|
Danimal says on 15/Nov/09
Yaspaa says on 14/Nov/09
Sorry about the news Danimal.
Thanks Yaspaa. I've been laying low for a few weeks. Going to send her a little something in the mail. She's a great girl. Hopefully, I can re-open that door (even just a crack).
Yaspaa says on 14/Nov/09
Sorry about the news Danimal. Mike says on 14/Nov/09
Someone on here said Nash is taller than Matt Morgan, Well I dont know if thas the case, but if so that would mean Nash is at least 6'10 as I personally know and have spoken to Matt Morgan and his mother who have both told me Matt Morgan is 6'10. Chris Jericho is 5'10 and has gone on record as saying so, same hieght as Kurt Angle. Clay says on 30/Oct/09
Yes I meant to put 5'9.5-5'10 for Jericho. Probably 5'9.5. Danimal says on 30/Oct/09
Clay says on 29/Oct/09
Thats a negative Danimal (nothing new for you). Jericho is 5'9-5'9.5, Michaels 5'11ish.
Been in a negative mood in the last week. I messed up with my gf and she bailed on me this Wednesday :(. Danimal says on 30/Oct/09
Vegas says on 29/Oct/09
jericho was taller than floyd mayweather Click Here jericho was taller next to ron killings than 5'9.5 barefoot measured nfl star pacman jones, jericho was taller than ricky steamboat, as tall as piper so 5'8 for jericho is impossible
Jericho wore the same space boots they had HBK wear in the early 90's when they were giving him a major push. I can live with Jericho being 5'9", but not more than that. Red says on 30/Oct/09
Jericho has a 5´9"body type but he has a big head. I saw him a year ago and he´s right at the 5´10"mark, maybe 5´9 3/4" but not shorter! Clay says on 29/Oct/09
Thats a negative Danimal (nothing new for you). Jericho is 5'9-5'9.5, Michaels 5'11ish. Vegas says on 29/Oct/09
i met lance storm in 2004, got video with him, he is about 5'10.5 Click Here Vegas says on 29/Oct/09
jericho was taller than floyd mayweather Click Here jericho was taller next to ron killings than 5'9.5 barefoot measured nfl star pacman jones, jericho was taller than ricky steamboat, as tall as piper so 5'8 for jericho is impossible
hal sparks (the short guy) is listed here at 5'8 Click Here Danimal says on 27/Oct/09
Nick says on 20/Oct/09
I'd give Nash a legit 6'10'' at his peak. He dwarfed the Undertaker during their PPV match in the 90s.
2" was dwarfing? Danimal says on 27/Oct/09
Red says on 25/Oct/09
Shawn Was NOT 6´1" in his prime, he was struggeling with 6´0" and is today 5´11"max. He was just a tad taller than 5´10" Kurt Angle and 5´10" Chris Jericho
He was never taller than 5'11" (same height as Bret Hart). He's about 5'10" today after major back surgeries. Chris is nowhere near 5'10". 5'8"-5'8.5" guy. Red says on 25/Oct/09
Shawn Was NOT 6´1" in his prime, he was struggeling with 6´0" and is today 5´11"max. He was just a tad taller than 5´10" Kurt Angle and 5´10" Chris Jericho Derek says on 25/Oct/09
dicksock says on 23/Oct/09
"Shawn WAS about 6'1 in his prime. He was almost the same height as a peak Vince McMahon. Right now he's probably a strong 5'11". And with the right footware HHH could be 6'4". He's no less than 6'2.5" barefoot. I've seen him look the exact same height as 6'3.5-6'4" Rock."
Shawn was never 6'1". 6'0" tops. As for HHH, he was always shorter than the Rock. Show me some evidence because from what I remember, Rock was always minimum 1 inch taller. dicksock says on 23/Oct/09
Vegas says on 22/Oct/09
a wrestler upgrades his height, shock horror, seems all the kliq like to think they are taller than they really are, HHH claims 6'4 for himself, nash claimed hbk was 6'1-6'2 lol
Shawn WAS about 6'1 in his prime. He was almost the same height as a peak Vince McMahon. Right now he's probably a strong 5'11". And with the right footware HHH could be 6'4". He's no less than 6'2.5" barefoot. I've seen him look the exact same height as 6'3.5-6'4" Rock. Vegas says on 22/Oct/09
a wrestler upgrades his height, shock horror, seems all the kliq like to think they are taller than they really are, HHH claims 6'4 for himself, nash claimed hbk was 6'1-6'2 lol dicksock says on 22/Oct/09
Hey, you guys should check out this video on youtube, "Scott Hall Shoot Interview on Sid Vicious, Eric Bischoff, Hulk Hogan & TNA's 6 Sided Ring"
Listen closely at about 5:39 into the video...Trust me Nick says on 20/Oct/09
I'd give Nash a legit 6'10'' at his peak. He dwarfed the Undertaker during their PPV match in the 90s.
Nowadays, I'd say 6'9'' or a smidge under. He doesn't quite tower over the competition like he used to, although he's the tallest man in TNA. He and Morgan are VERY close IMO - a recent facedown between them favoured Nash, but in an older nose-to-nose, Morgan was taller - this was when he was Cornette's enforcer though and was likely wearing higher shoes. Putting aside the specifics of footwear, that estimate seems fair as well, if we assume Mick Foley and Booker T are about 6'2'' and Abyss is 6'4''-6'5''.
Matt Morgan actually looked slightly shorter than Nathan Jones IMO although much more ripped. I agree that Jones looked roughly the same height as Undertaker during his first WWE run but oddly he looked taller during the second - different footwear, perhaps? Morgan looks an inch or two taller than Taker to me.
Rock's 6'4'' legit IMO.
I find it hard to buy Luger at 6'3'', despite his official football listings - he always towered over Sting, who can't be less than 6'2''.
Jake Roberts was 6'4'' at his peak.
Rick Rude outright said before he died that he was 6'4'' and Henning was 6'2''
Brian 'Crush' Adams was 6'5'' at best.
I'm surprised we haven't seen an entry of his own for Robert 'Kurgan' Mailet, given his recent publicity in accidentally smacking Robert Downey Jr. on the set of the new Sherlock Holmes movie. Kurgan's one of the few recent true giants in wrestling I haven't seen discussed much around here. He was usually billed at either 7'0'' or 6'10'' but 'Power Slam' magazine claimed both were huge exaggerations. Tough to get a true gauge on Kurgan as you didn't see him face off with guys the size of Kane or Undertaker often. He was paired with the 7'2'' legit Paolo 'Giant' Silva but usually measured up fairly well against him. He also dwarfed the 6'5'' John 'Golga/Earthquake' Tenta, Brian Adams and Brian 'Chainz' Lee, who was probably 6'4'' or so.
I think 6'4'' for the Big Boss Man is very fair. Daii says on 17/Oct/09
Does look a solid 6'8-9 tbh. Anything over 6'6 is hard to judge with a 5'8 person next to them. HUGE is a good description lol. Annoyed says on 17/Oct/09
Peak - Morning: 6'10" Evening: 6'9.25"
Current - Morning : 6'9.75" Evening: 6'9" Matthiew_- says on 15/Oct/09
Cut 2 inches to almost everyone's listing and you are right on the spot ( especially for the taller ones ) ...
Khali 7'3 -- 7'1
Big Show maybe the only one who isn't exaggerated that much , but I think he lost height since WCW days , he looked 7'1 to me back then .
Kane 7' -- 6'10 but with 2inches platforms , 6'8 in fact
Nash 7' -- 6'10
Taker 6'10.5 -- 6'8.5 (prime ) nowadays 6'7.5ish
Sid 6'9.5 -- 6'7.5
Hogan 6'8 -- 6'6 (prime , nowaday 6'4ish )
Brock 6'4 -- 6'2
Rock 6'5 -- 6'3
Batista 6'5 -- 6'3
Razor Ramon ( Hall )6'7 -- 6'5
Vader 6'5 -- 6'3
Earthquake 6'7 -- 6'5.5
Hunter HH 6'4 -- 6'2
Mabel 6'8.5 -- 6'6.5
etc the list is almost endless , consensus should be acknlowdging that in most cases their heights are overbilled by 2 inches , save the smaller ones ( it would be too evident ) and the tallest like Gonzalez ( billed 8' but the guy being 7'6+ they can go with it ) ... Annoyed says on 13/Oct/09
at 2:42 in the nash/bigshow which is the closest they come to a staredown at a decent angle, it looks as though the difference is around 2". BUT this is a quick shot at a poor angle and other angles make Show look 1" taller while others make him look 3" taller. I personally think in this particular video and on this particular night, Big show was standing a clean and comfortable 7'0" - 7'0.5" , Nash looking about 6'10" - 6'9.5" . Danimal says on 12/Oct/09
Wow, what's happening to the quality of the posters on this page? Looks like the last few comments have been either typed up by 11 year old kids, or the overall IQ has decreased by about 50 points.
Steven, you cannot just state things are FACTS, unless they are facts.
Johnson, Nash was not 7'0". Vegas says on 12/Oct/09
nash 6'11 or 7ft??? nash was billed at 6'10 in wcw, you even hear the ring announcer claim it here, staredown 2mins 40 secs in and he is more than inch shorter than wight there Click Here
steven you cannot add, you say big show is 2.5 inches taller than matt morgan (which is correct) and then you say morgan is 6'8 and show is 7ft exact??? eh thats 4 inch difference, morgan 3 inches shorter than nash is fantasy land (try same height or nash about half an inch taller), morgan 2 inches shorter than taker is lol, takers 6'7, jones and morgan are same height Johnson says on 11/Oct/09
Kevin Nash & the Big Show has strunk in height now that there older. Back when Kevin Nash & Big show was in WCW. Big Show was 7 ft1 and Kevin Nash was 7ft Steven says on 11/Oct/09
BIg show is 1 inch taller than Kevin Nash(fact) Big show is 2.5 inches(fact) taller(fact) then Matt Morgan. Big show is 2 inches taller than Undertaker(fact) They say that Nathan Jones is 6 feet 10 in the movies he makes and in wrestling because he is. When he stands next to Undertaker there basically the same height. & Nash is taller than Taker for a fact. Kevin Nash is 6 ft 11. Big Show is 7ft exact. Matt Morgan is only 6ft8 or 6ft 8 and a half Clay says on 11/Oct/09
Khali next to Conan O'Brien was spot on the same as KAB next to Conan. drk says on 10/Oct/09
i'd like to see Khali face to face with Nash. He would probably have around 4" on him today. Big Show says on 8/Oct/09
Click Here
Click Here
Here are 2 caps of Nash and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar from a video I've recently received. This was shot during a American Sportscaster Association Awards ceremony in November 1994. Kareem looks about 4 inches taller. Vince McMahon of course claimed during the commentary that Kareem is 7'4" (because Nash was billed 7' at the time). We can't see any footwear though. Kareem is in tuxedo and is probably wearing dress shoes. Nash has a self-made tuxedo and could be wearing any shoewear. Anonymous says on 5/Oct/09
I've always thought Morgan looked a solid 6,9". Vegas says on 5/Oct/09
nash didn't appear to be 6'10 with 6'8 tyler mane or 6'5 bryan clarke, just watched loads of old hbk/nash videos, nash doesn't look 6'10 next to shawn in any of them
one thing for sure having met morgan and wight on numerous occasions since 2001, wight is not more than 3 inches taller than morgan, its probably only 2.5 inches between the two, first time i met wight outside wwe new york in 2001 now way did he look 5 inches taller than morgan (first time i met him in 2004), i don't buy that wight had lost any height by the summer of 2001 Danimal says on 3/Oct/09
Vegas says on 29/Sep/09
Danimal says on 23/Sep/09
I see Morgan at slightly over 6'8".
why not 6'10?? you think big show was 7'1 based on his ncaa listing??
Because Paul White ONCE looked to be damn close to 7'1" in his WCW days, but Matt Morgan doesn't look to be 6'10", the way Kevin Nash did. Nash appeared to be a barefoot 6'9.5"-6'10" and that was his NCAA listing. Big Show appeared to be 7'0.5"-7'1" barefoot in the WCW. Morgan seems to be 6'9.5"-6'10" in his shoes. Vegas says on 29/Sep/09
Danimal says on 23/Sep/09
I see Morgan at slightly over 6'8".
why not 6'10?? you think big show was 7'1 based on his ncaa listing?? Danimal says on 23/Sep/09
I see Morgan at slightly over 6'8". mike says on 23/Sep/09
looks more like a 3 inch difference to me between vader and sid,sid 6'8",vader 6'5" Vegas says on 23/Sep/09
having met them all, if morgan is 6'7 then both kane and taker are in the 6'5 range probably 6'5'5, i met morgan in sneakers and kane within minutes of each other in hilton hotel in NY in march 2004, morgan was listed at 6'10 in ncaa in 1996-97, its rare if ever a player is listed 3 inches more than his legit height in college ball Click Here Chaminade Silverswords paragraph Click Here mike says on 22/Sep/09
matt morgan imo doesn,t look 6'10" i,d give him 6'7". mike says on 12/Sep/09
nash as deisel had an easy 8-9 inches on vince. nash i believe was a legit 6'10". general93 says on 10/Sep/09
who where the the land of the giants was it tyler mane and nash?i watched baba and andre against them, baba was actually taller than them both not much it was 1991 i belive so andre was about 6'11" or so baba had to be 6'9" i seen an earlier photo where andre has close to 5" on baba maybe 4".nash was defo 6'10 i belive mane to be about 6'8" maybe 6'9".sid and taker at uk rampage92 at the start it appears sid to be taller i know at wm13 taker had 1" or so on sid.taker has to be 6'8.5" billed 6'10.5" sid may have been 6'8" he had a bit of height on 6'7" spivey.studd was also taller than spivey by a inch or so. mike says on 7/Sep/09
scott hall looked every bit of 6'5" to me. mrelectricity says on 6/Sep/09
supermanfan380 says on 5/Sep/09: If someone said 6'2", that would likely be within a 2" + or - margin or error.
Agreed. I'm about 5'11" which I supposed I can say 6 feet and get away with it. I would also think that after 6'6" maybe, you could try to over bill by three inches and get away with it...I still think that two is the most you could overbill realistically without insulting the intelligence of the fans. For example, it's tough to listen to JR on Smackdown and say Kane is 7 foot and Batista, who would grow an inch every show to 6'6" and be shorter than the 6'4" billed Orton. I was watching a WWE 24-7 roundtable on "giants" again listening to JR say Vader was 6'5" and Taker is 6'10" then at the same time say Nash is 6'10". (But JR loves Taker) They also implied Andre was 7'5" (talk about overbilling) IMO, I still don't think you could bill Nash, Taker, Sid, Matt Morgan, or Kane at 7 feet without exaggerating too many inches. supermanfan380 says on 5/Sep/09
general93, the situation with Henning is a very good example of a guy being billed grossly taller than he could have been. 6'6" is way out of tange for henning.
If someone said 6'2", that would likely be within a 2" + or - margin or error.
Calling Kane 6'10" may be incorrect, but its not a "gross" over estimation in that someone could really mistake him for that if they met him. JT says on 5/Sep/09
Mr. Perfect at 6'6" is almost as laughable as Andre at 7'4". Click Here ~6'5" Scott Hall had Perfect by an easy 4 inches in the mid-1980s. Danimal says on 5/Sep/09
Curt Henning was 6'1" and Rick Rude was 6'2": Click Here Danimal says on 5/Sep/09
general93 says on 5/Sep/09
mr perfect was measured 6'6" then was 6'3 then 6'2" prime curt hennig 6'6".vader was heavy so maybe 6'3-4" then.
WHAT???????????????????????????????????????????????? Curt Henning 6'6"? KID, do you even READ what you type??? Vegas says on 5/Sep/09
perfect at 6'6 is lol he was never even 6'2, what was scott hall aka razor ramon then 6'10, nash must have been hogans claimed 7'3 after all Click Here general93 says on 5/Sep/09
mr perfect was measured 6'6" then was 6'3 then 6'2" prime curt hennig 6'6".vader was heavy so maybe 6'3-4" then. Vegas says on 4/Sep/09
mr perfect 6'6?? he was 1.5 inches shorter than a 6'3 nfl listed guy standing side by side
lex luger was listed at 6'3 in pro-football, vader was no more than a hair taller than mark henry and shorter than the rock in 1996, about 6 inches shorter than kane in 1998, true kane was in big boots but he would have to be 7ft+ in those boots if vader was 6'5 barefoot Click Here
vader and sid from 1993 looks more than 2 inches to me Click Here general93 says on 3/Sep/09
big show 6'11-7ft
andre 7'-1"
haystacks 6'9"
kurgan 6'10"
hogan 6'5-6"
warrior 6'2"
vader 6'5"
nash 6'10"
taker 6'8-9"
kane 6'8"
sid 6'7-8"
studd 6'7-8"
jbl 6'6"
crush 6'6"
jake roberts 6'5"
bossman 6'4"
perfect 6'6"
ted dibiase 6'3"
tugboat 6'4"
smash 6'2.5
hart 6'
luger 6'5" gazzdw says on 29/Aug/09
big show had nash by around 3 inches in those videos below from 'Vegas', nash was just above his eyeline and show was slouching Anh says on 27/Aug/09
Big Show - 7ft
Nash - 6'9.5 ft
Taker - 6'8 ft
Kane - 6'8 ft
Sid - 6'7.25 ft supermanfan380 says on 27/Aug/09
Vegas,
That video, with sid and nash is a perfect example of why wrestling ring videos are useless in trying to pin down a height.
Even in the “stare down” shot.
The reason is that Nash is standing just a tiny bit further from Sid, in relation to the camera. Not so much further he would look smaller, but in the wrestling ring, it actually gives an unfair advantage to Nash.
The reason, is that the camera points down at the ring at an angle, which leaves the rectangular ring at an angled perspective.
So if an object is standing just a bit further from the camera it will appear taller, because where the feet start is at a higher point on the perspective angle.
The green line shows a more accurate line of height, instead of the garbage that most people try to claim as the difference with the blue line. The reason all has to do with the placement on the rectangular surface, that has a perspective of back end being higher than the front end, due to the placement of the camera, looking down at the mat. It is not a level angle, and therefor can make a big difference in skewing height perspective.
Then if a “close up”, is taken from this, it makes the difference appear more than what it should be. The video on Nash and Sid displays this perfectly.
Click Here Vegas says on 26/Aug/09
more than 0.5 inch i suspect Annoyed Click Here Vegas says on 26/Aug/09
i would say nash had sid by more like 2 inches, staredown 3mins 50secs in Click Here
big show and nash staredown, one thing for sure there isn't twice the difference between nash and sid 2mins 40secs in Click Here Click Here Annoyed says on 26/Aug/09
weak 6'10" at his absolute peak, bout 6'9" now. 1.5" taller than Taker when Taker had boot advantage to Nash's flats, much taller than Sid, Kane, Taker, only 2" shorter than Big Show back in WCW and that was in flats ! People forget Nash has always wore 1/2" flats cause his knee issues since high school. general93 says on 26/Aug/09
kevin nash 6'10" no doubt kurt angle looked like a toy figure next to him.big show 7ft had him by 1.5" at most.he had sid by 3" and taker by 2.5".nothing less than 6'10". nothing will change my mind unless some calls him 6'11". supermanfan380 says on 24/Aug/09
The video with Ventura does not prove a damn thing. He is noticeably taller than Ventura. That’s all you can get from it. I you took that to a Professional to have analyzed he would come back with a margin realistic height of 6’7” to 6’11” or something like that. Using the best technology it is not possible to get an exact figure, because the guys are at different points on a mat, that is not filmed at a level angle, standing with different posture, and different foot wear, and they may not be exactly in the same plane. Even being 2” inches closer to the camera, or if standing in an environment where the angle is looking at a downward angle, being 2” further away can either make you look taller or shorter.
Proof would be a back to back shot, standing next to a guy of known height, barefoot, good posture, and the difference measured.
Otherwise it’s a crap shoot. How tall does Nash say he is? His site says 6’10”. We got a picture with Mamun and him here. Nash is being listed at 6’9”.
Where does the 6’9” listing come from? His image with Mamun and a Zoro cape? That is proof Nash is an inch shorter than he himself claims? If so, how on earth can that image prove nash is only 6’9” and not 6’10”? I doubt any of those photo geometry experts could tell that using the best technology, but here some amateur method of counting pixels is being used to list a guys height, presented as fact? supermanfan380 says on 24/Aug/09
Again, since it get ignored a lot, going by vids and stills that are clipped from vids to gauge height, and trying to bust a guy out as lying, in Nash’s case his own web site claims 6’10”, and using these videos and the clips in them that best help ones argument does not prove anything.
These are pieces of evidence, but I admit even the ones that support my arguments would not hold up in court. They are way too questionable.
In a court of law, where height or a measurement of something is needed as evidence, professors of math and photo geometry will be called upon as expert witnesses, and even then, using the most modern of scientific computer programs for photo and video analysis will then come up with an acceptable range of error. They will also take into account the footwear and posture, and just add even more distance to the margin of error. JT says on 21/Aug/09
From 1994: Click Here Football announcer Keith Jackson (to Nash's right) has been referred to as 6'3" but I'm guessing he's no more than 6'2", if not a little shorter here. Vince is closer to the camera than those two. This is the same awards ceremony where Nash stood next to Kareem, with Vince on WWF TV referring to Kareem as 7'4" (2 inches too tall) since there was at least a four inch difference in height between him and Nash. Anonymous says on 12/Aug/09
ventura at 6'4.5 is a joke, he is listed on wwe.com at 6'2, he was never taller mike says on 12/Aug/09
Kevin Nash is 6'10" face to face he had 3 inches on A train who,s roughly 6'7". Annoyed says on 12/Aug/09
watched the ventura video, why is it being used as any kind of evidence, Nash posture is awful and that isnt even mentioning VENTURA IS IN FRONT OF NASH with the camera at a low angle !!!!! Venture is getting a boost like no tomorow ! and this is crucial considering Ventura is a really tall man in the 6'3" - 6'4" region ! aarod says on 11/Aug/09
that ventura/ nash video didnt prove anything, at the end, ventura was several steps in front of kevin nash the whole time, and the camera was below both of them, so it gave the appearance of ventura being taller than he actually is when compared to nash. aarod says on 11/Aug/09
actually, ventura was 6'4.5" at his peak, but used to round up to 6'5" when people asked him. he himself says he is now somewhere between 6'3"-6'4", having had a hip replacement surgery. he was on howard stern recently, stood next to howard, and howard, at 6'5", was about 1 inch taller than him, with similar footwear Annoyed says on 7/Aug/09
A 7 foot billed man who claims he is a good 2 inches under his billing.....yeah he MUST only be 6'8", that was sarcasm. supermanfan380 says on 5/Aug/09
Nash has his own height listed on his website as 6'10", and is likley talking about his youth. I think that it would be more than fair to list a "peak height" of 6'10" under his 6'9" listing. Red says on 4/Aug/09
ImBack, whos back - Ola??? dave says on 3/Aug/09
ImBack......
one of the worst posts in the history of celebheights..... nash is 6'9 MINIMUM nowadays...... COUNTLESS pieces of information point toward this....
Besides, if he was lets say 6'8 peak, that would make taker about 6'6 peak....
both counts are BS...
go post elsewhere if you are going to make such flippint claims. ImBack says on 31/Jul/09
Nash was 6'8 or tops 6'9 peak, the video with ventura proves it since ventura was absolutely tops 6'3 but more likely shorter. Nash had 4-5 on him, but ventura had small heels probarly 1 inch advantage there supermanfan380 says on 31/Jul/09
We sort of have to go with what the guys say, themselves about their height, unless we have "proof", they are shorter.
Any wrestling image is mere evidence, not actual proof, unless they look grossly shorter than claimed, and even then with the correct angle of the camera (or incorrect) someone could look to have a bigger difference or less than they would barefoot in a lineup.
I have seen some videos where Nash looked around 2" to Big Show, and others where the difference looked around 4". What does than mean? Nothing, as they are at different points on a mat that is at a tilted angle to the camera, and the camera level may be different too.
All of it is just evidence that they comparably close in height. So are guys like the Undertaker, Matt Morgan, Kane etc…While they are not all the same height, weight, or build, none of them look short next to the other either.
That is why I am inclined to believe the height that they themselves give, unless I see concrete proof they are substantially shorter than claimed. While WWE often exaggerate, some of the guys will be quite candid with their height and weight when asked.
If say someone measure a wrestler or an actor and got an measurement 1.5” off from their listed height, I would not care much either, as that is within 2” of the claimed height. Height varies at the time of the day, as much as 1.5” right after waking vs. right before sleeping as well.
What I think bothers fans more, is when say they have a hero who they think is 6’2”, and then find out the guy is only 5’8”, then I would be surprised, as that is way out of the range I would expect if I met them.
Honestly though, if you are expecting a 6’10” Nash, and you meet a 6’9” Nash, are you really going to be like “WITF!!! You liar SUmoBiSH!!!****”? Of course not, you would just be impressed by the man-tower you are shaking hands with. Anonymous says on 28/Jul/09
the height difference between Big Show and Kevin Nash is roughly similar to the height difference between Shaq and Big Show, 1 1/2 inch-2 inches. Electric says on 20/Jul/09
I just saw a Nash promo. He seems shorter than he was in his prime. I'd give Nash roughly 6'10" prime. Today? maybe 6'9". He's old and has terrible knees. Annoyed says on 19/Jul/09
comfortable 6'10" in his youth, age, injury and posture have affected him now though but he still looks huge. supermanfan380 says on 3/Jul/09
Again, in the wrestling ring, it is hard to get a real good height, or even for that matter the odd angles of cameras back stage. Too many variables. It just gives you a vauge idea. You can see Nash is taller than Jesse by a good margin, but other than that the best you can guess his height by is within a 2" margin of error. Then there are those people that will suprise you. You guess their height, based off of them in person, then get the measuring stick out, barefoot, and they are out of out 2" margin of error.
Nash has said numerous times he is 6'10", and is likely talking about in his youth. Can we get a peak height of 6'10" added for him? Big Show says on 25/Jun/09
Click Here
Here's a arm wrestling match between Nash and Atlas. At the end there's a nice comparison of Nash and Jesse Ventura. Anonymous says on 20/Jun/09
Rob , you should add a peak height for Nash cause he was every bit of 6'10 in his younger days. Rika says on 20/Jun/09
Yeah he was billed at 7'1.
Perhaps his age has caught upto him and now he's lost some height? Joe says on 16/Jun/09
he's MASSIVE! I think Nash looks around 6'10. The Ben says on 16/Jun/09
LG69
I've seen wcw nash listed at 7'1 and wwf nash was often called 7ft... That seems pretty standard for how much they add on. LG69 says on 15/Jun/09
He was usually billed at 6'10", but I think 6'9" is right on the money. One thing with Kevin's height is, it never was ridiculously exaggerated like some wrestlers. Tom says on 15/Jun/09
You know, it's funny. WCW said Nash was 6 ft 11 back in the mid to late 90's... Did Kevin shrink two inches in ten years? LOL Rika says on 9/Jun/09
Hmmm his height seems to be shrinking everytime i log on here.
Last time he was 6'10. Mamun says on 8/Jun/09
Thank you T for telling the whole world the truth ! I know the truth can hurt
sometimes ! Yeah I loved that real picture !Nice job T !
Kind regards
Supermun T says on 5/Jun/09
haha, you like that Manum? T says on 4/Jun/09
Nash wore MASSIVE lifts, in this pic he looks no more than 5'9
Click Here T says on 4/Jun/09
his peak was 6'10, thats how people should be listed on here. Peak height. Mark D. says on 30/May/09
Danimal, I was being sarcastic, that's why I said 'ha ha'. What you're saying is exactly what I meant, 6'9 is still huge. If you read it again with scarcasim in mind you'll get the intended humor in it. The Ben says on 29/May/09
I met him in 1994 and he was the biggest man i recall ever seeing in my life. Clay says on 28/May/09
6'9 with a large build, is - in a word...massive. Danimal says on 28/May/09
Mark D. says on 28/May/09
Ha ha. Funny post there. "He was such a huge man at his peak", and "he was a
solid 6'10" in his youth". Yeah, he's not huge anymore, a not-so-solid 6'9".
6'9" isn't huge? Mark D. says on 28/May/09
Ha ha. Funny post there. "He was such a huge man at his peak", and "he was a
solid 6'10" in his youth". Yeah, he's not huge anymore, a not-so-solid 6'9". Jay says on 27/May/09
Holy cow Mamun says on 27/May/09
Nah !!!!!!!! That's only because he was wearing shoes and he has the camera
angle favour . I am taller than him ! I realy am !
Regards
Supermun Danimal says on 21/May/09
He was at least 6'10" in his younger days. Annoyed says on 20/May/09
nice pic JT, he was just such a huge man at his peak. James S says on 20/May/09
When I saw Nash he was just under me, I'd make him 6ft 10 back then, 6ft 9 now. Alex5 says on 12/May/09
It's not the fact that they're getting older. It's just that if you're 6'7"+ you have a lot of body to deal with and are going to slouch constantly. I'm 6'7" and I've forgotten how to stand properly. It's just so second nature to hunch over like that. Annoyed says on 8/May/09
"In the 2nd reference, in the first he puts him at just under 7 feet. Tho he also puts Sid at 6'9 and Andre at 7'4:D"
If Brett hinks Sid is the same height as nash in the other reference or at ANY stage then we can discrad Brett's opinion lol lol. Halb says on 7/May/09
"TELLEM says on 21/Apr/09
in bret hart's bio he said nash was 6'9."
In the 2nd reference, in the first he puts him at just under 7 feet. Tho he also puts Sid at 6'9 and Andre at 7'4:D Annoyed says on 5/May/09
sid, I believe Kane and Taker are 6'8" ish and Nash is 6'9" 'ish so that all works out well. sid says on 5/May/09
Annoyed Kane had a relaxed posture to, now he hunches alot..nash hunches, they all do when they get older..Nash and kane theres only a inch between them I'd say when I saw them years ago in street cloth, as well as taker. they all got out of the same car right in front me, they backed in, they all went to the back of the trunkm to grab there gear. Kane edges taker, nash edged kane by a bit..this was years ago...2000 before his injury...full masked kane with the tank top era... Annoyed says on 2/May/09
nash was 6'10" morning barefoot and peak. 6'9.5" morning now and 6'9" resting height. one of the few true big men who always wore flats and drew lifts out fo the biggest and tallest stars. a true big man. holds up well to big show and surpasses taker, kane and sid with ease and relaxed posture. Great character aswell. Da Man says on 28/Apr/09
Shock, you continue to remain incorrect. No logical leaps, anatomical misinterpretations or mental gymnastics will change this.
An example of one the most ridiculous lines of reasoning I have ever seen on celebheights: "Mike Knox I would put as high as 6'5.5" based on comparison with Richards if they are in even footwear as I see 4.5" there and Richards as I said from my own personal experience, no shorter than 6'1". In comparison with Kane, Knox is approximately 2.75" shorter by the direct comparison, but we do know Kane also has a .5" boot advantage on him, making Kane closer to 2.25" taller which also agrees with the difference with Big Ben, making Kane 6'7.75". That extra .5" in boots agrees with Kane and Taker being essentially the same height with a slight boot difference.
Using a similar comparison, the bottom line after boots difference between Taker and JBL is no less than 3". JBL at 6'5" even would leave Taker at a minimum 6'8" and honestly I believe JBL is 6'5.25". Another thing to point out, Taker is slightly more taller than JBL than Kane is compared to Big Ben, and JBL is slightly taller than Big Ben since he is "verified" 195cm and we've seen JBL as at least 6'5". I'm seeing .5" for Taker over Kane in cross reference aside from that same .5" we've seen from them in alike footwear that often gets ignored due all kinds of ifs buts and camera advantages." Shock of Electric says on 28/Apr/09
Da Man, your "wrong on both counts" reply still shows that I'm right. Taker's rear foot being level with Glenn's front foot doesn't make them even plane, and Glenn's hair is about even with the top of Taker's head. supermanfan380 says on 21/Apr/09
Haven't checked the site in months, and sure enough not a "peak height" listing for Nash yet. I think he was a solid 6'10" in his youth. Danimal says on 21/Apr/09
Ola says on 21/Apr/09
MK, whatever. he have been calling me TROLL for some years now... i have more accurate heights than him ;)
You're nothing but a joke Ola and are only here to PISS people off and act like the victim when ganged up on. TELLEM says on 21/Apr/09
in bret hart's bio he said nash was 6'9. MK says on 20/Apr/09
Ola says on 18/Apr/09
no offense but i believe that danimal would believe that scott hall would have take down a peak alexander karelin
And its comments like that which back up his claim that you're a TROLL wirh obviously nothing better to do. On this basis i'd have to agree. Alex says on 19/Apr/09
I think Nash needs his peak height of 6'10 listed. 6'9 seems about right for him today as he could be a bit less too. |
