|
Brad says on 6/Nov/09
Pitt & Clooney are 5' 10.5" if they "effect" up, especially Clooney who always is leaning this and that way due to his back. Both just ate a 5' 6.5" & 5' 6" G by 4", especially Clooney leaning in. It said 5' 8" under G's photo in it in '06 making Clooney 6'. G loved it, just loved it. Site wrecker, I almost fell for it...as my bud Tyler says "G chin's up with us, trying to get attention, he has to, celebs can't see him".
burby says on 6/Nov/09
I think Clooney on a good day would be taller than Pitt currently. James says on 5/Nov/09
Brad so do you think Clooney and Pitt are no more than 5'10 flat? derek d says on 5/Nov/09
Was Clooney really implying Pitt wearing lifts with the "irritating"? Brad says on 5/Nov/09
He had 4" on a pre '94 G who was 5' 6" tops. Both Pitt & Clooney are about the same. Pitt wears the monsters, Clooney doesn't, hence "irritating". James says on 3/Nov/09
You know to be honest I think Clooney could even look 1.5 inches taller than Brad Pitt in the pics I posted. The thing is though Brad Pitt is wearing a hat so you can't see how big his head is in comparion in the picturers but Clooneys eye level does look noticibly higher than Pitts. James says on 3/Nov/09
Well lets face it Brad Pitt and George Clooney are similar heights so maybe Brad woulden't feel the need to always wear lifts next to him? But in most of those pics from that even Clooney does seem to look just about 1 inch taller. Bo says on 3/Nov/09
James- Pitt is NO DOUBT wearing lifts in those shoes. When the toe points to the sky like that, that is often a red flag of lifts. I think Pitt is ALWAYS wearing lifts
[Editor Rob: those look normal shoes to me.] derek d says on 3/Nov/09
You're right James, Clooney's shoes do look thicker and have a bigger heel. Brad's shoes don't look too suspicious but its Brad, so who knows. Clooney actually seem taller in the pictures from that day. James says on 2/Nov/09
What type of shoes do you think Brad is wearing here Derek d?
Click Here
If you look closely here Clooney does appear to be wearing quite thick shoes
Click Here derek d says on 2/Nov/09
James says on 1/Nov/09
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Does kinda look 5'9.5 in comparion but as you can see Clooney is wearing thicker shoes than Pitt which might give 1 inch height advantage over Brad.
Just curious, where in the 4 pictures you posted shows their shoes? LOL. derek d says on 1/Nov/09
Anonymous says on 1/Nov/09
5'9 in most heels would be 5'11.25-5'11.5. Keep in mind that a 3" heel doesn't give a full 3" boost to one's height.
You're right about that. But remember girls also tend to wear 4" heels all the time, which in reality does give 3 inches. James says on 1/Nov/09
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Does kinda look 5'9.5 in comparion but as you can see Clooney is wearing thicker shoes than Pitt which might give 1 inch height advantage over Brad. James says on 1/Nov/09
Clearly Brad Pitt has footware advantage here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
In those converse shoes Paltrow is wearing would make her look 5'8-5'8.5 and Brad Pitt appears to be wearing boots which would make him look 5'11.5 that and the pavement advtangage in Pitts favour makes the differnce look easily 3 inches. Anonymous says on 1/Nov/09
5'9 in most heels would be 5'11.25-5'11.5. Keep in mind that a 3" heel doesn't give a full 3" boost to one's height. derek d says on 1/Nov/09
James says on 31/Oct/09
Click Here
Click Here
Judging by these pics Brad Pitt looks 1 or 2cm less than a full 5'11. I think he should be downgraded to 5'10.5 (179cm)also 5'10.25 flat at night for Pitt as well.
Well considering Paltrow is most likely wearing heels in that shot, Pitt looks pretty tall next to her if you ask me. She is what, 5'9? Plus heels make her around 6'0. Pitt has at least one 1inch on her. Making him around 6'1 in shoes there. If she is only 5'11 in heels then Pitt is looking at least 6 ft in shoes there. But, if he is in lifts then yeah 5'10.25 or even lower is definitely possible as well. James says on 31/Oct/09
Actually after looking at the 2nd pic I posted Brad Pitt looks just 5'11 there but maybe its his hair making him look taller? Paul says on 31/Oct/09
5'11" for Pitt is a ridiculous fantasy.
Does anyone seriously think that someone height-conscious enough to consistently wear lifts and high heels would really state his barefoot height when asked? The fact is that Pitt does what every other height conscious male does; he gives his height in shoes, then rounds up to the next integral inch. Barefoot he's 5'9.5". In shoes he's 5'10.5" or so, which rounds up to 5'11". Paul says on 31/Oct/09
When in comparable footwear, Pitt and Paltrow were nearly identical in height.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Their shoes Click Here
Notice that while Pitt looks a little taller than Paltrow in the last one, he is also standing at a higher position in the photo. In terms of body length they're both essentially the same.
The sandals photo Click Here Ace says on 31/Oct/09
Cris, in your first photo, they are standing on a slope that heavily favors jennifer aniston. Rob G says on 31/Oct/09
5'10.5" is ok for him, maybe not 5'10" flat, certainly not 5'11" legit. James says on 31/Oct/09
Click Here
Click Here
Judging by these pics Brad Pitt looks 1 or 2cm less than a full 5'11. I think he should be downgraded to 5'10.5 (179cm)also 5'10.25 flat at night for Pitt as well. Dural says on 31/Oct/09
Pitt and Paltrow at party for her film "The Pallbearer" in 1996. Pitt seems to be in normal shoes and I doubt Gwyn is in high heels, because she's a lot shorter than 6'1" David Schwimmer.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here Rob G says on 30/Oct/09
James says on 26/Oct/09
With 5'11 Tom Sizemore Click Here
I just watched that, Pitt actually looks tad shorter than Sizemore. Pitt's spiky hair and better posture vs Sizemore's being closer to the camera. I say Pitt looks 5'10.5"-5'10.75" there. Rob G says on 30/Oct/09
RisingForce says on 29/Oct/09
Rob, I was referring to Lowe's picture with Alan Light.
Ahh, yeah, sorry, I agree about Lowe, actually. Still it's preciselly my point, I don't doubt that Pitt can pull of looking like a legit 6footer+, but what matters heightwise is when he is barefoot. Even more obviously than Lowe Pitt wears lifts constantly, I say 5'9.5" - 5'10.5" is possible for him, I just don't see legit 5'11" guy next to Paltrow, or Redford/Duchovny/Casey Affleck etc. for that matter. Dural says on 30/Oct/09
James, ugly shoes but no high heels.
Click Here James says on 30/Oct/09
Hmmm 6'1 here Click Here
And amazingly he has shrunk but Paltrow might be wearing high heels? If they have similar footware I'd say Brad Pitt looks 5'9.5 or 5'10 in comparison
Click Here
Click Here James says on 30/Oct/09
Yeah probably at least 5'10 for Brad LG69 says on 29/Oct/09
Maximum 5'11"...minimum 5'10 1/2". RisingForce says on 29/Oct/09
Rob, I was referring to Lowe's picture with Alan Light. Rob G says on 29/Oct/09
RisingForce says on 29/Oct/09
Lifts are possible for Lowe in that picture. I
And not for Brad? Really?... Anonymous says on 29/Oct/09 says on 29/Oct/09
I don,t understand why some people doesn,t like lift wearers or they say they look ridiculous with those elevator shoes on,because yeah it is true that between 5,9 and 5,11 is a good height but it,s only when you are next to 5,5 or 5,7 guy but next to a 6,1 guy and over a 5,10 or 5,10.5 guy would look short.For example,i,m 5,10 and i got some boots and elevator shoes with 4 Inch lifts from increasingshoes company and i reach 6,2 with them on(almost 6,3 if i get straighned up)and they make me feel pretty comfortable and satisfied.Whatever people thinks or says it is cooler being around 6,2 or 6,3 and towering over almost everybody instead of being only 5,10 or 5,10.5 burby says on 29/Oct/09
The Paltrow and Redford pics are best. He's 5'10". Pitt and Damon wear big ones, the custom kind. Rob G says on 29/Oct/09
ACG says on 29/Oct/09
The picture with Rob Lowe is actually good evidence of Pitt being a strong 5'11 at the least.
Yeah, it's much better to gauge his height from this one than from the barefoot picture with Paltrow, NOT. RisingForce says on 29/Oct/09
Lifts are possible for Lowe in that picture. I haven't looked at his height much, but I've seen him look both 5'10" and 5'11". More 5'10" in the 80's and the pictures and movies where he's looked 5'11" have been recent from what I remember. ACG says on 29/Oct/09
The picture with Rob Lowe is actually good evidence of Pitt being a strong 5'11 at the least. cris says on 28/Oct/09
Look shoes brad...minimun 3 cm
Click Here cris says on 27/Oct/09
look at the difference in height in photos..Jennifer Aniston height: 5 ft 4.75 in (164 cm)
Brad and Aniston
Click Here
now
Click Here James says on 27/Oct/09
Click Here
This is an old pic but I bet Matt Damon and Brad Pitt are wearing small shoe lifts here. Dural says on 27/Oct/09
Rising, he's really looking taller than Alan Light. Lifts?
I've seen many pics and he usually looks 5'10".
Frank2 says on 27/Feb/06
Rob is barely 5'10" RisingForce says on 26/Oct/09
Dural, i could've sworn that Frank2 said Rob Lowe was about 5'10" and on his page there's a picture of Rob looking taller than 5'10.5" Alan Light. dicky curtis says on 26/Oct/09
we are going around in circles here. there are always the same arguments. i don't think this will change anytime soon.. sometimes we should just face facts and accept we will never really know. he is somewhere between 5.10 and 5ft11.5
Even in real life it is hard to exactly pinpoint some guys height. let alone someone you never see unless on pictures with diverted pavement footwear and hairgel! i think it is not necessaraly about the height of some people but the discussion itself. James says on 26/Oct/09
With 5'11 Tom Sizemore Click Here Matt says on 25/Oct/09
lean muscle, great posture, perfectly fitted clothing, no footwear (custom lift) too expensive, the big time celeb "Brad Pitt effect" and often spiky hair = Brad Pitt.
With all this mixed together, he can pull off looking 6'
Take all the effects away and I say he's really 5'10.5" When you're 5'10.5 or so with Brad's body type, it's really not hard to pull off the 6' look. Aleks says on 25/Oct/09
He's slightly taller than Andy Garcia. 5'10" tops. Brian says on 25/Oct/09
He's 5'11 in the morning and 5'10.5 in the evening. Shaun says on 25/Oct/09
James says on 23/Oct/09" Unless of course George Clooney is 5'9.5 and Matt Damon is 5'8 like some people say they are". Well Frank has met Matt Damon and claims he is 5'8". Clooney does look 5'9.5" most of the time and looked it to 5'11.5" David Beckham. Original says on 24/Oct/09
5'10.5" morning to 5'9.75" night. Dural says on 24/Oct/09
Pitt without lifts and Jolie in flip-flops (she has the camera advantage but he would destroy her with lifts anyway)
Click Here
Again, no lifts (the Inglorious Basterds premiere shoes in most of the pics) and short legs btw.. His secret weapon are hats.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
About the same difference here as in the first pic, but Jolie in heels and Pitt in customs.
Click Here
Take a look at the barefoot pic again and notice in the second pic she isn't standing on higher ground
Click Here
Click Here
Pitt and Paltrow in Argentina
Click Here
Pitt with great posture and Rob Lowe, Frank2 thought Rob Lowe is about 5'9.5" when he saw him
Click Here
Pitt and Norton, 2in difference, but we can't see their feet
Click Here
The other pic with Redford
Click Here James says on 23/Oct/09
Rob G says on 23/Oct/09
He IS 5'10" barefoot, in his shoes Pitt enters the realm of magic and wishful thinking.
Alright lets be realistic here in the pic with Pitt, Damaon and Clooney in socks Brad is wearing slippers and has just about 1.5 on Clooney and 2 inches on Matt Damon. This would make his height in those slippers around 182-183cm. Whithout the slippers 180cm-181cm? Not easy for me to beilvie either but its not impossible for Pitt. Unless of course George Clooney is 5'9.5 and Matt Damon is 5'8 like some people say they are. Matt says on 23/Oct/09
With his build(VERY SKINNY and very low bodyfat and no muscle mass) its easy to look taller than he is. I say he is maybe 5.10.5 add 1 inch heel + 1.5 inch lift = 6.1 with his spiky air = Looking way taller than he is.
Even he can pull off with his special shoes 1.5 inch heel + 1.5 inch lift = 6'1.5" , People dont really notice those things apart if your wearing big heel shoes that could look more noticeable.
I got Regular sneakers that everyone know about, but Trust me with my skills This exact Sneaker Boost me over 5 inches of total height!
It can take you from 5.6 to 5.11! its crazy Rob G says on 23/Oct/09
He IS 5'10" barefoot, in his shoes Pitt enters the realm of magic and wishful thinking. James says on 23/Oct/09
Well the tallest he's looked in his lifts is 6'1.5. RisingForce says on 23/Oct/09
Brad's shoes looked a bit suspect to me that day, James. His legs also looked unusually long. Click Here Click Here Brad says on 23/Oct/09
I only saw him once at the Palm Springs Film Festival from far away and he was over 6' easy in big dress boots. I'm sure he had the big wedge inside, they were whoppers. James says on 23/Oct/09
I am still not sure if he wore lifts in the 90's? Who knows?
Hugh he can look 182-183cm
Click Here
but who knows what he is packing in certain shoes he wears. Anonymous says on 23/Oct/09
If he is 5'11.25 then Gwyneth is 5'10.5" delphonic says on 23/Oct/09
Pitt has practically lived in lifts ever since the EARLY 90s. So any and every pic of him in shoes is suspect to some degree. Only the barefoot pics with Paltrow are true evidence of his barefoot height: 5'10" max Hugh 191cm says on 22/Oct/09
180cm minimum. I personally think 5ft11.25. Rob? Rob G says on 22/Oct/09
Anonymous says on 22/Oct/09
I just don't get how easily people seem to discredit the barefoot pics. If I see 100 pics of him looking 6'1 IN SHOES and 2 of him BAREFOOT looking barely 5'10 then what does that tell you? Instead of trying to explain how impossible it is to gain 3 inches from shoes, why dpnt we accept that this dude clearly has the best lifts and shoemaker in the world. Who's really desperate here people? Think about it.
I agree completally Anonymous. The voice of reason indeed. Pitt is 5'10"ish plus 2,5" lifts and "the effect" and he can pull of LOOKING solid 6ft/weak 6'1'er. Barefoot pictures support that. burby says on 22/Oct/09
That pesky pic again with 5'10" Redford
Click Here
Pitt is 5'10" Anonymous says on 22/Oct/09
I just don't get how easily people seem to discredit the barefoot pics. If I see 100 pics of him looking 6'1 IN SHOES and 2 of him BAREFOOT looking barely 5'10 then what does that tell you? Instead of trying to explain how impossible it is to gain 3 inches from shoes, why dpnt we accept that this dude clearly has the best lifts and shoemaker in the world. Who's really desperate here people? Think about it. James says on 22/Oct/09
Yeah he does mostly look 5'11. Big T says on 21/Oct/09
I've looked at about a million photos and he's still all of 5'11" to me. Some people are just desperate imo. klem says on 21/Oct/09
he looks about 2 inch shorter than Ford. Very weak 5-11. More 5-10.25 at the end of the day. lubee says on 21/Oct/09
Great. Another rising inflate. He's 5'11? how so? catch him barefoot, and he's 5'10 max, like when he's skinny dipping next to Paltrow. Will says on 21/Oct/09
In my opinion he is 5'10. But even if he is claiming that he is 5'11, no one can dispute that, he always looks this height. A one inch difference is not noticeable to someone who isn't looking for it. He can get away with saying he is 5'11 for the rest of his life, even 6 feet, he always looks it. So he may be only average height, but he looks 6 feet often, it does count, who is going to call him out on 2 inches? James says on 21/Oct/09
I think this picture is quite accurate to gauge
Click Here
Funny with straight posture Clooney looks like he could have 1.5 on Pitt. RisingForce says on 21/Oct/09
But looking 6'1" does if your shoes can look normal(even if they may not be. That's a hell of a tall height for a 5'10" man to look consistently. Dural says on 21/Oct/09
"Looking 6 ft" doesn't count if you are a constant lift wearer with military posture. RisingForce says on 21/Oct/09
Yeah, but at premieres Pitt almost always holds a 6 ft, even 6'1" height well. Look at him near Mickey Rourke, Edward Norton, Clint Eastwood and Angelina Jolie when she's in heels. Rob G says on 21/Oct/09
RisingForce says on 21/Oct/09
Pitt is 5'11". He easily pulls off looking 6 ft at most premieres.
That's very poor argument, honestly. So what? I easily pull of looking 6ft in some pictures and I'm 5'10"ish myself. Barefoot picture Risnig, he doesn't look near 5'11" there, he is 5'10". RisingForce says on 21/Oct/09
Pitt is 5'11". He easily pulls off looking 6 ft at most premieres. Brad says on 20/Oct/09
The idea of BP kicking it at an ESPN Sports Zone club is hilarious but then he had a card table pushing his movie outside a supermarket 10 years ago on Leno which was hilarious. James says on 20/Oct/09
Back to Brad Pitt
Did he Pitt wear lifts in 97? Well I think he looks closer to 5'11 than 5'10 in these pics.
With then 6ft-6.25 Harrison Ford Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
I struggle to see less than 5'11 in these old pics. James says on 20/Oct/09
You have got point anonymous Anonymous says on 20/Oct/09
James, I don't think it would go up that much because I believe the average height thing has some faulty measuring. Not to mention if any of it is based on an asking basis then it is surely exaggerated. Brad says on 19/Oct/09
Brad Pitt at the ESPN Sports Zone. I don't think so. Dural says on 19/Oct/09
@Jacob
That isn't a look-a-like. I'm convinced he's 5-10. James says on 19/Oct/09
Jacob that is Brad Pitt he has the same short legs and long torso as well. It could it have been photoshoped though? Jacob says on 19/Oct/09
@ Cris
that my friend is a look-a-like, but i'll be damned if that is really brad pitt:p James says on 19/Oct/09
Rob if everyone wen't by thier morning height would the average height by country for men and women have to be increased 1-2cm?
[Editor Rob: near 2cm.] James says on 19/Oct/09
Rob in the pic I just posted do you think Pitt looks 5'10 tops?
[Editor Rob: he looks to be wearing a 0.5 inch style of shoe, I don't know how big quentin's sneaker is at that time.] James says on 18/Oct/09
5ft10 at most here Click Here
I am starting to wonder if he really is 5ft11? Mace11 says on 17/Oct/09
In all honesty; Brad Pitt's true height is approx. 5'10.5 (mrn), 5'10 (avg), and 5'9.5 (evn). Definitely within that range because his figure looks like that. Otherwise he's into his lifts... Josh.J says on 15/Oct/09
that lmeister looks like insole lifted boots for sure. the top of the foot is way too thick and bulky. explains why pitt looked 6ft+ next to bloom and bana. pitt is under 5'11 that much im sure of. Midget says on 15/Oct/09
Brad's boots look "loaded" to me in Lmeister's pics. Possibly a 2" boost or so. Alex says on 15/Oct/09 says on 15/Oct/09
I have a question,does Pitt about this site and all these opinions about his height?And about his height i think he is 5,10. Cris says on 15/Oct/09
brad does not seem to be as high
Click Here Lmeister says on 15/Oct/09
Nice combat boots Brad ;) Look at the ankle. He seems to have at least thick insoles??? btw click the photo to enlarge.
Click Here Lmeister says on 15/Oct/09
In Troy Brad didn't wear sandals. He was the only one in the cast to wear boots.
Here is Brad wearing boots Click Here
and here Orlando and Bana wearing sandals Click Here derek d says on 15/Oct/09
Cris says on 12/Oct/09
more pic Gwyn and Pitt barefoot
Click Here
As for this barefoot picture of Pitt and Paltrow Cris posted on the 12 th, Pitt is on higher ground. Look at his right foot, he's at least a inch higher than she is. Josh.J says on 15/Oct/09
well cris, 2 things from that pic. looks like bana is donning sandals and orlando seems to have the same footware (you can tell by the shin armour). brad's footware however is unknown. it could be sandals or boots. personally i think he's wearing boots with lifts (most likely insole) but its just my opion. Antonio says on 14/Oct/09
I've been convinced (along with others) all along regarding his 5-10 stature. The barefoot pics (that we seek above all else) of Brad & Gweneth at the pool make it obvious and without doubt. These pics, for us are a dream come true, and I am amazed that there are so many that are still too blind to see or admit that they are wrong! If Brad is taller than Paltrow, it is only by an inch or less. The only reservation I have, is if Gweneth is 5-10 or more. If she is 5-9 or less, then there is no way, anyone can legitimately claim him at 5-11. Kull says on 14/Oct/09
I saw him at a restaurant in L.A. He was 5'11" in shoes. Slender, and very cool. dicky curtis says on 14/Oct/09
He looks taller than orlando bloom there who was about 179.5. i would just think it is stupid if he'd be wearing lifts in those things.
About those pictures i meant, i don't know how to post. but they were on this board a while ago. brad had a big sweater on and looked barely an inch taller than paltrow and later he had about 2 inches. it was the same event. klem says on 14/Oct/09
too bad footwear is cut out on picture that cris posted, Brad supposedly wear very special "sandals". I think he is same height as Bloom both barefoot, and to be honest Bloom looks very slouched.
Look how high Pitts knees are compared to Bana, yet he is 2' shorter ->suspicious. James says on 14/Oct/09
Brad Pitt and Orlando Bloom are probably standing on some sort of platform. TELLEM says on 14/Oct/09
vegas, i'm here for the truth, not side with a celebrity and ignore great evidence. what are you here for than vegas? TELLEM says on 14/Oct/09
you must be the individual that i was talking about vegas. you see the evidence of a barefoot brad pitt looking 5'10 max, a great pic may i say, and rather than become convinced, you still insist hes 5'11. like i said, why do u become ignorant and protect your idol so much? Cris says on 14/Oct/09
Bana ,Brad and Orlando bloom
Click Here Rob G says on 14/Oct/09
Vegas ypou should that in Stallone's page. Seriously double standards? maybe some peole indded hava a bias, but nevertheless majority is openminded I'd say. Really, concerm with Stallone;sheight has nothing to do witt Pitt looking max 5'10" with Paltrow, similar posture, both barefoot.
PS. Now in teh first picture I see 5'9" Sly on his tipotes and 6ft Bridget with weird posture, in the second I see again 5'8.5"-5'9" Sly kissing his 5'9" wife (who is bendig her kneens as all of us can see).
Back to topic, Pitt IS 5'10" :-) Vegas says on 14/Oct/09
Tellem; just because someone believes pitt is 5'11 makes him their idol?? sorry but not buying that
like rising said there is double standards on here as usual, nobody is buying sly at 6ft based on these and rightly so because for the most part photos suck Click Here Click Here but yet everyone is rushing to proclaim pitt at 5'8 based on similar photos, i lol and lol again Shaun says on 13/Oct/09
Cris says on 12/Oct/09
more pic Gwyn and Pitt barefoot
Again looks like 5'9.5".... TELLEM says on 13/Oct/09
ppl show proof that hes 5'10 max and they still tarnish it. it makes me think how biased and ignorant some folks are on here. Rather than try and find the truth, they do whatever it takes to protect their idol from looking short. James says on 13/Oct/09
bam in that pic Brad Pitt is closer to the camera and most likely standing at his straightest plus his hairstlye is adding to the illusion of height. If Malkovich stood at his tallest he would have about an inch on Pitt.
Its stange though becaue John only looked 5'9.75 or 5'10 nex tot glenn. Rob G says on 13/Oct/09
dicky curtis says on 13/Oct/09
Right Bam, that is what i mean. am just not convinced with those barefoot pictures. eventhough he isnt't wearing any shoes. in one photo pitt looked 1 inch taller than paltrow and in another foto of the same event he looked 2 inches taller. that's an illustration of how tricky it is comparing a guy's height from some pictures. i really think he is about 5.11. and again. that isnt't that tall. its normal height for him
Dicky, where did you see him in barefeet two inches taller than Paltrow? Can you post a link? As far as I remember he looked same height as her in the picture when they were both walking in sandals. Then the "kissing' picture near the poll was impossible to judge, and even then looked the same height as Paltrow, but he was slighly slouching. And here we have Dural's picture, the best one of those. In that one they are both standing in similar posture, and tehre;s not bad angle, and heck, he is even closer to the camera! I give him 5'10" flat.
Ps. Damm I just can't understand why some of you peole prefer to speculate why he looked that or this height with Norton, Bana, Malkovich. We can best gauge his height when he is not wearing shoes, right? So barefoot pictures are more accurate right? Indeed Dural's picture is the nail to 5'11" theory's coffin. Rob G says on 13/Oct/09
bam says on 13/Oct/09
good luck explaining this one
Click Here
That did it for me. There is no explanation. Besides the fact that pitt is 5'1l and malkovich is 5'11.5 with some weird posture.
Seriously, good luck explaining his BAREFOOT picture when he looks 5'10"flat. dicky curtis says on 13/Oct/09
Right Bam, that is what i mean. am just not convinced with those barefoot pictures. eventhough he isnt't wearing any shoes. in one photo pitt looked 1 inch taller than paltrow and in another foto of the same event he looked 2 inches taller. that's an illustration of how tricky it is comparing a guy's height from some pictures. i really think he is about 5.11. and again. that isnt't that tall. its normal height for him bam says on 13/Oct/09
Click Here
James you could be right. Glenn saw malkovich at 5'10.5,5'11 max. What do you think rob, could malkovich be shorter than 5'11.5?
[Editor Rob: glenn might have been wearing (he never said) almost 1.4 inch sneakers, he never mentioned what malko wore, but I checked and he was in barely 0.6 converse, so that's some height gone.] xyz says on 13/Oct/09
I agree with Rob G. Barefoot photographs are stronger proof then ones with shoes. Some people are pointing out a 1-2 cm difference on the surface they are standing on (I am amazed someone can see that) but really, compared to shoes or shoes+lifts, that's nothing. James says on 13/Oct/09
Brad Pitts got hair advantage and posture advantage next to John. If John Malkovich stood straighter he would have 1 inch on him. Matt says on 13/Oct/09
WOW he doesnt wear Lift in that pic Bam.
He is just a tad below Malkovich.About .5 inch of him.
He could be 5.11 after all.But never over that.
One thing for sure, He is above 5.10 and under or 5.11 bam says on 13/Oct/09
good luck explaining this one
Click Here
That did it for me. There is no explanation. Besides the fact that pitt is 5'1l and malkovich is 5'11.5 with some weird posture. Rob G says on 13/Oct/09
TELLEM says on 12/Oct/09
dicky curtis says on 12/Oct/09
everybody is always pleading for pitt being short. with all the evidence there is. yet nobody puts the emphasize on him being taller. there is many evidence for that as well. there should be a more objective comparison.
but heres the thing, this is a BAREFOOT shot. screw all the other evidence of pitt looking tall in shoes. has there ever been any evidence of him looking tall barefoot? NOPE, cause he isn't tall.
Agreed TELLEM, no matter what he looks in shoes, in that picture he appears no talelr than 5'10". Seriuosly, no offence but when we have some pretty good shot of him barefoot I don't see a point comapring it with all those when heis in shoes, and who knows what he has or has't got in them. We know his height fluctuates A LOT (f.ex. with Norton). BArefoot picture people!, no excuses, he isn't 5'11" for sure. James says on 13/Oct/09
Bana looks closer to 6'3. Anonymous says on 13/Oct/09
Jacob says on 12/Oct/09
He isn't 5'11", but why does no one notice that the ground is elevated towards the pool and paltrow is thus standing one or two centimeters elevated above pitt..
Some people would argue that it's Pitt who's standing on elevated ground. Refer to the orginal pic of Pitt and Paltrow kissing and it would seem Pitt is the one on elevated ground, when in fact they're both on level ground. That gap is a channel to drain excess water splashed from the pool and nothing else. John says on 12/Oct/09
Jacob, because you are wrong. No angle on the floor. Dan says on 12/Oct/09
Bana is not 6'2
Compare him to the 6 footers star trek crew, Karl Urban, Chris Pine, Zach Quinto.
Additionally there is a Glenn-Bana picture which should end all discussion on that matter. TELLEM says on 12/Oct/09
dicky curtis says on 12/Oct/09
everybody is always pleading for pitt being short. with all the evidence there is. yet nobody puts the emphasize on him being taller. there is many evidence for that as well. there should be a more objective comparison.
but heres the thing, this is a BAREFOOT shot. screw all the other evidence of pitt looking tall in shoes. has there ever been any evidence of him looking tall barefoot? NOPE, cause he isn't tall. James says on 12/Oct/09
Well I don't think it would be a bad thing giving Brad Pitt 5'10.75. Jacob says on 12/Oct/09
He isn't 5'11", but why does no one notice that the ground is elevated towards the pool and paltrow is thus standing one or two centimeters elevated above pitt..
Seriously, why does no one notice this, it's quite obvious. dicky curtis says on 12/Oct/09
everybody is always pleading for pitt being short. with all the evidence there is. yet nobody puts the emphasize on him being taller. there is many evidence for that as well. there should be a more objective comparison. James says on 12/Oct/09
Type in Click Here
There looks to be an illusion of 3 inches between Paltrow and Brad Pitt in this pic but the pavement could be uneven and Paltrows in sneakers and Brads wearing biggish boots. Not sure if there is lifts in them or not?
Anyway do you think he might have been packing lifts in those boots of his? If not then I still think 5'11 is reasonalbe when you look at that picture. Cris says on 12/Oct/09
more pic Gwyn and Pitt barefoot
Click Here Dural says on 12/Oct/09
James says on 12/Oct/09
Yeah it could just be that Brad Pitt is not standing at his tallest in the pic.
It could be that Gwyneth Paltrow is not standing at her tallest in the pic - pure speculation ;). Dural says on 12/Oct/09
Thanks everyone, I haven't seen the pic before either. It seems most of us agree, Pitt is around 5'10", either that, or Gwyneth Paltrow is taller than 5'9" (which is more than doubtfull).
As for the Cruise/Holmes barefoot pic, we don't know if Katie is shorter than 5'9", cause she claimed both, 5'8" as well as "I'm like 5'9"" - whatever that means.
It sounds like she isn't quite 5'9" to be honest. I still see 1.5in or a little more than an inch between Tom and Katie barefoot. Rob G says on 12/Oct/09
I think Pitt's barefoot picture is close to the ideal evidence that will solve this discussion, and to be frank I'm not seeing many more coming, since with years he become more "careful". I think that all of us would agree that he looks unusaully short, my first impression was he is 5'9.5". I agree, the picture is not perfect, slightly titled, ground not comletaly perfect, but still everyone with working eyes can see he is not a legit 5'11". We will probably never have him standing barefoot next to thh measuring tape to gougde without a doubt what heoght he is, however as I said this picture is absolute top of evidence he is 5'10" and change, and it would be unwise to disprove it. Honestly the picture beats any red carpet/remierre/movie picture of Pitt, and I'm sure we all agree on that!
Now, I think that any bareffot picture of a celeb is valuable. I am not familiar with the situation on Cruise page, but if there's Tom looking about 5'8" barefoot that's what he is, but we talk about Pitt not Cruise. So Pitt is looking no more then 5'10", and yes, that's what he is. James says on 12/Oct/09
Yeah it could just be that Brad Pitt is not standing at his tallest in the pic. RisingForce says on 12/Oct/09
Why is it that when a barefoot picture showing a celeb taller than people think shows up(Tom Cruise) many ignore it, but when a photo of one looking shorter like Pitt shows up, everyone acts as if it's conclusive proof?
If you want to get picky then the Tom and Katie photo is actually even better for judging height because of their posture and where they're standing. Both are good pictures, but there's defintley a double standard. Pitt looks 5'10" in that picture and Tom looks more like 5'8" in his barefoot picture, but for some reason that only means Pitt is 5'10" and it means nothing as far as Cruise's height, apparently. Anonymous says on 12/Oct/09
Admit it Rob, it won't get any better than this shot of Pitt caught off gaurd with a telephoto lens ;-) 5'10" flat if not shorter. Rob G says on 12/Oct/09
burby, I completaly agree with your estimates. Anonymous says on 11/Oct/09
rob how do you see a 5'11" man next to barefoot paltrow?
[Editor Rob: I think he doesn't look that tall, but then is the ground level and postures equal. He can look 5ft 10 for sure there...] Antonio says on 11/Oct/09
What more proof do you need Rob, unless you upgrade Gweneth to at least 5-10.
It even appears that Brad may be doing the tippy-toe move ... look closely.
Brad is 5-10 max, and maybe even less.
[Editor Rob: maybe the tiling rises closer to the poolside.] P says on 11/Oct/09
Damn, you people really wanted to prove he wasnt 5 11" didnt you haha yeah looking at that pic with paltrow its obvious that hes 5 9"-5 10", now can u people get on with your lives now lol delphonic says on 11/Oct/09
James says on 11/Oct/09
That pic with Paltrow is inaccurate because its taken on higher ground. I have seen other pics of the pair from the 90's in sneakrs and Pitt looks 2 inches taller sometimes.
Come on James!! That pic IS indisputable and if anyone is on slightly higher ground, it's Pitt! Look at his frame in that pic, he weighs 160 max there and IS between 5'9" and 5'10" barefoot period. Case closed. TELLEM says on 11/Oct/09
i've now inserted that pic under my files, incase ignorance hits this page again. TELLEM says on 11/Oct/09
great pic dural. it backs up what i've been saying over a year now about brad pitt, hes 5'10, and 5'11 is a joke. James says on 11/Oct/09
Rob would you say that barefoot pic of Brad Pitt and Paltrow is accurate to gauge height by or not? Shaun says on 11/Oct/09
5'7" is absolute BS for Paltrow. She is no less than 5'8.5", looks close to 5'9" to me. Pitt looks barely taller, most likely 5'9.5". Brad;s agents must be paying Rob to keep him at 5'11" as that photo is proof he aint 5'11" or 6'. burby says on 11/Oct/09
As usual, great pic Dural, I'm going to have to downgrade him from my previous 5'10.5" Pitt is 5'10". Clooney is hard to tell because of the back surgeries and slouching 5'10.5" for him, I still think Damon is tip-toeing in that boat pic, his posture looks really fishy, he might be weak 5'9". James says on 11/Oct/09
That pic with Paltrow is inaccurate because its taken on higher ground. I have seen other pics of the pair from the 90's in sneakrs and Pitt looks 2 inches taller sometimes. Rob G says on 11/Oct/09
In the light of new evidence (from here and Damon's page) I would say:
Pitt: 5'10"flat
Clooney: somewhere between weak 5'10" and 5'10.5"
Damon: at very max 5'9",
PS. One could wonder what Pitt had in those shoes with Damon and Clooney in socks (see picture above). Indded wizard shoes. Rob G says on 11/Oct/09
Dural says on 10/Oct/09
Gwyn and Pitt barefoot reloaded!!!
Click Here
Great find Dural, Pitt looks no more than 5'10"flat and than if Paltrow is 5'9".
I think we have some pretty solid evidence to supporst 5'10"ish claims, IMO 5'11" is a little too generous for him. Time to downgrade, maybe not a dramatic one, but he IS less than solid 5'11" barefoot. KheMiZTREE ;P says on 11/Oct/09
I strongly believe that Brad Pitt stands at 5' 9.75" (177 cm) barefoot. Rob will not downgrade him because it will kill the whole debate and the intrigue and rightly so.
Pitt is an inspiration to average height men and is proof that with strong posture, slick hair, a slim, toned physique, thicker heels and confidence, you can "appear" taller than you actually are.
He is not the only Celebrity who sports lifts and gets unfair stick for it in my opinion. He can wear them without looking hideous...that is why he has fooled us on many occasions! I really don't see the problem, he is under pressure to stand out that extra bit in a materialistic society...but hey, that's the price of fame for you!
I sincerely apologise in advance if everyone agrees and this much debated issue finally draws to a close...we'll all have to find some other poor Celebrity to pick on ;P Anonymous says on 11/Oct/09
Of all the pics from the famous Pitt/Paltrow nude shoot, I havn't seen this one before either. Thanks Dural for posting it. I've been saying it and will say it again, Pitt is 5'10" max and maybe below it. kevin says on 11/Oct/09
i have never seen that pic before. now i really believe hes not 180cm. he cant be taller than 178cm and that pic is the proof. Shakers says on 11/Oct/09
Dural says on 10/Oct/09
He is 176, here. delphonic says on 11/Oct/09
Read up on Paltrow's page here. Although she is listed as 5'9", the majority of posters on her page believe she is between 5'7" and 5'8" using comparative pictures and sightings. If Paltrow is less than 5'9", what does that say about Pitt in their barefoot photo together?? The cat is out of the bag Pitt!! delphonic says on 11/Oct/09
Great find Dural! This is the indisputable proof we've been waiting for that proves without a doubt that Pitt is 5'10" MAX and more likely between 5'9" and 5'10". 5'11" is completely out of the question. I posted pics on here last year that showed they were the exact same height in sandals, those pics have disappeared from the internet. I imagine this one will soon as well. So study it while you can and tell me Pitt looks over 5'9.5" without his custom mega-boots!! RisingForce says on 11/Oct/09
Thanks for posting that picture, Dural. I've never seen that one before, I'd only seen the other one before that. Dural says on 10/Oct/09
Gwyn and Pitt barefoot reloaded!!!
Click Here James says on 9/Oct/09
I wish I could create a link for this but here is a transcrip of info from a website called E.W.com (Entertainment Weekly) this is dated from 2002 regarding Brad Pitt and George Clooney being overweight. The name of the article is 'Weighty Issue'.
Talk about distorted body image. In a July 23 Wall Street Journal article, stars like George Clooney, Harrison Ford, and Brad Pitt were labeled ''overweight.'' The WSJ was attempting to demonstrate the shortcomings of the Body Mass Index, a height-and weight-based formula used by physicians to measure fitness.Yet according to reps for the cited celebs, the stats, which the WSJ got from two websites, are off the scale. Some discrepancies are flattering -- Pitt's camp, for instance, says he is 5'11'', not 6'. But the weight listings didn't go over so big with other actors' reps. ''You can go look at those guys and see that it's totally false,'' says Paul Bloch of clients Sylvester Stallone and Bruce Willis, who were listed as unpleasantly plump. According to Bloch, Stallone is closer to 175 pounds than 228, and Willis is about 160, not 211. ''Our intent was not to declare anyone overweight or obese,'' says WSJ spokesperson Aaron Bedy about the fat flap, which he blamed on conflicting information. ''Instead, we wanted to show readers how some well-known Americans measured up.'' And up and up. James says on 9/Oct/09
Shaun he can show consideration for people but by watching Brad Pitt in films and interviews he gives off a 'I don't give a **** about you' attitude.
I just think he is a very laid back guy thats all. Shaun says on 9/Oct/09
Disagree. 5 ft 10 is really not tall. Given that there are guys 6'2"-6'4" and handsome, plain old 5 ft 10 seems unremarkable, too average. When you have pressure on you like Pitt does to be looking "perfect" I can see why he wants to appear as 6' in public. If think Pitt has a big ego, like most people in Hollywood, even if he is considerably more grounded and doesn't go on about himself like a lot of actors do and does have consideration for others and poor people around the world. Juandi says on 8/Oct/09
Vibram says on 4/Oct/09
Anonymous says on 27/Sep/09
5'10 is a decent height. Remarkable that someone that size feels the need to eke more out with lifts/posture. Hundreds of millions of dollars and a Jolie by your side aren't enough to soothe a man's ego?
-----------------
That's why I think he's in the mid 5ft9 range. I provided solid evidence of this a few months back with him next to Ed Norton. At 5ft10 your o.k, it's the benchmark, but 5ft9 is short to some.... lots of 5ft9 men are unhappy... movie star or not.... it just feels a tad small except in big big boots you start to feel like a regular guy again, believe me as a 176cm guy that's how we are. I hate being in my socks around family members, even on my own, I feel short at 176cm.
The average white American man under 50 is 178cm."
I don't understand you Vibram. 176cm is not short by any means. The avg height for a male in the USA including all races is 175.50cm......and only 12% of the world's population is 180cm or taller. You are only 4cm shorter than 180cm which is my height and I truly believe that between 174 and 182 is avg. There are so many short people in this world. I've seen tons of white guys who are 5"6 or shorter. You are just fine coz the avg female height for american women is like 163cm so you are taller than probably 70% of all girls so cheers mate. James says on 7/Oct/09
Nortons a fraction over 6feet John says on 7/Oct/09
Paul good pic. Yet another candid pic of 5'10 Pitt with 6ft Edward Norton. Ed Norton told Jon Stewart in a 2002 interview that he was 6ft. MANY pics of Pitt not on the red carpet with Ed Norton show Pitt looking 2 inches shorter. James says on 7/Oct/09
bam in that pic Brad Pitt only looks 1.5 under Banner. Rob G says on 7/Oct/09
Yeah he looks 6'0"ish in that one with Bana. Also I think he can easily muster 2inch lifts. bam says on 6/Oct/09
no its 1.75 inch lifts+extreme posture+standing closer to the camera
Click Here
Heres pitt looking minimum 2 inches shorter. TELLEM says on 6/Oct/09
great pic again paul, pitt is shorter than norton James says on 6/Oct/09
A man like Brad Pitt could for sure afford 3 inch lifts Rob G says on 6/Oct/09
In Bam's picture looks 6'1" next to Bana, in Paul's picture he looks 5'10"ish next to Norton. Can 3inch lifts be the anwswer to that? Anonymous says on 6/Oct/09
if you watch troy , you will see that pitt is the exact same height as 5 ft 10.5 sean bean also pitt is mush smaller than bana wish is normal and pitt is the only guy who has no sandals and he dosnt looks ove 5 ft 10.5 during the entire movie MarcusTheSwede says on 6/Oct/09
Brad is maximum 180CM.End of discussion. Look at pictures in Movie Fight Club.He stands beside 175CM Jared Leto and he is about maximum 3-4 cm taller then Leto not a milimeter more.He does wear high heeled boots in many other pictures but the Movie Fight Club says it all.When he stands besides Jared Leto it shows clearly that Brad isnt more then max 179-180 cm. And that is when he has shoes on.Rest my case.Please see Fight Club. Vibram says on 6/Oct/09
I think when Pitt put down 5ft10 on an audition form back in the mid 80s he probably didn't know he was gonna be a star. I mean, he didn't really break through until the early 90s when he was 27/28 already. Not like Cruise, who was already a superstar by 24 when he made Top Gun. Anonymous says on 5/Oct/09
5'11-6'0 he's definitely pretty tall James says on 5/Oct/09
Wow weird pic bam. He actually looks 6'1.5 next to Bana lol. bam says on 5/Oct/09
i should point out that glenn saw malkovich at barely 5'11. Paul says on 5/Oct/09
Bud - Pitt is in boots + lifts in that video. In more even footwear, Norton is clearly taller Click Here burby says on 4/Oct/09
I think he's 5'10.5" with the posture, which is pretty much always turned on. Did Angelina kick him out of the house yet? Too busy rollin' the perfect jay for Mr. Maher? Maybe Diane was lookin too good? Captain Jack problems? Matt says on 4/Oct/09
between 5.10 to 5.11 Shaun says on 4/Oct/09
Sorry but Bana looks easily 2 inches taller than Pitt in that photo. I'd say that is how a 6' looks compared to a 6'2". Accounting for the big boots of course. Pitt is not far off 5'11" legit I'd bet any money on him being around 179-180cm. He is rounding up to 5'11. I disagree that Pitt is average height, he is taller than most men in most pics you see of him especially with lifts and posture. Shaun says on 4/Oct/09
Recent pics of Pitt and Jolie in Syria he towers above her. He seems to be wearing normal shoes and she is in flip flops and he looks 6-7 inches taller. If Pitt is say 6'0 in those shoes which he looks, Jolie must be 5'5" or 5'6". James says on 4/Oct/09
The thing is why would Brad Pitt put 5'10 down on an audition form? Did he not give a **** about his height back then or something and just carlessly put down a false height? bam says on 4/Oct/09
i just remembered, theres a pic of pitt standing next to john malkovich who is
5'11.5/6ft. (rob changed the listing very recently) and pitt looked taller. There
were no special shoes,funny angles, or weird posture. pitt is 5'11. RisingForce says on 4/Oct/09
Anonymous, yes he'd stand 6'1.5"-6'2" with lifts, but then consider that eveyrone else walks around with shoes that add about 1"/1.25" between normal sneakers and dress shoes. So he'd be getting a 1.5" or 2" advantage over everyone else hence looking 6'1" instead of 5'11". If you just measured 6'1" in elevators you'd appear like a 6' man walking the streets because nobody else walks the street barefoot.
For example, considering Eric Bana is 6'2.5", how tall would you think Pitt is if you didn't know his height here? Click Here I'd think he was 6'1" if I didn't know about lifts. That means to look like a 6'1" man wearing shoes he'd have to measure over that. Rob G says on 4/Oct/09
James says on 2/Oct/09
In the morning I think Brad Pitt would be 181cm.
I would say he is 180 cm in the morning. Bud says on 4/Oct/09
any more solid that this vibram, fast forward to 6 mins on the video, pictures lie, video does not Click Here Vibram says on 4/Oct/09
Anonymous says on 27/Sep/09
5'10 is a decent height. Remarkable that someone that size feels the need to eke more out with lifts/posture. Hundreds of millions of dollars and a Jolie by your side aren't enough to soothe a man's ego?
-----------------
That's why I think he's in the mid 5ft9 range. I provided solid evidence of this a few months back with him next to Ed Norton. At 5ft10 your o.k, it's the benchmark, but 5ft9 is short to some.... lots of 5ft9 men are unhappy... movie star or not.... it just feels a tad small except in big big boots you start to feel like a regular guy again, believe me as a 176cm guy that's how we are. I hate being in my socks around family members, even on my own, I feel short at 176cm.
The average white American man under 50 is 178cm. Rob G says on 3/Oct/09
He is not weak 5'10" for sure, but look at those elevators Rising, they are absolutely massive. In them and in "effect' he appeasr 6'1" indded, but say if he gets 2,5" - 3" boost from these shoes (and their certainly look BIG) that puts him in 5'10" territory. BTW I don't see Jolie's heels at all in those pictures, I don't claim she is not wearing them, but she may very well be in 3 inch heels or 2,5 inch heels etc. Still I'm not convinced he's legit 5'11", for he wouldn't need elevators to appear 6'1" for all I know. delphonic says on 3/Oct/09
Wow! Shoes so blatantly ridiculous that even RisingForce (diehard strong 5'11" believer) has to call them out! I bet my dick he's getting nearly 3 inches over barefoot height from those man-pumps. They are basically women's high heels with a man's dress-boot built around the exterior for effect. And for the record, Jolie is closer to 5'9" in heels than 5'10" according to the actual sightings. So factor that into the equation for Pitt's barefoot height. Antonio says on 2/Oct/09
It appears Rob is much more concerned about underestimating a celeb's height, rather than overestimating it. Anonymous says on 2/Oct/09
With his shoes and posture Pitt can pass for a 6'1" man at times. He's not a weak 5'10" as some suggest. There's a reason why Rob hasn't changed his listing, and that's because it's probably about accurate.
Correct me if im wrong, but in your previous post u basically insinuated that he indeed was wearing lifts. Now lifts probably add an additional inch or so ON TOP of the regular heel dress shoes have yes? Given that even my normal sneakers give an inch boost in height, wouldn't a dress shoe's large heel WITH hidden lifts give about 2.5-3" in total? Given that math, wouldn't brad pitt be standing around at least 6'1.5" - 6'2" if he were indeed 5'11"? Seriously despite his undoubtedly dodgy footwear and ridiculous posture, the guy never looks comfortably over 6". A real 5'11" man only needs to wake up after 8 hours sleep, slip on his lifts and go off to a premiere and he'll look EASILY over 6'1". I may be wrong, but with these numbers brad pitt cannot be a legitimate just shy of 6ft kinda guy. 5'10" tops. Brad says on 2/Oct/09
Redford is 5' 10" tops, maybe 5' 9" tricky shoes and cowboy boots. Side by side with Pitt it is obvious Pitt is 5' 10". Easy 6' 1" with custom boots for Pitt. I only saw Pitt once in person from way far away at a Palm Springs film fest and he was rockin' tall over 6' with ease in his dress boots and posture. Jolie in heels is 5' 10" easy. James says on 2/Oct/09
In the morning I think Brad Pitt would be 181cm. Anonymous says on 2/Oct/09
I used to own a pair of chunky shoes. They gave me two inches. I am 5'10.5 and everyone thiught I was 6'1-6'2 when I used to wear them. He can easily pull off 6'1 as a weak 5'11 guy. RisingForce says on 2/Oct/09
Now these looks like elevator shoes to me. Click Here
But on the same night, Pitt seems to tower over Jolie in those shoes. Click Here She's close to if not 5'10" in heels and he's 3.5"-4" taller.
With his shoes and posture Pitt can pass for a 6'1" man at times. He's not a weak 5'10" as some suggest. There's a reason why Rob hasn't changed his listing, and that's because it's probably about accurate. valeri says on 1/Oct/09
bradi,i did suggest to Rob that he's not 5'11, I actually stated that if he hesitates to put 5'10 down,then at least 5'10.5 would be in order.Redford is a flat 5'10 as he stated and Pitt was not taller than him in normal shoes at all.They were pretty much equal.But I think Rob will keep Pitt at 5'11 for the years to come unless Pitt himself states his height or something. Mike says on 1/Oct/09
I don't think anyone can argue that he's over 5'10. Downgrade please! Brad says on 1/Oct/09
K man is correct. Yes, he had major skin peels. Bradi says on 30/Sep/09
Rob, I think we already have enough evidence of him being 5'10''. We even have evidence of him being as low as 5'9.5''.
I think it's time for a downgrade |
