How tall is Mark Wahlberg

Mark Wahlberg's Height

5ft 8 (172.7 cm)

American actor, best known for roles in films such as Ted, The Italian Job, Boogie Nights and Three Kings. He stated his height in Newsweek, Mar 1995: "But I had to face reality: I'm only 5 feet 10"", although his brother Donnie also claims "5ft 10", and Mark looks a couple of inches smaller. He also mentioned once that "I'm told that I look taller on screen. One girlfriend said: "You look about 6ft 2in on screen." People look at me and say: "My God, what happened?" I can look pretty ordinary away from films. The camera does things to all of us.". In 2011 he mentioned his weight, saying "I weigh about 185 [pounds]".

How tall is Mark Wahlberg
Mark with Mel Gibson / Photo by PR Photos

You May Be Interested

Height of Matt Damon
Matt Damon
5ft 9 ¾ (177 cm)
Height of Dwayne Johnson The Rock
Dwayne Johnson The Rock
6ft 2 ½ (189 cm)
Height of Leonardo DiCaprio
Leonardo DiCaprio
5ft 11 ¼ (181 cm)
Height of Christian Bale
Christian Bale
5ft 11 ¾ (182 cm)

Add a Comment1826 comments

Average Guess (310 Votes)
5ft 7.58in (171.7cm)
DDH said on 7/Jun/21
Weak 5'8"
viper said on 18/May/21
He's 5-7-5-7 1/4
MaskDeMasque said on 15/May/21
I think the departed is worth adding to his bio Rob. Did think he was a flat 5'8 in Ted but maybe camera angles were helping? In his other films he generally looks 5'7.5 or 5'7.75.
Badar said on 4/May/21
171 cm/5'7.5
Spooner said on 28/Apr/21
He's 172.5cm absolute maximum in my opinion
CuriousPeachie said on 24/Apr/21
5'8 actors claiming 5'10 and 5'10 actors claiming 6 feet tall. What water do
these claims hold? Mark Whalberg is 5'8 flat and nothing more.
Dingdong da 5'5 1/8" said on 3/Apr/21
I think mark whalberg is in my opinion 5’7 7/8”
P?erre said on 28/Mar/21
imo max full 5"6' by this comparison=

Mark and James Corden = Click Here

Click Here James Corden /Matthew Horne listed 5"6' Click Here

Click Here James /Justin Timberlake
Badar said on 19/Mar/21
5'7 and a half to 3 quarters seems about reight.
AnthIris said on 13/Mar/21
He is about 170cm tall, I have always seen him as a max of 168-170cm.
And according to quite a few comments from people who have met him a lot say he is close to that, some even said he would be 5ft 5 (even less for a few others but that must be a joke) but I really don't think so.
heyyyyyyyy said on 12/Mar/21
probably only 5'7" in a half
Jade Aimers said on 10/Mar/21
Jade Aimers said on 10/Mar/21
Donald Quick said on 3/Mar/21
I think short Hollywood actors do what I did in Highschool football I would put on the program for the other team to see I was 5'11" 190 lbs when I was actually 5'7" 160lbs. It was to psych out the opponent. If they say they're 5'8" most likely 5'6" to 5'7".tom cruise sky stallone mark wahlberg etc.
viper said on 2/Mar/21
He isn't taller than 5-7
Costa said on 28/Feb/21
I honestly don’t think he’s over 5’7”

This guy either wears lifts or giant work boots.
slim 6'1 said on 17/Feb/21
100% sure rob would edge this guy out
cmillz said on 17/Feb/21
Lol, he hasn’t lost any height, and I highly doubt the average 50 year old has lost noticeable height let alone a full inch.
Jtm said on 16/Feb/21
He always looks short to me or below average. I have trouble buying that he’s around same height as rob.
slim 6'1 said on 13/Feb/21
Weak 5’8” guy
Saluta Andonio said on 12/Feb/21
He might have lost 1 inch, he's almost 50 now.
But when he was young he def was a solid 5'8, and he never looked short to me, which shows you that a solid 5'8 is just on the lower end of average, and not short.
Magnus 6'4 said on 8/Feb/21
Possibly 5'8" out of bed in his twenties, but no way he's 5'8" now.
berta said on 5/Feb/21
i think he is just under 5´8
slim 6'1 said on 3/Feb/21
Strong 5’7” weak 5’8”
Jtm said on 2/Feb/21
I will never believe over 5’7. He never pulls off looking average height on screen or pictures. A little less wouldn’t surprise me but I will stick with the full 5’7.
Jakey said on 31/Jan/21
172.2 cm for wahlberg bieber maybe Cople millimeters taller
Rising174cm said on 30/Jan/21
@Genau: I'd go with the following:

DiCaprio: 5'11"
Damon: 5'9.5"
Clooney: 5'10.5" peak, 5'10" current
Bale: 5'11.75"
Ledger: 6'0.5"
Gibson: 5'9" peak, maybe 5'8.75" current
Pitt: 5'10.75"
McConaughey: 5'10.5"
Wahlberg: 5'8"

Most of these are the most I'd guess them except for Ledger, whom I guessed at his minimum and DiCaprio and McConaughey could be 1/4" taller, particularly McConaughey who is basically a coin toss between 5'10.5" and 5'10.75", imo. Wahlberg looks short, but he could look roughly 5'8" in socks with Will Ferrell and I've seen him look solidly 5'8.5" with the aid of his Timberlands so I'd say he's an example of the 2" rule.
5ft10guy said on 17/Jan/21
Never looked this tall
slim 6'1 said on 13/Jan/21
@ ChaosControl 6'2.5

Weak 5’8” range is 171.5-172cm, your cousin can claim 5’8” and technically not lie about it since his rounding up his change 👍
ChaosControl 6'2.5 said on 9/Jan/21
@Slim isn’t 5’7.75 more of a weak 5’8? I know my cousin is 5’7.5 and claims 5’8 (to be fair he was measured at 5’7.5 very late in the evening when I asked for an exact measurement)
slim 6'1 said on 8/Jan/21
@genau, really decent guesses except I’d give Damon 5’9.75”
And yeah Wahlberg is in that strong 5’7” range 👍
Genau said on 8/Jan/21
Rob how likely are the following heights for these guys:

DiCaprio 5ft11.5
Damon 5ft9.5
Clooney 5ft10 (5ft10.5 peak)
Bale 5ft11.75
Ledger 6ft0.63
Gibson 5ft9 (5ft9.5 peak)
Pitt 5ft10.75 (5ft11 peak)
McConaughey 5ft10.63
Wahlberg 5ft7.75
Rising174cm said on 6/Jan/21
Marky Mark with 6'0" Zakk Wylde: Click Here Mark does look over 4.5" shorter, perhaps near 5" since he may have the ground or tilt in his favor. Zakk's boots made him look more 6'1" when I met him a few years after this so he could be 6'0.25". You can see Zakk has boots there, but I can't tell if they're the logger boots he wears, but Mark's sneakers look pretty thick so the footwear difference may not be as great - likely a half inch at most. Certainly, the barefoot difference would not be less than 4".
slim 6'1 said on 2/Jan/21
Strong 5’7” that 171/172cm area
BenSolooo said on 19/Dec/20
He doesn’t look shorter than 5‘7 and he doesn’t look taller than 5‘8.5.
I belobe he is maybe 5‘8 in the morning and 5‘7.5 later.
Logan Barringer said on 17/Dec/20
Saw him in real life. 5'7" 1/2.
Lomax said on 11/Dec/20
He said he’s 5’10 lmao he’s like 5’7
Morgan Kaye said on 10/Dec/20
He's probably 5'8 in the morning, and 5'7.5 on a night.
He doesn't look any shorter than 5'7, but he definitely isn't much taller than 5'8.
James B 172cm said on 8/Dec/20
rob apparently in pain and gain mark weighed 205 pounds.

does that seem accurate?
Editor Rob
He could look quite bulky in that, wouldn't be surprised at that.
Slim 6'1@ said on 8/Nov/20
Strong 5’7” weak 5’8” somewhere in that 171-172cm
Slim 6'1" said on 4/Oct/20
Peter175 said on 27/Sep/20
I had no idea about his other brother being so short. He looks around 5'3-4 with Mark.

Rob any idea for Paul? He doesn't even look 5'5. It is weird to have brothers varying in height from 5'4 to 5'10 lol
Editor Rob
5ft 4 might be close
Annonymous said on 20/Sep/20
He claimed to be 212 lbs in Pain and Gain.
Sean Anon said on 15/Sep/20
I met Mark back in 1997, after boogie nights, I'm 5'7"-5'8" and he was shorter than me, by about an inch, so I'm guessing he is about 170cm, or a bit less.
Neo said on 12/Sep/20
Editor Rob
he has posted some videos before of weighing, I forget the exact figure though, but under 200 lbs anyway.
Aaron Rosales said on 16/Aug/20
I think he's 172 flat, how many inches has Mel on mark Rob? 1.5?
Editor Rob
Can look near 4cm
slim 6'1 said on 8/Aug/20
please just give a 172 listing already
slim 6'1 said on 8/Aug/20
171-172 not 5'8"
Alvaro said on 23/Jul/20
First of all excuse my english cuz im spanish, but Rob what do you think was the Mark Wahlberg's weight in 1992-1993 when he was a Calvin Klein model.
Editor Rob
Still looked quite muscular back in those days too, maybe 175-80
Tunman said on 12/Jul/20
lol,has anyone seriously thought he could look 6'2 on the screen?Certainly something around 5'9 could be believable in many scenes in his movies but 6'2?He's acyually a good inch smaller than (today 5'9)Mel in the upper pic.5'8 seems fine
Cesco said on 8/Jul/20
@ Miss Sandy Cowell
Yeah I actually meant "possible" 😂🤣
It is also not "in" amazon, like I accidently wrote before, but ON Amazon.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 7/Jul/20
@ Cesco - I must say, I like your 'pissable'! 😆👍
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 7/Jul/20
@ Nik - Don't worry about it! We all get our ideas from somewhere, and I should actually be flattered. Cheers Nik! XX 😁👍
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 5/Jul/20
🎁🎊🎂🎈 Happy Birthday Mark! 🎈🎂🎊🎁

A Very Happy Birthday to Mark Wahlberg. He is 49 today, so I got it wrong last year.

Have a great day, Mark!

5ft8 😁👍

Canson said on 5/Jul/20
I agree with the estimate weak 5’8”
Cesco said on 3/Jul/20
I also would like to point out that it is entirely pissible for Mark to look 5'10"... with 4.4 inch/11cm insoles which are available in Amazon. Nonetheless, height does not matter that much in Germany where I live in and the average man is 5'11" tall.
Cesco said on 3/Jul/20
My mother met him in an airport 20 years ago. She wore flat shoes. So did Mark. She told me that he was shorter than her. At least 2 inches. Her morning height is 5'7". That would make Mark 5'5", 5'6" max in the morning.
JohnMoore-162cm said on 15/Jun/20
He could easily be a weak 5ft8 ..I say he's 171.5 cm or 172 cm
Nik said on 11/Jun/20
He doesn't look much shorter than Mel Gibson!

Rob's the big cheese round here!
Chris Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 5/Jun/20
@Editor Rob
standing on a higher part or lower part of a sidewalk probably is the main reason Glenn saw varying heights a lot.

Rob, what you mention also explain why someone claim to met Laurence Fisburne can estimate a 5'9-'5'10 ridiculous estimation also like someone insist Kevin Costner being 5'11 in real and Chris Noth at best 6'0. I think footwear and high/low standing ground play some part of tricks in the public.
Editor Rob
Also worth remembering if you are standing still and somebody is in motion, it can also throw off heights in some situations. It's why you might get somebody estimating 2-3 inches shorter...they may not be trolling or purposefully downgrading, it's just they remembered the celeb from a situation in which they did appear much shorter than normal.
Miss Sandy Cowell said on 5/Jun/20
🎁🎈🎉🎂 Happy Birthday Mark! 🎂🎉🎈🎁

Wishing the terrific actor Mark Wahlberg a very Happy 49th Birthday. I saw him in 'The Happening' recently. That has to be far and away my favourite of Mark's movies. Oh yes, and my boyfriend got me into his film 'Ted'!

5ft8. He didn't look below average when I saw him in 'The Happening', except when he was standing next to the gigantic Frank Collison, the nursery owner who knows all about plants and even talks to them! Frank stands 191cm tall.

Miss Sandy Cowell said on 4/Jun/20
Especially this Paul! He's the big cheese around here! 😝 Rob that is!
Hijoputamos said on 3/Jun/20
@Rob, remember Glenn rated Mark at 5ft7. Also remember Glenn lied about his own height so he upgraded absolutely everyone.
Editor Rob
standing on a higher part or lower part of a sidewalk probably is the main reason Glenn saw varying heights a lot.
cmillz said on 3/Jun/20
But then again, I’ve seen some photos of Wahlberg struggling for 5’7, pretty strange.
cmillz said on 3/Jun/20
I don’t think he’d measure under 5’7, though. He would edge out Tom Cruise IMO.
Nik Ashton said on 1/Jun/20
It’s amazing that he claimed 5’10”, just like his brother Donnie who was telling the truth! 😂😂😂

Many onliners think he is 5’7” and plenty think he is 5’8” too, some people out there even think he is 5’3”!
Nik Ashton said on 1/Jun/20
I have seen his brother Paul listed as 5’2” online and I have also seen Paul listed as 5’6” too!
Editor Rob
I think you could rule out 5ft 2 for Paul.
Nik Ashton said on 29/May/20
@ Littlelee5ft6 - It’s interesting what you said about Tom Cruise!
viper said on 29/May/20
No way Wahlberg is 5-8.

5-7 tops
Littlelee5ft6 said on 28/May/20
Jaffer why are you downgrading heights like that. Tom cruise is 5ft 7 and marky is 5ft 8 both listings are accurate well Mark's is anyway tom might be listed here .75" to high
berta said on 8/May/20
mark always looks weak 173 guy
Jaffer said on 1/May/20
I've worked on movie sets s a gaffer for over 30 years starting as an apprentice with Born On The Fourth Of July in Dallas. Tom Cruise is at best 5'6". I also worked on Boogie Nights and had to light most of Mark's scenes and I know he is about the same height maybe 1/4 taller than Cruise. The thing is most actors wear weird custom shoes (with lifts for shorter guys) which can give them an additional 1.5 to 2.25 inches. So strong 5'6.5"
Jaffer said on 1/May/20
I've worked on movie sets s a gaffer for over 30 years starting as an apprentice with Born On The Fourth Of July in Dallas. Tom Cruise is at best 5'6". I also worked on Boogie Nights and had to light most of Mark's scenes and I know he is about the same height maybe 1/4 taller than Cruise. The thing is most actors wear weird custom shoes (with lifts for shorter guys) which can give them an additional 1.5 to 2.25 inches. So strong 5'6.5"
sprint84 said on 22/Apr/20
Pictures of him in socks with Will Ferrell show him right where Rob has him listed — very weak 5’8”. Ferrell is 6’2.5” range by all accounts and Wahlberg came up past the tip of his nose in those shots meaning he is about 6-6.5” shorter. Wahlberg is obviously height conscious and a lift-wearer but these claims he’s 5’5” are as ridiculous as his claim of 5’10” (unless we want to question Ferrrell’s listing in which case all the dominos start falling).
viper said on 19/Apr/20
He is 5-7
OriginalAnon said on 16/Apr/20
I really think Wahlberg would be lucky to reach 5'7.5". He genuinely could be 5'7''. I think Rob is overestimating his height here. Maybe because Wahlberg's claim is so far from reality that it looks ludicrous to have him down anything below 5'8''.
Hijoputamos said on 9/Mar/20
Here we have the 5ft10 Mark with 5ft11ish Tiger Woods
Can anyone see a one inch difference?

Click Here
TheBat said on 6/Mar/20
Mark's 5'8" at best, he's probably 5'7.75" normally. His 5'10" claim is just absurd.
Man in Black said on 23/Feb/20
Saw him on Ant and Dec's saturday takeaway last night. He had *maybe* half an inch on Ant McPartlin when they were standing very close to each other. Looked same range. I'd estimate MaPartlin at 172cm
Vic S. said on 23/Feb/20
I've met him in NYC and he's more like 5 4' to 5 3" - he wears shoes with lifts. He's very short .
Trigueros-5ft9.5 said on 20/Feb/20
He has claimed "only 5ft10" as If It's a short height ! When he is 5ft8" at best.
Jkiller said on 4/Feb/20
Needs a slight downgrade, he's a solid 5'7 and a half, 171.5cm.
Mark Berney said on 2/Feb/20
Ok so he’s a bit of a height liar.... but how can you not love some mark Wahlberg??
Peter175 said on 27/Jan/20
He's clearly 5'8, he just has wonky proportions now a days. He looked taller back in the day because of the height illusion of being leaner and better dressing
Bradley said on 13/Jan/20
Beach shots are great...solid 5-7, no more.
Nik Ashton said on 7/Jan/20
@ Rob - Good answer, I bet he doesn’t!
Nik Ashton said on 5/Jan/20
I wonder what he thinks the average height is in America!
Nik Ashton said on 5/Jan/20
It’s amazing that he claimed to be 5’10” considering the fact that his noticeably taller brother also claims this height! 👌😇
Editor Rob
I bet he doesn't claim 5ft 10 when his brother is around.
Peter175 said on 30/Dec/19
There is no way he actually thinks he's 5'10. He looks 5'8 but barely. He could easily be a weak 5'8
6james94 said on 27/Dec/19
Too me he looks like a genuine five eight guy. I think his five ten claim is a little wack, but I don't think it would be a big deal if he claimed five nine my dad has a friend who has a similar built to Mark Wahlberg and he claims five nine and growing up I thought that was what five nine looked like growing up. He's definitely not five seven though definitely not five ten. I don't think he's quite five nine because there was another guy who resembled my dads friend, and he's shorter then me so five eight would work or him.
Hung said on 23/Dec/19
alan smithee is more accurate than all of you.
he is small. probably wears lifts to events but he is probably about 5.5ish
saw him a few time and he is the height of a average girl (and no not trying to be mean)
Costa said on 20/Dec/19
He wears a lot of weird shoes and sneakers. I think he’s 5’7” at most.
Blaze, B said on 10/Dec/19
I'm 5'8 and I was taller than him when I saw him.. He's no more than 5'7 and probably wears lifts.
Alan Smithee said on 2/Dec/19
Mark is 5 foot 5, flat foot. I'm in the industry. I know. Take it or leave it.
cmillz said on 16/Nov/19
Absolute highest I can buy for him is 5’7.5”
Nik Ashton said on 1/Nov/19
Cool guy, cool height!
TheBat said on 31/Oct/19
5'8" at best. Probably 5'7.75 normally. I don't see him shorter than 5'7.5", the 5'6" guesses are a joke like his 5'10" claim.
jordanft19 said on 16/Sep/19
5'8" makes sense. Large forehead.
TommyKnockers said on 11/Sep/19
Here is proof Wahlberg is about 5’5-5’7 (MAX):

Click Here

He’s standing with the confirmed 6’5” Calvin Johnson “MegaTron”.

Johnson looks 10-12” taller than Wahlberg. My friend met him and said he’s tiny too.

There is no way he’s 5’8” and he’s definitely not 5’10” and never was.
KH said on 21/Aug/19
First of all Tom Cruise is a fraction under 5'8 not 5'7. Wahlberg is right around 5'8. I dont know why people want to slag on these handsome male leads that are a little on the short side. Newsflash the world doesnt care all that much. It is annoying Mark needs to lie about his heaight by 2 inches though that is sad.
Jammes said on 19/Aug/19
Has he worn lifts? Cause in some pics he looks the same heght and taller as Donnie
Peter175 said on 16/Aug/19
If he's 5'7 than the Rock is 6ft1 flat.
Bradley said on 5/Aug/19
Hippo is correct. At 5' 7" he looks like a joke in action movies. He's 5" shorter than 6 feet.
Nik said on 3/Aug/19
It would be interesting if he was photographed with me! Mark can have his 1800th comment!
Chris Chen said on 29/Jul/19
172,no more no less
Hijoputamus said on 3/Jul/19
This guy is incredible. He played a 6ft4 Navy Seal Marcus Luttrell or 6ft2 John Holmes or even a bodybuilder when the guy is only 5ft7 and a bantam light weight
What’s next? Playing Larry Bird in his next movie?
cmillzz said on 29/Jun/19
Wahlberg might have a slight edge on Cruise, but I just can’t see him being a solid 5’8.
Peter175 said on 13/Jun/19
He has a video working out with James Corden.

He's taller than Tom Cruise in comparison. Solid 5ft8 while Tom can easily dip half inch under it imo
cmillzz said on 14/May/19
same height as Tom Cruise in my opinion, nothing over 5’7.
Costa said on 11/May/19
He’s very lucky if he’s 5’7” 1/2. He also lies about his weight too. At that height, even with the muscle he’s no heavier than 160-165 lbs.
so said on 4/May/19
Rob do you think he looks 6'2 on screen😁😁😁😁
Editor Rob
From seeing all his movies, he is far from even 5ft 10 overall.
Nik said on 16/Apr/19
The average vote is 5'7.39" after 173 votes!
viper said on 15/Apr/19
Average vote thinks he's 5-7
Editor Rob
5ft 7.4 isn't so bad an estimate, that would be the absolute worst I'd guess him at.
meezemaker said on 14/Apr/19
Wanted to write "the Non cheater Joaquim Phoenix".

Last thing I would write is MK 's is weird built. By watching the photograph with Mel Gibson, MW looks one inch shorter whereas eye by eye it is at least two inches différence. He got a wide forehead which maybe give him the inch that most everybody cant see.
meezemaker said on 14/Apr/19
This man is always looking 1-2 cm shorter than the cheater Joaquim Phoenix who is around 172 cm.

170 for walhberg.

Otherwise Will Ferrell aside MW, at least 20cm between both.

More 170/171 for wahlberg
cmillzz said on 13/Apr/19
absolutely not over 5’7.
Ian555 said on 11/Apr/19
Rob do you think Wahlberg knows he's not 5' 10" but claims it anyway because he's height conscious or do you think he thought he was 5' 10" at the time until he realized he might be shorter than that? I would have to agree with the people who say he looks taller on screen, but never looks as tall as 6' 2" in the movies I've seen him in.
Editor Rob
In timberland boots he might not be far off 5ft 10, so maybe he's a guy who thinks of himself as that height in big boots...

If it's 5ft 10 barefoot, then he should seek advice from his brother who also claims that height, but looks a bit taller than mark!
billionaireslayer said on 18/Mar/19
strong 5'6 weak 5'7, there is a pic from the early 90's at a charity basketball game with him and his brother Donnie who may me a 5'10, strong 5'9 looking 3 inches taller than Mark
Thukk said on 16/Mar/19
Rob he is 5'7.5 range. Good photo but you can see you are at least half an inch on him. I see it too and ; just doing this since some years;
Alex M. said on 15/Feb/19
5' 6 TO 5' 6 1/2" bare foot for Mark-it-up Mark! Twin height with Ludacris' 5' 6" bare foot.
Bradley said on 31/Jan/19
King Kong of height fibbers.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 20/Jan/19
@B.M.A Perhaps only happen in the morning measurement. 172 min.
Michael, 5'10" 178 cm said on 3/Dec/18
Mark was about 6-7 inches shorter than Will Ferrell in the Daddy’s Home movies, so this sounds about right. I think he’s 5’8” because if he was shorter, then all the celebrities shorter than him like Seth Green would need a severe downgrade. I’ll vote 5’8” for him.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 13/Nov/18
@Church's Paul Rudd is def taller than Wahlberg. If you call it on Wahlberg closer to 5'6 then Paul should be 5'6.5" not Both 5'6.
Church's said on 10/Nov/18
Totally laughing at Paul Rudd and Mark Wahlberg for both claiming 5'10" when they're both closer to 5'6". I guess we should be calling them Big P and Big M, LOL!
viper said on 8/Nov/18
He looks tall with 6-4 Michael Strahan just now
Annonymous said on 8/Nov/18
Yes, you're going to see 5'8 or less more often than 6' and up. You will still see plenty of 6'0-6'4 males any night out in any big city. Over 6'5 gets rare and freaky.
Nik said on 2/Nov/18
@ Sandy Cowell - I have been on the website and they say that 4.3% of UK men are 5'4" or under! It must be fantastic to compare Mark Wahlberg with Mila Kunis, what do you think about the idea of watching him in "Mile 22" with Lauren Cohan and Ronda Rousey? Seeing him pictured with Rob would also be great!
Sandy Cowell said on 1/Nov/18
@ Nik - Would you happen to know how many UK men are 5ft4 and under? I'd love to know the percentage; I have only ever known one (properly!) and he was a smasher!

My favourite Mark Wahlberg film is 'The Happening', and from that film I deduced he is around 5ft8. I'm not selecting a height below that, even if it means going against the average vote. I'd like to see 'Ted' again one day as I saw it when I was very tired and nodded off! It would be an opportunity and a half to be able to compare him to Mila Kunis's 5ft4.
Nik said on 1/Nov/18
@ sulu2019 - According to 36.6% of UK men are 5'8" or under and 15.2% of UK men are 6'0" or over! People are on average taller in the UK than in most countries too!
Nik said on 1/Nov/18
@ sulu2019 - According to 36.6% of UK men are 5'8" or under and 15.2% of UK men are 6'0" or over! people are on average taller in the UK than in most countries too!
Bradley said on 31/Oct/18
5-7. Notorious height liar and custom built up footwear artist.
Animus said on 30/Oct/18

Great question. According to Medscape, 6'0 is at the ~80th percentile for men, meaning 20% of men are 6'0 or taller, and 5'8 is at the ~28th percentile for men, meaning 28% of men are 5'8 or shorter.

So, to answer your question straightforwardly, there are more men who are 5'8 or shorter than men who are 6'0 or taller.
viper said on 30/Oct/18
5-8 and less. Not even close
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 29/Oct/18

It depends on the country or region. But most countries in the world have more 5'8" men than 6'0".
sulu2019 said on 29/Oct/18
In general society are more men 5'8" & less or 6'0" & more?
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 17/Sep/18
I heard the 5'6 rumors for Wahlberg in person a few times from several different person. Strange if he is really this tall that would make Donnie 5'8 top.
Yang said on 15/Sep/18
Met Mr. wahlburg in coffee shop about 2 years ago and he seems like less than inch shorter than me when I approached him for picture and autograph in a person. Yes, definitely taller than Wilmer Vanderrama at least.. I would vote this guys height as 5ft 7.4inch tall.
Scoot said on 14/Sep/18
At 56:59 in the movie “fear” (1996) his mugshot is on screen and it shows between 68-69 inches
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 12/Sep/18
Sometimes Wahlberg look between 5'5 1/2-5'6 from a picture standing alone by himself. But he look 5'7 3/4 with Will Ferrell.
Matt99 said on 10/Sep/18
Rob 5’7 7/8 listing?
Editor Rob
I think typically around 5ft 8 is still ok for him, whether a weak or strong 5ft 8 is debatable.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 20/Aug/18
Mark can only be 5'10 with a brush up hair and a solid 1.25" shoes on. I still think he is 5'7.75" but physically look like a 5'6 1/2 guy with a that buff build.
Matt99 said on 13/Aug/18
On his Instagram story he still puts 5’10 on his scales, surely it’d skew his targets for weight loss/gain? And rob do you think he genuinely believes he’s 5’10?
Rising - 174 cm said on 12/Aug/18
Mark wears Timberlands or thick Nikes that add a good 1 3/8". He rarely looks over 5'8" without them so his 5'10" claim is a bad joke, but he has worn lifts in some movies and I believe he's done it occasionally for talk shows and premieres. I think Donnie is slightly under 5'10", but I doubt Mark looked taller without a camera advantage. Donnie likes tip-toeing for photos so maybe Mark gave him a taste of his own medicine?
Paul Wood said on 6/Aug/18
I think he wears lifts sometimes. I have seen several photos of him standing next to 5ft 10 in Donnie Wahlberg and Mark appears several inches taller! They are standing next to each other and both the same distance away from the camera.
Hijoputamus said on 1/Aug/18
“I had to face reality: I’m ONLY 5ft10” LOL

I mean, if he can lie about what everyone can see, imagine what we cannot see...
Another Mario Lopez case.
These guys are a joke.
Bradley said on 18/Jul/18
Same height as Martin Sheen in The Departed: short.
QM6'1QM said on 15/Jul/18
Funny thing is that he's not even 5'8 ... Only!
Lmeister said on 5/Jun/18
Mark wears Timberland boots and Nike Airs quite often. Timberlands are the reason why he looks taller than James Corden in normal dress shoes. I(172cm afternoon/evening)was wearing Nike Airs and a friend of mine(179cm evening)slippers. He asked me whether I have grown taller and are we the same height. Good example how posture and shoes even up 7cm in height.
Junior Hernandez 1990 said on 27/May/18
Roughly 172.5cm would be what Wahlberg hold through the entire day when look at him with Damon and Leo Dicaprio.
Monkey knees said on 28/Mar/18
Dead on 5'7.5.
James B 170.8cm said on 19/Mar/18
Rob is it possible he was 5ft8 1/8th in his 20s and has lost a tiny fraction due too years of heavy weight lifting?

I understand though shorter weight lifters will not lose as much height compared too there taller counterparts.
Editor Rob
If he's lost anything it would be 1/8th or so, I can't really see him looking much different over last 15 years.
Sandy Cowell said on 19/Mar/18
I am very excited about seeing Mark's name as part of the production team, along with the infamous Martin Scorsese, for what is turning out to be my new and greatly entertaining trip-back-in-time watch, 'Boardwalk Empire'!

Another achievement in the illustrius career of the 5ft8 actor!
berta said on 18/Mar/18
to me he looks like a weak 173 guy. now that we have 1/8 listings then i think wahlberg would be good at 5 foot 7 7/8. rob is 95 procent chanse taller than wahlberg
Show said on 20/Feb/18
Click Here 0:40 and Dj khaled with same shoes
Jtm said on 8/Feb/18
Starting to wonder if Barkley is closer to 6'5.5 he claims. He makes the rock look 6'1 and I doubt he's under 6'2. I still don't think wahlberg is over 5'7. He's constantly shorter than legit 5'8 guys.
The Shredder said on 6/Feb/18
" Jtm said on 6/Feb/18
More than 10 inches shorter than Charles Barkley. "

Yep so he's 5'6 or less.
Jtm said on 6/Feb/18
More than 10 inches shorter than Charles Barkley.
Junior Hernandez said on 1/Feb/18
5'8 , 5'8 1/8 is way off on Wahlberg. I would rule out 5'7 7/8 (172.4cm) and sometimes look nothing over 5'7.
pierric said on 22/Jan/18
5'8" 172 pounds...Hmm I think more 185 lbs as he said...
Jack said on 17/Jan/18
"But I had to face reality: I'm only 5 feet 10"
LMFAO yea right you truly are facing reality by claiming 5'10 but actually no more than 5'8
Beej said on 13/Jan/18
Gibson about 5 '8 (if that) with slightly higher heels. I'll go Walberg at 5'7 max
Peter175 said on 10/Jan/18
Marky Mark has terrible proportions but he's every bit of 5 foot 8 inches tall before bed
Rising - 174 cm said on 10/Jan/18
I can't see him any taller than 5'8" flat. A near 70 year old Jack Nicholson had an inch on him and Joaquin Phoenix looked to edge him. Mark has Timberlands with Corden, which likely add about 1 cm or so more than Corden's dress shoes. Sly and an aged James Caan also looked more than an inch taller than Mark in golf shoes.
Darius said on 31/Dec/17
172 cm. think a quarter inch downgrade is quite fair with Wahlberg as he look 172 range as opposed to 173 cm. I don't really think he is taller than Robert Downey Jr.
Also, TBH for some reason Marky Mark gives a 5'7" range impression to me like many said here than 5'8".
The Shredder said on 31/Dec/17
He has an easy 3 inches on 5'6 Hatton , He is always taller than 5'8.25 Jeremy Renner and taller than 5'8.25 ( minimum 5'8.5 in reality ) James Corden.

This guy is most definitely pulling off a strong 5'9 range with most likely 1.5 boots , which still would put him at a weak 5'9.

Even in lifts he wouldn't be as low as 5'7" , I'm going to say it now , is 5'8.5 really impossible for him?
Ajay said on 24/Dec/17
Rob, why does Mark look taller than James Corden here? Click Here
Editor Rob
maybe not standing quite as well as Mark, with less footwear.
Rising - 174 cm said on 17/Dec/17
I see Marky Mark more 172-173 cm as opposed to 173-174 cm. I can see an outside chance of Mel at 176 cm, but imo, he's always been more 175 and good posture + extra footwear in the 1.2"-1.7" range can make him look 177 cm. Mel looks to have at least 1/4" more footwear to me. Mark was also noticeably shorter than another 175-176 cm guy Kurt Russell recently. A near 70 year old Jack Nicholson also looked at least an inch taller than Wahlberg during the Departed days. I believe Jack was more 5'8.5" than 5'9" by that point so I don't think just below 5'8" can be ruled out.

Mel and admitted 5'8" Joaquin Phoenix in 2002 with both in dress shoes: Click Here Can we really say Mark looks as tall as Joaquin did with Mel? Then if you look up Joaquin and Mark, they look close, but Joaquin seems to edge Mark out similar to how Mark edges Jeremy Piven. But Marky Mark looks taller with Mel than Jeremy Renner did here: Click Here Mel pulls off more 5'11" there! He did have his cowboy boots and who knows what inside and Renner is slouching, but still, Mel is looking pretty "Sly" there. ;)
u\Kwq said on 13/Dec/17
He was actually 5ft 8.25-8.5 back in the Marky Mark days. I used to like his music and what I also know is that he was a big fan of fitness and did lots of weight lifting, and he still does but not as hard as I imagine these days. Most guys this age that have done lots of weightlifting and working out usually have shrunk .5-1 inch. He is like a weak 5ft 8 now, possibly 5ft 7.75
Chase said on 3/Dec/17
Rob, you peg Mel at around 5'9 today and you say that's a 1.5 inch difference, so why is 5'7.5 or even 5'7.75 not a more proper listing? You see him taller than Robert Downey Jr. and the same height as you? I think you give off a taller impression
Editor Rob
mel could still be 5ft 9.25, wahlberg close to 5ft 8
Dmeyer said on 3/Dec/17
In the vidéo it looks near 4cm
Dmeyer said on 3/Dec/17
Gibson isnt over 176cm today Mark looks exactlty 3cm shorter
Rising - 174 cm said on 21/Nov/17
@The Shredder: Maybe. As you know, I peg Mel at 5'9" flat peak, but I think his range has always been within a 1/4" of 5'9" in either direction. If anything, seeing Mel with Marky Mark suggests to me he hasn't lost much because even accounting for footwear, admitted 5'8" Joaquin Phoenix looked closer to Mel's height 15 years ago than Wahlberg does now. Even Downey in Air America didn't look much different than Mark and Mel today -- I saw roughly a 3 cm difference between Mel and Robert walking side by side on the runway -- but with Garfield, Mel in 1.4"-1.5" type heels was really an inch minimum shorter than Andrew in 0.7"-0.8" type sneakers.

I'd agree Mel may have gone from say 5'9" flat to 5'8.75", but he almost always pulls off taller than say 5'8.5" so 5'8.75" would be the low end. Mel does take HGH and I'd guess at least Testosterone as well based on how much bigger his arms have gotten and still holds good posture so I wouldn't expect much height loss. I think Mark may be one of those 172 cm guys, though. Kurt Russell is still noticeably taller in his mid 60's and Joaquin Phoenix seems more a legit 5'8" to me.

@Christian: They always do that, especially guys who add 2". Johnny Depp, Wesley Snipes and Kirk Douglas struggled to reach 5'9" yet all claimed to be "only" 5'11". Ving Rhames is barely taller than Adam Sandler and claimed "only" 6 feet.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 21/Nov/17
Funny how he says "only 5'10"", as if 5'10" is somehow a short or inadequate height, lol.
The Shredder said on 21/Nov/17
Mel has to be more 5'8.75 or so at best now , He looks barely 5'9 with Andrew and has more footwear.
Rising - 174 cm said on 20/Nov/17
Yeah, I definitely don't see 2". Mel looks somewhere in that inch to 3 cm range taller in the photo, but 1.5" sounds about right when you consider Mark is closer and based on other photos where Mark isn't any closer, I don't see less than 1.5". However, Mel has those heeled boots he's worn a lot the past few years. Here's a side view of what I believe are the same type of boot: Click Here and here's another shot: Click Here I think a bit smaller than say a cowboy boot -- which Mel use to wear all the time -- and more like a Chelsea style boot. They probably add a similar amount to what Pitt often wears. Marky Mark has dress shoes on the other hand so I'd think a disadvantage there as his look 1" max to me. I think Mel has always been about 5'9", but Wahlberg is more of a 5'8" at best guy, imo.
Kourosh said on 20/Nov/17
when someone uses the word "only", know that he is 2 inches below that of whatever claims he make.
show said on 17/Nov/17
Wahlberg shorter then Gibson with full 4 centimeters Click Here 0:18
MJKoP said on 16/Nov/17
Very strong 5'8" at the worst.
MM said on 14/Nov/17
Rob, why does he look a full 2 inches shorter than Mel Gibson? Mel isn't even a proper 5'10, and I thought you said he could have shrunk to 5'9 range today. So either Mel is around 5'10 even today, or Marky Mark is 5'7ish
Editor Rob
I wouldn't say that was 2 inches, but I think it is near 1.5 with Mel.
andre said on 14/Nov/17
this guy is 5ft6.5 barefoot at night he is listed 5ft8 in google and that is with shoes
Jeremy said on 12/Nov/17
Wahlberg - 173
Gibson - 175
Ferrell - 189
Lithgow - 191
Chase said on 10/Nov/17
He's gotta be 5'7.5 maybe a tweeter. He was shorter than ludacris right? I can't see him being taller than RDJ.
Dmeyer said on 10/Nov/17
He looks 5ft 8-8,5 with Gibson who isnt less than 5'9,25
Shredder said on 9/Nov/17
An inch shorter than Gibson and Gibson has the better posture and Footwear , This guy is 5'8 .
Reeese said on 26/Oct/17
Looked like this in Ted
Brad said on 24/Oct/17
5-7, his 5-10 claim might be the biggest height lie by a celeb. Elevators are normal for him in films.
Junior said on 14/Oct/17
I did point out 172.5cm for Wahlberg on a mid day height and he can go to bed holding a strong 172cm.
an anonymous peach said on 14/Oct/17
Same height as Tom Cruise, 171cm
Shredder said on 8/Oct/17
185 lbs in 2011 is when he filmed Ted , no way is a 5'6 , 5'7 guy going to look like that at that weight. 5'8 is okay for him.
Anonymous said on 1/Oct/17
Walberg is 5'6", maybe 5'7" at best. As the description comparing Mark and his brother Donnie illustrates, he clearly has an inflated view of himself. I'm 5'6" myself and my buddy who's only 5'2", 5'3" at best (I can see the top of his head), claims to be 5'5", so this is not uncommon. I always cringe when I hear my friend announce his height to people, but haven't the heart to tell him he's dreaming. My cousin and I are the same height, yet he tells people he's 5'8", so that's another example. All guys lie about their height and the number of women they've been with. Rule of 3.
MisterManletMick said on 20/Sep/17
a few years ago I couldn't believe it when I found out he was just over 5 ft 7 and just not as big as I always thought he was, when I saw Shooter when I was a little boy I thought of him the same way most adults today think of The Rock Super Tall and Super Muscular when in reality Mark was nowhere near it, I guess everyone looks big to us at a certain age.
Rising - 174 cm said on 13/Sep/17
@Slim: Well you're memory is better than mine because I don't remember my exact words to you a week ago! But yeah, I was only half serious. I do believe it's foolish to base your ultimate conclusion on photos where feet aren't visible, but sometimes they're of interest, even as a novelty.
Slim said on 12/Sep/17
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Sep/17
@Slim: Don't shoot the messenger. I merely posted the photo with a question mark as ground is a questionable outdoors and we can't see feet as you mentioned. I've long thought Mark had to be somewhere from 5'7.5" to 5'8". Although Mark apparently wears elevators at times, which I didn't know until recently outside of the Italian Job.
Not to be taken seriously, it's just that those were your exact words when we started arguing a few months ago. I just couldn't resist 😉.
Rising - 174 cm said on 11/Sep/17
@Slim: Don't shoot the messenger. I merely posted the photo with a question mark as ground is a questionable outdoors and we can't see feet as you mentioned. I've long thought Mark had to be somewhere from 5'7.5" to 5'8". Although Mark apparently wears elevators at times, which I didn't know until recently outside of the Italian Job.
Darius said on 10/Sep/17
If the photo that Rising posted, of Mark and Pena together in the set of Shooter is legit, I would say 5'7.5" max. taking the slight slouch in to the account. Pena is a 5'7" guy btw. By seeing that photo I thought that Wahlberg was only 5'7". I am actually confused about Mark Wahlberg's height. Anywhere from 5'7" to 5'7.75" maybe. I would certainly rule out 5'8" though.
Slim said on 5/Sep/17
Rising - 174 cm said on 28/Aug/17
Marky Mark caught short with 5'7" Michael Pena? Click Here
Pffft please marky mark edged Pena, he also seems to be slouching a lot, plus we can't even see their footwear so it doesn't really mean much. 😉
adam said on 4/Sep/17
5'7 guy, he's 5'10 claim is funny.
Rising - 174 cm said on 28/Aug/17
Marky Mark caught short with 5'7" Michael Pena? Click Here
Anonymous said on 26/Aug/17
Mark and Akon(5ft10 here)
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Richardspain said on 26/Aug/17
Short to be actor. Very short.

I think he is 171 cm barefoot not more.

I agree with the people here. Marc isn't more than 171cm /172cm MAX
Realist said on 23/Aug/17
Isabella Moner was at his chin or so and she had on 6cm heels that would make her 5'0 in heels how could she be 5'3 because if so she would be a mere 3 inches shorter than Mark in lifts.
ReallyShortRussianDude said on 22/Aug/17
Click Here

Another video with Diddy, only brief, but Rob, would you have said Mark looks more than two inches shorter?
Editor Rob
he could look a bit more than 2 yeah.
Rising - 174 cm said on 19/Aug/17
Diddy does look more than 2" taller in that video, which is the first of Leo's links. It appears I was wrong about Marky Mark wearing elevator shoes as well. Apparently, he does wear them on occasion. I wouldn't guess him over 5'8" and it is possible he falls a bit short of the mark. Joaquin Phoenix could look a bit taller and more of a solid 5'8".
5'11.25 at noon. said on 18/Aug/17
Indeed 5'10 with heels on but unfortunately we get measured barefoot I'd say max 5'8
adam said on 14/Aug/17
Around 171 cm flat.
Leo said on 11/Aug/17
Looks 5ft 7.25-75(171-172cm)next to Sean Combs.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
teehona said on 3/Aug/17
5'7 without shoes, 5'8 with shoes.
Van said on 2/Aug/17
172 is a possiblity.
DirtySouth said on 30/Jul/17
5'7"-5'7.5 i believe ...
Bandet said on 22/Jul/17
NO idea why people like CA are coming from regarding his height. A clear nailed on 5ft8 dude and as touch as many 6ft4 dudes. What are most of you people looking at
or thinking when it comes to height. Most of the real guys that the film Perfect Storm is based on, were of similar height. How the hell is that supposd
to make you any less of a man?
Darius said on 16/Jul/17
I would say 5'8" max. I honestly thought he was 5'7" or around that 5 years ago.
Slim 181 cm said on 9/Jul/17
RisingForce said on 6/Jul/17
Marky Mark wearing elevators in The Italian Job: Click Here Click Here Can't remember if he was the same height as Statham in those shoes or if he edged him out. He also stood on a box in Broken City: Click Here Funny thing is, he's still never looked tall to me in movies so I don't know what Mark's girlfriend was talking about saying he looked 6'2". He's looked average at best in a few movies to me, but mostly still looks pretty short on screen. He's probably fairly height and image conscious outside of movies, which may be part of why he favors 1.5" Timberlands and 1.2"-1.4" type basketball sneakers, but I think that's as far as he goes.

Btw, has anyone looked into how tall Mark's wife Rhea Durham is? She has 5'9" online listings and apparently got 5'9.5" back in her modeling days. I'd be surprised if she was over 5'9", but if she's near it then it's difficult to see a 5'7" flat Wahlberg.
RisingForce said on 30/Jun/17
Marky Mark and Ludacris have consistently looked very close. Ludacris may well be his 5'8" claim, or he may well be just below at the 172 cm he use to be listed at here. Mark often wears Timberlands with casual clothes, but other times, basketball sneakers such as Nikes, Jordans etc. Mark seemed to be wearing the same shirt for Super Bowl that he was with Ludacris, so fwiw, these were his sneakers at Super Bowl: Click Here He did take a similar pic with Usher as well: Click Here
Slim 181 cm said on 21/Jun/17
172-173 is the truth.
Peterson188cm said on 16/Jun/17
10% - 5ft7 (170cm)
30% - 5ft7.5 (171cm)
40% - 5ft7.75 (172cm)
15% - 5ft8 (173cm)
05% - 5ft8.5 (174cm)
Drax said on 16/Jun/17
5'10 lol what a joke mat; that's like me saying I'm 6'3 hahaha this is ludacris
show said on 16/Jun/17
with Ludacris 2017 Click Here
Editor Rob
they look quite close, not knowing whether Mark has his boots on or not.

You rarely see Wahlberg in thin footwear.
Peter175 said on 15/Jun/17
Looks a decent 2 inches with P Diddy. Marky Mark is an indomitable and unquestionable 5ft8 guy. Just like Kanye West. If he were 5'7 the Rock would be 6ft1 lol
MJKoP said on 14/Jun/17
Maybe not a full 5'10", but I'm sure the guy who saw him at that "Mark"(who also claimed to be 5'10" and with matching footwear sizes), believed that he was telling the truth after spending time with Mr. Wahlberg. I'm convinced he's 100% taller than 5'8" and anything under Rob's listing is just beyond silly.
James B said on 13/Jun/17
Rob I'd bet he would meaure 172.7cm
World Citizen said on 6/Jun/17
Hey Big Rob, do you think he will measure the same as you or a little shorter? Let me know please.
Editor Rob
I think roughly 173cm, not sure he'd be 172 or 174 though, but somewhere between.
6'1-6'1.5 Guy said on 4/Jun/17
I agree with most here, 5'7.5 for ****ing Marky Mark ("i'm only 5'10", lol).
Anthony said on 3/Jun/17
show damn that looks like no more than 3-4 cm difference
show said on 31/May/17
Mark with P.Diddy Click Here
Angus said on 28/May/17
Saw him in church once in Newport Beach! 5' 8" is believable. I wouldn't be awestruck if he's shorter, but he was very bulked out and stocky. Sort of reminded me of a young Robert Blake in Baretta. Of course, Robert Blake is listed at 5' 4", so...
Average height and slim said on 27/May/17
5" 7 to 5" 8
171.5 cm

lol he looks like a dwarf next to will Ferrell in the other guys and daddy's home. Watch the barefoot scene in the other guys.
ma said on 19/May/17
You are probably 5 ft 7 if Mark was taller than you. Or shorter
Anonymous said on 14/May/17
5'9-10 claim is comical, he's not over 5'8.
RisingForce said on 12/May/17
He looks very similar to Hopkins in that video, but certainly no taller. He looked only slightly taller in his Timberlands at Cinemacon, but Hopkins seemed to stand worse. Btw, I never believed the 210 for Pain and Gain. Wahlberg was bulkier than usual, but not THAT bulky. 210 at his height is gonna look bigger than he was. He might be 185 when he has more size, but I think he's often closer to 165-170 when he's lean.
John Davis said on 10/May/17
Making us 5ft 10 guys look bad
Johan said on 7/May/17
The reason Mark looks so short at times is because he needs a stylist. He wears clothes that are too big especially the pants, I mean with his money he should be able to get fitted clothes. Guys who are 5'8" and under tend to have problems with getting clothes off the rack but there are business' that supply the proper attire.

Its a bit strange since he is only 5 cm tops under average for his age group and guys who are 6 feet have zero issues. It starts more around 6'4" on the other end. Ofc if he thinks he is 5'10" and his tailor supplies that...I can see how problems occur.
Leo2001 said on 6/May/17
With Hopkins(almost 79)last year.
Click Here
RisingForce said on 30/Apr/17
I agree 174 cm is too much, delancey, but you really have to find photos with Piven's feet visible since he's the most notorious tip-toer in Hollywood. But yeah, Wahlberg looked noticeably shorter than a 76 year old Robert Duvall, 63 year old James Caan, Sly Stallone and a 69 year old Jack Nicholson, all of whom were in that 174-175 cm range, plus, Joaquin Phoenix, who is an admitted 5'8" seemed taller than Wahlberg, imo, but that could have slight ground, footwear or posture difference for all I know. Wahlberg also seemed just a bit shorter than a 60 year old Robert De Niro, who was then no more than about 5'8.5" himself: Click Here I think 5'8" is fine for Marky Mark. He can surely look taller in some comparisons, but some of those may be when he has his Timberlands on or even a thicker basketball sneaker could give him a fraction advantage over someone with roughly 1" shoes. Honestly, he can look 5'7.5" at times as well, but 5'8" seems best for now since he doesn't appear to wear lifts, except for a role like The Italian Job and his build will make him look shorter at times.
delancey said on 26/Apr/17
@Peter175 I wouldn't go as far as saying he's 174 cm, a 5'8.5 guy wouldn't look like this next to Jeremy Piven.
5'7 is too low but I do think he's a weak sort of 5'8.

LInk: Click Here
Peter175 said on 25/Apr/17
Marky Mark is easily 5'8. Look at him next to the Rock and 6ft Christian Bale.

He might even be 174
delancey said on 25/Apr/17
@berta I'd go with Marky Mark. I think he's a 173/172 kinda guy while cruise is 172/171 range.
James B said on 24/Apr/17
Rob this is an interesting piece of info I found from 'are they on'

Mark Wahlberg’s stats for Pain and Gain:

Height: 5 ft 7

Weight: 210lbs

Body fat %: 13%
Balrog said on 15/Apr/17
@berta barefeet, I think Mark has the slight edge.
berta said on 13/Apr/17
i wonder who is taller mark wahlberg or tom cruise?!?!?! thats something for everyone to think about :P
S.J.H said on 13/Apr/17

Lol dude. He can't be under 5'6 for absolute minimun. If he wear high top shoes he gota be close to 5'7.5 not 5'6 with it.
RisingForce said on 13/Apr/17
Here his head is straighter than the other pic with Sly and Caan, though he still looks more than an inch shorter: Click Here But despite this and the Departed and We Own the Night premieres, I think 5'8" is fine. He can look it and doesn't wear lifts except for movie roles like the Italian Job with a tall female lead. I've wrongly heard his boots called elevators, but they always look like normal Timberlands: Click Here Click Here Thick, sure, but popular style and imo, nice boots. At times I've heard him exaggerate his weight, but 173 pounds sounds real. Amazing how long he's stuck to the 5'10"! Honestly, I thought he would have dropped that and said 5'9" or 5'8.5" years ago, but he repeated the line from 1995 almost word for word a few years ago. It's strange for a guy who walks around liftless looking no more than 5'8" yet gives such an outrageous height lie. He must have realized he's shorter than his 5'10" brother?
CA said on 12/Apr/17
I met him in 1993. I am 171 cm about 5'7.5". He was almost 5'6" in his high top tennis shoes and sweat suit. I have never been able to take the movie "The Perfect Storm" or any of his movies for that matter, seriously since I know he is barely 5'5". Like many actors he has a tiny little body (long torso, super short legs and a giant head)... good for the camera.
Shredder said on 12/Apr/17
173 lbs is believable. I love the 5'10.0 , he really thinks he is exactly 5 ft 10 lol.
Balrog said on 12/Apr/17
If DiCaprio and Damon were downgraded, so should Mark.

He looks 171-172cm range quite often.

Regarding his weight, he's been a buff guy since always, so 175-180 pounds is believable. On "pain and gain" though he looked near 200 pounds.
Leo2001 said on 10/Apr/17
Mark and Leo(Listed 5ft 11.25)
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Probably 5ft 7.25-5
Omar said on 10/Apr/17
Hey Rob I don't know if you saw this video but here he is measured at 5'10 in his sneakers.
Minute 1:50 Click Here
Editor Rob
it's not a measurement, Male/Age 44 and Height 5ft 10 are data that would be entered, the weighing portion is of course correct.

I bet nobody would think Wahlberg at 5ft 10 would seem only 173-4 pounds...of course being 5ft 8 and 173 pounds naked is believable.
KH said on 6/Apr/17
Weak 5'8. He has a big head too makes him look shorter.
HonestSlovene said on 7/Apr/17
He looks in the 5'7"-5'8" range to me. Definitely a guy who would probably only at best scrape a weak 5'8" at night, unlike Rob who is safely in the 173 cm zone at worst.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight or shoe size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.