Dr. Piano says on 19/Feb/07
Met him after a performance of Camelot yesterday -- very nice guy, and very accommodating to fans. I agree with Mr. R -- he's definitely not a shade over 5'10" -- I'd have said 5'9.5" at best.

Mr. R says on 13/Oct/05
As I mentioned, I saw Michael York last week, and he is not a shade over 5'10".

CelebHeights Editor says on 12/Oct/05
His agency CV lists him 180cm, 75kg. He may have shrunk a cm though ;)

Smoke says on 12/Apr/05
Mr. R, it could very well have been possible! I am not quite in my early 20s just yet, but I definately wasn't quite the 6'1" than I am now, back then. It is indeed possibly that he seemed taller because I wasn't full grown at the time. I think the listing given Mr. York by the editor at the moment is fair.

Mr. R says on 11/Apr/05
Smoke, this is interesting. If you were still growing when you saw Mr. York, that means you must be in your early 20's yes? I am now in my early 40's, so when I saw him, I was fully grown. We both saw him about the same time. Could the fact that you were still growing play into our different perspectives? Just a thought.

Anonymous says on 3/Mar/05
I'm 6'1" and he seemed to be about 2 or 3 inches shorter than me when I met him, so 5'10"-5'11" is pretty well on the mark. I would give him 5'11" which is a pretty good height for a man, he's also a pretty nice guy as well.

Mr R says on 14/Feb/05
Saw him at a screening of the film Cabaret. Usually listed at 6', but at best, he is 5'10"