How tall is Kim Kardashian

Kim Kardashian's Height

5ft 2 (157.5 cm)

American television personality. In 2008 on Fox News she mentioned "remember I am 5'2" and 1/2" and on twitter in 2010 was giving "5'3" as her height, although in 2011 mentioned "I'm 5'2"" and gave her own list of Kardashian heights: "Kourt-5' Kim-5'2" Khloe-5'10" Kendall-5'10" Kylie-5'8" Rob-6'". Her shoe size is: "Size 6.5 but in sneakers 7.5", her vital statistics are "34, 26, 39" and she stated her weight as being "Right under 120 lbs".


Kim, 5ft 9 Khloe and 5ft Kourtney.
Photo by PRPhotos.com

You May Be Interested

Height of Kendall Jenner
Kendall Jenner
5ft 9 ¼ (176 cm)
Height of Kylie Jenner
Kylie Jenner
5ft 6 (168 cm)
Height of Beyonce Knowles
Beyonce Knowles
5ft 6 (168 cm)
Height of Jennifer Lawrence
Jennifer Lawrence
5ft 7 ½ (171 cm)

Add a Comment280 comments

Average Guess (73 Votes)
5ft 1.88in (157.2cm)
Divalovro said on 28/Feb/19
My guess would be 157cm
Gerdo Paolli said on 26/Feb/19
She is very short. 5ft 0
Kelly Germany said on 23/Feb/19
5ft 1 MAX. In 5 inches high heels, she is still shorter for 2.5 inches than Kanye.
Yoas said on 18/Feb/19
5"2
Jancys said on 12/Jan/19
5'1 (155cm) max. Kanye is 5'7 (170cm) and Kim in high heels looks very shorter than him.
Sharie Zuluaga said on 20/Dec/18
Kim Kardashian looks taller than 5’2 so I’d guess 5’4
Michael 5'10", 178 cm said on 16/Dec/18
Kim is 5'2", not 5'3". She doesn't look too much taller than her sister Kourtney who is 5'0" tall flat. She looks 7 unches shorter than Khloe and Kendall Jenner.
MAD SAM said on 5/Jul/18
Did a lot of research, 156 cm woman
19901997 said on 24/May/18
Avril Lavigne is 5.1, right? how tall is kim?

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
finngo said on 6/May/18
Rob, any idea how tall she might be here?
Click Here
I think she looks much taller here than she normally does...
Please get back to me if you can!
thanks.
Editor Rob
I think the heels have the potential to put her close to 5ft 7-7.5 range if measured in them.
heightgirl said on 16/Mar/18
She recently said she has a 24" waist but there is no way! She would look like a total freak if that was true because she looks like her hips are at least 40". I think she has about a 32 inch waist at the least. I still think she is no more than 5f1 since that's the height she gave on her Myspace page.
Nona said on 13/Nov/17
Her hips are more like 42” and that is way too disproportionate for even her self proclaimed 5’2”
Anonymous said on 30/Oct/17
She looks like 5’3”
:) said on 17/Sep/17
@charlene what is the definition of very short lol. not trying to defend kanye but 5'7 is not "very" short imo.
Charlene said on 31/Aug/17
I think that Kim is no more than 4'10". Her husband is very short and she is smaller than he.
Slim 182 cm said on 20/Jul/17
If she's looking 5'7 with 5 inches of heels, that'd make her 5'2, no more, she is a short woman.
even said on 5/Jul/17
no more than 157
Lanaka said on 30/Jun/17
5'1 range for Kim K !
XXX said on 28/Jun/17
If she said 5'2 and a half she's probably 5'1 and a half, that's what I'm guessing
Height Girl said on 25/Jun/17
She listed 5'1 on her own Myspace so why now is she saying 5'2 sometimes and 5'3 other times? Next thing you know she grew again. lol I thought she was between 5'1 or 5'2 but who's to argue with classic Kim?
Lovatic said on 24/Jun/17
5'2 or 5'3.
Linda said on 19/Apr/17
What accounts for Khloes height. I know that Kylie and Kendall take after their 6'4" dad
Lanaka said on 16/Apr/17
5'1 for Kim K!
ben said on 15/Mar/17
5ft1
Owen said on 3/Mar/17
Totes 5'2". Totes.
Chris said on 5/Feb/17
I don't believe she would be under this listing likely a bit over next to celebs barefoot is better.
Bricks said on 16/Dec/16
I've met her. She's probably 5-2 at most.
M said on 9/Dec/16
She is just1.52m,Kourtney is 1.50m.
george said on 6/Dec/16
hey big rob, please can you make a page for Kim k's ex. NFL player Reggie bush. google has him at 1.83 but we all know not to trust google when it comes to heights.
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Nov/16
@ Sarah - I thought she's 5ft2 and a half on the dot!
Sarah said on 30/Oct/16
5'2" on the dot
Rojina said on 21/Oct/16
@tiny....Kim and Eva could almost be sisters. Eva's much smaller in physique and height but prettier just slightly
sam said on 8/May/16
rob how tall do you think reggie bush is kim k's ex the nfl player
aida said on 1/May/16
kim is taller than 5'1 , I'm 5'1 and she is taller according to her legs and even her arms
I think 5'2 or 5'2 and 1/2 is the most accurate.
M.A.R.S. said on 23/Oct/15
Her and Nicole Richie are the exact same height. Google photos of them. Richie always admits to being 5'1. See for yourself. Kim is very small
Mickey said on 17/Oct/15
When I type in Google search "Kim Kardashian height", is showing 5' 3"?!? What is her real height?
[Editor Rob: I think if you compared her to Kourtney, 5ft 3 seems a bit too much.]
Lisa tuxson said on 23/Sep/15
Thought she was shorter
Michael said on 17/Sep/15
5'2" max this lady. I would say 5' 1.5" would be more accurate.
Ethan said on 6/Sep/15
Rob, how tall would you say she is in these heels?
Click Here
Please respond!!!
[Editor Rob: they look a pretty high angle, but won't really give much over the 3-3.1 inch range]
Kay said on 22/Jul/15
@Kk it says 5'3", not 5'1". if you scroll down on that page there's a better quality image
Mike said on 18/Jul/15
Any idea on robert kardashian senior's height? I've heard 5'5' but standing next to 6'1' OJ Simpson he looks taller.
Kk said on 10/Jun/15
Someone's unearthed her old Myspace page where she lusted her height as 5'1".Click Here
Heightgirl said on 24/Apr/15
Kim was spotted in the most massive elevator shoes ever and still looked shorter next to 5f5 Whoopi Goldberg in flat shoes: Click Here Kim in the most huge wedge shoes I have ever seen: Click Here This makes me really question her 5f2 claim. I saw her sketchers cut out and it was tiny! Like under 5f tiny! Maybe it wasn't life size, however? I think she may only be 5f max and Courtney 4f10 or less.
BGee said on 12/Dec/14
5'1 - 5'2 max. Hasn't she claimed 5'3 too?
noname said on 20/Nov/14
Difference of Kim and Kourtney of height is about 1 inch.
TJE said on 12/Sep/14
Kendall: 5'9.75
Khloe: 5'8.25
Kylie: 5'6
Kim: 5'2
Kourtney: 4'11.75
User said on 8/Jul/14
Rob, do you think Kim could be closer to 5'1.5" or 5'1.75" ? She looks 4 inches shorter than Lindsay Lohan (who is listed as 5'4.75") when Lindsay is in heels that give her 1 inch advantage. So that makes Kim 3 inches shorter than Lindsay - 5'1.75".
[Editor Rob: generally I've thought she looked near enough her 5ft 2 claim, but a chance of being a fraction shy? Maybe.]
kk said on 23/May/14
I think shes under 5'2. always looks quite short next to orther celebs in photos. maybe 5'1/2. Also, don't understand the hype around her, as i dont find her to be particularly attractive. but hey,kudos to her for finding a way to make a name for herself and millions.
daddy said on 25/Jan/14
Ray J IS 5'7 and from the looking at the 'tape' of them standing next to each other (kim bare-footed),she appears to be about 5'2
RL said on 22/Dec/13
I dated a girl who was 5"4' and she told me a story of seeing Kim at a promo event and was surprised by how short she was. She said she couldn't have been no more than 5"2'.
o.k said on 7/Dec/13
Kim is 5'0 alot of celebs lie but one way I found it out is a recent picture of her and Lindsay Lohan at International Art Festival.Lindsay is standing next to Kim they are both wearing same sized heels. Lindsay states she is 5'5 so no way can Kim be 5'3.Lindsay Lohan towers over Kim in that Picture by at least 5 inches making Kim Kardashian 5'0.
tiny said on 4/Dec/13
Kim - 5'1" & 135 lbs, Kourtney - 4'11" & 95 lbs, Khloe - 5'9" & 170 lbs
hmm said on 3/Dec/13
@someone & ice: All three sisters are wearing similar length heals. Kim is more than a 1/2 inch taller than Kourtney here. And people have different facial feature placements. So, if Khloe were standing up straight she'd probably be almost an entire Kim's head taller than Kim.
IR said on 29/Nov/13
Khloe has mentioned Kim is 5' 1" so I will believe Khloe's claim, but no way will I believe her claim of her own height when she said five-ten. Khloe is 5' 9" at the most.
SK said on 20/Nov/13
She's not taller than 5'1"-5'2". I've seen her in person, and she's short, stocky, and extremely pear-shaped. She's always wearing massive heels, but even with heels on, she still looks short. Most of her Playboy photos were taken of her lying down or sitting down (no full-body shots of her standing up). They always use that trick on short women.
Beachy7777 said on 10/Nov/13
I am 5'3" and she walked slowly past me in the street and we were both wearing flip-flops. I'd say 5'2".
someone said on 1/Nov/13
well kourtney is 5 foot 0 kim is barely taller than her so i'd say kim is 5 foot 0 a half
Randomgirl said on 14/Oct/13
In this pic kourtneys knees look higher, anyone else notice that? It's also strange because Kim looks like she might be slightly closer to the camera.
little sue said on 4/Aug/13
Eva not curvy!! she has a slight athletic figure with a wide rib cage and small hips whereas Kim has a classic pearshape/hour glass figure.
tiny said on 2/Aug/13
always get confused between Kim Kardashian and Eva Longoria because both are so short and extremely curvy. The only area where Eva loses out is the booty.
nona said on 9/Jul/13
Kim - 5'0" & 140 lbs (pre-motherhood days), Khloe - 5'8" & 175 lbs, Kourtney - 4'10" & 100 lbs
ice said on 24/Jun/13
Kim comes up to Khloe's nose; therefore, Khloe is not 7 inches taller than Kim, unless she has a 13 inch head. I see 5 inches. Khloe is 5'7, Kim is 5'2 and Kourtney is 4'11 1/2.
SelmaMartin said on 10/Jun/13
Kim has never looked more than 5f2. And regardless of what she says, she weighs at least 125-130lbs, not pregnant.
Her sister Courtney is probably 5ft and weighs 110.
kg said on 7/Jun/13
even in this photo with khloe and kourtney she seems 1 insh taller than kourtney and they wear the same height of heels
dman9500 said on 2/Jun/13
hi Rob, one source says kim is 5'3. do you think thats true at all?
[Editor Rob: she has said 5ft 2, 2.5 and 3 as her height]
true said on 24/May/13
5'2.5 would be closer
Heightgirl said on 23/May/13
nilkn, Kim doesn't look 5' flat to me. I think she's 5f1.
nilkn said on 10/May/13
She honestly looks about 5' flat to me, possibly 5'1". I think even 5'2" is pushing it.
anon said on 22/Apr/13
A aupreme athlete like Serena cannot be compared to reality TV celebrities. Serena is way too big and strong compared to even Khloe Kardashian so comparing her to tiny Kim is not on
Arch Stanton said on 18/Apr/13
@Sepideh. If Kim was going to lie she'd be claiming 5 ft 7 like Shania Twain wouldn't she!!
Arch Stanton said on 18/Apr/13
Rob Kardashian is 5'10"-5'11" I think. He's taller than Scott Disick anyway. I originally thought Scott was 5'11"-6'0 range but I think he's more 5'9"-5'10 actually as he's a bit shorter than Kendall.
Sepideh said on 14/Apr/13
Hey Rob, do u think Kim lies about her height if yes why?
[Editor Rob: I don't think she really lies much, she looks about 5ft 2 in general]
Tila said on 30/Mar/13
Rob, how tall are her sisters. Kendall and Kylie Jenner?
[Editor Rob: they both claim 5ft 10 and 5ft 6...I think those girls are telling the truth about their height]
Heightgirl said on 28/Mar/13
Sources say Kim is "about 5f1" Click Here
lofty 1.92 said on 11/Mar/13
Kim looks about 5 ft and Kourt about 4ft 8in
talker said on 9/Jan/13
kim looks like a midget next to Serena Williams.Like 10"shorter.She barely reaches 5'in my book.
Even 5'1" is generous.
mike 181cm said on 6/Jan/13
Rob you need rob kardashian. Are you still looking in to him?
[Editor Rob: how many of these kardashian's are there!]
nicole said on 31/Aug/12
Kim is 5'1". Khloe has said it
J.J. said on 25/Aug/12
Rob please try and spot the difference between her and Bruce Jenner's daughter Kendall(5'10")?
I see a good 2" difference between them!
J.J. said on 24/Aug/12
Rob is Khloe even taller than 5'8"?
[Editor Rob: I think she looks in 5ft 9 range, I'm sure someone posted a mention on here once of Khloe saying she was almost 5ft 10. ]
Brad said on 1/Aug/12
Her booty measure is for major talk, not her height.
Alex (London) said on 1/Aug/12
Bigger booty? Any chance of a photo - for strictly research purposes!

QUOTE: AT says on 31/Jan/12
I am not a fan or anything, but I thought I'd add my thoughts. I am about 5'1 - 5'2, weight 122lbs, have a larger butt (38.5") with a 26 waist. I fit into 26 Seven jeans/J-brand. Maybe it's the bone structure?
LeBron6 said on 30/Jul/12
No way Khloe is 5'9.75". As she only looks 4-6 inches taller then 5'2" Kim in the picture.
Fiona said on 16/Jun/12
Khloe and I are dead on in height:
5 ft. 9.75 in. or 177 cm by metric.
Aria said on 6/Jun/12
5'2" is right because Kourtney's only 5'0"
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Heightgirl said on 6/Jun/12
Kim was recently photographed with 5f4 Olivia Munn in April and she looked to be around 3 inches shorter. Kim was wearing 4 or 5 inch heels and I don't think there was a platform. You couldn't see Munn's shoes so she may have been wearing platforms. I believe that Kim is around 5f1.
AT said on 31/Jan/12
I am not a fan or anything, but I thought I'd add my thoughts. I am about 5'1 - 5'2, weight 122lbs, have a larger butt (38.5") with a 26 waist. I fit into 26 Seven jeans/J-brand. Maybe it's the bone structure?
Barbie said on 29/Jun/09
shes not irish && qerman her entire family is armanian or however u spell that .
Alex said on 28/Jun/09
I've heard plenty of different ethnic backarounds for Kim too. I've heard Irish and German too but some sites are wrong.
NoNameGuy said on 24/Jun/09
Kim Kardashian's mother is half Scottish and half Dutch. Her father is Half Turkish-Armenian and half Russian-Armenian. This doesnt make Kim Armenian whats so every. The first part as in "Turkish" is your actual blood descent, the second part "Armenian" is where you were born. Heres in example; thats why in America they call black people African-American, because there blood descent is African but there were born in America. So Kim Kardashian is quarter Turkish, quarter Russian, quarter Dutch and quarter Scottish.
xstfux said on 20/Jun/09
I met her a few days ago in Vegas for a convention and let me tell you she 5'2'' for sure. She had on massive heels that made her onlyyy 5'7'ish. Her mom was pretty tall, I'm a weak 5'6'' and she had on heels and was like 4-5 inches taller than me; btw kim is famous for nothing but her butt and sex tape-sad we glorify people like that as 'celebrities' i would kill myself if someone considered her an artist, and khloe, who wasn't there, seems to be 5'8''
LG69 said on 15/Jun/09
I know Kourtney has admitted she's an even 5', and she looks just that. So, the 5'2" estimate for Kim is perfect. Khloe looks a solid 5'8" barefoot.
Alex said on 29/May/09
5'8 would be a push for her. A legit 5'7 girl in heels is going to look pretty tall. Thats probably why Khloe I thought passed as a taller girl.
J.J. said on 25/May/09
'Alex' I think Khloe could be 5'8" but noting more. 5'7"-5'8" seems right.
Alex said on 19/May/09
Ice, yea 5'7 seems fair enough for Khloe. Oh and remember out little Alyssa Milano height debate around last year. Not sure if you saw but I got a picture with her and its posted on this site.
ice said on 18/May/09
So, I think we agree on 5'7? LOL No, Tyra didn't appear to have any advantage. Khloe's shoes were huge. Even people not as interested in heights as we all are were commenting on the difference. It was really dumb on her part. She was claiming 5'10 that day, and then stood next to the much taller Tyra, who is a known 5'10.
Alex said on 18/May/09
Ice, yea probably but I wouldn't go under 5'7 for her either. Shes on the tall side for a girl and she is one of those girls who can appear taller than she really is but next to Tyra she didn't look as tall as she usually does unless Tyra had a footwear advantage.
ice said on 14/May/09
I disagree with Khloe being 5'8. I can see 5'7, but nothing higher. Tyra had her by at least three inches.
Alex said on 13/May/09
Cyn, I saw that video clip. Kim at 5'2 and Kourtney at 5'0 seems right. Now Khloe claims 5'9-5'10 but looked more 5'7-5'8 next to Tyra.
quas said on 13/May/09
Here's a pic of her standing next to her sister Courtney. If her sister is 5 feet then she would only be two inches taller.

Click Here
Cyn said on 10/May/09
I saw all three of the sisters on the Tyra Show a couple of months ago and Kim said herslef she was 5'2. Kourtney said she was 5'0 and the other two sisters were like "YOUR LYING! YOURNOT EVEN 5'0 YOUR 4'10" Then Kourtney was like no i'm 4'11 and 1/3, so i just round it up...and she was a smiling like she was lying. Then Tyra said "why do 4 foot something girls always lie about their height? 4 foot something is hot" And then the other sister was upset that everyone think she's huge and they don't know that she just looks huge next to her short sisters. I wish i had a youtube link of the interview to post here lol
Ali said on 9/May/09
No way!
She seems to look So much taller than 5'2" - 5'3"!
anon said on 4/May/09
Kim is definitely 5' 2 1/2- 5' 3". Btw, her sister Khloe is definitely NOT 5' 9". She's about as tall her mom, Kris Jenner, who is 5' 6 1/2". Heels don't count.
Alex said on 3/May/09
Her myspace says 5'3 but she has claimed 5'2 and 5'2.5 as well. Not that its easy to tell 5'2 from 5'3 by looking at her though she looks more 5'2ish than 5'3. Shes not going to round down or downgrade her height.
Alex said on 3/May/09
CC, yea I agree. Kim isn't a fat girl at all. On the thick side but not overweight though. She has claimed a size 2 and 4. Her waist is leanish but her ass is too big to get into jeans that size unless they custom made it. Her waist may be like a 4 but her ass is like an 8.
Cc said on 30/Apr/09
I just wanted to post this picture....I know this is about her height..but ya who cares... so take a look here Click Here
size 2 my ass!! LOL its not like it matters shes absolutely beautiful and shes so beautiful she could be 400 pounds and it wouldn't matter...but that ass is def not getting into a size 2!!!!!
deavionbabygirl said on 30/Apr/09
I just saw Kim and she maybe 5ft 2". Hard to tell on TV. I think that she is doing a great thing by excepting her body like it is. i feel more people should do the same. Kim K. has a nice figure.
Anna said on 30/Apr/09
I just saw Kim on the Rachael Ray show today and they were around the same height so I agree with 5f2. Both ladies had the same 4 inch heels on, without platforms. Kim seemed a 1/2" taller... I swear she looks the same height as Jennifer lopez? Jennifer claimed to be 5f6 so obviously she is not.
Cc said on 27/Apr/09
just a little comment to Roxy...I don't care if your 3 inches taller then me..that isn't enough to make that much of a difference LOL...but what does make a difference is body...just because you weigh 115 pounds and your 5'3 doesn't mean that your automatically smaller then me because im 5 feet and 115 pounds...we could carry our weight in totally diff ways! I might be bigger i might be smaller but either way i am def not fat..LOL so to call me "Fatter" is a joke...you could carry weight in your upper body and have absolutely no ass and thighs..which is probably exactly how you are...I happen to carry all of my weight in my lower body...and am very tiny on top. Any weight that i do have on me is in my butt and thighs which is why i am a size 6...and i still look small..i wouldn't want to be any smaller...i am a grown ass woman and that is exactly what i want to look like! And i have seen a lot of pictures of kim..i can tell her size..i have a butt but i have no wheres near as big a butt as she has...so i don't know what size 2's shes fitting her ass into...also i want to add that i wear petite jeans and pants..which means that they are shorter..and the sizes also run smaller..........
SoAnonymous said on 26/Apr/09
I happen to be 5'1 1/2 and weigh 125, but that's when I'm bloated on my you know what. I'm still growing, and I think her height is fine. So what most girls are getting tall? It's their bodies and as long as they love it, no one should care.
josh said on 25/Apr/09
no way she is 5-2 i think she just doesnt like being tall she is probly like amy winehouse she's obviously underestimated her height even through that is rare for somebody to do that and her sister cant be 5 ft i never seen somebody 5 ft look that tall maybe she is 5'2 and kim is 5'3
Lala said on 22/Apr/09
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dJg9ECTvXMs Check this out! Kim
KING said on 22/Apr/09
I agree with Cc Kim's butt is most deffo a 6 no lower!! i know abit about girls butts and hers is deffo lookin good!!
Gui said on 21/Apr/09
wierd Oo Click Here Scott Storch and her, he's 168 cm
Anonymous said on 16/Apr/09
Not to take the focus off height, kim is no where near 115 to 120 lbs. My gf is 2 inches taller with the same measurements minus kims heavy d cup and is 128 lbs. Physically speaking there is a resemblance and when we get to size and measurements, the math makes no sense.weight is very overrated I say kim is at the lest 125 to 135. And so be it. She looks amazing but clearly the "heavier" weight idea is not something a public sex symbol would state.
Roxy said on 15/Apr/09
Just face it regardless of the height and weight of the Kardashian girls they are beautiful inside and out. Females should look to them as role models.
Katy said on 15/Apr/09
I read that Khloe is 5'9....Kim is 5'2 and Kourtney said herself on an episode of keeping up with the k's that she is only 5' tall.
It was that episode with the homeless guy.
Alex said on 14/Apr/09
Khloe can give off a 5'9-5'10 impression but seeing her near Tyra I'd say more 5'7. Kim at 5'2 and Kourtney at 5'0 fits her being 5'7.
Anonymous said on 12/Apr/09
If you ever checked out Kim's eBay auctions, you'd know that she wears jeans in sizes 26, 27 and 28, depending on style and brand. In American designers, she wears a size 2 or 4. In European designers, she ranges between 4 and 8. Her eBay ID is "kimsaprincess", of course!
ice said on 10/Apr/09
Khloe is no wear near 5'9! Why he claims that is beyond me, but when she stood next to Tyra, they were both in large heels, yet Tyra had almost three inches on her. Khloe is 5'6-5'7. She's definitely claiming heel height.
Anonymous said on 8/Apr/09
Kourtney- 5'0, Kim- 5'2.5, Kris- 5'6.5, Khloe- 5'9. First and last are confirmed heights on multiple personal accounts.
Cc said on 6/Apr/09
Kourtney admitted she was only 5 feet a long time ago!the episode with that homeless guy shorty or whatever...she said she was only 5 feet and kim is only a tiny bit taller ...like 5'2.
Megan said on 6/Apr/09
Khloe is 5'10", in HIGH HEELS! I'm 5'10", barefoot! yet I never bill myself 5-11 or even 5-10 1/2". tsk tsk
Roxy said on 5/Apr/09
Responding to Cc's comment on 3/20/09. I am 5'3 and 115 pounds and I'm a size 2, the same as Kim. Your problem is you're shorter than us and fatter so of course you wouldn't be a size 2 or 4 you should be closer to a 6.
MR said on 23/Mar/09
On the newest Kardashian episode (where Khloe does the PETA nude ad), Kourtney admits she's only 5'.
lawdog said on 23/Mar/09
I don't care about anything else in regards to Kim Kardashian except for that beautiful huge butt of hers.......nice
Cc said on 20/Mar/09
I believe Kim is 115-120 pounds easily..... shes a short girl...and carries most of her weight in her lower body...butt and legs.. im exactly the same way...im 5 feet tall and 117 pounds and even at my height and weight I look pretty thin..but my legs and butt will always be bigger then my upper body....but I don't agree with the size 2 thing...there is no way this girl is fitting into a size 2 jeans with a ass like that...like i said im 5 feet and 117 pounds and i take a size 6 smallest i have ever taken in bottoms is a 4...so there is no way she takes a 2.....id give her a 4 but thats about it.....
Anonymous said on 2/Mar/09
why are all u ppl discussing weight ,this is about height
Alex said on 27/Feb/09
Rachael, you must be in good shape then to be a size 6 at 5'5 140lbs. Most girls would be a bit bigger at that size. Like with Kim shes curvy but also leanish in the waist area which is why her size isn't big. I still dont buy her as low as a size 2 and 115lbs.
Rachael said on 23/Feb/09
I completely agree with april. I'm 140 pounds and i'm 5 foot 5, but my dress size is a 6. People like kim kardashian are good role models for young women because they do have curves on their body.
Alex said on 1/Feb/09
Also some people dont realize the difference between a girl 115lbs straight up skinny compared to a girl 115lbs with muscle tone.
Pittmann said on 27/Jan/09
In Disaster Movie, she looked a smidge shorter than 5'2" Crista Flanagan in some scenes.
Alex said on 27/Jan/09
Some guys base it on weight and numbers. I just go by if they are attractive or not and have a sexy look. Sometimes girls much heavier will be in better shape and look more attractive then sometimes not.
Alex said on 25/Jan/09
I know plenty of girls 140 plus who are attractive then I see some that aren't. I see girls 150 more attractive and in better shape than girls 130 sometimes.
April said on 25/Jan/09
I am 5'10" and now am between 158-160 lbs. I have weighed between 118 and 171 in my adult years. There are no celebrities who are share this body type and most comments on here say that if a woman is over 140 lbs, she is unattractive. No wonder my body image sucks.
Khloe (and even Kim) are good role models
Alex said on 23/Jan/09
Ice, its the same with guys. You'll see guys much lighter and have more body fat than someone heavier, not all the time but sometimes you'll see it. Thats why you can't go by just weight/height. I am turned off by skinny girls who have a lot of body fat, eww. LOL
ice said on 22/Jan/09
Alex: I know exactly what you're talking about. I've seen girls cry over wearing 130, even though they are firm and toned, yet they even girls that are 110 with 40 percent body fat. I don't get it. I'd rather be toned and heavier any day over skinny and out of shape.
Alex said on 21/Jan/09
Ice, thats true. Like I've said I'd date anyone from a size 0 to a size 10-12. Size and weight is just a number. I look for how they're built and stuff. You can have someone 20lbs heavier than someone and both are the same height and the heavier girl can be in better shape still. Too many people go by weight and sizes.
ice said on 21/Jan/09
Alex: I think it depends on whose "ideal" you're refering to. Some people think Calista Flockhart's body is perfect, while other's think Jennifer Hudson's is. If I was to choose an ideal body for myself, I would be 5'2-5'5, and wear a 6 or 8. This waif stuff has really taken over, and I have no clue as to why. Sure, these people look nice on TV, but everybody comes back with an altered opinion once they see them in person.
Alex said on 21/Jan/09
I wouldn't have guessed her at 161 though. Actually 135-140lbs isn't very skinny at 5'10 especially when you have girls 5'10 weighing 120 something on Americas Next Top Model. Look at Adrianne Curry who is 5'10.5 and weighs 125lbs and she looks good. It depends on how they're built really. I think Megan Fox has one of the ideal bodies actually.
ice said on 20/Jan/09
Alex: Yeah, Tyra herself has claimed 161 pounds. I would have guessed around that much, because she is really tall. 135-140 on 5'10 would look like skeletor. Some people may disagree, but Tyra losing 20-25 pounds doesn't sound good to me. She's fine the way she is. At the very most, she could lose ten pounds, and still look normal. Super skinny is really unattractive to me, for both men and women. I think of Beyonce, Kim Kardashian and Shakira has decent bodies, not the Nicole Richies, Paris Hiltons and Mischa Bartons.
Alex said on 20/Jan/09
Ice, yea. Its mostly with people who are built or athletic whether is be male or female when males look more and females look less. But even on women of average body types they tend to look less than they really are. I've heard Tyra Banks is 150-160lbs, not sure how true that is but if its true she looks more like 135-140.
ice said on 19/Jan/09
Alex: It's a little different with women's jeans; you're more likely to buy a bigger size than a smaller one. I guess it's because most of us wear our clothes fitted, so if the jean runs small, you're doomed. But, you're right about the weight with women versus men. In my opinion, men look larger than what they actually weigh. An extreme example would be Bruce Lee. They say he never weighed over 140, and had even been as small as 115. I never would have guessed that. BTW, I'm from the midwest.
Alex said on 15/Jan/09
Ice, well it most often that a size runs big than run small in jeans. Its the fact that some jean brands shrink a bit while some dont then some just run big. So I'd never buy a 36 unless I want it a little loose. I've had 34's that shrunk to 33s after a few times getting washed. I got 2 pairs of 34s that feel like a 35-36.
Where in the US you from?

I reall did question her 115lb claim and figured she was more 125-130lbs. But with girls you will notice a lot that they will look less than what they really weigh. Maybe its girls who have muscle who look less than what they really weigh.
ice said on 14/Jan/09
Alex: Yeah, I'm from the US, and I think I started posting in spring/summer of 05. I felt a little out of place, because I was only 20/21, and there were guys on here talking about they met people back in '72. LOL

But, yeah, clothes do vary a lot. That' why I refuse to shop online. However, the size difference usually isn't too extreme. You say you wear a 33/34, so the odds are you would be buying something between a 32-36. I seriously doubt you will be purchasing 30s or 38s. Women sizes are the same.

Anonymous: I agree with 5'2 and 125, but I seriously doubt she can't wear a 6/7. You must remember that the camera adds ten pounds, so she will be a bit smaller than what is seen on TV. As for the resizing, that may be true, but they have plenty of clothes that are made just for curves. J-lo's brand, Nelly's brand, Kimora's brand, and many others. I know, because I have to specifically buy those kinds of jeans. In fact, I can't wear a jean unless it's stretch, because there's such a big difference between my waist and hips.
Alex said on 14/Jan/09
Goes for guys jeans too. They can run a bit bigger too depending on the brand or fit. I'm a 33-34 in jeans, flucuates but some 34s may be a bit lose on me and some 34s come fit so I could buy a 32 in certain brands and would actually fit.
Anonymous said on 13/Jan/09
I'm strictly speaking of measurements I was given to alter a pair of slacks and dress to fit her frame. As I said, I never measured her myself...that was left to the boutique owner....naturally.
I have worked making clothes for 18 years and know from experience that body shapes like Kim's usually require them to buy larger sizes and require altering to look more fitted (usually people with money do this). You have to fit the larger parts of your body then alter.
I am a women and stand 5'4" and weigh 111lbs. My measurements are 33 23 33 1/2 and I SOMETIMES fit into a size 2 jean. I wear a 0 or 1 in dresses and skirts however and that is because dresses and skirts and made to flow off of your body.
A size 2 is very small and her butt/thighs would never fit into any size 2, 3, 4, 5, or even most 6's for that matter.
There are some companies that run very large (Banana Republic, Express, and Juicy Coutour) so that women feel good about buying their clothes and become faithful clients. A lot of high end brands do this because they can afford to give a bit more fabric for loyalty. A 2 in their shop is a 4 in most others. Sorry guys, i maintain what I said.
My guess from just seeing her pictures and working on a couple of pieces of her clothes is that Kim is 5'2" and weighs 125lbs. She's beautiful, voluptuous, and has a load of money to buy her clothing any which way she wants.
Alex said on 13/Jan/09
Also very rarely will you see thin or skinny girls with curves but they can still have a nice figure and not be straight up skinny. Girls like Jessica Alba and Alyssa Milano are thin, aren't curvy but have a nice figure. Then you'll have girls like Paris who are more straight up skinny.
Alex said on 13/Jan/09
Yea, thats true. Body frame matters comes into play a lot. I personally think Kim looks great anyway.

Thanx for thinking I am younger, lol. I been here since September 2005 posting very conistantly. I'll post everyday. You from the US?
ice said on 12/Jan/09
Well, odd numbers are usually associated with juniors, while even is associated with womans. The even size is usually equivalent to the higher odd size, so a size 6 is similar to a 7. But, yeah, everything depends on the height and shape. The frame is extra important as well. I have a friend that looks fat, if she reaches a 6, where as I look sickly, if I get to as small as a six. Also, if a woman has curves the way Kim does, then you can get away with being a little bigger. But, if you have a more rectangular figure like Khloe, then it's not as forgiving.

Wow, I didn't know that you were my age. I always thought I was one of the younger regulars, considering I've been posting since 2005.
Alex said on 12/Jan/09
I heard that some places use the odd number and some use the even number, depending on the brand. I wasn't sure. Like a 5 would be same as a 6, but certain companies use either the odd or the even number.

Well its rare I see a girl a 0 that I find attractive. Even a 2 is pretty small but also it depends on height, same for guys sizes. I dont like the super skinny but super skinny may be different to others. They can be like 95-100lbs but if they're healthy and have a bit of muscle tone then its good. I just dont like the sickly looking girls. I am 24 too.
ice said on 12/Jan/09
LOL! Petite is for shorter women, while junior is a type of cut. The juniors fit better on people that have retained a more youthful body type (less thighs and hip than the women's jean). Anyway, I'm surprised that you said you don't go for the super skinny, but put a 0 in your range. That's hella tiny. As for my age, I'm 24.
Alex said on 11/Jan/09
Ice, yea but I am not familar with all that petite, juniors stuff since I am a guy but I only hear about number sizes. I do think Kim is pretty attractive, but I dont have a certain body type on a girl that I go for, just not overweight or sloppy or anything too skinny. Size 10 max, size 0 minimum is what I'd go for, yea I know a big range, lol.

How old are you by the way?
ice said on 11/Jan/09
Alex: I have no idea what Anonymous below me is talking about. Kim, herself, says her measurements are 34-26-39, which sounds perfect. (I have a friend with an almost identical build). There is no way she has a 38 inch bust, because I have that, and wear a 36DD. Also, Kim's lower half is bigger than her upper, not the other way around.
ice said on 10/Jan/09
Well, she says that she has 39 inch hips, and a size 26 inch waist. She also likes to wear stretch jeans. A normal person her size would probably buy a 6 petite in women, or a size 7 in juniors. But, considering she likes her jeans to be very fitted, she's likely shopping for 4s and 5s. There is no way she's getting into a size 2 jean, even with designer sizing. However, dresses are more generous, so maybe she's referring to that. So, possibly a size 2 dress, but more so a 4. As for the weight, I'm thinking about 125 as well. At the most 130. Anything more than that is too big.

Surprisingly, her sister doesn't come across as super big, even though the camera sure makes it seem that much. I'm thinking Khloe is a 5'6-5'7 woman that wears a size 10. At the most, a size 12. So, not huge, but not what her sisters are either.
Anonymous said on 10/Jan/09
Kim is 5'2 and weighs at least 120lbs. I make work with clothing and sometimes make specific clothing items and/or alter pieces.
From experience working with women's bodies, at 115 lbs and her height....no way she'd wear a size 2...anything
Kim has a large ass (thick thighs and hamstrings), large breasts, and has a medium (not small)rest of her body.
She wears a size 7 jeans.. and dress (she alters when needed to fit better). )
I know, though I have personally never measured her, i have been given the duty of altering a few of her clothing pieces.
I know this, her hip/butt is 371/2, waist 27, bust 38.
Alex said on 9/Jan/09
Ice, you're a female so let me ask you how much do you think Kim weighs? She has stated 115lbs and a size 2 jeans at 5'2. I buy the 5'2 but I would have thought she was 125-135lbs with like a size 6. Shes not big at all but she does have curves and a thickish lower body so shes certainly not a thin or skinny girl.
Alex said on 8/Jan/09
Kourtney they were saying was as low as 4'11, might be but I still think she'd be 5'0 with Kim at 5'2.
Alex said on 8/Jan/09
Maybe Tyra has on bigger heels because Khloe looks closer to 5'10 with Kim and Kourtney but I could see her as low as 5'7-5'8 though.
ice said on 8/Jan/09
After seeing Khloe next to Tyra, she can't be more than 5'7. That's the absolute most! How does she say 5'10 and keep a straight face?
Alex said on 4/Jan/09
Yea Kim is 5'2 if Kourtney is 5'0. Makes sense.
Ty said on 4/Jan/09
Click Here Khlow is 5`6 4 inches shorter than Tyra.
this is what they say said on 3/Jan/09
Click Here

Watch it and go to 7 mins and 30 seconds. They'll tell you.
Alex said on 25/Nov/08
Kourtney now is more like 5'0.
sabrin said on 24/Nov/08
yeah she is like alittle shorter than KC but not by that much. but agreeing with alex she has an awesome body...
P.P said on 20/Nov/08
Alex is right, there is no way she would claim to be 5'2 if she really was 5'3. If anything celeb tends to add an extra inch onto their actual heights.
Alex said on 19/Nov/08
She has claimed both 5'3 and 5'2. Shes either 5'2 1/2 or just 5'2. No way is she going to be 5'3 and claim 5'2, I'd be suprised if she did do that. Either way she got a slammin body!
RisingForce said on 17/Nov/08
Kim is probably 5'2.5" like she once claimed. I don't think being tall is important to her so she probably doesn't always add the extra half inch.
anonymous said on 16/Nov/08
Kim next to MTV star Kristin Cavallari (listed at 5'2").
Click Here
Kim looks slightly taller, so maybe she's 5'3". Or maybe Kristin is shorter than 5'2...
Alex said on 10/Nov/08
I'll see some girls who look less than what they really weigh too.
Lacey said on 6/Nov/08
She has a 26 inch waist and 39 inch butt. It's surprising she can fit into a 27 with that butt (despite the small waist) but with stretch jeans and vanity sizing anything's possible. Also the weight of 120lb is perfectly believeable. She is short & curvy with a small frame....people with this body type look heavier than they really are. Don't be fooled into thinking some extra hip and breast fat is adding lots of weight, fat doesn't weight all that much. What makes people heavier is muscle and kim admits she doesn't have much of that.
why not said on 1/Nov/08
Another poster provided a link to KK's official site which I visited and viewed a video of her trying on jeans. She seemed to want to prove that she is a 27 waist but that didn't happened.
The jeans with stretch didn't go up to her waist and she had to pour into them. Women worry too much about the number. She is pretty and should be happy with that.
Anyway, Khloe shot the video and said she is 5 ft. 9.
why not said on 1/Nov/08
On the Tyra Banks show, Kim stated her height at 5 ft. 2 and Kourt said she measured herself at 5 ft. 0 and half of an inch. Khloe complained that people think of her as a giant because her sisters are so short. Tyra went back to back with her and Tyra is clearly a few inches taller than Khloe. Rob isn't even as tall as Khloe. Kris is at least 5 ft. 5 or over.
Khloe isn't "thick", she just has a straighter build than her sisters have.
I would have believed Kim to be 5 ft. 3 but she doesn't have any reason to lie so 5 ft. 2 it is I guess.
Alex said on 30/Oct/08
Shes def in my top 5 favorite celebs. That accounts for singers, actresses, etc. Kim isn't any of those though. I think shes just famous for her tape and her last name I am guessing. Shes not a singer or an actress. Paris Hilton is like that too.
RisingForce said on 29/Oct/08
Alex says on 16/Oct/08
Rising Force, but whatever her waist size is shes in good shape though. I'd love to hit that. LOL

Yeah, she's the only reason I've ever watched Dancing with the Stars. She may not have any particular talent but she's easy on the eyes, that's for sure. Probably my favorite looking celebrity now.
Alex said on 24/Oct/08
I really dont consider Kim to be a thick girl though she does have a thick ass and lower body. Her arms aren't big at all, about average size for her size. I'd say shes more medium built but just curvy. Now Chloe is a thick girl or you can even say full figured.
Zoe said on 22/Oct/08
Her sister Clhoe looks like sasquatch. It's funny how genetics work. I am 5'3" and my kid brother is about 6'3". I am glad I didn't get his genes.
I don't like what Kardashian does as a pseudo celeb but she has a well proportionate beautiful body.
jovanna said on 19/Oct/08
I'm 5'2 1/2" with a weight of 118lbs in the evenings and in armani pants I wear a size zero or a 2, strech jeans of course,soo what I hear of kim being close to my height and weight is acceptable, I model and do know for a fact camera angles do wonders for height so ya, kim is definitely being honest. when perparing for a shoot I can easily drop 3lbs so her giving her weight is simply her average weight when shes got a gig or sumthing to do and yes since I am 5ft 2 1/2in I will round up to 5ft 3in jus to make it easier. I also have an hour glass shape with a bubble butt...and I love it prob more tjan kim herself...im also a 34 large C small D...in victoria secret and I can say assets don't always nesscesarily mean u have to way 130...sure if I let myself go for a few months that what ill level out at but 115-118lbs curvy and 5ft 3in is possible although not for many unfortunately ..
Alex said on 16/Oct/08
Rising Force, but whatever her waist size is shes in good shape though. I'd love to hit that. LOL
Alex said on 13/Oct/08
Maybe 28 at the very most.
RisingForce said on 13/Oct/08
I'd say her waist has to be more like a 28. I'd say 5'2.5", 125-130 lbs and a 28 waist.
Alex said on 12/Oct/08
Rising Force, you think shes more of less than a 27 inch waist? Alot of lean girls in shape have 23-25 inch waists so I'd think her waist would be like 26 inches, 27 inches max. Her stomach isn't big though.
RisingForce said on 12/Oct/08
I agree shes atleast 125 lbs and I highly doubt she's a 27 waist.
natasha said on 8/Oct/08
watch the disaster movie with carmen electra the fighting scene they're exactly the same height
Alex said on 8/Oct/08
Viper, some people associate tiny with short while its different. Tiny is overall height and weight while short is just height. Kim isn't even that short anyway. That 115lb claim still gets me. I could bet money if you put her on the scale you'll get 125-130lbs.
thekiddd said on 7/Oct/08
Well if she is 5'2", Rob was off by a lot on this one. He originally had her at 5'3 1/2".
Viper said on 7/Oct/08
Kim is "tiny"? LOL She looks 125 pounds. That ass is huge.
Alex said on 7/Oct/08
I'd be suprised if she was under 125lbs. once again I am not saying shes fat or overweight at all but she's not a thin girl and her lower body is thick, especially her ass and her chest is big too.
Anonymous said on 7/Oct/08
I just saw her @ the Saints/Vikings game.She's tiny.I'm 5'3" and weigh 120.She's definetly 5'2" and under 110.
Karis said on 3/Oct/08
Heres a pic of Kim with her sister Courtney. Courtney is listed at 5 foot, so Kim would be a couple of inches taller assuming they are wearing similar shoes.

Click Here
RFS said on 1/Oct/08
So Kim and Kourtney are below average, but how come Khloe and Rob are tall? Kris barely looks 5'5 ...
Evelyn said on 30/Sep/08
I am 5'2" and weigh 113lbs. I definitely don't have her chest and bottom, so I highly doubt she is 115lbs and a size 2!
Alex said on 29/Sep/08
She never even claimed 102lbs. Someone just said something about that. But she does claim 115lbs and said most think she weighs 130-140lbs. At 5'2 shes gotta be in the 125-130lb range with that lower body and chest. Not a big girl at all but certainly more than 115.
Surfergirl said on 28/Sep/08
Um, yeah...she does NOT way 102 lbs...her ass might way 102 lbs, but she does not way that little. i'm not saying she's fat, but she definitely weighs at least 130!! If she only weighed 102 lbs, then her sister must weigh about 70! and a size 2? No, I don't think so. I've got 3 inches on here and if she says she only weighs 102, then i've also got 40 lbs on her and I KNOW I look better than that! And don't say it's the cameras/angles, etc....she's just a normal sized girl and she should not be ashamed to say her true weight. She looks good, she shouldn't lie about it!
FiveOne said on 27/Sep/08
Kim looks to be about 120 pounds. I'm actually envious of her curvy figure . . . Even if she lost 10 or 15 pounds she'd still have curves.
Alex said on 26/Sep/08
Check out this.
Click Here

She claims 115lbs and a size 2. I dont think Kim is a big girl. Most would say shes thick which doesn't always mean big, but I still would have guessed her at 130lbs for her height and frame. But with an ass and lower body like she has I would never guess a size 2, but her waist must be pretty lean for her to be that size. Thats the only way. Paris Hilton is like a size 2 as well. Id never think those 2 were the same size in jeans. Kim looks great though, I am just suprised shes as small as she claims.
kelly said on 25/Sep/08
she says on her official site im 5'2 and a half, and a 27 waist
Click Here
jmv said on 11/Sep/08
and another thing to i am just about 5'1 1/4 and i am very thick in the lower body...5'2/5'3 and i'd be wayy skinnier and AA
jmv said on 11/Sep/08
there is no possible way on this earth she can be 5'2 or 5'3...i think more like she's barley pushing 5 feet...based on her weight she is WAY WAY WAY WAY too curvy to be even CONCIDERED to be 5'2 or 5'3 if she was 5'2 or 5'3 her lower body would basically be slightly curved and her upper body would be smaller...she would basically be rail thin...
Alex said on 19/Aug/08
Whether shes 5'2 or 5'3 I think shes more 130lbs. Her upper body isn't thin but its not thick either, but her lower body is pretty thick. Shes in good shape. Not soft and flabby though.
P.P said on 15/Aug/08
She went on the Wendy Williams show and stated her height as 5 foot 2 inches, seriously that should tell you that she is 5'2 and not any taller! If you want to see the clipping go on to her official website (Click Here) and click on 'channel Kim', scroll down and you will be able to watch her interview,
Viper said on 12/Aug/08
Yeah, shes at least 120 pounds at the bare minimum. 102 pounds, LOL.
RisingForce said on 12/Aug/08
She should be downgraded to 5'2 1/2". She said that height herself. No way is she 102 pounds either. I'll guess 125.
NoName said on 10/Aug/08
Kim is 5'3,which might make her a little bit small in her weight,but with her junk,there's now way she can be 102 lbs. Her sister,Kourtney,might be,because she's pretty short,about 5'0-5'2.
Alex said on 8/Aug/08
102lbs is for someone like umm maybe Hayden Panettiere. Kim is much more than that.
mandy said on 7/Aug/08
i say shes 5'2 she looks short. So 5'2 is extremely believeable.
jeeeee said on 6/Aug/08
kourtney said shes 5 foot on the show.
Viper said on 6/Aug/08
Im not sure, but 102 pounds is crazy for her.
Alex said on 5/Aug/08
Kims not a big girl, thick in some places but her waist isn't big though. Shes thick in the lower body, medium up top. I bet if you put her on a scale shes 130lbs, give or take a few pounds.
Viper what do you think she weighs?
Viper said on 3/Aug/08
No way does Kim weigh 102 pounds with that ass.
Leeloo said on 3/Aug/08
I know from a close source that her weight is 102 pounds. She looks that 'full' bc. of the camera plus the fact that she's very short and everyone else in hollywood is looking like a stick nowadays. In reality she is pretty healthy looking, normal weight and all save for her butt. Her other 5'2 peers, Nicole Richie and Christina Aguilera are 82 and 89 pounds respectively. If you compare her to that, yeah, she's fat.
Alex said on 1/Aug/08
If shes 5'3 which is likely, maybe 5'2-5'2 1/2 at the very least. I'd say her weight is probably 130lbs. Shes not that thick really, its just her lower body that is thick. Her waist isn't big, nor is it very lean. She is medium built but has thick parts to her. But Kim is in shape, not muscular or anything but just in shape. Shes not dumpy or very soft.
rin said on 26/Jul/08
hey thats heavy enough for 5'2" you know, im 5'2" girl also and i weigh 110 lbs and i already look fat.
brittany said on 19/Jul/08
there's no way kim kardashian weighs 120.
Anonymous said on 18/Jul/08
Click Here

Playboy magazine interviewed Kim and said, "the five-foot-two beauty..."
Anonymous said on 17/Jul/08
surely this dwarf aint 5'3 she is shorter than her 12 year old sister and the same height as her 10 year old sis, i really dout she is this tall, maybe 5,0 or 5'1 tops.Click Here
Lisa said on 4/Jul/08
From Kim herself.....

"Summer is here and I feel like I am in good shape, but of course my sisters tell me straight up, we all need to workout and get in better shape!

Kourtney doesn't workout too much, but knows working out isn't just to lose weight, it's to maintain a healthy lifestyle. She has been tiny her whole life! In kindergarten she had to get special school uniforms made because she was still in baby sizes! Kourtney is barely five feet tall and weighs 95 pounds! Khloe is looking fabulous too and has cranked up her workouts and changed her diet! She is 5'10" and I don't know how much she weighs! I am about 5'2 1/2" and weigh 120."
LaLaLa said on 19/Jun/08
Okay lets get this cleared up please...Kim Kardashian is part ARMENIAN! She is not Arabic or Persian. She is Armenian. I would say she is about 5'3 bc I saw her in person...she was a few inches shorter than me and im 5'5. With heals she was about 5'6 and i was about 5'9. One last thing...after the Armenian Genocide...many of the Armenians spread to different countries such as Turkey, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Russia etc. This is why there are Iranian-Armenians, Turkish-Armenians, Russian-Armenians, as well as Iraqi and Lebanese Armenians. This is the reason why there are different dialects of the Armenian language.
Maxwell said on 3/Jun/08
Everyone in Armenia speaks Russian because it was IMPOSED by the Soviet Union, DUH-- It really is NOT the case that Armenians had spoken Russian throughout history (whenever it is that Russian started; Armenian is older) because they culturally and / or ethnically identified with the Russians.

Catherine, however Armenian you may be, you are still miserably misinformed. That is why "you think" and you ONLY think Armenians are closer to Russians than they are to Persians. It's very plain to see that Armenians resemble Persians and Greeks more than they do Russians, and it isn't far off that they share more genetic markers with Persians than with Russians.
Princess said on 23/May/08
Pinar says:
Hey Kim, what do you think, do you have some Turkish roots?!?Because Armenians have mixed maybe early during the wars with Turks.I am a Turk and "Kardash" signifies brother. Sorry but my English is not so good =) xoxo pinar


My father was half Turkish Armenian and Russian Armenian. So yes, I am a quarter Turkish Armenian! -Kim Kardashian

Daniel says:
How tall is Khloe Kardashian? I'm 6'6''


Khloe is 5'10".
-Kim
Catherine said on 10/May/08
I, as an Armenian, don't think Armenia is closer related to Iran. And I can't stand it when people say Armenia is closer to Lebanon or Iran or other Arabic country. Armenia is really not like any other countries! If your dad is Iranian and your mother is Armenian or vice-versa, does NOT mean that every Armenian is closer to Iranians. (And this of course applies to every nationality. Most of us, especially the ones that come from Armenia, are MUCH more closer to Russians. To tell you the truth, everyone in Armenia speaks Russian as well as Armenian.
And for her height. She looks like she's 5'3.
glenn said on 29/Apr/08
its called a socialite.famous for attending events and or parties.
Viper said on 28/Apr/08
Nothing
yomin said on 28/Apr/08
wtf is kim Kardashian famous for anyway..?
Alex said on 27/Apr/08
This is kinda off topic but I have to ask. Who do you guys think is hotter? Kim Kardashian or Vida Guerra? Both are extremely hot but I'd give a slight edge to Vida.
glenn said on 19/Apr/08
thanks vertically challenged.
Jason said on 19/Apr/08
Armenians are closer related to Iranians than European Russians. Their used to having been part of the Soviet Union was just a matter of national boundary, not ethnic one. There's a myriad of ethnic groups in Russia and the former Soviet republics ranging from white and blonde to Chinese-looking Asians in the east.
leonari said on 19/Apr/08
khloe is way taller than her sisters...
Anonymous said on 19/Apr/08
Gongshow . Armenian is neither Persian(Iranian) nor Arab , it used to be a part of The soviet union (Russia) which is an independent country now. But it 's close to the Middle East.
vertically challenged said on 18/Apr/08
Glenn you are a lucky man!
Anonymous said on 17/Apr/08
she must be wearing heels, no way shes 5'5. 5'2.75 anyways
pete said on 11/Apr/08
she looks may an inch and a half or two inches shorter than glenn, and she's leaning over to the side, so she could be 5'5"
pollo loco said on 2/Apr/08
uhh i think kourtney is 5'2",kim 5'4'' i saw kim in the airport she was taller than me like 3 inches im 5'2" and kourtney was barefoot she was as tall as me. Hint:they were in flats and i was in uggs DUH!
brother_h said on 28/Mar/08
it says everywhere that shes 5'3. shes not even famous >.<
dude said on 26/Mar/08
she always takes pictures slouching down!!!!!!
Anonymous said on 25/Mar/08
she might be 5'3. kourtney says 5'2. how tall is khloe, like 5'6?
Mill said on 12/Mar/08
I'm always baffled by people who define the "correctness" of something based on their knowledge. The world is not limited to what YOU know-thank goodness. Try reading a book or two once in a while.

Kim is tiny, but she looks "bigger".
Alex said on 11/Mar/08
If her Kourtney is 5'0 then Kim is 5'2. If Kourtney is 5'1 then Kim is 5'3. Either way there is 2 inches between the 2.
quas said on 10/Mar/08
Here's a pic of her standing next to her sister Courtney. If her sister is 5 feet then she would only be two inches taller.
Click Here
Alex said on 10/Mar/08
I remember Rachelle said she was 5'6 so 5'7-5'7 1/2 in shoes there. Kim at 5'2 would result in at least 5'5 in heels and Rachelle still has over an inch on here there. Kim at 5'2 is very possible now.
Alex said on 10/Mar/08
Her myspace says 5'3 so you can be sure thats her maxiumum height. Looking at her on her show I could agree with Rachelle. I wouldn't be suprised at all if she was just 5'2.
Anonymous said on 29/Feb/08
i think shes 5'2.5
Param said on 21/Feb/08
Her sister Kourtney stated she was '5 feet tall' in their show and Kim looks no more than 2 inches taller than her. Also if it stated in her Playboy article that she is 5 foot 2, then there is no chance that shes taller than that. I think people get confused because she does look taller than what she is and thats probably down to her body shape. I think Kim is a great example of the fact that height doesn't always matter because she is stunning and people just focus on her face and body.
supes78 said on 19/Feb/08
Check it out, Rob. Kim's Myspace now states 5'3" as her height again;
Click Here
Just scroll down to the very bottom.
supes78 said on 16/Feb/08
How tall are you, Rachelle?
Rachelle said on 16/Feb/08
Kim, Me, and her sister, Kourtney: Click Here

Kim is tiny. She more like 5'1.5" - 5'2". She had four inch heels on and still wasn't taller than me, and I was only in UGGS.
glenn said on 10/Feb/08
thats easy to say,but asian is a fairly newer used term.growing up i never heard it.not once.it was always oriental.now younger people want sound more intelligent.it maybe be correct,but asian is a expression i only heard on the regular in the last 5 years.nothing against you nadia.maybe your not young.but ill be 36,and i never heard asian growing up to describe people.so i guess all of new york city is stupid.
Nadia said on 9/Feb/08
Ashnarlynx, you should not justify yourself to stupid people like PC and the others. They are too fu*n ignorant to understand what Oriental means. "oriental" is for things, Asian is for people. I want to punch this person in the mouth!!
supes78 said on 24/Jan/08
Doesn't Kim have a sister (not sure if it's blood related) that is really tall? Like 5'10" or better? I don't watch her show but I've seen some clips with this sibling and she towers over Kim and just about everybody else.
Alex said on 20/Jan/08
Well Supes posted a picture if you scroll down of Kim next to a 5'8 girl and she looks a good 6 inches shorter and both seem to have the same type of heels on. 5'2 I could see. Plus in general she can look that tall on her show. 5'3 is most I could see for her.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.