Nov/18
I remember Rob as you said everything from 6'2" to 6'2.5" is possible for Cusack. He can look 189 cm very often. Here are his pictures from the 90s alongside Laura Dern (who wears high heels) and John C McGinley:
Click Here
Click Here
Cusack next to them looks easy at 6'2.5". Besides, here are his photos next to Molly Shannon and Jennifer Coolidge under another camera account:
Click Here
Click Here
In 1997, Cusack looked easily over two inches taller than John Malkovich:
Click Here
Click Here
Here is his sample photo from the 90s alongside Jay Leno, Cusack looked easily over 3 inches taller than him:
Click Here
You can see many of his pictures from the 90s next to Chazz Palminteri, you said that peak height 6'3" is not impossible for Chazz, but Cusack did not look shortet from him:
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Cusack said both 6'2" and 6'2.5". Rob, can you give him at least 6'2.25"?
Editor Rob
From seeing him with a few friends, I think about 6ft 2 seems ok for him, arguably he could have once measured 6ft 2.5 earlier in the day.
Danimal 5'9 3/4" said on 6/Nov/18
May be a flat 6'2" today, but was easily 6'2.5" in his 20's and 30's.
berta said on 3/Nov/18
measured in late afternoon = 188-188,3 measured 1 hour before lunch 188,7. Out of bedd 190
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 22/Oct/18
@Rampage I felt so sometimes and gone away with that 1/4 more feeling but its a 50/50 chances for Cusack.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/May/18
Rob, I think he’s still roughly 6ft2 but maybe one-eighth shy of it at worst today and 20 years ago was one-eighth above it?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Apr/18
Rob perhaps he qualifies for that magical one-eighth listing?
Editor Rob
I just gave one to Paul Scofield, I think he qualified for it, I'm not as certain on John though.
berta said on 10/Mar/18
to me he looks 188- 188,5 rangeabout 188,3 is probably about right a very legit 6 foot 2 guy
JordanG said on 16/Jan/18
Click Here

6'2 and 215 lbs from his Twitter!
JordanG said on 16/Jan/18
I still stand by my original guess
Click Here
I'm JUST over 5'11. I measured our headsizes just now in the picture to try and get rid of the baseball cap and his hat is giving him a little bit of extra height but I'd definitely say Rob is right with 6'2!!
Editor Rob
The cap isn't a Trucker cap, so won't add that much, it's just like a fairly flattish (1/3rd inch or so) around 6ft 2 is believable.
Jake said on 30/Dec/17
I work at a hardware store in Chicago and helped John with his paint some years back. I’m 6’0” and he towered over me. I’d say he’s at least 6’3”.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Dec/17
Sam's bending a fair bit. I've seen that movie and both guys looked fairly close.
FatBoySlim185 said on 18/Dec/17
6'2" seems legit. Regardless of how they look on screen, Cusack seems to have an inch or so on Jackson in real life.

Click Here
Mister lennon said on 1/Dec/17
188-189. True 6'2 guy.
Bego said on 29/Nov/17
187 morning, 186.5 at night
Grit said on 14/Nov/17
6'2" for sure
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Nov/17
186-187cm is a joke
Richardspain said on 5/Nov/17
186/187 cm barefoot

John isn't a full 6'2
CDS said on 1/Nov/17
Last week I watched the recent movie, "Cell", and co-star Samuel L. Jackson, listed here as 6'1" looked consistently taller than Cusack, in spite of standing on a lot of uneven ground. I used to think Cusack is 6'2" or close to it, but if SLJ really is that low these days, as a number of comments have suggested, I don't see how Cusack could be over 6'1". Watch the movie...
Junior said on 27/Oct/17
Over 6'2 is impossible.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Aug/17
He looked a bit lanky and awkward in Grosse Point Blank and High Fidelity but he's never been a skinny guy. He's broad. If he played rugby, he'd make a decent back-row
KH said on 2/Aug/17
I don't understand it when people say Cusack doesn't look big. He is big. He is not a thin guy and is a strong 6'2. When you see him with other celebs in pictures is how you can tell he is big. Big mellon lol.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 6/Jul/17
Peak: 188.7cm
Today: 187.8cm

Still around 6ft2 today but maybe a grain of salt shy of it at worst in the evening. In 30's he definitely looked like he could have been a bit over it.
S.J.H said on 29/Jun/17
I still see 6'1.5 for Cusack. Don't think he is anything big 6'2
berta said on 7/Jun/17
this guy looks excactly like my father in proportions and body my dad can sometimes look 189 but are in reality 187,7 in the evening (little under 188) so i guess 188 i the best listing for this guy. I dont think he is under it. he can be little over. probably about 189 around 12 if he wakes up at 9 during the weekend
Jordan said on 18/May/17
I'm 5'8.25 and he looked 5 inches taller than me from the pic I got with him. I give this guy 6'1.25-6'1.5. He wore some nice sunglasses at the Con!
Moe said on 17/May/17
Came to comic con in my city a few days ago. Definitely 6'2. Might even be a hair above that mark.
Richardspain said on 1/May/17
He looks tall.Range 187-188cm sure.But no more.
Headbanger said on 1/May/17
LOL At 14 i thought he is like 5'10
Richardspain said on 30/Apr/17
Looks 194cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Apr/17
Rob, who do you think is taller Cusack or Cannavale?
Sandy Cowell said on 3/Apr/17
John Cusack is on my TV at the moment on an episode of 'Tales From the Darkside'! He is playing a man of the cloth and conversing with some kind of deformity with a face liked cracked porcelain!
He looks very tall indeed! I'd believe 6ft2.5 at least!

Now for something pretty remarkable: Christian Slater has just appeared in the episode as a BOY! John Cusack has barely aged a day since the making of this! I think they were made in around 1986.* Now he still looks almost as young today so that probably means his height has been maintained, don't you think so Rob?

* The episode is from 1984! (I checked at the end).
berta said on 17/Mar/17
i think he is taller than 6 foot 2 flat i can see him be around 188,7. really close to 189. tim robbins i think really look 196 cm. but its hollywood i think he deserves a 6 foot 5 listing
Canson said on 15/Mar/17
Agree with Rampage. I'd put both at their lowest

Cusack: 6'2
Robbins: 6'4 1/2
mister_lennon said on 15/Mar/17
cusack: 189-190
robbins: 195-196
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Mar/17
I don't think there was a full 3in between Cusack an Robbins, more 2-2½in IMO. So...

Cusack: strong 6ft2
Robbins: weak 6ft5
S.J.H said on 2/Feb/17
Click Here

Click Here

This is a real measured and claimed 6'2 korean model/actor name Kim Young Kwang. To be honest overall i look at this guy and his drama he look easily taller than john cusack, ben affleck, alfred molina and many 6'2 actors and i thought he was 6'3 at first. I'm not sure if korean model had downplay their height but from my perspective now i think john cusack maybe just 6'1.5
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Jan/17
A little over 6ft2 is not insane. Quite likely in fact...
S.J.H said on 24/Jan/17
Over 6'2 is insane. He look almost 3" shorter than tim robbins
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Jan/17
Rob, how tall do you think is brother is?

Click Here

I'm gonna say at least 6ft3 if not a bit more. He looks a bit taller than John and he's further away from the camera...
Editor Rob
yes Rampage, a chance he is that.
Redwing said on 24/Dec/16
JordanG, Interesting😃 I wonder who'd measure taller out of of me or you lol. I think I'm 6'2 (going out on a limb with saying that) in my Nike shoes; could you take a guess at how much cm my shoes would give but in email?
JordanG said on 20/Dec/16
Redwing, I'm 5'11'' barefoot. Probably about 6 feet in my running shoes and John looked like he was wearing some decent sized boots. We both probably gained an inch from our footwear.
Redwing said on 13/Dec/16
Whyd you downgrade his height? Also how tall is that JordanG (in cm) who took the photo with Cusack?
berta said on 24/Nov/16
188 ore litle over
Sandy Cowell said on 31/Oct/16
This is my second attempt to do this fine actor justice!
I don't work too well with a couple of glasses of wine AND a full bladder!
I know full well that John Cusack is a heartthrob, and yes, I can see why, but as I own only 2 of the 11 films listed above, I guess he has earnt this status on the rom-coms he has starred in.
I have 7 of his films and the one that really made me sit up and take notice was the Stephen King film '1408.'
He plays a virtual soliloquy in this sad tale, so, apart from the equally tall Samual L. Jackson, there is nobody to compare him to. The film was so absorbing that I missed my chance on making comparisons! Then I received a copy of the film '2012' one Christmas from my boyfriend, which we watched on Christmas Day. I couldn't take in John's height through the tears!
My conclusion is that he has earnt his his popularity with women from his rom-coms, but he gets the thumbs up from me because he chooses to star in a wide variety of parts, some of which are so good that I, for one, don't mind how tall he is because I haven't quite taken it in!
S.J.H said on 18/Oct/16
He look terribly lower than 6'1 in this PR photo. Like a 184cm guy but i know he can't be this short. He was always 6'2 and maybe 6'2.25
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Oct/16
Rob, is he at an age where a little loss is possible or do you think he's pretty much the same?

I think he had a good shot at 189cm in the 90's.
Editor Rob
1/4 inch near 50 is always's mostly undetectable by people, they won't notice you lost it unless they are very perceptive.

Of course to many height enthusiasts, if you look at people long enough you might notice those fractions might be spotted!
Shredder said on 8/Sep/16
The worst estimate I have ever heard was when a guy I know met him and said that John is " 6 and 1/2 , almost 7 feet tall " .
NBP said on 8/Sep/16
In late 80s I came across him in airport, and I was surprised on how tall he was - a strong 6'2" guy, on the plus side, on sneakers
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Sep/16
I think he's losing a good 1in in that photo...
Johan said on 8/Sep/16
If he was standing straighter I could see 6'2" but with his slouch I think he looks more 6'1.5" - 6'1.75" there. He has never been known for great posture though.
JordanG said on 7/Sep/16
Hey Rob, you've got the master eye I'd say so I'll give you all the information I can remember.
When I was in line, before I met him, I checked out his footwear. I don't think they were anything too extreme. They looked like a cross between dress shoes and styled boots, if that makes any sense and so that probably gave him a good inch, maybe two. We were both leaning in towards each other; but he looks to be slouching more than I am. I'm about 6 foot with my running shoes, 5'11'' without them. So I'd say your estimation at the top is pretty close. I'm guessing he was possibly 6'3'' with his footwear. Does that look right to you? I also used this site to match us up: Click Here
Editor Rob
I'd have said you both looked to be standing relatively similar and about 3 inches between you looks possible as your eyelevel might be slightly up and his slightly down there.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Sep/16
@JordanG: How tall are you, 5ft11?
JordanG said on 5/Sep/16
I met John the other day!
Click Here
Editor Rob
how tall did you guess he looked?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Aug/16
I'd argue 6ft3 in that photo.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 13/Aug/16
He makes Jim Carrey look 6'0" at best:

Click Here
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Jun/16
Somewhere in that 6ft2-2½ zone. He looks noticeably taller than 6ft1 range guys
berta said on 8/Jun/16
he looks like a guy that never could go under 188. I Think this height ore even a Little taller
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Jun/16
Rob, who do you think would measure the tallest out of John Cusack, Ryan Reynolds, Ben Affleck, Lance Reddick and Billy Baldwin?
Editor Rob
you really would need to measure them, I think most would fall within the same kind of zone, anywhere from 6ft 2 to 2.5.
GrTr said on 24/May/16
In the late 80s I saw/came across him in an airport - defintely 6ft 2+ in
kreyzig 6ft 3 said on 24/May/16
If molly shanon is 5ft 5..with those heels she is about 5ft 8..Jennifer is 5ft 9.5 and has 4in that makes her around 6ft 1.5..still he is an inch taller than jennifer and 6in taller than molly.So 6ft 2 is a good shout..may be 6ft 2.5.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 21/Apr/16
He can look either one of those so somewhere in-between is only fair. Same zone as Affleck, Driver Reynolds and Connery (prime). People just don't know how tall that is. It's really where you begin to stand out in a crowd.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 11/Apr/16
Rob, are you considering giving him an extra ¼in?

It ties in nicely with his two claims.
Editor Rob
he was at the mark years ago, so never ruled out
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Apr/16
Lol at 6ft for Cusack
190.5cm in sneakers jones said on 4/Apr/16
Cusack is 6' flat without shoes. Anybody can see that. Nothing to be ashamed of he's a good six feet. In 4cm shoes boots heels he'll stand 1.87m anyway. So, yeah the guy would stand around 6'2" big on the screen and in real life. He's amazing and incredibly talented and i love his body of work. I'm watching on frozen ground and the factory - he makes great thrillers and the equally great actor Nic Cage is with him in Frozen ground awesome. Cage a good six feet flat. By the way Samuel L jackson is 1.88m flat 6'2" look at him next to 1.83m/6' Travolta. all these Actors are simply the best.
Charlie said on 1/Apr/16
Cusack looks closer to 5' 11 maybe 6'
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Mar/16
Cusack looks at least 2in taller than Pattinson and yeah he's much broader. He's a big dude
JordanG said on 27/Mar/16
The John Cusack photographs with Robert Pattinson are strange because in some publicity photos, Cusack looks like he's not only towering over Pattinson; but he also looks like he's built MUCH bigger. But then, there are other photos, where they look pretty much the same height and both with the same build.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 23/Feb/16
I think one could make a good argument for B. He can definitely look the strong 6ft2 quite often
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Feb/16
Rob, which range is most likely for Cusack?

A) 191cm/189cm
B) 190.5cm/188.5cm
C) 190cm/188cm
D) 189.5cm/187.5cm
E) 189cm/187cm
Editor Rob
I think C, but B isn't impossible
random184.4.184.5 said on 23/Jan/16
I'd say 6'1.5
Someone! said on 26/Dec/15
Correg said on 11/Nov/15
Peak 1.89-90 , today 187-88.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 9/Nov/15
He looks 6ft2-3 w/h Jim Carrey.
JordanG said on 2/Nov/15
Click Here
Dejavu said on 22/Aug/15
He looked 188cm today.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Aug/15
@Arch: I was actually about to mention Con Air. There wasn't a lot between Cage and Cusack.
But I think the former was in boots. He was definitely 2in below Nick Chinlund (also listed 6ft2 but might be a little over it). Cusack had at least 3in over 5ft11 Colm Meaney.
Arch Stanton said on 26/Jul/15
Rob can you add a photo? Barely an inch on Cage in Con Air, but Cage could look
6ft 1 in it.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 22/Jun/15
Not under 188cm.
JJF said on 11/Jun/15
The ultimate 'B' list movie star :-)
No way he's over 1.88m
Sam said on 1/Jun/15
Rob, could you Better off Dead..., The Sure Thing, Saying Anything, The Grifters and Bullets Over Broadway to his credits?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Mar/15
More likely to be 6ft2-2½ range than 6ft1½-2, IMO.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Feb/15
Con Air and Grosse Point Blank...a brawny 6ft2-6ft3
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 26/Jan/15
Reynolds and Jackman are both 6ft2 flat.
Sam said on 8/Jan/15
I'd agree but I think Cusack could be a tad over 6'2" if he straightened up at his peak. I see Reynolds as very even 6'2" and Jackman as a guy who might dip to 6'1.75" range by afternoon.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 10/Dec/14
I think he'd edge both Jackman and Reynolds back to back
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 15/Nov/14
6ft2½-6ft3 in Grosse Point Blank with Dan Aykroyd.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Oct/14
Pattinson could be 6ft flat. He was 2in shorter than Pierce Brosnan in Remember Me. In that movie with Cusack he was noticeably shorter aswell.
Judd said on 16/Oct/14
Sam, not sure about it. I think that there could be a bit more than what showed those pictures, but not 2"...I think 1.25" between they is fair, and I wouldn't put pattinson under 6'0.5" for any reason...
Sam said on 14/Oct/14
The difference between Pattison and Cusack is more noticeable in the shots I posted back in May from some he looks more than 2 inches taller than Pattison. Then again some of these shots could have warping, proximity and posture that favors Cusack in those like Pattison is favored in the pics posted by Judd.
the shredder said on 14/Oct/14
Rob , what did the Plumber think he was? 6'2?
Editor Rob
yes that's what he thought he was from an earlier measurement I believe (not by me, I don't measure people wrong...well, apart from the one time I lost 1.35 inches from someone, but let's not go there).
Judd said on 14/Oct/14
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

for sure Cusack doesn't look 6'2.5" with robert pattinson...
i think pattinson is 6'0.5" and Cusack a strong inche taller, so like 6'1.75" the top picture i see a 184 guy next to a 187 one.
184.3cm said on 13/Oct/14
I think John is a really good example of a legit 188cm, when i watched Con Air years ago i thought that Nick Cage was 5'10 cause i assumed John was a 6 footer. Really surprised me he was so tall but its clear he is when you compare him to other actors at premiers and other events.
Andrea said on 13/Oct/14
Tim Robbins came out with a "precise" 6'4.5. A real 6'4.5 is gonna look very tall, especially in Hollywood! What if he really was never over a strong 194? It's not impossible! I think he generally looks near enough 6'5 but a 6'4.5 guy with a good posture will look a big 6'5 (or even over) to most of the people... You got some cases of people who actually make you think twice when you're about to give a listing to people! As Rob said, the plumber looked at least 6'2, even in person, and is just about 6'1.5. So, if a guy like him can pull off looking a solid 6'2, think about guys like Cusack or Jackman who already look under 6'2.
Editor Rob
even the plumber was surprised he measured that low, a guy in his 20's ain't really gonna be losing any height, but Jackman is what 46, I'd never rule out a chance of an actor in 45-50 range losing a small fraction, especially if they did a lot of physically demanding roles, like Jackman's done in last 10 years.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Oct/14
More chance of him being 189cm than 187cm
Danimal said on 13/Oct/14
Andrea says on 10/Oct/14
He does look a weak 6'2 next to Tim Robbins (if Tim really is only 6'4.75) and certainly doesn't look 6 inches taller than guys like Zac Efron! 6'2.5 could his height in shoes, 6'1.5 could be his real height!

First of all, Tim Robbins is more than 6'4 3/4" and John Cusask being 6'2"-6'2.5" barefoot just reinforces that fact.
Judd said on 12/Oct/14
I think Cusack is 6'1.75-2"...he looks more than 4" taller than his sister Joan, who's never been below 5'8.5" for sure...6'2" could be taken from a measurement made after 3-4 hours since he woke up, but I wouldn't put him below 6'1.75" as I said before...
Andrea said on 12/Oct/14
Even 6'2 is too much... Could he be 6'1.5?
Editor Rob
steady on, it took me a few years to end up putting MFox at that mark, Cusack I am not as convinced he is quite that low.
Andrea said on 12/Oct/14
Rob, could his claims be "in shoes"? I mean, don't tell me he looks a solid 6'2 next to Tim Robbins or Zac Efron!
Editor Rob
from the 2 movies they were in that had scenes together, 6ft 2.5 might look too much, unless you are of a view robbins really was over 6ft 5.
Andrea said on 10/Oct/14
He does look a weak 6'2 next to Tim Robbins (if Tim really is only 6'4.75) and certainly doesn't look 6 inches taller than guys like Zac Efron! 6'2.5 could his height in shoes, 6'1.5 could be his real height!
mike said on 25/Sep/14
Rob, would you consider putting him at 2.25? since he claimed both 6ft 2 and 2.5 like what you did with Tim Robbins.
tk said on 18/Sep/14
6ft 2.5 or 1.89 for John Cusack. Certainly tall and very good actor. And with a very good taste in music...
Arch Stanton said on 19/Jun/14
@ Marcus

More chance of 189 I think.
Sam said on 19/Jun/14
If he's 187 cm, then Robert Pattinson is under six foot, which is doubtful.
kio124 said on 27/May/14
totaly agreed
Editor Rob
you could say about 2 inches, some of the shots they are far apart so it's harder to guess
Sam said on 20/May/14
He looks at least 2 inches taller than Robert Pattinson...if anything, these photos seem to imply that Pattinson is barely six foot.
Click Here
I could buy even a 3 inch difference in this shot.
Click Here
Dejavu said on 9/Apr/14
6'2 could be a bit over
Arch Stanton said on 12/Feb/14
He could look a bit shorter in Money for Nothing but I think he's an honest 6'2" guy.
Arch Stanton said on 22/Jan/14
Looks it in Being John Malkovich.
sean73 said on 16/Jan/14
Defo a solid 6'2" guy at knight.
Ted said on 10/Jan/14
Looks 6'1" to 6'2" in most films. Neither measurement would surprise me.
Big Sam said on 1/Jan/14
If Hackman is listed as 188 on here and Cusack as 187, how come the latter appeared visibly taller in Runaway Jury? Interesting.
Editor Rob
cusack is 188 and hackman at that time had probably dropped a little
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 31/Dec/13
Rob, will you give Cusack the 6ft2.25?
Raptor Jesus said on 28/Dec/13
in '1408' he looked about 1 inch taller than Samuel L. Jackson. in The Sure Thing (1985) his carachter claims to be 6'2.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 18/Dec/13
I'd be interested to see him face to face with Hugh Jackman. I bet they'd be identical.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 5/Dec/13
He's more 6ft2-6ft3 than 6ft1-6ft2, IMO.
sambo said on 31/Oct/13
watching 1408, he looks at least as tall as Samuel L.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Sep/13
"John Cusack height: 6ft 2.25in (189cm)"
Hypado said on 12/Aug/13
1.88 is right.
cole said on 21/Jul/13
Rob do you think he could be a shade over 6'2? I think he's an honest guy when he claims 6'2 and 6'2.5, like he's between those two depending on the time of the day he measured. He seemed about 1 inch taller than Craig Robinson (requesitng a page for him!) in Hot Tub Time Machine whom I think could be 6'1.5 range, at least he looked it next to Ed Helms in The Office.
Editor Rob
there's not many 2.25 listings around, he could fit it
Ted said on 19/Jul/13
Yes he always looks tall in movies
A person at least 187 plus.
he stacks up well against other tall people except Tim Robinson.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 13/Jul/13
Rob, maybe he's somewhere between his two claims?
Caroline said on 9/Apr/13
Just see a clip of 'Adult World' where he's next to Emma Roberts (wearing some kind of wedge sneakers) and he looks so tall! I think 188-189cm at least.
twat said on 14/Mar/13
look at the film couch trip,best comparison 59.04. enough said,probably 5ft 6 max
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 1/Mar/13
Cage 183-184cm, Cusack 188-189cm
joe joe said on 19/Jan/13
@dani he is alot taller than cage. seen them side by side and he has at least 2 inches on him
BEASTMAN said on 22/Oct/12
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m says on 6/Jan/12
If he's claimed both 6" 2 and 6" 2.5, maybe a 6" 2.25 (1.89 m) listing is fair? Same as how Robbins is listed as 1.95 m, halfway between his claims of 6" 4.5 and 6" 5.

Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 2/Oct/12
Based on what he's said...
6ft2.75(190cm) out of bed
6ft2.5(189cm) morning
6ft2.5(189cm) lunchtime
6ft2.25(189cm) afternoon
6ft2.25(189cm) evening
6ft2(188cm) night

He's claimed 6ft2 and 6ft2.5. Between those two figures seems reasonable.
Silent d said on 1/Oct/12
I've seen him in a few movies. I remember he was in this movie with billy bob thronton and he was about ten cm taller. Forgot the name of the movie. In conair next to nicolas cage, he looked 187cm. 6 foot 2 is about right.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 28/Jul/12
I think Cusack is 188-189cm range.
dani said on 7/Jun/12
He is 1.84m barefoot. He height is as similar to nicolos cage who is 6'
steven said on 14/Jan/12
he probably claim 6'2.5 in boots.
jake, 1.82 m- 1.83 m said on 6/Jan/12
If he's claimed both 6" 2 and 6" 2.5, maybe a 6" 2.25 (1.89 m) listing is fair? Same as how Robbins is listed as 1.95 m, halfway between his claims of 6" 4.5 and 6" 5.
Bon_ said on 31/Dec/11
he is probably just about 6'2 out of bed and 186 cm by evening.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 30/Dec/11
Just watched Con Air and he never looked particularly tall, just a bit above average! And thinking he was listed at 189 and there were people that thought he was 6'3+ ahahah He was with an actor, listed on here at 180, and he looked max 5-6 cm taller but more likely less than that! He looked good 10 cms shorter than Tim Robbins! 6'2 could be his morning height, if he's lucky!
Bon_ said on 23/Dec/11
no more than 6'1.5 IMO, probably 6'1.25 at his lowest
Tman said on 5/Dec/11
1,86m bare footed 1,89m in dress shoes
ANDREA[ITA] said on 5/Dec/11
If hes 189, tim robbins is no less than 198
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 24/Nov/11
Robbins 195-196cm
Cusack 188-189cm
ANDREA[ITA] said on 14/Nov/11
O yeah, rampage! He could be but i think real height is without shoes, so forget about it!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 12/Nov/11
"John Cusack height: 6 ft 2.25 (189cm)"
LAN Jiao said on 5/Nov/11
Andrea, im thinking 2 cases of possibility :

1st. he is 6'2 morning 6'2.5 out of bed , 6'1.5 midday and lower down night he is tad bit mm under 6'1.5 if get measure.

2nd. easier to say he is just a strong 6'1(185.5cm something) and fits on footwear he is 6'2 - 6'2.5 he claim in twitter.

the main problem, he does't look under 6'1 and if put a compare to will smith he may be a half inch tad over him or something more is a lil chance.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 28/Oct/11
Night height, rob? Night height he could easily be 6'1.25! I mean: real height is after 5 hours like you said! Night height is .25 shorter than that! I assume that if someone is 6'2, his real height is 6'2.25!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 28/Oct/11
Rob what about this? Crispin Glover is listed at 179, even if most of users say he's less than that! Admitting he's 179, there are no more than 3 inches between them! There's more difference between Tim and John than between these two!
Click Here
Please, explain this since you're saying he's really 6'2.5! He just doesnt look it! Next to Tim and next to others! He looks 6'1.5 tops! Dont ignore me and give an explanation! You cant list him at that height only because he said it! I remember you that even will smith claimed 6'2.5 but is 6'1 tops!
Editor Rob
there probably is more chance six two half isn't a night height, maybe six two was a better fit
ANDREA[ITA] said on 26/Oct/11
Yeah, lan but in the famous scene with tim and john, john is dwarfed by tim! There are more than only 8 cms! There are two cases: or john is only 184-185 or tim is wearing heels!
LAN Jiao said on 20/Oct/11
i recall old pic here with 5'6.75 glenn ,cusack look 6'0 with slight slouch. 6'1.25 can buy that explain why 6'4.5 tim robbins look 8cm higher john cusack
LAN Jiao said on 18/Oct/11
He is 189cm with shoe. Look 190cm in boots. He had tendency wear boots in movie, look solid 186cm.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 13/Oct/11
Yeah but the height dont match at all! And these are not the only ones! Tim has 4 inches on John Cusack, no way only 6 cm -.-
ANDREA[ITA] said on 13/Oct/11
If you say hes min 6'2, why the hell you list tim robbins at only 195? Hes at least 198 in comparison! Explain that!
Editor Rob
Robbins said 6ft 4.5 and 5, I list him between the 2.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 12/Oct/11
So i say i'm 6ft3 but i look 6ft you list him at 6ft3? :O
I didnt think you gave so much importance to celeb's declaration! I remember for example that Johnny Depp said he's 5'11, why dont you list him at 5'11? An example as much others :O
Editor Rob
Cusack can sometimes look 6ft 2.5, sometimes 6ft 2.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 12/Oct/11
Rob, answer this question please! Why do you keep him at 189? He looked max 186-187 with tim robbins!
Editor Rob
I'm giving him the height he said on twitter
ANDREA[ITA] said on 9/Oct/11
no, not much! only 10 cms!
James said on 8/Oct/11
there would not be that much between tim and cusack. both tall guys.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 6/Oct/11
In fact! He would have if the heights were right but he looked solid 4 inches shorter than tim! 187 if tim is 197!
Lucoso said on 5/Oct/11
tall but not that i guess 187
James said on 5/Oct/11
robbins would have 2.25 inches on cusack.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 4/Oct/11
Yeah danimal! I agree with you! I dunno if cusack is shortern or tim is taller! I gotta say that tim robbins at "only" 195 screws up half the listings of this site! Rob you gotta work on it! Or you upgrade tim or you must downgrade most of the listings!
Danimal said on 3/Oct/11
James says on 30/Sep/11

Which puts Tim Robbins at minimum 6'6".
ANDREA[ITA] said on 3/Oct/11
Tim robbins has solid 4 inches on him! 186 is already generous for him!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 23/Sep/11
Hes 6'1.75 tops.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 4/Sep/11
Cusack looks 190-191cm with Tim Robbins in that pic.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 3/Sep/11
Ok! You officially need an oculist, James!
James said on 2/Sep/11
In Toms pic cusack looks 6'3.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 29/Aug/11
Yeah! Here he looks taller but hes closer to the camera! There must be no less than 3 inches between them! So no more than 187 for john!
Tom said on 28/Aug/11
John and Tim Robbins in the movie Tapeheads:
Click Here

The difference isn't as big as it is in High Fidelity so Tim probably had shoes advantage. I'm not sure if there is as much as 5 cm between their heights.
ANDREA[ITA] said on 27/Aug/11
there's less difference between Brad Pitt and Morgan Freeman than between John Cusack and Tim Robbins!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 26/Aug/11
He neither is 188! Come on! Always looked about 6ft1 max in his movies! He looks only 3-4 cms taller than 180 ray liotta, he looks about the same height of samuel l jackson ( that today aint over 6ft1, just see him next to the rock)! And the scene with tim robbins proofs it since he looks about 4 inches shorter! 185 max 186 for him! If you see his movies he looks just a bit taller than average, not particularly tall like a legit 189 man should look! Its enough he claims 6ft2.5 to list him at that height! I remember that also will smith said it but in reality he's 186 max!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 25/Aug/11
Aahah yeah! 190 with Nike Shox! There are 2 cases: or Tim Robbins is at least 6ft6 or you should downgrade most of the celebs, rob! Cusack looks at least 9 cms shorter than tim, clive owen the same, edward norton looks 15 cms shorter, charlize theron looks max 5'8 with him, sean penn looks 170, morgan freeman 186-187 tops!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 25/Aug/11
188cm min
190cm max
James said on 24/Aug/11
max 190cm for cusack more like
ANDREA[ITA] said on 23/Aug/11
Max 186 for cusack! Near 188 when he wakes up! The video with Tim Robbins shows that!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 20/Aug/11
Yeah but big disadvantage, like 4-5 cms! Is it possible? Its just ridicolous that.a 6ft5 man wears heels!
ANDREA[ITA] said on 19/Aug/11
If cusack is really 189, they made tim look about 2 metres! What do you think, rob? Was he in taptoes like tom welling? xD
Editor Rob
maybe he had shoe disadvantage...
James said on 18/Aug/11
Robbins must have had footware advantage
ANDREA[ITA] said on 17/Aug/11
See the scene! Cusack doesnt even reach tim's eyebrows! And even if it were 3 inches, it would mean tim robbins is 196-197! Maybe he really is...
James said on 16/Aug/11
ANDREA[ITA] says on 12/Aug/11
6ft2 was better for john cusack! In high fidelity scene, if John Cusack is 6ft2.5, Tim Robbins must be at least 6ft6.5! do you think that it is possible, rob? IMO its not! Then it's ridicolous that you have him at the same height of Tom Welling because he never looked as tall as Tom looks! There are some heights on this site that are pretty ridicolous and invented...

i think there was 3 inches between cusack and robbins.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.