How tall is Triple H - Page 2

Add a Comment3212 comments

Average Guess (335 Votes)
Peak: 6ft 1.91in (187.7cm)
Current: 6ft 1.51in (186.7cm)
Michael Allen said on 25/Dec/18
Also, in regards to his weight, it has fluctuated A LOT over his career.

I remember when he debuted for WWE in '95.. Back then, if he was an ounce over 225, I would be in shock.

He's definitely packed on the muscle over the years. I would give him a solid 240-245 for his "prime run" from 1999-2001, and then probably up to 255 from 2002-2004 (when he was at his biggest). He then most likely dropped back to 240 from 2004 onward.
Michael Allen said on 25/Dec/18
To me this guy never looked over 6'2 even in his prime.

I'm guessing 6' now. Anyone see the HOF ceremony this year when he stood with 6' Kid Rock. They looked about the same to me.
edwards said on 24/Dec/18
hhh at 6'1 or 6'1.5 is arguable for him today.6'2 is too high for him now.
Riccardo89 said on 19/Dec/18
185 cm max
Christian said on 19/Dec/18
He looked a solid 5 inches shorter than 6'6" Corbin. Click Here
Canson said on 18/Dec/18
I see about half inch difference with He and Lesnar. I’d say 186 for him max and 187-187.5 for Lesnar. 186 fits with what Ali Baba claimed he was in person 6’1”.
michael loughrie said on 17/Dec/18
I went over the match between BOD vs DX and it really made me think that Triple H can be as low as 6' 0.75" today. He was towered by Kane in their first staredown (Kane looking 6' 7" range like normal) and was towered by Undertaker who I presume is as low as 6' 4.5" today.
Canson said on 17/Dec/18
He wouldn’t even get to 6’3” in those thick dress shoes he’s wearing
Canson said on 15/Dec/18
@Michael Loughrie: that’s a good estimate and response!

@Christian: that’s where I see him. I’m not sure if he was a solid 6’2” at his peak although maybe he was. But 187 90s and 2000s and 186 today add up for me too
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 14/Dec/18
@michael

It's alright. No hard feelings.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 13/Dec/18
@Canson

My belief is that he was 187 in the 90's-2000's, and 186 from the 2010's, especially after semi-retiring from wrestling. (meaning only wrestling part time)
michael loughrie said on 12/Dec/18
I've also seen comments on Triple Hs weight. My dad is 6' 0" and weighs 240, and he is not as big as Triple H. Triple H still solid 250 - 260. Low body fat, too.
michael loughrie said on 12/Dec/18
Well, again I apologized as he did respond with a senseful response. And I thought to myself, even if he was obsessed, it's a very innocent obsession with no wrong doings. Either way, my point was that I think at this point of his career (or any wrestlers career) they really don't care about their height, Triple H may not be anywhere near 6' 4" and is probably no more than 6' 1" today, but he is still a legend and I don't think his height had anything to do with his success. He is however still taller than the average male anyway by quite a bit.
Canson said on 11/Dec/18
@Christian and Edwards: go back a few pages here (it would’ve been years back) but Ali Baba met Triple H and said he’s 6’1” max. Maybe that means the same type of estimate I gave along with Christian 6’1.25 but this was years ago so he lost height back then unless he was always that. Others here have also met him on this page and said he’s 6’1”. At his peak 187 is probably the most (188 is possible) but no higher than that.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 10/Dec/18
@Canson

True. By that logic, Michael himself would be obsessed as well. What a hypocrite.
Canson said on 9/Dec/18
@Christian: that would also mean that we are all obsessed since we are spending our free time assessing heights of celebrities and commenting on them. All would include Michael as well.
edwards said on 9/Dec/18
@michael loughrie i too think a same dude.hhh was probably 6'2 or a strong 6'2 at peak but maybe he is 6'1.5 now.he often gives 6'1 impression too.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 8/Dec/18
@michael

There's a fine line between a "hobby" and an "obsession".
Canson said on 8/Dec/18
@Michael Loughrie: thanks for the response. We all must be a bit obsessed if we’re on this site debating like we are. As for Triple H, Ali Baba a regular poster here met him and said that he’s 6’1” as well. I don’t think he’s lost much height. It’s more likely he was not more than 6’2” peak perhaps 6’1.75 and that he is 6’1.25ish today. What you said is correct that some don’t lose height. However, factor in the lifestyle that these guys live. It’s easier for them to lose it than others who don’t take the beating they do
michael loughrie said on 7/Dec/18
@Canson It means that from the pages I've seen he's been there, but he did give a pretty good response back as this is a hobby of mine too, and tbh being obsessed with height is a lot better than being obsessed with other things, its an innocent obsession.

Triple H is 6' 4", and 255 pounds according to WWE.com. He was probably 6' 2" or 6' 3" at peak barefoot and 6' 4" in boots, maybe now he is 6' 1" or maybe still 6' 2", not everyone loses height. My dad is 53 years old and he has been 6 foot since he was 20.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 4/Dec/18
@maa

Space is fine, I'm not angry at him.
Canson said on 27/Nov/18
Tree you can’t tell specifically because body compositions vary from person to person. Christian mentioned bone density which is part of that
Jjwatt99 said on 27/Nov/18
I thought The Game was decently over 250lb at his heaviest. I mean wouldn’t guys like Scott Steiner only be 235-240 if The Game was 250lb max? I always thought Steiner to be a 250lb guy at his heaviest and The Game a good 15lb heavier. Maybe I’m wrong, but I find it hard to believe The Game was only 250lb when he was decently over 6ft and pretty massive back then.
Canson said on 27/Nov/18
@Maa: you see where the one guy says “I’ve seen you on every page you’ve been on”. That means he takes just as much interest in height as Christian yet calling him obsessed?
Canson said on 27/Nov/18
@Christian: I saw back in 2012 and in 2014 when Ali Baba posted on this particular page that Triple H is only 6’1” as he did meet him in person. Try pages 5-7 he’s commented a few times I believe
Canson said on 27/Nov/18
@Arch: that comment to Christian was likely just because that person doesn’t like his estimates. You see where it started with someone calling him a height and weight downgrader first then this guy feeding off that person. Christian just like others (myself included) absorb those types of comments when we don’t make celebs talllee and don’t agree with some of the overlisted celebs here and their listings and then when he makes a sharp one back he’s looked at as “beginning an argument” or being rude. If you ask me, that commment was a bit rude and Christian definitely isn’t going around flaunting his height when he’s said before that 6’3” is ideal for a man and acknowledged that those size guys have it better than he does. To be fair, while being tall is great, people don’t realize how tall a true 6’5” guy is until they see someone his size in person and then they realize it. A lot of people will say that 6’5” is ideal height. While it’s not bad overall, a 6’3” guy has all of the same benefits as he does or myself being an inch shorter than he is
tree said on 27/Nov/18
U can tell hhh that he was 260lbs+ comparing him with folks who are 6ft2 and same weight like mma fighters who are measured,so it is normal if someone thinks he was that heavy.
maa said on 26/Nov/18
@Christian 6'5 3/8"

Don't get angry with @Space, he is probably a little meager scrawny and gaunt guy that try to make everyone heavier and bigger. Try to understand all his weaknesses
Arch Stanton said on 25/Nov/18
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Nov/18

I'm not obsessed about height. It's just a "hobby" for me. And so what if I have my height as part of my username? It's not an ego boost or anything."

Of course not, real 6'5 3/8 men don't need to go around celebrity height websites flaunting their height. Glad that you're one of them and are merely being modestly informative Christian, very chivalrous of you.

Triple H still married to Stephanie McMahon? Big crush on her.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 25/Nov/18
@Annonymous

Explain to me how am I "wrong". There's no objective proof that Triple H was ever 265-270 peak, and there's no proof that he was 250-255 either. Guessing weight is even more speculative than height because some people can have higher bone density than others. Quit stating your opinions as if they're facts.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Nov/18
@michael

I'm not obsessed about height. It's just a "hobby" for me. And so what if I have my height as part of my username? It's not an ego boost or anything.

@Space

How do you know if Goldberg was even 270lb? You're just going by their billed weights, which is almost always exaggerated. You're so naive that you believe billed weights are legit, so you're the one who needs to check yourself.
Space said on 24/Nov/18
That picture at the top of HHH’s height page is him on his decline at like 250lbs. He’s 240ish now a days. When he had the long hair he was way heavier like 265+
Space said on 24/Nov/18
Hhh was like the size as James “colossus” Thompson in mma who was like 6’2” 270lbs as well, like check yourself
Space said on 24/Nov/18
He was a strong 6’2” in his prime and massive. I don’t know why Christian thinks he was only 250, you really need to check yourself bro... he was comparable in size to 270lb Goldberg back then. If you saw the dude in ufc back then he would probably be the biggest heavyweight... like honestly check yourself
Canson said on 23/Nov/18
@michael loughrie: this is a height related site. Everyone debates heights here. There are many posters out there who comment much more than Christian does as a matter of fact and Christian doesn’t seem obsessed so much
Annonymous said on 22/Nov/18
If you ever watch YouTube shoots about wrestlers one of them has Steiner admitting he was in the shape of his life at shredded 247 lbs, that was a few years before the feud with triple h that everyone remembers. I'd say Steiner was more 260 by the time 2003 rolled around. Triple H was 265-270 in early 2000's, Christian is simply wrong. Dave Batista was 300 or more before WWE. Goldberg has said he was usually wrestling around 290 on the fighter and the kid podcast.

Some people have no clue, or either deliberately try to make some of these wrestlers smaller.
michael loughrie said on 22/Nov/18
Jesus why are you guys so obsessed with heights, are you insecure? this website is just a cool little tool, and i enjoy looking at it. stop arguing, is he 6' 1", is he 6' 4", is he 220 pounds, is he 285 pounds? doesn't matter, hes a legend and honestly you cant even tell his height until you do real analyze. if i saw triple h on my screen wrestling for the first time and some guy said he was 6' 4" i would believe it. just post your opinion, and move on. not everyone is going to agree with you, and

@christian you are definitely obsessed with height, ive seen you on every page ive been on and you even have your height in your name
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 21/Nov/18
@tree

How have I ever objectively downgraded anyone here? You can't prove that Triple H was 265 in that pic, you can only guess based on your opinions. Just like I can only guess based on mine. If I called you an "upgrader", that would be stupid and childish. Grow up.
Brad Pac said on 21/Nov/18
U can't always tell somebody's weight just by looking at them, especially when u guys are arguing over a smaller difference like 5-10 pounds lol. I'm around 245 pounds at 5'10 and I seriously doubt i have got the body size of Triple H or Lashley at their biggest. For example, I've got 17 inch biceps and theirs must be around 20 inches. If i was 3 or 4 inches taller, I'm sure I'd weigh around 265 pounds so it's more then plausible that they would.
tree said on 20/Nov/18
He was 265lbs and ii never sad he was 6ft2..
U are a huge downgrader lol ask anyone
Canson said on 19/Nov/18
@Tree: to be fair tho They’re celebs that Christian has felt were underlisted by Rob and pointed them out. You see a whole bunch of people on Undertaker’s page saying he’s 6’4 and 6’5 but Christian maintains that he’s close to 6’6” still
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 18/Nov/18
@tree

I don't know what pic you're seeing. Lashley in the pic I provided looks identical to Triple H's size.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 18/Nov/18
@tree

Calling someone a "downgrader" because someone thinks that your favorite celeb is shorter/lighter than you think, is the lamest insult ever. Please come up with something better. Hate to break it to you, but Triple H was never the 6'2.5" 265lb god like you make him out to be.
Vegas' said on 17/Nov/18
Batista looked bigger than 270 during his power plant days in wcw late 90s for sure, he looks over 300 in those photos with the long hair.

When we met Batista in march 2004 he looked heavier and wider (but shorter) than my friend who was around 260lb at the time. Not sure a 10lb difference would be that noticeable so he probably was at least 280 then billed at 313 I believe?
tree said on 17/Nov/18
Lashely may have been 240 iin ufc but he was smaller there,Triple looks a bit bigger and taller,255 lowest for young hhh and i am sure he was 260 at his biggest.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 15/Nov/18
@Space

I don't believe Batista was 285 either. Maybe 270-275 at his peak. But back to Triple H, he looked very similar in muscle mass and BF to 245lb Bobby Lashley here Click Here and his 245lb listing Click Here but let's say he was an inch taller for argument's sake. That would put Triple H no more than 250-255 in the pic you provided. Click Here
tree said on 15/Nov/18
HHH has a low bf there with Steiner,he looks better than him,260-265lbs for the game there.
Looks like Christian is not only a height downgrader but also a weight one lol
Bronson said on 14/Nov/18
Yea triple h is like 240 today. He was much bigger back then over 260+ easy. The dude lost like 30lbs since wcw and like 2 inches shorter now
Space said on 13/Nov/18
Click Here

Here’s a refresher, mind you he’s slightly over 6’2” there.
Space said on 13/Nov/18
@ Christian 6’5 3/8

If HHH was only 250lb, then in that video @tree provided us, 5’11” Scott Steiner is only around 235lbs which is BS... I think we can all agree that Steiner was closer to 250lbs. HHH was 2.5” taller than Steiner, and a good 15lbs heavier in that video
Space said on 13/Nov/18
In the early 2000s HHH was 265+ and juiced out on roids. he was decently larger/heavier than guys like the rock and Steve Austin who were around 245 back then. He was the same size as Bill Goldberg. Yet you’ll all agree that Batista was 285? I’m done...
Canson said on 12/Nov/18
@Christian: I think 250-260 is the most I could see for him too
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 11/Nov/18
@BURN

True

@tree

I can maybe see him at 255 in that video but not 265.
tree said on 11/Nov/18
Triple h peak was 260+ for sure Click Here
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 11/Nov/18
@Christian 6'5 3/8" Poeple always forget about body fat. Someone may look as big as another person but if they have body fat they're going to weigh less. That's the case here.
michael loughrie said on 11/Nov/18
I don't think Triple H is 6' 2", he is a lot closer to 6' 1". I would list him as 6' 1". He is around the tiny bit taller than 6' 0" John Cena, not 2 inches. I think Barefoot, Triple H is maybe 6'0.5, and in those boots, he is 6' 2". The 6' 4" listing is just WWE being WWE.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 9/Nov/18
@Space

First of all, Cormier is a lot shorter than guys like Triple H and Goldberg, plus he has pretty high body fat. And I'm not saying that peak Goldberg and peak Triple H didn't look similar based on body size. I meant that Goldberg was bigger in terms of weight because he had lower BF than Triple H, and we know that muscle weighs more than fat. I should've worded it more clear.

@maa

Lol
maa said on 9/Nov/18
@Christian 6'5 3/8

Don't tell to scrawny @viper the 303 pounds, otherwise he would comment that Reigns is now around 400 pounds just to list him heavier than the he really was.
Space said on 9/Nov/18
Early 2000s HHH had the same size as the ufc heavyweights who weigh in around 265lbs...

250lbs max???
Space said on 9/Nov/18
I’m saying if you look at videos or pictures of hhh and Goldberg squaring up back in the day, they were basically the same size (different body types) but same amount of mass. I don’t know how you guys don’t see that... If HHH was only 250lbs max back then, then Goldberg was 250lbs also. I’m like positive they were both 265ish back in the early 2000’s. There’s no doubt early 2000s HHH would have weighed in around 265lbs. If you saw earlys 2000s HHH walking around in person today you would not say that dude only looks 250lbs max..
Look at the ufc heavyweights who weigh in at 250lbs max today such as (Daniel Cormier & Cain Velasquez) you’re going to tell me an early 2000s HHH was only their size?
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 8/Nov/18
@Space

Wrestling promotions inflate wrestlers' weights. Just because Triple H may have been billed 265 back in the day, doesn't mean that he actually was.

@viper

He was actually weighed in at 303, but he was a lot fatter back then compared to now. Click Here Now he's around 250 or so.
Space said on 8/Nov/18
HHH looked very similar in size to 265lb Goldberg back then. HHH lost more than 10lbs over the years. He didn’t go from 250 to 240. More like from 265 to 240, along with loosing over an inch in height. The dude shrunk way more than 10lbs!
You really think he was only 250 back then? Jesus... HHH was significantly bigger than say Steve Austin back in the day, Steve Austin was around 245lbs back then.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 7/Nov/18
@maaaa

I'd put Triple H at max 250 peak too. No way he was as big as peak Goldberg, let alone bigger.
viper said on 7/Nov/18
Reigns weighed 265 at the NFL combine.

Maybe it's you who doesn't know anything about weight, lol
maaaa said on 7/Nov/18
WWE real weights, based on real weighted guys, (Cena peak at 250 and Lesnar peak at 275)

HHH: 250 pounds peak and today less than 240
Orton: around 240 today
Goldberg peak: 265
Batista peak: 285
Reigns: 250

You guys do not realise the exact weight of people. I am 6 ft 3, with 19 inc biceps and 8 % BF and I weight 230
Zampo said on 7/Nov/18
I remember (quite confident) that circa 2000-01 (McMahon-Helmsley Era) he was put at 246 lbs. Now even if this was billed, WWE are more likely to exaggerate a wrestlers weight thus there is a far greater chance that he was under 246 lbs than over at that point in time. What I am not sure about is if he was any bigger during his Evolution days. 270+ lbs though seems a little far-fetched to me.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 7/Nov/18
@Space I never said you did I was just making a general point. Muscle weighs more than fat and HHH had some body fat therefore it's going to be harder to hit even near 275lbs as opposed to just having muscle. He definitely looked big but not 275lbs and and he wasn't even billed at that, so I can't see him being near it because we know they usually exaggerate by 20-30lbs. If you look at someone like Lesnar back then he had tons of muscle and looked huge and he was probably creeping over 280lbs. You can definitely see the difference between someone like him and HHH.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 6/Nov/18
@tree

But Triple H probably has a higher BF percentage than Sorbo, plus Sorbo's taller. Under 240 for Triple H isn't BS.

@wwe-part2

You've got to be kidding if you think that Triple H was ever bigger than peak Goldberg.
Space said on 6/Nov/18
@ BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 26/Oct/18
@Christian 6'5 3/8" Even someone at 240 is big. Just look at John Cena. 275lbs with pure muscle would look huge.

Yes 275lbs of pure muscle would look huge, but I never said Triple H was pure muscle back then. He had a lot of body fat back then which added to his 275-270lbs back then.. also, someone has no problem saying Batista was 285lbs back then, I don’t see why triple h at 275lbs is crazy to believe. Look at videos of Triple H in 2003 squaring off with Goldberg, Austin, Rock, Orton, etc... he had size on all of those guys back then (not pure muscle, but he had mass/size on them). That’s all I’m saying. It’s not that hard to hit 275lbs when you are over 6’1”..
wwe-part2 said on 5/Nov/18
Tripe H had more mass than Goldberg in the early 2000s. Goldberg was 265lbs back then at the minimum... you all need a reality check.
wwe-part2 said on 5/Nov/18
Tripe H back in the early 2000’s was noticibly larger than 250lbs. You all need to check yourself if you really think he was only 250lbs back then. Lol
tree said on 5/Nov/18
Kevin Sorbo is a Honest guy he said when he played Hercules he was 235lbs and Triple h even nowdays look s a bit bigger than that.
Under 240lbs for Triple h is BS
tree said on 5/Nov/18
Triple h is bigger than Cena lol
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 2/Nov/18
He looks noticeably smaller than Cena size wise, and Cena himself is no more than like 240-245.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 30/Oct/18
@Canson He does but not 275lbs. Around 245-250lbs I can believe.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 29/Oct/18
@maaa

Yeah, I wouldn't put Triple H more than 240 today, especially if he has a higher BF %.
miko said on 29/Oct/18
I still think when he stands as tall as possible he can look close to 6'2.

Hunched down like he is most of the time he looks 6'1.

I don't think he's really lost much from his peak other than poorer posture. He might measure somewhere in the 6'1.5/6'1.75 range today.
Canson said on 29/Oct/18
@Burn: I can see how Triple H gives off a bigger impression than he is especially when considering muscle weighs more than fat. I’m unsure of his weight tho as well
maaa said on 29/Oct/18
I agree with Christian 6 ft 5, Triple H was never so heavy.

Evolution today
HHH: 6’1.25” 240 lbs at peak 250 lbs
Randy: 6’4” 240 lbs (he looks quite small in weight for being a wrestler)
Dave: 6’2.25” 250 lbs at peak 285 lbs
Rick: 5’9” 200 lbs

Lesnar is as similar to Triple H in height, but has at least 30 lbs more in muscles. ( he is around 275 lbs)
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 26/Oct/18
@Christian 6'5 3/8" Even someone at 240 is big. Just look at John Cena. 275lbs with pure muscle would look huge.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 26/Oct/18
@Smackdown Lol HHH at 275lbs is insane.
Iril said on 25/Oct/18
Triple H is nothing over 187cm (6'1.5) nowdays.. at evolution reunion he was exactly an inch shorter than Batista and more than a couple of inches shorter than Randy.. 187cm for sure and probably around 245lbs
Flexsoft said on 23/Oct/18
I would guess according to comparisons (other wrestlers with know heights) about 6.1' 1/2"
about the same height as myself. maybe he was 6'2" but so I was almost 6'3" prior to a car accident and 50yrs of gravity.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 23/Oct/18
@Smackdown

Triple H at 275? You don't seem to realize how big legit 275 is at 6'2" range. That's nearly Lesnar's size. Triple H was big but not that big.
tree said on 23/Oct/18
Nah Batista was never over 6ft3,Orton always had 1 inch on him.
Zampo said on 22/Oct/18
I have to agree with the general consensus that HHH most definitely needs a "current height". The current listing no longer represent how he looks, it's even arguable (very) that it doesn't represent the range he measures within. I would say there is a less than 20% chance that HHH would measure 6'2 in the afternoon.

I think a 6'1.75 (personally feel he could be around 6'1.5 currently) listing would be a ideal fit for celebheights based on how he looks with the listed celebs from the site.
Juby said on 21/Oct/18
See his earliest fights in WCW in 1993-1994. Triple H was at least 6'2 maybe even close to 6'3. Now, when he's almost 50, with so overweight (246-255 lbs during his wrestling carrier) and after the knee surgery, he looks 6'1.25 max.

@Rob - maybe you should add current and peak height to his profile?
Smackdown said on 21/Oct/18
Evolution 15years ago
Hunter: 6’2.25” 275lbs
Randy: 6’4” 240lbs
Dave: 6’3.5” 275lbs
Rick: 5’8.5” 180lbs


Evolution today
Hunter: 6’1” 245lbs
Randy: 6’4” 265lbs
Dave: 6’1.75” 255lbs
Rick: 5’8.5” 180lbs
Zampo said on 20/Oct/18
@maaa,

Indeed, I was flickering through channels when I heard the Evolution theme song which caught my attention. There was around 3 inches between HHH and Orton. He never has had the best posture so maybe he walks around at 6'1 range but may measure near 6'1.5 or so.

On a side note, I found the whole Evolution + Smackdown 1000th episode contradictory. Unless my memory is rusty. Evolution were synonymous with Raw. I can't remember a single segment where Evolution appeared on Smackdown until the last. Lol.
184guy2 said on 19/Oct/18
@Rob , how tall do you think is the black guy behind Triple H ? His name is Jordan Omogbehin
Click Here
He is in the WWE Performance Center and supposedely is 7'3 , I'd said at least 7'4 considering Triple H a weak 6'2
Editor Rob
He looks well over 7ft, it will be interesting to see how he looks with other wrestlers in the future, as a true 7ft 3 will make many of them seem rather short at times.
maaa said on 18/Oct/18
Triple h gets dwarfed last night by Orton... There was a good 3 inches between them with same footwear...Triple H has not the best posture, but it is hard to see him today over 6 ft 1.25
tree said on 15/Oct/18
He looked close to the rocks height here,i don't think he was over 6ft2,but with camera angles and maybe a little thicker shoes he can look 6ft3 Click Here btw he looked huge at 4:05 according to hhh the heavyest he was is 255 lbs,he looks that there for sure.
James B 172cm said on 6/Oct/18
Rob tripl H WWE’s answer too Alan Suger? LOL
Moheez Iqbal said on 2/Oct/18
Triple h current height 6"1.75 peak height 6"2.5 what do you think Rob?
Monkey knees said on 27/Sep/18
He seems to have lost a whole inch (almost) in 20 years. The steroids etc are definitely to blame, but 6ft1 now is correct. 6ft2 peak.
mdiz said on 11/Aug/18
Xpac99 said on 20/Jul/18
Sorry rob but triple h in prime was the same height of goldberg...
Click Here
It’s arguable for him 6 ft 2 1/2 for peak height ??

No, just remove the hairs of Triple H, Goldberg is taller by at least 1/2 inch. Goldberg & Triple H nowadays looks weak 6'2". Brock is still a strong 6'2" little above is possible, may be because he is younger than Goldberg & Triple H.
mdiz said on 11/Aug/18
Xpac99 said on 20/Jul/18
Sorry rob but triple h in prime was the same height of goldberg...
Click Here
It’s arguable for him 6 ft 2 1/2 for peak height ??

No, just remove the hairs of Triple H, Goldberg is taller by at least 1/2 inch. Goldberg & Triple H nowadays looks weak 6'2". Brock is still a strong 6'2" little above is possible, may be because he is younger than Goldberg & Triple H.
Ali said on 27/Jul/18
Hello Rob, just wondering if Triple H is 6'2 as listed but can hunch down to the 6'1 to 6'1.75 range, how tall would that make 5'11 listed NXT star Tommaso Ciampa? Judging from that photo, he looks in the 5'9.75 to 5'10 range. What do you say Rob? Anyone?

Click Here
Editor Rob
fraction height loss is possible...with poor posture I am sure he can look six feet one
Colberto said on 23/Jul/18
He looks generally 6'1 3/4". He's 187.5cm.
Xpac99 said on 20/Jul/18
Sorry rob but triple h in prime was the same height of goldberg...
Click Here
It’s arguable for him 6 ft 2 1/2 for peak height ??
187.5 cm said on 18/Jul/18
Bautista - 1,90 m
HHH - 1,86 m
Jdog said on 16/Jul/18
Triple h is 6 3 he is nearly as tall as 6 4 rock. He is a half inch bigger than Brock, He just has bad posture and hardly ever stands straight for some reason but when he does decide to stand straight up which is rare he is taller than Roman or Brock those guys just have lifts on but if he was in his boots he is definitely bigger than them same if they were wearing casual dress shoes like him.
Mel said on 3/Jul/18
186 range today.
BURN IT DOWWWWWN! said on 27/Jun/18
@miko Yeah he has that hunched down head which happens with age but close to 6'2 is fair. If you want to be accurate anywhere from 6'1.5-6'1.75 perhaps but over 6'1 nonethless.
miko said on 26/Jun/18
I know a few on here wont agree but I honestly believe in his best posture he can still look near to 6'2. I think he'd measure between the 6'1.5/6'1.75 range in reality. As for his prime, 6'2 or a hair over. Could look taller in boots in the late 90's.

I agree he can look 6'1 at best sometimes when he's hunched down, for example with 6'1 Rollins etc.
Christian 6'5 3/8" said on 24/Jun/18
Can't really pinpoint which of the Hardy brothers is taller, but both are around 6'0" IMO.
62B said on 24/Jun/18
I don't even know what to think now. I was just talking to my buddy this weekend that had his picture taken with HHH when he was deployed many years ago. He claims at the event, in person HBK looked taller Than triple H. I've met HBK in the late 80s's. In cowboy boots he was a little over 6", maybe 6'1" so probably 5'10"-5"11" barefoot. If HHH is really shorter than Michaels then what kind of lifts is that guy wearing? For those of you who are going to attack my buddies perception of how tall a person is, he met them all up close, so he can at least judge who seems taller than who.
tree said on 21/Jun/18
Matt hardy had a page but on this site but it got deleted i think he was 6ft or 6ft1
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Jun/18
Both Hardy boys have been billed 6ft1 and 6ft2 by WWE
Leno179 said on 13/Jun/18
Hey Rob, do you plan on opening a page on Jeff Hardy ? He is billed as 6'2, but looks 6'0, he was arrested earlier this year, and that was the height in his mugshot file. I think would be a nice addition to the site, to put one page for him.
Editor Rob
Maybe
Taxi Driver 101 said on 5/Jun/18
Definitely in the 6’2 range. Appears 2-2.5 inches taller than Punk.
Canson said on 22/May/18
Lol his 6’4 ranks up there with Taker claiming 6’10
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 17/May/18
@Lawrence

I don't think he wore lifts because he never looked even close to 6'4".
Leno said on 15/May/18
I think he falls in the same issue as Batista, even worse to be honest, dude never stands straight, he is always hunched over
Lawrence said on 14/May/18
Hhh wore obvious lifts from past photos to bring his height of approx. 6'2 to 6'4.
Canson said on 11/May/18
@Christian: that actually looks right. He may have never been a true 6’2”. I can see 6’2.5-.75 for the Rock prime
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 11/May/18
@Canson

I think 6'1.75" peak, he looked an inch shorter than The Rock.
Canson said on 9/May/18
@Juggernaut: he may have been 6’2” peak and 6’1.25 today
Juggernaut said on 9/May/18
Triple H in these recent years has gotten shorter..I believe He was a solid 6'2' or maybe even a little above 6'2' as he always used to stand face with face with 6'3' Rock during late 90s and early 2000s..Rock barely looked any taller that time but today I don't think he is anything more than 6'1'25 at best..Lost an inch over the years..
Bazza said on 5/May/18
Big lift wearer and always around 6'2.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 5/May/18
@Craig Pardy

I can't find an article or a page where The Rock was billed 6'3" by the CFL. Where did you find it? All I see is 6'5" billings from his football days. (which is exaggerated of course)
Ryan G said on 4/May/18
His peak was 6'2 and now he's no taller than 6'1. He looks exactly 3 inches shorter than Randy Orton and next to John Cena he barely looks any taller.
Canson said on 3/May/18
Today he’s no higher than 6’1.25. Peak height may have been 6’2 or a shade under at a low
Craig Pardy said on 3/May/18
I meet tripple H in real life. I'd say 6'2 takes it. Vince took an old trick from the beginning of the NBA days and adds 2/3 inches to a wrestlers height, to make them appear a little more larger than life. When the Rock played football in Canada he was billed at 6'3 by the CFL. Then a year later the WWE billed him at 6'5.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 30/Apr/18
@Er21

Though that would be worst case for him today I can still see that. But I think a 186 listing would be a bit more fitting.
Er21 said on 28/Apr/18
185.5cm for this man rob
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 24/Apr/18
@Rob

Triple H needs a peak and a current. If The Rock needed one, so should he.
RP said on 23/Apr/18
Ron, over due for a peak & current for HHH!
Peak 6'2.25"
Current 6'1.25"
Canson said on 21/Apr/18
Henry is hard to assess but Triple H is no better than 6’1” and change. Likely 6’1.25 at a low and maybe 6’2” in the morning
Juggernaut said on 18/Apr/18
@Christian-6'5 3/8 I don't think Henry lost that much but he certainly looked an inch taller than Triple H I'd say 6'1'25 for Triple H and 6'1'75-6'2' for Mark Henry..
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 18/Apr/18
@Juggernaut

That's strange because just 10 years ago Henry and Triple H looked similar in height. Click Here I highly doubt Triple H lost a full inch as well as Henry. Both of them lost around a half inch from their peak IMO. Triple H from 6'1.75" to 6'1.25" and Henry from 6'2" to 6'1.5"
Juggernaut said on 15/Apr/18
@Christian-6'5 3/8 Not sure about that, He might've lost a bit but looked comfortably an inch taller than both Triple H and Bill Goldberg at the hall of fame..Was towering over 5'11' Vince McMahon..They were all in dress shoes..
Phillip said on 15/Apr/18
6'1.25" Today. No less than 6'2" prime.
Jack Armstrong said on 14/Apr/18
He was billed as high as 6'6" in WCW. And WCW was know to exaggerate the heights of talent usually by about 4 inches, so my guess is 6'2"
Jack Armstrong said on 14/Apr/18
He was billed as high as 6'6" in WCW. And WCW was know to exaggerate the heights of talent usually by about 4 inches, so my guess is 6'2"
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 14/Apr/18
@Juggernaut

I doubt Henry's still 6'2" today, he lost some height.
Juggernaut said on 13/Apr/18
Saw pics and bids of Mark Henry at the Hall of fame..He was easily an inch taller than Triple H and Bill Goldberg..The photo posted by Vegas Trips is closer to the camera..Henry is legit 6'2'
berta said on 13/Apr/18
rob check out pictures with him and hulk hogan from andre the giant premiere. hogan have over 1 icnh on him. very good photo to judge height from. i believe if hogan is 190-191 now then h is about 187 now. i think legit 187 today and peak probably couple mm over 188.
Canson said on 12/Apr/18
I don’t think he’s less than 6’1” today but don’t think more than maybe a strong 6’1 peak or weak 6’2”
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 12/Apr/18
@Vegas

May not be the best pic. It favors Triple H more. I believe Henry and Triple H are similar in height today, both strong 6'1" range.
Juggernaut said on 12/Apr/18
Triple H with Lashley latest pic..I'd say 6'1' for Triple H Lashley looks half an inch taller

Click Here
Vegas said on 11/Apr/18
Henry is no less than 6'1 having met him in person Click Here
viper said on 10/Apr/18
He was never taller than 6-1
John barrett said on 8/Apr/18
Looking no more then 6'1 these days..
RP said on 8/Apr/18
Interesting, at the WWE Hall Of Fame introductions, HHH in dress shoes looked about the same height as Kid Rock in cowboy boots. If Kid Rock is truly only 6'0"?...then HHH "has" to be closer to 6'1" than 6'2" now.
Jenuin said on 5/Apr/18
He looks like a 6'2 guy and 6'4 with wrestling boots.
allornothing said on 24/Mar/18
Peak height was 6’2 and current height about 6’1.5-6’1.75
Juggernaut said on 13/Mar/18
Triple IMO could look anywhere from 6'2'-6'2'5 in his prime but may have dipped down a bit below 6'2' eventhough his posture is horrible ..I'd say both him and Goldberg would be the same height today.. 6'1'5 maybe..
QM6'1QM said on 9/Mar/18
I agree with Canson, 6'1.25" is the best guess for HHH.
He's taller than Ryan Giggs about 2,5in/ 6.35 cm.
187 cm/ 6'1.5" is absolutely max for Triple H (my opinion).
Canson said on 9/Mar/18
6’1.25 today tops
HeightcrazyRed6ft said on 25/Feb/18
Click Here

Then 6´4" Dustin Rhodes with HHH in 1994.

HHH looks 6´2-6´2.5" peak there

I think he can look 6´1.5" today
Danimal said on 23/Feb/18
FrankR1 said on 8/Feb/18
Triple H’s height was listed as 6’3.5” on a WWE trading card from the early 2000s. In his WWE debut in 1995, he may have been all of 6’3.”

He was NEVER 6'3". Here he is in 1999 next to aging Jesse Ventura who was still close to 6'4" at that time (that was pre-hip replacement for Jesse):
Click Here
Click Here

With 6'2 3/4" Batista:
Click Here

He's even shorter today (barely over 6'1").
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 20/Feb/18
Yeah that's my guess...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 17/Feb/18
Rob, could this guy be in a similar boat to Regal and Mick Foley and lost 1in?
Editor Rob
You couldn't rule it out that H was a solid 6ft 2 range and now a weak 6ft 2...
abdun noor said on 16/Feb/18
hhh has def lost height, he's 48. Prime young hhh was 188-189cm i think.
Vegas said on 10/Feb/18
HHH was originally billed 6'5 in the E @ 1 minute 7 seconds Click Here

Doesn't make him 6'3 though.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 9/Feb/18
@FrankR1

If Triple H really was 6’3”, then he would’ve easily been billed 6’5” since the typical wrestler’s exaggerated by 2”.
FrankR1 said on 8/Feb/18
Triple H’s height was listed as 6’3.5” on a WWE trading card from the early 2000s. In his WWE debut in 1995, he may have been all of 6’3.” A series of injuries along with the aging process could have shrunk him down to 6’2” at his current age, but I seriously doubt he’s any shorter than 6’2”.
Canson said on 5/Feb/18
Triple H today is 6’1” range. 6’2 peak is an absolute max
Danimal said on 4/Feb/18
Triple H with 5'10" Kurt Angle: Click Here
Shubo said on 15/Jan/18
Rob. How tall do you think he is at 48 years old. I think he's 186-7 barefoot. In his prime 188-189
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 14/Jan/18
@Ali

Triple H looks about 4.5"-5" taller than Kyle.
Ali said on 11/Jan/18
Hello Rob, just wondering if Triple H is around 6'2 how tall does that make NXTs Kyle O Reilly judging from this pic,

Click Here

He's listed as 5'11 but looks in the 5'9 to 5'10 range but take into account H is leaning quite a bit. What do you say Rob?
Editor Rob
Big Triple H might be losing 2cm of height there, so it's unlikely that Kyle is anywhere near 5ft 11!
Canson said on 11/Jan/18
Agree with Danimal and Christian
the rock said on 10/Jan/18
can you please add Terri poch aka the original tori
Vegas said on 9/Jan/18
Danimal what happened about not posting photos that don't show feet/ground?

Tall guy Josh was measured 6'6 barefoot at NFL draft so that's a decent comparison with HHH Click Here
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 8/Jan/18
@Danimal

He doesn't look 6'2" next to 5'5" listed Ronda Rousey either. Click Here
James B said on 3/Jan/18
Rob I have been using weight machines at the gym now for a while that work all major muscle groups. I warm up by doing cardio.Thing is though me being 170.8cm I have only gone up too 154-160 pounds of muscle.

Question is though how do these wrestlers get so heavy? Steriouds? HGH?


I did used too weigh between 168-182 pounds in 2010 when I lifted at the gym but I had a lot more body fat on me back then
Editor Rob: wrestlers are spending more time working out than the average bloke can manage. Some certainly might be getting help.
Canson said on 3/Jan/18
He deserves a downgrade if not then a peak and current
Tony said on 30/Dec/17
I've seen him in a lot of videos with Lesnar and Roman Reigns.

Roman is about 1.88
Brock is 1.88,5
HHH is 1.86,5 - 187.

Brock looks taller than both of 'em, especially HHH.
Cnrom89 said on 30/Dec/17
Triple H easily 270-280 pounds his prime.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 30/Dec/17
I doubt HHH was ever 280lbs. Wrestlers lie about their weight to seem larger than life like Big boi alluded to.
Big boi said on 29/Dec/17
Guys I think your getting a little obsessive regarding a cm here and there Hhh. If he did or didn’t weigh over 280 lbs ....does it even matter. Since the 1900’s wrestlers have been told to exaggerate there size to appear ‘larger than life’ to sell tickets , but analysing a cm here and there is a little sad.
Joe said on 23/Dec/17
He’s still 6’2 today.
Mike said on 22/Dec/17
Rob, do you think he think he ever weighed 280 lbs in his life or did he exaggerate?
Editor Rob: maybe at one stage when at his heaviest he might have been near it.
Ronel said on 21/Dec/17
Downgrade Triple H to 187CM
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 14/Dec/17
@Ricky

No, they weren't equal. Triple H appears to be shorter than Lesnar by a half inch Click Here but Triple H had footwear disadvantage by about a cm so barefoot I would say they were 1/8" apart with Lesnar at 6'1.75" and Triple H at 6'1 5/8" peak.
Canson said on 13/Dec/17
@Ricky: I respectfully disagree and yes I have seen Reigns taller than Lesnar on TV and looking at him with Rock he is the same height both taller than Lesnar by a hair. I said what I did about inflating because many of your estimates are at or above Rob’s listing and you compensate by making others taller. Nothing wrong with guessing rob’s listing or above but when you make others taller then question the ones like Christian mentioned it shows the tendency
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 13/Dec/17
@Ricky

It's simply my opinion that he was under 6'2", it's a speculation. You can't prove someone's height just by pics and clips, you have to either see the celeb in person or they have to be measured a certain height, like some basketball and football players. There's no proof here that Triple H's 6'1.75" or 6'2", but there's no proof that he's 6'2.75" either, like some here say he was.
And the fact that you want to leave the site if you get proven wrong, shows that you're arrogant. I'd have no problem if someone proves me wrong on a debate. I just accept it and move on.
Ricky said on 13/Dec/17
@Canson

I don't inlate anybody.
I don't understand why it makes you think so.

I never said HHH is 6'4".
I said his peak was about 6'2.5"

Whenever I guess anyone's height I always give the fact behind my guess,if I'm saying something I always tell why I'm saying so.

Click Here

Here,HHH is in formal shoes while Brock Lesnar is in wrestling boots which make him over 6'3".

Brock was 6'2.25" in 2002.

HHH even after being in formal shoes is appearing equal to lesnar here.

I want to ask you that whether you have ever seen Roman Reigns being taller than Brock Lesnar?
Ever?

Whenever you'll see their staredowns you'll always see either both are equal or Lesnar is a bit taller.

Still I saw you many times saying Brock is 6'1.75" at present.

I believe his is no shorter than 6'2" at present.
Maybe still about 6'2.25".
Maybe.
Canson said on 11/Dec/17
Ricky: no disrespect but why do you inflate every one of these wrestlers you comment on?
Ricky said on 9/Dec/17
@Christian

Please prove that he was under 6'2" in his prime.
If I get proved wrong I swear I'll leave this website forever.
Juggernaut said on 7/Dec/17
One of the biggest and difficult problems in guessing height is the posture of an individual..Like Dave Bautista even Triple H doesn't have a good posture I'd say he was 6'2'+ in his absolute prime he was barely shorter than a 6'3' Rock back in late 90s,early 2000s... Today he IMO is a bit under 6'2' like 6'1'5 reason he looked the same height as Goldberg in Goldberg's latest documentary...Triple H in all these years of abuse from pro-wrestling as well as the age has lost height..But his awful posture makes him even look 6'1' at times..Won't be surprised if he still measured 6'2' barefoot in a good straight up posture...
Canson said on 6/Dec/17
6’1” and change today
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 2/Dec/17
@Rampage

Definitely under 6'2", especially today. I might've underestimated him a bit by saying he's flat 6'1", but he doesn't look any more than 186.5cm best case these days so I'd have him at 6'1.25", peak could've been 6'1.75"
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 30/Nov/17
6ft2½ range peak is debatable and now a fraction under 6ft2. Not as low as 6ft1
Sepanta said on 30/Nov/17
Triple h didn't look much taller than Kurt angle who is in 5'9 range on Raw. I don't know what the problem is. If Triple h is 6'2 or 6'1.5 he should've been 4-5" taller than Angle but he was around 2-2.5" taller than him.
Ricky said on 28/Nov/17
@Rick

Triple H never claimed himself 6'3"
Ricky said on 28/Nov/17
@Anonymous

Don't make outlandish claims.
Anonymous said on 23/Nov/17
I've seen him look as low as 5'10.5" to 5'11.75" barefoot range. This is based on standing next to 5'8" - 5'11" range guys. There's just no way he is 6'1" or 6'2" barefoot. I believe he is in serious need of a downgrade by at least 3 inches but realistically more like 4 inches. Remember pro wrestlers usually exaggerate their heights by 2 to 5 inches.
Rick said on 23/Nov/17
Triple h is around 187-188cm in height no less or more. The rock is around 191cm. Footwear is giving them 4cm so they are claming their height with shoes like most of the people. Thats why the rock is claiming 6'4 and HHH claims 6'3. İts simple is that.
Canson said on 20/Nov/17
@Christian: Thanks! I am considered a downgrader by some only because a lot of these guys esp these wrestlers are kverlisted. I believe what Bobby3342 said that Triple H is still prob 6’1” range too. Rob’s a lot closer at 188cm than 183 lol!
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 20/Nov/17
@Canson

Yet some people call you a downgrader, lol. If you were really a downgrader, you wouldn't have defended Rob when he gets accused of being one.
Canson said on 17/Nov/17
@Andre: i don’t think rob “exaggerates” heights at all. If he has never met a celeb he tends to use pics and will give the benefit of the doubt sometimes could mean claims of others or that person. But we can agree pics aren’t necessarily a way of judging heights. Some pics have distortions which no one can see
andre said on 16/Nov/17
triple h was the same height as my karate teacher who is 6ft1 with shoes so this would put triple h 6ft barefoot

i do feel while heights here are more or less correct rob still exagerates many and triple h is one of them same as justin bieber who is only a weak 168cm
Canson said on 12/Nov/17
@Christian: that’s a good pic! Didn’t realize that
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 12/Nov/17
@Daniel Howe

What kind of shoes was he wearing? Maybe he had thicker shoes than you?
Daniel Howe said on 12/Nov/17
The Triple H character is 6 ft 4, Paul Levesque is 6 ft 2 and a half, met him in person, I'm 5 ft10 and a half and 15, I was 5 ft9 at the time, I sure an AT LEAST 5 inch difference when standing next to him, this was in an autograph signing, he could POTENTIALLY be 6ft 3
ma said on 11/Nov/17
Saw a pic of HHH and Vladimir Klitcho and hhh with his awful posture ( without neck) that looks 6 ft.
Of course he is not 6 ft today but I m saying that with his awful posture he may look it in pics; also in wwe with Lesnar he could look shorter.
I say that today he is around 6 ft 1.25-1.5 but could look 1 inc shorter for his vanishing neck.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 11/Nov/17
@Canson

Austin actually looks a bit shorter than Trump, but this was in 2007 so Trump might haven't lost as much height back then as he did today Click Here Click Here
Canson said on 9/Nov/17
@Danimal: maybe closer to 6’1” for Austin peak maybe like 183-184 or 184-185 similar to what trump is today but today maybe what you said
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 8/Nov/17
@Danimal

Austin at 183cm would mean Triple H peak would've been about 185cm which I believe it's too low. Even today after Triple H lost some height, the worst I would put him is 185.5cm
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 8/Nov/17
193cm in boots
Danimal said on 7/Nov/17
Ricky said on 3/Nov/17
Christian-6'5⅜

Austin's present height could be 1.85 m but his peak height was 1.87 for sure.

No. Austin was never over 183cm.
Danimal said on 7/Nov/17
Sacred said on 7/Nov/17
193 cm for him

No
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 7/Nov/17
187cm today I can see but peak he looked 189cm
Sacred said on 7/Nov/17
193 cm for him
Canson said on 3/Nov/17
@Anonymous: they could’ve both lost height today. I doubt Triple H is almost 6’2. He honestly looks 187 max like Christian said todaynmaybe 186 is really it
Ricky said on 3/Nov/17
Christian-6'5⅜

Austin's present height could be 1.85 m but his peak height was 1.87 for sure.

He broke his neck back in 1997 and then he might have become little shorter but still over 6'1".

That 1.87 m peak is the height before he broke his neck.

HHH 1.89 m peak height is pretty arguable thing and I can see here in the comment section that some are saying him to be 6'3" in his prime.

Well I agree that he was never 6'3"
Canson said on 2/Nov/17
I’m with 62B and Christian. He doesn’t strike me as more than 186-186.5
Anonymous said on 2/Nov/17
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 1/Nov/17
@Ricky

I have to disagree. My belief is that Austin was about 185cm and HHH 187cm peak.

Triple h always had 3cm on Austin
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 1/Nov/17
@Ricky

I have to disagree. My belief is that Austin was about 185cm and HHH 187cm peak.
Ricky said on 1/Nov/17
Current may be about 1.86 m or 1.87 m but peak was more like 1.89 m.
Austin was about 1.87 m in his prime and Triple H always looked around 2 cm taller than him.

Believable?
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 30/Oct/17
@62B

That makes a lot of sense. It's in line with how I guessed him at 6'1.25"' today, yet some people believe he's still a legit 6'2" today and even bashed me for not believing he's 6'2".
62B. said on 26/Oct/17
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 24/Oct/17
@62B

Did you ask your friend how exactly tall did HHH look? And what year did he meet him? I ask because he lost a bit of height especially in the last 10 years or so.
________________________________________________________
My friend just said that HHH looked short compared to me. 8 years ago I would still have been 6'3" on the nose, but even Today when I ask him he says that he seemed shorter by a couple of inches
Canson said on 25/Oct/17
@62B: I have to agree And it’s not me being disrespectful to Jinx. But he has inflated every last one of these wrestlers. You and Christian both have logic and basis for your arguments which carry more weight than anything
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 24/Oct/17
@62B

Did you ask your friend how exactly tall did HHH look? And what year did he meet him? I ask because he lost a bit of height especially in the last 10 years or so.
62B. said on 23/Oct/17
Jinx said on 17/Oct/17
Present Height:- 1.88 m
Peak Height:- 1.91 m

Because in 1998,D'lo Brown was legit 6'2" and HHH was taller than him.

Also his faction member Road Dogg was 6'2" and HHH was taller than him.

Not over yet,Mankind(Mick Foley) was a legit 6'2" guy in 1999 but shorter than HHH.

___________________________________________________________

Out of curiosity and not trying to be a jerk, but have you ever met any of the guys you talk about in person? I myself have never met HHH. But I trust my best friend of 30 years who has met him and tells me that HHH was not nearly as tall as me. I currently stand 6'2.5" to 6'2.75". It has to be going on 8 years or better since my friend has had his picture with him.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 23/Oct/17
@Canson

Very likely he did. About a cm most likely. Looks about 186cm today compared to 187cm in the 90's and 00's.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 23/Oct/17
Looks about 9.5cm taller than Kurt whose peak was around 177.5cm so maybe 187cm peak for Triple H, Click Here but the pic doesn't show footwear.
Canson said on 23/Oct/17
Wouldn’t surprise me if he’s lost some height today and is even less
Raoul said on 21/Oct/17
Hi everybody im new here, Rob i saw the kurt angle page when His peak is 177.8 cm , so im guessing triple h in this photo is not 191 cm Click Here
Editor Rob: I think when facing Kurt, he doesn't look like he'd be near 6ft 3, maybe 6ft 2ish
Jinx said on 21/Oct/17
Foley was never taller than HHH.
And Stone Cold was never under 6'1".

Even at Austin's peak he was a legit 6'2" guy.
Actually his legs are shorter than a normal guy of that height,hence he appears a bit short but he's not.

There's a myth that all pro-wrestlers are billed upto 2-4 inches but it is not necessary in all cases.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 19/Oct/17
@Rampage

I disagree, Austin always looked 2 inches shorter than The Rock who was 6'2.75" in the 90's. So under 6'1" for Austin was very possible.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 19/Oct/17
Foley was always taller than Triple H
Anonymous said on 18/Oct/17
Peak strong 6'2"
Now weak 6'2"
Roman Reigns looks taller than more one inch because his shoes have more lifts than HHH.
Jinx said on 17/Oct/17
Present Height:- 1.88 m
Peak Height:- 1.91 m

Because in 1998,D'lo Brown was legit 6'2" and HHH was taller than him.

Also his faction member Road Dogg was 6'2" and HHH was taller than him.

Not over yet,Mankind(Mick Foley) was a legit 6'2" guy in 1999 but shorter than HHH.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 16/Oct/17
A bit over 6ft2 in the 90's is arguable. Look at him next to Austin. Easily 1in there and there's no way Steve was under 6ft1 then
Canson said on 6/Oct/17
Average guess Is 6’1.83 with 152 votes. I doubt the guy was over 6’2 peak if that. Honestly agree with Christian here. And yes People are so quick to scold someone for downgrading someone even by half inch then when you see people upgrade by an inch or two it’s ignored or swept under the mat
Canson said on 5/Oct/17
@Christian: good examples of that are Cam Newton and Terrell Pryor. Both were listed at 6’6” in college and measured 6’5 and 6’4 1/2 ( earlier in the day) at the combine respectively. Likely are really 6’4.75 and 6’4.25
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 4/Oct/17
@Markus

College stats are often listed higher than NFL stats. I've seen tons and tons of football players that are overlisted by an inch or two during college, then get lowered once they get drafted to NFL. College height stats are usually exagerated.

Austin was only 3cm shorter than Goldberg in that clip. It wasn't a 2 inch difference. You don't seem to really know how to judge height differences. Austin at 185.5 (6'1") and Goldberg at 188.5 (6'2.25") is how I see them.

Undertaker was hunching his spine more than Goldberg, plus we can't see their footwear either. So not the best pic.

My opinion is that Lesnar's 6'1.75" rather than a full 6'2" or 6'2.25". He's barely 3cm taller than 184cm John Cena when they stare at each other.

And Brian Bosworth looks a bit shorter than Austin and only looks about 2cm taller than 182cm listed William Fichtner Click Here Click Here My opinion is that Bosworth's around 6'0.5" but he got listed 6'2" by NFL. Now NFL very rarely UNDERlists players, but quite common to OVERlist them. Look at Joe Montana. He was listed 6'2" by NFL but actually only around 6'0.5" Click Here

Goldberg peak was most likely about 6'2.25"
Anon2 said on 4/Oct/17
I've tried to see more of Triple H's height recently and he still looks 6'2'' even today. Even with a hunch he can still look 6'2''. Daniel Bryan said Triple H was 6'3'' in an interview a while back. This is coming from a man who has stood next to Triple H and been in the ring with him many times. He knows better than us!
Markus said on 4/Oct/17
@ Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 2/Oct/17

These Stats from Goldberg means nothing if they are obviously wrong. And there are 6-3 listings
of Goldberg too: Click Here Click Here

Stop at 05:33/34 and look good. If Goldberg had been a good 6-2 then, how small would Austin have been?
6? No way. Austin was about 6-1 then and Goldberg about 6-3, both with comparable soles: Click Here

Undertaker (was about 6-7 then) with Goldberg: Click Here
Lesnar with Goldberg in 2003/2004: Click Here
With NFL 6-2 listed (!) Brian Bosworth: Click Here

Contrary to the nonsensical 6-2 stats, the 6-3 stats fit well for Goldberg in height comparisons. Goldberg is a weak 6-2 toady, he has lost a lot of height. His peak height was a good 6-3.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 2/Oct/17
@Markus

Well Lesnar was never a legit 6'2", he's more like 6'1.75" based on him looking that with Triple H, Reigns, Cena, and the fact that people met him and said he looked under 6'2". And Goldberg peak wasn't above 6'2.25" Why else would he be listed at only 6'2" (188cm) during his NFL career then? Click Here Click Here Click Here Keep in mind that NFL listed heights are much more accurate than wrestling heights, but at the same time NFL very rarely underlists anyone as well. If Goldberg was a legit 6'3" like you seem to imply, then he would've been listed 6'3" by NFL, not 6'2".
Markus said on 1/Oct/17
"Goldberg peak 188.5cm
HHH peak 187cm"

Totally nonsense!

Goldberg was clearly taller at age of 37 than a good 6-2 Lesnar in 2004 (Wrestlemania): Click Here
Click Here
Anonymous said on 30/Sep/17
His present height is 6'2" but in his prime I believe him to be 6'3" because once I saw his picture with William Regal when they both were in WCW.

William Regal is legit 6'2" and HHH was an inch taller.

Both of them were in casuals so their is no case of lifts either.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 28/Sep/17
@Juggernaut

Was there visible footwear in those pics with the wrestlers though? We don't know if that guy had thicker shoes on.
Juggernaut said on 26/Sep/17
@Christian-6'5 3/8 Well no obviously I haven't seen him in person,But when you see a guy w multiple other people you can guess his height even if it might be a bit above or below..He looked like 1.5 taller than Bray Wyatt,Was like 4 inches shorter than Kane aka Glenn Jacobs..Almost half an inch shorter than Orton so he has to be 6'3' no doubt about that..
Canson said on 26/Sep/17
@juggernaut: Christian said it well. If that were the case we would be believing that Rock is 6'5" when he was a peak 6'2.75 max and 6'2-6'2.25 today tops
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 25/Sep/17
@Juggernaut

And how do you know if the "WWE Superman" guy is a legit 6'3"? Have you ever met him in person or have you ever seen him measure himself at 6'3" at night? If not, you shouldn't just accept whatever height someone claims as, as a lot of people exaggerate or round up their height. If he claims 6'3" yet only looked an inch taller than Triple H, then he's very likely not a real 6'3". You shouldn't guess wrestler's heights based off of Superman's 6'3" claim, because you have zero evidence he's 6'3" like he says he is.
Christian-6'5 3/8" said on 25/Sep/17
@Aswin MK

You're right about your first paragraph, we can never 100% know how tall these guys are until we meet them in person or there's a clip of them measuring on a stadiometer. But bobby3342 and Danimal met Triple H and Lesnar respectively, and said they were "6'1" and change" for HHH and "under 6'2"" for Brock, and there would be no reason for them to lie down about their heights. And Goldberg wasn't 6'2.5"+ at peak, he was 6'2.25", and the only reason he looked the same height as HHH, was because Goldberg was obviously hunching his neck, losing about a half inch, and anyone who denies that he was hunching, is either biased or something's wrong with them.

Goldberg peak 188.5cm
HHH peak 187cm
Juggernaut said on 24/Sep/17
@Christian 6'5 3/8 Look I am not gonna get any money if I say Triple H is 6'2' or Lesnar is 6'2'25..The mentions and comments you provided those people didn't even put up a pic and yet they said they met Brock and Triple H which is hilarious,I am on twitter and there is a wwe fan known as wwe superman who legit has pics w almost all the wwe superstars and I've seen him in pics w Brock,Triple H,Cena and many many more ..He claims to be 6'3' which he certainly looks in his Pics w Triple H he looked an inch taller,W Brock he was sitting but he said they were the same in height..Cena looked a lot shorter than him looked at least 2'5' to me..and in that clip w not much good quality how can you differentiate the sneakers,I'd tell you to see a segment between Lesnar,Cena and Chris Benoit in 2003 look at Cena's sneakers you'll know..You can think Brock and Triple H are below 6'2' that's your choice..
Aswin MK said on 24/Sep/17
Dear Christian,

Nothing against you, buddy, while we can argue multiple times on whether Triple H was under or over 6 foot 2, the truth is we will ever know till we produce him before stadiometer and measure his height (And we both know how (im)possible that is). What we do know is that in many of the videos, he has looked a range of heights from 6 1.5 to 6 foot 2.75 and even 6 foot 3 (Obviously due to lifts in shoes and camera angles).

Having said that, even you wouldn't disagree with me that he looks the same height as a 6 foot 2.5+ Bill Goldberg here. Please note that he is for once wearing dress shoes (Which give hardly a half inch advantage) and Bill is wearing similar footwear. I leave it up to you to tell me how Bill Goldberg who has always been taller than Brock Lesnar looked the same height as Triple H:
Click Here (Look at time elapse 1:15 - Their eye levels and top of the head are the same)
tree said on 24/Sep/17
Roman regins is taller than 6ft2 when it will enter your lemon head?
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 23/Sep/17
@Anon2

Argue? I didn't originally comment on this page to start an argument. You're the one who called me a troll just for having different opinions, and I think that's pretty rude and disrespectful, especially after I've shown you many pics where HHH doesn't look 6'2" next to Stephen Amell, Dwight Howard and John Cena. Btw, HHH looks 0.5" shorter than 6'1.75" Lesnar despite wearing dress shoes vs Lesnar's runners (as dress shoes tend to have a slightly thicker heel than most runners) Click Here and I can also show you how Lesnar's only 6'1.75" by him looking a bit shorter than 6'2" Roman Reigns Click Here also, a commentor named Danimal said on 23/May/17, that he met Lesnar and Lesnar looked under 6'2" next to Danimal's 6'3" friend. Surely a guy like Danimal will have a better understanding of how tall Lesnar really is since he met him in person, unlike the both of us.
And another thing, I never see you criticize Juggernaut for thinking that Triple H was 6'2.75" peak, but you do it when I say that HHH is 6'1.25" today. (even If I believe his peak was 6'1.75", which is a lot closer to Rob's 6'2" listing than Juggernaut's 6'2.75", I might add) And I've noticed that many people here are fine with people upgrading a celeb, but they get very defensive whenever someone "downgrades" a celeb, even if it's only as small as something like a half inch. I'll never understand that logic.
Jason said on 23/Sep/17
As of right now,

Triple h 188.5(but he never straighten his back nowadays so looks shorter)
Brock lesnar 188
Dave Batista 190.5 ( 3/4 inch on HHH)
The Rock 189.5
Roman Reignes 188
Gold burg 188 (He is exactly same with Brock)
Big show 210
Great khali 214
Kane 202
The undertaker 200.5
Brown Strowman 199.5
Randy orton 194
John Cena 183.5
Daniel Brian 171.5

I think
Aswin MK said on 22/Sep/17
Hey Rob, looking at this video of the staredown between Triple H (With normal shoes) and Goldberg (Who you quote as being 6 foot 2.5 inches tall), I can comfortably say he was a peak 6 foot 2.5er.

Look at time elapsed 00:15 to see his shoes and at 1:10 to see that both of them look similar in height, eye level at same heigh and of course, same height in 3 different angles. Please have a look and tell me if we have do downgrade Goldberg (Wait he was taller than 6 foot 2 Lesnar) or Upgrade Triple H (A wrestler who looked no less than 0.5-0.75 inches shorter than a peak Rock in 2002, looked hardly 1.5 inches shorter than Randy Orton, 4-5 inches shorter than Undertaker and slightly taller than Brock Lesnar).

I don't want an upgrade, but want your opinion on how a 6 foot 2.5+ Goldberg could look similar in height with a 6 foot 2 Triple H? Camera Angles (I saw three different angles and saw no visible difference and this was in early 2000s possibly 2004 when Triple H was still at peak height)
Anon2 said on 20/Sep/17
jeeeez how many people has Christian-6'5 3/8 argued with on here? i've lost count.... anyone notice a pattern here on who the true delusional one is? Christian-6'5 3/8 just wants the last word on here that is all... ''the last laugh'' as they say. Notice how he has shut up for a few days? lol

i can't find a person who agrees with this guy. certainly not me, d*cksock, juggernaut, tree, aswin and even Rob! since the listing is still the same! lol
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 20/Sep/17
@Juggernaut

Triple H at his peak being a half inch taller than Brock is absurdity. You just admitted before that Brock was a hair taller than him. "H looked a bit taller than Brock as he usually wears flat runners,W equal footwear Brock was a hair taller but you can say they are roughly the same" What's even more hilarious is the fact that you think Triple H peak was 6'2.75", lmao. The Rock was 6'2.75" peak and he was about an inch taller than HHH back in the day. So I'm guessing now you're going to inflate Rock to 6'3.75" peak, right? And for Cena and Brock, this is a clip of the two including visible footwear Click Here as you can see, Cena's shoes were barely much thicker than Brock's, yet there was not more than an inch difference. I'm convinced that Brock's not over 6'1.75", so if you think Lesnar's 6'2.25", then you would have to bump Cena up to 6'1" or 6'1.25"
Btw, there are some people who actually met Brock and HHH on this site, such as these guys:

(HHH) bobbyh3342 said on 31/May/17
I met him in the Norwich town mall when he was with chyna in da 90s looked 6'1 and change

(Lesnar)Danimal said on 23/May/17
Met the guy in Vegas in 2008. My 6'3" friend was noticeably taller than him. He's under 6'2".

bobby met HHH in the 90's (before he lost any height) and said he looked 6'1" and change (which means a little over 6'1", but not over 6'1.5") and Lesnar looked under 6'2" next to Danimal's 6'3" friend ("under 6'2"" might be anywhere from 6'1.75" to 6'1.5")

Both of these guys have a better accurate understanding of their true heights, more so than us, because they've actually met Brock and HHH, unlike us.
And I'm getting sick of being called a downgrader and a troll just for having different opinions for a celeb's height. The amount of butthurt some folks get over me thinking that a celeb is a bit lower than Rob list them as, is astonishing. I use logic over emotion, and I see some people use emotion because they're so infatuated over a celeb that they want to make them as tall as possible and criticize anyone who think they're shorter than how tall they preceive those celebs as. I'm not accusing you of being those types of people, but I would ask you to stop calling me a troll, and please learn that a lot of celebs aren't quite as tall as you thought them to be. I used to naively believe that every celeb was the height that Rob listed them as, when I first joined the site, but as I became more experienced about human height and judging height differences, I started to see that a lot of celebs here are overlisted slightly.
Christian-6'5 3/8 said on 18/Sep/17
I meant looking 16 inches shorter than Yao, not 14. Triple H comes a bit below his shoulder, but keep in mind that Yao is a giant, so the distance from his shoulder to the top of his head is very long.

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.