How tall is Brad Pitt ?

Home :: Bookmark :: About  

Brad Pitt height: 5ft 11in (180 cm)

American actor best known for movies such as Se7en, Fight Club, Snatch, Oceans Thirteen, Troy and World War Z. A newspaper article on heights (washington post) quoted as saying people had seen Pitt put down 5ft 10 on an audition form for his height. Well, before he was A-list, aged 24 he wrote his own height as 5ft 11 in a teen magazine profile. Granted he can look 182cm, but then he has impeccable posture and at times, most recently in the last few years, he also appears to wear impeccably sized footwear that give him a little boost over fellow actors. Even Clooney was wise to his footwear: (from USAToday) "He's tall. He's like 6-1. It's irritating". In slippers with Damon, Clooney in socks and here
Add your opinion on the Height of Brad Pitt

Your Comment:

184.9 on a bad day says on 22/Aug/14
come on people, he look 6 foot in boots with Edward Norton. He has to be atleast 179.
snatch says on 21/Aug/14
I'm going with the fact that he did not claim 6 foot and claimed 5 11
why 5 11? if he was 5 foot 10 Pitt would have been known as a 6 footer

my honest opinion not to downgrade the man but he is 177 in the morning
and shrinks down to 176.5 at night

he is still 3 cms taller then me which is why he can pull off 5 11

cmon hes at least 3.5 cm off 180 at least anyone who says he's a strong 178 or even 179
is not looking at the same person

ok let me put it like this 1.5 heel with 1 inch lifts is 6. 35 cm now plus that by 176.5
183 cms and thats being generous because he sometimes wears 2 inch heels with
who knows how big of lifts

i think he hits 177 cm in the morning and shrinks down to 176.5

he is still 3.5cm taller then me which is why he doesn't come off as short
like tom cruise

I've seen the photos of his legs his ankle to calve ratio is the same
exact as mine and from his knees to his hips looks a little just a little
long than mine

but his torso is normal not long not short and he has a long neck
which takes a lot of height when standing next to taller people
jamieorr4 says on 21/Aug/14
tk imo that barefoot picture with Gwyneth Paltrow prove that hes no taller than 178cm but that depends on if Gwyneth Paltrow is a legit 5ft9 i think she could be 5ft8 i think pitt is probably 177cm like i said lots of times before im a legit 179cm i don't really see brad being the same height as me
jamieorr4 says on 21/Aug/14
truth imo he his a upper body look of 5ft10 guy and how is 5ft9 i bad guess? not saying he doesn't look 5ft10 or 5ft11 but that his foot wear height barefoot he could be 175cm at lowest but i agree with Heylo i think 177cm is the most realistic barefoot height for pitt ok 178cm max for pitt but i doubt hes more than that im a legit 179cm guy im sure i have abit of a bigger body frame
tk says on 21/Aug/14
5-8 or even 5-9 is just absurd for Brad Pitt. Even the famous barefoot pictures with Gwyneth Paltrow prove that he's definitely taller than that, probably just shy of 5-11. I think 5-10.5 is fair for him. He has great posture, he could look close to 6 feet even with fairly normal shoes but he seems to enjoy wearing bigger than normal heels and small lifts to make him look even taller, sometimes close to 6-1, and that obviously "irritates" some people here...
truth says on 20/Aug/14
@Heylo I agree, his upper body looks that of a 6ft0 guy, but his legs resemble a 5ft8 guy. He is somewhere inbetween, a bit closer to 6ft0 still at 179-180cm. both 5ft10 and 5ft11 are still not bad guesses though and pretty good, but either 5ft9 or less or 5ft11.5 + is bad.
Dan says on 20/Aug/14
Snatch. Brad pitt hasn't been " skinny " for a long time. He has managed to stay about 170 to 175 since doing Troy. He got thin again for world war z and then bulked up again while shooting fury. Also, the shoes he wears in fight club do add about 1.5 to 2" in height. They are hodgman Lakestream fishing shoes. The character wore them because it was suppose to be like a wore thrift shop cheap clothing. Heylo is right. Although pitt can't be considered wide, he does have an X shape body. I say absolutely no shorter then 5-10 because of his strong core and slim waist which keeps a person standing tall with good posture
pauly e says on 20/Aug/14
agree RobV.
Heylo says on 20/Aug/14
Brad doesn't have a small built/upper body. It's the opposite. Brad does have pretty wide shoulders and a long back. He actually looks around 5'11 in his upper body, his legs though look kind of short for his height sometimes. Not extremely short or anything that makes him look weird but legs that would suit a 5'8-5'9 guy. I still think the theory of him being 177-178 is the most realistic one.
snatch says on 19/Aug/14
im skinny so i can pull off looking 2 inches taller than i really am

so at 5 foot 8 i can pull off at least 5 foot 10 with good footwear

im not saying pitt is 5 foot 8 he is at least a inch or a inch and half taller then me

thats why he can pull 6 feet

if he's 5 foot 9 and half and wears 1.5 inch heal with 1 inch lifts
he stands at 6 feet
and hes skinny so with big foot wear and slim body he can pull off 6 foot 1

he can never claim 6 foot hence is why i am suspicious about him even being
5 foot 10
i would have guess the biggest movie star in the world would have claimed 6 feet
if he was 5 foot 10

but him claiming only 5 11 makes me think that he is indeed 5 foot 9 range

its just obvious look at the shoes he wears to look 5 11 the lengths he goes to

have you seen the shoes he wears in fight club? they are the most hideous disgusting shoes
i have ever seen with a huge heel just disgusting looking shoes i have never in my life
seen shoes like that and for a A list star to wear them?
RobV says on 19/Aug/14
In passing, Pauly e & snatch, on actors and guys generally claiming 6'1" when they are 5'11". I am 6'2" & before I started wearing lifts to make me a tad taller (I started at 19), I noticed the weirdest thing - that loads of guys who seemed a bit shorter than me were claiming they were "just over 6-1". It was so weird I began to think I must genuinely be 6'4" or more or that I must have wrongly measured my height.

The 2" inflation thing is so common around that height that it makes all claims in the area a bit suspect.
pauly e says on 19/Aug/14
snatch says on 18/Aug/14
im 5 foot 8 if i was a actor i would 100% claim 5 10

if someone was in the 5 foot 9 range they would claim
5 11

a 5 foot 8 person can't claim 5 11 but certainly can claim
5 foot 10

catch my drift?

most non actors do that as well. most guys I see who are 5'11-ish almost always claim 6'1.
jamieorr4 says on 18/Aug/14
Parker thats just my opinion though
snatch says on 18/Aug/14
im 5 foot 8 if i was a actor i would 100% claim 5 10

if someone was in the 5 foot 9 range they would claim
5 11

a 5 foot 8 person can't claim 5 11 but certainly can claim
5 foot 10

catch my drift?

clooney is taller a blind man can see that
clooney has a bigger head and a bigger skeleton structures

pitt is small he's not a big guy

hes 5 foot 9 and half at very best
wears his shoes are always 1.5 heal with 1 inch lifts
that puts him at 6 foot

and when he puts on bigger lifts he hits close to 6 foot 1
which explains why he looks eric banns height
Parker says on 17/Aug/14
jamieorr4 says on 17/Aug/14
so i still think 5ft9 flat for pitt is possible

Zero chance of him being 5'9, 90% chance 5'10, 95% chance 5'10.5-5'11.5, zero chance of 6'.
jamieorr4 says on 17/Aug/14
Parker that still doesn't proof anything to me i still think hes 182cm or 183cm max in lifts and i saw a other picture with pitt next to Eric and Eric was a lot taller, so i still think 5ft9 flat for pitt is possible i think pitt is some were between 175cm and 177cm in barefeet and maybe 178cm is possible i guess but im 179cm and i image im a little bit taller than pitt, you can tell that Eric Bana is a legit 6ft2 by his body frame probably the same height as ashton Kutcher
Dmeyer says on 17/Aug/14
Dmeyer says on 17/Aug/14
As you can see shoes from that night normal 1.4inchers 3.5cm barely 1cm over Clooney shoes yet look easy talker
Click Here
truth says on 17/Aug/14
Clooney is 1 cm shorter but he is not 180cm, more likely 177-179cm and Pitt 178-180cm.
Parker says on 17/Aug/14
jamieorr4 says on 17/Aug/14
lelman its not just his lifts its his body frame and is there really any proof of him looking 6ft1?

Eric Bana is 6'3 in footwear. What does Pitt look to you here?
Click Here
jamieorr4 says on 17/Aug/14
lelman its not just his lifts its his body frame and is there really any proof of him looking 6ft1? and don't forget celebrity lie about there height
Dmeyer says on 17/Aug/14
As you can see shoes from that night normal 1.4inchers 3.5cm barely 1cm over Clooney shoes yet look easy talker
Dmeyer says on 17/Aug/14
Click Here look taller than arguably 5'10.25-10.75 Clooney who was at peak good angle
Dmeyer says on 17/Aug/14
when pitt apear smaller than Clooney is when Clooney is closer to caméra when the angle is good he is no shorter and likely 0.5-1cm under
c says on 17/Aug/14
He generally looks 6ish inches taller than Aniston. Which puts him at about 5 10.75 max imo and probably closer to like 5'10.25 or .5
Justanotherguy says on 16/Aug/14
The problem with that pic is he is wearing loafers. It could be a lift, but it also could just be his heel slipping out of the shoe slightly. If you've worn high quality loafers before, loafers made of real leather and with a leather sole, you'd be surprised how much they can weigh. I'm just saying... I think he wears lifts but I just don't see him putting them in loafers or anything like them.
Richi says on 16/Aug/14
Rob, you´ve listed B. Pitt at 5ft 11in (180 cm) - do you think he is rather under or over 5ft 11in?
5ft 11in is kind of a wonky evaluation.
[Editor Rob: I still believe he is very near to 5ft 11 flat]
truthseeker says on 16/Aug/14
Click Here

brad pitts shoes when seen as much shorter than george clooney
lelman says on 15/Aug/14
I don't understand how people can seriously believe he is under 5'10". Yes, he wears lifts, but he can look 6'1" at times - unless you are wearing heels, a 5'9" man is not going to be able to get 6'0"+. Brad is at least 5'10" - more likely 5'10.5"-5'11". Clooney is no less than 5'9.5" and thought he was "like 6'1".
Dan says on 14/Aug/14
Also, how can Leto be 5-8 when he is standing barefoot infront of norton in the film and in the behind the scenes footage and is only about 1.5" shorter then norton?
Dan says on 14/Aug/14
At the 1:29 mark of the video, fincher is standing directly in front of pitt about a foot and a half away. Fincher 6-0 Pitt 5-10
Dan says on 14/Aug/14
Google images of pitt and fincher and you'll see that pitt always lifts about two inches in public when wearing boots and about 1.5" when wearing his vans sneakers he always wears. He doesn't wear monsters but he always tries to gain at least two inches when around other mail celebs. He is a solid 5-10 guy. And yes, I do believe he is leto's height, the thing is is that brad has a very muscular body with muscular legs and looks way more manlier then the very slim rock star type Leto. Look at the behind the scenes fight club video and you'll see Leto is only about an inch shorter then norton. Same as pitt
Dan says on 14/Aug/14
Heylo what are you talking about. When the vid first cuts to the basement, norton fincher and pitt are all standing together about three feet away from each other. Pitt is wearing the cut off sweater and the fight club track pants. It's the first shot in the basement. I really don't think pitt is wearing lifts here and he looks about 5-9.5 to 5-10 considering norton is a solid 5-11
Giulio says on 14/Aug/14
Click Here

lololol even if paltrow is 174 and pitt is wearing lifts he still must be 178+, handsome **** i have to say, what has the nerfing brigade got to counter this ????
Jay says on 12/Aug/14
Have to agree with those that claim Pitt is no more than 177cm. The pics from his early career and then barefoot pics in films like Twelve Monkeys next to 6 foot Willis seem to support this. As Snatch says, if he was a solid 180cm, he'd claim 6 foot or 6'1", no doubt about it. Even at Premieres, with clearly substantial lifts compared to other photos, he is only hitting about 182cm max. I think he's no more than 177cm. The fact he claims 180cm means he could actually be no more than 175-6cm and claiming an extra 4-5cm.
jamieorr4 says on 12/Aug/14
im a legit 179cm guy and i guess 5ft10 is possible for pitt but 5ft9 wouldn't shock me
L says on 11/Aug/14
He's no more than 5'10.5
pauly e says on 11/Aug/14
i remember the scene in fight club where brad and jared leto are face to face. I remember thinking that pitt looked close in height to leto, maybe an inch difference. i can't see him at <5'10, but certainly not >5'11. i would have to agree with Truth and say 179 cm or 5'10.5" as his height.
snatch says on 11/Aug/14

if he was 180 min then hollywood would say he's is 183cm

i can't follow your argumentation 180 cm is absolute nonsense
max 178cm

if he was even close to 180 he would be labeled as a 6 footer
why would you say the worlds biggest movie star is only 5 11?

hes 5 9 to 5 10 max

not a dot over 5 10
Heylo says on 10/Aug/14
Dural, i saw now that Jared actually are closer to or is a full 5'9. I could buy the argument that Brad & Jared would look pretty similar barefoot next to each other but where Brad is 2-3 cm taller.
Heylo says on 10/Aug/14
Dan, how can you come to such sure conclusions when Pitt is standing meter(s) behind the actual shooting where Fincher, Leto & Norton stands?

Pitt is also not visible for a long time in the video so it's hard to judge but i don't think Leto is the same height as Brad. Since Leto is about 5'8. But your theory about Fincher & Brad Pitt is exactly my theory too. That Fincher is visibly 1-2 inches taller than Pitt but Pitt comes to Fincher's height with lift insoles on premieres & such.

I think the heights of many celebrities are wrong listed, even on here. It's weird that a 5'10 Brad looks 3 inches taller than 5'8-5'9 Anthony Hopkins for example.. Or that he very often looks more than just one inch taller than people that are supposed to be around 5'10-5'11.

Could the photo with Bloom from this year (the great photo wich was posted by Dural) show the truth. That he actually are using lifts more often than we think, that he might even always (even in sneakers & other flat shoes) have 1-2.2 inch lift insoles.. Cause to be honest, his feet doesn't look very natural when he is walking around in sneakers.

I still believe Brad is around 5'10 but i also believe that Brad since his breakthrough in the early 90s have been using lifts constantly (except for rear off shoot photos or nude photos who shows how tall he really is).

Shouldn't we concentrate on photos from the 80s if we want his real height with shoes without lifts on photos?
Richi says on 9/Aug/14
Can´t follow your argumentation. 1.75.5 m for Pitt is absolute nonsense.
Min. 1.80 m. That´s it!
truth says on 9/Aug/14
179cm is bang on.
snatch says on 9/Aug/14
180 is to tall for him barefoot

iam 173 and he looks a inch taller then me
i wouldn't be surprised if he is 175.5 on the dot

175.5 is his real height
180 is his hollywood height

if BRAD PITT was 5 11 then hollywood would have listed him
as 6 foot 1

why would you label the worlds biggest movie star 5 foot 11? not even 6 feet
just 5 11

because thats the most he can pull off

just think about it they say he's only 5 11 why?
why not 6 feet. Oh thats because he's badly 5 foot 10
i wouldn't be surprised if he's 5 9 and half

175.5 max
Dan says on 8/Aug/14 In this video you clearly see pitt and Leto are about the same height. I'm pretty positive pitt isn't wearing lifts in it cause you can see that he's about two inches shorter then david fincher and during Benjamin button promos pitt wearing lifts was fincher's height. Norton is a good inch taller then Leto and maybe two because of Norton's bad posture. Pitt is no shorter no taller then 5-10. That seems to be his height and given the guy seems to be a pretty honest guy with a good public track record I just think he added 1 inch to his height. That is why he is never that much taller then Damon or clooney. I think clooney and pitt are the same height. Except pitt likes wearing boots and has great posture. But yes. Pitt is famous for adding height with his boots and lifts inside his sneakers
jamieorr4 says on 8/Aug/14
Dmeyer 5ft10 is possible for pitt but not for bloom look at his body frame its too small to be 5ft10 im a legit 5ft10.5 btw
Dmeyer says on 8/Aug/14
Bloom looks 2cm shorter than pitt while pitt has 1cm more shoes i Know this type they give barely 1in some under the Heel starts 1cm under with it looks so 179 bloom and 180cm pitt or 178 and 179
Amaze says on 7/Aug/14
No way is beckham 6 ft. He's close to it tho outta bed. Hes 5'11. Rob is never wrong. Hes always been at 180cm at mutd

Pitt and becks are the same height. 180 or flat 5'11 boys. 1" off 6 ft.
Dural says on 7/Aug/14
Good pic of Bloom and Pitt imo.

Click Here

Beckham was listed 179cm and later 180cm at ManUnited and he claims 5'11". There's no reason to believe he's 6ft.
jamieorr4 says on 6/Aug/14
Richi i don't its just my opinion
Richi says on 5/Aug/14
jamieorr4 says on 5/Aug/14
Richi Beckham is not 6ft and rob didn't listed him at that height

Where is your proof, that he´s not 6ft? And in my opinion the size specification from Rob is incorrect - there is also not a real evidence shown for me.
Parker says on 5/Aug/14
Richi says on 4/Aug/14
D. Beckham is 6 feet tall. And he claimed to be 6 feet during his time at ManU!

Claims 5'11 in his latest autobiography.
Parker says on 5/Aug/14
Filippo says on 5/Aug/14
5'10.5 orlando bloom?? Parker, you must be joking!!

I was just going off what he is listed here, so its Rob that is joking not me.
Filippo says on 5/Aug/14
5'10.5 orlando bloom?? Parker, you must be joking!!
jamieorr4 says on 5/Aug/14
Richi Beckham is not 6ft and rob didn't listed him at that height
Richi says on 4/Aug/14
D. Beckham is 6 feet tall. And he claimed to be 6 feet during his time at ManU!
Dmeyer says on 4/Aug/14
A true 5'11 dosnt wear lifts thats whi brad dosnt , also i am 5'11.5 and i did wear cowboy boots or 0.5in lifts on rare ocassions
Dmeyer says on 4/Aug/14
Brad at Times wears converse or vans type and is probably 5'11.5 with Them on looking 5'10.5ish if he meet sly While sly has 2inchers and top posture they could look similar
pauly e says on 4/Aug/14
cobra says on 3/Aug/14
You know, I'm one of those people who finds it silly when people rely on a few dozen pics with paltrow over the thousands of him to "prove how short he is"...but this link provided by truthseeker below has done more than anything to convince me he might really be as short as some are claiming, just read through the topic:

Click Here

that picture of his white shoes is hilarious! you can totally see the lifts!
jamieorr4 says on 3/Aug/14
Stalker true 511 isn't tall but still no need for lifts but i don't think his a legit 511 guy anyway
Realist says on 3/Aug/14
Pizzamans estimations are good except for Affleck who is obviously 6'3.5.
Stalker says on 3/Aug/14
To me, he looks 180-181 cm. Apparently wears lifts oftentimes. I just dont get why would an almost legit six footer need to wear lifts? Probably thats because ive never been in the spotlight. That just what fame does to you, i guess.
Parker says on 3/Aug/14
David Beckham claims 5'11, I think he's a strong 5'11, but has never claimed 6', but I understand what you are saying. IMO, like you, I struggle how Pitt can pull off looking a 6 footer next to Bloom and William Hague if he was less than 5'10.5. The nonsense on the Cruise,Stallone and Pitt pages wrt to lifts is just that - nonsense. I don't doubt his footwear in enhanced, but 3 or 4 inch lifts? Rubbish.
cobra says on 3/Aug/14
You know, I'm one of those people who finds it silly when people rely on a few dozen pics with paltrow over the thousands of him to "prove how short he is"...but this link provided by truthseeker below has done more than anything to convince me he might really be as short as some are claiming, just read through the topic:

Click Here
RisingForce says on 3/Aug/14
Parker, I suspect Bloom is more 5'10" flat, and for all we know Pitt could have a small lift. I have no problem believing 5'11" either, as I've said 5'10.5" is my minimum, but I think it's a good possibility because he could look more solid 5'10" range early in his career and did only claim 5'11", which makes me skeptical itself, even though that's hardly proof since honest 5'11" guys do exist, but I at least wonder whether a legit 5'11" wouldn't try for that 6' mark, which most 5-11ish guys I've known do, especially since on that same questionairre, Pitt shaved two years off his age.
Dmeyer says on 2/Aug/14
179 bloom 187 pitt 195 bana in that pic
Parker says on 2/Aug/14
Here's a better angle of 5'10.5 Bloom and 5'10.5 Pitt
Click Here

And another, although 5'10.5 Pitt is slouching while 5'10.5 Bloom has his arm over Bana
Click Here

As I said.........Hmmmm
cobra says on 2/Aug/14
"RisingForce says on 1/Aug/14
Agreed, Jed. I can settle on 5'10.5"

So Rising, here's 5'10.5 Orlando Bloom with 5'10.5 Brad Pitt

Click Here


Horrible pic considering the angle, and we can't see the slant of the floor or footwear either.
Parker says on 2/Aug/14
RisingForce says on 1/Aug/14
Agreed, Jed. I can settle on 5'10.5"

So Rising, here's 5'10.5 Orlando Bloom with 5'10.5 Brad Pitt

Click Here

MarcusTheSwede says on 1/Aug/14
RisingForce: Robert Downey Jr Shoes that was funny ...well 5"10.5 at most without insanely High heels. If somebodty could find the picture of the 6cm heels minimum he had on Spy Game it would be nice. Those heels Where the highest ive ever seen him wear they Where like Buffalo shoe High looking for the picture as I speak.
whitesnuf says on 1/Aug/14
Recently heard from an interviewer that Pitt is around 5'11 and 6' tall. People can think what they think, he added. Whatever it means.
RisingForce says on 1/Aug/14
Agreed, Jed. I can settle on 5'10.5", it's what he looked in the barefoot picture with Gwyneth Paltrow and about what he could look in early to mid 90's movies like Across The Tracks, but no shorter. Can pass for 6 feet with his shoes and posture, and he's not wearing Robert Downey Jr. shoes either.
Sean73 says on 31/Jul/14
Yep-solid 5'11".Just watch Meet Joe Black.He's 3 inches taller than Hopkins.
Filippo says on 31/Jul/14
Glad to hear Parker switched his "nothing under 5'11" for a more reasonable "nothing under 5'10".
That's an inch more than Paltrow. More or less the height a lot of people here think he is.
Amen, Parker.
Jed says on 31/Jul/14
He's minimum 5'10.5.
Parker says on 30/Jul/14
jamieorr4 says on 27/Jul/14
Parker do we know jonah hill is a legit 56 guy

Judge for yourself next to 5'6 Ben Stiller

Click Here
Parker says on 30/Jul/14
@Marcus the Swede

Internally built up? They look perfectly natural.
Zero chance of Pitt being under 5'10 IMO
jamieorr4 says on 30/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede yes your right they may look like normal shoes he could have hidden insole and he use his pants to hidden them more
RisingForce says on 30/Jul/14
Pitt is absolutely more on the tall side than short side. Just compare him to most men he stands next to. He looks a lot taller than short guys, is rarely towered over and consistently looks taller than average guys like Matt Damon or high average like George Clooney. I suspect he's "only" 5'10.5"-5'10.75" because of how he looked up until the mid 90's and his 5'11" claim, but even now when I see how tall he looks next to Jonah Hill in sneakers, I start thinking more a solid 5'11".
MarcusTheSwede says on 29/Jul/14
Parker: When do you people learn. WHAT HE LOOKS doesnt f matter. You showed a picture with Jonah Hill Parker. If you where a professional..or atleast had fact right..look at those shoes he wears. They have internal height sole inside and are build up inside. How do I know that? Well if you look carefully at the shoe it has a high pressure out thats because the foot goes against the shoe strings and against the top of the shoe inside. The foot are not standing on the original footbed on the shoe thats why the shoe gets pushed out wich you and everyone clearly can see on that picture. Inside the shoe is build up plus probably height insole 1-2cm so thats a massive internar build up height shoe he wears. Anyone that been looking into those shoes knows how a foot look in a shoe like that and that picture you sent look exactely and is a shoe that is build up several centimeters from inside plus the sole itself thats why they are bulking up out that clearly shows in picture. Brad is at best. At best 177-178 and thats very very generous.Thanks.
Dmeyer says on 29/Jul/14
Rob have you seen truthseeker pics of pitt sneakers with a weird footpose Like there is something in his shoes wath do you think ? Anyway those shoes évén with a lifts Will give 1.25in
jamieorr4 says on 29/Jul/14
Dmeyer lol please pitt is not on tall side
Dmeyer says on 29/Jul/14
I Know Many Guys 5'10 and it is a height were you never look at best solid average pitt can look on the tall side évén when un normal shoes
jamieorr4 says on 28/Jul/14
truthseeker thanksi really think 510 possible now
truthseeker says on 27/Jul/14
pitt doesnt wear lifts in sneakers.... scroll to middle of page
Click Here
(S)aint 6'1 says on 27/Jul/14
Just watched Snatch again after two years. BP looks 5'10" minimum in it.
(S)aint 6'1 says on 27/Jul/14
Just watched Snatch again after two years. BP looks 5'10" minimum in it.
jamieorr4 says on 27/Jul/14
Parker do we know jonah hill is a legit 56 guy? but yes that picture proofs that 510 is possible
Parker says on 26/Jul/14
Pitt and 5'6 Jonah Hill

Low cut sneakers,no lifts, no heels - looks 5 inches taller
Click Here

Anything under 5'10 for Pitt is nonsense. He looks like a 5'11 guy.
MarcusTheSwede says on 25/Jul/14
Heylo: Exactely what I said 177-178. Never ever said five eight so you are wrong there.
Also. The picture with Clooney and Matt Damon when Brad wears shoes and Matt and George wears socks. You can twist and turn that blame on angles and so on but they ARE standing side by side and nothing but that. So its just to forget about the angles also IF he would be 180 he would tower Matt and he clearly not in any picture on Google or anywhere for that matter.
Brad is 177-178 without his HUGE heels in every single picture and also next to Jennifer in Any single picture he clearly shows he is not 180cm.
Brad is 177-178 just look at his heels on every single picture. For gods sake.
He always wears baggy jeans that cover the shoes also and thats for that reason.
And thats not even beginning that is exluded he does not have an height insole wich he clearly has. But the heels really tells their own story about his height. 177-178cm withous shoes is maxiumum absolute maximum due to every single picture a majority that clearly shows that Brad is not taller then 177-178cm without some help of his lifts.
So AGREE with Filippo and also Somebody and Giulio. 177-178 is Brad.s height and what everybody atleast the majority have told for years here at celebheights. This needs a downgrade once and for all Rob.
James B says on 25/Jul/14
He looked 5'10 range in the Mexican
Giulio says on 25/Jul/14
Vibram says on 21/Jul/14
Giulio, Paltrow although claimed as 5ft9 was never more than 5ft8.5. That means Pitt was 5ft9.75 to 5ft10 in that barefoot photo.

any real proof of her being 5'8 1/2 ?
Somebody says on 23/Jul/14
The picture with aniston in flip flops and pitt in sneakers also show that pitt wears lifts again. Look at the Position of his ankle, the side of his foot again pushes against the shoe, 4 cm height gain over barefoot
Filippo says on 23/Jul/14
Must agree with Heylo, this time.
176 sounds too low for Pitt. Just like 180 is a joke.
178 is spot on. But I guess we'll never see a downgrade for Hollywood golden son...
Heylo says on 23/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede, you are wrong about the 176 estimation, you know why? You use photos that these girls are using on that female forum where they are doing everything to make Brad Pitt look like a midget. Angles can create crazy illusions, Brad even looks 5'7 on some photos because of the angle, and in some he looks 6'1.

He could be 177cm at lowest but not any lower than that, he doesn't use enormous Robert Downey lifts to reach over 6ft. Therefor, he is very likely around 5'10.

You could make idiots here believe Brad is 5'8 through showing that photo from Ocean's 12 shooting where Brad looks very short "next to" George Clooney when he really just are standing several meters BEHIND Clooney but some people are not analyzing anything, they just look at the photo and then say what the eyes first see.
Adam says on 23/Jul/14
jamieorr4 says on 22/Jul/14
Parker im a legit 510.5 and i just think i have a bigger body frame than his
Magnet99 says on 22/Jul/14
Paltrow is listed as 1.77 m and Diaz as 1.79 m. Get the point??
MarcusTheSwede says on 22/Jul/14
And also. In the pictures below that I linked to. Brad is wearing Shoes and Jen flip flops. This is proof Brad is not taller then 176-177 without shoes.
And well Jennifers height is listed here on Celebheights and bare in mind she got flip flops and Brad Shoes and he clearly regardless of how he stand is not taller then 176-177 without those shoes next to her. Clear shot of both full body pictures next to eachother. Showing both of them wearing footwear..and in Brads case shoes and not sandals or flip flops 176-177cm height.
This listing needs a downgrade a long long long asked downgrade.
Click Here
MarcusTheSwede says on 22/Jul/14
Here is more proof Brad isnt tall at all. Not at all.
The picture really says it all.
He is not more then 176-177 at best without shoes.
Just look. He has a great build but well..the picture tells it.
Click Here
Parker says on 22/Jul/14
Gwyneth Paltrow and Cameron Diaz
Click Here

Lets not start downgrading Paltrow to fit Brad being shorter. Pitt has to be at least 5'10.5
MarcusTheSwede says on 21/Jul/14
Brad is at best 176-177 without his shoes. At best. Paltrow is 5ft8.5 and Brad is not more then 176-177 not a millimeter more.
Vibram says on 21/Jul/14
Giulio, Paltrow although claimed as 5ft9 was never more than 5ft8.5. That means Pitt was 5ft9.75 to 5ft10 in that barefoot photo.
Dmeyer says on 19/Jul/14
At somebody in that pics his feet dont look in normal position 0.5in lifts is possible wish Will give 0.3-0.4in because of pivoting
Giulio says on 19/Jul/14
photos with paltrow both barefoot show he is what he claims, 5'10 or 5'11
MarcusTheSwede says on 18/Jul/14
Chrism4: Thanks=) yes I think that is the most accurate due to fact and pictures 177-178cm without shoes insoles and god knows what is accurate yes.
somebody says on 18/Jul/14
especially for dmeyer and parker ... you are complety right, there is absolutely no lift inside those slippers lol

Click Here

didn´t know he suffers from alien-foot-syndrome ... c´mon guys, even people who don´t even know what hidden insoles are can see that he actually is standing ON his slippers, not IN them ... just look at the bulge at the front ... even with "high ankle" a man´s foot doesn´t look that weirdly shaped when it is in normal moccasins
Justanotherdude says on 18/Jul/14
Because they are slippers. When is the last time you wore slippers that didn't slip off your feet when you moved? You're seeing his ankles because they are low cut, usually you can when people are wearing that type of footwear.

I have no doubt the man wears lifts, but he doesn't live in them.
somebody says on 18/Jul/14
why do you say you doubt he would put lifts in slippers to play basketball when you can see it clearly in the picture that he does??
in all honesty, everyone who is not able to detect lifts even when a guy wears them in slippers without socks while wearing shorts, his ankle about 4 cm higher than it normally would be, then he commits himself as absolutely clueless in a discussion about height or height-enhancing footwear.

for everyone who doesn´t see it, put on a slim slipper like pitt does in this picture and then look where your ankle is ... and then compare it to pitt´s ankle in the picture.
as a support for people who don´t have much knowledge how hidden insoles look like, i illustrated in again in the picture ;)

Click Here
jamieorr4 says on 17/Jul/14
Brad Pitt maybe his a tall wannabe guy lol
Parker says on 17/Jul/14
Dmeyer says on 15/Jul/14
Hé has high ankle but there is no lifts in those not évén 1cm/0.4in

100% agree with you Dmeyer.
Sean says on 16/Jul/14
I doubt he would put lifts in slippers to play basketball.
Chrism4 says on 16/Jul/14
"Not 180cm. Without shoes maxiumum 177-178cm"

Totally agree!
Somebody says on 16/Jul/14
Dmeyer, you are not the right person to judge about lifts, because you simply have no clue, even when you look at most obvious ones. To me you seem like some kind of PR agent of Pitt.

If someone is not able to detect the insole inside this slippers he is either blind, a PR guy of Pitt or has simply no idea what a human foot looks like. You can even see the side of his foot sole pushing against the side of the slipper haha maybe you should watch the pic on a smartphone or tablet to zoom in properly
Filippo says on 16/Jul/14
Dmeyer says on 15/Jul/14
Hé has high ankle but there is no lifts in those not évén 1cm/0.4in

LOL at Pitt having "high ankle"!
He doensn't wear lifts neither. He's walking on a cloud!
Dmeyer says on 15/Jul/14
Hé has high ankle but there is no lifts in those not évén 1cm/0.4in
(S)aint 6'1 says on 15/Jul/14
I have slippers that are like an inch thick. Im not saying his slippers are thin but i doubt he bothered to put lifts in his slippers haha.
Brad Pitt says on 15/Jul/14
Judging by every half naked photo where he uses some kind of lifts in his slippers (!) he must be very concerned about his height. I honestly wouldn't be at shame being 5'10. It's average height for god's sake.
jamieorr4 says on 14/Jul/14
Alexa was he wearing lifts?
somebody says on 14/Jul/14
here is the picture:

Click Here
somebody says on 14/Jul/14
i think one can repeat it 100 times, pitt is NOT in thin-soled slippers in this picture, they are also lifts that give him around 4 cm.
just type in "brad pitt basketball" in google picture search, picture 3 in the list where he is topless, wearing shorts an no socks. same slippers, take a look at the place of his ankles, you can see that he is standing ON the shoes, not IN them, even the bulge of the inside wedge is visible
MarcusTheSwede says on 14/Jul/14
Need more Proof that Brad is 177-178cm at best???
Well here next to Jennifer Aniston listed 5ft4.75in.

Brad is NOT 180cm he is way shorter. Just look at picture below and also the picture next to George Clooney and Matt Damon.
Jennifer Aniston and Brad below. IF he would have been 180cm he would have towered her, he is at best. At best 177-178cm without shoes.

Click Here
MarcusTheSwede says on 14/Jul/14
Well The point is to repeat it again. 2 inch taller then five ten proofs Brad IS wihtout shoes at best..178cm. At best.
Not 180cm. Without shoes maxiumum 177-178cm
End of story
Emil 182.5 cm says on 13/Jul/14
180 cm imo. 177-178 is pushing it. He's still 1.25-1.5 inches taller than Clooney wearing thin soled shoes and 2 inches taller than Damon. Wearing lifts he's a little taller than Edward Norton and dont tell me Norton is 5'10 when he clearly is 2 inches taller
Alexa says on 13/Jul/14
He is over 180..I was standing by jolie and him at filmset 4,5 years ago..Im 189 so Im sure he is 180+
pauly e says on 11/Jul/14
that picture is totally tilted in Pitt's favor. I also have never been able to buy clooney at his listed height here. He looks like a weak 5'10 to me.
Parker says on 11/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede says on 10/Jul/14
So know finally take a good look on picture below. Brad Pitt in SHOES,

Yes, Brad in thin soled shoes looking 2 inches taller than 5'10 listed George Clooney......your point is what?
jamieorr4 says on 10/Jul/14
RisingForce i amit that 510 is possible but im not going over that
Vibram says on 10/Jul/14
2014 With 5ft11.25 Tom Hanks. Pitt Looks 5ft10. Click Here
and again: Click Here

Hanks with 5ft11.5 Di Caprio: Click Here
There is no way Pitt is 5ft11.
Heylo says on 10/Jul/14
Rob, i feel like you are ignoring the fact that Brad looks to be fairly close to Paltrow's height barefoot.

He can't be 5'11. 5'10 is what he is, he is often the same height as George Clooney and sometimes WAY above Clooney's height, such a big height difference because of lifts. He becomes 2 inches taller with lifts so it's not a surprise that he looks 183-84cm at some events.
MarcusTheSwede says on 10/Jul/14
For god sake.Brad is 177-178. Everbody that is serious about this height listing knows that.
Just look below for heaven sake. Look. Matt Damon George Clooney and Brad Pitt.
Brad is wearing shoes and Matt and George socks!!
Look at picture below or google Brad Pitt George Clooney and Matt Damon.
Anything Anything over 178 is ridicilous for Brad. Also both Brad and George Clooney have a inside joke that Brad is not that tall at all. At several times George has joked about Brad.s height and said..Oh he is "so tall"..and making fun out of all people that think he is as tall as in the movies. For god sake look at picture below. Evidence enough and a thousend other pictures also proves Brad is not taller then 177-178cm without shoes at best.At best
Everybody that been here for years and seen the pictures knows that. So tired of repeating this truth cause people dont see the evidence. So know finally take a good look on picture below. Brad Pitt in SHOES,althoug thin for a change..George and Matt wearing socks. Rest my case Brad is 177-178 without shoes. Ageering with Jamieorr and others that knows that also Rob seems to be facing this truth otherwise look below and see for yourself. 1 picture out of many that shows Brad with shoes next to Matt and George. Evidence enough. Thanks
Click Here
RisingForce says on 9/Jul/14
jamieorr, neither of us know what's in Pitt's shoes either, and it's funny how you think ONE imperfect picture not taken from a straight on angle with both Pitt and Paltrow dropping posture is the same thing as an exact measurement. It's amazing to me that people think just because you remove ONE variable being shoes that the other variables that factor in to height varying in photos no longer applies. FWIW, in that picture, I thought Pitt looked solid 5'10" range, maybe 5'10.5", but you can't tell the exact height difference from just one picture even if it's seemingly ideal for comparing. You can get a good idea with a series of good pictures or a good video, but lets say Pitt is a flat 5'11", him looking a half inch or so under that in one photo, much less a flawed photo is not even close to being unlikely, much less impossible.

Now that's what I find funny. I believe Pitt is between 5'10.5" and 5'11" from looking at a bunch of premiere pictures and videos as well as movies while taking note of his shoes, not just a single photo.
RisingForce says on 9/Jul/14
I agree DMeyer, I'd say 181 cm is more likely than 177 cm, though not more likely than 178 cm/5'10". Personally, I doubt he's as short s a flat 5'10" and I doubt he's any taller than 5'11" since early 90's Brad Pitt looked more solid 5'10" range than 5'11", and Pitt really didn't start looking 5'11"+ until the late 90's, plus I still have doubts a man over 5'11" would claim 5'11" even before they were famous when on the same form they claimed to be 2 years younger than they were when he was only 23-24 anyway. Personally, I think 5'11" flat is possible, but the highest I'd argue, while I suspect he might just as well be 5'10.5"-5'10.75" without his boots.

However, I do disagree with you about the shoes with Hague. I suspect Pitt might have some lifts there, but he looks 5'11.5" minimum in the video if Hague is 5'10" and can look 6'0" so Pitt should be 6'0.5"-6'1" in those boots making it highly unlikely he's anything below 5'10.5" barefoot.
jamieorr4 says on 9/Jul/14
rob don't you think its possible that he has hidden insoles in his shoes? and i honest don't know how anyone could think his over 510 after seeing him nexts to paltrow its beyond me
[Editor Rob: sometimes he will]
MarcusTheSwede says on 8/Jul/14
The picture below that Parker provided is evidence that Brad is not taller then Matt Damon OR George Clooney well to put it easy..just look at those heels. And also that in mind not whats inside the shoe itself the insole probably is a height insole or at least 1.5-2cm height inside or also the shoe itself could be build up inside also. But just the heel alone tells the truth. Just look at it and also look and compare with Angelina.s height. He is not taller then Matt or George Clooney. The majority of people here knows that due to so many pictures during the years that this almost get silly.
He is not 180cm. at best at best 178 without his shoes. He is shorter then Geena David without shoes and way shorter then Gwyneth Paltrow. Brad Pitt is not 180cm he is as Jamieorr4 and Alucard and me and so many else already told and discussed for ages not tall at all. Hollywood make him tall and lifts also. Its time for a well deserved downgrade. This is ridicilous height. Downgrade Rob. Thanks
qartt says on 8/Jul/14
I have a theory why Brad looks taller today than in his twenties. When I was young man I used to wear really flat trainers. This was due to loads of sport, thick trainers lead to more foot injuries. Now i wear similar shoes to men of my age (about 2 to 2.5cms) people argue with me if I say I am under 5'11 on evening. So I say 5'11.

When you are just above average, half inch seems to make a big difference. Could it be Brad was always 5'11, just like flat trainers rather than dress shoes. Also back in the late 80's boots and thick trainers were in fashion.
Dmeyer says on 8/Jul/14
Rob so you agree 181cm for pitt is likelier than 177-178cm
[Editor Rob: I think the odds would be better, I can't see a 177-8 range argument being stronger than a 181 argument.]
Dmeyer says on 8/Jul/14
Pitt shoes in the arch pics give near 4cm nothing more you can tell the foot is not lifted more than on the outside heel
jamieorr4 says on 8/Jul/14
Parker you don't know whats inside his shoes he could have hidden insoles and beside how do you explain how hes looks only a little taller than paltrow if not the same height?
Parker says on 7/Jul/14
As Arch Stanton posted previously, William Hague looks a solid 5'10 standing next to 6' Blair.
Click Here

Pitt has to be standing at minimum 6'1 in this pic, consistent with how he looked next to Orland Bloom
Click Here

Yes I agree Pitt is getting an easy 2 inches from his shoes, 3 I think is pushing it....4? Never.

He's between 5'10-5'11. Its strange how posters on Bieber,Stallone, Cruise and Pitt think they are all 5'2 with 8 inch lifts. There's only so much custom footwear will do unless you get a pair of frankensteins boots.
MarcusTheSwede says on 7/Jul/14
jamieorr4: =) Yes for sure. And also when he was in a episode of to Matt Le Blanc and David Schwimmer nearly every single shot in that episode Brad was filmed either from below to make him look taller and or he was leaning against a furniture everything to avoid to show his real height next to Matt Le Blanc and David Schwimmer. so yes as you said and based to a HUGE amount of pictures( Off Set ) and evidence. This listing needs to be downgraded it has been so many years everybody that like this page has argued and provided evidence so I think it wouldnt be more then right that this listing gets downgraded as you said=) lol
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jul/14
RisingForce the problem is your comparing him to other celebrities who also wear lifts and how is that accurate? and pauly e have see him with next gwyneth paltrow? i think thats accurate because they were in bare feet
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede thanks he definitely needs a downgrade lol
pauly e says on 7/Jul/14
I'll buy anything from 5'10.25 - 5'10.75.

I just can't see him at 5'9.
MarcusTheSwede says on 7/Jul/14
Alucard and Jamieorr4: Yes I agree so tired also of repeating same thing over and over Hollywood facade is not their real height agree with both of you.
jamieorr4 says on 6/Jul/14
rob i think you should downgrade him to atleast 510 he is barely taller than paltrow
jamieorr4 says on 6/Jul/14
RisingForce do you know whats in his shoes? i doubt you do its funny how people think 510.5 and 511 is possible when his barely taller than paltrow
Alucard says on 6/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede i keep saying this all the time, Pitt was always in the 5'9-5'9.5 max range, nothing more... Majority of people are really bad at estimating height and looking beyond the Hollyweird facade...
jamieorr4 says on 6/Jul/14
MarcusTheSwede i agree im a legit 179cm and brad built does look smaller than my i have all ways said he is 59 and the pictures of gwyneth paltrow say it all
MarcusTheSwede says on 5/Jul/14
Anything over 176cm is a joke he is clearly shorter then Geena Davis and have big problems with his height he is barely taller then Matt Damon and George Clooney and thats when Brad wears shoes and Matt and George had socks and Vans on. He always always wears lifts and also inside shoe is build up he always Also wears jeans and pants that goes over the back of the shoe and also heels on boots that are massive. Everyone that has been here for years knows Brad id not taller then Max 176 177cm without shoes and thats why we all have been looking for a downgrade. Look at every single off camera picture with for example Matt Damon George Clooney thats proof enough. Dont diiscuss how he looks in movies cause they make actors look how they want with camera angels and also adding inches with inside build up shoes and also he wears lifts offset at premiers and so on. He is a known liftwearer and always massive heels or boots. Great actor but his height without lifts and height soles at best same height as Matt Damon and George Clooney.Thanks
RisingForce says on 5/Jul/14
Actually, anything under 5'10" is a joke because Pitt is most likely taller than that. 5'10.5" to 5'11" makes the most sense. Pitt can, and often does look 6 feet. Many examples of this have been posted. I just posted the video recently where he looked at least as tall as Edward Norton, if not taller. He looked about 6 feet in Meet Joe Black next to Anthony Hopkins as well. He's obviously not above 5'11", but he's usually looked at least 5'11.5", often 6 feet the last 10-15 years due to his boots and posture. As for the Cruise picture, we can't see their entire bodies or shoes, and Cruise can look 5'8.5", even 5'9" at times due to lifts/elevator boots and posture.
Pauly e says on 2/Jul/14
Filippo says on 1/Jul/14
Brad can look 6' plus, huh? Click Here
Be serious. Everything over 5'10 is a joke..

hahaha....they are probably both on stilts canceling each other's lifts out.
Filippo says on 1/Jul/14
Brad can look 6' plus, huh? Click Here
Be serious. Everything over 5'10 is a joke..
Dmeyer says on 30/Jun/14
To me pitt can look 182.5-183cm shoes on with normal looking shoes and 184cm with 3.5-4cm cowboys on , on occasion can look 5ft 10
Chrism4 says on 27/Jun/14

Lion is nearly right, but B. Pitt is more in the range 1.78 - 1.80m -
Berek says on 25/Jun/14
Looks about 5' 10.5" in proportions and none of the photographic evidence, from bare foot shots with Paltrow thru blatantly heeled contemporary pictures, suggests anything else.
yjentia says on 25/Jun/14
Male actors lie about their height. Most men do, but at 6ft in tennis shoes I still tower over most of the men I've met that were "6'0"!
Lion says on 24/Jun/14
He is short, I met him. 174 cms + 6 cms heels (2-3 inside , 3 outside)...He appears 180, but with heels!
qartt says on 24/Jun/14
I have met William Hague he is 5'10. He is the MP for Richmond and Hambleton and has an office in Northallerton. My sister handed in a petition. He was slightly shorter than me less than an inch. I have always been measured at the doctors at 5'11. The doctors never measure like Rob, they just ask you to remove your shoes and put you up against a height chart and take off some height for your hair.

I thought he was half inch shorter than me, he probably had slightly more footwear as i like low heeled dress shoes.

Pitt Hague video would put me half way in between Pitt and Hague. You could account for this with shoes e.g. Pitt is at least my height unless he had some sort of lifts in his shoes.
jamieorr4 says on 24/Jun/14
Dustin M was he in normal shoes?
Dustin M. says on 23/Jun/14
He is 5' 10". Seen him many times
your friend 196 - 197cm says on 23/Jun/14
One of the biggest lift wearers about. 5'11 morning height.
Haylee Jen says on 21/Jun/14
Its funny I saw Mr.and Mrs.Smith last night and he was listed at 6'1 lol. He can pull off looking it though. I think he is 5'10.5-5'11 tops
RisingForce says on 21/Jun/14
Seahawksfan, I have no idea what you're going on about, but most here know Norton is taller than Pitt. Click Here That's actually one of the times where Pitt looks under 5'11" and more 5'10" range.

Pitt in boots was able to look at least as tall as Norton, though maybe a bit taller. Click Here You see them side by side at about 6:18 and Pitt generally seemed slightly taller that night, but I'm not sure if that's because Pitt's posture is better. You also see their footwear at about 9:17. Pitt has boots, Norton has a dress shoe with a pretty decent heel, probably at least an inch and Mel Gibson has cowboy boots. Here's Pitt with Mel Gibson that night on video Click Here Pitt looks 1", maybe 1.5" taller, imo. Mel is at least 5'9", and I have no trouble buying the 5'9.5" he's listed at here. Norton could be 6'0" as he's listed at here, though 5'11.5" wouldn't surprise me either, but I'd have trouble believing he's any shorter than that. Either way, assuming no lifts, Gibson would probably be 5'11" give or take a quarter inch in his cowboy boots, and Norton would be 6'0.5"-6'1" range in those shoes so Pitt would seem to be 6'0.5" absolute minimum in those boots, maybe 6'1". I'm not saying Pitt isn't wearing lifts too, but another example of why I see no chance he's under 5'10" and why I can't see anything under 5'10.5" myself, and actually, the guy who looks most suspicious as far as lifts there is Gibson. When you see Gibson walking in his cowboy boots at the end, it almost seems like he's walking in heels, so I wouldn't be surprised at all if he had an extra lift inside those boots.
RisingForce says on 21/Jun/14
Rob, I actually don't know that many men who hate Brad Pitt. Maybe more when he was younger and girls went nuts over him, but not so much now. I personally don't mind Pitt at all either. He's done some good movies.

As far as the big guy, no use in trying to judge someones height when we haven't seen them beside anyone else with a known height. Pizzaman, I'd say Statham is probably about 5'9", but can seem a bit shorter because he slouches, but while it's difficult to tell exactly because of Pitt's hat, Pitt looks closer to 5'11" there than 5'10", imo.
Pizzaman says on 21/Jun/14
Oops, and the link of Hague and Cameron:

Click Here
Pizzaman says on 19/Jun/14
Actually the guy on the total left seems more like a 6'2" guy to me, but yeah, very hard to judge on such a pic, could even be 6'5" though, hell idk. I do think the most right soldier is Shia LaBeouf, listed as 175 but most agree on 173-174, who looks 4 cm shorter, but again, hard to compare with such angles.

For the lil side discussion on Hague, his eyes are definitely under Cameron's lips, although his head is a tiny bit down, but he is at the least 3" shorter. So can't be much more than 5'9 I'd say, maybe 5'9.5".
Arch Stanton says on 19/Jun/14
Pitt's hair seems to grow a lot faster than the average male. He'll have extremely short back and side one day and then you'll see a photo 2 or 3 weeks later and it'll have completely grown back. Then 6 months to a year down the line it'll be shoulder length again LOL.
[Editor Rob: women love him, men hate him...I think, actually I don't mind him]
Pizzaman says on 19/Jun/14
Saw Snatch lately and as with any older movie Pitt again seems 5'10" range. Compared to Jason Statham who is most likely 174:

Click Here
Click Here
Click Here

Given Statham is looking a lil bit down in all 3 photos and also taking in mind Pitt's hat, I can't see much more difference than 4 cm, so again 178-179 for Pitt.
Seahawksfan 187-188 CM. says on 19/Jun/14
By 6'0 Edward Norton:

Click Here

He's six feet tall, and I was there (neither were in footwear).
Arch Stanton says on 18/Jun/14
Pizzaman says on 15/Jun/14
He seems fairly short here.

Click Here

Not really if you compare him to the guys on the right. The big bald guy is probably 6'5" or so. He looks like that guy Heidi Klum is dating who looks 6'5" range.
Arch Stanton says on 18/Jun/14
Hague looks nearer 5 ft 10 to me generally, 5'9.5" might be a good shout.
Pizzaman says on 16/Jun/14
Arch, compared to Cameron, Hague is definitely just a 5'9, making Pitt once again 5'11, but again also in bigger footwear..
Dmeyer says on 16/Jun/14
Pitt managed to look 5ft 11 wearing normal shoes
Pizzaman says on 15/Jun/14
He seems fairly short here.

Click Here
RisingForce says on 15/Jun/14
Good find, Arch. If Hague is 5'10" then Pitt looks at least 5'11.5", possibly 6'0" in the video. However, Pitt has a footwear advantage, and may be wearing lifts as well. Just look at the first picture, and then the 4th of them in mid-stride. In the latter picture in particular, his lower legs look unusual. Even if he is wearing lifts there, it'd be tough to see his boots big enough to make him look that tall if he wasn't at least strong 5'10" range.
Arch Stanton says on 15/Jun/14
Rob how does he do it at times though? I mean William Hague is around 5'10, Jolie in heels too, and in that top photo in the link I sent he actually pulls off looking like a 6'1 er!! In the other photo he's looking minimum 6 ft too. Yet people are still saying he's 5'9! I honestly don't blame you for listing him at 5'11.5-6 ft at one time as he tends to pull of looking more that than 5'11 or under. Is it Cuban heels which explain it? Lifts? I'm not so sure. In the early 90s in films like Thelma and Louise and Across the Tracks though he really did seem like a 5'9 guy but he suddenly seemed to "grow" by Interview with the Vampire. He definitely had an easy inch on Rick Schroeder though.
[Editor Rob: I think he has worked on his posture and remember with a small lift and editorial photos (published in your favour - see the one with benedict can bet there were more takne) you can suddenly start looking taller than expected.]
jon says on 15/Jun/14
Wow, there are people here saying he's 5'9? I wonder, do the people saying that actually believe it, or are they just downgrading him out of some weird sense of obligation like people on this site often do?
RisingForce says on 15/Jun/14
Dmeyer, I agree with you that he's in the 5'10.5"-5'11" range, but Pitt has never pulled off looking as tall as Tarantino with equal posture. The only times Pitt even in boots looked as tall as Tarantino was when Tarantino was slouching noticeably and dropping in height.
RisingForce says on 12/Jun/14
That's interesting, Dural. Then it is possible Schroder is only 5'9" since many are done growing by 17, though still young enough that it's not implausible he reached Rob's listing of 5'9.5". Either way, I'd say Pitt had him by about an inch in the scenes I've seen from Across The Tracks.

jamieorr4, Pitt has worn boots with 2" heels at times in movies like Spy Game, but that's rare. His boots usually probably add closer to 1.5", but with lifts, and I suspect he does wear them, though I'm not as sure as I am that say Stallone or Cruise wear them, then he probably gets around a 2" boost over barefoot height a good amount of the time. That wouldn't be implausible, but no, I don't think 5'9.5" is possible. 5'10" is the lowest I think is plausible and certainly no less, imo. Even if Pitt does get a 2" boost from his shoes, he usually looks taller than just a 5'11" guy, and often looks closer to 6 feet, and on rare occasions slightly taller. So even accounting for his posture, he probably measures close to, if not 6'1" in his bigger shoes, so even a 2" boost would make him more strong 5'10" range guy, if not 5'11". If he was just 5'9.5" and wore 2" lifts, he'd struggle to even look 5'11" with lifts and posture, and that clearly isn't the case looking at most of his red carpet appearances and movies the last 10-15 years.
Dmeyer says on 12/Jun/14
Pitt has managed to look 5'11 Like 6ft shoes on in low cut shoes without ROom for lifts Like with Tarantino in cannes were you can see the entire shoe or with 5'9.75 ejiofor pitt had normal 1in low cut dress shoes and looks légit 5'11 , he can look as low as 5ft10 with Tarantino and paltrow at Times , he can also look as tall as Quentin when in cowboy dress shoes . There is énaugh évidence to show he cant be under 5´10.5 or over 5'11
Arch Stanton says on 12/Jun/14
For all those people claiming he is 5 ft 9-10 Click Here William Hague is actually around 5 ft 10. I compared him to a few people previously. Pitt is pulling off looking over 5 ft 11 in comparison.
Dmeyer says on 11/Jun/14
Personally i think pitt Gets no mire than 1.5in from his shoes you could argue he has a 1-1.5in lifts that give somewere so he Will get 2.3-2.6in he has to be 5'10-10.25
Rhonda says on 10/Jun/14
RisingForce you have a solid knowledge on heights.I think he is 5ft11
cole says on 10/Jun/14
@jamieorr4: Going from "176-177 cm" to looking near 185 cm isn't possible in the kind of footwear he's wearing. He might get a good 5-6 cm or so from some of the more extreme shoes (if you can even call it that) I've seen him in.

He looked the same height or taller than Benedict Cumberbatch (who's always wearing more or less regular dress shoes) in some shots, and as shown with Rob, he's at least near 182 cm. So again, Brad's more than 182 cm in "lifts". I must say though, I've yet to see him in any outrageously large heeled footwear in 2014, and he still looks about 180 cm.

He has put down 5'10 and 5'11 as his height, and between those two marks is what he can look - closer to 5'11 more often than not I'd say.
Mathew says on 10/Jun/14
Roughly 5'10" barefoot, give or take a wee bit. Not short, but not tall either.
jamieorr4 says on 10/Jun/14
RisingForce do you think hes getting 2 inches in lifts? if so do you 59.5 is possibly? because i think in hes lifts he could be 182cm
Dural says on 10/Jun/14

The video was posted several years ago, he was measured 175cm barefoot/in socks when he was 17, 100%.
Cass says on 9/Jun/14
legit 5'10.5 for me
Dmeyer says on 9/Jun/14
The shortest i could see brad is 5'10 3/8" about 179cm
Dmeyer says on 9/Jun/14
The shortest i could see brad is 5'10 3/8" about 179cm
Shaz says on 9/Jun/14
He is a legit 5'10.4 guy. Yes, that sounds oddly specific, but he is a strong 5'10, which is why he can look 5'11 in relatively flat shoes, and around 6ft. in dress shoes or boots. He has an athletic build, and camera tricks make him seem much taller (EG. Inglourous Basterds).
jamieorr4 says on 9/Jun/14
RisingForce the main reason is the pictures with gwyneth they are both in barefeet
Filippo says on 8/Jun/14
It's pretty hard for a 5'10.5 or 5'11 man to look as short as 5'9, dmeyer.. Even near Jennifer Aniston.. Indeed, if you look at old pictures, in his youngest days brad appeared average a lot more often than tall.
Recently, he seems to grow taller every movie. Must be a very late bloomer.. Or a legit 5'10.
jamieorr4 says on 8/Jun/14
dmeyer ok maybe 510 is possible but his body frame make me doubt his even 510
RisingForce says on 8/Jun/14
I haven't heard that about Schroder, Dural. Would be interested to see a source, though as you said it still leaves variables such as time and his age since I believe most late growth spurts are exaggerated, but you can still grow a bit at 17. Most measurements will be closer to your low than high so even if Schroder was just 5'9", that would still make Pitt about 5'10" in Across The Tracks, and I don't think 5'10" is impossible, I just can't see much of a chance for anything lower, and I doubt he's below 5'10.5" myself. But I'm fine discussing 5'10" even if I disagree. I just can't see the 5'9" stuff at all honestly.

jamieorr4, I'm not sure how that addresses what I'm saying. I don't necessarily doubt Pitt wears lifts. In fact, I suspect he has at times since some of the candid photos Dural has posted have shown Pitt's legs looking a bit short compared to his torso and that's never the case at premieres and in movies, at least later in his career. But Pitt would need to consistently be getting a boost somewhere between 3.5"-4.5" to be just 5'9", and that's just not possible in the boots he wears. Even if he managed it, his lower legs wouldn't just look funny, they'd look ridiculous, and the size of the shoes would be so ridiculous to conceal such enormous lifts. That's why you see Downey with 3" heels, a platform of 1" or so on the front, the ridiculous angle of his foot and how out of proportion his legs look. It's not easy to get a 3"+ boost, and those who do, will look ridiculous.
RisingForce says on 7/Jun/14
jamieorr4, but a 5'9" guy isn't going to look 5'11.5"-6'0" like Pitt often easily does without boots MUCH bigger than what Pitt wears and lifts so obvious to the point there'd be no discussion about whether he is or isn't wearing lifts. In fact, I'm not sure what shoes could make a 5'9" man look as tall as Pitt usually does short of something like these. Click Here
dmeyer says on 7/Jun/14
jamieorr4 since a 5 ft 9 guy can look 5 ft 10 5 ft 11 this is whi pitt cant be 5 ft 9 and he can look 5 ft 11-6ft more often as he does 5 ft 10 flat or 5 ft 9 , therefore 5 ft 10.5-11 is wath he is , also you can tell his footwear isnt the 2-3in type more 1-2in tops
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jun/14
RisingForce the thing is though i think most celebrities lie about there heights and do anything to make them selfs look taller
Dural says on 7/Jun/14
Wasn't Schroder measured 175cm when he was 17 years old. This could be a morning measurement as well and we don't know if he was fully grown back than.
jamieorr4 says on 7/Jun/14
what you guys got to understand is a 59 guy with good foot wear can pull of looking 510 to 511

All heights are barefeet Estimates, derived from quotations by celebrities, official websites, agency resumes, actors I've met at conventions and pictures/films.

Vital statistics like weight, shoe or bra size measurements have been taken from quotes by the actors themselves in interviews, resumes or articles.

Celebrity Fan Photos and Agency Pictures of stars are © to their respective owners.