How tall is Brad Pitt

Brad Pitt's Height

5ft 11in (180 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Films, Troy, Inglorious Bastards, Interview With The Vampire and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. At times he can appear taller, but with impeccable posture and at times, in the last few years, cuban type heels, that is a given. Even his good friend George Clooney was wise to his footwear, saying once in USA Today that "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating."

How tall is Brad Pitt
Brad with Angelina Jolie, Jonah Hill and Claudia Schiffer
Photo by PR Photos

Add a Comment 250 comments

Average Guess (277 Votes)
5ft 10.69in (179.5cm)
Hijopotamus said on 22/Feb/17
S.J.H, Pitt is same height as Paltrow, whatever Height Paltrow is. On the other hand, Gwyneth may be 1-2 cm taller than Corden.
joe### said on 21/Feb/17
you is right clooney does not seem smaller
Neilsberg said on 21/Feb/17
Hello Rob!
Is it possible that Brad Pitt is 6 ft?

Click Here Brad pitt and Ryan Gosling 6ft 0.25in/ 1.84cm
Click Here Brad pitt and Ryan Gosling
Click Here Brad pitt with impeccable posture and Jon Bernthal 5ft 11in
Click Here Brad pitt and Ryan Gosling

How do you explain that Brad Pitt is 5ft 11in while he is always taller than George clooney(5ft 11in) on the pictures and he is also taller than Jon Bernthal(5ft 11in) in the photo and the same size as Ryan Gosling(6ft 0.25in)?
Editor Rob: with good posture any 5ft 11 guy has a potential to seem taller, but at times Pitt can pull of looking 5ft 11.5-6ft in some photos...I think a small insert is something I wouldn't rule out for someone like Brad.
Pierre said on 21/Feb/17
Gwyneth Paltrow /James Corden=imo James has flat sneakers Gwyneth has running sneakers=Gwyneth has probably a advantage of shoes no?= Click Here
Click Here
CS said on 20/Feb/17
Perhaps he's 5'10.5 - 5'10.75 now and was 5'10.75 - 5'11 peak. Don't know if he's lost any height though, if he has it isn't that much though.
S.J.H said on 20/Feb/17

Theres alot of movement of James Corden with Gwyneth Paltrow dance lesson clip. I don't buy James Corden being 5'8 he certainly look 5'7.5-5'7.75 max and Gwyneth Paltrow is a real 5'8 claim 5'9

Click Here
Pierre said on 20/Feb/17
@ Hijopotamus=I don't understand when you say"he's standing on a tiny step"(i'm french)
Simon said on 20/Feb/17
Wouldn't it be better if the pictures of him on this page were without heels? He's 6'1-ish in every photo...
Hijopotamus said on 20/Feb/17
Pierre, watch the pic of Paltrow and Pitt naked kissing.
NOW, watch Brad's feet. YES, he is standing on a tiny step! They are same height barefoot. And Paltrow is same height as James Corden.
This is messed up, Rob.
Downgrade Brad or upgrade 5'8" Corden.
Scott said on 20/Feb/17
Strong 5' 11". Maybe 5' 11.5"
David Iga said on 20/Feb/17
I meet him once,when he filmed for ocean twelve in Rome.I am 180cm,he was a little bit shorter(I think around 176-178cm).
David Iga said on 20/Feb/17
I meet him once,when he filmed for ocean twelve in Rome.I am 180cm,he was a little bit shorter(I think around 176-178cm).
Neilsberg said on 19/Feb/17
Hello Rob!
Brad Pitt appears always bigger than 5ft 11in. Is it possible that brad Pitt measures 6ft?
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Why Brad Pitt is indicated 5ft 11in while he appears always bigger than George Clooney(5ft 11in), and it seems to be the same size as Ryan Gosling(6ft 0.25in) and is bigger than jon bernthal(5ft 11in) in the photo?
c-mo said on 19/Feb/17
Shredder said on 19/Feb/17
I met Bernthal too , He isn't over 5 ft 11. Weird guy also


nobody said that he is "over" 5'11 . I said 5'11 (or 180cm) and pitt looks very similar . pitt is around 5'11 . end of story
mister_lennon said on 19/Feb/17
Sorry, but in the most pics, pitt is taller than clooney.
Shredder said on 19/Feb/17
I met Bernthal too , He isn't over 5 ft 11. Weird guy also
Editor Rob: Shredder, I'm sure we've all got people who look at us and think 'That guys weird' 😸

One man's eccentricity is another man's normality.
Pierre said on 19/Feb/17
the specificity of very good(and probably very expensive) elevator shoes is that is very difficult to detect the gain of this shoes imo.
Brad barefoot can be a little taller than Gwyneth Paltrow barefoot.Gwyneth Paltrow is looking the same height as James Corden who is listed 5"8'.If she's really 5"8'...Brad is not 5"11' imo
c-mo said on 18/Feb/17
Rob has met Jon Bernthal . Jon Bernthal is 180cm . look at these pics :

Click Here

Click Here

Brad Pitt and Jon Bernthal look very similar heightwise . take the differences of posture into account too (brad pitt stands a bit crouched) . Pitt is around 179-180cm evening height clearly . there is no doubt I mean look at the pics how much evidence do you need more to know that he cant be anything below/above 178cm/181cm at his low and is likely 179-180cm ?

the shoes he wears in the pics also look regular/normal dress shoes . brad pitt height = 5'10.75
Blob said on 18/Feb/17
If Brad is 180 cm that would make him 5"9. Check the google conversion. Can some one explain this to me. 180 cm equals 5"9 feet not 5"11. Rob do you have any answers for this? Thank you.
Editor Rob: the constant is 1 inch = 2.54cm.

Some search engines might give the user:

180cm = 5.90551 foot

Which is correct, but confusion comes from mistaking .90551 as being equivalent to 9 inches, when it's not...there are 12 inches in a foot.

So to find the inches just multiply 0.90551 * 12, which is just under 11 inches.
Dmeyer said on 18/Feb/17
When Pitt Clooney have similar posture and footwear wich IS rare the look about equal , it even happend that Pitt has 1cm more shoes and looks about 1,5-2cm taller so they are very close , of course if Pitt has 0,6in more shoes better posture and angle hé CAN give an impression of being 2in taller
Revisionist said on 17/Feb/17
Mrheightcaring80, I think that it's fair for you to claim a strong 175cm but nowhere near 177. I'm pretty much in the same boat as you, but I wake up at around 176.5 and drop to 175, maybe a few mm below on really tough days.

After reading through this entire thread and looking at countless pictures, I agree with most here who say that Brad's at beast a weak 179cm. He wakes up at 180, making him about the same height as Vin Diesel and just as crazily obsessed with being over 6 feet when they're actually above average height already!
Pierre said on 17/Feb/17
@ SJH =lol Brad always easily taller ?Have you see the recent comments with pictures in this page?Another picture Brad closer to the camera in good posture,Georges in relaxed posture Click Here lol
RisingForce said on 16/Feb/17
We don't know for sure that he actually wrote down 5'10". We do know he wrote down 5'11", which itself makes me think he's slightly under that since he lied and said he was 2 years younger than he really was on that form so I'd think he'd have claimed 6 feet. 5'10.5"-5'10.75" also looks believable based on his early roles. With a little extra heels and perfect posture, he's been able to look a consistent 5'11.5" or 6 feet.
S.J.H said on 16/Feb/17
Lol Pierre thinks that Pitt is lower than George Clooney. Brad Pitt could easily be taller when put them both barefoot for sure.

Pitt 178cm
Clooney 177cm
Damon 175cm
G 5'11 said on 16/Feb/17
@Gaba that's a lot of height loss you suffer, I'm a little over 5'11" first thing in the morning, highest I've measured was 5'11.25, and go down to 5'10.5-75 by night time. So compared to me you lose way more
Gaba said on 14/Feb/17
I'm 5'11 in the morning but can be between 5'10.25 and 5'9.75 in the evening depending on the physical activity during the day. I think Brad's situation is the same.
Free said on 14/Feb/17
He's 5-10 Max. He wrote it down.
CS said on 14/Feb/17
I think his proportions do make him give off a shorter look at times, I definitely do see that. But 5'9 for him is absolutely absurd lol. He's at least 179 cm.
HonestSlovene said on 13/Feb/17
@Sam I have the same line of thinking. Of course he is at least 5'10" but putting his height 5'10" firstly and then 5'11" later on in his carrer it means that he is probably safely in the 5'10" zone or a few fractions over it and just rounded up a bit to 5'11" due to being famous in Hollywood. He is about 5'10.5" most likely, maybe a weak 5'11" or just over the mark first thing in the morning.
Alex Marlin said on 13/Feb/17
mister_lennon said on 12/Feb/17
Brad is an strong 5'10 guy. Almost 5'11. 178-179. Clooney is a little bit shorter.
Dmeyer said on 11/Feb/17
It could happen easily to overmeasure by 1cm on a stadio thats not fix professionaly and plus the fact of measure early in the day thats à near 2cm mistake , but most poeple dont measure only one Time in theyr life
Pierre said on 11/Feb/17
Georges Clooney 5"10'
Brad 5"9.25'
Sam said on 10/Feb/17
If 5'11 was his real height he'd be 5'11.75 in the morning. I think he's a guy that can look 5'10 range because of his proportions (short legs) which is why I thought he could be my height. On second thoughts he might measure closer to 5'11. But if he is closer to 5'10, he was very honest about his height the first time it was mentioned. I personally haven't met anyone ever that downgraded their legit height by a full inch, and this is Brad Pitt we're talking about.
6'1-6'1.5 Guy said on 10/Feb/17
I think most will agree with me, Brad looks like a strong 5'10.5.
Dan said on 9/Feb/17
Del mar, Pitt is shorter than Fincher. It's only when Pitt wears boots that he's close to Finch.
Dmeyer said on 8/Feb/17
Stadiometer arnt so précise at hospital on France I was measured 182,7cm After à 30mn nap while at home I would have béen 181,7-182cm
Dmeyer said on 7/Feb/17
Bruce was 181 pushing 182 cm Peak , by early 50s he was still 181cm so Clooney was not less than 179cm Peak
S.J.H said on 6/Feb/17
I'm a Pitt fans for awhile and i admit but i never wonder he is over 5'10.5 and more i suspect he is just 5'10 but most fan came in this site they just find excuses to ugrade their favourite all time actors i find it so delusion and i would even say Pitt will drop into 5'9.75 by few more years instate of upgrade him saying he look over 5'11. Ben affleck page here had a pack of fans try to find ways giving false thoughts say he had very poor posture , bad posture , alot slouch going and bad slouch all this kind of untrue tales just to put him up at 6'2.25-6'3 serious terms of fake and hopeless. LOL..
Guest66 said on 6/Feb/17
Dan, you have attitude problems, nobody called you "slow". I wasn't even talking about Pitts height, all I told you was that 5'10.25 person in the morning ( which you called Pitt's height ) will drop to 5'9 range by the day.
Pierre said on 6/Feb/17
@SJH=I think this picture is better=Brad in good posture,Georges in a little relaxed posture=Brad isn't taller= Click Here
Peter 179cm said on 5/Feb/17
@ Dan Irrelevant to Pitt's height, but losing 0.75 inches through the day is fairly common.It's also very normal unless you sleep all day long or live in space lol... Some people lose 1 inch or more as well-i know i do sometimes.
Hijopotamus said on 5/Feb/17
Flippo, Paltrow is 5'8" ish
S.J.H said on 5/Feb/17

Something call camera angle. Thats an awful comparison lol. To be honest brad pitt has to be taller by a fraction at lowest that is why pitt listed higher than geroge clooney. Editor Rob aware about the different style of lifts on pitt's feet most of time if not he would have put down pitt's height below clooney. Matt damon probably about 5'9 or fraction lower since he gets 5'10 for a long period before downgrade and clooney look 5'9-5/6th to 7/8th so 5'10 fits pitt alot

Click Here Bruce willis is no way 180cm but may not be under 179cm and look about 2cm taller than Clooney

Click Here Look a weak 5'10 guy at most 177+cm so 5'9.75 only look his 5'11.5 claim with dress shoes cum a hair

Click Here 177ish frame and i can easily tell because my dad was 5'10.5

Click Here assume if is 2" lift's then pitt looks 6'0 with it and 6'1 a hair

Click Here let alone hair and heels just hardly see him as 5'9 proportion not 5'11 that high but look like an exact 5'10 guy
Del Mar said on 5/Feb/17
Rob what's your take on David Fincher and would you make a page on him? A lot of sources lists him 184, but in every pic with Brad they look the same height
Pierre said on 4/Feb/17
@SJH=And Brad is taller than Georges when he has very nice shoes,if not= Click Here
Pierre said on 4/Feb/17
@SJH=Imo not lol for Cameron Diaz in 5"7' range(and maybe shorter)=She's looking lots of time easily shorter than Gwyneth Paltrow who is the same height as listed 5"8' James Corden...
Dan said on 4/Feb/17
Guest66, not sure if you're trolling here or being seemingly idiotic on purpose while maintaining the semblances of a sound mind inferring others are "slow" witted? [insert double facepalm & 1-inch punch hehe]
Jokes aside, if you read my previous posts, you'd know my contention is that there's no way Brad would lose .75 inch from waking up. I firmly believe he's 5'10" on the dot mid-day height and barefoot. I've never seen him out of bed in the morning. Pretty sure you haven't either. So based on that height, you can add as much as your heart desires to get his morning height. Cheers and please try to keep it clean :-) Dan out
Filippo said on 3/Feb/17
Don't know if this one has been posted yet, but.
Brad + Gwyneth, both with good posture.
So, let's assume they had the same footwear. Brad Pitt is maximum a bare inch taller than Paltrow. Maximum.
So 5'9 Paltrow, 5'10 Pitt.
Definitely NOT 180.
jamie179cm said on 3/Feb/17
@S.J.H lol have you seen the pictures with Gwyneth?
Guest66 said on 3/Feb/17
Dan, Facepalm. Read my comment once again, but slowly.
jamie179cm said on 2/Feb/17
sorry i mean barefoot pictures with Gwyneth
jamie179cm said on 2/Feb/17
@Dan to be fair any of these Celebs could be lying about there height, and 5ft9 is possible he wears lifts and not to mention the barefoot with Gwyneth
Hijopotamus said on 2/Feb/17
Dan, no logic there at all. George can be 5'10 and Pitt 5'9" and be taller than George. How? Lifts, shoes, etc my friend. That is why I INSIST so much in the pics barefoot.
S.J.H said on 2/Feb/17
If pitt is not even 5'10.5 like i think then i'll insist he is at least 5'10 and so george clooney is 5'9.75, matt damon 5'8.75 and gwyneth Paltrow is ta least 5'8.25 and her bff cameron diaz would be 5'7. LOL
vin said on 2/Feb/17
Strong 5'10. Nothing more, nothing less.
Dan said on 2/Feb/17
Guess66, ???

You're not making any sense whatsoever... sorry friend, nice gamble but no dice.

If you have Pitt as a 5'9.25 then how tall is Damon? How tall is Clooney? Just try using logic and resist the urge to let jealousy - not referring to any particular down-grader here - cloud your judgment.
Pierre said on 2/Feb/17
By considering all the pictures of this event(brad and Georges) and the angles of the cameras, i would say Brad is looking a little shorter than Georges,even when Georges is in relaxed posture he look a little taller imo(picture number five of the comment Yang 27/Jan/2017)
S.J.H said on 1/Feb/17

No obligation but from your point of view and perspective you think brad pitt is only 5'8-5'9 and that would put clooney in 5'7-5'8 danger zone. I would rather believe on 5'10 min that might be his real height. I have thought of 176cm many years back but from what i look at him with some kind of visible lifts which is not that big in heels while he can look near 6'1 with it and that is obvious he can't be much under 5'10 But if you are pointing fanboys you might need to visit Steven Yuen page here see how Shredder trying to please rob to put him up 5'8.25 which lauren cohan may not even hit over 5'6 and always look just around an inch shorter than Steven Yuen but Shredder still insist he even look 5'8.5 max lol

Click Here Pitt looks about 5'10 proportion here with fans

Click Here might be lifts but i wouldn't go over 6cm for the maximun boosted heels and he look about 184cm with it
Guest66 said on 1/Feb/17
Dan, so perfect 5'10 is someone who is only 5'10.25 in the morning ? You consider daily shrinkage do you ? 5'10.25 in the morning means 5'9.5 by the day.
HonestSlovene said on 1/Feb/17
@Dan Agreed.
HonestSlovene said on 1/Feb/17
@Hijopotamus Ok I forgot you are challenged in all ways possible, so there is no need to explain things to you. You sure seem to sound positive, btw.
Dan said on 1/Feb/17
Yang, those pics were you stated Pitt seems short, take a closer look. Next to Paltrow, he is bending his head. As for the Clooney pic, look at letters on the panel. Camera was tilted. Pic is clearly taller.
No one is saying Pitt is 6-1. He's a puuuurfeckt 5-10. I would say 5-10.25 in the morning. Thanks to his perfect posture and proportions, he can look of course look much taller specially when cast next to actors like Jonah Hill. Wouldn't be surprised if many of his male co-stars and leading ladies are casted thanks to their "shortish" height and not just their acting chops.
Sam, your assessment on Norton/Leo is correct.
Hijopotamus said on 1/Feb/17
Pierre, according to some guys in here, Corden is 5'11"
Anyone remember those pics or Eric Bana and Brad 3 inches difference? Oh it was a 2 inch difference sime other day Pitt wore better shoes.
Paltrow looks same height as Corden and Pitt.
I know, this is "impossible", because Brad is handsome TALL etc you know, real serious arguments
Pierre said on 1/Feb/17
Is James Corden really 5"8'?
Pierre said on 31/Jan/17
but Gwyneth is the same height as listed 5"8' James Corden
Sam said on 31/Jan/17
Yeah somehow I can't picture Dicaprio only being just 1/4" taller than Pitt. I think its more likely 3/4" or possibly even an inch but obviously because Pitt has excellent posture and is a known liftwearer and Dicaprio isn't it might seem like they are near identical in height and at times Pitt seemingly even taller seeing as there are accounts of him looking 6'1 to people... Not sure about Ed Norton but he strikes me as someone who would be close in height to Dicaprio or just a shade taller.
Hijopotamus said on 31/Jan/17
HonestSlovene, dude, you don't need to clarify anything. You are not the law. What is perfectly clear is that you need glasses. Brad is not even 1cm taller than Paltrow in those pics. So one inch difference is possible? lol ok so he is 5'10" so he can possibly be 5'11"?? So according to that he can also be 5'9"? Or it just works upgrading?
Im 182cm at 10 pm. So using your method I coundround it up to 6 feet and may as well 6'1"
I wonder how dealing business with such a positive guy like you would be?
HonestSlovene said on 31/Jan/17
@yang How many many times do I need to clarify to you and others, he looks about 1 in taller. So yes while 5'10" is entirely possible so is 5'11". I'd wager 5'10.5" is on the money (5'10.75" peak).
Nova176 said on 30/Jan/17
Rob, why does Tom Cruise get always accused of Lifts when a guy like Brad pitt, a man of obviously above average height wears lifts pretty much 24/7. Tom cruise from my knowledge only wore lifts a few times and not at all in the last 8 years. He's the biggest lift wearer in Hollywood. RDJ may wear bigger lifts but Brad Pitt wears them more which is why he almost always looks 184.

I can't see how a 180cm guy can be so insecure about their height
Editor Rob: RDJ is the most obvious wearer or enhanced footwear.

Pitt did go through a period of seemingly wearing cuban heeled dress shoes, to give himself a little boost, but with boots, they don't seem that bulging - up to 0.5-0.75, a shoe lift won't make the foot (at the front) bulge that much, but when it gets to an inch lift, it might be more obvious.
Johnson said on 30/Jan/17
@yang You should see the clip of James Corden and Paltrow in sneakers, they are the same height
Hijopotamus said on 30/Jan/17
Yang, the funny thing is that there is evidence Gwyneth can be shorter than that. Videos and pics.
Just check her in this site.
In any case, some fanboys will continue saying that in those pics with Paltrow he is 2 inches taller lol
Incredible they rather guess Pitt's height when he is wearing who knows what kind of shoes. People just want to complicate things it's nonsense.
S.J.H said on 30/Jan/17
@yang said on 30/Jan/17

LOL. Look on the top of their ear and overall. Pitt look solid 1.5" 4cm taller than 175cm Paltrow. Pitt is always 179cm. Pitt does wear lifts often but i would say is small lifts 1.75-2.25" compare to what fits beneath tom cruise feet was often 2.25-3". The only time brad pitt is 5'11 could only be 8-9am in the morning and 5'8 is extreme impossible
yang said on 30/Jan/17

There are pictures of him with 5"9 Paltrow where he looks barefoot shorter than her.

Click Here
delancey said on 29/Jan/17
Wears lifts (like pretty much every A-Lister) but I still think this listing is correct. Maybe slips into the high 5'10s at night, which might explain him wanting to wear lifts at Red Carpet events etc.
HonestSlovene said on 29/Jan/17
@yang he looks about 6'1" in the first pictures and 5'10"-5'11" in the second ones, so yes sometimes he wears lifts to premieres. 5'8"? Just LOL.
fabrizio said on 29/Jan/17
brad pitt 180cm george clooney 179 cm matt damon 177 leonardo di caprio 182cm
Tarik said on 29/Jan/17
Judging on photos I've seen I would give Pitt 177cm and Damon 175cm.
Hijopotamus said on 29/Jan/17
St. Clair, Schiffer claimed 5'10" herself on german tv as I said and not 6 feet as you say. Mrheightcaring80 confirms it.
Yang, when you see someone look 5'9" and somewhere else he stands 6'1" you may as well take the 5'9". Everyone can look taller with lifts, boots, heels etc but you cannot trick being short.
yang said on 27/Jan/17
Rob, do you think that brad pitt could be a lift wearer?

There are pictures of him with confirmed 6'1 quentin tarantino, 5'9 paltrow and 5'10 clooney where he looks a solid 6'2 and there other pictures where he looks at most 5'8 with this same people.

Tall brad pitt
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

short brad pitt
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

His height fluctuate so much in photos, very hard to find his real height.
HonestSlovene said on 27/Jan/17
Damon is a strong 5'9" guy pushing 5'10" like 176-177cm or so. Pitt is a good 1 inch taller and Norton is exactly 1 inch taller than him. So i'd say they are 176.5 cm, 179.5 cm and 182 cm.
Pierre said on 27/Jan/17
An other picture next to Georges Clooney= Click Here
Dan said on 27/Jan/17
Sam, look at the huge shoes Matt Damon wears in rounders. I guarantee you, Ed Norton is way taller than Matt Damon. Maybe 2 inches. Damon is max 5-9. Norton is a legit 5-11 guy, possibly a weak 6 feet. Norton and Dicaprio are both legit, barefoot 5-11. Pitt and Clooney are about 5-10. Damon possibly 5-9. Mark Wahlberg like 5-8. If Pitt is 5-11, than Dicaprio and Norton are barefoot 6 footers.
Mrheightcaring80 said on 26/Jan/17
Hey Rob, I gotta a question and don't know whether there is a section for common questions here.

So I am exactly 177cm out of bed barefeet and also 179,5cm with shoes on. Now I feel like I lose height already like within the first hour in the morning. So for how long does the morning height last? Is it actaully accurate to say I am 177cm when I feel like I am 176cm an hour later? I am also like 174,5cm - 175cm in the evening barefeet which I find is quite terrible losing almost 2,5 cm in height.

And as for Brad Pitt, I have never seen this guy barefeet except for his nude pics. lol Jake Gyllenhaal was man enough to get a measuring in socks while Pitt doesn't even take his shoes off on the beach. I am German and I remember Claudia Schiffer once claiming on TV that she was like 178cm or 179 cm tall, that was like 20 years ago when she was at her physical peak. No way Brad Pitt looks taller next to a pregnant Claudia in really flat shoes and also while slouching. Brad is also wearing shoes with some good back heels, he ist standing straight as usual and his cap also adds some visual height on his stature. No more than 178cm for Pitt out of bed.
Hijopotamus said on 26/Jan/17
Scooby, I fully agree.
Sam said on 26/Jan/17
Pitt is 5'11.25" in the morning. Both down-graders and upgraders are trolling.
Damon is not 5'9". Same height as Norton and very close to Turturro in Rounders. He just looks short due to his frame and oversized head.
Scooby said on 25/Jan/17
There should be a petition for Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise to take off those ridiculous elevator shoes and be measured properly. Who's with me?
Peter 179cm said on 25/Jan/17
He's a weak 5'11 guy and that's why he can give a 6'0 impression with lifts.With normal shoes he's 5'11-6'0 range and with a 1-inch lift boost he's almost 6'1.It's not that hard to understand that and if he's not 179cm he's definitely not under 178 so a legit 5'10 guy on the worst case scenario otherwise Jonah Hill is 5'5, Schiffer barely 5'10,Damon at most 5'9 etc...
Sandy Cowell said on 24/Jan/17
What a staggering amount of traffic Brad Pitt has!
I've just been reading through a few of these comments and some do mention the possibility of Brad having lost some height now that he is over 50.
Since the film in which he measured 5ft11 was from over 20 years ago, I'm going to have to agree that the likelihood of losing a tad is very real by that age. I am therefore going to plump for 5ft10.75, so I've only docked him a quarter of an inch! I'm in a benevolent mood!
Dan said on 24/Jan/17
St Clair, no one wants Pitt to be shorter than 5-11. This is a site where people try an estimate actors' height. Considering 95% of A-list actors over estimate or straight up lie about their height, it should be no different for Pitt. Almost every actor who's 6-0 and over, always tells the truth about their height( any over estimation is done by fans or media. Every actor 5-10 and under lies about their height. Tom Cruise and Taylor Laughtner and Zac Efron listed at 5-10??? Gimme a break. Matt Damon, at most is 5-9, and he also lists himself as 5-10. Pitt and Clooney both look like perfect 5-10 dudes. They only vary depending on their footwear. Clooney appears taller at times because he's way skinnier than Pitt and has that really long bony face with a huge jaw.

There's no way in hell that Pitt could stand 1.5 - 2" shorter than Chris Cornell if he wasn't at least 5-10. Brad Pitt doesn't wear huge elevator shoes, and when he wears custom height increasing shoes while on the read carpet, they're noticeably normal, not those bulky weird shoes I've seen actors wear.
Hijopotamus said on 24/Jan/17
St Clair, why you want to upgrade Pitt? 6 foot? Really? That's trolling. Where's the evidence? Oh you can't disclose details lol
I made a short list of movies where Pitt does not tower co stars. I made a reference to the little step Pitt stands on while kissing Paltrow.
Your illogical reasoning is childish, fanboy.
Oh and once again, compcards from agencies mean very little, if you know the basics about the fashion world. Tyson Beckford was listed as 6'2", same as Markis Schenkenberg...ah forget it, you are not capableof understanding...
You are just a weird bad troll. At least be good, dude.
William St. Clair said on 23/Jan/17
No lol not just because she's a model. Here's Claudia's height as listed by Elite Click Here
She is also listed as 181cm here. Pic is just above and they are both standing relaxed.
Everything else you said is just blah blah, no pics and zero evidence.

Why do you want Pitt to be lower than listed so bad??? That's just weird.
Hijopotamus said on 23/Jan/17
St. Clair, just because she was a top model she has to be 6'? Ah now you downgraded her to 5'11" lol
Dude, Oliver Cheshire is barely 5'11" and did all the major runway shows. You obviously don't know a lot about fashion.
What Redford said about Brad's height?
Brad always taller than other actors in his movies?
Watch Troy, Fight Club, 12 monkeys, that one eith Harrison Ford. Oh, 5'11" barefoot Willis was taller than Pitt in sneakers, interesting...
So was Ford, Norton, Bana...
That Pic with Paltrow he was leaning? Yes, he was standing as straight as posible so to kiss her. Watch any pic of a man kissing a woman and the head does not tilt that way unless you are shorter.
Ok, so Pitt is 6' according to St clair
So Gwyneth 6'
Willis 6'1 min
Corden 6'
Clooney 6 ish
Corden 6'
Well done, dude
King of the hill 91 said on 22/Jan/17
People just whant to down grade him 180cm strong Nothing under peak and no mistake no 183 cm peak 181 .5 maybe weake 182cm most no more
Pierre said on 22/Jan/17
Georges Clooney is listed 5"10.75' in this site.Here is a picture Georges Clooney next to Brad Pitt,Brad is closer to the camera so logically advantaged,he look shorter than Georges imo= Click Here
William St. Clair said on 22/Jan/17
She is listed as 181cm here, that's good enough for me. If you want to claim otherwise, you should submit supporting documents and concrete references on her page. Oh wait, you can't because she really is 181. She's a top model and she was Karl Lagerfeld's muse... hello? hello? anybody home???
Maybe Brad was wearing heels for some of the shots but that was his character's outfit, nothing to do with height enhancement. Also, I can guarantee you he wasn't lifting in those shoes because you clearly see him running over uneven terrain. If you're saying he could do that in heels + lifts, either you are completely deluded or you're the one trolling...
And one question for you, Redford's been in the business for decades. He knows every trick of the trade. When he saw Brad wearing heels, what makes you think he didn't decide to wear lifts in his shoes?
He's been a leading man for most of his career, you're telling me he'd suddenly decide to look like a dwarf next to Pitt? C'mon, that's just crazy.
As for the Paltrow pics, he is everything but standing straight when next to her. He is leaning even more than the tower of Pisa and the shot is taken at an angle and from a distance so they don't really inform on his height. Look at all his other pics with her and he's always taller.
Just admit it, you just can't bear thinking that he's over 6'
Hijopotamus said on 22/Jan/17
St. Clair, stop the trolling. What did Redford say? Just google pics of them and see the huge heels Brad was sporting and barely taller than 5'9" at his peak Redford.
Schiffer said she was 5'10" on german tv years ago. 5'11" in her compcard and we all know about agencies...
James Corden is same height as Gwyneth and Gwyneth is taller than Pitt. Watch the pic of Brad and Gwyneth both naked and kissing. NOW, WATCH BRADS FEET...oh he is standing on a little step. Hmmm interesting, right?
Pierre said on 22/Jan/17
@Honestslovene= Look at the video James Corden/Gwyneth Paltrow=Gwyneth isn't taller than James imo
William St. Clair said on 21/Jan/17
Setting aside all other points of contention, just look at the Schiffer pic. She is definitely 182cm and his eyeline is about 2 inches taller than her's. They're both in a relaxed posture so...
He towers over Jonah Hill and many of the Ocean 11 cast. He made Redford look really short in Spy Games. Why would Redford agree to that? There's no tricks people, he really is 6'1 and can appear 6'2 sometimes, as in next to DeGeneres.
Isn't Hiddleston 6'3 or something so it would makes sense he appears taller than Brad.
HonestSlovene said on 21/Jan/17
@Pierre Corden: 5'8", Paltrow: 5'9", Pitt: 5'10.5".
Pierre said on 21/Jan/17
If Gwyneth is 5"10' James Corden is 5"10'.Unlikely imo
Dan said on 20/Jan/17
William, where the hell did you get that Brad and Morgan were barefoot in that bathroom scene? The camera never shows their feet. Brad never towers anyone. Although he does always seem to have an inch or an inch a a half over most average celebs. There is a pic with him and Samuel Jackson, Tom Hiddleston and Chris Evans taken back stage at the 2013 or 2014 MTV awards and they all appear taller than Brad. There's also a very new pic of Brad with Chris Cornell and Zach Galafanakis from last week and both Chris and Brad are in boots. Chris looks about two inches taller than Brad and Chris ALWAYS has very relaxed posture. Cornell is easily 6-1 barefoot.
Justanotherguy said on 20/Jan/17
I don't think he wears lifts as often as people think he does. He likes to wear boots with extra heel but occasionally he probably wears small lifts. He's just looks maxing because his career and status largely depend on his image.
Kaneff said on 20/Jan/17

because 5'11 isn't tall and he wants to appear tall 6'+, especially someone like Pitt who I doubt was ever a full 5'11 more like 5'10.75"
hr said on 19/Jan/17
why does a 5'11 man wear lifts? i don't get it
Hijopotamus said on 18/Jan/17
William, you are too funny!!
Where does Pitt tower Redford? You are delusional.
Gwyneth is 5'10"? Really? Then Brad is s few mm under that. Easy one, thanks
John said on 18/Jan/17
Privacy issues from a fan lol. I love coming and reading this debate.
William St. Clair said on 17/Jan/17
Gwyneth doesn't look 5'9" max. She's 5'10" and I know for a fact. I can't disclose the information due to privacy issues but she is a very tall statuesque lady. Look at A Perfect Murder, there's a scene where she is barefoot and towers over a 5'9" Michael Douglas. Try countering that lol lol
To those saying Brad looks 6'1"/6'2" just because he lifts and has a thin frame, I am sorry but that's just wishful thinking. I hate to burst your bubble but he really is that height. Your logic just doesn't make any sense. Is he the only thin celeb out there. Nooooo
There's many thin framed, narrow wasted celebs who look small. Brad always towers over his co-stars. Redford, Damon, Hill and held his own over the gigantic Freeman when they were both barefoot!!! (@hijopotamus) in that bathroom scene in 7.
So there you go, 183cm for Pitt barefoot in the morning. Can easily look 186cm in events or movies. Otherwise, are you going to tell me that all his co-stars are vertically challenged little people haha ppPPLease
HonestSlovene said on 17/Jan/17
Between 5'10.5" and 5'10.75" seems spot on for this guy. 5'10.25" bare minimum and 5'11.25" absolute maximum. Never looked 5'10" or less or 5'11.5"+. In shoes I'd imagine he would measure a weak 6'0" or 182 cm.
Hijopotamus said on 16/Jan/17
Dmeyer, you are assuming, guessing, rating etc which is more difficult if you dont know what foot advantage theyr wearing. According to you Gwyneth is 181, right!
Why does she look 5'9" max?
Dmeyer said on 16/Jan/17
I have let aniston wearing a 3in heels she was almost 5 ft 8 she looked like wath a 5 ft 7 men in normal shoes will look , and Pitt usualy look 4-5in taller so not fort from 6'1 boots on the Guy has to be near 5'11
Heylo said on 15/Jan/17
I saw some photos of him on vacation in 2004 between Ocean's 12 premieres with Matt Damon and Clooney on a boat. Matt and Brad was if I remember correctly jumping into the ocean and Brad had his pants and socks(!!) on while doing it. I mean, I don't wanna get into rash conclusions but there is a suspicion here of a small lift in his sock even though I didn't detect anything on those particular photos. Sadly, I can't find all of those photos anywhere but I know what I saw. He had his best physique in his life there after all the weighttraining for Troy but his legs was definitely on the thinner side in relation to his big frame and it might be so that he:

1. Might feel insecure about his thin legs so he kept the pants on
2. Don't want to flash his small lifts in his socks to his buddies, therefor also kept the socks on
3. He simply likes to take a bath with clothes on.

I found only one of the photos: Click Here
Matt179 said on 15/Jan/17
Brad pitt is in the same Range as David Bekcham and Adam levine. They are all Slim and leans guys, i estimate their weight to 150-160 pounds at 5foot11. They look taller because of their build. If you want to look taller wear proper fitting clothes and Lose weight, you will look taller.
vin said on 14/Jan/17
He has the proportions of a 5'10 guy
HonestSlovene said on 14/Jan/17
@Johan I'd say a strong 178 cm still is debatable but anything under that is just trolling.
Johan said on 14/Jan/17
He has a good 4 inches on Jonah Hill ( best pic here on this page) and he isn't under 5'6" so please can the sub 5'10" crowd just stop.

Its not possible guys, even under 5'10.5" seems absurd.

His range is 5'10.5"-5'11", an upper average height that with good posture/big shoes can look tallish at times.
Wrs567 said on 13/Jan/17
He still looks 5'11'' to me, but barely these days
Hijopotamus said on 13/Jan/17
Pizzaman, you just don't make any sense!
How do you know his foot advantage??
Just take a pic of Brad standing straight besise another person barefoot too. Oh, that would destroy your reasoning...sorry
Dan said on 12/Jan/17
I was at the Egyptian theater for the screening of Cake, which had a q&a with Jennifer Aniston and moderated by Jason Bateman. I saw her from about 8 feet away. She's no shorter than 5-4
Pizzaman said on 11/Jan/17
Click Here

Just a pic with Aniston back in the day. If she is about 5'6.5" or 5'7" in her rather low heels, then probably 5'10"-5'11" range for Pitt (solid 4" difference). The camerage advantage is for Pitt though and notice he has 1.25" boots as well. I think a simple photo like this one makes it clear it is really unlikely he is below 5'10" or above 5'11"
jd said on 11/Jan/17
70-71 inches as a young a man in his 20's according to himself so guess just wishful thinking for Brad unless he of course has the common 2nd growth spurt in his 40s that most of us experience...
HonestSlovene said on 10/Jan/17
@William St. Clair Ummm, no? Looked similiar height next to Ford who by the way never was over a strong 183 cm in his prime so he actually looked about 181 cm in that film. He wore lifts next to Redford in Spy Games and he looks normally around MAX an inch taller than 5'9.5" Matt Damon when not lifted at red carpet events so most likely he is about 179-180 cm strong 5'10/weak 5'11 pick your choice. both 178.5 cm and 181 cm are debatable as he looked those aforementioned heights as well.
King of the hill 91 said on 10/Jan/17
180cm strong Nothing under 183 cm no chance peak some time in the day 180cm strong maybe so much over no chance 183 cm
Peter 179cm said on 10/Jan/17
The reason why Brad looks 6ft to some people is simply due to the man's slim/thin physique.It's a known fact that the thinner you are the taller you look.Plus an average 5'10-5'11 man with great physical proportions and posture and maybe abit generous footwear can easily pass for a genuine 6ft to the public eye.Don't forget that most people overestimate height as well.
Hijopotamus said on 10/Jan/17
William, you are so wrong. In Spy Games he wore massive heels and barely taller than Redford who stands 5'9ish. You are too funny, dude...
berta said on 10/Jan/17
looks 181-182 most of the time but have perfect posture and could have something in the shoes so 180 is fine
William St. Clair said on 9/Jan/17
He is definitely 6" minimum. Easily looked 6'1" in Spy Games next to Redford. Looked similar in height to Ford in Devils Own and constantly dwarfs both Damon & Hopkins.
Those claiming under 6" for Pitt, it's just wishful thinking.
Dan said on 8/Jan/17
Joe said on 7/Jan/17
182cm outta bed

180.5cm outta bed
Edimar1.82cm said on 7/Jan/17
He is a 1.79m no more no less.
Correg said on 7/Jan/17
Brad is definetally 1.80
Hijopotamus said on 7/Jan/17
Rob, this site is getting huge as Brads people keep posting nonsense stuff. Congratulations! Brad people have spotted this site!

In the 90s he was 5'10" according to himself and then he wrote 5'11" in his compcard adding the extra inch 90% of people have in their stats and now iver 59 some fanboys and his people wanna make us believe he is 183. Too funny..
So I Paltrow is 183 too! Bruce Willis 186, Harrison Ford 186, Tom Cruise 176...right?
King of the hill 91 said on 5/Jan/17
Taller then jorge clooney peak Nothing under 180cm strong some pages have him 183 cm 182cm weake my claim peak maybe flat
josh jeffords said on 5/Jan/17
Brad has looked as tall as a weak 6 ft and short as 5 10 pretty weird his weight is all over the place too.
I dont think he is that good at acting but he is an fing chameleon as far as roles.
Clooney has never looked taller that is crazy he can look 5 9 to 5 10 unless tarantino is there he looked 5 8.5.
Personally I believe both wear boots to look above average to 6 ft mark, exact same thing shia lebouf does to look average..
Even without lifts a big pair of boots can really make a short or average guy look more, I wore them a lot as a young man when less secure.
mc said on 2/Jan/17
solid 5'11' maybe even closer to 6 foot
mister_lennon said on 2/Jan/17
less than 178 for him is a joke.
Pierre said on 1/Jan/17
He look shorter than listed 5"10.75'Georges Clooney sometimes.
Mathew Robinson (190 cm) said on 1/Jan/17
Evening height somewhere in the 5'10" - 5'10.5" range. A.M. height somewhere in the 5'10.5" - 5'11" range. Fair enough!
Hijopotamus said on 30/Dec/16
HonestSlovene, I was replying to John after he said Pitt was 6'....
HonestSlovene said on 29/Dec/16
@Hijopotamus He would state that because he is most likely between those 2 heights. Duh...
Hijopotamus said on 29/Dec/16
John, why would he state 5'10" and 5'11" in the 90s as a grown man? Is Paltrow 6'? Are Harrison Ford and Bruce Willis 6,2"? Tarantino 6'4"?
John said on 29/Dec/16
I'd guess he's about 6'2 with shoes and about 6'0 barefoot.
c-mo said on 28/Dec/16
if he claimed 5'11 himself then he is most likely 5'10 or 5'10.5 or something

my guess would be 178cm in the evening . but I wouldnt rule out 180cm either . but for sure nothing below 177cm or above 181cm
vin said on 26/Dec/16
The standard norm is for pretty much all male celebrities to inflate their official height by one inch. Tell me why a guy as obviously height-conscious as Brad Pitt would proclaim his height as 5'11 if he actually was a legit strong 5'11 in reality? He has the proportions of a strong 5'10 guy. I would guess him to be 5'10.25 or 5'10.5
Dan said on 25/Dec/16
Great comment Dan. You were also spot on in regards to his ability to get very very slim, like 155, and still appear normal. Good job.
Dan said on 25/Dec/16
To the other Dan.. I think the grace and swag in his step is due to him walking on his toes. I know this is going into weird territory but yea, I think that he has a very particular walk that many have pointed out. He is a very physical actor, meaning he uses his body a lot. In an actor thing.
Dan said on 25/Dec/16
To the other Dan.. I think the grace and swag in his step is due to him walking on his toes. I know this is going into weird territory but yea, I think that he has a very particular walk that many have pointed out. He is a very physical actor, meaning he uses his body a lot. In an actor thing.
Dan said on 25/Dec/16
Heylo, I agree with everything you said. Spot on. Dmeyer I just think he looked over 6-0 in inglorious basterds. I think that's the only movie that they wanted him to look really tall.
MarcusTheSwede said on 25/Dec/16
Heylo: Thanks for youre post I couldnt agree more you Said it very well. Regards Marcus
joe### said on 25/Dec/16
My bet that clooney was higher barefoot
Hijopotamus said on 25/Dec/16
Johan, nobody says they are shorter than reality.
In Hollywood and fashion people add an inch at least.
So Im not far from the truth when Pitt himself said he was 5'10". A little under then.
Dmeyer said on 24/Dec/16
Good comment dan , but to me Brad had 2-2.2in heeled boots that give just under 2in of height And no lifts inside , And to me he never look over 6 ft , or 6'1 with excellent angle/posture advantage
Ramualdo said on 24/Dec/16
He is no higher than 177 cm
Johan said on 24/Dec/16
The average guess could really be close to the truth.

He isn't 5'10" flat thats for certain, both him and Clooney are noticeably taller than weak 5'10" Matt Damon.

He put down on an audition form that he was 5'10", he claimed at another point he was 5'11". Seems logical that he was doing some rounding of a measurement.
Dan said on 24/Dec/16
Excellent post Dan!
Heylo said on 23/Dec/16
Dan, I agree with some of your points. He has a very aesthetic build. I wouldn't say that he has short legs though, it can very well be so that it looks short with most pants on but if you compare Brad Pitt's body (from the nude photos with Paltrow) in terms of proportions, he's basically perfect in relation to the golden ratio that the ancient greeks thought to be the most beautiful.
The thing is that many pants and too long shirts makes the human legs look shorter than what they really are. Most models have longer legs than average and they look really good in all types of loose fitting clothes without having to stuck in the shirt in their pants but naked the legs can look "too long". You might not agree with me which is fine but IMO Brad Pitt has the ideal body proportions. Most people don't know how to dress though and this is why many people with good proportions look shorter than what they are when you look around IRL.
Brad Pitt's clothes in Fight Club were perfect in order to highlight his natural proportions (short t-shirt, short jacket). When the shirt stops where the leg attaches to the upper-body, you're basically emulating your naked body and that's the most attractive.

Look at this photo of Brad naked (his private parts aren't showing so you can click on it without worrying): Click Here
Like Dan also said, I agree that Brad also has the perfect body for using lifts, his legs doesn't look weird in them. He gets the long leg model look in big lifts.

This is a perfect body in terms of proportions. Guy Pearce has similar proportions and looks very good with the right clothing style complimenting his natural body.

Yes, nerd warning on me I know but I thought this was fascinating and worth sharing. Remember to wear your clothes right if you want to look your most attractive.
Dan said on 23/Dec/16
In addition to Brad's athletic physique, I'd be remiss not to mention his natural grace. He could have easily been a ballet dancer had he decided not to pursue the life of thespian. Let's just say he struck gold when the time came for his soul to pick the genetic numbers. As I said, he can appear 6-0 and yes, even 6-1/6-2 (when wearing monster lifts) and that's also thanks to his amazing balance. Look at the Spy Games in slow motion and you'll see that in some of the scenes, he is running fairly quickly while sporting huge lifts. A regular gent would trip over himself and possibly twist his ankle or worse but Brad paced all over the set as if he was born with stilts on. This type of ability commands our highest respect! After all, anyone who is an actor or who has ever tried to perform in public knows the importance of body awareness and control. Brad never appears awkward the way other actors his size can when wearing similar lifts. I guess what I'm saying is that this man has been at it for close to 40 years now and by this time, he's reached the heights of perfection when it comes to mind-body-soul control and exposition. Think about it this way, most bodybuilders are small in height but can appear gigantic on stage thanks to their body awareness and control. Brad has attained a similar level of control and he enjoys the added benefits of clothing and the whole arsenal of film-making tricks. So to sum it all up, though he can appear to hit 6-2 at times, I still remain firm on my strong 5-10 estimate. An estimate which is based on personal observation of myself and of my fellow men in movement. Taller individual can appear like anorexic spaghettinis when they go on a diet. Never been the case for Brad, even when he was a mere 155 pounds in Fight Club.
Tunman said on 22/Dec/16
Wouldn't have said better man.Still Clooney looked more 179 than 180 although today truly gives the impression to be closer to 5'10 flat very often.177 for Damon is always what I thought him to be,just under 5'10
Dan said on 20/Dec/16
@guest66. Absolutely, they can be tricky and foo estimations. That's why I think for Pitt, his proportions hurt him because people see the small legs from knee to calves. He has the proportions of a compact small guy. Sure, his shoulders are pretty wide, but that's also because his chest is small and his waist is really tiny. I think his proportions can make him look about 5-9 but I can't see him smaller than 5-10. His proportions can also trick people, as he can wear lifts inside boots and still appear normal and not freakish, like he's on stilts. It's all asthetics. Here's an example... With a body like Pitt's; small waist and wide shoulders, he can wear a jacket with big shoulder pads in a movie to appear bigger. His body allows him to wear it without looking like Frankenstein. Pair that up with 3" lifts and you have him looking like he did in Inglorious Basterds. In that movie he was wearing huge lifts. Looked like 6-2 in that tuxedo scene, but you'd never guess. Only until you see him on the red carpet next to the other actors, that you see he was neither that much taller than them or not much wider than them. Watch that scene and you'll know what I mean. They made him look like a huge Clark Gable type guy. And he ain't like that. Point being, I really think he's a perfect 5-10, who can appear taller in boots and shorter when he's in shorts and not wearing big shoes. I really can't see Paltrow under 5-9
Maxus said on 20/Dec/16
@pauly e. I'd argue the same growth.
pauly e said on 19/Dec/16
I've never bought Damon at 5'10 or Clooney anything over a flat 5'10.

If I had to guess here is what I would have:

Damon - 5'9.25
Clooney - 5'10
Pitt - 5'10.5, maybe 5'10.75
King of the hill 91 said on 18/Dec/16
181 cm peak
Guest66 said on 17/Dec/16
Dan. So I get it, Brads torso is relatively long to his legs, but what it has to do with his height? If top of his head is touching 5'11" then he is 5'11", regardless of his proportions. Everyone can have different proportions being at the same height, I'm myself stand at 5'10.25" and one my fellows who stands at about 5'9.5" is having higher shoulder level than mine, even though I'm visibly taller when we stand next to each other. So proportions are tricky and can fool your estimations.
Dmeyer said on 17/Dec/16
Even thaugh its true that in one occasion that Pitt had near 1cm less shoes than Clooney hé had à hard time looking as tall Clooney And in many pics of that day hé even looked 2-3in under Clooney but the angle were realy bad , after looking at all pics of all ocassions Brad does seem to be 1cm over Clooney And about 3cm over damon
what!!!?!!! said on 16/Dec/16
Hijopotamus, thanks. Actually I think this is the reality...

Think about this :
Damon 1.76-7; Pitt 177-8; Clooney 178-9.
We don't include the lifts here folks...
Dan said on 15/Dec/16
Here's a perfect example of proportions. Garfield actually looks like a legit 5-11 slim model guy. But go and compare a shirtless Garfield with shirtless Pitt. Garfield's torso appears smaller than Pitt's. Pitt's torso from upper abs to his illiac crest or what people call The V that leads to your pubic area, is long as bagoogle. He has a long upper body. That's why he can wear boots and lifts in films and he can pull it off without looking weird. Pitt has long torso and long biceps, long thighs, but short forearms and short calves. That's why even when he's really skinny, he still looks muscular. If he had really long arms and long legs he'd look skinny as bagoogle. Don't know if you know what I mean, but bodybuilding has a lot to do with symmetry and proportions. Pitt doesn't have a model body, he has more of an athlete MMA fighter type body. It's evident when you see him in Snatch and Fight Club.
Dan said on 15/Dec/16
@guest66. Proportions do show a bit. Given proportions, you can tell Dicaprio and Norton are taller than Pitt, but also given proportions, you can tell Pitt is in the 5-10 range. I agree he's probably in Garfield's range. I don't know about being leaner, I agree Garfield is a lot skinnier than Pitt. Way less muscle than Pitt has.
Celebheights 6'1.5 said on 15/Dec/16
Brad Pitt with Tom Cruise:

Click Here

Andrew Garfield with Tom Cruise:

Click Here

He looks to be about 1 CM taller than Andrew Garfield.
Guest66 said on 13/Dec/16
I don't understand how you people are trying to link proportions with height. Person can be short and stocky or short and lanky, same with being tall. Garfield in my opinion looks leaner than Pitt.
Hijopotamus said on 13/Dec/16
D, you just nailed it.
Dan said on 12/Dec/16
@honestslovene. Yea I can definitely see him at 6-2. He's tall and will never be mistaken for average.
HonestSlovene said on 12/Dec/16
@Dan Chris Cornell is about 6'2".
HonestSlovene said on 12/Dec/16
@CS I agree, Pitt seems to be 5'10.5"-5'10.75" and Garfield is 5'10.25". Both are around my height so I know how a certain height looks like.
Dan said on 11/Dec/16
In 2011, Chris Cornell was photographed on the red carpet with Pitt while attending the premiere of Moneyball. It's a bad image for reference; it's a close up and you can't tell who is standing on higher ground. They appeared to be similar height, though Pitt was wearing healed tom ford shoes as Cornell was wearing flat chuck Taylor type sneakers. Now, I've seen Cornell multiple times and know that he's 100% about 6-1 and no shorter than 6-0 bare feet. Pitt may have had some inserts too, I'm just gif you referencece cause Cornell always appears over 6-0 with shoes on
CS said on 10/Dec/16
I honestly think there is something to him having the build of a guy a bit shorter than 5'11, like many on this page are saying. I don't think he's as low as 5'10 but his size does remind me of 5'10.5 Andrew Garfield, I believe someone on this page said something similar a little while back.

Would be awesome if Rob finally got to meet this guy one day. I say he's around the 180 cm mark somewhere though. The average guess has him at a 179-180 cm guy which is fair enough.
D said on 9/Dec/16
Think about this :
Damon 1.76-7; Pitt 177-8; Clooney 178-9.
We don't include the lifts here folks...
DJT said on 9/Dec/16
@Greg He's 5'8". 5'10.5" in shoes. Sad because he employs an army of internet trolls to jack up his height on the internet. Shame!
V said on 7/Dec/16
He has the build of a 5'10 guy. I'd give him 5'10.5 at most.
James said on 6/Dec/16
@hm In fact, Brad Pitt is above average, he is 5' 11".

The average young white male in the USA is 5' 10.

Click Here
King of the hill 91 said on 6/Dec/16
His height that is a shock to people is 181 cm some people say there height and hate to people just whant to down grade him peak 181 cm maybe lost some Hollywood claim of 183 cm on some pages a celebrity who tells the truth on his height that is a shock 181 cm peak maybe lost some old age 181 .5 cm maybe a weake 182cm lost height old age
King of the hill 91 said on 6/Dec/16
He is taller then roak they said on his page brad is 181 cm some people say there height and hate to people just whant to down grade him peak 181 cm maybe lost some Hollywood claimed 183 cm on some pages but he instead said 181 cm instead 183 cm because he gives the truth peak 181 cm maybe 181 5 cm 182cm a weake one hieast lowest 180cm strong hates his height but honest every one has big lifts in Hollywood i mean a celebrity who tells the truth on his height that is a shock
John said on 6/Dec/16
bl I'm gonna say BS on the 6ft claim. More like 5'10.
Greg said on 5/Dec/16
@DJT what do you mean it's sad? 5'11 is only a .5 inch round up from 5'10.5 most guys I know around that height in the noon would probs go with 5'11. and I think he's a bit more then 5'10.5 in the mornings.
hijopotamus said on 5/Dec/16
bl, looool
bl said on 5/Dec/16
hes 6ft
V said on 4/Dec/16
Based on his build and proportions he strikes me as a strong 5'10 guy with a tendency to wear massive lifts. If he truly was 5'11 he would be claiming 6ft because he seems to be kind of insecure about his height.
CS said on 2/Dec/16
Rob, I know some people just want to downgrade Brad Pitt for silly reasons but do you think Brad's proportions give off a shorter look? Just curious if you think his proportions might affect the way some people think about his height.
DJT said on 2/Dec/16
Lightweight Brad Pitt thinks he's 5'11" but this site proves he's just 5'10.5". Everyone knows it. Sad.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover said on 27/Nov/16
@sam: No offence but that is a pretty bizarre unintelligible statement. Like I'm built more like a 6ft3â…ž guy rather than a 6ft4 guy....
D said on 27/Nov/16
1.79 max. If he is 1.80. Then with shoes and 2 inches lifts he must be 1.85. Is he?????
MJKoP said on 27/Nov/16
sam said on 26/Nov/16
he has the proportions of a 5 foot 10 and a half guy. does not look like a 5'11 guy. usuall 5'1 guys who are lean like brad pitt look on the verge of tall. pitt looks average height

Are you seriously meaning tell to me that you can tell the difference of a mere half an inch from body proportions alone? GTFO
sam said on 26/Nov/16
he has the proportions of a 5 foot 10 and a half guy. does not look like a 5'11 guy. usuall 5'1 guys who are lean like brad pitt look on the verge of tall. pitt looks average height
MJKoP said on 25/Nov/16
hm said on 25/Nov/16
if he is 5'11 and maybe he is indeed, why does he wear 2 inch lifts? he's already average height

This has been addressed time and time again. 6'1" is undoubtedly a more desirable height than 5'11". Which is why Pitt looks the former in his lifts.
Arthur said on 25/Nov/16
My last opinion for Brad for my 4 years of research about height and photos. 5FT9.7 -5FT9.9 range. But waking up after 12 hourse of sleep in a holiday he can measure 5ft10.2 ish. Thats my guess for him. I respect everyones opinion.
hm said on 25/Nov/16
if he is 5'11 and maybe he is indeed, why does he wear 2 inch lifts? he's already average height
Celebheights 6'1.5" said on 24/Nov/16
With Snoop Dogg:

Click Here

Click Here

The angle isn't the best, but Snoop Dogg doesn't tower over him.
Pierre said on 24/Nov/16
Imo Brad isn't slouching next to Claudia,his head is looking upward compared to her,the hands in the pocket don't make him lose height, Claudia's posture from head to foot make her lose lot's of height,and she seem have very flat shoes compared to Brad.
The pictures of the comment(07/nov/2016)=Brad next to Georges Clooney seem instructive for the difference between shoes imo
hijopotamus said on 24/Nov/16
Great comment Dan
Dan said on 24/Nov/16
There are now two Dans in here and I'm the one who's been here since the beginning and I'll continue to say he's 5-10. The least he can ever be is a tiny bit under 5-10, but closer to 5-10. He could be 5-11, but I don't see it. No way is he 5-8 or anything close to that. Never.
Dmeyer said on 23/Nov/16
Great comment dan
Original__(( said on 23/Nov/16
5'9.75"/5'10 peak, 5'9.25" now.
sd said on 22/Nov/16
he was like 2-3 inches taller than matt damon who's listed at about 5-9 1/2...if pitt is 5-11 damon is 5-9 maybe even 5-8 1/2,
I think pitt is 5-10 1/2 and matt damon is 5-8 1/2 especially considering he was barely taller than franka potenta in bourne identity
he looked 1/2 an inch to an inch tops than her and she's only 5-7 or 5-8
mickey said on 21/Nov/16
5ft11 is good for this fellow
hijopotamus said on 21/Nov/16
Dan, looooool
Dan said on 20/Nov/16
don't know why the Paltrow comparison is still used, but we've had a panel of experts clearly proving that Brad is at least 2 inches taller than her. I will not cry wolf and alarm the whole village but I have a news flash that just might send the downgraders into uncontrolled panic attacks. Brad Pitt is minimum the listed height and most likely, an inch taller!
Just look at how he towers over Claudia. He does it effortlessly, with his hands in his pocket. You can see he's even slouching a bit.
hijopotamus said on 20/Nov/16
wow it seems Willies is under 5'11", go check him out! And from people that really met him.
Brad 5'9 for me, Rob.
sam99 said on 19/Nov/16
brad pitt 183 cm
hijopotamus said on 17/Nov/16
Pierre, spot on. Willis is 5'11" and Paltrow 5'8" ish, a tall girl, true hahaha dan, end of the story?
Pierre said on 17/Nov/16
Bruce Willis 6"1'?People who write they were standing next to him(in this site at Bruce's page)give him clearly under 5"11'.
Gwyneth Paltrow is looking the same height as James Corden who is "listed" 5"8'
dan said on 17/Nov/16
if you google Claudia schiffer and Gwyneth paltrow, and you search through the images, you'll find them standing together at the same height, except Paltrow has like 3-4" heels and Schiffer is wearing a short heeled ankle boot that is angled, meaning she's probably getting max 2" from them.
dan said on 17/Nov/16
don't know why there are two dans in here, but im the one who's been here for a long time
Dan said on 16/Nov/16
@hijo, now you're not even making sense anymore.
"and no way he is 5'11" even if he stands same height as Bruce Willis. BTW, Willies barefoot was taller than Pitt wearing sneakers. Amazing..."
Considering Willis easily reaches 6'1" barefoot, it confirms the stated height for Pitt. The persistence some people show at refuting the irrefutable never ceases to baffle me. Yes I said it, I am baffled like a Belgian waffle.
dan said on 16/Nov/16
hijopatamus, when has Pitt ever looked shorter than a 5-8ish girl barefoot? If youre talking about Paltrow, she is a tall woman. end of story.. I tried to put it to you as easy as I could.. No elevator shoes, custom or not, can give you 3" or more without looking like elevator shoes. Its not my opinion, its a fact. Ive been working as an extra in Hollywood for major tv shoes, and Ive seen famous actors wearing elevator shoes and theyre so obvious its almost comical Theyre chunky, theyre bulky and don't look at all like regular shoes. Unless Brad Pitt has extremely weird freak feet, theres no way those shoes can be elevator shoes.. Like I said, the most he can get with heel and inserts is max 2".
hijopotamus said on 16/Nov/16
Dan, custom elevator shoes cost dear, my friend. Thats why. Because you cannot spot them unless you touch them. How come Pitt look shorter than a 5'8 ish girl both barefoot? why in the world you keep guessing Pitts height when wearing shoes?? this goes beyond me!
Keep it simple guys.
Pierre said on 16/Nov/16
Imo the particularity of good elevator shoes is that it's very ardly or impossible to guess the real advantage in this shoes.The proof=Brad can be easily taller than Georges Clooney and people think Brad is taller than him and in some pictures Brad is looking shorter than Georges(pictures comment 7/nov/2016)
dan said on 15/Nov/16
right now go to just jared and look at brad pitt promoting Allied in China... He's sitting on a couch with his legs crossed and his shoes are 100 percent visible.. Tell me how its possible for him to be getting more than 2" from those regular looking dress shoes.. and Im being generous to the conspiracy theorists who think Pitt always walks around in 3-4" shoes.. Rob, I would ask you to check it out to if you have the time.
Editor Rob: dan, they are normal looking shoes. You could potentially fit 1 inch of lift in them, but any more and you'd fall out.
Animus said on 15/Nov/16
Rob, how tall do you think he looks next to Gosling? Do you think Pitt wears 1.5" shoes?
Editor Rob: Animus, sometimes Pitt has worn cuban style heels. With Gosling I think he could look a comfortable 5ft 11 range.
shiva 181 cms said on 15/Nov/16
Rob, how long would his head be
Editor Rob: not a huge head, shiva, he has more width than length, over 9, at most 9.5.
S.J.H said on 15/Nov/16
I feel that the lifts Pitt wore boost up 5-6cm and lower lifts he wore at 1.5" and he can look 6'1 max with it and 6'0 with small lifts. He really look proportionally 179cm not more
Shenm said on 13/Nov/16
Booker said on 12/Nov/16
178-179 cm
hijopotamus said on 12/Nov/16
Peter 179, Its been already discussed Pitt is shorter. Watch their legs and neck position. In any case if Pitt was taller he wouldnt be those 4 cm you say. Seriously, where do you see those 4 cm? Id say Pitt would be 2 cm shorter as he is standing on a higher step. Watch their feet.
Peter 179cm said on 12/Nov/16
@ hijopotamus He looked taller than Paltrow,not shorter.And even if Paltrow is only 173-174cm,that would still make Brad over 175.He's probably not 180 or 181,but anything less than 178 seems unlikely,especially if you compare him with Bernthal who Rob has met and estimated him at 180cm or even Christoph Waltz who looks every bit of 170cm.
hijopotamus said on 11/Nov/16
Theres a guy in the Daniel Craig forum that says hes been wearing lifts for ages 24/7. He says he is 5'7" and reaches a tad bit over 5'10" and nobody noticed. So many cases and too many that just add a couple of inches. Remember when people were discussing 5'10" for Sly Stallone. If Pitt was 181 he wouldnt be shorter than 5'9"ish Paltrow. Simple as that.
People have an ilusion about celebrities and they think Arnold is 6'2" because "he is the Terminator!!" and no way he is 5'11" even if he stands same height as Bruce Willis. BTW, Willies barefoot was taller than Pitt wearing sneakers. Amazing...
S.J.H said on 11/Nov/16
@Johnson said on 8/Nov/16
He is 181 cm tall

I agree but def a morning height in his 20s or 30s of age and holding well at 5'10.5 now
Animus said on 10/Nov/16
Rob, how did he manage to look so tall next to Gosling? Perhaps he wore 1.5" shoes?
Johnson said on 8/Nov/16
He is 181 cm tall
Jay 184cm said on 8/Nov/16
@ Jackson Yeah, it does look like that, buddy.
S.J.H said on 8/Nov/16
@miko said on 7/Nov/16

In boots he pass 6'0 and in lifts he pass 6'1 like george clooney been fooled
Jackson said on 8/Nov/16
Those pictures with Clooney looking 2 inches taller than Pitt then Pitt looking 2 inch taller than Clooney tell me Pitt is just wearing massive lifts and is really 5'9
hijopotamus said on 8/Nov/16
Bobby, this is a serious discussion...or supposedly serious.
Bobby said on 7/Nov/16
5'11 looks about right to me, he is definitely a tall man at a solid 5'11. Now, I know before I have listed my heights variously, but I have done very careful measurements recently, making sure I was measuring my morning height, and I stand at exactly 6ft tall, but am 6'1 with standard 1 inch shoes on, well they are 1.3 inch shoes, but I am basically 6'1 with my shoes on regardless, but dip down to 6'0.5 in the evenings at 184.3 cm with shoes on of course, otherwise without them on, I am 5'11.5. So yeah, I would expect him to be this tall in person. It's possible he may even be slightly taller in the mornings, but at his age I am not sure. It's feasible that his peak height as a young man was 6ft, maybe even 6'1.
hijopotamus said on 7/Nov/16
Jay 184cm, yeah thats the idea some fanboys dont want to see. Always take the ones he looks shorter and maybe he is even shorter than that.
But these fanboys take the ones where he looks the tallest. Isnt that absurd??
Funny thread that was.
Jay 184cm said on 7/Nov/16
This forum page has some very interesting pics of Pitt. There are some odd photos of him with Clooney where they are both of varying heights. Strangest of all are the ones with 6'1" Tarantino - Pitt looks weirdly taller in a couple of them and then totally dwarfed by Tarantino in a couple of others. In the ones where Tarantino dwarfs him, he looks 5'9" - comes up to Tarantino's eye-level...

Click Here
King of the hill 91 said on 7/Nov/16
I stand with my claim 5.11
miko said on 7/Nov/16
Don't think I've commented on Pitt before but I've always pegged him at 179 range. Not quite a flat 5'11.

In his boots he can pass for 6 foot.
Giorgi said on 6/Nov/16
I don't believe all the chattering about Brad Pitt being any shorter than this. The guy has obviusly good height. I don't see him any shorter than this anywhere.
Giorgi said on 6/Nov/16
I don't believe all the chattering about Brad Pitt being any shorter than this. The guy has obviusly good height. I don't see him any shorter than this anywhere.
S.J.H said on 6/Nov/16
@HonestSlovene said on 6/Nov/16

Pitt in lifts def taller than Bernthal by 0.75 range but if measure i think Bernthal could be a few mm taller not surprise at all while his 13years younger than pitt
HonestSlovene said on 6/Nov/16
@S.J.H It's IMDB and yeah 5'11 for him is closer to reality, Pitt is just a few fractions (o.5 at most) shorter.
HonestSlovene said on 5/Nov/16
I think Bernthal might edge out Pitt at 180 cm or 5'11" (maybe 5'10.75") and Pitt at 179 cm or 5'10.5". Both look at least like very solid 5'10-ers, neither give sub 5'10 impressions with normal shoes. He is not a weak 5'10 a.k.a Matt Damon range!
S.J.H said on 4/Nov/16
Jon Bernthal old listing was listed 5'10 on some site and change into 5'11 most recently. I would say Bernthal 5'10.5 same height as Pitt
Arthur said on 3/Nov/16
Editor Rob: personally there is literally a miniscule chance of Bernthal being 177-178...the chance is so small you'd need the hubble telescope to spot it.

How about 178-179 then?
Editor Rob: still a smaller chance...a chance of 10.75 is greater though, as I mentioned I have seen him at 2 events and the second time I thought there was a chance of 10.75-11, although up close the first times I seen him I thought a typical 5ft 11 man!
Greg said on 3/Nov/16
@Peter 179cm Oh okay that's cool! Yeah that's true, not many people are height aware so it could explain why the majority of false claims seem to be believable to certain individuals. And true a weight machine :P except weight can be changed height can not unless you want to go through expensive surgery.
Pierre said on 3/Nov/16
Imo around 5"9' in the picture next to Jennifer Aniston slouching on him at the beach
King of the hill 91 said on 3/Nov/16
He has proberly lost some height from age with ryan at oscars he looked close to five eleven peake he could be five elevrn
King of the hill 91 said on 3/Nov/16
He has proberly lost some height from age with ryan at oscars he looked close to five eleven peake he could be five elevrn
Greg said on 2/Nov/16
@Vibram okay and you do realize pictures are deceiving right? Robs actually met him in person and took a photo with him.. Pegging him around 179/180cm. I would trust someone who's a height expert and actually met the celeb in person whilst taking a photo with them. You're arguement is invalid.
Editor Rob: personally there is literally a miniscule chance of Bernthal being 177-178...the chance is so small you'd need the hubble telescope to spot it.
Peter 179cm said on 2/Nov/16
@ Greg I'm from Greece.
Yeah alot of people dudge their height by what others claim,even if it's a lie and just go with it no matter what.Same goes with weight as well,although it's harder to say if someone is honest or not,you'd need a weight-machine for that XD.
S.J.H said on 2/Nov/16
Lift wearer A listed celebrities current real height:

Stallone 5'7.75
Depp 5'8
Cruise 5'6.75
Pitt 5'10.5 (suspected lower but status on-hold)

Heights are barefeet estimates, derived from quotations, official websites, agency resumes, in person encounters with actors at conventions and pictures/films.

Other vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been sourced from newspapers, books, resumes or social media.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.