rajjy4boys says on 17/Dec/11
greetings Rob,
i would like you to help me in determining how a person standing by a 6'3.5 guy and reaching him above is eye level would be in height. my friend who is 6'3.5 had an arguement with his friend who claim to be 6'2 about his height.
can you plsss help me in determing how tall his friend who claim to be 6'2 is since they both are almost at the same height level and to me there is upto two inches difference in their height.
thanks a lot Rob .i remain one of your best (celebheights.com) visitor and contributor
[Editor Rob: say if the top of your friends head was up to the hairline of your other friend (if he has hair) it's possible he is near 6ft 2.]
ChiasmataX says on 22/Nov/11
Accurate listing considered that the eye-level of a 178cm guy go across the middle of the forehead of a legit 173cm person in pictures. Lenad is sexy says on 10/Sep/11
looks 179cm in the left pic. 3-3.5 inches taller than rob in the right Hansen says on 15/Aug/11
1st picture davison looks 179cm, 2nd looks 180cm. 180cm was pretty accurate given dmeyer says on 7/Jul/11
looks 5 ft 10.5 near rob but near jenny 5 ft 11 in the double shot , in the the single looks solid 5 ft 11 , rob do you agree he is solid 5 ft 11 he seems taller than most 5 ft 10.5 11 guys you have pics with
[Editor Rob: 2 years ago he didn't look over 5ft 11 to me] Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 19/May/11
Looks 5"10 range in both pictures James says on 28/Feb/11
Yeah his hairdo adds 1 inch to his height James says on 24/Feb/11
Rob do you really think he was 184cm at his peak or do you think that is inflated becasue in the pic with you he really does not look over the 177cm mark.
[Editor Rob: nah James, he can't look, at least in that double shot Less than 178.5cm.
What's interesting to me, imagine he had more hair covering the front of his head so you couldn't see the top of his head, but similar style...That's like 1 and a bit inches of hair! That's not even as big as someone like Joe Flanigan's hairdo, which is no less than 1.5 inches!] James says on 22/Feb/11
really does not look over 177cm in the left pic with rob.
[Editor Rob: he's lost height from his peak I'm certain. I mean with David Tennant he has been shorter, they were in a period drama of some sorts a few years back, at least Tennant looks his claimed height.]
sean89 says on 31/Jan/11
5'11 looks about right. James says on 16/Jan/11
he's still tallish at 5'11.
Actually depending on footware in the new pic with rob he really looks no more than 5ft10 (178cm) or 5ft10.5 (179cm) at best. in the older pic as well looks 5'10 range. Joe says on 11/Jan/11
there is no way someone in his late 50's could have lost 4 inches of height, especially as he's an actor. he looks about 6'0 dead on. maybe a little shorter without the shoes dmeyer says on 2/Dec/10
dosnt look over 5 ft 11 maybe 11.25 with you Rampage(-_-_-)Clover says on 14/Nov/10
5"11(180cm) tops these days.
Probably 5"11.75(182cm) peak |
