How tall is Brad Pitt ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Brad Pitt height: 5ft 11in (180 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Thirteen, Troy and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. Granted he can look 182cm, but then he has impeccable posture and at times, most recently in the last few years, he also appears to wear impeccably sized footwear that give him a little boost over fellow actors. Even Clooney was wise to his footwear: (from USAToday) "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating". In slippers with Damon, Clooney in socks and here
Add your opinion on the Height of Brad Pitt

Your Comment:

Somebody says on 23/Jul/14
The picture with aniston in flip flops and pitt in sneakers also show that pitt wears lifts again. Look at the Position of his ankle, the side of his foot again pushes against the shoe, 4 cm height gain over barefoot
Filippo says on 23/Jul/14
Must agree with Heylo, this time.
176 sounds too low for Pitt. Just like 180 is a joke.
178 is spot on. But I guess we'll never see a downgrade for Hollywood golden son...
Heylo says on 23/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede, you are wrong about the 176 estimation, you know why? You use photos that these girls are using on that female forum where they are doing everything to make Brad Pitt look like a midget. Angles can create crazy illusions, Brad even looks 5'7 on some photos because of the angle, and in some he looks 6'1.

He could be 177cm at lowest but not any lower than that, he doesn't use enormous Robert Downey lifts to reach over 6ft. Therefor, he is very likely around 5'10.

You could make idiots here believe Brad is 5'8 through showing that photo from Ocean's 12 shooting where Brad looks very short "next to" George Clooney when he really just are standing several meters BEHIND Clooney but some people are not analyzing anything, they just look at the photo and then say what the eyes first see.
Adam says on 23/Jul/14
5'10.25
jamieorr4 says on 22/Jul/14
Parker im a legit 510.5 and i just think i have a bigger body frame than his
Magnet99 says on 22/Jul/14
@Parker:
Paltrow is listed as 1.77 m and Diaz as 1.79 m. Get the point??
MarcusTheSwede says on 22/Jul/14
And also. In the pictures below that I linked to. Brad is wearing Shoes and Jen flip flops. This is proof Brad is not taller then 176-177 without shoes.
And well Jennifers height is listed here on Celebheights and bare in mind she got flip flops and Brad Shoes and he clearly regardless of how he stand is not taller then 176-177 without those shoes next to her. Clear shot of both full body pictures next to eachother. Showing both of them wearing footwear..and in Brads case shoes and not sandals or flip flops 176-177cm height.
This listing needs a downgrade a long long long asked downgrade.
Click Here
MarcusTheSwede says on 22/Jul/14
Here is more proof Brad isnt tall at all. Not at all.
The picture really says it all.
He is not more then 176-177 at best without shoes.
Just look. He has a great build but well..the picture tells it.
Click Here
Parker says on 22/Jul/14
Gwyneth Paltrow and Cameron Diaz
Click Here

Lets not start downgrading Paltrow to fit Brad being shorter. Pitt has to be at least 5'10.5
MarcusTheSwede says on 21/Jul/14
Brad is at best 176-177 without his shoes. At best. Paltrow is 5ft8.5 and Brad is not more then 176-177 not a millimeter more.
Vibram says on 21/Jul/14
Giulio, Paltrow although claimed as 5ft9 was never more than 5ft8.5. That means Pitt was 5ft9.75 to 5ft10 in that barefoot photo.
Dmeyer says on 19/Jul/14
At somebody in that pics his feet dont look in normal position 0.5in lifts is possible wish Will give 0.3-0.4in because of pivoting
Giulio says on 19/Jul/14
photos with paltrow both barefoot show he is what he claims, 5'10 or 5'11
MarcusTheSwede says on 18/Jul/14
Chrism4: Thanks=) yes I think that is the most accurate due to fact and pictures 177-178cm without shoes insoles and god knows what is accurate yes.
somebody says on 18/Jul/14
especially for dmeyer and parker ... you are complety right, there is absolutely no lift inside those slippers lol

Click Here

didn´t know he suffers from alien-foot-syndrome ... c´mon guys, even people who don´t even know what hidden insoles are can see that he actually is standing ON his slippers, not IN them ... just look at the bulge at the front ... even with "high ankle" a man´s foot doesn´t look that weirdly shaped when it is in normal moccasins
Justanotherdude says on 18/Jul/14
Because they are slippers. When is the last time you wore slippers that didn't slip off your feet when you moved? You're seeing his ankles because they are low cut, usually you can when people are wearing that type of footwear.

I have no doubt the man wears lifts, but he doesn't live in them.
somebody says on 18/Jul/14
@sean
why do you say you doubt he would put lifts in slippers to play basketball when you can see it clearly in the picture that he does??
in all honesty, everyone who is not able to detect lifts even when a guy wears them in slippers without socks while wearing shorts, his ankle about 4 cm higher than it normally would be, then he commits himself as absolutely clueless in a discussion about height or height-enhancing footwear.

for everyone who doesn´t see it, put on a slim slipper like pitt does in this picture and then look where your ankle is ... and then compare it to pitt´s ankle in the picture.
as a support for people who don´t have much knowledge how hidden insoles look like, i illustrated in again in the picture ;)

Click Here
jamieorr4 says on 17/Jul/14
Brad Pitt maybe his a tall wannabe guy lol
Parker says on 17/Jul/14
Dmeyer says on 15/Jul/14
Hé has high ankle but there is no lifts in those not évén 1cm/0.4in

100% agree with you Dmeyer.
Sean says on 16/Jul/14
I doubt he would put lifts in slippers to play basketball.
Chrism4 says on 16/Jul/14
@MarcusTheSwede:
"Not 180cm. Without shoes maxiumum 177-178cm"

Totally agree!
Somebody says on 16/Jul/14
Dmeyer, you are not the right person to judge about lifts, because you simply have no clue, even when you look at most obvious ones. To me you seem like some kind of PR agent of Pitt.

If someone is not able to detect the insole inside this slippers he is either blind, a PR guy of Pitt or has simply no idea what a human foot looks like. You can even see the side of his foot sole pushing against the side of the slipper haha maybe you should watch the pic on a smartphone or tablet to zoom in properly
Filippo says on 16/Jul/14
Dmeyer says on 15/Jul/14
Hé has high ankle but there is no lifts in those not évén 1cm/0.4in

LOL at Pitt having "high ankle"!
He doensn't wear lifts neither. He's walking on a cloud!
Dmeyer says on 15/Jul/14
Hé has high ankle but there is no lifts in those not évén 1cm/0.4in
(S)aint 6'1 says on 15/Jul/14
I have slippers that are like an inch thick. Im not saying his slippers are thin but i doubt he bothered to put lifts in his slippers haha.
Brad Pitt says on 15/Jul/14
Judging by every half naked photo where he uses some kind of lifts in his slippers (!) he must be very concerned about his height. I honestly wouldn't be at shame being 5'10. It's average height for god's sake.
jamieorr4 says on 14/Jul/14
Alexa was he wearing lifts?
somebody says on 14/Jul/14
here is the picture:

Click Here
somebody says on 14/Jul/14
i think one can repeat it 100 times, pitt is NOT in thin-soled slippers in this picture, they are also lifts that give him around 4 cm.
just type in "brad pitt basketball" in google picture search, picture 3 in the list where he is topless, wearing shorts an no socks. same slippers, take a look at the place of his ankles, you can see that he is standing ON the shoes, not IN them, even the bulge of the inside wedge is visible
MarcusTheSwede says on 14/Jul/14
Need more Proof that Brad is 177-178cm at best???
Well here next to Jennifer Aniston listed 5ft4.75in.

Brad is NOT 180cm he is way shorter. Just look at picture below and also the picture next to George Clooney and Matt Damon.
Jennifer Aniston and Brad below. IF he would have been 180cm he would have towered her, he is at best. At best 177-178cm without shoes.

Click Here
MarcusTheSwede says on 14/Jul/14
Well The point is to repeat it again. 2 inch taller then five ten proofs Brad IS wihtout shoes at best...at best..178cm. At best.
Not 180cm. Without shoes maxiumum 177-178cm
End of story
Emil 182.5 cm says on 13/Jul/14
180 cm imo. 177-178 is pushing it. He's still 1.25-1.5 inches taller than Clooney wearing thin soled shoes and 2 inches taller than Damon. Wearing lifts he's a little taller than Edward Norton and dont tell me Norton is 5'10 when he clearly is 2 inches taller
Alexa says on 13/Jul/14
He is over 180..I was standing by jolie and him at filmset 4,5 years ago..Im 189 so Im sure he is 180+
pauly e says on 11/Jul/14
that picture is totally tilted in Pitt's favor. I also have never been able to buy clooney at his listed height here. He looks like a weak 5'10 to me.
Parker says on 11/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede says on 10/Jul/14
So know finally take a good look on picture below. Brad Pitt in SHOES,

Yes, Brad in thin soled shoes looking 2 inches taller than 5'10 listed George Clooney......your point is what?
jamieorr4 says on 10/Jul/14
RisingForce i amit that 510 is possible but im not going over that
Vibram says on 10/Jul/14
2014 With 5ft11.25 Tom Hanks. Pitt Looks 5ft10. Click Here
and again: Click Here

Hanks with 5ft11.5 Di Caprio: Click Here
-----
There is no way Pitt is 5ft11.
Heylo says on 10/Jul/14
Rob, i feel like you are ignoring the fact that Brad looks to be fairly close to Paltrow's height barefoot.

He can't be 5'11. 5'10 is what he is, he is often the same height as George Clooney and sometimes WAY above Clooney's height, such a big height difference because of lifts. He becomes 2 inches taller with lifts so it's not a surprise that he looks 183-84cm at some events.
MarcusTheSwede says on 10/Jul/14
For god sake.Brad is 177-178. Everbody that is serious about this height listing knows that.
Just look below for heaven sake. Look. Matt Damon George Clooney and Brad Pitt.
Brad is wearing shoes and Matt and George socks!!
Look at picture below or google Brad Pitt George Clooney and Matt Damon.
Anything Anything over 178 is ridicilous for Brad. Also both Brad and George Clooney have a inside joke that Brad is not that tall at all. At several times George has joked about Brad.s height and said..Oh he is "so tall"..and making fun out of all people that think he is as tall as in the movies. For god sake look at picture below. Evidence enough and a thousend other pictures also proves Brad is not taller then 177-178cm without shoes at best.At best
Everybody that been here for years and seen the pictures knows that. So tired of repeating this truth cause people dont see the evidence. So know finally take a good look on picture below. Brad Pitt in SHOES,althoug thin for a change..George and Matt wearing socks. Rest my case Brad is 177-178 without shoes. Ageering with Jamieorr and others that knows that also Rob seems to be facing this truth otherwise look below and see for yourself. 1 picture out of many that shows Brad with shoes next to Matt and George. Evidence enough. Thanks
Thanks
Click Here
RisingForce says on 9/Jul/14
jamieorr, neither of us know what's in Pitt's shoes either, and it's funny how you think ONE imperfect picture not taken from a straight on angle with both Pitt and Paltrow dropping posture is the same thing as an exact measurement. It's amazing to me that people think just because you remove ONE variable being shoes that the other variables that factor in to height varying in photos no longer applies. FWIW, in that picture, I thought Pitt looked solid 5'10" range, maybe 5'10.5", but you can't tell the exact height difference from just one picture even if it's seemingly ideal for comparing. You can get a good idea with a series of good pictures or a good video, but lets say Pitt is a flat 5'11", him looking a half inch or so under that in one photo, much less a flawed photo is not even close to being unlikely, much less impossible.

Now that's what I find funny. I believe Pitt is between 5'10.5" and 5'11" from looking at a bunch of premiere pictures and videos as well as movies while taking note of his shoes, not just a single photo.
RisingForce says on 9/Jul/14
I agree DMeyer, I'd say 181 cm is more likely than 177 cm, though not more likely than 178 cm/5'10". Personally, I doubt he's as short s a flat 5'10" and I doubt he's any taller than 5'11" since early 90's Brad Pitt looked more solid 5'10" range than 5'11", and Pitt really didn't start looking 5'11"+ until the late 90's, plus I still have doubts a man over 5'11" would claim 5'11" even before they were famous when on the same form they claimed to be 2 years younger than they were when he was only 23-24 anyway. Personally, I think 5'11" flat is possible, but the highest I'd argue, while I suspect he might just as well be 5'10.5"-5'10.75" without his boots.

However, I do disagree with you about the shoes with Hague. I suspect Pitt might have some lifts there, but he looks 5'11.5" minimum in the video if Hague is 5'10" and can look 6'0" so Pitt should be 6'0.5"-6'1" in those boots making it highly unlikely he's anything below 5'10.5" barefoot.
jamieorr4 says on 9/Jul/14
rob don't you think its possible that he has hidden insoles in his shoes? and i honest don't know how anyone could think his over 510 after seeing him nexts to paltrow its beyond me
[Editor Rob: sometimes he will]
MarcusTheSwede says on 8/Jul/14
The picture below that Parker provided is evidence that Brad is not taller then Matt Damon OR George Clooney well to put it easy..just look at those heels. And also that in mind not whats inside the shoe itself the insole probably is a height insole or at least 1.5-2cm height inside or also the shoe itself could be build up inside also. But just the heel alone tells the truth. Just look at it and also look and compare with Angelina.s height. He is not taller then Matt or George Clooney. The majority of people here knows that due to so many pictures during the years that this almost get silly.
He is not 180cm. at best at best 178 without his shoes. He is shorter then Geena David without shoes and way shorter then Gwyneth Paltrow. Brad Pitt is not 180cm he is as Jamieorr4 and Alucard and me and so many else already told and discussed for ages not tall at all. Hollywood make him tall and lifts also. Its time for a well deserved downgrade. This is ridicilous height. Downgrade Rob. Thanks
qartt says on 8/Jul/14
I have a theory why Brad looks taller today than in his twenties. When I was young man I used to wear really flat trainers. This was due to loads of sport, thick trainers lead to more foot injuries. Now i wear similar shoes to men of my age (about 2 to 2.5cms) people argue with me if I say I am under 5'11 on evening. So I say 5'11.

When you are just above average, half inch seems to make a big difference. Could it be Brad was always 5'11, just like flat trainers rather than dress shoes. Also back in the late 80's boots and thick trainers were in fashion.
Dmeyer says on 8/Jul/14
Rob so you agree 181cm for pitt is likelier than 177-178cm
[Editor Rob: I think the odds would be better, I can't see a 177-8 range argument being stronger than a 181 argument.]
Dmeyer says on 8/Jul/14
Pitt shoes in the arch pics give near 4cm nothing more you can tell the foot is not lifted more than on the outside heel
jamieorr4 says on 8/Jul/14
Parker you don't know whats inside his shoes he could have hidden insoles and beside how do you explain how hes looks only a little taller than paltrow if not the same height?
Parker says on 7/Jul/14
As Arch Stanton posted previously, William Hague looks a solid 5'10 standing next to 6' Blair.
Click Here

Pitt has to be standing at minimum 6'1 in this pic, consistent with how he looked next to Orland Bloom
Click Here

Yes I agree Pitt is getting an easy 2 inches from his shoes, 3 I think is pushing it....4? Never.

He's between 5'10-5'11. Its strange how posters on Bieber,Stallone, Cruise and Pitt think they are all 5'2 with 8 inch lifts. There's only so much custom footwear will do unless you get a pair of frankensteins boots.
MarcusTheSwede says on 7/Jul/14
jamieorr4: =) Yes for sure. And also when he was in a episode of Friends..next to Matt Le Blanc and David Schwimmer nearly every single shot in that episode Brad was filmed either from below to make him look taller and or he was leaning against a furniture everything to avoid to show his real height next to Matt Le Blanc and David Schwimmer. so yes as you said and based to a HUGE amount of pictures( Off Set ) and evidence. This listing needs to be downgraded it has been so many years everybody that like this page has argued and provided evidence so I think it wouldnt be more then right that this listing gets downgraded as you said=) lol
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jul/14
RisingForce the problem is your comparing him to other celebrities who also wear lifts and how is that accurate? and pauly e have see him with next gwyneth paltrow? i think thats accurate because they were in bare feet
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede thanks he definitely needs a downgrade lol
pauly e says on 7/Jul/14
I'll buy anything from 5'10.25 - 5'10.75.

I just can't see him at 5'9.
MarcusTheSwede says on 7/Jul/14
Alucard and Jamieorr4: Yes I agree so tired also of repeating same thing over and over Hollywood facade is not their real height agree with both of you.
jamieorr4 says on 6/Jul/14
rob i think you should downgrade him to atleast 510 he is barely taller than paltrow
jamieorr4 says on 6/Jul/14
RisingForce do you know whats in his shoes? i doubt you do its funny how people think 510.5 and 511 is possible when his barely taller than paltrow
Alucard says on 6/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede i keep saying this all the time, Pitt was always in the 5'9-5'9.5 max range, nothing more... Majority of people are really bad at estimating height and looking beyond the Hollyweird facade...
jamieorr4 says on 6/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede i agree im a legit 179cm and brad built does look smaller than my i have all ways said he is 59 and the pictures of gwyneth paltrow say it all
MarcusTheSwede says on 5/Jul/14
Anything over 176cm is a joke he is clearly shorter then Geena Davis and have big problems with his height he is barely taller then Matt Damon and George Clooney and thats when Brad wears shoes and Matt and George had socks and Vans on. He always always wears lifts and also inside shoe is build up he always Also wears jeans and pants that goes over the back of the shoe and also heels on boots that are massive. Everyone that has been here for years knows Brad id not taller then Max 176 177cm without shoes and thats why we all have been looking for a downgrade. Look at every single off camera picture with for example Matt Damon George Clooney thats proof enough. Dont diiscuss how he looks in movies cause they make actors look how they want with camera angels and also adding inches with inside build up shoes and also he wears lifts offset at premiers and so on. He is a known liftwearer and always massive heels or boots. Great actor but his height without lifts and height soles at best same height as Matt Damon and George Clooney.Thanks
RisingForce says on 5/Jul/14
Actually, anything under 5'10" is a joke because Pitt is most likely taller than that. 5'10.5" to 5'11" makes the most sense. Pitt can, and often does look 6 feet. Many examples of this have been posted. I just posted the video recently where he looked at least as tall as Edward Norton, if not taller. He looked about 6 feet in Meet Joe Black next to Anthony Hopkins as well. He's obviously not above 5'11", but he's usually looked at least 5'11.5", often 6 feet the last 10-15 years due to his boots and posture. As for the Cruise picture, we can't see their entire bodies or shoes, and Cruise can look 5'8.5", even 5'9" at times due to lifts/elevator boots and posture.
Pauly e says on 2/Jul/14
Filippo says on 1/Jul/14
Brad can look 6' plus, huh? Click Here
Be serious. Everything over 5'10 is a joke..

hahaha....they are probably both on stilts canceling each other's lifts out.
Filippo says on 1/Jul/14
Brad can look 6' plus, huh? Click Here
Be serious. Everything over 5'10 is a joke..
Dmeyer says on 30/Jun/14
To me pitt can look 182.5-183cm shoes on with normal looking shoes and 184cm with 3.5-4cm cowboys on , on occasion can look 5ft 10
Chrism4 says on 27/Jun/14
Chris84

Lion is nearly right, but B. Pitt is more in the range 1.78 - 1.80m -
Berek says on 25/Jun/14
Looks about 5' 10.5" in proportions and none of the photographic evidence, from bare foot shots with Paltrow thru blatantly heeled contemporary pictures, suggests anything else.
yjentia says on 25/Jun/14
Male actors lie about their height. Most men do, but at 6ft in tennis shoes I still tower over most of the men I've met that were "6'0"!
Lion says on 24/Jun/14
He is short, I met him. 174 cms + 6 cms heels (2-3 inside , 3 outside)...He appears 180, but with heels!
qartt says on 24/Jun/14
I have met William Hague he is 5'10. He is the MP for Richmond and Hambleton and has an office in Northallerton. My sister handed in a petition. He was slightly shorter than me less than an inch. I have always been measured at the doctors at 5'11. The doctors never measure like Rob, they just ask you to remove your shoes and put you up against a height chart and take off some height for your hair.

I thought he was half inch shorter than me, he probably had slightly more footwear as i like low heeled dress shoes.

Pitt Hague video would put me half way in between Pitt and Hague. You could account for this with shoes e.g. Pitt is at least my height unless he had some sort of lifts in his shoes.
jamieorr4 says on 24/Jun/14
Dustin M was he in normal shoes?
Dustin M. says on 23/Jun/14
He is 5' 10". Seen him many times
your friend 196 - 197cm says on 23/Jun/14
One of the biggest lift wearers about. 5'11 morning height.
Haylee Jen says on 21/Jun/14
Its funny I saw Mr.and Mrs.Smith last night and he was listed at 6'1 lol. He can pull off looking it though. I think he is 5'10.5-5'11 tops
RisingForce says on 21/Jun/14
Seahawksfan, I have no idea what you're going on about, but most here know Norton is taller than Pitt. Click Here That's actually one of the times where Pitt looks under 5'11" and more 5'10" range.

Pitt in boots was able to look at least as tall as Norton, though maybe a bit taller. Click Here You see them side by side at about 6:18 and Pitt generally seemed slightly taller that night, but I'm not sure if that's because Pitt's posture is better. You also see their footwear at about 9:17. Pitt has boots, Norton has a dress shoe with a pretty decent heel, probably at least an inch and Mel Gibson has cowboy boots. Here's Pitt with Mel Gibson that night on video Click Here Pitt looks 1", maybe 1.5" taller, imo. Mel is at least 5'9", and I have no trouble buying the 5'9.5" he's listed at here. Norton could be 6'0" as he's listed at here, though 5'11.5" wouldn't surprise me either, but I'd have trouble believing he's any shorter than that. Either way, assuming no lifts, Gibson would probably be 5'11" give or take a quarter inch in his cowboy boots, and Norton would be 6'0.5"-6'1" range in those shoes so Pitt would seem to be 6'0.5" absolute minimum in those boots, maybe 6'1". I'm not saying Pitt isn't wearing lifts too, but another example of why I see no chance he's under 5'10" and why I can't see anything under 5'10.5" myself, and actually, the guy who looks most suspicious as far as lifts there is Gibson. When you see Gibson walking in his cowboy boots at the end, it almost seems like he's walking in heels, so I wouldn't be surprised at all if he had an extra lift inside those boots.
RisingForce says on 21/Jun/14
Rob, I actually don't know that many men who hate Brad Pitt. Maybe more when he was younger and girls went nuts over him, but not so much now. I personally don't mind Pitt at all either. He's done some good movies.

As far as the big guy, no use in trying to judge someones height when we haven't seen them beside anyone else with a known height. Pizzaman, I'd say Statham is probably about 5'9", but can seem a bit shorter because he slouches, but while it's difficult to tell exactly because of Pitt's hat, Pitt looks closer to 5'11" there than 5'10", imo.
Pizzaman says on 21/Jun/14
Oops, and the link of Hague and Cameron:

Click Here
Pizzaman says on 19/Jun/14
Actually the guy on the total left seems more like a 6'2" guy to me, but yeah, very hard to judge on such a pic, could even be 6'5" though, hell idk. I do think the most right soldier is Shia LaBeouf, listed as 175 but most agree on 173-174, who looks 4 cm shorter, but again, hard to compare with such angles.

For the lil side discussion on Hague, his eyes are definitely under Cameron's lips, although his head is a tiny bit down, but he is at the least 3" shorter. So can't be much more than 5'9 I'd say, maybe 5'9.5".
Arch Stanton says on 19/Jun/14
Pitt's hair seems to grow a lot faster than the average male. He'll have extremely short back and side one day and then you'll see a photo 2 or 3 weeks later and it'll have completely grown back. Then 6 months to a year down the line it'll be shoulder length again LOL.
[Editor Rob: women love him, men hate him...I think, actually I don't mind him]
Pizzaman says on 19/Jun/14
Saw Snatch lately and as with any older movie Pitt again seems 5'10" range. Compared to Jason Statham who is most likely 174:

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Given Statham is looking a lil bit down in all 3 photos and also taking in mind Pitt's hat, I can't see much more difference than 4 cm, so again 178-179 for Pitt.
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 19/Jun/14
By 6'0 Edward Norton:

Click Here

He's six feet tall, and I was there (neither were in footwear).
Arch Stanton says on 18/Jun/14
Pizzaman says on 15/Jun/14
He seems fairly short here.

Click Here

Not really if you compare him to the guys on the right. The big bald guy is probably 6'5" or so. He looks like that guy Heidi Klum is dating who looks 6'5" range.
Arch Stanton says on 18/Jun/14
Hague looks nearer 5 ft 10 to me generally, 5'9.5" might be a good shout.
Pizzaman says on 16/Jun/14
Arch, compared to Cameron, Hague is definitely just a 5'9, making Pitt once again 5'11, but again also in bigger footwear..
Dmeyer says on 16/Jun/14
Pitt managed to look 5ft 11 wearing normal shoes
Pizzaman says on 15/Jun/14
He seems fairly short here.

Click Here
RisingForce says on 15/Jun/14
Good find, Arch. If Hague is 5'10" then Pitt looks at least 5'11.5", possibly 6'0" in the video. However, Pitt has a footwear advantage, and may be wearing lifts as well. Just look at the first picture, and then the 4th of them in mid-stride. In the latter picture in particular, his lower legs look unusual. Even if he is wearing lifts there, it'd be tough to see his boots big enough to make him look that tall if he wasn't at least strong 5'10" range.
Arch Stanton says on 15/Jun/14
Rob how does he do it at times though? I mean William Hague is around 5'10, Jolie in heels too, and in that top photo in the link I sent he actually pulls off looking like a 6'1 er!! In the other photo he's looking minimum 6 ft too. Yet people are still saying he's 5'9! I honestly don't blame you for listing him at 5'11.5-6 ft at one time as he tends to pull of looking more that than 5'11 or under. Is it Cuban heels which explain it? Lifts? I'm not so sure. In the early 90s in films like Thelma and Louise and Across the Tracks though he really did seem like a 5'9 guy but he suddenly seemed to "grow" by Interview with the Vampire. He definitely had an easy inch on Rick Schroeder though.
[Editor Rob: I think he has worked on his posture and remember with a small lift and editorial photos (published in your favour - see the one with benedict cumberbatch...you can bet there were more takne) you can suddenly start looking taller than expected.]
jon says on 15/Jun/14
Wow, there are people here saying he's 5'9? I wonder, do the people saying that actually believe it, or are they just downgrading him out of some weird sense of obligation like people on this site often do?
RisingForce says on 15/Jun/14
Dmeyer, I agree with you that he's in the 5'10.5"-5'11" range, but Pitt has never pulled off looking as tall as Tarantino with equal posture. The only times Pitt even in boots looked as tall as Tarantino was when Tarantino was slouching noticeably and dropping in height.
RisingForce says on 12/Jun/14
That's interesting, Dural. Then it is possible Schroder is only 5'9" since many are done growing by 17, though still young enough that it's not implausible he reached Rob's listing of 5'9.5". Either way, I'd say Pitt had him by about an inch in the scenes I've seen from Across The Tracks.

jamieorr4, Pitt has worn boots with 2" heels at times in movies like Spy Game, but that's rare. His boots usually probably add closer to 1.5", but with lifts, and I suspect he does wear them, though I'm not as sure as I am that say Stallone or Cruise wear them, then he probably gets around a 2" boost over barefoot height a good amount of the time. That wouldn't be implausible, but no, I don't think 5'9.5" is possible. 5'10" is the lowest I think is plausible and certainly no less, imo. Even if Pitt does get a 2" boost from his shoes, he usually looks taller than just a 5'11" guy, and often looks closer to 6 feet, and on rare occasions slightly taller. So even accounting for his posture, he probably measures close to, if not 6'1" in his bigger shoes, so even a 2" boost would make him more strong 5'10" range guy, if not 5'11". If he was just 5'9.5" and wore 2" lifts, he'd struggle to even look 5'11" with lifts and posture, and that clearly isn't the case looking at most of his red carpet appearances and movies the last 10-15 years.
Dmeyer says on 12/Jun/14
Pitt has managed to look 5'11 Like 6ft shoes on in low cut shoes without ROom for lifts Like with Tarantino in cannes were you can see the entire shoe or with 5'9.75 ejiofor pitt had normal 1in low cut dress shoes and looks légit 5'11 , he can look as low as 5ft10 with Tarantino and paltrow at Times , he can also look as tall as Quentin when in cowboy dress shoes . There is énaugh évidence to show he cant be under 5´10.5 or over 5'11
Arch Stanton says on 12/Jun/14
For all those people claiming he is 5 ft 9-10 Click Here William Hague is actually around 5 ft 10. I compared him to a few people previously. Pitt is pulling off looking over 5 ft 11 in comparison.
Dmeyer says on 11/Jun/14
Personally i think pitt Gets no mire than 1.5in from his shoes you could argue he has a 1-1.5in lifts that give somewere 0.7-1.in so he Will get 2.3-2.6in he has to be 5'10-10.25
Rhonda says on 10/Jun/14
RisingForce you have a solid knowledge on heights.I think he is 5ft11
cole says on 10/Jun/14
@jamieorr4: Going from "176-177 cm" to looking near 185 cm isn't possible in the kind of footwear he's wearing. He might get a good 5-6 cm or so from some of the more extreme shoes (if you can even call it that) I've seen him in.

He looked the same height or taller than Benedict Cumberbatch (who's always wearing more or less regular dress shoes) in some shots, and as shown with Rob, he's at least near 182 cm. So again, Brad's more than 182 cm in "lifts". I must say though, I've yet to see him in any outrageously large heeled footwear in 2014, and he still looks about 180 cm.

He has put down 5'10 and 5'11 as his height, and between those two marks is what he can look - closer to 5'11 more often than not I'd say.
Mathew says on 10/Jun/14
Roughly 5'10" barefoot, give or take a wee bit. Not short, but not tall either.
jamieorr4 says on 10/Jun/14
RisingForce do you think hes getting 2 inches in lifts? if so do you 59.5 is possibly? because i think in hes lifts he could be 182cm
Dural says on 10/Jun/14
@Rising

The video was posted several years ago, he was measured 175cm barefoot/in socks when he was 17, 100%.
Cass says on 9/Jun/14
legit 5'10.5 for me
Dmeyer says on 9/Jun/14
The shortest i could see brad is 5'10 3/8" about 179cm
Dmeyer says on 9/Jun/14
The shortest i could see brad is 5'10 3/8" about 179cm
Shaz says on 9/Jun/14
He is a legit 5'10.4 guy. Yes, that sounds oddly specific, but he is a strong 5'10, which is why he can look 5'11 in relatively flat shoes, and around 6ft. in dress shoes or boots. He has an athletic build, and camera tricks make him seem much taller (EG. Inglourous Basterds).
jamieorr4 says on 9/Jun/14
RisingForce the main reason is the pictures with gwyneth they are both in barefeet
Filippo says on 8/Jun/14
It's pretty hard for a 5'10.5 or 5'11 man to look as short as 5'9, dmeyer.. Even near Jennifer Aniston.. Indeed, if you look at old pictures, in his youngest days brad appeared average a lot more often than tall.
Recently, he seems to grow taller every movie. Must be a very late bloomer.. Or a legit 5'10.
jamieorr4 says on 8/Jun/14
dmeyer ok maybe 510 is possible but his body frame make me doubt his even 510
RisingForce says on 8/Jun/14
I haven't heard that about Schroder, Dural. Would be interested to see a source, though as you said it still leaves variables such as time and his age since I believe most late growth spurts are exaggerated, but you can still grow a bit at 17. Most measurements will be closer to your low than high so even if Schroder was just 5'9", that would still make Pitt about 5'10" in Across The Tracks, and I don't think 5'10" is impossible, I just can't see much of a chance for anything lower, and I doubt he's below 5'10.5" myself. But I'm fine discussing 5'10" even if I disagree. I just can't see the 5'9" stuff at all honestly.

jamieorr4, I'm not sure how that addresses what I'm saying. I don't necessarily doubt Pitt wears lifts. In fact, I suspect he has at times since some of the candid photos Dural has posted have shown Pitt's legs looking a bit short compared to his torso and that's never the case at premieres and in movies, at least later in his career. But Pitt would need to consistently be getting a boost somewhere between 3.5"-4.5" to be just 5'9", and that's just not possible in the boots he wears. Even if he managed it, his lower legs wouldn't just look funny, they'd look ridiculous, and the size of the shoes would be so ridiculous to conceal such enormous lifts. That's why you see Downey with 3" heels, a platform of 1" or so on the front, the ridiculous angle of his foot and how out of proportion his legs look. It's not easy to get a 3"+ boost, and those who do, will look ridiculous.
RisingForce says on 7/Jun/14
jamieorr4, but a 5'9" guy isn't going to look 5'11.5"-6'0" like Pitt often easily does without boots MUCH bigger than what Pitt wears and lifts so obvious to the point there'd be no discussion about whether he is or isn't wearing lifts. In fact, I'm not sure what shoes could make a 5'9" man look as tall as Pitt usually does short of something like these. Click Here
dmeyer says on 7/Jun/14
jamieorr4 since a 5 ft 9 guy can look 5 ft 10 5 ft 11 this is whi pitt cant be 5 ft 9 and he can look 5 ft 11-6ft more often as he does 5 ft 10 flat or 5 ft 9 , therefore 5 ft 10.5-11 is wath he is , also you can tell his footwear isnt the 2-3in type more 1-2in tops
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jun/14
RisingForce the thing is though i think most celebrities lie about there heights and do anything to make them selfs look taller
Dural says on 7/Jun/14
@Rising
Wasn't Schroder measured 175cm when he was 17 years old. This could be a morning measurement as well and we don't know if he was fully grown back than.
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jun/14
what you guys got to understand is a 59 guy with good foot wear can pull of looking 510 to 511
Arch Stanton says on 6/Jun/14
Pitt could seem 5'9" in the early 90s, but yeah he had about 1-1.5 inches on Schroeder in Across the Tracks.
Brad says on 5/Jun/14
5-10, huge dress boots on red carpets.
RisingForce says on 5/Jun/14
I'd say the opposite, and I don't read too much into proportions because some have strange proportions, but his frame tells me there's virtually no way he's under 5'10". Most importantly, the height he looks next to other people suggests he's more around 5'11". Honestly, even the "short" early career Brad Pitt still looks about 5'10.5" or 5'10" at the absolute worst in movies like "Across The Tracks." He was clearly a bit taller, probably about an inch taller than Rick Schroeder in that movie and he's listed here at 5'9.5". Pitt with his boots and posture can pretty easily look 6 feet, and in movies as well as at premieres, Pitt in more recent years almost always looks about 5'11.5"-6'0". Both Pitt's early "pre-lifts" career and his current appearance in fairly big footwear suggest he's absolutely no less than 5'10" and I'd bet money he's always taller than just a flat 5'10". 5'11" is entirely possible, and I also think there's a good chance he'd measure around 5'10.5"-5'10.75" evening. Somewhere in that range. He's not truly tall, but some have described him as tall, and he's clearly more on the tall side than short side.
Dural says on 5/Jun/14
The top of Jennifer Anistons head comes up to his eye level. That's normally a 4-4.5inch difference. Jennifer Aniston is listed as 5'4.75". Assuming he has no lifts in his shoes and their footwear is equal, he should be about 5'8.75" - 5'9.25". Her slippers look pretty thick though, like 1.5in-1.75in so he's probably at a slight disadvantage.


Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
jamieorr4 says on 4/Jun/14
thanks for respect my opinion, but his body frame tells he is under 510
Core says on 3/Jun/14
definitely 5'11
Filippo says on 3/Jun/14
@mjkop again. Try to take a look at the pic with pitt and Paltrow barefoot and then tell me if 5'10 is still nonsense..
Heylo says on 2/Jun/14
This photo from Fight Club set for example: Click Here
I know that we don't see the shoes but it's very likely that Pitt didn't have lifts on here but when they started shooting he had. He looks about 177-178cm here next to around 6ft Norton & Fincher.
Heylo says on 2/Jun/14
jamieorr4, Okay, i respect your opinion.

But he is not getting up to 5'11 with lifts, he is getting up to 6ft, therefor, he is around 5'10. Which Fight Club also proves next to Fincher and Norton on set like Vibram said.
jamieorr4 says on 1/Jun/14
pauly e don't you think its possible that brad is wearing lifts to get up to 511 like hes 59 barefeet but put on lifts to get up to 511?
jamieorr4 says on 1/Jun/14
Heylo im not saying that 6ft is average its above average but still i wouldn't say its tall i say 510 is average but even though 511 and 6ft are above average i still don't considered it tall i say 61 is were start just my opinion though
Chrism4 says on 1/Jun/14
For all doubters, smart aleck and clever Dicks:
A long time I thought and was pretty sure that Pitt is around 1.80m - 1.83m. I´ve met him a few days ago and as a legit 1.80m person he seemed to be 2cm shorter than me! That means he´s around 1.78m/1.79. NOT taller! For me I´m glad to know it, you can go on with estimations - it´s an interesting platform here!
Vibram says on 1/Jun/14
He's never been 180cm in his life. 178cm in Fight club. Look at the behind the scenes of that movie and he has about 1.5 inches on 5ft8.5 jared Leto.
JohnGB says on 31/May/14
I don't believe he wakes over 6ft personally. I think his is like 181cm when he wakes and 179 evening. But that's just my opinion, he never seems quite as tall as that.
MarcusTheSwede says on 31/May/14
Please stick to the TOPIC: Brad Pitt Height. NOT youre own height. That is not of intrest. Brad Pitts height not youre not youre cousin grandpa or grandma. It Celebheight not youre own height. Thanks for great site
horacle says on 31/May/14
179cm 5'10.5 seems perfect for him
MJKoP says on 31/May/14
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM says on 27/May/14
I'm close to 6'2" (possibly 6'2") and people have guessed that I was 6'2" before.



So? You're essentially saying that some people have been correct about how tall you are. No offense, but I don't exactly see what your point is.

Regarding Pitt: I think that there's actually a good chance he wakes at over 6 foot and never drops below 5'11". The 5'10" tops talk is nonsensical.
5'10man says on 31/May/14
Perhaps just 5'11 out of bed, but likely 5'10.5"
Filippo says on 30/May/14
After with seahawk on the tall-short list below.
Disagree with Lorne about pitt. 182 out of bed is a joke. Brad is not taller than 5'10. Barefoot, of course..
Dmeyer says on 29/May/14
177cm is bang on average 178-9cm is upper average and 175-6cm lower 175-179cm is very average ,
Heylo says on 29/May/14
jamiorr4, sorry, the comment by nickname jamiorr4 was written by me to him. My mistake!

I could add that the popular culture makes us think that every height under 6 is short but comparable to average height in each country + the height of the women 5'9-5'10 is the most average you can be in almost every country in the world.
I'm not trying to say that the way you are thinking about your height is wrong, just trying to give you some perspective on it. When i was in UK with my 5'10 build i felt way taller than i did in Sweden. In London though, there are many tall turists i would guess..
John says on 29/May/14
After considering Brad's heels, I still think he's 5'10-5'11 range.
pauly e says on 28/May/14
The Horse of FUNK says on 27/May/14
Interesting. I am the EXACT same height as Dmeyer. Like him, I generally measure anywhere from 181.3cm - 181.7cm. Basically, I just say I'm 5'11.5". But like Dmeyer, EVERYBODY assumes I'm taller. I get 6'1" a lot, sometimes 6'2".

I think my posture and body type also has a lot to do with it. I've always held good posture since I was young, military posture, and I'm broad-shouldered with long limbs.

Sometimes I think it's all the people who fudge their heights who skew the perception. For example, the loads of men who are 5'8" - 5'9" who claim 5'10" deceive and skew many people's perception of what a genuine 5'10" actually looks like. Same with 6', many 5'10"ers and 5'11"ers round up to 6' and it throws people off when they see a legit 6'0".

exactly. well put.
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM says on 27/May/14
I'm close to 6'2" (possibly 6'2") and people have guessed that I was 6'2" before.
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM says on 27/May/14
5'7"=Short, but not ridiculously short.
5'8"=Below average, but not short.
5'9"=Lower average as it's the 42nd percentile.
5'10"=Higher average as it's the 58th percentile.
5'11"Above average as it's about the 70th percentile, but not necessarily tall.
6'0"=Tall
Dmeyer says on 27/May/14
I agree horse of funk ,
Lorne says on 27/May/14
Dmeyer says on 22/May/14
I think 1.3-1.5in shoes plus excellent posture can make people look aleast 1in taller than wath they are




I completely agree. I also think that with thick boots, like 1.8in type,plus excellent posture, and especially with a slim build, you can fool people for 3-4cm, I've noticed a lot of typical shoes actually give a bit less than an inch, with 1.7/1.9 cowboy boots, you'll have an inch footwear advantage over many, and you can add another cm or two by maintaining perfect Pitt posture.

But no chance he is less than 179cm, this guy easily clears 5'11 in the morning, and could very well be 182 out of bed.
jamieorr4 says on 27/May/14
Heylo but im a legit 510.5 guy and i don't feel near tall and i know someone who is a legit 6ft 183cm guy and he doesn't considered him self tall sorry but 61 is the start of tall imo atleast in uk it is
pauly e says on 27/May/14
Dmeyer says on 24/May/14
In thick shoes i am almost 6'0.75 since i am 181.3-5cm plus 3cm thats 184.3-5cm and people pegged me at 6'1 , since Many claim theyr height in shoes and i am not much under 6'1 shoes on it make sens Alex is somewere 6'1-1.5in shoes on so hé get guessed 6'1-6'2 , once you are 6'0.5-1in you get guessed 6'2 alot ,

agree. I have long thought this as well. I am about an inch shorter than you dmeyer (178.8-179 cm), people generally guess me at 6'0 since I am about 5'11.75 in shoes. the fact that most people guess height including shoes, is another reason why i don't see Pitt at 5'11 but 5'10ish at best.
jamieorr4 says on 27/May/14
RisingForce i don't know about the us but in uk i say tall starts at 61 anything under 61 doesn't seem tall to me but its just my opinion
The Horse of FUNK says on 27/May/14
Interesting. I am the EXACT same height as Dmeyer. Like him, I generally measure anywhere from 181.3cm - 181.7cm. Basically, I just say I'm 5'11.5". But like Dmeyer, EVERYBODY assumes I'm taller. I get 6'1" a lot, sometimes 6'2".

I think my posture and body type also has a lot to do with it. I've always held good posture since I was young, military posture, and I'm broad-shouldered with long limbs.

Sometimes I think it's all the people who fudge their heights who skew the perception. For example, the loads of men who are 5'8" - 5'9" who claim 5'10" deceive and skew many people's perception of what a genuine 5'10" actually looks like. Same with 6', many 5'10"ers and 5'11"ers round up to 6' and it throws people off when they see a legit 6'0".
Heylo says on 26/May/14
jamieorr4, The truth is that people who are over 180 are called tall by several people. You can't just say "that is tall and that is short" cause that depends on the location. In Sweden 6'1 might be the beginning of tall but in America and the rest of the world basically, everyone over 5'11 is tall walking through the mall.
RisingForce says on 26/May/14
5'8"-5'11" is average range to me. Once you get above that to around 6 feet, I'd definitely say that's tall and once you get below 5'8" to 5'7" range, I'd call that short. Maybe there are a few countries where 6 feet flat isn't tall, but it definitely is in the US, imo. The height I'd like to be would be anywhere from 6 feet to 6'2". A nice impressive height, but not too tall either.
cobra says on 26/May/14
In this video at about the 1:55 mark you see Pitt and Will Smith shake hands. It's not a great shot and we can't tell if either is wearing lifts, but Smith has a pretty clear advantage, so even if Pitt was wearing lifts he's not getting to whatever Smith's height is in them:

Click Here
jamieorr4 says on 25/May/14
pauly e actually i say tall starts at 61
Dmeyer says on 25/May/14
Above pics Clooney is at worst 179cm peak damon at worst 176.5 cm pitt does look aleast 3cm on Clooney so strong 182cm and solid 5cm on damon again 182cm this shoes give aleast 1.3cm Max 2.3-2.5 cm so thats 179.5-180.5cm for pitt also damon could very well be 177-177.5 and Clooney 179.5 wish make him 183cm shoes on and évén 181cm possible , from those pics 180cm is wath mâkes most sens , if pitt was 178.5-179cm hé Will be 180-181cm with those on wish is not the case , i have similar shoes when you were a 1-1.5cm lifts the foot dosnt look as flat as pitt so very high chance pitt Gets 0.6-0.8 in from those 1.5-2cm
Heylo says on 25/May/14
Dmeyer, you are very right. People are in general very ****ty at estimating heights. I am 5'10 (doesn't use any lifts, just regular shoes) and people tend to think i am close to 6ft sometimes.

Something that also is true is that 5'11 sounds average on the paper and it is average in a few countries too but 5'11 in reality does look quite tall, a friend of mine who is 181cm (we measured) but i always thought he was 184 or something lol. Most "6ft" people in Hollywood are really around 5'11. Same with Pitt, he is not really 5'11, he's around 5'10.
Dmeyer says on 24/May/14
In thick shoes i am almost 6'0.75 since i am 181.3-5cm plus 3cm thats 184.3-5cm and people pegged me at 6'1 , since Many claim theyr height in shoes and i am not much under 6'1 shoes on it make sens Alex is somewere 6'1-1.5in shoes on so hé get guessed 6'1-6'2 , once you are 6'0.5-1in you get guessed 6'2 alot ,
RisingForce says on 24/May/14
Agreed, Parker, I also think he looks a legit 5'11" while wearing sneakers with Jonah Hill, and at the other event with dress boots as well, then again you never know with Pitt's boots, but he actually looks at least as tall with the sneakers, if not taller. Can't say I'm convinced of the lifts at the beach thing, I'm not that sure about slippers/moccasins myself since I don't wear them, but I'd need more than one picture of Pitt's foot hanging out of one a bit before I'd state it as a fact that Pitt wears lifts in them.
Alex 6'0 says on 24/May/14
Dmeyer, people often think I'm 6'1 in 1-1.25 sneakers. Ive gotten 6'2 before too but most often its 6'1 from people
jamieorr4 says on 24/May/14
Alucard thanks pauly e not really im 510.5 i feel average and im 511 in morning i say 62 is were tall starts 61 is tallish though. i say a normal height range for a man is 59-6ft
JohnGB says on 22/May/14
Dmeyer I agree, I am 182.5-184.5 and people think I am about 6'1 usually but I just wear DMs and have good posture.
pauly e says on 22/May/14
5'11.5 is pretty tall imo. It doesn't sound tall, but most guys i see who are a legit 5'11.5 get described as "tall". I would say zero chance Pitt is 5'11.5. I agree with what dmeyer said about shoes and posture. Big shoes, plus good posture makes pitt's 5'10ish (at best) frame pass for 5'11 or more.
Alucard says on 22/May/14
Jamieorr4 is right on the spot, both Clooney and Pitt are in the 5'9 range, cm less cm more, without lifts obviously...
Dmeyer says on 22/May/14
I think 1.3-1.5in shoes plus excellent posture can make people look aleast 1in taller than wath they are
jamieorr4 says on 21/May/14
Almost 5 10 im a legit 510.5 guy and i think i have a bigger built than him, Blink 511.5 is a joke. no offence people but have you heard of lifts. seriously without lifts brad and george are probably are the same height 59 and they have a built of a 59 guy
Blink says on 20/May/14
He seems a little taller than George Clooney, I'd say 5'11.5
Almost 5 10 says on 20/May/14
5' 10.5" really would be the best fit, as he can look either 5' 11" or 5' 10"
Pizzaman says on 20/May/14
He most often looks about a strong 5'11" nowadays, but hardly ever did when he was younger. He seems like 1 solid inch taller on average now than early in his carreer. He has looked a bit short, tallish, average, everything. So I'd still say 178.2-178.6

Here is a complete list of my opinions to give a total view (I've thought hard about the estimates):
Radcliff 161
Black 166.2-166.8
Hill 167.8-168.5
Stiller 168.2-168.8
Waltz 170
Cruise 172
Downey Jr 171.8-172.5
Penn/LaBeouf/Renner/Wahlberg 172.2-172.8
Phoenix 173
Statham 173.2-173.8
Levitt 173.5-174
Depp 173.8-174.5
Leto 174.5-175
Stallone/Foxx 175
Hardy 175-175.5
Damon 176.2-176.8
Craig 177.2-177.8
Clooney 177.8-178.5
Pitt/Crowe 178.2-178.6
McConaughey/Fassbender 179.2-179.8
Willis 179.5-180
Dicaprio/Diesel 180-180.5
Gyllenhaal/Bale/Hanks 181.2-181.8
Washington 182
Cumberbatch/Schwarzenegger/Evans 182.2-182.8
Gosling 183.2-183.8
Cooper/Pine/Cavill 183.5-184
Costner 184-184.5
Walker/Smith 185.2-185.8
Butler 185.5-1.86
L Jackson 186.5-187
Jackman 186.8-187.5
Freeman 188
Affleck 187.8-188.5
Ferrel 189.2-189.8
Johnson 189.5-190.5
Hemsworth 190.5-191
Neeson 192.5-193
Filippo says on 20/May/14
You are all still wondering how often he "looked" this or that, and you are all forgetting the only real evidence we have shows him a bare inch taller than Paltrow...
Tell me, rightman,do you really believe Paltrow is 5'10?
Dan says on 19/May/14
Perfect 5-10 guy. If say pitt is a pretty honest guy and only think lied by adding one inch to his height. 5-9.5 at his very lowest and would never dip under that. Never. His proportions are not of a 5-9 or 5-8 guy. Same height as clooney
dmeyer says on 19/May/14
i doubt those give more than 3cm at best he got 0.25 in more shoes than pitt wish might make him look 6cm taller than pitt instead of 5cm
dmeyer says on 19/May/14
i doubt those give more than 3cm at best he got 0.25 in more shoes than pitt wish might make him look 6cm taller than pitt instead of 5cm
cole says on 19/May/14
At times he even looks more of a solid 5'11 guy next to Jonah Hill than what DiCaprio does.
Dural says on 19/May/14
He wears lifts on the beach but doesn't wear lifts at the Inglorious B******s premiere in Cannes, are you serious?
Rightman says on 18/May/14
MarcusTheSwede: How can you be so sure?? Have you ever met him? Have you ever measured him? Do you know exactly the high of G. Paltrow? Do you know the accurate sizes of Damon or Clooney?
Just answer one of these questions with NO and you realize how wrong you think!
Dural says on 18/May/14
Vegas says on 16/May/14

tarantino looks to be in cowboy boots that particular day so that has to be taken into account. if they are cowboys then tarantino would be getting the best part of 2 inches from his footwear.

i have posted the full video before, pitts easily taller than waltz @ 2mins 50seconds, he even has to bend down his head to talk to him Click Here

-----------------

Cowboy boots?

Click Here
Parker says on 18/May/14
@Rising
If Jonah Hill is 5'6, Pitt looks every bit of 5'11 in my opinion.
RisingForce says on 17/May/14
Good find, Vegas, I usually try to look for video at these events, but can't always find them. He does look a good 5'11" in comparison from the front angle, and Tarantino wearing cowboy boots would support Pitt at 5'11" there. Here's another premiere video of Pitt and Waltz. Click Here You see them briefly around 3:20 and a 4" difference looks possible, either 3.5" or 4", imo. Brad is with Angelina from about 4:10 on. She measures up fairly similar, but probably slightly better than he does. Probably a 3"-3.5" difference, imo. Here's Pitt and Jolie's shoes Click Here I think Jolie is about 5'6", but those heels would probably make her at least 5'9" or a fraction over. Pitt is in his usual dress boots, and he'd be standing about 6'0.5" in them, but more 6'1" in them if she's 5'6.5" barefoot as listed here. And Waltz looked to be in normal shoes standing similar in height to Mike Myers who is listed at 5'7" here Click Here

Here's another premiere video of Pitt and Jolie. Click Here The height difference looks similar to the first video, imo and you see their shoes at 0:20 which shows he's in similar dress boots while her heels look a good 3" or a fraction more. His height depends on if he has lifts in his boots. If he doesn't then he actually does look about how tall a 5'11" man in boots with heels that size should look next to a 5'6" woman in 3" heels. Of course, if she's 5'6.5" then he's standing a really solid height, but it depends on if he has anything in the shoes.
Alex 6'0 says on 17/May/14
I see no way he's only 5'9.5. He's gotta be somewhere from 5'10.5-5'11 range.
Vegas says on 16/May/14
RisingForce says on 14/May/14
Here's a comparison to Tarantino at different events, who I'll assume is the 6'1" he's listed at here.

Click Here Click Here Pitt's dress boots look to give him an advantage over Tarantino's dress shoes because if you look at their feet, Tarantino's look flat while Pitt's clearly look to be at more of an angle. In the first picture, Pitt looks solid 5'11"-5'11.5" range, though in the second he looks more of a solid 5'10", but Tarantino is a bit closer to the camera in that one and might have a bit of the tilt advantage.

Click Here Tarantino looks a solid 2 inches taller so I'd say Pitt looks like a weak 5'11" there. Pitt's shoes don't look unusual and he isn't forcing his posture there, but Tarantino has strange, loose posture so I'd imagine he's at a disadvantage there. I'm not sure I see a full 5'11" on that same day compared to Christoph Waltz who claims 170 cm either.
________________

tarantino looks to be in cowboy boots that particular day so that has to be taken into account. if they are cowboys then tarantino would be getting the best part of 2 inches from his footwear.

i have posted the full video before, pitts easily taller than waltz @ 2mins 50seconds, he even has to bend down his head to talk to him Click Here
RisingForce says on 16/May/14
I don't remember exactly how he compared to anyone in particular in Moneyball or his shoes, but he did give a tall impression and I'd have thought he was at least 6 feet. I do remember that he towered over Jonah Hill who is listed at 5'6.25" here. Here's a good pic of Pitt and Hill at an event. Click Here Pitt does look about 5 inches taller so he looks a solid 5'11" there, and he's in dress boots, but is Hill in boots as well? It's shots like this that have made me suspicious that Pitt wears lifts. Click Here Pretty big heel, but his foot looks to be at a pretty good angle. However, here's Pitt and Hill in sneakers. Click Here The difference looks at least as big, possibly slightly bigger, certainly no less than a 5" difference, though his style of sneakers may add a bit more than Hill's. Speaking of Pitt's shoes, the boots he wore in Killing Them Softly looked like they could give him a good boost. Click Here Pretty big heels and a thick boot overall that conceals a lot so it'd be pretty easy to fit lifts in there. So at the very least, we know that we have to be suspicious of how tall Pitt looks in Spy Game and Killing Them Softly for those boots as well as Themla and Louise for his cowboy boots. I haven't seen Ocean's 12 in quite a while because I didn't care for that movie much, but did he wear these boots in it? Click Here Or is that just for a promo pic? Because those heels look around 2".
Edy91 says on 15/May/14
in fight club he gives the impression of 5'10 guy, his powerful upper body and thin head makes him look taller … no more than 178 cm for him but not less than 176.
RobV says on 14/May/14
And of course this is the point about height. All those who ask: "I am 5'11 and a half, can I claim six foot?" should read the threads about Pitt and other celebs and realise that "hell yes, I can". No-one, even those really close to these guys or those seeing them all the time in films and photos etc, know their real height and neither do those commenting. If a specific number is your bag, then you can probably claim it unless it is totally daft. People just are not as aware of actual heights as you think, unless you are in the position of taking shoes off and measuring or doing back to back to prove something.

And Risingforce, you are quite right - Pitt's elevators (if indeed he uses them, which I kinda assume he does) are way better than those of the celebs like Diesel, Stallone, Downey Jnr etc who go for the full-on "Munster boot look with a suit".
Mr. Kaplan says on 14/May/14
Billy Beane is 6'4". They might have made Pitt look taller on purpose.
RisingForce says on 14/May/14
Here's a comparison to Tarantino at different events, who I'll assume is the 6'1" he's listed at here.

Click Here Click Here Pitt's dress boots look to give him an advantage over Tarantino's dress shoes because if you look at their feet, Tarantino's look flat while Pitt's clearly look to be at more of an angle. In the first picture, Pitt looks solid 5'11"-5'11.5" range, though in the second he looks more of a solid 5'10", but Tarantino is a bit closer to the camera in that one and might have a bit of the tilt advantage.

Click Here Tarantino looks a solid 2 inches taller so I'd say Pitt looks like a weak 5'11" there. Pitt's shoes don't look unusual and he isn't forcing his posture there, but Tarantino has strange, loose posture so I'd imagine he's at a disadvantage there. I'm not sure I see a full 5'11" on that same day compared to Christoph Waltz who claims 170 cm either. Click Here Click Here

Click Here Pitt looks about 5'11" there, but his boots have a pretty good heel definitely giving him an advantage over Tarantino there even assuming he isn't wearing lifts, but I wouldn't say that's a safe assumption. Click Here

Pitt often looks around 5'11" next to Tarantino, give or take maybe a quarter inch, but Pitt usually has better posture and at most of these events, he appeared to have a footwear advantage. Unless Tarantino is over 6'1" then 5'10.5" seems more likely than the full 5'11" if the two were standing next to each other barefoot with equal posture.
pauly e says on 14/May/14
Given all of that and the fact that I still have a hard time believing a legit 5'11" wouldn't claim 6'

see, this is what always gets me. If i had a dime for every 5'10.25 - 5'10.75 guy I have met who claimed 6'0 I'd be a very rich man. I have met a handful of people in my entire life who actually claim what appears to be their true height.
Arch Stanton says on 14/May/14
@Kourosh, he looked 2-2.5 inches taller than Philip Seymour Hoffman, not sure how you came to that conclusion, but he could look 6 ft in some scenes agreed.
Kourosh177cm says on 13/May/14
i just watched the movie moneyball and he appeared so tall in that movie like between 6'1 to 6'2 it so strange.
RisingForce says on 13/May/14
Personally, I don't think Pitt's shoes are that bad compared to some celebrities, and I really wasn't sure if he even wore lifts until recently. What convinces me is that Pitt is some photos Dural has posted looks to have short legs for his height, yet in almost every red carpet appearance he has fairly well proportioned, long legs, and I have seen Pitt's lower leg look funny. Plus, Pitt claimed early to be just 5'11" so it'd be extremely doubtful he's any taller, yet he usually appears to be 182-184 cm at events, and looking that much taller than his claimed height pretty often strongly suggests lifts.

For example, even if Edward Norton isn't a full 6 feet, we know he's taller than Pitt, and even if Norton is a legit 6 feet, Pitt didn't look above 5'10.5" in comparison in that full body shot I posted below with posture advantage, possibly footwear advantage and a hat. Now watch this video from 5:50 on. Click Here Norton slouches at times, but Pitt was clearly standing a bit taller that night regardless. He was wearing boots, but to be passing for maybe 6'0.5", I'd imagine he must have had lifts. Interestingly here's a good video of Pitt and Mel Gibson from the same night. Click Here Gibson I believe is about 5'9.5" as he's listed here, and I'd guess Pitt was about 1.5" taller that night, possibly 2", but interestingly in the close ups, Pitt barely looks taller than Gibson.

To explain where I stand on Pitt, I do still entertain the possibility of a legit 5'11" because of how tall he can convincingly look, but the reason I'm at more 5'10.5", maybe 5'10.75" is because of the following comparisons. He simply doesn't look a full 2 inches taller than 5'9" Gwyneth in most of the pictures of them together. Early career, I didn't see him have more than an inch on Rcky Schroder who is listed here at 5'9.5" either. Then I'm pretty sure that Pitt in Themla and Louise was a bit shorter than 6'0" Geena Davis who was in flats and Pitt in 1.75" cowboy boots. Considering Geena's type of flats, she would only be a fraction over barefoot, so a legit 5'11" should have probably looked a bit taller, and definitely no shorter. He's also looking more 5'10" range than 5'11" in the premiere pics and videos I posted below with Sean Penn, then there were separate events where Pitt looked just 5-10ish with Tarantino and another event where he was possibly even struggling with 5'10", and to further the lifts theory, he was magically close to Tarantino's height at another. There's also the Spy Game comparison with Redford where at best, he'd be a bit under 5'11" due to his footwear advantage, and there was a bizarre series of pictures from one event for Burn After Reading where Pitt was consistently looking shorter than Clooney, but given most comparisons, and the pics above with Pitt in slippers and Clooney in socks, I'd have a hard time believing Pitt is shorter than Clooney and likely a hair taller, imo.

Given all of that and the fact that I still have a hard time believing a legit 5'11" wouldn't claim 6' even early in his career when Pitt went as far as to lie and write that he was born in 1965 as opposed to his actual birth year of 1963 in that same questionnaire, which seems like a pointless thing to lie about at just 23/24, while an actor rounding up from 5'11" to 6'0" is a much more logical lie and something you'd expect, even from an early career, possibly less height conscious Pitt.
Filippo says on 13/May/14
Yeah heylo I'm not an expert about boots and lifts, but a 4 centimeters boost is something I would call "huge"! Ahah!! but maybe I should deal with the fact that it isn't exactly huge, especially if your name is Robert Downey jr! :)
Anyway, I'm about your height, too and I know what it means! You wish you could gain those fu***ng 2 or three and reach 5'11 but.. Ahaha come on! We still are in the tallish side of average, which is good! Same height as brad pitt!
pauly e says on 13/May/14
RisingForce says on 13/May/14
I saw the latter part of Spy Game on tv the other day and if Redford was still 5'10" then Pitt did look at least 5'11.5" in comparison, imo, but we all know about his shoes in the movie. Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here The first picture really makes those heels look massive, but given the other pics, I'd guess they're 2" heels. If he doesn't have lifts in them, then a 5'10" Redford would make Pitt a weak 5'11" or 5'10.5"-5'10.75", which I'm beginning to think he is. But even if Redford was 5'10.5" peak, he was 64 at the time of the movie so 5'10" would likely be the most he was. Plus, you can always fit an extra inch lift in boots. If Pitt had lifts as well, then he'd barely be taller than Redford, if at all.

yeah, those heels in spy game were intense....I've never bought Redfort at 5'10. I think he may have been that in his prime but was probably closer to 5'9.5 by the time spy game was made. I've always thought Pitt was 5'10.25-5'10.5, but i'm even starting to doubt that now. no way a full 5'11. no. way.
Heylo says on 13/May/14
jamieorr4, His built doesn't look small imo. And a small built doesn't necessarily mean a shorter stature overall, proportions are different for everyone. I think Pitt's body looks 5'10, if you are 5'10 and have a bigger built that is probably because you have different proportions. The photo with Paltrow shows a tilting 177man at least.
RisingForce says on 13/May/14
I saw the latter part of Spy Game on tv the other day and if Redford was still 5'10" then Pitt did look at least 5'11.5" in comparison, imo, but we all know about his shoes in the movie. Click Here Click Here Click Here Click Here The first picture really makes those heels look massive, but given the other pics, I'd guess they're 2" heels. If he doesn't have lifts in them, then a 5'10" Redford would make Pitt a weak 5'11" or 5'10.5"-5'10.75", which I'm beginning to think he is. But even if Redford was 5'10.5" peak, he was 64 at the time of the movie so 5'10" would likely be the most he was. Plus, you can always fit an extra inch lift in boots. If Pitt had lifts as well, then he'd barely be taller than Redford, if at all.
jamieorr4 says on 12/May/14
heylo for 1 his built look small imo and the barefoot pictures with Gwyneth
Heylo says on 12/May/14
Filippo, I don't think they were more massive than the ones he use to have on these big awards, just that these had a more "massive" appearance. Could give him 2.25 with lift insoles. As we can see on photos Brad Pitt body looks perfect in proportions when he has lifts on.

I also think that since Brad have been using lifts for a long time, he may feel very uncomfortable without it, that's why i personally don't want to use any lifts at all.. I was thinking about using 1inch lift on a regular shoe with 2cm heel but i will feel pretty bad putting a 1inch insole in every shoe of mine just to look taller, i don't know.. So i only use regular shoes. I'm 5'10, living in Sweden so i'm feeling kind of short but i'm glad i got over 175 at least..
Heylo says on 12/May/14
Rob is right. Pitt never gets more than 2 inch taller than he is barefoot when he is on certain events.. He gets to like 6ft, he is around 5'10. I don't get why that is so hard to grip.
Filippo says on 11/May/14
Jesus, those dress shoes pitt wears in Risingforce's pics are huge.. Pitt must have a kind of paranoia about his height.. Which sounds absurd to me, since I can't really see him shorter than 5'9.5 (177 cm)..
Come on brad.. Take it easy!
jamieorr4 says on 11/May/14
rob is it possible that brad pitt and tom cruise could be wearing 3.5 inche lifts? i have seen there shoes and from what i read they could add 3.5
[Editor Rob: when you see elevator shoes in person compared to normal shoes they stand out. Even a 2.3 inch elevator is very large. Pitt has went for cuban heels at times and in some movies thick boots like 2 inchers, I don't think I've seen him wearing anything like what Downey might wear yet.]
RisingForce says on 10/May/14
I'm not sure I see a full 3 inches between Pitt and Sean Penn who is listed here at 5'8" in these videos either. Click Here Click Here Here are a couple of pics as well. Click Here Click Here

Penn only claims to be 5'9" and I personally don't think he's taller than 5'8" myself so considering that, I see more 5'10" range for Pitt at that premiere than 5'11". Penn could be in lifts, but I wouldn't say it's any more likely than Pitt wearing them since Pitt was in his usual dress boots with a pretty good heel. Click Here Click Here
RisingForce says on 10/May/14
Dural says on 7/May/14
@Rising

I agree, but we also don't know if he had lifts in his shoes or not.

Well, yeah, but his shoes at least look normal to me. Not an unusual heel, or any unusual amount of bulk or angle of his foot. I will say that it is difficult to see Pitt being 2 inches taller than Paltrow barefoot in all of the pictures of them together. And he does look under 5'11" here with Edward Norton. Click Here It's tough for me to see anything over 5'10.5" there even assuming Norton is the full 6'0" (and slightly under 6 feet is possible) since Pitt has better posture and he's still shorter even with his hat. But I doubt the height difference can be that big since Pitt in boots did look slightly taller than Norton on video a few years ago.
jamieorr4 says on 9/May/14
oh come on look at bloom in Mr. R picture thats not a built of a 5ft10.5 more like 5ft8
Dural says on 9/May/14
Bloom, Keira Knightley and 5'7" Jerry Bruckheimer


Click Here
pauly e says on 9/May/14
Mr. R, have you met Pitt? if so what's your estimate for him?
Dural says on 9/May/14
Vegas says on 8/May/14
Heylo says on 7/May/14
Orlando next to Keira Knightley (5'7) barefoot on the beach Click Here Orlando is closer to the camera but he doesn't look more than 5'8,
___________

how in the world do you only see 1 inch between the two people in that photo? thats a 4 inch difference even taking into account he is slightly closer to the camera, the top of her head is only reaching his eyebrows...

bloom was measured for his tussauds waxwork at 179.5cm. bloom is clearly barefoot in the shots for other things so i would assume he was barefoot for the height measurement, 1 minute 20 seconds Click Here
[Editor Rob: it's a shame they never actually showed the measurement taking place, but used the audio of it over a clip of him being photographed side on...]


He wears slippers from 1:27 onwards, so what do we know? The measurement could be taken in the morning, with or without slippers, in the afternoon or in a completely different outfit with different footwear.


Bloom was barely taller than 5'9" listed Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Carribbean. He never looks 2 inches taller than Depp.
Click Here
Mr. R says on 9/May/14
Check out them heels....On Brad!

Click Here
Dural says on 8/May/14
Orlando clearly had a disadvantage with his shoes + you can bet Pitt was wearing lifts in his shoes.

Click Here

Barefoot they are probably the same height.
Vegas says on 8/May/14
Heylo says on 7/May/14
Orlando next to Keira Knightley (5'7) barefoot on the beach Click Here Orlando is closer to the camera but he doesn't look more than 5'8,
___________

how in the world do you only see 1 inch between the two people in that photo? thats a 4 inch difference even taking into account he is slightly closer to the camera, the top of her head is only reaching his eyebrows...

bloom was measured for his tussauds waxwork at 179.5cm. bloom is clearly barefoot in the shots for other things so i would assume he was barefoot for the height measurement, 1 minute 20 seconds Click Here
[Editor Rob: it's a shame they never actually showed the measurement taking place, but used the audio of it over a clip of him being photographed side on...]
Pitt-bull says on 8/May/14
i just did the math.. and here comes the height
1.79713 (5'10.75 at peak) and that is the final..
to check it out, take the pic into Photoshop, and draw two vertical lines from feet to head, and just check the difference.. and that's what i got.
Pitt-bull says on 8/May/14
@jamieorr 4, he is not wearing any lifts at all in those shoes man! are you crazy? its all pretty obvious.. thats his original height.. and he isnt slouching or anything.. so,max 5'10 no doubt
Dmeyer says on 8/May/14
If you look well at all pics off pitt and Orlando of course in some pics he can look 2-3in taller but in some just 1-2cm taller , the réal difernce is 2-3cm with pitt 1cm more shoes , wish means 178-179 cm bloom and pitt 180cm looking 181cm cause of shoes ,

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes by the actors themselves in interviews, resumes or articles.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.