|
dmeyer says on 12/Mar/10
i think even if pitt himself admits he is 5 ft 10.25 or 5 ft 10.5 rob will never change the listing
Androgynous says on 11/Mar/10
Joe Blow just took everything to a whole new level, hahaha. But the heels on those shoes was really something. I am suprised he can actually walk in those shoes. Bradi says on 11/Mar/10
Evidence shows him at 5'9.5'' Cris says on 11/Mar/10
Again...they look at these shoes
Click Here 177cmmm says on 11/Mar/10
o wow Joe Blow is right he can't be more than 5.10 hes picture with paltrow shows him as the same height or a bit bigger. Then i went and saw a pic of her next to 5.6 jack black on her page and she was maybe a couple of inches taller. Anonymous says on 10/Mar/10
4/5th of the time I see Brad's shoes in a picture, they are some outrageous and suspicious towers. Jay says on 10/Mar/10
Click Here
JESUS look at the heels on those shoes. He's 5 ft 9 without the tricks.
Paltrow is 5ft 8. He skinniness makes her look taller. Same like Pitt. dmeyer says on 9/Mar/10
he realy dosnt look over 5 ft 10 in those pics he even looks under it but i steel think pit s no less than legit 5 f 10.25 like 5 ft 11 morning 5 ft 10.5 midday and evening 5 ft 10.25 josh says on 9/Mar/10
wow rob joe blow really wants you to downgrade brad pitt to 5'10 or he will take you to court lmao. Anonymous says on 9/Mar/10
great post Joe, but forget it, people are convinced that heīs at least 5.11 even it is VERY CLEAR that he isnīt Joe Blow says on 9/Mar/10
Why is this website so strict on posts? You should have a proper forum set-up with moderate's.
I've tried to post this 3 times and it never gets through... I really really like the concept of the website, but
because of brad pits height on here i really don't come here anymore. BRAD PITT IS NOT 5'11, the fact that he put
down 5'10 on a audition form should be proof enough a guy in the 5'10 range is not going to short change himself.
It also proves to me he is 5'9.5 because everyone lies a little bit about there height round up etc... But LOOK AT
THE PALTROW PICTURES!! Him standing next to her barefoot is all you need to see.
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS PICTURE!! Click Here
THERE YOU HAVE IT ALL THE PROOF YOU NEED !! RIGHT THERE GOD I LOVE THIS WEBSITE BUT PLEASE OH PLEASE DOWN GRADE PITT TO AT
LEAST 5'10 PLEASE GO PLEASE DO IT!
Click Here NOTICE SHE IS BENDING A BIT AND HE IS STANDING STRAIGHT!
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here Joe Blow says on 8/Mar/10
Why is this website so strict on posts? You should have a proper forum set-up with moderate's. I've tried to post this 3 times and it never gets through... I really really like the concept of the website, but because of brad pits height on here i really don't come here anymore. BRAD PITT IS NOT 5'11, the fact that he put down 5'10 on a audition form should be proof enough a guy in the 5'10 range is not going to short change himself. It also proves to me he is 5'9.5 because everyone lies a little bit about there height round up etc... But LOOK AT THE PALTROW PICTURES!! Him standing next to her barefoot is all you need to see.
PLEASE LOOK AT THIS PICTURE!! Click Here
THERE YOU HAVE IT ALL THE PROOF YOU NEED !! RIGHT THERE GOD I LOVE THIS WEBSITE BUT PLEASE OH PLEASE DOWN GRADE PITT TO AT LEAST 5'10 PLEASE GO PLEASE DO IT!
Click Here NOTICE SHE IS BENDING A BIT AND HE IS STANDING STRAIGHT!
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here Anonymous says on 8/Mar/10
Ali020202: 5'11 is around average in most northern european countries. If you are not of massai or totsi heritage, 5'11 is pretty much typical height for a man. irishguy says on 8/Mar/10
Does Brad Pitt ever actually look 6'1+ out and about?
I would say no, they only times he does is in a photo because he wears lifts AND slyly stands on his tiptoes. I saw at least one pic that had evidence of this, but I bet you he does it all the time, its quite easy to stand on one tiptoe, or even raise both feet slightly.
I'm still thinking about 5'10 - 5'10.25 at the moment for PItt. Shaun says on 8/Mar/10
Looked 5'9.5" and slight of frame next to Bruce Willis in Twelve Monkeys. That is his true height, 177cm. Kristian says on 8/Mar/10
5 foot 10 fits this guy so incredibly well, i feel like its useless debating this though Ali020202 says on 7/Mar/10
Do people consider 5ft11 short 4 a guy, because i'm 5ft11 and i don't feel short, i am south asian so maybe dat has sumthin 2 do with. Most of the guys considered gud luking tend 2 be around the 5ft11-6ft3 range i've noticed, not sure y dat is, maybe these proportions hav positive effect on face, i guess. lucian says on 7/Mar/10
brad is height obsessed.Definitely his morning height is 5'10",and goes down half an inch 2 three quarters by nightfall.regular lifts give you 2,5-3 inches and hair 1/2 inch.this makes him 6 ft.but great posture, dark clothing on his lean body, long legs ,small head and of course camera positioning make him appear even 6'1.5" tall.his biggest problem is that his long legs don't allow him 2 wear huge lifts.he is 46(ppl lose about 0.5 inches in 10 years from 40) so he lost about quarter inch already.STILL GREAT ACTOR,but my average height :P Christian says on 7/Mar/10
This is great pics of Pitt with his ex. Look at Angelinas high heels. She is 5'9'' with thoose on and Pitt looks fairly tall. Click Here misha says on 6/Mar/10
Chan man says on 5/Mar/10
Lifts could at the most give you a 1.5 inches of additional height without hurting your back and tripping all over your self.
I have to disagree, Chan Man. Various hiking boots and lately some athletic shoes give you close to 1.75 inches off the shelf. Insert modest half-inch lifts into a pair of these generously-heeled shoes and someone who is 5'9.5" is now just a quarter of an inch below six feet. misha says on 6/Mar/10
bandet says on 4/Mar/10
Misha, the only way anyone is going to see the truth is if they get out a measuring tape because pictures are misleading. Pitt is an easy 5,11.
Bravo, Bandet!!! We've all been waiting years for someone to actually measure Brad Pitt in person. So tell us, when you got him to take off his shoes, had him stand against a wall and then took his height with a tape measure, exactly how tall was he?
Rob, please don't post this if it's just a duplication of an earlier comment - I can't remember whether or not I posted it. Thanks. misha says on 6/Mar/10
bandet says on 4/Mar/10
Misha, the only way anyone is going to see the truth is if they get out a measuring tape because pictures are misleading. Pitt is an easy 5,11.
Bravo, Bandet!!! We've all been waiting years for someone to actually measure Brad Pitt in person. So tell us, when you got him to take off his shoes, had him stand against a wall and then took his height with a tape measure, exactly how tall was he? dmeyer says on 6/Mar/10
even thaugh i think brad might not be legit 5 ft 11 i do think h is aleast 5 ft 10.25 maybe 5 ft 10.5 anithing under 178.5 cm for him is too small 5 ft 9.75 claims for is too low dmeyer says on 6/Mar/10
in the pic of rising force pitt seems 1.5 i taller than clooney so solid 6 ft and the you can see his shoes and he dosnt have room for big lifts more like 1 in max so pitt can lok 6 ft with small lifts this could explain the 5 ft 11 for him Anonymous says on 6/Mar/10
Watched 12 Monkeys last night. It was obvious that Willis was noticeably taller & larger than Pitt. No way, he is 5-11. To me it appears obvious. Rob G says on 6/Mar/10
Chan man, lifts can add more than just 1,5". For reference check out Stallone's page on this site, it was confirmed that one can gain even 3,5"+ from elevators and they even don't look suspicious! PS. Pitt looked about 5'10" barefoot next to Paltrow, so much for him being "a straight 5'11" guy" Rob G says on 5/Mar/10
If I may, bandet, Pitt is most probably not "an easy" 5'11", as you put it. See the evidence posted here for months and months, best one is of course barefoot picture with Paltrow. Slim chance Pitt's legit 5'11", I think he's more 5'10"ish, 5'10" flat, and even 5'9.5" at first may seem to low for him, but compared to that "legit 5'11" " claim, 5'9.5" is certainly far more probable. Again check out the pictures posted here by Dural, Paul, Chris, delphonic and others. You'll see that legit 5'11" for Pitt is very hard to buy. Chan man says on 5/Mar/10
Lists could at the most give you a 1.5 inches of additional height without hurting your back and tripping all over your self. Someone could pull off a 6'1" illusion when his barefoot height is around 5'11". So Pitt is just a straight 5'11" guy with great posture and proportion without looking short. Rob G says on 4/Mar/10
Yeah Christian, Pitt indeed looks about 6'1" in your photos. To be fair I think he usually appears to be in 6'0"-6'1" range at events. Also, nice find that first photo you posted, great example of Pitt super-posture and custom lifts, they look to me to be giving him easy 2,5" gain. zein says on 4/Mar/10
5'10" barefoot in the morning,and half an inch shorter end of the day.good posture and hair add 1 inch, his lifts 2.5 inches,resulting in a 6'1.5 inches, 6'1" in the evening at premiers.his maximum height is 5'10" but he is smaller at premiers and such so lifts are necessary 4 him. Jacob says on 4/Mar/10
Rob, I do not get why you've still not downgraded Brad... NO-ONE here seems to believe he's 5'11" (even not morning height), and the highest anyone will go is 5'10.5" to 5'10". Where's the downgrade we have so wanted? bandet says on 4/Mar/10
MIsha, it's quite ironic that you tell people they are stubborn i changing their minds once an opinion is fixed. Pitt is an easy 5,11. It is you who see something and then refuse to change their mind. I imagine if you were to guess your friends heights you'd get them all wrong too. Gibson is an easy 5,9.5. Pitt is quite clearly above average height. The only way anyone is going to see the truth is if they get out a measuring tape because pictures are misleading. Learn to judge height by look
ing at the person on their own. I'ts not very difficult. RisingForce says on 3/Mar/10
Good picture, Dural. Those look a bit suspicious, for a boot with a modest exterior heel, his ankle position looks high and the angle steep. If he had a 2+ inch heel then that would make more sense. Definitely a good chance those have built in lifts.
It is suspicous that he's always in some form of boot even if they can look normal. Rob G says on 3/Mar/10
Christian, for one thing Pitt doesn't look close to 5'11" barefoot next to Paltrow, and I must disagree that Pitt looks constantly about 6'1" on events. Most of the time he looks to be about 6ft and when he does look 6'1" he prolly wears elevator shoes. Also, maybe your girlfriend didn't notice that Pitt was in big lifts, in fact majority of people don't. OliTheMan says on 3/Mar/10
Judging from his shoes... its pretty obvious by now he either wears lifts or picks big-heeled shoes, either option suggests he is self-conscious about his height, which means.... BINGO! hes not 5'11"
i mean, jesus, we even have a barefoot pic... its kind of impossible to ignore. at the very least, Rob, put him down to 5'10.5" adam2 says on 3/Mar/10
Rob, why dont you take half an inch to an inch off? Look at those barefeet pictures. Brad says on 2/Mar/10
That Nolifts81 shot of that boot is probably the best piece of evidence that these 5' 8" clowns like Sly & Mel get away with murder than anything else. Pitt obviously wears similar 3.75's cause he's over 6' in many shots with ease. He's 5' 10". Christian says on 2/Mar/10
A girl I am dating met Pitt in Marocco. She wore 4 inch heels and she is 5'9''. She and Pitt were eye to eye. So, Pitt can pull off 6'1'', in fact he looks 6'1'' on every event I think. And I think he is closer to 180 cm barefeet. Dural says on 2/Mar/10
Hey Rising, those boots look similar to the ones NoLifts81 posted on the Sly page
Click Here Anonymous says on 2/Mar/10
Click on RisingForce's last pic. Then hold "CTRL" key down and tap "+" on your keyboard, until pic expands to it's max. Lastly, slide to view Pitt's shoes and compare them to the gent standing to the right (Pitt's left). The slope and angle of the foot are obvious. Look at the back of the shoe and note how high it is. This is never visable in his pics. --- The back of the shoe must be high like this to contain his foot as he walks.
I believe Pitt is between 5-9.5 and 5-10. RisingForce says on 2/Mar/10
NoLifts81 posted his elevator boots on the Stallone page and these gave him 3.75". Click Here
Which does mean that Pitt could have some massive lifts in his dress boots. The angle of his shoe looks very steep compared to Clooney's. Click Here
The best proof of lifts is when someone sits down and you can see their ankle position. Unfortunately this is the best shot I could find, it's from the same night as the other pic. Click Here
Pitt has the best shoemaker in Hollywood. Shaun says on 2/Mar/10
I think he is 177cm barefoot, similar to Clooney. Shaun says on 2/Mar/10
I agree with Misha actually. The best evidence of Pitt is barefoot and I see him at 5'9.5"-5'10" the same height as Clooney. I do however think he is a good 5'10" out of bed anyway. Definately not 5'11", otherwise he would look taller barefoot next to Paltrow and pull off 6'1" regularly in 2 inch lifts, Most reports indicate that Pitt mostly appears as 6' in lifts and only 6'1" in his munsters.. Anonymous says on 28/Feb/10
Judging by the photos, I think hes probably 5'11 if he doesnt wear lifts. If he is a lift wearer than 5'10 is probably his height. Misha says on 28/Feb/10
Delphonic, I wish everyone could see what is so patently obvious to you and me. Pitt's boots are an embarrassment. They look like women's shoes, and a falling leaf would topple him over. The photo with Gwyneth Paltrow is irrefutable evidence that he could not possibly be taller than 5'9.5" - they are standing on hard, even tile flooring, and yet their heights are identical.
The core of the entire issue rests in the ad just below this post: "Elevator
Shoes for Men". Look at that diagram - it's easy - Pitt slithers/crawls/falls out of bed at 5'9.5", slips into something like these and shows up on the set at a solid six feet. This makes sense. But the opposite point of view is unsupportable. Please, someone who still thinks he's 5'11", explain to the rest of us how he could be that height and still be no taller barefoot than Paltrow, who is probably closer to 5'8" than 5'9". How does he hide the extra two or three inches of height, and more significantly, why would he want to? Misha says on 28/Feb/10
Thanks for the corroborative support, Delphonic, and speaking of "morning height", the chronic boosters are unique in that they GAIN height after they leave the house rather than lose it - it's "out of bed at 5'8.25" and into the
studio at 5'11"!
By the way, peteyork, I'm not including Rob when I point the accusatory finger at some imbicile for stubbornly clinging to a height that is simply wrong. Rob
is clearly a fine person and right on the money about most heights. He adds a
half inch to an inch here and there, but I think this reflects his generous nature rather than an error of perception. Glennnnn says on 27/Feb/10
Anyone who still thinks Pitt is over 5'10 barefoot are just stubborn fools, I've been saying take a look at Pitt's collection of elevator shoes for years as well but no one really cared... or they would spew nonsense like hes only wearing them during movie sets so I stopped commenting. I've always said Clooney is a bit taller than Pitt as well. Anyway Pitt is max 5'10, 178cm. Original says on 26/Feb/10
Pitt is 5'9.75" or 177cm. Anonymous says on 26/Feb/10
EXACTLY !! delphonic says on 26/Feb/10
Misha - Very well put and I agree with everything you say. Particularly good point about the fact that the true 5'11"- 6'1" guys NEVER have any 5'9"ish sightings or pics posted looking the same height barefoot as someone who is max 5'9" (Paltrow). But hey, who needs logic when there are tons of pics in 3 inch customs and straining military posture that make Stallone look 5'11", Pitt 6" and Cruise 5'9"?? so many posters are either too stubborn and bone-headed to grasp that, or maybe they are simply PR people trying to keep celeb myths alive? Who knows? Anyway, I just woke up. So I better get out there and take advantage of my "morning height" before I shrink back down to an average height guy by lunch time ;) peteyork says on 26/Feb/10
Misha Jeff Bridges, Aragoon from lord of the rings have all been downgraded. If a celeb is see on film stating his height is x, unless it is clearly wrong Rob normally changes them to that height. He does miss some like Sean Connery etc, but we are only talking 1/2 an inch. I think things change very little now because Rob has decent evidence on most celebs now. Misha says on 26/Feb/10
I just dropped in for a quick review of the site and I see nothing has changed, and this is why I stopped posting. Delphonic displays a photo of Pitt in bare feet right next to 5'8" - 5'9" Gwyneth Paltrow and he is looking not a millimeter taller(because he isn't)and then several posts later someone who has seen the photo and has made many intelligent comments over the years describes Pitt as 5'11" in the morning. What does he do, Dmyer, lose three inches in six hours? This site reflects a sad tendency humans have to not change their minds once they've reached a decision about something. The same people who thought Stallone was 5'll" four years ago still think he is, and those who thought he was 5'7" still hold that opinion. No amount of evidence, no matter how graphic and unequivocal, ever convinces anyone to add or subtract as much as one inch from a subject's height, and this is why I no longer post. Why go through the time and effort when not one single person is going to be swayed by it? So I just occasionally stop by to see what's new - and the answer is always the same: nothing, really. You are of course absolutely correct, Delphonic, and how sad that no one who thinks Pitt is 5'11" will be moved to change after veiwing the Paltrow-Pitt barefoot pics - but I was aware of them three or four years ago and I couldn't change anyone's mind then so don't feel bad.
I can't resist one little stab of logic befofe parting, though. Where there's
smoke there's fire, says a poster down the page a bit, and he's right. Why is it that no one ever says "I saw Val Kilmer, Harrison Ford, Nicholas Cage (i.e., an actor who is clearly at least 5'11" if not 6'0") and I'm 5'11" and
I couldn't believe it, he was three inches shorter than me."
Why don't we ever see a post like this? Why are the "suspected lifters" always the same culprits - Stallone, Mel Gibson, Tom Cruise, and lately Brad Pitt because he aspires to appear six feet tall? The answer is pathetically obvious. Anyone who thinks, for example, that Mel Gibson is 5'10 or 5'11" in his bare feet is ignoring mountains of eveidence to the contrary. But I'm through with trying to change anyone's mind, because I know it is pointless. I'm going to take Rob's advice and just have fun looking in to sample the grotesque distortions of logic that characterize ninety percent of the posts. RisingForce says on 26/Feb/10
His ankle bone does look high there, Cris. Bradi says on 26/Feb/10
I think 177cm is correct Mike- says on 25/Feb/10
Well then case closed huh- Max is a weak 5'10- With a greater likelihood of 5'9. Honestly, look to his costars generally as of late- Short Casey Affleck, short george clooney, matt damon, don cheadle- Look back to his wrangler jeans commercials- wrangler i believe it was- Now that was a short barefoot dude. Or look to his "Dallas' days- again short- Shaun says on 25/Feb/10
I see him around 177cm. Shaun says on 25/Feb/10
The Paltrow-Pitt photo is the best evidence. To me he appears as 5'9.5" and around 160 pounds. There are very few pics of Pitt barefoot... Watch him in Thelma and Louise and Across the Tracks. He looks 5'9.5" to me. 5'10" tops. 177cmmm says on 25/Feb/10
well im 6.2 so you guys can fight about if hes 5.9 or 5.11 i don't care because im taller than him :) RisingForce says on 24/Feb/10
Good example of Pitt wearing suspicious footwear, Delphonic. I often think his footwear is exaggerated, but those do indeed look strange. dmeyer says on 24/Feb/10
i think pitt is 5 ft 10.25 o 5 ft 10.75 5 ft 11 is morning hight Anonymous says on 24/Feb/10
I totally agree with you delphonic.
It even looks as though Pitt's heels are off the ground, in your first picture. Look closely. Anonymous says on 24/Feb/10
5'10" max for brad pitt. theres that paltrow picture. hes closer to the camera too. Rob G says on 24/Feb/10
Again, delphonic is right on the money. About 5'10" for Pitt, granted. delphonic says on 23/Feb/10
Ok, let's review this one more time. The first pic is Pitt barefoot, the second is a rare shot of Pitt in seemingly "normal" shoes. The third pic is Pitt in the type of custom party-pumps he wears to every event these days. He knows he'll be photographed next to other celebs for height comparison, so he comes "well-prepared" ;) Again notice how ridiculously high the arch and slope of his feet are in these things. If you take your finger and cover up the long clownish front part of his shoes, they basically look like a pair of lady's pumps. I guarantee you the long and flat front tip of those shoes are hollow and just there to give the illusion that they are "normal" flat shoes. He usually wears a longer boot-cut type pants that hide the ridiculous slope and built-up ankle part of his shoes to only reveal the stylish and flat front part. But on this occasion he is wearing a straight leg pant that isn't wide enough to cover the odd shape of his custom man-stilts. These 3 pics indicate that 5'10" barefoot may even be a hair generous, and 5'11" barefoot is just laughable!
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here Rob G says on 23/Feb/10
Even if Tarantino started wearing lifts (I doubt it) still Tarantino's footwear doesn't compare to Pitt's. TTB says on 23/Feb/10
Did any of you guys consider that Tarantino has taken to wearing lifts and in all those photos he is wearing the same type of lifts/footwear that Pitt is?
I doubt that Pitt is anything over 5'11 but Tarantino never looked as tall as he does now back in the 90s! Mike- says on 22/Feb/10
Delphonic- hey, I've always said 5'9 is probably correct- so, ya he can look 6' becausd he augments so liberally Mike- says on 22/Feb/10
Delphonic- hey, I've always said 5'9 is probably correct- so, ya he can look 6' becausd he augments so liberally Shaun says on 22/Feb/10
I don't honestly see how people can look at the pics of his footwear like the ones Delphonic provided and claim he isn't a lift wearer or height concious. Ife he mostly appears as 6' in such footwear with good posture how is a legit 5'11" possible? dmeyer says on 20/Feb/10
if pitt was legit 5 ft 11 men with exelant posture and 1.25 in dress shoes he should look and be pegged at 6 ft witout lifts and he looks 6 ft only with great posture and lifts delphonic says on 19/Feb/10
Check out this mega-custom man-heels!! The angle of his feet indicate a good inch of built-in lift on the inside as well as the large outside heel. He is getting a minimum of 2.5 inches above barefoot in these big boys!
Click Here
Click Here Shaun says on 19/Feb/10
ACG strong 5'11? Really? A strong 5'11" like David Beckham would never llok under 5'11". Pitt has appeared as low as 5'9.5". Strong 5'10" is even questionable but around 5'10" is likely. About an inch taller than Paltrow barefoot and can pull off a close 6'1" in lifts and posture. 5'10" all the way. fred says on 18/Feb/10
Click Here just look at his huge boots guys, and he still doesnt look very tall on that picture Elroy says on 18/Feb/10
Brad Pitt is shorter than you might think. Just for exemple, in the movie Kalifornia, at 39:14 he passes in front of juliette lewis (who's 5'6) getting out of the motel room and he's a little bit taller than her, maybe by an inch. And she's wearing sandals. We have the idea that hollywood actors are tall, but they're not. It's an illusion. You can do whatever you want with a camera. I may be wrong, I didn't see him in front of me. Anonymous says on 18/Feb/10
bam says on 18/Feb/10
i guess maybe he's just a 5'11 guy who has a few "short pictures", because of picture distortions. And people jump on those pictures screaming "he's 5'9, 5'10". The man is the same height as john malkovich, appearing taller without trying. So 5'11 it is.
only a few awesome pictures like barefoot by a pool. it doesn't get any better than that. he isn't 5'11" by the way. filip says on 18/Feb/10
Click Here
Pitt 2cm taller than Clooney
footwear here Click Here
I dont know what you,but i think ,that Brad has good 3cm boot boost.If Clooney is really 179cm,then 5 9"claims are really exaggerated........according to this pic,Pitt would be 178cm.imo Anonymous says on 18/Feb/10
totally agree on that bradi Rob G says on 18/Feb/10
delphonic is 100% correct. Bradi says on 18/Feb/10
If Affleck is 5'8'' like you say then Pitt isn't anything over 5'9''.
Considering Affleck is wearing CONVERSE in those shots and Pitt is wearing some kind of dress shoes...... Pitt is barely taller than him.
If Affleck is 5'9'' Pitt could be 176-177cm even less bam says on 18/Feb/10
i guess maybe he's just a 5'11 guy who has a few "short pictures", because of picture distortions. And people jump on those pictures screaming "he's 5'9, 5'10". The man is the same height as john malkovich, appearing taller without trying. So 5'11 it is. delphonic says on 17/Feb/10
Only at 5'10" could he look so close to Paltrow's height barefoot, yet pull off almost 6'1" in his mega-customs (2.5" gain) and military posture (another 1" gain over those who slouch or stand relaxed). Rob G says on 16/Feb/10
filip says on 15/Feb/10
am actually misunderstand that too,on all that photos he looked 178 max,and then you see video ,where he is 6 foot.it isnt very ordinary.and when you add possibility of Quentin being 187(not more)cm,then you start thinking about 5"11 again for Brad.
When you add barefoot picture with Paltrow, 5'10"ish seems the most reasonable estimate. Lenad says on 16/Feb/10
He's 5ft11ish barefoot and 6ft1ish in his elevator shoes. dmeyer says on 15/Feb/10
height can be tricky with some guys i know a guy who claims 6 ft 1.5 and looks it wih good posture and normal footwear but with converse and bad posture can look 6 ft flat another friend who claims 6 ft 2.5 but mostly looks 6 ft 1.25 at times looks 6 ft 0.5 in because of posture then 6 ft 1.5 with great posture some people because of posture look 1.5 in shorter than wath they are filip says on 15/Feb/10
its stupidity to say ,that 46 old,NOT HARD WORKING,man lost height.no way.
bam says on 12/Feb/10
filips post is the same exact night pitt looked 5'10 in the now infamous pitt-tarantino pics. That is totally bizzare.
I am actually misunderstand that too,on all that photos he looked 178 max,and then you see video ,where he is 6 foot.it isnt very ordinary.and when you add possibility of Quentin being 187(not more)cm,then you start thinking about 5"11 again for Brad. ACG says on 15/Feb/10
You guys are making this way more complicated than it needs to be. A strong 5'11 today....as tall as he's ever been. Period. bam says on 15/Feb/10
would it be odd to ask you to consider posting the pics dmeyer? Rob G says on 14/Feb/10
josh says on 13/Feb/10
Brad probably was 5'11 in earlier years probably more like 5'10.5 now, not that big of a difference.
Shaun says on 13/Feb/10
Brad probably was 5'11 in earlier years probably more like 5'10.5 now. Um, actually he looks a lot taller nowadays. Check out how he looks in Thelma and Louise and Across the Tracks. He looked more 5'9"-5'10" back then and he was in his late 20s. Nowadays he mostly looks 6' in public.
Or he was never a legit 5'11" guy, and in time his lifts and posture got better. I'm positive he's 5'10"ish, now and back in the day. ACG says on 14/Feb/10
lulu says on 14/Feb/10
5'11 peak and 5'8.5 now
Please tell me you're joking! dmeyer says on 14/Feb/10
most men will drop 1 cm by 50 probably 0.25 in by mid 40s but considering pitt posture and fitness he has lost nothing not even a mm dmeyer says on 14/Feb/10
i took a pic of me and a 6 ft 1.5 friend i wa a litl closer to the camera and i looked as tall but then i stood a litl behind and i looked 3 in shorter distance from camera even slightly is very important john says on 14/Feb/10
in the range of 5'10,he usually wears heals lulu says on 14/Feb/10
5'11 peak and 5'8.5 now Shaun says on 13/Feb/10
Brad probably was 5'11 in earlier years probably more like 5'10.5 now. Um, actually he looks a lot taller nowadays. Check out how he looks in Thelma and Louise and Across the Tracks. He looked more 5'9"-5'10" back then and he was in his late 20s. Nowadays he mostly looks 6' in public. Vegas says on 13/Feb/10
pitt is mid 40s, he hasn't lost height, the average man loses 1 inch by 70, no chance pitt has lost half an inch by 46 josh says on 13/Feb/10
Brad probably was 5'11 in earlier years probably more like 5'10.5 now, not that big of a difference. RisingForce says on 12/Feb/10
Lately I'm thinking 5'10.5" might be the most accurate, although I don't rule out 5'11". 5'10" flat is too low IMO. bam says on 12/Feb/10
filips post is the same exact night pitt looked 5'10 in the now infamous pitt-tarantino pics. That is totally bizzare. hi says on 12/Feb/10
wow I hadn't checked in like 6 months. wanted to see if Brad Pitt had finally be downgraded to a more realistic 5-10.
there is so much evidence the guy is cheating on his height. too many variations, too many sightings of him not looking a full 5-11 let alone 6-0.
this obstination to have him at 5-11 is beyond me Mike- says on 12/Feb/10
Casey Affleck is about 5'8 maxed out- Met him in Canmore on the jesse james shoot- Brad is no more than 5'10- closer to 5'9. Look at the way his 32 inch inseam pants bunch up on his ankles. filip says on 12/Feb/10
Click Here
go to 0.40....183cm here. Shaun says on 11/Feb/10
The Paltrow pics are the best. 5'10" tops barefoot. Rob G says on 11/Feb/10
Even with posture advantage Pitt is about 3 inches under Tarantino.
Cris, Pitt is probably about 6ft, maybe just shy of that height, in these premiere shots with Affleck. Then he looks 5'10"ish in the studio shot.
Shorty511 these shots with Jennifer are inconclusive at best. Ground level is uncertain, both guys are slouching, it is too much to give correct estimate. That said, I'm still not convinced he is a legit 5'11'guy, my money is on 5'10"ish, maybe weak 5'11". If I had to guess I would say 5'10.25" or 5'10.5", so legit 5'10" for Pitt. derek d says on 10/Feb/10
The one thing that gets me is Pitt isn't looking anywhere as close to Tarantino in lifts as he should be, assuming Pitt is 5'10.5 - 5'11. With his excellent posture (and lifts) and Tarantino's poor posture, he should be nearly as tall as him. Unless he is liftless in these shots (low possibility). Though, there is a a good chance Tarantino is 6'2, I mean he looks like a pretty big guy and used to be listed at 6'2. Anonymous says on 10/Feb/10
if he was 5'11, then he'd easily look taller than gwyneth paltrow by the pool. But, that wasn't it, he even had camera advantage. bam says on 10/Feb/10
acg does bring up an excellent point. It is expected that at 5'11, there will be pis of pitt looking shorter. josh says on 10/Feb/10
i would say 5'10.5 for him. Shorty511 says on 10/Feb/10
Here is a site with pictures of Gerard Butler and Zac Efron.
Maybe Efron is taller than we think.
Brad Pitt and Gerard Butler seem to be about the same height maybe Butler slightly taller..
Click Here yo says on 10/Feb/10
5'11" maybe 5'10" - At least 2 inches shorter than 6'1" Tarantino. Don't know how to post links. I go off back wall lettering as camera angles can really distort sizes.
Click Here Shorty511 says on 9/Feb/10
Gerard Butler and Pitt appear to be very close in height??
Click Here Anonymous says on 9/Feb/10
Cris says on 6/Feb/10
Click Here
I am not wrong ,when i am saying ,that on the left is 182-4 Edward Norton?then possibilty of Pitt being 180cm is really low.179 is much for him.What is certainty ,is that, Norton doesnt have lifts on that photo,or do you think that guy like Norton will be wearing uncomfortable boots with lifts no,cause he has that 6 foots ,that he claims.IF Brad Pitt wearing lifts(higher boots) on that photo?I think that it is really possible,so according to this Photo, Pitt is 173(if he really wears lifts on that photo)-178cm,i dont dare to say conrete number.what i dare to say is ,that Pitt is guy,who that 180 mark really deserves. Anonymous says on 9/Feb/10
Cris says on 7/Feb/10
what hell is this?
Click Here
yeah ,that could easily be 10cm boots Cris says on 8/Feb/10
ACG says on 8/Feb/10
What do you mean? It's still from behind the scenes of "Burn After Reading". I don't see what your point is
sorry..
Casey affleck listed 5.9(175)
Click Here
Brad looks 6.0???it can be using lifts in this pic???
after seeing some photos I believe that brad is at least 5.10.75
Max 5.11,but always it looks at 6.0. ACG says on 8/Feb/10
Cris says on 7/Feb/10
what hell is this?
Click Here
What do you mean? It's still from behind the scenes of "Burn After Reading". I don't see what your point is. Cris says on 7/Feb/10
what hell is this?
Click Here Rob G says on 7/Feb/10
ACG says on 6/Feb/10
WOW, so he looks 5'10ish on a rare occasion- big whoop! Considering the fact that 90 percent of the time he looks comfortably over 6 foot, I'm inclined to believe that he may be a bit OVER the 5'11" mark- even at night.
If by "looking confortably over 6foot"you mean being in lifs and having posture advantage, then sure he does look that. Plus he didn't exactly look over 5'11" barefoot next to Paltrow.
He is 5'10"ish. dmeyer says on 7/Feb/10
when brad has the bp shoes wish looks normal he does look solid 5 ft 11 considering he has beter posure and 0.25 to 0.5 footwear advantage wath boters me is that his pants is way too long like when e is tryng to hide lifts dmeyer says on 7/Feb/10
5 ft 11 is 180.34 cm wish is nearer 180.5 than 180 cm the shredder says on 7/Feb/10
Brad is looking every bit of the 5'10.5 I saw ! As for Walz , 5'8 or not he BETTER WIN THE OSCAR ! Mickey Rourke not winning was a big upset ! paul86 says on 6/Feb/10
He used to get listed at 6ft back in 1998 but i honestly this estimate correct 5'10.5'' minimum ACG says on 6/Feb/10
WOW, so he looks 5'10ish on a rare occasion- big whoop! Considering the fact that 90 percent of the time he looks comfortably over 6 foot, I'm inclined to believe that he may be a bit OVER the 5'11" mark- even at night. Jamie says on 6/Feb/10
All the pictures next to Tarantino prove Pitt is no more than 5'10" I'd even say 5'9.75" dmeyer says on 6/Feb/10
i met hedlund and he told me i was taller than pitt at 5 ft 11.25 0.25 inch is raughly noticable when he has normal shoes next to clooney he looks raughly 5 ft 10 when he has regular sneakers beside tarantino he looks 5 ft 10 also in normal brown dress shoes he looks 5 ft 10.5 in cowboy boots near geena davis she has 0.75 in sandals and he looks smaller he does 5 ft 11.5 in ifts and 6 ft in slightly bigger lifts sngly near noron he looks 6 ft 1 but i hink noron can look 5 ft 10 range in awful posure he looks 181 182 solid in small lifts i dont get whi rob is stock with that 5 ft 11 idea when he has similar footwear with jolie he never looks 4.25 in taller and he had a ot of strong 5 ft 10 sighting please rob give him 5 ft 10.5 to 5 ft 10.75 klem says on 6/Feb/10
Brad doesn't have to wear lifts here in Europe, we don't judge people by height like in US. He only wear lifts in US events, there he is same size as Tarantino:) Dural says on 6/Feb/10
After seeing some pics of Christoph Walz and Mike Myers together, I doubt Walz is even 5'8".
Click Here Dural says on 6/Feb/10
dicky curtis says on 6/Feb/10
With tarantino he indeed doesn't seem to get to 5.11 and how tall is that german guy who played the ss officer?
Christoph Walz is about 5'8" (he was the same height as Mike Myers at several premiers), Til Schweiger claims 5'10", Daniel Brühl's (the 4th from left) official height is 5'9.25", Diane Kruger is listed 5'6.5" but I'm sure she isn't that tall, Mélanie Laurent is at most a weak 5'2". dicky curtis says on 6/Feb/10
With tarantino he indeed doesn't seem to get to 5.11 and how tall is that german guy who played the ss officer? and with edward norton he seems tall again. some things don't add upp here. why wouldn't he have lifts with tarantino? seems a good occasion to do so. he is the second tallest guy in the picture after tarantino. is everybody short in that movie? Rob G says on 6/Feb/10
So lets see: the shredder says 5'10.5", bam says 5'10.5" too. Dmeyer, as I remember correctly, also claimed 5'10"ish for Pitt. He looks no taller than 5'10"ish in the pictures Chris, Dural and Paul posted, he looks even 5'10"flat in the pool picture with Paltrow. And when considering his older movies, I think he looked 5'10"ish in California next to Duchovny and also 5'10" in Thelma and Louise next to Davies. Also remember his Spy Game heels and his taste for enhanced footwear (even on the beach). So I think it's safe to say that 5'10.5" is fair for Pitt, and seems even more probable than legit 5'11". bam says on 5/Feb/10
i don't think the distortion is that bad, maybe 1/2 inch max. But this shows that short of meeting the celeb, even a picture can lie. Glenn, however saw pitt at 6ft in boots back in the day. Glenn sees everyone at around 1 inch taller than they are. So perhaps its fair to say pitt can look barely 6ft in elevator boots? bam says on 5/Feb/10
MID, that movie takes place in amsterdam. people in amsterdam are tall. Extras, would likely be average locals. The average height there is like 6'1ish for guys. RisingForce says on 5/Feb/10
I disagree with Dmeyer. I think the difference between Tarantino and Pitt looks like it's over 2 inches, but Pitt's footwear doesn't look unusual to me.
Regardless I think he looks 5-10ish there. Anonymous says on 5/Feb/10
Click Here looks kind of short here, isnīt he? and iīm sure even does shoes are some kind of elevator shoes Anonymous says on 5/Feb/10
itīs ridiculous to say heīs about 5. 10, why should someone with that height wear shoes like he did in spy game... come on guys hes 5.9 max, donīt believe hollywoods illusionists ;) dmeyer says on 5/Feb/10
considering he is stnding behind so thats 1.25 o 1.5 in disantvage so that poots pitt 1.5 to 1.75 in shorer than tarantino also pitt hs 1 in footwear advantage so thats 2.5 in under taranino thats 5 ft 10.5 possibly 10.25 also he pics were he looks about the same height pitt has about 2 in footwear 1.1 out 1 in inside and taranino has bad posure so thats again 2.5 in smaller and when pit had no lifts at all he did seem 2.5 to 2.75 in shorter dmeyer says on 5/Feb/10
pitt hs defenetly 1 in lifts in the boots you can see the pivoting it int the same as tarentino whos foot dosnt seem that elevated so pitt wth lifts on is a lot shorter than a 6 ft 1 men he is max 5 ft 10.5 Rob G says on 5/Feb/10
Agreed on 5'10.5" filip says on 5/Feb/10
Cris says on 4/Feb/10
brad looks 6.1 here...Edward norton listed 6.0(183 cm)
to me very important find.shoes he has on that pics never can be only 5 cm, 8 cm min and even who says that Norton must be 183cm flat?i am going even that futher ,when i am saying ,that Pitts minimum is really 175cm. the shredder says on 5/Feb/10
Rob , I think you should give him 5'10.5 , thats what he seemed to me in person ! ACG says on 5/Feb/10
Something is up with those Tarantino pics....at another recent event Pitt and Quentin were eye-to-eye. mId says on 5/Feb/10
I saw a clip on youtube a couple of days ago.. behind the scenes or something of oceans's eleven or twelve.. and there was a scene where pitt, damon and clooney is walking down the streets in some italian town or something.. I don't know. anyway.. they were all wearing some monster shoes.. it looked like they were walking on black logs.. dragging their feet because they were so big they could not walk.. and their pants looked like it was cut open to cover it (reminded me of jason's boots/pants in friday part 7-8).. anyway I think that it was so that they all would look about the same height on film but the people who walked by them on film (behind the scenes) looked huge.. I thought brad was a pretty big guy.. around 5'11 and normal weight.. but he looked really tiny.. I mean.. they all looked like 5'9 guys tops with small frames.. a guy comes by with a baby-stroller and he/it looks huge next to them. bam says on 4/Feb/10
rob, I wanted to ask, how bad is the pic distorted from pitt standing slightly behind tarrantino? Enough I take it that the guy is still listed at 5'11?
[Editor Rob: that's hard to tell, sometimes it can be hardly anything like 1/4 inch, other times it might be an inch, the lower the photographer the bigger the problem of one person standing nearer will have.] bam says on 4/Feb/10
the 5'10.75 was trying to appeal to rob. 5'10.5 is my guess, nothing under. Cris says on 4/Feb/10
brad looks 6.1 here...Edward norton listed 6.0(183 cm)
Click Here
your shoes:
Click Here Shaun says on 4/Feb/10
Interestingly Rising, your friend Glenn once claimed that he reckoned Pitt was the exact same height as Stallone. Yet some people claim 5'11"-6' for Pitt and 5'8" for Stallone!!! Either Glenn was lying, or one of us is wrong... Shaun says on 4/Feb/10
RisingForce says on 3/Feb/10
He does look shockingly short next to Tarantino, even in good posture!
Perhaps now you will begin to see that he is not the solid 5'11" you think he is. I see easily 3 inches between them personally... I still think Pitt is 5'10", 5'9.5" at lowest. Guy says on 4/Feb/10
the posters on this site (rob included) will always attribute Pitt's short photos to some obscure reason to protect this almost ridiculous 180cm listing. Granted i fully agree that pitt is in no way lower than 175, he is certainly not the full 180 rob grants him. I truly believe that a 178 listing is the most sensible. But again, despite all the height fluctuations (the tall sightings can be attributed to lifts, but what of the short full body sightings on level ground??), this 180 will endure. Unbelievable Shaun says on 3/Feb/10
AGreed Bam. Pitt's height has ranged from looking 5'9.5" to 6'1". And he looks nearly 4 inches shorter than Tarantino in the recent pics yet in those other pics you showed he strangely looks similar in height. Anonymous says on 3/Feb/10
Pauls's pics, also show that Pitt is in lifts or elevators. Pay attention to Brad's shoes. Compare the steep slope of the top of Brad's foot, to that of Tarantino's. Brad's is steeply inclined and Tarantino's, very slight. This proves that Pitt is wearing phonies.
I've always said 5-10 for Brad, but he could be a little under that. Even with his lifted footwear, he is straining so hard, it's giving me a headache. Regardless, he is still coming up short, against the very casual posture of Tarantino. This coupled with the barefooted pics with Paltrow, tells me he isn't close to 5-11. dmeyer says on 3/Feb/10
rob he do you explain pitt looks a weak 5 ft 10 even taugh the floor is even
[Editor Rob: to me he doesn't look 3 inches shorter...contrary to what the other poster said, they have literally the exact same heel size (without anybody knowing if he has anything in his boot), although pitt looks in that full length photo to be standing slightly further away!] Joseph says on 3/Feb/10
@Paul: I would have to agree, that I see more than 5 cm difference bwtween them, hposture and footware taken into account; 177-178 cm. Dural says on 3/Feb/10
bam says on 3/Feb/10
5'10.75?
Out of bed? RisingForce says on 3/Feb/10
He does look shockingly short next to Tarantino, even in good posture! Rob G says on 3/Feb/10
bam says on 3/Feb/10
5'10.75?
That would be the first step to downgrading Pitt a little. 5'10.5", for instance, is also fair for him, and even 5'10" is likely IMHO. zein says on 3/Feb/10
clearly 5'11 is the maximum. min could be 5'9.5(176) . his height varies a lot , earlier pix show him at 177 and recent ones 180-182.i think he is 5'9.5-5'10 barefoot middle of the day.my height 178 :)). if he sais 5'11 he must be cheating by half an inch, but could be 1 inch. imho he is 178 SPOT on,but lifts give 2 inches 2 anyone so VOILA 6FT.the hair, very lean body with long legs,small head, military posture and camera angles, clothes of one colour make him go as much as 6'1.FACT Anonymous says on 3/Feb/10
Paul's pics are telling. He is owned here. Brad is straining to get up there. He IS height obsessed. It is obvious. If you can't see this, then you can't see anything. bam says on 3/Feb/10
5'10.75? somebody says on 3/Feb/10
@bam:
I guess pittīs height compared to other (taller) people very much depends of the posture of the taller guys.
for example, if you see Pitt in low heeled shoes almost same height as tarantino, and on the next picture Pitt in bigger heeled dress shoes obviously quite a lot shorter than Tarantino than itīs because of Tarantinoīs posture.
I "know" this because it is the same situation with one of my collagues at work. I am 177, he is about 185/186 (same numbers I guess like Pitt and Tarantino). My collague has a very weird posture and sometimes when we stand next to each other and talk, we are about same height as my posture is quite good. On the same day, when we are in a elevator with a big mirror in it, standing next to each other, the difference is "suddenly" as much as in your first two pics between Pitt and Tarantino when he is standing completely straight and with good posture bam says on 3/Feb/10
shaun good call on the pics. Pitt looks 5'10ish. So we now have pics of pitt appearing 5'10 without any obvious explanation, and 6ft (next to malkovich) with no obvious explanation. I'm honestly stumped. The thing is he can look a legit 6'1 without munsters at all.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
6'1 without munsters...
Click Here dusk99 says on 2/Feb/10
You guys seriously need to see this picture. It almost looks like he's wearing heels.
Click Here klem says on 2/Feb/10
I have a pair of normal slipper that give half an inch, so that photo of him in slipper isn't very good. They could be from 0.25 to 1 inch. cris says on 2/Feb/10
brad and Quentin Tarantino
Click Here
Tarantino height: 6 ft 1 in RisingForce says on 2/Feb/10
The problem, delphonic is if Pitt is this constant lift wearer like he says, yet his elevators look normal, then how do we know he's even wearing lifts in the first place? It's all speculation. With some other celebs it's obvious, but I honestly can't see why everyone is so sure Pitt is in lifts 24%.
I don't doubt that he's worn lifts at premieres too, but I don't buy that he's as height-obsessed as Stallone, Downey or Burt Reynolds. somebody says on 2/Feb/10
those slippers in the picture with clooney and damon are definately lifts. quite a long time ago, some guy posted pictures here of pitt playing basketball with some of his friends with those slippers, and he was wearing shorts. you could clearly see that pittīs ankle was elevated, hard to tell by how much, but those are definately not normal slippers that only give about 1 or 2 cm. Anonymous says on 2/Feb/10
What I don't get Rising Force is how the slippers pic is so great but the BAREFOOT pic w/ Gwyneth is not? And if Pitt will stroll down the beach in high top converse then its not out of the realm of possibility that those "slippers" have shoe soles on them or better yet a little something inside them Dago Red says on 1/Feb/10
Check out the vamp (angle of foot) on them boots!!! Two inches of heel, plus one inch of lift inside, plus one inch of hair height would make him appear 6'3" or so, if indeed he was over 5'11" flatfoot. The tallest he ever looks is 6' 1" fully dressed, so subtract from there. I think there's a good chance he's under 5'11". delphonic says on 1/Feb/10
Hey Rising Farce - Newsflash! Not every pair of custom lifts look like Stallone's tacky and obvious munsters! Although Stallone's would be more comfortable as they are built up in the front as well. Look at the style of elevators made by sponsors who advertise on this site. They are like Pitt's, they look very low, stylish and "normal" from the front. But there is a BIG build up hidden INSIDE the shoe in the back. This is not rocket science Rising Farce! You couldn't be as dumb as you act and really believe Pitt has only worn special shoes in like two movies and never at red carpet events?!? And we don't know what's in Pitt's "slippers" for sure. They DO make lift slippers as well! The only pic we know his comparable height for sure is the BAREFOOT pic with Paltrow. But of course you don't like to discuss that one since it is SO obvious the the guy struggles with 5'10" truly barefoot. Rob G says on 1/Feb/10
RisingForce says on 1/Feb/10
Pitt IS the same height or taller than Clooney.
How about:
Pitt IS the same height or SHORTER than Clooney. checkurself says on 1/Feb/10
In a 2004 interview by the entertainment section of a daily news magazine during filming of Ocean's Twelve, George Clooney (who stands 5' 11"), Brad's co-star revealed "He's tall. He's like 6' 1". It's irritating." This comment has furthered the burning question of how tall is Brad Pitt, since Pitt's co-actor reveals Brad is taller. Shaun says on 1/Feb/10
LOL. New pics. "Pitt presented Tarantino with a plaque for being nominated for Outstanding Directional Achievement in Feature Film". Tarantino owns Pitt and looks 3-4 inches taller. If Tarantino is 6'1" Pitt is struggling with 5'10" in comparison. RisingForce says on 1/Feb/10
And I have no idea if he has lifts in those boots, Anonymous. RisingForce says on 1/Feb/10
My ignorant post? Listen to yourself. You're telling me to watch a MOVIE for proof of height rather than a picture of one of them in slippers and the other in socks? Hahah. Not only that, but the countless premieres where Pitt consistently looks taller than Clooney(with 1 or 2 exceptions) without Stallone munsters.
Pitt IS the same height or taller than Clooney. Anonymous says on 31/Jan/10
Clooney is TALLER than pitt, go watch the ocean flicks. And to reply to your ignorant post, if they were both barefoot in your pic, clooney would be taller. Anonymous Ninja says on 31/Jan/10
He's definitely between 5'10-5'11 straight out of bed. No more, no less. Bradi says on 31/Jan/10
I think he is 177cm Anonymous says on 31/Jan/10
RisingForce says on 29/Jan/10
Those "silly looking big boots" have a heel no larger than a cowboy boot, in fact it's probably smaller.
RF, do you think any lifts are in those "silly boots?" Note the steep angle on the top of his left foot? I agree with Lmeister.
I disagree with Ralf ... I think he's a terrible actor. He doesn't develop his characters into likable ones, or endearing one's. Not even as Benjamin Button. That movie gave Pitt the chance to really bond with his audience, and he blew it.
Great actors, form characters, that the audience love's ... not characters that actors love! RisingForce says on 29/Jan/10
Those "silly looking big boots" have a heel no larger than a cowboy boot, in fact it's probably smaller. Ralf says on 29/Jan/10
Don`t think that he reach the 180cm mark barefoot. More strong 177cm peak height.
He loves big boots in many different events.Maybe he likes it and also for looking taller. Probably both.But he is a great actor and seems sympathic. Lmeister says on 29/Jan/10
That is a good pic of Brad wearing lifts. Brad you are busted. You can clearly see that his ankle is in such a position as womens ankle while wearing high heels ;) RisingForce says on 29/Jan/10
Clooney would not be taller than Pitt in the picture I posted, even if he moved closer to the camera. Cris says on 28/Jan/10
Shorty511 says on 27/Jan/10
Brad in silly looking big boots..
Click Here runt says on 28/Jan/10
filip says on 27/Jan/10
"runt says on 26/Jan/10
Sorry but(IMHO),what you say is bull****,you must impeach that not everyone-rather most of people donīt raelly care about their true height,they only say 175 or 180, etc,not to every quarter of inch like we...yeah 182 dude say 6foot ,but 180 dude,that say 183 isnt "most of people"ī."
I really meant just male celebs. And of course I was only generalizing. James Woods was the classic case of the true 5-11 actor automatically saying 6' like its natural. The point is that the true 5-11 male celeb is prolly the most likely to upgrade himself successfully, therefore sticking to 5-11 makes me suspicious that he's a true 5-11. ACG says on 28/Jan/10
filip, in that last pic there's no way Pitt and Tarantino are standing on even ground mr. muscle says on 28/Jan/10
180cm solid, but brad always look taller. Anonymous says on 28/Jan/10
Pitt has the advantage over clooney. He has footwear,postureand camera advantage. Take all of that out and hes a half inch shorter. Clooney is as listed. Take off damons cap and hes 1 inch shorter than a terribly slouched clooney. Plus, damon has camera advantage and hes 5 ft. 8ish. Shorty511 says on 27/Jan/10
Brad in silly looking big boots..
see site below:
Click Here somebody says on 27/Jan/10
if Pitt is liftless in his slippers in this picture and is a full 5ī11, then Clooney is 175/176 (his eyes come up to just under Pittīs nose) and Damon is at best 5ī8 (seems to be stretching to his max, maybe even tip-toeing, and his eyes come up to Pittīs mouth) filip says on 27/Jan/10
Rob,i apologize for multiple posts ,but this find is reeeally interesting
Click Here filip says on 27/Jan/10
Click Here
looks 2cm taller than 176 Bruhl.their boots seems nearly same. filip says on 27/Jan/10
runt says on 26/Jan/10
Sorry but(IMHO),what you say is bull****,you must impeach that not everyone-rather most of people donīt raelly care about their true height,they only say 175 or 180, etc,not to every quarter of inch like we...yeah 182 dude say 6foot ,but 180 dude,that say 183 isnt "most of people"ī.
RisingForce says on 26/Jan/10
good find,this clearly shows that there isnt any floor advantage...only in boots:D Klem says on 27/Jan/10
Rob G says on 26/Jan/10
Pitt is not in slippers in the above picture with Clooney and Damon, he is in "slippers". Besides the picture is, as Anonymus pointed out, titled in Pitt's favor. See Paltrow picture, he's not convincingly 5'11" there, he's 5'10"ish. If I had to guess I would say Pitt's 5'11" morning and 5'10.25" late evening.
I also agree that those are not regular slipper, they might have a 0.75 sole(2cm). Even some sleepers have some sort of sole. I think Clooney is 5-10 and Pitt 5-10.5 Anonymous says on 27/Jan/10
heīs the only one wearing shoes !! if these are the pictures you build your opinions on, than a lot of things get clearer to me.. RisingForce says on 26/Jan/10
No tilt in Pitt's favor here. Click Here Even without the camera advantage he's still taller than Clooney and Damon. runt says on 26/Jan/10
5-11 is always a lie. A true 5-11 will say 6' every time. Rob G says on 26/Jan/10
Pitt is not in slippers in the above picture with Clooney and Damon, he is in "slippers". Besides the picture is, as Anonymus pointed out, titled in Pitt's favor. See Paltrow picture, he's not convincingly 5'11" there, he's 5'10"ish. If I had to guess I would say Pitt's 5'11" morning and 5'10.25" late evening. |
