ANDREA[ITA] says on 6/Feb/12
Did he look one inch taller than Challenge #13 (considering he has 0.5 inches more than you, in shoes)?
[Editor Rob: when I saw him at breakfast I thought he was 6ft 3 range, although on his own he can look anywhere 6ft 3-4 range.]
Josh B says on 30/Jan/12
@ChiasmataX
I'm not sure that would help, you'd have to take into account his footwear advantage as well as Rob's drop in posture. ChiasmataX says on 29/Jan/12
Triplescrew or Rob should do a comparison of Jim Parrack and the guy from challenge 13. Jim Parrack will look about 6'3 for sure. Kezza67 says on 24/Jan/12
Just saw Jim in Supernatural. Standing next to 6ft 4 Jared Padalecki he looks 6ft 3 and a half. steven says on 14/Jan/12
yeh 193cm at night in 1.5" shoe before bed. goal height 6 foot says on 12/Jan/12
193 at night 193.9 rest of the day andy says on 11/Jan/12
If you think this guys less than 6'4" check Mamun with Richard Anderson whos listed here as 6'3". Either this guys as listed or Anderson aint 6'3". Know which listin im goin for. andy says on 11/Jan/12
Tall dude, the footwear advantage makes it debatable but the guy looks 6'4" to me Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 4/Jan/12
Looks 191cm(6"3) with Rob
but might be 192-193cm up
straight?
[Editor Rob: that is him upstraight, he's standing better than me ;)] Lillo thomas says on 31/Dec/11
Considering all factors he is 6-3 max . The guy is claiming his height in shoes. Shaun says on 4/Dec/11
I'm not sure how somebody could think this guy was the same height as Justin Hartley. Look at the head levels! No posture or footwear difference would make this guy look as much taller. If he's not 6'4" he's surely an easy 6'3". Shaun says on 4/Dec/11
Rob did he look taller in person than #5?
[Editor Rob: yeah I think he's taller than #5] Shaun says on 4/Dec/11
ChiasmataX says on 1/Dec/11
Nice picture Triplescrew, it really proves my point that without his 1.1 inch shoes Barrack will be about 189 cm + or - 1cm at most. 193cm is kind of off.
What? First of all he only has 0.5 inches foot advantage over Rob. He's looking 192cm range in Triplescrew's comparison. Accounting for footwear he's still 6 ft 3. The chances of this guy measuring the same or shorter than #5. Can't see it, unless he is wearing big lifts. Sean73 says on 1/Dec/11
The new Toxic Avenger! ChiasmataX says on 1/Dec/11
Nice picture Triplescrew, it really proves my point that without his 1.1 inch shoes Barrack will be about 189 cm + or - 1cm at most. 193cm is kind of off. Triplescrew says on 29/Nov/11
Click Here
Rough comparison between challenge 5 guy and Parrack. Josh B says on 29/Nov/11
I thought he was the tall man from Dragon's Den for a moment, then realized he's not an actor and is much taller than Jim as well. :) Physics Enemy says on 25/Nov/11
Rob lists Parrack 6' 4" because he claimed it, but Rob said he thought Parrack looked the same height as Bruno/Sorbo; both listed 6' 3". Parrack is a weak 6' 2" in reality. With Jenny he's scraping 6' 2" and 1-2 mm shy if his posture is beating Jenny's (likely).
Yes, he 'looks' taller due to posture, footwear, arms on shoulders to push Rob/Jenny down; usual tricks height conscious celebrities use to look taller. ChiasmataX says on 24/Nov/11
@ Rob I think he's as tall as height challenge # 5 guy without shoes, he's definitely taller than # 8 dude by a few cm.
[Editor Rob: the number 8 guy is a tall guy with good posture generally.
and if a celebrity would probably fool some to think he's 6ft 3.] Shaun says on 24/Nov/11
ChiasmataX says on 24/Nov/11
If he's barefoot he's more or less near the height of the dude from height challenge # 8 as seen here.
Click Here
Again the question is why does Rob have this guy at 6 ft 4 if he's way off it?
[Editor Rob: he's taller than #8 is, how much though is the question.] ChiasmataX says on 24/Nov/11
Click Here Is the alternative link just in case. I messed up a bit as Rob is a few cm with Parrack compare to the Rob with the height challenge # 8 dude who is 186.8cm. The point is Parrack is about 188cm without the shoes. ChiasmataX says on 24/Nov/11
If he's barefoot he's more or less near the height of the dude from height challenge # 8 as seen here.
Click Here Shaun says on 23/Nov/11
The whole point of this website though is to expose the "magic two inches" and list celebrities as they likely are BAREFOOT. Physics Enemy says on 22/Nov/11
Exactly ChiasmataX, he's 6' 2" MAX, might even be 1-2 mm below. Rob's stadiometer pic with Jenny shows he's just over 6' 3" in his shoes + stadiometer error. Knock that all off and he's barely 6' 2". Everyone's height gets inflated. Shaun says on 22/Nov/11
But if you look at most listings Rob picks up on the "magic two inches" like George Lazenby etc. Remember Rob has met loads of 6'2" guys Physics and I think he is used to knowing how a legit 6'2" looks on him. Shaun says on 22/Nov/11
I honestly don't know though Physics how tall this guy often looks. But in these photos to me he does appear to be around 194cm. I don't know I haven't checked him against charts but he looks about 8 inches taller than Rob. I'm sorry but that's how he appears to me. Remember Physics I've mostly been within 1 cm on all the height challenges so I'm not the worst estimator of height either, I think I'm very good with my estimates generally and I'm sure Rob would agree with me on that one. Yes, I can be fooled occaisonally by footwear and posture but I honestly can't see this guy as low as a flat 6'2". What I want to know though is why he has him at 6'4" when he said he looked the same height as Frank Bruno?? ChiasmataX says on 22/Nov/11
Just compare this guy to Brandon Routh who is listed at 189cm on this site and you guys won't see much difference. In fact, the 186.8cm guy from height challenge # 8 is about as tall as Routh and Parrack. ChiasmataX says on 22/Nov/11
@Shaun people always over-estimate once you are about 178cm legit bare-feet and above. They thought a legit 178cm guy 6 feet, a 6 feet guy a 6 feet 2 guy and so on. I think Jim Parrack is a legit BARE-FEET 6 feet 2 guy (188cm) so once again Rob is probably over-estimated him by that magic 2 inches. Just compare this guy to the legit 186.8cm guy from height challenge # 8 and you will see.
Shaun says on 20/Nov/11
@Physics and Alex. If Parrack was 6'2" flat why does Rob have him at 6'4"? ChiasmataX says on 22/Nov/11
You guys are way off he's not 193cm consider his shoes advantage. In the pic he's about 189cm (so he's 188cm barefeet) guy considered that Rob dropped his posture a bit (that's why Rob is shorter than Jenny). Just compare this guy and Jenny(not Rob because he dropped his posture) with the legit 186.8cm guy and Rob from the height challenge. Physics Enemy says on 21/Nov/11
Shaun, Romero is a strong 6' 3" (see my comment on his page). Using Matt's stadiometer pic, he's 6' 3.75" (after deducting 2 mm error); in shoes. So 6' 2.75" barefoot. Add a little for posture and he's strong 6' 3" (1-2 mm over). He's got just over an inch on Parrack. Physics Enemy says on 21/Nov/11
Shaun - I've just looked at the George Romero pic with Rob. That's an interesting one, it's almost the exact opposite of Parrack. He's got loose, hunched posture with no footwear advantage, with Rob standing tall. I can't state his height. Physics Enemy says on 21/Nov/11
LOL, that height chart with Jenny and Parrack was made by Rob, not me Shaun. I was just linking you to Rob's pic. I'd rather trust someone who uses height charts since it's accurate.
The reason Mamoa is easily taller than Parrack is because Mamoa towers Rob with smallish footwear and no posture advantage. Parrack knows what he's doing with his posture and arms, he's trying to look as tall as possible.
He's a 6' 2" MAX guy 'looking' taller at a glance in these pics. Also, Alex agrees with me that Parrack is 6' 2" and Alex is a great estimator of height. Physics Enemy says on 21/Nov/11
He's 6' 2" MAX, I already proved it (Rob did). Just look at the pic I linked. He's just over 6' 3" in footwear inc stadiometer error, so he's 6´ 2" tops.
You're the one coming across as arrogant because you were telling people they were miles out when he's barely 6' 2". Yes, you got fooled by posture, footwear, etc. But he's nowhere near 6' 4".
I'm not sure why you think/state Rob is the best height estimator. From the height challenges he's been pretty close on most, but he hasn't been the best. Infact, I mentioned that he upgraded all of the volunteers by a little.
Rob said he looked the same height as Frank Bruno. That's 6' 3". But in reality once you deduct footwear advantage, posture advantage and look at the pic I linked, he's 6' 2" MAX.
Rob comes up to his moustache area because Rob is losing height in posture and footwear. If you read my posts you'd have understood that by now, it's obvious. Physics Enemy says on 21/Nov/11
He's 6' 2" MAX, I already proved it (Rob did). Just look at the pic I linked. He's just over 6' 3" in footwear inc stadiometer error, so he's 6´ 2" tops.
You're the one coming across as arrogant because you were telling people they were miles out when he's barely 6' 2". Yes, you got fooled by posture, footwear, etc. But he's nowhere near 6' 4".
I'm not sure why you think/state Rob is the best height estimator. From the height challenges he's been pretty close on most, but he hasn't been the best. Infact, I mentioned that he upgraded all of the volunteers by a little.
Rob said he looked the same height as Frank Bruno. That's 6' 3". But in reality once you deduct footwear advantage, posture advantage and look at the pic I linked, he's 6' 2" MAX.
Rob comes up to his moustache area because Rob is losing height in posture and footwear. If you read my posts you'd have understood that by now, it's obvious. Tman says on 21/Nov/11
1,91m Rob thought he could be nearer to 1,89-90m kevin Sorbo Shaun says on 20/Nov/11
@Physics and Alex. If Parrack was 6'2" flat why does Rob have him at 6'4"? Doesn't the fact that the best height estimater on here has stood right next to this guy and thinks he's near 6'4"? If you didn't think he was 6'4" Rob, you would have listed him at 191-2cm? Maybe 192cm would be more accurate? Shaun says on 20/Nov/11
Try looking at a George Romero height chart with Rob and try telling me he is 6'2" flat. Shaun says on 20/Nov/11
Rob comes up to his moustache area. Given that I don't compare people to the precise mm on height charts as you do Physics I was judging by the George Romero picture in which Rob is about that level on him and he's 6'4.5". Parrack, illusion or not looks 6'4.5" to me here, maybe its his big ass head and build that makes it seem so but accounting for footwear advantage he seemed 6'4". He certainly doesn't look shoter in this picture to Jason Mamoa who you agreed physics was 6'3.5"-6'4". Lowest I could buy is 6'3". Shaun says on 19/Nov/11
Physics you are starting to come across as an arrogant, obnoxious ****. I think he's a genuine 6'4" and even if he was 6'2" that's hardly "absolutely miles out". Rob, what are the chances of him being a flat 6'2" as Physics seems to be certain of? I could buy 6'3" but 6'2" does look extreme. To me he has the frame of a strong 6'3" guy and close to 6'4".
[Editor Rob: I saw jim up close the first time at breakfast and didn't think he was as tall as he said, but on his own he did look nearer 6ft 4 than 2.] Alex says on 19/Nov/11
6'2 to maybe 6'2.5 max taking account his 1/2 inch footwear and posture. Physics Enemy says on 18/Nov/11
To clarify: In this pic Click Here he's a little over 6' 3" in his 1.1" footwear. Knock that off and knock off 2mm error and it's 6' 2" or a mm under. Draw a line from the top of his head to the stadiometer, you can see the markings. He's listed 2" too high and Rob proved it with this pic. Physics Enemy says on 18/Nov/11
Look: Click Here
Draw a line across from Parrack's head to the stadiometer. He's a little over 6ft 3 against the stadiometer; in 1.1" footwear. Knock that off, you get a strong 6' 2". Knock off 2mm error and you get barely 6' 2"; maybe a mm under.
6' 2" flat or just under it. Shaun is absolutely miles out LOL. Physics Enemy says on 18/Nov/11
Any tall guy can 'look' 6' 4" with a big footwear advantage and a big posture advantage. Smoke and mirrors. Knock all of that off and use the stadiometer pics of Jenny/Rob for reference and he's not a mm over 6' 2". Rob already proved that when he created the pic of what a 6' 4" guy with 0.5" footwear should 'look like' next to a 5' 8" Jenny in flat sneakers. Parrack was miles short. And he had 0.7" over Jenny, not 0.5". He's a flat 6' 2" and may even be a mm under.
The right photo is even more deceptive, where he props himself up whilst pushing Rob downwards using his arm, stands military, AND has 0.5" shoe advantage. This guy obviously took tips from Stallone and has an inflated 6' 4" claim to match.
6' 2" or even a mm under 6' 2". Physics Enemy says on 18/Nov/11
Shaun, I'm laughing. You're telling people they can't judge height! This guy is a flat 6' 2". Rob is dropping a boatload of height in both pics, especially the left pic. Parrack is propping himself up in the right pic. He also has a BIG footwear advantage over both, especially Jenny.
As usual, Matt is up to his old tricks by assuming Jenny/Rob's barefoot heights are equal to their in-shoe heights. He also ignores Parrack's posture advantage relative to Rob's (as Parrack props himself up) in the right pic he uses.
This guy is a flat 6' 2". Matt got 191 cm; he forgot 0.6" for Rob's footwear and another 0.6" or so for Parrack propping himself up/posture advantage in the right pic (moreso propping). Deduct that and you get 6' 2" flat.
Also; Rob created a pic comparing Parrack to a legit 6' 4" guy with 0.5" extra footwear next to the stadiometer vs Jenny. Based on that, Parrack is a shade over 6' 2" reading off from the stadiometer. BUT, he has 0.7" footwear over Jenny, not 0.5"; giving him 6' 2" flat.
I also can't believe Rob got insulted when he was called shorter than Jenny and 'face it' etc when he's clearly always a fraction taller than Jenny. Fools. Physics Enemy says on 18/Nov/11
He's doing a good job of standing tall whilst making sure Rob can't stand straight. He has 0.7" footwear over Jenny; judge height against Jenny rather than Rob. Rob's dropping a boatload in the left pic and medium amount in the right pic. These are very flattering photos for the guy, height-wise. LAN Jiao says on 8/Nov/11
johno, 2nd picture rob standing tall with jim standing straight thought if we use by math which for rob 173.3 add on his converse 1.5cm rob is 174.8cm(5'8.75) and if you look closer jim had rob by 18cm. 18 add 174.8cm which is straight to flat 6'4. assume his dress shoe is 3cm deducted out he is about 190cm so 6'2.75 , he could be 6'2.5 dip into evening. 6'2 is too low unless he wore hidden lifts dress shoe with jenny rob he could be 6'2 a chances.
rob 5'8-1/8
jim 6'2.5-6'2.75 johno says on 5/Nov/11
Matt says on 9/Nov/10
when i used the picture on the right, jim came up to 191cm on the height comparison photo
[Editor Rob: Maybe This is how a 6ft 4 guy would look, considering he had 0.5 inch more footwear.]
The above picture proves my point. He would be luck to be 6'3. 6.2.5 is closer to the truth johno says on 5/Nov/11
The first picture is an example of when someone has an over you, thus reducing the others height. First picture rob reaches the bottom lip of parrack which wouldn't automatically mean 8 inches since, parrack has smaller head plus, 0.5 inch shoe advantage. 6'4 would be only appliable there if parrack head was the same length as robs and the shoe advantage wasn't there plus if rob wasn't being pushed down. To man 'ifs' for a 6'4
The second picture is more fair, taking footwear into consideration, he looks 6 - 6.5 inches taller then you rob
Rob 5'8.25
jim 6'2 - 6'2.5 johno says on 5/Nov/11
The first picture is an example of when someone has an over you, thus reducing the others height. First picture rob reaches the bottom lip of parrack which wouldn't automatically mean 8 inches since, parrack has smaller head plus, 0.5 inch shoe advantage. 6'4 would be only appliable there if parrack head was the same length as robs and the shoe advantage wasn't there plus if rob wasn't being pushed down. To man 'ifs' for a 6'4
The second picture is more fair, taking footwear into consideration, he looks 6 - 6.5 inches taller then you rob
Rob 5'8.25
jim 6'2 - 6'2.5 LAN Jiao says on 31/Oct/11
padalecki is dead on 6'4.25 max. 6'4 flat jeff goldblum is above 3/4in taller than parrack. so he came nothing above 6'3-1/4 at best. Triplescrew says on 27/Oct/11
Padalecki was taller than him in supernatural by a little bit. Michael says on 23/Oct/11
He has a long forehead. LAN Jiao says on 14/Oct/11
Thanks chameleon. I would have gave jim fraction under 191cm also. Chameleon says on 12/Oct/11
LAN you are right again, he is 191 no more. LAN Jiao says on 28/Sep/11
ignore the shoe advantage and bare parrack with rob without shoe , i cant imagine parrack could reach up over 191cm at best. he stand pretty straight here that account him not taller than 6ft3 and could be shorter than adam baldwin next to jenny alone. Shaun says on 26/Sep/11
James says on 4/May/11
[Editor Rob: he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.]
Rob sorry don't mean to be annoying but he probably did lie when he claimed 6'4. even 6'3 guys can round and claim 6'4 heck i knew a 6'3 guy in college who claimed he was 6'5.......
The lowest he could possibly be is 6'3.5" barefoot.
[Editor Rob: but I could always be wrong, height estimates are never a certainty ;)
you only have to look at the estimates or how tall actors look to different users, sometimes you have people seeing one guy at 5ft 11 while others think he is 6ft 0.5!] Shaun says on 26/Sep/11
Actually looks close to 6'5", 6'4.5" with footwear advantage, this guy looks a legit 6'4", he's big. ANDREA[ITA] says on 19/Sep/11
He looks around 6'4 with shoe advantage, barefoot he's goota be around 6'3.5! Deuce says on 18/Sep/11
He looks 6'4(193) to me lan_jiao says on 12/Sep/11
rampage, 6ft4.25 was 193cm so 194 you mention jim 6"4.5 but speaking honest, next to rob on right picture up here he only look 6ft3.25
barefoot probably still 6ft3.25 despite up here rob was abit closer to camera. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 8/Sep/11
Actually he looks 6"4.25(194cm) in the picture.
Barefoot is probably between 6"3.5-6"3.75? Alex says on 4/Sep/11
192cm considering the slight footwear advantage Gaga says on 2/Sep/11
Rob, why is jenny always taller than you in photos? Maybe she has better psture i guess, i thnk she is a better refence than you in some photos.
Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 2/Sep/11
Looks 6"4(193cm) with Rob but has a shoe advantage. Somewhere between 6"3-6"4 barefoot I reckon, probably 192cm. Shaun says on 16/Aug/11
Anybody who thinks this guy is only 191cm really cannot judge height. This is how a legit 6'4" looks next to a legit 5'8". Looks 6'4.5" in comparison here but hr has footwear advantage cancels out to 6'4" flat. Hansen says on 1/Aug/11
after rob stand straight up i don see 18cm under jim. between rob and jim 17-17.5cm. if rob was about 5ft8-1/4 in picture here therefore jim could be close 6ft3.25 , then about a 1.5cm shoe advantage he should be only 6ft2.5 barefoot in photo. Radek says on 29/Jul/11
jenny is taller than you Rob, accept it, If you are 173 cm ( 5'8) she should be upgraded to 5'9 (175 cm)
[Editor Rob: click the link showing our footwear...damn it rob is taller by a fraction when both are standing similarly :) that photo is thirty minutes before the jim one.] Chameleon says on 30/Jun/11
Correct, he looks 191cm in the fotos. Ali says on 28/Jun/11
Rob it looks like he has 7-8 inches on you.
So 6'3-6'4 seems correct, but he has 0.5 inch footwear
advantage. So I guess he is 6'3-6'3.5. 191cm seems correct. Teffy says on 27/Jun/11
Rob, why jenny always looks a little taller than you....??
[Editor Rob:look at the link at top of page, that is thirty minutes before this double shot, she is smaller at that moment...if jenny appears taller either I have a worse stance, she is nearer the camera, and most of the time she has thicker hair aswell, sometimes about 2cm more ;-)
] Terryman says on 26/Jun/11
Parrack: 1,92 meters Chameleon says on 22/Jun/11
Looks 191cm James says on 12/Jun/11
Looks 6'4 in pics Lenad is sexy says on 11/Jun/11
6'4ish Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 27/May/11
His long head makes him look 6ft5... thebad7 says on 23/May/11
I hope to see him in more projects after his success on TRUE BLOOD. Like other posters mentioned, he looks to be just a bit shorter than Alexander Skarsgard. I would say more of a weak 6'4"--6'3 1/2" sounds about right for him, but in the morning hours, I would bet he scrapes 6'4". I think you've got it, Rob.
tb7 James says on 4/May/11
does that mean rob that you might be wrong on your estimate for daniel cudmore being a legit 6'7 since other users think he looks more 6'6 in the photos?
No offense either but I could imagine it would be very hard for a 5'8 individual to estimate the height of someone who is over 6'5.
[Editor Rob: I've said before if I know 6ft 3 and 6ft 5 men (having measured some) then it can help with trying to guage how tall others look.
Cudmore remember had 0.4 inches less footwear when I saw him but still looked taller than how 6ft 5 men look from my viewpoint.] James says on 4/May/11
[Editor Rob: he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.]
Rob sorry don't mean to be annoying but he probably did lie when he claimed 6'4. even 6'3 guys can round and claim 6'4 heck i knew a 6'3 guy in college who claimed he was 6'5.......
[Editor Rob: but I could always be wrong, height estimates are never a certainty ;)
you only have to look at the estimates or how tall actors look to different users, sometimes you have people seeing one guy at 5ft 11 while others think he is 6ft 0.5!] Chameleon says on 4/May/11
191cm for this guy Truthman says on 3/May/11
He is bit shorter than Goldblum
Click Here
Pause at 4:26 James says on 3/May/11
okay rob so did he appear taller in person than he does in the picture?
[Editor Rob: he is similar size to kevin sorbo and frank bruno in person, but he says 6ft 4.] Matt says on 30/Apr/11
Aaron (6'5 says on 21/Apr/11
Take into account the footware advantage, and then check out the height advantage. Rob's head comes up to the middle of Jim's chin, and Jim's face is probably around 9 inches tall. Going by that, Jim only has about a 7.5 inch height advantage, but pictures aren't perfectly accurate; I'd say 6'4" midday, 6'4.5" or even a hair over that upon waking up. So 6'4".
[Editor Rob:
what about Jenny in this photo and the one on the right where I'm not dropping 3cm of posture like the left.
I guess she's invisible :)]
-----
Lol then why is he still listed as 6ft 4?
[Editor Rob: You can look barely 6ft 3 and 6ft 4 in the one photo. It's interesting how people perceive things.
If you just looked at Jenny. 30 minutes before we took this photo, she is 1/4 inch smaller at that moment in time.
Jenny's head is 8.5 inches, so in comparison Jim appears not much more than 7 inches taller. He's got 1/2 inch thicker footwear so he can also appear not quite 6ft 3 in the photo.
] James says on 28/Apr/11
maybe 191-192cm range and 6'3.75 max.
so he might be either 6'3.25 (191cm), 6'3.5 (192cm) or 6'3.75 (192cm). Chameleon says on 25/Apr/11
Looks 1.91 James says on 24/Apr/11
Yeah this guy has got a long head for sure and most 6'4 guys have a higher eye level than him so i bet he walks around feeling 6'2 or 6'3 most of the time.
I agree he does look 6'4 (193cm) in the photo but that is only with footware advantage.
I think his real true height is 6ft3.75 (192cm) does not look a legit 6'4 to me. Lenad is sexy says on 23/Apr/11
Looks 6'4ish to me Aaron (6\\\'5\\ says on 21/Apr/11
Take into account the footware advantage, and then check out the height advantage. Rob's head comes up to the middle of Jim's chin, and Jim's face is probably around 9 inches tall. Going by that, Jim only has about a 7.5 inch height advantage, but pictures aren't perfectly accurate; I'd say 6'4" midday, 6'4.5" or even a hair over that upon waking up. So 6'4".
[Editor Rob:
what about Jenny in this photo and the one on the right where I'm not dropping 3cm of posture like the left.
I guess she's invisible :)] Max says on 21/Apr/11
You are so worried about a miniscule footware difference. You make it sound like you would be the same height as this person if only you were all barefoot. James says on 14/Apr/11
yeah maybe 190cm with rob. 189cm at worst in the photo. Chameleon says on 13/Apr/11
Looks 1.90. Candyman says on 13/Apr/11
Very tall. If not 6'4", he is razor thin close. James says on 11/Apr/11
Well he does look 6'2.5 with footware in the right pic. Observant says on 7/Apr/11
@Ray: what are you talking about? hes 191 barefeet, the height chart is lined up with rob in shoes the same as his barefoot height therefore it is a barefoot measurement minus any advantage in this case he has a .4 advantage so it ends up being 190 cm Ray says on 30/Mar/11
"Matt" has proved that he is no more than 191cm assuming shoes on, so 188cm barefeet. flash_of_eden says on 27/Mar/11
Looks more like 6'5"-6'6". songoku211 says on 17/Mar/11
Looks taller than 6"4. James says on 24/Feb/11
If he had footware advantage then i'd go as far as saying he looks 189cm in the right pic with rob and 188cm if he did not have footware advantage.
In the left pic appears 192cm in comparison to rob (only because rob is losing an 3cm of height with his posture).
Looks 1cm shorter than adam baldwin in comparison to rob. SolidSnake says on 17/Feb/11
looks like a weak 6 foot 4 James says on 31/Jan/11
6'4 morning James says on 21/Jan/11
i think his true height is 6ft2.75 inches (190cm) barefoot without shoes. 6ft3.5 in the pic with slight footware advantage. 6'4 shoes.
so 6'3 max for this guy he has a big build which probably makes him give of a bigger and taller impression.
So he is a solid 6'3 guy in my eyes not 6'4.
A big 6'4 guy like tim robbins would have 1.5-2 inches on him for sure. Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 19/Jan/11
Dunno, I see 6"4-6"4.5 xyz.reg says on 6/Jan/11
A solid 6ft 4in guy..clearly..! James says on 24/Dec/10
6'2-6'3 Chad says on 24/Nov/10
Rob why does jenny look 3 inches taller than you here lol
[Editor Rob: I'm dropping height in my back there...
Here is a photo of me and Jenny not long before the double shot was taken...don't tell anybody right, I'm actually at that moment taller, I don't think she slept as well as normal.] James says on 10/Nov/10
He's a big dude but 6'4 is a stretch. Matt says on 10/Nov/10
yeah this guy is more like a solid 6'3 maximum in reality. Matt says on 9/Nov/10
when i used the picture on the right, jim came up to 191cm on the height comparison photo
Shaun says on 29/Oct/10
Accounting for footwear then, he looks a solid 6'4". Shaun says on 29/Oct/10
Mandilo you need glasses., he looks a very solid 6'4". If you imagine a height chart behind Rob you can imagine where 4 inches above at 6' would be. Well he looks mininmum 4 inches heigher than that. Looks 6'4"-6'4.5" range. |
