How tall is Arnold Schwarzenegger ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Arnold Schwarzenegger's height is 5ft 11.5in (182 cm)

Peak height was 6ft 1.5in (187 cm)
Austrian actor, bodybuilder and politician best known for starring in movies such as The Terminator, Predator, True Lies and Total Recall. He says of his stature, "I'm 6'2". I've heard rumors that I'm really much shorter in real life - like 5'6" or something like that - which is ridiculous. I can assure you this is not the case. People look up to me, and not just because I do a lot of work in the community. I mean, most people really LOOK UP to me."

Many people who have met him in his early career have said he was between 6ft 1 and 2, although a genuine 6ft 3 man like Kevin Sorbo thought differently, saying with a straight face: "Arnold Schwarzenegger's about 5-11...yeah he says he's Six Three". Jon Meade said Arnie told him in a 1980 interview he was "6ft 1.5" and bodybuilder Vince Basille gave an insight into a young Arnie's height in an email to me, in which he described how he personally measured Arnie in 1969 at 6ft 1.5. Arnold has also recently said that he was "6ft 1 and 3/4" but now has shrunk to 6ft 1, as measured by his daughter and in 2013 mentioned he was down to a worrying 6ft 1/2 inch.


Photo by PR Photos
Add your opinion on the Height of Arnold Schwarzenegger

Your Comment:

Hartman says on 25/Jan/15
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2": once again the photos are meaningless without shots of footwear. I you take shots from the knees up of Stallone with others, you get a false comparison. Same with Schwarzenegger, the lift king.
Hartman says on 25/Jan/15
Never confused "official height" ("officially measured by whom, another bodybuilder who got paid by the same boss, the guy who ran the federation?)with 'billed height.' Example: Andre the Giant was billed, at one point, at seven feet five. Was that his 'official height' because a lackey in the wrestling industry claimed to measure him at that. What malarkey. Peak height for Arnold: five foot eleven. Real height today: five foot ten. Sorry fanboys.
1.89m says on 25/Jan/15
@Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" Arnie is closer to the camera!! Think Perspective please.
6ftMagician says on 25/Jan/15
@Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2"

It is very easy to get swept away in the emotion of the moment, but alas, we must remain logical:

Myth: Arnold was never ''officially'' measured at 6'1.5''. That was and still is a claimed measurement by someone - pics or it didn't happen.

K thanks bye.
6ftMagician says on 25/Jan/15
@Rampage (and everyone on this forum this may be of service to you)

The analogy I was trying to draw with cycling was that even in sports where you would not expect to see PED use, such as enduracne cycling, you still see it. What makes anyone think athletes wouldn't use PEDS in sports where PEDS would be an obvious advantage (I've cited 6/7 fastest men in 100m history caught using PEDS). PED use is de-facto allowed in competitive or 'pro' bodbuilding and untested in 'natural'/ametuer competitions.

It is well known in the fitness industry that Simeon Panda has taken PEDS - he cannot admit it because he would lose his income (supplement sponsorship). It is not possible to reach that size naturally unless you are already muscular to begin with and have the perfect variables like I mentioned before (diet, training fequency, sleep/recovery, no injuries, no personal issues, no illness etc).

I agree you can build a fantastic physique, something like Cristiano Ronaldo's would be acheivable realistically - here's a guy who genuinely started out as a 145lb 6fter - over the span of a decade has made himself 40lbs heavier while staying at the same level of bodyfat.

Simeon, Plitt (RIP), Rob Riches (tested positive), Zyzz (RIP - tested positive, admitted to PED use) etc, all these fitness models are known in the industry to be on PEDS, but they immorally keep this a secret so they can sell workout programs and supplements to desperate teens the world over.

The fitness industry disgusts me, it teaches teenage boys/ young men (among other demographics) that they can look like their favourite athletes naturally, through buying their protein powders and expensive gym memberships. Fortunately there is much work being done to educate the population about what is realistically acheivable:

One such example is a youtube channel called FitnessFAQS - who teaches everyone that you can achieve your fitness goals with home workouts (slowly increasing difficulty), natural/organic food, recovery and most importantly, TIME.
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" says on 24/Jan/15
He's not that much shorter than Ashton Kutcher (in 2011):

Click Here

Click Here

If Arnold were wearing lifts here, then he would appear the same as Ashton Kutcher. I see 2-2.5" inches between them, so one of them. While Arnold is just slightly closer to the camera, the angle is in Ashton's favor.

Peak-6'1.5" (he was officially measured as this, so he's my height)
Today-6'0"
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Jan/15
1.89m says on 23/Jan/15
5-9.5" Joe weider with arnie on set of Predator 1987. 6-2" arnie?? You fan boys go a huge bromance on Arnie if you think hes 6-2" lol. Click Here



Still not sure about Weiders height, Arnie is 8cm taller there, so 177cm Weider means 185cm Arnie.

But Weider looked shorter than 5´9"-5´9.5" Frank Zane...
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 24/Jan/15
@6ftmagician: I'm not attacking you but it is possible to gain an impressive physique without steroids! Proper nutrition, plenty of rest and intense training but above all else...patience. He didn't gain all that mass in a short period of time. It's taken him a good few years to get there and he's gonna get even better. Those small scientific details that you mentionec are probably second nature to him. Genes do help but they're not the be all and end all. Look at Simeon Panda (6ft1 btw). He was a skinny runt before started lifting. Its taken him about 8 years at least to get to where he is now.

Lance Armstrong is a different bag altogether. He's a cheat who defecated on cycling. Even though I'm not a huge cycling enthusiast, I was always suspicious of his victories at Tour De France especially after his illness. That he could just bounce back and win like it was nothing.
spainmen192cm says on 23/Jan/15
Hey Rob, why Arnold has shrink 2 full inches at 67?!
[Editor Rob: extreme weight lifting over years might have been a contributing factor. The wear and tear on discs I think took it's toll...]
1.89m says on 23/Jan/15
5-9.5" Joe weider with arnie on set of Predator 1987. 6-2" arnie?? You fan boys go a huge bromance on Arnie if you think hes 6-2" lol. Click Here
6ftMagician says on 23/Jan/15
@rampageglover

It is not possible for a natural athlete to get that big. The general public is naturally oblivious to that - even Lance Armstrong (a 120lb guy) took steroids, for competitive cycling. Even in those endurance sports steroids use is rife - not least in sports where muscle is an advantage - sprinting (all top sprinters; Gay, Powell, Blake, Dix, Carter, except Bolt have tested positive). Even in natural bodybuilding (note, not competitive where steroid use is well documented and de facto allowed) everyone uses steroids. I suggest you educate yourself - the biggest a real natural can get is the size of Cristiano Ronaldo - but there is even suggestions that he took HGH (human growth hormone). So before you call anyone ignorant please educate yourself and do not attack someone before considering the evidence. I will not attack you, Calum very may well be the best living genetic specimen known to man but there is 0.00001% of that being possible.

I would hazard a guess most on this board do not even know scientifics behind building muscle - basics even - such as calorie, macronutrient and micronutrient requirements and protein synthesis, nor the impact genetics play in the ability to build muscle.

Here is a little fact to get you started - building muscle is a very slow process - and under the perfect variables (genetics, diet, training, no injuries, sleep) a natural athlete can build 10lbs of lean muscle a year maximum. Shocker, right? Well 10lbs is a lot - go get 10lbs of lean beef and imagine that spread over your body.

Oh yeah, all those hollywood transformations - 30lbs gain in 6 months - haha, either steroids or 5lbs muscle gain and 25lbs fat gain - just look at Fatleck preparing for Batman vs Superman.
Vegas says on 23/Jan/15
Height183 says on 22/Jan/15
Says he posted a screencap himself. Then says ''not sure why someone would post a screencap?''....... Vegas logic people.... He is very entertaining though.. It's not the first time he's made me laugh on here.
____________

i posted a screencap to show footwear (which most couldn't catch with the naked eye) you posted one to try and determine height based on a 30 second video of both guys standing together where it changes throughout...big big difference

glad some of us are making you laugh here though
Jaakoppi says on 23/Jan/15
Hey it seems you guys are accepting now the fact that he's likely 5'11 today. He's never been over 6'1".

Do steroids really effetct to height? I've never heard such a thing. I2 don't believe heavy weight training causes losing height, maybe after training but it's permanent.

Some people just lose more height when they get older. Long torso loses more that short torso. There are other things that affect on height loss like enough nutrients, calsium use and physical education.
Hartman says on 22/Jan/15
The Rock is shorter than six two (see the photo of him next to the slightly sub six five Barkley and see the Rock get truly dwarfed. Arnold, with his high heel booties, is still noticeably shorter than the 'six two' Rock. Five eleven without heels?
Connor6ft says on 22/Jan/15
That bodybuilder with Arnie looks more like 6ft 1 range than six two, Im seeing a two inch difference between the two guys maybe slightly a bit over two inches, so Arnie at 5ft 11, 6ft 1 range looks about right for the bodybuilder, he doesn't look 6ft 2.
Dmeyer says on 22/Jan/15
To me arnie is 5'11.25-11.5
Height183 says on 22/Jan/15
''Vegas says on 22/Jan/15
arnold was wearing big heeled boots probably giving him 1.5 inches (the screencap i have posted here more than once) and rock was wearing normal dress-shoes. if arnold was 6'1 at the time (1999) he would have been at least 6'2.5 in footwear. the full video is online so not sure why someone would post a screencap?''

Says he posted a screencap himself. Then says ''not sure why someone would post a screencap?''....... Vegas logic people.... He is very entertaining though.. It's not the first time he's made me laugh on here.
BigViking says on 22/Jan/15
Click Here

Here is the picture again from a slightly different perspective. Both Flex and Arnold are exactly the same distance from the camera and footwear (or lack thereof) can be clearly seen. Arnold looks max 2 inches taller than 5-8.5 Wheeler. Some sources give Wheeler 5-9 but NEVER more. How can this be a 6-2 man (would be 6-3 in shoes) standing next to a barefoot 5-9er. Only in LA LA land. Wake up!
Vegas says on 22/Jan/15
Luther says on 21/Jan/15
Height132, the Rock/Arnold photo does not show shoe size of either
_____

arnold was wearing big heeled boots probably giving him 1.5 inches (the screencap i have posted here more than once) and rock was wearing normal dress-shoes. if arnold was 6'1 at the time (1999) he would have been at least 6'2.5 in footwear. the full video is online so not sure why someone would post a screencap?
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 22/Jan/15
@6ftmagician: you're just ignorant. It's possible to attain that type of physique with the right discipline. That or you're jealous of his achievements.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 22/Jan/15
Click Here

Rob how tall do you think joe weider was? Looks not his billed 5´10" next to Burt Reynolds and shorter than 5´9"range Frank Zane
[Editor Rob: he could look anywhere between 5ft 9 and 10]
Danimal says on 22/Jan/15
Dmeyer says on 21/Jan/15
Exactly 5'11.5 with the 6'2 body builder

He is not 5'11.5".
6ftMagician says on 21/Jan/15
@Rampage(-_-_-)Clover

Haha, no roids. Funny world.Because no one lies on planet Earth, right? I can't take anything you say from now on given you believe Moger is natural. Moger looks 185 with Arnie anyway.
Luther says on 21/Jan/15
Calum can claim any height he wants. As we have seen with Arnold, 'six foot two' seems to cover anything from five foot ten to six foot one...
Luther says on 21/Jan/15
Height132, the Rock/Arnold photo does not show shoe size of either. So, unless both happen to be wearing the same shoe and neither is wearing lifts (unlikely in Arnold's history of cowboy boots), the comparison of estimated height does not work. I'm not striving to be difficult, just accurate.
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2 says on 21/Jan/15
He was measured at 6'1.5" already.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 21/Jan/15
That Von Moger kid is a genetic freak...no roids or anything and he is 6ft2.
A natural version of Arnold.
Height183 says on 21/Jan/15
The Rock was 6'2.5'' absolute Max in his peak. This picture is from 1999 or 2000. Rock looks at least 1.5 inches taller than Arnie. So Arnie was 6'1'' then and has lost 2 inches since. He just looks 5'11'' now.

Click Here
6ftMagician says on 21/Jan/15
Calum is not 6'2''. I will not get into a whole debate about this but I will say he is 185 or 186 max. Arnie is right around 5'11'' and before he was 184-ish. Cannot believe the myth about lifting reducing height drastically, as I've mentioned, basketball, with all its landing, exerts far more force through the body, and no, basketball does not and never will make anyone taller than their genetics allow.
Dmeyer says on 21/Jan/15
Exactly 5'11.5 with the 6'2 body builder
Daniel says on 20/Jan/15
Arnold and bodybuilder Calum von Moger:

Click Here

Calum claims 6'2" in height.
GP says on 20/Jan/15
I don't think Arnold was ever 187, I think he was more 184-185. In Predator, he was the same height as 6'1" Weathers and Arnold was in cowboy boots in the beginning scene. If bodybuilding takes such a toll on height then how is it possible that Lou Ferrigno, who I still see in the gym has only lost an inch?
Silky says on 20/Jan/15
Arnie was most likely much closer to a true 5'11 than 6'2. Heights are inflated and exaggerated in sporting events. And don't forget Arnie always liked to wear decent heeled shoes. So it could take a 5'11 man up to the 6'1 range for films and appearances.
6ftMagician says on 19/Jan/15
@ Henry, you are the closest to the truth here concerning Arnie's height. You are right attacking Danimal's claim regarding the bodybuilding world - it's true the bodybuilding industry is among the worst regulated in sports. It has no shame telling gym-goers that 1g of protein per lb of bodyweight is essential for building muscle. The truth is, the body needs only 0.7g per lb (I can cite this if needed) - they inflate this to sell more protein, the most expensive macronutrient (compared to Carbs and fats).
6ftMagician says on 19/Jan/15
@Danimal, Great so we agree Arnie is at best 181cm today. Sorted.

Now, your explanation regarding his peak height is all very well and good but there is no proof of this measurement in 1969 at 6'1.5'' at night. simply put, pics or it didn't happen. Till I see pics of this, I'll just assume he was closer to 183 peak height and he just shrunk within the normal 1 inch or so range.

@Henry As you rightly pointed out, this theory that lifting shrank Arnie's spine 5cm doesn't have much scientific backing. Basketball (among other sports) exerts far greater spinal stressors than does lifting weights, jumping exerts in excess of 5 times your bodyweight upon landing, and Kareem did that non stop for 20 years. Kareem was also a super athlete so his jumps were higher, thus his landing impact greater. He still aged very gracefully. What I'm getting at is Arnie did not shrink 5cm, he shrank closer to 2cm. Not even athletes in super spinal stressing sports such as basketball shrink that much (even considering taller people i.e. 7ft-ers should shrink more).
james says on 19/Jan/15
5'11 is spot on ..I remember standing with 6'1 president Obama at a podium when he was still gov of California and the president wasclearly 2 inches taller
Junior31 says on 19/Jan/15
Henry says on 19/Jan/15
Danimal, your contention that . "Arnold was a professional bodybuilder and a very well respected one," is fallacious on several levels. When he was a bodybuilder, there was no category of 'professional bodybuilder.' It didn't exist. Arnold made money from many other areas (laying bricks, for starters). Another hilarity is not understanding that "bodybuilder" and 'well-respected" is not an oxymoron. Next, you say "all of his measurements have been very well documented." Oh, really? By whom? The bodybuilding 'press' and Arnold himself, both of whom have a long, sorry history of exaggeration and distortion and denying facts (steroids, much?) to sell you something. You've been sold. Worse yet, you've bought into it. And are spreading their lies to the gullible. And no, losing three inches is not THE NORM for a guy in his mid 60's.


Your wrong in every accord.

Abnormal height loss has been lost by several 60 something body builders and wrestlers who have had multiple surgeries. Hulk hogan, roddy piper, the undertaker, ed corney. Paul orndoff, the list goes on and there will be more. Some of These guys can't even stand . Average height loss of 3 inches is not the norm of the average human but these guys don't sit in desks and aren't accountants. They severely abuse there body in every way

And yes. Arnold is a liar on several accords but other people measuring him especially those with distain for him isn't something that would be fabricated.

Arnold has admitted to using steroids frequently. The commentary of the pumping iron anniversary edition he says that he has and that it was commonly discussed amongst other body builders and was in fact the NORM. It wasn't a big deal to them it was part of what they did


If you read the celeb heights caption up top you will see that he was measured by a reputable body builder and trainer who actually didn't like Arnold and was measure 6'1.5. Please read its in the above caption

This argument will go on and on that that's why it's one of the hottest pages on the site.
I'm not arguing just using the facts provided. Let's not take shots at eachother. A witty conversation about height should be fun.
Henry says on 19/Jan/15
Danimal, your contention that . "Arnold was a professional bodybuilder and a very well respected one," is fallacious on several levels. When he was a bodybuilder, there was no category of 'professional bodybuilder.' It didn't exist. Arnold made money from many other areas (laying bricks, for starters). Another hilarity is not understanding that "bodybuilder" and 'well-respected" is not an oxymoron. Next, you say "all of his measurements have been very well documented." Oh, really? By whom? The bodybuilding 'press' and Arnold himself, both of whom have a long, sorry history of exaggeration and distortion and denying facts (steroids, much?) to sell you something. You've been sold. Worse yet, you've bought into it. And are spreading their lies to the gullible. And no, losing three inches is not THE NORM for a guy in his mid 60's.
Danimal says on 19/Jan/15
Height183 says on 15/Jan/15
Well John Cena does have an inch on Arnie, and we all know Cena calls himself 6'0''. I can't see anything more than 5'11'' for Arnie today.

Click Here

5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon has at least an inch on Arnold too.
Danimal says on 19/Jan/15
6ftMagician says on 16/Jan/15
@Daniaml,

I think the Dolph Ziggler case is one of the strongest yet but the John Cena case you mentioned evaded me, that is also very solid proof too!

Arnie seems to be 181cm in the morning and at night he is probably holding onto 180cm-ish!

I'm less interested in Arnies height today - nothing more than 5'11'' - I'm more interested in whether or not he was ever 187cm, for which I have doubts.

I don't like to over inflate guys heights, but in the case of Arnold, he was professional bodybuilder and a very well respected one. All of his measurements, from his bodyweight, to the circumference of his arms, legs, chest, etc, have been well documented over almost a span of 50 years. A man who openly despises Arnold (for everything that he stands for) wanted to prove that Arnold was not the 6'2" man that he claimed to be and so, Vince Basile challenged Arnold one night in Los Angeles in 1969 and measured him barefoot at 6'1.5". Arnold was a legit tall man, who used to be taller than almost everyone he met, including legit 6'0" and even 6'1" men. The list goes on and on and on. People don't have as much trust and credence in his former height, because of how tall he is today and has been for the past decade or more. It sort of lends to an inherent bias to his previous height when looking at his shrunken present height. YES, it is not the norm for a 67 year old man to have lost almost 3", but Arnold has never been a normal man in the physical sense. Whatever the contributing factors are, his body has aged well beyond his actual biological years. His face has aged 40 years in the last 10. His hair has thinned at a sped up rate in the last few years, as has his height. It's hard to imagine that he struggles to look 5'11" today, when he used to always look minimum 6'1" with ease, but that is the reality of it.
Henry says on 18/Jan/15
Arnold and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar are the exact same age. To those pretending that the vertically-challenged Arnold was once six foot two, but has lost something like four inches in his golden years, well, Kareem has lost what, a half-inch? Kareem was an actual athlete, not a faux athlete. The wear and tear on his body was immense. Six foot two peak for Arnold? Only in his own mind.
Dmeyer says on 18/Jan/15
All i meant is if rob list him 5'11.5/181.6cm it means he isnt 5'11.75/solid 182cm , also rob usualy dosnt list super low height but afternoon to low height so 5'11.25 is more possible than 5'11.75
Paul says on 18/Jan/15
Looked about 6'1 in the 1985 film Commando.
6ftMagician says on 16/Jan/15
@Daniaml,

I think the Dolph Ziggler case is one of the strongest yet but the John Cena case you mentioned evaded me, that is also very solid proof too!

Arnie seems to be 181cm in the morning and at night he is probably holding onto 180cm-ish!

I'm less interested in Arnies height today - nothing more than 5'11'' - I'm more interested in whether or not he was ever 187cm, for which I have doubts.
GP says on 16/Jan/15
I totally agree with Danimal. I remember years ago(4-5years)when I had an encounter with Arnold and I posted over here that he was 5'11"-5'11.5", I was laughed at, possibly when G and his posse were here. It's funny how some people just adjust the truth to their convenience rather than accepting it, lol!!
Height183 says on 16/Jan/15
@Horace: LOL!
Horace says on 16/Jan/15
"Danimal" is certainly correct: professional wrestling and professional bodybuilding never, ever exaggerate the heights or weights of their 'athletes.' Because they don't exaggerate to make money. Ever. That is not what they do. So Arnold must have once been six foot two. Because they billed him as that. And he said he was. So "Daimal" is correct. He has proved it. Congratulations, "Danimal." I now have some ocean-front property to sell you in Arizona.
Danimal says on 15/Jan/15
Bertram says on 13/Jan/15
Satchy, I can explain his 'drastical height loss,' he was never six two to being with. It was always a scam from day one. It is common in the bodybuilding and wrestling world, where the same so-called 'federation' that runs the 'sport' advertises the 'athletes.' Arnie? Real peak height, five eleven. Height today: five ten. One inch loss. Normal shrinkage rate for a senior citizen his age: 67.

No
Lucio says on 15/Jan/15
Dmeyer says on 15/Jan/15
If arnie was Čven 1mm over 5'11.5 ,rob would have listed him 6ft or 5'11.75 , if rob has him 5'11.5 it means he is more 5'11.25-11.5 than 11.5-11.
-------------

Dmeyer, come on, now don't exaggerate.
Rob will also be good at estimating heights, but a difference of a few millimeters, perhaps not even a laser beam is able to estimate it!
Look at the pic posted by Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" side by side with Joe Manganiello, you think he is only 182 cm ?
Click Here
Height183 says on 15/Jan/15
Well John Cena does have an inch on Arnie, and we all know Cena calls himself 6'0''. I can't see anything more than 5'11'' for Arnie today.

Click Here
Dmeyer says on 15/Jan/15
Morning peak 6'2.25 now 6ft 0-0 1/8 in peak night 6'1.25 now 5'11.25-11.5
Dmeyer says on 15/Jan/15
If arnie was Čven 1mm over 5'11.5 ,rob would have listed him 6ft or 5'11.75 , if rob has him 5'11.5 it means he is more 5'11.25-11.5 than 11.5-11.75
Vibram says on 15/Jan/15
How much in cm would a man close to 70 years old expect to have lost since his prime? 3cm??? You there Rob??
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/Jan/15
@satchy

You'll need to forgive Danimal. He tends to be overly dramatic and quite repetitive. That's what a decade 50 or more daily comments to the same website will do to you psychologically. Arnold has roughly 2in but not 3in. In another 10 years...who knows. A lot of it is to do with injuries on set followed by intensive surgeries. Age is also a factor.
Junior31 says on 14/Jan/15
Danimal says on 13/Jan/15
satchy says on 12/Jan/15
hi guys, can somebody explain to me why his height loss was so drastical? I mean 2 inches is quite a loss

More like 3" height loss, not 2". It's a combination of age, decades of heavy weightlifting, steroid abuse, poor health in later life, stress, and perhaps he's had surgeries (hip replacement, back surgery, etc).


No perhaps Danimal, his surgeries are well documented. I posted a bunch of links a while back

I don't understand that when it comes to a severe height loss (3 inches ) as in hulk hogan it's believable and actual and when it comes to Arnold some people believe even AN INCH is out of the question. What? How? They are roughly the same age with Arnold actually being older. They both abused there bodies, abused steroids, and were active into there 50's and more active then the normal 60+ man today. They both had major surgeries ( neck,back,hip) that severely alter posture and height. Much like hogan he's lost close to 3 inches in height.
Lucio says on 14/Jan/15
Danimal says on 13/Jan/15
satchy says on 12/Jan/15
hi guys, can somebody explain to me why his height loss was so drastical? I mean 2 inches is quite a loss

More like 3" height loss, not 2". It's a combination of age, decades of heavy weightlifting, steroid abuse, poor health in later life, stress, and perhaps he's had surgeries (hip replacement, back surgery, etc).
-------------------

Sure, why not do 4 inches while we're at?
It seems to me that a more correct estimate. lol
Do not say nonsense. First he has never been a full 6'2", point first.

Second point, it seems to me very, very strange that Basile has measured him at 6'1.5" in the afternoon after a heavy weight training.
Most likely he is wrong by a few millimeters in the measurement, because even at 19 or 20 years, he did'nt look more than 186 cm in good posture barefoot in a lot of photos next to Reg Park.

Point three, he in all the pics in his bodybuilding days, next to a legit 6'1" footer as Mike Katz, he was always their same height or a little more, so a solid 6'1", not 6'2" as you say.

Fourthly, I never heard that years of body bulding do lose height more than normal, even if the use of steroids, however something he has not made much use. If anything it's the opposite.

So in summary: peak height 185.5 cm, 183 cm now (if he's standing straight, look at his pic with Manganiello posted by Celebheights 6'1.5 "-6'2") and 182-181 cm if he's relaxed. So 1-1.5 inches of maximum height loss.
The 3 inch you say, are an absurdity that does not exist nowhere.
Linke says on 14/Jan/15
Hasta la vista 6 feet club
Danimal says on 13/Jan/15
satchy says on 12/Jan/15
hi guys, can somebody explain to me why his height loss was so drastical? I mean 2 inches is quite a loss

More like 3" height loss, not 2". It's a combination of age, decades of heavy weightlifting, steroid abuse, poor health in later life, stress, and perhaps he's had surgeries (hip replacement, back surgery, etc).
Danimal says on 13/Jan/15
6ftMagician says on 12/Jan/15
@Height183

Wow. Ziggler is in wrestling boots which probably adds slightly more than Arnie's footwear but you are right, Arnie looks nothing over 180cm there. You definetly made a legit case there!

What about Arnold next to 5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon, 5'9"-5'10" George St-Pierre, 5'11" Dennis Wolf, 6'0" John Cena? Do those not qualify as legit cases to you? Arnold has been looking below 5'11" for a while now.
Danimal says on 13/Jan/15
John95 says on 11/Jan/15
I think 6'1.25 peak morning height
Now 5'11 morning height

He was measured at 6'1.5" barefoot at night in 1969.
Bertram says on 13/Jan/15
Satchy, I can explain his 'drastical height loss,' he was never six two to being with. It was always a scam from day one. It is common in the bodybuilding and wrestling world, where the same so-called 'federation' that runs the 'sport' advertises the 'athletes.' Arnie? Real peak height, five eleven. Height today: five ten. One inch loss. Normal shrinkage rate for a senior citizen his age: 67.
6ftMagician says on 12/Jan/15
@Height183

Wow. Ziggler is in wrestling boots which probably adds slightly more than Arnie's footwear but you are right, Arnie looks nothing over 180cm there. You definetly made a legit case there!

Never thought Arnie would fall to a flat 180cm but I guess heavy lifting and years of spinal abuse does that to some people.
satchy says on 12/Jan/15
hi guys, can somebody explain to me why his height loss was so drastical? I mean 2 inches is quite a loss
Height183 says on 12/Jan/15
Arnie looking 5'11'' Max with 5'10.5'' Dolph Ziggler!

Click Here

Maybe you should knock off another cm Rob.. :)
John95 says on 11/Jan/15
I think 6'1.25 peak morning height
Now 5'11 morning height
Marcus says on 10/Jan/15
To be honest though I do not see Arnold as a big lift wearer. The dress shoes he usually wears do not look like they contain lifts in them, or at least it's not as apparant as say Brad Pitt or Robert Downey Junior.
Danimal says on 9/Jan/15
Ron B. says on 8/Jan/15
At least 6'.05" peak height. Anything below that is ludicrous.
Perfectly proportioned. He was taller than he looked.

Bare minimum 6'1" peak height.
Danimal says on 9/Jan/15
Shredo says on 8/Jan/15
Arnie is 68 years old, the man has lost some height with his age.

He still looks good though and keeps himself fit

He's lost far more than the average 67 year old will have lost (about 1").
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" says on 9/Jan/15
@Junior If he didn't accomplish what he accomplished, however, it wouldn't have been as big of a deal if he fibbed about his height or not to others. I do agree that it's irrelevant on a celebheights pages though.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 9/Jan/15
Yeah I can live with 185-186cm for his peak. He for sure wasn´t under 185cm...

Rob if I remember right, you once said 6´1.5" could´ve been a round up in your eyes too.
[Editor Rob: always possible, for every guy who sits on 6ft 1 or 1.5 you have as many sitting on 1/8th 1/4 or 3/8ths mark, but I can see people rounding to nearest half inch.]
Ron B. says on 8/Jan/15
At least 6'.05" peak height. Anything below that is ludicrous.
Perfectly proportioned. He was taller than he looked.
Junior31 says on 8/Jan/15
This is getting stupid. Looks and what this guy did or did not accomplish has NOTHING TO DO WITH HIS HEIGHT. Let's not even care about what he states for his height but look at him on comparison to others and what others say about his height like Vince basile. If this can't happen and you want to discuss your hatred or admiration for the guy, talk to your local therapist because this site is called Celeb HEIGHTS. Not freshman psychology. Get a grip it's not that serious.
josey wales says on 8/Jan/15
I am somewhat surprised how folks are allowed to directly or indirectly say derogatory things about peoples character as opposed to debate their height. I sometimes wonder how some of the posters would've faired being in the public eye. Sure they earn the mega bucks but theyre still human. As for the topic id go for a current height of 5'11" flat.
Celebheights 6'1.5"-6'2" says on 8/Jan/15
If he's only 5'11.5", then Joe Manganiello is no more than 6'3.5". That puts Chris Hemsworth at what? 6'1.5"? Here's the photo that proves that the difference between him and Joe is minimal:

Click Here
Shredo says on 8/Jan/15
Arnie is 68 years old, the man has lost some height with his age.

He still looks good though and keeps himself fit
Leland says on 7/Jan/15
New lines for Commando: "You know, Sully, when I told you, 'I'm six two?' I LIED!!!"
184.3cm says on 7/Jan/15
Trevor: Well thats something we will never know, however usually Guiness are very adamant about measurements. Alot of people have lost their records because of refusing said measurements. Also you should read the email from Vince Basille he states that Arnold was even taller than 185cm and his bicep measurement is pretty legit give a half inch or so. I actually believe his 186 cm claim as back then he was an unknown and more importantly he was using metric. 6'1.5 is in the 186cm range as well 186.69 or so which is why Rob rounded up but who is to say Vince didnt round up a bit?. He was already down to my height during films like End of Days, a couple cm loss which wasnt bad but then after 60 he started losing alot.
Junior31 says on 6/Jan/15
BigViking says on 5/Jan/15
Junior31 says on 3/Jan/15
...Hold up a pic of him in pimping iron and hold up a pic of him now. Not only does he look not remotely like this same person but the two don't even look related.

----------------------------------------------------------
Probably the dumbest and most biased line ever written on Celebheights!


Um why? Cut the biased garbage. The site is about height not about your emotional attachment toward an action star. That's my opinion and I'm entitled to it so chill.

Regarding his HEIGHT he's a weak 5'11 today and 6'1 back then.

Your wanting to quarrel over the looks of a celebrity on a height page is absurd and a testament to why your on here.
1.89m says on 5/Jan/15
Danimal says on 3/Jan/15
1.89m says on 2/Jan/15
Defiantly over 6-0 peak,6-0.75" max imo. Now 5-11"approx. 1.5" loss is believable. From 6-2 to now 5-11" is too much hence he was never 6-2". Hollywood height not real height.

Never understood this whole "it's too much", or "it doesn't sound right to me", etc. Too much according to whom? To what? Whether something doesn't compute in your mind, doesn't mean it's not real. Some people DO lose more than the average. Arnold is one of those people, as is Robert Plant, Clint Eastwood, Louis Gossett Junior, and just about every wrestler from the 1980's.

Well its your opinion,but he was never 6-2" in mine. Hence 5-11" approx today.
Junior31 says on 5/Jan/15
BigViking says on 5/Jan/15
Arnold still looks very good. Junior just loves to degrade Arnolds looks. It´s so obvious Junior gets his rockers off doing this. My verdict on Junior: Malignant narcissism syndrome. Eat that, Junior!


Freud I mean big Viking. Something tells me your sitting in front of your computer dressed as Conan wearing a terminator t shirt while kindergarten cop is blaring on the tv behind you. When did this page become a n Arnold fan club.

Look the guy aged like crap as did most of the 70s action stars and wrestlers. His 2-3 inch height loss sums it up. You also have to remember the amount of plastic surgery he had. Minus the Botox from the equation too and yikes

Arch Stanton my dad is that age too but c'mon. Aside from a few age marks and 20lbs you can still tell it's him lol look at his eyes. Arnold looks like he's perpetually on a motorcycle doing 100mph.
BigViking says on 5/Jan/15
Junior31 says on 3/Jan/15
...Hold up a pic of him in pimping iron and hold up a pic of him now. Not only does he look not remotely like this same person but the two don't even look related.

----------------------------------------------------------
Probably the dumbest and most biased line ever written on Celebheights!
BigViking says on 5/Jan/15
Arnold still looks very good. Junior just loves to degrade Arnolds looks. It´s so obvious Junior gets his rockers off doing this. My verdict on Junior: Malignant narcissism syndrome. Eat that, Junior!
JOHN says on 5/Jan/15
No,it's not possible that he is taller than 6ft.I would guess that he is at max 5 11 1/2,unquestionably not over than 6ft st these days.(at his height shrinking stage.Even in his youth ,I would still have doubts if he was really 6ft 1/2.
Arch Stanton says on 5/Jan/15
Junior31 says on 3/Jan/15
This guy is a shell of the man he was in the 1970s. Screw height. As a whole he did not age well. Suddenly e looks Asian. His posture. His mannerisms. We are talking about the alpha male of alpha males at one point. Juiced up. He looks horrendous. With that being said I think he's a weak 5'11 today wich means I believe he's generally in the high 5'10 range mid day. A far cry from the Austrian oak who stood in my eyes 6'1 the days of pumping iron.

He's 67 years old Junior. Gingery hair dye and back wear and tear aside he's not looking too bad at all for his age. You can't possibly expect a 67 year old guy to still be as they were in their prime. My dad, although still fit, is starting to look the shell of what he used to at 66, he's shrunk in both height and frame and looks quite frail at times now and in his prime he was an athletic surfer. He can't even hold down a bar chord on the guitar for very long anymore due to arthritis problems. It is horrendous generally what happens to guys in their 60s. Most guys undergo some major aging changes in which they go from essentially middle age to old age. Harrison Ford is one of the few guys I can think of off the top of my head who managed to go through his 60s relatively unscathed aside from the height loss. Arnie compared to a lot of guys his age still looks pretty good I think.
Danimal says on 5/Jan/15
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Jan/15
Click Here

If Arnies head was 10inches he looks 2.6" / 6,6cm taller than 5´10" Bruno Sammartino, so about 185cm/ 6´0.75", that´s not a near 6´2" man next to a 5´10" man

Bruno was 5'10"-5'11" at his peak.
Danimal says on 5/Jan/15
Rudolph says on 3/Jan/15
So what if Arnold is shorter than Jimmy Fallon. At least there was a time when Arnold was stronger than Jimmy Fallon.

No one is saying that Arnold is lesser of a man because he's shorter than Jimmy Fallon. We're just stating facts (at least I am). Besides, Arnold at his peak would have had 2" on Jimmy Fallon.
lelman says on 3/Jan/15
Cant believe my eyes! I guess he stopped with the payments then rob...
[Editor Rob: he sent me a suitcase of Zimbabwean Dollars...]
Junior31 says on 3/Jan/15
This guy is a shell of the man he was in the 1970s. Screw height. As a whole he did not age well. Suddenly e looks Asian. His posture. His mannerisms. We are talking about the alpha male of alpha males at one point. Juiced up. He looks horrendous. With that being said I think he's a weak 5'11 today wich means I believe he's generally in the high 5'10 range mid day. A far cry from the Austrian oak who stood in my eyes 6'1 the days of pumping iron.

Hold up a pic of him in pimping iron and hold up a pic of him now. Not only does he look not remotely like this same person but the two don't even look related.

Hulk hogan, Roddy piper, sly. And the list goes on and on for 60+ year old dudes who absurd there bodies. The end result. More then average height lost
Danimal says on 3/Jan/15
1.89m says on 2/Jan/15
Defiantly over 6-0 peak,6-0.75" max imo. Now 5-11"approx. 1.5" loss is believable. From 6-2 to now 5-11" is too much hence he was never 6-2". Hollywood height not real height.

Never understood this whole "it's too much", or "it doesn't sound right to me", etc. Too much according to whom? To what? Whether something doesn't compute in your mind, doesn't mean it's not real. Some people DO lose more than the average. Arnold is one of those people, as is Robert Plant, Clint Eastwood, Louis Gossett Junior, and just about every wrestler from the 1980's.
Rudolph says on 3/Jan/15
So what if Arnold is shorter than Jimmy Fallon. At least there was a time when Arnold was stronger than Jimmy Fallon.
Dmeyer says on 3/Jan/15
Click Here ,
Trevor says on 3/Jan/15
184.3cm: The question is did Guiness take his measurements at face value or did they actually go to the trouble of measuring him? Arnold's supposed calf measurements of 20 inches have always been an open joke in the bodybuilding world. As has his supposed height.
uhoh says on 3/Jan/15
Once a height has been changed it's kind of like that ugly rug you had in your foyer, it probably won't make it back into the house once it's in the garage, although the possibility for reversal is not completely ruled out.
Kevin says on 3/Jan/15
GUY says on 2/Jan/15
You lose.....................................

What did i exactly lose. Dude i even did not bother talking to you and you still replied. Thumbs UP.
GUY says on 3/Jan/15
lexander says on 1/Jan/15
GUY says on 1/Jan/15
Dude what ever your whole argument maybe, but as an undergrad medical student, i can tell you for sure that the distance from the mid of your eye to infratip break of your nose is anything but 2 inches.Its exactly 1.12 inch give or take a little depending on facial variation.
---------------------------------
Whatever you say Dr.NNA. I'm the Supreme President of the World Weights and Measurement Society and I say the real distance is 9.856 inches, give or take depending on facial variation. We recently officially lengthened both the inch measurement, and the distance from your pupil to your "infratip break of your nose."
broth a says on 3/Jan/15
Serge Nubret sstated a few years before he passed that he was 180cm. Arnold looked two inches taller minimum.
Joe says on 2/Jan/15
Body building is very stressful on the body particularly the skeleton, its not hard to imagine that he has lost height with age, he is in his 60s, when he was in his prime, I believe he was 6'1" not a full 6'2", that was his height in shoes. With age he has gotten out of shape and lost cartilage in his spine and knees, so my best guess is that he is 5'11" today.
6ftMagician says on 2/Jan/15
Rob, I normally agree with your opinions but a 5cm loss is honestly not right for Arnold. On no planet can someone lose that much. Arnie was never over 185cm, can't see 186 or 187 to be honest. Let's not forget just how commanding a true, legit 187 guy/girl is.

I think his peak was just under the full 6'1'' and today he is just under 6'0''. Arnie probably has genes which make him more susceptible to height loss + injuries/spine damage and lifting weights causes extra wear and tear.

From 184-185cm to 181-182cm today.
[Editor Rob: look at some of the wrestlers who have lost inches, I don't think 2 inches by latter half of 60's is out of this world for someone who was putting their spine under decades of extreme work, stuff that 99.999% of people don't do.]
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Jan/15
Click Here

If Arnies head was 10inches he looks 2.6" / 6,6cm taller than 5´10" Bruno Sammartino, so about 185cm/ 6´0.75", that´s not a near 6´2" man next to a 5´10" man
Avillax says on 2/Jan/15
I think he was actually 6' 1.5", I'll you why. In Austria they use the metric system, so that would be equal to 187 cm, people who use the Metric system wouldn't know how to translate that exactly and so they would just say 2" instead of 1.5. I've read his bio as well as seen all his of his pics and in his body building days he was always towering over other competitors who were believed to be between 5' 10 and 5'11 and he was always good 2-3" taller barefoot, plus the only believable record that survived was when he was measured in competition to be 187 cm. I do believe he shrank, I mean he's a 70 year old with a big head which also gives the impression of being shorter now so I believe he's probably 6 feet tall now.
BigViking says on 2/Jan/15
Lou is 6-2 with Manny Perry. He looks a tad taller in the picture but he is on higher ground. Makes perfect sense. Lous bodyweight during his early competitive years is what Arnolds would have been had he been a true 6-2.
thom says on 2/Jan/15
I have no idea of arnolds peak, but today arnold is under 5'11". Its a fact chock it up to age/heavy body building/juice but its a fact. His son is 5'11" he is noticably shorter look them up, in movies or on red carpet you can wear lifts, on the street with your kid maybe not. Im 5'11" flat at night-asked my dad about it (flew him, private pilot, 5'9") he said arnolds 5'9". Thats a stretch but 5'11" is also, either way he made it clear when i asked if he was my height the answer is absolutely not. Downgrade another inch, sorry.
yabbadabbadoo says on 2/Jan/15
Peak: 6'1" in the evening (6'0.5" minimum)
Now: 5'11" in the evening

5'11" peak, LOL. It's very simple: You can't claim '' I'm 6'2" '' if you are 3 inches from that, people would notice it quickly. You can do that if you just add yourself 0.5"-0.75", which is this case.
These things happen. My father is 62 and has lost 3 cm without lifting weights in his life.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/Jan/15
He looks so diminished in that picture
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 2/Jan/15
Click Here peak Lou and 6´2" Manny Perry
1.89m says on 2/Jan/15
Defiantly over 6-0 peak,6-0.75" max imo. Now 5-11"approx. 1.5" loss is believable. From 6-2 to now 5-11" is too much hence he was never 6-2". Hollywood height not real height.
GUY says on 2/Jan/15
Kevin says on 1/Jan/15
@Lucio I am still struggling to understand your post.
@MJKoP I highly doubt that he was 6'2. I would put my bet on 5'11 max.
---------------------------------
You lose.....................................
Luther says on 1/Jan/15
I think Arnold stands five foot eleven. So long as you include the hair plugs.
Alexander says on 1/Jan/15
GUY says on 1/Jan/15
Dude what ever your whole argument maybe, but as an undergrad medical student, i can tell you for sure that the distance from the mid of your eye to infratip break of your nose is anything but 2 inches.Its exactly 1.12 inch give or take a little depending on facial variation.
184.3cm says on 1/Jan/15
@Trevor

He was entered into the Guiness book for his other measurements, 57 inch chest which was massive. 22 inch bicep, there were full body measurements done , height was only added in the interest of being thorough. In was the 74 edition i think but its been a long time since i had that copy. Now think about it if they measured his chest at 57 inches then he would have to be tall to pull of the proportions he had at the time. I personally have a 46 inch chest with low fat and im just over 6'.05 at night barefoot and i dont look stocky neither did he if you look at photos. He was minimum my height at peak so maybe 185cm in afternoon but i cant say he would be lower. In this case the proportions do not lie a 5'11 man would look like a box with that size chest.
Lucio says on 1/Jan/15
NNA says on 31/Dec/14
"..Secondly My lines are positioned at the center.."

"..lines not straight..."
___________________________________________


It 's true, your lines are the thinnest, I checked with paintbrush, however the only true thing you said.
Your lines are positioned at the center ?? LOL. If for you what is the center, then you must be the subject that Picasso used for his paintings.
I was referring to Arnold not being standing straight, but in relaxed posture.
What does your lines have to do with it?
It's useless to try to mystify things, everyone can see your stupid lines are positioned on the lowest Arnie's eye, so you can step on toes to ground up to consume the shoes.

Anyway, your Arnold-Lee pics are horrible.
For starters we don't see the shoes, nor the ground, the shooting angle is bad, and most important, there is no other Arnold-Lee photos for a rebuttal.
Besides, I am not surprised that much, is the tactic of you trolls bring unclear and badly angled photos, so everyone can say everything and its opposite.

But why sometimes you don't bring some good photos for an honest comparison?
My dear alienated friend, you lost and you have been beaten on your own ground. :)
Rodney says on 1/Jan/15
Whether Arnold is, or ever was, over six feet tall and whether he is, and has possibly always been, under six feet tall is surely missing the point. The point is surely that he single-handedly inspired literally millions of boys around the world to risk their health, take anabolic steroids, and lie about it. This is true greatness. Forget they also shaved their legs and underarms and attempted to grow breasts bigger than their own mothers to match their masculine icon. What a man.
Dmeyer says on 1/Jan/15
Jimmy fallon is very possibly 5'11.75 and arnie not allways stands at his best with him but i agree he can look 5'10.75 with him
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 1/Jan/15
184.3cm says on 29/Dec/14
@Heightcrazyred6ft
...
And to be honest the amercian dream in that period was more 6'4 as all the big names were around that range. It still is the alpha height even guys taller than 6'4 claim it !


If he were a legit 6´2" they would have billed him 6´4".
He just wasn´t tall enough to get away with it.

Here´s peak Lou Ferrigno next to his 6´2" stuntdouble Manny Perry... barefoot/socks Lou at best 6´3"-6´3.25" full stretched.

Here´s peak Lou barefoot next to Arnold Click Here

Anyone with eyes and a logic based brain can see Arnold was not near 6´2"
He was what he claimed at peak: 185cm...
So I call the Basille measurement bogus! Wonder how he would explain this comparison...

So 6´2" fanboys start your crying an yelling and bring up odd pics, it´s all useless.
We have this BAREFOOT fullbody pics for years now - to much of you will never learn...


And Danimal - you were there for the "night" measurement - lol show your 5´9" British Bulldog next to your 6´2" Arnold...

Did you ever adjust one of your favourite estimations? Bashing Bulldog and Will Smith for years now and hyping Arnie, Lou and Hogan!
It doesn´t add up.
But do bash like you want to do...
Kevin says on 1/Jan/15
@Lucio I am still struggling to understand your post.
@MJKoP I highly doubt that he was 6'2. I would put my bet on 5'11 max.
GUY says on 1/Jan/15
@NNA
Clearly you don't understand sarcasm. If you need to drop credentials and education because you can't properly articulate your points, then anyone can do this. Guess what, Mensa held a competition and I won, so therefore I'm right.

Your whole argument here is based on inaccuracies. You clearly prefer a rigged game. I never said it's two inches from the middle of your eye to the "tip" of your nose. It's from the middle of your eye to the bottom of your nostril where it joins your face. If you don't believe me, get a ruler and measure it. I certainly never said it was three inches either, as that's just a strawman tactic. With that in mind
Click Here
that's 2 inches difference, when measuring from lee's higher eye to Arnold's lower eye. For the sake of this argument I'll look past the flagrant favoritism of Lee's advantaged side VS Arnold's disadvantaged side that surely was intentional. Correcting for this with putting the line at the average between both eyes gives a more fair and accurate comparison. Saying it's just a inch is plain wrong, and I've proven it to be incorrect. Maybe a baby might have only an inch. Understand that you're wrong, and quit making up petty fallacies to save yourself.

This is actually a first. I've seen lots of made up height downgrades and upgrades only to cheat an agenda. But I've never seen a unit of measurement upgrade. How could anyone expect anyone to believe it's only an inch from your eye to the center of your forehead, or that it's "hardly" and inch difference in the photos you've posted. And that Arnold is as low as only 2 inches taller than Hollande shows you're either just a troll or entirely ignorant of units of measure (among many other things I'm sure). Are you truly confused? Or are you that desecrated to make up false facts in face of defeat.

Simply repeating that the lines are not aligned properly here
Click Here
or that there's a tilt doesn't make it true. Both accusations are made up by you.

Francois Holland height sources
Click Here
Click Here
Take your pick. It's unanimous, and there's nothing of mention of your height "correction". Arnold enjoys all kinds of shoes and boots, and has been seen numerous times in cowboy boots. But he's never been seen or proven to use lifts or elevator shoes. That's always been fantasy speculation by people like you on sites like this. Sarcozy is a proven lift wearer who also stands on platforms in front of podiums and stands on his toes. Look at his heels, they almost look like disco platforms, compared to Hollandes normal looking shoes
Click Here
Click Here
So again, proper critical thinking should not accept throwing away numerous listed heights in light of a comparison to a known lift wearer in stacked heels.

I'm not familiar with Aamir khan, but he's listed 5'6", not 5'3"-5'4". He's also rumored to be a lift wearer from what I've read, being a short action star in India. I don't know because I don't know him. One thing for sure, I can see skin above where you've drawn Arnold's cranium line. Yet another "mistake" among a deluge of mistakes on this latest post of yours. Aamir's cranium is at Arnold's eye level, as you've drawn, which displays 5 inches. Arnold has a head lean, so straightening up he'd easily reach the 5'11.5" he's currently listed at.

This is overall a poor example for several reasons. We can't see their feet, as this guy is meeting his hero, this would be the time to wear lifts if he wears them. Low ball estimations for him are only public speculations and opinions, so they are nothing solid or official to go by. It's a one of a kind photo, as there aren't any other photos or videos to compare it to. But going by whats officially on the books, Arnie does seem to be over 5'11" but under 6' there.
Lucio says on 31/Dec/14
Danimal says on 30/Dec/14
Dmeyer says on 29/Dec/14
6 ft 0-0.25 out of Bed night 5'11.25-11.5

Which part of 5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon being noticeably taller than Arnold is difficult for you to accept?
------------------

Danimal, you can see the footwear they worn in the video?
No, because the feet are cut by the frame.
Then, you're so sure that Jimmy is not wearing some type of shoes that give him some advantage?
Are you really sure?
Is Jimmy Fallon really 182 cm tall?
I can fold down to you the question: is a concept so hard to accept for you?
markb says on 31/Dec/14
There's something poignant about going to Celebrity Heights on January 1st and actually seeing it there on the screen -- "Arnold Schwarzenegger's height is 5ft 11.5in".
uhoh says on 31/Dec/14
Starting to feel bad for Arnie, I think we should undo the downgrade and put 6ft.
NNA says on 31/Dec/14
Lucio says on 31/Dec/14
first picture: just pathetic. Your line is thick and is positioned on the lowest Arnie's eye.
Laughable comparison and macroscopically obvious attempt to cheat.

Second photo: pathetic. Arnold is not standing straight but relaxed.

Third photo: clearly pathetic as above. Arnold has his head tilted and he's not standing straight.

Fourth photo: Same for the third.

Fifth photo: always the same thing. The line is positioned on the lowest Arnie's eye in a pathetic attempt to cheat, hoping that the others don't notice it. Unfortunately you went wrong.

Sixth picture: you can't see the ground, the angle slightly favors Holland and who knows what other lifts and various tricks is using Sarkozy (another with the Napoleon complex).

Seventh photo: pathetic and blatantly obvious that the line on the Arnold's head cuts the top of his skull. Besides Arnold has his head tilted towards Aamir khan.

Unfortunately for you, your clumsy and obvious attempts were discovered.
You can safely conclude conclude that a psychiatric visit would be particularly appropriate. :-)

_____________________________________________________________________________

Wow we got another Hallucinating friend or is it GUY posting with a different ID. Hmmm. You never know.

Anyways, First of all, i used the thinnest line available in any software to draw the lines.

Secondly My lines are positioned at the center. But even if for argument sake, i except your STUPID rebuttal that i positioned it on lower level of Arnold's eye, again it doesn't support your Twin hallucinating friend's argument of 3 inches difference, because if the distance between the center of your eye and its lower part accounts for something in inches then My Friend, you are not a human. In this case, You are a Tarsier. Yes that's what you are.

I see that you never came up if anything solid to negate my proofs. You acted like a typical 3 year old who cried over the fact that his Twin brother was bullied. " Pathetic", "lines not straight" and " Pathetic" is all i could get from your laughable post.

Anyways, if you have anything solid to come up with next time, i would be happy to give an answer to it. Till that time, you see that corner in your room ... Yeh that corner ... go there and cry.
MJKoP says on 31/Dec/14
Easily 6'2" during his prime. Probably still scrapes or even eclipses the six foot notch at breakfast in 2014/15.
Lucio says on 31/Dec/14
@NNA,

first picture: just pathetic. Your line is thick and is positioned on the lowest Arnie's eye.
Laughable comparison and macroscopically obvious attempt to cheat.

Second photo: pathetic. Arnold is not standing straight but relaxed.

Third photo: clearly pathetic as above. Arnold has his head tilted and he's not standing straight.

Fourth photo: Same for the third.

Fifth photo: always the same thing. The line is positioned on the lowest Arnie's eye in a pathetic attempt to cheat, hoping that the others don't notice it. Unfortunately you went wrong.

Sixth picture: you can't see the ground, the angle slightly favors Holland and who knows what other lifts and various tricks is using Sarkozy (another with the Napoleon complex).

Seventh photo: pathetic and blatantly obvious that the line on the Arnold's head cuts the top of his skull. Besides Arnold has his head tilted towards Aamir khan.

Unfortunately for you, your clumsy and obvious attempts were discovered.
You can safely conclude conclude that a psychiatric visit would be particularly appropriate. :-)
BigViking says on 31/Dec/14
I always wondered how Arnold could be 6-2 and only 235 lbs when everyone else at that height easily weighs 280-290 lbs looking the same size as Arnold. But of course at 5-11 - 5-11.5 peak everything makes much more sense!
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 30/Dec/14
Arnold at his peak would have been around the same as Will Smith
Danimal says on 30/Dec/14
Dmeyer says on 29/Dec/14
6 ft 0-0.25 out of Bed night 5'11.25-11.5

Which part of 5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon being noticeably taller than Arnold is difficult for you to accept?
Dmeyer says on 30/Dec/14
Rob considering at night i can be Anywere 181.3-181.7cm arnie is not taller today , if i met him i. Would be a good comparison
Dmeyer says on 30/Dec/14
Rob considering at night i can be Anywere 181.3-181.7cm arnie is not taller today
Jesse says on 30/Dec/14
Arnold's self-proclaimed 'height' is much like his college 'degree': phony, phony, phony. But, given the plastic surgery, the dye job, the capped teeth, you've got to admit the guy is consistent when it comes to living the lie.
Horace says on 30/Dec/14
I admit, for much of my life, I actually believed Arnold was six foot two, because that was his billed height and that is what he told everyone for decades. Am I to understand that all this time, he was not, in fact, a man (over six feet tall), but a manlet (under six feet tall)? Wow. Talk about smoke and mirrors. I wonder if he had to use a booster seat when he had to GET TO THE CHOPPER.
NNA says on 30/Dec/14
GUY says on 29/Dec/14
Well I'm actually an astrophysicist and I also perform brain surgery for fun on my days off, so that pretty much makes me right. Comparing Hollande to Sarcozy is comparing someone to a notorious lift wearer who's insecure about his height. But if you want to declare that all of the listings of Hollande's height of 5'7" are unreliable, and your comparison to a lift wearer IS reliable, then cherry-pick whatever evidence supports your claim regardless of any accuracy.

Belittling insults do nothing for your cause, and that's all you bring. It doesn't faze me, and reveals nothing but a smokescreen for flimsy paper-thin argument. We can argue about proper eye placement or line width until the cows come home. Frankly Arnold is not standing straight in that photo anyway, so focusing an argument there is baseless to get an accurate comparison with Lee. This shot, which is a still from the video you provided, is the more accurate comparison
and yet you refuse to comment. The video earlier shows Arnold lowering his height to honor the shorter man, which is seen in the published photo. But Arnold then raises his height, and it's clear the difference is greater. You say you're a graduate student, which implies you insist you're very smart, and yet you choose to overlook this. Like I've said before, you use photos from two months ago to prove Arnold was 5'10" max prime 45 years ago, as if to say that if he doesn't look 6'1.5 now, he never was.

I don't have much of a problem with Arnold now being listed 5'11 1/2", as that's what he seems to look today. He was taller than 6' Tony Blair and 5'11 1/2" George W Bush during his term as Governor. He's clearly been shrinking since around the year 2000. None of this confirms your continued insistence that he was only 5'10" peak. You haven't proven anything.

____________________________________________________________________________

Oh you are astrophysicist and you perform brain surgeries on your off days for fun ... YEAH RIGHT. and I go to moon on my off days ... match that.

How many times i have to remind you my hallucinating friend, your lines are not aligned properly. Please Mr. Astrophysicist, try learning how to draw lines on your off days, that'll help you more.

Now coming to the fact that i don't talk with proves. Lets see some pictures, this time, thinnest lines used to answer all those who criticized me with using thicker lines in my previous pictures.

1) Click Here

In this picture you can clearly see that the difference is hardly about an inch. If you measure the distance from the center of your eye to the tip of your nose, its hardly an inch. All of you try it now and see.
@GUY, if the distance in your case is about 3 inches or more, then you are not a human. You are a Horse.

2) Click Here

In the above picture, Lee's head is slightly tilted towards his right shoulder which affects the measurement. But again, if you analyse, the difference is far from 3 inches. Again everyone, try measuring the distance from the center of your eye to the middle of your forehead and tell me how much is it. hardly an Inch or 1.2 inch in some cases.
@GUY, if your distance is about 3 inches or more, i bet you know what you are then.

3) Click Here

In the above picture again, the difference is hardly about 1 inch to 1.2 inch.

4) Click Here

In this picture, Arnold is standing more upright and Lee's head is slightly tilted towards his right shoulder. Again the difference is about 1 inch to 1.2 inch.

Now what did you say that my comparison of Francois Hollande with Sarcozy was absurd because Sarcozy wears lifts. It's even rumored that Arnold too wears lifts in these kind of shoes which he is so fond of: Click Here

Now coming to Sarcozy and Hollande. Please quote a reliable source where it says that Hollande is 5'7. Please list one reliable source. Since you cant so let's move forward:

5) Click Here

In the picture above, Hollande (Probably 5'6 to 5'6.5) standing next to Arnold. Here you can see a difference of 2-3 inches. Plus there is no question about the footwear regarding Hollande.

6) Click Here

Here is the picture of Nicholas Sarcozy ( around 5'5 or little less) with Francois Hollande (5'6 to 5'6.5).

7) Click Here

Here is the picture of Arnold with Bollywood actor Aamir khan who is shortest in the whole Indian industry at 5'3 to 5'4. This is what you call a difference of 4-5 inches.

8) Click Here

For all my friends who doesn't know how big an inch is. Above is the reference. For even more practical reference, please see any measuring tape at your house which gives measurement in Inches as well.

We have to realize that Arnold is rumored to wear those suspicious heeled shoes on many occasions which may conceal a lift.

We can safely conclude that Arnold Current height is some where between 5'9 and 5'10. Peak height would have been 5'11 to 5'11.5 in his 20's and 30's.
Trevor says on 30/Dec/14
How does anyone know he was measured by Guiness? Maybe, they took his 'stats' from his fake sport ("Go, Thong Warriors!") at face value. Five eleven, peak. Five ten today. The mystery is not how he magically shrunk 'so much' (he was never tall to begin with). The mystery is how he fooled everyone into believing it for so long.
Danimal says on 29/Dec/14
NBAer says on 29/Dec/14
probably a flat 5'11 in the evening
peak:nothing over 6'1 in his 20s-30s

I feel like a broken record, but he was measured at 6'1.5" at night and barefoot in 1969.
Danimal says on 29/Dec/14
1.89m says on 28/Dec/14
GSP is 5-10" max!! So do people really see arnie as 6-0!!! Pls thats just silly. Rob says here 5-11.5" which is a max perhaps!! 5-11" imo. Fanboys stop you look tools.
Click Here

Truer words have never been spoken. BTW, I have met GSP in person. He's under 5'10".
Tunman says on 29/Dec/14
I wonder who would turn be taller if Dmeyer met him,I would bet for Dmeyer.
Basically Hollande was at his eyelevel.One source gave him 5'7 but at 60 it seems he won't be more than 5'6.5".I think Arnie could be more 5'11.25"
Dmeyer says on 29/Dec/14
6 ft 0-0.25 out of Bed night 5'11.25-11.5
Dmeyer says on 29/Dec/14
He can look 5'10.75-11 alot but if he stretches Will reach 5'11.25-11.5 but not more
Jim says on 29/Dec/14
Yes, Miko, that would also be Arnold's response to his divorce, his out-of-wedlock child, the halving of his net worth, and the state of California after his 'reign.' Feel the burn.
184.3cm says on 29/Dec/14
@Heightcrazyred6ft

Yes he was also measured by the Guiness Book of World Records and his height was stated as 185cm , this was in the 70's but he did claim 186cm during the filming of The Running Man i think it was and both are possible. If he was a flat 6ft 1 then there is the possibility that he was Rob's listing out of bed and down to the low 185 range at night. 186 is still very fair though unlike his later claim of 6ft 2 (188cm).
And to be honest the amercian dream in that period was more 6'4 as all the big names were around that range. It still is the alpha height even guys taller than 6'4 claim it ! Although in Europe i tend to hear 190cm the most.
GUY says on 29/Dec/14
NNA says on 23/Dec/14
Dude i know its frustrating when someone beats you at your game. I am a doctorate student and very much a reliable source when it comes to measurements. In your first picture, your line with relation to eye levels has a tilt. Good trick to prove your fake argument. Second one was a cheesy joke.

If you possess a thing called Common Sense (in case you don't know what it is, feel free to google it), kindly zoom in to my pictures and see that i have made sure to include the center of his eye.

As for Francois Hollande, no reliable source gives his actual height. But guessing by looking at his pictures while standing next to Nicholas Sarcozy who is 5'5, he has clearly got an inch edge, which is a simple math and adds up his height to be 5'6. I know this logical argument is difficult for your diminitive mind to comprehend but nevertheless, i hope you can grasp what i am saying (though i expect you to propagate your fake hero worship again and again - which is ok since we need comedians like you on these pages to lighten up the mood).
---------------------------------
Well I'm actually an astrophysicist and I also perform brain surgery for fun on my days off, so that pretty much makes me right. Comparing Hollande to Sarcozy is comparing someone to a notorious lift wearer who's insecure about his height. But if you want to declare that all of the listings of Hollande's height of 5'7" are unreliable, and your comparison to a lift wearer IS reliable, then cherry-pick whatever evidence supports your claim regardless of any accuracy.

Belittling insults do nothing for your cause, and that's all you bring. It doesn't faze me, and reveals nothing but a smokescreen for flimsy paper-thin argument. We can argue about proper eye placement or line width until the cows come home. Frankly Arnold is not standing straight in that photo anyway, so focusing an argument there is baseless to get an accurate comparison with Lee. This shot, which is a still from the video you provided, is the more accurate comparison
Click Here
and yet you refuse to comment. The video earlier shows Arnold lowering his height to honor the shorter man, which is seen in the published photo. But Arnold then raises his height, and it's clear the difference is greater. You say you're a graduate student, which implies you insist you're very smart, and yet you choose to overlook this. Like I've said before, you use photos from two months ago to prove Arnold was 5'10" max prime 45 years ago, as if to say that if he doesn't look 6'1.5 now, he never was.

I don't have much of a problem with Arnold now being listed 5'11 1/2", as that's what he seems to look today. He was taller than 6' Tony Blair and 5'11 1/2" George W Bush during his term as Governor. He's clearly been shrinking since around the year 2000. None of this confirms your continued insistence that he was only 5'10" peak. You haven't proven anything.
Lucio says on 28/Dec/14
Rob, but if you say that his son Patrick is 184 cm tall, then his father must be not less than 183 cm, because if you notice, in this pic, Patrick is on the red carpet with his heels, and this gives him some cms of advantage.
Click Here

If we look at this other pic where both are on flat ground, it seems to me that they are more or less around the same height, don't you think?
Click Here

IMO, or Arnie is still 183 cm, or his son is tall 182 like him.
Are you really sure Arnie is now shrunked to 182 cm?
Because by these two photos I don't seems.
Dmeyer says on 28/Dec/14
Its amazing how posture changes the height i was at bread store this more there was a big miroir and a tall Guy next to me , he was near 6'1 when i stood relax next to him i looked 3in shorter then i stood well Like him i looked just 1in shorter
1.89m says on 28/Dec/14
GSP is 5-10" max!! So do people really see arnie as 6-0!!! Pls thats just silly. Rob says here 5-11.5" which is a max perhaps!! 5-11" imo. Fanboys stop you look tools.
Click Here
Danimal says on 28/Dec/14
miko says on 28/Dec/14
I think this would be Arnold's response to talk of a 3 inch height loss

Click Here

We know Miko, you don't believe in the concept of height loss. Hogan is the same height today as he was in 1979. Arnold hasn't lost a mm in height and no one else ever has and no one ever will in your world.
Danimal says on 28/Dec/14
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 27/Dec/14
A guy like Arnold I'd have expected to lose a very minimal amount of height.
Ralf Moeller whose now 55 still looks as tall as he was 25 years ago, no lifts or anything. I'm sure he'll still be 6ft5 range in his 60's.

I think it's safe to say that the movies are responsible for Arnold's height loss.

That makes absolutely no sense? Decades of lifting heavy weights, taking boatloads of steroids did Arnold in, but imo, was sped up the process at a ridiculous rate was when he became governor. Look at Bill Clinton. It seems that the stress of being in office takes it's toll on the body and these men walk away a shadow of their former selves. I think the divorce didn't help either.
uhoh says on 28/Dec/14
Poor Arnie
connor6ft says on 28/Dec/14
Arnie I think would clear 5ft 11.75-182cm out of bed but not during the day, hes not over 5ft 11 today.
miko says on 28/Dec/14
I think this would be Arnold's response to talk of a 3 inch height loss

Click Here
derick says on 27/Dec/14
peak 6'1.5
today 5'11.5 and hit 6'0.5 in footwear
Danimal says on 27/Dec/14
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Dec/14
Rob, could Arnold still hit 6ft in the morning?

Not a chance, unless he shrinks over an inch throughout the day.
Danimal says on 27/Dec/14
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Dec/14
Click Here
Arnie 1996 age 49 looks nothing more than a solid 6ft next to 6´3" Thomas Gottschalk.

So it´s safe to say he already lost 0.5"-1" before turning 50yrs

There's a couple of flaws with your paragraph. You're implying that Arnold was never over 6'0.5"-6'1" and you based your 6'0" estimate on 1 pic from 1996. There is ample evidence that Arnold was still a solid 6'1" (down from 6'1.5"-6'1.75") well into the 1990's. His height loss only started becoming apparent by the time he became governor (he started looking around 6'0" at that point).
Danimal says on 27/Dec/14
the shredder says on 27/Dec/14
He's actually younger than Danny Glover and lost 2 inches ? If that's the case than Glover is could be under 6'1.5 from a 6'3 or over peak.

Arnold has lost more than 2". He's lost closer to 3" imo.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 27/Dec/14
A guy like Arnold I'd have expected to lose a very minimal amount of height.
Ralf Moeller whose now 55 still looks as tall as he was 25 years ago, no lifts or anything. I'm sure he'll still be 6ft5 range in his 60's.

I think it's safe to say that the movies are responsible for Arnold's height loss.
Judd says on 27/Dec/14
5'11.5" rob?! Great, that's the perfect listing for him as his current height.

I hope you have a great lawyer, rob...XD
the shredder says on 27/Dec/14
He's actually younger than Danny Glover and lost 2 inches ? If that's the case than Glover is could be under 6'1.5 from a 6'3 or over peak.
Danimal says on 26/Dec/14
Connor183 says on 26/Dec/14
Arnie is not 182cm because Jimmy Fallon is that height and Arnie is noticeably shorter than him so how can he be 182?, to me hes not over 5ft 11 today.

Completely agree with you.
Danimal says on 26/Dec/14
What prompted you to lower his height Rob? Was it a specific pic and/or video that acted as the catalyst for you?
[Editor Rob: not specific, just in general the last 2 years he has struggled on average to look 6ft.]
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Dec/14
184.3cm says on 23/Dec/14
Full 6'1 peak - 185.5cm hence the 186cm claim he gave when younger. 6'2 claim was shoe height.
Nowadays give him a break hes in pension age..5'10.75-5'11.25 he can appear. It seems alot but the steriod abuse and seriuos heavy lifting for decades takes a toll.

************************************************

Actually he claimed 1,85m before he used the standard system and claimed 6´1" before he mysteriously grew to his 6´2" claim of an optimal man height for american dream propaganda of american dream...

Or he just used the american system of measuring height in shoes...

Take it how you want but in reality he was 1,85m peak (evening) and is 5´11" today... Basille had either a generous stadiometer or is just bogus.



Rob,
tell Arnie he can use the metric system again as he still clears the magic 180cm, before he terminates you.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Dec/14
Sry hit the button to early
pause the vid at 9:33 onwards are also good moments to catch
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Dec/14
Click Here
Arnie 1996 age 49 looks nothing more than a solid 6ft next to 6´3" Thomas Gottschalk.

So it´s safe to say he already lost 0.5"-1" before turning 50yrs
Height183 says on 26/Dec/14
His son Patrick is more 6'0''. Arnie looks a good inch shorter than his son. 5'11.25'' Max is the highest I'm going with Arnie today.
Liam89 says on 26/Dec/14
Arnold is not 182 anymore i met him not long ago he was about 5.10 to me (with shoes)
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Dec/14
Lucio says on 26/Dec/14
Connor183 says on 25/Dec/14
So you finally downgraded Arnie Rob but I have to say I disagree with you on this one sorry he doesn't look anywhere near 182 cm more like 180.5-181cm to me.
---------------
Stan says on 25/Dec/14
Rob might had generous enough given 5'11.5 to arnie. this listing had to be in shoe
------------------

Poor frustrated troll, you feel better now Arnie is 182 cm.. that poor man..


___________________

Actually he´s at 181.61cm ...
Connor183 says on 26/Dec/14
@Stan yeah 5ft 11.75 in shoes, 5ft 11 flat barefoot.
Lucio says on 26/Dec/14
Connor183 says on 25/Dec/14
So you finally downgraded Arnie Rob but I have to say I disagree with you on this one sorry he doesn't look anywhere near 182 cm more like 180.5-181cm to me.
---------------
Stan says on 25/Dec/14
Rob might had generous enough given 5'11.5 to arnie. this listing had to be in shoe
------------------

Poor frustrated troll, you feel better now Arnie is 182 cm.. that poor man..
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 26/Dec/14
Rob, could Arnold still hit 6ft in the morning?
[Editor Rob: I'm sure he still could clear it a bit]
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Dec/14
5´11.5" is pretty good imo, it´s 181.6cm, 182 is just a round up.
But I agree he can look even under 5´11" today...
Arch Stanton says on 26/Dec/14
Haha, I'm guessing Arnie didn't send that Christmas bonus he promised!! Been a long time coming, he can look as low as 5'11 flat today!
Kevin says on 26/Dec/14
@Guy
"Faran is likely closer to the camera. You can tell by the shadow he's casting on Arnold. He and Stallone appear to be side by side, but Arnold could be a one or two feet behind"

Whaaaaat The F**K
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 26/Dec/14
Wow, didn´t expect this now, but it makes sense, he didn´t appear 6ft over the last years so max 5´11.5" is as good as it gets.

Merry Christmas :)
Connor183 says on 26/Dec/14
Arnie is not 182cm because Jimmy Fallon is that height and Arnie is noticeably shorter than him so how can he be 182?, to me hes not over 5ft 11 today.
Stan says on 25/Dec/14
Rob might had generous enough given 5'11.5 to arnie. this listing had to be in shoe
Connor183 says on 25/Dec/14
So you finally downgraded Arnie Rob but I have to say I disagree with you on this one sorry he doesn't look anywhere near 182 cm more like 180.5-181cm to me.
Dmeyer says on 25/Dec/14
Rob you agree arnie has Been 5'11.5 for aleast 3 years , it make sens arnie rounding 1in up 6'0.5 , also when he claimed 6'1 he was 6ft , at peak claimed 6'1.75-2in but was close Like 6'1-1.5in
[Editor Rob: in the last 2 years he has been struggling to look the 6ft mark. At times he still looks close, other times not much over 5ft 11]
uhoh says on 25/Dec/14
ALL ARNIE GOT FOR CHRISTMAS WAS 2 CM HEIGHT LOSS
miko says on 25/Dec/14
Wow and so it is, Arnold is now a member of the 5 foot somethings club!
Dmeyer says on 25/Dec/14
Good listing i think he could dip to 181cm in the evening
Dmeyer says on 25/Dec/14
Finaly that day has come
Danimal says on 24/Dec/14
uh-oh says on 23/Dec/14
That picture with the Asian actor proves Arnie is at least 5'11", possibly 6 feet even (183cm) out of bed.

1 picture does NOT prove anything. 5'11.5" MAX Jimmy Fallon was noticeably taller than Arnold today. I don't know why most people cannot accept this FACT.
Danimal says on 24/Dec/14
UpYours says on 24/Dec/14
Seeing him in younger pictures and the Conan/Terminator years, 6-1.5 is about right. Now it is obvious he's shrunk down to about 5-11.5 to 6'. Nothing to be ashamed of, everyone that get's older looses about 2 inches or more.

5'11.5" Jimmy Fallon is noticeably taller than Arnold today.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 24/Dec/14
Rob what´s your estimation for Christina Schwarzenegger?
GUY says on 24/Dec/14
NNA says on 20/Dec/14
Here is another proof. In the picture below you can see Stallone, Faran Tahir and Arnold:

Click Here

Now Faran Tahir is a little bent in the picture above and Faran is registered on this site around 5'9.
--------------------------------
Faran is likely closer to the camera. You can tell by the shadow he's casting on Arnold. He and Stallone appear to be side by side, but Arnold could be a one or two feet behind. I can't find any other good comparison photos of both of them. In order to make a good solid claim, you'd need several good shots with ideal comparison. Having only one with possible balance issues won't alter history. And considering this movie just came out, it wouldn't do anything anyway towards meddling with Arnold's established peak height 25+ years ago.
UpYours says on 24/Dec/14
Seeing him in younger pictures and the Conan/Terminator years, 6-1.5 is about right. Now it is obvious he's shrunk down to about 5-11.5 to 6'. Nothing to be ashamed of, everyone that get's older looses about 2 inches or more.
grizz says on 24/Dec/14
@Rob, do you know how tall Maria Shriver is? 5ft11 claim is ridiculous IMO.
Richard says on 23/Dec/14
"I mean, most people really LOOK UP to me," says Arnold.

Yes, Arnold, yes. Most people five foot eight and below really LOOK UP to you.

The rest of the population, really look DOWN ON you.
Shanin says on 23/Dec/14
@Guy Seriously.
@Lucio Putting the height line on the lowest eye creates an illusion worth of
2-3 inches.

I am in awe of both of you.
richie3 says on 23/Dec/14
@Guy, i think you are over rating your measurement in your pictures. get a life bro.
NNA says on 23/Dec/14
UY says on 23/Dec/14
So you've basically replaced my more narrow precise line with a much wider more vague one in the face to face photo. You've placed it on the lower part of Arnie's eye rather than the center, hoping the extra width of the line will create the illusion of a lower eye level .

The side by side one where their heads are tilted, I made sure to place my line at the average height between both eyes. You've deliberately chosen the lower eye, at least to demonstrate Arnold's eye level. And it's still at least 2 inches difference by your cheating method, so you've failed your agenda even while taking deviant liberties. I don't think you even know what an inch looks like in comparison to begin with.

Francois Hollande is 170cm or 5'7", as what is listed on page after page of research. Why do you trolls feel the need to lie and deceive with made up facts and corrupt methods? Why does one side exclusively do this while the other easily proves their point being fair and honest? That tells you something, because yet again you've used Arnold's lower eye as a reference and downgraded a comparison height. And what's even more laughable is using photos from 2 months ago to prove Arnold was only 5'10" peak 30-40 years ago, and still failing! That's taking cherry-picking to a whole new level.

I noticed you didn't comment on my last photo
Click Here
You know you could have got around it with this
Click Here
_________________________________________________________________________

Dude i know its frustrating when someone beats you at your game. I am a doctorate student and very much a reliable source when it comes to measurements. In your first picture, your line with relation to eye levels has a tilt. Good trick to prove your fake argument. Second one was a cheesy joke.

If you possess a thing called Common Sense (in case you don't know what it is, feel free to google it), kindly zoom in to my pictures and see that i have made sure to include the center of his eye.

As for Francois Hollande, no reliable source gives his actual height. But guessing by looking at his pictures while standing next to Nicholas Sarcozy who is 5'5, he has clearly got an inch edge, which is a simple math and adds up his height to be 5'6. I know this logical argument is difficult for your diminitive mind to comprehend but nevertheless, i hope you can grasp what i am saying (though i expect you to propagate your fake hero worship again and again - which is ok since we need comedians like you on these pages to lighten up the mood).
uh-oh says on 23/Dec/14
That picture with the Asian actor proves Arnie is at least 5'11", possibly 6 feet even (183cm) out of bed.
184.3cm says on 23/Dec/14
Full 6'1 peak - 185.5cm hence the 186cm claim he gave when younger. 6'2 claim was shoe height.
Nowadays give him a break hes in pension age..5'10.75-5'11.25 he can appear. It seems alot but the steriod abuse and seriuos heavy lifting for decades takes a toll.
HeightcrazyRed6ft says on 23/Dec/14
today out of bed 182cm, evening 180cm
peak out of bed 187cm, evening 185cm
GUY says on 23/Dec/14
NNA says on 22/Dec/14
@GUY

Could you please stop fooling people around with your poor measuring skills. I have done the same by drawing lines on the photos and here is the result:

Click Here

In the above picture, you can clearly see that there is hardly a difference of an inch there.

In the second picture below, Lee's head is tilted towards right while Anrold's head is more straight thus creating a little more difference.

Click Here


Now in the picture below, Arnold is standing next to Francois Hollande who is around 5'6. Here you can see the difference of 3-4 inches.

Click Here

My Advice, please do not make up stuff on your own and i can assure you we can help with this condition.
------------------------------------------
So you've basically replaced my more narrow precise line with a much wider more vague one in the face to face photo. You've placed it on the lower part of Arnie's eye rather than the center, hoping the extra width of the line will create the illusion of a lower eye level .

The side by side one where their heads are tilted, I made sure to place my line at the average height between both eyes. You've deliberately chosen the lower eye, at least to demonstrate Arnold's eye level. And it's still at least 2 inches difference by your cheating method, so you've failed your agenda even while taking deviant liberties. I don't think you even know what an inch looks like in comparison to begin with.

Francois Hollande is 170cm or 5'7", as what is listed on page after page of research. Why do you trolls feel the need to lie and deceive with made up facts and corrupt methods? Why does one side exclusively do this while the other easily proves their point being fair and honest? That tells you something, because yet again you've used Arnold's lower eye as a reference and downgraded a comparison height. And what's even more laughable is using photos from 2 months ago to prove Arnold was only 5'10" peak 30-40 years ago, and still failing! That's taking cherry-picking to a whole new level.

I noticed you didn't comment on my last photo
Click Here
You know you could have got around it with this
Click Here
Lucio says on 22/Dec/14
@NNA, in your second and third picture, your height lines are badly positioned, because they don't be placed on the Arnie's lowest eye, but at the center of both of them, as rightly Guy did it.
it's obvious that putting height line on the lowest eye, you false the measurement and you get a wrong measure.
And then why don't you draw the line also on the Lee's eyes in your second photo?
Because so you can see that the difference is the same as in the Guy's picture?
Come on..
1.89m says on 22/Dec/14
Hes not over 6ft today thats a fact.
GUY says on 22/Dec/14
Vibram says on 17/Dec/14
People on here who are offended that he is below 5ft11.5/6ft today and not even 6ft2 prime are the weak ones that have an utter dismal view on masculinity. All of their own sense of masculinity is tied to the height and size of their homo-erotic hereo's, and themseleves. Once that hereo's height isn't all that 'great' (in their world view), in turrn they feel hurt and somewhat demasculinized too. Absolutely pathetic bunch on here.
------------------------------
Hey you're the one saying this stuff, about masculinity and homo-eroticism......the only thing that concerns me and others are cold facts. That's all we need, but if you need to bring that other stuff into it, then whatever floats your boat. A bunch of you actually remind me of Bennet from Commando, and I'm not sure about that guy.........
NNA says on 22/Dec/14
Guy says on 21/Dec/14
I'm at wits end here so here you go
Click Here
Click Here
You keep saying their eye levels are almost the same in these photos, so I've had to go to the trouble drawing lines to reveal what you're obviously incapable of seeing. I don't mind, as some special people need a little more help. Do they look the same now? Are you going to stop this incessant nonsense now because it's getting old. Did you just glance at those photos for a brief moment, because I can't think you used your cursor or a straight edge to come to that conclusion. If you did, you didn't do a very good job.

As I suspected Arnold was resting his posture during a lot of the ceremony, and the video makes it even more clear. He's stooping his head and slouching in order to better engage the shorter man. We see Arnold raise his posture for a brief moment though, and both are standing in similar fashion.
Click Here
Arnold's cranium height is based on his chin to eye level, as your eyes are actually at the center of your head. I've based Lee's cranium height on Arnold's, so he's probably got a bonus as Arnold has the bigger head and no charge of favoritism. No crying that I've chopped off Lee's skull, as he obviously has bigger hair. In this comparison Arnold does look about 3 inches taller.

____________________________________________________________________________

@GUY

Could you please stop fooling people around with your poor measuring skills. I have done the same by drawing lines on the photos and here is the result:

Click Here

In the above picture, you can clearly see that there is hardly a difference of an inch there.

In the second picture below, Lee's head is tilted towards right while Anrold's head is more straight thus creating a little more difference.

Click Here


Now in the picture below, Arnold is standing next to Francois Hollande who is around 5'6. Here you can see the difference of 3-4 inches.

Click Here

My Advice, please do not make up stuff on your own and i can assure you we can help with this condition.
Vibram says on 21/Dec/14
NNA says on 20/Dec/14
Here is another proof. In the picture below you can see Stallone, Faran Tahir and Arnold:

Click Here

Now Faran Tahir is a little bent in the picture above and Faran is registered on this site around 5'9.
------

He looks about bang on 5ft11 with him. He his def. not 6ft today. Arnold said goodbye to 6ft probably in 2006.
GUY says on 21/Dec/14
NNA says on 20/Dec/14
@Guy ... Reading your totally absurd argument in the last post, i can officially refer you to an ophthalmologist or maybe a psychiatrist also, for the hallucinations you undergo every now and then.
I have left the case for the audience here to judge since i can't understand what category of intellect you fall in. Obviously its a new category we need to create.
Anyways, the eye level in both the pictures is almost the same and i stand with my argument that Arnold is in 5'10 range.
ANyways, good luck with your Hallucinations.
--------------------------------
I'm at wits end here so here you go
Click Here
Click Here
You keep saying their eye levels are almost the same in these photos, so I've had to go to the trouble drawing lines to reveal what you're obviously incapable of seeing. I don't mind, as some special people need a little more help. Do they look the same now? Are you going to stop this incessant nonsense now because it's getting old. Did you just glance at those photos for a brief moment, because I can't think you used your cursor or a straight edge to come to that conclusion. If you did, you didn't do a very good job.

As I suspected Arnold was resting his posture during a lot of the ceremony, and the video makes it even more clear. He's stooping his head and slouching in order to better engage the shorter man. We see Arnold raise his posture for a brief moment though, and both are standing in similar fashion.
Click Here
Arnold's cranium height is based on his chin to eye level, as your eyes are actually at the center of your head. I've based Lee's cranium height on Arnold's, so he's probably got a bonus as Arnold has the bigger head and no charge of favoritism. No crying that I've chopped off Lee's skull, as he obviously has bigger hair. In this comparison Arnold does look about 3 inches taller.
BigViking says on 21/Dec/14
RampageClover: No, he didn´t.
NNA says on 20/Dec/14
Here is another proof. In the picture below you can see Stallone, Faran Tahir and Arnold:

Click Here

Now Faran Tahir is a little bent in the picture above and Faran is registered on this site around 5'9.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 20/Dec/14
Appeared 6ft3 on Letterman years ago. A sub-6ft1 man would not be able to pull that off.

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes in newspapers, books and resumes.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.