|
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
or you being someone who cant accept opinions?! Ola says on 3/Jul/08
So im a troll or just stupid?
Ola says on 2/Jul/08
So, Nash 6'8 1/2 and andre 6'9 then? Frank says on 2/Jul/08
Well Mr E Andre was taller than Tyler Mane by about 2 inches late in Andres Career when he was all broken down and Nash looked alittle taller than Mane so i would say Andre would have been Taller than Nash not by much but still Taller tuga says on 2/Jul/08
You´re right Mr.E, taker´s long forehead and lower eye level gives him the apearance of being shorter, nash has no way more than 1 and a half inch, looking at both men eye level makes it look a bigger difference...
People WANT to be 2 inches because for then taker was no more than 6'8 peak, so if the difference is less than 2 inches then nash would not be 6'10...
Well...nash is every bit 6'10 peak at least, look again how legit 6'7 magic johnson is much shorter than nash compared to both taker and sid. Mr. E says on 1/Jul/08
I think it's closer to about two inches, but I digress. Plus, Taker has an unsually long forehead. Taker's eye level comparisons with others leave him looking shorter than he really is. Check some of his pics with Sid. Sid's shoulders and eyes are always much higher. The same can be said about the staredown pic with Taker and Brock Lesnar. Taker didn't have a lot on him until that head just continued to go on and on. I think Taker is one of the more unusl one's because he doesn't look like a 6-8 guy unless he's standing next to someone that challenges his height. He really come across as a 6-6 guy. Someone once mention that Taker never stands tfully tall unless he has to. I think to a degree the same can be said for Nash. Although I think he's lost a bit, I still think he's 6-9 and some change. I know it's tough with apples to oranges, but I've seen it done on the Andre/Big Show page. How does Nash match up with Andre? Does anyone have that? Dave says on 1/Jul/08
kevin nash is comfortably taller than taker, by anything up to 2 inches, without any trouble whatsoever....... there is countless pics, matches and footage to suggest anything up to a 2 inch difference... and besides the odd biased, innaccurate and circumstantial pic theres NO evidence to suggest that taker is close to nash's height, the very least is one inch.... but anyone who has watched them wrestle or met them will know there is a bigger difference than that...... besides, i am a solid 2 inches taller than a friend of mine, but there are many pics of us in countless drunken nights and joking around where he looks the same height and if not even taller at times! pics mean nothing. Eric says on 1/Jul/08
Kevin Nash is definitely taller than Mark Calaway aka The Undertaker by about 2 inches.In 1996 they had a stare down whilst being interviewed in the locker room and taker had to look up into Kevin's eyes.Taker is 6' 8" so I'd say Kevin Nash is 6' 10" Ola says on 1/Jul/08
vegas iam not so sure about that! here we have worlds tallest dog filmed from a very low camera position. the dog gibson, is said to be 109 cm at the withers according to his owner sandy hall herself(107 cm according to guinness but he has grown a inch since the world record)
however, sandy hall was on tonight show and was dwarfed by jay leno so she is only around 5'4 like we can see here: Click Here
Now, a 109 cm dog would be even MORE than a 2/3 of her height... is this 2/3?: Click Here imo he's just little over 1/2 of her height. not even the dog's head is near the 109 cm line! also notice how high 109 cm is for a small women like that! SO, a low camera angle favours the tallest ones Ola says on 1/Jul/08
Alex2 i couldnt care less! since its not my problem... iam 6'1 1/2 NashOwnsAll says on 1/Jul/08
If people watch that video again, the camera swings closer to Nash for a second, Nash clearly looks taller, but then when the camera swings closer to Undertaker, he looks taller than Nash.
It's people like Red and LV who keep look at the point where the camera is closer to Nash where he appears over 2 inches taller.
The best frame capture is the one I posted the other day where the camera is even between the 2, the gap is around 1 inch considering Nash/Diesel's *big* hair :) while taker's hair is flat
Take a look at the size of undertaker's eye, most human eyes that are normally open (not strained as if you seen a ghost open) is 1/2 - 3/4 of an inch in height, so lets just say for arguments sake taker's eye is 3/4 inch in size, so compare it to the gap in height and you'll see only an inch in height difference. Alex2 says on 1/Jul/08
Ola NOBODY likes you! Your posts make me cry there so funny and wrong! How tall are you? 4'6"!?! tuga says on 1/Jul/08
Vegas is right about the low camera angle BUT THIS IS NOT THE CASE WITH THIS VIDEO!
You have there Paul bearer, tell me where does he look closer in height to taker or nash?? If anything he even looks shorter...
Common, why do you want to see a bigger difference than it is in reality? Atoadaso says on 30/Jun/08
Lower angles bring things closer together in height. LV says on 30/Jun/08
Ola says on 30/Jun/08
Red no you're stupid! a low camera angle will give the advantage to the TALLER one... i still say 1 inches between them. why? becouse undertaker probarly had very low shoes but i think everyone can live with a 1 1/2 inches difference, they can also live with only 1
You make no sense. Stop posting here. Vegas says on 30/Jun/08
low camera angle will give advantage to shorter person
Click Here
low angle Click Here Ola says on 30/Jun/08
Red no you're stupid! a low camera angle will give the advantage to the TALLER one... i still say 1 inches between them. why? becouse undertaker probarly had very low shoes but i think everyone can live with a 1 1/2 inches difference, they can also live with only 1 tuga says on 30/Jun/08
LV says on 29/Jun/08
Why does everyone that wants to discredit a picture always say that a particular individual was closer to the camera? I don't think Nash is any closer to the camera in those pictures than UT.
He´s CLEARLY closer, see NashOwnsAll pic or even better...the video! NashOwnsAll says on 30/Jun/08
I think some of you have problems with perceiving the size on an inch or simply just trolling.
Everybody knows deep down that they are very close in height, 1 to 1.5 inch, thats it. If people had a really good grasp of how much an inch actually is in a picture there wouldnt be this much of a disagreement. LV says on 29/Jun/08
Why does everyone that wants to discredit a picture always say that a particular individual was closer to the camera? I don't think Nash is any closer to the camera in those pictures than UT. Frank says on 29/Jun/08
I would say there might be about 1.5 difference at best like i was saying for 2 years now i have that on VHS AND looked @ it many times ...When Taker stands really straight he narrows the difference tuga says on 29/Jun/08
Some say 1 inch others 2 inches, I´ll say 1 and 1/2, no way more.
Taker is very close to nash and sid also is quite close himself.
By the way, thanks for the video Red. Red says on 29/Jun/08
Ola you´re just stupid.
A low camera angle will always give an advantage to the shorter men. Nash has at least 2 inches if you watch the vid unbiased.
And Ola don´t talk about 1 inch differences, cause we all know that something is wrong with your measuring tape Ola says on 28/Jun/08
Please! its not two inches between them its ONE for gods sake. Nash is close to camer almost all the time... but look at 1:21 - at that time no one gets favoured by the camera and nash is being only a tad taller. i think we can forget anything more than 1 inch Red says on 28/Jun/08
I´ve uploaded the vid Click Here
It´s clear to see that UT did something with his hairs to look taller.
Nash is at least 2 inches taller. The low camera-angle makes UT look closer to Nash. Red says on 28/Jun/08
NashOwnsAll look at the camera position in your pic - much lower than in my pic and that´s the reason why UT looks closer than 2 inches to Nash.
And your lines are not correct - I´m going to find the vid, you can see that UT worked with his hairs to look taller. tuga says on 28/Jun/08
LV says on 27/Jun/08
Good find Red (Click Here). Clearly two inches Ola, not just one.
LV, nash is closer to camera, look at NashOwnsAll pic, there´s 1 1/2 inch max difference, too bad I can´t find the video.
Besides, look at nash vs sid vid I posted, theres a 2 inches difference, since taker had 1/2 inch on sid it all makes perfect sence. LV says on 27/Jun/08
Good find Red ( Click Here). Clearly two inches Ola, not just one. Ola says on 27/Jun/08
NashOwnsAll great find! there we have the 1 inch only like i have been claimed all the time
there you go LV!, now i understand why the truth hurts and why u are afraid of my comments haha NashOwnsAll says on 27/Jun/08
Here is the staredown pic between Diesel and Undertaker, looks like 1 - 1.5 inches to me.
Click Here
Refer to the size of undertaker's eyes, if you think the gap is 2.5 or 3 inches then his eyes must be 1.5 - 2 inches! LOL Red says on 27/Jun/08
LV look down this page at red 22/Jun/08 Red says on 27/Jun/08
I say
Nash 6´10" peak
UT 6´8" peak
Sid 6´7.5" peak tuga says on 27/Jun/08
Im anonymous below... Anonymous says on 27/Jun/08
I agree 1 inch is to low, Red, I can´t find the video, can you?
But still diference between taker and nash is a little below 2 inches, nash has barely 2 inches on sid, check my video below LV.
Nash was I believe 6'10 peak, there´s more than enough evidence on that, all of these 3 men have their height to low on this site. LV says on 26/Jun/08
Someone please post the close-up stills of Nash and the Undertaker which clearly shows Nash 2"+ taller! Ola's stupid claims are driving everyone crazy again. Red says on 26/Jun/08
Nash is not even standing straight in your pic Ola - I´m very sad about that there´s not a good moment to estimate them in that match - maybe Taker doesn´t want to look shorter against the leaving Big Daddy Cool.
1 inch is to low - Nash has minimum 2 inches on Taker. If Nash was only 1inch taller than Taker would have 1.5 inches on Sid and we know that Taker is barely taller than Sid - about 0.5" Ola says on 25/Jun/08
Barefooted they're very close in height. imo no more than 1 inch difference. taker almost never stand fully straight, but here he does... and they are equal in height Click Here Red says on 24/Jun/08
The camera angla was much lower in the pic you mean. For the vid I´m going - to find it.
Nash is more than 2 inches taller than UT, you can see it also in comparison to other wrestlers. Frank says on 24/Jun/08
I have that Taker, Nash staredown and when Taker stands up straight there is about an 1.5 difference Nash looks alot taller in the begining and at the end taker stands very straight and there is a small difference between them tuga says on 23/Jun/08
Red, if you have the video post it, in that its clear no way even 2 inches, last time you posted it someone also took a pic out of it and the difference was much smaller than your photo... Red says on 23/Jun/08
from this distance - there´s not really an advantage for Nash beeing slightly closer to the cam. from that low Camera level UT has the cam advantage.
There is no higher/better cameralevel than in this pic.
Nash is 2-2.5 inches taller for fact. tuga says on 23/Jun/08
Red says on 22/Jun/08
Click Here lol Ola thats the biggest inch I´ve ever seen
Why don´t you post the video Red, nash is CLOSER to the camera CLEARLY, we´ve had this discussion before, nash is 1 and 1/2 inches taller, no more... Ola says on 22/Jun/08
Red, nash is much closer to camera... and taker had very low shoes, like i said: watch the match! face to face in the ring nash is maybe 1 inch taller, tops 2! Big Show says on 22/Jun/08
Click Here
I'm not sure if there has ever been posted a good comparison between Nash and Sid Vicious, but here's a good one. From 3:58 and onwards there's a good staredown between them and Nash looks to be 2 inches taller. The video is from 1995. Red says on 22/Jun/08
Click Here lol Ola thats the biggest inch I´ve ever seen Ola says on 22/Jun/08
1 is closer to a fact than 2 Red says on 21/Jun/08
There´s no good comparison in their match. BDC has also very flat boots. The backstage picture is the best staredown between UT and BDC I´ve ever seen. Nash has 2-3 inches on Taker trough the whole vid.
Rob do you dislike Nash? I like Taker much much more, but 2"+ is fact. Ola says on 21/Jun/08
Red, watch the match between them... its no way more than 2 inches between them, and then take in mind taker's low shoes Mamun says on 18/Jun/08
This picture was taken march of 2004 .
Regards
mamun Alex2 says on 11/Jun/08
Danimal, I just find it funny how Flair's police file listed as 6'1" humm. You think he could have been 6'0" peak? Domo says on 9/Jun/08
How old is that pic with Mamun! Kevin Nash has long hair and a beard now Ola says on 7/Jun/08
Please... hogan was never even close to 6'6. was he ever 6'4? now i doubt Alex says on 7/Jun/08
Danimal, I'd still love to see a peak Hogan face off with some of these wrestlers today. Guys like Big Show, Khali, Kane. Sure he'd be much shorter still but not like it would be today. Steve says on 6/Jun/08
COMPARING TO MAMUN NASH IS ABSOLUTELY WITHOUT A DOUBT TALLER THAN MANE. Alex2 says on 6/Jun/08
Ola, just cause a wrestler is "Billed" to a height, it doesnt always mean he aint that height, for example look at Mark Henry and Randy Orton, both are billed to their exact real height and if anything are a little taller! Danimal says on 6/Jun/08
Kiat says on 6/Jun/08
If Flair is only 5'11", how could Hogan be 6'6"? I don't see a 7 inch difference between them. 5 inches or so.
Hogan hasn't been 6'6" since the 1980's. Show me comparsions of them from the 1980's. Flair ALWAYS wore high heeled designer shoes to his interviews. He was very vain. I'm sure he hit 6'1" with the shoes. Supermanfan380 says on 6/Jun/08
flair could be 5'11", and that would still put Nash at 6'10" peak. flair always looked shorter than 6ft, even if the other wrestlers were really as big as claimed. Size was never flairs gimmick. Ola says on 6/Jun/08
anonymous says on 4/Jun/08
flair is around 6,1" sting another 2 inches taller a good 6,3".
total ridiculous... sting was once BILLED as 6'2 in wcw. more facts: sting was shorter than the 6'1 1/2 tops warrior so sting CANNOT have been taller than 6'1 1/4 and flair maybe WAS 6'0 for like 20 years ago, but no way today.
JT some of your pics sux(no offense) they are from a horrible angle. face to face, sting was indeed only around 2 inches taller than flair. watch the last wcw nitro; after sting won they hugd each other, actually it dont looks to be even 2 inches between them...
so if we continue, a 5'11 flair is good to start with, it will result into a: 6'1 sting, 6'4 scott hall, and a 6'9 Nash... i think those heights are very right on!
Danimal you want flair and hitman as short as possible while you want hogan as tall as possible like 6'6, guess what... you cant have both! there was no way near 7 inches between hogan and flair, never ever. face it, my pal ;) Vegas says on 6/Jun/08
yet flair was booked at 6'1 Click Here
when WWE.com listed Big show at 399lb you didn't believe that
WWE.com lists jessa ventura at 6'2, you still say 6'4
where is the proof that just because someone is listed at a certain weight and height on wwe.com they cannot be above that, what makes WWE.com so right?? michael cole was listed at 5'7 on there and he was 5-6 inches minimum taller than mysterio in the ring. mike tenay was listed at 5'8 on tnas website, yet he stood 1 inch taller than a measured 5'9.5" nfl star in the middle of the ring Kiat says on 6/Jun/08
If Flair is only 5'11", how could Hogan be 6'6"? I don't see a 7 inch difference between them. 5 inches or so. Danimal says on 5/Jun/08
Clay says on 4/Jun/08
Flair is peak 6'0'' and 5'11'' today. Get it right.
Get it right? I bet your a little insecure man in real life. FLAIR was billed at 5'11" and 220 pounds upon his return to the WWF in 2001-2002 ON THEIR WEBSITE. FACT. He WAS never over 5'11". Alex says on 5/Jun/08
Clay I could buy that. 6'0 peak but today 5'10.5, maybe 5'11. Clay says on 4/Jun/08
Flair is peak 6'0'' and 5'11'' today. Get it right. anonymous says on 4/Jun/08
flair is around 6,1" sting another 2 inches taller a good 6,3". Alex says on 4/Jun/08
Hogan looked 6'4-6'4.5 around 2000 and 6'3 in 2002. He was no more than 1/2 inch tops taller than The Rock. Danimal says on 3/Jun/08
supes78 says on 2/Jun/08
Yeah, if Magic is 6'7", then Nash looks a good 6'10" tall. That photo was taken in the early mid 90s in a casual setting, outside of any wrestling venues.
Which also puts Scott Hall at 6'5" and we know that Hogan was the same height as Nash from 1996-2000, which leads me to believe that Hogan was around 6'5" up until 2000 and taller pre-1990. Come 2002, we saw a pigmea Hogan come back to the WWF :(. Alex2 says on 3/Jun/08
I take it this photo wasn't taken that long ago, if Nash was straight there, damn I could see 14" on Mamun, maybe more, id say 6'9" today, but 6'10" may be possible, apparently Nash never had any major surgery either, although I may be wrong. Supermanfan380 says on 3/Jun/08
If you notice in the picture with Mamun, there is a door frame in the background, and it is tilted toward nash, thus hiding the fact that he is leaning over, and making the angle slightly favor Mamun. MK says on 3/Jun/08
Clay says on 3/Jun/08
I see a slouching Nash, and I see more than a foot over Manum. He is in his 40's - Alex2 is right he has probably lost half an inch as well.
More like a full 1'' imo, if he was a full 6'10'' peak then it could be as much as 1.5'' Clay says on 3/Jun/08
I see a slouching Nash, and I see more than a foot over Manum. He is in his 40's - Alex2 is right he has probably lost half an inch as well. JT says on 3/Jun/08
Ola says on 2/Jun/08
cantstop25, sting was 2 inches taller than bret hart and ric flair what part of that do you still not understand?....
Who doesn't understand??
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here
Here’s Sting next to Greg Valentine, whom I’ve seen in person and was about 6'0" in cowboy boots (~ 5’10” barefoot). Click Here Anyone know the guy between Valentine and DiBiase? He should be around 6’0”.
Supermanfan380 says on 2/Jun/08
Trying to compare Nash to guys like Sting is absurd. There is too much difference to tell peg Nash accurately within 0.5" of his actual height at the time….
No one on this site can project any person's height to within 0.5" unless he's standing barefoot and side by side next to a guy who's height has been verified, and ideally both have shaved heads. That does not mean you still can’t make a reasonable estimate. At his size, Nash has at least a 10 inch head. Figure out where approximately the top of Sting’s head comes up relative to the bottom of Nash’s chin. If it’s about 2 inches above, Sting's at least 8 inches shorter. It’s not rocket science. Since we can’t actually measure each person, we’re all making estimates based on as much photographic evidence as possible. supes78 says on 2/Jun/08
Yeah, if Magic is 6'7", then Nash looks a good 6'10" tall. That photo was taken in the early mid 90s in a casual setting, outside of any wrestling venues. Alex2 says on 2/Jun/08
Ola sometimes you can say some good things, but annoting untrue statements like below really p*****s me off and others, Nash was easuily 6'10", he had 2" on Taker, and just look at him with Kurt Angle (even today) he has around 1 foot on him, not like you watch TNA... Danimal says on 2/Jun/08
Supermanfan380 says on 2/Jun/08
Trying to compare Nash to guys like Sting is absurd. There is too much difference to tell peg Nash accurately within 0.5" of his actual height at the time.
I would say one should try to compare to guys of similar stature with known heights. Guys like Sid, UT, Kane, BigShow etc… None are the same height as Nash, but are all relatively close. 6’6”+ for all of them (some here will argue that to not be true, but they are all TALL), where sting being 6’0”-6’3” is still way bellow the height of Nash, and to fit his face into the same frame for a picture with fans Nash would have to crouch or bend his knees, making comparisons inaccurate from the start.
I agree. Supermanfan380 says on 2/Jun/08
Trying to compare Nash to guys like Sting is absurd. There is too much difference to tell peg Nash accurately within 0.5" of his actual height at the time.
I would say one should try to compare to guys of similar stature with known heights. Guys like Sid, UT, Kane, BigShow etc… None are the same height as Nash, but are all relatively close. 6’6”+ for all of them (some here will argue that to not be true, but they are all TALL), where sting being 6’0”-6’3” is still way bellow the height of Nash, and to fit his face into the same frame for a picture with fans Nash would have to crouch or bend his knees, making comparisons inaccurate from the start. Ola says on 2/Jun/08
cantstop25, sting was 2 inches taller than bret hart and ric flair what part of that do you still not understand? sting was also a little shorter than the 6'1 1/2 tops warrior... we can forget anything over 6'1 1/4 for sting. Anything OVER 6'9 for nash is ridiculous LV says on 1/Jun/08
JT says on 31/May/08
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here This should put Nash at 6’9” minimum, if not 6’10”.
Nash's infamous "head tilting" (which is does in nearly every picture with fans) can cause him to look at least 2" shorter than he actually is. Anyone can see Nash is clearly much taller than Magic Johnson even with the tilted head ( Click Here). LV says on 1/Jun/08
supes78 says on 31/May/08
Here's Magic Johnson with legitimate 6'5" Razor Ramone and Nash:
Click Here
So just exactly how tall is Magic because Nash seems to have a good 3 inches on him.
He is 6'7". I'll never understand why he was listed at 6'9" since Larry Bird was clearly 2" taller throughout their careers. tuga says on 1/Jun/08
Good comparison JT, like I tought, Nash even with a relaxed posture and tilting his head is still CLEARLY TALLER.
Even 6'9 for his current height may be to low.
Great find supes78, I mentioned that photo before but could not find it, thats yet again another proof that anything under 6'10 peak for nash is ridiculous, he could even be a little above that. Steve says on 1/Jun/08
Picture with 6'7"1/2 tall NBA player is confusing,even if Nash would be leaned it would give him hardly half of an inch difference,and he appears to be 6'9" in nowadays. supes78 says on 31/May/08
Here's Magic Johnson with legitimate 6'5" Razor Ramone and Nash:
Click Here
So just exactly how tall is Magic because Nash seems to have a good 3 inches on him. cantstop25 says on 31/May/08
cmon ola sting aint 6'1", its just common sense just because he appears that tall on occasions doesnt make him that height, he can appear 6'4" at times as well. hes a strogn 6'2" no doubt about it Ola says on 31/May/08
Luger never looked 6'3. he always looked only 1 inch taller than the 6'1 sting and he was a little shorter than the 6'3 tops ddp. 6'2 1/4-1/2 is right on? Ola says on 31/May/08
JT, sting cannot be 6'2 since he was never more than 2 inches taller than bret hart and ric flair. the most i can give sting is a strong 6'1 like 186 cm and Nash is being nearly 8 inches taller, putting him to nearly a full 6'9 (kinda close since i have him as 6'8 1/2) JT says on 31/May/08
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Click Here
Click Here
Click Here This should put Nash at 6’9” minimum, if not 6’10”. Danimal says on 30/May/08
Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash.
Nash is not standing straight. Alex says on 30/May/08
This guy does appear to be 6'0 compared to Kurt Angle. Viper says on 30/May/08
The 6-7 1/2 NBA guy looks taller in comparison to Nash. JT says on 28/May/08
tuga says on 27/May/08
Hope this helps estimating nash´s current height:
Click Here
Chris Richard from the NBA is listed at 6'9....
Chris Richard was measured barefoot at 6'7.5" for the 2007 NBA draft. anonymous says on 27/May/08
nash 6,10" (billed at 7,0")undertaker 6,8"(billed at 6,10")big show 7,0"(billed at 7,4") Alex2 says on 27/May/08
I think Kevin Nash at peak could well have been 6'10.5" but now is 6'9", Rob you really need to make a peak and current height :) No way was he only 6'9" peak...... tuga says on 27/May/08
Hope this helps estimating nash´s current height:
Click Here
Chris Richard from the NBA is listed at 6'9, there he is trying to look as tall as possible, on the other hand, nash is relaxed and leaning, my guess is that nash is taller even with bad posture, what do you guys think? Photos are not best quality...but he has also with kurt angle. Alex says on 27/May/08
That picture with Greg isn't a good picture. No way can Greg really be 6'0 1/2. I would say he is more 5'11. mike says on 27/May/08
oh maybe 8 ,ok JT says on 25/May/08
mike says on 24/May/08
a good 6-7 inch difference in height there jt between sting and nash.
Sting barely comes up to Nash's mouth. That's about an 8 inch gap. mike says on 24/May/08
steve borden aka(sting) hios bio says he,s 6,3". mike says on 24/May/08
a good 6-7 inch difference in height there jt between sting and nash. marotte says on 23/May/08
I don't think he's ever been 6-7 cause he is not over 6-4 today and loosing 3 inches .......... I don't think so ImRight says on 23/May/08
He's 6'10.5". Not a hair shorter. I'm right. Clay says on 23/May/08
And next to the gigantic 7'0'' Andre the Giant, Viper. Viper says on 22/May/08
Hogan only looks 6-7 with a suppossed 6-0 1/2 Greg on here. mike says on 22/May/08
nash of the outsiders 6,10", scott hall 6,5". mike says on 21/May/08
hogan may have been as much as 6,7" tops. Danimal says on 20/May/08
JT says on 20/May/08
Nash still looks really tall in your pics Vegas. I think Rhino’s around 5’11” and Nash towers over him.
This gives you a rough idea how a peak Nash and Hogan would have measured up (Click Here) It’s around 4 inches there and probably 5 if Nash raises his head.
A few more of Nash with Hogan (still at least 6’4” at this point) (Click Here) and Hall (Click Here)
With 6’3” Luger Click Here He’s 6’9” on a bad day Ola.
You see, THOSE are unbiased comparisons, which means you ARE capable of being unbiased JT. I am proud of you old friend. Danimal says on 20/May/08
Luger was 6'3". This was his football listing, which was established on this site a while ago. Jason says on 20/May/08
Could be anything from 5-6'' in that pic. Nash has a relatively small forehead, but a long head from the brow, down. mike says on 20/May/08
nash has a good 6 inches on luger who i believe is around 6,4". so nash in that pic is easily 6,10". Viper says on 20/May/08
How would Charles Barkley look next to Kevin Nash Vegas. Steve says on 20/May/08
He cannot be less than 6'9"(206cm) in nowadays.6'10(208cm) peak height. JT says on 20/May/08
Nash still looks really tall in your pics Vegas. I think Rhino’s around 5’11” and Nash towers over him.
This gives you a rough idea how a peak Nash and Hogan would have measured up ( Click Here) It’s around 4 inches there and probably 5 if Nash raises his head.
A few more of Nash with Hogan (still at least 6’4” at this point) ( Click Here) and Hall ( Click Here)
With 6’3” Luger Click Here He’s 6’9” on a bad day Ola. Vegas says on 19/May/08
i have never really paid too much attention to stings weight to be honest, he made his comeback to tna on the very first live impact which i was at and wrestled on the next two shows which i also attended. he is in great shape, jumping around and looking as fresh as ever Alex says on 19/May/08
When I first saw Nash come onto the stage back in late 2006 at the autograph session I swear he at first gave me a 6'7 impression but then I looked at him and he looked between 6'8 and 6'9. He was on a stage and I was 15-20 feet away so it wasn't the most accurate range to judge his height. Ola says on 19/May/08
vegas, have you noticed how steve borden has lost weight? he cant be much over 220 lbs(100 kg) these days Vegas says on 19/May/08
i took a few photos of nash in tna during my time in orlando in march, he is still very tall despite struggling big time to walk properly these days, didn't get to stand right beside him though, he did walk past me at ringside but not going to try and estimate from there
Click Here
Click Here Vegas says on 19/May/08
Click Here a 6'8 nash would be bad news for a lot of nba players like the number 40 to his left there howard wood who the nba said was 6'7 Click Here reggie johnson to his right number 32 was listed at 6'9 and is a good inch shorter Click Here Ola says on 19/May/08
6'10 in shoes... makes him 6'8 1/2 - 6'8 3/4 barefooted. but i guess its safe to say he was 6'9 some lucky morning - no more Alex2 says on 17/May/08
I think its safe to say Nash was good 6'10" peak. Mattiew_- says on 16/May/08
6'10.5-6'11" peak sounds legit to me ...
6'9 to 6'9.5 nowadays ... Dave says on 14/May/08
alex i agree..... in the new nwo wwe times there was less of a difference between the two Alex says on 14/May/08
Sometimes I saw a 2 inch difference between Nash and Big Show, this was in 2002. Dave says on 14/May/08
@ tom.... on a uk tv show called 'live and kicking' on a saturday morning, he was on the show and talking about wresting, not taking it seriously at all and almost breaking the rule of saying wrestling is fake.... and he corrected, the man said something like 'so, you ate 7 feet tall then!' or something.... and he said, nah nah, wcw only say that, im actually around 6'10...... so after this honesty, why would he lie?? Tom.. says on 14/May/08
Recall when he was an active wrestler in WCW, he was once interviewed on a talk show. They spoke about him being 7ft. He then corrected them saying "I'm actually between 6.10' and 6.11 - but don't tell WCW I told you that". Danimal says on 13/May/08
Well, Nash got a 6'10" listing in College and Big Show got a 7'1" listing. There WAS a 3" difference between them from 1996-2002. If these measurements were with shoes, Nash, could have been less than 6'9" and Big Show 7'0" respectively. Today, I give Nash at least 6'8" and Show not less than 6'11". Danimal says on 13/May/08
Well, Nash got a 6'10" listing in College and Big Show got a 7'1" listing. There WAS a 3" difference between them from 1996-2002. If these measurements were with shoes, Nash, could have been less than 6'9" and Big Show 7'0" respectively. Today, I give Nash at least 6'8" and Show not less than 6'11". Dave says on 13/May/08
@ mike, its well known that nash does not wear huge footwar (like kane etc).... as his knees simply forbid it, for years nash has insisted that the flatter and down to earth the sole on his wrestling boots the better, and i have to say his boots always looked flat for a wrestling boot. And i think most if not all of us can agree that:
At peak height, 6'10 was CERTAINLY a possiblility..... (i myself personally believe a 6'10 peak is very true)
And nowadays after countless knee surgeries and worse posture he could be as low as 6'8.5.
I think even if nowadays nash was in the ring with wwe's taker and kane we would see a clearly taller man, by 2 inches in my opinion. Supermanfan380 says on 12/May/08
I still have not been convinced that at Nash's peak he was anything short of 208 cm, or 6'10".
The 6'9" current listing I agree with, but there should be an added statement of {6'10" peak}. miki says on 11/May/08
yeah Kevin Nash barefoot is 2.06 cm, is really tall. Undertaker & Kane are "only" 2.02-2.03 cm, Hogan 1.92 cm, Batista 1.90 cm .. is real barefoot, wwe ever exagerates heigth. Big Show is 2.13, Great Khali is 2.16 cm and Giant Gozalez was 2.29, mike says on 11/May/08
hunched forward shaking mamuns hand there is about a 12 inch difference between the two.however if nash were to stand perfectly straight there would have to be a 14 inch difference placing nash at an even 6,10" bare minumum 6,9". mike says on 11/May/08
kevin nash had at least a foot or more over Kurt angle,kurt angle i believe is at least 5,10",but then again we have to take into account the footwear kevin was wearing. Alex2 says on 9/May/08
6'10-6'10.5" peak 6'8.5-6'9 today. Alex says on 9/May/08
Nash was 6'10 at his peak I do strongly believe, he did look it. Far as today he could be as low as 6'8-6'8 1/2 but I'd push more toward 6'9 though. When I saw him in person I estimated 6'8 1/2. Dave says on 9/May/08
jesse D, thats a GREAT point, i nearly forgot about that!!!.... he was measured as 6'10 for both punisher for costume, and he was 6'10! mike says on 9/May/08
domo nash has never been 7 foot tall,that is what he,s billed at. kevin nash has admitted himself to be only 6,10" on many occasions,even as deisel he was billed at 7 foot. JesseD says on 8/May/08
I remember on the "making of" feature of "The Punisher (2004)" that the costume designer said he was 6 foot 10. Domo says on 8/May/08
Kevin Nash, the wrestler from TNA is 7 foot tall cantstop25 says on 8/May/08
dave the angle favors hoyt bigtime, morgan does tower over hoyt, you can also tell becasue morgan towers over cornette a lot more then hoyt does. nash and morgan are on a completely different level then hoyt and abyss when it comes to height Alex2 says on 7/May/08
I actually saw a recent impact where Matt Morgan didnt have to duck through a door, so that door must have been about 7'0" as id put Matt around 6'9" mike says on 7/May/08
kevin nash has never appeared to me to be less than 6,10". if anything today he,s probably closer to 6,9" minumum. Dave says on 2/May/08
firstly i dont think matt morgan towers hoyt... alot of that is angles... and not just that. Abyss is 6'5 min. And doors everywhere are different heights!, i know of many dorrs that are about 6'!!!!!!!!!! then upwards to 6'10! Viper says on 2/May/08
6-2-6-3? Thats wild. Actually there are doorways shorter than that in some old homes from the 1700s. Because people were a lot shorter then on average. Alex says on 1/May/08
In my house most of the doors ways are 6'5-6'6. One is 6'7. Alex2 says on 30/Apr/08
Alex some of my doors are scraping the 7 foot mark! LOL and others as low as 6'4"-6'8" Alex says on 28/Apr/08
It depends on the house. Most nowadays are 6'8 but you can get some as low as 6'6 and as high as 6'10 in houses. Office buildings they're even taller I think.
My friend lives in an old house where some of the doorways are 6'2-6'3! I have to almost duck with my sneakers on. Viper says on 26/Apr/08
Doors in my house are 6-8-6-10. Alex2 says on 26/Apr/08
alot of doors can be around 6'6" though. Mr. 6\'5\'\' says on 25/Apr/08
Hey, looking at that kids profile there are pictures of him next to a door, and lets say that door is the average 6'8'', no way is he the 6'6'' he claims, more like 6'4'' at the ost, and he even ooks it next to hoyt in that picture Alex2 says on 17/Apr/08
Lance Hoyt was always 1-2" taller than 6'5.5 Abyss Vegas says on 16/Apr/08
met hoyt in person during the live tna impact a few weeks ago, he was wearing huge boots and on slightly higher ground but he looked 6'6ish cantstop25 says on 14/Apr/08
sine lance hoyt doesnt hae a page I thought id post this here, here is lance hoyt looking 2-3 inces taller then a kid who claims to be 6'6" on his myspace page.
Click Here
I found this nteresting becasue I thought lance hoyt was only about 6'6" after he was towered by matt morgan, as you can see by this entire gallery
Click Here miko says on 10/Apr/08
Probably closer to 6"8 these days, still a tall guy though. Atoadaso says on 7/Apr/08
Damn, that kid is gonna be tall. Hasn't hit puberty yet. He'll probably be just as, or taller than Nash. Supermanfan380 says on 6/Apr/08
Taller height it a dominant trait. So likely his kid would be rather tall. I think his wife is about 5-10 or 5-11, so for a woman she is tall too. They would have needed a tragedy to keep their son from getting very tall. At 6-1 at age 11, I would expect him to be around 7ft as an adult.
However, I think Nash would prefer he boy not get into a business that can eat them alive. supes78 says on 5/Apr/08
Jeez. According to this interview, his 11 year old son is already 6'1" tall!
Click Here
I think we have another future giant here. Alex2 says on 4/Apr/08
I don't think any of those guys standing in that picture are below 6'3 if you look. Supermanfan380 says on 4/Apr/08
MK, Nash was listed at 6'10" back then. MK says on 2/Apr/08
JT says on 2/Apr/08
I'm referring to the guy to Nash's right (No. 40), not No. 32.
In that case i'd give No.40 6'5''-6'6'', Nash 6'9''-6'10'' and No.32 6'8''-6'9''. btw does anyone know what Nash himself was listed at on that same site? JT says on 2/Apr/08
MK says on 2/Apr/08
5-6 inches??, surely thats a typing error JT, that would put Nash over 7'0'' lol, 6'10'' max he does look tho, probably at his full peak back then, 6'8.5'' is what i'd give him nowadays.
I'm referring to the guy to Nash's right (No. 40), not No. 32. MK says on 2/Apr/08
5-6 inches??, surely thats a typing error JT, that would put Nash over 7'0'' lol, 6'10'' max he does look tho, probably at his full peak back then, 6'8.5'' is what i'd give him nowadays. JT says on 2/Apr/08
MK says on 1/Apr/08
LV, Nash has 0.5'' at best on Johnson, check the shoulder level, plus Johnson is slouching slightly, Nash is standing dead straight...
It looks like the camera is slightly to the left of the players though, so it favors everyone left of Nash. Nash has the 6'7" listed guy to his right by 5-6 inches, and we know Nash is probably 6'10" max. LV says on 1/Apr/08
Pretty blurry photo to be making out .5". Regardless, Nash is taller. The top of Nash's head goes up to the top of Johnson's afro if not more, easily closer to 1". MK says on 1/Apr/08
LV, Nash has 0.5'' at best on Johnson, check the shoulder level, plus Johnson is slouching slightly, Nash is standing dead straight.(well done with that btw JT) LV says on 31/Mar/08
JT, that is an excellent picture. I've never seen any photos of him while he was in college except that one. He is clearly much taller than Johnson especially if you factor out Johnson's afro. JT says on 30/Mar/08
Interesting photo of Nash from 1978 (age 19) when playing center on the University of Tennessee basketball team ( Click Here). The guys to the left (Howard Wood) and right (Reggie Johnson) of Nash in the photo were both NBA draft picks and were listed at 6’7” and 6’9” ( Click Here) Johnson played for the 1983 Philly 76ers, who won the NBA championship that year. Nash looks at least an inch taller than Johnson and is obviously the tallest guy on the team given his position in the photo. Supermanfan380 says on 28/Mar/08
I still think it would be a good idea to add, under the 6'9" listing a "peak height of 6-10"
Anyhow, WCW listed his stats at 7'1" and 367 pounds. He was never that tall, at his tallest, or that heavy, even when he debuted. He may have been 350ish when he was "steel", but he was never a 367 pounder either.
Gotta love the late 1990s WCW stats. exagg much. RICHARD says on 24/Mar/08
He looks like a solid 6'9,300 pound guy to me. JT says on 21/Mar/08
With 6'3" Kevin Greene, a former linebacker and defensive end for the then LA Rams. Click Here Regan99 says on 21/Mar/08
the seems to be around 1 foot 1-2 inches diffrents between them both and that would make nash around 6,9 to 6,10 but if kevin nash stood proud and was not slouching a little he could gain around another 1 to 2 inchs makeing his over all height 6,11 to 7 foot ...which is believable Robby says on 14/Mar/08
6'9" right now is believable. but you should also note that Nash has had numerous knee operations that do take away height. so I believe he was 6'10" at his peak. Alex2 says on 13/Mar/08
To be quite honest, Nash looks easily 6'10" if not more in the pic with Mamun. MK says on 10/Mar/08
I'd say 6'9.5'' peak, 6'8.5'' now but it dosen't need stating. Either way 6'9'' average seems feesable. Supermanfan380 says on 9/Mar/08
Rob - could you add a "6'10" (208)cm peak height" to the listing on the page?
The general consensus here seems that he was a solid 6’10” when he was younger, and has only recently shrunk to 6’9" from age & injuries. Alex2 says on 8/Mar/08
If you got a PEAK Nash he would be clearly taller than Morgan who is in his PEAK. Supermanfan380 says on 6/Mar/08
Found another old one. Ron Simmons vs. Oz. This Match was from back when Nash was wrestling as “Oz- the great and powerful”. Nash was not in as good of shape as his debut 1 year earlier, but his legs still look just as strong as his upper body, as it was several years before they were ruined with compounding injuries.
Click Here
They announce him at 7ft tall, and he does clearly tower over Simmons, who looks anywhere from 6’0” to 6’2”. Alex says on 6/Mar/08
JT, those pictures are better. Mainly the first where they look the same height, could be 1/2 inch difference at most. Look anywhere from 6'8 to 6'9 tops. Alex says on 5/Mar/08
Nash is no more than 6'9 at most today. And I wouldn't doubt him as low as 6'8 flat today with a 2 inch height loss. Its possible. He looked 6'8-6'9 in person in late 2006. Use to be a 6'10 guy I think. Morgan looks around the same height, maybe even a bit taller. I give Morgan 6'9. Supermanfan380 says on 5/Mar/08
I think that on the site here, they should add to the 6'9" height listed for Nash, that he had a peak height of 6'10" back in the 1990s.
Sure he may only be 6'9" now, but he is close to 50 years old, with damage to both knees, and clearly would have had another inch and change, 6'10", 10 years ago. Supermanfan380 says on 4/Mar/08
I think had either of them made it to the NBA they would have been listed as 7'0" or even 7'1", as the NBA is almost as bad as WWE at padding heights.
It would stand to reason that college stats are more accurate. Dave says on 4/Mar/08
good pics vegas, and yeah i agree with you.... also, if these 2 were in the nba i think they would have been listed closer to 7ft.
But i still firmly believe (especially after seeing the way nash looked on impact against kurt angle) that a 99 nash would have been taller than morgan, even if only a cm or two. but nowadays it seems they are very very close in height. good work vegas Vegas says on 2/Mar/08
nash and morgan in tna Click Here and Click Here and Click Here
both nash and morgan were listed at 6'10 in college basketball so there would never have been much if anything between these guys
Morgan played ball for Chaminade Silverswords and his listing is here third last paragraph Click Here
Nash Click Here
i have found college ball listings to be far more legit than nba listings, many big men have their college listings increased by an inch and sometimes 2 inches in the nba Dave says on 2/Mar/08
supermaanfan, good point.... i agree with everything you said there. 350 it would have had to be.... and doesnt anyone find it very impressive that steroids or not, a man roughly 6'10 inches in height can be SO massively built?! i know someone 6'5 and he eats like a monster, works out and takes every protein supplelment under the sun, and in the past done steroids,.... but still hes NO-WHERE near the build of nash, hes about half the size actuallly, but hes still a muscular guy. Steroids are no wonder drug, they still require disciplined dieting, and a HELL of alot of dedication and commitment to working out. Respect to nash for that, to get so huge and cut at that height is impressive, as with all of the other ripped/once ripped big men.
BTW, @ MK - I agree, nash is certainly taller than morgan, even nowadays, id say he has an inch easy.... and back the the wcw days hed have 2 inches no problem Supermanfan380 says on 1/Mar/08
Back then his legs were muscular enough to see the both the Vastus-Lateralis, and Vastus-Medialis (outer and inner Quadriceps “teardrops”) when he moves as the legs flex. That is even more impressive considering that black tights will visually minimize his legs.
The same could not be said for what his legs were like only 5 years after that. When he lost size, his legs were the first thing to go to hell. Not a big surprise as the knee joints on a guy who is 6’10” are going to take a lot more shock than on say a guy who is only 5’10”.
To even show the amount of mass he had over-all, considering his upper body as well, and the amount of mass it takes to make the legs of a guy that tall look muscular, at all, he would have had to weigh around 350 at that point in time. MK says on 1/Mar/08
How tall do y'all reckon Matt Morgan is, even with them huge shoes he still doesn't match, i'd say Nash has 1.5'' on Morgan and probably 1-0.5'' on Nathan Jones. So maybe 6'8.5'' for Jones??(btw great find with that vid Supermanfan) Dave says on 28/Feb/08
nash looks HUGE there, id agree with 350 from nash.... HUGE, in height and physique Supermanfan380 says on 28/Feb/08
Hey, I found Nash's debut match in WCW, as part of the "Master Blaster" tag team. He was called "Steel" then, had an orange Mullethawk, and was anounced as 6'10" and 300 pounds. JR also said "over 300 pounds". Nash Claimed in a recent interview to have been closer to 350 then, as that was back when he was using steroids. Even though he is wearing black tights in the Match, he clearly still has decently built legs hen too. For a 6-10 guy anyhow, and before his knees went to heck. You can also tell that his boots had a rather thin, white colored sole to them.
Normally guys are exaggerated in height, by the anouncers, yet here they may have been giving his real height.
Click Here Alex2 says on 27/Feb/08
No way was Nash only 6'9" PEAK i could believe that today but no way peak. Dave says on 27/Feb/08
nash was listed as high as 7'1 quite often in wcw, infact he was listed that high most of the time. TNTinCA says on 25/Feb/08
He absolutely DWARFED Thomas Jane in the Punisher movie. I would have said at least a foot of difference between them. Thomas Jane is around 5'10" I believe. So at least 6'9" for Nash if not maybe even 6'10". MK says on 25/Feb/08
15 years back i'd say 6'10 now probably 6'8.5 Alex says on 24/Feb/08
I've seen Nash said at 7'1 in WCW too with The Giant at 7'4. That made most more sense. Dave says on 24/Feb/08
still, i am impressed at how well nash sizes up to the big show... show also had bigger lifts on both occaisions. Show always had bigger lifts than nash. Infact as i recall there was a discussion remarking on how small nash's lifts were, especially in wcw days. And there was a rumour that it was something to do with his knees and the ankle arch being bad for him. I think nash still sizes up to big show the best out of every wrestler (aside from khali of course). And i still firmly believe nash to be no less than 6'9 at any point.... meaning big show must be very near his 7' billing. IMO. JT says on 24/Feb/08
Alex2, WCW usually referred to Nash as being 7'0". Alex2 says on 23/Feb/08
Humm, i noticed WCW builled Show as "7 Foot 4" and Nash as 6 Foot 10", they should have builled Nash 6'11, and Show at 7'4" is rediculous, as if their is 6" between them LOL. Mr. E says on 22/Feb/08
Thanks Vegas, I was curious due to the fact that the WCW video shows Nash tip toeing to get up in Shows face. Vegas says on 22/Feb/08
here you go Mr.E, nash closer to the camera too there circa 2002-2003 Click Here
WCW staredown now show slightly closer here, if you notice in both photos nash's eyeline is level with the tip of big shows nose Click Here JT says on 22/Feb/08
You’re missing the point Frank. This pic ( Click Here) shows where his fibula is as well as where the sole of the boot is. There is no room for lifts. Ever see the size of Big Show’s hands? His feet are the same way from acromegaly. If there are “lifts” in there, they’d have to be miniscule so what’s the point?
This is not how a 7 footer should look next to Mayweather (recognized pretty much everywhere as 5’8”)? Click Here The lines are spaced identically between Big Show’s chin and the top of Mayweather’s head and from the top of Big Show’s head down to his eyebrows. That’s at least a 4.5” forehead, as Big Show’s head is at least 12 inches long.
This is the other pic with Big Show and “6’1.5”” Mike that I believe Cantstop25 found ( Click Here) Slightly different outcome, isn’t it. Also, the size of Big Show’s head does not even match up in the pics whereas Mike’s does, so something’s fishy.
Dave, if Big Show appears a little shorter now, it is probably due mostly to posture. He does have a few herniated discs in his neck but that would not necessarily result in a loss of height. Standing straight, Big Show would still have around 3 inches on Nash. Big Show standing straight and at 500 + lbs. was basically the same height as Dalip Singh (Great Khali) in 2006. Also, Big Show shaves his thinning hair now whereas his hair was pretty wild back in the WCW days. Mr. E says on 22/Feb/08
Does anyone have the standoff of the WWE version of the NWO with Show and Nash? I think that's what we all getting at. In WCW there's around 3" between the two, but a little less in WWE. Mr_6'5 says on 21/Feb/08
everyone has to remember that big show has a huge head! maybe 12 or 13 inches big, just compare the average head to his, and you'll see this. he definitely looked 7ft next to that chump mayweather, and i believe he was 7'1'' in WCW and now 7ft flat Vegas says on 21/Feb/08
here you go frank i used a screenshot of wight and gene from 1995 in the ring so no funny camera work like putting people on boxes etc
i also made gene about half an inch taller than mayweather despite gene being billed at 5'8 for nearly 20 years and mayweather listed at 5'8 3/4 in boxing, wer are missing about half an inch on the top of big shows head with mayweather but they come out very close
Click Here
also what about big shows basketball billing, he is one of the few wrestlers whom we have a legit NCAA listing for |
